https://ebookmass.com/product/explorations-in-analyticecclesiology-that-they-may-be-one-1st-edition-joshua-
Instant digital products (PDF, ePub, MOBI) ready for you
Download now and discover formats that fit your needs...
Regard for Reason in the Moral Mind Joshua May
https://ebookmass.com/product/regard-for-reason-in-the-moral-mindjoshua-may/
ebookmass.com
Neuroethics: Agency in the Age of Brain Science Joshua May
https://ebookmass.com/product/neuroethics-agency-in-the-age-of-brainscience-joshua-may/
ebookmass.com
Essays in Analytic Theology Michael Rea
https://ebookmass.com/product/essays-in-analytic-theology-michael-rea/
ebookmass.com
The Ends of Resistance: Making and Unmaking Democracy Alix Olson And Alex Zamalin
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-ends-of-resistance-making-andunmaking-democracy-alix-olson-and-alex-zamalin/
ebookmass.com
Python Debugging for AI, Machine Learning, and Cloud
Computing: A Pattern-Oriented Approach 1st Edition Vostokov
https://ebookmass.com/product/python-debugging-for-ai-machinelearning-and-cloud-computing-a-pattern-oriented-approach-1st-editionvostokov/
ebookmass.com
Putting Properties First Matthew Tugby
https://ebookmass.com/product/putting-properties-first-matthew-tugby/
ebookmass.com
Penne Dreadful Catherine Bruns [Bruns
https://ebookmass.com/product/penne-dreadful-catherine-bruns-bruns/
ebookmass.com
Knowledge Management Toolkit, The: Practical Techniques for Building a Knowledge Management System Amrit Tiwana
https://ebookmass.com/product/knowledge-management-toolkit-thepractical-techniques-for-building-a-knowledge-management-system-amrittiwana/
ebookmass.com
Tom and Huck's Howling Adventure: The Further Adventures of Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn Champlin Tim
https://ebookmass.com/product/tom-and-hucks-howling-adventure-thefurther-adventures-of-tom-sawyer-and-huckleberry-finn-champlin-tim/
ebookmass.com
https://ebookmass.com/product/international-business-competing-in-theglobal-marketplace-charles-w-l-hill/
ebookmass.com
SeriesEditors
MichaelC.ReaOliverD.Crisp
OXFORDSTUDIESINANALYTICTHEOLOGY
AnalyticTheologyutilizesthetoolsandmethodsofcontemporaryanalyticphilosophy forthepurposesofconstructiveChristiantheology,payingattentiontotheChristian traditionanddevelopmentofdoctrine.Thisinnovativeseriesofstudiesshowcases highquality,cutting-edgeresearchinthisarea,inmonographsandsymposia.
Atonement EleonoreStump
Humility,Pride,andChristianVirtueTheory KentDunnington
InDefenseofExtendedConciliarChristology APhilosophicalEssay TimothyPawl
LoveDivine
ASystematicAccountofGod’sLoveforHumanity JordanWessling
ThePrinciplesofJudaism SamuelLebens
VoicesfromtheEdge CentringMarginalizedPerspectivesinAnalyticTheology EditedbyMichellePanchukandMichaelC.Rea EssaysinAnalyticTheology Volume1&2 MichaelC.Rea
TheContradictoryChrist JcBeall
AnalyticTheologyandtheAcademicStudyofReligion WilliamWood
DivineHolinessandDivineAction MarkC.Murphy
ForEleanor
Preface
1.AnalyticTheologyandEcclesiology
Whileanalytictheologyisstillayoungandemergingdiscipline,thelackof workonecclesiologywithinthis fieldisstriking.¹Despitepath-breakingwork onmanyofthecoredoctrinesoftheChristianfaith,workonecclesiologyhas notreceivedthesameshareofattention.Analytictheology,asIapproachit,is committedtoexplicatingthecoreclaimsoftheChristiantradition,usingthe toolsofcontemporaryanalyticphilosophy.²Sincebeliefinthe ‘oneholy, catholic,andapostolicChurch’ isacoredoctrineofthistradition,³itseems obviousthatanalytictheologiansshouldpayattentiontothisimportantarea oftheology.Therehavebeennumerouscallstoaddressthelackofecclesiology inanalytictheology.InTomMcCall’ s AnInvitationtoAnalyticTheology, whichisseenbymanyasthego-tointroductiontoanalytictheology,hewrites, considertheunderdevelopedareasofinquiryinecclesiology.Whatisthe church?Isitbestunderstoodasafour-dimensionalentity?Whatistherelation ofthe “ one ” tothe “ many ” inecclesiology?Whathappensintheliturgy? WhatdowelearnfromtheliturgyaboutGod,Christ,sinandsalvation?How shouldweunderstandthesacraments?Whatisthemissionofthechurch? Whathappensinactsofministry?Thesequestions,andmanymore,largely awaitfurtherexplorationandanalysis.⁴
McCallisrightthatthesequestionshavelargelygoneunaskedbyanalytic theologians.Thisbookaimstobeginthistaskofexplorationintothenature andlifeoftheChurchbyaddressingtheissueoftheChurch’sunityinChrist throughtheHolySpirit.
OneareathathasseensomegrowthsinceMcCallwrotethesewordsisthe discussionofChristianliturgybyanalyticthinkers.Inhisaddresstothe40th
¹Afewexceptionsincludethecontributionstothespecialissueof TheoLogica onAnalytic Ecclesiology(seeCockayneandEfird,2020),achapterofAbraham(2018),andachapterinCrisp (2022).
²Seechapter1ofCrisp,2019.³TakenfromtheNiceneCreed.
⁴ McCall,2015:151–2.
AnniversaryoftheSocietyofChristianPhilosophy,theleading figureinthe analyticdiscussionofliturgy,NicholasWolterstorff,reflectedontheneedfor moreworkinthisarea.InWolterstorff ’swords: ‘Iwouldlovetoseea floweringofdiscussionaboutliturgyinthenextdecadeortwo,perhapsthat floweringisbeginning....Ihavecomemyselftothinkthatliturgyisinfact oneofthemostchallengingandfascinating fieldsforphilosophicalinquiry.’⁵
The ‘flowering’ towhichherefersisexemplifiedbythethreerecentbooksand anumberofarticlespennedbyWolterstorffandTerenceCuneo.Here, theyexplorethephilosophicalsignificanceofChristianliturgy.⁶ Butas Wolterstorff ’scommentsmakeclear,thereisstilltomoretobedone.As Ihavearguedelsewhere,⁷ thediscussionofliturgyinanalytictheologywould beenrichedbygainingclarityonthenatureoftheChurch.InWolterstorff ’ s words, ‘Thechurchenactstheliturgynottosatisfytheneedsanddesiresof individualcongregantsbuttoworshipGod ....It’snottheindividualmemberswhodothesethingssimultaneously;it’stheassembledbodythatdoes thesethings.’⁸ Thisseemsrighttome.Andyet,thediscussionofliturgyinthe analytictraditionhasreallyonlyscratchedthesurfaceontherelationbetween theChurchanditsworship.Thus,thepresentvolumeaimstoaddressthelack ofecclesiologyinanalytictheology,whilstalsoseekingtoexpandthediscussionofliturgy.
2.TheScopeoftheDiscussion
Beforewecanproceed,someclarificationsaboutthescopeofthepresent volumearerequired.First,itisnotwithinthescopeofthisbooktooffera comprehensiveecclesiologywhichpresentsafar-rangingaccountofthe natureandlifeoftheChurch.Rather,asthesubtitleofthebookalludesto thattheymaybe one thefocusofthediscussionisontheissueoftheunity, oroneness,oftheChurch.Thatis,thevolumeseekstoofferanaccountof whatitmeansfortheChurchtobeone,andtoconsidertheimplicationsof thisaccountsfortheliturgicalandsacramentallifeoftheChurch.Assuch, therearemanyissuesonwhichIwillremainsilent.Myhopeisthatthisisnot theendofthediscussionofecclesiologyintheanalytictraditionandthat floweringofliturgicaltheologyintheanalytictradition,ofwhichWolterstorff describes,willalsoextendtothestudyoftheChurch.
⁵ Wolterstorff,2018. ⁶ IsummarizethisliteratureinCockayne(2018a,2018b).
⁷ SeeCockayne,2021b. ⁸ Wolterstorff,2015b:11.
Secondly,abriefwordonmethodology.Throughoutthebook,Iseekto drawfromworkincontemporaryanalyticphilosophyinordertoexplorethe natureoftheChurch’sunity.Thatistosay,thebookbelongsinthetradition ofanalytictheology.Incertainrespects,itfollowstheapproachadvocatedby thelateDavidEfird,ofoffering ‘philosophicalexplanations’ toissuesin theology.⁹ AsRobertNozickdescribesit,aphilosophicalexplanationoffers onepossibleexplanationofhow X mightbeso,giventhat Z isthecase.¹⁰ Inthe contextofecclesiology,theassumptionsorlimitationsofthediscussion(Z)are providedbyourtheologicalreflectionsfromScriptureandtradition.So,for example,Chapter2offersadiscussionofthetheologicalclaimthattheChurch isonethroughtheworkoftheHolySpiritandthenturnstorecentworkin analyticphilosophytoprovideoneexplanationofhowthismightbeso,within theparametersspecifiedinourtheologicalexploration.
However,whereIdifferfromEfirdisthatIthinkofsuchworkaspartofthe theologicaltask,whereasEfirdmaintaineditwasonlyreallyakindofapplied philosophy.IntheworkofOliverCrisp,wecanseethekindofphilosophical explanationadvocatedbyEfirdpressedintotheserviceoftheologicalmodel building.AsCrispdescribesit,
Bya “model” ...Imeana theoreticalconstructionthatonlyapproximatesto verisimilitude,offeringasimplifiedaccountofaparticulardatasetor(inthis case)clusteroftheologicaldoctrines .... Thisalsocomportswithanintellectualhumilityonthepartofthetheologian:itmaybethatweareunableto capturethetruth[ofthematter]...becauseweareincapableofunderstandingitas finitecreaturesordonothavetheepistemicaccesstocomprehend thedoctrine,whichispartofthemysteryofthedivinenature.Similarly,in contemporaryphysicsNewtonianclassicalmechanicscanstillbeusedto generateaccurateresultswhenappliedtolarge-scalemacroscopicobjects thatarenottravelingatveryhighvelocities,thoughitisunderstoodthat classicalmechanicsis,strictlyspeaking,anapproximationtothetruthofthe matterratherthanthetruthsimpliciter.¹¹
Thus,inthespiritofEfirdandCrisp,thisprojectoffersa model ofecclesiology whichservestomakeclearwhatitmeanstothinkoftheChurchasonein ChristthroughthepoweroftheHolySpirit,butonewhichneverpretendsto gettothefulltruthofthematter.
⁹ SeeCockayneandWorsley(2021)foradiscussiononEfird’sapproachtoanalytictheology. ¹⁰ Nozick,1981.¹¹Crisp,2019:54–5.
Suchanapproachisnotwithoutprecedentinecclesiology,andbynomeans isitlimitedto analytic theology.Forinstance,asAveryDullesdescribesinthe introductiontohisbook ModelsoftheChurch,byoffering ‘models’ , ‘aspects’ , or ‘ dimensions ’ oftheChurch,weneverdescribetheChurch ‘ directly ’ , sincetheChurchisultimatelymysterious.¹²Instead,theseindirectdescriptionsoftheChurchcanallowustogrowinunderstanding,solongasthese descriptionsremain indirect. Similarly,byprovidingaphilosophical explanationofonepossiblewayinwhichtheChurchmaybeunitedyet divided,thesamemightbesaid.TheexplanationswhichIexploreinthe chaptersofthisbookaremodels,intendedtoexpandourunderstandingof theChurch,butwithoutseekingtogiveanultimateaccountofthe Church’ smysteriouslife.
Thirdly,whilstdrawingfromtheconceptsandideasfoundinanalytic literatureonthenatureofsocialgroupscanproveilluminatinginoffering modelsoftheChurch,wecannotapplythesediscussionswithoutqualification.AnyattempttoreducetheChurchtothelevelofthehumaninstitutions whichsocialmetaphysiciansandepistemologistshaveastheirsubject-matter willleadustomakingtheChurchinourownimage.Andso,ouraimsmust remainmodest.
Lastly,whilstIhopethereismuchinthisbookwhichwillinterestthose fromarangeoftraditions,thisprojectisintendedneithertobeentirely ecumenical,butnorisitconstrainedto oneparticulartheologicaltradition. IdonotpretendtoofferanaccountoftheChurchwithwhichallwill agree.Iamscepticalaboutthepossibilityofofferingatrulyinclusive ecumenicalecclesiologywithoutdistortingimportanttheologicalclaims. Forinstance,Protestantsandnon-Protestantswillthinkverydifferently aboutissuesofwhohasauthoritytospeakonbehalfoftheoneChurch. Tryingtoforcetheseviewstogetherisnotapromisingapproach. Moreover,whileIamanordainedAnglican,Idonotattempttoprovide anAnglicanecclesiologywhichisapplicableonlytothoseinmyown tradition.ThetheologicalvoicesIdrawfromthroughoutthebookare varied aswellseekingtogroundthediscussioninthewitnessof Scripture,eachchapterconsidersatheological fi gurefromthetradition. ThebookdrawsinsightsfromLutheran,Reformed,Methodist,Eastern Orthodox,RomanCatholic,andAnglicantraditions.Theinsightsgleaned from fi guresinthesetraditionsprovidethestartingpoints,orcorrectives, tothemodelsdevelopedineachchapter.
¹²Dulles,1978:14.
3.OneChurch:ASummary
BeforeembarkingonourexplorationoftheunityoftheChurch,itisworth beginningwithabigpicturesummaryofthebook’sargument,suchthatwe mightseehowthepiecesofthediscussion fittogetherasawhole.
ThecentralthesisofthebookisthattheChurchisasocialbody,composed ofmanyindividualmembers,unitedthroughtheworkoftheHolySpirittobe thebodyofChrist.Callthistheunitythesis.Thisthesisisthenexpandedin twodirections: first,conceptualandsecond,practical.
Webeginwiththeconceptual.Chapters1–3providea model oftheChurch whichseekstoofferaphilosophicalexplanationofhowtheunitythesismight beso.Chapter1isreallyapieceofconceptualgroundwork,whichmustbelaid beforethistaskofmodel-buildingcanbegin.Morespecifically,Iseektoclarify therelationshipbetweenindividualismandcollectivismintheChurch. FocusingonJesus’ prayerinJohn17,thathisdisciples maybeone,Iargue thattospeakoftheonenessoftheChurchisnotacalltoenforcehumanly imposedunityontheChurch,butrather,itistoclaimthattheChurchisone invirtueofitsrelationtotheoneGod.Thereasonconceptualgroundworkis inorderisthatsuchclaimsaboutsocialonenessintheChurcharesometimes treatedwithsuspicion,asiftheyentailthatindividualresponsibilityisatrisk bytalkingofsocialwholes.Itisthereforeimportanttomakeclearjustwhatthe commitmentsadvancedbymyecclesiologicalmodelare.
Thisdiscussionofindividualismandcollectivismisadvancedintwodirections,onetheologicalandonephilosophical.First,IconsiderDietrich Bonhoeffer’sassessmentofHegeliananthropologyinhisdoctoralthesis, SanctorumCommunio. BonhoefferemphasizesthatwhiletheHegeliansmay berighttoemphasizetheimportanceofcommunityfortheChristianlife,they downplaythesignificanceoftheindividualbeforeGod.Thus,Bonhoeffer thinks,boththeindividual and theChurchmustrespondtoGodinfaith. Secondly,Iarguethatrecentphilosophicaldevelopmentscanhelpclarify Bonhoeffer’stheologicalclaim.Here,IunpackPhilipPettit’sdiscussionof individualismincontemporarypoliticalphilosophy.Pettitcontendsthatindividualismcommitsonetotheviewthatsocialrealitiesneveroverrideor undermineindividualagency,butitdoesnotprecludeacommitmentto holism,accordingtowhichhumanthoughtmustberealizedincommunity. Thus,drawingfromPettitandBonhoeffer,Iarguethattheapparentdisagreementonindividualismisterminological,ratherthansubstantial.Wecan endorsethethesisthatindividualsmustrelatetoGod,andyetstressthat theirdoingsoisboundupinthelifeofcommunity.Individualismdoesnot
undermineacommitmenttotherealityofsocialgroups,northeimportance ofthesegroupsforhumanthought.Andso,wecanproceedtoofferamodelof thesocialontologyoftheChurchwithoutdownplayingtheimportanceof individualautonomyorresponsibility.
Withthispresuppositionoutlined,Chapters2and3offeraconstructive modelofthenatureoftheChurchinordertoexpoundtheunitythesis. Chapter2beginsbyidentifyingwhatPaulAvishasdescribedasthe ‘unbearableparadox’ ofecclesiology;¹³thatis,IaskhowitcouldbethattheChurchis oneinChrist,unitedbytheworkoftheHolySpirit,despitetheoverwhelming divisionanddiscorditdisplays.IarguethatunityinthebodyoftheChurch mustbelocatednotinhumanorganizationorstructure,butonlyinthework ofthe ‘oneSpirit’ inwhom ‘wewereallarebaptised’ (1Cor.12:13).Thus,a socialontologyoftheChurchmustemphasizetheSpiritastheprimaryagent atworkwithinit.Byoutliningrecentworkontheontologyofsocialgroups, Iarguethatfunctionalistaccountsofgroupagencycanhelpustoseehowthe Churchasasocialrealitymightbeunitedbyitsdecision-makingprocedures.¹⁴ Unliketheothersocialbodiesdiscussedinthisliterature,however,theChurch doesnotderiveitsdecision-makingfromthegroupaggregationofitsmembers,butinstead,fromtheworkoftheSpiritwithinthecommunity.Applying RichardHooker’sworkonAnglicanChurchpolity,Iarguethatonemeansof discerningtheSpirit’sworkmightbethroughthestructuresoftheinstitutionalchurch,solongasthesestructuresdon’tseekto replace theSpirit’swork intheChurch.
BuildingonthisfunctionalistontologyoftheChurch,Chapter3seeks toofferamodelforunderstandingtheclaimthattheChurch is thebodyof Christ.AfterconsideringGregoryofNyssa’ sreflectionsontheChurchasthe bodyofChrist,Iseektoofferaphilosophicalmodelwhichcanhelptoelucidate hisclaims.Iarguethatrecentworkonthenatureofextendedcognitioninthe philosophyofmindcanhelptoshedlightontherelationbetweentheone ChurchandtheonebodyofChrist.¹⁵ AsbothRichardCrossandJamesArcadi haveshown,thisphilosophicalliterature(whichseekstoshowthatcognition canbeextendedbeyondthehumanbrainintoexternalartefacts)canhelp providemodelsforunderstandingboththeincarnationandtheEucharist.¹⁶ Here,IdevelopbothCross’sandArcadi’sincarnationalmetaphysicstoexplain howtheChurchmightbethoughtofasthebodyofChrist.However,unlikethe
¹³Avis,2018:24.¹⁴ Seee.g.ListandPettit,2011;Tollefsen,2015;Collins,2019.
¹⁵ Seee.g.Clark,2010;ClarkandChalmers,2010;Tollefsen,2015.
¹⁶ Arcadi,2018;Cross,2011.
Eucharistandtheincarnation,thedoctrineoftheChurchdoesnotthinkof Christasextendedintosomeartefactortangibleobject,butintoasocialbody. TogiveametaphysicsoftheChurchasthebodyofChrist,then,Ibuildon workin socially extendedcognition,whichseekstoshowthewaysinwhich mindsareextendedintootherminds.Thiscanprovideonemodelforthinking abouthowtheChurchasagroupagentmightparticipateinthebodyof Christ.
Wethenmovefromconceptualtopractical.IfChapters1–3askthe question: ‘WhatistheChurch?’,thenChapters4–7askthequestion: ‘What doestheChurch do?’.Theunitythesisandthetheologicalmodelofferedin Chapters1–3arethenusedtohelpusexaminethestudyofthesacraments (specifically,baptismandEucharist)andliturgy(bothinsideandoutsideof formalchurchworship).Moreover,thisdiscussionofwhattheChurchdoes focusesonthequestionofhowtheactivitiesoftheChurchservetheunityof theChurch.Thus,weareabletoseehowthemodelofferedinChapter1–3 mightinformthepracticesthatareperformedbythemembersoftheone Church.
InChapter4,IconsidertheroleofbaptismintheoneChurch.Thechapter focusesontheroleofabaptismalliturgyasaninstanceofinitiationintothe communityoftheChurch,reflectingontheimplicationsofthisinitiationfor howanewmemberrelatestothegroup.First,Iconsiderrecentphilosophical workonthenatureofpromises.Iarguethatthepromisesmadeinbaptism mightbeunderstoodasinstancesofwhatMargaretGilberthascalled ‘joint commitments’.¹⁷ AsGilbertshows,promising,understoodasaninstanceof jointcommitment,alwaysentailscertainobligationsofbothpromisorand promisee,andthesameisclearlytrueinthepromisesofbaptism.However, whilstGilbert’saccountcapturesimportantfeaturesofbaptismalobligations inlocalcommunities,itfarespoorlywhenextendingthistoconsiderthe relationshiptotheChurchasawhole.Wemustunderstandthesepromises asaresponsetoworkofthepersonsoftheTrinity,whodeterminethegrounds ofmembershipintheChurch,ratherthaneffectingthemembershipbyitself. Here,IunpackJohnCalvin’snotionofbaptismasa signandseal ofthework alreadyachievedthroughChrist.Finally,Iconsiderhowthispositioncanbe extendedtothinkaboutthecaseoftheinfantbaptism.Understandingbaptism notasaninstanceofpersonaltestimony,butasaninitiationintothefamilyof theChurchallowsustoseethatmakingcommitmentsonbehalfofachildcan bemadesenseofwithinourunderstandingoftheChurch’sontology.
¹⁷ Gilbert,2011.
Whereasbaptismisaonceinalifetimesignofourmembershipintheone Church,theEuchariststandsasaperpetualsignofourmembershipintothe body.TheNewTestamentmakesitclearthatsharingintheonebread somehowallowsustosharemorefullyinthebodyofChrist(1Cor.10).In Chapter5,IarguethattheEucharistiscentraltoourunderstandingofhowwe participateintheonebodyoftheChurchbysharingthebodyofChristinthe onebread.First,drawingfromrecentworkinsocialpsychology,Ireflecton thesignificanceofsharedexperiencesandritualizedmovementforcommunitycohesion,arguingthatthismightplayaroleintheoutwardformsofunity intheChurch.WhiletheseaccountscanexplainthepsychologicalmechanismsbehindtheEucharistasahumanritual,andtherebyprovidesome explanationof how theSpiritenactsunitythroughthesacramentsofthe Church,anaccountwhichissolelypsychologicalriskslocatingunityinthe wrongplace.Secondly,then,IofferanaccountoftheEucharistasunitive throughtherealpresenceofChrist.Here,Idevelopadiscussionfromthe AmericanReformedtheologian,JohnWilliamsonNevin,asheseeksto emphasizetheimportanceofChrist’spresenceintheEucharistforuniting theChurch.
The finaltwochaptersconsidertheimplicationsofourdiscussionofunity forthepracticeofliturgy.First,inChapter6,IofferanaccountofparticipationinthelifeoftheChurchthroughtheliturgiesofgatheredworship.The discussionisframedaroundEvelynUnderhill’sthreemodesofliturgical participation:jointaction,representativeaction,andcorporatesilence.¹⁸ Expandingthesethreeaccountsofliturgicalaction,Idrawfromrecentwork inanalyticphilosophy.Onjointaction,Iconsiderhowdiscussionsofshared agencycanhelpexplainwhatistoactjointlywithanotherpersoninliturgy, say,inreadingaliturgicalscriptatthesametime.Onelimitationofsuch accounts,Iargue,isthattheycannotofferinclusiveaccountsofChurchaction whichexplainhowalltheChurch’smembers(includingthosewithcognitive impairmentsandyoungchildren)contributetotheactionsoftheChurchasa widerbody.Ithenconsiderhowtheapplicationoftheliteratureongroup agency(seeChapter2)canexplainthenotionofrepresentativeaction.Inthe practiceofordination,forinstance,oneindividualisauthorizedtoperform liturgicalactionsonbehalfofthewholecommunity.Iarguethatthisshouldbe understoodinasimilarmannertothewayinwhichweauthorizepoliticiansto actonourbehalfthroughvoting.Thiscanalsobeextended,Ithink,toshow hownon-paradigmparticipantsintheliturgycanbebroughtintothegroup’ s
¹⁸ Underhill,1936.
liturgy,eveniftheylackthecapacitytoengageinjointaction.Finally, Iconsiderthenatureofcorporatesilenceinliturgy.Drawingfromworkin thephilosophyofperception,Iarguethatliturgicalsilenceisnotthesameas absolutesilencebut,instead,standsasacontrasttotheotheraspectsofthe liturgy.Inthespacewhichsilenceallows,ourindividualactionsareunitedby theworkoftheHolySpirittoformgroupactions,thusemphasizingtheneed forbothliturgicalactionandleavingspacefortheunitingworkoftheSpiritin worship.
Iconclude,inthe finalchapter,byconsideringhowtheliturgyofthe Churchextendsbeyondactsofgatheredworship.Evenifwerecognizethat theChurchisoneintheSpirit,wemustlamentwhentheoutwardsofthe Churchcommitactsofabhorrenceintheworld.Reflectingonthediscussion ofworshipandjusticeintheminorprophetsoftheHebrewBible(seeAmos 5:21–4,forinstance),Ishowthatthereisacloseconnectionbetweenworship andethics.BringingAugustine’sdiscussionofsocialjusticetobearonthe ethicsofworship,Ishowthatweshouldlooktoanaccountofgroupinjustice tobestunderstandcasesofabuseandinjusticeintheChurch.Then,Iturnto recentanalyticworktohelpexpandthisclaim.First,drawingfromworkby MirandaFricker,Iconsiderhowresponsibilitiesmightbesharedbytwoor moreagents.However,Iargue,suchaccountsarelimited.Justasshared agencyaccountsofliturgicalactionareinsufficientlyinclusive,collectivevirtue accountsdonotexplainhownon-paradigmparticipantsinacommunitycan contributetoitsvirtueorvice.Thus,buildingonthediscussionsoffunctionalistsocialontology,Iapplyanaccountof group virtuetothecontextof worship.Iarguethatweshouldthinkofgroupinjusticeinroughlythesame waythatwethinkofindividualinjustice;asthecommunity’sfailingtodowhat itoughttodo,namely,tolove.Finally,Iconcludebyconsideringanumberof questionsforthinkingabouthowweshouldrespondtoissuesofgroup injusticewithinourcommunities:Whenshouldanindividualsubmittoa churchcommunityandwhenshouldtheyprotest?Whendoesanactiondone onbehalfoftheChurchbecomedisassociatedwiththeChurchasawhole?
BuildingonStephanieCollins’ discussionofgroupresponsibility,Iarguethat, asamemberoftheChurch,onehasaresponsibilitytoprotestactionswithin theChurchwhichonetakestodivergefromtheChurch’spurposeinChrist throughtheSpirit.Oneformthismighttake,Iargue,isthecorporateactof lamentinliturgy.
Whilstthemodelexpoundedinthisbookhasmanyfacets,thecorethesis remainsthesamethroughoutthechapters:theChurchisonlyoneinvirtueof
theworkoftheFather,Son,andHolySpiritatworkinthemidstofthosewho aremembersoftheoneChurch.Inunderstandingthelifeofthebodyof Christ,wemustseethatinalltheChurchdoes whetherinsacraments,in corporateliturgy,orinactingintheworld unitycanonlyariseinand throughtheworkofGod.
Acknowledgements
ThisbookmarkstheculminationoffouryearsofresearchattheLogos InstituteforAnalyticandExegeticalTheologyattheUniversityof StAndrews.Thecolleagues,students,andvisitingscholarswhohaveshaped thisprojectaretoonumeroustomention.
Iinitiallyjoinedtheinstitutein2017toworkonanalytictheologyand liturgy,butitsoonbecameapparentthattheprojectIwantedtowriteneeded totakeamuchbroaderapproach.Ifwewanttounderstandwhatitisto participateintheworshipoftheChurch,thenwemust firstunderstandthe natureandlifeoftheChurch.
AndrewTorrancehasbeenaconstantsourceofencouragement,challenge, andfriendshipoverthepastfouryears.Withinmy firstmonthattheLogos Institute,AndrewhadsuggestedIreadhisgrandfather’sbook, Worship, CommunityandTheTriuneGodofGrace.Itscontentsshapednotonlymy academicinterests,butalsomyapproachtoministryandliturgyinthe Church.IamgratefulforthesupportofAlanTorranceandOliverCrispas directorsoftheLogosInstitute,bothofwhomhavebeenrelentlessintheir supportandfriendship.Icouldnothavewishedforabetterwaytospendfour years,norforbettercolleaguestoworkalongside.
JonathanRutledgeandKoertVerhagenhaveprovedtobeinvaluable sourcesoftheologicalcorrectionandphilosophicalchallenge,butmost importantly,theyhavebeenfellowconnoisseursofcoffeeandwhiskyover thepastfouryears.Thisbookwouldnotexistwithouttheirinfluence,support, andfriendship.
Duringthe2020–1academicyear,agroupofcolleaguesintheinstitute convenedtoprovidefeedbackononeanother’swork,buildingonamutual interestonthethemeofparticipation.Thegroupnotonlyprovidedfeedback onmanyofthechaptersfromthisbook,butalsoprovedtobeameltingpotof ideaswhichinspiredmanyofthedirectionsthisbookendeduptaking.Thank youtoOliverCrisp,JoannaLeidenhag,JonathanRutledge,andAndrew Torranceforparticipatinginthisgroup.
Alongsidethewritingofthisbook,Ihavealsoembarkedontwocollaborativeprojects.First,togetherwithmygoodfriendsScottHarrowerandPreston Hill,IhavewrittenabookexploringhowtheChurchmightrespondtoissues
oftrauma.Thesegentlemen(therearenonetowhomthistitleismoresuited) havebeenasourceofsupport,friendship,andmutualcareoverthepast coupleofyears,openingmyeyestotherealityofthedamagetheChurch hassometimesinflictedonsurvivorsoftrauma.IamthankfultoGodfortheir companionshipandlookforwardtomanymorejointventuresinthefuture. Secondly,IhavebeengratefulfortheopportunitytocollaboratewithGideon Salter,apsychologistattheUniversityofStAndrewsonanumberofgrant projectsandarticles,exploringhowpsychologycanhelpustounderstandthe natureofcorporateworship.Someofthismaterialhasmadeitswayintothe presentmonograph,butourconversationshaveinspiredmuchmorethanis onthepage.InGideon,Ihavefoundafellowlong-sufferingfollowerofthe Englishfootballteam,andalikemindedco-author.
Oneofthemostwonderfulpartsofbeingemployedbyauniversityisbeing abletoteachsomeofthebrightesttheologicalmindsintheworld.Mydoctoral students:D.T.Everhart,PrestonHill,MadelineJackson,DanielSpencer,and JasonStigallhaveeachbeenpeersandfriendsinverydifferentways.Manyof themhavegiventheirtimetograpplingwiththecontentsofthisbookand discussingideaslateintothenightoveraglassofscotch.Iamthankfulforthe wayseachofthemhavehelpedshapethisprojectandIamexcitedtoseehow theirowncareersandprojectswilldevelop.Iamalsoblessedtohavetaught outstandingMLittcandidates,manyofwhomhavebeeninflictedwiththe chaptersofthisbookascompulsoryreadingandhaveprovidedmanyimportantinsights.
Anumberofpeoplehavebeenkindenoughtogivefeedbackondraft chaptersofthebook.IamgratefultoHarveyCawdron,AndrewEsnouf, DerekKing,SarahShin,andChrisWhytefortheirinsightfulfeedback, whichhastransformedmyownthinkingonmanyissues.Thetwoanonymous refereesfromOxfordUniversityPressprovidedtimelydirectiontotheproject initsinfancyandraisedmanyimportantpointsforclarificationasitwas nearingcompletion.Iamgratefultothemboth.
Beforehisuntimelydeath,thelateDavidEfirdprovidedextensivecommentsonmanyofthechapters.Iamthankfultohaveknownhimandhe continuestoshapemysenseofvocationtothisday.Theresearchgroup startedbyDavidatYork theStBenedictSocietyforPhilosophyofReligion andPhilosophicalTheology kindlyagreedtoreunitetoprovidefeedbackon a finaldraftofthemanuscript.OurFridaymorningZoommeetingsspanned threecountries(Chile,England,andScotland)andIamverythankfulto DanielMolto,JackWarman,andDavidWorsleyfortheirattentiontodetail andprobingquestions,nottomentiontheircontinuedfriendship.
Thecompletionofthismanuscriptalsocoincideswiththeendofmytimeat theLogosInstituteandamoveintofulltimeministryintheChurch.Assuch, thisbookisnotamereacademicstudy,butareflectionontheChurchIhave committedtoloveandserve.ThecongregationsofG2,YorkandSaint Andrew’sEpiscopalChurch,StAndrewshaveshapedmyfaithandsenseof vocationinverydifferentways.InChristianSelvaratnamandTrevorHart, Ihavefoundlike-mindedcolleaguesinministryandexemplaryrolemodelsof ordainedministry.Althoughhemaynotalwayshaverealizedit,myweekly coffeemeetingswithTrevorhavealsoprovedtobeanexcellenttestingground forexploringmanyoftheideasinthisbook.Finally,asIembarkonanew ministryatHolyTrinityChurchandStGeorge’sChurchinLeeds,Iam thankfultotheiropennessandhospitalityinwelcomingusintotheircommunityandIamexcitedtogetstartedinservingtheoneChurchofChrist togetherwiththem.
Finally,thanksareduetomywife,EleanorandwonderfulchildrenJudah, Emmeline,andZachary.Aswellasprovidingasourceoflaughter,challenge andlove,EleanordailysharpensmyfaithinChristanddeepensmydevotion toservinghisChurch.Iamlookingforwardtomanymoreyearsservingthe Churchalongsideyou.
1.ThatTheyMayBeOne:TheIndividualandtheCommunity oftheChurch1
1.ThatTheyMayBeOne1
2.IndividualismvsCollectivism4
3.Bonhoeffer’sPhilosophicallyInformedEcclesiology8
4.IndividualismandItsImplications12
5.ClarifyingtheDebate16
6.Conclusion18
2.OneSpirit:TheChurchasaGroupAgent20
1.TheUnbearableParadoxofEcclesiology20
2.TheChurchastheBodyofChristthroughtheAgencyoftheSpirit21
3.GroupRealismExpanded24
4.GroupRealismandtheChurch30
4.1RedundantGroupRealismandtheSocialOntologyofDictatorships35
4.2TheBenevolentDictator:GroupAgencyintheOneSpirit38
4.3PolityandDiscernmentintheLifeoftheOneChurch40
4.4RogueAgencyandtheSinoftheChurch44
5.Conclusion46
3.OneLordJesusChrist:TheChurchastheSociallyExtended BodyofChrist48
1.TheChurchastheBodyofChrist48
1.1ParticipationintheOneBodyofChrist49
1.2IdentifyingtheChurchastheBodyofChrist54
2.FunctionalismandExtendedMinds55
2.1BodilyExtensionandtheParityPrincipleRevised59
3.ArcadiandCrossonTheologicalApplicationsof ActiveExternalism63
4.TheChurchastheExtendedBodyofChrist66 4.1SocialExtension68
4.2TheChurchastheSociallyExtendedBodyofChrist71 5.Conclusion74
4.OneBaptism:GroupMembershipandRitesofInitiation75
1.SocialOntologyandInitiation75
2.PromisingandGroupMembership77
2.1OntheRelationshipbetweenPromisingandMembership82
3.MembershipandAuthorization84
3.1BaptismandSpeechActTheory86
3.2TwoModelsofBaptismalSpeechActs87
3.3TheCalvinianModel91
3.4GroupMembershipandBaptism95
4.InfantBaptismandGroupMembership97
5.Conclusion104
5.OneBread,OneCup:TheEucharistasaSacramentofUnity105
1.MorethanMetaphysics:AnalyticTheologyandEucharisticUnity105
2.Human-to-HumanUnitythroughtheEucharisticRitual107
2.1SocialCohesionandEucharisticRitual107
2.2RemembranceandUnitywiththePast110
3.EucharisticUnityinChrist117
3.1UnityintheEucharisticBodyandtheEcclesialBody118
3.2TheDifferencebetweentheEucharisticBodyandtheEcclesialBody122
3.3YouAreWhatYouEat:TheEucharistasaSourceofUnity124 4.Conclusion130
6.ActingasOne:LiturgyandGroupAction132 1.TheGatheredChurch132
1.1LiturgicalParticipation134
2.Underhill’sPrinciplesofCorporateWorship136
2.1CorporateSilence137
2.2RepresentativeAction138
2.3JointAction138
3.AnAnalyticAccountofGroupLiturgicalAction139
3.1JointAction140
3.2SharedAgencyandLiturgicalAction141
3.3Inclusivity,Belonging,andJointAction145
4.RepresentativeAction147
4.1Inclusivity,Belonging,andRepresentativeAction151
4.2AuthorizationandDiscernment153
5.CorporateSilence154
5.1TheNatureofSilence155
5.2GroupActionandCorporateSilence157
5.3Inclusivity,Belonging,andCorporateSilence159
6.Conclusion160
7.OnePurpose:ExtensiveLiturgyandProtest161
1.GoinPeacetoLoveandServetheLord161
2.SystemicAbuseintheLifeoftheChurch163
3.InjusticeandthePeopleofGod169
3.1SocialJusticeandthePeopleofGod173
4.SocialJusticeasJointCommitment175 4.1SocialJusticeandCollectiveDuties179
5.LiturgicalProtest183 6.Conclusion185
