England and the papacy in the early middle ages: papal privileges in european perspective, c. 680-10

https://ebookmass.com/product/england-and-the-papacy-in-theearly-middle-ages-papal-privileges-in-europeanperspective-c-680-1073-benjamin-savill/

Instant digital products (PDF, ePub, MOBI) ready for you

Download now and discover formats that fit your needs...

Abbatial Authority and the Writing of History in the Middle Ages Benjamin Pohl

https://ebookmass.com/product/abbatial-authority-and-the-writing-ofhistory-in-the-middle-ages-benjamin-pohl/

ebookmass.com

Abbatial Authority and the Writing of History in the Middle Ages Dr Benjamin Pohl

https://ebookmass.com/product/abbatial-authority-and-the-writing-ofhistory-in-the-middle-ages-dr-benjamin-pohl/

ebookmass.com

Graphic Signs of Authority in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages Ildar Garipzanov

https://ebookmass.com/product/graphic-signs-of-authority-in-lateantiquity-and-the-early-middle-ages-ildar-garipzanov/ ebookmass.com

Worlds Together, Worlds Apart (Fifth Edition) (Vol. 2) Fifth Edition – Ebook PDF Version

https://ebookmass.com/product/worlds-together-worlds-apart-fifthedition-vol-2-fifth-edition-ebook-pdf-version/

ebookmass.com

Ravana's Kingdom: The Ramayana and Sri Lankan History from Below Justin W. Henry

https://ebookmass.com/product/ravanas-kingdom-the-ramayana-and-srilankan-history-from-below-justin-w-henry/

ebookmass.com

New Beginnings in Honeydale (Honeydale Series, Book 5) K.T. Dady

https://ebookmass.com/product/new-beginnings-in-honeydale-honeydaleseries-book-5-k-t-dady/

ebookmass.com

Relationship Between Microbes and the Environment for Sustainable Ecosystem Services, Volume 1: Microbial Products for Sustainable Ecosystem Services Jastin Samuel

https://ebookmass.com/product/relationship-between-microbes-and-theenvironment-for-sustainable-ecosystem-services-volume-1-microbialproducts-for-sustainable-ecosystem-services-jastin-samuel/ ebookmass.com

Read and Write Course 3 Teachers Edition Mcgraw-Hill [Mcgraw-Hill]

https://ebookmass.com/product/read-and-write-course-3-teachersedition-mcgraw-hill-mcgraw-hill/

ebookmass.com

CDPSE Certified Data Privacy Solutions Engineer All-in-One Exam Guide Peter H. Gregory

https://ebookmass.com/product/cdpse-certified-data-privacy-solutionsengineer-all-in-one-exam-guide-peter-h-gregory-2/

ebookmass.com

The Testament of Lazarus: The Pre-Christian Gospel of John

Janet Tyson

https://ebookmass.com/product/the-testament-of-lazarus-the-prechristian-gospel-of-john-janet-tyson/

ebookmass.com

FRONTMATTER

EnglandandthePapacyintheEarlyMiddleAges:PapalPrivilegesinEuropeanPerspective,c.680-1073

BenjaminSavill

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198887058.001.0001

Published:2023 OnlineISBN:9780191994586

CopyrightPage 

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198887058.002.0004 Pageiv

Published:August2023

PrintISBN:9780198887058

Subject: HistoryofReligion,MedievalandRenaissanceHistory(500to1500)

Collection: OxfordScholarshipOnline

GreatClarendonStreet,Oxford,OX26DP, UnitedKingdom

OxfordUniversityPressisadepartmentoftheUniversityofOxford

ItfurtherstheUniversity’sobjectiveofexcellenceinresearch,scholarship, andeducationbypublishingworldwide.Oxfordisaregisteredtrademarkof OxfordUniversityPressintheUKandincertainothercountries

©BenjaminSavill2023

Themoralrightsoftheauthorhavebeenasserted

Allrightsreserved Nopartofthispublicationmaybereproduced,storedin aretrievalsystem,ortransmitted,inanyformorbyanymeans,withoutthe priorpermissioninwritingofOxfordUniversityPress,orasexpresslypermitted bylaw,bylicenceorundertermsagreedwiththeappropriatereprographics rightsorganization Enquiriesconcerningreproductionoutsidethescopeofthe aboveshouldbesenttotheRightsDepartment,OxfordUniversityPress,atthe addressabove

Youmustnotcirculatethisworkinanyotherform andyoumustimposethissameconditiononanyacquirer

PublishedintheUnitedStatesofAmericabyOxfordUniversityPress

198MadisonAvenue,NewYork,NY10016,UnitedStatesofAmerica

BritishLibraryCataloguinginPublicationData

Dataavailable

LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2023935783

ISBN978–0–19–888705–8

DOI:10 1093/oso/9780198887058 001 0001

PrintedandboundintheUKby

TJBooksLimited

LinkstothirdpartywebsitesareprovidedbyOxfordingoodfaithand forinformationonly Oxforddisclaimsanyresponsibilityforthematerials containedinanythirdpartywebsitereferencedinthiswork.

FRONTMATTER

EnglandandthePapacyintheEarlyMiddleAges:PapalPrivilegesinEuropeanPerspective,c.680-1073

BenjaminSavill

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198887058.001.0001

Published:2023 OnlineISBN:9780191994586

PrintISBN:9780198887058

Acknowledgements 

Published:August2023

Subject: HistoryofReligion,MedievalandRenaissanceHistory(500to1500)

Collection: OxfordScholarshipOnline

ThisisacompletereworkingofmyDPhilthesis,supervisedbySarahFootandexaminedbySimonKeynes andChrisWickhamin2017 ThemanydebtsIaccumulatedwhilepreparingtheoriginalthesisare acknowledgedtherein,butImustthankagaintheWolfsonFoundation,InstituteofHistoricalResearch (IHR)andRoyalHistoricalSocietyforfundingmyresearch,andthe‘Jaé3’/‘Papsturkundendesfrühen undhohenMittelalters’project,basedattheAkademiederWissenschaftenzuGöttingenandFriedrichAlexander-UniversitätErlangen-Nürnberg,forinvitingmetoconsulttheirunpublishedmaterialsand photographiccollectionsin2015–16.ThatthesisbecamethismonographduringtheCovid-19lockdownsof 2020–21,withearliergroundworkputdownattheBritishLibrary,WarburgInstitute,IHR,Cambridge UniversityLibrary,andUniversityofEastAnglia ItwasbroughttocompletionatTrinityCollegeDublin ThroughoutthistimeIhavebeenespeciallygratefulforthesupportofDavidd’Avray,CarolineGoodson, NicholasVincent,BryanWard-Perkins,andImmoWarntjes.IndividualchapterswerereadbyKatyCubitt, TomLicence,LeviRoach,AlanThacker,FrancescaTinti,andJudithWerner,andimprovedbytheir comments JuliaCricklentinvaluablepalaeographicadvice FelicityHillhonouredthewritingpact Thelate RichardSharpegavemuchneededencouragementatacriticalearlystage.Works-in-progresswere presentedtotheGermanHistoricalInstituteMedievalSeminar,BritishAcademyAnglo-SaxonCharters Symposium,IHREarlierMiddleAgesSeminar,OxfordMedievalSeminar,andtheStAndrewsInstituteof MedievalStudiesSeminar SpecialthanksareduetoOHMandOUP,theirreader(laterself-‘revealed’as JanetNelson),andaboveallJuliaSmithasAdvisoryEditor.Anyerrorsaremyown.

Berlin,2022 p vi

ListofFigures

2.1Theearliestsurvivingpapyrusprivilege:PaschalIforRavenna,819 (243 52cm)(JE2551):Ravenna,Archivioarcivescovile,Papiron.4, insitu inthepresent-dayarchiepiscopalarchive(Arcidiocesidi Ravenna-Cervia,withpermission).33

2.2PapyrusprivilegesofJohnXIIIconcerningVic,971(JL3746–7,3750): VicArxiuEpiscopal,405–7, insitu inthepresent-dayepiscopal archive(Vic,ArxiuEpiscopal,withpermission).34

2.3Twopapyrusprivileges:(a)StephenVforNeeunheerse,891 (145 32cm:uppersectionmissing)(JL3468):Münster, LandesarchivNRWAbteilungWestfalen,B605u/StiftHeerse/ UrkundenNr.3(MarburgerLichtbildarchiv,withpermission); (b)JohnXIIIforAtóofVic,971(237 66cm;with bulla)(JL3747): Vic,ArxiuEpiscopal,406(Vic,ArxiuEpiscopal,withpermission).35

2.4Arabicmanufactorymarkonapapyrusprivilege:JohnVIIIfor Tournus,876(fragment1of8)(55cmwide;fullprivilegeis320cm inlength)(JL3052):BnF,Lat.8840(Source:gallica.bnf.fr/BnF).36

2.5 Curialis script:fromJohnVIIIforTournus,876(=Figure2.4) (fragment2of8)(Source:gallica.bnf.fr/BnF).37

2.6A ‘reform-period’ parchmentprivilege:LeoIXforBamberg,1052 (JL4283):Munich,BayerischesHauptstaatsarchiv,Bamberg.Urk. 1203(MarburgerLichtbildarchiv,withpermission).40

2.7Another ‘reform-period’ parchmentprivilege:AlexanderIIforFulda, 1064(JL4557):Marburg,Staatsarchiv,Stiftsarch.Fulda10643 (MarburgerLichtbildarchiv,withpermission).41

2.8Pre-‘reform’ BENEVALETE (detail,Figure2.3b).42

2.9Monogrammatic BENEVALETE (with ‘Komma’)(detail,Figure2.6).42

2.10 Rota (detail,Figure2.6).43

3.1 Bulla ofPaschalI(817/24)(detached,nowclippedatsides), discoveredinHerefordshire,2004: PAS HESH-ADE183 (BirminghamMuseumsTrust,CCBY-SA4.0licence).80

3.2NicholasIIforWells,1061(JL4457),contemporaryfacsimile: Wells,D&C,CF/3/2(MichaelBlandford,bypermissionofthe ChapterofWellsCathedral).100

5.1 ‘Cynedridę regine’ in Liberdiurnus V93:VaticanCity,Archivio SegretoVaticano,Misc.arm.xi,19,f.97(©2022Archivio ApostolicoVaticano;bypermissionofArchivioApostolicoVaticano, allrightsreserved).156

6.1JohnXII’sprivilegeforDunstan,960(JL3687),copyintheDunstan Pontifical:BnF,Lat.943,f.7(detail)(Source:gallica.bnf.fr/BnF).192

7.1LeoIXforCrediton-Exeter(1049/50)(JL4208),copyintheLeofric Missal:Oxford,BodleianLibrary,Bodley579,f.3v(DigitalBodleian, CC-BY-NC4.0licence).240

8.1Forgery, c.1200: ‘ConstantineI’ forEvesham, ‘713’ (JE †2149):BL, CottonCleopatraE.i,ff.64–5(BritishLibrary,withpermission).273

ListofMaps

4.1Beneficiariesofpapalprivilegesformonasteries,granting iurisdicio or comparableimmunities,514–762113

4.2BeneficiariesofpapalprivilegesformonasteriesinEngland,678–715133

6.1Beneficiariesofextantauthentic/possiblyauthenticpapal privileges,955–96190

7.1Beneficiariesofextantauthentic/possiblyauthenticpapal privileges,1049–73236

University of Birmingham user on 17 September 2023

ListofAbbreviations

AAineditaActapontificumRomanoruminedita,ed.J.vonPflugkHarttung,3vols.(Tübingen,1880–8)

AAWIRegestaregumAnglo-Normannorum:theActaofWilliamI (1066–1087),ed.D.Bates(Oxford,1998)

AbingdonChartersofAbingdonAbbey,ed.S.E.Kelly,2vols.(Oxford, 2000–1)

ANParis,ArchivesnationalesdeFrance

ARTEM

Chartesoriginalesantérieuresà1121conservéesenFrance, http://telma.irht.cnrs.fr/outils/originaux/index/

ASCTheAnglo-SaxonChronicle:aCollaborativeEdition,ed. D.N.DumvilleandS.Keynes,17vols.(Cambridge,1983–)

BarkingChartersofBarkingAbbeyandWalthamHolyCross,ed. S.E.Kelly(Oxford,2021)

BathandWellsChartersofBathandWells,ed.S.E.Kelly(Oxford,2007)

BCS CartulariumSaxonicum:aCollectionofChartersRelating toAnglo-SaxonHistory,ed.W.deGrayBirch,3vols. (London,1885–93)

BLLondon,BritishLibrary

BnFParis,BibliothèquenationaledeFrance

BobbioCodicediplomaticodelMonasterodiS.ColombanodiBobbio finoall’annoMCCVIII,ed.C.Cipolla,3vols.(Rome,1918)

Böhmer-FrechK.A.Frech, RegestaImperiiIII.5.Papstregesten1024–1058, 2vols.(Cologne,WeimarandVienna,2006–11)

Böhmer-ZimmermannH.Zimmermann, RegestaImperiiII.5.Papstregesten 911–1024,2ndedition(Vienna,Cologne,Weimar,1998)

ChertseyChartersofChertseyAbbey,ed.S.E.Kelly(Oxford,2015) ChristChurchChartersofChristChurchCanterbury,ed.N.P.Brooksand S.E.Kelly,2vols.(Oxford,2013)

Chron.Mos.ChroniqueoulivredufondationdumonastèredeMouzon, ed.andtrans.M.Bur(Paris,1989)

Chron.Rames.ChroniconabbatiaeRameseiensisasaec.x.usqueadan. circiter1200,ed.W.D.Macray(London,1886)

Chron.Winch.TheWinchcombeandCoventryChronicles:Hitherto UnnoticedWitnessestotheWorkofJohnofWorcester,ed. andtrans.P.A.Hayward,2vols.(Tempe,2010)

September 2023

CS I

CouncilsandSynods,WithOtherDocumentsRelatingto theEnglishChurchI, A.D.871–1204,ed.D.Whitelock, M.Brett,andC.N.L.Brooke,2vols.(Oxford,1981)

DavisG.R.C.Davis, MedievalCartulariesofGreatBritainand Ireland,rev.C.Breay,J.Harrison,andD.M.Smith (London,2010)

Deantiq. WilliamofMalmesbury, DeantiquitateGlastoniensis Ecclesie,ed.J.Scott,inJ.Scott, TheEarlyHistoryof Glastonbury:anEdition,TranslationandStudyofWilliam ofMalemsbury’sDeantiquitateGlastonieEcclesie (Woodbridge,1981),pp.40–172

D&CDeanandChapter

ECEETheEarlyChartersofEasternEngland,ed.C.R.Hart (Leicester,1966)

GlastonburyChartersofGlastonburyAbbey,ed.S.E.Kelly(Oxford,2012)

GP WilliamofMalmesbury, GestapontificumAnglorum:the HistoryoftheEnglishBishops,ed.andtrans. M.WinterbottomwiththeassistanceofR.M.Thomson, 2vols.(Oxford,2007)

GR WilliamofMalmesbury, GestaregumAnglorum:the HistoryoftheEnglishKings,ed.andtrans.R.A.B.Mynors, completedbyR.M.ThomsonandM.Winterbottom, 2vols.(Oxford,1998)

HA Bede, Historiaabbatum,in AbbotsofWearmouthand Jarrow,ed.andtrans.C.GrocockandI.N.Wood (Oxford,2013),pp.21–75

HE Bede, EcclesiasticalHistoryoftheEnglishPeople,ed.and trans.B.ColgraveandR.A.B.Mynors(Oxford,1969)

HN Eadmer, HistorianovoruminAnglia,ed.M.Rule(London, 1884)

HS CouncilsandEcclesiasticalDocumentsRelatingtoGreat BritainandIreland,ed.A.W.HaddanandWilliam Stubbs,3vols.(Oxford,1869–78)

JE,JK,JLP.Jaffé, RegestapontificumRomanorumabconditaecclesia adannumpostChristumnatumMCXCVIII,2ndedition, rev.W.Wattenbach,S.Loewenfeld,F.Kaltenbrunner,and P.Ewald,2vols.(Leipzig,1885–8)

J³P.Jaffé, RegestapontificumRomanorumabconditaecclesia adannumpostChristumnatumMCXCVIII,3rdedition, rev.K.Herbers,M.Schütz,J.Werner,etal.,4vols.todate (Göttingen,2016–)(Usuallyonlycitedwhennoentryin 2ndedition)

K

CodexdiplomaticusaeviSaxonici,ed.J.M.Kemble,6vols. (London,1839–48)

LDLiberdiurnusRomanorumpontificum,ed.HansFoerster (Bern,1958)

LPLeLiberpontificalis,ed.L.Duchesne,3vols.(Paris, 1884–1957)

MalmesburyChartersofMalmesburyAbbey,ed.S.E.Kelly(Oxford,2005)

MGHEpp. I–VII MonumentaGermaniaeHistorica.Epistolae I–VII,7vols. (Berlin,1887–1928)

MGHFormulaeFormulaeMerowingicietKaroliniaevi,ed.K.Zeumer, MonumentaGermaniaeHistorica.LegesV (Hanover, 1886)

NorthernHousesChartersofNorthernHouses,ed.D.A.Woodman(Oxford, 2012)

PASPortableAntiquitiesScheme,https://finds.org.uk/database

PeterboroughChartersofPeterboroughAbbey,ed.S.E.Kelly(Oxford, 2009)

PLPatrologiaecursuscompletus,seriesLatina,ed.J.P.Migne, 221vols.(Paris,1841–64)

PRDPPontificumRomanorumdiplomatapapyraceaquaesupersunt intabulariisHispaniaeItaliaeGermaniae,ed.C.deSilva TaroucaandC.Erdmann(Rome,1929)

PROLondon,TheNationalArchives,PublicRecordOffice PUUPapsturkunden896–1046,ed.H.Zimmermann,3vols. (Vienna,1984–9)

PUUEnglandPapsturkundeninEngland,ed.W.Holtzmann,3vols. (Berlin,1930–52)

PUUFrankreichPapsturkundeninFrankreich,ed.W.Wiederhold,7vols. (Berlin,1906–13)

PUUIle-de-FrancePapsturkundeninFrankreich,NeueFolge7.Nördliche Ile-de-FranceundVermandois,ed.D.Lohrmann (Göttingen,1976)

PUUItalienPapsturkundeninItalien.ReiseberichtezurItaliaPontificia, ed.P.Kehr,6vols.(VaticanCity,1977)

PUUSaint-DenisPapsturkundeninFrankreich,NeueFolge9.DiözeseParis II.AbteiSaint-Denis,ed.R.Grosse(Göttingen,1998)

PUUSpanienPapsturkundeninSpanien.VorarbeitenzurHispania Pontificia,ed.P.Kehr,D.Berger,K.Herbers,and T.Schlauwitz,3vols.(Berlin,1926–2020)

Reg. GregorytheGreat, Registrumepistularum,ed.D.Norberg, CorpusChristianorumSeriesLatina140–140A,2vols. (Turnhout,1982)

Downloaded from

by University of Birmingham user on 17 September 2023

RochesterChartersofRochester,ed.A.Campbell(Oxford,1973)

SP.H.Sawyer, Anglo-SaxonCharters:anAnnotatedListand Bibliography (London,1968);rev.S.E.Kelly,R.Rushforth etal.onlineathttps://esawyer.lib.cam.ac.uk

StAlbansChartersofStAlbans,ed.J.Crick(Oxford,2007)

StAugustine’sChartersofStAugustine’sAbbey,CanterburyandMinsterin-Thanet,ed.S.E.Kelly(Oxford,1995)

StPaul’sChartersofStPaul’ s,London,ed.S.E.Kelly(Oxford,2004)

SherborneChartersofSherborne,ed.M.A.Donovan(Oxford,1988)

VCVitaCeolfridi,in AbbotsofWearmouthandJarrow,ed. andtrans.C.GrocockandI.N.Wood(Oxford,2013), pp.77–121

VSW

WBEASE

EddiusStephanus[StephenofRipon], TheLifeofBishop Wilfrid,ed.andtrans.B.Colgrave(Cambridge,1927)

M.Lapidge,J.Blair,S.D.Keynes,andD.Scragg,eds., The WileyBlackwellEncyclopediaofAnglo-SaxonEngland, 2ndedition(Oxford,2014)

WinchesterNMChartersoftheNewMinster,Winchester,ed.S.Miller (Oxford,2001)

Numbersin bold throughouttheapparatusofthisbookrefertopapalprivilegesin EnglandcataloguedintheAnnotatedHandlist(Chapter3):thereaderwill findtheir fullcitationdetailsthere.

Introduction

Asallfellsilentafterthereading,Berhtfrith,theking’stopman, spoketothearchbishop: ‘Itwouldpleasethoseofuswhoneedan interpretationtohearwhattheapostolicauthorityhastosay.’ The archbishopreplied: ‘Decisionsoftheapostolicseeareexpressed inalanguagewhichistortuousandenigmatic – nevertheless,each documentdoesrevealasingleunderstandingofthismatterat hand.Iwilluntangleatleasttheirsenseinbrief.’¹

Oursurvivingevidenceatteststotheacquisitionofapurportedsixty-seven papalprivilegesrelatingtoEnglandintheearlymiddleages.Someare authentic,manyforged,andonlyafewthesubjectofextendedanalysis: Berhtfrithwouldbealarmedtolearnthattherestillremainsmuchto unravel.Theabsenceofadedicatedstudyhasnotgoneunnoticed.Way backin1839JohnMitchellKemble,thegodfatherofmodernAnglo-Saxon studies,promisedavolumewhichfailedtomaterialisebeforehisuntimely death.Attheturnofthepresentcentury,twoofthe field’spre-eminent scholarsreiteratedthecallforthis ‘urgentdesideratum’.²Evenhadtheynot, therecurringappearanceofthesedocumentsacrossalmostallthe loca classica ofAnglo-Saxonhistoriographycouldnotescapeanystudentof theperiod.Papalprivileges(documentsissuedinthenamesofthebishops ofRome,grantingorconfirmingspecialrightstoindividualsorinstitutions) meetwithrepeatpraiseintheworksofBedeandhiscontemporariesinthe Northumbriangoldenage.Theystandoutamongthedocumentaryrecords ofthe ‘MercianSupremacy’.Someofthemostfamousroyaldiplomasofthe tenthandeleventhcenturycitethemasprecedents,whilethesuspicious discoveryoflong-lostprivilegesischaracteristicofthearchivalcreativityof post-ConquestEngland.Theyaretiedtothenamesofsuchcelebrated figuresasBenedictBiscopandAldhelm,OffaandCynethrythofMercia,

¹ VSW,60,p.130. ²Wormald, ‘Æthelwold’,p.200,n.89;Keynes, ‘Foreword’,p.xxi; WBEASE,p.362. EnglandandthePapacyintheEarlyMiddleAges:PapalPrivilegesinEuropeanPerspective,c.680–1073 BenjaminSavill,OxfordUniversityPress.©BenjaminSavill2023.DOI:10.1093/oso/9780198887058.003.0001

2

andSaintsWilfrid,Dunstan,Æthelwold,andEdwardtheConfessor.We findthemintextsofdiversegenres:history,chronicle,andhagiography; homily,gospelbook,andliturgicalcollection;usuallyinLatin,butoccasionallyinOldEnglishtranslation.Theymayhaveevenmadetheirwayintoour archaeologicalrecord.Yetstillnostudyhasbroughtallthismaterial togetherandanalyseditonitsownterms.That’sthetaskofthismonograph. Theabsenceofsuchanexaminationcanseemstrange,sincepapal privilegesrepresentapointofintersectionbetweentwoofthemajorareas ofresearchinterestinAnglo-Saxonhistoriography:charterstudies,andthe relationshipbetweentheearlyEnglishandRome.ThestudyofAnglo-Saxon chartershasbeenrevolutionisedoverthepasthalf-century.Thankstoa numberofinfluentialsecondaryworks,andthesteadyappearanceofaseries ofhigh-calibrecriticaleditions,asophisticatedengagementwiththesetexts hasnowbecomeahallmarkofscholarshiponearlymedievalEngland.³ Nevertheless,thesestudieshavetendedtofocuspredominantlyonwhatone mightcallthenativecomponentofAnglo-Saxondocumentaryculture,with relativelylittleconsiderationaboutwhathappenedwhenanadditional, exoticgenreofwritteninstrumentwasimportedintothissameenvironment (andasweshallsee, ‘exotic’ istherightwordforthesehuge,metres-long scrollsofMediterraneanpapyrus).Thisdoesnotmean,ofcourse,that Anglo-SaxonstudieshasshiedawayfromexploringmainlandEuropean influencesandconnectionsinthehistoryofpre-ConquestEngland.Sinceat leastthetimeofthegroundbreakingworkofWilhelmLevison,thishas constitutedasignificantsubstratumofthe field,andscholars takingcues fromBedehimself haveoftenplacedEngland’srelationshipwithRome anditsbishopsattheforefrontoftheseinvestigations.⁴ Insomecasesthat ‘emotionalconnection’ and ‘closerelationship ’ (or ‘specialrelationship ’) withthepapacyhasbeenperceivedasa ‘characteristicphenomenonofthe Anglo-Saxonperiod’,perhapsexceptionallyso,whileonescholarhasgone asfarastoidentifyRomeastheAnglo-Saxon ‘capital’ . ⁵ Beyond,however, Levison’sownmajorcontributions,thedocumentaryaspectsofthisrelationshiphave,untilquiterecently,⁶ notalwaysbeensubjectedtothesame kindofattentionoranalyticalrigourasoneisusedtoseeingelsewhere. Whendiscussionhastakenplace,ithasoftencentredaroundeitherthe earliestconversion-eralettersknownfromBedeandGregorytheGreat’ s

³ WBEASE,pp.97–9,102–3,withbibliography.

⁴ Levison, England; WBEASE,pp.359–62,409–10,withbibliography.

⁵ Ortenberg, ‘Anglo-SaxonChurch’,pp.31–2,58–62;Howe, ‘Rome’

⁶ HereIreferespeciallytotheimportantworkofSusanKelly,JoannaStory,and FrancescaTinti.

on 17 September 2023

Register,or,attheotherendofthespectrum,thepost-Conquest ‘Canterbury forgeries’,principallyofinteresttoAnglo-Normanistsandtwelfth-century specialists.Accordingly,therichinsightsintoearlyEnglishreligion,politics, andsocietymadethroughadvancesinAnglo-Saxoncharterstudiesover thepastfouror fivedecadeshavenotextendedasfarastheymightinto therealmofAnglo-papalcommunications,despitetherelativewealthof materialavailable.

Moststraightforwardlythen,thisbookconfrontsthisweakpointinthe scholarshipbyinterrogatingthefullcorpusofpapalprivilegesinearly medievalEnglandwiththatsamedegreeofscrutiny.Doingsoisabout more,however,thansimply fillingthegaps.Itisamajorcontentionof thisstudythatpapalprivilegeshaveausefulnessforhistorianswhichfar surpasseswhathashithertobeenexpectedofthem,atleastbyAngloSaxonists.Let’sstatethisemphatically:papalprivilegessurviveasagenre totallyuniqueamongourwrittensourcesfortheearlymedievalwest. Nowhereelse,inthisageoffragmentedpoliticalandtextualcultures,do we findanothercaseofasingletypeofwrittendocumentproducedand authenticatedatasinglelocation,yetsoughtby,andtransmittedto,individualsandinstitutionsfromdiversesocietiesacrossEurope,oftenones separatedbydifferentpoliticalconfigurations,andsometimesimmense distances.Itaddsanexcitingnewdimensiontothesortsofquestionswe canaskaboutearlymedievalEngland,ifwereflectonthefactthatprivileges muchlikethoseweseeattheJarrowofBede ’sdaycouldalsobefound withinthespaceofafewdecadesatthemonasteriesofBenevento,Farfa,and Fulda.Or:thatonerarewitnesstoMercianinheritancestrategiesexistsonly asagenerictemplateforscribespreservedinasinglenorth-Italianmanuscript,theearliestextantcitationofwhichcomesfromafewdecades later,onastill-survivingEgyptianpapyrusaddressedtopost-Byzantine Ravenna.Orindeed:thatanow-lostprivilegesoughtinpersonatRome byArchbishopOswaldofYorkwouldhavehaditsimmediateparallelsin documentsissuedforhiscounterpartsatLatinEurope’sotherfrontiers, atMagdeburg,Salerno,andCatalanVic.Reflectiveworkoncomparative methodologyhasstressedtheneedforhistorianstocontrastonly ‘like withlike’,limitingcomparisonstotightlycontrolledsharedphenomena (e.g.bishops,castles,communes,coins)thatmightserveas spie (‘peepholes’) intothewiderfabricofsociety.⁷ Ascloselycomparable,sometimesnearidenticaltexts,producedunderthe ‘control’ ofasingleissuingbody,yet

of Birmingham

on 17 September 2023

Wickham, ‘Problems’,withreferencetoGinzburg, ‘Spie

4

foundbetweendiversesocietieswithotherwisefewelementsofextantsource materialincommon,papalprivilegeshavethepotentialtoserveasjustsuch spie.Itisapotentialsofarlargelyuntapped.Thisdoesnotmean,ofcourse, thatwecanjustthinkofprivilegesassimpleportalsbetween,say,the ThamesValleyandValTrebbia,allowingustojuxtaposethetwodirectly. Asweshallsee,thegreatdifferencesbetweentheexistingconditionsand frameworksofreferenceofsuchsocietiesmakestheapplicationofprivileges ascompletelystraightforwardcomparatorsalmostimpossible.Butthefact thattextsmuchlikethoseweareseekingtounderstandinEnglandcouldbe foundelsewhereacrossthecontemporaryLatinwestaddstwocrucial dimensionstothisstudy.Firstly,wewillnotbeabletospeakwithmuch authorityaboutpapalprivilegesinearlymedievalEnglandunlesswesee howelsetheymanifestedthemselvesthroughoutEurope.Secondly,adoptingsuchanapproachwilltakethismonographbeyondabasicstudyofa neglectedgenreofAnglo-Saxonevidence,andtowardsafarwider-ranging investigation,whereinwemightpinpointmomentsatwhicheventsin Englandcorrelatedorcontrastedwiththoseinothersocieties,andaskwhy.

I.StateofResearch

LookingoutsideEnglandthereforerequiresthinkingbeyonditshistoriographicalboundaries.Here,however,theworkofthehistorianofpapal privilegesinEnglandbecomesnotchallenged,butvastlyenriched:the scaleofoutputinthis fieldisimmense.Foratleasttheearlymiddleages, thevastbulkofworkonpapaldocumentshasbeen,andremains, Germanophone.Itsrootsandmostsignificantadvanceslayinthesame ‘goldenage’ ofGermantextualscholarshipthatsawthegloryyearsof the MonumentaGermaniaeHistorica. ⁸ Takingoffinthelastdecadesof thenineteenthcenturyandstillenduringtothisday,multi-volumeprojects byGermanophonescholarsonpapaldocuments(Papsturkunden)have dominatedanddefinedthe fieldasitnowstands,intheformofregisters (Jaffé,1851;secondedition1885–8;thirdedition2016–;theGöttingen Academy’ s Pontificia series,1906–;the RegestaImperii ,1968–),critical editions(theGöttingen Papsturkunden series,1896–;theAustrian Academy’ s Papsturkunden896–1046,1984–9;the Monumenta itselffrom

⁸ Wood, ModernOrigins,pp.156–61.

the1890s),anddiplomaticmanuals.Whiletheseprojectsfedintoatradition ofgrand-typenarrativehistoriographythatreacheditsapogeeinthe mid-twentiethcentury,⁹ theyalsoappearedindialoguewithanumberof importantstudiesexploringlargelydiplomaticproblems,suchastheuse offormularybooks,thetechnologyandaestheticsofthedocuments (script,layout,writingsupports),andsuppositionsaboutpapalchancery organisation.¹⁰ QuitewhytheGermanhistoriographicaltraditionhas investedsomuchintopapalhistoryisnotself-evident,andoneshouldat leastbeconsciousofthepoliticalbackgroundthat firstsetthesegearsin motion.Althoughtherootsofaconfessionalisedscholarlypreoccupation abouttheroleofthepapacyinsacredhistorydatebacktothepublishing warsoftheReformation,¹¹theinstitutionalisationofmodernpapal historiography andwithit,theelevationof Papsturkunden toakindof canonicalstatusinthestudyofEuropeanlegalandconstitutionalhistory mustoweagooddealtoanumberofintersectingepisodesinlate nineteenth-centurystatecraft.Iftheprofessionalisationofthehistorical disciplineandthematurityofthe Monumenta anditsrelatedprojects werefuelledbycontemporaryGermannationalismandstate-building,the kindsofsubjectmatterandsourcematerialtheyprioritisedalsodepended uponimmediatedevelopmentsinconfessionalhighpolitics.Themodern birthofearlymedievalstudiesinGermanycannotbeviewedapartfromthe TakingofRomeanddissolutionofthePapalStatesin1870;theconclusion oftheFirstVaticanCouncilandtriumphofUltramontanismthatsameyear; theCatholicrevivalandPrussian-Vatican ‘culturewar’ ofthesubsequent decade;followedbytheopeningoftheVaticanArchivesin1882and,in consequence,thefoundationoftheGermanHistoricalInstituteatRomesix yearslater.¹²Wethereforeneedtobewaryofsomeofthestatistand confessionalbaggagethatthis fieldinevitablybrings.Lessobviously,one alsoneedstobeconsciousthatthepreoccupationofthat findesiècle generationofresearchersintheunravellingofthehiddenmysteriesofthe papalchancery,andintheediting,ordering,andregistrationofpapal documentsasanendinitself,wasinnosmallpartaprojectionofthe hyper-bureaucraticmentalitiesoftheirlatenineteenth-centurystate.¹³ Registers,editions,anddiplomaticanalysescan,anyway,onlytakeusso

⁹ Fuhrmann, ‘Papstgeschichtsschreibung’,pp.157–61;Noble, ‘Morbidity’,pp.506–11.

¹⁰ SeeabovealltheworkofPflugk-Harttung,Sickel,Kehr,Santifaller,andRabikauskas.

¹¹Fuhrmann, ‘Papstgeschichtsschreibung’,pp.143ff.

¹²Elze, ‘DeutscheHistorischeInstitut’;ClarkandKaiser,eds., CultureWars

¹³Mersiowsky, Urkunde,i,pp.25,29.

6

far.Withoutthem,modernscholarshiponpapalhistorywouldbe impossible.Butdefiningthesourcematerialisonlythebeginningofanalysis,andwemustnotfallintothetrapof fine-tuningandfetishisingthe criticaltextsof Papsturkunden attheexpenseoffurtherinterpretationand theapplicationofwiderhistoricalquestions somethingakintowhatMark Mersiowskyhascalledthe cartaedita,causa finita approachofcertain strandsofdiplomaticscholarship.¹⁴

Importantandwider-ranginginterpretiveworkonearliermedieval Papsturkunden hasneverthelessemergedinthelatestgenerationof Germanophonescholarship,muchofitaby-productofthosemorerecent institutionalefforts.SpecialiststudiesbyHans-HenningKortümandJochen Johrendt,togetherwithaseriesofcollectedvolumespublishedbythe GöttingenAcademyhavedemonstratedwhatscholarscanachievethrough atrans-regionalapproachtothisuniquecorpus.Thesehaveappliedquestionsaboutcommunication,memory,preservation,beneficiaryinfluence, andregionalidentityacrossthiscontinent-widebodyofevidence,witha viewinparticulartotheworldsofitsrecipients,ratherthanRome.¹⁵ This researchhasappearedalongsideasmallernumberofstudiesworkingwithin whathassometimesbeencalledthe ‘newdiplomatic’,andhasfocusedupon principallynon-verbalaspectsofpapalprivileges,analysingthemasmaterialartefactsandvisualinstrumentsofpower.¹ ⁶ Together,theseprojectshave indicatedhowmuchispossibleifweemancipate Papsturkunden fromthe confinesofspecialisttextualanalyses,thinkingofthemasmorethanjust evidencefortheadministrativecapacitiesofpapalRome.Thesestudieshave, however,entirelypassedoverEngland.Theremaybegoodreasonsforthis. Farfewerpapalprivileges(andnooriginals)survivefromearlymedieval England,makingitextremelydifficulttointegratethismaterialintothe relativelybig-datacomparativeanalyseswhichthesestudiessometimes prefer.Indeed,theEnglishevidenceiscomparablyweakestfromthelater ninthtoearlytwelfthcenturies,theperiodwithwhichthismostrecentwave ofscholarshiphaslargelyconcerneditself.Nevertheless:whateversensible researchconsiderationsmightliebehindthisgenerationalmoveawayfrom

¹⁴ Mersiowsky, ‘TowardsaReappraisal’,p.19(‘charteredited,caseclosed’).

¹⁵ Kortüm, ZurpäpstlichenUrkundensprache;Johrendt, Papsttum;Johrendt, ‘Empängereinfluß’ ; JohrendtandMüller,eds., RömischesZentrum;JohrendtandMüller,eds., Romunddie Regionen;HerbersandFleisch,eds., Erinnerung;Herbers,Engel,andLópezAlsina,eds., Das begrenztePapsttum;HerbersandJohrendt,eds., PapsttumunddasvielgestaltigteItalien;Große, ed., L’acte;HerbersandKönighaus,eds., VonOutremer;HerbersandMüller,eds., Lotharingien ¹⁶ Seebelow,Chapter2.

on 17 September 2023

theAnglo-papalevidence,itslong-termeffecthascertainlybeennegative.It hascementedatrendwithincontinentalworkontheearlymedievalpapacy thattreatsEnglandasamarginaloutsider,and,withinAnglo-Saxonstudies, donelittletoremedyareluctancetoengagewithnon-Anglophonedevelopmentsinpapalhistoriography.

Thesingleareainwhichscholarshiponearlymedievalpapalprivileges hasseriouslyexpandedbeyondtheconfinesofGerman-languagespecialist literature,meanwhile,hasbeenindedicatedstudiesof ‘exemption’ and ‘protection ’.Thistopichasseenimportantcontributionsoverthepast centuryfromscholarsacrossEuropeandNorthAmerica,coveringmaterial frombothAnglo-SaxonEnglandandcontinentalEurope.Thedocuments nowlabelledunderthesetermswereundoubtedlyimportant,andthisbook willturntothemonseveraloccasions.Nevertheless,thepredominanceof thissubjectacrossmuchofthescholarshiphasprobablyhadadistorting effectonwiderperceptionsofpapalprivilegesinearlymedievalEurope. Firstly:grantsofthiskindmadeuponlyonepartoftheprivilegesissuedby thepopes,whofromatleastthelatereighthcenturybecameincreasingly preoccupiedwithguaranteesforpre-existingchurchproperty.Focusingso muchattentionuponthesequiteparticularkindsofprivilegehastherefore perpetuatedafalseimpressionthat ‘papalprivileges’ wereessentiallysynonymouswithgrantsof ‘protection’/‘exemption’,anapproachthatsignificantlymisrepresentsthenatureofmostdocumentsactuallypetitioned fromRomeacrossthesecenturies.Secondly:thesestudiestypicallylean towardsapronouncedteleologicalposition,particularlyoneofalegalistconstitutionalistbent,somethingwhichcontinuestohauntmanymodern approachestoearlypapalhistory. ‘Protection’ and ‘exemption’ would emergeashighlyimportantlegalcategoriesinthecentralmiddleages, havingaparticularsignificance,forexample,inthehistoryofCluniac monasticism.Butinsearchingprimarilyforthe ‘growth’ or ‘origins’ of thesehigh-medievalphenomenaacrossearliercenturies,manystudies showonlylimitedconcernforearlymedievaldevelopmentsintheirown right,preferringinsteadtotracealinewhichculminatestowardstheir author’speriodofcoreinterest.EvenBarbaraRosenwein’sexcellent NegotiatingSpace (1999)betraysthistendency,beginningwithUrbanII’ s privilegingofClunyin1095,beforetracingacross150pagesthedevelopmentsleading towards thatpoint,andthenendingwithanexcursusonits implicationsfortheUnitedStatesConstitution.

Amidstallthis,dedicatedworkonpapalprivilegesinearlymedieval Englandhasnot flourished.Earlytwentieth-centurycontributionsmade

byGermanscholarsfromthe Monumenta school theearlymedieval sectionsofWaltherHoltzmann ’ s PapsturkundeninEngland (1930–52), andLevison’ s EnglandandtheContinent (1946) setanexceptionally highstandard,andtheirworkremainsindispensable.Whatfollowswill verymuchbeanexerciseinstandingongiants’ shoulders.Yetthesestudies remainnotjustunsurpassedbutalsonotsubstantiallydevelopedupon. TheGöttingenAcademy ’splanned AngliaPontificia projectcurrently sitsonhiatus.Morerecentpublicationssurveyingthepastandfutureof papaldocumentaryscholarshipseemalmosttomoveEnglandoutofthe picturealtogether,celebratingtheachievementsmadeoverthepastcentury instudyingpapaldocumentsatthe ‘ core ’ ofEurope(Italy,France, Germany),whilelookingforwardtofutureprogressinresearchonits ‘peripheries’ (Iberia,centralandeasternEurope,Scandinavia).¹⁷ Itmay notbetooearlytodetectparallelsheretothecurrentpoliticalmoodin Europe.ThisdisinclinationamongpapalspecialiststoengagewithEngland has,anyway,notalwaysbeencompensatedbyenthusiasmwithinAngloSaxonistscholarship.HansHubertAnton’sten-pagestudyof1975onthe authenticityofanumberofBede-eraEnglishprivilegesremainsperhapsthe mostcitedwork.¹⁸ TheBritishAcademy’ s Anglo-SaxonCharters series (1973–),whilemakinginvaluablecontributionsinthisarea,hasremained inconsistentfromvolumetovolumeastowhetherornottoincludepapal documentsaspartoftheEnglishdocumentarycorpus:whentheydoappear, theyhavesometimesbeenrelegatedtoappendiceswithmorelimitedcommentary.Thisisofcourseperfectlyreasonable,giventhatpapaldocuments didnotfallwithintheoriginalremitoftheBritishAcademyproject,which alreadyhasthetaskofcoveringalmosttwothousandEnglishcharters,writs, andwills.Butaresultofthisdividedtreatmentisthat,whileAnglo-Saxon charterscholarshiphasexplodedsincethe1970s,andatthesame timenumerousvolumesofbothtechnicalandinterpretiveworkhave appearedasaresultofwell-funded,institutionalisedcontinentalresearch on Papsturkunden ,thesetwostrandsofscholarshiphavenotonlylargely failedtointeract,buthavearguablybecomeincreasinglyalienatedfrom oneanother.Considering,asoutlinedabove,theimportantpotentialof papalprivilegesascomparativetools,thispartingofwayshasimplications beyondtherelativelynarrowworldofdiplomatic.Itmayhavehada detrimentaleffectuponhowbothAnglophoneandcontinentalscholars havebeenpreparedtosituateAnglo-SaxonEnglandwithinearlymedieval Europemoregenerally.

II.ThisBook:ScopeandStructure

Thismonographthereforesetsouttoexplorewhatwecanlearnfromthe survivingevidenceforpapalprivilegesinearlymedievalEngland.Itfully engageswiththeadvancesmadeinbothAnglo-Saxonstudiesandspecialist papalhistoriographyoverthepastcentury,whilealsousingtherare, Channel-crossingpotentialprivilegesoffertoinvestigatewhatinsights theymightgenerateaboutEnglandwithinthewiderEuropeanpicture.It worksonthebasicpremisethatweshouldnottreatpapaldocumentsin Englandseparatelyfromeitherthe ‘native’ Englishtextsamongwhichthey survive,northehugecorpusofalmost800papalprivilegesacquiredelsewhereacrosstheLatinwestthroughoutthissameperiod,ofwhichthey comprisedonlyasmallpart(seeTable1.1).¹⁹ Itdoessoontheconviction thatstudyingtheminisolationcreatesafalsedividethatmayhavemade littlesenseinlightofcontemporarypractices;thatsuchanapproachallows

Table1.1 AuthenticpapalprivilegesinwesternEurope,590–1073:thestateof theevidence

ItalyTransalpine Europe IberiaEngland

GregoryIto

SergiusI (590–701) 21 (18ofwhich GregoryI) 12–17 (7ofwhich GregoryI) 1 (only GregoryI) 6 (1ofwhich GregoryI) + 4deperdita

JohnVIto HadrianI (701–795) 1111–1202 +1deperditum

LeoIIIto JohnIX (795–900) 306424 +1deperditum

BenedictIVto GregoryV (900–999) 61106131–3 +1deperditum?

SilvesterIIto AlexanderII (999–1073) 210175237–8 +4deperdita

¹⁹ Table1.1: figuresforEnglandaretakenfromChapter3;thoseforelsewherearebasedon Santifaller, ‘Verwendung’,updatedbycurrentscholarship.Theaimofthistableissimplyto makeclearataglancethescaleanddistributionofthe known evidence.

ustogeneratenewobservations,connections,andcomparisonssofar overlooked;andthatitalsoprovidesamuchneededoccasiontobring togetherbodiesofscholarshiptraditionallydividedbetweenspecialist fields. Itaddressestextualissuesinthesourcematerialandestablishesapreliminarygroundworkforaworkablecorpusofauthenticallyearlymedievalpapal privilegesinEngland,buttreatsthisasawaytowardsaskingwiderandmore interestingquestions,ratherthanasanendinitself.Moreover,whileastudy ofthissizecanonlyaimtodoasmuchastofocusprincipallyuponEngland, itsexplorationsofwhatwemightgainfromtakingamoreregionalised, petitioner-focusedapproachtoengagementwiththepapacyinthisperiod will,Ihope,beofvaluetothoseworkingonotherpartsofEuropeaswell.In astill-relevantinterventionof1995,TomNoblecomplainedofthe ‘ morbidity’ ofmuchhistoricalwritingontheearlymedievalpapacywithin thewider fieldofearlymedievalstudies.Whateverthetransformationsof thelatterdisciplinesincethemid-twentiethcentury,muchworkwithin theformerhasremainedcommittedtotracingoutalinearnarrative, gearedaroundthegradualrealisationofa fixedpapal ‘idea’ alonga ‘series ofpolitical-diplomaticencounters’,ultimatelylookingforwardtoits supposedculminationunderInnocentIII(1198–1216)orBonifaceVIII (1294–1303).²⁰ Ifitisnowtruethatthiskindofmaster-narrativenolonger hasmanyadvocates,analternativeapproachhasyettotakeitsplace.This book,focusingupononeregion ’sengagementwithpapaldocumentary cultureatparticularmomentsacrosstheearlymiddleages andviewing thoseengagementsprimarilyfromtheperspectiveofthatregionalsociety, ratherthanaccordingtoanydevelopmentalnarrativeofthepapalcentre seekstocontributetoanewwayofwritinglong-formearlymedievalpapal historywhichmightchallengeatleastsomeofthe ‘moribund’ tendencies identifiedbyNoble.

Asforchronology,thisbookcoverstheperiodfrom c. 680upto1073: thatis,fromthepointaroundwhichourevidenceforauthenticmonastic privilegesintheEnglishkingdomsbegins,uptothedeathofAlexanderII (1061–73).AlthoughChapter3providesareviewofallgenuineandforged privilegesfromtheGregorianmissions(597–604)onwards,thethree authentictextsfromtheseearliestdecadespertaintotheorganisational effortsoftheconversion,atopicwhichhasalreadyenjoyedextensive treatment.Thestudyproperthereforecommenceswiththepontificateof

Agatho(678–81),whenwe firstseeEnglishmonasticleadersheadingto Rometoacquireprivilegesinperson.Endingat1073isamorearbitrary decision.Butastudyofthissizecoveringmorethanfourcenturieswould haveonlyalimitedusefulness,andthefactthatacquisitionsofprivilegesin EnglandfallsilentforagenerationfollowingtheendofAlexander’ spontificate,togetherwithitsroughproximitytotheNormanConquest,makesit anappropriatepointatwhichtobringthisearlymedievalinvestigationtoa close.Altogetherthisperiodgivesussixty-sevenpurportedprivilegesfrom theseventhtoeleventhcenturies,ofwhichjustunderhalfcanbeconsidered authentic.

Anecessarycaveat:thereislittlechancethatthis figureaccuratelyreflects thefullnumberofacquisitionswhichactuallytookplace.Historiansofthe earlymiddleagesarenowmoreattunedthanevertoproblemsofarchival lossesandhowtheymighthavewarpedourunderstandingofthepast.²¹ Northumbria’searlymedievalrecordshavecomedowntousinastateof especialdevastation,andinpartsofthisbookobservationsabout ‘England’ refermoreaccuratelytotheSouthumbrianpolities.Itisalsothecase,aswe willseeinChapter5,thatthedestructionandmutilationofdocuments couldoccurwithinacontemporarysettingthatwasfarfromaccidental. Nevertheless,thereisstillreasontobelievethatwhenitcomestopapal privileges,thesurvivingrecord,forallitsveryrealproblems,hasnot distortedourpictureofearlymedievalrealitybeyondallrecognition.²² Archivallossespredominantly,ifnotexclusively,affectephemera(e.g. lettersoftransitoryimportordeedsconcerningperishables),layorprivate charters(whichinAnglo-SaxonEnglandcouldberenderedinthevernacular,andthusespeciallyvulnerabletolaterdisposal),ormemorandaand othernotesofinformal,minorinterest.Bycontrast,earlymedievalpapal privilegeswereextraordinary,maybeevenquasi-sacraldocuments,whose veryacquisitioninvolvedfortheEnglishanenormousinvestmentoftime andresources,andwhichwereusuallygrantedwithperpetualvalidity. Meanwhile,althoughitistruethattwelfth-andthirteenth-centuryprocesses ofarchivalreorganisationwouldhaveledtothelossoratleastcorruptionof

²¹Brownetal ,eds., DocumentaryCulture;Whittow, ‘Sources’ ²²Cf.Koziol, Politics,pp.307ff.NotethatthecombinationofrelativelyliberalUKmetaldetectorlawswiththeunusualphenomenonofpapaldocumentshavingleadseals(bullae) meansthatwecan,uniquely,alsogetaveryloosepictureofpapaldocumentaryculturein Englandindependentofarchivaltraditions.Howevercrudethedata,itisstillnoteworthythatof the494 findsofloosemedieval bullae currentlylistedon PAS,onlytwopredatethetwelfth century:seebelow,Chapter3,p.79.

September 2023

12

manyoriginalpapaldocuments(seediscussioninChapter8),thiswillhave alsosavedmanyofthetextsfromoblivionduringtheReformation,when cartulariesandothermixed-mediacodiceshadamuchhigherchanceof survivalthanloose papalia.²³Somedestroyedorlostprivileges(deperdita) havealsolefttheirtraceinanumberofnarrativeworks,andevenfootprints inarchivesoverseas.Moreover,thefactthatthetenthcentury,theperiodfor whichourdocumentarysurvivalsare richest inAnglo-SaxonEngland,isalso whenourevidenceforpapalprivilegesis poorest suggeststhatcertain lacunaereflectmorethanjustarchivalaccidents.Overall,thereadermust remainascautiousaseverofacceptinganabsenceofevidenceasevidenceof absence.Butoursourcebaseissufficientlystrongforustothinkthat,in whatfollows,arguments about silencearemorethansimplyarguments from it.

Beforewegetstarted,it’simportanttobeclearastowhatwemeanby papalprivileges,asopposedtoother papalia.Wemaydefineapapal privilegerelativelywidelyinthisbookasanydocumentissued,orpurportingtohavebeenissued,inthenameofthebishopofRome,grantingor confirmingsomekindofspecialtreatmenttoaparticularnamedindividual and/orinstitution,usuallywithperpetualvalidity.Acrossthecontinental corpus,thesemightconcernrightsoverpropertyorpossessions,local economicarrangements,theuseofliturgicalvestments,rightsofappealto Rome,seatingarrangementsatcouncils,rightsofauthorityoverother personsorchurches,orconverselytheexclusionoftheauthorityof otherpersonsorchurches.Theyweredocumentswhich,aswithmost otherchartersordiplomas,wereperceivedashavingalimitedapplicability: whattheygrantedpertainedspecificallytothenamedbeneficiary,andwas notmeantasageneralruleforthechurchatlarge.(Inthisrespecttheydiffer fromwhatcanonistswouldlatercall ‘decretals’:literally,privilegessetoutan instanceof ‘privatelaw’—privalex ratherthangenerallaw.)²⁴ While sometimesambiguousandcertainlynotexclusive,theuseoftheterm priuilegium forthesepapaldocumentsiscontemporary,andalthough

²³Cheney, ‘SomeFeatures’.ReaderswhohaveusedanEnglishmedievalcartularywill, however,havenoticedthefrequenterasureorcancellationoftheword papa frommanyrubrics, probablytheresultofHenryVIII’sproclamationof9June1535, ‘tocauseallmannerprayers, orisons,rubrics,canonsinmassbooks,andallotherbooksusedinthechurches,whereinthe saidBishopofRomeisnamedorhispresumptuousandproudpompandauthoritypreferred, utterlytobeabolished,eradicated,anderasedout,andhisnameandmemorytobenevermore’ : TudorRoyalProclamations,ed.HughesandLarkin,i.15(mythankstoJennaGayleforthis reference).

²⁴ Santifaller, ‘Verwendung’,pp.22–33.

thesetextsweresubjecttowidevariation,theyneverthelessshowcertain consistentpatternsintheirstructure,wording,content,andexternalappearance.Thissuggeststhattheywouldhavebeenrecognisedatthetimeasa genreintheirownright.

Thisdefinitionisintentionally flexible.Thelaterdistinctionsmadebythe lawyersofthetwelfthcenturyonwards,between ‘solemn’ and ‘simple’ privileges,arenotusefulforstudyingtheseearliercenturies.²⁵ Nevertheless thisdefinitiondoesnotincludealloutputattributedtothepapalchancery, andonemustbeclearthatthisbookisnotconcernedwithpapaltextsin England intoto.Admonitorypapalletters,repliesonmattersofchurch disciplineororganisation,penitentialletters,synodaldecisions,orletters detailingRomanjudicialproceedingsarenotincludedhere.Admittedly,the dividinglinebetweenpapal ‘letters’ and ‘diplomas’ suchasprivilegesisnot clearcut,especiallysincepapaldocumentstypicallyassumedanepistolary form(‘XtoY,greetings...’ , ‘...Farewell’).InthisbookIfollowthedefinitionsetoutbyAchimThomasHackbetweenmedievallettersanddiplomas.Hackarguesthat,despitethelimitedcontemporaryvocabularyfor thedifferencebetweenthesetwocategories,thetypical ‘dialogue-character’ ofaletter(asopposedtotheone-way ‘declaratory’ styleofadiploma), togetherwiththeusualassumptioninaletterofaspatialandtherefore temporaldistancebetweensenderandrecipient(asopposedtotheimplicationofapublicgrantmadetoanimmediate,presentrecipientusually foundinadiploma)doesindicateagenuinedistinction,onewhichcontemporarieswouldhaveappreciated.²⁶ However,IdepartfromHackinacknowledgingthatthefunctionsandperceptionsofsuchtextscouldchangeover time,orbetweendifferentaudiences.Ifatextthathavemighthaveinitially fallenundertherubricofaletter(suchastheadmonitorymessageofone PopeJohntoanEaldormanÆlfric,orLeoIX’sremarkstoEdwardthe ConfessorconcerningExeter)cameinduecoursetobepreservedwithinan institution’sarchiveasawrittenguaranteeofitsspecialstatus,thenthat lettercouldindeed become adiplomaor ‘privilege’ intheeyesofsome, whateveritsoriginallyintendedgenreorpurpose.Insomecases,therefore, thedecisionstakeninthisbookastowhatquali fiesasa ‘privilege’ are necessarilysubjective.Yetthatsubjectivitymayitselfbehistorical,reflecting theprobabilitythat,tocontemporaries,whatdidandwhatdidnotqualifyas

²⁵ Frenz, Papsturkunden,pp.19–21.²⁶ Hack, Codex,i,pp.32–6.

apapal priuilegium maynothavealwaysfeltabsolutelyclear,andcouldwell havebecomecontested.

Thisbookfollowsabipartitestructure.PartIlaysthefoundations, looking firstattheimmediatesettingofpapalprivilegesinearlymedieval Europe,exploringhowtheywerepetitioned,drawn-up,conveyed,andthen introducedintotheirbeneficiaries’ regionalsocieties(Chapter2).Itthen turnstotheknowncorpusofprivilegesforEngland,establishingasfaras possibletheshapeandauthenticityofthesourcebaseuponwhichasustainedanalysismightrest,andintheprocessprovidingaworkinghandlist forthereader(Chapter3).PartIIconsistsoffourseparatestudiesofpapal privilegesatworkinfourdistinctperiodsofearlymedievalEngland.

Chapter4investigatesthesignificanceofahandfulofprivilegesacquired byEnglishbene ficiariesaroundtheturnoftheeighthcentury.Itconsiders theirimplicationsforcontemporaryconceptionsofmonasticandepiscopal space,whilealsosettingthesedocumentswithin(butalso,outsideof)a continentaldocumentaryculturebeginningin fifth-centuryProvence. Chapter5takestheformofamoreclose-focuscasestudy,investigating thewaysinwhichroyalmenandwomenofthe ‘MercianSupremacy’ sought tousepapalprivilegestosecuretheirownfamilialinheritance,andhow these initially,itseems,highlysuccessful effortswerelatersupressed, forgotten,andmisremembered.Chapter6turnstothelatertenth-century Cerdicing ‘KingdomoftheEnglish’,andaskswhyweseesuch little evidence forpapalprivilegesinthisemergingpolity,atjustthesametimeastheiruse wasproliferatingacrossmuchofthepost-Carolingianworld.Chapter7then lookstothelastdecadesofAnglo-SaxonEnglandandthecomingofthe NormanConquest,whenanewgenerationofecclesiasticssoughttoengage withtheearlyleadersofthepapalreformmovement.Toavoidasfaras possibletheimpositionofalinearnarrative,thesefourchapterseachtake theformofstand-alonestudies,althoughthereaderwillseethatthereare waysinwhichChapter7workslikesomethingofasequeltothatpreceding. Abookofthissizecanonlygoasfarastoexplorewhatwecanknowofthese documentswithintheirownimmediate,earlymedievalsetting,andneedsto drawthelineatinvestigatingatanylengththeirafterlifeinthehighmiddle ages.Wecannot,however,ignorethefactthatthechangingattitudesand practicesofthatperiodhadimportantimplicationsforourownaccesstothe earlierpast:abrief ‘coda’ thereforeaddressesthisissue(Chapter8),before some finalconcludingremarks(Chapter9).

GettingtoGripswithPapalPrivileges intheEarlyMiddleAges

Printedcriticaleditionsofearlymedievalpapalprivilegesdeceiveus.Intheir presentationofthesedocumentsasstraightforwardlegal acta,arrangedin sequentialorderunderamoderntypeface,theyrenderthemindistinguishablefromtheroutineadministrativeoutputofalatermedievalchancery, andreducedtosimple,bureaucratictextsinawaythatwouldhavemade littlesensetocontemporaries.Earlypapalprivilegeswerenotlikethat.In theiroriginalcontext,thearrivalofthesespectacularobjectsmarkedthe culminationofaremarkable,months-longprocess.Beforeallelse,papal privilegessignalledanevent.Formuchoftheearlymiddleages,their acquisitiondemandedareturnjourneyofperhapsoveronethousand milestothemajorculticcentreoftheLatinwest;personalsupplicationto thebishopofRomeforhisspecialfavour;andthepublicisingofhisgift, embodiedasametres-longscrollofEgyptianpapyrus,beforeanassemblyof dignitariesinone’shomeland.Themostrecentwaveofscholarshiponearly medievalchartershasstressedtheirimportanceasperformative,symbolicallychargedobjects.¹Yetthedegreetowhichtheprocessesofacquisition andproductionpeculiartoearlypapalprivilegeslentthemaspecialquality withinthiswidergenrehasgonelittleexplored.Thischapterthereforeseeks tointroducethereadertoearlymedievalpapalprivileges,notbyconjuring themoutofthinairasself-evidentdiplomaticcategory,butbyfollowing step-by-steptheroutetakenbytheirpetitioner-pilgrimstothepapalseeand back.Itspremiseisthatwecannotbegintostudythesedocumentswithin theirbeneficiaries’ homesocietiesuntilwe firstreconstructhowtheycame intoexistence,andinwhatmaterialform.Giventhepaucityofoursources, itisnecessarilywide-ranging,drawingonevidencefoundacrossEurope fromthesixthtoeleventhcenturies.Weneed,ofcourse,tobealerttothe ¹e.g.Rück, ‘Urkunde’;Keller, ‘Privilege’;Koziol, Politics;Mersiowsky, Urkunde