https://ebookmass.com/product/paul-and-the-resurrection-ofisrael-jews-former-gentiles-israelites-jason-a-staples/
Instant digital products (PDF, ePub, MOBI) ready for you
Download now and discover formats that fit your needs...
Nationalism and the Politicization of History in the Former Yugoslavia Gorana Ognjenovic
https://ebookmass.com/product/nationalism-and-the-politicization-ofhistory-in-the-former-yugoslavia-gorana-ognjenovic/
ebookmass.com
Jews of Iran: A Photographic Chronicle Hassan Sarbakhshian
https://ebookmass.com/product/jews-of-iran-a-photographic-chroniclehassan-sarbakhshian/
ebookmass.com
The Last Apostle : Resurrection William Hill
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-last-apostle-resurrection-williamhill/
ebookmass.com
The Caged Viking: Viking Navy SEALs, Book 8 Sandra Hill
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-caged-viking-viking-navy-sealsbook-8-sandra-hill/
ebookmass.com
Construction Project Organising Simon Addyman
https://ebookmass.com/product/construction-project-organising-simonaddyman/
ebookmass.com
The Student’s Guide to Social Neuroscience 2nd Edition, (Ebook PDF)
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-students-guide-to-socialneuroscience-2nd-edition-ebook-pdf/
ebookmass.com
Perpetrators of International Crimes: Theories, Methods, and Evidence Alette Smeulers (Editor)
https://ebookmass.com/product/perpetrators-of-international-crimestheories-methods-and-evidence-alette-smeulers-editor/
ebookmass.com
Key Concepts in Agriculture and Farming Hazem Shawky Fouda
https://ebookmass.com/product/key-concepts-in-agriculture-and-farminghazem-shawky-fouda/
ebookmass.com
Automotive Service: Inspection, Maintenance, Repair Book 6th Edition Tim Gilles
https://ebookmass.com/product/automotive-service-inspectionmaintenance-repair-book-6th-edition-tim-gilles/
ebookmass.com
Visions and Voice-Hearing in Medieval and Early Modern Contexts 1st ed. Edition Hilary Powell
https://ebookmass.com/product/visions-and-voice-hearing-in-medievaland-early-modern-contexts-1st-ed-edition-hilary-powell/
ebookmass.com
PaulandtheResurrectionofIsrael
ThegospelpromotedbyPaulhasformanygenerationsstirredpassionate debate.ThatgospelproclaimedequalsalvificaccesstoJewsandgentiles alike.Butonwhatbasis?Inmakingsenseofsucharemarkablestep forwardinreligioushistory,JasonStaplesreexaminestextsthathave proventhoroughlyresistanttoeasycomprehension.HetracesPaul’s inclusivetheologytoahiddenstrandofthinkingintheearlierstoryof Israel.PostexilicsouthernJudah,heargues,didnotsimplyappropriate theidentityofthefallennorthernkingdomofIsrael.Instead,Judah maintainedanotionof ‘Israel’ asreferringbothtothenorth and the ongoingrealityofabroad,pan-Israelitesensibilitytowhichthedescendantsofbothancientkingdomsbelonged.Paul’sconcomitantbelief wasthatnorthernIsrael’sexilemeantassimilationamongthenations –effectivelyapeople’sdeath – andthatitsrestorationparadoxically requiredgentileinclusiontoresurrectagreater ‘Israel’ fromthedead.
JasonA.StaplesisanassistantteachingprofessorintheDepartmentof PhilosophyandReligiousStudiesatNorthCarolinaStateUniversity. Heistheauthorof TheIdeaofIsraelinSecondTempleJudaism (CambridgeUniversityPress, )andofnumerousarticlesonthe themesofancientJudaismandearlyChristianity.
PaulandtheResurrectionofIsrael
Jews,FormerGentiles,Israelites
JASONA.STAPLES
NorthCarolinaStateUniversity
ShaftesburyRoad,Cambridge ,UnitedKingdom OneLibertyPlaza, thFloor,NewYork, ,USA WilliamstownRoad,PortMelbourne, ,Australia
–, rdFloor,Plot ,SplendorForum,JasolaDistrictCentre, NewDelhi – ,India
PenangRoad,#–/,VisioncrestCommercial,Singapore CambridgeUniversityPressispartofCambridgeUniversityPress&Assessment, adepartmentoftheUniversityofCambridge. WesharetheUniversity’smissiontocontributetosocietythroughthepursuitof education,learningandresearchatthehighestinternationallevelsofexcellence.
www.cambridge.org
Informationonthistitle: www.cambridge.org/
©JasonA.Staples
Thispublicationisincopyright.Subjecttostatutoryexceptionandtotheprovisions ofrelevantcollectivelicensingagreements,noreproductionofanypartmaytake placewithoutthewrittenpermissionofCambridgeUniversityPress&Assessment.
Firstpublished PrintedintheUnitedKingdombyTJBooksLimited,PadstowCornwall AcataloguerecordforthispublicationisavailablefromtheBritishLibrary.
ACataloging-in-PublicationdatarecordforthisbookisavailablefromtheLibraryofCongress
- Hardback
CambridgeUniversityPress&Assessmenthasnoresponsibilityforthepersistence oraccuracyofURLsforexternalorthird-partyinternetwebsitesreferredtointhis publicationanddoesnotguaranteethatanycontentonsuchwebsitesis,orwillremain, accurateorappropriate.
Tomywife,Kari Andmymother,Brenda
Theysupportedhishands
Oneononeside,oneontheother Sohishandswerefaithful.
Contents
ListofFigures page x
ListofTables xi
Preface xiii
Acknowledgments xvii
Introduction:Jews,FormerGentiles,Israelites
WhoArePaul’s(Former)Gentiles?
“AllIsraelWillBeSaved”
EmpiricalEthnicity?
TheAgendaofThisWork
Excursus:TheAudienceofPaul’sLetters
Excursus:TranslatingKeyTerminology
JewsorJudaeans?
TheGodofJewsOnly?
AnExperimentinCriticism:BeyondtheInsider/ OutsiderParadigm
TwoNationsunderGod:TheOtherIsraelites
TheGreatDivorce:IsraelandJudah
GreatExpectations:TheRestorationofIsraelandJudah
WilltheRealIsraelitesPleaseComeBack?
RevivalintheLandandIsrael’sOngoingExile
ThereandBackAgain:IsraelandRestorationEschatology
ReturnoftheKing:JesusandtheGospel
PaulandtheIsraelProblem
MinisterofaNewCovenant
TheNewCovenantandIsrael’sJusti fication
TheSpiritandtheNewCovenant
SpiritsinBondage:TheCurseoftheTorahand Israel’sInfidelity
SmokeontheMountain:TheLetterandtheVeil
TheCurseoftheTorah:Death(ByExile)
DeliverancefromtheAgeofWrath
TheIsraelProblemandtheGentiles
TheStumblingBlockofRomans –
ParadiseLost:JudgmentagainstImpietyandImmorality
TheDiscardedImage:Idolatry,Immorality,andthe KnowledgeofGod
PrideandPrejudice:IsraelandtheNationsunderSin
TheAbolitionofMan:God’sImpartialJustice
JusticeandMercyHaveKissed
CrimeandPunishment:ImpartialJudgmentforJews andGreeksAlike
SalvationthroughJusti fication:JewsandGentilesAlike
JewishIdentityandGod’sImpartiality
ThatHideousStrength:TheThreeTrapsofBelial
TheValueofCircumcision
TheHiddenJewBelongstoGod
CircumcisedJews,UncircumcisedIsraelites
DoingTorahbytheSpirit:GraceandWorks
RestorationviatheSpiritinRomans
“NotMyPeople”:Israel’sInfidelityandGod’sFidelity
“NotAllfromIsraelAreIsrael”
GodintheDock:Potter,Clay,andDivinePathos
God’sPatienceandDivinePathos
VesselsofWrath
“NotMyPeople,” EthnicMixture,andVesselsamong theNations
NotesfromtheUnderground:Dishonored VesselsRedeemed
HaveGentilesAttainedRighteousness?
TheBusinessofHeaven:RedemptiveReversal
God’sJusticeandtheEndoftheTorah
BringingtheMessiah:RighteousnessandRedemption
RighteousnessandRestorationintheTorah andProphets
TheYa _ hadasRighteousVanguardofIsrael
TheContingencyofIsrael’sRestoration
RepentanceandRestorationinRabbinicTraditions
TheGrandMiracle:DivinelyInitiatedJustness
TheOneWhoLives:MessiahandtheJustnessofGod
DivineDeadlifting:TheResurrectionoftheJustOne
TheJustOneandRedemptionfromtheCurseof theTorah
TheLogicofGalatians
ReconsideringaSo-calledAntithesis
He’stheMessiah!PledgingFealtytotheLivingLord
TheMysteryofIsrael’sSalvation
Disobedience,Mercy,andJealousy
JealousGod,JealousPeople
ImpartialJustice,MercytoAll
Jealousy,Not-My-People,andaNon-Nation
ConsecratedbyIncorporation
TheOliveTree
BrokenOffandGraftedIn
JudgmentandtheRemnant
Paul’sMysteryRevealed
AMysteriousSequence?
Paul’sMystery:TheFullnessoftheNations
“AllIsrael”:IsraelandJudah
SurprisedbyJoy:MercytoIsrael,MercytoAll
TheEndoftheMatter
TheLastBattle:Death,Resurrection,andtheVindication ofYHWH
Paul’sCoherentCore:Israel’sResurrection
Incorporation,NotSupersession
WhyNotCircumcision?
StrengthsofThisReading
ThePayoff:TheTaskDischarged
Bibliography
PrimarySourcesIndex
AuthorIndex
SubjectIndex
. JewsaspartofIsrael page
. Prophetic/sectarianviewofJewsandIsrael
Tables
. JewsandIsraelitesinJosephus page
. VesselsofwrathinLXXJeremiah : andRomans :
. Leviticus :bandPaul’scitations
. God’sjustness,theMessiah,and fidelity
. ParallelisminGalatians :–
. Ephraim’sseed:Thefullnessofthenations
Preface
IoftenimaginePaulineinterpretationasakintoputtingtogetherajigsaw puzzletobestrepresenttheimagesketchedoutbyPaul’sletters.AsIsee it,thedominantparadigmsforPaulineinterpretationhavetendedtostart byputtingthe “easy” pieces(e.g., “justi ficationbyfaith”)togetheronlyto discoverthatseveralseeminglyextraneouspiecesdon’tseemto fitthe reconstructedimageattheend.Romans and – haveprovenespeciallydiffi cultto fitintocommonparadigmsofPaul’stheology,withsome goingsofarastosuggestthatthesesectionsdonotinfactrepresentthe apostle’sthoughtorthatPaulwassimplyself-contradictory.Butinmy experience,whenafewpiecesremainonthetableattheend,itusually meanssomepartofthepuzzlehasbeenwronglyputtogether.Iwouldbe hesitanttoboardanairplaneafterlearningthatseveralpiecesfromthe insideoftheenginewerestilllayingontheground,regardlessofreassurancesfromtheairport’smechanicthattheysimplydidn’t fitwhenhewas rebuildingtheengine. Instead,afterdiscoveringthepiecesleftoutbythe reconstruction,theonlysolutionistopullthewholethingapartandstart anewbeginningby figuringoutwheretheproblematicpieces fitandthen buildingaroundthem.
Thisbookrepresentsmyattempttodoexactlythat.Ratherthan beginningfromconsensusparadigmsbuiltontheseeminglyeasierpassagesandthentryingtoaccountforwhycertainpassages fi tsopoorly, Ihavestartedfromwhatarewidelyregardedasthemostdif ficultand
WillTimminssimilarlycomparestheprocesstosolvingaRubik’scube: “evenasingle piecewhichremainsoutofplacebetraystheneedforanewsolution” (Romans and ChristianIdentity [], ).
anomaloussectionsofthePaulinecorpus.Theideaisthatbyestablishing theproperplacesforthemostdif ficultpieces,therestcanmoreeasily snapintoplacearoundthem.Ultimately,ifmyargumenthereiscorrect, thereasonthesedif ficultchaptershave fitsopoorlywithmodernreconstructionsofPaul’stheologyisthatthosemodernreconstructionshave builtonfaultyfoundationalassumptions,resultinginnumerousloose ends.Inotherwords,theprimaryprobleminPaulineinterpretationhas notbeenwhatwedon’tknow – it’sthatmuchofwhatwe’vethoughtwe knowisn’tso.
Ifthisisindeedthecase,oncethosedif ficultpiecesareproperlyplaced, manyotherpassageswillneedtobereexaminedinlightofwhatPaulis doinginthechaptersaddressedhere.Thus,althoughthisbookfocuses speci ficallyonPaul’sargumentsaboutIsrael,Torah,andthegospelina seriesofspecifi cpassages,itrepresentsanattempttolayafoundationfor anewandmorerobustparadigmforunderstandingPaul’slettersand gospelproclamationingeneral.(Althoughmyanalysisislimitedtothe sevenundisputedletters,inmyjudgmenttheframeworkproposedinthis studyappliesequallywelltotherestofthePaulinecorpus.)Bytheendof theprocess,myhopeisthatbyestablishingabetterfoundation,avariety ofspeci ficinsightsfrompreviousinterpretersmaybeseenfromadifferent andwideranglerevealingmorepiecesatonce,allowingthewholeelephantto finallycomeintoview.
Seeingfromawideranglealsorequiressteppingoutsidethenarrow worldofPaulinestudies,whichtoooftentreatstheapostleinnear isolationoronlyengageswithoutsidesourcesasfoilsagainstwhich Paul,theuniqueandoriginalthinker,isunderstood.ButthePauline lettersinvolvehighlycompressedandallusiveargumentsthatassume thereadersshareagreatdealoffoundationalcommonknowledge –knowledgemodernreadersdonottendtoshare.Arrivinglatetoa conversationmakesiteasytomisunderstandwhatisbeingsaiduntil othersexplainwhatwassaidearlierinthediscussion,andwhenreading Paul’sletters,wearehearingonlyonesideofaconversationthatbuilds onearlierdiscussionstowhichwehavenoaccess.ReadingthePauline corpusisthereforeakintotryingtounderstandameme-heavyexchange ontheInternet,potentiallyinscrutablewithoutsharedknowledgeofthe movies,television,orotherpopularmediareshapedandreappliedinnew contexts.IamthereforepersuadedthattounderstandPaul,onemust first endeavortoreconstructthatcommonfoundationasmuchaspossibleby immersingintheHebrewBible/LXXandothersourcematerialsfromthe SecondTempleperiod,preparingtorecognizethesubtle,complex
nuancesembeddedinseeminglystraightforwardstatements,thesimplicityinwhatmayinitiallyseemhopelesslycomplexorcontradictory.
Iendeavoredtoreconstructsomeofthatcorefoundationin TheIdea ofIsraelinSecondTempleJudaism (),ofwhichthisbookservesasa sequelvolume.Assuch,IamapproachingPaulnotasthoughhewerea whollyoriginalanduniqueindividualdisconnectedfromhistemporal andculturalfoundationbutratherasadistinctrepresentativeofearly Judaism – itselfanexceedinglydiversephenomenon – inthecontextof theearliestJesusmovement.ThisbookthereforeaimstoputPaulin conversationwithothersourcematerialfromtheSecondTempleperiod whilesimultaneouslyusingthatinformationtodelvedeeplyintothe exegesisofspeci ficPaulinepassages.
Theresultofthisapproachisthateachindividualchapterisbotha speci fic,self-containedargumentandanimportantfoundationstonefor thelargerargumentofthebook.Nevertheless,nosinglechapteror speci ficargumentisdeterminativeforthelargerargumentasawhole –onemight,forinstance,disagreewithmuchofmyanalysisofRom or Cor whilestillagreeingwiththelargerparadigmasawholeorviceversa.Consequently,thereadermostinterestedinthelargerthesiswill havetoworkthroughnumerousdetaileddiscussionsofspecificcases, sincethelargerparadigmIamproposingdependsonacumulativecase abouthowthevariouspiecesofthepuzzle fittogether.Ontheotherhand, thosemoreinterestedinmyreadingofaspeci ficchapterorpassagewill needtoconsidertherelationshipofthosespeci ficpartstothecomprehensiveargumentofthebook(andinsomecasesfoundationaldetailsfound intheprecedingvolume),asthecumulativeweightofotherpassages contributestotheplausibilityofsuchspecifi cs.
Intheinterestofreadability,Ihavenotattemptedtorepresentthefull rangeofscholarshiponthepassagesandsubjectmattercoveredinthis volume,letalonePaulinestudiesasawhole,andhaveinsteadlimitedmy engagementwithpreviousscholarshiptowhatseemednecessarytothe discussion.Ataneditoriallevel,IhavetranslatedallsubstantiveforeignlanguagequotesintoEnglish,providingtheoriginalquotationsincorrespondingfootnoteswhenthatseemedwarranted.Alltranslationsof ancientmaterialsaremyownexceptwherenoted.Ihavealsotransliteratedafewkeytermsfrequentlyusedinthebodytext(e.g., Ioudaios, ekklesia)tomakethebookmoreaccessiblebuthaveotherwiseretained
Cf.thesimilarcaveatsinJasonA.Staples, TheIdeaofIsraelinSecondTempleJudaism (),xiii;andE.P.Sanders, PaulandPalestinianJudaism (),xii.
GreekorHebrewcharactersinparentheticalreferencesorfootnotes.All citationsandabbreviationsfollow TheSBLHandbookofStyle, nded., thoughforeconomyIhaveeschewedthelong firstcitationwithfull publicationdatainfavorofabbreviatedtitleanddate,leavingother informationtothebibliography,withafewexceptionswheremoreinformationincontextwasdeemedpreferable.Abbreviationsnotincludedin the SBLHS followtheconventionsoftheirrespective fields.Allreferences totheHebrewBible/OldTestamentusetheHebrewversification(“ET” = Englishtranslation).Chapter ,whichsummarizesthethesisof TheIdea ofIsraelinSecondTempleJudaism,borrowsheavilyfromthatbook. PartsofChapters and includematerialthathaspreviouslyappearedin the JournalofBiblicalLiterature (“WhatDotheGentilesHavetoDo with ‘AllIsrael’?AFreshLookatRomans :–” [])and HarvardTheologicalReview (“VesselsofWrathandGod’sPathos: Potter/ClayImageryinRom :–” []).
Acknowledgments
Thisbookbeganwithideas firstformedandputforwardinWilliam L.Lyons’ HebrewBibleProphetsclass,andIamprofoundlythankfultoBillforallhisencouragementandhelpfulfeedbackoverthepast twodecades.Iamalsodeeplyindebtedtomy Doktorvater,BartEhrman, whosesupport,counsel,andgenerosityhavebeeninvaluableoverthe past fifteenyears.IamalsogratefultoDavidLevensonforhistraining andmentorshipwhenIwasatFloridaState – itturnsouttherewasindeed worklefttodoonPaulafterall!Thisbookalsomayneverhavecometo fruitionwithouttheearlyenthusiasmofthelateRobertJewett,who stronglyadvocatedfortheprojectfromwhichthisbookgrew.Bobwent outofhiswaytovouchfortheinitialinsightsofanascentprojectthat departedsosignifi cantlyfrompriorparadigms,volunteeredtobean outsidereaderofmydissertation,andcarvedouttimetodiscusscore conceptsintheearlystagesofmyresearch.Heexempli fiedkindness, gentleness,generosity,andbreadthofmind,andhedemonstratedhow touseseniorstatusandinfluencetobenefitthosewithless.Mayhis memorybeforablessing.
Iamdeeplyindebtedtothegenerosityofthosewhoreadandprovided valuablecritiquesandfeedbackofvariouspartsofthisbookatdifferent stages,especiallyStephenCarlson,PaulSloan,SonyaCronin,David Schroder,BenjaminL.White,LoganWilliams,andIsaacSoon.Paula Fredriksen’sgenerousfeedbackandencouragementoverthepastdecade –evenwhenwehavedisagreed – havemeantagreatdeal.Ialsoowe gratitudetoEibertTigchelaar,JoelMarcus,JodiMagness,Douglas Campbell,AnatheaPortier-Young,DavidLambert,ZlatkoPleše, JonathanBoyarin,andRossWagnerfortheircritiquesandsupport
throughearlystagesofthisproject.RichardHays,JamesCrenshaw,and Fr.RonOlszewskiweregenerousteacherswhoalsoinfluencedthisprojectinonewayoranother.IamdeeplyindebtedtoSvetlaSlaveva-Grif fin, KathrynStoddard,JohnMarincola,andFrancisCairns,whotaughtme toreadGreektextsanddomyowncarefullexicalworkratherthan merelytrustingalexiconandregurgitatingglosses.Inparticular,Cairns’ offhandcommentina Aeschylusseminaraboutthereciprocity inherenttotheword χάρις – asmallmomentIwillneverforget – significantlyimpactedmyunderstandingofPaul’sgospel.Otherlong-suffering soulswhohavetoleratedmyobsessionwiththissubjectandproved especiallyvaluableconversationpartnersduringwhatmusthaveseemed likeanunendingprojectincludeJasonCombs,T.J.Lang,Nathan Eubank,IsaacOliver,MichaelBarber,JamesTabor,MarkNanos,Scott Hahn,JohnKincaid,MarkGoodacre,DavidBurnett,MatthewGrey,Jim Hayes,Fr.Gregory(Joshua)Edwards,andTimCupery.
ThisbookgrewoutofmyPhDdissertationattheUniversityofNorth CarolinaatChapelHill,whereIwassupportedbyaJacobK.Javits FellowshipandaThomasS.andHelenBordaRoysterDissertation Fellowship.MostofthebookwaswrittenwhileinvisitingfacultypositionsatWakeForest,Duke,andNCState,andIamgratefultocolleaguesinthosedepartments(MichaelPendleburyandWilliamAdlerin particular)andforthebeneficenceofthelibrarystaffateachinstitution. IamalsogratefultomycolleaguesfromInsideCarolina,especiallyBuck SandersandBenSherman,whounderstoodthatthisprojectwasapriorityandwerepatientwhenmyoutputdiminishedattimesintheoffseason. ThanksalsotothemanywhohelpedmywifeandIstayafl oatafterour house firein andtoMichaelG.Scottforhelpwiththemanagement ofsuchalargeproject.LuisandLizMarquezalsosupportedthisproject inmorewaysthanone,andforthatIwillalwaysbegrateful.Thanksalso tothefullCambridgeUniversityPressteam,especiallyforthepatience andencouragementofBeatriceRehl,whosevisionofatwo-volume projectmadethisbookpossible.Twoanonymousreadersalsoprovided helpfulcritiquesthatimprovedthe finalproduct.Thede ficienciesthat remaininthisworkareofcoursemyownresponsibility.
Thisbookistheproductofmanyyearsofcommitment,support,and sacri ficefromfamily.Inadditiontoproducingmusicthathelpedfuellong hoursofwriting,mysisterStephanieandbrother-in-lawErikhavebeen supportiveinavarietyofways.Myfather,Mark,laidthefoundationof howIunderstandPaul’sgospelandremainsoneofthe finestteachersand brightestmindsIhaveeverencountered.Heplantedandcultivatedthe
seedsthathavegrownintothisbook,trainingmefromthebeginningto reexamineeverytraditionandquestioneveryinterpretation,nomatter how firmlyestablishedorwidelybelieved,inthequestfortruth.His readinesstorecognizeandadmithisownerrorsandlimitationsalsoset awonderfulexampleofhumility.Hissupporthasbeenunwaveringover theyears,andthisbookrepresentshistoilasmuchasmine – itwas possibleonlybecauseIamstandingonhisshoulders.
Finally,thisbookisdedicatedtothetwowomenwhoseprodigious effortsandsacrificesmadeitpossible.Mymother,Brenda,hassacrificed moretoensurethisbookwouldcometofruitionthanIeverimagined possible.Shehasgivenbeyondmeasure,andwhatevergoodcomesfrom thisbookshouldbecreditedtoheraccount.Thankyou,mom.Mywife, Kari,hastrulybeenmy γνήσιοςσύζυγος andhassharedinthetoil throughouttheprocess;hersupportneverwaveredevenwhensheknew followingthispathmeantsacri ficingluxurieslikeaconsistentpaycheck andretirementsavings.Themakingofmanybooksisendlessandexcessivestudyisexhausting,butsheismorepreciousthanlifeandherloveis strongerthandeath.Ihopeonedaytobeworthyofit.Maythisbook provealastingandvaluablecommemorationofthatlove.
Introduction
Jews,FormerGentiles,Israelites
ThereisneitherJewnorGreek,thereisneitherslavenorfree,thereisnotmaleand female,foryouarealloneinMessiahJesus.
AndthusallIsraelwillbesaved.
Galatians :
Romans :
Paul’sthoughtcontainsoneoverarchingdifficulty,andhehimselfwasawareofit: howdoesGod’srecentrevelationinChristrelatetohisformerrevelationstoIsrael?
E.P.Sanders
Alittleoveracenturyago,AlbertSchweitzersuggestedthatprovidingan explanationforhowasmallJewishsectproclaimingarabbifromthe backwatertownofNazarethtobethemessiahofIsraelsoquickly transitionedtoamovementprimarilyinvolvingnon-Jewswas “thegreat andstillundischargedtaskwhichconfrontsthoseengagedinthehistoricalstudyofprimitiveChristianity. ” “Theprimarytask,” Schweitzer says, “istode finethepositionofPaul,” theJewishteacherwhodeclared himself “apostleofnations/gentiles ” andinsistedontheinclusionof
E.P.Sanders, Paul:AVeryShortIntroduction (), . AlbertSchweitzer, PaulandHisInterpreters (),v.Further: “Thesystemofthe ApostletotheGentilesstandsoveragainsttheteachingofJesusassomethingofan entirelydifferentcharacter,anddoesnotcreatetheimpressionofhavingarisenoutofit. ButhowissuchanewcreationofChristianideas – andthatwithinabaretwoorthree decadesafterthedeathofJesus – atallconceivable? ... Thiswantofconnectionmusthave someexplanation” (vii).
Schweitzer, PaulandHisInterpreters,x.
Rom :;cf.Gal :–;Rom :, .SeeE.P.Sanders, “PatternsofReligioninPaul andRabbinicJudaism” ().
non-JewsasequalmembersinthecommunitiesofJesus-followers. Despitesigni ficantadvancesoverthepastcentury,thepositionofPaul hasremaineddif ficulttodefi neandhasbeenthesubjectofsigni ficant scholarlyreappraisalinrecentdecades.Paul’sdistinctiveinsistenceonthe inclusionofuncircumcised “gentiles” (thatis,non-Jews)asfullmembers ofcommunitiesdevotedtofollowingJesusasthemessiahofIsraelserved asakeypivotpointinthetransitionfromasmallJewishsecttothe primarilygentilemovementagenerationlater. Buttherationaleforthat inclusion – andhowit fitswithGod’splanforIsraelasPaulunderstands it – hascontinuedtoengenderconsiderableinquiryanddebate.
Thatisnottosaythatnoprogresshasbeenmade,asmuchthatcould betakenforgrantedinSchweitzer ’sdayhasbeenweighedandfound wanting.Forexample,evenagenerationago,mostscholarlyworkcould presumeatraditional(mostlyProtestant)viewinwhichPaulunderstood JesustohaveabolishedtheTorah,resultingintheuniversal “law-free ” messageof “justi ficationbyfaith” asopposedtoJewish “legalism ” or “works-righteousness ”– thatis,theideathatonemustobservetheTorah toachieveGod’sfavorthroughone’srighteousworks,ataskPaul allegedlyfoundonerousandimpossiblebeforehis “conversion” to “Christianity. ” Inthismodel,theinclusionofgentilesinthenew ChristiancommunityisthereforeanaturaloutgrowthofPaul’srealizationthatsalvationcouldnotbeachievedthroughobediencetothe Torah – whichChristabolished – butisinsteadfreelyavailabletoanyone whobelievesinChristwithoutregardforworks.Consequently,non-Jews nowhavethesameaccesstosalvationasJews,whose “legalism ” or “works-righteousness ” providesthefoilforPaul’suniversalmessage.In thismodel,Paul’snew “Christianreligion” hassuperseded “Judaism,”
Seetheexcursusattheendofthischapterfordiscussionofthedifficultiesinvolvedinthe translationoftheterms “Jews” and “gentiles.”
Forsummariesandassessmentsofsomeoftherecenttrendsinthisarea,seeMatthew Novenson, “WhitherthePaulwithinJudaism Schule?” ();MagnusZetterholm, “Paul withinJudaism” ();N.T.Wright, PaulandHisRecentInterpreters ();Wright, “PaulinCurrentAnglophoneScholarship” ();JohnM.G.Barclay, “Paul,Judaism, andtheJewishPeople” ();ChristopherZoccali, WhomGodHasCalled (); ChristineGerber, “BlickeaufPaulus” ();GuntherWenz, “OldPerspectiveson Paul” ();MagnusZetterholm, ApproachestoPaul ();MichaelF.Birdand PrestonM.Sprinkle, “JewishInterpretationofPaulintheLastThirtyYears” (). Foranolderbutstillrelevantsummaryoftheseissues,seeTerenceL.Donaldson, Pauland theGentiles (),esp. – “Judaism” isanotherproblematicterm,inpartbecauseofcenturiesofbaggageinwhichit hasservedtodescribethe(alleged)religiousorculturalcharacteristicsofJewsoverand againstChristianity.Butthetermisalsodifficultbecauseitisanabstractcategory
andthechurchhasbecomethe “trueIsrael,” effectivelyreplacingthe disobedientJewswhohaverefusedthegospel.
Thoughthisreadinghasbynomeansdisappeared,itcannolongerbe takenforgrantedbecauseofmanyfaultsfoundinitsfoundation – most notablyintheallegedoppositionbetween ”Jewishlegalism ” andPaul’s messageof “grace” and “justi ficationbyfaith.” First,asKristerStendahl famouslypointedoutin “PaulandtheIntrospectiveConscienceofthe West,” theapostlegivesnoindicationofhavinghadaguiltyconscienceor ofhavinghadanydif ficultykeepingtheTorah – aviewStendahlidenti fies ashavingderivedfromAugustineratherthanPaul.Instead,Paulhada “rather ‘robust’ conscience,” declaringthathehadbeen “blamelesswith respecttorighteousnesswhichisintheTorah” (Phil :)andcontinuing toemphasizetheimportanceofobediencethroughouthisletters,warning hishearersthatallwillreapwhattheyhavesown(Gal :–)andwillbe judgedbasedonworks( :–).ItisthereforeunlikelythatPaularrived atthedoctrineofjusti ficationbyfaithinoppositiontoobedienceto Torahandthenconcludedthatgentilescouldbeincludedonthatbasis. Then,evenmoresignifi cantly,E.P.Sanders’ landmark Pauland PalestinianJudaism ()demonstratedthatJewishbeliefandpractice inPaul’sdaydidnotresemblethetraditionallegalisticimagepresumedby Paulineinterpreters,making “works-righteousness” animplausiblefoil forPaul’sgospel. ThismorerobustunderstandingoftheJudaismof describingthecustoms,culture,andboundariesofaparticularsocialgroup(orsetof groups)andbecausethecharacteristicsof “Judaism” arevariegatedandencompassboth whatwouldtypicallybecalled “ethnic” and “religious” categoriestoday.Wherethat termappearsinthisstudy,itreferstocustoms,practices,andtheologicalperspectives commonamongthoseidentifiedas Ioudaioi intheSecondTempleperiod.Onthe difficultiesinherentintheterm “Judaism,” seeMichaelL.Satlow, “DefiningJudaism” ();Satlow, “AHistoryoftheJewsorJudaism?” ();SethSchwartz, “HowMany JudaismsWereThere?” ();andthediscussionintheexcursusattheendof thischapter.
SeeMarcelSimon, VerusIsrael (), –;DeniseKimberBuell, WhyThisNew Race? (), –. KristerStendahl, “TheApostlePaulandtheIntrospectiveConscienceoftheWest” (), ;arevisedEnglishversionofStendahl, “PaulusochSamvetet” ().
Sanderswasnotthe firsttochallengetheimageofJudaismasalegalistictheologyofmerit butratherbuiltontheworkofearlierscholarssuchasC.G.Montefiore, JudaismandSt. Paul ();GeorgeFootMoore, “ChristianWritersonJudaism” ();W.D.Davies, PaulandRabbinicJudaism ();SolomonSchechter, AspectsofRabbinicTheology ();andothers.MarkusBarth, Ephesians (), –,alsoanticipatesSanders’ moreextendedtreatmentinmanyrespects.Butwhereastheirprotestshadgonelargely unheeded,Sanderssynthesizedatourdeforcethatcouldnolongerbeignored,resulting
Paul’sdayledtoa “NewPerspective” onPaul’sgospel. Nevertheless, mostproponentsoftheNewPerspectivehavestilloperatedfromthe assumptionthatPaulmusthavefound something wrongwithJudaism, followingSandersinunderstandingPaulandJudaismasrepresentingtwo distinct “patternsofreligion. ” With “Jewishlegalism” nolongeran obviousfoil,manyhavesincerelocatedPaul’sobjectiontoJudaismfrom thesupposed rationale fortheinclusionofgentilestothe fact ofthe inclusionofgentilesitself.Thatis,PaulrejectedJewishinsistenceon ethnicidentityasanecessarycomponentofmembershipamongGod’s peopleinfavorofaraciallyinclusiveChristianityexempli fiedinhis declarationthat “inChrist,thereisneitherJewnorGreek” (Gal :). Essentially,ratherthanrejectinglegalism,Paul’sgospelisbased onarejectionofracism,andthecoreofhisgospelwas,inN.T.Wright’s words, “grace,notrace.” JamesD.G.Dunnexplains: FortheJudaismwhichfocuseditsidentitymostfullyintheTorah,andwhich founditselfunabletoseparateethnicidentityfromreligiousidentity,Paulandthe Gentilemissioninvolvedanirreparablebreach.
AtitshistoricheartChristianityisaprotest againstanyandeveryattemptto markoffsomeofGod’speopleasmoreholythanothers,asexclusivechannelsof divinegrace.
ThismodeldoeshavetheadvantageofnotsettingPaulagainstthe imaginaryandanachronisticbogeymanoflegalism,butitlacksone strengthofthetraditionalreading:aplausibleexplanationforPaul’s objectiontoethnocentrism.Instead,thisapproachsimplypresumesthat
inaparadigmshift.SeealsoDanielR.Langton, “TheMythofthe ‘TraditionalViewof Paul’” ().
JamesD.G.Dunnisusuallycreditedwithpopularizingtheterm “NewPerspectiveon Paul” inhis MansonMemorialLecture,publishedas “TheNewPerspectiveon Paul” (),thoughitwouldbemoreaccuratetocallitanewperspectiveonJudaism forPaulinestudies.SeethesummaryinMarkD.NanosandMagnusZetterholm,eds., PaulwithinJudaism (), –.
ThephrasecomesfromthesubtitleofSanders, PPJ.Elsewhere,Sanders(Paul,theLaw, andtheJewishPeople [], –)concludesthat “Paul’sbreak[withJudaism]is clearlyperceptible.”
E.g.,JamesD.G.Dunn, Jesus,Paul,andtheLaw (), –, –;N.T. Wright, TheClimaxoftheCovenant (), , , ;BruceW.Longenecker, EschatologyandtheCovenant (), –;DanielBoyarin, ARadicalJew ().
Wright, Climax,
JamesD.G.Dunn, ThePartingsoftheWaysbetweenChristianityandJudaism (), .
Dunn, ThePartingsoftheWays, –
Paul’sencounterwithJesusmusthavecausedhimtorealizethatopenness andinclusivenessareprimafaciesuperiortoexclusivityandparticularity, anunlikelyconclusionforaJewlivinginthe fi rst-centuryRomanEmpire. ItisalsohardlymerecoincidencethatagroupofWesternscholars fromthelatetwentiethcenturydiscoveredthatPaul’sgospelwasreally aboutinclusivenessandoppositiontoracism. “Inclusiveness” is,afterall, arguablythehighestvirtueinpostmodernWesternculture.TheNew Perspectivehasthereforeexchangedanantithesismoreathomeinthe sixteenthcentury(merit/grace)foronebettersuitedtothetwenty-first century(racism/inclusiveness). ByinterpretingPaul’smessageasthe gospelofinclusiveness, Paul’sinterpretershaveonceagainlookeddown thedeepwellofhistoryandseentheirownfacesreflectedbackatthem. Moreover,bytrading “legalism ” for “ethnocentrism,” muchNew Perspectivescholarshipironicallyandunfortunatelyrepresentsaretreat totheanti-Jewishtendenciesofpre-SchweitzerPaulinescholarship,effectivelyportrayingPaulastheenlightenedapostleofmodernliberalism, embracinginclusiveandprogressiveidealsoverandagainstaregressive Jewishparticularism.
DavidI.Starling, NotMyPeople:GentilesasExilesinPaulineHermeneutics (),
See,forexample,thediscussioninJacobNeusner, “WasRabbinicJudaismReally ‘Ethnic’?” (),
ThisimageisoftenassociatedwithSchweitzerbutinfactderivesfromGeorgeTyrrell, ChristianityattheCross-roads (), .
“MostscholarshiptakesasitsstartingpointthepositionthatIsraelintheJudaismofthat timeisethnic,buttheGospel,universal.ChristianityimprovedonJudaismbybringingto allthepeoplesoftheworldwhathadoriginallybeenkeptforonepeoplealone .The contrastbetweentheethnicJudaismandtheuniversalistChristianityderivesfromthe presentationofIsraelbytheapostlePaul” (JacobNeusner, “ThePremiseofPaul’sEthnic Israel” [], ).SeealsoMarkD.Nanos, “Introduction” (), –;Kathy Ehrensperger, ThatWeMayBeMutuallyEncouraged (), –.OntheantiJewishperspectivesofthepre-Schweitzerera,seeBarclay, “Paul,Judaism,andthe JewishPeople,” ;foranexample,seeFerdinandChristianBaur, TheChurch HistoryoftheFirstThreeCenturies (), ..SuchanimageofaprogressivePaul atoddswithregressive,racistJudaismisobviouslycoherentwiththeanti-Semiticzeitgeist leadinguptotheHolocaust,astheJewsweremalignedfortheirunwillingnesstoleave behindtheirJewishparticularitiesandfullyassimilateintotheirwidernationalsocieties, aswasexpectedupontheiremancipation.SeeStevenBeller, Antisemitism (), –; DavidJanSorkin, TheTransformationofGermanJewry, – (), –; JonathanM.Hess, “JewishEmancipationandthePoliticsofRace” ();Hess, Germans,Jews,andtheClaimsofModernity ();DavidLeeBrodbeck, Defining Deutschtum (), –.Foracloserlookathowmodernconcernshaveimposedon theinterpretationofRom –,seeKlausHaacker, “DasThemavonRömer – als ProblemderAuslegungsgeschicte” ().
