Skip to main content

Edoardo Valletta, Architecture Portfolio

Page 1

PORTFOLIO sel e c t ed wo r k

Edoardo Valletta


Edoardo Valletta

2


Selected work

CONTENTS

01 Saguaro Skin 02 Penna Brick Factory 03 Student City 04 Parco Pozzi Pavilions

3


Edoardo Valletta

01

Saguaro Skin, Amman

A cactus-inspired, self-shading facade for Amman, optimised for today and for 2080

Year

2026

Location

Amman, Jordan

Programme

Office building facade

Work type

Master’s thesis, in progress

Supervisor

Nicola Pisacane

Team size

1

Role

Concept, parametric modelling, optimisation

Software

Rhino, Grasshopper, Ladybug, Wallacei X

Axonometric view, recommended facade for 2080, context for illustration only

4


Selected work

0.30 m

glass

0.05 m

min

1.20 m

0.30 m

glass

How should a facade change between today’s climate and that of 2080? The test case is an elliptical, fully glazed office building in Amman, 42 by 26 m over six storeys. Under the SSP3-7.0 scenario, hours above 14 °C rise by about 16% by 2080 and hours below 10 °C fall by 50%.

max

min

max

0°

glass

30°

min

Ribbed cacti shade themselves: each rib shades the trough beside it, and areoles follow crossing spirals that draw a diamond lattice. The facade borrows both: ridges act as ribs along that lattice, deeper and more tilted where the sun is most harmful. Wallacei tunes them per climate, trading harm against sky view. Revit transfer is next.

max

4.60 m

25°

60°

5


Edoardo Valletta

Ladybug maps where the sun helps or harms the bare facade in each climate: the more harmful it is at a point, the closer R comes to 1. Each ridge reads R at its midpoint, and its depth and tilt follow. One rule, two facades: the third map shows where they differ.

Bare facade, 2011–2025

Bare facade, 2080

R map, 2011–2025

1

R, 2011–2025 0: least harmful sun 1: most harmful sun

0.5

0 N

W

S

E

N

R map, 2080

1

R, 2080 0: least harmful sun 1: most harmful sun

0.5

0 N

W

S

E

N

Change in R, 2080 minus 2011

+0.25

Change in R Red: higher R in 2080 Blue: lower R in 2080

0

−0.25 N

W

S

E

N

Harmful sun on the bare facade and depth map R with its change, 2011–2025 and 2080 Ladybug benefit sky matrix, 1.0 m grid, no surrounding context; R normalised per climate, shown on the 25° lattice

6


Selected work

Where the ridges deepen matters more than how much

Hours per year 2011–2025

Depth map (where)

61%

Genes (how much)

39%

2080, SSP3-7.0 5,817

Above 14 °C

−201 MWh

6,763 1,526

10 to 14 °C

Harm on the glass in the 2080 climate: 1,554 MWh with the 2011 facade, 1,353 MWh with the 2080 facade

1,291

Depth map: same genes, R map of 2080. Genes: minimum depth 0.20 to 0.25 m, maximum tilt 0 to 5°

1,417

Below 10 °C

Pareto fronts

Front 2011–2025 (259 designs)

Max light

2,500

Other designs explored

2,500

2,250

Harmful sun on the glass (MWh)

Front 2080 (259 designs)

706

2,250

2,000

2,000 Recommended, 2080

Recommended, 2080

1,750

1,750

1,500

1,500

1,250

1,250

1,000

1,000 Compromise, 2011

750 20

Compromise, 2011 750

Max protection 25

30

35

40

45

50

50

Sky view on the glass (%)

From today to 2080 the facade changes mostly in where its ridges deepen, less in how much: the genes barely move, and 61% of the gain comes from the depth map. The 2080 climate brings about 16% more harmful sun and 48% less useful sun; the 2080 facade cuts that harm by about 13%, about 95% of what the climate adds.

100

150

200

250

300

350

Useful sun on the glass (MWh)

Harm, same facade

+16%

Useful sun

−48%

2080 facade

−13% harm

Harm recovered

95%

From depth map

61%

Designs per front

259 / 259

Cross-climate test in 2011–2025 2011 facade

2080 facade

in 2080

1,343

1,554

MWh harm

MWh harm

275 MWh · 38.7%

144 MWh · 38.7%

1,181

1,353

MWh harm

MWh harm

236 MWh · 35.6%

126 MWh · 35.6%

Small figures: useful sun, sky view

Share of adaptation from depth map and genes, hours per year, Pareto fronts 2011–2025 and 2080, cross-climate test Radiation-based indicators, not energy simulation, no surrounding context; 2080 file: Future Weather Generator, SSP3-7.0

7


Edoardo Valletta

Self-shading Ridges

A Grasshopper definition turns the harmful sun on a bare facade into a lattice of ridges Grasshopper builds the lattice and ridges, Ladybug measures sun and sky view on the glass, and Wallacei searches four genes. Still to do: Rhino.Inside.Revit will carry the geometry into Revit.

01

Elliptical volume

Four genes, 6,384 possible facades. From today to 2080 the genes barely change: what moves is where the ridges deepen and tilt, up to 1.20 m and 5°.

02

42 × 26 m, six storeys

04

Ridges Depth and tilt follow R

Diamond lattice

03

Two per storey, 25 to 60°

05–06

Optimisation

Bare-facade harm, R 0 to 1

07

Wallacei X, two climates

Grasshopper definition, group 03 Rule 03, depth map Each ridge reads R, from 0 to 1, at its midpoint; R is normalised separately for each climate. Depth is Dmin + (Dmax − Dmin) · R and downward tilt θmax · R: ridges deepen and tilt where the bare facade receives the most harmful sun.

South elevation, recommended facade for 2080, 1:500

8

Depth map

Revit transfer Rhino.Inside.Revit, next step


Selected work

01 Elliptical volume

02 Diamond lattice

03 Depth map

04 Ridges

05 Harmful sun on glass

06 Wallacei X search

Max protection

Recommended, 2080

Max light

Genes

4

Combinations

6,384

Evaluations

2 × 1,600

Ridges

1,100

Ridge depth

0.25 to 1.20 m

Revit transfer

Next step

Genes along the 2080 front Min depth Max depth Max tilt Angle

0.30 m 0.05 m 1.20 m 0.30 m 30° 0° 60° 25°

25

30

35

40

45

Sky view on the glass (%), 259 designs on the 2080 front. Dashed line: recommended facade

Steps 01 to 06, three solutions along the 2080 front, genes along the front

9

50


Edoardo Valletta

02

Penna Brick Factory, Scicli

A ruined coastal brickworks becomes a civic centre, under a kinetic roof that shades a public agora

Year

2026

Location

Punta Pisciotto, Scicli, Sicily, Italy

Programme

Study hall, café, conference hall, public agora

Work type

Ideas competition “Reuse the Kiln”, Reuse Italy

Jury

Office Winhov, PARABASE, CMA, Graphisoft

Team size

2

Role

Concept, parametric and BIM modelling

Software

Rhino, Grasshopper, Ladybug, Rhino.Inside.Revit, Revit

Masterplan, 1:2000 0

50

100 m

10


Selected work

The new volume continues the extrusion of the kiln and keeps its tapered faces. Stretched at one end, it opens into a loggia; the rounded end of the upper floor is carved away for a terrace. Study hall and café occupy the first floor, conference hall and terrace the second floor.

Sicily is among the first Italian regions to face drought. A kinetic roof based on the Yoshimura fold spans the ruin as a covered agora: it opens at midday in summer to shade the masonry and the agora below, and closes in winter. Defined in Grasshopper, it reaches Revit through Rhino.Inside.Revit.

11


Edoardo Valletta

First floor, 1:500 0

10

20 m

12


Selected work

Second floor, 1:500 0

10

20 m

13


Edoardo Valletta

Terrace Conference hall Lift Circulation Services Café Study hall Cloakroom Garden maintenance

14


Selected work

A

A’

Keyplan

Perspective section A-A’

15


Edoardo Valletta

Kinetic Roof

A Yoshimura fold turns a single arc into a kinetic roof over the public agora Closed, the roof is 29 m long and casts no shade; open, it reaches 72.5 m and covers the agora. Grasshopper generates the geometry; Rhino.Inside.Revit maps it onto families built for the roof.

01

Arc array

One arc, repeated thirty times and folded by a Yoshimura pattern, becomes 203 triangular fabric panels, 337 beams and 135 joints, placed in Revit as parametric families.

02

Span 14 m, rise 2.5 m, 30 arcs

04–06

Solar radiation Summer: agora -51%, volume -81%

Yoshimura pattern

03

Alternate points, 8 divisions

07

Structure

203 triangular fabric panels

08–09

337 beams, 135 joints

Triangulation

Revit families Adaptive panels, beams, joints

Summer, no roof

Grasshopper definition, group 04 Rule 04, solar radiation The agora floor is divided into 1.0 m cells, each tested against a sky matrix from the Comiso weather file, with the ruin as context. The 203 fabric panels are the only change between the two runs: in summer the agora receives 51% less radiation and the new volume 81% less.

Summer, open roof

Incident radiation on the agora, no roof and open roof, summer Ladybug, Comiso TMYx, 1.0 m grid, fabric panels modelled as opaque

16


Selected work

01 Arc array

02 Yoshimura pattern

03 Triangulation

04 Summer, no roof

05 Summer, open roof

06 Winter, closed roof

07 Structure

08 Revit families, open

09 Revit families, closed

Span

14 m

Roof length

29 to 72.5 m

Fabric panels

203

Beams / joints

337 / 135

Agora, summer

−51%

Volume, summer

−81%

Steps 01 to 09, Revit schedule

17


Edoardo Valletta

03

Student City, Perugia

Student housing on a 0.60 m module, with a facade shaped by six cell depths

Year

2024

Location

Perugia, Italy

Programme

Student co-housing, canteen, coworking area

Work type

Academic work

Professor

Efisio Pitzalis

Team size

2

Role

Concept, parametric and BIM modelling

Software

Rhino, Grasshopper, Revit

South elevation, 1:500 0

10

20 m

18


Selected work

The building keeps the volume that stood on the site, redrawn on a 0.60 m module. On the main facade, cells take six depths, which gives it movement and forms the balconies. A reference plane follows the ground-floor facade: walls behind it are timber, walls on it get a double skin that is also the balustrade, walls beyond it are rendered.

19


Edoardo Valletta

Terrace Coworking area Connection Residence Common area Open-air theatre Canteen Service area

20


Selected work

+

=

reference plane

−

+ Render = Double skin A

− Timber battens

A’

Keyplan

Perspective section A-A’, vertical connection between residence, canteen and open-air theatre

21


Edoardo Valletta

Parametric Facade

A Grasshopper definition turns the former building’s facade into a grid of student cells Every dimension is a multiple of the 0.60 m module. The concept was developed in Rhino and Grasshopper, then completed in Revit: architectural elements, sections and elevations.

01

Rationalised volume

On the main facade, 36 residential cells project at six depths, all multiples of the 0.60 m structural module, from 0.60 to 3.60 m.

02

60 × 25 m, 24 m high

04

Residential cells 36 of 60 modules

Facade selection

03

Main face of the volume

05

Depth variation 6 depths, 0.60 m module

Grasshopper definition, overview Rule 05, depth variation Each residential cell takes one of six depths, multiples of the 0.60 m module. A seeded distribution sets the facade rhythm: changing the seed tests alternatives without breaking the module.

Grasshopper definition, group 05

22

Facade grid 5 × 12 = 60 modules

06

Extrusion and union Cells merged with volume


Selected work

01 Rationalised volume

02 Facade selection

03 Facade grid

04 Residential cells

05 Depth variation

06 Extrusion and union

Seed 12

Seed 46

Seed 77

Facade modules

60

Residential cells

36

Structural module

0.60 m

Depths

0.60 to 3.60 m

Depth options

6

Seed

77

Steps 01 to 06, iterations with seeds 12, 46 and 77, elevation of cell depths

23


Edoardo Valletta

04

Parco Pozzi Pavilions, Aversa

Two temporary timber pavilions invite a community back into a neglected public park

Year

2024

Location

Aversa, Italy

Programme

Exhibition pavilion, community pavilion

Work type

Academic work

Professor

Marco Borrelli

Team size

2

Role

BIM modelling

Software

Revit, Lumion

Site plan, 1:1000 0

25

50 m

24


Selected work

Exhibition pavilion

Community pavilion

Parco Pozzi is a neglected public park. Two timber pavilions invite the community back in: one, 35 m across, holds an exhibition on Daniel Spoerri; the other, 18 m, hosts talks and workshops. Inspired by Lina Ghotmeh’s Serpentine Pavilion 2023, their nine-sided plans gather shared tables around an open centre. Both were modelled in Revit.

Outdoor foyer Exhibition areas Circulation Social and workshop areas Community hall Pedestrian routes

25


Edoardo Valletta

B

A

B’

A’

Exhibition pavilion, plan, 1:500

Community pavilion, plan, 1:500

0

0

10 m

10 m

Exhibition pavilion, west elevation, 1:500

Community pavilion, west elevation, 1:500

0

0

10 m

10 m

Exhibition pavilion, section A-A’, 1:500

Community pavilion, section B-B’, 1:500

0

0

10 m

26

10 m


Selected work

27


Edoardo Valletta +39 327 718 9687 edoardo.valletta@icloud.com linkedin.com/in/edoardovalletta issuu.com/edoardovalletta


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Edoardo Valletta, Architecture Portfolio by edoardovalletta - Issuu