Paper For Above instruction
During the week of reporting, three courses were primarily covered: College Algebra, Survey of the United States History II, and Reading Skills Enrichment at college level. Each course had specific sub-topics, teaching methods, homework assignments, and time commitments that contributed to my understanding and performance.
In College Algebra, the session focused on fundamental algebraic concepts, such as quadratic equations, functions, and graphing techniques. The instructor primarily used the syllabus to structure lectures and engage students through interactive problem-solving. The homework required approximately four hours of study, emphasizing mastery of algebraic equations and functions, vital for my major. This course, located in room KOM 159 at 1:00 p.m., enrolls about 22 students and is a required three-credit-hour class. My engagement in this course reflects my recognition of its importance to my academic trajectory, which enhances my concentration and motivation.
Survey of the United States History II covered topics including the Civil Rights Movement, post-World War II economic developments, and modern political changes. Instruction was delivered via lectures grounded in the syllabus, with major emphasis on understanding historical contexts and critical analysis. Students are assigned reading homework, which takes around three hours weekly, with no written assignments but a quiz to assess comprehension. The class meets in room TODD 206 at 4:20 p.m., with approximately 25 students, also for three credit hours. This course deepens my knowledge of U.S. history, contributing to my academic goals and civic awareness.
The Reading Skills Enrichment course included sub-topics such as survey techniques, reading comprehension strategies, and vocabulary development. The instructor used the syllabus as a guide,
prompting active reading exercises within a scheduled 1:00 p.m. class attended by 17 students for three credit hours in KOM 126. I dedicated about three hours weekly to assignments aimed at improving my English reading and understanding capabilities, which additionally enhances my overall academic performance.
The factors influencing my coursework performance include the relevance of the courses to my major, which motivates sustained effort and focus. College Algebra directly supports my future career, making concentration more effortless. Reading Skills helps improve my language proficiency, critical for academic success, while U.S. History broadens my knowledge base, fostering cultural and historical awareness.
My background context notes that all these courses are required, carry three credit hours each, and are structured around scheduled classes and homework that reinforce learning. The classes are held in different rooms and times, with a typical enrollment of 17-25 students, fostering a collaborative yet focused learning environment.
The instructional methods employed involve the use of syllabi, structured lectures, readings, quizzes, and active engagement exercises. For example, in HRM 1101, theory of motivation is presented through real-life applications, promoting understanding of intrinsic and extrinsic motivators and their influence on performance and satisfaction. This approach aids in deepening my comprehension of complex motivational theories.
Regarding motivation, I personally observe instances of intrinsic motivation when engaging in activities that I find inherently satisfying, like solving algebraic problems or reading historical texts. Extrinsic motivation is apparent when I complete assignments to earn grades or praise from instructors. I often experience 'flow'—a state of deep focus and immersion—while actively solving problems or analyzing historical cases, which enhances my learning efficiency.
Understanding my motivators is crucial for future career success. Intrinsic motivators, such as curiosity and personal interest, drive sustained effort, while extrinsic rewards like grades and recognition reinforce engagement. Experiencing flow during challenging tasks fosters resilience and confidence, equipping me with the mental state necessary for tackling complex workplace problems.
Applying motivational theories in real-life scenarios improves how I manage and motivate others. For example, the Hierarchy of Needs explains that fulfilling basic needs first creates a foundation for higher-level motivation. Goal-Setting Theory emphasizes clear, challenging objectives to enhance
performance. Expectancy Theory suggests that believing effort leads to reward influences motivation. Operant Conditioning highlights reinforcement strategies, and Social Learning Theory underscores modeling behaviors to influence motivation.
As a future manager or coach, recognizing these theories through observation allows tailored approaches. For instance, addressing employee boredom with Zeke might involve increasing task variety or setting attainable goals, aligning with Goal-Setting Theory. Asking coaching questions such as, "What part of your work feels most engaging?" or "What goals would motivate you more?" helps identify personal drivers and adjust motivation strategies accordingly. Following-up to assess behavioral changes could involve regular check-ins or performance tracking.
In the case of Lilana, her diminished performance post-surgery indicates a need for intrinsic motivation support. She is likely experiencing physiological and emotional factors affecting her motivation, suggesting her motivation leans more toward the intrinsic side, influenced by her internal well-being and personal significance of her work (Gagné & Deci, 2005). The Self-Determination Theory, which distinguishes between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, best encapsulates her situation.
To support Lilana, coaching questions such as, "What aspects of your work do you still enjoy?" and "How can we modify your tasks to make them more manageable during recovery?" can foster autonomy and relatedness, thereby boosting her intrinsic motivation. These approaches align with the SDT framework, emphasizing the importance of competence, autonomy, and relatedness for fostering motivation. Furthermore, human resources influence organizational motivation by implementing policies and practices that foster engagement. For example, HR can develop recognition programs that reward desirable behaviors, or provide professional development opportunities that satisfy employees' growth needs (Kuvaas, 2006). Such initiatives motivate employees intrinsically and extrinsically by enhancing their sense of purpose and competence.
In conclusion, the course activities, motivational factors, and management approaches discussed reflect the importance of understanding behavioral drivers in academic and organizational settings. Developing awareness of intrinsic and extrinsic motivators, utilizing motivational theories, and applying supportive coaching strategies contribute to personal success and organizational effectiveness.
References
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-Determination Theory and Work Motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362.
Kuvaas, B. (2006). Work performance, affective commitment, and work motivation: The roles of pay administration and pay level. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 365-385.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Latham, G. P. (2007). Work motivation: History, theory, research, and practice. Sage publications.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (2011). The motivation to work. Transaction Publishers.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task features. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224-253.
