This course is all about Evaluationuse These Seven Questions To Carefu This course is all about EVALUATION Use these seven questions to carefully evaluate Context 1 and 2, and make sure that each of “Context” answer’s the seven questions clearly. 1. WHAT will you evaluate? 2. WHEN will you evaluate? 3. WHY will you evaluate? 4. WHO will evaluate? 5. WHOM will you evaluate? 6. WHERE will you evaluate? 7. HOW will you evaluate? Context 1: A diabetes education program for newly diagnosed diabetics at the Methodist Hospital in Atlanta has been running for the past 4 years. You have been approached to evaluate this program. Context 2: Insurance of Omaha implements a wellness program for its employees. It is a large work site with over 10,000 employees, and the program has been in existence for 5 years. You have been approached to evaluate this program.
Paper For Above instruction Evaluation is a fundamental process within public health and organizational settings that ensures programs achieve their intended outcomes and operate efficiently. When conducting an evaluation, it is crucial to approach the task systematically by addressing key questions that guide the process, ensuring clarity in objectives and methods. The seven questions—what, when, why, who will evaluate, whom to evaluate, where, and how—serve as a comprehensive framework for effective assessment. In the case of the diabetes education program at Methodist Hospital, the first step is to specify what will be evaluated. This includes assessing the program's effectiveness in improving patient knowledge, behavioral changes, and health outcomes among newly diagnosed diabetics. The evaluation period might coincide with key milestones, such as six months after program completion, or aligned with annual reviews, to measure short-term and sustained impacts. The purpose or why of this evaluation is to determine whether the program effectively meets its goals and identify areas for improvement. The evaluator—whether internal staff or external consultants—must be clearly identified, with considerations for expertise and objectivity. The target population—newly diagnosed diabetics—is central to whom the evaluation will focus on, and the geographic location is primarily within Atlanta, although health data might be compared across similar institutions for wider relevance. The evaluation methods could involve surveys, clinical data analysis, and interviews, employing both quantitative and qualitative techniques to gather comprehensive insights.