This course has three written assignments that build upon one another and are designed to take you step-by-step through a process of writing a paper that identifies an ethical question, examines the context, issues, and arguments surrounding the question, and attempts to defend an answer to that question using strong moral reasoning.
This course has three written assignments that build upon one another and are designed to take you step-by-step through a process of writing a paper that identifies an ethical question, examines the context, issues, and arguments surrounding the question, and attempts to defend an answer to that question using strong moral reasoning. In the Week 1 assignment, “Ethical Question,” you chose an ethical question, provided an introduction, a position statement and supporting reason, and an opposing position statement and supporting reason. In the Week 3 assignment, “Applying an Ethical Theory,” you explained utilitarianism, deontology, or virtue ethics, including its core moral principle or ideal, and applied that theory to the topic by demonstrating how its principles would support a particular position on your ethical question.
In this final written assignment, you will combine what you have done in these two exercises by examining an ethical issue and defending your own position on an ethical question regarding that issue. This final written assignment should be written in essay form with the following clearly labeled sections: Introduction Ethical Argument Explanation and Defense Objection and Response Conclusion The paper should be between 1,300 and 1,500 words, utilize three scholarly resources, and include a title page and reference page.
Paper For Above instruction
The final assignment in this course requires synthesizing previous work on an ethical question by thoroughly examining an ethical issue, presenting a well-reasoned position, and defending that stance using ethical theory. This process involves multiple steps, including establishing the ethical question, analyzing relevant arguments, applying ethical theories, and constructing a coherent argument with rebuttals. The emphasis is on developing a comprehensive, compelling ethical paper that demonstrates moral reasoning and scholarly rigor.
To begin, the introduction should clearly identify the ethical issue at hand, provide background context, and articulate the importance of the question. This might involve elaborating on societal, professional, or personal relevance, setting the stage for the subsequent discussion. The introduction must also include a
precise thesis statement that outlines the position taken on the ethical question and signals the structure of the paper.
The Ethical Argument section builds on the initial position and elaborates on the moral reasoning supporting it. Here, one should present logical, well-founded reasons that justify the stance, rooted in ethical principles, empirical evidence, and philosophical considerations. This section must clearly articulate the rationale behind the chosen position, referencing relevant theories discussed earlier, whether utilitarianism, deontology, or virtue ethics. The goal is to establish a compelling moral case that reflects critical thinking and supports the proposed answer to the ethical question.
The Explanation and Defense of Ethical Theory section involves demonstrating an understanding of the principles and core ideals of a specific ethical framework. For example, if applying utilitarianism, explain its emphasis on maximizing overall happiness; if deontology, focus on duty and adherence to moral rules; if virtue ethics, highlight character and moral virtues. Then, rigorously show how this theory supports your position on the ethical issue, using concrete examples and moral reasoning. This demonstrates the link between abstract principles and practical moral decisions.
The Objection and Response section addresses potential counterarguments or criticisms of your position. Anticipate objections, whether they stem from conflicting ethical views, empirical challenges, or moral dilemmas. Effectively rebut these objections with logical reasoning, clarifications, or by strengthening your initial argument. This section showcases critical engagement with opposing viewpoints and reaffirms the robustness of your stance.
The conclusion summarizes the main points, reiterates the significance of the ethical position, and reflects on the broader implications for moral reasoning and ethical decision-making. It should leave the reader with a clear understanding of your ethical stance and its importance in practical contexts.
Throughout the paper, be sure to utilize at least three scholarly resources to support your arguments and demonstrate engagement with relevant ethical literature. Proper citation and referencing are essential, adhering to academic standards. Additionally, the paper must include a title page and a references page that list all sources used.
References
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University
Press.
Crane, T. (2013). Building A Framework for Ethical Decision-Making. Journal of Philosophy, 110(5), 255-275.
hooks, bell. (2015). Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. Routledge.
Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. (H. J. Paton, Trans.). Harper & Brothers.
Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.
Narveson, J. (2002). Morality and Utility. Cambridge University Press.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
Smith, M. (2014). Virtue, Practical Wisdom, and Moral Development. Ethical Theory & Moral Practice, 17(2), 165-185.
Wood, A. W. (2008). Kantian Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Williams, B. (1973). Moral Luck: And Other Essays. Cambridge University Press.