This Are Two Separate Questionswith 100 Words Each1currently A For 1) Currently, a foreign-born naturalized citizen cannot be President or Vice President per the Constitution. Should this portion of the Constitution be amended? Why or why not? 2) One problem in the electoral process is campaign contributions. Where does that money come from? Why do people and organizations contribute thousands of dollars to candidates and political parties? Does money buy influence? Should it?
Paper For Above instruction The restriction that only native-born citizens can become President or Vice President, as outlined in the U.S. Constitution, has longstanding historical roots aimed at safeguarding national sovereignty and ensuring allegiance to the United States. However, in an increasingly diverse and globalized society, this clause may be considered outdated and exclusionary. Amending the Constitution to allow naturalized citizens to hold these high offices could reflect the country's evolving demographic reality and reinforce values of equality and fairness. Critics argue such an amendment might weaken national identity, yet supporters believe it would promote inclusivity and recognize the contributions of naturalized citizens. Ultimately, whether to amend this provision depends on balancing constitutional tradition with the principles of inclusion and equal opportunity. Campaign contributions represent a significant challenge to the integrity of the electoral process. Typically, this money originates from various sources, including individuals, corporations, political action committees (PACs), and interest groups. These entities contribute thousands of dollars to support candidates and political parties they believe align with their interests or policy goals. Many argue that substantial funding can buy influence, allowing donors to sway policy decisions or gain access to elected officials. This raises concerns about greater influence of wealthy donors over democracy and whether electoral outcomes truly reflect the will of the people. While some believe campaign finance reforms are necessary to ensure fairness, others contend that contributions are a form of free speech. The debate continues on whether money should play such a decisive role in politics. References Hasen, R. L. (2021). *Election Meltdown: Dirty Tricks, Distrust, and the Threat to American Democracy*. Yale University Press.