There Are Three Assignments Each Of Them Should Be At Lease One And A There are three assignments, each of them should be at least 1.5 pages long, at least 1.5 pages long. Times New Roman, 12, double spaced. Assignment 1 is attached in Extra1.zip Assignment 2: Find case "Cutter v Powell (Term Rep 320)" on Google, OR, Find any case related to "Discharge of contract" on Google, write a 1.5 pages paper, it should be a brief of the case, it should include FACTS, ISSUES AND DECISION. Assignment 3: Find any law case related to "breach of contract" on Google, write a 1.5 pages paper, it should be a brief of the case, it should include FACTS, ISSUES AND DECISION. 1.5 page is minimum, do not include anything like title, I just want the content.
Paper For Above instruction Assignment 1: (Note: As the actual content of the first assignment is attached separately in Extra1.zip, it is not included here in the response but should be completed as per the instructions and attached file.) Assignment 2: Case analysis of "Cutter v Powell" (Term Rep 320) The case of Cutter v Powell (1795) is a foundational decision in contract law concerning the discharge of contractual obligations. The facts of the case involve a maritime voyage contract where Cutter agreed to crew a ship owned by Powell for a specified period. Cutter's contract stipulated that he would serve for the entire voyage, but he died after completing part of the journey. Powell then refused to pay Cutter's estate, arguing that Cutter's incomplete performance did not warrant payment. The key issue in this case was whether partial performance of a contract was sufficient to enforce payment or whether full performance was a strict condition for payment. The court examined whether Cutter's death and partial service entitled his estate to compensation under the contract. It was argued that Cutter had not completed the voyage entirely, and thus, the employer was not obligated to pay in full. The court's decision emphasized the principle that contractual obligations need to be performed in full unless an agreement states otherwise. The court held that Cutter's service was incomplete at his death, and therefore, he was not entitled to the full payment stipulated in the contract. The case underscores the importance of complete performance in contractual obligations, especially in maritime contracts of that era. This decision continues to influence the understanding of conditions for discharge in contractual law, particularly emphasizing that partial performance generally does not trigger full contractual rights unless explicitly stipulated.