The assignment consists of picking a side whether you are for or against banning official authorities from using facial recognition The assignment consists of picking a side whether you are for or against banning official authorities from using facial recognition. Below I attached a sample of what the paper should look like and the guidelines that MUST be followed when writing this paper. I also attached readings to be used as the research for this paper that MUST be cited in the paper, these are to help pick aside. I do not mind which side is chosen whether it is for or against.
Paper For Above instruction Facial recognition technology has emerged as one of the most transformative tools in modern law enforcement and security sectors. Advocates argue that its deployment enhances public safety by aiding in the rapid identification of suspects, preventing crimes, and solving cold cases. Conversely, opponents assert that the technology infringes on individual privacy rights, leads to potential misuse and discrimination, and lacks sufficient regulation. This essay will argue that banning official authorities from using facial recognition is a necessary step to protect citizens’ privacy and prevent potential abuses, despite its potential benefits. The problematic aspects of facial recognition, including privacy violations, racial bias, and lack of oversight, outweigh its advantages. Supporting the Ban: Privacy and Civil Liberties The core concern against facial recognition is its threat to privacy and civil liberties. This technology allows authorities to monitor individuals without their consent or knowledge, effectively eroding personal privacy in public and private spaces. According to a report by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), facial recognition can be used for mass surveillance, infringing on the right to privacy guaranteed by the Constitution (ACLU, 2020). When law enforcement deploys these systems without strict oversight, it can lead to unwarranted surveillance, chilling effects on free speech, and the suppression of civil liberties. Furthermore, widespread use of facial recognition can lead to a 'surveillance society' where citizens feel constantly watched. This persistent monitoring could suppress dissent and activism, which are fundamental to democratic societies. Critics argue that until there are clear regulations and safeguards, authorities should be prohibited from using this technology to prevent infringing on rights that are essential to democracy.