Skip to main content

Seiics Compensation And Benefits Programs Are Based On Tradi

Page 1


Seiics Compensation And Benefits Programs Are Based On Traditional De

Seiics Compensation and Benefits Programs Are Based On Traditional De

SEIIC’s compensation and benefits programs are based on traditional design principles typical of a company of its age and history. For example, almost all employees receive annual pay increases of two to five percent. This is frustrating to both managers and high performing employees. Managers would like to give better pay raises to high performers. However, budgets are only enough to cover the “required” raises to all employees; this leaves too little for more significant raises to high performers.

Naturally, as a result, high performers who feel underpaid often seek other employment. The company’s policies have tended to reward seniority rather than performance, and because of the job evaluation system, compensation is tightly compressed. Benefits are thought to be generous in that the company pays for most of the cost. However, the structure of the benefits is rigid and only includes such traditional benefits as health insurance, life insurance, and a 401(k) plan. The company recognizes that things are changing in its business environment, the needs of its people are changing, and business is more global than in the past.

As part of the ongoing analysis of trends that should influence the redesign of HRM in the company, what are the relevant trends in compensation and benefits to which the company should pay the most attention to develop the kind of employees it needs and retain its most valuable performers? To answer this question, address the prompts: Evaluate at least three trends or recent approaches in compensation that SEIIC should consider in its redesign effort, including the pros and cons of each. Evaluate at least three trends or recent approaches in benefits that SEIIC should consider in its redesign effort, including the pros and cons of each. Assess other intrinsic and extrinsic motivators that SEIIC should consider in its redesign effort, including pros and cons of those motivators. Using your evaluation in the previous three sections (compensation, benefits, and intrinsic/extrinsic motivators), justify an action plan to develop and retain valuable performers in the organization must be 4 to 5 pages apa format and cite all sources.

Paper For Above instruction

In the context of modernized human resource management, Seiics’ traditional compensation and benefits strategies require a significant overhaul to align with emerging trends that foster motivation, retention, and performance enhancement. As the company recognizes the shifting landscape of global competition, technological advancements, and evolving employee expectations, understanding current trends in

compensation, benefits, and motivators becomes essential for creating a compelling value proposition for employees. This paper evaluates three recent approaches in compensation, three in benefits, and considers intrinsic and extrinsic motivators, proposing an integrated action plan to attract and retain high performers effectively.

Emerging Trends in Compensation

One significant trend is the adoption of **performance-based pay** systems, including individual and team incentives linked to measurable outcomes. Such systems motivate employees by aligning their efforts with organizational goals (Milkovich, Newman, & Gerhart, 2016). The pros include increased motivation for high performance, greater alignment with organizational objectives, and potential for higher productivity. However, a major con is the risk of fostering unhealthy competition, short-term focus, and possible perceptions of inequity if the performance metrics are poorly designed (Lawler, 2016).

Second, **pay for skills or competencies** is gaining popularity. This approach involves compensating employees based on their skill sets and proficiency levels rather than job titles, encouraging continuous learning and versatility (Gerhart & Rynes, 2018). Its advantages include a more flexible workforce capable of adapting to changing business needs, increased employee engagement, and fostering a culture of development. Conversely, it can lead to increased costs, complexity in managing skill assessments, and potential pay disparities (Cascio & Boudreau, 2016).

Third, the trend towards **variable pay and profit sharing** emphasizes sharing organizational success with employees, thus reinforcing commitment and a sense of ownership (Kaufman, 2015). This approach effectively boosts collaboration and collective effort but may introduce variability into compensation, which can decrease employees' financial stability and create dissatisfaction among those in less profitable periods (Youndt et al., 2014).

Recent Approaches in Benefits

In benefits, **flexible benefits plans** or cafeteria plans are increasingly prevalent, allowing employees to customize benefits according to their individual needs, including options such as wellness programs, childcare, or educational assistance (Bridgman, 2017). The merit of offering tailored benefits is higher employee satisfaction and retention, particularly among diverse employee groups. Nonetheless, administering such plans can be costly and administratively complex (Davis-Blake & Broschak, 2016).

Secondly, **enhanced health and wellness programs** are becoming critical, especially as organizations recognize the link between employee health and productivity (Goetzel & Ozminkowski, 2017). The pros include lower healthcare costs, reduced absenteeism, and improved morale. The negatives involve the substantial initial investment and privacy concerns associated with health data (Chapman, 2012).

Third, **global benefits portability**, such as maintaining consistent benefits for expatriates or mobile employees, supports globalization efforts (Brennan & Buchanan, 2018). Benefits like international health coverage or transferability reinforce company loyalty and global integration. Challenges include the high costs involved and the complexity of equitable benefit structures across regions (Dowling, Festing, & Engle, 2013).

Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivators

Intrinsic motivators, such as **sense of purpose**, **autonomy**, and **mastery**, are increasingly recognized for their role in fostering sustainable engagement beyond monetary incentives (Pink, 2009).

Pros include higher engagement levels, creativity, and retention of innovative talent. Cons are difficulty in measurement and the need for organizational culture adjustments.

Extrinsic motivators like **recognition programs**, **performance bonuses**, and **career advancement opportunities** provide immediate reinforcement and are relatively easier to implement (Deci & Ryan, 2017). These motivators can quickly boost morale but may diminish intrinsic motivation if overused or misaligned with employee values (Gagné & Deci, 2005).

An integrated approach combining intrinsic motivators, such as empowering employees through meaningful work, with extrinsic benefits like timely recognition, creates a balanced motivational framework conducive to high performance (Ryan & Deci, 2017).

Action Plan for Developing and Retaining Top Performers

Based on the evaluations, Seiics should prioritize implementing a **performance-based compensation system** that rewards high performers and aligns with organizational objectives, complemented by a **flexible benefits plan** tailored to diverse employee needs. The company must also foster intrinsic motivators by promoting purpose-driven work and autonomy, alongside recognition programs that reinforce employees' contributions.

First, developing clear, measurable performance metrics and transparent appraisal processes will ensure

fairness and motivate employees to excel. Concurrently, introducing flexible benefits like wellness programs, skill development stipends, and international benefit portability will enhance job satisfaction and loyalty. To cultivate intrinsic motivation, leadership should emphasize organizational purpose, provide opportunities for mastery and skill-building, and recognize achievements regularly.

In conclusion, Seiics can transform its HR practices by integrating modern compensation, benefits, and motivators, which collectively will foster a high-performance culture resistant to turnover and capable of sustaining competitive advantage. The implementation should be phased, with ongoing evaluation and adjustments based on feedback and organizational needs.

References

Brennan, L., & Buchanan, D. (2018). Global HRM strategies and expatriate management. Human Resource Management Review, 28(3), 254-263.

Chapman, L. S. (2012). Meta-evaluation of workplace health promotion programs. American Journal of Health Promotion, 26(4), 230-242.

Cascio, W. F., & Boudreau, J. W. (2016). The search for global competence: From international HR to talent management. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 103-114.

Davis-Blake, A., & Broschak, J. P. (2016). Managing disadvantages in staffing: The case of contingent workers. Journal of Management, 29(5), 681-703.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.

Dowling, P. J., Festing, M., & Engle, A. D. (2013). International human resource management. Cengage Learning.

Gerhart, B., & Rynes, S. L. (2018). Compensation: Theory, evidence, and strategic implications. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 138, 1-17.

Goetzel, R. Z., & Ozminkowski, R. J. (2017). The health and productivity cost-benefit rationale for health promotion and disease management programs. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 58(3), 254-259.

Kaufman, B. E. (2015). The realignment of compensation strategy: Insights from history. Compensation &

Benefits Review, 47(3), 132-137.

Lawler, E. E. (2016). Rewarding excellence: Pay strategies for the new economy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Milkovich, G. T., Newman, J. M., & Gerhart, B. (2016). Compensation. McGraw-Hill Education.

Pink, D. H. (2009). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. Riverhead Books.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.

Youndt, M. A., Snell, S. A., Dean, J. W., & Lepak, D. P. (2014). Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance. Journal of Management, 33(4), 564-590.

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook