Scholarly Research Journal for Humanity Science & English Language, Online ISSN 2348-3083, SJIF 2016 = 4.44, www.srjis.com UGC Approved Sr. No.48612, AUG-SEPT 2017, VOL- 4/23 https://doi.org/10.21922/srjhsel.v4i23.9636
PERCEPTION OF STUDENTS TOWARDS EFFECTIVE TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A MIXED ANALYSIS APPROACH Indu Bala1 & Franky Rani2 1
Research Scholar, Department of Education, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab,
India 2
Assistant Professor (Supervisor) Department of Education, Guru Nanak Dev University,
Amritsar, Punjab, India Abstract Higher education is the source or feeder system in all works of life and therefore supplies the muchneeded human resources in management, planning, designing, teaching and research. Scientific and technological advancements and economic growth of a country are as dependent on higher education system. This paper presents an investigation carried out to determine the perception of students regarding effective teaching in higher education. The research was conducted using data, collected from 100 participants of Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar. A mixed analysis approach was used that includes both the qualitative as well as quantitative methods for data analysis. The findings of the study qualitatively showed that the gender wise overall 69% female students and 55% male students, Qualification wise 82% undergraduate students and 83% post-graduate students and the stream wise 59% arts, 59% science and 58% commerce students agree with the effective teaching in higher education. Further the results were strengthened by using quantitative data analysis. Quantitatively t-test was conducted on the data to verify the perception of participants and the results reveal that there is significant difference between the perceptions of the male and female student towards effective teaching in Higher education. Moreover, there is no significant difference of student’s perception on the basis of their academic qualification and streams towards effective teaching in higher education. Keywords: Perception, Effective Teaching, Higher Education
Scholarly Research Journal's is licensed Based on a work at www.srjis.com INTRODUCTION A sound higher education system plays an imperative role in the economic development and progress of a country. Higher education, in terms of its importance and consequence, enjoys a considerable position in the education system as it provides the people with recent acquaintance, advancements and skills to be advantageously employed. India has one of the third largest systems of higher education in the world which offers the provision of education and preparation in almost all aspects of human originality, creativity, training and logicalrational undertaking (Sudha, 2013). The Kothari Commission (1966) stated the following roles of the higher education institutions in the modern society Copyright Š 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Indu Bala & Franky Rani
(Pg. 5942-5954) 5943
1. To look and inform for new knowledge, also to engage enthusiastically and confidently in the search of truth, and to recreate the old knowledge and thinking in the light of new activities and searches; 2. To support the quality and social integrity, and to reduce social cultural differences through communication of education 3. To promote the teachers and students towards society generally, the attitudes and ethics needed for developing the “good life” in individuals and society (Government Of India, 1968). Effective Teaching is most central part in higher education because it helps in student learning. Teaching is being seen as progressively more significant in relation to one of the research goals of higher education system. In 2006, the Canadian Council of Learning held in Canada to set up apparent, rational, and consistent goals for post-secondary education, many of which imitate on the quality of teaching and learning (Cappon, 2006). Indian higher education suffers quality as well as quantity challenges and also the crisis like shortage of high quality teachers (Bhushan, 2009; Kamran, 2004). Higher education in India was plagued with poor technology, infrastructure and human resources especially the skilful and competent teachers (Bora, 2012; Komow, Khanna, Raghav and Sharma, 2012; Roy, 2007; Singh, 2009). The emphasis should be given on quality improvement in classroom facilities, curriculum development, teacher effectiveness and role of the community and the stakeholders (Chauhan, 2016; Kaur, 2015; Thamarasseri, 2016). The effective teaching in a changing higher education context and teaching excellence requires sound knowledge of one’s discipline and adds that excellent teachers are those who know how to convey concepts and how to help the students to overcome their learning difficulties. The understanding of effective teaching is important to ensure the quality of university teaching and learning and the ways in which teaching should be practised in the multiple overlapping contexts (Allan, Clarke and Jopling, 2009; Kreber, 2002; Samarawickrema, 2009). The appropriate teaching skills and practices in higher education settings require a good grasp of subject matter and knowing how to present it to students, thus emphasizing knowledge and presentation (Stephanou and Kyridis, 2012). Also, the teaching effectiveness to know that how well students learn the criterion, the students with four different instructional settings: Business, Sociology, Education, and Physical Education and identified five attributes of effective teacher: commitment to learners; recent knowledge of the material; organization and management of the classroom environment; their own will Copyright © 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Indu Bala & Franky Rani
(Pg. 5942-5954) 5944
power to improve; and collaboration of work with others concluded that exemplary university teaching is discernable and the quality of components that define it can be assessed (Saroyan, and Amundsen, 2004). The significant relationship between the students’ attitude towards mathematics and teacher’s knowledge of Mathematics content, communication ability and use of appropriate teaching strategies and classroom management skills has been seen. It has been also concluded that when the student’s perception of their teacher’s characteristics is low, then the student’s attitude towards mathematics tends to be negative (Ampadu, 2012; Etuk, Maria, Afangideh and Asukwo, 2013). METHODOLOGY 2.1 Objectives 1. To analyse the perception of students towards effective teaching in higher education on the basis of followings: 1. Gender 2. Qualification 3. Streams 2. To compare the mean scores of perception of male and female students towards effective teaching in higher education. 3. To compare the mean scores of perception of under graduate and post graduate students towards effective teaching in higher education. 4. To compare the mean scores of perception of arts, science and commerce students towards effective teaching in higher education. 2.2 Hypotheses H1: There is no significant difference between the perception of male and female students towards effective teaching in higher education. H2: There is no significant difference between the perception of under graduate and post graduate students towards effective teaching in higher education. H3: There is no significant difference between the perception of arts, science and commerce student towards effective teaching in higher education. 2.3 Delimitations of the Study The present study is delimited to the Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar only. 2.4 Research Methodology The present study comes under the domain of descriptive research. Copyright © 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Indu Bala & Franky Rani
(Pg. 5942-5954) 5945
2.5 Sample A sample of 100 students was taken from Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar. All participants were students of higher education. 2.6 Research Tool A Questionnaire with 25 statements was used to study the student’s perception of effective teaching towards higher education (To be prepared by the investigator). All the statements are positive in nature. The response pattern was designed as follows to record student’s perception: 1. In case of agreement showing satisfaction (Yes) and assigned the number 1. 2. In case of disagreement showing dissatisfaction (No) and assigned the number 0. 2.7 Statistical Techniques A mixed analysis approach includes both the qualitative as well as quantitative methods were used for the analysis of data. Qualitative analysis carried out by using the response analysis method and Quantitatively the Statistical techniques like: Mean, Standard Deviation, t-test and ANOVA were used to analyse the data. RESULTS 3.1 Analysis and Interpretation of Data Objective-I To analyse the perception of students towards effective teaching in higher education on the basis of followings: a) Gender The perception of male and female students towards effective teaching in higher education have been analysed and presented in following table and graph: Table 3.1: Percentage Analysis of Perception of male and female students towards Effective Teaching in Higher Education (N (100) = 50 Female & 50 Male) Sr No.
Statements
Female Ye % s a (N g ) e
N o ( N ) 06
% a g e
Male (N) Ye % s ag (N e )
Teachers encourage me to look for 44 8 1 38 links between the different units of 8 2 the course. Teachers provide handouts and other 48 9 02 4 46 2 materials to understand the unit. 6 Teachers encourage me to rethink 47 9 03 6 45 3 my understanding of some aspects of 4 Copyright © 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies 1
N o (N )
% ag e
76
12
24
92
04
08
90
05
10
Indu Bala & Franky Rani
(Pg. 5942-5954) 5946
4
5
6 7
8
9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
the course Teachers provide plenty of examples and illustrations to help me to grasp things better Teachers structure and present the unit content in ways that help me to understand Teachers show genuine concern for student progress and needs Teachers having skill at developing a class atmosphere conducive to learning Teachers have good manner (e.g. friendly, helpful, professional, enthusiastic) Teachers explain how knowledge is developed in the particular subject Teachers discuss recent developments in the field of the course Teachers emphasize conceptual understanding Teachers try to share his/her enthusiasm about the course with us Teachers patient in explaining things which seemed difficult to grasp Teachers set tasks that are useful as learning experiences Teachers show genuine interest in improving his/her teaching Teachers help me to see how I am supposed to think and reach conclusions in the course Teachers give feedback to improve my ways of learning and studying Teachers give me the support I needed to complete the set work for the unit Teachers give lectures that are easy to outline Teachers are careful and precise in answering questions Teachers encourage class discussion Teachers state objectives for each class session Teachers invite students to share their knowledge and experiences Teachers invite criticism of his/her own ideas Teachers have interest and concern in the quality of his/her teaching
40
8 0
10
2 0
34
68
16
32
30
6 0
20
4 0
21
42
29
58
42
8 4 6 4
08
1 6 3 6
40
80
10
20
28
56
22
44
22
4 4
28
5 6
25
50
25
50
25
5 0 8 6
25
5 0 1 4
11
22
39
78
39
78
11
22
6 0 7 8 8 4 4 0 8 0 6 0
20
4 0 2 2 1 6 6 0 2 0 4 0
16
32
34
68
36
72
14
28
42
84
08
16
08
16
42
84
30
60
20
40
14
28
36
72
2 0 6 4
40
8 0 3 6
04
08
46
92
20
40
30
60
9 2 9 2 8 0 4 0 7 0 2 0 9 8
04
0 8 0 8 2 0 6 0 3 0 8 0 0 2
48
96
02
04
44
88
06
12
40
80
10
20
05
10
45
90
10
20
40
80
01
02
49
98
45
90
05
10
32
43
30 39 42 20 40 30
10 32
46 46 40 20 35 10 49
18
07
11 08 30 10 20
18
04 10 30 15 40 01
Copyright Š 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Indu Bala & Franky Rani
(Pg. 5942-5954) 5947
Perception Percentage
Percentage Analysis of Perception of Male & Female Students 100 80 60 40 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1-25 Statements Female
Male
Figure (a): Percentage Analysis of Perception of male and female students towards Effective Teaching in Higher Education It is clear from the above table 3.1 and figure (a) which are showing that male and female student’s perception differs towards effective teaching in higher education. The statements according to their number in the questionnaire are 4, 5, 9, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 22, 23, and 24 showing most of the difference in the perceptions of both male and female students. The female students showed effective perception than the male students in these statements that are 4) 80% female students and 68% male students agree that teachers provide plenty of examples and illustrations to help students to grasp things better, 5) the 60% female students said that teachers structure and present the unit content in ways that help students to understand, 9) again 50% female students agree that teachers explain how knowledge is developed in a particular subject whereas only 22% male students are agree with this, 11) the 60% female students and 32% male students agree with the teachers emphasize the conceptual understanding, 14) 40% female students agree that teachers set tasks that are useful as learning experiences whereas only 16% male students agree with this, 15) the 80% female students and 60% male students agree that teachers show genuine interest in improving his/ her teaching, 16) teacher help students to see how they supposed to think and reach the conclusions in the course, the 60% female students and 28% male students agree with this statement, 17) again the 20% female and only 08% male students agree that teachers give the feedback to improve the ways of learning and studying, 18) teachers give the student’s support they needed to complete the set work for the unit, 64% female and 40% male students agree with this, 22) the 40%female and 10% male students agree teachers state objectives for each class session, 23) the 70% female and 20% male students showing their agreement that teachers invite students to share their knowledge and experiences, and 24) Copyright Š 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Indu Bala & Franky Rani
(Pg. 5942-5954) 5948
teachers invite criticism of his/ her own ideas, 20% female and only 02% male students agree with this. Further, the male and female students are also showing very less difference in their perception for some statements numbered 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 19, 20, and 25. No doubt the students showed very less difference in their percentage of perceptions but again the female students are having effective perception than the male students. These statements include the 1) the 88% female and 76%male students showing their agreement that teachers encourage students to look for links between the different units of the course, 2) teachers provide handouts and other materials to understand the unit, 96% female and 92% male students agree with this, 3) again the 94% female and 90% male students show that teachers encourage students to rethink for understanding of some aspects of the course, 6) the 84%female and 80% male students agree that teachers show genuine concern for student progress and needs, 7) teachers having skills at developing a class atmosphere conducive to learning, 64%female and 56% male students agree with this, 8) the 44%female and 50%male students show that teacher has good manners(e.g. friendly, helpful, professional, enthusiastic), 10) 86% female and 78% male students agree that the teachers discuss recent developments in the field of the course, 12) teachers try to share his/ her enthusiasm about the course with students, 78%female and 72% male students agree with this, 19) teachers give lectures that are easy to outline, 92% female and 96% male students showing their agreement with this, 20) the 92%female and 88% female students agree that teacher is careful and precise in answering questioning, and 25) again the 98% female and 90% male students agree that teacher has interest and concern in the quality improvement of his/ her teaching. However male and female students showed that same perception to some statements numbered as 13 and 21. These include the 13) both the 84% female and male students agree that teachers are patient in explaining things which seemed difficult to grasp and 21) teachers encourage class discussions, the 80% female and male students showing their agreement with this statement.
Copyright Š 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Indu Bala & Franky Rani
(Pg. 5942-5954) 5949
Overall Percentage of Perception of Female Students
Overall Percentage of Perception of Male Students
31%
45% 69%
Yes
55%
No
Yes
(b)
No
(c)
Figure (b) and (c): Pie Charts showing the overall Percentage of Perception of both Male and Female students The above figure b) and c) are showing the overall percentage of perception of female students and the male students regarding effective teaching in higher education. The overall 69% female students and 55% male students agree that teaching is effective. b) Qualification The perception of under-graduate and post-graduate students towards effective teaching in higher education have been analysed and presented in following graph:
Percentage Analysis of Perception of Under-Graduate & PostGraduate Students
Perception Percentage
100 80 60 40 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1-25 Statements Under-Graduate
Post-Graduate
Figure (d): Percentage Analysis of Perception of under-graduate and post-graduate students towards Effective Teaching in Higher Education Copyright Š 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Indu Bala & Franky Rani
(Pg. 5942-5954) 5950
It is clear from the above figure (d) that all the statements showing very less percentage difference of perception of under-graduate and post-graduate students. The statement number 8 and 19 are not showing any difference in the percentage of perception of these students regarding effective teaching in higher education. Overall Percentage of Perception of under-graduate Students
Overall Percentage of Perception of post-graduate Students
17%
18%
83%
82%
Yes
No
Yes
(e)
No
(f)
Figure (e) and (f): Pie Charts Showing the Overall Percentage of Perception of Undergraduate and Post-graduate Students The above figure (e) and (f) is showing the overall percentage of perception of undergraduate students and post-graduate students regarding effective teaching in higher education. The overall 82% undergraduate students and 83% post-graduate students agree that teaching is effective. c) Streams The perception of arts, science and commerce students towards effective teaching in higher education have been analysed and presented in following graph: Percentage Analysis of Perception of Arts, Science & Commerce Students 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Arts
Science
Commerce
Copyright Š 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Indu Bala & Franky Rani
(Pg. 5942-5954) 5951
Figure (g): Percentage Analysis of Perception of arts, science and commerce students towards Effective Teaching in Higher Education It is clear from the above figure (g) that the all the statements showing very less percentage difference of perception of arts, science and commerce students. The statement number 2 does not show any difference in the percentage of perception of these students regarding effective teaching in higher education. Overall Percentage of Perception of Arts Students
41%
59%
Overall Percentage of Perception of Science Students
41% 59%
Yes
No
Yes
(h)
No
(i)
Overall Percentage of Perception of Commerce Students
42% 58%
Yes
No
(j) Figure h), i) and j) Pie Charts Showing the Overall Percentage of Perception of Arts, Commerce and Science Students The above figure (h), (i) and (j) is showing the overall percentage of perception of arts, science and commerce students regarding effective teaching in higher education. The overall 59% arts, 59% science and 58% commerce students agree with the effective teaching in higher education. Hypothesis-I There is no significant difference between the perception of male and female students towards effective teaching in higher education. The value of means, standard deviation and t-value for the perception of male and female students towards effective teaching in higher education are shown in table 3.2 Copyright Š 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Indu Bala & Franky Rani
(Pg. 5942-5954) 5952
Table 3.2: N, Mean, Standard Deviation and t-value of scores of perception of male and female students towards Effective Teaching in Higher Education Gender
N
Mean
Male Female
48 52
14.10 16.54
Std. Deviation 6.349 7.180
t-value
Significance level
2.09*
Significant
*Significant at level 0.05 As shown by the Table 3.2 that the t-value for perception of male and female students regarding effective teaching in higher education came out to be 2.09 which is significant at 0.05 level. This significant value indicates that male and female students differ in their scores of perception. The high mean score is in favor of female students reveals that majority of the female students in the present sample agree that the teaching is effective as compared to their counterpart of male students. Thus the hypothesis that “There is no significant difference between the perception of male and female students towards effective teaching in higher education” was rejected leading to the conclusion that female students are showing agreement of their perception than male students towards effective teaching in higher education. Hypothesis-II There is no significant difference between the perception of under graduate and post graduate students towards effective teaching in higher education. The value of means, standard deviation and t-value for the student’s perception and their academic qualification (under graduate UG and post graduate PG), towards effective teaching in higher education are shown in table 3.3 Table 3.3: N, Mean, Standard Deviation and t-value of scores of perception of under graduate and post graduate students towards Effective Teaching in Higher Education Qualification
N
Mean
t-value
15.22
Std. Deviation 6.705
PG
32
UG
68
15.44
6.993
0.153**
Significance level Nonsignificant
**Non-significant at level 0.05 Table 3.3 shows that t-value was calculated for the above data of students according to their academic qualifications that is UG and PG which came out to be 0.153, which showed the non- significant t-value at 0.05 level of significance. Therefore the students are showing the non-significant difference with respect to their academic qualification towards effective Copyright © 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Indu Bala & Franky Rani
(Pg. 5942-5954) 5953
teaching in higher education. Thus the hypothesis “There is no significant difference between the perception of under graduate and post graduate students towards effective teaching in higher education” was accepted leading to the conclusion that the qualification wise students are showing same perception towards effective teaching in higher education. Hypothesis-III There is no significant difference between the perception of arts, science and commerce students towards effective teaching in higher education. Table 3.4: Summary of analysis of variance Perception of arts, Science and Commerce students: One Way ANOVA SCORE Between Groups Within Groups Total
Sum Squares
of Df
Mean Square
15.148
2
7.574
4656.162 4671.310
97 99
48.002
F
Significance Level 0.158* Non* significant
**Non-significant at 0.05 level Table 3.4: shows that the value of F comes out to be 0.158 which was calculated between the three groups that are arts, science and commerce students. This value is showing there is no significant difference between the perceptions of student’s streams wise towards Effective Teaching in higher education. Thus the hypothesis “There is no significant difference between the perception of arts, science and commerce students towards effective teaching in higher education” was accepted leading to the conclusion that students from different streams are having the same perception towards effective teaching in higher education. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION The findings in this study raised some questions for the researcher about the current state of teaching and the perception of students regarding effective teaching in higher education. The findings of the study both qualitatively and quantitatively reveal that female students in the present sample agree that the teaching is effective as compared to their counterpart male students. May be the reason behind this is female students are more sincere and male students neglect or non-serious regarding their studies. The other reason may be male students did not fill the questionnaire carefully and properly. No doubt with the measures of student’s perceptions of effective teaching in higher education, teachers can be trained to be more skilled, competent and knowledgeable in their work conditions. Teacher should also show the genuine concern for student’s progress and needs, set tasks that are useful as learning experiences and also encourage more class discussions. Copyright © 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Indu Bala & Franky Rani
(Pg. 5942-5954) 5954
REFERENCES Allan, J., Clarke, K., & Jopling, M.(2009). Effective Teaching in Higher Education: Perceptions of First Year Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 362-372. Ampadu, E.(2012). Students’ Perceptions of their Teachers’ Teaching of Mathematics: The Case of Ghana. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 351-358. Bora, A.(2012). Professional Education: Overcoming Major Challenges. University News, 49(52), 917. Bhushan, S.(2009). Restructuring Higher Education in India”. New Delhi: Rawat Publications. Cappon, P. (2006). CCL calls for clear, measurable goals in post-secondary education. Canadian Council on Learning. Retrieved April 23, 2009, from http://search.cclcca.ca/CCL/Newsroom/Articles/22Feb2006.htm Chauhan. S. P. C.(2016). Inputs for New Education Policy”. University News, 54, 44. ISSN: 05662257. Etuk N. Etuk., Maria E., Afangideh., & Asukwo. O. U.(2013). Student’s Perception of Teacher’s Characteristics and Their Attitude towards Mathematics in Oron Education Zone, Nigeria. International Education Studies, 6(2), 197-204. GOI (1968). Education and National Development: Report of the Education Commission (1964-66), New Delhi: Government of India. Kamran, P. R.(2004). Qualitative Improvement in Teacher Education. SOUVENIR, State Level Seminar cum Workshop on Quality Improvement in Teacher Education. Ferozepur : Dev Samaj College of Education for Women. Kaur, R.(2015). Quality Concerns in Teacher Education. Education and Enlightened society, 1, 299309. Komow, B., Khanna, Raghav and Sharma R.K. (2012). Journey of Higher Education in India: An Analysis of Post Independence Era. Asian Journal of Post Multidimensional Research, 1(1), 96-115. Kreber, C.(2002). Teaching excellence, teaching expertise and scholarship of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 27(1), 5-23. Roy, S.(2007). Globalization and Indian Higher Education. Perspectives in Education, 23(3), 158169. Samarawickrema. G.(2009). The criteria of effective teaching in a changing higher education context. Higher Education Research & Development, 29: 2, 111-124. Saroyan, A.,& Amundsen, C.(2004). Assumptions underlying workshop activities. Rethinking the Teaching in Higher Education, 15-29. Singh, K.(2009). Community Response to Development of Education in Punjab in the Era of Globalisation: An Evaluative Study. Ph.D. Thesis in Education. Patiala: Punjabi University. Stephanou, G., & Kyridis, A.(2012). University Students’ Perceptions of Teacher Effectiveness and Emotions in Lectures: The Role of Socio-cognitive Factors, and Academic Performance. International Education Studies, 5(2), 58-79. Sudha, T.(2013). Total Quality Management In Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research, 06(2), 121-132. Thamarasseri. I.(2016). Indian Higher Education Institutions and their tryst with contemporary changes. Edutracks, 16(02), 07-11.
Copyright © 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies