Issuu

Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, Online ISSN 2278-8808, SJIF 2016 = 6.17, www.srjis.com UGC Approved Sr. No.45269, SEPT-OCT 2017, VOL- 4/36 https://doi.org/10.21922/srjis.v4i36.10194

GAMMA RAY INTERACTION STUDIES ON SOME SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS IN THE ENERGY RANGE 122 KEV TO 1330 KEV Gopinath P. Dapke1, Vishal V. Awasarmol2, Siddheshwar D. Raut3, Pravina P. Pawar4 1-4

Department of Physics, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad:

431004, India. E-mail:- dapkegp@gmail.com and awasarmol123@gmail.com

In this paper, we have been calculated and measured the attenuation cross section parameters of some shape memory alloys in the energy range 122 keV to 1330 keV. From the present study, it is observed that there is good agreement between experimental and theoretical values and the variation of obtained values of all parameters strongly depends on the photon energy; it decreases or increases due to chemical composition and density of the sample material. All samples have been studied extensively using WinXCOM program and transmission curve shows that the variation of all sample materials initially decreases with increasing photon energy. The present study can be useful in radiation therapy, medical, aerospace, robotics, engineering and many technological applications. Keywords: Mass attenuation coefficients, total atomic cross section, total electronic cross section

Scholarly Research Journal's is licensed Based on a work at www.srjis.com 1. Introduction: The data on absorption and penetration of X-rays/ gamma rays photon interaction with matter is great significant in many fields such as medical, biological and industrial area. The study of absorption and scattering of gamma rays in the compound materials has become an interesting and exciting field of research (Manohara et al., 2007). There is a plethora in this particular field and a large number of photon attenuation measurements and calculations have been made for diverse materials and the attenuation coefficient has been studied as a function of various parameters. The mass attenuation coefficient, total atomic cross section and total electronic cross section are basic parameter for penetration and diffusion of x-ray or gamma ray in extended media. The accurate values of the mass attenuation coefficient for Xray and gamma ray in different materials are very significant in various fields such as medical, agriculture, industrial, biological, nuclear radiation physics and radiation dosimetry (Han and Demir ; 2009). The mass attenuation coefficient is key parameter in the primary physics and many applied fields. Mass attenuation coefficient (ď m) is a measure of the probability of interaction that occurs between incident photons and samples mass per unit area. Mass attenuation coefficient is needed to understand the diffusion and transmission of Copyright ÂŠ 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies

Gopinath P. Dapke, Vishal V. Awasarmol, Siddheshwar D. Raut, Pravina P. Pawar 8019 (Pg. 8018-8026)

X-ray and - ray in the material (Manohara and Hanagodimath; 2007). Number of the authors were represented the table in the form of tabulation for all elements and developed new computer program such as WinXCOM program (Hubbell; 1982, Hubbell and Seltzer; 1995, Berger and Hubbell; 1987, Gerward et al.; 2001). Some of the research papers are available on experimental and theoretical study of mass attenuation coefficient (μm) values in a variety of elements and compounds/mixtures. Mass attenuation coefficient data can be used for the determination of several parameters such as effective atomic numbers (Zeff), effective electron density (Neff), molar extinction coefficient (), mass energy absorption coefficient (µen/ρ), etc. of compound materials (Kore et al.; 2016, Pawar and Bichile; 2013, Ladhaf and Pawar; 2015, Gaikwad et al.; 2016, Awasarmol et al.; 2017a, Awasarmol et al.; 2017b, Awasarmol; 2017c, Awasarmol et al.; 2017d). Shape Memory Alloy’s (SMA’s) are the most significant branch from the smart / intelligence materials (Satish et al.; 2013). During the last decade smart materials and structures have received increasing attention because due to their huge technological and scientific consequence. SMA’s are basically functional materials which exhibit peculiar thermo mechanical properties such as shape memory effect and the super elasticity. These properties are significant as a reversible thermo elastic martensitic transformation occurring at the solid state. SMA alloys are most commonly used in commercial fields such as biomedical (i.e. stents, surgical tools); sensor/actuator (valves); coupling (i.e. electric fastener, pipe fastener); sport, antennas, gadgets, manufactures etc (Kumar and Lagoudas ; 2008). In literature, we observed that the no experimental data is available on the study of some shape memory alloys. The aim of the present study, we have been measured the mass attenuation coefficient of some shape memory alloys and related parameters in the energy region 122 keV to 1330 keV by using the transmission method and compared with Win XCOM data. 2. Theoretical Analysis: 2.1 Calculation of mass attenuation coefficient (µm) The mass attenuation coefficients for the compound materials and energies are determined by the transmission experiment. This process described by the following equation:

I  I 0 exp(- m t )

(1)

Gopinath P. Dapke, Vishal V. Awasarmol, Siddheshwar D. Raut, Pravina P. Pawar 8020 (Pg. 8018-8026)

where I0 and I are the unattenuated and attenuated photon intensities respectively, µm (cm2gm-1) is mass attenuation coefficient of the material and t (g/cm2) is the sample thickness. The photon mass attenuation coefficient for compound or mixture of element is given by mixture rule:  m   iWi (  m ) i

(2)

where Wi and (m)i are the weight fraction and mass attenuation coefficient of the ith constituent element, respectively. For a chemical compounds, the fraction by weight (Wi) is represented by following expression: Wi 

ni Ai  j n j Aj

(3)

where Ai is the atomic weight of the ith element, ni is the number of formula units, ∑jnj is the total number of atoms present in the molecular formula and Aj is the molecular weight of the jth constituent elements. 2.2 Calculation of total atomic cross section (t,a) The total atomic cross section can be derived by following equation:



t,a

m 1 N A i Wi / Ai



(4)

where NA is the Avogadro’s number, µm is the mass attenuation coefficient. 2.3 Calculation of total electronic cross section (t,el) The total electronic cross section is determined by,

 t , el 

f A 1  i i ( m )i N A i Zi

(5)

where fi is the number fraction of atoms of element i and Zi is the atomic number of the ith element in the mixture or compound. 3. Experimental details In this study, we have been carried out some attenuation cross section parameter by the transmission method of the narrow beam good geometry setup. The schematic diagram as shown in Fig. 1. In this experiment we have been used six radioactive sources such as 133

Ba,

137

Cs,

Mn60, Co, and

Co,

Na. All these radioactive sources are provided by Bhabha

Atomic Research Center, Mumbai, for the experimental work. These radioactive sources emitted gamma ray photon energies at 122, 356, 511, 662, 840, 1170, 1275 and 1330 keV. Copyright © 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies

Gopinath P. Dapke, Vishal V. Awasarmol, Siddheshwar D. Raut, Pravina P. Pawar 8021 (Pg. 8018-8026)

The radioactive sources were collimated and detected by (2″×2″) NaI (Tl) scintillation detector with resolution 8.2% at 662 keV and the signals at the detector were amplified and analyzed by the 8K multichannel analyzer. For preparation of the sample in the form of pallet and the sample was weighed in a sensitive digital balance and having a good accuracy of measurements about 0.001 mg and the plastic container was used as sample holder, and attenuation of a photon by unfilled container were found to be negligible (Pawar and Bichile; 2013). The weighing samples five time to get more accuracy. The mean of this set value was considered to be the mass of the sample. The transmitted intensity of photo peak was measured to minimize both contributions of small angle and multiple scattering within the full width at half maxima. For more accuracy, a thickness of the sample was selected as per Creagh (1987) criteria 2 < ln (I0 /I) < 4. More information about the experimental arrangement has been reported in our previous work by (Awasarmol et al.; 2017a, Awasarmol et al.; 2017b, Awasarmol; 2017c, Awasarmol et al.; 2017d). 4. Results and discussion In this study, the theoretical and experimental values of mass attenuation coefficient (μm), total atomic cross section (t,a) and total electronic cross section (t,el) were measured at 122 keV to 1330 keV photon energies for some shape memory alloys i.e. cast Iron, Nitinol, Babit Metal, Stelite, Amalgam carried out by NaI (Tl) scintillation detector with a well collimated narrow beam good geometry setup. Theoretically and experimentally measured values of the mass attenuation coefficients (m) for five samples tabulated in Table 1 and variation with energy (E) is displayed in Fig. 2. From Fig. 2 it is clearly seen that the variation of m values decreases with increasing photon energy. The experimental values of µm agree with theoretical values calculated using the WinXCOM program based on the mixture rule. Measured total atomic cross section (t, a) and total electronic cross section (t, el)

for the studied shape memory alloys are listed in Tables 2 and 3 respectively. The typical

plots of t, a and t,

versus photon energy (E) are displayed in Figs. 3 and 4 respectively.

From Figs. 3 and 4 the behavior of t, a and t, el with photon energy (E) is almost similar to that of µm. The variation of the all attenuation parameters were systematically studied in the given photon energy region. 5. Conclusion In this research m were investigated to get sufficient information about mass attenuation coefficients (µm), total atomic cross section (t, a), and total electronic cross Copyright © 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies

Gopinath P. Dapke, Vishal V. Awasarmol, Siddheshwar D. Raut, Pravina P. Pawar 8022 (Pg. 8018-8026)

section (t, el) for shape memory alloys materials and it has been observed that the present data on m values and other parameters are very useful in biomedical, medical and biological, sensor/actuator, and other applications. In this paper, we reported that the experimental data on (m), (t, a), and (t, el) of shape memory alloys materials at different photon energy range. Mass attenuation coefficient and other parameters of all samples have been calculated at 122 keV to 1330 keV photon energies. This study concludes that any compound material depends on its chemical composition, density, and concentration of the elements that it contains Acknowledgments: The author (VVA) would like to thank University Grant Commission, New Delhi for providing RGNF References: Manohara S.R., Hanagodimath S.M.; 2007, Studies on effective atomic numbers and electron densities of essential amino acids in the energy range 1keV-100GeV, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, Vol. 258, 321-328. Han I., Demir L.; 2009, Studies on mass attenuation coefficient, effective atomic and electron number of Ti and Ni alloy, Radiation Measurements, Vol. 44, 289-294. Manohara S.R., Hanagodimath S.M.; 2007, Studies on effective atomic numbers and electron densities of essential amino acids in the energy range 1keV-100GeV, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, Vol. 258, 321-328. Hubbell J.H.; 1982, Photon mass attenuation and energy absorption, International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes, Vol, 1269-1290. Hubbell J.H., Seltzer S.M.; 1995, Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy absorption coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for elements Z=1 to 92 and 48 additional substances of dosimetric interest, National Institute of Standards and Physics Laboratory, NISTIR 5632. Berger M.J., Hubbell J.H.; 1987, (XCOM) Photon cross section on a personal computer. NBSIR, 873597. Gerward L., Guilbert N., Jensen K.B., Levring H.; 2001, X-ray absorption in matter, Reengineering XCOM. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, Vol. 60, 23-24. Kore P.S., Pawar P.P., Selvam T.P.; 2016, Evaluation of radiological data of some saturated fatty acids using gamma ray spectrometry, Radiation Physics and Chemistry, Vol. 119, 74-79. Pawar P.P., Bichile G.K.; 2013, Studies on mass attenuation coefficient, effective atomic number and electron density of some amino acids in the energy range 0.122-1.330 MeV, Radiation Physics and Chemistry, Vol. 92, 22-27. Ladhaf B.M., Pawar P.P.; 2015, Studies on mass energy absorption coefficient and effective atomic energy absorption cross-section for carbohydrates, Radiation Physics and Chemistry, Vol. 109, 89-94. Gaikwad D.K., Pawar P.P., Selvam T.P.; 2016, Attenuation cross sections measurements of some fatty acids in the energy range 122-1330 keV. Pramana- J. Phys. 87 (12), 1-7. DOI: 10.1007/s12043-016-1213-y.

Gopinath P. Dapke, Vishal V. Awasarmol, Siddheshwar D. Raut, Pravina P. Pawar 8023 (Pg. 8018-8026) Awasarmol V.V., Gaikwad D.K., Raut S.D. Pawar P.P.; 2017, Photon interaction study of organic nonlinear optical materials in the energy range 122-1330 keV. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, Vol. 130, 343-350. Awasarmol V.V. Gaikwad D.K., Raut S.D. Pawar P.P.; 2017, Gamma ray interaction studies of organic nonlinear optical materials in the energy range 122 keV to 1330 keV. Results in Physics, Vol. 7, 272-279. Awasarmol V.V.; 2017, Gamma ray attenuation parameters of inorganic nonlinear optical materials in the energy range 122 keV to 1330 keV. Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics, Vol. 55, 65-72. Awasarmol V.V., Pawar P.P. Solunke M.B.; 2017, Effective atomic numbers and effective electron densities of inorganic nonlinear optical materials in the energy range 356 keV to 1330 keV. International journal of technical research and science, 2, 26-29. Satish S., Malik U.S., Raju T. N.,” corrosion Behavior of Cu -Zn Ni Shape Memory Alloys” Journal of Minerals and Material characteristics and Engineering, 2013 , 1 , 49-54. Kumar P.K., Lagoudas D.C. (ed), Introduction to shape memory Alloys Springer Science + business media LLC; 2008 DOI: - 10.1007 / 978 -0-387-47685-8-1. Creagh D.C.; 1987, The Resolution of Discrepancies in Tables of Photon Attenuation Coefficient, Nuclear Instruments and Methods A, Vol. 255, 1–16.

Gopinath P. Dapke, Vishal V. Awasarmol, Siddheshwar D. Raut, Pravina P. Pawar 8024 (Pg. 8018-8026)

Fig. 1 Schematic set up of NaI (Tl) scintillation detector. 2.0

Cast-Iron NiTinol Babit Metal Stelite Amalgam

1.8 1.6 1.4

 (cm-1)

1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Energy (keV)

Fig. 2 Mass attenuation coefficients of shape memory alloys. Cast-Iron NiTinol Babit Metal Stelite Amalgam

1800 1600

t, a(barn/atom)

1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Energy (keV)

Gopinath P. Dapke, Vishal V. Awasarmol, Siddheshwar D. Raut, Pravina P. Pawar 8025 (Pg. 8018-8026) 40

Cast-Iron NiTinol Babit Metal Stelite Amalgam

35 30

t, el(barn/atom)

25 20 15 10 5 0 0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Energy (keV)

Fig. 4 Total electronic cross section of shape memory alloys. Table 1. Mass attenuation coefficients of shape memory alloys. Energy 122 356 511 662 840 1170 1275 1330

Cast-Iron Exp. Theo. 0.229 0.231 0.098 0.101 0.081 0.085 0.075 0.078 0.067 0.068 0.055 0.057 0.051 0.055 0.05 0.054

NiTinol Exp. Theo. 0.275 0.281 0.098 0.102 0.081 0.084 0.075 0.077 0.066 0.067 0.054 0.056 0.051 0.053 0.049 0.051

Babit Metal Exp. Theo. 0.0991 0.996 0.128 0.133 0.087 0.091 0.075 0.08 0.061 0.066 0.05 0.054 0.048 0.051 0.044 0.049

Stelite Exp. 1.685 0.177 0.107 0.088 0.071 0.056 0.052 0.051

Theo. 1.706 0.183 0.111 0.093 0.074 0.058 0.054 0.052

Amalgam Exp. Theo. 1.809 1.816 0.183 0.189 0.108 0.113 0.091 0.094 0.071 0.073 0.055 0.058 0.051 0.054 0.048 0.051

Table 2. Total atomic cross section of shape memory alloys.

840

Cast-Iron Exp. Theo. 36.45 1 36.769 15.59 16.076 9 5 12.89 13.529 3 7 11.93 12.415 8 5 10.66 10.823 5 8

NiTinol Exp. Theo. 48.61 49.671 1 6 17.32 18.030 3 2 14.31 14.848 8 4 13.25 13.611 8 1 11.66 11.843 7 4

1170

8.755

9.0729

9.545

3.8989

1275

8.118

8.7545

9.015

1330

7.959

8.2876

8.662

9.3686 9.0151 4

Energ y 122 356 511 662

Babit Metal Exp. Theo. 50.08 503.38 6 4 64.69 67.218 2 9 43.97 45.991 0 9 37.90 40.432 5 5 30.83 33.356 0 7 25.27 27.291 0 9 24.25 25.775 9 7 22.23 24.764 8 8

Stelite Exp. 988.65 0 103.85 2

Theo. 1000.97 107.372 6

Amalgam Exp. Theo. 1672.12 1678.59 5 5 169.154

174.699

62.781

65.1276

99.828

104.45

51.633

54.5664

84.115

86.8876

41.658

43.4184

65.628

67.4765

32.857

34.0306

50.839

53.6115

30.510

31.6837

47.141

49.9142

29.924

30.5016

44.368

47.1411

Gopinath P. Dapke, Vishal V. Awasarmol, Siddheshwar D. Raut, Pravina P. Pawar 8026 (Pg. 8018-8026)

Table 3. Total electronic cross section of shape memory alloys. Energy 122 356 511 662 840 1170 1275 1330

Cast-Iron Exp. Theo. 2.378 2.3984 1.018 1.0487 0.841 0.8825 0.779 0.8098 0.696 0.706 0.571 0.5918 0.530 0.571 0.519 0.5406

NiTinol Exp. Theo. 1.944 1.9868 0.693 0.7212 0.573 0.5939 0.530 0.5444 0.467 0.4737 0.382 0.3959 0.361 0.3747 0.346 0.3606

Babit Metal Exp. Theo. 1.156 11.6174 1.493 1.5513 1.015 1.0614 0.875 0.9331 0.712 0.7668 0.583 0.6298 0.560 0.5948 0.513 0.5715

Stelite Exp. 6.093 2.715 1.641 1.350 1.089 0.859 0.798 0.782

Theo. 26.1691 2.8071 1.7026 1.4265 1.1351 0.8896 0.8283 0.7974

Amalgam Exp. Theo. 35.426 35.563 3.584 3.7012 2.115 2.2129 1.782 1.8408 1.390 1.4295 1.077 1.1358 0.999 1.0575 0.940 0.9987