Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, Online ISSN 2278-8808, SJIF 2016 = 6.17, www.srjis.com UGC Approved Sr. No.45269, SEPT-OCT 2017, VOL- 4/36 https://doi.org/10.21922/srjis.v4i36.10079
CORRELATIVE STUDY OF STRESS & STRESS MANAGEMENT OF TRAINEE TEACHERS OF TEACHER EDUCATION Pravin Laxman Kothawade, Ph. D. Principal, Shree Jain Vidya Prasarak Mandal, College of Education Chinchwad. Pune. - 33.
In this study an attempt has been made to study the Correlative Study of Stress & Stress Management of Trainee teacher. Standardized stress scale by Zakhir Akhtar & Stress Management Scale by Dr. Vandana Kaushik & Dr. Namrata Arora Charpe has been used for the Present study to measure the stress & Stress Mangement Trainee teacher. The random sample technique has been followed to data collection. The sample includes 200 male & female Trainee Teacher of college of Education. For purpose of analysis and interpretation of data, descriptive and inferential statistical techniques like Mean, S.D., Skewness , kurtosis, correlation & t-test were used. Major findings of the study were i) There is no significant difference in level of stress of Male & female Trainee teacher. ii) Positively but of low level correlation found between stress & stress management Trainee teacher. Keywords: Stress, Stress Management, Trainee Teachers. Scholarly Research Journal's is licensed Based on a work at www.srjis.com
Background:In the daily routine of the Modern world Stress has become an unavoidable for human being. Every adult, teens, & even kids experiences it at times & in different ways. It has become important issue in every facet of life. Stress is the process that occurs in response to events that disrupt, or threaten to disrupt our physical or psychological functioning. Stress exists when demands on a person are perceived as a taxing or exceeding that person’s adjustive capacity. Just enough, stress can keep you on your toes, ready to rise to a challenge. But too much stress can have debilitating effect on our health, contributing to agitating many problems including heart disease, high blood pressure, stroke and depression and sleep disorders. Now researcher has decided to do correlative study of stress & stress management of trainee teachers who are the future of next generation; means student who are going to become teacher. First of all there is a need to explain the meaning of stress. Stress is associated with distress, kind of burden, pressure and hardship. Stress is anxiety or distress, caused by any pressure or Copyright Š 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Dr. Pravin Laxman Kothawade (Pg. 7040-7048) 7041
tension. Basically stress is wear & tear which our body experiences as we adjust to our continually changing environment. According Lazarus (1961) Stress is an internal response of the individual to pressure when experienced pressure is greater than normal abilities. A certain amount of stress is an inevitable part of learning student. Without stress there is no life. Stress is created by desirable and successful effect is called as Eustress which may increase the achievement and progress in learning children but the stress created by undesirable outcomes cause distress which leads to discomforts, anxiety, fear, laziness and also low confidence. As everyone have to face stress; but everyone tries to overcome on it by its own way or by others guidance. Some manages it comfortably while some looks unable to manage daily routine stress. And under such circumstances teacher factor also looks under so much stress. Trainee teachers who are waiting to get job of teaching from near about decade are so many in number .Maharashtra Government have stopped recruitment of teacher from 2008. Due to this nowadays students after graduation or post graduation not showing interest in B.Ed. Some student who have interest in teaching taking admission by knowing problems of insecurity of job. Some having economical, language problem or need of doing part-time job till takes admission to B.Ed. So by facing such stressing circumstances when students have to complete B.Ed. training in the period of 2 years question arises how they manage? So, investigator decided to study Correlative Study of Stress & Stress Management of trainee teachers. Importance of the Study: 1) Due to this study we will get information about stress of trainee teacher’s of Teacher Education. 2) Due to this study we will get information about level of Stress Management of trainee teacher’s of Teacher Education. 3) Due to this study we will get information about whether there is a significant difference in the mean score of stress & Stress Management between a) Male and female trainee teacher’s of Teacher Education. b) Trainee teacher’s of SC/ST and other category of Teacher Education. c) Trainee teacher’s of Arts & Science faculty of Teacher Education. d) Married & unmarried trainee teacher’s of Teacher Education.
Copyright © 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Dr. Pravin Laxman Kothawade (Pg. 7040-7048) 7042
Conceptual Definitions of key terms :Stress:- A state of mental tension and worry caused by problem in our life & work. Stress Management:- Stress Management refers to the wide spectrum of techniques and psychotherapies aimed at controlling a person's levels of stress, especially chronic stress, usually for the purpose of improving everyday functioning. Operational Definitions of Key terms:Trainee Teachers: - One who is enrolled or attend the class of Teacher training Education (B.Ed.), after completing graduate or Post graduate. Objectives:1) To Measure the level of Stress of Trainee Teacher’s of Teacher Education. 2) To Measure the level of Stress Management of Trainee Teacher’s of Teacher Education. 3) To find out the extent of relationship between stress & stress management of Trainee Teacher’s of Teacher Education. Hypothesis:The hypothesis set for the study were as follow:1) There exist a significant difference in the score of correlation of stress & stress management between a) Male and female trainee teacher’s of Teacher Education. b) Trainee teacher’s of SC/ST and other category of Teacher Education. c) Trainee teacher’s of Arts & Science faculty of Teacher Education. d) Married & unmarried trainee teacher’s of Teacher Education. 2) There exists a significant difference in the mean score of stress between a) Male and female trainee teacher’s of Teacher Education. b) Trainee teacher’s of SC/ST and other category of Teacher Education. c) Trainee teacher’s of Arts & Science faculty of Teacher Education. d) Married & unmarried trainee teacher’s of Teacher Education. 3) There exists a significant difference in the mean score of stress management between a) Male and female trainee teacher’s of Teacher Education. b) Trainee teacher’s of SC/ST and other category of Teacher Education. c) Trainee teacher’s of Arts & Science faculty of Teacher Education. d) Married & unmarried trainee teacher’s of Teacher Education.
Copyright © 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Dr. Pravin Laxman Kothawade (Pg. 7040-7048) 7043
Method:-The Methodology adopted for measuring stress & stress management of Trainee Teacher’s of Teacher Education is Normative Survey Method. Tools:The following tools were used to measure stress & stress management of the student teacher -
Standardized student stress scale constructed & validated by Dr. Zaki
Akhtar
(Jamshedpur) was used for the present study to measure the stress of trainee teachers. Validity & reliability of test is 0.72 & 0.78 The stress-management scale standardized by Dr.Vandana Kaushik & Dr. Namrata Arora Charpe has been used for the present study to measure the level of management of stress of student teacher. Reliability of test is 0.87 Sample: - The Present study was conducted on a total sample of 200 student’s teacher of 3 training colleges at Yeola. dist. Nashik (Maharashtra state). The sample was selected using stratified random sampling technique giving due representation to both the sexes (male and female), the type of (category and marital status) , and the faculty of the graduation study ( Arts and Science) Analysis & Interpretation : A preliminary analysis had done to see whether the dependant variable stress is normally distributed. Important statistical constant such as Mean, Standard Deviation, kurtosis, Skewness, Correlation & ‘t’ value were computed for the total sample. Summary of statistical details presented in table no.1 Table -1 Stress level of Trainee Teachers Stress Level Group
No.
Whole Male Female Other Category SC-ST Category Art Science
200 120 80
V.H.S . 32 23 09
131
H.S
Mod
L.S.
V.L.S.
37 23 14
39 27 12
51 28 23
41 19 22
20
26
24
31
30
69
12
11
15
20
11
132 68
21 11
22 15
28 11
31 20
30 11
Unmarried
118
21
23
21
33
20
Married
82
11
14
18
18
21
Copyright © 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Dr. Pravin Laxman Kothawade (Pg. 7040-7048) 7044
In Table No.1 stress level of trainee teacher is shown. While Considering Stress level of whole & other sub group it has been found that 50% trainee teachers in each sub group except female group with whole group are under high to very high stress level. Percentage of female student Teacher group under low & very low stress found near about 56% which found higher than all sub group and the same for all other subgroup found near about less than 47%. This means that female student teacher group found under the level of low to very low stress. Group
Stress Level Ex V. Very Ex. Good Mod Poor Gd. Gd. Poor Poor 200 22 33 39 44 34 22 05 120 15 15 21 27 22 18 02 80 08 18 18 17 12 04 03 09 04 131 19 24 27 28 20 No
Whole Male Female Other Category SC-ST 69 Category 132 Art 68 Science Unmarried 118 82 Married
04
09
12
16
14
18 05 11 12
21 12 18 15
20 19 22 17
29 15 25 19
22 12 23 11
13
01
17 05 18 04
05 01 04
In Table No.2 level of Stress Management of trainee teachers is shown. 47% trainee teachers of whole group are found under the good to extremely good level of Stress Management. While considering the level of stress management other sub group; 53.65% trainee teachers of married group are found under good to extremely good level which is higher than all other sub group.SC-ST Category group’s level of stress management found 40.57% at poor to extremely poor level which is higher than all subgroups. This means that Stress Management of married is better than all other sub group while SC-ST Category group Stress Management is poor than all other sub groups. Table -3 Mean, S.D., Sk. & Ku. Of stress of Trainee Teacher Group Whole Male
N 200 120
Mean 156.6 159.08
S.D. 21.9 21.26
S.K. 0.246 0.210
Ku 0.278 0.333
Female Other Category SC-ST Category Arts Science Unmarried Married
80 131
152.87 156.33
13.80 22.16
0.85 0.089
0.094 0.267
69
157.97
20.38
0.0647
0.415
132 68 118 82
156.39 157 156.4 157.69
23.61 16.85 20.84 23.52
0.228 0.27 0.273 0.316
0.267 0.284 0.274 0.262
Copyright Š 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Dr. Pravin Laxman Kothawade (Pg. 7040-7048) 7045
In Table No. 3 Mean, Standard deviation, Skewness & Kurtosis of Stress of trainee teachers is shown. Mean of stress of whole group is 156.6
while considering mean of
stress of sub groups it has been found that mean of SC-ST category group is 157.97 which is higher than rest of other group. And mean of stress female group is 152.87, which is lower than all other group. Regarding Standard deviation of stress of trainee teachers; It has been found that group of female student teacher is homogenous while group of Art student teacher found heterogeneous. The value obtained for Skewness for whole with other sub group is positive & value for kurtosis for whole with other sub group except female & married group are above the standard value 0.263 this means that distribution of group except female & married group is like playtikrtic curve. Table no. 4 Mean, S.D., Sk. & Ku. Of stress Management of Trainee Teacher Group Whole Male Female Other Cate. SC-ST Cat. Arts Science Unmarried Married
N 200 120 80 131 69 132 68 118 82
Mean 119.3 117.83 121.12 122.67 114.5 118.9 120.24 117.04 122.55
S.D. 23.12 23.17 21.47 23 21.58 24.17 19.94 21.67 24.71
S.K. 0.147 0.285 -0.28 -0.017 -0.486 0.297 -0.139 0.282 -0.168
Ku 0.213 0.309 0.617 0.303 0.298 0.336 0.802 0.311 0.328
In Table No. 4 Mean, Standard deviation, skewness & Kurtosis of Stress Management of trainee teachers are shown. Mean of stress Management of whole group is 119.3
while
considering mean of stress Management of sub groups it has been found that mean of Other category group is 122.67which is higher than rest of other groups. Mean of stress SC-ST Category group is 114.5, which is lower than all other groups. Regarding Standard deviation of stress of trainee teachers; It has been found that group of Science trainee teacher is homogenous while group of Married trainee teacher found heterogeneous. The value obtained for skewness for whole with sub group like Male, Art, unmarried is positive and rest of other is negative. Value for kurtosis for whole group is 0.213 which is below than the standard value 0.263 so nature of group of trainee teacher is like leptokurtic curve. Other sub group is above the standard value 0.263 this meant that distribution of group is like playtikurtic curve. Copyright Š 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Dr. Pravin Laxman Kothawade (Pg. 7040-7048) 7046
Table No 5. Correlation of Stress & Stress Management of Trainee Teachers Group
N
Whole Male Female Other Category
200 120 80 131
Coefficient of Correlation (r) 0.43* 0.46* 0.33* 0.40*
SC-ST Category Arts Science Unmarried Married
69
0.48*
132 68 118 82
0.38* 0.32* 0.43* 0.29*
* =Significant at 0.05 level From table no.5 it is found that the coefficient of correlation between Stress & Stress Management of trainee Teachers of whole & subsample based on sex and other categories is positive. Value is between 0.254 to 0.309 & significant at 0.05 levels. Its means that correlation is in slight proportion. Table No 6: Testing of Hypothesis – Significance of difference between the score of correlation of Stress & Stress management Sr. No. 1
2
3 4
Group Male Female Other Category SC-ST Category Arts Science Unmarried Married
N
r
‘t’ value
120 80
0.4 0.3
0.763
131
0.4
69
0.48
132 68 118 82
0.38 0.32 0.43 0.29
0.151
2.60* 0.95
* = Not significant at 0.05 level In table no. 6‘t’ value is calculated regarding score of correlation of stress & stress management score of the trainee teachers various group. Except Arts & Science group no significant difference was found in stress & stress management score of the trainee teachers various group
Copyright © 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Dr. Pravin Laxman Kothawade (Pg. 7040-7048) 7047
Table No 7: Testing of Hypothesis - – Significance of difference between the Mean score of Stress
Group
N
M
Ϭ (S.D.)
Male
120
159.08
21.9
Female
80
152.81
21.26
Other Category
131
156.33
22.16
69
157.97
20.38
68
157
16.85
Arts
132
156.39
23.61
Married
82
157.69
23.52
Unmarried
118
156.4
20.84
SC, ST Category Science
t- Value (0.05)level
0.253
0.506
0.238
0.399
In table no. 7‘t’ value is calculated regarding stress score of the trainee teachers various group. No significant difference was found in stress & stress management scores of the trainee teachers various groups. This means that null hypothesis is accepted and there is no significance difference in stress of all groups. Table No 8: Testing of Hypothesis - – Significance of difference between the Mean score of Stress Management Group
N
M
Ϭ (S.D.)
t- Value (0.05)
Male Female Other Category SC, ST Category Science Arts Married Unmarried
120 80
117.83 121.125
23.17 21.47
1.032
131
122.67
23
69
118.9
24.17
68 132 82 118
120.24 118.9 122.55 117.04
19.94 24.17 24.71 21.67
2.39
0.418 1.630
In table no.7‘t’ value is calculated regarding stress Management score of the trainee teachers various group. No significant difference was found in stress management score of the trainee teachers various group. This means that null hypothesis is accepted and there is no significance difference in stress Management of all groups. Copyright © 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Dr. Pravin Laxman Kothawade (Pg. 7040-7048) 7048
Findings:1) More than 50% trainee teachers found under high to very high stress. 2) More than 50% female trainee teachers found under low stress. 3) Only 47% trainee teachers stress management found under good to
extremely good
level. Married trainee teachers stress management found better than unmarried trainee teachers. 4) SC-ST Category’s trainee teachers stress management found poor than Other Category’s student teacher. 5) Female student teacher’s group found homogenous and Art faculty student teacher’s group found heterogeneous regarding stress and in the case of stress management science group found homogenous and married group student teacher found heterogeneous. 6) Correlation between stress & Stress management of trainee teachers is positive but in very slight proportion. 7) There exist no significant difference in the score of correlation of stress & stress management of trainee teachers various groups except Art’s & science group. 8) There exists no significant difference in the stress of trainee teachers various group. 9) There exist no significant difference in the stress management of trainee teachers various groups. References:Arun & Chaven ( 2009):- “Stress & Social ideas in adolescent students in Chandigarh”. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences. Canon W. B.(1932) “The Wisdom of the body” New York. NY: W.W. Norton & Company . Pearlin L.I. (1982). “The Social Contexts of Stress”. In L. Goldberger & S. Brenztiz, eds. Hand Book of Stress : Theoretical & Clinical Aspects. New York : The Free Press. Garret Henry E. Statistics In Psychology and Education (10thed.). Bombay; vakils feffer And Simons Ltd. A .Selvaraj,R. Gnanadevan-.(Mar.-2014)Self-Confidence And Stress among Higher Secondary Students of Cuddalore District Of Tamilnadu, Journal of Community Guidance & Research, Vol.31,No.1 M.V.Padmavati-.(July.-2014),- Psycological and Educational Stress among Rural & Urban Students Journal of Community Guidance & Research, Vol.31,No.2 MkW- ch-,u- dosZ & rk.k vkf.k vkjksX;fo’k;d ekul”kkL= MkW- e-u- iylkus] MkW- lfork uojs &mi;ksftr ekul”kkL= ok;yh bLVuZ fy- iCyh”klZ - rk.kr.kko fo”ks’kkad &fparu vkns”k ¼uksOgsca j fnokGh 2010½
Copyright © 2017, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies