Lifestyled
Health and Places David Mah and Leire Asensio Villoria
vii
Contents Preface Acknowledgments
ix xi
Public Health and the Design of the Built Environment
1 6 8 12 17 34
44 60 70
Chapter 1 Introduction Chronic Lifestyle Diseases Aging Populations Healthy Environments A Timeline of Public Health, and the Built Environment, Ann Forsyth, Leire Asensio Villoria, David Mah, Har Ye Kan, Justin Kollar, Xinhui Li + Han Yang Environments, Populations, and Health: Learning from (Modern) Health and Place, Leire Asensio Villoria + David Mah When Public Health and Planning Closely Intersect: Five Moments, Five Strategies, Ann Forsyth Chapter 2 The Social Determinants of Health – An Interview with Dr. Ichiro Kawachi The Built Environment and Mental Well-being –An Interview with Dr. Gary Evans Promoting Physical Activity for All Ages, Laura Smead
The Chinese Superblock
92 104
Chapter 3 China’s Modernist Superblocks, Peter Rowe + Har Ye Kan Spatial Foundation of the ‘Aging in Place’ Community, Shanghai, Yu Yifan
119 131
Chapter 4 Research by Designers, Leire Asensio Villoria + David Mah Design Research Process and Visualization
Life-Styled. Health and Places
Lifestyled - China-Town
279 289 299 313
Chapter 5 Lifestyled China-Town Studio Themes, Leire Asensio Villoria, David Mah, Justin Kollar, Elizabeth Wu, Han Yang, Xinhui Li The Collective - The Family Governance The Environment The Block Studio Projects The Glorious Manual for Community Health, Justin Kollar + Ali Karimi A Life Aquatic, Dima Rachid + Alejandro Lara Seeing the Forest for the Trees, Wen Wen + Won Joon Seol Farms, Forks, and the METS in between, Whitney Hansley Linong Evolution, Rituparna Simlai + Wei Lin A Variegated Framework for Social Life, Yi Li + Clayton Strange Lee Community for the Multitude, Yujun Yin + Zhe Peng
332
Credits
205 206 211 216 220 241 253 265
viii — ix
Preface The research presented in this book is part of a broader research initiative developed through the Health and Places Initiative (HAPI) at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Founded in 2013, HAPI consists of multi-disciplinary groups involving faculty and researchers from both Harvard’s Graduate School of Design and the T.H. Chan School of Public Health. This initiative has been engaged with investigating the scope and possibilities for creating healthier places in the future. The ambition of HAPI, as a whole, is to create a forum for understanding the multiple issues that cities face in light of rapid urbanization and an aging population worldwide. Through the coordinated work of different research subgroups within the initiative, the project is invested in developing templates for alternative models of urban development, with particular emphasis on their impact on health and aging. Much of the work presented within this book was generated by the Prototypes group, a subgroup within HAPI that was established to focus specifically on the development of research on health and place through design. The HAPI Prototypes group was led by the authors and editors of this book: Leire Asensio Villoria and David Syn Chee Mah. The group’s primary focus has been on the development of design models and processes that inform or guide readers in the ways that health concerns may be embedded within the main set of design considerations and parameters which organize urban neighborhoods in China. The research work, writings, and interviews that follow aim to elaborate on the topic of health and the environment for a lay design audience and to offer design research findings and prototypes of healthy neighborhood models for readers invested in the thoughtful development of our urban environments. This book aims to deliver considerations of history, discussions on current challenges, as well as projections for the future. By addressing these challenges with a simultaneously reflective and projective drive, the book aims to raise questions, or offer insights, as to how the ongoing investigation into the relationships between health and place may evolve. The prototypes research focuses specifically on addressing, through design, a number of important, emerging, place-based public health challenges currently unfolding or anticipated to be significant problems in the coming decades. The design research is specifically situated in China, and concentrates on health at the neighborhood scale within the country’s second and third tier cities. The deliberate focus on China was indicated by its massive scale of urban and social transformation, offering a situation where research into healthier models for cities could provide strategies of imminent and immediate utility. However, many of the issues facing China today can be seen as concerns shared by many others in contexts where contemporary public health has global consequences as well as influence. While not always applicable in every circumstance, the issues and proposals offered through the research within this book are intended to provide insights that may spark conversation and reflection on similar issues in other situations.
The book is composed of three main sections. The first section, Public Health and the Design of the Built Environment, focuses on a more general discussion of the relationship between health and place that includes contributed essays by members of the GSD HAPI group, Ann Forsyth and Laura Smead, as well as interviews with leading researchers within the fields of public health, Dr. Ichiro Kawachi and Dr. Gary Evans. Collectively, a series of essays and a detailed description of the HAPI Prototypes design research project form the second section: The Chinese Superblock. A more context specific series of essays by Peter Rowe with Har Ye Kan and Yu Yifan explicates the history of the Chinese Superblock (the “site” of research) and charts some of the contemporary challenges surrounding existing residential neighborhoods in China. This series is bundled together with an essay by the book’s editors on the methods and theoretical positions adopted by the research team with regards to design research to support a detailed overview of the process and findings developed through a sustained investigative project completed by the HAPI Prototypes Group between 2014 and 2016. The final section showcases the premise and background research, as well as the projects developed in an advanced graduate option studio offered at Harvard’s Graduate School of Design in the fall of 2014. The studio was designed to speculate on models for residential neighborhood models for China that foreground public health issues. Contextual concerns surrounding the changing conceptions of collective life, approaches towards the management of the environment, relevant national policies, and the different residential types that have emerged in China are elaborated on in this section in order to provide readers an insight into the specific milieu which the projects are seeking to address.
Photograph by Ann Forsyth
9—9
Chapter 1 Introduction Chronic Lifestyle Diseases 1 Aging Populations 6 Healthy Environments 8 A Timeline of Public Health, and the Built Environment, Ann Forsyth, Leire Asensio Villoria, David Mah, Har Ye Kan, Justin Kollar, Xinhui Li + Han Yang 12 Environments, Populations, and Health: Learning from (Modern) Health and Place, Leire Asensio Villoria + David Mah 17 When Public Health and Planning Closely Intersect: Five Moments, Five Strategies, Ann Forsyth 34
Lifestyled – Health and Places Figure 1 Prevalence of diabetes in the chinese population.
15% 2010 11.6% 2007 9.7%
10%
2000-2001 5.5%
Prevalence of Diabetes in China
5%
1994 2.5%
Global Prevalence of Diabetes
1980 <1% 0% 1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
Source: Journal of the American Medical Association, 2013, Survey 4 The Lancet 2014, 716. It is also projected in the referenced article that non-communicable diseases make up 70% of the total disease burden for China. 5 World Health Organization (Department of Measurement and Health 80% Information, 2010) 70% 6 WHO cancer fact sheet. 60%
50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 7 Xu et al. 2013. 0%
Prevalence of Diabetes in the Chinese Population
When considering the specific case of China, over 80% of the countries’ current mortality rate is said to be a consequence of non-communicable diseases.4 Cardiovascular disease alone is the leading cause of death worldwide and according to a study by the Chinese Society of Cardiology, China can attribute over 40% of total deaths every year5 to cardiac illnesses, a rate more than double that of typical European countries. Furthermore, the WHO projects annual cardiovascular events in China to surge by 50% with trends in diabetes, cholesterol, blood pressure, and smoking contributing a projected 23% increase. Cancer, another major chronic disease, is also recorded to have steadily increasing global rates with predictions that prevalence of the disease will rise by 70% over the next two decades.6 China has suffered one of the highest rates of increase contributing to 27% of the world’s total cancer deaths, and this Contribution of chronic disease trajectory is expected to continue. to all deaths In addition to cancer and cardiovascular diseases, diabetes is also emerging as a significant global Contribution of chronic disease problem with forecasts for it to become the seventh leadingtocause of death 2030. However, it has the global burdenby of disease already emerged as a much more acute concern in China, with an alarming prevalence that exceeds the global averages. According to a 2010 survey for diabetes in the country, it was found that close to 12% of adults or 114 million people,7 (roughly equivalent to Nigeria’s total population), suffer from diabetes with 2002II diabetes being pervasive. 2020 type These numbers suggest that China may have the largest population of diabetes sufferers in the world. Contribution of Chronic Disease to the Mortality, Morbidity and Disability In parallel to this pattern, an unexpected surge in worldwide obesity has also evolved into a major The World Health Report 2002: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life, WHO, 2002 worldwide health challenge. At a global scale, obesity has been recognized as a pandemic, by the WHO. This inflammatory disease defies assumptions of its association with prosperity alone, where as it currently presents a significant concern for both developed and developing countries. The growth Journal of the American Medical Association, 2013 Survey
Figure 2 Obese population in China as compared to the population of the UK.
=
3.95% Diabetes
Other Cardiovascular Diseases 46.05% Cardiovascular
10.53% Respiratory
Cancer Respiratory Diseases
21.58% Cancer
(5%) 62 Million Obese
3.95% Diabetes
17.89% Other UK
Diabetes
China Total Population of 1.357 Billion (2013)
Other
Annual Deaths Caused by Major Types of Noncommunicable Diseases (NCDs)
46.05% Cardiovascular
Total Population of 64 Million (2013)
10.53% Respiratory
21.58% Cancer
Chapter 1 / Introduction
2 — 3 Figure 3 (Left) A young woman depicted after contracting cholera in the first European epidemic in 1831. Figure 4 (Right) Tourists II, Duane Hansen, 1988. Courtesy Van de Weghe Fine Art, New York.
8 All data on obesity rates from Marie Ng, PhD. et al. 2014.
in the global population of overweight or obese individuals from 857 million in 1980 to 2.1 billion in 2013, indicates that the problem has rapidly expanded to affect nearly 30% of the total global population. Although type II diabetes, a prevailing concern in China, is linked to obesity, when taking a cursory glance at general numbers related to obesity incidence in the country, it would appear that, statistically speaking, it doesn’t pose a significant problem. According to the WHO 2011 Global Database on Body Mass Index, China is among the countries with the smallest proportion of its population affected with a less than 5% obesity rate. However, given the size of China’s population, this translates to roughly 62 million people, a population approximately equal to that of the United Kingdom, making it the country with the second largest number of affected individuals in the world. Even more significant is the rapid growth in the obesity rate for children, where young boys suffer a rate double to those of adult males with an overall overweight/obesity rate of 23%. Out of a survey of 188 countries, children in China were found to have had the fourth fastest growth in obesity rates between 1980 and 2013.8 Within this short summary of the main public health challenges posed by chronic illnesses, we clearly see their current and projected impact on the global population. These trends are anticipated to persist if little is done to address the modifiable risks that lead to many of these diseases. Modifiable risks for the major chronic diseases are common and include poor diet, physical inactivity, tobacco use, and environmental factors such as pollution. In addition to any number of strategies such as public education campaigns promoting physical activity or healthy eating and increasing taxes on cigarettes for instance, the design and planning of our built environments is also a crucial factor in addressing chronic diseases. Key among the concerns related to the built environment are the careful cultivation of physical activity and food environments, as well as providing the appropriate infrastructure or places that may contribute
Figure 5 Population in China with type II diabetes compared to the population of Nigeria.
=
(12%) 160 Million with Diabetes Type II (2010) Nigeria Total Population of 159 Million (2010)
China Total Population of 1.339 Billion (2010)
Ann Forsyth
When Public Health and Planning Closely Intersect Five Moments, Five Strategies
Lifestyled – Health and Places
1 Sloane 2006; Lopez 2012.
Trained in planning and architecture, Ann Forsyth is a professor of urban planning at the Harvard Graduate School of Design. From 2007-2012 she was a professor of city and regional planning at Cornell. She taught previously at the University of Minnesota, directing the Metropolitan Design Center (2002-2007), Harvard (1999-2002), and the University of Massachusetts (1993-1999) where she was co-director of a small community design center, the Urban Places Project.
Professional public health and urban planning are practices with intertwined histories, intersecting and diverging at various points in the past century or so. Both fields developed in their contemporary form as responses to a set of conditions arising from industrialization, urbanization, and migration. They looked forward to cleaner, safer, healthier, and more supportive places and communities. Their histories demonstrate multiple specific interconnections from slum clearance and anti-sprawl advocacy to traffic safety and water supply protection.1 This chapter focuses on five key intersections that represent both a substantive interest and a methodological approach: • • • • •
Documenting and analyzing social conditions in neighborhoods, towns, and cities, Reforming the city with targeted social interventions in places, Regulating cities and regions for health outcomes, Building model communities, and Coordinating diverse actors to make places healthier.
These are important moments. However, they were not necessarily those seen as most important overall, particularly in the field of public health. When the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 1999 articulated ten great public health achievements of the 20th century, these included: immunizations, infectious disease control, workplace safety, healthier mothers and babies, family planning, fluoridation of water, tobacco seen as a health hazard, safer and healthier foods, work to decrease deaths from heart disease and strokes, and motor vehicle safety. While some of these overlapped with urban planning activities, planning was not the main actor. For example, motor vehicle safety, the area with perhaps the most obvious links, has increased due to changes in vehicle and highway design, laws (e.g. safety belts and anti-drunk driving), and secondarily the work of planners to protect pedestrians with mechanisms like traffic calming. This reflects the complexities of intervening in specific places, and the difficulties of population-wide solutions to the problems of specific localities.
Chapter 1
Figure 1-3 (Above) Thomas Annan’s 1868 photos of Glasgow.
34 — 35
Documenting + Analyzing In the nineteenth century Britain led the world in industrialization and urbanization. The relatively stable, if hierarchical and unequal, world of Jane Austen novels, set in the late 18th and very early 19th century, was transformed into the more chaotic and ruthless world of Charles Dickens some decades later. As industrial urbanization spread more globally, those documenting and analyzing the situation worked to systematically understand the resulting poverty, disease, and inequality. They communicated these problems to a set of opinion leaders and policy makers who had ignored or just not grasped their magnitude. This work in the middle and later part of the nineteenth century included: •
2 Engels 1943.
• • 3 Annan 1900; Riis 1890.
•
Written reports based on observations of living conditions— compellingly Engel’s Condition of the Working Class in England in 1844.2 Mapping of disease—most famously the early 1850s maps by Snow of the Broad Street pump cholera outbreak in London. Photography of living conditions—Annan’s early photography of Glasgow taken in between 1866 and 1871, but also Riis’s (1890) work on How the Other Half Lives in New York.3 Surveying and mapping of poverty and in equality—exemplified by Booth’s poverty maps of London and DuBois’ work on race in Philadelphia in the 1980s.
Showing the interplay between crowded conditions, poverty, and unhealthy housing and work places, the earliest of these analyses and exposés predate both the public health and planning fields, at least in their
Photograph by Justin Kollar
11 — 11
Chapter 2 The Social Determinants of Health – An Interview with Dr. Ichiro Kawachi 44 The Built Environment and Mental Well-being – An Interview with Dr. Gary Evans 60 Promoting Physical Activity for All Ages, Laura Smead 70
Lifestyled – Health and Places
Overall Walkability
Recreation facilities (access/density/ proximity)
Residential density + land-use mix/ destinations (transit, jobs, stores)
Street connectivity
Walking/biking facilities (e.g. designated paths)
Figure 10-12 (Top) Photographs of recommended characteristics for able-bodied adults. Figure 13 (Middle) Diagram of ideal and recommended characteristics to employ. Figure 14 (Right Page, Full Bleed) Photograph of a poor physical environment that can make healthier life practices challenging.
21 Controlled intersections have traffic lights, stop signs, or yield signs.
• Parks (access/density/proximity) • Transit proximity and access Highly Recommended: • Access to recreational facilities (access/density/proximity) (e.g. such as a neighborhood gym, pool, green space, or recreational equipment) • Residential or population density (more likely to be close to neighbors, destinations, or services) • Aesthetics (e.g. street trees, landscaping, green roofs, green walls) • Low traffic speed/volume (e.g. less than 30mph or 48kph) Good-to-do: • Safety from neighborhood disorder or crime (might be perceptions of safety or an objective measure such as violent crime rates) • Pedestrian safety structures (e.g. controlled intersections,21 crosswalks, etc.) • Pedestrian amenities (e.g. benches, public toilets, water fountains)
Photograph by Justin Kollar
13 — 13
Chapter 3 China’s Modernist Superblocks, Peter Rowe + Har Ye Kan 92 Spatial Foundation of the ‘Aging in Place’ Community, Shanghai, Yu Yifan 104
Peter G. Rowe + Har Ye Kan
China’s Modernist Superblocks
Lifestyled – Health and Places
Peter G. Rowe is the Raymond Garbe Professor of Architecture and Urban Design and a Harvard University Distinguished Service Professor at Harvard University where he has taught since 1985 and served as Dean of the Graduate School of Design between 1992 and 2004. He is an author or editor of numerous books, several of which deal with housing, including Making a Middle Landscape, Modernity and Housing, and Modern Housing in China, 1840-2000. Har Ye Kan has been a Research Associate and Post-Doctoral Fellow at the Graduate School of Design, Harvard University, where she recently completed her doctoral degree. The author of several articles and book chapters dealing primarily with Chinese urbanism, she also served as an instructor with Peter Rowe in a graduate seminar on housing. A defining feature of China’s urban landscape is its modernist superblocks. Spreading out in a carpet-like fashion across the built-up fabric, these superblocks or megaplots typically occupy sites of some six hectares and above, and are bounded by wide arterial roads. They are commonly used as the basic configuration to structure Chinese neighborhoods with each block composed of a mixture of walk-up slabs and/or high-rise towers, supported by amenities such as community and retail services. Prosaic as they may seem, these large tracts have arguably been held as the standard template for urban expansion and adopted across most cities writ large since the beginning of the communist era. At the outset, under the danwei or ‘work-unit’ system, a rather full array of production facilities and community services were incorporated, before the privations of the Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution set about reducing the scope of building projects. Then again, in more contemporary projects, there have been noticeable shifts towards incorporating a greater diversity of programs and land uses once again, as well as attempts to resolve some of the problems arising from this mode of development. What follows is an analysis of how and why superblocks emerged as the prototype for urbanization in modern China, an evaluation of their efficacy, and commentary on recent design evolutions that seek to chart new pathways forward for their redevelopment.
Early Urban Blocks 1 Colquhoun 1981, 83-103. Also see Sarah Whiting, “The Invisible Superblock” in SOM, accessed September 30, 2013, https://www.som.com/publication/invisible-superblock.
The superblock, as defined by Alan Colquhoun, refers to a large tract of real estate which is financed and organized as a single entity.1 The form of the superblock could be determined by the existing street pattern or it could be composed by a cluster of buildings or a single megastructure spanning an area across one or more adjacent blocks. More importantly, a superblock is distinguished by its ‘total design’ where it is generally conceived of as a whole. Blocks have been used for the organization of cities, including those in China, reaching far back into the early imperial times. The construction
Chapter 3
Figure 1 (Above) Inside Langrun Gardens by Vanke.
2 The dimensions of the smallest wards in Chang’an ranged between 500–590 meters by 550-700 meters while the dimensions of the largest wards ranged between 660-838 meters by 1,020-1,125 meters. See China Baike, “Sui Daxing Tang Chang’an Cheng Yizhi (Sui Daxing & Tang Chang’an Historic City Ruins),” accessed August 17, 2015, http://www.chinabaike.com/ article/1/78/434/2007/20070520113556_2.html . 3 Steinhardt 1990.
92 — 93
manual Kaogongji (Record of Trades) from the Book of Zhou Li (Rites of Zhou) compiled during the Spring and Autumn Period (771 to 476 B.C.) described the canonical form of the state capitals. In this idealized plan, the square-shaped cities measure nine li on side, with three gates on each side. Within the walled settlement are nine meridional and nine latitudinal streets, thereby giving rise to the grid iron pattern subdividing the city into blocks. Of the many Chinese capitals from the various eras, Chang’an from the Tang Dynasty is most renowned for its checkerboard block configuration. The street layout was formed by fourteen latitudinal and eleven longitudinal streets which divided the city into approximately 130 blocks, some of which were set aside for commercial, administrative, and religious purposes. 108 of these blocks were developed into walled residential wards of various sizes, ranging from roughly the equivalent of 27.5 hectares to 94.3 hectares in area.2 Apart from other East Asian capitals such as Kyoto and Nara that were modeled after Chang’an, the imperial capitals from the Song, Yuan, and Qing dynasties adhered as much as possible to the gridded block pattern and the creation of residential wards.3 In essence, Chinese cities have long maintained the practice of organizing residential spaces into walled, largesized blocks. While the block has long been a basic unit used in Chinese cities since the pre-modern era, the superblock is a modernist invention. The earliest adoption of the term refers to the German word Siedlung which largely refers to a human settlement and acquired a particular meaning in Vienna under the rule of the Austrian Socialist Party. Between 1919 and 1934, nearly a
Lifestyled – Health and Places
Figure 7 (Above, Left) Photo of Tiantongyuan.
Opportunities & Recent Design Evolutions
Figure 8 (Above, Right) Photo of Huilongguan.
28 Qiu 2007.
29 Li Ju, “Shanghai Vanke Langrun Gardens, Vanke City Gardens Case Studies,” accessed August 4, 2015, http:// wenku.baidu.com/view/44bdc66b1eb91a37f0115c02.html.
30 “Low Carbon Cities: Principles and Practices for China’s Next Generation of Growth,” accessed August 4, 2015, http://www.calthorpe.com/files/China%20Design%20 Manual%20Pamphlet.pdf.
31 “Jian Wai SOHO,” SOHO China, accessed October 20, 2013, http://jianwaisoho.sohochina.com/en.
Shortcomings of the superblock template have been recently acknowledged by some policy makers who have re-oriented urban planning towards more compact forms of development and improving diversity in urban environments.28 At the same time, the large size and coverage of China’s superblocks offer opportunities for design interventions that can enhance the estates’ environmental performances, live-work circumstances, and infrastructural access. Vanke’s Langrun Gardens, for instance, was developed to be the “first, green ecological residential district” in China. Occupying a 9.6-hectare site, the project incorporated a rainwater collection and recycling system into the neighborhood’s themed landscape areas. Other environmental and ecological features include green roofs, vertical greening elements, the use of solar power and natural gas, double-glazed and high solar gain and low-E glass windows, as well as having a high green space coverage of 40%.29 In this case and in many other ecological residential estates that were developed thereafter, the ‘total design’ nature of the superblocks lends itself well to undertaking interventions that would enhance the sustainability of these communities. Attempts at introducing a finer-grain of road and transit network with smaller blocks of mixed use activities have also been initiated by a collaboration between Calthorpe Associates, The China Sustainable Energy Program, and the ClimateWorks Foundation. The aim is to create active, vibrant urban communities that will be more sustainable, resilient, and energy efficient by designing these around the pedestrian, bicyclists, and transit. These ideas are currently being tested out in the planning and construction of Chenggong New Town in Kunming, and in Yuelai Eco-City in Chongqing.30 A project that effectively redeveloped what was originally a danwei superblock configuration is Jian Wai SOHO in central Beijing. The 34-hectare superblock was subdivided into nine smaller parcels by re-introducing a denser network of roads, effectively reducing the size of a typical block to around 300 meters by 200 meters. Within this expansive site, the entire Jian Wai SOHO development took up just 16.9 hectares spread across four and a half parcels.31 The uses in each block were also varied to incorporate conventional office and retail spaces, as well as different types of home-office apartments which offered a higher degree of programmatic adaptability. To enhance the spatial
Chapter 3 / China’s Modernist Superblocks
Figure 9 (Above) Photo of Vanke’s Langrun Gardens.
32 Enlazado 2008, 226-241.
Figure 10 (Below) Jian Wai SOHO by Riken Yamamoto. Small open plaza with adjacent offices and residential complexes.
100 — 101 experience, the architect Riken Yamamoto explored what might be termed a ‘field operation’ to ‘thicken’ the ground plane. In the first few phases of the project, the checkerboard layout of nine slender towers and the four low-rise villas were combined with a plinth of underground parking and common living spaces together with a horizontal ground plane above for public open space. Sunken courtyards marked the common living spaces, crisscrossed by pedestrian pathways allowing residents and visitors to explore different aspects of the place in a maze-like manner. Another contemporary project of note is Steven Holl’s Linked Hybrid located in the northeast corner of Beijing beyond the Second Ring Road. Here, the focus was on introducing greater porosity to challenge the enclave-like condition of most superblock housing estates in China. To create a connected “city of spaces,” passages lined with shops and public functions on the ground floor were designed to be open to be street.32 Within the site, seven individual buildings were joined together by a C-shaped loop comprising a multitude of amenities servicing the residents, including a pool, a gym, cafes and stores, galleries, lounges, and viewing decks. In six out of the seven buildings, residential space was combined with commercial, recreational, and sometimes educational uses. Besides the effort to foster greater interactions with the broader urban fabric, the Linked Hybrid also installed some 600 geothermal wells under the reflecting pool encircled by the buildings to provide cooling in the summer and heating in the winter. Such a feature clearly leveraged the superblock’s nature and the size of the site to be able to put in place such a large-scale system. In Shanghai, similar strategies of opening the estate to through pedestrian traffic and creating an artificial lake in the middle of an urban block to enhance the environmental amenity were used by the Canadian firm, B + H Architects, in their design for Top of the City I, a multi-tower residential development with podiums for retail and commercial space.
Photograph by Justin Kollar
15 — 15
Chapter 4 Research by Designers, Leire Asensio Villoria + David Mah 119 Design Research Process and Visualization 131
Lifestyled – Health and Places
Figure 15 (Above) Recent photograph of a Beijing Hutong. Figure 16 (Below) Primary elements of the courtyard house type.
2 1 2
3
1 Private Inner Courtyard
2 Other Functional Courtyards
3 Entrance and Hutong Alleyway
Chapter 5 / Lifestyled China-Town Studio Themes
224 — 225
Figure 1 (Below, Left) Siheyuan (四合院) Example courtyard house and Hutong aggregation pattern.
Aggregation of Attached Buildings for Family Residence Private Courtyard Entry Gate Hutong Street
Figure 18 (Above, Right) The arrangement of courtyard houses fills in space to form the hutong: small pedestrian alleyways.
Changes in the family structure and property ownership demanded a re-thinking of the courtyard housing typology and its conservation. The shrinking of the family unit to nuclear family models has shifted emphasis away from preserving an extensive family structure. Private courtyard housing ownership was transferred to government ownership in the 1950s and 1960s. This changed the singleextended family function of the courtyard housing to multi-family compounds. Throughout the 1960s and through the 1980s, many courtyard houses were packed with a variety of migrant populations and partitions were put up that largely negated the older structure. Present day conservation and construction of new courtyard housing typologies address the preservation of the cultural heritage of the traditional courtyard house, even if traditional family functions have been lost. Lilong Housing With China’s defeat in the Opium War of 1842, Shanghai was forced to open to European trade, and by the end of the 1840s, many foreign powers had already set up settlements in the city. According to the Land Regulation of 1845, these settlements were to be reserved for foreigners and their own housing. However, these regulations were far from effective as many migrants and refugees moved in to Shanghai’s foreign settlements throughout the Taiping Rebellion, and by 1854, the segregationist policies were dropped. Under the new mixed-residence policy coupled with a surging population, property suddenly became one of the most valuable businesses.
Figure 27 (Both Pages) Image of adjacent conditions in Songjiang
Chapter 5 / Lifestyled China-Town Studio Themes
“Since economic reform, the real estate market has gradually become one of the main contributors to economic growth and sources of local government revenue. Today, local governments hold auctions for land-use rights and developers buy the rights to use the land to develop the land into xiaoqu.�
Lifestyled – Health and Places
Prototypes Design Research Team Design Coordinators: Leire Asensio Villoria David Syn Chee Mah Team: Justin Kollar Xinhui Li Leo Miller Yannis Orfanos Bingjie Shi Weishun Xu Han Yang Yujun Yin Elizabeth Wu
Upper Level Graduate Option Studio: Life-Styled – China-Town Studio Instructors: Leire Asensio Villoria David Syn Chee Mah Students: Whitney Hansley (M’Arch 1) Ali Karimi (M’Arch 1) Justin Kollar (M’Arch 1) Alejandro Lara (MAUD) Yi Li (M’Arch 1) Wei Lin (MAUD) Zhe Peng (M’ARCH2) Dima Rachid (MLA2) Won Joon Seol (MLAUD/MLA1) Rituparna Simlai (MLA1) Clayton Strange Lee (MAUD) Wen Wen (M’Arch 1) Yujun Yin (M’ARCH2/MLA1)
332 — 333
Editors David Syn Chee Mah: David Mah has been a lecturer in landscape architecture at Harvard’s Graduate School of Design since 2010. Previous to Harvard, he has taught at Cornell University’s departments of Architecture as well as City and Regional Planning from 2007 till 2010. David has also taught within the postgraduate design, Landscape Urbanism program at the Architectural Association in London from 2004 till 2007. Leire Asensio Villoria: Leire Asensio-Villoria is a registered architect in Spain and studied architecture at the ETSASS and the Architectural Association (AA). She received her diploma in architecture (with honors) from the AA. She has been a lecturer in architecture and landscape architecture at Harvard’s Graduate School of Design since 2011. Asensio-Villoria was a design studio instructor in graduate design school at the AA from 2004 to 2007 and a Visiting Lecturer in Architecture at Cornell from 2006 to 2010. Both Leire and David have been design research coordinators for the prototypes design research team of Harvard University’s Health and Places Initiative (a collaboration between the Graduate school of Design and the TH Chan School of Public Health) from 2014 till 2016.
Contributing Authors Dr. Gary Evans: Dr. Gary Evans is the Elizabeth Lee Vincent professor at the College of Human Ecology at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York. He is an environmental and developmental psychologist interested in how the physical environment affects human health and well-being among children. Evans’ specific areas of expertise include children’s environments, the environment of childhood poverty, cumulative risk and child development, environmental stressors, and the development of children’s environmental attitudes and behaviors. Ann Forsyth: Trained in planning and architecture, Ann Forsyth is a professor of urban planning at the Harvard Graduate School of Design. From 2007-2012 she was a professor of city and regional planning at Cornell. She taught previously at the University of Minnesota, directing the Metropolitan Design Center (2002-2007), Harvard (1999-2002), and the University of Massachusetts (1993-1999) where she was co-director of a small community design center, the Urban Places Project.
Lifestyled – Health and Places
Har Ye Kan: Har Ye Kan is a Research Associate and Post-Doctoral Fellow at the Graduate School of Design, Harvard University, where she recently completed her doctoral degree. The author of several articles and book chapters dealing primarily with Chinese urbanism, she also served as an instructor with Peter Rowe in a graduate seminar on housing. Ichiro Kawachi: Ichiro Kawachi, MB.ChB., Ph.D., is the John L. Loeb and Frances Lehman Loeb Professor of Social Epidemiology, and Chair of the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences at the Harvard School of Public Health. Dr Kawachi received both his medical degree and Ph.D. (in epidemiology) from the University of Otago, New Zealand. He has taught at the Harvard School of Public Health since 1992. Peter G. Rowe: Peter G. Rowe is the Raymond Garbe Professor of Architecture and Urban Design and a Harvard University Distinguished Service Professor at Harvard University where he has taught since 1985 and served as Dean of the Graduate School of Design between 1992 and 2004. He is an author or editor of numerous books, several of which deal with housing, including Making a Middle Landscape, Modernity and Housing, and Modern Housing in China, 1840-2000. Laura Smead: Laura Smead is a research associate in urban planning for the Health and Places Initiative at Harvard’s Graduate School of Design. With master’s degrees in both urban planning and psychology, Ms. Smead has specialized knowledge on health, aging, climate change, and sustainable urban planning. Her contributions to the Health and Places Initiative include being the primary author of research briefs on health and place, contributing to the development of a new suite of health impact assessment tools for planners, and co-authoring a guidelines book on creating healthy neighborhoods. Yu Yifan: Yu Yifan, Ph.D (EHESS, France, 2003), has been a professor at the Urban Planning Department of Tongji University since 1996. She has been a research fellow at Harvard University Graduate School of Design and Sorbonne University in Paris. She also serves as Vice President of Shanghai Urban Planning Association, Deputy Secretary General of the China Real Estate Research Association, and Deputy President of Sino-francophone Scholars Association (SORSA). Yu’s practice and research focus on urban housing and city renovation, and she has published more than 40 articles and has authored three books: Urban Habitation Morphology, Urban Design Project and Atlas de Shanghai (with UNESCO).