Auckland City Rail Link In association with:
CONSTRUCTION WORKS CONTRACT 1 PUBLIC ART DELIVERY WORK PLAN Document Ref: CRL-BTM-ENV-DOW-PLN-000364
Revision: 11 December 2018
COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
Version history Rev.
Date
Version details
Prepared by
Reviewed by
1
October 2015
Draft for Auckland Transport review
R Purdy
P Roan
2
October 2015
Draft for CLG review
R Purdy
P Roan, R Jenkins
3
December 2015
Draft for Independent Peer Review
R Purdy
P Roan, S Lough, K Martinengo
4
April 2016
Draft incorporating revised BTC designation conditions, Independent Peer Review and Auckland Council comments
R Purdy
P Roan
5
April 2016
Draft for consultation/CLG review
R Purdy
P Roan, R Jenkins
6
May 2016
Draft incorporating CLG comments for Independent Peer Review
R Purdy
P Roan, R Jenkins
7
May 2016
Draft for Auckland Transport review incorporating CLG and Peer Reviewer comments
J Urquhart
P Roan
8
June 2016
Final
J Urquhart
P Roan, R Jenkins
9
June 2016
Final incorporating Auckland Council comments
R Purdy
R Jenkins
10
October 2017
Annual plan review
R Purdy S Sutherland
D Burtenshaw
11
December 2018
Annual plan review
S Sutherland
D Burtenshaw
Distribution Date
Version
Issued to
Quantity & type
Approved for the DSBJV by
23 October 2015
Draft
Auckland Transport
1x Electronic
D Burtenshaw
30 October 2015
Draft
Community Liaison Group
1x Electronic
D Burtenshaw
8 December 2015
Draft
Independent Peer Review
1x Electronic
D Burtenshaw
8 April 2016
Draft
Auckland Transport
1x Electronic
D Burtenshaw
12 April 2016
Draft
Community Liaison Group
1x Electronic
D Burtenshaw
17 May 2016
Draft
Independent Peer Review
1x Electronic
D Burtenshaw
28 May 2016
Draft
Auckland Transport
1x Electronic
D Burtenshaw
2 June 2016
Final
Auckland Transport
1x Electronic 1 x Hard copy
D Burtenshaw
30 June 2016
Final
Auckland Transport, Auckland Council
1x Electronic
D Burtenshaw
13 October 2017
Draft
CRLL
1 x Electronic
D Burtenshaw
21 December 2017
Draft
Auckland Council
1 x Electronic
D Burtenshaw
2 July 2018
Final
CRLL, Auckland Council
1 x Electronic
D Burtenshaw
19 December 2018
Draft
CRLL, Auckland Council
1 x Electronic
D Burtenshaw
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
This document remains the property of DSBJV. Its contents are confidential and shall not be reproduced, destroyed or given away without express, written permission of DSBJV. The electronic version of this document in FULCRUM on designated serves(s) is the Master Copy and is a controlled document. Unless specifically noted, thereon, other copies of this document are uncontrolled. j:\crl c1\08 environment sustainability\0801 environmental management plans and delivery work plans\public art dwp\crl-btm-env-dowpln-000364 public art rev 10.docx
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
Table of contents 1
2 3 4
5
6 7
Introduction 1.1 Purpose of Public Art Delivery Work Plan 1.2 Relevant Conditions 1.3 Urban Design DWP 1.3.1 Permanent Public Realm Design Project Description Project Area Public Art Management of Public Art 4.1 Forest of Stainless Steel Trees 4.1.1 Removal 4.1.2 Storage 4.1.3 Reinstatement 4.2 Bluestone Basalt Waterfalls 4.2.1 Removal 4.2.2 Storage 4.2.3 Reinstatement 4.3 After the Irish Guards 4.3.1 Removal 4.3.2 Storage 4.3.3 Re-siting 4.4 Maori Warrior 4.5 Te Ahi Kaa Roa 4.5.1 Removal 4.5.2 Storage 4.5.3 Re-siting Consultation 5.1 Auckland Council 5.2 Mana Whenua Asset Management Plan DWP Review and Updating 7.1 DWP Review 7.2 DWP Updates
Appendix A :
Asset Management Plan for Te Ahi Kaa Roa
Appendix B :
CLG and Independent Peer Review Comments
Appendix C:
Register of Plan Updates
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
1 1 2 3 3 4 5 8 8 9 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 16 17 17 17
December 2018
Glossary of abbreviations Acronym
Definition
AT
Auckland Transport
BTC
Britomart Transport Centre
CEMP
Construction Environmental Management Plan
CPO
Former Chief Post Office building
CRL
City Rail Link
CRLL
City Rail Link Limited
DWP
Delivery Work Plan
QEII Square
Queen Elizabeth II Square
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
1
1
Introduction
The City Rail Link (CRL) project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line in the vicinity of Mt Eden station. The works relating to this Public Art Delivery Work Plan (DWP) constitute part of the enabling works for the CRL. The works (the Project) involve the construction of an extension to the existing passenger rail network from the current termination point within the Britomart Transport Centre (BTC), westwards underneath the former Central Post Office Building (CPO) and lower Queen Street. The Project footprint is shown by the blue shaded area in Figure 1.1 below.
LEGEND CRL alignment BTC designation CRL designation C1 worksite
Figure 1.1: Project Footprint
1.1
Purpose of Public Art Delivery Work Plan
This Public Art DWP has been prepared to manage the adverse effects of constructing the CRL on public art located within or in close proximity to the Project footprint. A Public Art DWP is required under Condition 56 of the CRL designation and Condition 32 of the BTC designation. The objective of the Public Art DWP is to enable the appropriate removal or relocation of public art directly affected by construction of the Project. Redevelopment of the Downtown Shopping Centre site, including construction of the CRL rail tunnels beneath the site, will require the removal of Te Ahi Kaa Roa (also known as ‘Enduring Fires’) from its current location within Queen Elizabeth II (QEII) Square. The Maori Warrior, located on the corner of Quay Street and lower Queen Street, is outside the Project footprint. The Project works within the BTC will require the removal of the bluestone basalt waterfalls, the forest of stainless steel trees, and the ‘After the Irish Guards’ lightboxes in the pedestrian concourse. The Public Art DWP outlines the following: •
Public art located within or adjacent to the Project construction footprint;
•
Management of public art impacted by the Project;
•
Consultation undertaken in relation to the management of public art impacted by the Project; and
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
2 Asset management of public art works impacted by the Project.
•
This DWP has been prepared by Tonkin & Taylor Ltd (T+T) for the Downer Soletanche Bachy Joint Venture (the Contractor - DSBJV) and forms part of the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) for the Project.
1.2
Relevant Conditions
Table 1.1 identifies the designation conditions relevant to this Public Art DWP and where they are addressed in the document. Table 1.1: Condition No.
Public Art DWP conditions and DWP section where addressed Condition
Relevant section of DWP City Rail Link Designation
CRL 56.1
A Public Art DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects on public art located within or in close proximity to the designation footprint.
This document
CRL 56.2
The objective of the Public Art DWP is to enable: (a) The appropriate removal and / or relocation of one piece of public art directly affected by the construction of the City Rail Link; (b) The protection of two pieces of public art that are located on public land in close proximity to the City Rail Link construction works.
This document
CRL 56.3
To achieve the above objective the following shall be included in the Public Art DWP and implemented as required: (a) The process that will be undertaken to remove the public art work known as "Enduring Fires" (at the time of the Notice of Requirement process located within Queen Elizabeth Square), including the consultation undertaken with the Auckland Council and Ngati Whatua ki Tamaki or Ngati Whatua o Orakei as to its removal, storage, re-establishment or relocation and / or replacement (as part of the restoration works associated with the City Rail Link construction);
Sections 4 - 5
(b) The process that will be undertaken to protect or remove the public art work known as "Maori Warrior" (at the time of the Notice of Requirement process located on the pavement of Quay Street adjacent to 1 Queen Street), including the consultation undertaken with the Auckland Council as to its protection during construction or whether it should be removed, stored, relocated and / or replaced (as part of the restoration works associated with the City Rail Link construction);
Sections 4 - 5
CRL 56.4
If one does not already exist, an asset management plan shall be prepared by the Requiring Authority in collaboration with Auckland Council for any of the above listed public art works as part of any protection or removal process.
Section 6
CRL 56.5
Should the above public art works be removed from these sites prior and separate to the City Rail Link project, this condition will not need to be complied with.
N/A
Britomart Transport Centre Designation 1 BTC 32.1A
A Public Art DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects on public art located within or in close proximity to the designation footprint.
This document
Conditions as attached to Auckland Transport’s Confirmation Notice of 17 March 2016 on Notice of Requirement to alter Britomart Transport Centre Designation
1
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
3 Condition No.
Condition
Relevant section of DWP
BTC 32.2
The objective of the Public Art DWP is to enable the appropriate removal and / or relocation of public art directly affected by the construction of the Project.
This document
BTC 32.3
To achieve the above objective, included in the Public Art DWP shall be the process that will be undertaken to remove the public art, its storage, re-establishment or relocation and / or replacement (as part of the restoration works associated with the Project), including the consultation undertaken with the Auckland Council and proposed implementation
Sections 4 - 5
BTC 32.4
If one does not already exist, an asset management plan shall be prepared by the Requiring Authority in collaboration with Auckland Council for any of the public art works as part of any protection or removal process.
Section 6
BTC 32.5
Should any public art works be removed prior to and separate from the Project, this condition will not need to be complied with.
N/A
1.3
Urban Design DWP
1.3.1
Permanent Public Realm Design
On completion of the Project, the affected streets and other public spaces (‘public realm’) will be reinstated in accordance with the Urban Design Delivery Work Plan (Urban Design DWP) for CRL. The Urban Design DWP is still being developed by City Rail Link Limited (CRLL). Amongst other things, the Urban Design DWP will identify the location of public art, including any re-siting or relocation of existing pieces of public art impacted as a result of the Project works.
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
4
2
Project Description
The Project involves the construction of an extension to the existing passenger rail network from the current termination point within the BTC, westwards underneath the CPO Building and lower Queen Street. Separate works are being undertaken to continue the CRL tunnels from this point under the Downtown Shopping Centre site (which is being redeveloped by Precinct Properties), and up Albert Street. The Project will involve significant works beneath the CPO, with the construction of two new tunnels extending westwards beneath the basement floor level. In lower Queen Street, secant piling will be extended across the road corridor, excavation undertaken to form the tunnels followed by reinstatement of the road corridor following the completion of works. During construction, existing ticketing and retail functions and pedestrian access to the station will be accommodated in Station Plaza, at the rear of the CPO building. Surface works will also be required in QEII Square associated with the Downtown Shopping Centre redevelopment, including construction of the CRL rail tunnels beneath this site (Precinct Properties scope of work). A detailed description of the construction works is provided in the Project CEMP.
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
5
3
Project Area Public Art
Table 3.1 identifies the public art works located within or in proximity to the BTC and CRL designation footprints. The location of these public art works is shown on Figure 3.1. It should be noted that this Public Art DWP does not include those elements within the BTC that are considered by the Auckland Council Public Art Team to be ‘design elements’. Such features include the finely woven mesh within the BTC that references tuku panelling, and the volcanic cone light wells. Table 3.1:
Public Art located within or in proximity to the BTC and CRL designation footprints
Art Work
Location
Description of Art Work
The forest of sculptured stainless steel trees
BTC Levels Basement 1 (B1) and Basement 2 (B2)
Forest of stainless steel trees with truncated, sawn-off limbs surrounded by a garden of real plants. The art is a monument to nature lost in the name of progress. The trees range in height from 5 to 23 m. Their patterned steel surfaces were created using computer-scanned photos of the tree trunks of native kauri, totara and cabbage trees.
Artist: Michael Parekowhai, 2004
Stainless steel trees and basalt waterfall This idea of the art being a monument to nature lost in the name of progress, is further reflected in the 18 kauri trees planted in QEII Square. These living trees provide a counterpoint to the stainless steel trees in the BTC Glasshouse space. Bluestone Basalt waterfalls
BTC Levels Basement 1 and Basement 2
Curved waterfalls backed with dark, fine-grained basalt volcanic rock and native plants on either side. Refer to the picture above showing part of one of the basalt waterfalls, which are located behind the stainless steel trees. Note that the waterfalls are no longer in operation.
After the Irish Guards
Concourse between BTC and Lower Queen Street
‘After the Irish Guards’ light works are located in the B1 concourse where they frame the entrance into the subway leading through from QE11 square. The works are visible through the banking floor of the CPO via a circle cut where the original kiosks in the banking chamber were sited.
Artist: Michael Parekowhai, 2004
After the Irish Guards Te Ahi Kaa Roa –
Queen Elizabeth II Square
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
Te Ahi Kaa Roa represents continued tribal occupation, possession and guardianship of lands, waterways and taonga.
December 2018
6 Art Work
Location
Enduring Fires
Description of Art Work Te Ahi Kaa Roa references the idea that keeping the home fires burning is essential for the maintenance of mana (authority) and the right to occupy a place. Burning fires are a potent Maori symbol of connection and belonging to the land. The artwork lies in the centre of Queen Elizabeth Square and aligns with both the CPO and the volcanic cones.
Artist: Ngati Whatua, 2004
Te Ahi Kaa Roa Maori Warrior Artist: Molly Macalister, 1967
Footpath on the corner of Quay Street and lower Queen Street
The 3m-tall bronze figure is enveloped in an artistic interpretation of a traditional Maori cloak. The warrior looks to the horizon holding a mere, a symbol of peace, in his right hand. It was intended that the welcoming figure would seem to greet visitors and new settlers who, at that time, arrived on passenger liners that docked at the wharves in downtown Auckland.
Maori Warrior
It should be noted that the Matahorua Anchor and The Tainui Anchor listed in CRL designation Condition 56.3(c) are located at the northern end of the Bledisloe Building on Wellesley Street and hence outside the Project footprint. Accordingly, these two pieces of public art are not discussed further in this DWP.
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
7
Stainless steel trees and basalt waterfall (inside BTC)
After the Irish Guards (BTC pedestrian concourse)
Maori Warrior
Te Ahi Kaa Roa
Figure 3.1: Location of Public Art in relation to the CRL (red line) and BTC (blue line) designation footprints
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
8
4
Management of Public Art
This section outlines the proposed management of public art during the construction works, and specifically the process that will be undertaken to remove, store and reinstate/re-site or relocate the individual art works impacted by the Project. The section also identifies the parties responsible for managing and implementing this process for the individual art works i.e. CRLL or the Auckland Council Public Art Team, along with providing indicative timeframes for the removal and reinstatement/re-siting of the public art. Table 4.1 provides a summary of the public art works impacted by the Project, and identifies the parties responsible for the management of individual art works. Table 4.1:
Summary of Art Work impacted by Project and Management Responsibility
Art Work
Project Impact on Public Art Work
Party Responsible for Public Art Management and DWP Implementation
Proposed Management Strategy
Forest of Stainless Steel Trees
Yes – within the BTC
CRLL
• Removal • Storage • Reinstatement
Bluestone Basalt waterfalls
Yes – within the BTC
CRLL
• Removal • Storage • Reinstatement
After the Irish Guards
Yes – within the BTC
CRLL
• Removal • Storage • Re-siting
Te Ahi Kaa Roa – Enduring Fires
Yes – while outside the Project footprint, Te Ahi Kaa Roa is located within the CRL designation footprint and will be impacted by redevelopment of the Downtown Shopping Centre site, including construction of the CRL rail tunnels beneath the site. The art work is to be managed through the provisions of the sale of Queen Elizabeth Square and the redevelopment of the Downtown Shopping Centre.
Auckland Council
• Removal • Storage
Maori Warrior
No – outside the BTC and CRL designation footprints and outside the zone of physical construction works by around 20 m.
Auckland Council
Re-siting to be agreed with Mana Whenua
Not impacted by works
Further detail on the management of the Public Art Works within the Project area is outlined in Sections 4.1 - 4.5 below.
4.1
Forest of Stainless Steel Trees
The Forest of Stainless Steel Trees will need to be removed from the BTC during the construction works, stored and reinstated following the completion of the works. Management of the removal, storage and reinstatement of the Forest of Stainless Steel Trees, along with engagement with the artist and the Auckland Council Public Art team, is the responsibility of CRLL.
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
9 A summary of the proposed methodology for the removal, storage and reinstatement of the Forest of Stainless Steel Trees is outlined below. This methodology has been developed in consultation with the Auckland Council Public Art team and the artist’s representative. The methodology will be confirmed with the artist (or artist’s representative) prior to the art work being removed. It should be noted that the 18 kauri trees planted in QEII Square, which provide a counterpoint to the stainless steel trees in the glasshouse space, will be removed as part of the Downtown Shopping Centre redevelopment and construction of the CRL rail tunnels beneath this site (Precinct Properties scope of work).
4.1.1
Removal
The removal of the Forest of Stainless Steel Trees will occur at some point in time during the period July – October 2016. During removal of the art work, the artist, or their appointed representative, will be on-site to supervise the removal process in order to minimise any impacts on the work. 4.1.1.1
BTC Basement 2 Columns
The proposed methodology to remove the 16 columns, all less than 22 metres in height, from Basement 2 of the BTC is as follows: a b
c
d e f
Install scaffolding to the top of each column. Manually remove the top section of each column and separate from the lower section. Place removed section in excavator bucket (lined with cushioning) and lower to the ground where it will be placed on a trolley and transported to storage. Cut exposed stainless steel skin down to a manageable lengths of 2 metres, strop with the excavator, lift and lower to ground level. Label all casing with the pole and section details. Transport to truck for storage. Complete above steps until the bottom section of the column is reached and stainless steel skin removed. Note that the bottom foam-filled section of column is to be left intact. Remove steel casing and break out the base of each pole with a gas axe if required, ensuring the bottom skin is wrapped/protected against damage. Strop casing with the excavator and gas axe the base of the casing. Once cut free, lift the casing onto a trolley and transport to storage.
The above process will be undertaken concurrently on a number of columns. The proposed methodology to remove the three remaining larger columns (approximately 22 metres in height) from Basement 2 of the BTC is as follows: a b c
d
Establish crane with man-cage attachment at northern end of the glasshouse, outside of the glasshouse. Remove glass louvers from the glasshouse. Access the column via the man-cage and strop column with auxiliary hook. Cut the column at 2 metre intervals using a gas axe. Use the crane to lift the cut section of column and place it at ground level or lower the cut section to Basement 2. Place the cut section on a trolley and transport it to a truck for storage. Method repeated until column removed.
4.1.1.2
BTC Basement 1 Columns
The proposed methodology to remove the eight columns from the BTC Basement 1 level is as follows:
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
10 a b c d
e f
4.1.2
Install scaffolding to the top of each column. Manually remove the top of the stainless steel skin. Relocate the crane from Basement 2 to Basement 1 and use the small skip attached to the crane to lift the skin to Basement 1. Load the skin onto a trolley and transport to storage. Gas axe the casing using the process outlined for the Basement 2 art works. Strop the crane to the steel casing and remove the cut sections through the glasshouse louvers. Load the sections onto a truck and transport to storage. Repeat the above process until the bottom foam filled section of the column is reached. Strop the column to crane and gas axe the base of the column to free the last section. Lift and transport the section to storage. Alternatively, if the bottom of the pole cannot be accessed, break out the surrounding concrete slab and cut off the steel casing below ground level.
Storage
All Removed stainless steel skins will be boxed up and packed with polystyrene billets and stored at a secure off-site AT storage facility during the construction period until the artwork is reinstated towards the end of the Project (refer to Section 4.1.3). The removed stainless steel casing will be securely stored at a designated AT storage facility during the construction period until the art works is reinstated towards the end of the Project. CRLL will be responsible for the storage of the art work during the construction phase of the Project.
4.1.3
Reinstatement
Reinstatement (in a reconfigured arrangement) of some of the Stainless Steel Trees within the BTC B1 and B2 levels will be undertaken as part of the BTC reinstatement works. Due to the westward extension of the new rail tunnels within the BTC, it will not be practicable to reinstate all of the Stainless Steel Trees and in the current configuration. Reinstatement will be undertaken at some point in time from late 2019 through to early 2020, with the process managed by CRLL in consultation with the artist or their appointed representative. Reinstatement of the art work will likely be undertaken in reverse order of the removal methodology outlined in Section 4.1.1 above, following the completion of the enabling works. The reinstatement methodology will be confirmed with the artist, or artist’s representative, prior to the works being undertaken.
4.2
Bluestone Basalt Waterfalls
Four of the bluestone basalt waterfalls will need to be removed from the BTC Basement 1 and 2 levels during the Project works, stored and then reinstated following the completion of the works. Management of the removal, storage and reinstatement of the Bluestone Basalt Waterfalls, along with engagement with the artist and the Auckland Council Public Art team, is the responsibility of CRLL. A summary of the proposed methodology for the removal, storage and reinstatement of the art work is outlined below. This methodology has been developed in consultation with the Auckland Council Public Art team and the artist’s representative and will be confirmed with the artist (or their representative) prior to the art work being removed.
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
11
4.2.1
Removal
The removal of the Bluestone Basalt Waterfalls from Basement 1 will occur at some point in time during the period October to November 2016 while the walls from Basement 2 will be removed in late 2019 to early 2020. During removal of the art work, the artist, or their appointed representative, will be on-site to supervise the removal process in order to minimise any impacts on the work. The proposed removal methodology is as follows: a
b c d e
4.2.2
Install scaffolding to the face of the wall (note that for the waterfalls that extend between BTC Basements 1 and 2 scaffolding will be installed after the bottom section of the temporary evacuation stairs have been removed). Start removal of the wall from top corner of wall. Demolish two tile squares to gain access to back of tile fixings. Pry tiles one by one from one side of the wall to the other until all tiles are removed. Demolish block backing wall. Saw cut the wall in manageable sections. Lift the cut sections of the wall out of the glasshouse onto a truck for recycling.
Storage
The tiles will be appropriately stored during the construction works until the art work is reinstated towards the end of the Project. Specifically: a
b
4.2.3
Tiles from the wall will be lowered down from scaffold and placed on pallets in the BTC Basement 1 level (for the wall from the ground floor to Basement 1) and Basement level (for the wall extending from Basement 1 to 2). Pallets to be stored at a designated AT facility.
Reinstatement
Reinstatement of the Bluestone Basalt Waterfalls will occur in the first half of 2020 as part of the BTC reinstatement works. Reinstatement will likely be undertaken as follows: a b
4.3
All tiles are to be preserved and reinstated at the end of the works as per the existing arrangement. For the wall between Basement 1 and Basement 2, once the CRL rail tunnel penetrations are completed, the wall will be realigned to accommodate the new rail tunnels (with a gap in the wall in this area).
After the Irish Guards
The pedestrian concourse that extends beneath Basement 1 of the BTC and Lower Queen Street is being demolished as part of the Project. The ‘After the Irish Guards’ lightboxes will be removed from their current location within the concourse. Management of the removal, storage and reinstatement of the lightboxes, along with engagement with the artist and the Auckland Council Public Art team, is the responsibility of CRLL. A summary of the proposed methodology for the removal, storage and reinstatement of the lightboxes is outlined below. This methodology has been developed in consultation with the Auckland Council Public Art team and the artist’s representative. The methodology will be confirmed with the artist (or artist’s representative) prior to the art work being removed.
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
12
4.3.1
Removal
Removal of the ‘After the Irish Guards’ lightboxes will occur in April or May 2016 following the closure of the BTC pedestrian concourse between the station and QEII Square, prior the commencement of the main CRL Britomart enabling works. The methodology for removal of the lightboxes is as follows: a b c d
4.3.2
Each light box will be isolated from the electrical supply. The picture panels will removed, cleaned, bubble wrapped, flat packed and stacked on a pallet. The frames and back light electrical components will be removed protected, wrapped and packed into crates. The removed components will be transported off-site.
Storage
The light box components will be stored securely in a designated Auckland Council or Auckland Transport storage facility until such time that they are re-sited. The storage location will be confirmed prior to the removal of the light box components.
4.3.3
Re-siting
The light boxes will be re-sited to a suitable location as agreed between the artist (or artist’s representative), Auckland Council and CRLL. All light box components will undergo a thorough check and refurbishment, as required, prior to reinstallation.
4.4
Maori Warrior
The Maori Warrior is located outside the CRL and BTC designation boundaries and the Project footprint. The Maori Warrior will be approximately 20 m from the physical construction works in lower Queen Street and not adversely affected by the proposed construction works. Accordingly, no specific management or protection of the Maori Warrior is required during the works.
4.5
Te Ahi Kaa Roa
As outlined in Section 3 of this Public Art DWP, Te Ahi Kaa Roa is located within the CRL designation. While outside the Project works footprint, Te Ahi Kaa Roa will need to be removed to enable construction of the Downtown Shopping Centre redevelopment, including construction of the CRL rail tunnels beneath this site. Management of the removal, storage and potential re-siting of Te Ahi Kaa Roa, along with engagement with the artist and mana whenua, is the responsibility of the Auckland Council Public Art Team. A summary of the proposed methodology for the removal and storage of Te Ahi Kaa Roa is outlined below. This methodology has been developed in consultation with the Auckland Council Public Art team and the artist’s representative. The methodology will be confirmed with the artist (or artist’s representative) prior to the art work being removed.
4.5.1
Removal
Removal of Te Ahi Kaa Roa was undertaken in May 2016.
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
13 During removal of the art work, the artist, or their appointed representative, was on-site to supervise the removal process in order to minimise any impacts on the work. A summary of the proposed removal methodology is as follows: a b c d e f g h i j k l
4.5.2
Disconnect and isolate existing services including gas, water and power located in the underground pump room that connect to Te Ahi Kaa Roa. Remove the fountain and gas flare fittings from the top basalt boulder. Insert steel wedges or packers into the gap between the two boulders. Use a wire saw to cut through the steel anchor bars that extend between the top and bottom basalt boulders. Strop and lift the top boulder off the bottom boulder in accordance with the Te Ahi Kaa Roa crane lift plan. Place removed boulder securely on a storage pallet or in a storage crate. Remove the service pipework from the top boulder. Repeat items e) through to g) from the above methodology in order to remove the bottom boulder. Water blast and clean the removed boulders. Water pump and associated equipment to be crated and placed onto waiting truck. Crane the storage pallets or crates containing the removed boulders onto a waiting truck. Transport the boulders and water pump to a designated Auckland Council Parks Department storage facility.
Storage
Te Ahi Kaa Roa will be stored in safe keeping at a designated Auckland Council Parks Department storage facility until such time that a suitable location for the resitting of Te Ahi Kaa Roa is confirmed. The Auckland Council Public Arts team will be responsible for the management of Te Ahi Kaa Roa for the storage duration.
4.5.3
Re-siting
The Auckland Council Public Art team will manage the re-siting of Te Ahi Kaa Roa, inclusive of consultation with the artist and mana whenua, in particular Ngati Whatua ki Tamaki or Ngati Whatua o Orakei, and any physical re-siting works.
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
14
5
Consultation
In accordance with CRL designation conditions 56.3(a) and 56.3(b) and BTC designation condition 32.3, AT has consulted with Auckland Council with respect to the management of public art during the Project works. A summary of the consultation undertaken is provided below.
5.1
Auckland Council
AT has consulted with Auckland Council on the management of public art impacted by the Project as outlined in Table 5.1. Table 5.1:
Engagement with the Auckland Council Public Arts Team
Engagement
Matters Discussed
Outcome/DWP Implementation
Various meetings in late 2015/early 2016 regarding the management of the Forest of Stainless Steel Trees
Meetings with Kim Martinengo (Auckland Council Public Art Project Co-ordinator) and artist’s representative regarding the management of the Forest of Stainless Steel Trees in the BTC during the Project works. Meetings discussed: • The proposed methodology for the removal, storage and reinstatement of the art work • Storage locations for the art work - the Auckland Council Public Art Team advising the DSBJV as to suitable locations. • Configurations for the reinstated art work – unlikely that all the trees will be reinstated due to the location of the new rail tunnels in the BTC. • Artist involvement in the management of the Forest Stainless Steel Trees in order to minimise effects on the art work. • Construction programme.
• Meeting informed management strategy for the Forest of Stainless Steel Trees, including the removal, storage and reinstatement methodology outlined in Section 4.1 of this Public Art DWP.
Various meetings in late 2015/early 2016 regarding the removal and management of Te Ahi Kaa Roa
Meetings with Peter Tilley (Auckland Council Public Art Collections Manager), Kim Martinengo (Auckland Council Public Art Project Co-ordinator) regarding: • The management of Te Ahi Kaa Roa including: the proposed methodology for the removal of Te Ahi Kaa Roa storage location and method – custom built crates likely required for the transport and storage of Te Ahi Kaa Roa future re-siting of the art work following the completion of the CRL enabling works, which is being led by the Auckland Council Public Art Team artist involvement in the management of Te Ahi Kaa Roa • The management of the Maori Warrior, which will not be affected by the Project. • Construction programme.
• Meeting informed the relocation methodology and storage of Te Ahi Kaa Roa outlined in Section 4.5 of this Public Art DWP. • Meeting also confirmed that the Project works will be sufficiently set back from the Maori Warrior, hence protection of this art work is likely not required
Various meetings in
Meetings with Kim Martinengo (Auckland Council Public Art Project Co-ordinator) regarding:
Meeting informed management strategy for the ‘After the Irish
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
15 Engagement
Matters Discussed
Outcome/DWP Implementation
late 2015/early 2016 regarding the management of the Lightboxes (‘After the Irish Guards’)
• The proposed methodology for the removal, storage and reinstatement of the lightboxes. • Storage locations for the art work – likely to be the upper levels of the CPO. • Artist involvement in the removal of the lightboxes in order to minimise effects on the art work. • Construction programme.
Guards’ lightboxes, including the removal and storage methodology outlined in Section 4.3 of this Public Art DWP.
Various meetings in late 2015/early 2016 regarding the management of the Bluestone Basalt Waterfalls
Meetings regarding: • The proposed methodology for the removal, storage and reinstatement of the waterfalls. • Storage locations for the art work. • Artist involvement in the removal of the waterfalls in order to minimise effects on the art work. • Construction programme.
Meeting informed management strategy for the waterfall, including the removal, storage and reinstatement methodology outlined in Section 4.2 of this Public Art DWP.
5.2
Mana Whenua
Auckland Transport undertook some initial engagement with mana whenua with respect to the management of Te Ahi Kaa Roa, as part of the permanent design of the public realm once CRL has been constructed. As the Auckland Council Public Art Team are responsible for the management of Te Ahi Kaa Roa, following removal of the art work from QEII Square, further engagement with mana whenua will be led by the Public Art team.
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
16
6
Asset Management Plan
The Auckland Council Public Art Team has prepared an Asset Management Plan for Te Ahi Kaa Roa (refer to Appendix A of this DWP). The Plan outlines the future operational and maintenance requirements for this art work, which is the responsibility of the Auckland Council Public Art Team. The Asset Management Plan will be reviewed and following agreement with mana whenua in relation to the re-siting of Te Ahi Kaa Roa. Specific asset management plans are not required for the art works in the BTC, which are addressed under the provisions of wider Britomart Station operations and management plans.
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
17
7
DWP Review and Updating
This Public Art DWP has undergone a review process with the Community Liaison Group (CLG) established for the Project and a suitably qualified independent peer reviewer. An explanation of how any comments from both the CLG and Peer Reviewer have addressed is provided in Appendix B.
7.1
DWP Review
This DWP will be reviewed throughout the course of the Project: a b
To reflect material changes associated with changes to construction techniques, the natural environment or due to unresolved complaints; and As part of the annual management review of the DWP.
The management review of the DWP will be undertaken at least annually by the Project Management team and the CRLL representatives. The management review will be organised by the Environmental and Sustainability Manager and the Project team will be informed of any changes to this DWP through the regular Project communications processes. The review will take into consideration: •
Compliance with the designation or consent conditions, the CEMP, DWPs and EMPs (including site specific plans) and material changes to these plans.
•
Any significant changes to construction activities or methods.
•
Key changes to roles and responsibilities within the Project team.
•
Changes in industry best practice standards.
•
Changes in legal or other requirements (social and environmental legal requirements, consent conditions, CRLL objectives and relevant policies, plans, standards, specifications and guidelines).
•
Results of inspections, monitoring and reporting procedures associated with the management of adverse effects during construction.
•
Comments or recommendations from Auckland Council regarding the CEMP, DWPs and EMPs.
•
Unresolved complaints and any response to complaints and remedial action taken to address the complaint.
7.2
DWP Updates
The process for updating this DWP as a result of a material change to the Project or the annual review, is as follows (refer to CRL designation Condition 23 and BTC designation Condition 22 for further information): •
Any material change to this DWP must be consistent with the purpose and objective of the relevant conditions listed in Table 1.1 of this document.
•
Affected parties and the CLG must be notified of the review and any material change proposed to this DWP.
•
This DWP must clearly document the comments and inputs received from affected parties in relation to any material changes, along with a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not.
•
Any material change proposed to this DWP shall be subject to an independent peer review as required by CRL Condition 11.
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
18 •
Any material change proposed to this DWP relating to an adverse effect shall be submitted for approval to Auckland Council Compliance and Monitoring Officer, at least 10 working days prior to the proposed changes taking effect. If any changes are not agreed, the relevant provisions of the RMA relating to approval of outline plans shall apply.
A copy of the original Public Art DWP document and subsequent versions will be kept for the Project records, and marked as obsolete. Each new / updated version of the Public Art DWP documentation will be issued with a version number and date to eliminate obsolete Public Art DWP documentation being used. A summary of the review process will be provided annually to Auckland Council and otherwise be made available on request.
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
19
8
Management and Control of Documents
All project documentation is created, reviewed, approved, issued, revised, retained, and superseded in accordance with the project’s Document Management & Control Plan, which includes the requirement for records of review and authorisation to be maintained. The following project-specific documents need to be created to support the processes described in this plan: 1. Asset Management Plan 2. Annual Review a.
Record of review of DWP
Public Art Delivery Work Plan
December 2018
Appendix A:
Asset Management Plan for Te Ahi Kaa Roa
Appendix B:
CLG and Independent Peer Review Comments
CLG Review Comments
•
Comments received from the CLG are as follows:
•
Date
CLG Member
Comment
Response
14th April 2016
Cooper and Company
Section 4.1.2 states that the stainless steel skins for the forest of stainless steel trees will be boxed up and stored in the upper floors of the CPO and says similar for the bluestone basalt waterfall tiles (Section 4.2.2). Cooper and Company would like to understand exactly what is being proposed for the upper levels of the CPO given the investment they have made in that building. Should also clarify that this storage, if it is to occur, is only during construction.
Additional text included in Section 4.1.2 regarding the storage of the stainless steel trees in the CPO during the construction phase of the Project.
14th April 2016
Cooper and Company
Section 7 notes that any material changes to the DWP will require approval from Council. However it should also note that any material changes also need to be notified to the CLG under condition 8.7.
Section 7 updated with new subsections on the review and updating process, including CLG notification.
18 May 2016
Cooper and Company
Section 4.3.2 states that the Irish Guards lightboxes will be stored in a designated AC or AT facility until they are re-sited. However, table 5.1 states that they are “likely to be” stored in the upper levels of the CPO. If this is the case we would like a similar provision put into section 4.3.2 to mirror that in section 4.1.2 (which relates to the stainless steel skins) and which requires engagement with Cooper and Company should storage occur within the upper levels of the CPO
Text added to Section 4.3.2 requiring consultation with Cooper and Company should the Irish Guards lightboxes be stored in the upper levels of the CPO.
Independent Peer Review Comments
An Independent Peer Review of the draft Public Art DWP was undertaken by Julia Scott, with peer review comments received on 1st February 2016. The comments received are as follows: Reference
Comment
Response
General Comments Responsibility
• The DWP generally does not specify who is responsible for decisions or implementing actions within the plan. In particular, Sections 4 and 5 it is not clear who is
• Additional text included in Section 4 of the Public Art DWP in relation to responsibility for the management of
Reference
Comment responsible for managing and resolving differences and issues arising from ongoing consultation, making decisions and implementing the DWP. • It seems likely that the actions to implement the DWP will be carried out by contractors and it is unclear who will be responsible for letting and supervising those contracts.
Timeline
Response the individual public art works impacted by the Project.
• Contractual arrangements are not relevant to the scope of this Public Art DWP, or required by the Project designation conditions.
• The DWP needs to be well developed in terms of contract and construction timetables, particularly given a potential May 2016 contract start, so that any decisions and actions made relating to removal, re-instatement or relocation can be included in relevant design and construction plans and contracts. How is it intended to plan and manage the overall timeframe to implement the DWP? Timely planning for the future location and relocation of affected artworks is a key part of the overall purpose of the Public Art DWP. • It is not clear when critical decision points occur within the DWP for sign off of the DWP and interface with signoffs with principal plans and contracts. • How will the Public Art DWP timeline be managed to ensure the co-ordination of relevant aspects related plans? • In relation to Te Ahi Kaa Roa, potentially the most contentious re-siting, when are the critical decision points within the DWP to ensure public art requirements are incorporated into the plans and contracts relating to the Project?
• Additional text included in Section 4 of the DWP around the removal and reinstatement of the individual public art works. • Contractual arrangements are not relevant to the scope of this Public Art DWP, or required by the Project designation conditions.
Contractual Arrangements
• The DWP indicates that Auckland Council’s public art team will manage some aspects of the re-siting of affected artworks. The basis for implementing contractual arrangements with and/or via Auckland Council Public Art team is not specified but should be. • If decisions made relating to the future location of Te Ahi Kaa Roa have implications for the contract with Precinct Properties or others, how will they be incorporated into the contract(s) and how will compliance with the DWP be ensured?
• Information pertaining to contractual agreements is not required by the Project designation conditions and is not relevant to the scope of this DWP.
Budget
• There is no mention in the plan of a budget for the DWP and which organisations will fund each component
• Information pertaining to funding for the removal, storage and reinstatement of public art is not
• The Auckland Council Public Art team will manage the process around the re-siting of Te Ahi Kaa Roa and this is outside the scope of this DWP.
Reference
Comment action. A budget is a fundamental component of any well-developed plan. It is unclear which entity has responsibility to plan, review, implement, monitor and review the budget and make budget-‐ related decisions for the full cycle of the DWP (removal, storage and reinstatement/relocation). • The DWP should make this clear to ensure clarity and accountability.
Risk
• The DWP does not identify risks and issues in implementing the DWP or indicate how it is planned to manage them.
Response required by the Project designation conditions and is not relevant to the scope of this DWP.
• Risk management in relation to public art removal, storage or reinstatement is not required by the Project designation conditions.
Comments on Specific Sections Sections 1.1 & 1.2 CRL 56.3 (b)
• Maori Warrior was specifically named in the CRL Designation Conditions. While it is just outside the immediate footprint it is in very close proximity to anticipated significant project construction activity. Have the risks of unintended damage been sufficiently addressed to protect Maori Warrior?
• Additional text included in Section 4.4 regarding the location of the Maori Warrior in relation to the construction works, and hence why physical protection is not currently proposed. It is noted that if the construction works were to extend closer to this art work, then consideration of physical protection may be required.
Section 1.3
• How will the Public Art DWP will be integrated with the Urban Design DWP and who is responsible for managing and co-ordinating this? Have the implications, dependencies and timelines been discussed with the Urban Design DWP team? • The Public Art DWP should address how this will be achieved.
• Auckland Transport is responsible for preparation of the Urban Design DWP and the integration of public art into the public realm design. The Urban Design DWP is currently being prepared by AT.
Table 3.1
• Is this list complete? E.g., Do the live Kauri trees in Queen Elizabeth Square and lighting wells also form part of Michael Parakowhai’s concept? • Maori Warrior and Matahorua Anchor and Tainui Anchor are specified in the CRL Designation Conditions. • Maori Warrior –‐ Refer to comment made in Reference 1.1 above in this table.
• The Auckland Council Public Art Team have advised that the light wells are a design element within BTC and are not considered public art for the purposes of this DWP.
• For consistency, it should also be noted that Matahorua Anchor and Tainui Anchor are outside the footprint of works.
• Additional text included in Section 3 of the DWP (under Table 3.1) to reference the Matahorua and Tainui Anchors
• Only conditions relevant to the Project area are included in Table 1.1 – no reference to the Matahorua and Tainui Anchors is required
Reference
Comment
Response
Section 4.1 Forest of Stainless Steel Trees
• The removal and storage methodologies proposed also have implications for future reinstatement feasibility, logistics and costs. • The removal methodology outlined (4.1.1.) does not appear to have been confirmed with the artist and Auckland Council. Who will be responsible for managing and resolving any conflicting advice arising from this consultation and should any issues arise during removal. Who has responsibility for decision-‐ making? • Who will responsible for implementing and managing the removal, re-‐ instatement/relocation? Who is responsible to put the contractual arrangements in place? • The DWP process should be clear about the process for implementation and delivery for the full cycle of the required work.
• Matters around logistics and costs are not relevant to the scope of this DWP
Section 4.1.2 Storage
• The DWP should address how any changed requirements, including timeline extensions and budget, will be managed resulting from consultation with the artist, Mana Whenua and Auckland Council.
• This information is not relevant to the scope of the DWP.
Section 4.1.3 Reinstatement
• This section is not developed in sufficient detail and in particular there are no cost estimates, or funding responsibilities outlined. Additionally it appears to assume that no changes will be made as a result of consultation with the artist and or Auckland Council? • Similar comments as for 4.1. How will any conflicts of advice and changes be managed and incorporated into the DWP? The DWP should address how this will be dealt with and managed.
• Cost and funding responsibilities are not relevant to the scope of the DWP.
• This description is not consistent with the previous section’s similar introduction (4.1) where the artist or representative is also on site to supervise the removal process. • Similarly, has the removal methodology been discussed with the artist and Auckland Council in relation to any feasibility and cost implications for reinstatement? And how will any
• Additional text included in Section 4.2 regarding artist involvement.
Section 4.2 Bluestone Basalt Waterfall
• Additional text included in Section 4.1 around responsibility for the management of the Forest of Stainless Steel Trees. The Project designation conditions do not require the Public Art DWP to include a disputes resolution process.
• Additional text included in Section 4 in relation to management responsibility. Contractual arrangements are not relevant to the scope of the DWP.
• The full management strategy is already addressed in the DWP.
• As per above response to comment in Section 4.1 above.
• The Project designation conditions do not require the Public Art DWP to include a disputes resolution process.
Reference
Comment conflicts be resolved and managed? The DWP should demonstrate a consistent approach unless there are specific reasons not to.
Response • Cost implications are not relevant to the scope of this DWP.
Section 4.3 After the Irish Guards
• This section does not include any reference to involvement of the artist. As previously noted in 4.1, the DWP should demonstrate a consistent approach unless there are specific reasons not to.
• Additional text included in Section 4.2 regarding artist involvement.
Section 4.3.3 Resitting
• How this will be implemented is unclear. How will the relocation process be managed, who will be responsible for budget and decision-‐making? How will the re-‐siting be integrated with the development and timing of the Urban Design DWP and public realm design? • The DWP should address how this will be dealt with in more detail in order to provide a clear process for implementation.
• Budget and decision making aspects are not relevant to the scope of this DWP.
Section 4.4 Maori Warrior
• See previous comment (Reference 1.1. in this table).
• Refer to comment under section 1.1 of this table.
Section 4.5 Te Ahi Kaa Roa
• This section does not include any reference to involvement of the artist. • As previously noted, the removal of the Forest of Sculptured Stainless Steel trees introduction (4.1) includes the artist or representative confirming the removal methodology and being on site to supervise the removal process. • The DWP should be clearer about how this removal and relocation will be planned and implemented.
• Additional text included in Section 4.5 regarding artist involvement.
Section 4.5.3 Re-siting
• The re-siting of this work is potentially the most contentious issue with both political and operational risks. While consultation with Mana Whenua is described in Section 5 neither section provides a plan for implementation. The impact of these decisions on financial responsibilities and contractual arrangements should be addressed. • E.g. who is responsible for resolving differences and issues arising during consultation and for making decisions that impact on AT’s relationship with Mana Whenua, Precinct Properties and associated contracts for this work. • How will contractual arrangements be managed with Auckland Council relating to engaging suitable suppliers to remove, store and re-site affected artworks. Is it
• The potential re-siting of Te Ahi Kaa Roa is being led and managed by the Auckland Council Public Art Team separately to this DWP, hence it is not relevant to the scope of this DWP
Reference
Comment
Response
planned to agree terms of reference or similar and will contractors be subcontractors to AT’s main contractor or will Auckland Council contract suppliers separately? • Given the significance of the work and its current location to Mana Whenua, responsibility for decisions about its relocation should be dealt with in the plan. • The DWP should address more clearly how it plans to implement the re- siting of this work. Section 5.1 Auckland Council
• The stated outcomes of on-‐going liaison are insufficient to provide a clear plan of how the project will be delivered. • It is not clear from the plan how this section and Section 4 will be integrated, implemented and who is responsible for decisions about outcomes of the consultation with Auckland Council and how any conflicts of advice will be dealt with. Responsibilities, timelines and decision-‐making processes are generally not clear. • Further work is required to provide a plan to articulate how implementation of consultation outcomes will be achieved.
• Additional text included in Table 5.1 regarding implementation and consultation outcomes.
Section 5.2 Mana Whenua
• This section summarises what has happened so far but does not provide a plan for delivery. The listed outcomes are insufficient to show what you intend to do to integrate and then implement the outcomes of consultation with Section 4. • For example: Who is responsible for decisions about outcomes of the consultation with Auckland Council and how any differences or conflicts of advice will be dealt with and when do critical timeline dates occur? • How will decision-‐making and associated costs in leading the management Te Ahi Kaa Roa removal, storage and relocation be managed? • Who is responsible and how will co-‐ ordination with the Urban Design DWP be maintained during the delivery process? • The DWP should address how this will be dealt with.
• Section has been re-worded to outline that the Auckland Council Public Art Team are responsible for the management of Te Ahi Kaa Roa and all further engagement with mana whenua in this regard.
Appendix A: Management
• The document provided as Appendix 1 is titled “Project Completion Form”. The document title is confusing.
• Document title changed to ‘Te Ahi Kaa Roa – Asset Management Plan’
• Additional text included throughout Section 4 of this DWP to address responsibilities in relation to the management of the individual public art works and project timelines for removal and reinstatement of the individual art works.
Reference
Comment
Response
Plan for Te Ahi Kaa Roa
A further Independent Peer Review of the draft Public Art DWP was undertaken by Julia Scott to review the amendments made to the DWP as a result of Auckland Transport’s confirmation of the altered BTC designation conditions. A second round of peer review comments was received on 16th May 2016. The comments received are addressed as follows: Reference
Comment
Response
General Comments Responsibility
The changes made to and additional text incorporated into Revision 6 of the DWP provide a clearer plan of the intended process to manage the removal, storage and re-siting of the affected public artworks. This includes greater clarity around responsibilities, timelines and consultation implementation and outcomes within the project scope.
Noted. No amendment required.
Clarity on design elements and artwork within the project scope of work
Revision 6 of the WP makes it clear what artwork is within project scope but outlining what has been agreed to be ‘design elements’, such as the finely woven mesh within the BTC and the volcanic cones, and what is being treated as artwork. Revision 6 also clarifies that removal of the 18 kauri trees in Queen Elizabeth II Square, a counterpoint to the stainless steel trees artwork, will be managed within the (Precinct Properties scope of work). It clarifies that that the Matahorua and Tainui Anchors listed in CRL Condition 56.3I are located outside the project footprint and that management of and responsibility for Maori Warrior was duly considered in developing the DWP.
Noted. No amendment required.
DWP Review and Updating Section 7 DWP review and updating
The expansion of Section 7 to include ongoing review, updating and monitoring of the DWP is beneficial and will enable more effective integration and implementation the DWP during the course of the Project.
Noted. No amendment required.
Appendix B: CLG and Independent Peer Review
I note CLG Review comments and changes made to the revised DWP document. I also note Auckland Transport’s responses that my questions and points raised relating to the impact of contractual arrangements, cost, budget and risk relating to removal storage and reinstatement are outside the scope of the DWP or not required by the Project designation conditions. Auckland Transport states these aspects are outside the remit for this DWP scope of work and I presume that they are being fully addressed elsewhere your planning processes.
The matters are being appropriately addressed elsewhere. No amendment required.
Appendix C: •
Register of Plan Updates
Annual Review 2017 Updates
Date
Updates have been made to the following sections: • Section 2 – change to piling method • Section 4.1.2 – update to reflect confirmed storage location for the stainless steel trees at AT yard not in the CPO Building • Section 4.2.2 – update to reflect confirmed storage location for the basalt tiles at AT yard not in the CPO Building • Section 4.3.2 – update to reflect confirmed storage location at AT yard not in the CPO Building • Section 8 – new section added to the DWP which identifies the project-specific documents that need to be created to support the processes described in this plan
October 2017
The plan was updated to change reference from Auckland Transport to City Rail Link Limited.
December 2018