Skip to main content

Outline Plan

Page 1

30 January 2020 Mr Warwick Pascoe Principal Project Lead, Premium Resource Consents Auckland Council Private Bag 92300 Auckland 1142

Dear Warwick, City Rail Link – Outline Plan submission – Karangahape Station Main Works Please find enclosed an Outline Plan for works related to the construction of the City Rail Link (CRL) in the Karangahape area, referred to as the “Karangahape Station Main Works”. In summary the works relate to: •

The excavation of a temporary access shaft and mining of platform tunnels;

The excavation and construction of the station entrance box at Mercury Lane;

The excavation and construction of the station entrance box at Beresford Square; and

The operation of each of the Construction Support Areas (CSA) at Mercury Lane and Beresford Square.

The majority of the Karangahape Station Main Works will occur within the boundaries of, and are authorized by, CRL Designation 2500-4 in the Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in Part (AUP). Areas of the mined tunnels and station box excavations and construction components of the works are provided for by CRL Designation 2500-2. City Rail Link Limited is the requiring authority for these designations. The Karangahape Station Main Works are also provided for by the CRL Aotea to North Auckland Line (A2N) regional resource consents. The following documents are now provided: 1. An outline plan under section 176A of the Resource Management Act 1991, for works to be undertaken in accordance with CRL Designations 2500-2 and 2500-4, including: a. A Communication and Consultation Plan; b. A Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP); Link Alliance - 12 Morgan Street, Newmarket, Auckland 1023


c. Delivery Work Plans (DWPs): (i)

Transport, Access and Parking DWP;

(ii)

Construction Noise and Vibration DWP, inclusive of Site Specific Construction Noise and/or Vibration Management Plans;

(iii)

Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP;

(iv)

Historic Character DWP (Built Heritage Section);

(v)

Historic Character DWP (Archaeology Section);

(vi)

Contamination DWP; and

(vii)

Air Quality DWP.

The following DWPs are also required by the CRL designation conditions, but are not being prepared as part of this Outline Plan submission: ▪

Trees and Vegetation DWP;

Urban Design DWP; and

Public Art DWP.

2. A CEMP and the following management plans have also been prepared for certification under the conditions of the A2N resource consent – these documents have been forwarded directly to Mr Tim O’Grady under separate cover: a. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Flocculent Treatment Management Plan; b. Air Quality Management Plan; c. Contaminated Soils Management Plan; d. Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan; and e. Industrial and Trade Activity Environmental Management Plan. Where the designation and resource consent conditions require DWPs and management plans to be prepared for the same aspect of environmental management (e.g. CEMP, contamination and air quality) then a combined plan has been prepared to address the requirements of both sets of conditions. These combined plans are submitted for both Outline Plan and certification purposes. This Outline Plan is submitted under Link Alliance’s account with Auckland Council. The details of this are: •

Account name: Link Alliance (CRL Construction JV)

Account number: 2600568867

PO reference: (to be advised)

Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned should you wish to discuss any aspects of the documents submitted.

Link Alliance - 12 Morgan Street, Newmarket, Auckland 1023


Yours sincerely,

Peter Roan Link Alliance –Planning and Consents Lead

Link Alliance - 12 Morgan Street, Newmarket, Auckland 1023


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800013

Revision: 000 Date: January 2020

Page 1

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800013

This document is uncontrolled when printed. This document should be printed in colour

Revision Status Revision

Issue Date

Major Changes

Changed By

Approved By

000

30/01/2020

Final for submission

Cameron Sunde

Richard Jenkins

Approval Status Name/Title

Signature

Date

Prepared by:

Cameron Sunde Link Alliance - Planner

30/01/2020

Reviewed by:

Peter Roan Link Alliance – Consents Manager

30/01/2020

Approved by:

Richard Jenkins City Rail Link Limited – Principal Planner

30/01/2020

Page 2

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

Table of contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................. 8 1.1

Purpose ........................................................................................................................ 8

1.2

City Rail Link Project ...................................................................................................... 8

1.3

Summary of Works ........................................................................................................ 8

1.4

Statutory Approvals Overview ....................................................................................... 9

1.4.1.

CRL Designation 2500-4 and 2500-2 ............................................................................... 9

1.4.2.

Regional Resource Consents ........................................................................................... 9

1.5

Outline Plan Supporting Documents ............................................................................ 10

1.6

Requiring Authority and Site Details ............................................................................ 11

2. Statutory Framework ............................................................................. 12 2.1

Section 176A RMA - Outline Plan Requirements ........................................................... 12

2.2

Designation Conditions................................................................................................ 12

3. Site Description...................................................................................... 14 4. Description of Proposed Works .............................................................. 15 4.1

Overview .................................................................................................................... 15

4.2

Staging ........................................................................................................................ 15

4.3

Description of Works Activities .................................................................................... 15

4.3.1.

General Establishment Works....................................................................................... 15

4.3.2.

Temporary Shaft and Mined Tunnels ........................................................................... 15

4.3.3.

Station Box Excavations and Construction ................................................................... 15

4.3.4.

CSA Operation ............................................................................................................... 16

4.4

Hours of Work ............................................................................................................. 16

5. Outline Plan Requirements .................................................................... 17 5.1

Height, Shape and Bulk of the Works ........................................................................... 17

5.2

Location on the Site..................................................................................................... 17

5.3

Likely Finished Contour of the Site ............................................................................... 17

5.4

Vehicular Access, Circulation and Parking .................................................................... 17

5.5

Landscaping ................................................................................................................ 18

6. Other Matters to Avoid, Remedy or Mitigate Adverse Effects on the Environment ................................................................................................ 19

Page 3

6.1

Transport, Access and Parking ..................................................................................... 19

6.2

Construction Noise and Vibration ................................................................................ 19

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan 6.3

Built Heritage .............................................................................................................. 20

6.4

Archaeology ................................................................................................................ 20

6.5

Contamination ............................................................................................................ 20

6.6

Air Quality .................................................................................................................. 21

6.7

Social Impact and Business Disruption ......................................................................... 21

6.8

Erosion and Sediment Control ..................................................................................... 22

6.9

Building Condition Surveys .......................................................................................... 22

6.10 Environmental Monitoring .......................................................................................... 22

7. Consultation .......................................................................................... 23 7.1

Community and Business Liaison Group ....................................................................... 23

7.2

Auckland Council ......................................................................................................... 23

7.3

Mana Whenua ............................................................................................................ 23

7.4

Network Utility Operators ........................................................................................... 24

7.5

Other parties............................................................................................................... 24

Appendix A:

Planning Maps ..................................................................... 25

Appendix B:

Designation Conditions ........................................................ 26

Appendix C:

Drawings .............................................................................. 27

Appendix D:

Construction Environmental Management Plan ................... 28

Appendix E:

Communication and Consultation Plan................................. 29

Page 4

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

Glossary Term

Definition

The Council

Auckland Council

ACZ

Active Construction Zone

AEE

Assessment of Environmental Effects

AQ DWP

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan, also Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP)

AUP

Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part)

BCS

Building Condition Survey

CLG (or CBLG)

Community (Business) Liaison Groups

CCP

Communication and Consultation Plan

CEMP

Construction Environmental Management Plan

C DWP

Contamination Delivery Work Plan, also refers to Contaminated Soils Management Plan

CNV DWP

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Communication and Consultation

Responsible for notifying residents of works occurring within the near vicinity and managing mitigation as required; primary contact for project related complaints and enquiries.

Construction Contractor

Also referred to as Link Alliance

CPTED

Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design

CRL

City Rail Link

CRLL

City Rail Link Limited

CWD

Clean Water Diversion Bunds

CSA

Construction Support Area

dB

A unit of measurement on a logarithmic scale which describes the magnitude of sound pressure with respect to a reference value (20ÂľPa)

DWD

Dirty water diversion

DWP

Delivery Work Plan

ERP

Emergency Response Plan

ESCP

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan

ESCM

Erosion and Sediment Control Measures

ESM

Environment and Sustainability Manager

ESP

Environmental Sustainability Planning Manager

GD05

Auckland Council, Erosion and Sediment Control, Guidelines for Land Disturbing Activities in the Auckland Region, Guideline Document 005, 2016

Page 5

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

Term

Definition

GSMCP

Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan

H&S

Health and Safety

HHA

Historic Heritage Area

HC DWP (Built Heritage Section)

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

HC DWP (Archaeology Section)

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

HNZPT

Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga

IAP2

International Association for Public Participation

IPRP

Independent Peer Review Panel

IS

Infrastructure Sustainability

ISCA

Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia

ITA EMP

Industrial and Trade Activity Environmental Management Plan

Link Alliance

Construction Contractor

MP

Management Plan

NA

Not applicable

NAL

North Auckland Line

NIMT

North Island Main Trunk-line

NUO

Network Utility Operators

NZHPT

New Zealand Historic Places Trust

OP

Outline Plan

PA DWP

Public Art Delivery Work Plan

Permit to Notify (PTN)

Permit to Notify will be used to facilitate internal approvals for works that are likely to have an impact on the adjacent community (refer CCP for further detail).

RMA

Resource Management Act 1991

SIBD DWP

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

SSCNMP

Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan

SSCVMP

Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plan

SSCNVMP

Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

SDS (or MSDS)

(Material) Safety Data Sheet

SSESCP

Site Specific Erosion and Sediment Control Plan

Page 6

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

Term

Definition

Sub-plans, suite of plans, DWP, MPs

Referring to sub-plans throughout the documents. These plans include all Delivery Work Plans (DWP) and Management Plans (MP) which are supporting documents to the CEMP. All DWP/MPs are listed in section 1.4 of the CEMP.

TAP DWP

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

TV DWP

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

UD DWP

Urban Design Delivery Work Plan

WARRMP

Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Management Plan

Page 7

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

1.

Introduction 1.1 Purpose

This Outline Plan describes the works (referred to as the Karangahape Station main works) that will occur in the vicinity of Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane to enable the construction of the new Karangahape Station as part of the City Rail Link (CRL). The works are authorised and provided for by CRL Designations 2500-4 and 2500-2, for which City Rail Link Limited (CRLL) is the requiring authority (refer to Section 1.4 for further detail). The drawings located in Appendix C show the designation boundary.

1.2 City Rail Link Project The CRL project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line in the vicinity of Mt Eden Station. The CRL also involves the construction of two new underground stations at Aotea and Karangahape and a redeveloped Mt Eden Station (refer to Figure 1-1). The design and construction of the CRL infrastructure between the Aotea and Mt Eden Stations is being delivered by the Link Alliance. Figure 1.1 Alignment of CRL

1.3 Summary of Karangahape Station main works The Karangahape Station main works (the main works) described in this Outline Plan generally involve the excavation of a temporary construction access shaft, mining of platform tunnels and cross-passages, excavation and construction of the two station entrance boxes and the operation of Construction Support Areas (CSAs) in the vicinity of Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane.

Page 8

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan Earlier works to facilitate construction of Karangahape Station, including demolitions, relocating utilities and establishing construction site facilities, have been described in previous, approved Outline Plans1.

1.4 Statutory Approvals Overview The works described in this Outline Plan are authorised by CRL Designations 2500-4 and 2500-2, and the CRL Aotea to North Auckland Line (A2N) resource consents.

1.4.1. CRL Designation 2500-4 and 2500-2 The CRL is provided for by six separate designations (2500-1 to 2500-6) in the Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP), with the Karangahape Station being provided for by Designation 2500-4. Designation 2500-4 is a “surface and sub-strata designation for the construction, operation and maintenance of Karangahape Station, and encompassing land within road reserve and private property in the vicinity of Pitt Street, Beresford Square, Karangahape Road, and Mercury Lane 2.” The Karangahape Station main works will be contained almost entirely within the boundary of Designation 2500-4. However, some aspects of the subterranean works, such as the mining of platform tunnels, will fall outside of Designation 2500-4 and rely on Designation 2500-2. Designation 2500-2 is a “sub-strata designation of land below the ground surface (within road resource and private property) for the construction, operation and maintenance of the CRL – including two rail tunnels and ancillary activities2.” Designation 2500-4 and Designation 2500-2 contain largely the same set of conditions, and for the purposes of this Outline Plan are referred to collectively as “the designation”. The conditions relating to the designation are provided in Appendix B and addressed further in Section 2.2. The main works will be undertaken in general accordance with the purpose of the designation and the conditions noted above.

1.4.2. Regional Resource Consents A suite of regional resource consents (known as the Aotea to North Auckland Line (A2N) consents) provide for the construction of CRL between Wyndham Street in the City Centre and Mt Eden3. It is noted that the relevant resource consent conditions are not addressed as part of this Outline Plan, other than by way of inclusion of relevant management plans that are required by both the designation and resource consent conditions (refer to Section 1.5 below).

1.4.1. Works Outside Designation In some locations, the main works may require works outside of the designation boundary. This will be limited to hoardings and parts of a temporary site office at Beresford Square. Where such works are required, they will be reviewed to ensure they are provided for by the AUP as a permitted activity or additional resource consents will be obtained as required.

1 Karangahape Road Demolition Works Outline Plan, confirmed by Auckland Council on 21 June 2019 (OPW60339200), Karangahape Station early works Outline Plan, confirmed by Auckland Council on 11 November 2019 (OPW60347591) 2 Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part) – 2500 City Rail Link 3 Activities associated with the Beresford Square entrance are addressed in a separate resource consent application. The management plans attached to this Outline Plan include the Beresford Square works. Page 9 | Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

1.5 Outline Plan Supporting Documents This Outline Plan has been prepared by the Link Alliance on behalf of CRLL, in accordance with section 176A of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) and designation Condition 10. As required under designation Condition 10.1, this Outline Plan includes: • • •

a Communication and Consultation Plan; a Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP); and a suite of Delivery Work Plans (DWPs) that sit as sub-plans to the CEMP4.

The CEMP and sub-plans that form part of this Outline Plan are shown in Table 1.1, along with reference to the specific designation (and resource consent) conditions that set out the requirements for the individual plans. Some plans are required by both designation and resource consent conditions (refer to Table 1.1), in which case, a single plan has been produced to address all relevant designation and consent requirements. Table 1.1: CEMP and Sub-plans

Plan5

Relevant Conditions CRL Designation

Resource consents

Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) – Appendix D to this Outline Plan

C 20-21

C 35

Transport, Access and Parking DWP (TAP DWP) – Appendix K of the CEMP

C 25

-

Construction Noise and Vibration DWP (CNV DWP) (including Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plans (SSCNVMPs)) – Appendix L of the CEMP

C 36

-

Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP (SIBD DWP) – Appendix F of the CEMP

C 61

-

Historic Character DWP (comprising Built Heritage and Archaeology sections) – Appendix M and N of the CEMP

C 41, 42

-

Industrial and Trade Activities Environmental Management Plan (ITA EMP) – Appendix J of the CEMP

-

C 159

Contamination DWP / Contaminated Soils Management Plan – Appendix O of the CEMP

C 57

C 131

Air Quality DWP / Air Quality Management Plan – Appendix I of the CEMP

C 59

C 222

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) – Appendix H to the CEMP

-

C 53

Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan (GSMCP) – this plan is being prepared and will be submitted to Auckland Council for certification at a later date – Draft included as Appendix P to the CEMP

-

C 97

Communication and Consultation Plan – Appendix E to this Outline Plan

C 15

C 25

The plans listed in Table 1.1 have been reviewed by the Karangahape Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG) (refer to Section 7.1 of this Outline Plan) and, with the exception of the ESCP, 4

The CEMP also contains two Environmental Management Plans (EMPs) which are required under the A2N consents but not under the designation (refer Table 1.1). These plans (ESCP and GSMCP) are submitted to the Council for certification and do not form part of the Outline Plan. 5 An Urban Design DWP (designation Condition 47), Trees and Vegetation DWP (designation Condition 55) and Public Art DWP (designation Condition 56) are not required with this Outline Plan as they are not triggered by the main works. Page 10 | Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan ITA EMP and GSMCP, the Independent Peer Review Panel. In accordance with designation Condition 10.2, the CEMP and sub-plans document the comments and inputs received during this process, along with an explanation of where comments or recommendations have been incorporated in the plans, or where they have not been incorporated, the reasons for this. All works undertaken as part of the main works will be carried out in general accordance with this Outline Plan and supporting documents listed in Table 1.1 as required by designation Condition 10.6.

1.6 Requiring Authority and Site Details Table 1.2: Requiring authority and property details

Requiring Authority

City Rail Link Limited

Owner of site

City Rail Link Limited and Road Reserve

Site address / map reference

Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane

Legal descriptions

Beresford Square Road Reserve, Lot 1 and 2 DP 523853 Mercury Lane Road Reserve, Part Allotment 8 Section 7 Suburbs of Auckland and Lot 1 DP 45190, Lot 3-4 DP 51945, Lot 1 DP 71575, Lot 1 DP 82089, Lot 1 Deeds Plan 1082, Allotment 62 Section 7 Suburbs of Auckland

Record of Title references

Surface works: Beresford Square Road Reserve, 834656, 834657 Mercury Lane Road Reserve, NA129A/195, NA67C/819, NA43B/3, NA38D/205, NA541/140, NA75C/630

Relevant Plans

Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part (AUP)

Designation reference

CRL designation – 2500-2 and 2500-4 (AUP) – confirmed 10 November 2015

Underlying zoning

Business – City Centre Zone

Address for service

City Rail Link Limited Attention: Richard Jenkins – Principal Planner Phone: 021 870 124 Email: richard.jenkins@cityraillink.govt.nz

We attach copies of the relevant planning maps in Appendix A.

Page 11

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

2.

Statutory Framework 2.1 Section 176A RMA - Outline Plan Requirements

Under section 176A of the RMA, CRLL is required to submit an Outline Plan to Auckland Council for the works that are to be undertaken within the designation. Section 176A(3) of the RMA requires that an Outline Plan must show: • • • • • •

The height, shape and bulk of the works; The location of the work on the site; The likely finished contour of the site; The vehicular access, circulation, and the provision for parking; Proposed landscaping; and Any other matters to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on the environment.

These matters are addressed in Section 5 below.

2.2 Designation Conditions In addition to the matters set out in section 176A(3) of the RMA, this Outline Plan must also address the conditions of the designation. Table 2.1 below identifies the relevant designation conditions and where they are addressed in this Outline Plan. The full set of designation conditions is included as Appendix B. Table 2.1: Designation conditions relevant to this Outline Plan

Condition No.

Condition

Section where addressed

9.2

A summary of the communication and consultation undertaken between the Requiring Authority and Network Utility Operators prior to construction commencing shall be provided as part of the Outline Plan.

Section 7.4

10.1

The Requiring Authority shall submit an Outline Plan to the Auckland Council for the construction of the City Rail Link in accordance with section 176A of the RMA. The Outline Plan shall include:

10.2

Page 12

a) The Communications and Consultation Plan (Condition 15);

Appendix E

b) The Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP);

Appendix D

c) Delivery Work Plans (DWPs);

Appendix D

d) Site Specific Construction Noise/Vibration Management Plans (SSCNVMPs) and Notable Received Management Plans; and

Appendix D

e) Any other information required by the conditions of this designation associated with the construction of the City Rail Link.

This document and Appendix D

The plans listed in Condition 10.1 above must clearly document the comments and inputs received by the Requiring Authority during its

Appendix D

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

Condition No.

Condition

Section where addressed

consultation with stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties, and any recommendations received as part of the Independent Peer Review Panel process (where applicable), along with a clear explanation of where any affected party comments or peer review recommendations have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. 10.4

These plans should clearly show how the part integrates with adjacent City Rail Link construction works and interrelated activities. This particularly applies where the Urban Design DWP is submitted as a number of plans.

Sections 1.1 and 4

10.5

Early engagement will be undertaken with Auckland Council in relation to preparation and submission of the Outline Plan to establish a programme for the Outline Plan process to ensure achievable timeframes for both parties.

Section 7.2

10.6

All works shall be carried out in accordance with the Outline Plan(s) required by this condition.

Section 1.4

11.1

Prior to submitting the CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39) to Auckland Council for the construction of the City Rail Link, the Requiring Authority shall engage suitably qualified independent specialists agreed to by Auckland Council to form an Independent Peer Review Panel. The purpose of the Independent Peer Review Panel is to undertake a peer review of the CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39) and provide recommendations on whether changes are required to those plans in order to meet the objective and other requirements of these conditions.

Appendix D

11.2

The CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with condition 39) must clearly document the comments and inputs received by the Requiring Authority during its consultation with stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties, along with a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. This information must be included on the CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39) provided to both the independent peer reviewer and Auckland Council as part of this condition.

Appendix D

11.3

The CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39) submitted to Auckland Council shall demonstrate how the recommendations from the independent peer reviewers have been incorporated, and, where they have not, the reasons why not.

Appendix D

Page 13

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

3.

Site Description

The main works will be undertaken within in the vicinity of Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane. Works are geographically separated into two distinct areas either side of Karangahape Road, with the exception of underground mining works for the station platforms. Refer to Figure 3.1 below. Construction staging drawings showing the indicative works areas are included in the drawing set in Appendix C. At Mercury Lane, works will largely be undertaken within the Mercury Lane CSA. However, at Beresford Square works will be concentrated within the station box works area, with additional activities undertaken in the adjacent CSA. The overall above ground works area is largely similar to that described in the Karangahape Station early works Outline Plan, confirmed by Auckland Council on 11 November 2019 (OPW60347591). Demolition works and the works described in the Karangahape Station early works Outline Plan have commenced on the site. The Karangahape Station area is characterised as a dense urban environment with a mixture of residential, commercial, and business land uses. Pitt Street and Karangahape Road are important transport corridors for both private and public transport.

Figure 3.1:

Page 14

Plan showing approximate aboveground works areas in red and below ground works areas in green.

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

4.

Description of Proposed Works 4.1 Overview

The main works for the Karangahape Station generally involve the excavation of a temporary access shaft, mining of platform tunnels, excavation and construction of the two station entrance boxes at Mercury Lane and Beresford Square, and the operation of Construction Support Areas (CSAs) in the vicinity of Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane. The main works will commence in February 2020 and are expected to continue for approximately three years. A detailed description of the main works is included in the CEMP (Appendix D), with a summary provided below.

4.2 Staging The construction staging of the main works is shown in the staging drawings included in Appendix C and described in further detail in the CEMP (Appendix D). A number of activities will be repeated at both station entrances over the course of construction, such as diaphragm wall installation. Where this occurs, works at Mercury Lane will generally be undertaken first, and the associated plant and equipment then moved to Beresford Square where the works will be repeated. Some activities will be concurrent, such as mining of the platform tunnels and the station box excavations at Mercury Lane.

4.3 Description of Works Activities 4.3.1. General Establishment Works General establishment works across the Karangahape Station area include the implementation of traffic management measures and installation of fencing and hoardings at both Mercury Lane and Beresford Square / Pitt Street. This work will continue from the Karangahape Station early works, with much of the traffic management and hoardings having been installed during the early works.

4.3.2. Temporary Shaft and Mined Tunnels A temporary access shaft shall be constructed within the Mercury Lane CSA to enable the mining of the platform tunnels and cross-passages. Mining of the platform tunnels will be undertaken to facilitate the receival of the tunnel boring machine (TBM) at Karangahape Station. All spoil from the shaft excavation and mining of tunnels will be removed via the temporary access shaft. These works also include a noise enclosure constructed over the temporary shaft, which will provide a noise barrier for mining works and also house the ventilation system, water treatment plant and temporary spoil storage pit / area.

4.3.3. Station Box Excavations and Construction At both station entrance boxes (Mercury Lane and Beresford Square), excavation and construction will follow the same general methodology. This generally includes diaphragm wall construction, excavation, ground floor slab and top down construction, bottom up construction of lower levels and mechanical, electrical, fire and hydraulic (MEFH) installation. The diaphragm wall and ground floor slab will provide stability to the excavation as levels are progressively excavated and constructed under the slab through a top down methodology. Upon Page 15

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan reaching rock head, the full extent of each station box will be excavated and a bottom up methodology utilised. During this time spoil will be removed from the excavations by craning through openings in the slab, before being loaded directly into trucks or stored in spoil storage areas. This will be followed by the MEFH installation.

4.3.4. CSA Operation The works required to establish CSAs at Beresford Square and Mercury Lane has been authorised through the Karangahape Station early works Outline Plan, however the operation of the CSAs for the duration of the station construction is included in the scope of this Outline Plan. Each CSA contains a variety of plant and equipment, site offices, water treatment plants, bentonite plants, spoil handling areas and staff parking. The indicative CSA layouts are shown in the drawings in Appendix C. Further detail of each CSA establishment is included in the CEMP (Appendix D).

4.4 Hours of Work It is anticipated that construction work (with the exception of the tunnel mining work) will generally be undertaken between 0700hrs to 2200hrs Monday to Saturday. However, works undertaken between 1900hrs and 2200hrs would not be a general occurrence, and all works will be undertaken in accordance with the designation and resource consent conditions. The platform tunnel mining works may be undertaken 24 hours per day, up to seven days per week, dependent on programme pressures. These works will be subterranean and associated surface activities contained within the noise enclosure.

Page 16

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

5.

Outline Plan Requirements

Section 176A of the RMA sets out the matters to be included in an Outline Plan. These are outlined in Sections 5.1 to 5.5 below. Matters to avoid, remedy or mitigate effects on the environment are addressed in Section 6. For the avoidance of doubt, this Outline Plan does not address any aspects of the architectural fit out of the Karangahape Station nor the permanent above ground public realm reinstatement or landscaping. These matters will be addressed in a future Outline Plan that will include an Urban Design DWP to address Designation Conditions 47-54. The design of the Karangahape Station, including architecture and urban design elements has been ongoing since the early stages of the project. This design will continue to develop in accordance with the urban design and associated mana whenua principles specified in the designation conditions, and will be addressed in the future Karangahape Station Urban Design DWP. Construction of the Karangahape Station main works in accordance with the drawings and information provided as part of the current Outline Plan will not compromise the ability to undertake the future architectural and public realm works in a manner consistent with the urban design principles. For information purposes, the design principles, indicative station flythrough and latest concept drawings can be found on the CRLL website (https://www.cityraillink.co.nz/stations-karangahaperd).

5.1 Height, Shape and Bulk of the Works The main works will be largely undertaken underground, with the mining of tunnels and station box excavations and construction being below ground level. The height, shape and bulk of the underground structures is shown in the plans and sections included in the drawing set in Appendix C. Although temporary, plans and elevations of the noise enclosure at the Mercury Lane CSA are also included in Appendix C.

5.2 Location on the Site The main works are located in the vicinity of Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane, along with the underground mined platform tunnels, as shown in the drawings in Appendix C.

5.3 Likely Finished Contour of the Site The finished contours of the Karangahape Station area are shown generally in the drawings in Appendix C. The Mercury Lane and Beresford Square works areas and CSAs will be reinstated to the same or similar ground level as currently exits. The station entrances at Mercury Lane and Beresford Square will also be reinstated to similar ground levels as currently exist at each site. However these finished contours will not be established until construction of the Karangahape Station is complete, and will be addressed as part of a future Outline Plan which will include an Urban Design DWP.

5.4 Vehicular Access, Circulation and Parking The TAP DWP (Appendix K of the CEMP) describes the vehicle access, circulation and provisions for parking during the main works. The main works will be undertaken in several construction stages over a period of approximately three years. During this time, a number of Temporary Traffic Management Plans (TMPs) will be Page 17

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan implemented for the works with evolving traffic management requirements and traffic lane configurations. Traffic management will range from temporary footpath occupation and temporary closures to traffic lane closures on Pitt Street (one lane of traffic in each direction on Pitt Street will be maintained throughout the duration of works). Vehicular access to private properties will be maintained as far as practicable for the duration of the main works. Pedestrian access adjacent to works areas will be maintained with a minimum width of 1.5m. TMPs will ensure that all pedestrian routes meet accessibility requirements, with appropriate ramps and gradients for all users. Full pedestrian access across the Karangahape Road, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane intersection will be maintained at all times during the works. Traffic management areas interfacing with pedestrian crossing points will widen to cater for the crossing demand as required during the works. Wayfinding signage will be provided at each junction along the key pedestrian routes through the works area. Where appropriate, this will provide information on the location and operation of specific buildings or businesses. Vehicle access from Beresford Square onto Pitt Street will be closed permanently from Q1 2020 as part of the Karangahape Station early works. This closure will continue for the duration of the main works. Beresford Square will remain accessible from Hopetoun Street and Day Street. All other existing traffic movements between public roads will continue to be available during the main works. Overall, the volume of construction traffic generated by the main works is predicted to peak in Q1 2021 with a maximum of 176 vehicles (352 one-way movements) across the two sites (Beresford Square and Mercury Lane). Construction traffic will include staff vehicles, spoil removal and deliveries of plant and equipment for the works. Parking for construction vehicles during the main works will be provided within each works area and CSA.

5.5 Landscaping The main works do not include any permanent landscaping.

Page 18

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

6.

Other Matters to Avoid, Remedy or Mitigate Adverse Effects on the Environment

The CEMP and sub-plans that form part of this Outline Plan provide comprehensive detail on the management of environmental effects during construction of the main works, including measures to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on the environment. A summary of the matters covered in the CEMP and sub-plans is provided below.

6.1 Transport, Access and Parking The TAP DWP (Appendix K of the CEMP) outlines the measures that will be implemented during the main works to manage effects on transport, access and parking. Measures outlined in the TAP DWP that will be implemented during the main works include: • •

• •

Provision for pedestrian access around the works areas and retaining access to businesses and offices; All access to private properties will be maintained for pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles. Signage will be used to direct traffic and pedestrians wishing to gain access to businesses as appropriate. Where any access to private property is temporarily impacted by the main works, the affected parties will be consulted with, prior to the closure in accordance with the designation conditions; Beresford Square will be closed to vehicle through traffic, however access to private entrances, Samoa House Lane and Day Street will be maintained at all times; and The works area on Pitt Street will be managed to ensure at least one lane of traffic in each direction is available at all times.

6.2 Construction Noise and Vibration The main works will create changes to the existing noise environment, with noise and vibration generating machinery operating in relatively close proximity to noise and vibration sensitive receptors. The management of construction noise and vibration during the main works is addressed by the CNV DWP (Appendix L of the CEMP). The CNV DWP outlines the construction noise and vibration performance standards that must, as far as practicable, be complied with, along with management and mitigation measures that will be implemented during the main works in order to avoid or mitigate adverse noise and vibration effects on sensitive receptors located in the surrounding area. The CNV DWP identifies those buildings where construction activities are predicted to exceed the Project Noise and Vibration Standards and for which a Site Specific Construction Noise or Vibration Management Plan (SSCNVMP) is required in accordance with designation Conditions 37 and 38. Specifically, a SSCNVMP is required for the buildings set out in Section 5 of the CNV DWP (Appendix L of the CEMP). Four combined SSCNVMPs have been prepared (Appendix E of the CNV DWP) for specific construction activities; being the temporary shaft excavation, piling, diaphragm wall construction and slab construction and excavation. These outline the Best Practicable Option (BPO) that will be implemented during the works to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on a receiver resulting from construction noise or vibration. Page 19

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

6.3 Built Heritage The Built Heritage Section of the HC DWP (Appendix M of the CEMP) has been prepared to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of the main works on built heritage, as far as reasonably practicable. The Built Heritage Section of the HC DWP outlines how effects on heritage buildings will be avoided or mitigated during the main works, including: • • •

The protection methodology to be employed in order to protect buildings from any adverse effects during the main works; The requirement for building condition surveys to be undertaken before works commence, during construction and post construction; and Settlement and vibration monitoring to be undertaken during construction.

6.4 Archaeology The Archaeology Section of the HC DWP (Appendix N of the CEMP) outlines the procedures and measures that will be implemented during the main works in order to minimise the potential for adverse effects on archaeological remains. These include: •

• •

Pre-construction briefings to be given to project staff in order to inform them of the nature and form of archaeological material that may be encountered during excavations and procedures to be followed in the event of archaeological remains being encountered; Monitoring of excavations by an archaeologist in order to identify and record any archaeological remains; Procedures to be followed if any unrecorded archaeological remains are discovered (including should the Project Archaeologist not be present on site), including protocols should any artefacts of Maori origin, especially koiwi, be discovered; and A comprehensive methodology for the recording, sampling, investigation and analysis of archaeological remains encountered during the main works.

An Archaeological Authority under Section 44(a) of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 (Authority no. 2017/793) has been obtained and the works will be in accordance with this Authority.

6.5 Contamination The Contamination DWP (Appendix O of the CEMP) outlines the procedures to be implemented in relation to the handling and excavation of potentially contaminated soils during the main works in order to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on human health and the environment. Specifically, the DWP includes: • •

Page 20

Procedures for the management of contaminated fill and groundwater within the main works footprint, including soil classification, sampling and testing; Procedures to manage the disturbance of contaminated fill during earthworks activities, including measures for reducing human exposure to contaminated fill and minimising contaminated discharges to air, land or water;

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan •

• •

Measures to ensure the disposal of contaminated material to an appropriately licensed landfill and appropriate treatment of potentially contaminated water in order to avoid, remedy or mitigate effects; The requirement for the Project Contaminated Land Professional to supervise excavation works as required; and Contingency measures to manage any unexpected discovery of contamination.

6.6 Air Quality The AQ DWP (Appendix I of the CEMP) outlines how any adverse effects of dust and odour from the main works will be avoided, remedied or mitigated. The overall approach to dust control during the main works involves a focus on pre-emptive mitigation measures such as visual inspections and monitoring to aid in the avoidance of significant dust emissions. The AQ DWP sets out: • • • • • •

Sources of dust, odour and combustion air pollutants that may be created during the main works; Sensitive locations and receivers within/surrounding the works area; Methods to manage dust and odour emissions and mitigate impacts on local air quality; Methods to minimise the discharge of combustion emissions from vehicles; Monitoring methods to be implemented during the works; and Procedures for responding to complaints regarding discharges into air and keeping compliance records.

6.7 Social Impact and Business Disruption The Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP (SIBD DWP) has been prepared (Appendix F of the CEMP) to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects arising from disruption to businesses, residents and community services/facilities so far as reasonably practicable. The SIBD DWP has been prepared in consultation with representatives from the community, business owners, affected parties and affected in proximity parties. Common issues raised by parties consulted are summarised below: • • • • •

Page 21

The potential for construction noise impacts; Concerns that construction noise and disruption would lead to tenants vacating a property; Concerns about the loss of pedestrian and vehicular access to properties, including private car parks, and road diversions that would be required. Concerns around the position of hoardings and passage ways/diversions being unwelcoming to walk along; and The businesses on Beresford Square were specifically concerned about: o The proximity of hoardings and the impact on the appearance of the street; o The need to maintain visibility to businesses; o The loss of outdoor seating areas; o The need to retain pedestrian access and private car parking; and o The impact of noise, vibration and disturbance on the employees from construction work and traffic. | Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan The SIBD DWP addresses the management and mitigation of these potential impacts during the construction works.

6.8 Erosion and Sediment Control The main works involve bulk earthworks for the excavation of the temporary access shaft, mining of the platform tunnels and station box excavations at both Mercury Lane and Beresford Square. Earthworks activities have the potential to generate sediment laden discharges to the surrounding receiving environment if not appropriately managed. The main works Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) (Appendix H of the CEMP) identifies the measures that will be implemented to mitigate and manage the potential adverse effects on the receiving environment from any erosion and sediment generation during the main works. The ESCP follows the principles of erosion and sediment control set out in Auckland Council “Erosion and Sediment Control Guide for Land Disturbing Activities in the Auckland Region�, Guideline Document 005 (GD05), which supersedes Auckland Council Technical Publication 90 (TP90). All erosion and sediment control measures will be fully established within each works area before physical works commence in that area.

6.9 Building Condition Surveys Building condition surveys will be undertaken in accordance with designation Condition 46 and resource consent Condition 133. Specifically, a condition survey will be undertaken for all buildings where there is potential for damage to buildings or structures arising from construction works, such as excavation, dewatering or vibration effects. Building condition surveys are described in the CEMP (Appendix D). The majority of building condition surveys required as part of the main works have recently been completed as part of the Karangahape Station early works.

6.10 Environmental Monitoring Section 6 of the CEMP (Appendix D) provides a comprehensive outline of environmental monitoring to be undertaken during the main works. In summary, monitoring of compliance with the designation conditions and resource consent conditions will be undertaken throughout the main works to ensure that environmental effects are appropriately managed. This will enable the overall effectiveness of the environmental controls to be determined and allows areas of non-compliance or opportunities for improvement to be identified so appropriate actions can be taken. The specific monitoring required for each environmental element is detailed in the respective subplans appended to the CEMP. The sub-plans outline monitoring requirements, the frequency of the monitoring to be undertaken and the appropriate responsible person. Section 6 of the CEMP also details the collaborative process between the Link Alliance, CRLL and Auckland Council compliance officers to be followed during construction in accordance with designation Condition 13.

Page 22

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

7.

Consultation

Consultation with the Karangahape CLG, Auckland Council, Mana Whenua and Network Utility Operators has been undertaken to inform preparation of this Outline Plan and the supporting CEMP and sub-plans. A summary of this consultation is outlined below.

7.1 Community and Business Liaison Group The Karangahape CLG comprises directly affected and affected in proximity property owners and occupiers (or representatives for these parties), representatives of the Karangahape Road Business Association and other parties with an interest in the Karangahape area. CLG meetings are held at least every three months and will continue for the duration of the Karangahape Station construction. The CLG is a key forum for providing: • • •

The community with regular information in relation to the CRL project, such as construction details, programme and what can be expected during construction; An opportunity for community concern and interest to be raised and reported to the Link Alliance; and The community with an opportunity to review and provide feedback on the CEMP and subplans.

The CEMP and sub-plans listed which form part of this Outline Plan were presented to the CLG at a meeting on 12 November 2019, and have been made available to the CLG for review and comment. Comments received from the CLG have served to inform the preparation of these plans and are captured in an appendix to the respective documents, along with a clear explanation of where comments or recommendations have been incorporated in the Plans, or where they have not been incorporated, the reasons for this.

7.2 Auckland Council Engagement has been undertaken with Auckland Council in relation to the preparation of this Outline Plan. The Link Alliance team met with the relevant Auckland Council specialists on 6 August 2019 and presented an overview of the CRL project, planning approvals and associated CEMP and sub-plans, construction methodology and environmental management framework for the project. Regular meetings between the Link Alliance and Auckland Council have continued from this time. Auckland Council has been provided with copies of the draft CEMP and sub-plans to review and comment on, prior to formal lodgement of this Outline Plan with these comments included in an appendix to the respective plans.

7.3 Mana Whenua A CRL mana whenua forum has been established for the purposes of undertaking kaitiakitanga responsibilities associated with the project. The forum comprises those mana whenua groups who expressed an interest in being involved in the CRL project and its related activities. Refer to Section 1.6 of the CEMP (Appendix D) for detail in this regard. The main works were presented to the mana whenua forum on 3 December 2019.

Page 23

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

7.4 Network Utility Operators Engagement has been undertaken with the following Network Utility Operators (NUOs) as part of the utility relocations described in the Karangahape Station early works Outline Plan: Vector Electricity, Vector Gas, Vector Communications, Chorus, Vodafone, Auckland Council stormwater unit (Healthy Waters), and Watercare. Engagement with NUOs is continuing as part of the main works and further detail of engagement undertaken to date with NUOs is outlined in Section 5.1 of the CEMP (Appendix D).

7.5 Other Parties Engagement has also been undertaken with representatives from the community, business owners, affected parties and affected in proximity parties in the process of developing the SIBD DWP. That engagement is detailed in the SIBD DWP document contained in Appendix F of the CEMP.

Page 24

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

Appendix A:

Page 25

Planning Maps

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Auckland Council

429

246-254

a ha p

238

191-197

e Ro a d 214

202 184

170

150-154

136

et

t

Cross Street

5 25

29 9

24 30

29

23

Built Environment

75

90-94 74-80 2-4

1

6-8

S tr eet

1 23-31

83-85

14

een

11-13

20

12

111

ee

9

16

520

441

161

r Q u

18

t tr e e th S

17

21 23

oad

18

508

415-427

105-107

20

pe

Sou

26

22-26

tre o nds S et ym

6A

Ka r a n g

City R

S

8

20

9

12 14

15-19

a ce

r

8

21 23 25-27

10 DISCLAIMER: This map/plan is illustrative only and all information should be independently verified on site before taking any action. Copyright Auckland Council. Land Parcel Boundary information from LINZ (Crown Copyright Reserved). Whilst due care has been taken, Auckland Council gives no warranty as to the accuracy and plan completeness of any information on this map/plan and accepts no liability for any error, omission or use of the information. Height datum: Auckland 1946.

278-280

et

t tree 13 sS

er r

t Quee n S

10

2

15-19

500

411

251-253

S tre

1

ato

8

70-74

401

Sco tia P 2 l ace

492-494

61-65

292-300

5

3

211-235

t Eas

a ce err st T We

432S

Gal

4

e

283

3 14

59

3

6

4

T

Po

8 10

326-334

1

16-18

303-307

312

ua r

Mercur y Lane

tr

22-28

345-361

352-356

Sq

7

tr e

ee

t

rth No

y

31

25

sf o rd

68

Up

n er

36

t

Po r t Mo to r w t h e r n To N or a

Be re

10

´

385

poo lS

Mo

mp Ra On eet S tr

am

p Ho b

s on

S out h e r n M ot o rw a Of f y R

n

18

8

Poynto n

Ne lso n S tr eet

u to

327

374-386

50-60 14

15

S

15

375

1-35

17-27

21

e Stre Day

k n L in

k y L in rn N or w a o r t h he Western Mo t ort o N rt T

er - W e st e r n T o N o r t h

432

pe

e nu

47

t P it t S tr e e

No rth 442

Ho

2

ys

to

rw

G re

e Av

Map

Liv er

ay

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

1/30 0

10

20

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

30


Auckland Council

15-19

6A

17

Mercur y Lane

246-254

214

202 184

18 20

11-13

23-31

th Sou et e r St

29

1

Ka r a n 170

g ah a p e Road 150-154

Cross Street

25

1

eet Q ue S tr e n e et 16 12

Karangahape Ro ad

) 83-85 ) ) ) 75)

)) ) ) ) 74-80 ) ) 90-94

2-4

Ka ra

) ng

) ah

) )

ap

)

eR oa d

)

14 105-107

20

1/30 0

10

20

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

9

L ive rp Str e o ol et

Ne l s

Qu e S tr e n e et Q u ee nS tr

111 ) )

City Roa d

18

508

9

23

500

22-26

Roa d

6-8

29

30

´

City

492-494

520

U

136

5

24

Controls

S tr

429

)211-235 ) ) )) ) 191-197 ) ) ) Ka r a n 441 ga ha ) ) 161 pe R o ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ad 238

ee n 415-427

21 23

1-35

15-19

eet 26

9

12 14

21 23

8

20

Up pe r S t r Qu e e n e et

11

) )

10 DISCLAIMER: This map/plan is illustrative only and all information should be independently verified on site before taking any action. Copyright Auckland Council. Land Parcel Boundary information from LINZ (Crown Copyright Reserved). Whilst due care has been taken, Auckland Council gives no warranty as to the accuracy and plan completeness of any information on this map/plan and accepts no liability for any error, omission or use of the information. Height datum: Auckland 1946.

17

e Ro a d

Me rc u La ry ne

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1

5-7

14

10

8

et

4

8

5

nT er race

e r Qu een p p S tr e et

S tre

432S

t Eas

o rt T

8 10

3

411

Map

401

Sco ti 2 Plac a e

Qu

Ho p St e t re ou et n

er orw n ay

S tr

e et

ot

Off Ra Ho bs o mp N nS o Ho t re bs P o r t h e et O on r t nR Mo rn T St am r ee o to p rw tO a nR y N am p M orth

t her

Sou

th No r

Ho p St e t re ou et n

Karan g ah a p

3

6

Q uee n) S tree t

345-361 ) )

374-386

432

)

7

4

61-65

) ) ) 251-253 ) ) )

) 278-280 Ka r Ro ad 292-300 ) e ) 312 ap ) ) a nga h ) 326-334 r d a a K Ro ) ) 352-356 375

et

Po

) ) 327) ) a pe ) ) a nga h

2

y cur Mer ne La

Stre ay Day st We e rw ra c o t o To Ter M rn e rn ay h e N o rt h t o r w S ou t o t M Por k N o rth -W es te rn Lin M ot or w a y ern rt h No

) 303-307

283)

3

70-74

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

-W N elso n S tre et Nor t est e O f f R am p her rn

on

15

59

385

) ) )) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Da St r e y et

16-18

68

18 10

8

to P oy n

17-27 Be r Sq esfo 15 ua r d re Be r Sq esfo u ar r d 36 et e Be 1 Stre y r a D Sq esfo ua r d 31 re 22-28

14

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) P it t S tr ee t

21

rn S o uth e ay M o tor w 442

25

47

50-60

t P it t S tr e e

un e to Ho p r e e t St

2

) ) )

n u to t e e p o re H St

s ey e Gr enu Av

P it t S tr e et

n L T i nk o n M ot or wa y

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

30

)

)


Auckland Council

17

11

15-19

6A

17

18 20

11-13

23-31

th Sou et e r St

29

1

150-154

Cross Street

136

V U

5 25

23

eet Q ue S tr e n e et

22-26

Roa d

City Roa d

18

9

16 12

L ive rp Str e o ol et

111

83-85

90-94 74-80

2-4

75

Ka ra

ng Ro a ha p ad e

V U 8831

6-8 14

9

30

Designations

1

29

1552

24

Qu e S tr e n e et Q u ee nS tr

eet 170

500

508

Karangahape Ro ad

U

´

City

492-494

520

441

9

12 14

21 23

8

Mercur y Lane

5

184

S tr

429

1-35

15-19

415-427

Up pe r S t r Qu e e n e et

5-7

14

10

10 DISCLAIMER: This map/plan is illustrative only and all information should be independently verified on site before taking any action. Copyright Auckland Council. Land Parcel Boundary information from LINZ (Crown Copyright Reserved). Whilst due care has been taken, Auckland Council gives no warranty as to the accuracy and plan completeness of any information on this map/plan and accepts no liability for any error, omission or use of the information. Height datum: Auckland 1946.

26

21 23

U V V U

2500-3

y cur Mer ne La

432S

1

8

8

et

ay st We e rw ra c o t o To Ter M rn e ay rn h e N o r th t o r w o t M Por

8 10

3

4

20

e r Qu een p p S tr e et

352-356

S tre

374-386

411

nT er race

Me rc u La ry ne

t

ay

S ou t

rw

ah a ng Ka r Ro ad

251-253

Karan g ah a p

4

Map

401

Sco ti 2 Plac a e

Qu

Ho p St e t re ou et n

a pe

70-74

3

6

e Ro a 2500-4 211-235 pe d 191-197 a ha g n Ka r a n a 278-280 ga ha Ka r Ro ad 292-300 161 pe R o 246-254 ad K 312 a r an g a 238 h a p e Road 214 326-334 202 327

345-361

2

3

7

Q uee n S tree t

375

303-307

59

61-65

283

t Eas

e Stre Day

2

P

k to Lin M o a mp rn ern fR f the rt h So u et O e No r t nS To ort 432

16-18

15

Ne l s o

442

21

V U

10

8 68

2500-2

18

385

ee n

Ho p St e t re ou et n

er orw n ay ot

et

17-27 Be r Sq esfo 15 ua r d re Be r Sq esfo u ar r d 36 et e Be 1 Stre y r a D Sq esfo ua r d 31 re 22-28

Da St r e y et

S tr e

14

47

P it t S tr eet

n e to u H op

25

50-60

to P oy n

tr e et O Ho b s on f f Ra m N o Ho p St r bs P o r t h e ee t on r t On r n M R am St r ee o t o T o p rw tO ay nR N am p M orth 6736

s ey e Gr enu Av

t P it t S tr e e

n u to t e e p o re H St

V U

P it t S tr e et

No r th-W Nor t est e her r n L n To Sou i nk t her n M ot or Ne l wa so n y S

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

20

105-107

V U 1553

V U 6736

1/30 0

10

20

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

30


Auckland Council

246-254

a ha p

238

429

191-197

e Ro a d 214

441

161

202 184

170

150-154

136

et

t

Cross Street

5 25

29 9

r Q u

24 30

29

Historic Heritage and Special Character

2-4

1

6-8 14

23

75

105-107

20

pe

23-31

83-85

90-94 74-80

S tr eet

1

12

111

ee

9

16

520

een

11-13

20

t tr e e th S

17

21 23

oad

18

508

415-427

22-26

tre o nds S et ym

Sou

Ka r a n g

City R

S

6A

26

r

10 DISCLAIMER: This map/plan is illustrative only and all information should be independently verified on site before taking any action. Copyright Auckland Council. Land Parcel Boundary information from LINZ (Crown Copyright Reserved). Whilst due care has been taken, Auckland Council gives no warranty as to the accuracy and plan completeness of any information on this map/plan and accepts no liability for any error, omission or use of the information. Height datum: Auckland 1946.

18

21 23 25-27

8

20

9

12 14

et

t tree 13 sS

278-280

8

15-19

a ce

t Quee n S

10

er r

211-235

S tre

1

ato

8

2

15-19

500

411

251-253

292-300

5

3

70-74

401

Sco tia P 2 l ace

492-494

61-65

t Eas

a ce err st T We

432S

Gal

4

e

283

3 14

59

3

6

4

T

Po

8 10

326-334

1

16-18

303-307

312

ua r

Mercur y Lane

tr

22-28

345-361

352-356

Sq

7

tr e

ee

t

rth No

y

31

25

sf o rd

68

Up

n er

36

t

Po r t Mo to r w t h e r n To N or a

Be re

10

´

385

poo lS

Mo

mp Ra On eet S tr

am

p Ho b

s on

S out h e r n M ot o rw a Of f y R

n

18

8

Poynto n

Ne lso n S tr eet

u to

327

374-386

50-60 14

15

S

15

375

1-35

17-27

21

e Stre Day

k n L in

k y L in rn N or w a o r t h he Western Mo t ort o N rt T

er - W e st e r n T o N o r t h

432

pe

e nu

47

t P it t S tr e e

No rth 442

Ho

2

ys

to

rw

G re

e Av

Map

Liv er

ay

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

1/30 0

10

20

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

30


Auckland Council

6A

Sou

211-235

246-254

a ha p

238

203-207

e Ro a d 214

21 23

183

429

202 184

170

150-154

Cross Street

25

29 9

30 23

Infrastructure

83-85

t

136

5

24

29

12

111

ee

82-88 2-4

1

r Q u

23-31

16

520

441

155

6-8

S tr eet

1

508

415-427

et

26

9

18

tr e

20

14

een

11-13

20

t tr e e th S

17

a ce

oad

75

72

tre o nds S et ym

10 DISCLAIMER: This map/plan is illustrative only and all information should be independently verified on site before taking any action. Copyright Auckland Council. Land Parcel Boundary information from LINZ (Crown Copyright Reserved). Whilst due care has been taken, Auckland Council gives no warranty as to the accuracy and plan completeness of any information on this map/plan and accepts no liability for any error, omission or use of the information. Height datum: Auckland 1946.

18

21 23 25-27

8

411

61-65

Ka r a n g

500

22-26

S

t tree 13 sS

er r

City R

492-494

9

12 14

15-19

2

243

15-19

r

10

5

3

70-74

401

Sco tia P 2 l ace

t Quee n S

8

et

1

ato

8

278-280

S tre

Gal

4

259-281

292-300

t Eas

a ce err st T We

432S

283

3 14

e

59

3

6

4

T

Po

8 10

326-334

1

16-18

303-307

312

ua r

Mercur y Lane

tr

22-28

345-361

352-356

Sq

7

105-107

20

pe

ee

t

rth No

y

31

25

sf o rd

68

Up

n er

36

t

Po r t Mo to r w t h e r n To N or a

Be re

10

´

385

poo lS

Mo

mp Ra On eet S tr

am

p Ho b

s on

S out h e r n M ot o rw a Of f y R

n

18

8

Poynto n

Ne lso n S tr eet

u to

327

374-386

50-60 14

15

S

15

375

1-35

17-27

21

e Stre Day

k n L in

k y L in rn N or w a o r t h he Western Mo t ort o N rt T

er - W e st e r n T o N o r t h

432

pe

e nu

47

t P it t S tr e e

No rth 442

Ho

2

ys

to

rw

G re

e Av

Map

Liv er

ay

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

1/30 0

10

20

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

30


Auckland Council

429

246-254

a ha p

238

191-197

e Ro a d 214

202 184

170

150-154

136

23-31

Cross Street

5 25

29 9

24 30

29

23

Mana Whenua

et

t

75

90-94 74-80 2-4

1

6-8

S tr eet

1

20

83-85

14

een

11-13

12

111

ee

9

16

520

441

161

r Q u

18

t tr e e th S

17

21 23

oad

18

508

415-427

105-107

20

pe

Sou

26

22-26

tre o nds S et ym

6A

Ka r a n g

City R

S

8

20

9

12 14

15-19

a ce

r

8

21 23 25-27

10 DISCLAIMER: This map/plan is illustrative only and all information should be independently verified on site before taking any action. Copyright Auckland Council. Land Parcel Boundary information from LINZ (Crown Copyright Reserved). Whilst due care has been taken, Auckland Council gives no warranty as to the accuracy and plan completeness of any information on this map/plan and accepts no liability for any error, omission or use of the information. Height datum: Auckland 1946.

278-280

et

t tree 13 sS

er r

t Quee n S

10

2

15-19

500

411

251-253

S tre

1

ato

8

70-74

401

Sco tia P 2 l ace

492-494

61-65

292-300

5

3

211-235

t Eas

a ce err st T We

432S

Gal

4

e

283

3 14

59

3

6

4

T

Po

8 10

326-334

1

16-18

303-307

312

ua r

Mercur y Lane

tr

22-28

345-361

352-356

Sq

7

tr e

ee

t

rth No

y

31

25

sf o rd

68

Up

n er

36

t

Po r t Mo to r w t h e r n To N or a

Be re

10

´

385

poo lS

Mo

mp Ra On eet S tr

am

p Ho b

s on

S out h e r n M ot o rw a Of f y R

n

18

8

Poynto n

Ne lso n S tr eet

u to

327

374-386

50-60 14

15

S

15

375

1-35

17-27

21

e Stre Day

k n L in

k y L in rn N or w a o r t h he Western Mo t ort o N rt T

er - W e st e r n T o N o r t h

432

pe

e nu

47

t P it t S tr e e

No rth 442

Ho

2

ys

to

rw

G re

e Av

Map

Liv er

ay

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

1/30 0

10

20

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

30


Auckland Council

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

V

V

V

V

V

V

V G re V V 50-60

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

47V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

401 V ScoV V tia P 2 la

V

V

V

V

n er

S unV o t

Ho

ee

pe

V

V

V 36

V

21

V

V

V

V

V

V

15 V

V

V

V

V

V2

V

V

V327

V

V

375 V

V

V

345-361

V

V 374-386

V

V V 326-334

352-356 V V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

8 V 10

V

V

V

V

1 V 432S V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V sf

V

V

V

Be re

V V 22-28

25

V

V

V

31 V

V

y

V

V

tr

No V

t

V

rth

V

17-27

V 4

ato Gal

V V

DISCLAIMER: This map/plan is illustrative only and all information should be independently verified on site before taking any action. Copyright Auckland Council. Land Parcel Boundary information from LINZ (Crown Copyright Reserved). Whilst due care has been taken, Auckland Council gives no warranty as to the accuracy and plan completeness of any information on this map/plan and accepts no liability for any error, omission or use of the information. Height datum: Auckland 1946.

8

S tre sV

V

V

V

V

V

e V

59 V

V

2 V

V

ua r

1

16-18

V

V 292-300

312

3

V 14

V V 6A 8 V

V

5

V

V V 278-280

V

V V68

V

V

V

V

8V

V

V

4 V

V

V

V

3

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

211-235 V V

a ha p

V

erV r a ce

18

V

V

V

Ka r a n g

14

V

70-74 V V

61-65 V V 251-253

V 283 V 303-307

et 13 V

10

V 15

Sq

V

V

10

or d

ys

10

V

V

V

V

V 20

V 26

V

V

V

V

2-4 V

V

V

V

V V 11-13

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

1V

V

V 29

V

V

V

V 23-31

r ee V uth StV So 17 29

V 24

V

V

V

V

V

202 184

Cross Street

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

Natural Heritage

V

V

V

V

V

V

136 V

V

V

V

170 150-154 V V

V

V 520 V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

30 V

16 V

V

V

t

V

V

V

V

508 V

V

V

18 V 20 21 23 V 25-27

V

V 161

V

V

25

23

V

9

5

1

V V

V

V

V

V

V

83-85 V

75 V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V V 105-107

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

1/30

V

V

V

V

V

V

20

441

V

12

V

V

V

oad

22-26 V

18 V

V

V

V

V

V

V 415-427V V

CV ity R

´

V

V 191-197

8 V

V

V

500 V

429 V

V

15-19

V

V 492-494 V

V

V

V

411

15-19

V

21 23 V

V

12 14 V

V

V

V

9

ce

V

e Ro a d V 214

3

6 V V

246-254 V V

V 238

7

385

et

Mo

mp Ra On eet S tr

s on

p Ho b

am

V

V1-35

111

eV et

90-94 74-80 V V

6-8 14

0

V

10

20

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

30

V

#

9

tre o nds S et ym

V

V

S

V

V

et

V

432

V

S tre

V

V

t Eas

442

V

V

a ce err st T We

V

V

V

r

Po V

V

t

V

V

t Quee n S

V

V

e Stre Day

V

V

V

Po r t Mo to r w t h e r n To N or a

V

k n L in

V

V

Ne lso n S tr eet

V

V

V

T

V

V

V

Poynto n

V

V

k y L in rn N or w a o r t h he Western Mo t ort o N rt T

er - W e st e r n T o N o r t h

V

V

V

t P it t S tr e e

No rth

V

V

tr e

V

V

e Av

poo lS

V

eV nu

V

Liv er

V

V

S tr eet

V

V

een

V

V

r Q u

V

V

pe

V

V

Up

V

V

V

Mercur y Lane

V

ay

V

rw

V

to

V

S out h e r n M ot o rw a Of f y R

V

Map


Auckland Council

429

246-254

a ha p

238

191-197

e Ro a d 214

202 184

170

150-154

136

et

t

Cross Street

5 25

29 9

24 30

29

23

Natural Resources

75

90-94 74-80 2-4

1

6-8

S tr eet

1 23-31

83-85

14

een

11-13

20

12

111

ee

9

16

520

441

161

r Q u

18

t tr e e th S

17

21 23

oad

18

508

415-427

105-107

20

pe

Sou

26

22-26

tre o nds S et ym

6A

Ka r a n g

City R

S

8

20

9

12 14

15-19

a ce

r

8

21 23 25-27

10 DISCLAIMER: This map/plan is illustrative only and all information should be independently verified on site before taking any action. Copyright Auckland Council. Land Parcel Boundary information from LINZ (Crown Copyright Reserved). Whilst due care has been taken, Auckland Council gives no warranty as to the accuracy and plan completeness of any information on this map/plan and accepts no liability for any error, omission or use of the information. Height datum: Auckland 1946.

278-280

et

t tree 13 sS

er r

t Quee n S

10

2

15-19

500

411

251-253

S tre

1

ato

8

70-74

401

Sco tia P 2 l ace

492-494

61-65

292-300

5

3

211-235

t Eas

a ce err st T We

432S

Gal

4

e

283

3 14

59

3

6

4

T

Po

8 10

326-334

1

16-18

303-307

312

ua r

Mercur y Lane

tr

22-28

345-361

352-356

Sq

7

tr e

ee

t

rth No

y

31

25

sf o rd

68

Up

n er

36

t

Po r t Mo to r w t h e r n To N or a

Be re

10

´

385

poo lS

Mo

mp Ra On eet S tr

am

p Ho b

s on

S out h e r n M ot o rw a Of f y R

n

18

8

Poynto n

Ne lso n S tr eet

u to

327

374-386

50-60 14

15

S

15

375

1-35

17-27

21

e Stre Day

k n L in

k y L in rn N or w a o r t h he Western Mo t ort o N rt T

er - W e st e r n T o N o r t h

432

pe

e nu

47

t P it t S tr e e

No rth 442

Ho

2

ys

to

rw

G re

e Av

Map

Liv er

ay

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

1/30 0

10

20

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

30


Auckland Council

Qu e S tr e n e et

ry r cu Me ane L

Precincts

Li v St erp r e oo et l

e et City

Roa d

City Roa d

Li ve rp o

ol

ee n

St re

et

S tr

eet

ne

et Stre

t Eas et e Str

th Sou

e Ro a d

´

K ar a n

g a h a p e Ro ad

U

Karangahape Ro ad

Ka ra

ng

ah

ap

eR oa d

Cross Street

Sy m S tr o n d s ee t

Mercur y Lane et

y La

S tre

r y Mer cu

t

a ha p

r Mer cu Lan e

tree

t Eas

DISCLAIMER: This map/plan is illustrative only and all information should be independently verified on site before taking any action. Copyright Auckland Council. Land Parcel Boundary information from LINZ (Crown Copyright Reserved). Whilst due care has been taken, Auckland Council gives no warranty as to the accuracy and plan completeness of any information on this map/plan and accepts no liability for any error, omission or use of the information. Height datum: Auckland 1946.

sS

t Eas t e Stre

ay

et

w

ato Gal

Ka r a n g

e r Qu een p p S tr e et

S tre

No

den Cob et Stre

r o ot M ce rn erra he st T ut We To So e rn wa y rt h r No oto t M o Por rt T nk P o rn L i e r th

Karangahape Road

e Ro a d

Qu

Stre e

D ay

t

ah a ng Ka r Ro ad

Karan g ah a p

pe

Map

Q uee n S tree t

a pe

a ha a ng Ka r Ro ad

t Eas

e Stre Day

ata Ng et e Str

City Centre Residential

nT er race Poyn ton Terrac e

P it t S tr ee t

Karangahape Road

Sco t Plac ia e

City Centre Residential

Up pe r S t r Qu e e n e et

t

Qu e S tr e n e et Q u ee nS tr

Be r Sq esfo ua r d re Be r Sq esfo ua r d re Bere s Squ fo rd ar e

to P oy n

tr e e ay S D t

Sco t Pla ia Sco ce t Plac ia e

Ho p St e t re ou et n Ho p St e t re ou et n

No Mo r ther n tor wa y

Ra

ob s On o n S R a t re mp e t

B n e u S resf o t t qu or d ar pe e e o tr e H S

P it t S tr e et

No r th-W Nor t est e her r n L n To Sou i nk the r Ne l s n M N or t h - W est e r n on St r o to eet M o t o r w ay N or t rw her Off ay n T Po rt Ra m No Mo o p tor rt h wa y M o -W e Ho s to bs rw te r o a n O n n St r y H

City Centre Residential

ys re e G en u Av

t P it t S tr e e

t Ne lson S tr e e

ay p S ou t h e r n M ot o r w am O ff R

un to t e p e Ho S t r e

P it t S tr e et

e mp e t

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

0

10

20

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

30


Auckland Council

5-7

10

17

11

15-19

Mercur y Lane

18 20

21 23 25-27

10

8

6A

Sou

t tr e e th S

17

214

e Ro a d

202 184

Ka r a n

29

11-13

23-31

1

g ah a p e Road

Cross Street

5 25

23

eet Q ue S tr e n e et S tr

ee n

City

500

22-26

Roa d

City Roa d

18 16 12

L ive rp Str e o ol et

111

83-85

2-4

ga

ha

pe

Ro

ad

14 9

30

´

6-8

29

24

Zones and Rural Urban Boundary

1

1-35

K ara ng a h ap e 75 Ro ad Ka ra n 90-94 74-80

U

136

Map

15-19

508

520

441

161

150-154

e e t Qu e S tr e n e et Q u

S tr Qu

429

Up pe r S t r Qu e e n e et

8

y cur Mer ne La

4

14

23

191-197

401

415-427

9

12 14

5

238

a ha p

26

20

Qu e S tr e n e et

Ho p St e t re ou et n

8

211-235

Sco ti 2 Plac a e

411

nT er race

Ka r a n g

3

6

ee n

Ho p St e t re ou et n

er orw n ay

Da St r e y et

326-334

3

DISCLAIMER: This map/plan is illustrative only and all information should be independently verified on site before taking any action. Copyright Auckland Council. Land Parcel Boundary information from LINZ (Crown Copyright Reserved). Whilst due care has been taken, Auckland Council gives no warranty as to the accuracy and plan completeness of any information on this map/plan and accepts no liability for any error, omission or use of the information. Height datum: Auckland 1946.

251-253

Karan g ah a p

7

4

61-65

283

312

366-368

432S

2

385

e r Qu een p p S tr e et

ah a ng Ka r Ro ad

et

o rt T

a pe

3

70-74

e Ro a e d ha p nga a 278-280 r d Ka Ro a 292-300 246-254

345-361

1

59

16-18

303-307

327

8 10

1

t Eas t e Stre

Stre ay Day ce rw e rra st T to We To Mo rn e rn ay h e N o rt h t o r w S ou t o t M Por k N o rth -W es te rn Lin M ot or w a y ern rt h No

Po

375

68

Me rc u La ry ne

Ne l s

on

S tr

e et

ot

Off Ra Ho bs o mp N nS o Ho t re bs P o r t h e et O on r t nR Mo rn T St am r ee o to p rw tO a nR y N am p M orth

t her

Sou

No r

th

-W N elso n S tre et Nor t est e O f f R am p her rn

22-28

15

18 10

8

to P oy n

31

50-60

P it t S tr eet

rn S o uth e ay M o tor w 432

25

17-27 Be r Sq esfo ua r d re Be r Sq esfo u y ar r d 36 D a e et e r t S

ys

e nu

14

47

15

2

442

n u to t e e p o re H St

21

G re

e Av

t P it t S tr e e

un e to Ho p r e e t St

P it t S tr e et

n L T i nk o n M ot or wa y

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

105-107

20

1/30 0

10

20

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

30

9


Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 15th November 2016 - LEGEND Date: 15/07/2019

NOTATIONS

Tagging of Provisions:

Appeals Pr op e r t i e sa f f e c t e db yAp p e a l ss e e ki n gc ha n g et o z on e so rma n a g e me n t l a y e r s Pr op e r t i e sa f f e c t e db yAp p e a l ss e e ki n gr e i n s t a t e me n t of ma n a g e me n t l a y e r s

[ i ] =I n f or ma t i o no n l y

[ r p] = Re g i on a l Pl a n

Proposed Plan Modifications No t i c eo f Re qu i r e me n t s Pl a nCha n g e s

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

[ r c p] = Re g i on a l Co a s t a lPl a n [ r p s] = Re g i on a l Po l i c ySt a t e me n t [ d p] = Di s t r i c t Pl a n( on l yn ot e dwhe nd u a l p r ov i s i on sa p p l y )

ZONING Residential

Rural

Re s i d e n t i a l -L a r g eL ot Z on e

Ru r a l Ru r a l Pr od u c t i o nZon e Ru r a l Mi x e dRu r a l Zon e

Re s i d e n t i a l -Si n g l eHo u s eZon e

Ru r a l Ru r a l Co a s t a l Zon e

Rural

Re s i d e n t i a l -Ru r a l a n dCo a s t a l Se t t l e me n t Zon e

Re s i d e n t i a l -Mi x e dHo u s i n gSu bu r ba nZ on e

Ru r a l Ru r a l Co n s e r v a t i o nZon e

Re s i d e n t i a l -Mi x e dHo u s i n gUr ba nZ on e

Ru r a l Co u n t r y s i d eL i v i n gZon e

Re s i d e n t i a l T e r r a c eHo u s i n ga n dAp a r t me n t Bu i l d i n g sZon e

Ru r a l Wa i t a ke r eFoo t hi l l sZon e

Business

Bu s i n e s sCi t yCe n t r eZ on e

Ru r a l Wa i t a ke r eRa n g e sZ on e

Future Urban

Bu s i n e s sMe t r op ol i t a nCe n t r eZon e

F u t u r eUr ba nZon e

Bu s i n e s sT o wnCe n t r eZon e

Gr e e nI n f r a s t r u c t u r eCo r r i d o r( Op e r a t i v ei ns o meSp e c i a l Ho u s i n gAr e a s )

Bu s i n e s sL oc a l Ce n t r eZon e

Infrastructure

Sp e c i a l Pu r p os eZ on e-Ai r p or t s&Ai r f i e l d s Ce me t e r y Qu a r r y He a l t hc a r eFa c i l i t y&Ho s p i t a l T e r t i a r yEd u c a t i on Mā or i Pu r p os e Ma jo rRe c r e a t i o nFa c i l i t y Sc ho o l St r a t e g i cT r a n s p or t Co r r i d o rZon e

Bu s i n e s sNe i g hb o u r ho o dCe n t r eZon e Bu s i n e s sMi x e dUs eZon e Bu s i n e s sGe n e r a l Bu s i n e s sZon e Bu s i n e s sBu s i n e s sPa r k Zon e Bu s i n e s sHe a v yI n d u s t r yZ on e Bu s i n e s sL i g ht I n d u s t r yZon e

Coastal

Co a s t a l -Ge n e r a l Co a s t a l Ma r i n eZon e[ r c p ]

Open space

Op e nSp a c e-Co n s e r v a t i o nZon e

Co a s t a l -Ma r i n aZon e[ r c p / d p ]

Op e nSp a c e-I n f or ma l Re c r e a t i o nZon e

Co a s t a l -Mo o r i n gZon e[ r c p ]

Op e nSp a c e-Sp or t a n dAc t i v eRe c r e a t i o nZon e

Co a s t a l -Mi n or Por t Z on e[ r c p / d p ]

Op e nSp a c e-Ci v i cSp a c e sZon e

Co a s t a l -F e r r yT e r mi n a l Zon e[ r c p / d p ]

Op e nSp a c e-Co mmu n i t yZon e

Co a s t a l -De f e n c eZon e[ r c p ]

Water [i]

Co a s t a l -Co a s t a l T r a n s i t i o nZon e

Pr e c i n c t s

Ru r a l Ur ba nBou n d a r y

I n d i c a t i v eCo a s t l i n e[ i ]


Overlays

Natural Resources

Ì Ì Ì ÌÌ Ì Ì Ì Ì ÌÌ Ì Ì Ì Ì ÌÌ Ì Ì Ì Ì ÌÌ Ì

T er r es t r i a l [r p/ d p] Ma r i n e 1[r c p] Ma r i n e 2[r c p]

Natural Heritage

Si gni f i c a nt Ec o lo gi c a l Ar ea sOv er la y@@

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

Wa t erSu pplyMa na g emen t Ar ea sOv er la y[r p]

WWWW WWWW

Na t u r a l St r ea mMa na g emen t Ar ea sOv er la y[r p] Na t u r a l Ur b a n

! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! !

V V V V▼ V▼V▼ ▼ V▼ V▼V▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼

L a k e Ma na g emen t Ar ea sOv er la y ( Na t u r a lL a k ea n dUr b a n L a k e)

( ( ( ( ( Quali t y Sen s i t i v e Aqu i f er Ma na g emen t Ar ea sOv er la y[r p] ((((( ( ( ( ( ( Wet la n dMa na g emen t Ar ea sOv er la y[r p]

▬ ▬▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬▬

Ai r po r t Appr o a c h Su r f a c e Ov er la y AAAAA AAAAA AÒ ( Ò AÒ ( AÒ ( AÒ ( A ( (Ò Ò (Ò (Ò (Ò ( (Ò Ò (Ò (Ò (Ò (

!

Na t i o na l Gr i d Co r r i d o rOv er la y

Na t i o na l Gr i dYa r dCo mpr o mi s ed

# # # #

St o c k a d e Hi ll Vi ew s ha f t Ov er la y–8 mh ei ght a r ea

Mo t o r wa yI nt er c ha n g e Co nt r o l

"

V eh i c le Ac c es s Res t i c t i o n Co nt r o l

Cen t r e Fr i n g e Of f i c e Co nt r o l Hei ght V a r i a t i o n Co nt r o l

@ @ @ @ Par k i ng V a r i a t i o n Co nt r o l @@@@ U U U U U ev el Cr o s s i n g sWi t h Si ght li n esCo nt r o l U@U@U @ U @ U L U U U U U

V U 123

Ar t er i a l Ro a d s

Designations

Ha z a r d o u sFa c i li t i es I nf r a s t r u c t u r e

Emer g en c yMa na g emen t Ar eaCo nt r o l

Ma c r o i nv er t eb r a t e Co mmu ni t yI nd ex G G G G

"

Business Park Zone Office Control

Bu i ld i n g Fr o nt a ge Co nt r o l

G G G G

Gen er a l

Controls

G G G G

) ) )

Hi s t o r i cHer i t a g e Ov er la yPla c e [r c p/ d p]

F lo w 1[r p]

EEEE p] E E E E Flow 2[r E Ç ÇE Ç ÇE Ç ÇE ÇÇ Ç Ç Ç ÇÇ Ç Ç Ç

G G G G

a c en t t oL ev el Cr o s s i ngs X X X Adj

Wa i t a k er e Ra n g esHer t a ge Ar eaOv er la y

Su b d i v i s i o n Sc h ed u le

St o c k a d e Hi ll Vi ew s ha f t [i ]

I d en t i f i edGr o wt h Co r r i d o rOv er la y

Gen er a l Co mmer c i a lF r o nt a ge

Ex t en t o f Ov er la y

Au c k la n dWa rMemo r i a l Mu s eu mVi ew s ha f t Ov er la yCo nt o u r s[i ]

Built Environment

!

Ri d g eli n e Pr o t ec t i o n Ov er la y

Au c k la n dWa rMemo r i a l Mu s eu mVi ew s ha f t Ov er la y[r c p/ d p]

Si t es&Pla c eso f Si gni f i c a nc et oMa n aWh en u aOv er la y[r c p/ d p]

KeyRet a i l Fr o nt a ge

L o c a llySi gni f i c a nt Vo lc a ni cVi ew s ha f t sOv er la yCo nt o u r s[i ]

Spec i a l Ch a r a c t er Ar ea sOv er la yRes i d en t i a la n dBu s i n es s

Mana Whenua # # # #

L o c a llySi gni f i c a nt Vo lc a ni cVi ew s ha f t sOv er la y[r c p/ d p]

Hi s t o r i cHer i t a g e Ov er la yEx t en t o f Pla c e [r c p/ d p]

Na t i o na l Gr i dYa r dUn c o mpr o mi s ed # # # #

Reg i o na llySi gni f i c a nt Vo lc a ni cVi ew s ha f t sOv er la yCo nt o u r s[i ]

Historic Heritage & Special Character

Na t i o na l Gr i dSu b s t a t i o n Co r r i d o r

# # # #

Reg i o na llySi gni f i c a nt Vo lc a ni c Vi ew s ha f t s&Hei ght Sen s i t i v e Ar ea sOv er la y[r c p/ d p]

L o c a l Pu b li cVi ew sOv er la y[r c p/ d p]

Ai r c r a f t No i s e Ov er la y

ÉÉÉÉ r yBu f f er Ar eaOv er la y É É É É Quar É É É É Nat i o na l Gr i dSu b d i v i s i o n Co r r i d o r

# # # #

Hei ght Sen s i t i v e Ar ea s

Na t u r a l

Ci t yCen t r e Po r t No i s e Ov er la y[r c p/ d p]

# # # #

Vi ew s ha f t s

Mo d i f i ed

Infrastructure # # # #

# # # #

Ou t s t a nd i n g Na t u r a lL a nd s c a pesOv er la y[r c p/ d p] Hi g h Na t u r a l Ch a r a c t erOv er la y[r c p/ d p]

Hi ghUs e Aqu i f erMa na g emen t Ar ea sOv er la y[r p]

# # # # # # # #

Ou t s t a nd i n g Na t u r a l Fea t u r esOv er la y[r c p/ d p] Ou t s t a nd i n g Na t u r a l Ch a r a c t er Ov er la y[r c p/ d p]

Hi ghUs e St r ea mMa na g emen t Ar ea sOv er la y[r p]

! ! ! ! !

No t a b le T r eesOv er la y

#

@

@

Ç Ç Ç ÇÇ Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç ÇÇ Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç ÇÇ Ç Ç Ç ******* ******* ******* *******

St o r mw a t erMa na g emen t Ar eaCo nt r o l

Su b d i v i s i o n Va r i a t i o n Co nt r o l Su r f Br ea k s[r c p] Ca b le Pr o t ec t i o n Ar ea sCo nt r o l [r c p] Co a s t a lI nu nd a t i o n 1per c en t AEPPlu s1 mCo nt r o l

Designations

U 200

Airspace Restriction Designations


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

Appendix B:

Page 26

Designation Conditions

| Karangahape Station Main Works


CRL Designation Conditions 29 October 2019

Aotea Alteration: BROWN (confirmed 24 January 2017) Condition 27.1(b) (Swanson St diversion): ORANGE (confirmed 23 June 2017) Strata/Sub-Strata Alteration: GREEN (confirmed 22 September 2017) Mt Eden CRL and NAL Alteration: BLUE (Environment Court Decision 15/12/17) Condition 27.1(b) (second Swanson St diversion): PINK (confirmed 27 March 2018) Operational Vibration Conditions 63 & 66: PURPLE (confirmed 24 July 2018) Karangahape Station Alteration: RED (Environment Court Decision 12 April 2019, upheld by High Court Decision 25 October 2019)

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 1


Explanatory Note: The following explanatory note does not form part of the conditions. It is a non-statutory way finding explanation of how the conditions are structured, what they cover in broad terms and where referenced documents can be found. This note does not alter legal obligations and rights created by the conditions. The conditions attach to six different designations. The designations are: 2500-1

A surface designation extending from Britomart Transport Centre to Albert Street/Mayoral Drive (in the vicinity of the Aotea car park entrance on Mayoral Drive) for the construction, operation and maintenance of the CRL – including two rail tunnels and Aotea Station.

2500-2

A sub-strata designation of land below the ground surface (within road resource and private property) for the construction, operation and maintenance of the CRL – including two rail tunnels and ancillary activities. This designation sits underneath the strata (protection) designation 2500-3 and extends from Mayoral Drive to New North Road.

2500-3

A strata (protection) designation that acts as a buffer between activities on the ground surface and the sub-strata designation (2500-2) that provides for the two rail tunnels. This designation sits above designation 2500-2, starting from 5 metres below the ground surface, and extends from Mayoral Drive to New North Road.

2500-4

A surface and sub-strata designation for the construction, operation and maintenance of Karangahape Station, and encompassing land within road reserve and private property in the vicinity of Pitt Street, Beresford Square, Karangahape Road, and Mercury Lane.

2500-5

A surface and sub-strata designation for the construction, operation and maintenance of Newton Station, and encompassing land within road reserve and private property in the vicinity of Symonds Street, Dundonald Street, and New North Road.

2500-6

A surface designation for the construction, operation and maintenance of the CRL – including the rail tunnels and connections required to join the CRL to the North Auckland Railway Line (NAL). This designation is located generally between New North Road, Mt Eden Road and Boston Road in the north and the NAL in the south. It also includes land located on the southern side and adjacent to the NAL between Normanby Road and Mt Eden Road, and to the immediate east and west of Porters Avenue.

Hereafter for the purpose of this condition set the designations are referred to as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. The table of contents for the conditions provides a broad overview of the subject matter. It commences with definitions and abbreviations and progresses to general conditions applicable to all designations followed by the conditions for pre-construction, construction, and operation. Under each of these

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 2


headings may be found sub-headings dealing with specific aspects of the work. There follow advice notes and appendices for: - buildings for consideration as to building condition surveys; and - heritage buildings for consideration as to building condition surveys The conditions for designation 3 conclude the suite of conditions. Set out below are a series of figures illustrating and explaining the location, extent and nature of designations 1 – 6. For precise details, please refer to the relevant designation overlays within the planning maps. Figure 1: Designations Overview Map The map below is not to scale and is intended as a visual tool only to show the location of each designation. The Land Requirement Plans and associated Schedule of Directly Affected Parties (attached to each designation) should be referred to for the actual area of land required.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 3


Figure 2: Visual explanation of the designation types Surface Designations

Sub-strata Designations

Strata Designation with Sub-strata Designation below

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 4


Figure 3: Indicative long-section of the designations across the length of the CRL

The relationship between the various plans required by designation conditions is illustrated in the diagram below:

The documents referred to in the designation conditions can be found at [insert]

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 5


Contents

Requiring Authority Designation Conditions – for Designations 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 DEFINITIONS GENERAL CONDITIONS Condition 1 Condition 2 Condition 3 PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS Condition 4 – Appointment of Communication and Consultation Manager Condition 5 – Pre-Construction Communication and Consultation Plan Condition 6 – Network Utility Operators Condition 7 – Community Liaison Groups Condition 8 – Mana Whenua Consultation Condition 9 – Network Utility Operator Liaison CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS Condition 10 – Outline Plan Requirements Condition 11 – Independent Peer Review of CEMP and DWPs Condition 12 – Availability of Outline Plan(s) Condition 13 – Monitoring of Construction Conditions Communication and Consultation Condition 14 – Contact Person Condition 15 – Communication and Consultation Plan Condition 16 – Communications – Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers Condition 17 – Concerns and Complaints Management Condition 18 – “One Network” Consultation Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and Delivery Work Plans (DWPs) Condition 19 – Preparation, Compliance and Monitoring Condition 20 – CEMP Requirements Condition 21 – CEMP Construction Works Requirements Condition 22 – Review Process for CEMP and DWPs

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 6


Condition 23 – Update of CEMP and DWPs following review Condition 24 – Network Utilities Transport, Access and Parking Condition 25 – General Transport, Access and Parking Condition 26 – Monitoring of Transport Network Congestion Condition 27 – Transport, Access and Parking: Specific Requirements (Britomart to Mayoral Drive) Condition 28 – Transport, Access and Parking: Specific Requirements (Karangahape Station Area) Condition 29 – Transport, Access and Parking: Specific Requirements (Newton Station Area) Condition 30 – Transport, Access and Parking: Specific Requirements (NAL Area) Noise and Vibration Condition 31 – Project Standards – Construction Noise Condition 32 – Project Standards – Blasting Noise Condition 33 – Project Standards – Construction Vibration Condition 34 – Project Standards – Construction Vibration (Amenity) Condition 35 – Project Standards – MediaWorks Condition 36 – Construction Noise and Vibration DWP Condition 37 – Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan (SSCNMP) Condition 38 – Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plan (SSCVMP) Condition 39 – Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers Condition 40 – Construct ion Noise and Vibration Management Plan – MediaWorks Built Heritage/Archaeology Condition 41 – Historic Character – Built Heritage Condition 42– Historic Character – Archaeology Condition 43 – Heritage Advisory Group and Composition Condition 44 – Heritage Advisory Group Function Condition 45 – Bluestone Wall Management Plan Building Condition Surveys Condition 46 – Process for Building Condition Surveys Urban Design Condition 47 – Urban Design Principles

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 7


Condition 48 – Mitigation Planting Requirements Condition 49 – Engagement with Mana Whenua and the Mana Whenua Principles Condition 50 – Specific Area Requirements: Britomart to Aotea Station Condition 51 – Specific Area Requirements: Karangahape Station area Condition 52 – Specific Area Requirements: Newton Station area Condition 53 – Specific Area Requirements: North Auckland Line area Condition 54 – Station Plan Requirements Trees and Vegetation Condition 55 – Trees and Vegetation DWP Public Art Condition 56 – Public Art DWP Contamination Condition 57 – Contamination DWP Condition 58 – Contamination Validation Report at Completion of Construction Air Quality Condition 59 – Air Quality DWP Social Impact and Business Disruption Condition 60 – Property Management Strategy Condition 61 – Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP Specific Design Requirements Condition 62 – Specific Design Requirements relating to 152 Vincent Street OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS Condition 63 – Operational Rail Vibration Condition 64 – Operational Noise – Mechanical Ventilation Plant Condition 65 – Operational Noise and Vibration Management Plan (ONVMP) Condition 66 – Operational Noise and Vibration Management – Mediaworks ADVICE NOTES APPENDIX ONE – Buildings for Consideration as to Building Condition Surveys APPENDIX TWO – Heritage Buildings for Consideration as to Building Condition Surveys

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 8


Requiring Authority Designation Conditions – Designation 3 Condition 1 Condition 2 Condition 3 Condition 4 Condition 5 ADVICE NOTES

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 9


Requiring Authority Designation Conditions – for Designations 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

DEFINITIONS 1 2

Consult

4

Consulting

5

Consultation

6 1 4 5

Fully operational traffic lane

May include a traffic lane that is subject to a reduced speed limit, or one which may have a temporary reduction in the lane width, due to construction activity.

Two way access

Access into and out from a site or a road. This access may include restrictions (eg. left in, left out) where these are specified within the relevant conditions.

6 1 4 5 6

Receivers that undertake activities within spaces that rely on a particularly low noise and vibration environment. For these designations these spaces are defined as:

1 2 4 5

The process of providing information about the construction works, and receiving for consideration, information from stakeholders, directly affected and affected in proximity parties, regarding those effects and proposals for the management and mitigation of them.

Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers

6

Public Performance Theatres;

Recording Studios, both sound and television (including Mediaworks, except the specific spaces addressed by Condition 35);

In relation to sensitive equipment - Medical Facilities and Scientific Laboratories;

In relation to the requirement to record witness statements - The Auckland District Court in Albert Street

Receivers that may be disturbed during rest, concentration, communication or prayer. For these designations these include (but are not limited to): 1 2 4 5

Sensitive Noise and Vibration Receivers

6

1

Site Specific Construction

Dwellings

Offices

Schools, including Child Care Centres and tertiary facilities

Libraries

Hospitals

Rest Homes

Marae and other Cultural Centres

Churches

Hotels or other accommodation facilities

These include site specific construction noise management plans (SSCNMP), site specific construction vibration plans (SSCVMP), or a

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 10


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

2 4 5 6

Condition

Noise and Vibration Management Plans

1 2 4 5

Best practicable option

Has the meaning under the Resource Management Act 1991 and, for the purpose of these conditions, comprises the best practicable option for minimising the effects of any construction activity (including effects on the transport network or heritage values) on the receiver.

Historic Character

This includes heritage buildings, sites and places identified in the New Zealand Historic Places Trust register or in the Auckland Council District Plan (Isthmus or Central Area Sections) or as specifically identified in conditions.

6 1 2 4

combination of both noise and vibration in one plan (SSCNVMP) to address the effects from the construction activity on notable or sensitive receivers.

5 6

Mana whenua for the purpose of this designation are considered to be the following (in no particular order), who at the time of Notice of Requirement expressed a desire to be involved in the City Rail Link Project: 1 2 4

Mana Whenua

5 6

1 2 4

Material change

5 6

4 5 6

Ngati Maru

Ngati Paoa

Ngai Tai ki Tamaki

Ngati Te Ata

Ngati Whatua o Orakei

Te Akitai

Te Kawerau o maki

Ngati Tamaoho

Material change will include amendment to any base information informing the CEMP or other Plan or any process, procedure or method of the CEMP or other Plan which has the potential to materially increase adverse effects on a particular receiver. For clarity, changes to personnel and contact schedules do not constitute a material change. Delivery Work Plans will contain specific objectives and methods for avoiding, remedying or mitigating effects and address the following topics:

1 2

Delivery Work Plans

(a)

Transport, Access and Parking;

(b)

Construction noise and vibration;

(c)

Historic Character (including Archaeology);

(d)

Urban Design (including landscape and station plans);

(e)

Trees and vegetation;

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 11


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(f)

Social Impact and Business Disruption;

(g)

Air quality;

(h)

Public Art; and

(i)

Contamination.

1 2 4 5

Peak Particle Velocity

The maximum component peak vibration level (in mm/s) measured in any of three orthogonal axes (vertical, transverse, longitudinal).

MediaWorks

MediaWorks means any television, radio and/or interactive media facilities which broadcast from the MediaWorks site (including any successor which conducts the same activities).

6 6

MediaWorks site means the properties at 2-3 Flower Street and 44-52 New North Road included within the following:

6

MediaWorks site

6

MediaWorks buildings

6

Studio 1

Lot 1 DP 84213

NA40B/1323

Lot 2 DP 49561

NA2063/54

Lot 4 Section 3 Deeds Plan 45(blue)

NA557/190

Part Lot 5 Section 3 Deeds Plan 45 Blue

NA557/144

Lot 1 DP 60771

NA15C/727

MediaWorks buildings means the buildings located at 2 Flower Street (Lot 2 DP 49561, NA2063/54), 3 Flower Street (Lot 1 DP 84213, NA40B/1323), 40 New North Road (Lot 1 DP 80372, NA37A/545), 44 New North Road (Lot 4 Section 3 Deeds Plan 45 (Blue), NA557/190), 4648 New North Road (Pt Lot 5 Section 3 Deeds Plan 45 (Blue), NA557/144), and 52 New North Road (Lot 1 DP 60771, NA15C/727). Studio 1 means the main broadcasting studio at the MediaWorks building at 3 Flower Street as shown on Diagram 1.

ABBREVIATIONS CEMP

Construction Environmental Management Plan

DWP

Delivery Work Plan

NoR

Notice of Requirement

ONVMP

Operational Noise and Vibration Management Plan

PPV

Peak Particle Velocity

SSCNVMP

Site Specific Noise and Vibration Management Plan

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 12


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

GENERAL CONDITIONS 1.1 The City Rail Link Project (City Rail Designations 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6) shall be undertaken in general accordance with the following, subject to final detailed design: (a) the information provided by the Requiring Authority in the Notice of Requirement dated 23 August 2012 and supporting documents (as updated by information provided by the Requiring Authority up until the close of the Hearing and during the course of Environment Court proceedings) being: (i) Assessment of Environmental Effects report (contained in Volume 2 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated 15 August 2012 Rev B); (ii) Supporting environmental assessment reports (contained in Volume 3 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated August 2012); (iii) The Concept Design Report (contained in Volume 2 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated 13 August 2012 Rev 3); (iv) Plan sets:

1 2 1

4 5 6

Land requirement plans (contained in Volume 1 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated 15 August 2012 and GIS4214293-100-10 Rev 5 as amended for 32 Normanby Road, dated 14 September 2015);

Plans contained in the Concept Design Report Appendices (contained in Volume 3 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated 13 August 2012 Rev 3);

Plan CIV-000-DRG-0001 attached at Appendix 1 to these Conditions.

(v) Information provided in response to the Section 92 requests and/or in advance of the Council’s section 42A report, including the following: •

“City Rail Link Notice of Requirement: Social Impact Assessment” prepared by Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Ltd (Beca), dated 19 April 2011 (approved for release 19 April 2013);

“City Rail Link – Supplementary Report: Traffic Modelling of Alternative Construction Scenarios” prepared by Flow Transportation Specialists Ltd, dated 22 May 2013.

(vi) Evidence (including supplementary evidence) provided prior to and at the Council hearing, including but not limited to: •

Statement of Evidence by Ian Clark (Transport) dated 2 July 2013;

“Drawing 0220, Revision B” dated 20 August 2013, being part of the City Rail Link Project: Mt Eden Worksite set by Aurecon, submitted as part of the Second Supplementary Statement of Evidence of William (Bill) Russell Newns for Auckland Transport;

“City Rail Link Notice of Requirement: Outline Plan Process and Environmental Management Plan System (Indicative)” prepared by Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Ltd, dated 27 September 2013;

“City Rail Link: Indicative Communication and Consultation Plan” prepared by Auckland Transport, dated September 2013;

“Outline Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan” submitted as Attachment A to the Statement of Evidence of Amelia Joan Linzey (Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Ltd), dated 26 September

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 13


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

2013. (vii) All material and evidence (including rebuttal evidence) provided by the Requiring Authority in the Environment Court proceedings (ENV-2014-AKL-000057). (b) Except as modified by the following alterations: (i) Assessment of Environmental Effects (Reference CRL-AOT-RME-000-0057), Design and Construction Report (Reference CRL-AOT-RME-000-0059 and Drawings CRL¬ SYW-RME-000- DWG-0025-0030 (‘Aotea Alteration’ - CRL Designation 1); and (ii) Assessment of Environmental Effects (Reference CRL-SYWRME-000-RPT-0065, Design and Construction Memorandum (Reference CRL-SYW- RME-000-MEM0002) and Drawings CRL-SYW- RME-000-DRG-0120 to 0124 and 0128 to 0132 ‘Strata / Sub-Strata Alteration (CRL Designation 2); and (iii) Assessment of Environmental Effects (Reference CRL-MTE-RME- 000-RPT-0060, Revision 7 dated 9/11/16), Design and Construction Memorandum (Reference CRL-MTE-RME-000-MEM-0001, dated 9/11/16) and Drawings CRL-SYW-RME000-DWGDRG-0101 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16, 0102 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16, 0110 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16 and 0133 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16 and CRL-EFCROA-000-DRG-1027 Revision 4 dated 30/6/16, 1028 Revision 4 dated 30/6/16 and 1127 Revision 2 dated 30/6/16 and CRL-EFC-CON-000-DRG- 0060 Revision 1 dated 20/6/16, 0061 Revision 1 dated 20/6/16, 0062 Revision 1 dated 20/6/16, 0063 Revision 1 dated 20/6/16 and 0064 Revision 1 dated 8/7/16)(‘Mt Eden Station Alteration’ - CRL Designation 6), Section 92 responses dated 20/12/16, 17/2/17 and 27/4/17; (iv) Assessment of Environmental Effects (Reference CRL-PAT-ENV-CON-PLN-003285, Revision 2 dated 19/12/17, Section 92 Responses dated 19/2/18. (v) Assessment of Environmental Effects (Reference CRL-KRD-RME-000-RPT-003, Revision 3.0 dated 2/5/17), Design and Construction Memorandum (Reference CRL-KRD-RME-000-MEM-0002 FINAL, Revision 0 dated 2/5/17) and Drawings CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-0134 Revision 2.0 dated 21/9/18 and 0135 Revision 2.0 dated 28/9/18 (Karangahape Station Alteration – CRL Designation 4), and Section 92 response dated 4/7/17, as amended to exclude any reference to the ventilation and emergency egress structures on Pitt Street and the temporary removal of canopies at 70-74 and 82-86 Pitt Street. For the avoidance of doubt these Pitt Street structures and canopy works at these locations no longer form part of the Karangahape Station Alteration. Temporary removal of canopies is limited to 55-59 and 61-65 Pitt Street and 9 Mercury Lane. 1.2 Where there is inconsistency between: (a) The documents listed above and these conditions, these conditions shall prevail; (b) The information and plans set out in conditions 1.1(a) and 1.1(b) lodged with the requirements and presented at the Council Hearing and during the course of Environment Court proceedings, the most recent information and plans shall prevail; (c) The indicative management plans and evidence presented at the Council Hearing and the management plans (DWPs, CEMP, etc) required by the conditions of these designations and submitted through an Outline Plan, the requirements of the management plans shall prevail. 2

1 2

2.1 In accordance with section 184(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the RMA), these designations shall lapse if not given effect to within 15 10 years from the date on

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 14


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

4

Condition

which they are confirmed.

5 6 3.1 As soon as reasonably practicable, and no later than the point at which any part or parts of the City Rail Link become operational, the Requiring Authority shall: (a) Review the area and volume of land designated for the City Rail Link; (b) Identify any areas of designated land that are either no longer necessary for construction of the City Rail Link (if the City Rail Link has been constructed in part), or no longer necessary for the on-going operation and/or maintenance of the City Rail Link or for on-going mitigation measures; and (c) Give notice in accordance with Section 182 of the RMA for the removal of those parts of the designation identified in (b) above.

1 2 3

4 5 6

(d) Give notice in accordance with s182 of the RMA for the drawback of the CRL designation post construction where the CRL overlaps the North Auckland Line designation (Auckland Unitary Plan reference 6300) as follows: (i) Between 4 Haultain Street and 5 Fenton Street north and south (Identification reference 7 on drawing CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-0104 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16); (ii) Between 49-51 Boston Road and Severn Street (Identification references 1, 2 and 3 on drawing CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-0101 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16; (iii) At 14-22 Boston Road (Identification references 5 on drawing CRL-SYW-RME000-DRG-0101 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16); (iv) At 11 Water Street (Identification reference 6 on drawing CRL-SYW-RME-000DRG-0101 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16); (v) At 26 and 28 Mt Eden Road (Identification references 5 and 6 on drawing CRLSYW-RME-000-DRG-0103 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16); (vi) Over road reserve at Normanby Road between Lauder Road and Boston Road to reflect the Normanby Road overbridge (Identification reference 2 on drawing CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-0103 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16); and (vii) At Porters Ave to reflect the location of signalling infrastructure (Identification reference 8 on drawing CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-0104 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16).

PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS Appointment of Communication and Consultation Manager

4

1 2 4 5 6

4.1 Within three months of the confirmation of the designation the Requiring Authority shall appoint a Communication and Consultation Manager to implement the Pre-construction Communication and Consultation Plan (Condition 5). The Communication and Consultation Manager shall be the main and readily accessible point of contact for persons affected by or interested in the City Rail Link Project until the commencement of the construction phase of the Project, or the contact person under Condition 14 is appointed. 4.2 The Communication and Consultation Manager’s contact details (or, if appointed under Condition 14, that contact persons details) shall be listed in the Pre-construction Communication and Consultation Plan and listed on the Requiring Authority website, the City Rail Link Website, and the Auckland Council website.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 15


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Pre-Construction Communication and Consultation Plan 5.1 The objective of the Pre-construction Communication and Consultation Plan is to set out a framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation is undertaken with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties prior to the commencement of construction of the City Rail Link. 5.2 The Requiring Authority shall prepare a Pre-Construction Communication and Consultation Plan. This Plan shall be submitted to Auckland Councils Major Infrastructure Projects Team Manager, within 2 months of the Designation being confirmed, for confirmation that the Plan has been prepared in accordance with this condition. 5.3 The Plan shall be implemented and complied with within 3 months from the confirmation of the designations until the commencement of the construction of the City Rail Link. 5.4 This Plan shall set out recommendations and requirements (as applicable) that should be adopted by and/or inform the development of the CEMP and DWPs. 5.5 The Pre-construction Communication and Consultation Plan shall set out how the Requiring Authority will: (a) Inform the community of Project progress and likely commencement of construction works and programme; (b) Engage with the community in order to foster good relationships and to provide opportunities for learning about the Project;

5

1 2 4 5 6

(c) Obtain (and specify reasonable timeframes for) feedback and input from Stakeholders, directly affected and affected in proximity parties regarding the development of the CEMP and DWPs; (d) Respond to queries and complaints. Information shall include but not be limited to: (i) Who is responsible for responding; (ii) How responses will be provided; (iii) The timeframes that the responses will be provided within. (e) Where feedback (in accordance with this condition) is provided, the Pre-construction Communication and Consultation Plan shall articulate how that feedback has informed the development of the CEMP and DWPs and where it has not, reasons why it hasn’t; (f) Provide updates on the property acquisition process as well as the management strategy for properties acquired by the Requiring Authority for the construction of the City Rail Link. 5.6 The Pre-Construction Communication and Consultation Plan shall be prepared in consultation with Stakeholders, directly affected parties and affected in proximity parties including, but not limited to: (a) All property owners and occupiers (including, subject to Condition 61.5, sub lessees) identified within the designation footprint; (b) All property owners and occupiers adjacent to construction sites (Britomart and Albert Street (Designation 1), Karangahape Road (Designation 4), Newton Station (Designation 5), and the main construction site including grade separation works at Normanby Road and Porters Ave (Designation 6)); (c) New Zealand Historic Places Trust (NZHPT); (d) Department of Corrections; (e) Ministry of Justice;

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 16


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(f) MediaWorks; (g) Network Utility Operators; (h) Bear Park Early Childhood Centre; (i) Body Corporate 164980 & Tenham Investments Limited (j) Community Liaison Group(s) (refer Condition 7); 5.7 The Pre-construction Communication and Consultation Plan shall, as a minimum, include: (a) A communications framework that details the Requiring Authority’s communication strategies, the accountabilities, frequency of communications and consultation, the range of communication and consultation tools to be used (including any modern and relevant communication methods, newsletters or similar, advertising etc.), and any other relevant communication matters; (b) Details of the Communication and Consultation Manager for the pre-construction period (Condition 4 of this designation) including their contact details (phone, email and postal address); (c) The methods for identifying, communicating and consulting with stakeholders, directly affected parties and affected in proximity parties and other interested parties. Such methods shall include but not be limited to: (i) Newsletters; (ii) Newspaper advertising; (iii) Notification and targeted consultation with stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties; and (iv) The use of the project website for public information. (d) The methods for identifying, communicating and consulting with the owners of 1 Queen Street (HSBC House) and 21 Queen Street (Zurich House) regarding the development of the City Rail Link design and construction methodology between Britomart Transport Centre and Customs Street (through the Downtown Shopping Centre site). (e) The methods for communicating and consulting with mana whenua for the implementation of mana whenua principles for the project (refer to condition 8 and 48); (f) The methods for communicating and consulting with the Community Liaison Group(s); (g) How communication and consultation activity will be recorded; and (h) Methods for recording reasonably foreseeable future planned network utility works so that these can be considered and incorporated, where appropriate, into the City Rail Link design. 5.8 The Pre-construction Communication and Consultation Plan will be publicly available once finalised and for the duration of construction. 1 2 6

4 5 6

Network Utility Operators 6.1 Under s 176(1)(b) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) no person may do anything in relation to the designated land that would prevent or hinder the City Rail Link, without the prior written consent of the Requiring Authority. 6.2 In the period before construction begins on the City Rail Link (or a section thereof), the following activities undertaken by Network Utility Operators will not prevent or hinder the City Rail Link, and can be undertaken without seeking the Requiring Authority’s

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 17


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

written approval under section 176(1)(b) of the RMA: (a) Maintenance and urgent repair works of existing Network Utilities; (b) Minor renewal works to existing Network Utilities necessary for the on-going provision or security of supply of Network Utility Operations; (c) Minor works such as new property service connections; (d) Upgrades to existing Network Utilities within the same or similar location with the same or similar effects on the City Rail Link designation. 6.3 For the avoidance of doubt, in this condition an “existing Network Utility” includes infrastructure operated by a Network Utility Operator which was: (a) In place at the time the notice of requirement for the City Rail Link was served on Auckland Council (23 August 2012); or (b) Undertaken in accordance with this condition or the section 176(1)(b) RMA process. Community Liaison Groups 7.1 Within three months of the confirmation of the designations the Requiring Authority shall, in consultation with the Auckland Council, establish at least one Community Liaison Group in each of the following key construction areas: (a) Britomart and Albert Street (Designation 1) (b) Karangahape Road (Designation 4) (c) Newton Station (Designation 5) (d) Main Construction site (Designation 6) 7.2 The number of Groups shall be confirmed with the Auckland Council. 7.3 The membership of the Community Liaison Group(s) shall include representative(s) of the Requiring Authority and be open to all directly affected and affected in proximity parties to the Project including, but not limited to the following:

7

1 2 4 5 6

(a) Representative(s) for and/or directly affected and affected in proximity property owners and occupiers; (b) CBD Residents Advisory Group; (c) The Karangahape Road Business Association; (d) Eden Terrace Business Association; (e) Heart of the City; (f) Roman Catholic Diocese of Auckland; (g) St Patrick’s Cathedral; and (h) St Benedict’s Parish. 7.4 In addition to the requirements in Condition 5, the purpose of the Groups shall be to: (a) Provide a means for receiving regular updates on Project progress; (b) Monitor the effects of constructing the Project on the community by providing a regular forum through which information about the Project can be provided to the community. (c) Enable opportunities for concerns and issues to be reported to and responded by the Requiring Authority. (d) Provide feedback on the development of the CEMP and DWPS. (e) Proposed potential joint initiatives to the Requiring Authority for the Property Management Strategy regarding the interim use of properties including vacant land

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 18


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

acquired for the construction of the City Rail Link. 7.5 The Requiring Authority will consult with the Groups in respect of the development of the CEMP and DWPs. 7.6 The Requiring Authority will appoint one or more persons appropriately qualified in community consultation as the Community Consultation Advisor(s) to: (a) Provide administrative assistance to the Groups; (b) Ensure the Groups are working effectively (including the development of a Code of Conduct) and appropriate procedures for each Group; and (c) Act as a community consultation advisor to the Group. 7.7 The Requiring Authority will use its best endeavours to ensure that the Groups meet at least annually until the commencement of construction and then at least once every three months or as otherwise required once construction commences. 7.8 Once construction has commenced the Requiring Authority will provide an update at least every three months (or as otherwise agreed) to the Groups on compliance with the designation conditions and the CEMP and DWP and any material changes to these plans. 7.9 The Requiring Authority shall provide reasonable administrative support for the Groups including organising meetings at a local venue, inviting all members of the Groups, as well as the taking and dissemination of meeting minutes. 7.10 The Groups shall continue for the duration of the construction phase of the Project and for six months following completion of the Project. Mana Whenua Consultation 8.1 Within three months of the confirmation of the designations the Requiring Authority shall establish a kaitiaki or mana whenua forum to provide for an on-going role in the design and construction of the CRL Project. 8.2 The frequency at which the forum meets shall be agreed between the Requiring Authority and mana whenua. 8.3 The role of the mana whenua forum may include the following: (a) Developing practical measures to give effect to the principles in the Urban Design DWP (refer to Condition 49);

8

1

(b) Input into, where practicable, the design of the stations (refer to Condition 54);

2

(c) Input into the preparation of the CEMP and DWPs;

4

(d) Working collaboratively with the Requiring Authority around built heritage and archaeological matters;

5 6

(e) Undertaking kaitiakitanga responsibilities associated with the City Rail Link Project, including monitoring, assisting with discovery procedures, and providing mÄ tauranga MÄ ori input in the relevant stages of the Project; and (f) Providing a forum for consultation with mana whenua regarding the names for the City Rail Link stations, noting that there may be formal statutory processes outside the project (such as the New Zealand Geographic Board) which may be involved in any decision making on station names. 8.4 The mana whenua forum may provide written advice to the Requiring Authority in relation to any of the above matters. The Requiring Authority must consider this advice and the means by which any suggestions may be incorporated in the City Rail Link project.

9

1

Network Utility Operator Liaison

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 19


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

2 4 5 6

Condition

9.1 The Requiring Authority and its contractor shall: (a) Work collaboratively with Network Utility Operators during the development of the further design for the City Rail Link to provide for the ongoing operation and access to network Utility operations; (b) Undertake communication and consultation with Network Utility Operators as soon as reasonably practicable, and at least once prior to construction timing being confirmed and construction methodology, and duration being known; and (c) Work collaboratively with Network Utility Operators during the preparation and implementation of the CEMP (Condition 24) and DWPs in relation to management of adverse effects on Network Utility Operations. 9.2 A summary of the communication and consultation undertaken between the Requiring Authority and Network Utility Operators prior to construction commencing shall be provided as part of the Outline Plan. 9.3 The Requiring Authority shall undertake on-going communication and consultation with Network Utility operators throughout the duration of construction, including in relation to changes envisaged by Conditions 22 and 23 affecting Network Utility Operations to ascertain whether or not any changes or updates to the CEMP Network Utilities section are required to address unforeseen effects.

CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS Outline Plan Requirements 10.1 The Requiring Authority shall submit an Outline Plan to the Auckland Council for the construction of the City Rail Link in accordance with section 176A of the RMA. The Outline Plan shall include: (a) The Communication and Consultation Plan (Condition 15); (b) The Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP); (c) Delivery Work Plans (DWPs); (d) Site Specific Construction Noise/Vibration Management Plans (SSCNVMPs) and Notable Receiver Management Plans; and 1 2 10

4 5 6

(e) Any other information required by the conditions of this designation associated with the construction of the City Rail Link. 10.2 The plans listed in Condition 10.1 above must clearly document the comments and inputs received by the Requiring Authority during its consultation with stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties, and any recommendations received as part of the Independent Peer Review Panel process (where applicable), along with a clear explanation of where any affected party comments or peer review recommendations have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. 10.3 The Requiring Authority may choose to give effect to the designation conditions associated with the construction of the City Rail Link: (a) Either at the same time or in parts; (b) By submitting one or more: (i) Communication and Consultation Plans; (ii) CEMP; (iii) DWPs; and (iv) SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 20


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

10.4 These plans should clearly show how the part integrates with adjacent City Rail Link construction works and interrelated activities. This particularly applies where the Urban Design DWP is submitted as a number of plans. 10.5 Early engagement will be undertaken with Auckland Council in relation to preparation and submission of the Outline Plan to establish a programme for the Outline Plan process to ensure achievable timeframes for both parties. 10.6 All works shall be carried out in accordance with the Outline Plan(s) required by this condition. Independent Peer Review of CEMP and DWPs 11.1 Prior to submitting the CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39) to Auckland Council for the construction of the City Rail Link, the Requiring Authority shall engage suitably qualified independent specialists agreed to by Auckland Council to form an Independent Peer Review Panel. The purpose of the Independent Peer Review Panel is to undertake a peer review of the CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39), and provide recommendations on whether changes are required to those plans in order to meet the objective and other requirements of these conditions. 1 2 11

4 5 6

11.2 The CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39) must clearly document the comments and inputs received by the Requiring Authority during its consultation with stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties, along with a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. This information must be included in the CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39) provided to both the independent peer reviewer and Auckland Council as part of this condition. 11.3 The CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39) submitted to Auckland Council shall demonstrate how the recommendations from the independent peer reviewers have been incorporated, and, where they have not, the reasons why not. 11.4 In reviewing an Outline Plan submitted in accordance with these designation conditions, Auckland Council shall take into consideration the independent specialist peer review undertaken in accordance with this condition and any additional information provided to Auckland Council by affected parties. Availability of Outline Plan(s)

1 2 12

4 5 6

13

12.1 For the duration of construction the following plans and any material changes to these plans shall be made available for public viewing on the Project web site: (a) CEMP; (b) DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs); and (c) Communication and Consultation Plan. 12.2 A copy of these Plans will also be held and made available for viewing at each construction site.

1

Monitoring of Construction Conditions

2

13.1 The Requiring Authority, its contractor team, and the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s) shall establish and implement a collaborative working process for dealing with day to day construction processes, including monitoring compliance with the designation conditions and with the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and

4 5

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 21


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

6

Condition

SSCVMPs) and any material changes to these plans associated with construction of the City Rail Link. 13.2 This collaborative working process shall: (a) Operate for the duration of the construction works and for 6 months following completion of construction works where monitoring of designation conditions is still required, unless a different timeframe is mutually agreed between the Requiring Authority and the Auckland Council; (b) Have a “key contact” person representing the Requiring Authority and a “key contact” person representing the contractor team to work with the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s); (c) The “key contacts” shall be identified in the CEMP and shall meet at least monthly unless a different timeframe is agreed with the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s). The purpose of the meeting is to report on compliance with the designation conditions and with the CEMP, DWPs and material changes to these plans and on any matters of non-compliance and how they have been addressed; (d) Once construction has commenced, the Requiring Authority and / or the contractor shall provide an update to the Community Liaison Groups (Condition 7 of this designation) at least once every 3 months, or if in accordance with Condition 7 these groups meet more regularly, at least once every two months. 13.3 The purpose and function of the collaborative working process is to: (a) Assist as necessary the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s) to confirm that: (i) The works authorised under these designations are being carried out in compliance with the designation conditions, the CEMP, DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and any material changes to these plans; (ii) The Requiring Authority and its contractor are undertaking all monitoring and the recording of monitoring results in compliance with the requirements of the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and any material changes to these plans; (b) Subsequent to a confirmed Outline Plan, provide a mechanism through which any changes to the design, CEMP or DWPs, which are not material changes requiring approval under Condition 10 triggering the requirement for a new Outline Plan, can be required, reviewed and confirmed; (c) Advise where changes to construction works following a confirmed Outline Plan require a new CEMP or DWP (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs); (d) Review and identify any concerns or complaints received from, or related to, the construction works monthly (unless a different timeframe is mutually agreed with the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer) and adequacy of the measures adopted to respond to these.

Communication and Consultation Contact Person

14

1 2 4 5 6

15

1

Communication and Consultation Plan

14.1 The Requiring Authority shall make a contact person available 24 hours seven days a week for the duration of construction for public enquiries on the construction works.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 22


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

2 4 5 6

Condition

15.1 The objective of the Communication and Consultation Plan is to set out a framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation is undertaken with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties during the construction of the City Rail Link. 15.2 The Requiring Authority shall prepare a Communication and Consultation Plan which shall be implemented and complied with for the duration of the construction of the City Rail Link. 15.3 The Communication and Consultation Plan shall set out how the Requiring Authority will: (a) Inform the community of construction progress and future construction activities and constraints that could affect them; (b) Provide early information on key Project milestones; (c) Obtain and specify a reasonable timeframe (being not less than 10 working days), for feedback and inputs from directly affected and affected in proximity parties regarding the development (as part of the review process provided by Condition 22) and implementation of the CEMP or DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSNMPs and SSCVMPs); and (d) Respond to queries and complaints including but not limited to: (i) Who is responsible for responding; (ii) How responses will be provided; (iii) The timeframes that responses will be provided within. 15.4 The Communication and Consultation Plan shall as a minimum include: (a) A communications framework that details the Requiring Authority’s communication strategies, the accountabilities, frequency of communications and consultation, the range of communication and consultation tools to be used (including any modern and relevant communication methods, newsletters or similar, advertising etc), and any other relevant communication matters; (b) The Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project including their contact details (phone, email and postal address); (c) The methods for identifying, communicating and consulting with persons affected by the project including but not limited to: (i) All property owners and occupiers within the designation footprint (ii) All property owners and occupiers adjacent to construction sites (Britomart and Albert Street (Designation 1), Karangahape Road (Designation 4), Newton Station (Designation 5), Main Construction site and the works at Normanby Road and Porters Ave (Designation 6)) (iii) New Zealand Historic Places Trust (NZHPT) (iv) Department of Corrections (including the entity contracted by Department of Corrections to administer and run the Mt Eden Corrections facility at 1 Lauder Road) (v) Ministry of Justice (including but not limited to) confirming the details of the contact person required under Condition 14 of this designation, and to provide appropriate details (including but not restricted to timing, duration, scale, noise effects, vibration effects, access restrictions, and disruption to utilities) in respect to any works impacting the operation of the Auckland District Court at 65-71 Albert Street, Auckland. Communication and consultation of such details should be provided to the Ministry of Justice Auckland Property Programme

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 23


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Manager at least 9 months prior to the commencement of such works. (vi) Media Works (vii) Community Liaison Group(s) (refer Condition 7); (viii) Bear Park Early Childhood Centre; (ix) Body Corporate 164980 and Tenham Investments Ltd; (x) Network Utility Operators, including the process: •

To be implemented to capture and trigger where communication and consultation is required in relation to any material changes affecting the Network Utilities;

For the Requiring Authority to give approval (where appropriate) to Network Utility Operators as required by section 176(1)(b) of the RMA during the construction period;

For obtaining any supplementary authorisations (including but not limited to resource consents (including those required under a National Environmental Standard) and easements);

For inspection and final approval of works by Network Utility Operators; and

For implementing conditions 9, 22, 23, and 24 of this designation in so far as they affect Network Utility Operations.

(xi) The owner of 4 Kingston Street (xii) The owner of 6-12 Kingston Street (xiii) The owner of 83 Albert Street (xiv) The owner(s) of 5 Porters Avenue (ALLOT 236 SEC 10 Suburbs AUCKLAND) (d) How stakeholders and persons affected by the project will be notified of the commencement of construction activities and works, the expected duration of the activities and works, and who to contact for any queries, concerns and complaints; (e) How stakeholders and persons affected by the project will be consulted in the development and review of the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs), including specifying reasonable timeframes for feedback; (f) Methods for communicating in advance temporary traffic management measures and permanent changes to road networks and layouts to directly affected and in proximity parties, bus (public and private) operators, taxi operators, bus users, and the general public; (g) Methods for communicating in advance to surrounding communities (including sensitive noise and vibration receivers) which must be notified at least 24 hours in advance where construction activities are predicted to: (i) Exceed the noise limits (refer Condition 31); or (ii) Exceed a vibration limit (refer Conditions 33 and 34); or (iii) Be within 200m of a blast site (refer Condition 32). Further provisions for Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers are contained in Condition 16. (h) Methods for communicating in advance proposed hours of construction activities outside of normal working hours and on weekends and public holidays, to surrounding communities, and methods to record and deal with concerns raised about such hours; (i) Methods for communicating and consulting with mana whenua for the duration of

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 24


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

construction and implementation of mana whenua principles for the project (refer to Conditions 8 and 49); (j) Methods for communicating and consulting with the Auckland Council Parks Department regarding works to be undertaken to any trees on public land (streets, squares, etc.) located within the City Rail Link surface designation footprint, including how trees not being removed, or in close proximity to the surface designation footprint where works are occurring, will be protected; (k) Methods for communicating and consulting in advance of construction works with emergency services (Police, Fire, Ambulance) on the location, timing and duration of construction works, and particularly in relation to temporary road lane reductions and/or closures and the alternative routes or detours to be used, with specific detail around the management of the Fire and Ambulance from their central stations on Pitt Street; (l) A list of Stakeholders, directly affected and affected in proximity parties to the construction works who will be communicated with; (m) How communication and consultation activity relating to construction activities and monitoring requirements will be recorded; and (n) Methods for communicating and consulting with the Department of Corrections (including the entity contracted by Department of Corrections to administer and run the Mt Eden Corrections facility at 1 Lauder Road), to confirm the details of the contact person required under Condition 14 of this designation, and in respect of any works impacting on access or works in proximity to the Mt Eden Corrections Facility and the Boston Road Community Corrections site; including temporary traffic management measures and permanent changes to road networks and layouts which may impact on access to and from the Facility and the motorway network. 15.5 The Communication and Consultation Plan shall also include (as relevant) linkages and cross-references to the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs). 15.6 The Communication and Consultation Plan shall include a summary of the communication and consultation undertaken between the Requiring Authority and parties as required by the Pre-construction Communication and Consultation Plan. The summary shall include any outstanding issues or disputes raised by parties. The Communication and Consultation Plan shall be reviewed six monthly for the duration of construction and updated if required. Any updated Communication and Consultation Plan shall be provided to the “key contacts” (see Condition 13) and the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer for review and agreement on any further action to be undertaken. Any further action recommended as a result of this review shall be undertaken by the Communication and Consultation Manager for the City Rail Link and confirmation of completion provided back to the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer. 15.7 If, in the course of amendments undertaken as part of the review process, a material change to the Communication and Consultation Plan is made, those parties affected by the change shall be notified within 1 month of the material change occurring. Communications – Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers 1 16

4 5 6

16.1 A SSCNVMP shall be prepared for all Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers (refer Condition 39). As part of the SSCNVMP (and further to Condition 15 of this designation), the Requiring Authority shall undertake communication and consultation, as soon as reasonably practicable (and at least once following confirmation of construction timing and methodology), with any Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers located within 200 metres of blasting, or within 100 metres (either horizontally or vertically) of the

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 25


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

designation footprint for other construction activities. Communication and consultation with these parties should focus on a collaborative approach to manage the adverse effects from construction noise and vibration while works are undertaken in the vicinity. 16.2 The Requiring Authority shall undertake on-going communication and consultation with notable noise and vibration receivers throughout the duration of construction occurring in the vicinity. This communication shall be reported back to the “key contacts” (see Condition 13) and the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer for their review and confirmation of any further action to be undertaken. The Auckland Council Consent Monitoring Officer shall advise the Requiring Authority of its recommendation within 10 working days of receiving this information from the Requiring Authority. Concerns and Complaints Management 17.1 Upon receiving a concern or complaint during construction, the Requiring Authority shall instigate a process to address concerns or complaints received about adverse effects. This shall: (a) Identify of the nature of the concern or complaint, and the location, date and time of the alleged event(s); (b) Acknowledge receipt of the concern or complaint within 24 hours of receipt; (c) Respond to the concern or complaint in accordance with the relevant management plan , which may include monitoring of the activity by a suitably qualified expert, implementation of mitigation measures, and, in the case of noise and / or vibration, preparation of a site specific noise and / or vibration management plan (in accordance with Conditions 37 and 38); 17.2 A record of all concerns and / or complaints received shall be kept by the Requiring Authority. This record shall include: 1 2 17

4 5 6

(a) The name and address of the person(s) who raised the concern or complaint (unless they elect not to provide this) and details of the concern or complaint; (b) Where practicable, weather conditions at the time of the concern or complaint, including wind direction and cloud cover if the complaint relates to noise or air quality; (c) Known City Rail Link construction activities at the time and in the vicinity of the concern or complaint; (d) Any other activities in the area unrelated to the City Rail Link construction that may have contributed to the concern or complaint such as non-City Rail Link construction, fires, traffic accidents or unusually dusty conditions generally; (e) Remedial actions undertaken (if any) and the outcome of these, including monitoring of the activity. 17.3 This record shall be maintained on site, be available for inspection upon request, and shall be provided every two months (or as otherwise agreed) to the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer, and to the “key contacts” (see Condition 13). 17.4 Where a complaint remains unresolved or a dispute arises, the Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer will be provided with all records of the complaint and how it has been dealt with and addressed and whether the Requiring Authority considers that any other steps to resolve the complaint are required. Upon receiving records of the complaint the Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer must determine whether a review of the CEMP and/or DWPs is required under Condition 22 to address this complaint. The Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer shall advise the Requiring Authority of its recommendation within 10 working days of receiving the

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 26


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

records of complaint. “One Network� Consultation 1 18

4 5 6

18.1 The Requiring Authority and its contractor shall work collaboratively with the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) during the preparation of the Traffic, Access and Parking DWP (Conditions 25, 27, 28, 29, and 30) in relation to confirming the management of adverse transport effects on the road network. A record of this consultation and outcomes shall be included in the Traffic, Access and Parking DWP. The Requiring Authority shall consult with the NZTA throughout the duration of construction on any changes or updates to the Traffic, Access and Parking DWP which relate to the management of the road network.

Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and Delivery Work Plans (DWPs) Preparation, Compliance and Monitoring 19.1 The objective of the CEMP and DWPs is to so far as is reasonably practicable, avoid, remedy or mitigate any adverse effects (including cumulative effects) associated with the City Rail Link construction.

19

1 2 4 5 6

19.2 All works must be carried out in accordance with the CEMP, the DWPs required by these conditions and in accordance with any changes to plans made under Condition 23. 19.3 The CEMP and DWPs shall be prepared, complied with and monitored by the Requiring Authority throughout the duration of construction of the City Rail Link. 19.4 The DWPs shall give effect to the specific requirements and objectives set out in these designation conditions. 19.5 The CEMP shall include measures to give effect to any specific requirements and objectives set out in these designation conditions that are not addressed by the DWPs. 19.6 Where mitigation measures are required to be implemented by the Requiring Authority in relation to the construction of City Rail Link, it shall meet reasonable and direct costs of implementing such mitigation measures. CEMP Requirements 20.1 In order to give effect to the objective in Condition 19.1, the CEMP must provide for the following: (a) In relation to Designation 2, the use of one Tunnel Boring Machine (unless the effects of using more than one Tunnel Boring Machine are not materially different from those associated with the use of one Tunnel Boring Machine);

20

1 2 4 5 6

(b) Notice boards that clearly identify the Requiring Authority and the Project name, together with the name, telephone number and email address of the Site or Project Manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager; (c) Training requirements for employees, sub-contractors and visitors on construction procedures, environment management and monitoring; (d) A Travel Management Plan for each construction site outlining onsite car parking management and methods for encouraging travel to the site using forms of transport other than private vehicle to assist in mitigating localised traffic effects; and (e) Where a complaint is received, the complaint must be recorded and responded to as provided for in Conditions 13, 15 and 17. 20.2 The CEMP shall include details of: (a) The site or Project Manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager (who will implement and monitor the Communication and Consultation Plan), including

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 27


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

their contact details (phone, email and physical address); (b) The Document management system for administering the CEMP, including review and Requiring Authority / Constructor / Auckland Council requirements; (c) Environmental incident and emergency management procedures; (d) Environmental complaint's management procedures (see also Condition 17); (e) An outline of the construction programme of the work, including construction hours of operation, indicating linkages to the DWPs which address the management of adverse effects during construction; (f) Specific details on demolition to be undertaken during the construction period; (g) Means of ensuring the safety of the general public; and (h) Methods to assess and monitor potential cumulative adverse effects. 20.3 Subject to any alternative agreement with the landowner(s) of HSBC House and Zurich House, the Requiring Authority shall prepare specific construction methodologies for the works adjacent to 1 Queen Street and 21 Queen Street detailing how they will be undertaken to avoid compromising the structural integrity of the existing structures on the site including their foundation systems. The specific construction methodologies shall be prepared in consultation with the owner(s) of these properties. A record of this liaison and outcomes shall be included in the CEMP as part of the Outline Plan. This summary must provide a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated into the CEMP, and the reasons why not. This summary must be provided to both the Independent Peer Review Panel and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan process. CEMP Construction Works Requirements 21.1 In order to give effect to the objective in Condition 19.1, the CEMP shall include the following details and requirements in relation to all areas within the surface designation footprint where construction works are to occur, and / or where materials and construction machinery are to be used or stored: (a) Where access points are to be located and procedures for managing construction vehicle ingress and egress to construction support and storage areas; (b) Methods for managing the control of silt and sediment within the construction area;

21

1 4 5 6

(c) Methods for earthworks management (including depth and extent of earthworks and temporary, permanent stabilisation measures and monitoring of ground movement) for earthworks adjacent to buildings and structures; (d) Measures to adopt to keep the construction area in a tidy condition in terms of disposal / storage of rubbish and storage unloading of construction materials (including equipment). All storage of materials and equipment associated with the construction works shall take place within the boundaries of the designation; (e) Measures to ensure all temporary boundary / security fences associated with the construction of the City Rail Link are maintained in good order with any graffiti removed as soon as possible; (f) For the duration of construction affecting Lower Queen Street or Queen Elizabeth II Square, construction fences and / or hoardings shall be placed no closer than 3 metres from the north frontage (building frontage onto Queen Elizabeth II Square) of 21 Queen Street in the vicinity of the entrance to the ground level retail space and the main pedestrian entrance to the building. (g) The location and specification of any temporary acoustic fences and visual barriers, and where practicable, opportunities for mana whenua (see Condition 8) and

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 28


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

community art or other decorative measures along with viewing screens to be incorporated into these without compromising the purpose for which these are erected; (h) How the construction areas are to be fenced and kept secure from the public and, where practicable and without compromising their purpose how opportunities for public viewing, including provision of viewing screens and display of information about the project and opportunities for mana whenua and community art or other decorative measures can be incorporated to enhance public amenity and connection to the project; (i) The location of any temporary buildings (including workers offices and portaloos) and vehicle parking (which should be located within the construction area and not on adjacent streets); (j) Methods to control the intensity, location and direction of artificial construction lighting to avoid light spill and glare onto sites adjacent construction areas; (k) Methods to ensure the prevention and mitigation of adverse effects associated with the storage, use, disposal, or transportation of hazardous substances; (l) That onsite stockpiling of spoil or fill at Downtown and Lower Albert Street construction yards be minimised where practicable; (m) That site offices and less noisy construction activities be located at the edge of the construction yards where practicable; and (n) Methods for management of vacant areas once construction is completed in accordance with the Urban Design DWP. 21.2 Unless expressly agreed in writing with the landowner of the Downtown Shopping Centre (at 7 Queen Street): (a) the Downtown construction yard (including QEII Square, Downtown Shopping Centre and Lower Albert Street), shall be progressively released from occupation for construction purposes where the area or any part of the area is no longer required for construction of the section of CRL between Britomart and Wyndham Street; and (b) following completion of the section of the CRL between the Downtown Shopping Centre and Wyndham Street and reinstatement of Albert Street, Lower Albert Street shall not be occupied for construction purposes for any section of CRL south of Wyndham Street. Review Process for CEMP and DWPs 22.1 The CEMP and DWPs shall be reviewed at least annually or as a result of a material change to the City Rail Link project or to address unforeseen adverse effects arising from construction or unresolved complaints. Such a review may be initiated by either Auckland Council or the Requiring Authority. The review shall take into consideration: 22

1 2 4 5 6

(a) Compliance with designation conditions, the CEMP, DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and material changes to these plans; (b) Any changes to construction methods; (c) Key changes to roles and responsibilities within the City Rail Link project; (d) Changes in industry best practice standards; (e) Changes in legal or other requirements; (f) Results of monitoring and reporting procedures associated with the management of adverse effects during construction; (g) Any comments or recommendations received from Auckland Council regarding the

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 29


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs); and (h) Any unresolved complaints and any response to the complaints and remedial action taken to address the complaint as required under Condition 17. 22.2 A summary of the review process shall be kept by the Requiring Authority, provided annually to the Auckland Council, and made available to the Auckland Council upon request. Update of CEMP and DWPs following Review 23.1 Following the CEMP and DWPs review process described in Condition 22, the CEMP may require updating. 23.2 Any material change to the CEMP and DWP must be consistent with the purpose and objective of the relevant condition.

23

1 2 4 5 6

23.3 Affected parties will be notified of the review and any material change proposed to the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs). 23.4 The CEMP and DWPs must clearly document the comments and inputs received by the Requiring Authority from affected parties about the material change, along with a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. 23.5 Any material change proposed to the CEMP and DWPs shall be subject to an independent peer review as required by Condition 11. 23.6 Following that review any material change proposed to the CEMP and DWPs relating to an adverse effect shall be submitted for approval to Auckland Council Compliance and Monitoring Officer, at least 10 working days prior to the proposed changes taking effect. If any changes are not agreed, the relevant provisions of the RMA relating to approval of outline plans shall apply. Network Utilities 24.1 To manage the adverse effects on Network Utilities Operations during the construction of the City Rail Link, the following shall be included in the CEMP. 24.2 The purpose of this section of the CEMP shall be to ensure that the enabling works and construction of the City Rail Link adequately take account of, and include measures to address the safety, integrity, protection or, where necessary, relocation of existing network utilities that traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation during the construction of the City Rail Link.

1 24

4 5 6

24.3 For the avoidance of doubt and for the purposes of this condition an “existing Network Utility� includes infrastructure operated by a Network Utility Operator which was: (a) In place at the time the notice of requirement for the City Rail Link was served on Auckland Council (23 August 2012); or (b) Undertaken in accordance with condition 6 of this designation or the section 176(1)(b) RMA process. 24.4 The CEMP shall be prepared in consultation with Network Utility Operators who have existing Network Utilities that traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation and shall be adhered to and implemented during the construction of the City Rail Link. The CEMP shall include as a minimum: (a) Cross references to the Communication and Consultation Plan for the methods that will be used to liaise with all Network Utility Operators who have existing network utilities that traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation; (b) Measures to be used to accurately identify the location of existing Network Utilities,

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 30


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

and the measures for the protection, support, relocation and/or reinstatement of existing Network Utilities; (c) Methods to be used to ensure that all construction personnel, including contractors, are aware of the presence and location of the various existing Network Utilities (and their priority designations) which traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation, and the restrictions in place in relation to those existing Network Utilities. This shall include: (i) Measures to provide for the safe operation of plant and equipment, and the safety of workers, in proximity to existing Network Utilities; (ii) Plans identifying the locations of the existing Network Utilities (and their designations) and appropriate physical indicators on the ground showing specific surveyed locations; (d) Measures to be used to ensure the continued operation of Network Utility Operations and the security of supply of the services by Network Utility Operators at all times; (e) Measures to be used to enable Network Utility Operators to access existing Network Utilities for maintenance at all reasonable times on an ongoing basis during construction, and to access existing Network Utilities for emergency and urgent repair works at all times during the construction of the City Rail Link; (f) Contingency management plans for reasonably foreseeable circumstances in respect of the relocation and rebuild of existing Network Utilities during the construction of the City Rail Link; (g) A risk analysis for the relocation and rebuild of existing Network Utilities during the construction of the City Rail Link; (h) Earthworks management (including depth and extent of earthworks and temporary and permanent stabilisation measures), for earthworks in close proximity to existing Network Utilities; (i) Vibration management and monitoring for works in close proximity to existing Network Utilities; (j) Emergency management procedures in the event of any emergency involving existing Network Utilities; (k) The process for providing as-built drawings showing the relationship of the relocated Network Utilities to the City Rail Link to Network Utility Operators and the timing for providing these drawings; (l) Measures to ensure that network utility services are not interrupted to the Mt Eden Corrections Facility as a result of City Rail Link works. The requiring authority shall advise the Department of Corrections and the entity contracted by Department of Corrections to administer and run the Mt Eden Corrections facility at 1 Lauder Road, of any works on network utilities in the vicinity of the Mt Eden Corrections Facility which may impact on utility service provision to the Mt Eden Corrections Facility at least 14 days prior to those works occurring to allow the Department of Corrections (and the entity contracted to administer and run the facility at 1 Lauder Road) to arrange suitable contingencies. Communication and consultation with the Department of Corrections, and the entity contracted to administer and run the facility at 1 Lauder Road, shall be recorded in accordance with condition 15) of this designation. The Requiring Authority shall be responsible for ensuring that construction works do not interrupt network utility services to the Mt Eden Corrections Facility, unless by prior arrangement with Department of Corrections and

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 31


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

the entity contracted by Department of Corrections to administer and run the Mt Eden Corrections facility at 1 Lauder Road. (m) A summary of the consultation (including any methods or measures in dispute and the Requiring Authorities response to them) undertaken between the Requiring Authority and any Network Utility Operators during the preparation of the CEMP. 24.5 If the Requiring Authority and a Network Utility Operator cannot agree on the methods proposed under the CEMP to manage the construction effects on the Operator’s network utility operation, unless otherwise agreed, each party will appoint a suitably qualified and independent expert, who shall jointly appoint a third such expert to advise the parties and make a recommendation. That recommendation will be provided by the Requiring Authority as part of the CEMP along with reasons if the recommendation is not accepted. Transport, Access and Parking General Transport, Access and Parking 25.1 A Transport, Access and Parking DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects of construction of the City Rail Link, or any part of it, on the transport network. 25.2 The objective of the Transport, Access and Parking DWP is to so far as is reasonably practicable, avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on transport, parking and property access. This is to be achieved by: (a) Managing the road transport network for the duration of construction by adopting the best practicable option to manage congestion; (b) Maintaining pedestrian access to private property at all times; and (c) Providing on-going vehicle access to private property to the greatest extent possible. 25.3 To achieve the above objective, the following shall be included in the Transport, Access and Parking DWP:

25

1 4 5 6

(a) The road routes which are to be used by construction related vehicles, particularly trucks to transport construction related materials, equipment, spoil, including how the use of these routes by these vehicles will be managed to mitigate congestion, and to the greatest extent possible, avoid adverse effects on residential zoned land and education facilities; (b) Transport route options for the movement of construction vehicles carrying spoil, bulk construction materials or machinery shall be identified and details provided as to why these routes are considered appropriate routes. In determining appropriate routes, construction vehicles carrying spoil, bulk construction materials or machinery shall as far as practicably possible only use roads that: (i) Form part of the regional arterial network; (ii) Are overweight / over dimensioned routes; (iii) Or other routes (specified below) where no other practical option is available. (c) For the purposes of this condition the following routes (that at the time this designation was confirmed were not part of the regional arterial network and / or overweight / over dimensioned) shall be used where practicable for the movement of construction vehicles carrying spoil, bulk construction materials or machinery: (i) Ngahura Road, for trucks heading to/from Eden Terrace construction site; (ii) Dundonald Street and Basque Road, for trucks heading to/from the Newton Station construction sites; (iii) Pitt Street (between Hobson Street and Hopetoun Street), Beresford Square, Mercury Lane, Canada Street and Upper Queen Street (between Canada Street

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 32


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

and Karangahape Road), for trucks heading to/from Karangahape Station construction sites; (iv) Wellesley Street (between Nelson Street and east of Albert Street), Cook Street (between Mayoral Drive and Hobson Street) and Mayoral Drive (between Wellesley Street and Cook Street) for trucks heading to/from Aotea Station construction sites; (v) Nelson Street (north of Wellesley Street), Hobson Street (north of Cook Street) and Lower Albert Street, for trucks heading to/from the Albert Street and Downtown construction sites. (d) Where other routes are necessary (other than those routes identified above), the Transport, Access and Parking DWP shall identify any residential zoned land and education facilities and shall provide details on how adverse effects from these vehicle movements are to be mitigated through such measures as: (i) Communication and consultation (in accordance with Condition 15 of this designation) with these properties in advance of the vehicle movements occurring; (ii) Restricting vehicle movements on Monday to Friday to between 9.30am and 4pm, and on Saturday to between 9am and 2pm. (e) Proposed temporary road lane reductions and / or closures, alternative routes and temporary detours, including how these have been selected and will be managed to mitigate congestion as far as practicably possible and how advance notice will be provided; (f) How disruption to the use of private property will be mitigated through: (i) Ensuring pedestrian and cycle access to private property is retained at all times; (ii) Providing vehicle access to private property as far as practicably possible at all times, except for temporary closures where landowners and occupiers have been communicated and consulted with in reasonable advance of the closure; and (iii) How the loss of any private car parking will be mitigated through alternative car parking arrangements. (g) Where an affected party unexpectedly finds their vehicle blocked in as a result of a temporary closure, the Requiring Authority shall (within reasonable limits) offer alternative transport such as a taxi, rental car, or other alternative. Note: For the purposes of designation Conditions 25, 27, 28, 29 and 30 “temporary closure� is defined as the following: (i) In place for less than six hours, the Requiring Authority shall communicate and consult on the closure at least 24 hours in advance, but is not required to offer or provide alternative parking arrangements, though it may choose to offer this on a case by case basis in consultation with the affected party; and (ii) In place for between six and 72 hours, the Requiring Authority shall communicate and consult on the closure at least 72 hours in advance, and will offer and provide where agreed with the affected party alternative parking arrangements. The alternative parking arrangement should be as close to the site affected as is reasonably practicable. (h) How disruption to use of the road network will be mitigated for emergency services, public transport, bus users, taxi operators, freight and other related vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists through:

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 33


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(i) Prioritising, as far as practicably possible, pedestrian and public transport at intersections where construction works are occurring; (ii) Relocating bus stops and taxi stands to locations which, as far as practicably possible, minimise disruption; and (iii) Identifying alternate heavy haul routes where these are affected by construction works. (i) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan that detail how emergency services, landowners, occupiers, public transport users, bus and taxi operators, and the general public are to be consulted with in relation to the management of the adverse effects on the transport network. (j) The alternative (to road) transport options that are available (including the option of rail use at the main construction site adjacent the North Auckland Rail Line) and that have been considered and assessed for the transportation of spoil. This will include as applicable: (i) Benefits that could be provided by alternative options; (ii) Potential adverse effects associated with alternative options; (iii) Where an alternative option is proposed, methods for managing potential adverse effects; and (iv) Reasons for either adopting or not adopting alternative transport options. Monitoring of Transport Network Congestion 26.1 To achieve the objective of Condition 25.2(a), the Requiring Authority will undertake monitoring of the transport network and implement additional mitigation measures as required to manage congestion to achieve the best practicable option. 26.2 The purpose of the monitoring is to monitor congestion on the transport network by measuring average delays for traffic travelling along specified routes. The evaluation times will be: (a) The average travel times over the weekday two hour morning peak period; and (b) The average travel times over the weekday two hour evening peak period; and (c) The average weekday inter-peak travel times between 9am to noon, noon to 2pm and 2 to 4pm. 1 26

4 5 6

26.3 The Requiring Authority shall carry out continuous monitoring for the duration that construction of the City Rail Link is occurring. The intention is that this monitoring is to be continuous, although it is acknowledged that there may be occasional malfunctions. 26.4 If a congestion incident occurs (such as an accident), the monitoring during the affected period will be considered unrepresentative. 26.5 Monitoring shall commence six months prior to construction of the City Rail Link to establish a baseline of existing transport congestion. 26.6 The monitoring will establish whether the City Rail Link construction works have increased traffic delays as follows: (a) Either by more than 10 minutes (from the monitoring previously undertaken in accordance with this condition) (b) Or if the travel times are more than three minutes or 30% greater than the forecast modelled increases along that route (according to the most recent traffic model test of that scenario, undertaken prior to the start of construction. The modelled time is to be based on the Auckland City Centre SATURN traffic model or a different traffic model approved by the Requiring Authority).

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 34


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(c) The 30% above shall only apply for an increase predicted to be over four minutes. 26.7 If the travel times exceed the above criteria on any one of the specified routes, then additional mitigation shall be implemented by the Requiring Authority in its role as the Road Controlling Authority (under its statutory obligation). The additional mitigation could include but is not limited to advertising alternative routes, removing on street car parking or implementing operational measures, such as lane reconfigurations or signal phasing, to increase capacity on the surrounding network where reasonably possible at that time. 26.8 The purpose of additional mitigation measures is to mitigate the increases in traffic delays, reducing these to below the levels identified in Condition 26.6 as far as is reasonably achievable. 26.9 For the purposes of this condition, the following are the specified routes: (a) Wellesley Street (between Victoria Street and Princes Street) (b) Victoria Street (between Wellesley Street and Princes Street) (c) Customs Street/Fanshawe Street (between Nelson Street and Tangihua Street) (d) Quay Street/Lower Hobson Street (between Fanshawe Street/Hobson Street and Tangihua Street) (e) Nelson Street/Hobson Street (between Pitt Street and Fanshawe Street) (f) Queen Street (between Mayoral Drive and Customs Street) (g) New North Road/Symonds Street (between Dominion Road and Newton Road) (h) Mount Eden Road (between Normanby Road and Symonds Street) (i) Khyber Pass Road between the southern motorway ramps and Symonds Street if this route is to be used by construction related trucks (j) Newton Road between the northwestern motorway ramps and Symonds Street 26.10 The specified routes shall exclude whichever east-west route has its intersection with Albert Street closed at the time of the surveys. Transport, Access and Parking: Specific Requirements (Britomart to Mayoral Drive) 27.1 To achieve the objective in Condition 25, the following measures shall be implemented: (a) A vehicle access lane at least 3m wide shall be provided along the eastern side of Albert Street between Customs Street and Victoria Street to provide access to properties (except that while the Albert Street/Victoria Street intersection is closed, this access lane is only to be provided between Customs Street and Durham Street);

27

1

(b) A vehicle access lane at least 3m wide shall be provided along the western side of Albert Street between Customs Street and Victoria Street to provide access to properties, except that: (i) While the Albert Street/Customs Street intersection is closed, this access lane is only to be provided between Victoria Street and Wolfe Street; and (ii) While the Albert Street/Victoria Street intersection is closed, this access lane is only to be provided between Kingston Street and Customs Street. If Kingston Street is also to be closed to Albert Street during this construction stage, this access lane shall be provided between Wyndham Street and Customs Street; and (iii) For a single period of up to 3 months while the cut and cover trench structure establishment works are carried out along Albert Street between Swanson Street and Customs Street, this access land is only required to be provided between Victoria Street and Swanson Street if northbound traffic is otherwise diverted via

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 35


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Swanson Street West and Federal Street; and (iv) For a single period of up to 10 months while the public realm reinstatement works are carried out along Albert Street between Wyndham Street and Wolfe Street, this access lane is only required to be provided between Victoria Street and Swanson Street if northbound traffic is otherwise diverted via Swanson Street West and Federal Street. (c) The east-west / west-east connection (two fully operational traffic lanes in each direction) is to be maintained in each direction at two of the Customs Street, Victoria Street and Wellesley Street intersections with Albert Street during the period when the third of those intersections is otherwise fully closed; (d) The left turn movement from Customs Street (from the east) into Albert Street, and the left turn from Customs Street (from the west) into Albert Street, shall be retained while the Albert Street / Customs Street intersection is fully closed; (e) The left turn from Durham Street into Queen Street shall be reopened while the Albert Street/Victoria Street intersection is fully closed; (f) Two way access shall be provided on the single service lane along the western side of Albert Street between 87 Albert Street and Kingston Street while the Albert Street/Victoria Street intersection is fully closed. If Kingston Street is also to be closed to Albert Street during this construction stage, this access shall be provided to Wyndham Street; (g) Vehicular access into and egress from: (i)

Mills Lane to and from either Albert Street or Swanson Street; and

(ii) The Stamford Plaza Auckland main entrance and forecourt area is to be provided at all times and for the avoidance of doubt cannot be temporarily closed during construction. (h) Providing pedestrian and cycle access to private property at all times; (i) Providing footpaths of at least 1.5m in width along either side of Albert Street; (j) At a minimum two safe crossing passageways (which are “fully accessible” with a minimum width of 1.5m wide and well lit ), need to be provided in the vicinity of Swanson Street and Wyndham Street, in addition to pedestrian crossings at the intersections of Victoria Street and Customs Street; (k) Ensuring that construction traffic does not use Swanson Street, Wolf Street or Federal Street north of Swanson Street; (l) During the Kingston Street closure, pedestrian access to and from the Auckland District Court’s fire escape on the north side of Kingston Street shall be maintained at all times; and (m) 18 metres of on street parking within Kingston Street shall be reserved for police at the nearest practicable location. 27.2 The Transport, Access and Parking DWP shall demonstrate how these measures will be implemented and shall also include the following: (a) How construction works will be undertaken to mitigate congestion on Albert Street, Wellesley Street, Victoria Street, Customs Street, and Quay Street including retaining east-west traffic movements across Albert Street on Customs Street, Victoria Street and Wellesley Street; (b) The timing and sequencing of temporary road lane reductions and / or closures, and the alternative routes and temporary detours to be used, including: (i) How these have been selected and will be managed to, where practicable,

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 36


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

mitigate congestion on the surrounding road network; (ii) How the Albert Street/Wyndham Street intersection will be reopened as soon as practically possible; (c) How disruption to the use of private property located immediately adjacent the designation with access onto Galway Street, Tyler Street, Queen Elizabeth Square, Customs Street, Albert Street, Kingston Street, will be mitigated through: (i) Providing vehicle access to private property as practicably possible at all times; (ii) Retaining local vehicle access to properties located along Albert Street (which may include only left in, left out access); (iii) Retaining access for loading and unloading of goods located along the service lane on the eastern side of Albert Street, between Victoria Street and Wellesley Street; and; (iv) Providing an on street loading bay on Customs Street, Lower Albert Street or Lower Queen Street to provide servicing to 21 Queen Street if access during construction cannot be provided to the existing loading bay area for 21 Queen Street, accessed from Lower Albert Street; and; (v) Providing access for loading and unloading of goods between Wyndham Street and Victoria Street West. (d) How disruption to the use of the local road network will be mitigated for private bus users, pedestrians and cyclists through: (i) Providing, where practicable, for the continued operation of private bus operators from hotels and other pick up / drop off locations in the city centre area (cross references to the Communication and Consultation Plan for consulting with private bus operators shall be included in the CEMP and Traffic, Access and Parking DWP); and (ii) Retaining pedestrian and cycle access through Lower Queen Street and / or Queen Elizabeth Square to provide access to and from the Ferry terminal and Customs Street; and (e) How disruption to pedestrians and cyclists requiring the ability to cross from east to west (and vice versa) across Albert Street between Victoria Street and Customs Street can be mitigated through providing, where practicable, safe pedestrian and cyclist passageways across the construction works on Albert Street. Transport Access and Parking: Specific Requirements (Karangahape Station Area) 28.1 To achieve the objective in Condition 25, the following measure shall be implemented: (a) Retaining one lane of traffic in each direction on Pitt Street (unless otherwise agreed with the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer); and (b) Spoil trucks shall not use East Street where practicable and on-street parking at the Southern end of East Street will be retained. 28

4

28.2 The Transport, Access and Parking DWP shall demonstrate how these measures will be implemented and shall also include the following: (a) How construction of the shafts providing access to the Station can be undertaken to mitigate congestion on Pitt Street, Karangahape Road, and Mercury Lane; (b) The timing and sequencing of temporary road lane reductions and / or closures on Pitt Street, Mercury Lane, and the western end of Beresford Street, and the alternative routes and temporary detours to be used, including how these have been selected and will be managed to, where practicable, mitigate congestion on the

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 37


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

surrounding road network; (c) How disruption to the use of private property located immediately adjacent the surface designation with access onto Beresford Street, Pitt Street, Mercury Lane, and East Street will be mitigated through: (i) Providing pedestrian and cycle access to private property at all times, particularly those businesses located at the eastern end of Beresford Street and the northern end of Mercury Lane; (ii) Providing vehicle access to private property, which may include only a turn in and a turn out in the same direction), as practicably possible at all times, except for temporary closures where landowners and occupiers have been communicated and consulted with in reasonable advance of the closure; (iii) Providing local vehicle access to properties located along Beresford Street and Samoa House Lane (which may include only a turn in and a turn out in the same direction); (iv) Alternative parking arrangements or other offers for resolving the temporary loss of car parking during construction for the Hopetoun Alpha Building. Transport, Access and Parking: Specific Requirements (Newton Station Area) 29.1 To achieve the objective in Condition 25, the Transport, Access and Parking DWP shall include the following: (a) How construction of the shafts providing access to the Newton Station, although constructed wholly on private land, can be undertaken to mitigate construction related congestion on Symonds St, the Symonds Street / Mt Eden Road / New North Road intersection, Dundonald Street, and the western end of Basque Road; (b) The timing and sequencing of temporary road lane reductions and / or closures on Symonds St in the vicinity of the intersection of Symonds Street / Mt Eden Road and New North Road , Dundonald Street, and the western end of Basque Road, and the alternative routes and temporary detours to be used, including how these have been selected and will be managed to, where practicable, mitigate congestion on the surrounding road network; 29

5

(c) How disruption to the use of private property located immediately adjacent the surface designation with access onto Symonds Street, Dundonald Street, and the western end of Basque Road will be mitigated through: (i) Providing pedestrian and cycle access to private property at all times, particularly for those businesses and residences located along Symonds Street and Dundonald Street; (ii) Providing vehicle access to private property, which may include only a turn in and a turn out in the same direction), as practicably possible at all times, except for temporary closures where landowners and occupiers have been communicated and consulted with in reasonable advance of the closure. How the loss of public pay and display parking located at the Auckland Transport Symonds Street Public Car Park will be mitigated through alternative parking arrangements. The Requiring Authority may be able to arrange such alternative car parking at the Burleigh Street car park. (d) The effects of the temporary use of the Symonds Street car park as a construction site are to be mitigated by the Requiring Authority by active parking management and enforcement, within 400m of the car park, to maximise short term parking within this area

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 38


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Transport and Property Access: Additional Requirements (NAL Area) 30.1 To achieve the objective in Condition 25, the following measures shall be implemented: (a) The retention of at least two traffic lanes (one in either direction) on Mt Eden Road during the construction of the replacement Mt Eden Road Bridge; (b) During the closure of the Normanby Road level crossing to construct the grade separated crossing, the Mt Eden Road and Normanby Road intersection shall be signalised and a second traffic lane shall be provided on the Boston Road approach to its intersection with Mt Eden Road intersection. Additionally, the no parking restrictions on Boston Road shall be extended along the length of Boston Road and considered for any adjacent local roads to facilitate through traffic; (c) A temporary pedestrian crossing (over the rail line) at Normanby Road is to be provided for the period of the temporary closure of the Normanby Road connection; (d) Access will be maintained to Nikau Street at all times by at least one lane (minimum 3m), and two lanes on Nikau St between Flower and Korari Streets. Access to sites within Flower Street and Korari Street is to be retained, from Nikau Street or New North Road, at all times; (e) Construction works will be undertaken to ensure two-way access is maintained at all times for vehicles to all accessways to the MediaWorks site including staff and visitors cars, trucks and service vehicles; (f) Providing for traffic to turn right out of Ruru Street to reduce any congestion (particularly at peak times) resulting from not being able to travel via Nikau Street to the traffic lights at Flower Street and New North Road; 30

6

(g) Providing accessibility along Mt Eden and Normanby Roads as a priority for, where practicable: public transport (buses), emergency services, access to properties for pedestrians, and cyclists; (h) Construction works will be undertaken to ensure two-way access is maintained at all times for all vehicles accessing the Mt Eden Corrections Facility at Lauder Road (including staff and visitors’ cars, service vehicles, prison vans, emergency vehicles and buses), communication and consultation with the Department of Corrections, and the entity contracted by Department of Corrections to administer and run the Mt Eden Corrections facility at 1 Lauder Road, on this matter shall be recorded in accordance with Condition 15) of this designation. The Requiring Authority shall be responsible for ensuring that the construction works do not restrict 24-hour two-way access for all vehicles accessing the Mt Eden Corrections Facility at Lauder Road; (i) Construction works will be undertaken to ensure two-way access is maintained at all times for vehicles accessing the premises at 51-63 Normanby Road, including staff and visitors cars, trucks and service vehicles. The measures shall: (i) Ensure safe and reasonable access to and from the site, to Austroads standards; (ii) Not result in the loss of any on site parking; (iii) Incorporate a crossing width sufficient not to reduce the range of vehicles required to access the site, relative to the existing situation; (iv) It is noted that the site is used occasionally by large trucks of up to 18m. These vehicles are to be provided for in the design of the access (i.e. the vehicle crossing and the access onto the site); (v) Following completion of the grade separation of Normanby Road safe and reasonable access will be provided to and from the property at 51-63 Normanby Road to meet the relevant Austroads and NZS2890.1 standards or the applicable

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 39


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

standard required by the road controlling authority. (j) Construction works will be undertaken to ensure pedestrian and two-way vehicle access is maintained at all times to access the premises at 32 Normanby Road, including staff and visitors cars, trucks and service vehicles. The measures shall: (i) Ensure safe and reasonable access to and from the site, to Austroads standards; (ii) Incorporate a crossing width sufficient not to reduce the range of vehicles required to access the site, relative to the existing situation; (iii) Should the Requiring Authority require part of the site at 32 Normanby Road that is currently used for 40 car parking spaces for the construction of the City Rail Link 34 alternative car parking spaces will be provided at 14-22 Boston Road (in accordance with Plans DRG 0052 Rev 2.0 CRL-EFC-CON-000-DRG-0064 Revision 1 dated 8/7/16 and DRW 0058 Rev 5.0 CRL-EFC-ROA-000-DRG-1027 Revision 4 dated 30/6/16, 1028 Revision 4 dated 30/6/16 and 1127 Revision 2 dated 30/6/16). The Requiring Authority shall provide safe pedestrian access across the North Auckland Line and into the site for customers and staff, visiting or employed at the site in accordance with Condition 30.1(c) until the grade separation works are completed and permanent access is reinstated to the site. (k) At completion of the grade separation of Normanby Road safe and reasonable pedestrian and vehicle access to and from the site and 34 on site car parking spaces will be provided for the property at 32 Normanby Road. In the case of pedestrian and vehicle access and parking arrangements, this will be in accordance with Plans DRG 0058 Rev 5.0 CRL-EFC-ROA-000-DRG-1027 Revision 4 dated 30/6/16, 1028 Revision 4 dated 30/6/16 and 1127 Revision 2 dated 30/6/16, and meet the following requirements: (i) The ramp access will meet relevant Austroads, NZS2890.2 and the Auckland Council District Plan: Isthmus Section design standards; (ii) The 34 car parking spaces will be provided across the site and the adjoining KiwiRail property. The spaces will be compliant with the appropriate Auckland Council District Plan: Isthmus Section parking standards for dimension and manoeuvring; (iii) The design, structures and barriers associated with the ramp and pedestrian access to the site will be subject to the urban design process of Condition 47; and (iv) Provision for landscape planting both on the site and on the KiwiRail land in the area shown on DRG 0058 Rev 5.0 CRL-EFC-ROA-000-DRG-1127 Revision 2 dated 30/6/16 and if appropriate beyond the site (in accordance with Condition 47.2). Indicative widths of landscaping on DRG 0058 Rev 5.0 are 1m for the section shown alongside the railway and 0.5m for the section on the southern side of the ramp. (l) The KiwiRail land required by condition (k) above for car parking spaces, landscaping and the ramp access will be provided by the Requiring Authority until such time as the vehicle access ramp is no longer required by the landowner. If the vehicle access ramp is no longer required to provide access to the property it shall be removed by the Requiring Authority at its cost within 3 months unless otherwise agreed with the landowner. (m) Construction of the grade separation works at Normanby Road on the parcels of land identified on the CRL NOR6 Sheet 2 as parcels 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 393, 394, 399, 400 and 401 shall not commence until the KiwiRail land is available and written

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 40


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

confirmation of this has been provided by the Requiring Authority to Auckland Council. (n) Access to Water Street to and from Mt Eden Road for CRL construction related heavy commercial vehicles shall be limited to left-in and left-out movements only. (o) Access to 14-22 Boston Road from Normanby Road shall be restricted to left-in and left-out movements only; the exception to this will be when Normanby Road is closed; and (p) During the temporary works along Boston Road, a 1.8m wide footpath on the north side of the street, in addition to two 3.0m wide traffic lances shall be provided on Boston Road between Normanby Road and Khyber Pass. A safe temporary pedestrian crossing facility shall be provided at the western extent of Active Construction Zone M1. 30.2 The Traffic, Access and Parking DWP shall demonstrate how these measures will be implemented and shall also include the following: (a) How construction works can be undertaken to mitigate congestion on New North Road, Ruru Street, Korari Street, Flower Street, Nikau Street, Ngahura Street, Porters Avenue, Mt Eden Road, Normanby Road, Boston Road, Nugent Street, and the road network in general in this area including: (b) Which routes are to be used by construction trucks to remove spoil from the construction yard including how the use of these routes by these vehicles will be managed to mitigate congestion; (c) Which routes are to be used by construction related traffic (especially trucks) to deliver construction materials and other related goods and services to the construction yard including how the use of these routes by these vehicles will be managed to mitigate congestion; The grade separation of Porters Ave so that it is undertaken at a time when vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists can be managed and accommodated on Dominion Road, Mt Eden Road and Normanby Road to an extent which mitigates where practicable, delays to travel journeys from congestion on these roads resulting from City Rail Link construction works; (d) The grade separation of Normanby Road so that it is undertaken at a time when vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists can be managed and accommodated on Dominion Road, Mt Eden Road and Porters Avenue, to an extent which mitigates where practicable, delays to travel journeys from congestion on these roads resulting from City Rail Link construction works; (e) Any reduction in the number of fully operational traffic lanes associated with the closure of Porters Avenue and Normanby Road, and the reduction in the number of vehicle lanes on the Mount Eden Road bridge, is to be undertaken on only one of these three two routes at a time; (f) The timing and sequencing of temporary road lane reductions and / or closures at the Symonds Street / New North Road / Mt Eden Road intersection , Ruru Street, Korari Street, Flower Street, Nikau Street, Ngahura Street, Porters Avenue, Mt Eden Road in the vicinity of the bridge over the rail line, Normanby Road, Boston Road, Nugent Street in the vicinity of the rail crossing, and the alternative routes and temporary detours to be used, including how these have been selected and will be managed to, where practicable, mitigate congestion on the surrounding road network; (g) How disruption to the use of property located immediately adjacent to the surface

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 41


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

designation with access onto New North Road, Ruru Street, Korari Street, Flower Street, Nikau Street, Ngahura Street, Porters Avenue, Mt Eden Road, Normanby Road, Boston Road, Nugent Street will be mitigated through: (i) Providing pedestrian and cycle access to private property at all times; (ii) Providing local vehicle access and pedestrian access at all times to properties located along Flower Street (between Nikau Street and Shaddock Street) and Shaddock Street (between Flower Street and its dead end to the east), which are not located within the designation footprint, except for temporary closures where landowners and occupiers have been communicated and consulted with in reasonable advance of the closure; (iii) Retaining local vehicle and pedestrian access to properties located outside the designation footprint along Haultain Street, Fenton Street, Porters Avenue, Ngahura Street, Ruru Street, Korari Street, Flower Street, Nikau Street, Mt Eden Road, Boston Road, Nugent Street, and Normanby Road at all times except for temporary closures where landowners and occupiers have been communicated and consulted with in reasonable advance of the closure; and (iv) Full accessibility to those parts of Porters Avenue not affected by, but in the vicinity of, the construction works; and (h) How disruption to the use of Mt Eden Rail Station will be mitigated through providing, where practicable, access during construction works associated with the replacement of Mt Eden Road Bridge. Noise and Vibration Project Standards - Construction Noise 31.1 Construction noise shall comply with the following Project Standards (unless otherwise provided for in a SSCNMP which is approved under Condition 37, 39 or 40): Monday to Saturday 0700 – 2200

Sundays and Public Holidays

Occupied commercial and industrial buildings (including offices)

75 dB LAeq

75 dB LAeq

Sensitive Noise and Vibration Receivers (excluding offices)

75 dB LAeq 90 dB LAFmax

65 dB LAeq 1

Receiver Type

1 31

4 5 6

Early Childhood Education Centres (whilst occupied during normal opening hours)

At all other times

0700 – 2200

80 dB LAFmax

2200 – 0700

75 dB LAeq

2

60 dB LAeq 75 dB LAFmax

35 dB LAeq in sleeping areas

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 42


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Bear Park Early Childhood Education Centre at 32 Akiraho Street (whilst occupied during normal opening hours)

35 dB LAeq in sleeping areas 65 dB LAeq in outdoor playing areas

Notes: 1. 60dB LAeq for Designation 5 and Designation 6; and 2. 75dB LAFmax for Designation 5 and Designation 6. 31.2 Construction noise shall be measured and assessed in accordance with the provisions of NZS 6803:1999 Project Standards - Blasting Overpressure and Vibration For the avoidance of doubt this condition only applies to NoR 6 where blasting is required. 32.1 Prior to commencement of production blasts (ie. blasting that is undertaken as part of the construction process), trial blasts (ie. preliminary blasts that occur prior to production blasts for the purpose of data acquisition), shall be undertaken to demonstrate how adverse effects will be managed and how compliance with Conditions 32.2, 32.3 and 32.4 will be achieved in production blasting. Trial blasts will determine site-specific attenuation characteristics, air overpressure levels and maximum instantaneous charge weight (MIC) thresholds. Outcomes shall be documented in a Trial Blasting Report. This Trial Blasting Report shall be used for subsequent design of production blasting. 32.2Air overpressure from the blast events shall not exceed 120 dB LZpeak at the facade of any occupied building measures and assessed in accordance with the provisions of the Australian Standard AS 2187.2-2006 Explosives – Storage and use – Use of explosives.

32

6

32.3Air overpressure from blast events shall not exceed 133dB LZpeak at the facade of any unoccupied building measured and assessed in accordance with the provisions of Australian Standard AS 2187.2-2006 Explosives – Storage and use – Use of explosives. 32.4 Unless a SSCNVMP is approved under Conditions 38, 39 or 40 which includes an alternative blasting vibration standard: (a) Vibration from blast events shall not exceed 10mm/s PPV for 95% of blast events and 15mm/s for 100% blast events when measured at the foundation of any building that will be occupied during the blast event when measured and assessed in accordance with the provisions of DIN 4150-3:1999. (b) Vibration from blast events shall not in any case exceed the limits specified in Condition 33 when measured at the foundation of any building when measured and assessed in accordance with the provisions of Condition 33. 32.5 For the purposes of 32.2 and 32.3, a building is deemed to be occupied if there are persons inside only during the blast event (ie. if the occupants of a dwelling are out (eg. at work) during the blast event then the dwelling is deemed to be unoccupied). 32.6 Blasts must be performed at set times during the daytime only, between 9am and 5pm, Monday to Saturday only. 32.7 Comprehensive vibration and air overpressure level predictions must be performed prior to every blast event. 32.8 Blasting shall not be carried out where overpressure levels are predicted to be above the Project Standards in 32.1 and 32.2 at any building. Blasting shall not be carried out where

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 43


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

vibration levels are predicted to be above the project standards in Condition 32.4 at any building. 32.9 These criteria may be varied only by a Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan (SSCNMP) that has been approved under Condition 37. Project Standards - Construction Vibration 33.1 Construction vibration (including blasting) shall comply with the following Project Standards for building damage (unless otherwise provided for in a SSCVMP which is approved under Condition 38, 39 or 40) Type of Structure

Short-term (transient) vibration1

PPV at the foundation at a frequency of

1 2 4 33

5 6

Long-term (continuous) vibration

PPV at horizontal plane of highest floor (mm/s)

PPV at horizontal plane of highest floor (mm/s)

1-10Hz (mm/s)

10-50 Hz (mm/s)

50-100 Hz (mm/s)

Commercial/ Industrial

20

20 – 40

40 – 50

40

10

Residential/ School

5

5 – 15

15 – 20

15

5

Historic or sensitive structures

3

3–8

8 – 10

8

2.5

Note: 1. Standard DIN 4150-3:1999 defines short-term (transient) vibration as “vibration which does not occur often enough to cause structural fatigue and which does not produce resonance in the structure being evaluated”. Long-term (continuous) vibration is defined as all other vibration types not covered by the short-term vibration definition. 33.2 Construction vibration (including blasting) shall be measured in accordance with German Standard DIN 4150-3:1999. Project Standards - Construction Vibration (Amenity) 34.1 Between the hours of 10pm and 7am vibration generated by construction activities (excluding blasting) shall not exceed: 1 2 34

4 5 6

(a) a Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) of 0.3mm/s when measured at any part of the floor of any bedroom; (b) a noise level of 35 dB LAeq(15min) when measured in any bedroom. 34.2 Between the hours of 7am and 10pm vibration generated by construction activities (excluding blasting) shall not exceed: (a) A Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) of 1mm/s as measured on the floor of the receiving room for residentially occupied habitable rooms, bedrooms in temporary accommodation and medical facilities; and (b) A Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) of 2mm/s as measured on the floor of the receiving room for retail and office spaces (including work areas and meeting rooms); 34.3 The limits in 34.1 and 34.2 shall only be investigated and applied upon the receipt of

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 44


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

a complaint from any building occupant. They shall not be applied where there is no concern from the occupant of the building. 34.4 Where the limits in 34.1 and 34.2 are found (through measurement) to be exceeded then a SSCVMP shall be prepared for that receiver (Condition 38). Project Standards – MediaWorks

6

35

35.1 The noise and vibration limits set out in Conditions 35.2 and 35.3 shall apply only during Sensitive Times. For the purposes of MediaWorks, Sensitive Times are defined as follows: (a) During scheduled live broadcasting (b) During emergency/breaking news live broadcasting (c) During scheduled recording sessions If the limits are complied with in Studio 1, the noise and vibration levels in all other Studios will be acceptable. For the avoidance of doubt, (a)-(c) above include sound checks as well as actual broadcast/recording time. 35.2 Noise Limits – Studios The noise level (whether air borne or reradiated from ground vibration) from all construction sources as received inside Studio 1 shall not exceed 30dB LAeq (5 min) and 33 dB LAeq (1 sec). These limits apply to the construction component of the total noise. However for up to two periods of tunnelling, each no more than 15 consecutive days, the noise limits may be up to 5 decibels higher (ie. 35dB LAeq (5 min) and 38 dB LAeq (1 sec)) during Sensitive Times, other than during the Live Broadcasting Periods as follows: (a) Weekdays: 0600-0900 hours 1200-1230 hours 1730-1930 hours 2230-2330 hours (b) Christmas holiday season (Saturday prior to Christmas Day to Sunday following New Years Day inclusive) and weekends: 1730-1900 hours The Requiring Authority must give MediaWorks at least 12 days notice of the commencement of each such period. 35.2A Rockbreaking shall not be used for tunnel excavation within 100m of the MediaWorks site during Sensitive Times unless compliance with the noise limits in Condition 35.2 can be demonstrated in accordance with the methodology set out in the SSCNVMP. 35.3 Vibration Limits – Studios For the protection of studio camera image quality, the construction vibration level (including blasting) as received inside Studio 1 shall not exceed 0.1mm/s PPV. This limit may be elevated by agreement of both the Requiring Authority and MediaWorks where image quality is found to be unaffected. 35.4 Noise level measurements inside Studio 1 shall be undertaken at a position that is representative to the level received within 2m from, and at a similar height to, the microphone of the main presenter(s). 35.5 Noise level measurements inside Studio 1 shall be undertaken with all doors to the studio closed.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 45


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

35.6 For the protection of amenity, the construction vibration level as received in inside office areas, meeting rooms and technical suits shall not exceed 1mm/s PPV (as received on the floor of the receiving room) when those spaces are in use. 35.7 For the prevention of building damage, the construction vibration level shall not exceed the limits in Condition 33 at all times. 35.8 For the protection of sensitive equipment, the construction vibration (including blasting) level shall not exceed 200mg (2m/s2) between 5-500Hz. Levels are to be measured on the floor supporting the Sensitive Equipment. 35.9 All attended noise and vibration measurements shall be undertaken by a suitably qualified and experienced expert. 35.10 For the avoidance of doubt, the MediaWorks conditions (Conditions 35, 40 and 66) only apply for so long as television, radio and/or interactive media facilities broadcast from the MediaWorks site. 35.11 Blasting shall not occur during MediaWorks Sensitive Times (as defined in Condition 35.1). Blasting shall occur at times to be agreed with MediaWorks and as documented in the SSCNVMP. Construction Noise and Vibration DWP For the avoidance of doubt, this condition is applicable to the management of construction noise and vibration on all receivers, including sensitive and notable receivers. 36.1 A Construction Noise and Vibration DWP shall be prepared and implemented. The objective of the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP is to provide for the development and implementation of identified best practicable option to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects on receivers of noise and vibration resulting from construction. 36.2 The Construction Noise and Vibration DWP shall: (a) Adopt the noise and vibration standards for construction set out in Conditions 31, 32, 33 and 34 of these designations; 1 2 36

4 5 6

(b) Be generally consistent with the draft Construction Noise and Vibration management plan submitted as part of the Notice of Requirement documentation (dated 23 August 2013); and (c) Identify methods to achieve best practicable option for mitigating adverse effects. 36.3 To achieve this objective, the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP shall include: (a) The roles and responsibilities of the noise and vibration personnel in the contractor team with regard to managing and monitoring adverse noise and vibration effects; (b) That piling and road cutting will be restricted to between the hours of 7am to 7pm, Monday to Saturday; (c) Construction machinery and equipment to be used and their operating noise and vibration levels; (d) Identification of construction activities that are likely to create adverse noise and vibration effects, the location of these in the construction site areas, and the distance to comply with the Project Criteria in Conditions 31, 32, 33 and 34; (e) The timing of construction activities that are likely to create an adverse noise and vibration effect; (f) The location of sensitive noise and vibration receivers; (g) A record of communication and consultation with sensitive noise and vibration receivers. The record must include a clear explanation of where any comments from

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 46


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

sensitive receivers have not been incorporated in the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP, and the reasons why not. This information must be included in the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP provided to both the Independent Peer Review Panel and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan process specified in Condition 11; (h) Specific measures to address the concerns raised by those sensitive receivers; (i) Specific training procedures for construction personnel including: (i) The project noise and vibration performance standards for construction (conditions 31, 32, 33 and 34); (ii) Information about noise and vibration sources within the construction area and the locations of sensitive noise and vibration receivers; and (iii) Construction machinery operation instructions relating to mitigating noise and vibration; (j) Methods and measures to mitigate adverse noise and vibration effects including, but not limited to, structural mitigation such as barriers and enclosures, the scheduling of high noise and vibration construction, use of low noise and vibration machinery, temporary relocation of affected receivers or any other measures or offer agreed to by the Requiring Authority and the affected receiver; (k) The proposed methods for monitoring construction noise and vibration to be undertaken by a suitably qualified person for the duration of construction works including: (i) Updating the predicted noise and vibration contours based on the final design and construction activities; (ii) Confirm which buildings are to be subject to a pre and post building condition survey in accordance with Condition 46. This includes consideration of those buildings in Appendix One and Two to these conditions; (iii) The timing and location for monitoring of buildings during construction is required (Note that the flow charts contained in Appendices B and C of Appendix J of the technical noise and vibration report provided as part of the Notice of Requirement should be used as a guide); (iv) Identifying appropriate monitoring locations for receivers of construction noise and vibration; (v) Procedures for working with the Communication and Consultation Manager to respond to complaints received on construction noise and vibration, including methods to monitor and identify noise and vibration sources; (vi) Procedures for monitoring construction noise and vibration and reporting to the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer; and (vii) Procedures for how works will be undertaken should they be required as a result of the building condition surveys; (l) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which detail how landowners and occupiers are to be communicated with around noise and vibration effects.

37

1

Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan (SSCNMP)

2

For the avoidance of doubt, this condition does not apply to MediaWorks.

4

37.1 The objective of a SSCNMP is to detail the best practicable option to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on a receiver resulting from construction noise that does not

5

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 47


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

6

Condition

comply with the Project Noise Standards. 37.2 Further to the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP in Condition 36, a SSCNMP shall be prepared for any receiver or activity for which air overpressure is either predicted or measured to exceed the limits in Condition 32, or where construction noise is either predicted or measured to exceed the Project Noise Standards in Condition 31, except where the exceedance of the standards in Condition 31 is less than 5 decibels and does not exceed : (a) 0700-2200: 1 period of up to 2 consecutive weeks in any 2 months (b) 2200-0700: 1 period of up to 2 consecutive nights in any 10 days 37.3 For predicted exceedances of less than 5 decibels (refer 37.2) monitoring shall be undertaken to confirm the actual noise levels. If exceedance is shown to be more than 5 decibels, or the period exceeds those detailed, then a SSCNMP will be prepared. 37.4 In addition to the SSCNMPs prepared in accordance with Condition 37.2, and notwithstanding Condition 37.1, the Requiring Authority shall prepare SSCNMPs specifying the best practicable option for management, methods and measures to mitigate all noise effects for the properties located at: (a) 1 Queen Street (Lot 1 DP 165403); (b) 21 Queen Street (Lot 1 DP 67723); (c) 29 Customs Street West (Lot 7 DP 77037) (d) 188 Quay Street (Lot 5 DP 63972 and Lot 1 DP 78340); and (e) 23-29 Albert Street (Lot 1 DP 116724). 37.5 SSCNMPs will identify: (a) The extent to which noise may exceed the Project Noise Standards in Condition 31 or the overpressure limits in Condition 32; (b) The timing and duration of any exceedance; (c) Details of the type of activity causing any exceedance; (d) The summary of the communication and consultation undertaken with the receiver. The summary must include a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. This information must be included in the SSCNMP provided to both the Independent Peer Review Panel and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan process specified in Condition 11; (e) The methods and measures to mitigate noise effects, including but not limited to, potential to offer temporary relocation of affected receivers, alternative ventilation, faรงade sound insulation improvements, building condition surveys in the case of overpressure generated by blast events, or other offers made by the Requiring Authority and whether these have been agreed to by the affected receiver; (f) The reasons why the management and mitigation measures and methods reflect best practicable option. 37.6 The SSCNMP shall be submitted for the review of Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan. The works shall then be undertaken in accordance with the SSCNMP confirmed by the Requiring Authority as part of the Outline Plan.

38

1

Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plan (SSCVMP)

2

For the avoidance of doubt, this condition does not apply to MediaWorks.

4

38.1 The objective of a SSCVMP is to detail the best practicable option to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on a receiver resulting from vibration that does not comply with

5

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 48


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

6

Condition

the Project Vibration Standards. 38.2 Further to the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP in Condition 36, a SSCVMP shall be prepared: (a) For any unoccupied building, structure or infrastructure for which construction vibration is either predicted or measured to exceed the Project Vibration Standards in Condition 33; (b) Where a complaint or concern is raised and the vibration level exceeds the amenity levels of Condition 34.2(a) and 34.2(b); (c) In response to other concerns or complaints where required (refer Condition 17).; (d) For the properties listed in Condition 37.4. 38.3 Where the amenity limits in Conditions 34.2(a) and 34.2(b) are exceeded: (a) Best practicable management of vibration must be applied; and (b) The vibration activity shall be scheduled to avoid disturbance. If this is not practicable then reasonable respite periods shall be provided to reduce vibration exposure. 38.4 The limits in condition 33 may be relaxed by a SSCVMP but only for a building, structure or infrastructure that has been assessed by a suitably qualified and experienced structural engineer and where it has been deemed to be capable of withstanding higher vibration levels without sustaining building or structural damage, and where appropriate vibration and building condition monitoring regimes are in place. 38.5 SSCVMPs will identify: (a) The timing and duration of any exceedance; (b) Details of the type of activity giving rise to any exceedance; (c) Site Specific vibration criteria that addresses the issue(s) of concern (i.e. building damage, amenity and sensitive equipment). Site Specific criteria shall be determined by a suitably qualified independent vibration expert; (d) The summary of the communication and consultation undertaken with the receiver. The summary must include a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. This information must be included in the SSCVMP provided to both the Independent Peer Review Panel and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan process specified in Condition 11; (e) The methods and measures to mitigate vibration effects, including but not limited to, investigating alternative low-vibration construction methods, undertaking highvibration works outside sensitive times, vibration barriers, building condition surveys, potential to offer temporary relocation of affected receivers, or other offers made by the Requiring Authority and agreed to by the affected receiver; (f) The reasons why the management and mitigation measures and methods reflect best practicable option. 38.6 The SSCVMP shall be submitted for the review of Auckland Council. The works shall then be undertaken in accordance with the SSCVMP confirmed by the Requiring Authority as part of the Outline Plan.

Notable Receivers 39

1

Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers

2 4

For the avoidance of doubt, Conditions 39.5 and 39.6 do not apply to MediaWorks. 39.1 Further to Condition 36, the Requiring Authority and its contractor, in conjunction with a

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 49


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

5 6

Condition

suitably qualified expert, shall work collaboratively with each notable receiver during the preparation of a SSCNVMP to confirm the extent and management of adverse effects on each Notable Receiver. 39.2 In addition to the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP, a SSCNVMP shall be prepared for each identified Notable Receiver. The objective of the SSCNVMP is to detail the best practicable option to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse noise and vibration effects on each Notable Receiver. 39.3 The Requiring Authority shall consult with the notable receiver throughout the duration of construction and update the SSCNVMP as required to achieve the objective in 39.2. 39.4 The SSCNVMP shall include: (a) The level at which noise and vibration effects on the notable receiver will unreasonably interfere with its operation. This will enable development of the site specific criteria. In the case of MediaWorks this is set out in Condition 40; (b) Construction activities and equipment which are likely to create adverse noise and vibration effects and the location and timing of these in relation to the notable receiver; (c) The methods and measures associated with the worksite including, but not limited to, structural mitigation such as barriers and enclosures, use of low noise and vibration machinery and the scheduling of high noise and vibration construction; (d) The methods and measures associated with the notable receiver building or operation including, but not limited to, potential for isolation of sensitive areas and equipment, dampening of reradiating surfaces and temporary relocation of affected receivers that are proposed to minimise adverse noise and vibration effects on the notable receiver; (e) Details about the methods to be adopted by the Requiring Authority to minimise construction noise and vibration effects on the notable receiver and the anticipated effectiveness of those methods; (f) A summary of the communication and consultation undertaken with the notable receiver. The summary must include a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not; (g) Offers made by the Requiring Authority to the notable receiver to mitigate effects and the response by the operators, such as relocation, and whether those offers were accepted or not by the notable receiver; 39.5 If the parties cannot agree on any of the matters above they shall each appoint a suitably qualified and independent expert, who shall jointly appoint an independent and suitably qualified third expert who shall certify the following matters to be included in the SSCNVMP: (a) The level at which noise and vibration effects on the notable receiver unreasonably interfere with its operation (the certified noise and vibration limit); (b) The mitigation methods and measures within the worksite (at source) including, but not limited to, structural mitigation such as barriers and enclosures, use of low noise and vibration machinery and the scheduling of high noise and vibration construction; (c) The mitigation methods and measures at the notable receiver including but not limited to: isolation of sensitive areas and equipment; dampening of reradiating surfaces; any response to such offers; and temporary relocation of affected receivers; (d) Whether or not the mitigation methods and measures reflect best practicable

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 50


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

management; and (e) Whether or not the residual effects are likely to cause significant disruption to the activities of the notable receiver. 39.6 Following the above process the SSCNVMP shall be submitted for the review of Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan. For the avoidance of doubt, the Requiring Authority shall not be entitled to make any changes to the SSCNVMP through the Outline Plan process following any agreement reached with the notable receiver and/or through the above certification process without the consent of the notable receiver. The works shall then be undertaken in accordance with the SSCNVMP confirmed by the Requiring Authority as part of the Outline Plan process.

40

6

Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan – Mediaworks Further to Condition 36, a SSCNVMP shall be prepared for MediaWorks implementing the project standards in Condition 35. 40.1 The MediaWorks SSCNVMP shall identify high noise or vibration plant and machinery, and list the relevant items that require testing in accordance with Condition 40.4 and 40.8. 40.2 Prior to any demolition or construction commencing, the Requiring Authority shall undertake a noise survey to determine the Transmission Loss (TL) performance of the MediaWorks building envelope. This testing shall only be undertaken outside of Sensitive Times. 40.3 Prior to any demolition or construction commencing, the Requiring Authority shall undertake a vibration survey to determine the transfer function of the MediaWorks building structure from ground vibration outside the building to reradiated noise in Studio 1. This testing shall only be undertaken outside of Sensitive Times. 40.4 All high noise plant and machinery to be used at a location where it is predicted to generate noise levels in excess of 3 dB below the limits specified in Condition 35.2 shall be tested prior to use, to determine its Sound Power Level (Lw) at a sufficient distance from the MediaWorks building to ensure compliance. These measured Lws shall be used to predict the noise level at the MediaWorks building façade(s) from proposed construction scenarios. The façade TL (refer Condition 40.2) shall then be applied to predict the noise levels in the relevant rooms. 40.5 All high noise plant and machinery may not be used until Condition 40.4 is satisfied, taking into account the cumulative noise levels from active sources on the site. 40.6 The Requiring Authority and its contractor, in conjunction with a suitably qualified expert, shall work collaboratively with MediaWorks during the preparation of a SSCNVMP to confirm the extent and management of adverse effects on MediaWorks. 40.7 The SSCNVMP shall set out the requirements for monitoring, the number of monitors, the instrument location, any adjustments necessary if a proxy position is required and any other procedures or requirements that are necessary. The data shall be available in real time to the Requiring Authority, Auckland Council and MediaWorks. 40.8 Prior to the use of any high vibration equipment to be used at a location where it is predicted to generate vibration levels greater than 75% of the PPV vibration limits in Condition 35.3, 35.6, 35.7 and 35.8, or reradiated noise within 3 decibels of the limits in Condition 35.2, the Requiring Authority shall undertake vibration measurements at a sufficient distance from the MediaWorks building to ensure compliance, applying the transfer function required by Condition 40.3 to assess reradiated noise. These measurements shall be used to determine minimum set-back distances from the building to avoid potential exceedances of the vibration limits in Conditions 35.2, 35.3, 35.6, 35.7 and 35.8. The results of the testing and the outcomes affecting construction operations

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 51


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

shall be set out in the SSCNVMP. 40.9 The noise and vibration levels from construction shall be monitored to determine compliance with conditions 35.2, 35.3, 35.6, 35.7 and 35.8 continuously by automated noise and vibration monitors located at positions that will represent the noise and vibration level in the relevant spaces and for the relevant noise and vibration limits. The SSCNVMP shall set out the requirements for monitoring, the instrument location, any adjustments necessary if a proxy position is required and any other procedures or requirements that are necessary including methods to exclude extraneous sources. The data shall be available in real time to the Requiring Authority, Auckland Council and MediaWorks. 40.10 Monitoring to determine compliance or otherwise with Condition 35.67 relating to office amenity shall only be undertaken in response to complaints from MediaWorks. The measurements must be attended by a suitably qualified person. 40.11 The SSCNVMP shall set out corrective action measures that must be adopted in situations where any of the noise and vibration limits in Conditions 35.2, 35.3, 35.6, 35.7, and 35.8 are exceeded and where the noise and/or vibration levels are unacceptable to MediaWorks. The corrective action measures must include the following: (a) Immediate cessation of the work(s) that is giving rise to the exceedance; (b) A procedure to require the implementation of whatever measures are necessary to reduce the noise or vibration levels; (c) A monitoring procedure to determine compliance (once the remediation works are complete); (d) A requirement to ensure that the work(s) responsible for the exceedance are not recommenced during Sensitive Times; (e) A complaints procedure that is capable of effecting the immediate cessation of works including making a point of contact directly available 24 hours, seven days a week. 40.12

40.13

If there is a disagreement between the Requiring Authority and MediaWorks as to the content of the SSCNVMP, they shall each appoint a suitably qualified and independent expert, who shall jointly appoint an independent and suitably qualified third expert who shall certify the matters set out in Condition 40.11 and any other matters in dispute in the SSCNVMP. Following the above process the SSCNVMP shall be submitted for the review of Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan. For the avoidance of doubt, the Requiring Authority shall not be entitled to make any changes to the SSCNVMP through the Outline Plan process following any agreement reached with MediaWorks and/or through the above certification process without the consent of MediaWorks. The works shall then be undertaken in accordance with the SSCNVMP confirmed by the Requiring Authority as part of the Outline Plan process.

Built Heritage/Archaeology Historic Character – Built Heritage 1 2 41

4 5 6

41.1 The Historic Character DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects on built heritage and archaeology that may result from associated works prior to, during, and after the construction of the City Rail Link or any part of it. 41.2 The objective of the Built Heritage section is to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on built heritage as far as reasonably practicable. To achieve the above objective, the following shall, as a minimum, be included in the built heritage section of the Historic Character DWP:

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 52


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(a) Preparation of a Building Record and Salvage Strategy that outlines a suitable set of procedures for the removal, storage and for later refitting and reuse of elements of heritage buildings and/or structures identified for demolition including the Griffiths Building, Beresford Toilets, Bluestone Toilets, and the rear annex to the building at 223-227 Symonds Street. (b) The proposed methods for monitoring building damage that is to be undertaken by a suitably qualified person for the duration of construction works. This includes confirming which Built Heritage buildings and structures are to be subject to a pre and post building condition survey through: (i) Using the updated predicted vibration contours undertaken in Condition 36; (ii) Reviewing those buildings in Appendix 2 to these conditions in accordance with Condition 46.1; (iii) Reviewing buildings within the designation footprint (including above sub-strata designation) or located in close proximity to identify buildings which have been recognised as having heritage value as a result of scheduling under the Historic Places Act 1993 or in the Auckland Unitary Plan. (c) Identification and methodology for recording of Built Heritage directly affected by the construction, or associated pre- and post-construction works (i.e. within the surface designation footprint), which cannot be retained and / or adaptively re-used / partially retained. For the avoidance of doubt, the following buildings and structures may be demolished: (i) Bluestone Toilets (SCDP Category B); (ii) Beresford Toilets; (iii) Rear annex to building at 229-231 Symonds Street; and (iv) Griffiths Building. (d) Identification and methodology for recording Built Heritage directly affected by the construction, or associated pre- and post-construction, which are to be: (i) Adaptively reused; (ii) Partially retained in design and construction; or (iii) Built heritage elements have been integrated into other elements of the City Rail. (iv) In particular, the Requiring Authority shall explore the adaptive re-use of the buildings at 51-53 Victoria Street West (known as Martha’s Corner building) with complete demolition only considered as a last resort. As guidance, an appropriate level of adaptive re-use could include retention of the façade on all street frontages or the utilisation and incorporation of elements of the building into the design: (e) How Built Heritage Buildings and Structures will be protected during construction through the use of screening or other protective measures to mitigate adverse construction effects; (f) How mitigation or rectification of damage to Built Heritage Buildings and Structures will be addressed; and (g) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which detail how the Auckland Council Heritage Department, the New Zealand Historic Places Trust, and mana whenua (see condition 15) are consulted, and the communication with the general public on the management of the adverse effects relating to Built Heritage.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 53


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(h) That the detailed design of the reinstated and/or replacement canopies on heritage buildings shall be based on an engineered architectural design which replicates the present installations, and/or recovers original (historical) construction and architectural detail. Historic Character - Archaeology 42.1 A Historic Character DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects on built heritage and archaeology that may result during construction of the City Rail Link or any part of it. 42.2 The objective of the Archaeology section of the Historic Character DWP is to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on archaeological remains during construction, as far as reasonably practicable. 42.3 To achieve the above objective the following matters shall be included in the Archaeology section of the Historic Character DWP: (a) Constructor roles and responsibilities, stand-down periods and reporting requirements are to be clearly identified; (b) How procedures for archaeological investigations and monitoring of preliminary earthworks are to be implemented in areas where there is potential for archaeological remains to be discovered; (c) Procedures for the discovery of, including accidental discovery of archaeological remains including: (i) The ceasing of all physical construction works in the immediate vicinity of the discovery; 1 42

4 5 6

(ii) Practices for dealing with the uncovering of cultural or archaeological remains and the parties to be notified (including, but not limited to, appropriate iwi authorities, the Auckland Council Consents Monitoring officer, the New Zealand Historic Places Trust, and the New Zealand Police (if koiwi (human skeletal remains) are discovered); (iii) Procedures to be undertaken before physical works in the area of discovery can start again, including any iwi protocols, recording of sites and material, recovery of any artefacts, and consultation to be undertaken with iwi, Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer and Heritage Unit, and with the New Zealand Historic Places Trust; and (iv) Procedures for recording any archaeological remains or evidence before it is modified or destroyed, including opportunities for the conservation and preservation of artefacts and ecofacts (biological material) that are discovered. Consideration shall be given to the incorporation of in-situ material or artefacts into the design of stations and / or public places associated with the City Rail Link project. Consideration shall also be given to the provision for ‘post-excavation’ assessment analysis and publication of material within 24 months of completion of construction. (v) Provision for ‘post-excavation’ archiving, assessment and analysis of the archaeological records and materials; publication of results of that work within 24 months of completion of construction assessment analysis and publication of material within 24 months of completion of construction. (d) Training procedures for all contractors are to be undertaken in advance of construction, regarding the possible presence of cultural or archaeological sites or material, what these sites or material may look like, and the relevant provisions of

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 54


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

the Historic Places Act 1993 if any sites or material are discovered; (e) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which details how the Auckland Council Heritage Department, the New Zealand Historic Places Trust, mana whenua (see condition 8) are consulted, and the communication with the general public on the management of the adverse effects relating to archaeology. Heritage Advisory Group and Composition 43.1 The Requiring Authority must engage, at its expense, a panel of suitably qualified and experienced heritage experts to discharge the functions required by conditions 44 and 45. The Heritage Advisory Group will consist of three independent experts, whose members will not be directors or employees of the Requiring Authority, the New Zealand Historic Places Trust or the consent authority. The Heritage Advisory Group will comprise one nominee from the Requiring Authority, one nominee from the consent authority, and a third nominee appointed jointly by the Requiring Authority's and consent authority's nominees. 43

1

43.2 Before establishing the Heritage Advisory Group the Requiring Authority shall seek the opinion of NZHPT on the appointment of the Heritage Advisory Group. 43.3 The Heritage Advisory Group may determine its own processes and procedures for conducting its meetings and performing its functions as it sees fit, including methods for ensuring any disagreements between panel members are resolved, and must meet as necessary to fulfil its functions. All costs associated with the role and function of the Heritage Advisory Group and appropriate administrative support must be paid by the Requiring Authority. If any member of the Heritage Advisory Group is unable to continue in the role for whatever reason, then a replacement member must be appointed using the process set out in this condition. Heritage Advisory Group Function 44.1 The functions of the Heritage Advisory Group are to review the assessment of the alternatives and option selected by the Requiring Authority to manage the adverse effects on the heritage values of the Bluestone wall and the Martha’s Corner building. 44.2 In relation to Bluestone Wall, the Heritage Advisory Group will: (a) Certify that the method selected by the Requiring Authority under Condition 45 will have the least impact on the heritage value of the Bluestone wall compared to other reasonably practicable methods; or

44

1

(b) Prepare a report as to why the method selected by the Requiring Authority under Condition 45 will not have the least impact on the heritage value of the Bluestone wall and set out details as to an alternative recommended reasonably practicable method. 44.3 In relation to Martha’s Corner, the Heritage Advisory Group will: (a) Certify that the heritage outcomes for Martha’s Corner adhere to the intent of Condition 41; or (b) Prepare a report as to why the method selected by the Requiring Authority will not adhere to the intent of Condition 41 and set out details as to the recommended reasonably practicable method. 44.4 The Requiring Authority must provide Auckland Council with the Heritage Advisory Group’s certification or report, and if applicable the reasons the Requiring Authority has not selected the method recommended by the Heritage Advisory Group.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 55


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Bluestone Wall Management Plan 45.1 A Bluestone Wall Management Plan shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects on the heritage values of the Bluestone wall during the construction of the City Rail Link. 45.2 The objective of this Plan is to minimise adverse effects on the heritage values of the Bluestone wall during the construction of the City Rail Link by adopting the best practicable option. 45

1

45.3 To achieve the above objective, the following shall be included in the Bluestone Wall Management Plan: (a) Identification of the key heritage values of the wall; (b) Assessment of the alternative construction methods to ensure that construction of the City Rail Link has the least impact on the heritage value of the Bluestone wall, within the practical constraints of constructing the project; and (c) The option selected by the Requiring Authority. 45.4 The Bluestone Management Plan shall be prepared in consultation with the NZHPT and the Heritage Advisory Group (set out in Condition 43).

Building Condition Surveys Process for Building Condition Surveys 46.1 Prior to construction, as a minimum those buildings listed in Appendix One and Appendix Two or identified pursuant to Condition 41.2(b) will be considered for a building condition survey. A building condition survey will be undertaken where it is assessed that there is potential for damage to buildings or structures arising from construction as determined by an independent suitably qualified person appointed by the Requiring Authority based on the criteria below unless the relevant industry criteria applied at the time or heightened building sensitivity or other inherent building vulnerability requires it. Building damage criteria will initially be assessed in accordance with Burland, J.B. (1997) “Assessment of Risk of Damage to Buildings due to Tunnelling and Excavation�. Additional factors which may be considered in determining whether a building condition survey will be undertaken include:

46

1

(a) Age of the building;

2

(b) Construction types;

4

(c) Foundation types;

5

(d) General building condition;

6

(e) Proximity to any excavation; (f) Whether the building is earthquake prone; and (g) Whether any basements are present in the building. 46.2 Where prior to construction it is determined that a Building Condition Survey is required in accordance with Condition 46.1, or if measurements exceed the criteria in Condition 33: (a) The Requiring Authority shall employ a suitably qualified person to undertake the building condition surveys and that person shall be identified in the CEMP; (b) The Requiring Authority shall provide the building condition survey report to the relevant property owner within 15 working days of the survey being undertaken, and additionally it shall notify and provide the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer a copy of the completed survey report;

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 56


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(c) The Requiring Authority shall contact owners of those buildings and structures where a Building Condition Survey is to be undertaken to confirm the timing and methodology for undertaking a pre-construction condition assessment; (d) The Requiring Authority shall record all contact, correspondence and communication with owners and this shall be available on request for the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring Officer; (e) Should agreement from owners to enter property and undertake a condition assessment not be obtained within 3 months from first contact, then the Requiring Authority shall not be required under these designation conditions to undertake these assessments; (f) The Requiring Authority shall undertake a visual inspection during "active construction" if requested by the building owner where a pre-construction condition assessment has been undertaken. (g) The Requiring Authority shall develop a system of monitoring the condition of existing buildings which is commensurate with the type of the existing building and the proximity of the CRL works. The purpose of monitoring is to assess whether or not active construction is compromising the structural integrity of the building. (h) The Requiring Authority shall, during the Building Condition Survey, determine whether the building is classified as Commercial / Industrial / School or a Historic or sensitive structure in terms of Condition 33. 46.3 During construction: (a) The Requiring Authority shall implement procedures that will appropriately respond to the information received from the monitoring system. Where necessary this may include the temporary cessation of works in close proximity to the relevant building until such time as measures are implemented to avoid further damage or compromise of the structural integrity of the building. (b) Any damage to buildings or structures shall be recorded and repaired by the Requiring Authority and costs associated with the repair will met by the Requiring Authority. 46.4 Following construction: (a) The Requiring Authority shall, within 12 months of the commencement of operation of the City Rail Link, contact owners of those buildings and structures where a Building Condition Survey was undertaken to confirm the need for undertaking a post-construction condition assessment; (b) Where a post-construction building condition survey confirms that the building has deteriorated as the result of construction or operation works relating to the City Rail Link, the Requiring Authority shall, at its own cost, rectify the damage; and 46.5 Where the Requiring Authority is required to undertake building repairs in accordance with Conditions 46.3(b) or 46.4(b), such repairs shall be undertaken as soon as reasonably practicable and in consultation with the owner of the building. Urban Design 1 47

4 5 6

Urban Design Principles 47.1 The objective of the Urban Design DWP is to enable the integration of the CRL’s permanent works into the surrounding landscape and urban design context. 47.2 An Urban Design DWP shall be developed to ensure that the areas within the designation footprint used during the construction of the City Rail Link are to be restored and the

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 57


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

permanent works associated with the CRL are developed in accordance with urban design principles. The following Principles from the Urban Design Framework submitted as part of the Notice of Requirement documents will be used to inform the Urban Design and Landscape Plan: (a) Mana Whenua Principles – see Condition 49; (b) Movement and Connections – (i) Existing Networks - Structures of the CRL should not interrupt or adversely change the function of existing public open space, street networks and infrastructure. (ii) Entrance Location - Station entrances should be clearly identifiable and conveniently located in relation to existing and anticipated main pedestrian routes and destinations. (iii) Intuitive Orientation - The location and nature of structures resulting from the CRL (station entrances in particular) should facilitate intuitive orientation and support a legible street network. (iv) Way Finding - Coherent signage should be utilised to aid intuitive orientation and way finding. (v) Mode Integration - Spatial integration with bus stops as well as kiss and ride should be facilitated where possible without imposing on the quality of public realm. (vi) Bicycle Parking – Appropriate numbers of safe bicycle storage or parking should be provided in each station environment. (vii) Street Crossings - Safe pedestrian street crossings shall be provided in the immediate vicinity of station entrances to the extent practicable. The provision of level street crossings is preferable over any grade separated solutions. (viii) Footpaths – Footpaths surrounding stations need to be adequate to provide for pedestrians entering and exiting the stations. (ix) Grade separated rail crossings – Structures associated with grade separated rail crossings need to be carefully and sensitively designed and in accordance with crime prevention through environmental design principles to ensure appropriate amenity and safety are retained or achieved. Measures to achieve this may include: a.

Utilising permeable balustrades on overbridges;

b.

Maximising the width of the footpath at grade in street reserves;

c.

Orientating any steps parallel to overbridges;

d.

Providing appropriate levels of lighting (in accordance with the Auckland Transport Street Lighting Policy (Appendix 1) for “Pathways in high risk, high brightness areas”); and

e.

Treatment of the sides of ramps and footpaths to enhance visual amenity.

(x) Grade separated rail crossings – Permeable balustrades on overbridges should be required not only for crime prevention purposes but to enable views into the neighbouring sites. For clarity all balustrades comprised within Normanby Road grade separation works (as defined in condition 30.1(l) shall be permeable including without limitation the ramp to be constructed into the site at 32 Normanby Road. (xi) The Porters Avenue Bridge (lift and bridge structure above finished ground level)

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 58


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

shall be located no closer than 3.5m from the property boundary of 5 Porters Avenue (ALLOT 236 SEC 10 Suburbs AUCKLAND). Foundation support (i.e. below finished ground level) for the bridge may extend closer but shall not cross the property boundary. (xii) The design of the Porters Avenue and Fenton Street pedestrian/cycle bridges shall: a.

Minimise loss of privacy on adjacent residential sites, including by locating the pedestrian/cycle bridge in the western half of the Avenue;

b.

Ensure the lifts are through lifts to carry bicycles; and

c.

Incorporate bicycle push ramps into the side of the pedestrian stairways.

(xiii) The extensions to Ruru Street and Nikau Street shall generally be undertaken in accordance with the indicative road layout shown on drawing CRL-SYW-RME000-DRG-0110 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16. (c) Public Realm and Landscape – (i) Existing Streetscape – Structures of the CRL should be designed to respect and contribute positively to the form and function of existing public open space. (ii) Universal Access – Station environments should promote universal access (e.g. footpath ramps and smooth ground surfaces). (iii) Safe Environments – Structures resulting from the CRL should promote safe environments. The station entrances should release patrons into safe public spaces that are well lit at night, overlooked by other users (e.g. residents or workers) and have sufficiently wide and unobstructed footpaths. (iv) Reinstated Surfaces - The design and construction of reinstated streetscapes should be coherent with the wider area and/or recent public realm upgrades in the area. (v) Station Plazas - The design and construction of station plazas should be coherent with the wider area and/or recent public realm upgrades in the area. (vi) Public Art - Integration of art and design should foster local identity and character and reflect and/or interpret local characteristics including natural heritage and Mana Whenua cultural narratives, history, art and particular traits of the local community. (vii) Landscape Planting – Plant species used in station environments and/or as part of landscape plantings should consider the opportunity to acknowledge the area’s pre-human ecology as and where appropriate. This may include species which connect strongly with Mana Whenua cultural narratives. (viii) Entrances within the Road Reserve - Designs for station entrances within the road reserve should be designed to consider the impacts upon other modes of traffic, including the expected pedestrian patronage. (ix) Utility Structures - Above ground utility structures (e.g. vents, access services) should be designed to minimise any negative effect on public realm. Where possible these structures should be integrated with other buildings. (x) Where landscape planting is affected by construction works on private properties, replanting and/or mitigation of any such landscaping shall be undertaken in consultation with those landowners, and in recognition of wider mitigation works required for those properties (e.g. vehicle parking and access

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 59


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

requirements). 47.3 The Urban Design DWP shall show how these principles have been used to guide and influence the design of permanent works associated with the CRL, and how the design has responded or otherwise to these principles and initiatives. 47.4 The work to restore those areas within the designation footprint used during construction of the City Rail Link will occur as part of construction or within six months of the City Rail Link being operational. Auckland Council Urban Design Panel 47.5 The Requiring Authority shall request the Auckland Council to refer the Urban Design DWP to the Auckland Urban Design Panel (or other equivalent entity (if any) at that time) and invite the Auckland Urban Design Panel to comment on: (a) The degree to which the Urban Design DWP has appropriately responded to the principles listed in 47.2 and 49.1; (b) The degree to which station plans have appropriately responded to the principles listed in Condition 54.1. 47.6 As part of the Urban Design DWP submitted, the Requiring Authority shall: (a) Provide a record of feedback received from the Auckland Urban Design Panel (or equivalent entity at that time); (b) Provide detail of how the Urban Design DWP has responded to any feedback received from the Auckland Urban Design Panel (or equivalent entity at that time) and, where they have not, the reasons why; (c) Provide detail regarding the degree to which the community stakeholder, affected party and affected in proximity party feedback has been considered and where applicable incorporated into design. Where feedback has not been incorporated, the Requiring Authority shall provide comment as to reasons why the feedback has not been incorporated; (d) The information set out in (a), (b) and (c) above must be included in the Urban Design DWP submitted to both the independent peer reviewer and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan. Mitigation Planting Requirements

1 48

4 5 6

48.1 The Urban Design DWP shall include any replacement planting proposed to mitigate the adverse effects of tree and vegetation removal from within the designation footprint. It is acknowledged that the mitigation of effects of tree and vegetation removal will be considered in response to the urban design principles of Condition 47. 48.2 Any landscaping included under the Urban Design DWP shall be implemented in accordance with this plan within the first planting season following the City Rail Link being operational. If the weather in that planting season is unsuitable for planting, as determined by the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer (in consultation with the Auckland Council Parks Department), the landscaping shall instead be implemented at the first practicable opportunity thereafter. The next practicable opportunity shall be agreed by the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer. 48.3 The landscaping will be maintained by the Requiring Authority for a period of 5 years for specimen trees and 3 years for all other landscape planting.

49

1

Engagement with Mana Whenua and the Mana Whenua Principles

4

49.1 The Urban Design DWP shall include:

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 60


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

5 6

Condition

(a) How mana whenua (see Condition 8) have been engaged with during its development in relation to the implementation and interpretation of the Principles set out under Condition 47, and particularly in relation to the mana whenua principles set out below: (i) Mana / Rangatiratanga – As the original local authorities of Tamaki Makaurau, Iwi require high level Treaty based relationships with all key stakeholders including the Requiring Authority and Auckland Council which recognise their Tangata Whenua status in order to fulfil their roles as kaitiaki. Such partnership relationships can then inform engagement with AT / Council at all levels including direct involvement with design consortia. Relationships are required at governance and senior management levels. Such relationships are a precursor to actualising the other 6 principles. (ii) Whakapapa – Names and genealogical connections– reviving names revives mana through Iwi connections to specific ancestors and events / narratives associated with them. An Iwi inventory of names associated with a given site can be developed so that the most appropriate names are identified to develop design, interpretation and artistic responses. (iii) Tohu – Acknowledging the wider significant Iwi cultural land marks associated with the CRL route and their ability to inform the design of the station precincts, entrances and exits. In particular exploring opportunities to maximise view shafts to such tohu / landmarks as a way of both enhancing cultural landscape connections and as way finding / location devices. (iv) Taiao – Exploring opportunities to bring natural landscape elements back into urban /modified areas e.g. specific native trees, water / puna wai (springs) – promoting bird, insect and aquatic life to create meaningful urban eco systems which connect with former habitats, mahinga kai (food gathering areas) and living sites. (v) Mauri tu – Ensuring emphasis on maintaining or enhancing environmental health / life essence of the wider site – in particular focusing on the quality of wai / water (puna / springs), whenua / soil and air. In particular any puna or underground waterways encountered should be carefully treated with Mana Whenua assistance to ensure their mauri is respected and enhanced where possible. It is also important to minimise the disturbance to Papatuanuku through carefully planned ground works. (vi) Mahi toi – Harnessing the Creative dimension through drawing on names and local tohu to develop strategies to creatively re-inscribe iwi narratives into architecture, interior design, landscape, urban design and public art. (vii) Ahi kaa – need to explore opportunities to facilitate living presences for iwi / hapu to resume ahi-kaa and kaitiaki roles in and around the CRL route and new station precincts; and (b) A summary of the engagement with mana whenua (see Condition 15) and identification of where design has incorporated the mana whenua principles and other mana whenua aspirations. The summary must include a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated and the reasons why not. The summary must be included in the Urban Design DWP submitted to both the Independent Peer Review Panel and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan.

50

1

Specific Area Requirements: Britomart to Aotea Station 50.1 For this designation the Urban Design DWP shall include how the following are to be

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 61


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

restored following completion of the City Rail Link construction works: (a) Queen Elizabeth Square and lower Queen Street between Quay Street and Customs Street; (b) Albert Street between Quay Street and Victoria Street; and (c) Albert Street between Victoria Street and Mayoral Drive including those part of Victoria and Wellesley Streets, the Council owned land on the southeast corner of Albert and Wellesley Streets which is to be used as a construction area, affected by surface construction works; and (d) Kingston Street. 50.2 The restoration plan for this designation shall demonstrate how street upgrades and public realm improvements have been considered when Albert Street and Mayoral Drive are reinstated. This should include as a minimum how the design and construction utilises material palettes, planting schedules and street furniture that are coherent with the surrounding streetscape character. Specific Area Requirements: Karangahape Station area 51.1 For this designation the Urban Design DWP shall include restoration plans (showing how the following are to be restored following completion of the City Rail Link construction works): (a) Beresford Square and Street including where surface works have occurred within Pitt Street; and (b) Mercury Lane. 51.2 The restoration plan for this designation shall demonstrate how street upgrades and public realm improvements have been considered when Beresford Street, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane are reinstated. This should include as a minimum: (a) How the design and construction utilises material palettes, planting schedules and street furniture that are coherent with the surrounding streetscape character. (b) Methods for street upgrades and public realm improvements. 51

4

(c) With reference to condition 47.2(c)(ii), in Mercury Lane how either a maximum gradient of 1 in 12 for the footpath and approaches to the Station will be achieved, or the compensatory measures to be introduced to address a steeper grade. The number and location of any pause points to improve accessibility should be identified, taking into account other users of the footpath. 51.3 Final public realm design for Mercury Lane shall include the following features: (a) The widening of footpaths of both sides of Mercury Lane between Karangahape Road and the station entrance including the provision of level pause points at intervals within the paved areas with seats and soft landscaping; (b) The forming of a new public laneway between Mercury Lane and East Street, beside the southern edge of the station entrance building; (c) The forming of a raised street surface pedestrian crossing between Cross Street and the station entrance; (d) New street lighting to Mercury Lane; and (e) Resurfacing of all roadway surfaces affected by the works.

52

5

Specific Area Requirements: Newton Station area 52.1 For this designation the Urban Design DWP shall include restoration plans (showing how the following are to be restored following completion of the City Rail Link construction

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 62


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

works) for those areas used for surface construction works within the designation footprint, including the construction yard located on the northeast corner of Mt Eden Road and Symonds Street. Specific Area Requirements: North Auckland Line area 53.1 For this designation the Urban Design DWP shall include the following: (a) Restoration Plans showing how the worksite area will be maintained during the construction period. (b) Restoration Plans showing how the following are to be restored after construction completion: 53

6

(i) The replacement of Mt Eden Road Bridge; (ii) The area used for the grade separation of Porters Avenue; (iii) The area used for the grade separation of Normanby Road; and (iv) The replacement of the pedestrian connection, to be provided over the railway, between Ngahura Street and Fenton Street, including a connection to the Mount Eden Station. (c) How the bulk, scale and massing of structures resulting from the City Rail Link at Mt Eden Station are integrated with the components of the Mt Eden Station located in the adjacent North Auckland Line designation. Station Plan Requirements 54.1 The Urban Design DWP shall include a Station Plan/s (report and design plan/s as required) and include the following: (a) The design details showing both the above ground and below ground elements of the station/s; (b) How the above ground and below ground design of the stations has taken into account the following principles: (i) Overarching - stations should achieve a successful and memorable transport experience. (ii) Function - stations will provide safe, functional and clear transport solutions.

1 54

4 5

(iii) Performance - stations will provide a credible, sustainable design outcome that responds to climate, site and social economics. (iv) Personality - stations will provide an expression that contributes to their context and local identity and will respond to an appropriate network wide identity. (v) Existing and New Building Structures. (vi) Built Heritage: •

Where built heritage is required for City Rail Link station requirements, adaptive reuse strategies should be considered to preserve the building’s role in establishing the streetscape and urban character. The development of new buildings and structures should minimise impact on, and disturbance of, Built heritage listed by the New Zealand Historic Places Trust or the Auckland Council District Plan that play a significant role in establishing the streetscape and urban character of the local area.

(vii) Bulk, Scale and Massing: •

Bulk, scale and massing of structures resulting from the City Rail Link (station buildings in particular) should be sympathetic with the surrounding built urban form.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 63


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

• •

Aotea Station building frontages should correspond with the road reserve boundary unless a specific station plaza area is intended. Karangahape Road station building(s) should be sensitively designed so as to contribute positively and to complement the good public realm and urban form qualities that currently exist in this area of Karangahape Road, Pitt Street and the upper end of Beresford Street. The redevelopment of land acquired for the Newton Mt Eden Station provides the opportunity for a continuous active building frontage to correspond with the road reserve boundary, providing:  This does not conflict with the operation requirements of the station; or  Unless a specific station plaza area is intended.

(viii) Active Frontage – Structures resulting from the City Rail Link should present an active frontage towards public spaces like streets, squares, pedestrian walkways or station plaza areas provided that this doesn’t conflict with the operation requirements of the station. Where no active frontage is proposed, an explanation of the reasons shall be outlined in the Urban Design DWP. (ix) Weather Protection – Where practicable, station entrances should provide some weather protection along their frontage (e.g. verandahs, awnings, canopies etc.) and these should be considered as part of the design. (x) Adaptability – The design of structures resulting from the City Rail Link should be able to adapt to change over time (e.g. change of uses, innovations in technology etc.) where reasonably practicable and anticipate opportunities (e.g. additional entrances) that may become possible in the future. The station design should not inhibit wider development opportunities (e.g. above or around station entrances). (xi) Identity – The design of the station entrances should provide an expression that reflects their respective context and local cultural identity. They could reflect, respond and/or interpret local characteristics like natural or Mana Whenua heritage, history, art, particular traits of the local community and unique architectural and urban forms of the area. (xii) Construction Quality – The design and construction of structures resulting from the City Rail Link (station buildings in particular) should be of a quality that lasts over time. Materials should be selected that are highly durable, elegant and vandal resistant where they come into contact with patrons. (xiii) Mana Whenua Principles – see Condition 49. (c) How these principles have been used to guide and influence the design, and how the design has responded, or otherwise, to these principles and initiatives; and (d) A summary of the engagement with mana whenua (see Condition 15) and identification of where design has incorporated the mana whenua principles and other mana whenua aspirations into station design. The summary must include a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated and the reasons why not. The summary must be included in the Urban Design DWP submitted to both the Independent Peer Review Panel and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan. Trees and Vegetation

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 64


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Trees and Vegetation DWP 55.1 A Trees and Vegetation DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects from the removal of trees and vegetation during the construction of the City Rail Link or any part of it. 55.2 The objective of the Trees and Vegetation DWP is to avoid the removal of scheduled trees as far as practicable. Where trees are identified for removal in surface works the Requiring Authority will remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on trees and vegetation. 55.3 To achieve the above objective the following shall be included in the Trees and Vegetation DWP and implemented as required:

1 55

4 5 6

(a) Confirmation of the trees to be removed due to surface construction works and whether it is appropriate and feasible to relocate or store these trees for replanting. The removal of schedule trees which form a significant group should only be undertaken as a last resort; (b) A list of trees, which due to being located in proximity to construction works, have root systems and / or foliage within and / or overhanging the surface designation footprint, and the methods to be used, where practicable, to protect these trees from construction works; (c) Cross references to the Urban Design DWP and the proposed mitigation of any tree / vegetation removal through replanting trees at a 1:1 ratio, re-instatement of the area, and other methods. In preparing the Trees and Vegetation DWP, the Requiring Authority shall seek input from the Auckland Council Parks Department with regard to tree species / vegetation selection, tree pit construction where deemed necessary, and the positioning of replacement trees and from directly affected land owners with regards to preferences for any replacement planting for vegetation / trees removed from private property or for any replacement planting on private property; (d) Other methods to be used to monitor and report on the management of the adverse effects from tree / vegetation removal; and (e) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which detail how the Auckland Council Parks Department, mana whenua (see condition 8) are consulted, and communication with the general public on the management of the adverse effects relating to the removal of trees and vegetation.

Public Art Public Art DWP 56.1 A Public Art DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects on public art located within or in close proximity to the designation footprint. 56.2 The objective of the Public Art DWP is to enable: 56

1

(a) The appropriate removal and / or relocation of one piece of public art directly affected by the construction of the City Rail Link; (b) The protection of two pieces of public art that are located on public land in close proximity to the City Rail Link construction works. 56.3 To achieve the above objective the following shall be included in the Public Art DWP and implemented as required: (a) The process that will be undertaken to remove the public art work known as "Enduring Fires" (at the time of the Notice of Requirement process located within Queen Elizabeth Square), including the consultation undertaken with the Auckland

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 65


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Council and Ngati Whatua ki Tamaki or Ngati Whatua o Orakei as to its removal, storage, re-establishment or relocation and / or replacement (as part of the restoration works associated with the City Rail Link construction); (b) The process that will be undertaken to protect or remove the public art work known as "Maori Warrior" (at the time of the Notice of Requirement process located on the pavement of Quay Street adjacent to 1 Queen Street), including the consultation undertaken with the Auckland Council as to its protection during construction or whether it should be removed, stored, relocated and / or replaced (as part of the restoration works associated with the City Rail Link construction); (c) The process to protect the public art known as "Matahorua Anchor and Tainui Anchor" (at the time of the Notice of Requirement process located at the northern end of the Bledisloe Building on Wellesley Street) from construction works to the west, including the consultation undertaken with the Auckland Council as to its protection. 56.4 If one does not already exist, an asset management plan shall be prepared by the Requiring Authority in collaboration with Auckland Council for any of the above listed public art works as part of any protection or removal process. 56.5 Should the above public art works be removed from these sites prior and separate to the City Rail Link project, this condition will not need to be complied with. Contaminated Land Contamination DWP 57.1 A Contamination DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects relating to contaminated land during the construction of the City Rail Link or any part of it. 57.2 The objective of the Contamination DWP is to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on human health which may result from the disturbance of contaminated materials during construction. 57.3 To achieve the above objective the following shall be included in the Contamination DWP and implemented as required: (a) A health and safety plan that addresses: (i) Worker safety in relation to hazardous substances; and 1 57

4 5 6

(ii) Worker training with regard to handling hazardous substances, identifying potentially contaminated soil / material, and notification procedures for discovery of contamination; (b) Procedures for how erosion and sediment control, storm water, dust, and odour control measures will manage the removal of contaminated soil / material; (c) Procedures for contaminated soil classification, management and disposal of contaminated soil / material; (d) Where any trenches/excavations during civil works are to be sealed as a result of contamination and how this is to be recorded; (e) How and which work areas are to be restricted to authorised personnel only and procedures to limit the presence of ignition sources in these areas (e.g. no smoking within or adjacent to construction area, no welding or open flames near areas with high concentrations of hydrocarbon contamination); (f) Procedures for the monitoring and management of the removal of contaminated soil / material by a suitably qualified environmental specialist; (g) How the placement of re-used contaminated soil / material will be recorded and

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 66


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

tracked; (h) Where areas for stockpiling and storing contaminated soil / material will be established on the construction site and the procedures for managing the containment of the contaminated soil / material in these areas; (i) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which detail how the general public are to be communicated with on the management of the adverse effects relating to the removal of contaminated soil / material. Contamination Validation Report at Completion of Construction 1 58

4 5 6

58.1 At the completion of construction works a validation report will be prepared in accordance with any Ministry for the Environment guidelines and submitted to the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer documenting the management of soil and evidence of appropriate disposal. The validation report shall include a record of all analytical results, volumes, tip dockets, and any incidents or complaints and how these were addressed. The validation report shall also identify any areas which need on-going monitoring and management by the Requiring Authority.

Air Quality Air Quality DWP 59.1 An Air Quality DWP shall be prepared to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects on air quality during the construction of the City Rail Link or any part of it. 59.2 The objective of the Air Quality DWP is to detail the best practicable option to avoid dust and odour nuisance being caused by construction works and to remedy any such effects should they occur. 59.3 To achieve the above objective the following shall be included in the Air Quality DWP and implemented as required: (a) The procedures to be implemented for the continuous monitoring of Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) concentrations and meteorology including, but not limited to, the establishment of two monitoring sites (to the north and south of the site); 1 59

4 5 6

(b) Identification of the sensitive locations, and the specific methods for monitoring, including trigger limits to determine whether further action (such as implementation of the mitigation measures discussed below or other mitigation measures) is required; (c) Procedures for responding to malfunctions with construction machinery or works causing accidental dust discharges including, but not limited to, the requirement to remedy any malfunction within 24 hours; (d) Procedures for monitoring weather conditions and the requirement that water spray is used on soil stockpiles, any non-paved construction areas, and the wheels of trucks where dust may disperse beyond the site; (e) Procedures for establishing when the covering of trucks will be required; (f) Procedures for determining when hard surfaced areas in construction yards and active construction areas should be cleaned including, but not limited to, the requirement that such areas be cleaned whenever dust generation occurs due to traffic on these surfaces; (g) Procedures for responding to discharges of odour (including in the event of excavation of contaminated sites) including, but not limited to, the requirement to

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 67


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

address discharge of objectionable odour by immediately ceasing the activity causing the discharge; (h) Procedures for equipment inspection (including timeframes for regular inspections), maintenance, monitoring and recording, including baghouses, pressure relief valves and high level alarms to mitigate dust emissions; (i) Procedures for, where practicable, limiting dust and odour nuisance and the methods for monitoring these procedures including Identification of contingency measures to address identified and verified adverse effects on sensitive receptors. Contingency measures may include options such as: (i) Cleaning of air filtration intakes; or (ii) Cleaning of other buildings and infrastructure; and (j) Procedures for responding to any complaints received and the timeframes for response to complaints and reporting; (k) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which detail how the communities in the vicinity of construction works are to be communicated with on the management of the adverse effects relating to air quality. Social Impact and Business Disruptions Property Management Strategy 60.1 The Requiring Authority will prepare a Property Management Strategy and shall submit the Strategy to Auckland Council within 3 months of the Designation being confirmed for confirmation that the Strategy has been prepared in accordance with this condition.

1 60

4 5 6

60.2 The purpose of the Strategy is to set out how the Requiring Authority will ensure the properties acquired for the City Rail Link are appropriately managed so they do not deteriorate and adversely affect adjoining properties and the surrounding area. The Strategy shall identify measures and methods to ensure the properties are managed in a manner that: (a) Does not significantly change the character, intensity and scale of the effects of the existing use of the land; (b) Maintains the condition of the property at that which existed at the time of purchase by the Requiring Authority; (c) Contributes to the functioning of the area within which the property is located; (d) Maintains occupancy as far as reasonably practicable; and (e) Provides confidence to occupants, adjoining property owners, and the community that the properties are managed responsibly pending construction. Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP

1 61

4 5 6

61.1 The Requiring Authority shall prepare a Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP. The objective of the Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP is to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects arising from disruption to businesses, residents and community services/facilities so far as reasonably practicable. 61.2 To achieve this objective the Requiring Authority shall engage a suitably qualified specialist(s) to prepare a Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP to address the following specific issues: (a) How disruption to access (including pedestrian, cycle, passenger transport and service/private vehicles) for residents, community services and businesses as a result of construction activities will, so far as is reasonably practicable, be avoided,

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 68


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

remedied or mitigated; (b) How the disruption effects that result or are likely to result in the loss of customers to businesses as a result of construction activities will, so far as is reasonably practicable, be avoided, remedied or mitigated; (c) How the loss and/or relocation of community facilities and the loss or change to catchments associated with these facilities as a result of the property acquisition process particularly to the Chinese Community Centre and Life Centre Church and the temporary loss of car parking at Hopetoun Alpha will be mitigated; and (d) How loss of amenity for residents, community services and businesses as a result of construction activities will be or has been mitigated through the CEMP and other DWPs. 61.3 The Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP shall be prepared in consultation with the community, community facility operators, business owners, affected parties and affected in proximity parties to: (a) Understand client and visitor behaviour and requirements and operational requirements of community facilities and businesses; (b) Identify the scale of disruption and adverse effects likely to result to businesses, residents and community services/facilities as a result of construction of the City Rail Link; (c) Assess access and servicing requirements and in particular any special needs of residents, community facilities and businesses; and (d) To develop methods to address matters outlined in (b) and (c) above, including: (i) The measures to maximise opportunities for pedestrian and service access to businesses, residents and social services/facilities that will be maintained during construction, within the practical requirements of the Transport, Access and Parking conditions (Conditions 25 to 30) and the Transport, Access and Parking DWP; (ii) The measures to mitigate potential severance and loss of business visibility issues by way-finding and supporting signage for pedestrian detours required during construction; (iii) The measures to promote a safe environment, taking a crime prevention through environmental design approach; (iv) Other measures to assist businesses and social services/facilities to maintain client/customer accessibility, including but not limited to client/customer information on temporary parking or parking options for access; (v) Other measures to assist residents, businesses and social services/facilities to provide for service delivery requirements; (vi) The process (if any) for re-establishment and promotion of normal business operation following construction; (vii) If appropriate and reasonable, requirements for temporary relocation during construction and/or assistance for relocation (including information to communities using these services and facilities to advise of relocations); and (viii) The measures to remedy and mitigate the disruption impacts to the community as a result of any closure and/or relocation of community services and facilities required by the Project. 61.4 The Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP shall include: (a) A summary of the findings and recommendations of the Social Impact Assessment

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 69


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

report (2013); (b) A record of the consultation undertaken with the community including specific access and operational requirements of individual businesses and residents including, if relevant, consultation on the necessity for, and the feasibility of, options and requirements for temporary relocation during construction and/or assistance for relocation); (c) An implementation plan of the methods to mitigate the disruption effects (as developed in 61.3 above); (d) Reference to any site/business specific mitigation plans that exist (though these may not be included in the DWP); (e) Cross reference to detail on how the CEMP and DWPs have responded to the issues of resident, business and social service/facility accessibility and amenity; (f) Details of on-going consultation with the local community through the Community Liaison Groups to provide updates and information relating to the timing for project works and acquisition; (g) Details of best endeavours steps undertaken with regard to acquisition and/or relocation of the Chinese Community Centre and Life Centre Church under the Public Works Act 1981; and (h) The process for resolution of any disputes or complaints in relation to the management / mitigation of social impacts (including business disruption impacts). 61.5 In relation to the site at 32 Normanby Road, the Requiring Authority shall consult with sub-lessees in the presence of the landowner and head lessee when developing site/business specific mitigation plans, unless the sub-lessee(s) request otherwise. 61.6 The Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP shall be implemented and complied with for the duration of the construction of the City Rail Link and for up to 12 months following the completion of the Project if required. 61.7 Suitably qualified independent specialists for the social impact and business disruption mitigation (whose appointment shall be agreed by the Council) shall peer review the Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP pursuant to Condition 11. 61.8 The Requiring Authority shall prepare an annual report on the identification, monitoring, evaluation and management of the effects outlined in the Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP together with a summary of matters raised by the community, and how these have been responded to. The report shall be presented to the Community Liaison Groups. Specific Design Requirements 62

2

62.1 The operational tunnel will avoid running under the building footprint of the property at 152 Vincent Street.

OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS Operational Rail Vibration 63.1 The Requiring Authority shall confirm that operational rail vibration and reradiated noise levels comply with the following Project Criteria at any noise or vibration sensitive receiver existing at the time of lodgement of the CRL NoR:

63

Building Type 1

Vibration Criteria

Reradiated Noise Criteria (dB LASmax re: 20 ÂľPa)

PPV (mm/s)

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 70


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Commercial uses with primarily daytime use1

0.2

40

Residences and buildings where people normally sleep

0.15

35

Auditoria/Theatres1

0.1

30

TV/Recording Studios

0.06

25

Note: 1. 2.

Such as offices, businesses, churches, schools, universities and libraries. This includes Albert Street District Court.

63.2 For any noise or vibration sensitive building types that are not provided for in the table above, the upper limit for vibration and reradiated noise shall not exceed 0.3 mm/s PPV and 50 dB LASmax respectively. 63.3 For the avoidance of doubt this does not apply to the North Auckland Line and Britomart Designations. 63.4 When assessing operational rail vibration and reradiated noise, compliance with Conditions 63.1 and 63.2 shall be achieved for at least 95% of any 20 consecutive train pass-by ‘events’. Operational Rail Vibration 63A.1 The Requiring Authority shall confirm that operational rail vibration and reradiated noise levels comply with the following Project Criteria at any noise or vibration sensitive receiver existing at the time of lodgement of the CRL NoR: Building Type

Vibration Criteria

Reradiated Noise Criteria (dB LASmax re: 20 µPa)

Velocityᵌ (mm/s)

2 4 63A

5 6

Commercial uses with primarily daytime use1

0.14

40

Residences and buildings where people normally sleep

0.1

35

Auditoria/Theatres1

0.1

30

0.045

25

TV/Recording Studios Note:

1. Such as offices, businesses, churches, schools, universities and libraries. 2. This includes Albert Street District Court. 3. Maximum one-second root-mean-square (RMS) value with an upper frequency limit of 80 Hz. 63A.2 For any noise or vibration sensitive building types that are not provided for in the table above, the upper limit for vibration and reradiated noise shall not exceed a RMS level (1s, maximum) of 0.21 mm/s and 50 dB LASmax respectively. 63A.3 For the avoidance of doubt the Project Criteria in Conditions 63A.1 and 63A.2 do not apply to the North Auckland Line and Britomart Designations. 63A.4 When assessing operational rail vibration and reradiated noise, compliance with

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 71


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Conditions 63A.1 and 63A.2 shall be achieved for at least 95% of any 20 consecutive train pass-by ‘events’. The events shall be representative of the rolling stock fleet operating on the line and shall include maintenance activities, unless such maintenance activities are undertaken after 11.30pm or before 6.00am. 63A.5 Subject to Condition 66.4 in the case of MediaWorks, when assessing operational rail vibration measurement shall be made in accordance with Section 5.2.3 of BS6472-1:2008 Guide to evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings. Operational Noise – Mechanical Ventilation Plant 64.1 Operational noise from mechanical ventilation plant servicing the underground rail sections of the City Rail Link shall be measured and assessed in accordance with the following Project Criteria:

1

Location

Period

Auckland Central Area

7.00am to 11:00pm

65

11:00pm to 7:00am

60

7.00am to 10:00pm

60

10:00pm to 7:00am

55

2 64

dB LAeq

dB LAFmax 75

4 5 6

Auckland Isthmus Area

75

64.2 Measurements shall be undertaken in accordance with New Zealand Standard NZS 6801:2008 “Acoustics – Measurement of environmental sound” and assessed in accordance with New Zealand Standard NZS 6802:2008 “Acoustics - Environmental Noise”. 64.3 For the avoidance of doubt this does not apply to the North Auckland Line and Britomart Designations. Operational Noise and Vibration Management Plan (ONVMP)

1 2 65

4 5 6

65.1 To manage the adverse effects from the maintenance and operation of the City Rail Link, the Requiring Authority shall, prior to the operation of the CRL, prepare an Operational Noise and Vibration Management Plan, (ONVMP) to the satisfaction of Auckland Council’s Compliance Monitoring Manager. The objective of the ONVMP shall be to ensure that the tracks, rolling stock and associated infrastructure (including ventilation and other mechanical plant) are maintained and operated in accordance with maintenance standards as outlined in the Requiring Authority’s maintenance programme for the City Rail Link, so that operational noise and vibration levels received at noise sensitive receiver locations, and vibration levels comply with Conditions 63 and 64. . 65.2 The ONVMP shall set out procedures for: (a) The maintenance of rolling stock to minimise noise and vibration emissions including, but not limited to, the management of wheel roughness and flats, braking systems, cooling systems, suspension systems and any other significant source associated with the operation of locomotives; (b) The maintenance of tracks to minimise noise and vibration emissions, including, but not limited to, the management of curve squeal, rail roughness, joint constructions and any other significant source associated with the use of the tracks;

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 72


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(c) The implementation of mitigation measures associated with the operation and maintenance of the City Rail Link, for the operational life of the City Rail Link; (d) The management of noise from the operation of the line, including, but not limited to, the use of audible warning devices and acceleration / deceleration controls (where relevant); and (e) The management of noise and maintenance of noise-generating equipment from stations and associated ventilation and mechanical plant infrastructure including, but not limited to, PA systems, fans and ventilation noise and audible warning devices. 65.3 The ONVMP shall be adhered to at all times. It may be updated or amended at any time with the approval of Auckland Council’s Compliance Monitoring Manager. 65.4 For the avoidance of doubt this does not apply to the North Auckland Line and Britomart Designations. Operational Noise and Vibration Management – MediaWorks 66.1 At least six months prior to the opening of the CRL, the Requiring Authority shall provide a report from a suitably qualified noise and vibration expert to Auckland Council’s Compliance Monitoring Manager and to MediaWorks. The report shall confirm the trackform mitigation applied to the project has been designed to ensure that operational noise and vibration will not exceed the levels as set out in Conditions 63A.1, 63A.2 and 66.5. 66.2 The Requiring Authority shall implement continuous vibration monitoring on the tunnel structure on the East Link Down Main line within 20m of the closest point of the CRL tunnel to Studio 1 to determine compliance with Conditions 63A.1 and 63A.2 during the operation of the CRL (but only for so long as MediaWorks remains located at the MediaWorks site). The monitoring regime shall: (a) Be based on measurements with an upper frequency limit of 500 Hz; Note: The upper monitored frequency band of 500Hz reflects the supplier’s permissible criteria specified for equipment operated by MediaWorks. (b) Ensure that measurement equipment and signal chain complies with the manufacturers guidelines for accuracy and calibration; 66

6

(c) Capture every train pass-by on the line which may be triggered by vibration level radio frequency tag, interrupted beam or any other practicable triggering method; (d) Ensure the retention of the RMS data for every train pass-by on the line; (e) Ensure the transmission of RMS data for every train pass-by to the Requiring Authority at an interval not exceeding 48 hours between data uploads to enable records to be viewed and interrogated as required without requiring access to the monitoring location; (f) Ensure that the Requiring Authority, Auckland Council’s Compliance Monitoring Manager and MediaWorks are alerted to RMS values exceeding a value at the tunnel monitoring location that corresponds to 90% of the limits specified in Condition 63A.1 for TV/Recording Studios to enable the Requiring Authority to instigate preventative maintenance of tracks and rolling stock with the aim of avoiding exceedences of the noise and vibration limits at the MediaWorks building. The ONVMP required by Condition 65 shall set out the method for determining the transfer function between the tunnel monitoring location and the floor of Studio 1, and what the vibration trigger level is (based on measurements on the tunnel structure) for investigation and corrective action measures relative to Condition 66.2(f) above. The transfer function shall be accurately determined prior to the railway becoming

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 73


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

operational using the tunnel monitoring location and the floor of Studio 1. 66.3 Conditions 63A.1, 63A.2 and 66.5 shall be complied with at the MediaWorks building for so long as MediaWorks remains located at the MediaWorks site. 66.4 Noise shall be measured in accordance with the requirements of NZS6801:2008 Acoustics - Measurement of Environmental Sound. Vibration shall be measured in accordance with the requirements of section 5.2.3 of BS6472-1:2008 Guide to evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings, except that all references to people, persons and body in that clause shall apply to equipment as well. 66.5In addition to compliance with the criteria set out in Condition 63A.1 relating to TV/Recording Studios, and for the purpose of monitoring the effects of vibration on camera shake, the vibration arising from train pass-bys shall at all times comply with a vibration limit of 1m/s2 between 5Hz and 500Hz when measured on the floor of the MediaWorks filming studios. 66.6 In the event of any exceedance of any noise or vibration in Conditions 63A.1 and 63A.2 during a Sensitive Times (as defined in Condition 35.1) measures to reduce the noise or vibration below the relevant limit in Condition 63A shall be implemented as soon as reasonably practicable. ADVICE NOTES

1 AN1

4 5 6

1 2 AN2

4 5 6 1 2

AN3

4 5 6 1 2

AN4

4

The Requiring Authority will require an Authority under the Historic Places Act 1993 to destroy, damage or modify any archaeological site. This Authority is required in advance of earthworks commencing in the area where the archaeological site is located. It is expected that there will be staged Section 12 Authority applied for to cover the earthworks programme. In the event of unanticipated archaeological sites or koiwi being uncovered the Requiring Authority shall cease activity in the vicinity until it has the relevant approvals, and consulted with the Historic Places Trust and relevant iwi interests. The Requiring Authority will need to acquire the relevant property interests in land subject to the designation before it undertakes any works on that land pursuant to the designation. That may include a formal Public Works Act 1981 land acquisition process. It is acknowledged that property rights issues are separate from resource management effects issues and that the resolution of property issues may be subject to confidentiality agreements between the Requiring Authority and the relevant landowners. Prior to construction if Network Utility Operators are carrying out works that do not require prior written consent of the Requiring Authority in accordance with condition 6 of this designation, they must carry out those works in accordance with the Corridor Access Request (CAR) Process (as set out in Part 4 of the National Code of Practice for Utility Operators’ Access to Transport Corridors 2011) where that process applies to the works being carried out. Under section 176 of the RMA no person may do anything in relation to the land subject to the designation that would prevent or hinder the Rail Link without the written approval of the Requiring Authority.

5 6 AN5

1 2

Some of the land is subject to existing designations. Nothing in these designation conditions negates the need for the Requiring Authority to adhere to the provisions of section 177 of the RMA.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 74


Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

4 5 Some of the land is subject to existing designations. Nothing in these designation conditions negates the need for the Requiring Authority to adhere to the provisions of section 177 of the RMA.

AN6

6

AN7

1

Modifications to Britomart Transport Centre to connect the City Rail Link tracks into the rail network are separate to this designation and are covered under the Britomart Transport designation.

AN8

6

Works required to connect the City Rail Link to the North Auckland Rail Line occurring within the North Auckland Rail Line designation are separate to this designation and are covered under the North Auckland Line Rail designation.

For the avoidance of doubt, the Requiring Authority shall obtain the written consent of the Minister of Corrections in accordance with section 177 of the RMA for any work authorised by the City Rail Link designation on the Mt Eden Corrections Facility site at 1 Lauder Road.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 75


Appendix One to Designation Conditions (NoR for Designations 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6) Condition 36 of this designation requires as part of the CEMP process the confirmation of where and when building condition surveys will be undertaken in relation to vibration and settlement. Note that those buildings classed in the “heritage� category are covered under the Appendix Two below. In accordance with condition 46, at a minimum building condition surveys shall be considered for the following buildings:. No

Address

Property Known As

1

8-12 Albert Street

Quay West Hotel

2

17 Albert Street

Cohesive Technology House

3

22-26 Albert Street

The Stamford

4

74 Albert Street

Chifley Suites

5

76-84 Albert Street

City Gardens Apartments

6

103,105,107 Albert Street

Manhattan Apartments

7

109-125 Albert Street

Sky City - Grand Hotel & Convention Centre

8

106-108 Albert Street

Elliot Tower (Proposed)

9

128 Albert Street

Crown Plaza

10

103 Vincent Street

YWCA Accommodation

11

109 Vincent Street

The Rodney Apartments

12

113 Vincent Street

Winsun Heights Apartments

13

135 Vincent Street

Dynasty Gardens Hotel

14

150 Vincent Street

The City Lodge

15

156 Vincent Street

Eclipse Apartments

16

71-87 Mayoral Drive

Rendezvous Grand Hotel

17

29,39,41 Pitt Street

Hopetoun Delta Apartments

18

22-28 Beresford Square

The Beresford

19

259-281 Karangahape Road

Retail and Residential building

20

14 East Street

Residential Building

21

9 A-C Mercury Lane

Residential Building

22

18 East Street

Residential Building

23

153 Newton Road

Beatnik

24

10 Flower Street

Eden Terrace Apartments

25

1 Akiraho Street

Eden Oaks

26

21 Queen Street

Zurich House (Anzo Tower)

27

7 Albert Street

Retail and Office building

28

9-11 Albert Street

Food Alley

29

23-29 Albert Street

ANZ Centre

30

12-26 Swanson Street

Affco House Carpark

31

58 Albert Street

APN NZ Complex

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 76


No

Address

Property Known As

32

63 Albert Street

AMI House

33

65-69 Albert Street

Auckland District Court

34

38 Wyndham Street

Wyndham Towers

35

92-96 Albert Street

Former Telecom Tower

36

85 Albert Street

Retail and Office building

37

87-89 Albert Street

Albert Plaza

38

99 Albert Street

AA Building

39

135 Albert Street

ASB Building

40

120 Albert Street

BDO Tower

41

44-52 Wellesley Street West

Wellesley Centre

42

67-101 Vincent Street

Auckland Police Station

43

22 Dundonald Street

Soundcraft Ltd

44

3 Flower Street

TV3 Building

45

32 Normanby Road

Commercial Building

46

3 Enfield Street

Horse and Trap

47

101 Mount Eden Road

Hometune

48

1 Ngahura Street

Auckland Boxing Association

49

1 Queen Street

HSBC House

50

125 Queen Street

New World Supermarket tenancy

51

148 Quay Street

Tenham Investments and Body Corporate 184960

52

29 Customs Street West

AMP Centre

53

15-19 East Street

54

32 Akiraho Street

55

83 Albert Street

56

4 Kingston Street

57

6-12 Kingston Street

Bear Park Early Childhood Centre

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 77


Appendix Two to Designation Conditions (NoR for Designations 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6) Condition 41 of this designation requires as part of the CEMP process the confirmation of where and when building condition surveys will be undertaken in relation to Built Heritage (including those affected as a result of excavation). In accordance with condition 46, at a minimum building condition surveys shall be considered for the following buildings: No

Address

Property Known As

1

12 – 32 Customs Street

Customs House

2

2 Queen Street

Endeans Building

3

12 Queen Street

4

3 Albert Street

West Plaza

5

13 Albert Street Auckland Central

Yates Building

6

15 Albert Street

Link House

7

35 Albert Street Auckland Central

Price Buchanan Building

8

37 – 39 Albert Street Auckland Central

9

41 Albert Street

10

46 Albert Street

11

49 Albert Street Auckland Central

12

53 Albert Street Auckland Central

13

55 Albert Street

14

57 Albert Street

15

61 Albert Street Auckland Central

Shakespeare Hotel and Brewery

16

76 to 78 Albert Street Auckland Central

Bluestone Wall + toilets under wall

17

83 to 85 Albert Street Auckland Central

18

102 Albert Street

19

26, 34 – 36 Wyndham Street

Former Gas Co Building

20

9 – 11 Durham Street

Bluestone Store

21

37-43 Victoria Street West

22

51-53 Victoria Street West

23

61-65 Victoria Street West

24

66 Victoria Street West

London Dairy

25

68 Victoria Street West

J H Hannan

26

24 Wellesley Street West

Bledisloe House

27

15-31 Wellesley Street West

Former CPO - Britomart Transport Centre

New Zealand Herald

Martha’s Corner

Archibald and Sons Warehouse/ T & G Building

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 78


No

Address

Property Known As

28

42 Wellesley Street

Griffiths Holdings Building

29

33 Wyndham Street

30

Aotea Square Aotea Centre (rear section)

31

11 Mayoral Drive

Former Public Trust

32

105 Vincent Street

Auckland Chinese Presbyterian Church

33

133 Vincent Street

Juliette’s

34

53 Pitt Street

Former Central Ambulance Station

35

59 Pitt

36

65 Pitt Street

37

70 – 74 Pitt Street

The Chatham

38

78 Pitt Street Pitt Street

Wesleyan Church

39

78 Pitt Street

Wesleyan Bicentennial Hall

40

1 Beresford Square Auckland Central

Former Pitt Street Fire Station

41

16 – 18 Beresford Square

42

211-235 Karangahape Road

43

238 Karangahape Road

George Court Building

44

1 Cross Street

George Court Factory Building

45

243 Karangahape Road

Naval and Family Hotel

46

246-254 Karangahape Road

Hallenstein Brothers Building

47

251 – 253 Karangahape Road

48

256 Karangahape Road

49

257 Karangahape Road

50

258-266 Karangahape Road

51

268 Karangahape Road

52

259-261 Karangahape Road

53

270 Karangahape Road

54

283 Karangahape Road

Samoa House

55

9 Mercury Lane

Mercury Theatre former Kings Theatre

56

151 Newton Rd

Retail/Recording Studio

57

206-208 Symonds Street

58

210 Symonds Street Retail

Pitt Street Buildings (O’Malley’s Corner)

Mercury Theatre entrance - Norman Ng Building

Cheapskates/Penny Farthing Bike Shop French Café

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 79


No

Address

Property Known As

59

215 Symonds Street

Edinburgh Castle Building

60

221 Symonds Street

61

224 Symonds Street

62

227 Symonds Street

63

231 Symonds Street Retail

64

233 Symonds Street

65

235 Symonds Street

66

237 Symonds Street

67

239-241 Symonds Street

68

243 Symonds Street

69

245 Symonds Street

70

249 Symonds Street

71

253 Symonds Street

72

1-13 Mt Eden Road

73

15-17 Mt Eden Road

74

21 New North Road

75

14 New North Road

Villa Dalmacija

76

St Patrick’s Square 43 Wyndham Street

St Patrick’s Cathedral

77

59 Alex Evans Street

St Benedict’s Church

78

1 – 9 St Benedicts Street

St Benedict's Presbytery

79

6 St Benedicts Street

Residential

80

43 Wyndham Street & Hobson Street

St Patrick’s Presbytery

81

Beresford Square

Forrester’s Hall

Former Post Office

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 80


Proposed Draft Notice of Requirement Requiring Authority Designation Conditions – NoR for Designation 3 Condition Number

NoR Design ation Applies to

Condition

1.1 The City Rail Link Project (City Rail Designation 3) shall be undertaken in general accordance with the following: (a) The information provided by the Requiring Authority in the Notice of Requirement dated 23 August 2012 and supporting documents being: (i) Assessment of Environmental Effects report (contained in Volume 2 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated 15 August 2012 Rev B); (ii) Supporting environmental assessment reports (contained in Volume 3 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated August 2012); (iii) The Concept Design Report (contained in Volume 2 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated 13 August 2012 Rev 3); (iv) Plan sets: (i) Land requirement plans (contained in Volume 1 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated 15 August 2012); 1

3

(ii) Plans contained in the Concept Design Report Appendices (contained in Volume 3 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated 13 August 2012 Rev 3). (b) Except as modified by the following alterations: (i) Assessment of Environmental Effects (Reference CRL-SYW-RME-000-RPT0065, Design and Construction Memorandum (Reference CRL-SYW-RME-000MEM-0002) and Drawings CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-0120 to 0124 and 0128 to 0132 ‘Strata / Sub-Strata Alteration (CRL Designation 2 and 3). (ii) Assessment of Environmental Effects (Reference CRL-MTE-RME- 000-RPT0060 Revision 7 dated 9/11/16), Design and Construction Memorandum (Reference CRL-MTE-RME-000-MEM-0001 dated 9/11/16) and Drawing CRLSYW-RME-000-DRG-0133 Revision 1 dated 26/7/17) (‘Mt Eden Station Alteration’ - CRL Designation 3 and 6). 1.2 Where there is inconsistency between the documents listed above and these conditions, these conditions shall prevail.

2

3

2.1 In accordance with section 184(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the RMA), this designation shall lapse if not given effect to within 10 years from the date on which it is confirmed. 3.1 The Requiring Authority shall, as soon as reasonably practicable, but no later than at completion of detailed design:

3

3

(a) Review the area and volume of land of NoR Designation 3 required to protect the structural integrity of the two tunnels (including the relevant considerations at Condition 5.5); (b) Identify any areas of designated land that are no longer necessary to protect the structural integrity, safety or operation of the two tunnels; and (c) Then give notice in accordance with Section 182 of the RMA for the removal of those parts of the designation identified in (b) above.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 81


Condition Number

NoR Design ation Applies to

Condition

4.1 Under s 176(1)(b) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) no person may do anything in relation to the designated land that would prevent or hinder the City Rail Link, without the prior written consent of the Requiring Authority. 4.2 In the periods pre, during and post construction of the City Rail Link, the following activities undertaken by Network Utility Operators will not prevent or hinder the City Rail Link, and can be undertaken without seeking the Requiring Authority’s written approval under section 176(1)(b) of the RMA: (a) Maintenance and urgent repair works of existing Network Utilities; 4

3

(b) Minor renewal works to existing Network Utilities necessary for the on-going provision or security of supply of Network Utility Operations; (c) Minor works such as new property service connections; (d) Upgrades to existing Network Utilities within the same or similar location with the same or similar effects on the City Rail Link designation. 4.3 For the avoidance of doubt, in this condition an “existing Network Utility� includes infrastructure operated by a Network Utility Operator which was: (a) In place at the time the notice of requirement for the City Rail Link was served on Auckland Council (23 August 2012); or (b) Undertaken in accordance with this condition or section 176(1)(b) RMA process. 5.1 This designation does not authorise any CRL works but restricts development from proceeding without the approval of the Requiring Authority where that development would result in an adverse effect on the CRL in terms of safety, operation or construction. 5.2 The Requiring Authority will work with developers in a collaborative manner and may require alterations or changes to development proposals for the purpose in 5.1. 5.3 The Requiring Authority may require alterations or changes to any proposal for development including but not limited to construction of basements and foundations where such works disturb the ground in a way that is likely to result in loading changes and result in deformations or produce other risks to the integrity of the CRL structures.

5

3

5.4 Reasons shall be given by the Requiring Authority for these changes to demonstrate they are reasonably necessary to provide for safety, construction or operation of the CRL, 5.5 Any proposal for physical works or activities within the designation shall be provided to the Requiring Authority and will be assessed on the following: (a) Building height, size, mass and proximity to the CRL structures; (b) Foundation and basement designs; (c) Geotechnical conditions; (d) Separation between the CRL structures and the proposed development; (e) Nature of the activities including methods and staging of construction; (f) The predicted loading change on the CRL structures resulting from the development; and (g) Any other relevant information necessary to determine the likelihood and extent of any adverse effect that may occur as a result of the proposed development.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 82


Condition Number

NoR Design ation Applies to

Condition

These factors will also be relevant considerations in the drawback of the designation as provided for in Condition 3.1. 5.6 That assessment shall be peer reviewed by an independent certified engineer, paid for by the Requiring Authority, and the findings supplied to the landowner/ developer and the Auckland Council for information. Advice Notes relating to the Designation

AN 1

AN 2

3

This is a designation for protection purposes only. It protects the City Rail Link infrastructure to be constructed, operated and maintained in a separate designation located beneath this designation. The use of the land within this designation is subject to the agreement of the Requiring Authority to protect the subterranean works below. Any person proposing to undertake physical works within this designation is required to contact the Requiring Authority and obtain its approval in accordance with provisions set out in section 176(1)(b) of the Resource Management Act 1991.

3

If Network Utility Operators are carrying out works that do not require prior written consent of the Requiring Authority in accordance with condition 6 of this designation, they must carry out those works in accordance with the Corridor Access Request (CAR) Process (as set out in Part 4 of the National Code of Practice for Utility Operators’ Access to Transport Corridors 2011) where that process applies to the works being carried out.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 83


Diagram 1

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 84


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

Appendix C:

Page 27

Drawings

| Karangahape Station Main Works


ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

N

1: Q4 2019 - Q1 2020 (continuation from Early Works)

SITE ACESS

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT: Road closure and parking closure signage erected (if not previously done during Early Works). Traffic attenuator trucks temporarily diverting traffic. Traffic barriers and cones setup behind safety of attenuator trucks. Necessary line-marking conducted. -

SITE ACESS SITE OFFICE

SITE

STO

RAG

E

MAIN SHAFT PLATFORM

SIT

EA

CES S

STORAGE AREAS

HOARDING INSTALLATION: Approx. 450m, combination of fixed and movable barriers, completing installation from Early Works. Traffic attenuator trucks temporarily diverting traffic. 1. 2. Crane truck deliver and install fencing. 3. Drill/fix hoarding posts into ground/concrete blocks. Traffic barriers installed on Mercury Lane. 4. Install plywood and banners for hoarding. 5. Road closure and parking closure signage repositioned accordingly. Necessary line-marking conducted. 6.

SITE FACILITIES/CSA: Continue setup from Early Works. Storage containers. 1. 2. Install supply conduits/pipes to shaft area for D-Wall construction within CSA. 3. Set up environmental controls. 4. Set up waste management area. Water treatment and covered spoil areas. 5.

GENERAL LAYOUT NTS

Link Alliance has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other third party should rely on this document without the written consent of Link Alliance. Link Alliance undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document.

MERCURY LANE SITE OUTLINE PARKING CLOSURES DESIGNATION BOUNDRY COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CREATOR ID : 70

80

90

100mm

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

A1

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

STATUS APPROVED

PROJECT:

MDS DRAWN

-

TITLE:

HCO A00 FIRST_ISSUE REV

DESCRIPTION

CHP

-

CHECKED

DATE

APPROVED

DATE

JH

_

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE_STATION

ZONE:

MERCURY_LANE CONSTRUCTION_SITE_LAYOUT PLAN_VIEW PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

TYPE

SHEET

CRL - KRD - CON - LKA - DRG - XXXX00

REVISION

A00

TN


ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

2: Q1 - Q2 2020

SITE ACESS

SITE ACESS SITE OFFICE

SITE

STO RAG E

MAIN SHAFT PLATFORM

4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.

ACE

BATCH PLANTS FOR D-WALLS

SIT E

1. 2. 3.

D-WALL CONSTRUCTION: Remove redundant services. Set up batch plant for D-Wall construction. Excavate guide wall perimeter, 600m3 muckaway 190m (L) x 2m (W) x 1.5m (D) Construct concrete guide walls, pour 150m3 concrete. Mobilise Hydrofraise cutter, grab crane and service crane. Excavate D-Walls in stages with bentonite/polymer installation. Progressively muck away spoil, approx 3,100m3 total. Progressively deliver reinforcement cages for D-Walls. Pour concrete for D-Wall in stages, total 3,100m3. Vacuum top of concrete to cut off level. Demobilise Hydrofraise, grab crane and batch plant.

SS

D-WALL .

GENERAL LAYOUT NTS

Link Alliance has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other third party should rely on this document without the written consent of Link Alliance. Link Alliance undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document.

MERCURY LANE SITE OUTLINE PARKING CLOSURES DESIGNATION BOUNDRY COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CREATOR ID : 70

80

90

100mm

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

A1

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

STATUS APPROVED

PROJECT:

MDS DRAWN

-

TITLE:

HCO A00FIRST_ISSUE REV

CHP DESCRIPTION

APPROVED

-

CHECKED

DATE

DATE

JH

_

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE_STATION

ZONE:

MERCURY_LANE CONSTRUCTION_SITE_LAYOUT PLAN_VIEW PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

CRL - KRD - CON - LKA

TYPE

SHEET

REVISION

- DRG - XXXX00 A00


ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

3: Q1 - Q3 2020

PARKING CLOSURE

SITE ACESS

SITE ACESS

E

SITE OFFICE

STO RAG

TEMP SHAFT

SITE

MAIN SHAFT PLATFORM

BATCH PLANTS FOR D-WALLS

EA

SITE ACESS

SIT

TEMPORARY SHAFT CONSTRUCTION: 17m diameter, 22m deep excavated shaft for mined tunnel access. 1. Install sheet-piles down to rock head. 2. Construct foundations and working platform. 3. Excavate temporary shaft down to rock level, muck away approx 2500m3 spoil. 4. Install ring beams progressively. 5. Break through rock down to required depth, cart out approx. 2000m3 rock. 6. Install rock bolts and shotcrete as necessary. Construct noise shelter above excavated shaft 7. opening.

CES

S

SPOIL AREA

GENERAL LAYOUT NTS

Link Alliance has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other third party should rely on this document without the written consent of Link Alliance. Link Alliance undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document.

MERCURY LANE SITE OUTLINE PARKING CLOSURES DESIGNATION BOUNDRY COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CREATOR ID : 70

80

90

100mm

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

A1

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

STATUS APPROVED

PROJECT:

MDS DRAWN

-

TITLE:

HCO A00 FIRST_ISSUE REV

DESCRIPTION

CHP

-

CHECKED

DATE

APPROVED

DATE

JH

_

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE_STATION

ZONE:

MERCURY_LANE CONSTRUCTION_SITE_LAYOUT PLAN_VIEW PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

TYPE

SHEET

CRL - KRD - CON - LKA - DRG - XXXX00

REVISION

A00


ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

4: Q2 - Q3 2020

SITE ACESS SITE ACESS SITE OFFICE

SITE

STO RAG

E

TEMP SHAFT

EXCAVATION AREA AND CONCRETE SLAB

SPOIL AREA

SIT EA CES S

STORAGE,ENVIROMENTAL BATCH PLANTS AND COVERED CONTROLS FOR D-WALLS SPOIL AREA

TEMPORARY PLUNGED-IN COLUMNS: Approximately 17no. steel columns 35m deep. Drill bored pile with temp support casing as necessary to required depth. Muck-away approx. 500m3 bored pile material. Progressively deliver plunged column sections to site. Weld together for full column length. Install column into pile and pour concrete. Backfill above concrete cut-off as required. Repeat at all proposed column positions.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

GENERAL LAYOUT NTS

Link Alliance has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other third party should rely on this document without the written consent of Link Alliance. Link Alliance undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document.

MERCURY LANE SITE OUTLINE PARKING CLOSURES DESIGNATION BOUNDRY COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CREATOR ID : 70

80

90

100mm

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

A1

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

STATUS APPROVED

PROJECT:

MDS DRAWN

-

TITLE:

HCO A00FIRST_ISSUE REV

CHP DESCRIPTION

APPROVED

-

CHECKED

DATE

DATE

JH

_

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE_STATION

ZONE:

MERCURY_LANE CONSTRUCTION_SITE_LAYOUT PLAN_VIEW PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

CRL - KRD - CON - LKA

TYPE

SHEET

REVISION

- DRG - XXXX00 A00


ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

5: Q3 2020

INDICATIVE OPENINGS IN GROUND LEVEL CONCRETE SLAB

SITE ACESS

SITE ACESS

SITE

STO

RAG

E

SITE OFFICE

SS

EXCAVATION AREA AND CONCRETE SLAB

SIT E

ACE

STORAGE,ENVIROMENTAL BATCH PLANTS CONTROLS AND COVERED FOR D-WALLS SPOIL AREA

L0 GROUND FLOOR SLAB CONSTRUCTION: Breakout concrete guide walls and clear rubble. Excavate ground floor slab area approx. 45m (W) x 40m (L) x 1.1m (D) Muck away approx 1,800m3 spoil. Progressively deliver reinforcement for slabs. Construct 1000mm thick floor slab (underground station roof), approx. 1,600m3 concrete.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

GENERAL LAYOUT NTS

Link Alliance has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other third party should rely on this document without the written consent of Link Alliance. Link Alliance undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document.

MERCURY LANE SITE OUTLINE PARKING CLOSURES DESIGNATION BOUNDRY COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CREATOR ID : 70

80

90

100mm

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

A1

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

STATUS APPROVED

PROJECT:

MDS DRAWN

-

TITLE:

HCO A00FIRST_ISSUE REV

CHP DESCRIPTION

APPROVED

-

CHECKED

DATE

DATE

JH

_

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE_STATION

ZONE:

MERCURY_LANE CONSTRUCTION_SITE_LAYOUT PLAN_VIEW PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

CRL - KRD - CON - LKA

TYPE

SHEET

REVISION

- DRG - XXXX00 A00


ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

L0 ML ENTRANCE SSL 58893

PARKING CLOSURE

6: Q4 2020 - Q2 2021

B1 ML SOUTH SSL 51643

B2 ML SOUTH SSL 45493

ML SOUTH DWALL TOE 43150

B3 ML SOUTH SSL 40442 B4 ML SOUTH SSL 39643 B5 ML SO UTH SSL

38367

B6 PLATFORM SSL 33643 B7 UNDER PLATFORM SSL 32243

SITE ACESS

SITE ACESS

SITE

STO R

AGE

SITE OFFICE

LEVEL 1 AND B2 CONSTRUCTION BELOW GROUND

SIT

EA

CES

S

STORAGE,ENVIROMENTAL BATCH PLANTS CONTROLS AND COVERED FOR D-WALLS SPOIL AREA

TOP DOWN CONSTRUCTION B1-B2 BELOW GROUND L0: 1. Level B1 excavate 8,700m3 spoil 2. Level B1 pour concrete 950m3 3. Level B2 excavate 7,400m3 spoil 4. Level B2 pour concrete 900m3 Part of B2 excavation may be through rock 5. Crawler crane extract skips with spoil to ground level. 6. Tipper trucks move spoil to site stock pile or muck away off site. 7. Progressively deliver steel reinforcement and concrete. GENERAL LAYOUT NTS

Link Alliance has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other third party should rely on this document without the written consent of Link Alliance. Link Alliance undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document.

MERCURY LANE SITE OUTLINE PARKING CLOSURES DESIGNATION BOUNDRY COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CREATOR ID : 70

80

90

100mm

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

A1

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

STATUS APPROVED

PROJECT:

MDS DRAWN

-

TITLE:

HCO A00FIRST_ISSUE REV

CHP DESCRIPTION

APPROVED

-

CHECKED

DATE

DATE

JH

_

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE_STATION

ZONE:

MERCURY_LANE CONSTRUCTION_SITE_LAYOUT PLAN_VIEW PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

CRL - KRD - CON - LKA

TYPE

SHEET

REVISION

- DRG - XXXX00 A00


ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

7: Q1 2021- Q2 2022

PARKING CLOSURE

B5 ML SO UTH SSL

38367

B6 PLATFORM SSL 33643 B7 UNDER PLATFORM SSL 32243

SITE ACESS SITE ACESS

SITE

STO

RAG

E

SITE OFFICE

LEVEL B4,B6,B7 CONSTRUCTION BELOW GROUND

BOTTOM UP CONSTRUCTION B4, B6, B7: Level B4: rock break and excavate 6,400m3. Shotcrete and rock bolt as required. Level B6: rock break and excavate 5,300m3. Shotcrete and rock bolt as required. Level B7: rock break and excavate 2,500m3. Shotcrete and rock bolt as required Install drainage system level B7. Level B7: Construct concrete floor slab 1,400m3. Construct walls 700m3. Install temporary steel props to support construction of Level B4 slab. Level B4: Construct concrete floor slab 800m3, construct walls 550m3.

2.

3. 4. 5. 6.

7.

CES

S

STORAGE,ENVIROMENTAL BATCH PLANTS AND COVERED CONTROLS FOR D-WALLS SPOIL AREA

SIT EA

1.

GENERAL LAYOUT NTS

Link Alliance has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other third party should rely on this document without the written consent of Link Alliance. Link Alliance undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document.

MERCURY LANE SITE OUTLINE PARKING CLOSURES DESIGNATION BOUNDRY COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CREATOR ID : 70

80

90

100mm

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

A1

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

STATUS APPROVED

PROJECT:

MDS DRAWN

-

TITLE:

HCO A00FIRST_ISSUE REV

CHP DESCRIPTION

APPROVED

-

CHECKED

DATE

DATE

JH

_

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE_STATION

ZONE:

MERCURY_LANE CONSTRUCTION_SITE_LAYOUT PLAN_VIEW PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

CRL - KRD - CON - LKA

TYPE

SHEET

REVISION

- DRG - XXXX00 A00


ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

8: Q1 2021 - Q3 2022

SITE ACESS

SITE ACESS

SITE

STO

RAG

E

SITE OFFICE

MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, FIRE & HYDRAULIC (MEFH): 1. Deliver MEFH equipment to site above ground, including: Escalators Elevators Tunnel Ventilation Bathrooms Pipes/ducts Cables, fixtures, tiles, etc 2. Unload MEFH from semi trailers into site. Lower MEFH equipment into station levels via openings and in3. stall

SIT EA

CES

S

STORAGE,ENVIROMENTAL CONTROLS AND COVERED SPOIL AREA

GENERAL LAYOUT NTS

Link Alliance has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other third party should rely on this document without the written consent of Link Alliance. Link Alliance undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document.

MERCURY LANE SITE OUTLINE

PARKING CLOSURES DESIGNATION BOUNDRY COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CREATOR ID : 70

80

90

100mm

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

A1

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

STATUS APPROVED

PROJECT:

MDS DRAWN

-

TITLE:

HCO A00FIRST_ISSUE REV

CHP DESCRIPTION

APPROVED

-

CHECKED

DATE

DATE

JH

_

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE_STATION

ZONE:

MERCURY_LANE CONSTRUCTION_SITE_LAYOUT PLAN_VIEW PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

CRL - KRD - CON - LKA

TYPE

SHEET

REVISION

- DRG - XXXX00 A00


ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

N

Q2 2020 - Q4 2023

MINED TUNNEL BERESFORD SQUARE SHAFT

MINED TUNNEL

TEMP SHAFT MERCURY LANE SHAFT

NOISE ENCLOSURE

SPOIL AREA

MINED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION: Works beneath noise shelter at Temporary Shaft. Gantry crane used to lift in/out plant, equipment and materials. Large excavator to commence cross adit. 1. 2. Road-header mines cross adits and platform tunnels. 3. Rock anchors and shotcrete progressively installed. 4. Excavators and loaders collect excavated material. 5. Dumper trucks cart material to base of Temp shaft. 6. Gantry crane extracts skips with excavated material to ground level. 7. Excavators/Loaders load material to tipper/dump trucks. 8. Dump trucks muck away from noise shelter to designated site stock pile or cart off site. 9. Permanent concrete lining constructed. 10. 10. Fit out including precast / insitu concrete platforms GENERAL LAYOUT

NTS

Link Alliance has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other third party should rely on this document without the written consent of Link Alliance. Link Alliance undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document.

KROAD STATION SITE OUTLINE DESIGNATION BOUNDARY PARKING CLOSURES COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CREATOR ID : 70

80

90

100mm

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

A1

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

STATUS APPROVED -

TITLE:

HCO A00 FIRST_ISSUE REV

CHP DESCRIPTION

APPROVED

-

CHECKED

DATE

DATE

JH

_

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

KARANGAHAPE_STATION

ZONE:

MDS DRAWN

CITY RAIL LINK

PROJECT:

BERESFORD_SQUARE_&_MERCURY_LANE CONSTRUCTION_SITE_LAYOUT PLAN_VIEW PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

CRL - KRD - CON - LKA

TYPE

SHEET

REVISION

- DRG - XXXX00 A00


.0 55

54.2

54.2

57.6 60.6

55.2

54.4

.4 57

54.0

60.8

SLIDING GATE SITE EXIT

54.2

.8

57

60.0

54.0

57.4

60 .4

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

.2 60

53.6

54 .4

54.8

55.0

55.2

55.4

.6 55

56.0

56.2

56.4

56.6

58.4

58.6

56.8

58.0

.0 59

59.4

58.8

TURNSTILE

.6

.6

54

54

55.8

.0 57

.2 58

54.0

53.6

59.2

53.8

.0

54

.2

57

59.4

54.8

59.6

61.8

53 .8

59.8

62.0

N

54.8

.4 55

56.6

53.6

54.0

.0 54

53 .6

53.8 56.2

55.8

54.2

53.6

53.6

.6 53 54.0

.2 54

.4 54

.6 54

.8 54

+53 .0

gate box 55.0

5

55.2

55.4

5.6 .8 56

54.0

53.8

53.2

53.6

57

58

53.6

.4 53

56.4

57.0

.4

.6 57

57.8

57 .2

58.0

Wheel Wash

60.2

OFFICE

56

.0

57.0

56 .8 .2

55 .6

54.6

59.0

59.2

54.4

.6 59

.2 60

53.4

gate box

58.6

53.2

INTERNAL PLATFORM SUPPORT COLUMNS

53 .8

60.4

54.6

57.2

58.4

59.8 60 .0

61.0

60.6

JET FAN

58.0

58.8 58.6 58.58. 4 2

53.8

.4

60.2

58.8

UTILITY SERVICES CORRIDOR (NO HEAVY LOAD ABOVE)

53

59.4

.4

.4

60.8

53.8 53

53

60.2

54.4

.0

61.2

.4

54

60

54.8

57.4

57.6

57.8

MERCURY LANE

.6 60

61.4

.2

55

61.6

.0

55

61.8

.2

54

.0 61

53.8

62.0

.2

54

62.2

53.4

.2 61

53.6

.6

56 .6

60.0

55

58 .8 59.8

OFFICE

53.2

55 .6

55.4

.0 56

55.8

56 .4

56 .2

PREMIX SHOTCRETE SILO 53.0

59.0

53.2

53.0

53.4

59.2

53.8

COMPRESSOR SILO

59.4

FUEL TANK

53.2

GANTRY CRANE

.2

.4

53

53

59.6

53.4

.4

55

53.6

SILO ET

53.2

AIR TANK

53

.2

TGBT

53.0

+53 .8 TOP PILE OF SH E

.8

WATER TANK

52

WATER TREATMENT PLANT

52.8

52.6

Ø

1.4

0

EXCAVATOR PLATFORM

53.0

52.8 52.4

52.6

TRUCKS RIGHT TURN

52.4

52.6

52.4

shotcrete

.6 52

52.4

GZ KIN

52.4

52.6

51

.6

51.8

NO

ga t bo e x

SLOPE: 9.0%

52.2

51.8

52.0

PAR

51.8

52.2

51.6

ON

E

52.2

52.0

51

.8

52.4

+53

Trailer

.0

52.4

52 .0

.0

52

CA NA D

52.0

.4

52

+55

52.4

AS

52.2

+52 .4

52.2

bolter A -

.6

T.

52.2

Dump Truck

LOADING AREA

+52 .6

SPOIL

+52 .6

52.6

52.4

0

roadheader

52.6

52.8

STORAGE AREA

52.8

52.8

53 .0

0

53.0

53.0

WATER TANK

52.6

1.8

.0

53.0

Ø

+55

OFFICE

52.8

.0

52.4

52.6

52

52.2

53.0

52 .8

52

52.0

52

.6

52

.8

53.2

53.4

53.6

53.8

54.0

54.2

54.4

54.6

54.8

55.0

55.2

55.4

55.6

55.8

56.0

56.2

56.6

56.8

57.0

57.2

57.4

57.6

57.8

.6

51.8

52.2

56.4

SLIDING MAIN GATE ENTRY

B -

PLAN

54.2

54.4

52

.4

58.0

57.8

53.6

57.8

NTS 53.0

53.2

52.6

52.8

53.0

53.2

54.0

53.8

53

.6

54.6

55.0

55.2

55.4

55.6

55.8

56.0

56.2

.0 57

.2 57

56 .8

57.6

56 .6

57.4

.4

56

57.8

52.4

.0 58.0 58

.4 53

54.8

53.4

52.2

53.8

Link Alliance has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other third party should rely on this document without the written consent of Link Alliance. Link Alliance undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document.

SITE ASPHALT AREA SITE ROAD PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CREATOR ID : 70

80

90

100mm

NOISE ENCLOSURE OUTLINE

GANTRY RANGE INTERNAL PLATFORM

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

A1

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

STATUS APPROVED

PROJECT:

ASO DRAWN A01 2ND_ISSUE

CHP

A00 FIRST_ISSUE REV

DESCRIPTION

-

TITLE:

-

HCO

CHP

-

CHECKED

DATE

APPROVED

DATE

CHP

_

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE_STATION

ZONE:

MERCURY_SHAFT SITE_LAYOUT PLAN_VIEW PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

TYPE

SHEET

CRL - KRD - CON - LKA - DRG - 102500

REVISION

A01


ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

3,1%

3,1%

50t

JET FAN

TECHNICAL AREA

INTERNAL STEEL PLATFORM - LIVE LOAD = 350 kg/m² SUPPORT COLUMN

+55.0

RL 53.80 m

+54.0

SPOIL

+53.0

+52.6 (exist)

562.0071

SHAFT BEYOND

B5 PLATFORM 33.643

SECTION A Link Alliance has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other third party should rely on this document without the written consent of Link Alliance. Link Alliance undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CREATOR ID : 70

80

90

100mm

SIZE A1

STATUS APPROVED

PROJECT:

A01 2ND_ISSUE

CHP

A00 FIRST_ISSUE DESCRIPTION

-

TITLE:

-

HCO

CHP

-

CHECKED

DATE

APPROVED

DATE

CHP

_

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE_STATION

ZONE:

ASO DRAWN

REV

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

SCALE AS SHOWN

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

MERCURY_SHAFT SITE_LAYOUT SECTION_A-A PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

TYPE

SHEET

CRL - KRD - CON - LKA - DRG - 102501

REVISION

A01


ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

NOISE ENCLOSURE BLDG

GANTRY CRANE (50 TON CAPACITY) EXCAVATOR

SPOIL

+55.0

SLOPE 9% APPROX

RL 53.80 m

+52.6 (exist.)

+53.0

+52.6

EXCAV. PLATFORM GROUND SLAB

SHAFT BEYOND 562.0071

SITE HOARDING FENCE

ADIT BEYOND

B5 PLATFORM 33.643

SECTION B Link Alliance has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other third party should rely on this document without the written consent of Link Alliance. Link Alliance undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CREATOR ID : 70

80

90

100mm

SIZE A1

STATUS APPROVED

PROJECT:

A01 2ND_ISSUE

CHP

A00 FIRST_ISSUE DESCRIPTION

-

TITLE:

-

HCO

CHP

-

CHECKED

DATE

APPROVED

DATE

CHP

_

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE_STATION

ZONE:

ASO DRAWN

REV

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

SCALE AS SHOWN

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

MERCURY_SHAFT SITE_LAYOUT SECTION_B-B PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

TYPE

SHEET

CRL - KRD - CON - LKA - DRG - 102502

REVISION

A01


ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

PARKING CLOSURE

1: Q1 - Q2 2020 BUS S TOP R

N

SITE FACILITIES/CSA: Continue setup from Early Works. Storage containers. 1. 2. Install Retaining walls 3. Supply conduits/pipes to shaft for D-Wall construction. Excavate trench 50m (L) x 2m (W) x 1m (D) in road reserve (100m3), install pipes and backfill. Pedestrian access and private parking shall be maintained. 4. Set up environmental controls. 5. Set up waste management area. Water treatment and covered spoil areas. 6.

EMOVE D

PRIVATE ACCESS MAINTAINED

MAIN SHAFT PLATFORM

HOARDING/BARRIERS RETAINING WALL

STORAGE AREA

S ES AC E SIT 50m (L) x 2m (W) x 1m (D) TRENCH FOR D-WALL PIPES/CONDUITS SITE OFFICES, WELFARE FACILITIES AND SERVICE SET-UP DURING EARLY WORKS

ROAD CLOSED

RO -

n

ve ro ED s or te p OS icle priva CL o veh ss to ed

-

IT EX

AD

ac

ce tain in ma

E SIT

ng rki pa s le rtie hic pe

PARKING CLOSURE

GENERAL LAYOUT

NTS

Link Alliance has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other third party should rely on this document without the written consent of Link Alliance. Link Alliance undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document.

BERESFORD SQUARE SITE OUTLINE

DESIGNATION BOUNDARY PARKING CLOSURES COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CREATOR ID : 70

80

90

100mm

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

A1

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT: Majority conducted during Early Works Traffic attenuator trucks temporarily diverting traffic. Traffic barriers and cones setup behind safety of attenuator trucks. Road closure and parking closure signage erected. Necessary line-marking conducted. Bus stops removed on Pitt Street. HOARDING INSTALLATION: Approx. 600m, combination of fixed and movable barriers. Traffic attenuator trucks temporarily diverting traffic. 1. 2. Crane truck deliver and install fencing. 3. Drill/fix hoarding posts into ground/concrete blocks. 4. Install plywood and banners for hoarding. 5. Road closure and parking closure signage repositioned accordingly. 6. Necessary line-marking conducted. STATUS APPROVED -

TITLE:

HCO A00 FIRST_ISSUE REV

DESCRIPTION

CHP

-

CHECKED

DATE

APPROVED

DATE

JH

_

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

KARANGAHAPE_STATION

ZONE:

MDS DRAWN

CITY RAIL LINK

PROJECT:

BERESFORD_SQUARE CONSTRUCTION_SITE_LAYOUT PLAN_VIEW PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

TYPE

SHEET

CRL - KRD - CON - LKA - DRG - XXXX01

REVISION

A00


ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

2: Q2 - Q4 2020

MAIN SHAFT PLATFORM PERIMETER GUIDE WALL

DIAPHRAGM WALL

D-WALL CONSTRUCTION: D-walls constructed in stages together with hoarding re-positioning to maintain vehicle access to private properties, trafficable plates may be used in conjunction Remove redundant services. 1. 2. Set up batch plant for D-Wall construction. 3. Excavate shaft perimeter, 600m3 muckaway approx. 200m (L) x 2m (W) x 1.5m (D) 4. Construct concrete guide walls, pour 200m3 concrete. 5. Mobilise Hydrofraise cutter, grab crane and service crane. 6. Excavate D-Walls in stages with bentonite/polymer installation. 7. Progressively muck away spoil with staged stockpiling at CSA, approx 4,000m3 total. 8. Progressively deliver reinforcement cages for D-Walls. 9. Pour concrete for D-Wall in stages, total 4,000m3. 10. Vacuum top of concrete to cut off level. 11. Demobilise Hydrofraise and grab crane.

SILOS

STORAGE

DESANDER PLANT

E SIT

SITE OFFICES, WELFARE FACILITIES AND SERVICE SET-UP DURING EARLY WORKS

ES AC

S

ROAD CLOSED

AD RO -

SS

ng rki pa s le rtie hic pe ve ro ED s or te p OS icle priva CL veh to no cess ined ac inta ma

-

CE

EA SIT

GENERAL LAYOUT

NTS

Link Alliance has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other third party should rely on this document without the written consent of Link Alliance. Link Alliance undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document.

BERESFORD SQUARE SITE OUTLINE DESIGNATION BOUNDARY PARKING CLOSURES COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CREATOR ID : 70

80

90

100mm

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

A1

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

STATUS APPROVED -

TITLE:

HCO A00 FIRST_ISSUE REV

CHP DESCRIPTION

APPROVED

-

CHECKED

DATE

DATE

JH

_

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

KARANGAHAPE_STATION

ZONE:

MDS DRAWN

CITY RAIL LINK

PROJECT:

BERESFORD_SQUARE CONSTRUCTION_SITE_LAYOUT PLAN_VIEW PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

CRL - KRD - CON - LKA

TYPE

SHEET

REVISION

- DRG - XXXX02 A00


ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

3: Q4 2020 - Q1 2021

INDICATIVE FLOOR SLAB OPENINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION ACCESS

GROUND LEVEL EXCAVATION AND L0 CONCRETE SLAB

STORAGE AREA

SS

CE

EA SIT

L0 GROUND FLOOR SLAB CONSTRUCTION: Breakout concrete guide walls and clear rubble. 1. 2. Excavate proposed shaft ground floor/roof slab area 20m (W) x 90m (L) x 1.5m (D) 3. Combined muckaway and/or stockpile at CSA 1,600m3. 4. Progressively deliver reinforcement for slabs. 5. Construct reinforced concrete floor slab (station roof), approx 1,500m3 concrete. Sections of concrete slab shall be constructed in stages to maintain vehicle access to private parking. Trafficable plates may also be utilised as crossings.

STORAGE AREA

SITE OFFICES, WELFARE FACILITIES AND SERVICE SET-UP DURING EARLY WORKS

ROAD CLOSED -

AD

RO ng rki pa s le rtie hic pe ve ro ED s or te p OS hicle priva ve to no cess ined ac inta ma

CL

-

SS

CE

EA SIT

GENERAL LAYOUT

NTS

Link Alliance has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other third party should rely on this document without the written consent of Link Alliance. Link Alliance undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document.

BERESFORD SQUARE SITE OUTLINE DESIGNATION BOUNDARY PARKING CLOSURES COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CREATOR ID : 70

80

90

100mm

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

A1

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

STATUS APPROVED -

TITLE:

HCO A00FIRST_ISSUE REV

CHP DESCRIPTION

APPROVED

-

CHECKED

DATE

DATE

JH

_

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

KARANGAHAPE_STATION

ZONE:

MDS DRAWN

CITY RAIL LINK

PROJECT:

BERESFORD_SQUARE CONSTRUCTION_SITE_LAYOUT PLAN_VIEW PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

CRL - KRD - CON - LKA

TYPE

SHEET

REVISION

- DRG - XXXX03 A00


ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

4: Q1 2021 - Q4 2021 nG

nF

nE

nD

nC

nB

nA

L1 BS ROOF SSL 70693

L0 BS ENTRANCE SSL 64593

B1 BS NORTH SSL 58643

B2 BS NORTH SSL 53643

◄ WEST

EAST ►

INDICATIVE FLOOR SLAB OPENINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION ACCESS

B3 BS NORTH SSL 48643

B4 BS NORTH SSL 43643

T AS

B5 BS NORTH SSL 38643

B6 PLATFORM SSL 33643 B7 UNDER PLATFORM SSL 32243

T ES W

E

L0 CONCRETE SLAB

EA SIT

S CE

TOP DOWN CONSTRUCTION BELOW L0: EAST section levels B1 & B2. WEST section levels B1, B2, B3 & B4. Position hoarding into required locations for remainder of Top-Down construction 1. phase. 2. Maintain necessary traffic management to allow access for vehicles to private property parking. 3. Excavate and top-down construct station slabs below L0 4. Level B1 EAST & WEST: excavate 8,000m3, pour concrete 900m3 5. Level B2 EAST & WEST: excavate 8,000m3, pour concrete 1,300m3 Part of Level B3 and B4 excavation may be through rock. 6. Level B3 EAST: rock break and excavate 3,800m3, pour concrete 600m3 7. Level B4 EAST: rock break and excavate 3,000m3, pour concrete 480m3 8. Crane extracts skips with spoil to ground level. 9. Tipper trucks move spoil to site stock pile or muck away off site. 10. Multiple deliveries of steel and concrete.

S

ROAD CLOSED

AD RO ng rki pa s le rtie hic pe ve ro ED s or te p OS hicle priva ve to no cess ined ac inta ma

CL

S

-

S CE EA T I S

GENERAL LAYOUT

NTS

Link Alliance has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other third party should rely on this document without the written consent of Link Alliance. Link Alliance undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document.

BERESFORD SQUARE SITE OUTLINE DESIGNATION BOUNDARY PARKING CLOSURES COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CREATOR ID : 70

80

90

100mm

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

A1

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

STATUS APPROVED -

TITLE:

HCO A00 FIRST_ISSUE REV

CHP DESCRIPTION

APPROVED

-

CHECKED

DATE

DATE

JH

_

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

KARANGAHAPE_STATION

ZONE:

MDS DRAWN

CITY RAIL LINK

PROJECT:

BERESFORD_SQUARE CONSTRUCTION_SITE_LAYOUT PLAN_VIEW PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

CRL - KRD - CON - LKA

TYPE

SHEET

REVISION

- DRG - XXXX04 A00


ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

5: Q4 2021 - Q4 2022 nG

nF

nE

nD

nC

nB

nA

L1 BS ROOF SSL 70693

L0 BS ENTRANCE SSL 64593

B1 BS NORTH SSL 58643

B2 BS NORTH SSL 53643

◄ WEST

EAST ►

INDICATIVE FLOOR SLAB OPENINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION ACCESS

B3 BS NORTH SSL 48643

B4 BS NORTH SSL 43643

B5 BS NORTH SSL 38643

ST

B6 PLATFORM SSL 33643 B7 UNDER PLATFORM SSL 32243

T ES

EA

W

L0 CONCRETE SLAB

SS CE

EA SIT

ROAD CLOSED

ng rki pa s le rtie hic pe ve ro ED s or te p OS hicle priva ve to no cess ined ac inta ma

CL

-

S CE

AD RO -

S

EA SIT

GENERAL LAYOUT

NTS

Link Alliance has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other third party should rely on this document without the written consent of Link Alliance. Link Alliance undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document.

BERESFORD SQUARE SITE OUTLINE DESIGNATION BOUNDARY PARKING CLOSURES COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870 10

20

30

40

50

60

CREATOR ID : 70

80

90

100mm

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

A1

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

0

BOTTOM UP CONSTRUCTION: EAST section levels B5, B6 & B7. WEST section level B3. 1. Level B5 EAST: rock break and excavate 2,500m3. Shotcrete and rock bolt as required. 2. Level B6 EAST: rock break and excavate 2,500m3. Shotcrete and rock bolt as required. 3. Level B7 EAST: rock break and excavate 1,000m3. Shotcrete and rock bolt as required. 4. Install drainage system and structures at Level B7. 5. Level B3 WEST: rock break and excavate 5,400m3, pour concrete slab 700m3, construct walls 450m3. 6. Level B7 EAST: Construct concrete slab 400m3, construct walls 350m3. 7. Install temporary steel props to support construction of B5 East. 8. Level B5 EAST: Construct concrete slab 400m3, construct walls 270m3. 9. Level B6 EAST: Construct station platform (in-situ and precast concrete) approx. 200m3. STATUS APPROVED -

TITLE:

HCO A00 FIRST_ISSUE REV

CHP DESCRIPTION

APPROVED

-

CHECKED

DATE

DATE

JH

_

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

KARANGAHAPE_STATION

ZONE:

MDS DRAWN

CITY RAIL LINK

PROJECT:

BERESFORD_SQUARE CONSTRUCTION_SITE_LAYOUT PLAN_VIEW PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

CRL - KRD - CON - LKA

TYPE

SHEET

REVISION

- DRG - XXXX05 A00


ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

6: Q2 2021 - Q1 2023

INDICATIVE FLOOR SLAB OPENINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION ACCESS

T AS

T ES

E

W

L0 CONCRETE SLAB

SS

CE

EA SIT

MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, FIRE & HYDRAULIC (MEFH): 1. Deliver MEFH equipment to site above ground, including: Escalators Elevators Tunnel Ventilation Bathrooms Pipes/ducts Cables, fixtures, tiles, etc 2. Unload MEFH from semi trailers into site.

ROAD CLOSED

AD RO ng rki pa s le rtie hic pe ve ro ED s or te p OS icle priva CL veh to no cess ined ac inta ma

-

SS

CE

EA SIT

GENERAL LAYOUT

NTS

Link Alliance has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other third party should rely on this document without the written consent of Link Alliance. Link Alliance undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document.

BERESFORD SQUARE SITE OUTLINE DESIGNATION BOUNDARY PARKING CLOSURES COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CREATOR ID : 70

80

90

100mm

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

A1

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

STATUS APPROVED -

TITLE:

HCO A00 FIRST_ISSUE REV

CHP DESCRIPTION

APPROVED

-

CHECKED

DATE

DATE

JH

_

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

KARANGAHAPE_STATION

ZONE:

MDS DRAWN

CITY RAIL LINK

PROJECT:

BERESFORD_SQUARE CONSTRUCTION_SITE_LAYOUT PLAN_VIEW PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

CRL - KRD - CON - LKA

TYPE

SHEET

REVISION

- DRG - XXXX06 A00


ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

+53

.00

HOPETO UN

PROTE SLAB CTION

.00

ck

+58

ru Rigid T Medium

ALPHA

.15 +55

PROTE SLAB CTION

B-TraEin (N12.T5Rm mY in. radius)

ET TRE T S

PIT

N1

N4

SFOR D

SQUA

ENTRY

BERE

N3

ENTRY

Medium Rigid Tru

ck

N2

RE

N5

N6

Semi-Trailer

N7

Medium Rigid Truck

B9 Vehicle (8m min radius) (20 4) NA

ENTRY

ENTRY

ENTRY

B9 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (20 4)

NB

NC

BERESFORD SQUARE SITE SET-UP (CONSTRUCTION) STAGE) NTS

Link Alliance has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other third party should rely on this document without the written consent of Link Alliance. Link Alliance undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document.

FENCE PANEL HOARDING PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY RETAINING WALL COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CREATOR ID : 70

80

90

100mm

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

A1

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

STATUS APPROVED

A01 GENERAL_UPDATE

CHP

A00 FIRST_ISSUE REV

DESCRIPTION

-

TITLE:

-

HCO

CHP

-

CHECKED

DATE

APPROVED

DATE

CHP

_

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

KARANGAHAPE_STATION

ZONE:

ASO DRAWN

CITY RAIL LINK

PROJECT:

BERESFORD_SQUARE SITE_LAYOUT_CONSTRUCTION_STAGE PLAN PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

CRL - KRD - CON - LKA

TYPE

SHEET

- DRG - 114500

REVISION

A01


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

Appendix D:

Page 28

Construction Environmental Management Plan

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Outline Plan

Appendix E:

Page 29

Communication and Consultation Plan

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Karangahape Station Main Works Communication and Consultation Plan

CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800016

Revision: 000 Date: January 2020

Page 1

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

Karangahape Station Main Works Communication and Consultation Plan CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800016 This document is uncontrolled when printed. This document should be printed in colour

Revision Status Revision

Date

Version details

Prepared By

Approved By

000

30/01/2020

Final for submission

Simon Mitchell

Peter Roan

Approval Status Name/Title

Signature

Date

Prepared by:

Simon Mitchell Karangahape Community Manager

30/01/2020

Reviewed by:

Rachel Blundell Communications and Engagement Manager

30/01/2020

Approved by:

Peter Roan Consents Lead

30/01/2020

Page 2

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

Table of contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................. 5 1.1

Karangahape Station Overview............................................................................................... 5

1.2

CCP Staging ............................................................................................................................. 6

1.3

Purpose of the Communication and Consultation Plan .......................................................... 6

1.4

Methodologies and References .............................................................................................. 6

1.4.1.

SIBD Monitoring and Reporting ............................................................................................ 7

1.5

Relevant Conditions ................................................................................................................ 7

1.6

CCP Review and updates....................................................................................................... 13

2. Karangahape Station Main Works .......................................................... 14 2.1

Overview of Works................................................................................................................ 14

2.2

Affected parties..................................................................................................................... 15

3. Overarching Strategies and Methodologies............................................ 16 4. Consultation and Communication Strategy ............................................ 20 4.1

Plan Overview ....................................................................................................................... 20

4.2

Consultation and communication approach......................................................................... 20

4.3

Key Project Messages ........................................................................................................... 21

4.4

Expected Outcomes .............................................................................................................. 22

5. Roles and Responsibilities ........................................................................ 23 5.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................... 23 5.2 Key Personnel ............................................................................................................................ 23 5.3 Link Alliance and CRLL Reporting Requirements ....................................................................... 23 5.3.1 Reporting tools........................................................................................................................... 24

6. Communication Approach........................................................................ 25 6.1 Strategy Overview: Conversation Locally; Broadcast to Wider Audience ................................. 25 6.2 Current and Planned Communication and Engagement Activities ........................................... 25 6.3 Communication Channels .......................................................................................................... 26 6.4 Branding and Collateral ............................................................................................................. 27 6.5 Identifying and communication with key stakeholders............................................................. 27 6.5.1 Parties affected by the project .................................................................................................. 28 6.5.2 Owners, occupiers and businesses ............................................................................................ 28 6.5.3 Network Utility Operators ......................................................................................................... 28 6.5.4 Auckland Council Parks Department ......................................................................................... 28 Page 3

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan 6.5.5 Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga .................................................................................... 29 6.5.6 Emergency Services.................................................................................................................... 29 6.5.7 Auckland Transport .................................................................................................................... 29 6.5.8 Identifying additional people affected by the project ............................................................... 29

7. Protocols, Processes and Contact Details ................................................. 29 7.1 Community and Business Liaison Group.................................................................................... 29 7.1.1 CLG purpose ............................................................................................................................... 29 7.1.2 Process ....................................................................................................................................... 30 7.2 Stakeholders and affected parties ............................................................................................. 30 7.2.1 Pre-Construction Engagement ................................................................................................... 30 7.2.2 Construction Phase Engagement ............................................................................................... 31 7.2.4 Kaitiaki or Mana Whenua Forum ............................................................................................... 31 7.2.5 Network Utility Operators ......................................................................................................... 32 7.2.6 Emergency services .................................................................................................................... 33 7.2.7 Heritage...................................................................................................................................... 34 7.2.8 Auckland Transport .................................................................................................................... 34 7.2.9 CEMP and Sub-plan reviews ...................................................................................................... 34 7.3 Public Engagement .................................................................................................................... 35 7.3.1 Public Enquiries .......................................................................................................................... 35 7.3.2.

Complaints .......................................................................................................................... 35

7.3.3 Digital Channels.......................................................................................................................... 37 7.3.4 Media ......................................................................................................................................... 37 7.4 Managing Crisis and Emergency Situations ............................................................................... 37 7.4.1 Requirements ............................................................................................................................. 38 7.4.2 Emergency contacts ................................................................................................................... 38

Page 4

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

1.

Introduction

The City Rail Link (CRL) project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line (NAL) in the vicinity of Mt Eden Station. The CRL also involves the construction of two new underground stations at Aotea and Karangahape and a redeveloped Mt Eden station (refer to Figure 1-1). The design and construction of the CRL infrastructure between the Aotea and Mt Eden Stations is being delivered by the Link Alliance.

Figure 1-1: CRL Route and Location

This Communication and Consultation Plan (CCP) has been prepared in relation to the main construction works for the new Karangahape Station.

1.1 Karangahape Station Overview The Karangahape Station consists of two entrances, one at Beresford Square / Pitt Street and the other at Mercury Lane, linked together by platforms with two mined tunnels approximately 32m below Pitt Street. The Station will also comprise equipment rooms, ventilation systems and emergency egress at both Mercury Lane and Beresford Square / Pitt Street. Given the nature and scale of the Karangahape Station construction, works will be undertaken in a staged manner, involving: ● ● ● Page 5

Early works (demolition, network utility relocation and site establishment works) – to be undertaken from October 2019 through to early 2020; Main construction works (construction of the station and mined tunnels for the rail tracks) – to be undertaken from early 2020 through to late 2023; and Public realm reinstatement – likely to be undertaken from late 2022 to late 2024.

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

1.2 CCP Staging To reflect the staged construction approach for Karangahape Station, a series of CCPs are being prepared. This CCP addresses the Karangahape Station main works, which are described in detail in the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and summarised in Section 2 of this CCP. CCPs have been prepared for earlier stages of the project and will be prepared for the subsequent public realm reinstatement works.

1.3 Purpose of the Communication and Consultation Plan This CCP has been prepared to provide a framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in-proximity parties during the Karangahape Station main works. The two key elements of the CCP relate to: ● ●

Communication: keeping stakeholders and affected parties fully informed on the progress of the works and the relevant processes involved so that they can make informed decisions. Consultation: providing information/options and discussing them with stakeholders and affected parties, giving them the opportunity to influence and inform the management and mitigation of effects from the works and to inform the preparation of Delivery Work Plans (DWPs) and Management Plans required by the CRL designation conditions and the Aotea to North Auckland Line (A2N) resource consent conditions. The purpose and approach of this CCP is set out in more detail in Section 3 and the communication and consultation strategy is set out in Section 4.

1.4 Methodologies and References To ensure effective communication and consultation practices are implemented during the works, the International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) engagement spectrum1 has been considered in the preparation of this CCP. In addition, this CCP has been informed by the following strategies prepared by City Rail Link Limited (CRLL): ●

The CRL Overarching Communication and Consultation Strategy (2018); and

The CCP also builds upon the following plans: ● ●

1

The CRL Pre-Construction Communication & Consultation Plan (November 2015); and CRL Communication & Consultation Plans prepared to date for other CRL contracts (in particular the Britomart and Albert Street works). A number of plans, both current and in development, are relevant to the delivery of effective communications and community engagement for Karangahape Station main works. These include: Disruption Management Communications Plan. This has been developed for the construction of Karangahape Station and managing disruption relating to associated works. In particular, it ensures consistency with Auckland Transport, of message and approach.

https://www.iap2.org.au/About-Us/About-IAP2-Australasia-/Spectrum

Page 6

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan ●

Karangahape Station Development Response Plan (DRP). The DRP is a plan of how the project can work with the local business community to mitigate the disruption caused by large-scale construction. Karangahape Station main works ‘Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan’ (SIBD DWP). The SIBD DWP identifies measures that will be implemented to mitigate and manage potential adverse effects on businesses, residents and community services/facilities during construction of the Karangahape Station main works. Appendix B of this CCP reflects the linked approach between the SIBD team’s engagement activities and those undertaken by the project’s communications and engagement team. Stakeholder meetings have often involved members of both teams.

1.4.1. SIBD Monitoring and Reporting The SIBD team will undertake a range of monitoring and reporting activities, the outputs of which will also inform the activities of the communications and engagement team. Where possible the following measures will be carried out quarterly, unless otherwise stipulated: 1. Population; Statistical Area population statistics, updated annually with new projection announcements by Statistics New Zealand - Annual measure. 2. Movement; pedestrian counts, Traffic Management Plans (TMPs) issued nearby, traffic flow (provided via Auckland Transport) – Quarterly Measure. 3. Operations; Construction site audits issues and close out period – Quarterly Measure. 4. Social and Public Life; No. of events, type of events – Quarterly Measure. 5. Real Estate and Development; vacancy rates, prime rent and consents issued - Quarterly Measure. 6. Business and Commerce; No. of businesses, overall spending, no. of transactions, average transaction value via MarketView, business support uptake, vacant retail shops. 7. Environment – picked up in other monitoring. An annual report will be prepared, and will capture the monitoring of: ● ● ● ●

The affected communities experience and perception of SIBD impacts The effectiveness of the identified Mitigation Measures. Any changes in the community profile of the area. Complaints and public enquiries.

1.5 Relevant Conditions Table 1-1 identifies the designation and resource consent conditions relevant to this CCP and where they are addressed in the document. Table 1-1: Relevant conditions and location in this CCP

Conditio n No.

Condition

City Rail Link Designation Conditions Page 7

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Relevant section of CCP

Other Plans


Communication and Consultation Plan

Conditio n No.

Condition

Relevant section of CCP

Other Plans

15.1

The objective of the Communication and Consultation Plan is to set out a framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation is undertaken with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties during the construction of the City Rail Link.

This document

15.2

The Requiring Authority shall prepare a Communication and Consultation Plan which shall be implemented and complied with for the duration of the construction of the City Rail Link.

This document

15.3

The Communication and Consultation Plan shall set out how the Requiring Authority will: (a) Inform the community of construction progress and future construction activities and constraints that could affect them;

6,7

SIBD DWP

(b) Provide early information on key Project milestones;

6,7

SIBD DWP

(c) Obtain and specify a reasonable timeframe (being not less than 10 working days), for feedback and inputs from directly affected and affected in proximity parties regarding the development (as part of the review process provided by Condition 22) and implementation of the CEMP or DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSNMPs and SSCVMPs); and

7.2

(d) Respond to queries and complaints including but not limited to: (i) Who is responsible for responding; (ii) How responses will be provided;

5,7

CEMP, SIBD DWP

(iii) The timeframes that responses will be provided within. 15.4

Page 8

The Communication and Consultation Plan shall as a minimum include: (a) A communications framework that details the Requiring Authority’s communication strategies, the accountabilities, frequency of communications and consultation, the range of communication and consultation tools to be used (including any modern and relevant communication methods, newsletters or similar, advertising etc), and any other relevant communication matters;

4, 5, 6

(b) The Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project including their contact details (phone, email and postal address);

5.2

(c) The methods for identifying, communicating and consulting with persons affected by the project including but not limited to: (i) All property owners and occupiers within the designation footprint (ii) All property owners and occupiers adjacent to construction sites (Britomart and Albert Street (Designation 1), Karangahape

6,7

| Karangahape Station Main Works

CEMP


Communication and Consultation Plan

Conditio n No.

Condition

Relevant section of CCP

Other Plans

Road (Designation 4), Newton Station (Designation 5), Main Construction site and the works at Normanby Road and Porters Ave (Designation 6)) (iii) New Zealand Historic Places Trust (NZHPT) …….. (vii) Community Liaison Group(s) (refer Condition 7); ……. (x) Network Utility Operators, including the process: • To be implemented to capture and trigger where communication and consultation is required in relation to any material changes affecting the Network Utilities; • For the Requiring Authority to give approval (where appropriate) to Network Utility Operators as required by section 176(1)(b) of the RMA during the construction period; • For obtaining any supplementary authorisations (including but not limited to resource consents (including those required under a National Environmental Standard) and easements); • For inspection and final approval of works by Network Utility Operators; (d) How stakeholders and persons affected by the project will be notified of the commencement of construction activities and works, the expected duration of the activities and works, and who to contact for any queries, concerns and complaints;

6,7

(e) How stakeholders and persons affected by the project will be consulted in the development and review of the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs), including specifying reasonable timeframes for feedback;

6,7

CEMP, SIBD DWP and CNV DWP

(f) Methods for communicating in advance temporary traffic management measures and permanent changes to road networks and layouts to directly affected and in proximity parties, bus (public and private) operators, taxi operators, bus users, and the general public;

6,7

TAP DWP

(g) Methods for communicating in advance to surrounding communities (including sensitive noise and vibration receivers) which must be notified at least 24 hours in advance where construction activities are predicted to: (i) Exceed the noise limits (refer Condition 31); or

6,7

CNV DWP and SSCNVMP

(ii) Exceed a vibration limit (refer Conditions 33 and 34); or (iii) Be within 200m of a blast site (refer Condition 32). Page 9

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

Conditio n No.

Condition

Relevant section of CCP

Other Plans

(h) Methods for communicating in advance proposed hours of construction activities outside of normal working hours and on weekends and public holidays, to surrounding communities, and methods to record and deal with concerns raised about such hours;

6,7

CNV DWP and SSCNVMP

(i) Methods for communicating and consulting with mana whenua for the duration of construction and implementation of mana whenua principles for the project (refer to Conditions 8 and 49);

7.2.5

(j) Methods for communicating and consulting with the Auckland Council Parks Department regarding works to be undertaken to any trees on public land (streets, squares, etc.) located within the City Rail Link surface designation footprint, including how trees not being removed, or in close proximity to the surface designation footprint where works are occurring, will be protected;

6.5.4

Further provisions for Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers are contained in Condition 16.

TV DWP

(k) Methods for communicating and consulting in advance of 6.5.5 construction works with emergency services (Police, Fire, Ambulance) on the location, timing and duration of construction works, and particularly in relation to temporary road lane reductions and/or closures and the alternative routes or detours to be used, with specific detail around the management of the Fire and Ambulance from their central stations on Pitt Street;

SIBD DWP and TAP DWP

(l) A list of Stakeholders, directly affected and affected in proximity parties to the construction works who will be communicated with;

Appendix B

SIBD DWP

(m) How communication and consultation activity relating to construction activities and monitoring requirements will be recorded; and

5.3

CEMP

(n) ‌‌.

N/A

N/A

15.5

The Communication and Consultation Plan shall also include (as relevant) linkages and cross-references to the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs).

As referenced in this document

15.6

The Communication and Consultation Plan shall include a summary Appendix B of the communication and consultation undertaken between the CRL and parties as required by the Pre-construction Communication and Consultation Plan. The summary shall include any outstanding issues or disputes raised by parties. The Communication and Consultation Plan shall be reviewed six monthly for the duration of construction and updated if required. Any updated Communication and Consultation Plan shall be

Page 10

| Karangahape Station Main Works

SIBD DWP


Communication and Consultation Plan

Conditio n No.

Condition

Relevant section of CCP

Other Plans

provided to the “key contacts� (see Condition 13) and the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer for review and agreement on any further action to be undertaken. Any further action recommended as a result of this review shall be undertaken by the Communication and Consultation Manager for the City Rail Link and confirmation of completion provided back to the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer. 15.7

If, in the course of amendments undertaken as part of the review process, a material change to the Communication and Consultation Plan is made, those parties affected by the change shall be notified within 1 month of the material change occurring.

1.6

Resource Consent Conditions 25

27

At least 3 months prior to the commencement of construction, the Consent Holder shall prepare a CCP the purpose of which is to set out a framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in-proximity parties during the construction of the Project.

This document

The CCP shall be based on and, where appropriate, incorporate the provisions of the PCCP, and shall set out how the Consent Holder will: a) Inform the community and business of construction progress and future construction activities and constraints that could affect them;

6,7

SIBD DWP

b) Provide early information on key Project milestones;

6,7

SIBD DWP

c) Obtain and specify a reasonable timeframe (being not less than 10 working days), for feedback and inputs from directly affected and affected in-proximity parties regarding the implementation and review of the CEMP or other Management Plans;

6,7

d) Respond to queries and complaints including but not limited to: i) Who is responsible for responding;

6,7

ii) How responses will be provided; and iii) The timeframes within which responses will be provided. 28

The CCP shall (as a minimum) include: a) A communications framework that details the Consent Holder’s communication strategies, accountabilities, frequency of communications and consultation, the range of communication and consultation tools to be used (including relevant communication methods, newsletters or similar, advertising etc.), and any other relevant communication matters;

Page 11

| Karangahape Station Main Works

4,5,6,7


Communication and Consultation Plan

Conditio n No.

Condition

Relevant section of CCP

b) The Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project including 24 hour contact details (phone, email and postal address);

5

c) The 0800 CRL TALK phone number;

7.3.1

d) The methods for identifying, communicating and consulting with persons affected by the project including but not limited to: i) All property owners and occupiers of the sites that are identified at Appendix A, and adjacent to the Project’s construction sites;

6,7

Other Plans

CEMP

ii) Mana Whenua unless any of those named advise the Consent Holder of a different liaison process; iii) Heritage NZ; iv) NZ Transport Agency/ Auckland Motorway Alliance (AMA); v) Kiwirail; …….. viii) Network Utility Operators; and ix) The Community and Business Liaison Group (refer Conditions 16-24) e) How stakeholders and persons affected by the Project will be notified of the commencement of construction, the expected duration of the activities and works, and who to contact for any queries, concerns and complaints;

6,7

f) How stakeholders and persons affected by the Project will be 7 consulted in the development and review of the CEMP and other Management Plans, including specifying reasonable timeframes for feedback;

Page 12

g) A list of stakeholders, directly affected and affected in-proximity parties to the construction works with whom the Consent Holder will communicate;

Appendix B

h) …..

N/A

N/A

i) A summary of communication and consultation undertaken between the Consent Holder and parties as required by the PCCP. The summary shall include any outstanding issues or disputes raised by parties;

Appendix B

SIBD DWP

j) How communication and consultation relating to construction activities and monitoring requirements will be recorded; and

5

CEMP

k) How opportunities to interpret and display archaeological finds within the Project area will be identified and implemented, including how Heritage NZ will be involved in this process.

6,7

HC DWP

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

Conditio n No.

Condition

Relevant section of CCP

29

The CCP shall also include (as relevant) linkages and crossreferences to the CEMP and other Management Plans.

As referenced in this document

30

The CCP shall be reviewed six monthly for the duration of construction and updated if required. Any updates to the CCP shall be provided to the “key contacts” and the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for review and agreement on any further action to be undertaken.

1.6

31

Any further action recommended as a result of the review under Condition 30 shall be undertaken by the Consent Holder’s Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project and confirmation of completion shall be provided to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

Noted

32

If, in the course of amendments undertaken as part of the review process under Condition 30, a material change to the CCP is made, the Consent Holder shall notify those parties affected by the change within 20 working days of the material change occurring.

1.6

33

The CCP shall be implemented and complied with for the duration of the construction of the Project.

Noted

Other Plans

1.6 CCP Review and updates This CCP is a live document that will be reviewed six monthly for the duration of construction and updated if required. Any updates to the CCP shall be provided to the parties referred to in CRL designation condition 15.6 and resource consent Condition 28(d) and the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for review and agreement on any further action to be undertaken. In accordance with designation Condition 15.7 and resource consent condition 32, any parties affected by material change to the CCP shall be notified of the change within one 20 working days of the change occurring. A formal review process is described in the CEMP.

Page 13

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

2.

Karangahape Station Main Works 2.1 Overview of Works

The main construction works for the new Karangahape Station are described in detail in the CEMP and summarised in Table 2.1 below (refer also the drawings provided in Appendix B of the CEMP). It should be noted that construction of the Mercury Lane and Beresford Square station entrance superstructures and other building units for Karangahape Station, along with the internal station fit out and public realm reinstatement works will form part of a separate Outline Plan to be prepared in the future prior to the commencement of the respective works. Table 2.1: Overview of Main Works Construction Activities

Works Location General establishment works Mercury Lane

Overview of construction activities ● ●

● ● ●

Beresford Square

● ●

Construction Support Areas

Installation of hoardings and temporary traffic management around active construction zones Construction of the temporary shaft at Mercury Lane to provide access for tunnel construction. Works will include excavation, piling and construction of the above ground acoustic enclosure surrounding the shaft. Excavation of platform tunnels (likely using a road header) from the temporary shaft through to the Beresford Square station box. Diaphragm wall construction and piling around the perimeter of the Mercury Lane station box. Construction of the Mercury Lane station box, involving: o Top down construction works - excavation and floor slab construction; and o Bottom up construction works - rock breaking and excavation, construction of floor slab and rail platforms. o Off-site disposal of excavated material from the temporary shaft construction, mining of platform tunnels and station box construction. Diaphragm wall construction and piling around the perimeter of the Beresford Square station box. Construction of the Beresford Square station box, involving: o Top down construction works - excavation and floor slab construction; and o Bottom up construction works - rock breaking and excavation, construction of floor slab and rail platforms. o Off-site disposal of excavated material from the station box construction. Continued establishment of Construction Support Areas (CSA) at Beresford Square and Mercury Lane (following on from the establishment works undertaken as part of the early works and authorised by the early works plans). This will include the bentonite plant, water treatment plant and temporary spoil storage areas. Operation of the Beresford Square and Mercury Lane CSAs.

It should be noted that the demolition of buildings and above ground structures within the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area is authorised by the CRL Enabling Work Outline Plan – Karangahape Road Demolition Works (Auckland Council reference OPW60339200), confirmed in June 2019. Utility diversions, tree removal and set up of the Construction Support Areas at Mercury Lane and Beresford Square have also been authorised by the Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, (Auckland Council reference OPW60347591), confirmed in November 2019. Page 14

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

2.2 Affected parties A comprehensive stakeholder list will be maintained, enabling targeted communication with the local and wider community. Affected parties are defined as: ● ● ●

Tenants and owners of property within or adjacent to the project area, including business owners and residents (refer Figure 2-1 for directly affected and affected in proximity parties). People who work within or regularly visit the project area. People who travel through the project area.

Figure 2-1: Map showing directly affected properties in purple and affected in proximity parties in bluewithin or adjacent to the main works area

Page 15

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

3.

Overarching Strategies and Methodologies

This section outlines the existing CRLL communication and engagement strategies that have informed the preparation of this CCP along with key public participation and guidance, in particular the IAP2 engagement spectrum.

3.1 International Association for Public Participation IAP2 is an international association of public participation and engagement practitioners. To ensure that this CCP is effective and all communication and consultation is meaningful, the International Association for Public Participation’s (IAP2) core values2 have been used in the development of this CCP. These are: ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

Public participation is based on the belief that those who are affected by a decision have a right to be involved in the decision-making process. Public participation includes the promise that the public's contribution will influence the decision. Public participation promotes sustainable decisions by recognizing and communicating the needs and interests of all participants, including decision makers. Public participation seeks out and facilitates the involvement of those potentially affected by or interested in a decision. Public participation seeks input from participants in designing how they participate. Public participation provides participants with the information they need to participate in a meaningful way. Public participation communicates to participants how their input affected the decision.

IAP2’s community engagement spectrum of participation is based on the decisions to be made and the associated level of influence (if any) the community has on project decision making, noting that the level of public engagement will depend on the likely impact of a project on communities. Community engagement for CRL will range from informing people about the project, to consulting and involving them in meaningful decisions about key aspects of the project design as well as empowering them with the opportunity for innovative initiatives. Table 3-1 below identifies examples of how the proposed CRL engagement approach aligns with the IAP2 spectrum and how communication and engagement activities will help achieve the objectives for the project.

2

https://www.iap2.org.au/About-Us/About-IAP2-Australasia-/Core-Values Page 16 | Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan Table 3-1: Alignment with IAP2 Public Participation Spectrum

Inform

Consult

Involve

Collaborate

Empower

Website updates

Mana Whenua Forum

Social media

Local Boards

● Opportunities for communitydecision making will be identified through the engagement activities with affected parties and stakeholders

Project newsletters and factsheets

Project enquiry email and phone line

● Construction notifications

Community information pop-up hub

Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG)3 ● Stakeholder workshops, presentations and briefings

Social impact assessments

● Advisory Boards / Steering Groups

● Opportunities for collaboration making will be identified through the engagement activities with affected parties and stakeholders, particularly in relation to the Development Response Plan (DRP).

The results of engagement undertaken in relation to the CRL project to date have and will continue to inform the management and mitigation of actual and potential adverse effects from the works and the preparation of the suite of Delivery Work Plans and Management Plans required by the CRL designation and resource consent conditions.

3.2 The CRL Overarching Communication and Consultation Strategy (2018) CRLL is committed to delivering a high level of communications and engagement and the implementation of the overarching Communication and Consultation Strategy is recognised as supporting the delivery of the CRL and of building positive perceptions of the CRL throughout its development and delivery. Table 3-2 provides an overview of CRLL’s communications and engagement objectives for the wider CRL Project.

3

The designation conditions reference the Community Liaison Group (CLG), while the resource consent conditions reference the Community and Business Liaison Group. CLG has been used through this DWP as a common reference for the same group. Page 17 | Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan Table 3-2: Communications and Engagement Objectives

These objectives have been adopted by the Link Alliance in the development of this CCP.

3.3 Communication and engagement strategic objectives and principles A Communication and Consultation Strategy was first established for the CRL project in 2012, including a range of objectives and principles. These were adopted in the Pre-Construction Communication and Consultation Plan prepared by Auckland Transport (November 2015) and subsequent CCPs prepared for the CRL construction works undertaken to date. The engagement objectives and principles set out in the Communication and Consultation Strategy have informed and been adopted in the preparation of this CCP. These include the following: A proactive approach - approach stakeholders with information rather than sit back and wait for people to come to it with inquiries; key stakeholders and affected parties have a right to express their views and concerns about a project that has the potential to affect them. Effective communication channels - maintain constructive links with key stakeholders by communicating on a regular basis; continual networking and presence in the business and other relevant communities; and seeking opportunities for dialogue and information-sharing. Openness about issues - be upfront and transparent about what is proposed and provide as much certainty as possible while acknowledging that aspects of project detail is not finalised. Responsiveness - Responses will use best practice by being timely, full, helpful, frank and detailed; key stakeholders and affected parties have a right to expect that their views and concerns will be listened to and considered in project decisions even if agreement cannot be reached. Page 18

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan The objectives have four areas of focus: 1. Inform stakeholders about the Project ● ●

Engage constructively with key stakeholders/target audiences, providing consistent information across the project Maintain and enhance existing relationships for ongoing constructive engagement

2. Explain the process and timing ● ●

Ensure key target audiences and stakeholders have an accurate understanding of the project and its implications Explain how the planning processes work and how people can input into them

3. Educate people about the CRL ● ●

Discuss how the project fits into strategic city planning and the regional development of transport infrastructure Minimise uncertainty and dispel misinformation

4. Enhance our reputation ● ●

Page 19

Being open and responsive to stakeholder feedback Manage communications risks that may impact the project and our reputation.

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

4.

Consultation and Communication Strategy 4.1 Plan Overview

This CCP has been prepared to provide a communications framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected inproximity parties during the Karangahape Station main works. In accordance with the designation and consent conditions, this CCP set outs the processes and protocols that will be implemented by the Link Alliance during the main works to: ● ● ●

Inform the community of construction progress and future construction activities and constraints that could affect them. Provide early information on key project milestones. Obtain and specify a reasonable timeframe for feedback and inputs from directly affected and affected in-proximity parties regarding the development and implementation of the CEMP and sub-plans (DWPs and Management Plans). Respond to queries and complaints including but not limited to: ● ● ●

Who is responsible for responding to feedback and inputs; How responses will be provided; and The timeframes within which responses will be provided.

4.2 Consultation and communication approach The purpose of this CCP is to describe the processes and protocols relating to how the Link Alliance will: ● ● ●

Manage and deliver communication and consultation with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties during the Karangahape Station main works. Undertake project partner and stakeholder relationship activities (including the Mana Whenua Forum, Local Board engagement and engagement with the media). Comply with the requirements and responsibilities set out in the CRL designation and resource consent conditions and the overarching CRLL Communication and Consultation Plans (as identified in Section 1.4) for the wider CRL project.

This CCP will ensure: ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

Page 20

The public, including affected in proximity and directly affected parties, are well informed of the project – works progress and any potential impacts that could affect them. Disruptions are minimised. There is ‘one face’ for the project. Both the Link Alliance and CRLL maintain a positive reputation and support amongst the stakeholder groups. Information is provided early on key project milestones. A framework is provided to obtain feedback and input from directly affected and affected in proximity parties. That queries and complaints are responded to quickly and appropriately. Stakeholders, including the media, pedestrians, motorists, adjacent residents and businesses, are positively engaged. | Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan ●

All parties involved in the project understand their responsibilities and can collaborate and quickly respond to stakeholder concerns.

4.3 Key Project Messages The key messages to be communicated to affected parties, stakeholder and wider audiences in relation to the wider CRL works are: ● ●

● ● ●

● ●

CRL is integral to meeting Auckland’s growth and subsequent transport demand. Completing the CRL will provide faster, more frequent travel for all Auckland rail users with two new stations at Aotea and Karangahape and major redevelopment of the Britomart and Mt Eden Stations. Better frequency and reliability will encourage people to leave their cars at home, easing pressure on Auckland’s roads for those who need to use them. The CRL is more than just improving public transport. It is a transformative project that will lead the way in integrated transport and urban development. It will enable significant residential and commercial development around the stations to create new urban precincts, support our housing needs, enhance our environment and make Auckland a more attractive place to live. Disruption during construction will be managed to ensure Auckland keeps working. The CEMP and sub-plans developed for the works reflect unwavering commitment to environmental sensitivity and community well-being, cultural matters and safety.

The following key messages are particularly relevant to the Karangahape Station main works: ●

● ● ● ● ● ●

● ●

Page 21

Karangahape Station is a new 32 -metre-deep, 203-metre long, underground station with entrances on Mercury Lane and Beresford Square. Up to 1400 people are expected to disembark here at peak times. The directional flow of Cross Street will be reversed from mid-February 2020 until the completion of the project. This is to allow for the safe passage of larger vehicles through the Cross Street / Mercury lane intersection as Alliance works will reduce the road width of Mercury Lane. The Link Alliance is working with Auckland Council and Auckland Transport to ensure that people are aware of changes to access through the project area and can plan their journeys. The Link Alliance seeks to build and maintain relationships of trust with stakeholders. The Link Alliance will communicate new information and respond to stakeholder concerns and questions in a proactive and timely manner. Community engagement will be facilitated by a dedicated project email address, 24/7 0800 number, Community Liaison Group and regular drop-in session. Throughout works, we will keep footpaths open and properties accessible. Access will be maintained to all properties during the works. In the event that short term and temporary impacts on property access are required, the Link Alliance will engage with the affected parties prior to the works being undertaken. We will work with businesses to ensure customers have easy access and goods can be received. Works will be undertaken in accordance with the CEMP and sub-plans, prepared in accordance with the designation and resource consent conditions.

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan The hierarchy of the key messages and the communication methods will be defined by the audience (e.g. local / regional / national) and its relationship to the Main Works.

4.4 Expected Outcomes The following is a summary of the outcomes expected as a result of implementing this CCP: ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

Page 22

Strong relationships with key stakeholders Positive interaction with affected parties and affected in proximity parties. Robust information received to influence the CEMP and sub-plans. Effective CLGs. Informed community. Informed road users. Informative and useful online presence. Positive media coverage. Reduced misinformation. Emerging issues identified and mitigation measures developed and implemented that prevent escalation. Minimise interface risks within the alliance and with others Minimise disruption to people on local transport networks, in businesses and in the wider community and enhance usability where possible Maximise opportunities to support local businesses and suppliers

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

5. Roles and Responsibilities 5.1 Overview The Link Alliance and the CRLL Communication and Stakeholder Engagement Team will work together during the Karangahape Main Works in the following ways: ●

During the works, communications with directly affected and affected in proximity parties and stakeholders will be the responsibility of the Link Alliance, in collaboration with CRLL. The Link Alliance will be responsible for communicating with the wider Auckland population in relation to the works, in collaboration with CRLL. The Link Alliance will provide regular information and updates to CRLL on works progress as required. The works will be closely monitored to endeavour to ensure stakeholder satisfaction.

● ● ●

5.2 Key Personnel The key Link Alliance personal responsible for implementation of this CCP are identified in Table 5- 1. However, all site personnel are responsible for following the requirements of this CCP. Refer to the Main Works CEMP for further detail on roles and responsibilities. Table 5-1: Key Personnel

Role

Name

Karangahape Station Project Manager

Jonathan Hill

Karangahape Station Construction Engineer (Beresford Square)

Manura De Silva

Karangahape Station Construction Engineer (Mercury Lane)

Adam Stilges

Karangahape Station Community Manager

Simon Mitchell

Contact details for the Karangahape Station Project Manager and Community Manager are provided in Table 5-2. Table 5-2: Link Alliance Contact details

Title

Name

Email

Contact no.

Karangahape Station Project Manager

Jonathan Hill

Jonathan.hill@linkalliance.co.nz

022 0191668

Karangahape Station Community Manager

Simon Mitchell

simon.mitchell@linkalliance.co.nz

022 329 8021

5.3 Link Alliance and CRLL Reporting Requirements

Page 23

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan A high level of communication will be maintained between the Link Alliance and CRLL during the works. This will enable a proactive response to issues as they arise and seek to avoid escalation of high-risk issues that may negatively affect the reputation of CRLL, the Link Alliance or the Auckland Council. The Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager will immediately report to the CRLL GM Corporate Relations & Communications on any high-risk events or issues will: ● ● ●

Be of interest to CRLL or the CRL project sponsors (Auckland Council and Central Government). Have the potential to attract media attention. Present reputational risk to the Link Alliance or CRLL.

5.3.1 Reporting tools The following reporting tools will be used as part of the communications process between the Link Alliance and CRLL. Table 5-32: Reporting tools

Tools

Responsibility

Description

Urgent notifications

Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager

Immediately report any issues or concerns to CRLL communications team when they may result in media interest or present reputational risk to the project participants.

Weekly meeting

Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager

Weekly meeting with the CRLL GM Corporate Relations and Communications to report on progress, any issues being proactively addressed by Link Alliance, the forward construction programme and media opportunities.

Customer Relationship Management (CRM) database

Karangahape Station Community Manager

Central repository for all stakeholder contact details and interactions with Link Alliance.

Page 24

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

6. Communication Approach 6.1 Strategy Overview: Conversation Locally; Broadcast to Wider Audience The Link Alliance communication and consultation approach will be to engage and inform a primary audience of local residents, businesses, and affected/interested stakeholders about the Karangahape Station main works. The engagement approach will prioritise face-to-face interaction and access to information to ensure affected parties are aware of the works and associated actual or potential effects. A wider audience (i.e. the general public) will be engaged with through a predominantly online and electronic communication strategy. The key messages for this audience will be advanced communication of changes to road function to enable informed choice and to ensure travel-related information is readily available. Wider messaging regarding construction-related intersection closures, changes to bus routes and general travel through the area and bus routes will be developed in partnership with Auckland Transport and with input from Auckland Council.

6.2 Current and Planned Communication and Engagement Activities Communication and engagement activity relating to Karangahape Station main works has focussed on: ●

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

Building a relationship with the local community, through direct engagement and the establishment of regular meetings with stakeholders. Building understanding of the methodology planned to construct the station, construction impacts and seeking feedback on appropriate mitigations. Key stakeholder engagement, e.g. fortnightly meetings with Karangahape Business Association and key property owners. Political engagement, e.g. presentations to the Waitemata Local Board. Undertaken via CRLL. Mana Whenua engagement as project partner, via regular hui. Supporting the Development Response workstream, e.g. engagement with business owners to support the development of wayfinding signage and printed scrim for construction fences. Supporting the development of Delivery Work Plans. Supporting the establishment of environmental monitoring, e.g. engaging with property owners to facilitate installation of monitoring equipment. Supporting preparatory work to enable station construction, e.g. engaging with property owners and tenants regarding canopy cut-backs and removal. Maintaining regular opportunities for the local and wider community to engage with the Link Alliance project team, including: o Weekly drop-in session at the Info Hub o Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG) Collateral development, flyer advertising the different ways to engage with the project team was emailed to the Karangahape Station stakeholder database and distributed around Beresford Square and Cross Street.

Stakeholder engagement for Karangahape Station main works will focus on the following in the lead up to construction start:

Page 25

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan ●

Joint planning with Auckland Transport and Auckland Council to align strategy and messaging, supported by a Disruption Management Communications Plan CLG focus on station construction Presentations to local community and business groups Disruption planning meetings with local businesses Wider public engagement via Info Hub Collateral to support public engagement and understanding Community outreach. Initiatives to be a part of the community that will be further discussed in the Placemaking and Community Engagement Strategy that include regular thank-you events, community sponsorship opportunities and activities Ministerial/mayoral events will be held for major milestones as each project progresses and will be closely coordinated with the Minister’s and Mayor’s office. Establishment of a 90-day plan that outlines key milestones and activities, to be reviewed monthly. A monthly email newsletter will provide a look-ahead of all key construction activities in the station areas, promote upcoming engagement opportunities and promote construction progress with photos and videos. Subscribers to the email newsletter will be collected at all engagement events Link Alliance will provide contributions to the monthly CRL Connections newsletter as required. Link Alliance will liaise with CRLL for updates to any existing maps and develop new ones to act as a visual aid for all types of learners in the community.

● ● ● ● ● ●

● ● ●

● ●

6.3 Communication Channels The following engagement and communication channels will be utilised during the works, with a preference for electronic media rather than printed material in keeping with the Link Alliance sustainability goals. Table 6-1: Communication tools

Channel

Usage/content

Distribution frequency

Construction Works update

E-notices or printed notifications that provide advance notification of the proposed work activities and potential impacts. Notifications will address (as appropriate):

Monthly

● Key project milestones ● Upcoming works ● Activities and the expected impact ● Major complaints ● Feedback Distribution: via email to all parties within the project stakeholder database and any other parties that have registered an interest in the project. Also, available on CRL website and Karangahape Business Association website FAQs and Q&As Page 26

Approved responses to frequently asked questions. Distribution: email or CRL website.

| Karangahape Station Main Works

As and when required


Communication and Consultation Plan

Flyer/Newsletter /Brochure

To inform regarding the project and notify of upcoming construction activity Distribution: distributed to parties within the project stakeholder database and hand delivered to the project area.

As and when required

One-on-one discussions

One-on-one meetings with residents, businesses or organisations to inform them of the main works and address specific concerns.

Ongoing as required during the works

This includes meetings with directly-affected and affected in proximity parties to inform them of the Main Works occurring outside their business or residence and discuss the details of the main works, proposed mitigation and address any specific concerns. Weekly Info Hub session

A weekly Thursday evening drop-in session, held at the Info Hub in Beresford Square enables members of the public to engage informally with members of the project team. These drop-in sessions will be increased to two per week and access to the Hub be open from noon to 6 PM. This frequency will be reviewed on a quarterly basis.

Weekly

CLG meetings

Karangahape Community Liaison Group (CLG) meetings will be undertaken as required. Any material changes to the CEMP of sub-plans, shall be provided to the CLG for review and comment.

Every 3 months, or at another frequency agreed by all parties

0800 number/ Karangahape email address

Widely advertised 0800 number (option 4) connects the public to project communication staff to answer queries and provide information.

As required

6.4 Branding and Collateral All communication materials and signage developed for the Main Works will adhere to the CRLL and Link Alliance Branding Guidelines.

6.5 Identifying and communication with key stakeholders The Link Alliance recognises the diversity of stakeholders and their level of interest and involvement in the Karangahape Main Works. While large segments of the community or particular groups have similar interests and issues, there are also specific individuals and groups with unique or individual needs. This includes those from culturally diverse backgrounds. The Link Alliance will endeavour to fully understand stakeholders and the community, their expectations and communication needs. Page 27

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan The Link Alliance, in co-ordination with CRLL as required, will be responsible for maintaining clear lines of communication between key stakeholder groups and ensuring they are kept fully informed about the Main Works. The communication channels which will be utilised to engage with stakeholder groups, including the frequency of engagement, are described in section 6.3 above.

6.5.1 Parties affected by the project A list of the parties affected by the main works is provided in Appendix B. The Link Alliance is responsible for keeping this list updated during the main works. An overview of the parties affected by the works is set out below.

6.5.2 Owners, occupiers and businesses The current key contacts for the property owners, occupiers and businesses directly affected and affected in proximity to the works have been identified during the pre-construction consultation phase. These persons will be provided with the contact details for the Link Alliance, including phone, email, post and website details where they will be able to sign up for information and updates.

6.5.3 Network Utility Operators The network utilities that will be impacted by the main works are owned by the following Network Utility Operators (NUOs): ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

Vector Electricity; Vector Gas; Vector Communications; Chorus; Vodafone; Auckland Council’s stormwater unit (Healthy Waters); and Watercare Services Ltd.

Engagement with the NUOs has been undertaken to inform the design of the main works and will be ongoing during construction, with the objective of ensuring appropriate management of utility assets and the ability to meet operational requirements at all times. Refer to Section 7.2.3 of this CCP for further detail.

6.5.4 Auckland Council Parks Department The Link Alliance has engaged with the Auckland Council Parks Department regarding works to trees on public land located within the works area. Trees initially identified within the construction footprint of the Karangahape Station have been removed during the Karangahape Station early works and consisted of a mixture of native and exotic specimens as outlined in the Karangahape Station early works ‘Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan’ (TV DWP).

Page 28

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

6.5.5 Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Extensive engagement has been undertaken with the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga (HNZPT) Regional Archaeologist in obtaining the CRL Archaeological Authority (Authority No. 2017/793). Ongoing consultation with HNZPT will continue to occur in accordance with the conditions of this Authority, including notifying HNZPT prior to the commencement of works. Refer to Section 7.2.5 of this CCP for further detail regarding engagement with HNZPT, along with Auckland Council in relation to heritage aspects of the main works.

6.5.6 Emergency Services The Link Alliance have and will continue to engage with emergency services regarding the Main Works and potential changes in traffic movements around the works area to inform the preparation of the Transport, Access and Parking DWP. Emergency services engaged with include: ● ● ●

New Zealand Police. Fire and Emergency New Zealand. St Johns Ambulance.

6.5.7 Auckland Transport The Link Alliance will work closely with Auckland Transport in regard to traffic alterations and changes to public transport routes.

6.5.8 Identifying additional people affected by the project Additional parties or stakeholders affected by the Main Works will be identified through site visits, the preparation of the CEMP and sub-plans, complaints and enquiries recorded in the CRM system, email communication and one-on-one discussions with the community.

7. Protocols, Processes and Contact Details 7.1 Community and Business Liaison Group The establishment of a Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG) is one of the key consultation tools required by the CRL designation and resource consent conditions. The CLG is a key mechanism for reflecting community concern and interest and communicating the programme to the community’s most affected parties. A CLG has been established for the Karangahape Station area. Membership of the Karangahape CLG includes representatives from affected property owners and occupiers, businesses, local board and the Karangahape Business Association.

7.1.1 CLG purpose The purpose of the Karangahape CLG is to: ●

Page 29

Provide the CLG with regular updates on works progress, construction activities, including any significant changes or milestones and the management of potential adverse construction effects. | Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan ●

Ensure that community interests are identified and recognised through the construction process so that construction impacts/disruption can be minimised as practicable and community safety can be appropriately managed. Provide feedback on the development of the CEMP and sub-plans. Monitor the effects of construction works on the community by providing a regular forum through which feedback can be provided to the Link Alliance. Provide opportunities for concerns and issues to be raised and responded by the Link Alliance. Propose initiatives regarding the interim use of properties including vacant land acquired for the construction of CRL.

● ● ● ●

7.1.2 Process The Link Alliance will organise CLG meetings, including the meeting venue and provide administrative assistance to the CLG. The process for coordinating the Karangahape CLG meetings is set out below. Table 7-1: CLG meeting coordination

Stage

Description

1

The Link Alliance Communications staff will liaise with the Karangahape CLG members regarding meeting dates and venues. The venue will always be a local venue.

2

The Link Alliance will organise the CLG meetings and arrange for the appropriate Link Alliance personnel to be present.

3

The Link Alliance Communications staff will take notes and carry out actions required.

4

The Link Alliance Communications staff will keep a record of the meetings (including attendance). CRLL will subsequently publish the meeting minutes on the CRL project website.

In accordance with the designation and resource consent conditions, the CLG shall be provided with a reasonable timeframe (not less than 10 working days) to provide feedback on the development, implementation and review of any material changes in relation to the CEMP and sub-plans.

7.2 Stakeholders and affected parties 7.2.1 Pre-Construction Engagement The Link Alliance has undertaken pre-construction communication and consultation with affected and affected in proximity parties identified in Appendix B, along with key stakeholders, during the preparation of the main works CEMP, DWPs and Management Plans (MPs). The following DWPs are required under the CRL designation conditions: ● ● ●

Page 30

Construction Environmental Management Plan*. Communication and Consultation Plan*. Transport, Access and Parking DWP.

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan ● ● ● ● ●

Construction Noise and Vibration DWP (including Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plans). Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP. Historic Character DWP (comprising Built Heritage and Archaeology sections). Contamination DWP*. Air Quality DWP*.

The following MPs are required under the A2N resource consent conditions: ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

Construction Environmental Management Plan*. Communication and Consultation Plan*. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan Industrial and Tarde Activities Environmental Management Plan Contaminated Soils Management Plan*. Air Quality Management Plan*.

* Note: For these plans, which are required under both the CRL designation and A2N resource consent conditions, one combined plan has been prepared to satisfy both the resource consents and designation conditions. Feedback from affected and affected in proximity parties, along with the CLG and key stakeholders, regarding the development of the CEMP and sub-plans was sought in accordance with the CRL designation and A2N resource consent conditions. Feedback is captured in the respective plans, along with the Link Alliance’s response to the feedback.

7.2.2 Construction Phase Engagement The Link Alliance is required to monitor the construction works progress and identify activities that may impact the community and stakeholders. This includes ensuring workers understand the construction activities that may cause particular concern to the community, such as noisy activities or works that may result in disruption to property access or the transport network. The ‘Communication Channels’ detailed in Section 6.3 of this CCP provide a framework to proactively communicate with stakeholders and the adjacent community during the main works. In addition to the general communication and consultation protocols which will be implemented during the works, the following sections outline the stakeholder specific protocols which will be implemented.

7.2.4 Kaitiaki or Mana Whenua Forum A CRL Mana Whenua forum was established in 2012 for the purposes of undertaking kaitiakitanga responsibilities associated with the project. The forum comprises those Mana Whenua groups who expressed an interest in being involved in the CRL project and its related activities. Eight Mana Whenua self-identified their interest in the CRL project and are currently part of the forum: ● ● ● ● ● Page 31

Ngāti Maru; Ngāti Paoa; Ngāi Tai Ki Tāmaki; Ngāti Te Ata Waiohua; Ngāti Whātua o Ōrākei; | Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan ● ● ●

Te Ākitai Waiohua; Te Kawerau a Maki; and Ngāti Tamaoho.

The Mana Whenua forum will be managed by CRLL and will continue to address matters such as: ● ● ● ● ●

CEMP and sub-plans. Archaeology, including assistance with discovery protocols. Koiwi and artefact discovery. Cultural induction and monitoring. Ongoing provision of mātauranga Māori input.

During construction works the Link Alliance shall: ● ●

Attend the hui arranged by CRLL as required. Follow the protocols for recovery and preservation of artefacts, koiwi, and other items of interest to Maori in the event that these are discovered during the Main Works. These protocols are identified in the Main Works Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section) (Appendix G of the CEMP) and in the Archaeological Authority4 granted for the CRL Aotea to Maungawhau (Mt Eden) construction works. Ensure that all project staff are given a cultural induction, in accordance with iwi guidelines.

7.2.5 Network Utility Operators Ongoing communication and consultation will be undertaken with NUOs during the Main Works as outlined below.

Material changes affecting Network Utilities Where a material change is identified that has not already been agreed with the NUO and which affects network utilities, then the following process will be adopted: ● ● ●

The Link Alliance will contact the relevant NUO to organise an on-site meeting in conjunction with the contractor. If the change is subsequently agreed on site, then the relevant construction and/or as-built drawings will be revised. If the change cannot be agreed on-site, then a meeting will be held between Link Alliance and the relevant NUO Project Manager to identify a mutually agreeable outcome.

Section 176(1)(b) RMA Approvals In relation to the Requiring Authority (CRLL) giving approval to NUOs under section 176(1)(b) of the RMA for NUO works in the CLR designation: ● ●

4

The relevant NUO will identify the scope of work required to be undertaken, including location and timing. The Link Alliance Utilities Manager and the CRLL Utilities Manager will meet with the relevant NUO Project Manager to discuss the scope of work, programming, and physical interface with the CRL construction works. Based on this discussion, CRLL will determine whether or not the

Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga reference 2017-793 Page 32 | Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan proposed utility works would ‘prevent or hinder’ the main works (and whether CRLL is able to give written consent to the utility works). Wherever possible, a mutually agreed ‘work plan’ will be developed that allows necessary utility works to proceed in a way that does not hinder the main works (particularly in the case of maintenance and urgent repair works).

Supplementary Authorisations Depending on the circumstances, the relevant NUO or the Link Alliance Utilities Manager, along with the CRLL Utilities Manager will identify what authorisations are required and consider: ● ●

If the proposed utility works are not related to the CRL project, then the NUO will be responsible for obtaining any necessary authorisations (including resource consents where required). If the utility works are required to facilitate the CRL project, then the Link Alliance will meet with the relevant NUO Project Manager to identify an appropriate design and construction methodology for the works and confirm authorisations required. The Link Alliance will be responsible for obtaining any necessary authorisations (including resource consents where required).

Inspection and final approval of works by network utility operators The process for the inspection and final approval of works by NUOs is as follows: ● ● ● ●

Upcoming inspection, testing, and commissioning works will be identified at weekly meetings between the Link Alliance and the NUOs. The Link Alliance will arrange necessary site inspections directly with the relevant NUO Project Manager. If the inspection passes, then the NUO will sign off the work package. If the inspection fails, then the Link Alliance will work together to identify the appropriate remedial action and a re-inspection will be organised with the NUO.

Ongoing communication and consultation During the Karangahape Station main works there will be regular on-site liaison between the Link Alliance and the NUOs. This will generally be undertaken by way of ‘tool box’ meetings at the start of each day, complemented by weekly meetings during utility construction works between the Link Alliance and the NUOs. The purpose of the weekly meetings when utility works are progressing is to plan in greater detail for upcoming utility works in conjunction with other aspects of the project works – e.g. temporary traffic management.

Review of Management Plans The CEMP and sub-plans for the works will be reviewed at least annually, or as a result of a material change to the project, or to address unforeseen adverse effects arising from construction, or unresolved complaints. The Link Alliance will inform the NUOs of any such reviews and will actively engage with the NUOs where a material change to the project has implications for network utilities or the review is required in order to address unforeseen effects or unresolved complaints relating to the utilities aspect of the project.

7.2.6 Emergency services Page 33

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan As outlined in Section 6 of this CCP, the Link Alliance will consult with emergency services regarding their specific operational requirements in relation to the main works. This will include information on the location, timing and duration of the works (particularly in relation to traffic lane reductions and/or closures, alternative routes and detours) and consultation in advance of the commencement of construction. The Transport, Access and Parking DWP (Appendix D of the CEMP) states that the main works will be undertaken so as not to impede emergency service access to properties adjacent to the works area or the Central Fire Station and St Johns Ambulance Station located on Pitt Street.

7.2.7 Heritage In addition to engagement undertaken with HNZPT outlined in Section 6.5.4 of this CCP, the Link Alliance has engaged with the Auckland Council Cultural Heritage Implementation Team Leader regarding the preparation of the Archaeology Section of the Historic Character DWP and the Auckland Council Heritage Unit (Built Heritage and Implementation) during the preparation of the Built Heritage Section of the Historic Character DWP. Engagement with these parties will remain ongoing during the Main Works in relation to matters such as construction progress and any unexpected archaeology or built heritage finds during the Main Works. In relation to engagement on heritage related matters during the main works, the Link Alliance shall: ● ● ●

Communicate information on any archaeological or built heritage discoveries during the course of works to Auckland Council Heritage Unit, HNZPT and Mana Whenua. Contact HNZPT, iwi and the police in the occurrence that koiwi (human remains) are discovered during the course of works. Provide a written summary report by the Project archaeologist to HNZPT, Auckland Council (Heritage Unit and Consent Monitoring officer) and Mana Whenua within 20 days of the completion of monitoring. Provide archival photography records of the Beresford Toilets (to be demolished as part of the Main Works) to the Manager Auckland Council Heritage Unit (Built Heritage and Implementation) as per the building record and salvage strategy for the toilets set out in the Built Heritage section of the Historic Character DWP. Maintain regular updates (via the appropriate communication tools detailed in section 6.3) with regard to archaeological or built heritage discoveries and monitoring during the Karangahape main works.

7.2.8 Auckland Transport As outlined in Section 6 of this CCP, the Link Alliance will consult with Auckland Transport. This will include information on the location, timing and duration of the works (particularly in relation to traffic lane reductions and/or closures, alternative routes and detours) and consultation in advance of the commencement of construction. Discussions will also relate to the Auckland Transport Karangahape Road Enhancement Works. Refer to the Transport, Access and Parking DWP (Appendix D of the CEMP) for further details on engagement with Auckland Transport.

7.2.9 CEMP and Sub-plan reviews Page 34

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan In accordance with the designation and resource consent conditions, the CEMP, DWPs and MPs shall be reviewed at least annually, or as a result of a material change to the works, or to address unforeseen adverse effects arising from construction, or unresolved complaints. The Link Alliance shall notify any parties affected by the review and any material change proposed to the plans and document any inputs received from the affected parties. All affected parties shall be provided with a reasonable timeframe (not less than 10 working days) to provide feedback on the changes.

7.3 Public Engagement 7.3.1 Public Enquiries Email addresses for public enquiries in relation to the Karangahape Station main works are as follows: karangahape@linkalliance.co.nz - in relation to Karangahape Station construction works; and ● info@cityraillink.govt.nz - in relation to the wider CRL Project (any queries in relation to the Karangahape Station construction works will be forwarded through to the Link Alliance email). ●

Access to a member of the Link Alliance will also be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week at the CRL Freephone number: 0800 CRL TALK (275 8255), option 4 for Karangahape Station. This number will be promoted to directly affected and affected in proximity parties and stakeholders before the Main Works commence. This number will feature on all project signage, communication material, CRL website and other collateral. The Link Alliance will: ● ● ●

Identify the Freephone number on all project advertising and collateral. Allocate a team member responsible for answering the Freephone at all times. They will actively respond to issues, enquiries and emergencies. Record all enquiries, requests for information and complaints.

Response timeframes In responding to enquiries the Alliance Participants must: ● ● ● ● ●

provide at least an oral response to telephone enquiries within two hours from the time of the enquiry being received unless the enquirer agrees otherwise; provide a written response to letters within 24 hours of the letter being received; provide a written response to emails within 24 hours of the email being received; record details of enquiries received in the stakeholder relationship management database within 24 hours of the enquiry being received; and report monthly on any enquiries received, and response given.

7.3.2.

Complaints

Complaints will be dealt with in a responsive manner to ensure a relationship of trust and reliability between the community, the Link Alliance and CRLL is developed. The project will be contactable 24/7 through the 0800 number. A report detailing complaints and responses will be provided to Auckland Council each month. Link Alliance shall ensure that: Page 35

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan ● ●

The Karangahape Station Communications and Engagement Team handles all complaints that arise on the project, and they are tracked through the CRM system. The community is notified of the project contact details through which complaints can be made. This will include the website, works notifications, onsite signage and project publications and newsletters. Link Alliance staff shall be briefed on the complaints process and are prepared to receive complaints through the Freephone number, by email, in writing or through face to face contact.

The process for managing complaints is set out in Table 7-2 below. Table 7-2: Complaints management process

Stage

Description

1

All complaints are forwarded to the Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager.

2

The Link Alliance Community Manager acknowledges the complaint on day of receipt by phone or in writing. If the Community Manager is not available, the Link Alliance Karangahape Station Project Manager or another member of the project team shall acknowledge the complaint.

3

The contact details and details of the complaint are entered into the CRM database, Darzin.

4

Acknowledgement of a complaint is provided on the day of receipt. Response timeframes are listed above

5

The Link Alliance Community Manager (or their delegated nominee) shall work closely with the Link Alliance Karangahape Station Project Manager or Construction Manager to resolve complaints. They are proactive in keeping complainants informed of what action is being taken to address their concerns.

6

If a complaint cannot be resolved within the complaints process timeframe, the complainant is invited to a meeting with the Link Alliance Community Manager and the Karangahape Station Project Manager (or their delegated nominees). Resolution timeframes should be agreed at this meeting.

7

All meetings shall be recorded in the CRM database to ensure that a complete record of times, dates and locations of meetings is maintained.

8

When a complaint is resolved it shall be ‘closed out’ as an action in the CRM. Each month a record of complaints activity will be reviewed by the Community Manager to check that all actions have been closed out.

9

Complaints data is reviewed regularly by the Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager.

Auckland Council Reporting In accordance with the designation and resource consent conditions, a record of complaints shall be maintained on-site and be available to the Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer on Request (refer Section 5.2 for contact details). The record shall be provided to Auckland Council every two months (or as otherwise agreed) and to the “key contacts” listed in Section 6.1 of the CEMP. Where a complaint remains unresolved or a dispute arises, the Link Alliance shall provide the Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer with all records of the complaint and how it has been dealt with

Page 36

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan and addressed and whether the Requiring Authority considers that any other steps to resolve the complaint are required.

7.3.3 Digital Channels The CRL Project website is the heart of the project’s communications strategy. It is a ‘one-stop-shop’ for vital and interesting information for both the local community and a wider audience. It also has links to other Project information including newsletters, FAQs, photos and video updates. The Link Alliance provides information to the CRLL Communications Team to update the CRL website and social media channels, as outlined in the table below. Table 7-3: Media channels

Channel

Details

Information requirements

Website

As the hub of communications for project information, CRLL’s website provides:

The Karangahape Station Communications and Engagement Team will provide the CRLL Communications Team with regular updates about construction progress, works notifications, photography and videography for upload to the CRL website.

● Regular construction updates ● Facility for people to sign up for email updates

● Contact email address for public enquiries. ● The Freephone number: 0800 CRL TALK (275 8255).

● DWPs, CEMP and CCP relating to the project. Social Media

CRLL manages Facebook and Instagram accounts for the Project.

Link Alliance provides regular updates to CRLL to update Facebook and Instagram channels.

7.3.4 Media All media enquiries will be channelled through the CRLL Media Manager. The Link Alliance shall support the CRLL Media Manager in responding to media enquiries as follows: ● ● ●

Reporting to CRLL immediately on any matters which may be contentious or affect the good reputation of CRLL or the project. Providing a very quick turnaround on facts. The Karangahape Community Manager shall work closely with the CRLL Media Manager to provide technical responses, personnel or material to assist with media enquiries.

As part of the project induction, all Link Alliance staff and subcontractors will be briefed on the process to follow if approached by the media during the Main Works.

7.4 Managing Crisis and Emergency Situations The Link Alliance Emergency Response and Incident Management Plan describes how the Link Alliance will manage any emergencies and potential crisis situation. A crisis or emergency is a potential or actual incident that: Page 37

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan ●

Poses significant harm to people, property, the environment or the local community, and requires assistance from external emergency services agencies.

It is not a small-scale incident that can be managed without the mobilisation of the Incident/ Crisis Management team and without the assistance of external emergency agencies. For example, a first aid injury or small spill.

7.4.1 Requirements In the event of a crisis or emergency, the Link Alliance shall: ● ● ●

Activate the Emergency Response and Incident Management Plan which details all Health and Safety processes. Guide strategic stakeholder management and communication processes, in line with the Incident Management Frameworks of Link Alliance and CRLL. Alliance shall support CRLL in responding to the community, the media or the public.

7.4.2 Emergency contacts Table 7-4: Emergency responsibilities contact

Responsibility

Contact

Emergency Response Co-ordinator – Karangahape Station

Link Alliance Karangahape Station Project Manager – Jonathan Hill

Crisis/emergency management oversight

Link Alliance Project Director – Francois Dudouit

Construction management

Link Alliance Construction Manager – Phillipe Begou Link Alliance Karangahape Station Construction Manager – Adam Stilges

Health and Safety

Link Alliance Health and Safety Manager – Joseph McArdle

Link Alliance Communications

Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager – Rachel Blundell

CRLL Communications

CRLL GM Corporate Relations & Communications - Victoria Jessop

Page 38

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

Appendix A: Staging Drawings – Station Main Works Beresford Square indicative works

Page 39

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

Page 40

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

Page 41

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

Page 42

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

Mercury Lane indicative works

Page 43

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

Page 44

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

Page 45

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

Page 46

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

Mined Tunnel Construction indicative works

Page 47

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

Appendix B: Affected Community and Their Feedback This feedback is taken from Karangahape Station Main Works Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan which has been prepared in consultation with the community, business owners, affected parties and affected in proximity parties. Additional recent and relevant feedback from the affected community is contained within: â—?

Karangahape Station Early Works SIBD DWP

Address Property/ Occupier Mercury Lane 3-5 1. Mercury Bar Mercury and Gaming Lane Lounge

Meeting summary

Feedback

Mitigation

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Services and Deliveries Deliveries on Mercury Lane are in a convenient location to the pub.

Affected businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area. No mitigation required.

Business Effects Construction workers are an opportunity for the business. Loading Bay Had issues with our site turning the parking space out the front of the pub into a safety zone as he uses it for loading. Other Comments Communication is key and will help with business planning. Page 48

| Karangahape Station Main Works

We organised that our traffic controller on Mercury Lane will allow access to the parking space when the bar is getting deliveries. The CCP will be implemented to ensure affected parties are kept informed, with the Communications &


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

Meeting summary

2. White Elephant Op Shop

SIBD and acoustic door knocked but manager not available has had cancer. Spoke to the Manager in November 2019 within the shop. SIBD and acoustic door knocked but manager not available. Contact details left. SIBD and acoustic door knocked and discussion with event manager / staff.

3. BK Hostel

9 Mercury 4. Mercury Lane Theatre

2 Mercury 5. Residential Lane (also Property / see 238 KCommercial Road)

SIBD and acoustic door knocked and discussion with property manager and resident attendee at the Cross Street Market Community Event - Refer to Section 6.7 of the SIBD DWP.

Feedback Queried whether there are wider works to re-grade Mercury Lane. Problems getting her, spoke to the shop as parking on Mercury Lane had been removed.

Mitigation Engagement Manager leading on future engagement. Immediately discussed it with the traffic controller and organised that the manager and her team were allowed to temporarily park on the street when dropping off stock.

/

/

Other Comments Welcomed briefing on the works and keen for ongoing communication and updates with the theatre manager/owner. Amenity Concern about noise levels during construction works for businesses and residents.

The CCP will be implemented to ensure affected parties are kept informed, with the Communications & Engagement Manager leading on future engagement with the owner. Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

Access Pedestrian and car park access needs to be maintained on Mercury Lane/

Refer to TAP DWP mitigation measures. Pedestrian and vehicle access to off street car parking will be maintained

Concerns about the level of construction traffic. Page 49

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

Meeting summary

Feedback

Mitigation

24 Mercury Lane

6. Wilsons Car Park

The Commercial Manager was keen to be kept alert of all changes to the area, especially those that effected traffic flow towards the car park on Cross Street.

Monthly updates via the Station Newsletter and notices are sent to him, and often a follow up phone call.

30 Mercury Lane 3/2 Canada St

7. Wilsons Car Park

Have had discussions with the Commercial Manager who manages a number of Wilson Parking facilities near the numerous CRL Stations See above

See above

See above

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with manager.

Other Comments Operate an outreach programme and drop in location for wider Auckland Region. Respect for privacy and discretion is required.

Refer to Section 8.13 Diverse Community and Vulnerable Groups and 8.14 Community Safety of the SIBD DWP.

8. NZ Prostitutes Collective

Offer a lot of social support for diverse group of vulnerable people from across the Region. Need a key go-to contact person with responsibility if concerns or issues arise

Page 50

| Karangahape Station Main Works

The Communications & Engagement Manager will be a point of contact for issues and will co-ordinate responses from SMEs.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

Meeting summary

Feedback

Mitigation

Access Parking needed, already shortage of parking in the area.

Off street car parking will be maintained. The Link Alliance will provide advance notice of the loss of on street car parking and the provision of signage to identify additional public car parking will be considered as part of the DRP.

Already issues with parking. Some days are busier with clinic times. Need parking for nurses also. Karangahape Road 195-239 K 9. Buana Satu Road

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Access Loading Bay on K-Road, but also load from rear of property (accessed via Pitt St). Access will need to be arranged to the rear of the property.

Affected businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area. Access to the rear of the property will be maintained with any diversion notified to the occupier (refer to the TAP DWP for details of diversions on Pitt St)

Customer drive to the shop so loss of car parking will have an impact.

Communication via a number of different methods will be used to make the public aware that businesses in the area are open for business. The provision of signage to identify additional public car parking will form part of the DRP.

Page 51

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

Meeting summary

Feedback

Mitigation

Other Comments Combination of CRL and K-Road Enhancement works mean a lot going on.

The implementation of the DWPs will be used to mitigate the effects of the early works. Link Alliance will continue to work with AT to minimise the combined impacts and proactively communicate and update the affected community.

10. Leo O’Malley

243 K Road

11. Calendar Girls

12. Pitt St Pub

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Invite to Beresford Square Community event with contact details provided. SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business manager.

Other Comments The premises are re-locating in w/c 07/10. Relocation is partly due to the extent of CRL works and K-Road Enhancement Works, and wider retail trends.

Business / Customer Effects The pavement area is used for outdoor seating and concerns about any loss. The area has an active night-time economy.

Page 52

| Karangahape Station Main Works

No specific occupier mitigation required.

The DRP will identify business support measures, which may include support for businesses to obtain outdoor licenses.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

Meeting summary

Feedback

Visibility and Wayfaring Signage and visibility important.

Other Comments Public toilets on Beresford Square are focus of anti-social behaviour. 249-253 K Road

13. VAPO

14. The Hemp Store CafĂŠ

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked, and contact details left – Two visits. SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Other Comments Concerns over the extent of Albert Street works and similar impacts on K-Road.

The cumulative effects of K-Road enhancement work and the early works. | Karangahape Station Main Works

Wayfinding measures will be utilised to guide members of the public to the premises. Visibility impacts will be minimised via the use of mesh or low rise fencing if practicable. Refer to Section 8.14 Community Safety of the SIBD DWP.

/

Ongoing proactive communication and updates required.

Page 53

Mitigation The implementation of the DWPs will mitigate the impacts on the affected businesses day and night.

The SIBD team explained the difference in approach between Albert St and K-Road. The CCP will be implemented to ensure affected parties are kept informed, with the Communications & Engagement Manager leading on future engagement.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

Meeting summary

Feedback

The removal of the public toilets and the impact on businesses in the area.

Mitigation Link Alliance will continue to work with AT to minimise the combined impacts and proactively communicate and updated the affected community. Refer to Section 8.14 Community Safety of the SIBD DWP.

More bike parking as part of final design. SIBD SMEs explained the nature of the early works and the opportunities for future engagement. 259-261 K Road

15. Eagle Bar

16. POKPOK Thai Restaurant 267-281 K Road

17. The Kebab house

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked, and contact details left – Two visits. SIBD and Acoustic door knocked, and contact details left – Two visits. SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

/

/

Servicing and Deliveries Access for delivery vehicles directly outside on K-Road only. Waste bin taken from Beresford Square

18. Uncle Man

Page 54

| Karangahape Station Main Works

SIBD and acoustic door knock, and contact details left.

Customer/ Business Effects 1 staff car park in the Beresford Square Car Park building. /

No changes to access - no mitigation required. Affected businesses will be notified of any changes to waste pick up locations. Access to off street parking is to be retained – no mitigation required.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

283 K Road 214 K Road 238 KRoad (Selected) (also see 2 Mercury Lane) 256 & 258A K Rd

Property/ Occupier 19. Strange Haven

Meeting summary SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

20. Samoa House

Meeting not obtained.

Feedback Servicing and Deliveries Waste / Services / Deliveries picked up on K Rd outside store – not too concerned Access Access from Beresford Square only used a little. Car parking for staff, but not too concerned. /

21. Vacant

/

/

22. Multiple Occupiers

SIBD meeting with property manager / representative.

See 2 Mercury Lane.

23. Mithaiwala Restaurant / Café

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Servicing and Deliveries All deliveries directly outside, or on Mercury Lane. No special waste delivery/removal.

Customer/ Business Effects Access for customers and to deliveries to be maintained during works. 24. Shosha (Vape & Hookah Store) Page 55

| Karangahape Station Main Works

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with

Servicing and Deliveries

Mitigation No mitigation required.

Noted – general mitigation measures identified in Section 7 of the SIBD are sufficient.

No works are proposed outside of the property but affected businesses will be notified of the closure and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area and waste pick up locations. Access will be maintained to the business – no specific mitigation is required. No works are proposed outside of the property but affected businesses will


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

25. G.A.Y. Auckland

26. Charlie Baxters

27. Free Bird

268 K Rd

Page 56

28. Ink bar & Nightclub

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Meeting summary business owner / manager.

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked, and contact details left. SIBD and Acoustic door knocked, and contact details left. SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked, and contact details left.

Feedback Out the front of store. No large deliveries. Deliveries and customer parking are for short durations. Customer/ Business Effects They have three other stores in Auckland. If they find the site no longer functions during the proposed works, they will close it down to operate from the other locations. /

Mitigation be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area and waste locations. The implementation of the DWPs will help mitigate the impacts on affected businesses and support measure will be identified in the DRP if required.

/

Servicing and Deliveries Deliveries outside, drivers use access directly in front of the store. Access out front of the store is important.

Access No concerns as long as vehicle access in front of the store is retained and pedestrian access remains available. /

No works are proposed outside of the property but affected businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area and waste locations. Pedestrian and vehicle access will be maintained – no specific mitigation required.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier 29. Bangkok’s Thai Food Café

270 K Rd

30. The Family Bar

270 K Rd

31. Club Saloon Bar

278 – 282 K Road

32. Apero Restaurant (Ismo Koski)

Meeting summary SIBD and Acoustic door knocked, and contact details left. SIBD and Acoustic door knocked, and contact details left. SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with staff member.

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Feedback /

/

Other Comments Staff member confirmed that the Manager has received a copy of the Information Sheet with contact details. No comments raised to date. Customer/ Business Effects Generally, not concerned about CRL as project as sufficiently distant from the business and there is an opportunity if more people are walking past the restaurant as they cannot park in the area. But conversely concerned that the area may be less desirable to due to the construction works. Access All access is provided via Karangahape Road; deliveries, staff and customers. Servicing and Deliveries Use the loading bays immediately outside, but more concerned about the effects of the Karangahape Road enhancement work

Page 57

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Mitigation

No specific mitigation required.

Communication via a number of different methods will be used to make the public aware that businesses in the area are open for business. Additional support measure for affected businesses will be identified in the DRP if required.

Pedestrian and vehicle access will be maintained – no specific mitigation required. Affected businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address 284 - 286 K Rd

Property/ Occupier 33. Cosmic

Meeting summary SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Feedback Servicing and Deliveries Quick drop-offs directly out front.

Access Customers either park close by, walk in, or park outside and rush in quickly. Loss of short-term parking out front of store is biggest concern.

290 K Rd

34. African Hair Braiding & Extension Centre

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Servicing and Deliveries Loading out front K Rd.

Access requirements Customers park nearby or walk in off street. Request options on where customer can park.

Access to property biggest concern.

292 - 300 K Rd Page 58

35. ArtSpace

| Karangahape Station Main Works

SIBD door knocked and contact details left.

/

Mitigation Affected businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area. The Link Alliance will provide advance notice of the loss of on streetcar parking and the provision of signage to identify additional public car parking will be considered as part of the DRP. No works are proposed outside of the property but affected businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area and waste locations. The Link Alliance will provide advance notice of the loss of on streetcar parking and the provision of signage to identify additional public car parking will be considered as part of the DRP. No impact on pedestrian access.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier 36. Tautai Guiding Pacific Arts

Meeting summary SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Feedback Servicing and Deliveries Off East St which leads to the rear of the property - retain access. Access requirements Customers park nearby or walk in off the street. Request parking alternatives if lost.

Amenity Limit noise during art show hours. Concern over noisy construction vehicles travelling up East St. Inform of construction vehicle routes.

37. K Rd Mart 312 K Rd

38. Ivan Anthony Gallery

SIBD door knocked and contact details left.

Mitigation Access to private properties will be retained. The Link Alliance will provide advance notice of the loss of on streetcar parking and the provision of signage to identify additional public car parking will be considered as part of the DRP.

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP. Implementation of the CCP to ensure affected parties are kept informed, with the Communications & Engagement Manager leading on engagement with the owner.

/ Access Customers park nearby or walk in off street. Parking is a concern, question where people will be able to park.

The Link Alliance will provide advance notice of the loss of on streetcar parking. Signage to identify additional public car parking will be considered as part of the DRP.

Page 59

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

Meeting summary

39. Michael Lett Gallery

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / occupier.

Feedback Amenity Concern over noisy construction vehicles travelling up East St. Limit noise during art show hours Servicing and Deliveries Deliveries directly outside (East St) retain access.

Access requirements Customers park nearby or walk in off street - retain access. Amenity Concern over noisy construction vehicles travelling up East St. Request to be informed of construction vehicle routes. East Street 8 East 40. Vacant Street 10 East Street

41. Adio Trust

SIBD door knocked and discussion with onsite worker. SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with manager.

Asbestos currently being removed from building, but no concerns raised. Access requirements Critical health service dependant on ease of access to clinic. Ease of access on East St is essential Vehicle access up East St at all times of the day is essential (24 hr access). If access to surrounding streets impacted this will affect how easily people can get to the premises.

Page 60

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Mitigation Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP. Affected businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area and waste locations. Pedestrian access will be retained – no mitigation required. Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

No specific mitigation required.

Refer to Section 8.13 Diverse Community and Vulnerable Groups and 8.14 Community Safety of the SIBD DWP.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

12 East Street

Property/ Occupier

42. Residential Mixed use

Meeting summary

SIBD door knock meeting with residential occupier.

Feedback Business / Customer Effects Open 10am-8pm. ‘Vending machine’ dispensing clean needles is open 24 hours. Amenity Vibration sensitive. Lots of sensitive medical equipment. Equipment might be compromised if vibration occurs too much. Wayfinding Clear signage directing to business would be helpful

Access One on-site car parking. Two on-street car parks but accepting that there is no entitlement to on-street car parks.

Maintain access for on-site car parking. 14 East Street

43. Mixed residential and commercial use

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / occupier.

Amenity Concerns for noise, vibration, and construction effects and their proximity to them that would mean they will end their tenancy at this location.

Mitigation

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

Wayfinding measures will be utilised to guide members of the public to the premises.

The Link Alliance will provide advance notice of the loss of on street car parking and the provision of signage to identify additional public car parking will be considered as part of the DRP. Vehicular access will be maintained. The implementation of the DWPs will be used to mitigate the effects of the early works. Additional support measure for affected businesses will be identified in the DRP if required.

Page 61

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

16 East Street

44. Studio Q

18 East Street

45. Residential

15 – 19 East Street

Page 62

46. Backpacker Car World

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Meeting summary

SIBD door knocked. Communications team to follow up on engagement. SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with owner.

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / occupier.

Feedback Access No foot traffic or clients to the site. Access through gate to car parking area for at least 4x car parks. Other comment 2x residential flats upstairs.

Mitigation Noted not specific mitigation required.

Implementation of the CCP to ensure affected parties are kept informed.

/

Amenity The property is currently rented out and the owner is concerned that tenants will leave once the construction works start due to noise and disruption. Other Comments CRL are communicating in regard to the purchase of the rear section of the property, but the owner is not responding as she does not feel CRL are listening to her or appreciate the value/rental income of the property. Access Loss of car parking will affect business as customers won’t have anywhere to park on-street, or if car parking is provided within the yard (off-street) this will result in a loss of display area.

The implementation of the DWPs will be used to mitigate the effects of the early works, including the CNV DWP and SSCNV MP.

Implementation of the CCP to ensure affected parties are kept informed in regard to the early works. Refer to Section 9.3 in relation to Public Works Act. The Link Alliance will provide advance notice of the loss of on street car parking and the provision of signage to identify additional public car parking will be considered as part of the DRP.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

Meeting summary

Feedback Business / Customer Effects Concerns over construction traffic movements and the potential for vehicles to damage parked cars and stock. Requests CCTV be installed to monitor traffic and to capture any accidents. Concerned it will be difficult to evidence accidents that occur without CCTV.

Mitigation

Over-dimensional loads will be managed by limiting the movements of these vehicles outside of the commuter peak periods, and by applying mobile traffic management where these vehicles are required to traverse multiple lanes of traffic. Refer to the TAP DWP for further details.

Noise General noise and disruption will impact Noise and Vibration impacts on the work and be less attractive for customers. property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP. 17 Galatos Street 21 East Street

Page 63

47. Venue

48. UnoLoco Event Management

| Karangahape Station Main Works

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting. No place to leave contact details. SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with Business Owner/Manager

/

Visibility and Wayfaring Not a particular concern. Clients make appointments – don’t relying on customers arriving on impulse. Servicing and Deliveries Access for deliveries / pickups via the garage which fronts onto East Street. Items / props for events are stored in the garage and are dropped off / collected at all hours.

No specific mitigation required.

Private access will be maintained to the property. Affected businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

Meeting summary

Feedback Amenity Noise is a concern, due to the sound booth utilised by the business. It is located in the rear of the building (away from the East St frontage) but is very sensitive to noise – e.g. the internal air conditioning must be turned off when in use. It is in use approx. 2 -3 times per week. Construction noise would be very disruptive.

Mitigation Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

The noise may also be disruptive for staff working in the office. The building is also not well insulated. This could prevent staff from concentrating. The meeting rooms are also located on the East St frontage so noise may disrupt client and internal meetings. Dust may also be an issue in the garage. Props for events are stored in the garage and do not want these damaged.

Access Staff and customers park on the surrounding streets. Pedestrian and vehicle access are via the front door and garage on East Street.

Page 64

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Dust suppression techniques will be used. Refer to the AQ DWP for details.

Pedestrian and vehicle access to the property will be maintained and wayfinding measures will be utilised to guide members of the public to the premises.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

23 East Street

49. European Motors

Meeting summary

Feedback

Mitigation

Noise Quiet periods required in order to successfully identify mechanical issues. Concern over noise form the project will impact his ability to do his job well.

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

Servicing and Deliveries Large vehicles on East St. Waste oil / tyres / couriers Access requirements Road tests for vehicles, need access up East St. Generally, do a loop around Cross St / Mercury Lane. Customers dropping off cars to his shop

Over-dimensional loads will be managed by limiting the movements of these vehicles outside of the commuter peak periods, and by applying mobile traffic management where these vehicles are required to traverse multiple lanes of traffic. Refer to the TAP DWP for further details. Ongoing engagement and notification to be led / coordinated by the Communications & Engagement Manager.

29 East Street

Page 65

50. International Earth Sciences (IESE) Ltd

| Karangahape Station Main Works

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meetings (two – follow up with acoustician) with

Amenity Owner advised that they have their own noise monitoring equipment. They will monitor levels and contact Auckland Council should the limits be exceeded.

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

51. Electric Bike Team

Page 66

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Meeting summary Business Owner/Manager.

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with Business Owner/Manager.

Feedback Customer/ Business Effects Concerned about impact on business from dust, asbestos contamination and rat infestations as a result of the demolition of the Mercury Plaza. Requested written confirmation of how these issues have been dealt with. Are there management plans? Access Disruption to access would incur a cost for the business.

Mitigation

Requested written confirmation regarding any changes to access and parking affecting their office, and details of the process to follow if they find their access is restricted.

Ongoing engagement and notification to be led / coordinated by the Communications & Engagement Manager.

Particularly concerned about the effects on access, parking and queuing on public roads. Effect of construction traffic on vehicle access a major concern with queuing outside the site and volumes of movements. Effect on car parking along East Street on narrow roads. Access Concern about access for Trucks to the Compound if they use East Street. Traffic management – problems with drivers speeding around corner up East St.

Refer to TAP DWP mitigation measures.

Demolition works are carried out under OPW OPW60339200. All DWPs will be available on the CRL website - Communications & Engagement Manager to notify.

Business support measures will be identified in the DRP if required.

Refer to the TAP DWP for further details of required mitigation.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

Meeting summary

Feedback Concern with narrow foot path.

General Provide better connection from station to the bike path once project completed. Amenity Store very close to compound.

52. Think Concepts

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with Business Owner/Manager.

Amenity Noise is a particular concern; may cause disruption to work. They are planning to install some internal glass partitions in the next month or so, to create meeting rooms along the East Street frontage (adjacent to the CRL construction services area). Access Car parking for the business is provided in basement. Want to ensure the road remains open so that customers and staff have access to the car parks.

South Street Page 67

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Mitigation

Noted.

The suite of DWPs will manage and / or mitigate amenity impacts as far as practicable. Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

Vehicular access to the premises will be maintained. The TAP DWP will be implemented which includes traffic management and mitigation.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address 2 South Street

Property/ Occupier 53. Residential

Meeting summary SIBD and Acoustic site visit and contact details left.

Feedback Amenity The occupier lives and works on site. Noise is a concern as the occupier is on site all day. Requested no noise outside of 8am – 6pm. Is also concerned that should adapted shipping containers be used to provide temporary pedestrian access around the construction sites they will generate noise – the sheet metal panels used in these create a lot of noise underfoot. Concerned about tracking of mud and soil from the construction sites onto the surrounding streets and footpaths. This could make its way inside – this is not acceptable.

2A South Street

54. Residential

17 South Limited

55. Gorilla Technology

Page 68

| Karangahape Station Main Works

SIBD and Acoustic site visit and contact details left. SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with

Access Pedestrian and vehicle access to the property is via South Street. There are 5 car parks on site; 2 are used by tenants in the cottages around the corner, one by the interviewee, and also by tenants of the residential unit at 2 South Street. /

Customer/ Business Effects The business records podcasts – their recording space is available for customers

Mitigation Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

DWPs, including the CEMP, will be implemented to prevent mud and soil tracking on the road.

Vehicular and pedestrian access to the premises will be maintained. The TAP DWP will be implemented which includes traffic management and mitigation.

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

Meeting summary Business Owner/Manager.

Feedback to rent at any time of the day or night. Have concerns about the effect of noise and vibration on the podcast recordings. Access Pedestrian access is via the front door on South Street. Staff and customers park on the surrounding streets. Have that construction workers and any other locals who’s normal carparking spaces have been removed due to CRL will occupy the spaces they rely on. Some of their customers are politicians who are accompanied by security staff (i.e. require multiple cars), therefore availability of on street car parks in important. Want to ensure vehicle access to the property via surrounding streets remains available. Suggested imposing time limits for on-street car parks to ensure people don’t occupy the spaces all day.

56. World Net

Cross Street Unit 5 - 1 57. Glamuzina Cross Architects Street Page 69

| Karangahape Station Main Works

SIBD and Acoustic site visit and contact details left.

/

SIBD and acoustic door knock and left contact details. Representative

Refer to Section 6.7 of the SIBD DWP.

Mitigation CNV DWP. Other support actions will be developed as part of the DRP.

The Link Alliance will provide advance notice of the loss of on street car parking and the provision of signage to identify additional public car parking will be considered as part of the DRP.

Vehicular and pedestrian access to the premises will be maintained. The TAP DWP will be implemented which includes traffic management and mitigation.

/


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

58. Epsilon Law; Black & Blue Ltd

Meeting summary attended the Cross Street Market Community Event. SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the individual Business Owner/Manager.

Feedback

Mitigation

Noise / Business Effects Concerns about impacts on noise during working hours. One occupier indicated that they would leave the building if noise was disruptive.

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP. Other support actions will be developed as part of the DRP.

Need for sound insulation. Concerns about the effect of noise and vibration on the recording equipment/studio.

59. The Aviary 60. Nisha Madhan 61. Motion Sickness 62. Voice Brand Agency

63. IMPAC Services

Page 70

| Karangahape Station Main Works

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the

Access Need for pedestrian access and access to car parking areas.

Vehicular and pedestrian access to the premises will be maintained. The TAP DWP will be implemented which includes traffic management and mitigation.

Other Comments Request for ongoing updates on works.

Ongoing engagement and notification to be led / coordinated by the Communications & Engagement Manager.

Other Comments The business is relocating to new premises.

No mitigation is required.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

2 Cross Street

64. Cross Street Markets

2A Cross Street

65. The Warren Woodwork

Page 71

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Meeting summary individual Business Owner/Manager. SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting and subsequent Cross Street Market Community Event. SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager and subsequent Cross Street Market Community Event.

Feedback

Mitigation

Refer to Section 6.7 of the SIBD DWP.

Feedback from the meeting has been used to inform Section 8 of the SIBD.

Visibility and Wayfaring Not a particular concern. They have some impulse shoppers / enquiries. A proportion are via word of mouth from Cross Street Market, the rest are on their database therefore come to the business for a specific purpose. Amenity Their business is reasonably noisy itself therefore construction noise is not a particular concern. Dust however is more concerning as they do keep their door onto Cross Street open. They have a mechanical ventilation system in the workshop – this does not bring in air from the outside. Access Not overly concerned about access. Advised that access to the business / workshop is via the door on Cross Street. Courier deliveries use this access. Customers either park nearby or walk to classes if local to the area. The classes are typically in the evening.

No specific mitigation required.

Dust suppression techniques will be used. Refer to the AQ DWP for details.

The Link Alliance will provide advance notice of the loss of on street car parking and the provision of signage to identify additional public car parking will be considered as part of the DRP.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address Property/ Occupier Pitt Street 40 Pitt 66. Central Fire Street Station

70 Pitt Street

67. Chattham Apartments

72-80 Pitt Street (multiple units)

68. Pitt St Methodist Church

69. Flying out movie and music store

Meeting summary

Feedback

Mitigation

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Services Manager. Two SIBD site visits – no place to leave calling card and no contact details available online. Initial SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting followed by an arranged meeting with SME and Construction Contractor.

Request for a meeting with SMEs, Construction Contractor and Fire Service Personnel.

Communications & Engagement Manager is organising a meeting to be attended by SMEs.

/

Refer to Section 6.5 of the SIBD DWP.

Access requirements Need customer access to the front door. Need access to a loading space. Carparks at rear of building.

Pedestrian access will be maintained to the property. The businesses will be notified of changes to the car park access, and the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area.

Amenity Visibility, noise and dust main concern. There is a small podcast recording area downstairs in the basement but not expected to be disrupted by the construction activity. Front door is main ventilation. Page 72

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP. Other support actions will be developed as part of the DRP.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

82 Pitt Street

Property/ Occupier

70. Def Store

Meeting summary

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Feedback Other Comments Lots of creative people in the community who could contribute to artwork. Servicing and Deliveries Utilise the church parking space for loading, when needed.

Access The priority is to have access to their front door. Noise Concerned about noise.

47 Pitt Street

Page 73

71. Auckland central ambulance station

| Karangahape Station Main Works

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Mitigation Noted and opportunities will be explored as part of the DRP. The businesses will be notified of changes to the car park access, and the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area. Pedestrian access will be maintained to the property.

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

Business / Customer Effects Concerned about overall experience when inside the shop. 90% of visitors are walk-ins, hence need for good visibility and pedestrian access.

Wayfinding measures will be utilised to guide members of the public to the premises.

Visibility into the shop is very important

Visibility impacts will be minimised via the use of mesh or low rise fencing if practicable.

Noise Noise and vibration are less of a concern – equipment is built for ambulances.

No specific mitigation required.

Access


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

55-59 Pitt Street

Property/ Occupier

72. Vada Hairdresser

Meeting summary

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Feedback Transport issues discussed at meeting regarding TAP DWP. Other Comments Homeless sleeping is prevalent in the area.

Mitigation Refer to TAP DWP.

Welcomed wider communication and information on the wider Emergency Planning Strategy.

Ongoing engagement and notification to be led / coordinated by the Communications & Engagement Manager.

Access Needs easy and convenient customer access. Taxi/uber drop off and pick up point. Convenient drop off and pick up point for customers is essential (e.g. uber drop off/pickup). Business / Customer Effects Would appreciate anything that can be done to avoid deterring clients especially at Christmas time. January is very quiet and a good time to do works.

Page 74

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Refer to Section 7.13 Diverse Community and Vulnerable Groups

Pedestrian access will be maintained for customers, with wayfaring signage used to direct customers around the works. This will include customers arriving via uber. Taxi stands are not impacted by the early works.

DWPs will be implemented to avoid impacts of the works over the Christmas period, and the business owner will be updated on the works by the Communications & Engagement Manager.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

73. Tattoo Parlour

Meeting summary

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Feedback Visibility and Wayfaring Visibility is a priority. Currently benefit from good visibility due to the corner location and large picture windows on both sides of the building.

Other Comments Planning to invest in interior of shop and is very concerned about the financial impact of the project. But understands the value and importance of the project to Auckland and the area. Positive supporter of the CRL project. Access requirements Access to front door. Access to carparking building in Beresford Square.

Wayfinding Would like opportunity for signage on hoardings.

Other Comments Power and internet connections are essential for day to day business – therefore cannot lose access.

Page 75

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Mitigation Wayfinding measures will be utilised to guide members of the public to the premises. Visibility impacts will be minimised via the use of mesh or low rise fencing if practicable. The implementation of the DWPs will help mitigate the impacts on the business and support measure will be identified in the DRP if required.

Pedestrian access will be maintained to the property and vehicular access to the car park.

Wayfinding measures will be utilised to guide customers to the premises, and signage displayed to the car park building on Beresford Sq. if required.

Advance notice will be given of any network disruption in line with the CCP and / or by the utility provider.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier 74. Neighbourhood Good NZ

Meeting summary SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Feedback Access / Servicing and Deliveries Customers currently benefit from relatively easy access to the shop and available on street parking.

Mitigation Pedestrian access will be maintained for customers, with wayfaring signage used to direct customers around the works.

Loading access required.

The businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area.

Concerned with the duration and loss of carparking outside the shop in Beresford Square

DRP will identify business support measures and consider signage to other car parks.

Have subsequently moved location to Karangahape Road 2020

Business / Customer Effects Uninterrupted electricity and internet is VIP to continued business activity.

Concerned that with all the works going on in the area K Road will become a high avoidance area for retail.

Page 76

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Moved location in anticipation as their customers tend to have small children. Positive relationship with the owners remain.

Advance notice will be given of any network disruption in line with the CCP and / or by the utility provider. The implementation of the DWPs will help mitigate the impacts on the business and support measure will be identified in the DRP if required.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

Meeting summary

Feedback Amenity Experience with the trenching works is that they were very noisy.

Mitigation

Very concerned about outlook to the building site, lighting and access to the shopfront all

The implementation of the DWPs will help mitigate the impacts on the business and support measure will be identified in the DRP if required.

Wayfinding and Visibility Visibility is key to customers. Currently relies on passing trade.

Wayfinding measures will be utilised to guide members of the public to the premises.

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

Visibility impacts will be minimised via the use of mesh or low rise fencing if practicable. 75. Waves Vintage

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Access Pedestrian access for customers is priority. Needs access to carpark. Wayfinding Visibility to the shop window.

Business Effects Uninterrupted electricity and internet is important to continued business activity.

Page 77

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Pedestrian and vehicle access will be maintained – no specific mitigation required. Wayfinding measures will be utilised to guide members of the public to the premises. Advance notice will be given of any network disruption in line with the CCP and / or by the utility provider.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

Meeting summary

Feedback Other Comments Advance communication is very important. Need to know about the extent of barriers outside her property

76. Red Bar

Door knock meeting with Business Owner/Manager. He also came to an Information Hub session.

No real concerns as their business primarily runs outside of construction times and does not require parking for patrons. .

77. Graphic Design

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Noise Wil not be able to work in the building if vibration and noise is significant.

Access requirements Owner requires access at all hours 24/7. Loading bay access is required. Losing traffic access from Beresford square is biggest downside but not end of the world. Not a lot of foot traffic in Beresford square unless people live or work there.

Page 78

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Mitigation Implementation of the CCP to ensure affected parties are kept informed, with the Communications & Engagement Manager leading on engagement regarding barriers. Owner if a supporter of the project.

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

Pedestrian access will be maintained – no specific mitigation required. The DRP will identify business support measures. The businesses will be notified of closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

Meeting summary

Feedback Business Effects Uninterrupted electricity and internet is important to continued business activity. Other Comments Relocation of toilets should be in eyesight of where they are now so people can see them and still us

Mitigation Advance notice will be given of any network disruption in line with the CCP and / or by the utility provider. Refer to Section 8.14 Community Safety of the SIBD DWP.

Anti-Social and homelessness are issues in the area. Interested in providing community design input to final outcome for Beresford Square. 61 Pitt Street

78. Johnny Feedback Coffee Shop

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Servicing and Deliveries Along Pitt St. Receive deliveries approx. twice a week.

Access requirements Retain access as customers are foot traffic, or from nearby offices. Wayfinding Wayfinding signage important as customer base is mainly foot traffic. Amenity Noise is a concern. Page 79

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Noted and opportunities will be explored as part of the DRP.

The businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area. Pedestrian access will be maintained, but wayfaring signage will be implemented to ensure ease of access for customers.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

Beresford Square 15 & 19 79. Hopetoun Beresford Alpha Square

Meeting summary

Feedback

Two SIBD site visits and follow up voicemail to the occupier.

Summary of key comments from arranged meeting with the owner: Major concern with Parking, truck access and need for a discussion on Houptoun Alpha. Concerned this will be a repeat of Albert Street and businesses in the area will all fold Does not feel confident with AT and insist it must be done better than Albert St. Hopeful for better results for Beresford Square. Would like to meet and discuss hoardings and get a better understanding of what is planned for the businesses in the area

Arranged meeting with building owner (also owns a number of properties in the areas including 1 Cross Street)

Page 80

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Mitigation Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

Refer to the mitigation set out in Section 8. Continued engagement by the Communication & Engagement Manager in line with the CCP, including in relation to the DRP.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address 1–7 Beresford Square

Property/ Occupier 80. Northern Line

Meeting summary SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager. Follow up meeting arranged with the construction contractor.

Feedback Business Effects Very concerned about continued viability of business but owner met with the contractor and now understands scope of works and impact on his outdoor area. Access and use of his outdoor area is very important along with visibility. Heavily reliance on outdoor seating area.

Mitigation The DRP will identify business support measures, which may include support for businesses to obtain outdoor licenses.

The Communication & Engagement Manager will explain the programme to the business to allow them to plan ahead.

Christmas is busiest trading week and concerns about impacts on customers during this period. Concerned with the impact on the business over the four-year development timeframe. Concerned that hoarding might result in loss Access The only entrance is off Beresford square. Wayfaring / Visibility The business enjoys very good visibility from Pitt St and Beresford Square and wants to maintain this as much as possible.

Pedestrian access will be maintained.

Wayfinding measures will be utilised to guide members of the public to the premises. Visibility impacts will be minimised via the use of mesh or low rise fencing if practicable.

Servicing and Deliveries Page 81

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier 81. Bravo Hospitality

Meeting summary SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Feedback Usually on Beresford Square - retain access / provide close alternative.

Access requirements Staff have 3 – 4 carparks in the Beresford Square car park building. Drop in interviews, but generally office just used by staff. Amenity Noise – ground floor business so important noise is adequately mitigated. 82. Sugar and Partners

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Servicing and Deliveries Deliveries are via the car parking building accessed off Beresford Square Normal daily deliveries of milk / groceries etc. Access requirements Staff vehicle access is via the car parking building accessed off Beresford Square Need notification of any changes or alternatives.

General Biggest concern is vehicle access to car park building on Beresford Sq. Inform early if not achievable. Page 82

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Mitigation The businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area. Pedestrian and vehicle access to off street car parking will be maintained.

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP. The businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area.

Pedestrian and vehicle access to off street car parking will be maintained. The Link Alliance will implement the CCP and notify the business of access changes. Pedestrian and vehicle access to off street car parking will be maintained


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

Meeting summary

Feedback Amenity Noise and visibility are concerns.

Mitigation Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP. Visibility impacts will be minimised via the use of mesh or low rise fencing if practicable.

83. Theta System Limited

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Servicing and Deliveries Deliveries are via the car parking building accessed off Beresford Sq. Access requirements Staff vehicle access is via the car parking building accessed off Beresford Square. Staff occupy majority of car parks in this building. Need notification of any changes or alternatives as critical to business. Amenity Noise request to mitigate as much as possible.

16-18 Beresford Square

84. Centurion Sauna

22-28 Beresford Square

85. Residential

Page 83

| Karangahape Station Main Works

SIBD team called to arrange a meeting / attendance at Info Hub / Community event. SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting and follow up meeting with

/

Amenity Investigation works have started in Beresford Square and is already finding

Vehicle access to off street car parking will be maintained Pedestrian and vehicle access to off street car parking will be maintained. The Link Alliance will implement the CCP and notify the business of access changes.

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property/ Occupier

Meeting summary residents. Residents also attended the Beresford Square community event - Refer to Section 6.7 of the SIBD.

Feedback the noise disruptive. One occupier requested double glazing. Concern about noise levels during future stages and outdoor balcony areas will be unusable. To manage the impact the occupier has requested double glazing of all the windows on the Beresford Square frontage and a heat pump to manage the heat in summer. Access Pedestrian and car park access needs to be maintained.

Concerns about the level of construction traffic. Other Comments Concern about the impacts on the appearance and character of Beresford Square and local businesses. Day Street 36 Day 86. Residential Street

Page 84

| Karangahape Station Main Works

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting and follow up meeting with residents. Residents also

Mitigation Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

Amenity Concern about noise levels during construction works and concerns that tenants will move.

Pedestrian and vehicle access to off street car parking will be maintained Refer to TAP DWP mitigation measures.

Refer to Section 8.11 of the SIBD.

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.


Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Page 85

Property/ Occupier

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Meeting summary attended the Beresford Square community event - Refer to Section 6.7 of the SIBD.

Feedback Access Pedestrian and car park access needs to be maintained.

Mitigation

Concerns about the level of construction traffic.

Refer to TAP DWP mitigation measures.

Pedestrian and vehicle access to off street car parking will be maintained


Communication and Consultation Plan

Appendix C: Engagement Material – Brochure and Flyer

Page 86

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan

Appendix D: Project Roles and Responsibilities Role

Name

Contact details

Responsibilities

Karangahape Community Manager

Simon Mitchell

karangahape@linkallia nce.co.nz

● ●

Page 87

| Karangahape Station Main Works

Manages a communications and engagement team that is the primary contact for project related enquiries and complaints Having ongoing conversations with the community to keep them informed of key construction activity, milestones, programme and progress Utilising a range of communications tools including face-to-face engagement, works notifications, dropin sessions, station email addresses, digital channels including the CRL website and social media and the CRL freephone number, to have ongoing conversations with the business and residential communities about best ways to manage effects and impacts Managing stakeholder risks and immediately reporting any high-risk stakeholder / communication issues to the Karangahape Station Project Manager and Communications and Engagement Manager. Assisting the CRLL Communications team with key stakeholder engagement including the Mana Whenua Forum, Local Board engagement and media. Providing advice to the Karangahape Station Project Manager / Construction Manager on critical stakeholder engagement, communications and relationship building. Co-ordination of Karangahape CLG meetings. Assisting the Karangahape Station Construction Manager in briefing site personnel on: o - The mandatory site inductions regarding the standards and


Communication and Consultation Plan

Link Alliance Development Response Manager

Arash Barzin

arash.barzin@linkallian ce.co.nz

● ● ● ●

Social Impact and Business Disruption Monitoring

John Daly

John.daly@linkalliance. com

Page 88

| Karangahape Station Main Works

requirements for community relations; o - Procedures to follow if staff are approached by a member of the public or the media; and Behavioural procedures in and around the construction site boundaries.

Manages planning, delivery and evaluation of the overall Development Response Plan for the Aotea precinct. Manages street response measures including street cleaning, graffiti removal. Co-ordinates business promotion events. Co-ordinates business support programme. Proactively identifying opportunities to mitigate impact on businesses. Regular audits of the construction sites, including the DRP, and address issues with the construction manager. Monitoring of SIBD Effects and mitigation measures, via: o Attendance or review of minutes from CLG, Business Forum and / or consultation events to monitor SIBD impacts. o Undertake SIBD engagement to inform the annual report or updates of the SIBD DWP. o Review of feedback, public enquiries and complaints raised by affected parties for annual report. Share feedback with the project team, and co-ordination and facilitation of responses. Prepare, review and update SIBD DWP (if required), including identifying additional affected parties and mitigation measures. Preparation of the annual SIBD monitoring report and reporting to CLG (As required by Condition 61.8).


Communication and Consultation Plan

Appendix E: Development Response The Link Alliance will implement the following measures in conjunction with the affected community as far as practicable. The DRP is a live document and opportunities for additional mitigation will be sought from the affected community from future engagement and in response to SIBD monitoring. Business Support package A free of charge business support package which includes: ● ● ●

12 months with a Business Mentor from Business Mentors NZ, a 12-month membership with the Auckland Business Chamber, and free social media training.

Trader Directory An online directory promoting businesses to the 1600+ CRL workers expected at peak construction, encouraging them to shop local and to use local services and facilities. Also accessible by Auckland’s wider community. The Trader Directory will be printed and available at all construction sites, handed out to cruise ship passengers and will be promoted using established social media channels. It is free to list local businesses and Link Alliance has received strong interest in the Trader Directory already. Business may register by emailing the City Rail Link at traders@cityraillink.govt.nz. Meet the Neighbours Series A ‘meet the neighbours’ series which profiles local businesses providing insights into business owners and the challenges and opportunities that exist neighbouring the CRL project. The series is included in the CRL project newsletter ‘CRL Connection’ which is disseminated to more than 4000 people. The profiles are also promoted on our existing social media channels and have been shared by Heart of the City in their e-newsletter also. Street cleaning and maintenance Link Alliance will work closely with council contractor cleaning services to prioritise construction areas with regular cleaning, that is often more regular and thorough than the businesses have normally. Business, Venues and Community Organisation advertising Link Alliance will work with businesses to include advertising where possible on hoarding structures. Additional temporary signage has also been created to help further emphasise that these businesses are open. Wayfinding and Business, Venues and Community Organisations Signage Link Alliance will display wayfinding signage at key points to help pedestrians navigate their way through diversions and to find businesses and community organisations within the affected community area. Signage will also be displayed for major events within the affected community area.

Activations and Events Page 89

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Communication and Consultation Plan Working with our partners to leverage key events and festivals and promotional opportunities such as the Pride Festival, Cross Street Music Festival and the Fringe Festival. Link Alliance will also implement activation opportunities along the corridor and undertake a number of tours along the project corridor each month. Loading Bays and Car Parking Proactive communication regarding the closure and changes to loading bays and on-street car parking to allow businesses to plan ahead. Hoardings and Fences Hoardings will be required throughout the construction programme for Karangahape Station. However, hoardings will be removed when no longer required if practicable. Additionally, low rise or open mesh fencing, ‘Perspex’ windows and lighting installed to maintain visibility.

Page 90

| Karangahape Station Main Works


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Outline Plan by City Rail Link Ltd - Issuu