City Rail Link Project In association with:
REFERENCE DESIGN Mandated Design Philosophy
Document Ref: CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 8 May 2017 Revision 1.0
INTERNAL WORKING DOCUMENT COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE
Document control record
Document prepared by: Aurecon New Zealand Limited Level 4, 139 Carlton Gore Road Newmarket Auckland 1023 PO Boc 9762 Newmarket Auckland 1149 New Zealand
T +64 9 520 6019 F +61 9 524 7815 E auckland@aurecongroup.com W aurecongroup.com A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon.
Document control Report Title
Mandated Design Philosophy
Document ID
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002
Project number
239933
Auckland Transport
Client contact
Steve Hawkins
File path Client Rev
Date
Revision details / status
Prepared by
Author
Verifier
Approver
1.0
8 May 2016
Data drop EOI
M.Pineda
C. Jack
M. Walton
G. Daniels
Current revision
1.0
Approval
Page 2
Author signature
Approver signature
Name
Name
Title
Title
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Contents
1 Overview.................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Mandated Design elements 4 1.2 Scope 4 2 2.1
Te Aranga Principles ............................................................................................. 6 Te Aranga Principles 6
3 Linewide concept.................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Linewide concept 8 3.2 Concept elements 8 3.3 Design requirements - Sky element 10 3.4 Process 10 3.5 Evaluation criteria 10 3.6 Reference Design benchmark 14 3.7 Design requirements - Earth element 18 3.8 Process 18 3.9 Evaluation criteria 18 3.10 Reference design benchmark 26 4 4.1
Internal Linings...................................................................................................... 30 Design requirements - Internal linings 30
5 5.1 5.2
The Threshold element......................................................................................... 34 Design requirements 34 Contractor interface requirements 34
6 6.1 6.2
The Fourth Element............................................................................................... 46 Design requirements 46 Evaluation criteria 46
7 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7
Station planning - Aotea Station.......................................................................... 52 Aotea Station 52 Wellesley Street 53 Victoria Street entrance 56 Station concourse 58 Station platform 61 Karangahape Station 64 Mt Eden Station 70
8 8.1 8.2 8.3
Urban realm - Precinct streetscapes.................................................................. 72 Albert Street (Wyndham to Wellesley Street) 72 Pitt Street to Mercury Lane 74 Ruru Street, Nikau Street, Korari Street 76
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 3
1
Overview
1.1
Mandated Design elements
This section identifies the design elements relating to the architectural, public art and public realm within the scope of works which;
1.2
Scope
• The scope of the mandated design elements covers; • Te Aranga principles and the Mana Whenua narrative matrix;
• have been the subject of significant stakeholder engagement and design inputs in the development of the principal design requirements and the Reference Design; and
• the linewide concept; • station planning;
• are a mandated outcome of this process. • public realm reinstatement and While Tenderers may choose to investigate opportunities to further improve or enhance the design response for these elements, they should;
• the public art process.
• identify and familiarise themselves with the full technical performance, material and workmanship commitments, constraints and requirements associated with the design of these elements; • address these and the actual limitations that they may impose on any improvements or enhancements that they are considering; and • develop the mandated elements in compliance with those principal design requirements.. The following chapters describe the: • areas for mandated design; • defined scope of the mandated areas, which are those areas within the “red lines” on the drawings within this document and are defined as the Red Line Drawings; • background information and benchmarking of the architectural elements of the Reference Design; and. • qualitative criteria for assessment of detailed design development.
Page 4
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Linewide concept diagram
View from Albert Street looking south
SKY
Sky
Threshold THRESHOLD
Earth
Papatuanuku + Ranginui
EARTH
Figure 1-1  Linewide Concept diagram
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 5
2
Te Aranga Principles
2.1
Te Aranga Principles
The CRL Designation conditions, specific to mana whenua design principles, highlight various conceptual opportunities for delivering design outcomes that help to deepen our sense of place. The opportunities must also be considered holistically across the project area to ensure consistency is achieved within the wider public realm/streetscape. The architectural elements of the Reference Design of the stations has embraced the Te Aranga design principles and recognised the unique opportunity presented by embracing a Te Ao Maori perspective as core to the design expression of both the inside and outside of the stations. The Te Aranga design principles, through partnership with Mana Whenua, have been overlaid with line wide and local narrative opportunities which have been consolidated into a narrative matrix. This matrix is identified in Figure 1-2 and must inform any further creative expression and design development for the development of the Concept Design. The development, application and resolution of these narratives, and their embodiment within the Concept Design, must be undertaken through a consultative and review process with the CRL’s Representative and Mana Whenua during the interactive tendering phase of the Tender process, to ensure the Tenderer’s interpretations and resolutions of these narratives are expressed creatively, appropriately and correctly.
Core Māori values have informed the development of earlier Māori design principles. These process-oriented principles have provided the foundation for, and underpin the application of, the outcome-oriented Te Aranga Māori Design Principles. • Rangatiratanga: The right to exercise authority and selfdetermination within ones own iwi / hapū realm. • Kaitiakitanga: managing and conserving the environment as part of a reciprocal relationship, based on the Māori world view that we as humans are part of the natural world. • Manaakitanga: the ethic of holistic hospitality whereby mana whenua have inherited obligations to be the best hosts they can be. • Wairuatanga: the immutable spiritual connection between people and their environments. • Kotahitanga: unity, cohesion and collaboration. • Whanaungatanga: a relationship through shared experiences and working together which provides people with a sense of belonging. • Mātauranga: Māori / mana whenua knowledge and understanding • Mana Atua, Mana Tangata, Mana Whenua: acknowledging the relative authority and realms of the atua, humankind and whenua.
Page 6
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Mana Whenua narrative matrix
1
Te Aranga Principles
Definition
Aotea (Horotiu Station)
Karanga-a-Hape Station
Mt Eden (Maungawhau Station)
Mana/Rangatiratanga: Authority
The status of iwi and hapū as mana whenua is recognised and respected
Work collaboratively with mana whenua groups as well as wider mana whenua interests to ensure relationships are carried throughout the process of design – from reference design through construction and beyond
incorporating opportunities for the future programming of public spaces that recognise and visually identify mana whenua as respected co governance partners.
incorporating opportunities for the future programming of public spaces that recognise and visually identify mana whenua as respected co governance partners.
incorporating opportunities for the future programming of public spaces that recognise and visually identify mana whenua as respected co governance partners.
Whakapapa: Names & Naming
Māori names are celebrated
Horotiu Station:
Karanga-a-Hape:
Maungawhau
Naming of Station. Suggested working title reflects the proximity of the station entrances to Horotiu stream and visual connection (from Victoria St entrance) east to Horotiu Pa site (Albert Park). New station needs appropriate name.
Naming of Station. New station needs appropriate name. Ideas raised- Hape platform, Karanga-a-Hape platform
Naming of Station. Suggested working title reflects the proximity of the station and visual connection to Maungawhau (Mt Eden) . Ideas raised- Mataoho, Te Ipu kai ā Mataoho
Taiao: The Natural Environment
The natural environment is protected, restored and / or enhanced. Opportunities to bring back appropriate coastal broadleaf forest species into the urban environments are explored
Identify naming opportunities that reflect sites of significance and/or heritage/natural environment. These may manifest as actual site naming opportunities and/or contribute to a design language that reflects and celebrates the stories and values of the area Identify opportunities to reintroduce native vegetation (and subsequent bird & insect life) into the public realm:
Maramataka- moon (phases) and stars-signalling relevant season/times- e.g for planting certain crops (gardens-māra kai); for gathering berries or fishing for tuna. Raupo reeds, Ti kouka / cabbage tree (other examples elsewhere where silhouettes embossed into concrete.) Te Waiohorotiu [ what is the correct spelling?]- celebrating of the stream. Dense bush previously. Also look into planting of Taro to acknowledge the former māra kai in the area
Tāne Mahuta [Still relevant at Mercury Lane Station area] Possible planting of the big forest trees. E.g tōtara, kauri, rimu. Reflection of dense bush taller trees , Nga Tamariki a Tāne
Karā / Basalt-cooled basalt is black/dark Fire heat light, fluid, molten, soft shapes Important water sourceTe Ipu pākore Broken calabash narrative- coupled with the spring water. Whau –plant. Agreed to focus on the puna as opposed to the conflict Ngarahu-[black pigment in this meaning]
Natural environment Forest birds- images, sounds[potential key idea] feathers, bark, insects
Mauri Tu: Environmental Health
Environmental health is protected, maintained and / or enhanced. Landscape and building Materials are selected on the basis of their intrinsic connection to the area and synergy with mana whenua cultural narratives
Identify opportunities for sustainable, local material sourcing, community wellbeing and maintenance/enhancement of resources:
‘ Celebrating’ Te Waihorotiu , as a managed water feature Bio-retention may be difficult given the terrain- mechanical devices might need to be used. Planting of trees if possible. Work with Auckland Transport, Watercare and Council stormwater teams
(double ‘a’ reflecting origin of the name) Planting of trees – Extend Pohutukawa in this area, look into other appropriate gully native species looking at Te Wai Pāruru (Grafton Gully) as a unique remnant native plant habitat. . Minimal opportunity for bio- retention opportunities.Work with Auckland Transport, Watercare and Council stormwater teams
Mahi Toi: Creative Expression
Iwi/hapū narratives are captured and expressed creatively and appropriately
Opportunity to creatively inscribe iwi narratives into the public realm & engage iwi/hapu design
Horotiu: Relecting the former role and significance of this stream including the kaitiaki/ taniwha Rongo-mā-Tane- atua of the kūmara and cultivated food and one of the offspring of Rangi-nui and Papa-tū-ā-nuku, he is also known as Rongo-hīrea and Rongo-marae-roa-a-Rangi. Opportunity to look into the gardening implements that were discovered in Aotea square as inspirations for artworks / CNC motifs Haumia-tiketike atua of fernroot and uncultivated food - one of the offspring of Rangi and Papa. Also known as Haumia, Haumia-tikitiki and Haumia-roa. and Mapping, direction(s) connectivity-Showing historical setting(s) places in context of the Station. Mapping of the present presence and the past presence. Water feature on Victoria Street- nearer Queen street where Waihoritu would have been[ using artificial water feature to create a reference to the stream as steam actually some 10m or more below grade .] Maramataka- almanac, calendar - a planting and fishing monthly almanac Matariki- in realtion to the meaning- Pleiades, The Seven Sisters - an open cluster of many stars in the constellation Taurus, with at least seven stars visible to the naked eye. The brightest star is aso known as Matariki (Alcyone). The other six stars are: Tupu-ā-rangi (Electra), Waipuna-ā-rangi (Taygeta), Waitī (Maia), Ururangi (Pleione), Tupu-ā-nuku (Atlas) and Waitā (Merope). First appearance before sunrise of Matariki in the north-eastern sky indicates the beginning of the Māori year - about the middle of June. Matariki disappears at the end of the Māori year. During this time Matariki was said to visit four places, each for seven nights, Maukahau, Tārarau-ātea, Papawhakatangitangi and Tītore-māhu-tū. Need to ensure the Matariki constellation receives lighting treatments to signify times of the year. Check with Hoturoa Kerr / Rereata Makiha re number of whetu (and names) of stars in Matariki constellation. Also good to look at other constellations that are significant to Tāmaki. Taro – reflecting former Māori gardening practices and the swampy nature of the Aotea Square area. Peruperu – in relation to its meaning as potato, Solanum tuberosum - a general term sometimes used in the northern North Island, but also used for a particular cultivar- colour purple tones of the potato could be used as colour reference purapura whetū [a tukutuku pattern that represents the stars and the great numbers of people of a nation.] exterior faces of Victoria Street entrancesweaving
Karanga-a-Hape: Tane Mahuta Greens, blacks and browns of the forest, and blues of the sky. With flashes of relevant bird life colour. Piercing light[shafts] through canopy of the forest- capture and create this effect.
Desire to tap into and celebrate Te Ipu Pākore puna / aquifer within the station environment .Work with Auckland Transport, Watercare and Council stormwater teams Look into use of locally sourced Karā / basalt for use in landscaping, building and artworks. Explore use of local native timbers (Kauri die back source?) for threshold treatments. Need to engage with Kawerau ā maki re use of local kauri. St Lukes Timber another good source of ground recovery timber. Te Ipu Pakore- the broken calabash- Agreed not to reflect on the conflict side of this name Te Ipu Kai ā Mataoho - hua- quite a few possible relevant meanings- to bear fruit, be abundant: to flower, blossom; fruit, berry, roe, egg. Plus others? Kai bowl
Idea-linking element pointing to significant sites at each station, with half of the element in a material that is also at the next station and half for that station, which then appears half at the next station and so on and a linking device. Allowing various artists and artistic use of materials to be used/shown off. Insects/critters Birds Forest trees, barks/textures,
Figure 2-1 Te Aranga principles for the CRL stations
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 7
3
Linewide concept
3.1
Linewide concept
The Creation Story, Te Po, Te Whaiao, Te Ao Marama. The overall theme for the design elements of the CRL Project is their integration with the traditional Maori Creation Story (Creation Story) of the Atua (gods), which is a myth telling the story of Ranginui, the sky father, and Papatuanuku, the earth mother, and the emergence of the natural world, Te Ao Marama, from the darkness and nothingness, Te Po and Te Kore respectively. Ranginui, and Paptuanuku prevented light from reaching the world because of their close embrace and all was in darkness and nothingness. Their offspring, or Tupuna, plotted against their parents in order to separate the two and bring light into the world. Their son Tane was responsible for the separation by lying on his back and pushing his legs against Ranginui . By the separation of Ranginui,and Paptuanuku the world of light and the state of creation came into being. This informs the primary station entrance designs, the primary interior station architecture linings and the secondary station component elements within the public realm (for example canopies, tunnel vents, exhaust outlets).
3.2
Concept elements
The Concept Elements are considered to be made up of the following four primary elements for architectural expression of the narrative. • Sky Element - an architectural façade (generally as a rain screen) that is representative of Ranginui responding to both the narrative opportunity and the key functional and technical requirements of the station; • Earth Element - an architectural façade that is representative of Papatuanuku responding to both the narrative opportunity and the key functional and technical requirements of the station; • Threshold Element - a public art response that is representative of the relevant Atua identified for each station responding to the expression of station identity. A brief is to be provided to a selected Public Artist by the CRL and Auckland Council Arts team and delivered as an integrated artwork for the Station entrances by the Contractor. • Fourth Element - station common elements that are representative of Te Whaio for example tunnel vent shafts, secondary entrances and other station secondary elements within the public domain.
Page 8
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Figure 3-1 Artist Jane Crisp’s painting Tane Mahuta’s Triumph depicting the separation of Papatuanuku and Ranginui by Tane Mahuta
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 9
The Sky Element 3.3
Design requirements - Sky element
The Sky Element is an architectural façade that is common to the following main Station entrances and responds to the line wide theme derived from the Mana Whenua narrative pertaining to the creation story; • Aotea station - Wellesley Street entrance building (upper floors above main concourse level); • Karangahape Station – Mercury Lane entrance building (upper floors above main concourse level); and • Mt Eden Station - entrance building (main concourse, station building enclosure). The Sky Element is an architectural rain screen that responds to specific architectural, functional and contextual requirements, which include (but are not limited to); • expression of Ranginui in the central linewide theme of the Creation Story;. • high quality design, detail and material response to the façade; • moderation of sun, natural ventilation strategies and views as a double skin for accommodation spaces at Mt Eden Station; • response to technical and functional requirements, including mechanical ventilation and extraction requirements for buildings and station plant;
• Karangahape station, Mercury Lane building – Rain screen, twin skin to floors above ground level (3 elevations). Within the twin skin build up the internal elevation is the primary weather line for the plant room enclosures responding to weather proofing, air extract, air intake, access and other primary MEP interfaces to the building envelope. The exterior rain screen is the architectural element facing the public realm. • Mt Eden station, Ruru Street building and tunnel vent portal building – Rain screen, twin skin to floors above ground level (3 elevations). Within the twin skin build up the internal elevation is the primary weather line for the plant room enclosures responding to weather proofing, air extract, air intake, access and other primary MEP interfaces to the building envelope. The exterior rain screen is the architectural element facing the public realm
3.4
Process
It is expected that the Tenderer will further develop the Sky Element within the framework of the design requirements using the architectural elements of the Reference Design response as a starting point. The Tenderer is to develop: • the final modulation and surface finish exploring where feasible the common application of a single modular approach at all locations giving the advantage of common size, material specification and appearance and ease of maintenance from a common pool of replaceable, interchangeable components ;
• represents the realm of Ranginui in the Creation Story; • meets the functional requirements in responding to air and sun, including sunscreens, ventilation, air extract and air intakes, privacy, maintenance access and the reverse sensitivities to neighbouring buildings; • creates depth through the layering of facade and envelope elements; • integrates the Sky Element rain screen with the functional envelope; • uses integrates architectural treatments to address permeability, breathability and light modulation; • integrates any further overlay of the design narrative, for example purapura whetu; • resolves a considered rhythm of opening and enclosure holistically across the façade; • resolves the relationship of mass and tension to the Threshold Element and Earth Element; • addresses the mass of the Sky Element and openings for the scale and legibility of entrances and proportions within urban context; and
• the final material selection and mounting system; • a maintenance and cleaning regime for its design concept; and
• incorporates dynamic lighting as an additional embedded art response.
• the final perimeter geometry that is proximate to the Red Line indicated in figure 3-1,
• responds to the need for the economic use of common modular components across all three stations
• expression of entrance volumetric proportions; • scale, mass and proportion of the overall composition of earth, sky and threshold elements of the station massing; • scale, mass and proportion in relation to neighbouring buildings;
In the further development of the Sky Element, the design process will involve (but is not limited to the following);
The Tenderer must provide in its design response; • high quality, photo realistic visualisations and 3-dimensional BIM models;
• technical and performance requirements for finishes, material and maintenance for the life of the element; and
• regular design review meetings to be initiated by the Tenderer and include CRL’s Representative;
• dynamic lighting from within the facade at night
• presentations by the Tenderer and CRL’s Representative to the Mana Whenua design forum and other stakeholder groups; and
• sections, plans, assembly details and elevations required to fully convey design intent, detailing, assembly methodology and maintenance;
• gateway reviews by CRL’s Representative.
• materials boards;
The make-up and primary function of the Sky Element relative to each station entrance structure is as follows; • Aotea station, Wellesley Street entrance – Rain screen, twin skin to floors above ground level (4 elevations). Within the twin skin build up, the internal elevation is the primary weather line for the plant room enclosures responding to weather proofing, air extract, air intake, access and other primary mechanical, electrical and plumbing (MEP) interfaces to the building envelope. The exterior rain screen is the architectural element facing the public realm.
Page 10
3.5
Evaluation criteria
Evaluation of the quality of the Tenderer’s design of the Sky Element will be based on an assessment of the clarity, development and quality of the design in terms of how well it:
• precedent imagery; and • material samples and prototype assemblies.
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Aotea Station
Figure 3-2  Aotea Station, Wellesley Street entrance (exterior)
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 11
The Sky element
Figure 3-3  Maungawhau (Mt Eden) entrance (exterior)
Page 12
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Figure 3-4  Aotea Station, Wellesley Street entrance (exterior)
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 13
The Sky element - Reference design 3.6 Reference Sky facade represents theDesign realm of benchmark Ranginui in the creation story myth. It is conceived as a light, ephemeral and puffy element that may be shiny
As a benchmark theItArchitectural elements of the Design is a rain and/or reflective. is like the sky in being an Reference empty canvas. screen façade set off the building envelope allowing maintenance access and creating to has the facade. The skydepth facade a functional requirement as a: Sunscreens, ventilation,
extract and intakes, privacy (reverse sensitivities to neighbouring • a modulated designusing response consisting a 3-dimensional buildings). It is created a double skinofto control visibility of formal surface treatment that is contained within an over-all regular outcome and achieve various depths. It is generally a rain screen (the geometry modular skin). dimensions all three primary weatherusing linecommon is the internal The across sky uses perforations in stations. panels or louvres to address permeability / breathability / light modification which includes a further design narrative.
• a materiality consisting of acrylic (recycled content) rods affixed to a stainless steel subframe. Rods are varying lengths dictated The relationship of mass and tension toofthe threshold and earth mass is by the overall composition of the sky element, extent of important. As much as it is for the scale and legibility ofvisual entrances and screening andurban layering. proportions within context. • consistent detail used for the rain screen and ceiling of the Sky Element, to form the appearance of a 3-dimensional mass. • a panelised system that allows for removal, replacement and plant maintenance access. • Incorporates dynamic LED lighting within the double skin. • Utilisies parametric modelling in it’s design response. • Embraces biophillic design.
Page 14 2
Figure 1-1 UK Pavilion for Shangai Worl Espo 2010 Source: Heatherwick Studio
Figure 1-3 Hedgehog building Source: Moxon Architects
Figure 1-2 Hedgehog building Source: Heatherwick Studio
Figure 1-4 m Source:
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 File CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0001 Architecture and Planning Definition Design Report Project 239933 8 May 2017 | Data drop Project 239933 | 30| May 2014 | Revision 1.1
Reference Design benchmark
Figure 1-5 Aotea Station main entry. View from the intersection of Albert Street and Wellesley Street
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax || Grimshaw Aurecon | Mott MacDonald Jasmax ||ARUP Grimshaw
| ARUP
Page Page15 3
The Sky element - Reference design The facade must respond to a need for: •
80% open area in front of ventilation systems
•
20% open area in front of air intake
•
Solid cladding in front of various plant systems
•
Glazing where spaces are habitable
Glazing system to main structure where spaces beyond are habitable, i.e. Mt Eden Rail Operations Centre. 100mm x 100mm mesh welded to frame holding rods and panels behind.
Variable rod length providing sun shading, while maintaining visibility from inside.
MATERIALITY: •
Reflective / Shiny
•
Ephemeral Light responsive at night
•
Puffy
•
Canvas / Empty Space
Solid panelling to main structure, where ventilation through facade is not required.
TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS: •
Ventilation area
•
Dirty air/Cleaning
•
Temperature
•
Panelling + Substructure
•
Wrap to ceiling and roofs
100mm x 100mm mesh welded to frame holding rods and panels behind.
Long rods clustered together in more solid areas, fixed to weldmesh in frame.
80% open louvres/panels to main structure where required for Ventilation systems 100mm x 100mm mesh welded to frame holding rods and panels behind
Variable rod length, 100mm x 100mm spacing allows consistent 80% open area. Figure 1-6 Modules composition against different facade backgrounds, responding to different technical requirements
Page16 4 Page
File CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0001 Architecture and Planning Definition Design Report CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 30| 8May 1.1 Project 239933 May2014 2017| Revision | Data drop
Reference Design benchmark
Welded mesh
4-way steel fixing clamp
Fiberglass rod Fibre optic lighting
Figure 1-7 Hedgehog building - detailed section, allows ventilation and visual permeability where needed
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald Jasmax| ARUP | Grimshaw Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax ||Grimshaw
| ARUP
Figure 1-8 Possible fixation methods of rods into the welded mesh
Page Page 175
The Earth element 3.7
Design requirements - Earth element
The Earth Element is an architectural façade that is common to 3 of the main Station entrances and responds to the CRL linewide theme derived from the Mana Whenua narrative pertaining to the creation story. This element is situated in the following locations: • Wellesley Street entrance building above ground forming a base to the entrance.
3.8
Process
It is expected that the detailed designer will further develop the Earth Element within the framework of the design intent using the Architectural elements of the Reference Design response as a starting point. The detailed designer is to develop: • the final modulation and surface finish
vandal resistance, maintenance, openings and signage and those required by the principals requirements documents. • creates an apparent solidity created through materiality, detail and articulation • articulates the architectural definition between the public realm paving and the Earth Element and its juxtaposition in relation to the adjacent Sky and threshold elements
• common size of modular components • Karangahape Station entrance building above ground forming a base to the entrance.
• incorporates landscape appropriately • compliance with the technical and functional requirements • incorporates art appropriately
• Mt Eden Station entrance building above ground forming a base to the entrance. The Earth Element is an architectural cladding element that responds to specific architectural, functional and contextual requirements. A number of these are listed below (but not limited to) • Expression of Papatuanuku the Earth Mother in the central linewide theme of the Creation Story.
• the final material selection and mounting system • the design concept with an accompanying maintenance and cleaning regime • the final perimeter geometry that is proximate to the Red Line indicated in Figures 3-9 to 3-12.
• resolves station naming as embedded typography within the earth element • resolves architectural materiality including texture, colour, surface finish and detail • resolves a considered composition of the Earth Element mass
In developing the detailed design, the design process will involve; • transitions to interior linings deeper within the stations
• High quality design, detail and material response to the façade.
• Regular design review meetings and workshops with the CRL representatives and the Principals public arts creative studio team
• Response to technical and functional requirements including mechanical ventilation, extract requirements for building and Station plant.
• Presentations to Mana Whenua design forum and other stakeholder groups.
• Expression of entrance volumetric proportions.
• Gateway review requirements.
• Reflect local geology and morphology in its colour, texture and materiality. • Scale, mass and proportion of the overall composition of Earth, Sky and threshold elements of the Station massing.
In developing the detailed design, the design process will involve • Regular design review meetings and workshops with the Principals creative studio team
• it is lit • Considers the importance of a holistic composition of mass, scale and proportion in relation to the Threshold Element and Sky Element. • Addresses the mass of the Earth Element and openings for the scale and legibility of entrances and proportions within urban context. • Addresses the mass of the Earth Element and openings for the scale and legibility of Station components and elements.
• Presentations to Mana Whenua design forum • Scale, mass and proportion in relation to neighbouring buildings. • Gateway review requirements • Expressive of solidity, warmth, mass in it’s materiality, texture and colour. • Finishes, material and maintenance as required by the technical and performance requirements documents.
3.9
Evaluation criteria
The CRL Principal Team will assess the quality of the proponent’s development of the Earth Element in the design. CRL representatives will assess the clarity, development and quality of the Earth Element design in terms of how well it: • represents the realm of Papatūānuku in the creation story myth • Integrates the functional requirements including crash protection,
Page 18
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
n
0
CRL Geological cross sections Aotea Deliverables for evaluation (minimum requirements)
Karangahape Karangahape Station Station
Approx. Platform Level: Approx. RLPlatform +33740 Level: RL +33740
Station
Approx. Platform Level: RL +9844
To assist in the design development interaction with the CRL representatives and its key stakeholders Wet Swamp and enable gateway deliverable sign off the following are minimum requirements (in addition to those required in the delivera-bles requirements documents) Raupo Swamp birds • Elevations, plans, sections and details
Mt Eden Station Mt Eden Station
Average Platform Level: Average RLPlatform +52400 Level: RL +52400 Dry Forest Kahikatea Trees Coloured Berries Kowhai Tree Bright moss
Dry Forest Kahikatea Trees Coloured Berries Kowhai Tree Bright moss
Tauranga Group clay, sand, silt
Tauranga Group clay, sand, silt
Volcanic Plains Spring Tī Kōuka (Cabbage Tree) Whau Tree
Volcanic Plains Spring Tī Kōuka (Cabbage Tree) Whau Tree
• Material samples (demonstrating colour, texture, material and typical assembly and joint details • Precedent imagery • 3-dimensional assembly visualisations • High quality photo realistic 3 dimensional renders (including as a minimum comparable views to those provided in the mandated package for each Station) • Specifications • Access and maintenance regimes
Tauranga Group clay, sand, silt
Waitemata Group Waitemata Group sandstone, siltstone, sandstone, siltstone, mudstone mudstone weathered weathered
Waitemata Group Waitemata Group sandstone, siltstone, sandstone, siltstone, mudstone mudstone weathered weathered
Waitemata Group sandstone, siltstone, mudstone - unweathered
Waitemata Group Waitemata Group sandstone, siltstone, sandstone, siltstone, mudstone mudstone - unweathered - unweathered
Waitemata Group Waitemata Group sandstone, siltstone, sandstone, siltstone, mudstone mudstone - unweathered - unweathered
Figure 3-5 Aotea Station Geology cross section
Aurecon | Mott MacDonaldAurecon | Jasmax | Mott | Grimshaw MacDonald | ARUP | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP Figure 3-6 Karangahape Station Geology cross section
Britomar Ara Encyc Lyndersay Aotea Im Photograp Country L Karangah Brebner/ F nz Sedim Mount Ed Wikipedia Commons
Auckland Volcanic Field - Ash
Waitemata Group sandstone, siltstone, mudstone weathered
CRL-AOT-ARC-000-RPT-0008 Reference Design, Aotea Station Design Report, Part 2: Architecture Project 239933 | 23 June 2016 | Revision 3.0
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Auckland Volcanic Field - Ash
G
Figure 3-7 Mt Eden Station Geology cross section
Page 19
The Earth element
Figure 3-8  Aotea Station, Wellesley Street entrance (exterior)
Page 20
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Figure 3-9  Aotea Station, Wellesley Street entrance (exterior)
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 21
The Earth element
Figure 3-10  Aotea Station, Wellesley Street entrance (exterior)
Page 22
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Figure 3-11  Karangahape Station entrance (exterior)
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 23
The Earth element
Figure 3-12  Karangahape Station entrance (exterior)
Page 24
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Figure 3-13  Maungawhau Station entrance (exterior)
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 25
The Earth element - Reference design The Earth element comprises the cladding system to the solid element 3.10 Reference design benchmark at and below ground level in the station environment.
The Architectural elements of the Reference Design for the Earth Element The element is a contrasting material against the ground that breaks consists of:
through it, this element then links to the internal linings of the station. • Textured and coloured GRC/architectural pre cast panelling
It mustutilising be: admixtures that reflect the local geology and where • •
possible utilising recycled excavated material.
Resilient and vandal resistant
• Emphasis on the irregular, horizontal strata nature of earth in its Applicable rendering.over multiple storeys
• • Appropriate public application (not feeling corporate) minimisationinofit’s expressed joints, panels appearing monolithic. • • Applicable to raised internal/external Deep reveals where planters, recesses for doors, windows cladding, and stationlift shaft cladding, landscaping elements components are located.
Figure 1-9 Victor Gelez Community Center, changing tonality in pattern
Figure 1-12 Devils tower National monument. Earth dramatically protruding out of the ground
PUNCHING THROUGH A shadow gap detail and contrasting materiality emphasises the idea that the Earth element has punched dramatically through the pavement. Figure 1-10 At Kunstmuseum Source: Derek Li Wan Po, Basel
Page 26 6 Page
Figure 1-11 Design options for Earth Element against surroundings.
File CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0001 Architecture and Planning Definition Design Report CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 30| May 2014 | Revision 1.1 Project 239933 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Reference Design benchmark The Earth materiality is based and must follow the following considerations: MATERIALITY: • • • • • • • Earth-terracota tonality
R E D
L
E C
O H
LA
P
Solid/Heavy Texturized Rough Layered
TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS: TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS: • Durable • Durable • Impact resistant • Impact resistant • Graffiti protection • Graffiti protection Pigments and Oxides added to precast panels could provide the subtle variation earth tones. Texture or pattern in the pre-cast moulds could Pigmentsofand Oxides added to precast panels could provide the subtle further emphasise the Earth element. variation of earth tones. Texture or pattern in the pre-cast moulds could further emphasise the Earth element.
Modules with different pigments will assit giving a transition to the underground
Texture in modules and size of modules can also help with the transition connecting to the internal linings of the underground Figure 1-11 1-13modulesEarth that allow element vthe applied integration at the of entries vegetation and nesting places
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald Jasmax| |ARUP Grimshaw Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax || Grimshaw
| ARUP
Figure 1-14
GRC panels or pigmented concrete
Page277 Page
Reference Design benchmark PAPATUANUKU CLOTHING Papatuanuku is the mother Earth figure that gives birth to all living things. The earth element gives a good oportunity to represent its clothing throughout the facade, gaps between panels or perforations provides the habitat for plants to grow and birds to nest. Variations in depth of the earth cladding gives areas where the clading can peel off and provide the space for plants to grow. The Papatuanuku clothing it is only represented above ground along the facade and it does not transition to the internal linings that links to the Earth element.
Figure Figure 1-17 1-17
Page Page28 88 Page
Papatuanuku Papatuanuku
Figure Figure 1-15 1-15
Schematic Schematic section section illustrating illustrating the the interpretation interpretation of of Papatuanuku Papatuanuku clothing clothing through through the the earth earth element element
Figure Figure 1-16 1-16
modules modules that that allow allow the the integration integration of of vegetation, vegetation, nesting nesting places places and and urban urban integration integration with with incorportated incorportated seating seating elements elements in in the the facade facade where where possible possible
File File CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0001 CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0001 Architecture Architecture and and Planning Planning Definition Definition Design Design Report Report CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project Project 239933 239933 || 30 30| May 2014 2014 || Revision Revision 1.1 1.1 Project 239933 8May May 2017 | Data drop
Figure 1-19 modules that allow the integration of vegetation and nesting places by pilling the surface and creating some movement
Figure 1-18
Examples of New Zealand native birds
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald Jasmax| ARUP | Grimshaw Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax ||Grimshaw
| ARUP
Figure 1-21 modules that allow the integration of vegetation and nesting places with perforations. modules would require a less dense approach than referenced image
Figure 1-20
Schematic Earth cladding detail section
Page Page 299
4
Internal Linings
4.1 Design requirements - Internal linings Connected to the earth element above ground, has a transition to the underground by reinterpretation of the strata of the existing ground
The internal linings relate predominantly to the complete modular and conditions. systemised approach to internal cladding systems from internal station entrances to platform.
A modular system allows to have a transition applied by different colours, textures or sizes. the use of any of these methods will give Connected to the earth element above ground, has a transition to the a gradient transition that can be visible from the time you enter the underground by reinterpretation of the strata of the existing ground conditions. station. In the process the materials go deeper into the underground the modules become darker, denser or texturized. A modular system allows to have a transition applied by different colours, textures or sizes drawn from a common pool that applies to all three stations. The cladding system in applied in the outter face of the waller beams to the use of any of these methods will give a gradient transition that can be visible have a smoother and more continuos finish that allows to have a clear from the time you enter the station. In the process the materials go deeper into reading of the transition of colours in the panels. the underground the modules become darker, denser or texturized.
Lighting strips are also applied into the linings in a way that ties in the
The cladding system in applied in the outer face of the waller beams to have a gradient pattern, colours to the lighting strips can be applied depending smoother and more continuous finish that allows to have a clear reading of the on each station allowing to have a differentiating element for each one of transition of colours in the panels.
the stations throught the network.
Lighting strips are also applied into the linings in a way that ties in the gradient It must be: pattern, colours to the lighting strips can be applied depending on each station allowing to have a differentiating element for each one of the stations whilst • Resilient and vandal resistant using a common set of modular components throughout the network.
• • • •
Applicable over multiple storeys
• Resilient and vandal resistant
Appropriate in it’s public application (not feeling corporate)
Figure 1-42
Konzerthaus Blaibach
Figure 1-39 Madrid Social housing Source: David Chipperfield
Figure 1-40
Gradient paneling system
Figure 1-41 GRC or precast concrete with pigments and texture to help achieve the transition from the Earth element
• Applicable over multiple storeys
Internal/external cladding, lift shaft cladding, incorporated lighting
• Appropriate in it’s public application (not feeling corporate)
Modular
• Internal/external cladding, lift shaft cladding, incorporated lighting • Modular • all the disparate Fourth Element components. • it is lit or otherwise expressed at night.
Page 30 Page 18
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 File CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0001 Architecture and Planning Definition Design Report Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop Project 239933 | 30 May 2014 | Revision 1.1
Figure 1-43
General application of the cladding system incorporating gradient transition to the underground, strips of light incorporated to help break the modules
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 31 Page 19
Internal Linings The materiality is based and must follow the following considerations: MATERIALITY: •
Solid/Heavy
•
Texturized
•
Rough
•
Layered
Karangahape Station
Aotea Station
Approx. Platform Level: RL +33740
Approx. Platform Level: RL +9844
TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS: •
Durable
•
Impact resistant
•
Graffiti protection
Wet Swamp Raupo Swamp birds
Dry Forest Kahikatea Trees Coloured Berries Kowhai Tree Bright moss
Figure 1-45
Figure 1-44
ECOLO
Volcanic Plains Spring Tī Kōuka (Cabbage Tree) Whau Tree
Layering of exisitng ground conditions reinterpreted trhough the cladding leading to the underground of the stations
Tauranga Group clay, sand, silt
Tauranga Group clay, sand, silt
Auckland Volcanic Field - Ash
Waitemata Group sandstone, siltstone, mudstone weathered
Waitemata Group sandstone, siltstone, mudstone weathered
Waitemata Group sandstone, siltstone, mudstone weathered
Waitemata Group sandstone, siltstone, mudstone - unweathered
Waitemata Group sandstone, siltstone, mudstone - unweathered
Waitemata Group sandstone, siltstone, mudstone - unweathered
Existing ground conditions. Existing layering in the strata. CRL-AOT-ARC-000-RPT-0008 Reference Design, Aotea Station Design Report, Part 2: Architecture Project 239933 | 30 January 2015 | Revision 1.0
Page2032 Page
Mt Eden Station
Average Platform Level: RL +52400
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 File CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0001 Architecture and Planning Definition Design Report 239933 | 8 May | Data1.1 drop ProjectProject 239933 | 30 May 20142017 | Revision
Britomart Image Sources ( Ara Encyclopedia of New Ze Lyndersay, Ben Crawford, H Aotea Image Sources (Top Photography, Grapeman4/ W Country Landscapes, Anz S Karangahape Road Image Brebner/ Flickr, Sandy Austin nz Sedimentology Group, Av Mount Eden Image Source Wikipedia Commons, Jethro Commons
B GEOLOGY
ABOVE GROUND OGY + PEOPLE/PLACE
Figure 1-46 Element
Tonality change - Transition from connecting to the Earth
Figure 1-47 Lighting strip to break panel, coloring can help differentiation with other stations
Figure 1-48
Density - difference in size of panels
(Top to Bottom): Auckland Museum/ Erik Schlรถgl, Te
BELOW GROUND ealand, Deviantart/ SootyAlbatross, Waitomo Times, Mark High Country Landscapes + PEOPLE/PLACE
p to Bottom): Peter Langsland, Jonathan Harrod Wikipedia Commons, Hawkes Bay Regional Council, High Sedimentology Group, Avenue/ Wikipedia Commons Sources (Top to Bottom): New Zealand Photography, Mike n/ Flickr, Julianna Brown/ Flickr, High Country Landscapes, venue/ Wikipedia Commons es (Top to Bottom): Designlike, Sarah Landau, Jon Sullivan, o Carr, ANZ Sedimentology Group, Avenue/ Wikipedia
Figure 1-49
Costumer experience - transition to the underground Page 15
Aurecon | |Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP Aurecon Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page2133 Page
5
The Threshold element
5.1
Design requirements
The Threshold element is an expressive art opportunity located in each of the following entrances in the main concourse. • Aotea Station - Wellesley Street entrance
5.2
Contractor interface requirements
The Contractor will be responsible for the following (to be read in conjunction with the Functional and technical requirements documents) • Spatial provision of the thresholds as indicated in attached diagrams.
• Aotea Station - Victoria Street entrances (East and West) • Karangahape Station - Mercury Lane entrance
• Co-ordination of all Station functional and technical requirements with the Artwork.
• Mt Eden Station - Ruru Street Entrance
• Provide services, power, data, lighting to the artwork.
The Threshold Element is a 3 dimensional element expressing key Mana Whenua narratives and is suspended over the gateline and primary concourse of the entrances. Artists will be appointed by the CRL and Public Arts Council team who will be responsible for the creative concept of the threshold element. The contractor will be responsible for working with the artist in an integrated design process to develop the detail, interface the Station technical and functional requirements and complete the installation and construction of the art work. • Elements of the artistic brief will consist of: • A 3 dimensional element that serves as a beacon for the Stations location and expression of entrance.
• Provide structural support and integration of the artwork to the overall Station building envelope and structure. • is responsible for the overall security, weather tightness and envelope requirements where integral and interfacing with the artwork (facades, claddings, soffits, canopies and structural and services penetrations where required) • The contractor must incorporate the installation of art works into the construction program, establish suitable methodologies for construction and coordinate all required services and structural inputs for the art works completion and undertake commissioning. • Incorporate the artwork into the buildings access, maintenance and cleaning methodology.
• Integrates Mana Whenua narratives from the mandated matrix with particular attention to the importance of the threshold representing each Stations individual Atua and their relationship to Rangi and Papa. • Considers the objects relationship and composition with the earth and sky facades. • explores the use of dynamic lighting. • Engages with daytime and night time expression. • Individual contextural expression for each Station in relation to narrative, environment and built context. • Materiality expressive of context and the narrative matrix and individual for each Station. Consideration of material, texture and form in relation to earth and sky. • Expresses 3 dimensional volume. • Engages the public and transport users both from afar and from within the Station.
Page 34
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
The Threshold element - Aotea Station
Figure 5-1  Aotea Station, Wellesley Street entrance threshold from the concourse
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 35
The Threshold element - Aotea Station
Figure 5-2  Aotea Station, Wellesley Street entrance (exterior)
Page 36
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Wellelsey Street entrance
Figure 5-3  Aotea Station, Wellesley Street entrance (exterior)
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 37
The Threshold element - Aotea Station s5
38 s1
s2
s3
s4
1
1
2
2
4053
4055
4055
4053
s5
ALUMINIUM ROOF ON TIMBER TRUSSES
ALUMINIUM ROOF ON TIMBER TRUSSES
44050 FFL SOUTH PLANT ROOF
44050 FFL SOUTH PLANT ROOF
35
515
39050 FFL SOUTH PLANT LEVEL 3
34050 FFL SOUTH PLANT LEVEL 2
(ENTRANCE INDICATOR) PERFORATED CORTEN SHEETS HUNG BELOW STRUCTURE
520
521
520
521
520
540
521
39050 FFL SOUTH PLANT LEVEL 3
540 34050 FFL SOUTH PLANT LEVEL 2
491
31
468
540
29050 FFL SOUTH PLANT LEVEL 1
29050 FFL SOUTH PLANT LEVEL 1
23900 FFL MAYORAL STREET LEVEL
32
552
110
23900 FFL MAYORAL STREET LEVEL
516
22250 FFL SOUTH STATION ENTRY
22250 FFL SOUTH STATION ENTRY 20850 FCL RCP CONCOURSE
05 125
17250 FFL B1 CONCOURSE
204
601
540
17250 FFL B1 CONCOURSE
OTE 8m²
2000
495 STAIR
12250 FFL B2.5 RAISED PLANT FLOOR
ESCALATOR
504
LIFT
479
9844 FFL B3 PLATFORM
480
700
2400
130
12250 FFL B2.5 RAISED PLANT FLOOR 9844 FFL B3 PLATFORM
Figure 5-4 Aotea Station, Wellesley Street entrance threshold extent
TRENCH
LIFT PIT
Page 38
4
4054 - CROSS SECTION GRIDLINE SE
2113
SCALE @ A1 1 : 250
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
The Threshold element - Aotea Station Threshold element
sA
sB
Scoping box indicating the 3 dimensional curtilage of the Threshold element
sC
sD
sE
A
B
3
2
4
1
4054
4054
4054
1500
C
2
ALUMINIUM ROOFING ON TIMBER TRUSSES
1500
STAINLESS STEEL GUTTER
FFL 44050 SOUTH PLANT ROOF
FFL
39050 SOUTH PLANT LEVEL 3
FACADE - PERFORATED ALUMINIUM RAINSCREEN ON SECONDARY FRAMING ALLOW FOR 50% PERM
500 - 501
520
520
PLANT ROOMS
423
524
526
110
(ENTRANCE INDICATOR) PERFORATED CORTEN SHEETS HUNG BELOW STRUCTURE
521
FFL
34050 SOUTH PLANT LEVEL 2
FFL
29050 SOUTH PLANT LEVEL 1
GLASS CANOPY STEEL SUPPORT FRAME FROM ABOVE
FRAMELESS GLASS CANOPY WITH SPIDER FITTINGS SUSPENDED FOR CEILING ABOVE ON CABLES AND S.S. RODS
ALBERT STREET
STATION SHUTDOWN LINE STATION ACCESS
LIFT 23900 FFL MAYORAL STREET LEVEL
FFL
3000
FFL 22250 SOUTH STATION ENTRY 426
425
125
424
CONCOURSE LEVEL
491-493 499
17250 B1 CONCOURSE
7030
FFL 12250 B2.5 RAISED PLANT FLOOR FFL 9844 B3 PLATFORM
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 39
The Threshold element - Aotea Station
Figure 5-5  Aotea Station, Victoria Street entrance threshold extent
Page 40
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Victoria Street entrance Threshold element Scoping box indicating the 3 dimensional curtilage of the Threshold element
1
5
1500
4120
VICTORIA STREET
2
PERFORATED ARCHITECTURAL METAL ROOF POWDERCOATED ALUMINIUM RAINSCREEN ON SUPPORT STRUCTURE. FIXED ONTO SECONDARY STEEL FRAME SUPPORT OFF PRIMARY.
ALBERT STREET
1500
6
4
3
4120
4120
4120
VICTORIA STREET
2
1
4120
4120
GLASS CURTAIN WALL
3200
3200
3200
3200
EXISTING NOR BOUNDARY LINE
TEXTURED PRECAST CONCRETE
FFL 26800 VICTORIA STREET WEST LIFT
TEXTURED PRECAST CONCRETE
KERB LINE
CHILLER VENT
UTILITIES TRENCH
4350
PERFORATED ALUMINIUM POWDERCOATED STATION ENTRY
PLAN EXTENT OF ROAD 7000 SERVICES CROSSING BOX
GLASS CANOPY TO ENTRY
10910 NO SERVICES CAN CROSS THE BOX IN THIS REGION
BALUSTRADE TOUGHENED LAMINATED LOW IRON GLASS STONE FINISH
RL 22500
1220
3010
680
1460
FCL 20850 RCP CONCOURSE
STATION ENTRY
LEVEL
3600
3500
EXISTING GRO UND
SLOPE 1:14
EXISTING GROUND LEVEL
SLOPE 1:14
750
FFL 17250 B1 CONCOURSE
VICTORIA STREET RAMP 25670
RAMP STARTING POINT
FFL 16495 CONCOURSE NORTH
EXISTING NOR BOUNDARY LINE
EMERGECY EGRESS
FFL 9844 B3 PLATFORM
EMERGECY EGRESS
Figure 5-6  Aotea Station, Victoria Street entrance threshold extent
1 5
1500
1
4121_VICTORIA ST RAMP GRIDLINE -14.5
2111
SCALE @ A1 1 : 150
4120
2 1500
6
4
4120
4120
Page 41
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
B 00 OVER
C
A
The Threshold element - Karangahape Station
Figure 5-7  Karangahape Station Mercury Lane entrance Threshold extent
Page 42
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
SE
SD
SC
5690
OPMENT
9010
SB 5550
Mercury Lane entrance Threshold element CHILLERS REFER TO MEP DOCUMENTS
Scoping box indicating the 3 dimensional curtilage of the Threshold element
MERCURY LANE ALUMINIUM STANDING SEAM PREFINISHED METAL ROOF STAINLESS STEEL GUTTER TO PERIMETER
561
POTENTIAL FUTURE OVERSITE DEVELOPMENT PERFORATED ARCHITECTURAL SCREEN POWDERCOATED ALUMINIUM RAINSCREEN ON SUPPORT STRUCTURE. FIXED ONTO SECONDARY STEEL FRAME SUPPORT OFF PRIMARY WITH GAP. PERFORATED 40% FOR VENTILATION / EXTRACT. PROPOSED LANEWAY
200
PERFORATED ENTRANCE INDICATOR
570
4100 CLEAR
GLAZED ENTRANCE CANOPY
3500 CLEAR
RISERS
200
450
423
200
485
PERFORATED ARCHITECTURAL SCREEN POWDERCOATED ALUMINIUM RAINSCREEN ON SUPPORT STRUCTURE. FIXED ONTO SECONDARY STEEL FRAME SUPPORT OFF PRIMARY WITH GAP. PERFORATED 40% FOR VENTILATION / EXTRACT. GLAZED FACADE - RETAIL SHOPFRONT
OUTLINE OF PILE FOUNDATION REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
431
433
000 448 200
430
PERFORATED ENTRANCE INDICATOR
CROSS STREET
CHILLERS REFER TO MEP DOCUMENTS FIRE INTERVENTION ACCESS DOOR
STATION SHUTDOWN LINE
ESCALATOR SHAFT CONNECTING TO PLATFORM LEVEL UNDER MERCURY LANE
FFL
74000 L3 - MERCURY LANE ROOF
TEXTURED PRECAST CONCRETE
MERCURY THEATRE
OUTLINE OF PILE FOUNDATION REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
541
200
200
TVS / OTE / DRAFT RELIEF TRANSITION LEVEL
FFL
69000 L2 - PLANT LEVEL SOUTH
TVS / OTE / DRAFT RELIEF TRANSITION LEVEL
209
200
542
VERTICAL ACOUSTIC WALL PANEL (1500 x 3000)
FFL 64000 L1 - PLANT LEVEL TVS/OTE PLENUM
OHLE ROOM NEXT TO RAIL TRACKS
401
FFL 59000 CROSS LEVEL PASSAGE GL - STREET SOUTH EXISTING ACCESS/LANEWAY
INVERT / SERVICE ZONE, REFER TO ENGINEERS DETAILS INVERT / SERVICE ZONE, REFER TO ENGINEERS DETAILS PROJECTED LINE OF STATION BUILDING BELOW GROUND
Figure 5-8  Karangahape Station Mercury Lane entrance Threshold extent
1
MERCURY LANE_EAST ELEVATION
2101
SCALE @ A1 1 : 250
POTENTIAL FUTURE OVERSITE DEVELOPMENT Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
MERCURY LANE
Page 43
The Threshold element - Mt Eden Station
Figure 5-9  Maungawhau Station (Mt Eden) entrance Threshold extent
Page 44
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Ruru Street entrance
Figure 5-10  Maungawhau Station (Mt Eden) entrance Threshold extent interior concourse
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 45
6
The Fourth Element
The 4th element is the transition from darkness into light, according 6.1 Designtradition. requirements to the Mana Whenua This transition includes 17 stages of darkness, the dawn, and the light.
The Fourth Element is an architectural language that is used as a joining element theKore mainelement entrancesallows between Earth,more Threshold and Sky, for using theinTe to have monolitic andand clean treating secondary and other functional station components structures that areentrances isolated from the main entries of the stations in the public realm. The Fourth Element responds to the CRL linewide theme derived fromTe theKore Manaelement Whenuaisnarrative the creation story. The appliedofto: element is situated following •ThisVentilation outlets in onthe street levellocations:
• • •
• Fire Wellesley Street entrance egress at street level building to articulate the separation of the Sky Element, the Earth Element, and the Threshold Element
Sky-lights at street level
• Karangahape Station entrance building the separation of the Sky Element, the Earth Element, and the Threshold Element Secondary entry to Aotea Station • Mt Eden Station entrance building the separation of the Sky Element, the Earth Element, and the Threshold Element • Kingston Street vent • Pitt Street vents and escape stairs • Albert Street vents • Victoria Street entrances
6.2
Ko Te Kore (the void, energy, nothingness, potential)
Evaluation criteria
Te Kore-te-whiwhia (the void in which nothing is possessed)
• The Principal will assess the quality of the Contractors development of the Fourth Element in the design. The Principal will assess the clarity, development and quality of the Fourth Element design in terms of how well it:
Te Kore-te-rawea (the void in which nothing is felt)
• represents the realm of Weiao in the creation story myth.
Te Kore-i-ai (the void with nothing in union)
• architecturally represents the concept of transitional elements, between spaces.
Te Kore-te-wiwia (the space without boundaries) Na Te Kore Te Po (from the void the night)
• integrates the functional requirements including crash protection, vandal resistance, openings and signage
Te Po-nui (the great night)
• creates an apparent dematerialisation of the functional elements within the public realm.
Te Po-roa (the long night)
• resolves being both a recessive, neutral background element while maintaining a confident design character of its own.
Te Po-uriuri (the deep night)
• combines a palate of materials that have qualities of transparency, translucency, reflectivity, solidity, texture and layering within a consistent Steilneset language Memorial for the Element. Figure 1-29
Te Po-kerekere (the intense night)
Source: Andrew Meredith
Te Po-tiwhatiwha (the dark night)
• resolves architectural materiality including layering, texture, colour, surface finish and detail.
Te Po-te-kitea (the night in which nothing is seen)
• Skylights in Albert street • Mt Eden tunnel ventilation portal head house
• articulates the architectural tension between the Earth Element and the Sky Element.
Te Po-tangotango (the intensely dark night)
• is used to resolve other secondary architectural components as part of the over-all project identity.
Te Po-whawha (the night of feeling)
• unifies through materiality, detail, composition and other treatment, all the disparate Fourth Element components.
Te Po-namunamu-ki-taiao (the night of seeking the passage to the world)
• it is lit or otherwise expressed at night.
Te Po-tahuri-atu (the night of restless turning)
• integrates any further overlay of the design narrative.
Te Po-tahuri-mai-ki-taiao (the night of turning towards the revealed world)
• resolves the relationship of mass and tension to the Earth Element, Threshold Element and Sky Element.
Ki te Whai-ao (to the glimmer of dawn) Ki te Ao-marama (to the bright light of day) Tihei mauri-ora (there is life)
Figure 1-30 Smoked Glass with fading pattern Source: Pinterest
Page 12 Page 46
Figure 1-31
Transition - Creation - Te Kore.
File CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0001 Architecture and Planning Definition Design Report Project 239933 | 30 May 2014 | Revision 1.1 CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Cit
Aurecon | M
Application - secondary structures Ko Te Kore (the void, energy, nothingness, potential)
ght, according 17 stages of
Te Kore-te-whiwhia (the void in which nothing is possessed)
itic and clean e stations
Te Kore-te-rawea (the void in which nothing is felt) Te Kore-i-ai (the void with nothing in union) Te Kore-te-wiwia (the space without boundaries) Na Te Kore Te Po (from the void the night) Te Po-nui (the great night) Te Po-roa (the long night) Te Po-uriuri (the deep night)
Figure 1-29 Steilneset Memorial Source: Andrew Meredith
Te Po-kerekere (the intense night)
Figure 6-1  Victoria Street entrance (west of Albert Street)
Te Po-tiwhatiwha (the dark night) Te Po-te-kitea (the night in which nothing is seen) Te Po-tangotango (the intensely dark night) Te Po-whawha (the night of feeling) Te Po-namunamu-ki-taiao (the night of seeking the passage to the world) Te Po-tahuri-atu (the night of restless turning) Te Po-tahuri-mai-ki-taiao (the night of turning towards the revealed world) Ki te Whai-ao (to the glimmer of dawn) Ki te Ao-marama (to the bright light of day) Tihei mauri-ora (there is life)
Figure 1-30 Smoked Glass with fading pattern Source: Pinterest
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Figure 1-31 Transition - Creation - Te Kore. Figure 6-2  Pitt Street TVS shaft enclosure
File CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0001 Architecture and Planning Definition Design Report Project 239933 | 30 May 2014 | Revision 1.1
Figure 1-32
Application of the forth element at th
City Rail Link
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 47
The Fourth Element GLAZING TO GROUND The fourth element is being materialized using dark glazing where possible and it will incorporate a gradient pattern with variable heights. These heights can relate to the use of each element allowing either better visual permeability or concealing equipment and other structures. In this scenario the glazing floats above the ground sitting on top of the Earth element that breaks through the ground. Where cross ventilation is required dark perforated metal is used; the density and pattern of the perforation will follow the frit pattern of the glass that sits next to it.
Figure 1-33
AOTEA SECOND ENTRY WEST
AOTEA SECOND ENTRY EAST Figure 1-34
Page Page14 48
Smoked glass with pattern examples
FIRE EGRESS
VENTILATION SHAFT (X5)
SKY LIGHT (X7)
AOTEA SECOND ENTRY EAST (Perspective)
Glazing to ground application scenarios
File CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0001 Architecture and Planning Definition Design Report CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 30 May 2014 | Revision 1.1 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
SOLID BASE Some elements would require a solid base, mainly in elements that need to have a crash barrier protection along the road. The fourth element in these cases can be materialized through dark concrete. The skylights along Albert Street in all cases would require to have a solid base, each concrete base would offer the possibility to have the name of the star each skylight represent.
Figure 1-35
Dark concrete with pattern examples
AOTEA SECOND ENTRY WEST
AOTEA SECOND ENTRY EAST Figure 1-36
FIRE EGRESS
VENTILATION SHAFT (X5)
SKY LIGHT (X7)
AOTEA SECOND ENTRY EAST (Perspective)
Solid base application scenarios
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw| |Grimshaw ARUP
Page Page15 49
The Fourth Element
Laminated and toughened glass with frit pattern
Laminated and toughened glass with frit pattern
SKY LIGHT ELEVATION
SKY LIGHT PLAN
FIRE EGRESS ELEVATION Figure 1-37
Page Page16 50
Glazing to ground application scenarios
File CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0001 Architecture and Planning Definition Design Report CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 30 |May 2014 | Revision 1.1 Project 239933 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Perforated black steel panel Smoked glass with frit pattern
Internal linings/Earth element
Smoked glass with frit pattern
Threshold
VICTORIA STREET WEST Figure 1-38
VICTORIA STREET EAST
Victoria St entry fourth element application
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald Jasmax ||ARUP Grimshaw | ARUP Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax || Grimshaw
Page51 17 Page
7
Station planning - Aotea Station
7.1
Aotea Station
Design The general arrangement of the Aotea Station Architectural elements of the Reference Design has undergone significant analysis, design and consultation. The most considered areas are listed below. While tendering parties may choose to investigate opportunities to further improve or enhance the design response in these areas, the perceived limitations of such an undertaking should be considered.
• The weaved cross beams within the main station box at mid height across the concourse level derived from the Mana Whenua narrative. • The 3-dimensional volumetric cross section of the main Station platform box incorporating the voids over the platform, the upper concourse and ceiling and skylights.
• Track alignment and platform extent. • Interfaces with adjoining owners, including future-proofing of potential future entrances • Relationship to the existing Albert Street service lane retaining wall.
• The general arrangement and location of primary vertical circulation elements along the length of the platform. • The 3 dimensional volume and height of the Wellesely Street entrance within the main station concourse.
• Future-proofing for a potential future North Shore Line Station, including escalators to the Aotea Station platform, future connections to concourse and other elements described in the North Shore connection report documentation included for information. • Positioning, passenger capacity and orientation of the entrances. • The general arrangement, location of primary concourse station components and the volumetric spatial qualities of Wellesley Street entrance.
*Note that the Station fore court and precinct public realm reinstatement design is covered in a seperate Chapter.
• Location of Victoria Street East entrance ramp to allow for 4 lanes of proposed traffic, meeting the fire evacuation and passenger movements required for the Station whilst maximising the pedestrian footway to the south of the entrance.
Mandated design elements
• The general arrangement, location of primary concourse station components at the Victoria Street entrance. (entrances, ticket windows, gateline, retail, vertical circulation)
Elements bounded by the red line diagrams are considered mandated for the tenderer to carry forward into detailed design in conjunction with the technical and functional requirements.
• Location and positioning of ventilation elements in Kingston Street and Albert Road. • The location and number of skylights along the median in Albert Street through to the Station below being 7 representing the Matariki Narrative.
Page 52
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Aotea Station Wellesley Entrance1 35
36
37
38 s1
20.0m
7.2
s3
s2
4053
s4
1
2
4055
4053
s5 BLEDISLOE BUILDING
Wellesley Street m 20.5
EXISTING LEVELS 21.0m +
21.0
m 21.3m +
5m 21.
21.7m +
BICYCLE PARKING X 32 SPACES
BOLLARDS
21.5m +
5002 FIRE EGRESS
STATION ACCESS
1
22.2m +
EXISTING LEVELS
312
312
514
303
ENTRY LOBBY
801
FFL 22250
KITCHENETTE
300
202
FOOTPATH
471
183 513 hvac 463 Electrical
462 460 462 463
460 460
sC
Access
PAID
460 460
510 222
comms
STAIR 1
181 463 Electrical
sD
Access UP
648
180 514
LIFT 1
Access
VO ID
24.5m +
Fire / Hyd
BE LO W
LIFT 2
m 4.5
212
MATT WELL
OVERHANG ABOVE
SITE FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BY OTHERS
comms
315 STAIR 3
FULL HEIGHT GLAZING
EXISTING CAR PARK TO BE RECONFIGURED TO SUIT STATION BUILDING FOOTPRINT
509
182 Access
ESC 1
320
ESC 2
2
2
552
NOTE - FOUNDATION OUTLINE BELOW
516
sE
STATION SHUTDOWN LINE FIRE INTERVENTION & MAINTENANCE ACCESS
CANOPY ABOVE
3 Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
PROVISION FOR 2 OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE CAR PARKS AS PART OF EXISTING CARPARK
STATION SHUTDOWN LINE CASH DESK UNPAID
322
5m
800
STAFF ACCESS
22.
sA sB
MATT WELL
ESC 3
WELLESLEY STREET
m 22.0
CANOPY ABOVE
5002
NoR (DESIGNATION)
STATION SHUTDOWN LINE
RISER
EXISTING KERB LINE
EXISTING KERB LINE
FUTURE BUS STOPS
22.0m +
FOOTPATH
34
5002
EXISTING TREE REMOVED REFUSE COLLECTION
EMERGENCY VEHICLE PARKS AND ACCESS
sF TAXI RANK BUS LANE
Page 53
Station planning - Aotea Station
38 s1
s2
s3
s4
1
1
2
2
4053
4055
4055
4053
s5
ALUMINIUM ROOF ON TIMBER TRUSSES 44050 FFL SOUTH PLANT ROOF
515
NCE INDICATOR) RATED CORTEN HUNG BELOW URE
520
521
520
521
520
540
521
39050 FFL SOUTH PLANT LEVEL 3
540 34050 FFL SOUTH PLANT LEVEL 2
491 468
540 29050 FFL SOUTH PLANT LEVEL 1
552
110
23900 FFL MAYORAL STREET LEVEL
516
22250 FFL SOUTH STATION ENTRY 20850 FCL RCP CONCOURSE
125
204
601
540
17250 FFL B1 CONCOURSE
OTE 8m²
495 STAIR
ESCALATOR
504
LIFT
479
Figure 7-1 Aotea Station, Wellesley Street entrance
480
12250 FFL B2.5 RAISED PLANT FLOOR 9844 FFL B3 PLATFORM
TRENCH
Page 54
4
700
2400
130
4054 - CROSS SECTION GRIDLINE SE
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Aotea Station Wellesley Entrance sA
sB
sC
sD
sE
A
B
3
2
4
1
4054
4054
4054
1500
C
2
ALUMINIUM ROOFING ON TIMBER TRUSSES
1500
STAINLESS STEEL GUTTER
FFL 44050 SOUTH PLANT ROOF
FFL
39050 SOUTH PLANT LEVEL 3
FACADE - PERFORATED ALUMINIUM RAINSCREEN ON SECONDARY FRAMING ALLOW FOR 50% PERM
500 - 501
520
520
PLANT ROOMS
423
524
526
110
(ENTRANCE INDICATOR) PERFORATED CORTEN SHEETS HUNG BELOW STRUCTURE
521
FFL
34050 SOUTH PLANT LEVEL 2
FFL
29050 SOUTH PLANT LEVEL 1
GLASS CANOPY STEEL SUPPORT FRAME FROM ABOVE
FRAMELESS GLASS CANOPY WITH SPIDER FITTINGS SUSPENDED FOR CEILING ABOVE ON CABLES AND S.S. RODS
ALBERT STREET
STATION SHUTDOWN LINE STATION ACCESS
LIFT 23900 FFL MAYORAL STREET LEVEL
3000
FFL 22250 SOUTH STATION ENTRY 426
FFL
425
125
424
CONCOURSE LEVEL
491-493 499
17250 B1 CONCOURSE
7030
FFL 12250 B2.5 RAISED PLANT FLOOR FFL 9844 B3 PLATFORM
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 55
Aotea Station - Victoria Street entrances 7.3
Page 56
Victoria Street entrance
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Aotea Station - Victoria Street concourse
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 57
Aotea Station - Wellesley Street lower concourse 7.4
Station concourse Room Schedule - Concourse South
33
34 10000
35 10000
36 10000
37 5000
s2
38 s1 13040
14650
s3
s4
3940
s5
7070
Room No
7775
1
1
2
2
4053
4055
4055
4053
NoR (DESIGNATION)
SAFE PATH 1200 WIDE X 2400 HIGH STAIR OVER CONSTRAINS SAFE PATH AND SERVICES PROPERTY LINES
1200 3000
1200
551
223 425
STAIR 2
467
471 2000
513 426
220
462 463 462 463
513
460 460
Access
225
504
sC
1530
01
497
... | DRG | 2112
sA sB
hvac
509
182
Electrical
3
NoR (DESIGNATION)
510 Access
224
4054
460
715
1500
3200 MIN.
comms
181
comms
221
136 STAIR 1
424
sD
Access
180 462 Electrical 491-493
LIFT 2
4054
446
Access
H.P.
2
514
Fire / Hyd
10000
499
542
REDUCED HEAD HEIGHT
204
4054
SEATS
120
sE
122
ESC 1
ESC 2
STAIR 3 ESC 3
540
FIRE EGRESS ROUTE
4 H.P.
PIPE JACK REFER TO UTILITIES DOCUMENTS
sF
R
2130 2000
FUTURE PLATFORM COOLING RISER
C
2000
00 20
R
TVS SHAFT
20 00
647
226
NoR (DESIGNATION)
s6
2 H.P.
FFL 17250 ESC 5
R 3700
ESC 4
B
14.6 m² 15.9 m² 3.1 m² 0.9 m² 4.4 m² 2.7 m² 3.0 m² 5.4 m² 12.1 m² 3.0 m² 177.1 m² 13.2 m² 10.4 m² 189.7 m² 41.8 m² 12.9 m²
3700
000 R2
900 R7
1
Area 37.2 m² 8.7 m² 9.7 m² 35.5 m² 35.5 m² 4.8 m² 205.8 m² 14.6 m² 3.6 m² 4.8 m² 5.4 m² 3.7 m² 13.6 m² 5.1 m² 9.0 m² 8.2 m² 5.0 m² 6.4 m² 15.3 m² 4.1 m² 22.4 m² 20.0 m² 19.6 m² 2.5 m² 1.5 m² 3.0 m² 1.5 m² 3.0 m² 1.0 m² 1.0 m² 3.0 m² 2.3 m² 2.3 m² 3.0 m² 43.2 m² 3.1 m² 12.7 m² 7.4 m² 25.1 m²
TVS PLENUM
SEATS
CONCOURSE
497 499 504 505 506 509 510 513 513 514 540 542 551 601 647 715
Abreviation CORRIDOR LIFT 1 LIFT 2 MALE PUBLIC TOILET FEMALE PUBLIC TOILET ACC PUBLIC TOILET BOH CORRIDOR EGRESS STAIR 1 BOH CORRIDOR BOH CORRIDOR BOH CORRIDOR BOH ACCESS FIRST AID SCISSOR HOIST / PLATFORM CEILING ROOM MALE STAFF WC FEMALE STAFF WC MALE STAFF SHOWER ACC FEMALE STAFF SHOWER ACC STAFF MESS CLEANERS STORAGE UPS 1 UPS 2 UPS 3 DB CBD COMMS RISER B COMMS RISER A COMMS RISER A COMMS RISER B HV 'A' RISER HV 'B' RISER ELECTRIC RISER LV RISER'A' LV RISER'B' ELECTRIC RISER CER FIRE RISER RISERS LIFT EQUIP INTERVENTION COMBINED LIFT CONTROL+ ESCALATOR EQUIP. CROWD CONTROL & GENERAL STORAGE ESCALATOR STEP STORAGE FCU FUTURE COOLING DUCT FUTURE COOLING DUCT FIRE INTERVENTION RISER STAIR PRESSURATION HVAC RISER HVAC RISER FIRE & HYDRAULICS RISER TVS OTE RISER GAS SUPPRESSION EMERGENCY EGRESS FIRE INTERVENTION LOBBY FOUL SUMP B
OUTLINE OF BUILDING OVER
121
A
4003
LIFT 1
105 106 120 121 122 125 136 180 181 182 183 204 219 220 221 223 224 225 226 424 425 426 446 460 460 460 460 462 462 462 463 463 463 467 471 481 491 491-493
4003
491
BORED REFER TUNNELS BE LO TO PAC KAGE/Z W ONE 'A
TVS SHAFT
219
BORED TUNNELS BELOW REFER TO PACKAGE/ZONE 'ATK'
TK'
Mandated design elements Elements desrcibed bounded by the red line diagrams are considered mandated for the tenderer to carry forward into detailed design in conjunction with the technical and functional requirements.
NoR (DESIGNATION)
Figure 7-2 Aotea Station, concourse
ROOM COLOUR LEGEND
Page 58
BOH BUILDING SERVICES Project TVS/ OTE RETAIL
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Aotea Station - Station concourse
16
17
18
5000
19
10000
20
10000
21
10000
10000
22 10000
23
24
10000
10000
25
26
10000
27
10000
28
10000
29
10000
10000
30 10000
31 10000
32 10000
33
34
10000
10000
35 10000
15000
4 2300
3
6502
2300
2 4052
01
2
1 4052
... | DRG | 2113
5000 ACTIVE PLATFORM CENTRE LINE
... | DRG | 2111
01
CENTRELINE
5000
NoR (DESIGNATION)
15000
15000
PILES ALIGNED WITH EXISTING PILES
A 3443
3600
FFL 17250 SEATS
ESC 1 SKYLIGHT OVER
B
SKYLIGHT OVER
ESC 3
10470
6400
3600
SERVICES ZONE CONCOURSE
11000 OPEN TO BELOW
3600
C
ESC 4
STAIR 2
3380
STAIR 1
OPEN TO BELOW
SEATS
BREAKTHROUGH TO POTENTIAL ENTRY FROM SKYCITY
3600
ESC 2
1 4002
SERVICES ZONE
4000
NoR (DESIGNATION)
SKYCITY ENTRY
Filename: C:\Revit\CRL_AOT_ARC_000_MD3_STATION_R15_VE2_JHR.rvt
BASEMENT OF SKYCITY LOCATION OF PLAN TO BE VERIFIED
ROOM COLOUR LEGEND BOH
Office:
BUILDING SERVICES TVS/ OTE
Plot Date: 28/06/2016 4:42:51 p.m.
RETAIL PUBLIC
ISSUE FOR AT REVIEW 0
2.5
5
7.5
10
CLIENT
12.5m
N
SCALE 1:250 AT A1 SCALE 1:500 AT A3
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
REV 3 2 B 1. A 0. 1
DATE 28-06-16 21-03-16 11-03-16 31-01-15 19-12-14
REVISION DETAILS VALUE ENGINEERING 2 REFERENCE DESIGN VALUE ENGINEERING 2 CHANGES REFERENCE DESIGN ISSUED FOR VERIFICATION REVIEW ISSUE FOR AT REVIEW ISSUED FOR VERIFICATION REVIEW
APPROVAL C. JACK C. JACK C. JACK C. RITTER C. RITTER
SCALE
SIZE
1 : 250
A1
DRAWN
APPROVED
Jasmax/ Grimshaw
DATE 28/06/16
DESIGNED
TITLE
Page 59
Eduardo Velasquez / James Raimon CHECKED
0
Grant Daniel
Chris Jack
ORIGINAL SIZE 20mm
40
60
80
100
200
300
400
AOTEA STATION ALBERT ST FROM VICTORIA ST TO WYNDHAM ST CONCOURSE PLAN -ZONE MIDDLE
PROJECT
500
DOCUMENT 600
PROJECT
ZONE
DISCIPLINE
ELEMENT
TYPE
SHEET
CRL
AOT
ARC
000
DRG
2112
700
REVISION
3 800
Aotea Station - Platform level Mandated design elements Elements bounded by the red line diagrams are considered mandated for the tenderer to carry forward into detailed design in conjunction with the technical and functional requirements.
Room Schedule - Platform Middle Room No 160 446 446 472 472 486 487 488 489 491 491 493 493 496 498
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Area
34
1827.0 m² 3.3 m² 0.7 m² 3.9 m² 2.0 m² 5.8 m² 11.2 m² 10.7 m² 10.7 m² 4.2 m² 4.2 m² 16.4 m² 17.9 m² 0.7 m² 1.0 m²
35
2500
3
2
4
2
2300
6501
2300
4052
CENTRELINE
1 4052
SUB-SURFACE NOR DESIGNATION BOUNDARY
... | DRG | 2123
2500
PILED WALL ALIGNED WITH EXISTING PILES SHOWN WHITE REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
01
17
... | DRG | 2121 CRL UP
CRL UP
HELP POINT
489
491
SEATS
FALL 1:100
SEATS
3480
OVERHEAD EDGE
OVERHEAD EDGE
H.P. OVERHEAD EDGE
FALL 1:100
491
488
SEATS OVERHEAD EDGE
HELP POINT
ESC
FIRE HYDRANT
493
487
486
cL
cL TRACK
CRL DOWN SUB-SURFACE NOR DESIGNATION BOUNDARY
150M OPERATIONAL PLATFORM
CRL DOWN
PLATFORM EDGE
Figure 7-3 Aotea Station, platform level
Page 60
1 4002
ESC OVERHEAD EDGE
FALL 1:100
2336
3630
OVERHEAD EDGE
FLOOR ACCESS HATCH
2540
cL PLATFORM
FALL 1:100
SEATS
2500 STAIR
ESC
OVERHEAD EDGE
OVERHEAD EDGE
FIRE HYDRANT SEATS
3420
493
FLOOR ACCESS HATCH
FALL 1:100
OVERHEAD EDGE
SEATS
9785
472
FALL 1:100
OVERHEAD EDGE
9743
ESC
3550
498 496 446 446
2500 STAIR
2325
cL TRACK
8646
L 9842
GLASS LIFT ENCLOSURE WITH STEEL STRUCTURE EXPOSED
2550
01
16
Name PLATFORM DB CBD DB CBD COMMS NODE COMMS RISER COMMS NODE TUNNEL LV FIRE HYDRANT FIRE HYDRANT LIFT EQUIPMENT LIFT EQUIPMENT ESCALATOR EQUIP ROOM ESCALATOR EQUIP ROOM DB CBD DB CBD
ROOM COLOUR LEGEND
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 BOH Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop BUILDING SERVICES TVS/ OTE RETAIL
Aotea Station - Cross section Station box 7.5
Station platform C
B
A SKYLIGHT FRAMELESS GLAZING, TOUGHENED LAMINATED LOW IRON GLASS, F5 FINISH CONCRETE CRASH BARRIER AND SKYLIGHT ROOF
FFL 26000 NDG - Level 3
FFL 23900 MAYORAL STREET LEVEL
EXISTING SERVICE LANE
FFL 23350 LID SOUTH CONCRETE SLAB CEILING CAVITY SERVICES CROSS OVER LOCALLY
ACOUSTIC ABSORBENT LINING COVER COMPLETE UNDERSIDE OF CONCRETE SLAB
CONCRETE BEAM EXPOSED UNDERSIDE AND PART SIDE TO BE F5 FINISH
FCL 20850 RCP CONCOURSE
SUSPENDED CEILING, POWDER COATED STEEL PANELS PERFORATION (50%)
EQ
SERVICES ZONE FOR ELEC, COMMS AND FIRE SERVICES
EQ
FFL 20000 NDG - LEVEL 2 GRC WALL PANELS ON SUBSTRUCTURE PERFORATION TO ACOUSTIC ABSORBENT BACKING. REFER TO ACOUSTIC CONSULTANT ADVICE FOR TOTAL AREA REQUIRED. REMOVABLE PANELS AND ACCESS DOORS AS REQUIRED LOCALLY GLASS BALUSTRADE TOUGHENED LAMINATED LOW IRON GLASS WITH STAINLESS STEEL RAILINGS AS STRUCTURALLY REQUIRED, GLASS FIXED IN CONCEALED BOTTOM RAIL, HINGED LOCALLY TO ALLOW FOR MAINTENANCE ACCESS
EQ
1500
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
CONCOURSE
FFL 17250 B1 CONCOURSE
CONCRETE STRUTS EXPOSED CONCRETE F5 FINISH
1300
VOID
CONCRETE BEAM AND SLAB REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
OVER TRACK EXHAUST (OTE)
OVER TRACK EXHAUST (OTE)
EQ
STEEL HANGAR REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS FIRE RATED LINING LOCAL DAMPERS TO OVER TRACK EXHAUST
SERVICES ZONE
EQ
PRECAST SLAB WITH TOPPING REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS 14000 NDG Level 1
GRC WALL PANELS ON SUBSTRUCTURE PANELS TO HAVE 20% PERFORATION TO ACOUSTIC ABSORBENT BACKING, REMOVABLE PANELS AS REQUIRED LOCALLY FOR ACCESS
EQ
OHLE TRACTION POWER (REFER TO RAIL SYSTEMS)
FFL
STEEL HANGAR REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS LINING FACING INSIDE TRACK SIGNAGE
Filename: C:\Revit\CRL_AOT_ARC_000_MD3_STATION_R15_VE2_JHR.rvt
FFL 9844 B3 PLATFORM RL
EMERGENCY SAFETY DEPRESSION
9094
T.O.R.
2500
KINEMATIC ENVELOPE (REFER TO RAIL SYSTEMS)
ZONE FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE PSD ESCALATOR LINING BRUSHED STAINLESS STEEL FINISH EXPOSED CONCRETE F4 FINISH TO SECONDARY LINING AS ARCHITECTURAL LOCAL ADVERTISING AS PER INTERNAL ELEVATIONS
PLATFORM
CONCRETE PILE REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS FALL 1:100
FALL 1:100
UNDER PLATFORM SERVICES CAVITY FOR ELEC, COMMS AND HYDRAULIC SERVICES
Office:
2120
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION_FOREGROUND
Plot Date: 28/06/2016 5:13:57 p.m.
1
85 CONC. FACING 1200 PILE
1870 MIN. VARIES
2
PARTIAL CROSS SECTION CONCOURSE
SCALE @ A1 1 : 50
SCALE @ A1 NTS
ISSUE FOR AT REVIEW 0
0.5
1
1.5
2
CLIENT
2.5m
N
SCALE 1:50 AT A1 SCALE 1:100 AT A3
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
REV 3 2 B 1. A 0. 1
DATE 28-06-16 21-03-16 11-03-16 31-01-15 19-12-14
REVISION DETAILS VALUE ENGINEERING 2 REFERENCE DESIGN VALUE ENGINEERING 2 CHANGES REFERENCE DESIGN ISSUED FOR VERIFICATION REVIEW ISSUE FOR AT REVIEW ISSUED FOR VERIFICATION REVIEW
APPROVAL C. JACK C. JACK C. JACK C. RITTER C. RITTER
SCALE
1 : 50
SIZE
A1
DRAWN
APPROVED
Jasmax/ Grimshaw
DATE 28/06/16
DESIGNED
0
Grant Daniel
Chris Jack 20mm
40
60
80
100
200
300
400
TITLE
Page 61
Eduardo Velasquez / James Raimon CHECKED
ORIGINAL SIZE
AOTEA STATION ALBERT ST FROM VICTORIA ST TO WYNDHAM ST ENLARGED CROSS-SECTION
PROJECT
500
DOCUMENT 600
PROJECT
ZONE
DISCIPLINE
ELEMENT
TYPE
SHEET
CRL
AOT
ARC
000
DRG
6503
700
REVISION
3 800
Aotea Station
Figure 7-4  Aotea Station, concourse
Page 62
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
City Rail Link
Figure 7-5  Aotea Station, platform
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 63
Station planning - Karangahape Station 7.6
Karangahape Station
Design The general arrangement of the Karangahape Station Architectural elements of the Reference Design has undergone significant analysis, design and consultation. The most considered areas are listed below. While tendering parties may choose to investigate opportunities to further improve or enhance the design response in these areas, the perceived limitations of such an undertaking should be considered. • Track alignment. • Interfaces with adjoining owners, including future-proofing of potential future entrance at Beresford Square (Pitt Street box interface and future adit connection) • Positioning and orientation of the entrance in relation to Mercury Lane and views of this entrance from Karangahape Road. • The spatial arrangement and volumetric height at the Station entrance and concourse circulation spaces. • Passenger capacity of circulation elements and escape capacity of emergency escape routes • The general arrangement, location of primary concourse station components and the volumetric spatial qualities of Mercury Lane entrance. (ticket windows, gateline, retail, vertical circulation)
*Note that the Station fore court and precinct public realm reinstatement design is covered in a seperate Chapter.
• Location and positioning of tunnel vent and emergency escape stair in Pitt Street widened footway.
Mandated design elements
• The general arrangement and location of primary vertical circulation elements, including the primary concourse terminating at the main platform level central adit.
Elements bounded by the red line diagrams are considered mandated for the tenderer to carry forward into detailed design in conjunction with the technical and functional requirements.
• The general arrangement, location and provision for the service access lane adjacent the Mercury Theatre and the Station building set back on the south of the site to provide a laneway connection east west from Mercury Lane to East Street.
Page 64
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
E Y LAN R U C MER
2
Station entrance concourse
FOOTPATH
MERCURY
NOTE - FOUNDATION OUTLINE BELOW
BIK OSED PROP
E
LANE + RID G/KISS PARKIN
FOOTPATH
E
OA
5002
1 800
r y ove
OC
265
520
LIFT 2
FFL 59850
WN L UTDO H S ION STAT
VO ID
INE
100
ATM
580
WAY LANE
WELL MATT
BE LO W
5002
2
EVEL D E R TU IAL FU T N E POT
6200
MAINTE NA FIRE IN NCE ACCESS TERVEN ACCESS TION
Canop
UP
245
REFUSE COLLECTION
UP
OB 5380
MERCURY THEATRE
S CCES ION A T A T S
BOLLARDS
11-13
9
FOOTPATH
G ARKIN CLE P BICY X SPACES 30
3
ATION)
5090
NoR (DESIG N
E L AN
OD
ID UNPA
301
310
CASH DESK
9230
202
1 LIFT
300
PAID
200 205
331 541
206 121
330
NOTE - FOUNDATION OUTLINE BELOW
TVS SHAFT
525
5750
101 GL - STREET LEVEL SOUTH FFL 59000
OVE R AB LOO OF F LINE TION JEC
210
OE
PRO
203
1 ESC
454
3 ESC
3
2 ESC
5002
OF
525 525
NOTE - FOUNDATION OUTLINE BELOW
120 525 320
122 532
321 FIRE EGR E
OTE SHAFT
277 FFL 61500
525 200
231 6750
520 5640
O5
0 1186
ST EAST
Figure 7-6  Mercury Lane entrance
O6
N TO CTIO ONNE RE C FUTU
SS
FUTURE COOLING RISER OVER
525
O4 WAY LANE G N I Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP T EXIS
8260 0 1179
O3
NTIAL E T O P ITE & MENT S N CTIO LOP
Page 65
MERCURY
RB PROPOSED KE
OA
ER
1
ESC 4
BE LO W
4
ESC 5
5090
VO ID
102
6002
B2.5 - LANDING SOUTH FFL 51500
3
LIFT 2
524
524 000
200
524
505 524
3000
200 208
1:20 SLOPE
1:20 SLOPE
421
471
450 533
481
525
3000
TVS SHAFT
OTE SHAFT
FFL 54000
525
5640
525
230
O3
O5 O4
SE
O6
ET STRE EAST
O2
Figure 7-7 Mercury Lane lower concourse
525
6750
0 1186
8260
542
SD
525
525
:14 PE 1 SLO
520
TVS SHAFT OVER
N TO CTIO ONNE RE C FUTU
OTE SHAFT OVER
OUTLINE OF PILE FOUNDATION REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
229
9010
275
276
5690
PROJEC TION LIN E OF BU ILDING
ABOVE
506
200
FUTURE COOLING RISER OVER
SC
423
508
FIRE EGRESS CORRIDOR
OTE/TVS SHAFT TRANSITION TO ABOVE GROUND LEVELS
SA SB
ONE METRE HIGH LOUVRE OPENNING REQUIRED FOR AIR RELEASE DISCHARGE
484
1 LIFT
2550
FIRE EGRESS TRANSITION STAIR OVER
PROJECTION LINE OF WESTERN TUNNEL BELOW
HT HEIG S HEAD CALATOR CED S REDU UNDER E E SPAC
3000
B2 - LANDING SOUTH FFL 53743
6002
OD
O1
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
8380
6440
4780
9230
EMERGENCY EGRESS SCISSOR STAIR
6
5
2880
264
6200
524
485 520
OC WAY OVE LANE G AB OSED ILDIN PROP F BU INE O ON L ECTI PROJ
244 524
INTERVENTION STAIR/LOBBY/LIFT
OUTLINE ESCALATOR PIT
4.28°
207
5380
000 SCISSOR LIFT - ACCESS B2.5 LANDING SOUTH
REDUCED HE AD HEIGHT
2 ESC
MERCURY THEATRE OVER
3 ESC
REDUCED HE AD HEIGHT
1 ESC
2
ATION)
OB
OUTLINE OF PILE FOUNDATION REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
ESC 6 NoR (DESIG N
Page 66
EO
WATER TANK REFER TO MEP DOCUMENTS
ER
LANE OVE R
KERBLINE O V
IN
IN ERBL ED K S O P PRO
STORMWATER TANK REFER TO MEP DOCUMENTS
WALER BEAM AROUND CONNECTING SHAFT TO MERCURY LANE STATION ACCESS FLOOR PANEL TO MATCH WALL FINISH PANEL
7.08°
PROPO SED
KERBLINE O V
L KERB
Y LAN R U C MER
5550
PROPO SED
CROSS STR
Escalator concourse
2m x 1m OPENNING FOR UPS/CER MAKE UP AIR DURING TOTAL POWER FAILURE.
OSED PROP
Escalator adits PROJECTION CONNECTING SHAFT TO MERCURY LANE STATION ACCESS ESCALATOR PIT UNDER
8600
9360
ESC 7 ESC 8
104
FFL 43000
ESC 4 ESC 5
ESC 9 ESC 6
OUTLINE OF PILE FOUNDATION OF TRANSITION SHAFT BELOW MERCURY LANE REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
° .72 85
OUTLINE OF PILE FOUNDATION REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
242 520 LIFT 2
524
OTE SHAFT
524
TVS SHAFT
262
EMERGENCY EGRESS SCISSOR STAIR
524 VOID524
227 524
OUTLINE OF PILE FOUNDATION OVER REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
4.28°
INTERVENTION STAIR/LOBBY/LIFT
VOID
505 524 1 LIFT
533 B4 - LANDING SOUTH FFL 43743 OTE SHAFT
CRL DOWN
533
541
PROJECTION LINE OF WESTERN TUNNEL BELOW
OTE SHAFT OVER
TVS SHAFT
NoR (SUBSURFACE DESIGNATION )
PF NoR (SUBSURFACE DESIGNATION )
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 67
Platform level N1
PC
EXTENT OF WORKS KRD
PB
NoR (SUBSURFACE DESIGNA
8380
8400
5950
4630
5700
N5
N4
N3
N2
... | DRG | 2162
N6 TION )
ACTIVE PLATFORM START
13440
1
2
4102
4102
01
Room Sch
PLATFORM EDGE TACTILE INDICATORS
CRL UP
END OF PLATFORM GATE
P1
cL TRACK
476
SEATS
ACCESS HATCH SEATS
FALL 1:100
HELP POINT
FALL 1:100
ACCESS HATCH
466
291
EXTENT OF HANDRAIL ON EMERGENCY WALKWAY WITHIN STATION SHOWN DASHED
FALL 1:100
L UP ACCESS HATCH
115 PLATFORM 1 SOUTH BOUND FFL 33743
SEATS
HELP POINT
113
526 TVS OVER
ACCESS HATCH TO SUMP BELOW PLATFORM LEVEL VERTICAL TVS FAN
ER
460 1450
544
2000
526 526 526 526
DRAFT RELIEF OVER
701 TVS OVER
495
440
700
215
UP
REFUGE x4
250
ACCESS HATCH
SEATS HELP POINT
105
477 LINE OF WALER OV
20420
ACCESS HATCH
P2
LOWER CONCOURSE FFL 33743
SEATS
467
508
4000 CLEAR
TVS CONNECTING ADIT TO PLATFORM
109 441
EMERGENCY EGRESS SCISSOR STAIR
SEATS
B7 - PLATFORM LANDING FFL 33743
482
111
4101
LIFT 3
107
4000 CLEAR
PROFILE OF FUTURE ESCALATORS (STAGE 03)
2
216
3000
OUTLINE OF PILE FOUNDATION OVER REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
526 UP
LINE OF WALER OV
CAT LADDER TO ACCESS UNDER PLATFORM LEVEL
526 526
ENCLOSED SPACE
VERTICAL TVS FAN
CONNECTING ADITS TO PLATFORM REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
520
251 REFUGE x2
- STAGE 1
464
4101
526
526
4000 CLEAR
1
4000 CLEAR
PROFILE OF FUTURE ESCALATORS (STAGE 03)
ER
OUTLINE OF PILE FOUNDATION OVER REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
112
114
VARIES
TVS CONNECTING ADIT TO PLATFORM
110
END OF PLATFORM GATE
SEATS ACCESS HATCH
116 PLATFORM 2 NORTH BOUND FFL 33743
SEATS
HELP POINT
FALL 1:100
SEATS
FALL 1:100
HELP POINT ACCESS HATCH
FALL 1:100
4000 CLEAR
EXTENT OF HANDRAIL ON EMERGENCY WALKWAY WITHIN STATION SHOWN DASHED
ACCESS HATCH
RL DOWN cL TRACK
P3 16240
CRL DOWN
EXTENT OF WORKS KRD
TACTILE INDICATORS
PA
ACTIVE PLATFORM START
PD PE NoR (SUBSURF AC
Page 68
11450
PLATFORM EDGE
E DESIGNATIO
PF
N) CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Room No 107 113 114 116 200 215 216 250 291 440 460 464 466 477 495 508 520 526 544 700 701
LOWER PLATFO PLATFO PLATFO CIRCULA FIRE EG FIRE EG LOBBY STATION ELECTR COMMS COMMS COMMS SIGNALL TUNNEL FAN COI PRESSU MEP RIS DRAFT R PLENUM SUMP SUMP PU
... | D
PG
1 1
NoR (SUBSURFACE DESIGNATION )
1
4103
4104
ACTIVE PLATFORM START
EXTENT OF WORKS KRD
4105
PLATFORM EDGE TACTILE INDICATORS
CRL UP
HELP POINT
ACCESS HATCH SEATS
HELP POINT
ACCESS HATCH SEATS
ACCESS HATCH HELP POINT
SEATS
4000 CLEAR
OF FUTURE ESCALATORS (STAGE 03)
MEP CONNECTION TO NORTHBOUND PLATFORM REFER TO MEP DOCUMENTS
441
ACCESS HATCH
3500 CLEAR
105
540 OUTLINE OF PILE FOUNDATION OVER REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
ESC 7
ACCESS HATCH
108 ESC 8
LOWER CONCOURSE
200
ESC 9
SEATS
ACCESS HATCH
467
CONNECTING ADIT TO PLATFORM (PASSENGERS AND TVS EXTRACTION) REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
463
OF FUTURE ESCALATORS (STAGE 03)
PROJECTION CONNECTING ADIT TO MERCURY LANE STATION ACCESS
465
ESCALATOR PIT UNDER
200 524
520
260
LIFT 2
524 702
REFUGE x2
SEATS ACCESS HATCH
HELP POINT
505
OUTLINE OF PILE FOUNDATION REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
200
SEATS
SB
ACCESS HATCH TO SUMP BELOW PLATFORM
475
B7 - PLATFORM SOUTH FFL 33743
EXTENT OF HANDRAIL ON EMERGENCY WALKWAY WITHIN STATION SHOWN DASHED
1 LIFT
ACCESS HATCH
SC
ACCESS
cL TRACK
CRL DOWN
N TACTILE INDICATORS
OTE SHAFT OVER
11450
401
PE
END OF PLATFORM GATE
540
SD
TVS SHAFT OVER
NoR (SUBSURFACE DESIGNATION )
5690
PLATFORM EDGE
PF
SE ACTIVE PLATFORM START OUTLINE OF PILE FOUNDATION OVER REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
EXTENT OF WORKS KRD
NoR (SUBSURFACE DESIGNATION )
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
SA
9010
ACCESS HATCH
'CAT LADDER' TO ACCESS UNDER PLATFORM LEVEL
524
106
224
3660 CLEAR
SEATS
FALL 1:100
ACCESS HATCH
HELP POINT
225
EMERGENCY EGRESS SCISSOR STAIR FALL 1:100
SEATS
HELP POINT
FALL 1:100
116
524
496
2880
INTERVENTION STAIR/LOBBY/LIFT
5550
240
4000 CLEAR
° .72 85
4.28°
CONNECTING ADITS TO PLATFORM REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
110
112
TFORM 2 NORTHBOUND FFL 33743
EXTENT OF HANDRAIL ON EMERGENCY WALKWAY WITHIN STATION SHOWN DASHED
540
109
111
HELP POINT
461
END OF PLATFORM GATE
4000 CLEAR
SEATS
3000
SEATS
FALL 1:100
ACCESS HATCH
115
PLATFORM 1 SOUTHBOUND FFL 33743
FALL 1:100
FALL 1:100
cL TRACK
Page 69
Mt Eden Station 7.7
Mt Eden Station
Design The general arrangement of the Mt Eden Station Architectural elements of the Reference Design has undergone significant analysis, design and consultation. The most considered areas are listed below. While tendering parties may choose to investigate opportunities to further improve or enhance the design response in these areas, the perceived limitations of such an undertaking should be considered. • Track alignment. • Positioning and orientation of the entrance in relation to Ruru Street. • The spatial arrangement and volumetric height at the Station entrance and concourse circulation spaces. • The general arrangement, location of primary concourse station components. • Location of the tunnel headhouse and access from Korari Street. • The general arrangement and location of primary vertical circulation elements. • The general arrangement and location of emergency escape elements.
*Note that the Station fore court and precinct public realm reinstatement design is covered in a seperate Chapter.
• The passenger capacity of circulation elements and emergency escape elements. • The SGCC location.
Mandated design elements Elements bounded by the red line diagrams are considered mandated for the tenderer to carry forward into detailed design in conjunction with the technical and functional requirements.
Page 70
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
10 Room Schedule - Station - Ground Number 103 106 107 108 110 111 112 115 116 117 118 119 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 208 210 213 230 230 231 240 241 250 300 301
N 2
1
1
2
4005
4005
4002
4002
PR EM IUM F
EN C
ET
OB
OU ND
AR Y
S KIS IDE NR
K IS
W NE
400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 450
SN E RID
108
ESC 3
BR OU IDGE TR A I GG C C ER ESS S
SECURE GATE
119 118 117 116 115
PA TAXI
PLAZA
231
BRIDGE OVER
107 240
RKS
AC C
206
230
PA TAXI
2240
200
RKS
STAIRS ESC 2
R/O
R/O
R/O
120
UP
UP
426
2
FUTURE OVERSITE DEVELOPMENT
EXIT STAIRS
4000
427 428 520
R/O
203
Plot Date: 14/06/2016 12:43:49 p.m.
406 UPS 3
405
407
208
UPS 2
UPS 4
1
MTE STATION - LEVEL GROUND
1200
SCALE @ A1 1 : 250
0
CIRCULATION
204
410
BMS
CER 1
510
409
GAS
CER 2
Ø 1400 WATER MAIN
STAFF PARKING
2 1800mm HIGH PREMIUM BALUSTRADE TO EDGE
5100
BRIDGE
1200
CANOPY ESC 1
METAL ROOF STAIR CANOPY STAIRS
111 LIFT 4
METAL ROOF STAIR CANOPY
CANOPY
1800 BALUSTRADE WITH GLAZED TOP 800HIGH
CANOPY OVER
ROOF GLAZING SECTIONS ALUMINIUM STANDING SEAM PREFINISHED METAL ROOF
1800mm HIGH PREMIUM BALUSTRADE TO EDGE
2.5
5
7.5
10
CLIENT
12.5m
REV 4 3 2 1
DATE 14/06/16 03/06/16 19/04/16 22/02/16
REVISION DETAILS REFERENCE DESIGN FOR AT REVIEW AT REVIEW REFERENCE DESIGN FOR AT REVIEW REFERENCE DESIGN FOR AT REVIEW
APPROVAL CHRIS JACK CHRIS JACK CHRIS JACK GRANT DANIEL
SCALE
SIZE
1 : 250
A1
DRAWN
100
AT REVIEW
CANOPY
MOUNT EDEN STATION
PROJECT
MT EDEN STATION - FLOOR PLAN - GL
APPROVED
JASMAX
DATE 14/06/16
DESIGNED
TITLE
Chris Jack CHECKED
Grant Daniel
Chris Jack 80
112
2
BRIDGE ACCESS OUTRIGGERS
ORIGINAL SIZE 60
UP
MAINTENANCE ACCESS
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP 40
PRIVATE CIRCULATION
408 UPS 5
1800mm HIGH PREMIUM BALUSTRADE TO EDGE
SCALE 1:250 AT A1 SCALE 1:500 AT A3
20mm
PUBLIC
103
SECURE GATE
DIVERTED WATER MAIN EXISTING WATER MAIN TO BE RELOCATED
0
213
RETAIL
99% CAR
2000
430
Office:
429
UPS 1
403 LV 2
106
2470
1 4000
R/O
210
CL
425
RURU STREET NEW BRIDGE
424
FIRE EGRESS
423
1400
2855 1900
4000
421 422
401
CANOPY OVER
801 FIRE EGRESS
404
250 110
CONCOURSE
TVS/ OTE
3
TX B
4400
LV 1
MATT WELL
1800mm HIGH PREMIUM BALUSTRADE TO EDGE
STATION - GL STATION - GL STATION - GL
BUILDING SERVICES
5100
TX A
R/O
GATELINE 8 NO.
2500
SECURE GATE
KORARI STREET NEW BRIDGE
Filename: C:\Revit\CRL_MTE_ARC_000_MD3_STATION_R15_v2_JHR.rvt
3 4500
STATION ENTRY
2
14 m² 53 m² 35 m²
BOH
402
300
3265
2
- GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL
LEGEND RO AD
400 205
STAIRS
BOLLARDS
ES S
301
NOTE: REFER CALLOUT FOR HEAD HOUSE AREA SCHEDULE FUTURE OVERSITE DEVELOPMENT
STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION
UP
1
TVM
26 m² 31 m² 15 m² 16 m² 16 m² 17 m² 19 m² 16 m² 20 m² 28 m² 28 m² 37 m²
7500 Bridge
LIFT 2
5100
- GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL - GL
241
230
201 202
Level STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION
C L
800
Area 97 m² 9 m² 9 m² 10 m² 355 m² 12 m² 21 m² 3 m² 2 m² 2 m² 2 m² 2 m² 24 m² 6 m² 13 m² 15 m² 10 m² 18 m² 10 m² 6 m² 12 m² 3 m² 3 m² 8 m² 12 m² 25 m² 7 m² 27 m² 11 m² 12 m²
in.
CANOPY OVER
4500
510 800 801
450
300 0m
N SIO EN XT TE EE TR US UR -R
EMERGENCY SERVICES PARK
400 0M IN
AD RO
60 BICYCLE PARKS
Name CORRIDOR LIFT 3 LIFT 2 LIFT 1 CONCOURSE LIFT 4 FIRE EGRESS STAIR ACC WC UNI WC UNI WC UNI WC STORAGE OFFICE FIRE INLET PANEL COMMS /CASH FCR / SCR BMS CLEANERS / STORE BINS UNALLOCATED POLICE UNALLOCATED ACC WC WC ACCESS CORRIDOR STORE STORE LOBBY TICKET WINDOWS TICKET VENDING MACHINES TX A LV 1 TX B LV 2 UPS 1 UPS 2 UPS 3 UPS 4 UPS 5 CER 2 CER 1 LIFT EQUIPMENT / HYDRANT / CLEANING GAS RETAIL RETAIL
200
300
400
500
DOCUMENT 600
PROJECT
ZONE
DISCIPLINE
ELEMENT
TYPE
SHEET
REVISION
CRL
MTE
ARC
000
DRG
2100
4
700
Page 71 800
8
Urban realm - Precinct streetscapes
8.1
Albert Street (Wyndham to Wellesley Street)
The general arrangement of the urban realm streetscapes undergone preliminary stakeholder discussion. The following scope drawings indicate the general arrangement of street scapes which are to be informed by further development of the C3 Reference design document. The materials finishes palette, furniture selection and quantity, planting selections will be informed by the C2 detailed design development.
Wyndham Street
Page 72
C3
Kingston Street
C2
Albert Street
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Victoria Street
Aotea Station precinct
Laneway
Station Entrance Station Entrance
Station Entrance
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Mayoral Drive Wellesley Street
Albert Street
Page 73
Karangahape Station precinct 8.2
Pitt Street to Mercury Lane
Karan
gahap
e Roa
d
Note : The TVS and escape stair is proceeding through an NOR alteration with the TVS located north of the Pitt Street Church driveway and the Stair to the south of the Methodist southern driveway
t
Be
res
for
dS
qu
are
Pitt Stree
Page 74
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Cross Street
Karangahape Station precinct
Karan
gahap
e Roa
d
Mercury Lane
y
ewa
Lan t Eas
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
et
Stre
Page 75
Mt Eden precinct 8.3
Ruru Street, Nikau Street, Korari Street w Flo er ee
Str t
u
S ari Kor
ka
Ni
et
re
St
t tree
tree
ru S Ru t
do
ad
Sh
t
ee
tr aS
ur
ah
Ng
et
tre
S ck
reet
Flow er St
Stree
t
Mt
Ede
nR
oad
Ruru
Page 76
CRL-SYW-ARC-000-RPT-0002 Project 239933 | 8 May 2017 | Data drop
Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw | ARUP
Page 77
Auckland Office Level 4, Aurecon House 139 Carlton Gore Road Auckland 1023 New Zealand T+ 64 9 520 6019 F+ 64 524 7815