K Rd early works outline plan by City Rail Link Ltd

21 October 2019 Warwick Pascoe Principal Project Lead Premium Resource Consents Auckland Council Private Bag 92300 Auckland 1142

Dear Warwick, City Rail Link – Outline Plan submission and Management Plans for Certification – Karangahape Station early works Please find enclosed an Outline Plan and Management Plans for the Karangahape Station early works required to enable construction of the City Rail Link (CRL) Karangahape Station. The works relate to utility relocations, tree removal, building demolition and Construction Support Area (CSA) establishment in the vicinity of Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane. The Karangahape Station early works are authorised and provided for by CRL Designation 2500-4 in the Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in Part (AUP), for which City Rail Link Limited (CRLL) is the requiring authority. The works are also authorised by the CRL ‘Aotea to North Auckland Line’ (A2N) regional resource consents. The following documents are now provided: (1) An Outline Plan under section 176A of the Resource Management Act 1991, for works to be undertaken in accordance with CRL Designation 2500-4, including: (a) Communication and Consultation Plan; (b) Construction Environmental Management Plan. (c) Delivery Work Plans: (i)

Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP;

(ii)

Air Quality DWP;

(iii)

Trees and Vegetation DWP;

(iv)

Transport, Access and Parking DWP;

(v)

Construction Noise and Vibration DWP;

(vi)

Historic Character DWP (Built Heritage Section);

(vii)

Historic Character DWP (Archaeology Section);

(viii) Contamination DWP and; (ix)

Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan.

The following Delivery Work Plans are also required by the designation conditions, but are not included in the Outline Plan for the reasons set out below: Link Alliance – 100 Carlton Gore Road, Newmarket, Auckland 1023

  (2)

Public Art DWP – there is no identified public art located within or adjacent to the Karangahape Station early works; and Urban Design DWP – an Urban Design DWP will be prepared at the completion of the main construction works for the Karangahape Station. A Construction Environmental Management Plan and the following Management Plans for certification, as required by the conditions of the A2N regional resource consents: (i)

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan;

(ii)

Air Quality Management Plan;

(iii)

Contaminated Soils Management Plan; and

(iv)

Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan.

Where the designation and resource consent conditions require Delivery Work Plans and Management Plans to be prepared for the same aspect of environmental management – i.e. Construction Environmental Management Plan, Contamination, and Air Quality – then a combined plan has been prepared addressing the requirements of both sets of conditions. These combined plans are submitted for both Outline Plan and certification purposes. This Outline Plan is submitted under Tonkin + Taylor’s account with Auckland Council, as a member of the Link Alliance. The details of this are:   

Account name: Tonkin Account number: 2650624004 PO reference: 1007807.1000R.01

The Link Alliance’s PRR number for processing of this Outline Plan is PRR00032302. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned should you wish to discuss any aspect of the documents submitted.

Yours sincerely,

Peter Roan Consents Lead – Link Alliance

Link Alliance - 100 Carlton Gore Road, Newmarket, Auckland 1023

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800000

Revision: Final Date: October 2019

Page 1

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800000

This document is uncontrolled when printed. This document should be printed in colour

Revision Status Revision

Issue Date

Major Changes

Changed By

Approved By

21/10/2019

Final for submission to Auckland Council

Cameron Sunde

Peter Roan

Approval Status Name/Title

Signature

Date

Prepared by:

Cameron Sunde Link Alliance - Planner

21/10/2019

Reviewed by:

Peter Roan Link Alliance â€“ Consents Manager

21/10/2019

Approved by:

Richard Jenkins City Rail Link Limited â€“ Principal Planner

21/10/2019

Page 2

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan

Table of contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 5 1.1

City Rail Link Project .......................................................................................................... 5

1.2

Extent of Works ................................................................................................................. 5

1.3

Statutory Approvals Overview .......................................................................................... 5

1.3.1.

CRL Designation 2500-4 .............................................................................................. 5

1.3.2.

Regional Resource Consents ....................................................................................... 6

1.4

Outline Plan Supporting Documents ................................................................................. 6

1.5

Requiring Authority and Site Details ................................................................................. 7

2. Statutory Framework .................................................................................. 9 2.1

Section 176A RMA - Outline Plan Requirements ............................................................... 9

2.2

Designation Conditions...................................................................................................... 9

3. Site Description ......................................................................................... 11 4. Description of Proposed Works ................................................................ 11 4.1

Overview ......................................................................................................................... 11

4.2

Staging............................................................................................................................. 12

4.3

Vegetation Removal ........................................................................................................ 12

4.4

Building Demolition ......................................................................................................... 12

4.5

Relocation of Network Utilities ....................................................................................... 12

4.6

Construction Support Areas............................................................................................. 12

4.7

Hours of Work ................................................................................................................. 13

5. Outline Plan Requirements ....................................................................... 14 5.1

Height, Shape and Bulk of the Works .............................................................................. 14

5.2

Location on the Site ......................................................................................................... 14

5.3

Likely Finished Contour of the Site .................................................................................. 14

5.4

Vehicular Access, Circulation and Parking ....................................................................... 14

5.5

Landscaping ..................................................................................................................... 15

6. Other Matters to Avoid, Remedy or Mitigate Adverse Effects on the Environment .................................................................................................... 16

Page 3

6.1

Transport, Access and Parking ......................................................................................... 16

6.2

Construction Noise and Vibration.................................................................................... 16

6.3

Network Utilities ............................................................................................................. 17

6.4

Built Heritage .................................................................................................................. 17

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan 6.5

Archaeology..................................................................................................................... 17

6.6

Trees and Vegetation ...................................................................................................... 18

6.7

Contamination................................................................................................................. 18

6.8

Air Quality ....................................................................................................................... 18

6.9

Social Impact and Business Disruption ............................................................................ 19

6.10 Erosion and Sediment Control ......................................................................................... 19 6.11 Building Condition Surveys .............................................................................................. 20 6.12 Environmental Monitoring .............................................................................................. 20

7. Consultation .............................................................................................. 21 7.1

Community and Business Liaison Group .......................................................................... 21

7.2

Auckland Council ............................................................................................................. 21

7.3

Mana Whenua ................................................................................................................. 21

7.4

Network Utility Operators ............................................................................................... 22

7.5

Other parties ................................................................................................................... 22

Appendix A:

Application forms ................................................................... 23

Appendix B:

Planning Maps ........................................................................ 24

Appendix C:

Designation Conditions ........................................................... 25

Appendix D:

Staging Plans ........................................................................... 26

Appendix E:

Construction Environmental Management Plan .................... 27

Appendix F:

Communication and Consultation Plan .................................. 28

Page 4

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan

1. Introduction This Outline Plan relates to the Karangahape Station early works in the vicinity of Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane, which will enable the construction of the new Karangahape Station as part of the City Rail Link (CRL). The works are authorised and provided for by CRL Designation 25004, for which City Rail Link Limited (CRLL) is the requiring authority (refer to Section 1.3 for further detail).

1.1 City Rail Link Project The CRL project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km twin-tunnel underground passenger railway up to 42 metres below the Auckland city centre. It will transform the downtown Britomart Transport Centre into a two-way through-station that better connects Aucklandâ€™s rail network, allowing it to double in capacity. Two new stations will be constructed (Aotea and Karangahape) and Mount Eden Station will be redeveloped. Figure 1.1 below shows the alignment of the CRL between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Line at Mt Eden. Figure 1.1 Alignment of CRL

1.2 Extent of Works The Karangahape Station early works (the early works) described in this Outline Plan involve utility diversions, tree removal, building demolition and establishment of Construction Support Areas (CSAs) in the vicinity of Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane.

1.3 Statutory Approvals Overview The works described in this Outline Plan are authorised by CRL designation 2500-4 and the CRL Aotea to North Auckland Line (A2N) resource consents.

1.3.1. CRL Designation 2500-4 Page 5

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan The CRL is provided for by six separate designations (2500-1 to 2500-6), with the Karangahape Station being provided for by Designation 2500-4. Designation 2500-4 (hereafter referred to as “the designation”) is a “surface and sub-strata designation for the construction, operation and maintenance of Karangahape Station, and encompassing land within road reserve and private property in the vicinity of Pitt Street, Beresford Square, Karangahape Road, and Mercury Lane 1.” The Karangahape Station early works will be contained entirely within the designation boundary and undertaken in general accordance with the purpose of the designation. The conditions relating to the designation are provided in Appendix C and addressed further in Section 2.2.

1.3.2. Regional Resource Consents A suite of regional resource consents (known as the Aotea to North Auckland Line (A2N) consents) provide for the construction of CRL between Wyndham Street in the City Centre and Mt Eden. It is noted that the relevant resource consent conditions are not addressed as part of this Outline Plan, other than by way of inclusion of relevant management plans required by the resource consent conditions (refer to Section 1.4 below).

1.4 Outline Plan Supporting Documents This Outline Plan has been prepared by the Link Alliance, in accordance with section 176A of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) and designation Condition 10. As required under designation Condition 10.1, this Outline Plan includes:   

a Communication and Consultation Plan; a Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP); and a suite of Delivery Work Plans (DWPs) that sit as sub-plans to the CEMP2.

The CEMP and sub-plans that form part of this Outline Plan are shown in

1 2

Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part) – 2500 City Rail Link

The CEMP also contains two Environmental Management Plans (EMPs) which are required under the A2N consents but not under the designation (refer Table 1.1). These plans (ESCP and GSMCP) are submitted to the Council for certification and do not form part of the Outline Plan. Page 6 | Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan Table 1.1, along with reference to the specific designation and resource consent conditions that set out the requirements for the individual plans. Some plans are required by both designation and resource consent conditions (refer to

Page 7

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan Table 1.1), in which case, a single plan has been produced to address all relevant designation and consent requirements.

Page 8

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan Table 1.1: CEMP and Sub-plans

Plan3

Relevant Conditions CRL Designation

Resource consents

Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) – Appendix E to this Outline Plan

C 20-21

C 35

Transport, Access and Parking DWP (TAP DWP) – Appendix K of the CEMP

C 25

Construction Noise and Vibration DWP (CNV DWP) (including Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plans (SSCNVMPs)) – Appendix L of the CEMP

C 36

Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP (SIBD DWP) – Appendix F of the CEMP

C 61

Historic Character DWP (comprising Built Heritage and Archaeology sections) – Appendix M and N of the CEMP

C 41, 42

Trees and Vegetation DWP (TV DWP) – Appendix J of the CEMP

C55

Contamination DWP / Contaminated Soils Management Plan – Appendix O of the CEMP

C 57

C 131

Air Quality DWP / Air Quality Management Plan – Appendix I of the CEMP

C 59

C 222

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) – Appendix H to the CEMP

C 53

Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan (GSMCP) – this plan is being prepared and will be submitted to Auckland Council for certification at a later date – Draft included as Appendix P to the CEMP

C 97

Communication and Consultation Plan – Appendix F to this Outline Plan

C 15

C 25

The plans listed in

The Urban Design DWP required under designation condition 47 and the Public Art DWP required under designation condition 56 are not required with this Outline Plan as the early works do not include public realm reinstatement or any impacts on public art as identified in the conditions. Page 9 | Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan Table 1.1 have been reviewed by the Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG) (refer to Section 7.1 of this Outline Plan) and with the exception of the ESCP and GSMCP, the Independent Peer Review Panel. In accordance with designation Condition 10.2, the CEMP and sub-plans clearly document the comments and inputs received during this process, along with a clear explanation of where comments or recommendations have been incorporated in the plans, or where they have not been incorporated, the reasons for this. All works undertaken as part of the early works will be carried out in general accordance with this Outline Plan and supporting documents listed in

Page 10

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan Table 1.1 as required by designation Condition 10.6.

1.5 Requiring Authority and Site Details Table 1.2: Requiring authority and property details

Requiring Authority

City Rail Link Limited

Owner of site

City Rail Link Limited and Road Reserve

Site address / map reference

Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane

Legal descriptions

Beresford Square Road Reserve, Lot 1 and 2 DP 523853 Mercury Lane Road Reserve, Part Allotment 8 Section 7 Suburbs of Auckland and Lot 1 DP 45190, Lot 3-4 DP 51945, Lot 1 DP 71575, Lot 1 DP 82089, Lot 1 Deeds Plan 1082, Allotment 62 Section 7 Suburbs of Auckland

Record of Title references

Beresford Square Road Reserve, 834656, 834657 Mercury Lane Road Reserve, NA129A/195, NA67C/819, NA43B/3, NA38D/205, NA541/140, NA75C/630

Relevant Plans

Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part (AUP)

Designation reference

CRL designation – 2500-4 (AUP) – confirmed 10 November 2015

Underlying zoning

Business – City Centre Zone

Address for service

City Rail Link Limited Attention: Richard Jenkins Phone: 021 870 124 Email: richard.jenkins@cityraillink.govt.nz

We attach copies of the application forms in Appendix A and a copy of the relevant Records of Title in Appendix B.

Page 11

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan

2. Statutory Framework 2.1 Section 176A RMA - Outline Plan Requirements Under section 176A of the RMA, CRLL are required to submit an Outline Plan to Auckland Council for the works that are to be undertaken within the designation. Section 176A(3) of the RMA requires that an Outline Plan must show:      

The height, shape and bulk of the works; The location of the work on the site; The likely finished contour of the site; The vehicular access, circulation, and the provision for parking; Proposed landscaping; and Any other matters to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on the environment.

These matters are addressed in Section 5 below.

2.2 Designation Conditions In addition to the matters set out in section 176A(3) of the RMA, this Outline Plan must also address the conditions of the designation. Table 2.1 below identifies the relevant designation conditions and where they are addressed in this Outline Plan. The full set of designation conditions is included as Appendix C. Table 2.1: Designation conditions relevant to this Outline Plan

Condition No.

Condition

Section where addressed

9.2

A summary of the communication and consultation undertaken between the Requiring Authority and Network Utility Operators prior to construction commencing shall be provided as part of the Outline Plan.

Section 7.4

10.1

The Requiring Authority shall submit an Outline Plan to the Auckland Council for the construction of the City Rail Link in accordance with section 176A of the RMA. The Outline Plan shall include:

10.2

Page 12

a) The Communications and Consultation Plan (Condition 15);

Appendix F

b) The Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP);

Appendix E

c) Delivery Work Plans (DWPs);

Appendix E

d) Site Specific Construction Noise/Vibration Management Plans(SSCNVMPs) and Notable Received Management Plans; and

Appendix E

e) Any other information required by the conditions of this designation associated with the construction of the City Rail Link.

This document and Appendix E

The plans listed in Condition 10.1 above must clearly document the comments and inputs received by the Requiring Authority during its consultation with stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties, and any recommendations received as part of the Independent Peer Review Panel process (where applicable), along with a clear

Appendix E

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan

Condition No.

Condition

Section where addressed

explanation of where any affected party comments or peer review recommendations have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. 10.4

These plans should clearly show how the part integrates with adjacent City Rail Link construction works and interrelated activities. This particularly applies where the Urban Design DWP is submitted as a number of plans.

Sections 1.1 and 4

10.5

Early engagement will be undertaken with Auckland Council in relation to preparation and submission of the Outline Plan to establish a programme for the Outline Plan process to ensure achievable timeframes for both parties.

Section 7.2

10.6

All works shall be carried out in accordance with the Outline Plan(s) required by this condition.

Section 1.4

11.1

Prior to submitting the CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39) to Auckland Council for the construction of the City Rail Link, the Requiring Authority shall engage suitably qualified independent specialists agreed to by Auckland Council to form an Independent Peer Review Panel. The purpose of the Independent Peer Review Panel is to undertake a peer review of the CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39) and provide recommendations on whether changes are required to those plans in order to meet the objective and other requirements of these conditions.

Appendix E

11.2

The CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with condition 39) must clearly document the comments and inputs received by the Requiring Authority during its consultation with stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties, along with a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. This information must be included on the CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39) provided to both the independent peer reviewer and Auckland Council as part of this condition.

Appendix E

11.3

The CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39) submitted to Auckland Council shall demonstrate how the recommendations from the independent peer reviewers have been incorporated, and, where they have not, the reasons why not.

Appendix E

Page 13

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan

3. Site Description The early works will be undertaken in the vicinity of Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane. The indicative works areas are shown in Figure 3.1 below. Staging drawings of the works are included in Appendix D.

Figure 3.1 Early works indicative work areas shown in red and indicative traffic management areas in yellow.

Works will largely be undertaken within the road reserves of Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane, with the exception of the Construction Support Areas (CSA) to be established on the adjacent land. The CSA at Beresford Square will be located adjacent to the northern side of the street, on the corner of Beresford Square and Hopetoun Street. This area is currently used for carparking and is unsealed with two tiered areas sloping down toward the north west. The CSA at Mercury Lane will occupy the area at the southern extent of Mercury Lane, bordered by East Street and Canada Street. The demolition of existing buildings located in the Mercury Lane CSA is already authorised by Outline Plan (OPW60339200). The Karangahape Station area is characterised as a dense urban environment with a mixture of residential, commercial, and business land uses. Street trees are present in some areas including Beresford Square and Pitt Street, and Pitt Street and Karangahape Road are important transport corridors for both private and public transport.

4. Description of Proposed Works 4.1 Overview The early works involve the relocation of network utilities through trenching and directional drilling, the removal of street trees within Beresford Square, demolition of the Beresford Square cafĂŠ and adjacent Beresford Toilets, and establishment of the CSAs in Beresford Square and Mercury Lane. The works will commence in November 2019 and are expected to be completed in mid-2020. Page 14

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan A detailed description of the early works is included in the CEMP (Appendix E), with a summary provided below.

4.2 Staging The construction staging of the early works is shown in the staging drawings included as Appendix D and described in further detail in the CEMP (Appendix E).

4.3 Vegetation Removal The early works will require the removal of 13 street trees from Beresford Square. These are identified and described in the TV DWP included as Appendix J of the CEMP. Works will generally involve setting up fencing around the tree or area of trees involved, trimming of branches and cutting of the trunk, excavation of the stump and subsequent clean-up of the work area. The two street trees outside the Methodist Church on Pitt Street (shown as T146 and T147 in the TV DWP) are outside the works footprint and will not be removed. Tree protection measures for these two trees will be implemented as necessary. Refer to Section 5.5 for detail on replacement planting.

4.4 Building Demolition The cafĂŠ and toilet building in the centre of Beresford Square will be removed as part of the early works. Fencing will be set up around the perimeter of the works area to restrict public access to the site, before the buildings are dismantled, demolished and removed with an excavator.

4.5 Relocation of Network Utilities The relocation of network utilities is required to facilitate the excavation of the Karangahape station boxes at both Beresford Square and Mercury Lane. Works will include the relocation of stormwater, wastewater, potable water, gas, telecommunications and electrical utilities as detailed in the construction staging drawings included in Appendix D. Shallow utility relocations will be undertaken by trenching, and generally include potable water, gas, telecommunications and electrical utilities. Deeper utility relocations will be undertaken by directional drilling and generally include stormwater and wastewater. Further detail on the utility relocation works is included in the CEMP (Appendix E).

4.6 Construction Support Areas The early works will include the establishment of CSAs in Beresford Square and Mercury Lane. The CSA establishment works will include earthworks to contour each site, construction of retaining walls, establishment of site offices, staff facilities, laydown and storage areas. The indicative site layout for each CSA is shown in the drawings included as Appendix D. These works include the setting up of plant and equipment in preparation for the Karangahape Station main construction works, such as water treatment plants and bentonite plants. However the operation of this plant does not form part of the early works and will be addressed in a separate Outline Plan for the main construction works and supporting CEMP and sub-plans. Page 15

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan The early works at Mercury Lane will also involve establishment of the Mercury Lane temporary working platform above the new station box (work will comprise cut and fill earthworks and concrete works). The CSAs at Beresford Square and Mercury Lane will be progressively established from November 2019 through to early 2020. Further detail of the CSA establishment is included in the CEMP (Appendix E).

4.7 Hours of Work It is anticipated that construction work will generally be undertaken between 0700hrs to 2200hrs Monday to Saturday. However, works undertaken after 1900hrs would not be a general occurrence, and all works will be undertaken in accordance with the designation and resource consent conditions.

Page 16

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan

5. Outline Plan Requirements Section 176A of the RMA sets out the matters to be included in an Outline Plan. These are outlined in Sections 5.1 to 5.5 below.

5.1 Height, Shape and Bulk of the Works The tree removal and building demolition works in Beresford Square will result in this area being levelled to road grade (where excavation is required as part of the works this will be backfilled to the existing road level). Utility relocations will involve the excavation of a number of trenches and pits to facilitate the relocation works, located within the road reserve. Excavations will be open for a period while relocations are carried out, before being backfilled and pavements reinstated to current levels. The CSAs at Beresford Square and Mercury Lane will be fenced around the perimeter with approximately 2 m high security fencing. Within each CSA a number of buildings and structures, such as offices, toilets, water treatment areas and covered spoil areas, will be established and remain in place for the duration of the station construction. The CSA at Mercury Lane will also include retaining wall structures and the establishment of a temporary working platform. The CSAs are described in further detail in the CEMP (Appendix E).

5.2 Location on the Site The early works are located in the vicinity of Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane as shown in the drawings in Appendix D.

5.3 Likely Finished Contour of the Site The utility relocations, building demolition and tree removal works will not alter the current contours of the site. The establishment of CSAs includes contouring of these areas, construction of retaining walls and a temporary working platform at the Mercury Lane CSA. The indicative finished contours of the CSAs are shown in the drawings included in Appendix D.

5.4 Vehicular Access, Circulation and Parking The TAP DWP (Appendix K of the CEMP) describes the vehicle access, circulation and provisions for parking during the early works. The early works will be undertaken in several construction stages over a period of approximately six months. During this time, a number of Temporary Traffic Management Plans (TMPs) will be implemented for the works with evolving traffic management requirements and traffic lane configurations. Traffic management will range from temporary footpath occupation and temporary closures to traffic lane closures on Pitt Street (one lane of traffic in each direction on Pitt Street will be maintained throughout the duration of works). Vehicular access to private properties will be maintained as far as practicable for the duration of the early works. Page 17

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan Pedestrian access (with a minimum width of 1.5m) will be maintained adjacent to the individual work areas in Pitt Street, Beresford Square and Mercury Lane. TMPs will ensure that all pedestrian routes meet accessibility requirements, with appropriate ramps and gradients for all users. Full pedestrian access across the Karangahape Road, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane intersection will be maintained at all times during the works. Traffic management areas interfacing with pedestrian crossing points will widen to cater for the crossing demand as required during the works. Wayfinding signage will be provided at each junction along the key pedestrian routes through the works area. Where appropriate, this will provide information on the location and operation of specific buildings or businesses. To enable the early works, vehicle access from Beresford Square onto Pitt Street will be closed permanently from Q1 2020 continuing through the main construction works phase. This will include the removal of car parking at the eastern end of Beresford Square to accommodate the works area. Beresford Square will remain accessible from Hopetoun Street and Day Street. All other existing traffic movements between public roads will continue to be available during the early works. Overall, the volume of construction traffic generated by the early works is predicted to be very low, with approximately 15 truck deliveries per day for each site (Beresford Square and Mercury Lane). Construction traffic will include deliveries of plant and equipment for the works. Parking for construction vehicles during the early works will be provided within each works area and CSA.

5.5 Landscaping The early works do not comprise any landscaping. Replacement planting for the street trees removed from Beresford Square will be undertaken as part of the public realm reinstatement works following the completion of the Karangahape Station construction (and subject to a separate Outline Plan and set of supporting documents, including an Urban Design DWP).

Page 18

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan

6. Other Matters to Avoid, Remedy or Mitigate Adverse Effects on the Environment The CEMP and sub-plans that form part of this Outline Plan provide comprehensive detail on the management of environmental effects during construction of the early works, including measures to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on the environment. A summary of the matters covered in the CEMP and sub-plans is provided below.

6.1 Transport, Access and Parking The TAP DWP (Appendix K of the CEMP) outlines the measures that will be implemented during the early works to manage effects on transport, access and parking (which will include footpath and lane closures and the removal of on street parking). Measures outlined in the TAP DWP that will be implemented during the early works include: 

 

Construction vehicle movements resulting from the early works are expected to be low, at approximately 30 vehicle movements per day at Beresford Square and Mercury Lane (15 at each site); Provision for pedestrian access around the works areas and retaining access to businesses and offices; All access to private properties will be maintained for pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles. Signage will be used to direct traffic and pedestrians wishing to gain access to businesses as appropriate. Where any access to private property is temporarily impacted by the early works, the affected parties will be consulted with, prior to the closure in accordance with the designation conditions; Beresford Square will be closed to vehicle through traffic, however access to private entrances, Samoa House Lane and Day Street will be maintained at all times; and Works on Pitt Street will be managed to ensure at least one lane of traffic in each direction is available at all times.

6.2 Construction Noise and Vibration The early works will create changes to the existing noise environment, with noise and vibration generating machinery (including concrete cutting, hydro excavation, and use of mechanical excavators) operating in relatively close proximity to noise and vibration sensitive receptors. Any road cutting works will be restricted to between the hours of 7am-7pm Monday to Saturday in accordance with designation Condition 36.3(b), with the implementation of mitigation measures as practicable. The management of construction noise and vibration during the early works is addressed by the CNV DWP (Appendix L of the CEMP). The CNV DWP outlines the construction noise and vibration performance standards that must, as far as practicable, be complied with, along with management and mitigation measures that will be implemented during the early works in order to avoid or mitigate adverse noise and vibration effects on sensitive receptors located in the surrounding area. The CNV DWP identifies those buildings where construction activities are predicted to exceed the Project Noise and Vibration Standards and for which a Site Specific Construction Noise or Vibration Management Plan (SSCNVMP) is required in accordance with designation Conditions 37 and 38. Page 19

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan Specifically, a SSCNVMP is required for the buildings set out in Section 5 of the CNV DWP (Appendix L of the CEMP). A combined SSCNVMP has been prepared (Appendix E of the CNV DWP) and outlines the Best Practicable Option that will be implemented during the works to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on a receiver resulting from construction noise or vibration.

6.3 Network Utilities The early works will require the relocation of network utilities within the road corridors of Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane. All works relating to network utilities will be undertaken in a manner that takes account of, and includes measures to address the safety, integrity and protection of existing network utilities that traverse, or are in close proximity to the works area. Co-ordination and consultation with Network Utility Operators (NUO) has been undertaken throughout the development of the works methodology and will continue during the works. Refer to Section 5.1 of the CEMP (Appendix E) for a more detailed outline of network utility management during the early works.

6.4 Built Heritage The Built Heritage Section of the HC DWP (Appendix M of the CEMP) has been prepared to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of the early works on built heritage, as far as reasonably practicable. The Built Heritage Section of the HC DWP outlines how effects on heritage buildings will be avoided or mitigated during the early works, including:    

The protection methodology to be employed in order to protect buildings from any adverse effects during the early works; The requirement for building condition surveys to be undertaken before works commence, during construction and post construction; Settlement and vibration monitoring to be undertaken during construction; and A building record and salvage strategy for the Beresford Toilets.

6.5 Archaeology The Archaeology Section of the HC DWP (Appendix N of the CEMP) outlines the procedures and measures that will be implemented during the early works in order to minimise the potential for adverse effects on archaeological remains. These include: 

 

 Page 20

Pre-construction briefings to be given to project staff in order to inform them of the nature and form of archaeological material that may be encountered during excavations and procedures to be followed in the event of archaeological remains being encountered; Monitoring of excavations within the CSAs by an archaeologist in order to identify and record any archaeological remains; Procedures to be followed if any unrecorded archaeological remains are discovered (including should the Project Archaeologist not be present on site), including protocols should any artefacts of Maori origin, especially koiwi, be discovered; and A comprehensive methodology for the recording, sampling, investigation and analysis of archaeological remains encountered during the early works. | Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan An Archaeological Authority under Section 44(a) of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 (Authority no. 2017/793) has been obtained and the works will be in accordance with this Authority.

6.6 Trees and Vegetation The TV DWP has been prepared to remedy or mitigate the adverse effects on trees and vegetation affected by the early works (Appendix J of the CEMP). As noted, the early works require the removal of 12 street trees from Beresford Square. The TV DWP outlines how the trees will be removed and how effects on remaining trees and vegetation will be managed.

6.7 Contamination The Contamination DWP (Appendix O of the CEMP) outlines the procedures to be implemented in relation to the handling and excavation of potentially contaminated soils during construction in order to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on human health and the environment. Specifically, the DWP includes:  



  

Procedures for the management of contaminated fill and groundwater within the early works footprint, including soil classification, sampling and testing; Procedures to manage the disturbance of contaminated fill during earthworks activities, including measures for reducing human exposure to contaminated fill and minimising contaminated discharges to air, land or water; Measures to ensure the disposal of contaminated material to an appropriately licensed landfill and appropriate treatment of potentially contaminated water in order to avoid, remedy or mitigate effects; The requirement for the Project Contaminated Land Professional to supervise excavation works as required; A contamination Health and Safety Plan; and Contingency measures to manage any unexpected discovery of contamination.

6.8 Air Quality The AQ DWP (Appendix I of the CEMP) outlines how any adverse effects of dust and odour from the early works will be avoided, remedied or mitigated. The overall approach to dust control during the early works involves a focus on pre-emptive mitigation measures such as visual inspections and monitoring to aid in the avoidance of significant dust emissions. A range of measures will be used to manage and mitigate the effects of discharges of dust, odour or construction vehicle exhaust emissions during the early works. In particular:  

Page 21

Controlling dust from exposed surfaces and limiting the disturbance of soil or dusty materials or the area of exposed materials, particularly during windy conditions; Temporary stabilisation or dust suppression measures shall be implemented to prevent dust nuisance to adjoining properties, pedestrians and road traffic. Surfaces that could give rise to dust will be swept regularly to remove any deposited material, and where this is impractical or ineffective these surfaces will be maintained in a damp condition;

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan 

 

Controlling emissions from plant and equipment where applicable, in accordance with regulatory requirements (such as emissions standards), and plant utilised for contract works shall be maintained in a good state of repair so as not to produce excessive fumes or leakage of contaminants when parked or in operation; Covering loads in haulage trucks where there is a risk of dust and materials being blown from vehicles; and Dust contingency measures to address complaints or concentrations of dust that are significantly greater than the trigger values.

Visual monitoring will be undertaken for the duration of the early works and a Total Suspended Particulate monitor installed at the Mercury Lane CSA as outlined in the AQ DWP.

6.9 Social Impact and Business Disruption The Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP (SIBD DWP) has been prepared (Appendix F of the CEMP) to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects arising from disruption to businesses, residents and community services/facilities so far as reasonably practicable. The SIBD DWP has been prepared in consultation with representatives from the community, business owners, affected parties and affected in proximity parties. Common issues raised by parties consulted are summarised below:     

The potential for construction noise impacts; Concerns that construction noise and disruption would lead to tenants vacating a property; Concerns about the loss of pedestrian and vehicular access to properties, including private car parks, and road diversions that would be required. Concerns around the position of hoardings and passage ways/diversions being unwelcoming to walk along; and The businesses on Beresford Square were specifically concerned about: o The proximity of hoardings and the impact on the appearance of the street; o The need to maintain visibility to businesses; o The loss of outdoor seating areas; o The need to retain pedestrian access and private car parking; and o The impact of noise, vibration and disturbance on the employees from construction work and traffic.

The SIBD DWP addresses the management and mitigation of these potential impacts during the construction works.

6.10 Erosion and Sediment Control The early works will involve small scale earthworks within the road associated with utility relocations, along with earthworks associated with the contouring of the CSAs and establishment of the Mercury Lane temporary working platform. Earthworks have the potential to generate sediment laden discharges to the surrounding receiving environment if not appropriately managed. The early works Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) (Appendix H of the CEMP) identifies the measures that will be implemented to mitigate and manage the potential adverse effects on the receiving environment from any erosion and sediment generation during the early works. The ESCP follows the principles of erosion and sediment control set out in Auckland Council “Erosion and Page 22

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan Sediment Control Guide for Land Disturbing Activities in the Auckland Regionâ€?, Guideline Document 005 (GD05), which supersedes Auckland Council Technical Publication 90 (TP90). All erosion and sediment control measures will be fully established within each works area before physical works commence in that area.

6.11 Building Condition Surveys Building condition surveys will be undertaken in accordance with designation Condition 46 and resource consent Condition 133. Specifically, a condition survey will be undertaken for all buildings where there is potential for damage to buildings or structures arising from construction works, such as excavation, dewatering or vibration effects. Building condition surveys are described in the CEMP (Appendix E).

6.12 Environmental Monitoring Section 6 of the CEMP (Appendix E) provides a comprehensive outline of environmental monitoring to be undertaken during the early works. In summary, monitoring of compliance with the designation conditions and resource consent conditions will be undertaken throughout the early works to ensure that environmental effects are appropriately managed. This will enable the overall effectiveness of the environmental controls to be determined and allows areas of non-compliance or opportunities for improvement to be identified so appropriate actions can be taken. The specific monitoring required for each environmental element is detailed in the respective subplans appended to the CEMP. The sub-plans outline monitoring requirements, the frequency of the monitoring to be undertaken and the appropriate responsible person. Section 6 of the Project CEMP also details the collaborative process between the Link alliance, CRLL and Auckland Council compliance officers during construction in accordance with designation Condition 13.

Page 23

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan

7. Consultation Consultation with the Karangahape Community and Business Liaison Group (CBLG), Auckland Council, Mana Whenua and Network Utility Operators has been undertaken to inform preparation of this Outline Plan and the supporting CEMP and sub-plans. A summary of this consultation is outlined below.

7.1 Community and Business Liaison Group The Karangahape CBLG comprises directly affected and affected in proximity property owners and occupiers (or representatives for these parties), representatives of the Karangahape Road Business Association and other parties with an interest in the Karangahape area. CBLG meetings are held at least every three months and will continue for the duration of the Karangahape Station construction. The CBLG is a key forum for providing:   

The community with regular information in relation to the CRL project, such as construction details, programme and what can be expected during construction; An opportunity for community concern and interest to be raised and reported to the Link Alliance; and The community with an opportunity to review and provide feedback on the CEMP and subplans.

The CEMP and sub-plans listed in

Page 24

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan Table 1.1, and which form part of this Outline Plan, have been made available to the CBLG for review and comment. Comments received from the CBLG have served to inform the preparation of these plans and are captured in an appendix to the respective documents, along with a clear explanation of where comments or recommendations have been incorporated in the Plans, or where they have not been incorporated, the reasons for this.

7.2 Auckland Council Engagement has been undertaken with Auckland Council in relation to the preparation of this Outline Plan. The Link Alliance team met with the relevant Auckland Council specialists on 6 August 2019 and presented an overview of the CRL project, planning approvals and associated CEMP and sub-plans, construction methodology and environmental management framework for the project. The meeting also considered the programme for lodgement of the Outline Plan and sub-plans. Auckland Council has been provided with copies of the draft CEMP and sub-plans to review and comment on, prior to formal lodgement of this Outline Plan with these comments included in an appendix to the respective plans.

7.3 Mana Whenua A CRL mana whenua forum has been established for the purposes of undertaking kaitiakitanga responsibilities associated with the project. The forum comprises those mana whenua groups who expressed an interest in being involved in the CRL project and its related activities. Refer to Section 1.6 of the CEMP (Appendix E) for detail in this regard. The early works were presented to the mana whenua forum on 3 September 2019.

7.4 Network Utility Operators Engagement has been undertaken with the following Network Utility Operators (NUOs) who have network utility services located within the early works area: Vector Electricity, Vector Gas, Vector Communications, Chorus, Vodafone, Auckland Council stormwater unit (Healthy Waters), and Watercare. Further detail of engagement undertaken to date with NUOs is outlined in Section 5.1 of the CEMP (Appendix E).

7.5 Other parties Engagement has also been undertaken with representatives from the community, business owners, affected parties and affected in proximity parties in the process of developing the SIBD DWP. That engagement is detailed in the SIBD DWP document contained in Appendix F of the CEMP.

Page 25

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan

Appendix A:

Page 26

Application forms

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Application for Outline Plan of Works Property, Consents and Licensing Under section 176A of the Resource Management Act 1991 Please send or deliver your application to the Council Of f i ce Use On ly : Application No: Receipt Date: Deposit Paid: !

1.0

GENERAL DETAILS!

Site(s) to which this application relates is described as: No:

Pitt Street, Beresford Square, Mercury Lane

Street:

Suburb: City Centre

Legal Description:

Designation Ref:

2500-4

Requiring Authority: City Rail Link Limited

Purpose of Designation: !

2.0

City Rail Link

APPLICANT DETAILS!

Name: (please write all names in full)

City Rail Link Limited

Physical address:

AMP Centre - Level 17, 29 Custom Street West, Auckland

Postal address: (if different)

PO BOX 105 777, Auckland

Phone (day):

Postcode:

Mobile:

021 870 124

Richard.Jenkins@CityRailLink.govt.nz

Email:

Postcode:

1010 1141

Fax:

! Please tick if email preferred method of contact

The applicant is the

! Owner

! Occupier

! Lessee

! The Crown

! Network Utility Operator

! Other

! Prospective Purchaser

of the site to which the application relates. !

3.0

AGENT/CONSULTANT DETAILS (If different from above)!

Company:

The Link Alliance

Postal address of Agent:

105 Carlton Gore Road, Newmarket

Phone (day): Email:

Contact Person:

Mobile:

Peter.Roan@linkalliance.co.nz

Peter Roan - Consents Lead Postcode: Fax:

! Please tick if email preferred method of contact

P0280.4 08/07/10

Page 1 of 4

4.0

ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE AND INVOICES!

All correspondence (excluding invoices) sent to:

Invoices sent to:

5.0

Applicant

Agent/Consultant

Applicant

Agent/Consultant

! Other ______________________

Tonkin + Taylor (on behalf of Link Alliance) Other ______________________ !

DISTRICT & REGIONAL PLANS

Relevant District Plan

! ! ! !

6.0

! ! !

Auckland Central Franklin Papakura

Auckland Gulf Islands Manukau Rodney

! ! !

Auckland Isthmus North Shore Waitakere

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTIVITY (If insufficient space please provide additional pages)

Utility relocation works works,along tree removal, buildingKingston demolition andand the establishment Victoria Street, Street Albert Street. of Construction Support Areas in the vicinity of Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane

7.0

PRE APPLICATION INFORMATION!

Have you received pre-application information or had a pre-application meeting regarding this proposal from the Council?

! Yes

! No

If YES, YES provide the reference number and/or name of staff members(s):

8.0

! Copy of meeting minutes attached

Date of meeting:

Copies of draft DWPs have been provided to Council. Warwick Pascoe

SITE VISIT REQUIREMENTS!

As landowner and with the consent of any occupiers or lessees, I agree to council staff or authorised consultants visiting the site, which is the subject of this application, for the purpose of assessing this application. OR

If applicant is not the landowner:

Landowner's full name:

Landowner's signature:

Date Signed:

Person authorised to sign on behalf of Landowner: Authorising person's signature: Is there a locked gate or security system restricting access by council staff?

Date Signed:

! Yes

! No

Page 2 of 4

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan

Appendix B:

Page 27

Planning Maps

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Auckland Council

429

246-254

a ha p

238

191-197

e Ro a d 214

202 184

170

150-154

136

Cross Street

5 25

29 9

24 30

Built Environment

90-94 74-80 2-4

6-8

S tr eet

1 23-31

83-85

een

11-13

111

520

441

161

r Q u

t tr e e th S

21 23

oad

508

415-427

105-107

Sou

22-26

tre o nds S et ym

Ka r a n g

City R

12 14

15-19

a ce

21 23 25-27

10 DISCLAIMER: This map/plan is illustrative only and all information should be independently verified on site before taking any action. Copyright Auckland Council. Land Parcel Boundary information from LINZ (Crown Copyright Reserved). Whilst due care has been taken, Auckland Council gives no warranty as to the accuracy and plan completeness of any information on this map/plan and accepts no liability for any error, omission or use of the information. Height datum: Auckland 1946.

278-280

t tree 13 sS

er r

t Quee n S

15-19

500

411

251-253

S tre

ato

70-74

401

Sco tia P 2 l ace

492-494

61-65

292-300

211-235

t Eas

a ce err st T We

432S

Gal

283

3 14

8 10

326-334

16-18

303-307

312

ua r

Mercur y Lane

22-28

345-361

352-356

tr e

rth No

sf o rd

n er

Po r t Mo to r w t h e r n To N or a

Be re

Â´

385

poo lS

mp Ra On eet S tr

p Ho b

s on

S out h e r n M ot o rw a Of f y R

Poynto n

Ne lso n S tr eet

u to

327

374-386

50-60 14

375

1-35

17-27

e Stre Day

k n L in

k y L in rn N or w a o r t h he Western Mo t ort o N rt T

er - W e st e r n T o N o r t h

432

e nu

t P it t S tr e e

No rth 442

G re

e Av

Map

Liv er

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

1/30 0

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

Auckland Council

15-19

Mercur y Lane

246-254

214

202 184

18 20

11-13

23-31

th Sou et e r St

Ka r a n 170

g ah a p e Road 150-154

Cross Street

eet Q ue S tr e n e et 16 12

Karangahape Ro ad

) 83-85 ) ) ) 75)

)) ) ) ) 74-80 ) ) 90-94

2-4

Ka ra

) ng

) ah

) )

)

eR oa d

)

14 105-107

1/30 0

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

L ive rp Str e o ol et

Ne l s

Qu e S tr e n e et Q u ee nS tr

111 ) )

City Roa d

508

500

22-26

Roa d

6-8

Â´

City

492-494

520

136

Controls

S tr

429

)211-235 ) ) )) ) 191-197 ) ) ) Ka r a n 441 ga ha ) ) 161 pe R o ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ad 238

ee n 415-427

21 23

1-35

15-19

eet 26

12 14

21 23

Up pe r S t r Qu e e n e et

) )

e Ro a d

Me rc u La ry ne

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1

5-7

nT er race

e r Qu een p p S tr e et

S tre

432S

t Eas

o rt T

8 10

411

Map

401

Sco ti 2 Plac a e

Ho p St e t re ou et n

er orw n ay

S tr

e et

Off Ra Ho bs o mp N nS o Ho t re bs P o r t h e et O on r t nR Mo rn T St am r ee o to p rw tO a nR y N am p M orth

t her

Sou

th No r

Ho p St e t re ou et n

Karan g ah a p

Q uee n) S tree t

345-361 ) )

374-386

432

)

61-65

) ) ) 251-253 ) ) )

) 278-280 Ka r Ro ad 292-300 ) e ) 312 ap ) ) a nga h ) 326-334 r d a a K Ro ) ) 352-356 375

) ) 327) ) a pe ) ) a nga h

y cur Mer ne La

Stre ay Day st We e rw ra c o t o To Ter M rn e rn ay h e N o rt h t o r w S ou t o t M Por k N o rth -W es te rn Lin M ot or w a y ern rt h No

) 303-307

283)

70-74

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

-W N elso n S tre et Nor t est e O f f R am p her rn

385

) ) )) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Da St r e y et

16-18

18 10

to P oy n

17-27 Be r Sq esfo 15 ua r d re Be r Sq esfo u ar r d 36 et e Be 1 Stre y r a D Sq esfo ua r d 31 re 22-28

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) P it t S tr ee t

rn S o uth e ay M o tor w 442

50-60

t P it t S tr e e

un e to Ho p r e e t St

) ) )

n u to t e e p o re H St

s ey e Gr enu Av

P it t S tr e et

n L T i nk o n M ot or wa y

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

)

Auckland Council

15-19

18 20

11-13

23-31

th Sou et e r St

150-154

Cross Street

136

V U

5 25

eet Q ue S tr e n e et

22-26

Roa d

City Roa d

16 12

L ive rp Str e o ol et

111

83-85

90-94 74-80

2-4

Ka ra

ng Ro a ha p ad e

V U 8831

6-8 14

Designations

1552

Qu e S tr e n e et Q u ee nS tr

eet 170

500

508

Karangahape Ro ad

Â´

City

492-494

520

441

12 14

21 23

Mercur y Lane

184

S tr

429

1-35

15-19

415-427

Up pe r S t r Qu e e n e et

5-7

21 23

U V V U

2500-3

y cur Mer ne La

432S

ay st We e rw ra c o t o To Ter M rn e ay rn h e N o r th t o r w o t M Por

8 10

e r Qu een p p S tr e et

352-356

S tre

374-386

411

nT er race

Me rc u La ry ne

S ou t

ah a ng Ka r Ro ad

251-253

Karan g ah a p

Map

401

Sco ti 2 Plac a e

Ho p St e t re ou et n

a pe

70-74

e Ro a 2500-4 211-235 pe d 191-197 a ha g n Ka r a n a 278-280 ga ha Ka r Ro ad 292-300 161 pe R o 246-254 ad K 312 a r an g a 238 h a p e Road 214 326-334 202 327

345-361

Q uee n S tree t

375

303-307

61-65

283

t Eas

e Stre Day

k to Lin M o a mp rn ern fR f the rt h So u et O e No r t nS To ort 432

16-18

Ne l s o

442

V U

8 68

2500-2

385

ee n

Ho p St e t re ou et n

er orw n ay ot

17-27 Be r Sq esfo 15 ua r d re Be r Sq esfo u ar r d 36 et e Be 1 Stre y r a D Sq esfo ua r d 31 re 22-28

Da St r e y et

S tr e

P it t S tr eet

n e to u H op

50-60

to P oy n

tr e et O Ho b s on f f Ra m N o Ho p St r bs P o r t h e ee t on r t On r n M R am St r ee o t o T o p rw tO ay nR N am p M orth 6736

s ey e Gr enu Av

t P it t S tr e e

n u to t e e p o re H St

V U

P it t S tr e et

No r th-W Nor t est e her r n L n To Sou i nk t her n M ot or Ne l wa so n y S

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

105-107

V U 1553

V U 6736

1/30 0

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

Auckland Council

246-254

a ha p

238

429

191-197

e Ro a d 214

441

161

202 184

170

150-154

136

Cross Street

5 25

29 9

r Q u

24 30

Historic Heritage and Special Character

2-4

6-8 14

105-107

23-31

83-85

90-94 74-80

S tr eet

111

520

een

11-13

t tr e e th S

21 23

oad

508

415-427

22-26

tre o nds S et ym

Sou

Ka r a n g

City R

21 23 25-27

12 14

t tree 13 sS

278-280

15-19

a ce

t Quee n S

er r

211-235

S tre

ato

15-19

500

411

251-253

292-300

70-74

401

Sco tia P 2 l ace

492-494

61-65

t Eas

a ce err st T We

432S

Gal

283

3 14

8 10

326-334

16-18

303-307

312

ua r

Mercur y Lane

22-28

345-361

352-356

tr e

rth No

sf o rd

n er

Po r t Mo to r w t h e r n To N or a

Be re

Â´

385

poo lS

mp Ra On eet S tr

p Ho b

s on

S out h e r n M ot o rw a Of f y R

Poynto n

Ne lso n S tr eet

u to

327

374-386

50-60 14

375

1-35

17-27

e Stre Day

k n L in

k y L in rn N or w a o r t h he Western Mo t ort o N rt T

er - W e st e r n T o N o r t h

432

e nu

t P it t S tr e e

No rth 442

G re

e Av

Map

Liv er

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

1/30 0

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

Auckland Council

Sou

211-235

246-254

a ha p

238

203-207

e Ro a d 214

21 23

183

429

202 184

170

150-154

Cross Street

29 9

30 23

Infrastructure

83-85

136

111

82-88 2-4

r Q u

23-31

520

441

155

6-8

S tr eet

508

415-427

tr e

een

11-13

t tr e e th S

a ce

oad

tre o nds S et ym

21 23 25-27

411

61-65

Ka r a n g

500

22-26

t tree 13 sS

er r

City R

492-494

12 14

15-19

243

15-19

70-74

401

Sco tia P 2 l ace

t Quee n S

ato

278-280

S tre

Gal

259-281

292-300

t Eas

a ce err st T We

432S

283

3 14

8 10

326-334

16-18

303-307

312

ua r

Mercur y Lane

22-28

345-361

352-356

105-107

rth No

sf o rd

n er

Po r t Mo to r w t h e r n To N or a

Be re

Â´

385

poo lS

mp Ra On eet S tr

p Ho b

s on

S out h e r n M ot o rw a Of f y R

Poynto n

Ne lso n S tr eet

u to

327

374-386

50-60 14

375

1-35

17-27

e Stre Day

k n L in

k y L in rn N or w a o r t h he Western Mo t ort o N rt T

er - W e st e r n T o N o r t h

432

e nu

t P it t S tr e e

No rth 442

G re

e Av

Map

Liv er

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

1/30 0

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

Auckland Council

429

246-254

a ha p

238

191-197

e Ro a d 214

202 184

170

150-154

136

23-31

Cross Street

5 25

29 9

24 30

Mana Whenua

90-94 74-80 2-4

6-8

S tr eet

83-85

een

11-13

111

520

441

161

r Q u

t tr e e th S

21 23

oad

508

415-427

105-107

Sou

22-26

tre o nds S et ym

Ka r a n g

City R

12 14

15-19

a ce

21 23 25-27

278-280

t tree 13 sS

er r

t Quee n S

15-19

500

411

251-253

S tre

ato

70-74

401

Sco tia P 2 l ace

492-494

61-65

292-300

211-235

t Eas

a ce err st T We

432S

Gal

283

3 14

8 10

326-334

16-18

303-307

312

ua r

Mercur y Lane

22-28

345-361

352-356

tr e

rth No

sf o rd

n er

Po r t Mo to r w t h e r n To N or a

Be re

Â´

385

poo lS

mp Ra On eet S tr

p Ho b

s on

S out h e r n M ot o rw a Of f y R

Poynto n

Ne lso n S tr eet

u to

327

374-386

50-60 14

375

1-35

17-27

e Stre Day

k n L in

k y L in rn N or w a o r t h he Western Mo t ort o N rt T

er - W e st e r n T o N o r t h

432

e nu

t P it t S tr e e

No rth 442

G re

e Av

Map

Liv er

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

1/30 0

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

Auckland Council

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

V G re V V 50-60

47V

401 V ScoV V tia P 2 la

n er

S unV o t

V 36

15 V

V327

375 V

345-361

V 374-386

V V 326-334

352-356 V V

8 V 10

1 V 432S V

V sf

Be re

V V 22-28

31 V

No V

rth

17-27

V 4

ato Gal

V V

DISCLAIMER: This map/plan is illustrative only and all information should be independently verified on site before taking any action. Copyright Auckland Council. Land Parcel Boundary information from LINZ (Crown Copyright Reserved). Whilst due care has been taken, Auckland Council gives no warranty as to the accuracy and plan completeness of any information on this map/plan and accepts no liability for any error, omission or use of the information. Height datum: Auckland 1946.

S tre sV

e V

59 V

2 V

ua r

16-18

V 292-300

312

V 14

V V 6A 8 V

V V 278-280

V V68

4 V

211-235 V V

a ha p

erV r a ce

Ka r a n g

70-74 V V

61-65 V V 251-253

V 283 V 303-307

et 13 V

V 15

or d

V 20

V 26

2-4 V

V V 11-13

V 29

V 23-31

r ee V uth StV So 17 29

V 24

202 184

Cross Street

Natural Heritage

136 V

170 150-154 V V

V 520 V

30 V

16 V

508 V

18 V 20 21 23 V 25-27

V 161

V V

83-85 V

75 V

V V 105-107

1/30

441

oad

22-26 V

18 V

V 415-427V V

CV ity R

Â´

V 191-197

8 V

500 V

429 V

15-19

V 492-494 V

411

15-19

21 23 V

12 14 V

e Ro a d V 214

6 V V

246-254 V V

V 238

385

mp Ra On eet S tr

s on

p Ho b

V1-35

111

eV et

90-94 74-80 V V

6-8 14

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

tre o nds S et ym

432

S tre

t Eas

442

a ce err st T We

Po V

t Quee n S

e Stre Day

Po r t Mo to r w t h e r n To N or a

k n L in

Ne lso n S tr eet

Poynto n

k y L in rn N or w a o r t h he Western Mo t ort o N rt T

er - W e st e r n T o N o r t h

t P it t S tr e e

No rth

tr e

e Av

poo lS

eV nu

Liv er

S tr eet

een

r Q u

Mercur y Lane

S out h e r n M ot o rw a Of f y R

Map

Auckland Council

429

246-254

a ha p

238

191-197

e Ro a d 214

202 184

170

150-154

136

Cross Street

5 25

29 9

24 30

Natural Resources

90-94 74-80 2-4

6-8

S tr eet

1 23-31

83-85

een

11-13

111

520

441

161

r Q u

t tr e e th S

21 23

oad

508

415-427

105-107

Sou

22-26

tre o nds S et ym

Ka r a n g

City R

12 14

15-19

a ce

21 23 25-27

278-280

t tree 13 sS

er r

t Quee n S

15-19

500

411

251-253

S tre

ato

70-74

401

Sco tia P 2 l ace

492-494

61-65

292-300

211-235

t Eas

a ce err st T We

432S

Gal

283

3 14

8 10

326-334

16-18

303-307

312

ua r

Mercur y Lane

22-28

345-361

352-356

tr e

rth No

sf o rd

n er

Po r t Mo to r w t h e r n To N or a

Be re

Â´

385

poo lS

mp Ra On eet S tr

p Ho b

s on

S out h e r n M ot o rw a Of f y R

Poynto n

Ne lso n S tr eet

u to

327

374-386

50-60 14

375

1-35

17-27

e Stre Day

k n L in

k y L in rn N or w a o r t h he Western Mo t ort o N rt T

er - W e st e r n T o N o r t h

432

e nu

t P it t S tr e e

No rth 442

G re

e Av

Map

Liv er

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

1/30 0

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

Auckland Council

Qu e S tr e n e et

ry r cu Me ane L

Precincts

Li v St erp r e oo et l

e et City

Roa d

City Roa d

Li ve rp o

ee n

St re

S tr

eet

et Stre

t Eas et e Str

th Sou

e Ro a d

Â´

K ar a n

g a h a p e Ro ad

Karangahape Ro ad

Ka ra

eR oa d

Cross Street

Sy m S tr o n d s ee t

Mercur y Lane et

y La

S tre

r y Mer cu

a ha p

r Mer cu Lan e

tree

t Eas

t Eas t e Stre

ato Gal

Ka r a n g

e r Qu een p p S tr e et

S tre

den Cob et Stre

r o ot M ce rn erra he st T ut We To So e rn wa y rt h r No oto t M o Por rt T nk P o rn L i e r th

Karangahape Road

e Ro a d

Stre e

D ay

ah a ng Ka r Ro ad

Karan g ah a p

Map

Q uee n S tree t

a pe

a ha a ng Ka r Ro ad

t Eas

e Stre Day

ata Ng et e Str

City Centre Residential

nT er race Poyn ton Terrac e

P it t S tr ee t

Karangahape Road

Sco t Plac ia e

City Centre Residential

Up pe r S t r Qu e e n e et

Qu e S tr e n e et Q u ee nS tr

Be r Sq esfo ua r d re Be r Sq esfo ua r d re Bere s Squ fo rd ar e

to P oy n

tr e e ay S D t

Sco t Pla ia Sco ce t Plac ia e

Ho p St e t re ou et n Ho p St e t re ou et n

No Mo r ther n tor wa y

ob s On o n S R a t re mp e t

B n e u S resf o t t qu or d ar pe e e o tr e H S

P it t S tr e et

No r th-W Nor t est e her r n L n To Sou i nk the r Ne l s n M N or t h - W est e r n on St r o to eet M o t o r w ay N or t rw her Off ay n T Po rt Ra m No Mo o p tor rt h wa y M o -W e Ho s to bs rw te r o a n O n n St r y H

City Centre Residential

ys re e G en u Av

t P it t S tr e e

t Ne lson S tr e e

ay p S ou t h e r n M ot o r w am O ff R

un to t e p e Ho S t r e

P it t S tr e et

e mp e t

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

Auckland Council

5-7

15-19

Mercur y Lane

18 20

21 23 25-27

Sou

t tr e e th S

214

e Ro a d

202 184

Ka r a n

11-13

23-31

g ah a p e Road

Cross Street

5 25

eet Q ue S tr e n e et S tr

ee n

City

500

22-26

Roa d

City Roa d

18 16 12

L ive rp Str e o ol et

111

83-85

2-4

14 9

Â´

6-8

Zones and Rural Urban Boundary

1-35

K ara ng a h ap e 75 Ro ad Ka ra n 90-94 74-80

136

Map

15-19

508

520

441

161

150-154

e e t Qu e S tr e n e et Q u

S tr Qu

429

Up pe r S t r Qu e e n e et

y cur Mer ne La

191-197

401

415-427

12 14

238

a ha p

Qu e S tr e n e et

Ho p St e t re ou et n

211-235

Sco ti 2 Plac a e

411

nT er race

Ka r a n g

ee n

Ho p St e t re ou et n

er orw n ay

Da St r e y et

326-334

251-253

Karan g ah a p

61-65

283

312

366-368

432S

385

e r Qu een p p S tr e et

ah a ng Ka r Ro ad

o rt T

a pe

70-74

e Ro a e d ha p nga a 278-280 r d Ka Ro a 292-300 246-254

345-361

16-18

303-307

327

8 10

t Eas t e Stre

Stre ay Day ce rw e rra st T to We To Mo rn e rn ay h e N o rt h t o r w S ou t o t M Por k N o rth -W es te rn Lin M ot or w a y ern rt h No

375

Me rc u La ry ne

Ne l s

S tr

e et

Off Ra Ho bs o mp N nS o Ho t re bs P o r t h e et O on r t nR Mo rn T St am r ee o to p rw tO a nR y N am p M orth

t her

Sou

No r

-W N elso n S tre et Nor t est e O f f R am p her rn

22-28

18 10

to P oy n

50-60

P it t S tr eet

rn S o uth e ay M o tor w 432

17-27 Be r Sq esfo ua r d re Be r Sq esfo u y ar r d 36 D a e et e r t S

e nu

442

n u to t e e p o re H St

G re

e Av

t P it t S tr e e

un e to Ho p r e e t St

P it t S tr e et

n L T i nk o n M ot or wa y

Auckland Unitary Plan - Operative in part

105-107

1/30 0

Meters

Scale @ A4 = 1:2,500

Date Printed: 21/10/2019

Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 15th November 2016 - LEGEND Date: 15/07/2019

NOTATIONS

Tagging of Provisions:

Appeals Pr op e r t i e sa f f e c t e db yAp p e a l ss e e ki n gc ha n g et o z on e so rma n a g e me n t l a y e r s Pr op e r t i e sa f f e c t e db yAp p e a l ss e e ki n gr e i n s t a t e me n t of ma n a g e me n t l a y e r s

[ i ] =I n f or ma t i o no n l y

[ r p] = Re g i on a l Pl a n

Proposed Plan Modifications No t i c eo f Re qu i r e me n t s Pl a nCha n g e s

[ r c p] = Re g i on a l Co a s t a lPl a n [ r p s] = Re g i on a l Po l i c ySt a t e me n t [ d p] = Di s t r i c t Pl a n( on l yn ot e dwhe nd u a l p r ov i s i on sa p p l y )

ZONING Residential

Rural

Re s i d e n t i a l -L a r g eL ot Z on e

Ru r a l Ru r a l Pr od u c t i o nZon e Ru r a l Mi x e dRu r a l Zon e

Re s i d e n t i a l -Si n g l eHo u s eZon e

Ru r a l Ru r a l Co a s t a l Zon e

Rural

Re s i d e n t i a l -Ru r a l a n dCo a s t a l Se t t l e me n t Zon e

Re s i d e n t i a l -Mi x e dHo u s i n gSu bu r ba nZ on e

Ru r a l Ru r a l Co n s e r v a t i o nZon e

Re s i d e n t i a l -Mi x e dHo u s i n gUr ba nZ on e

Ru r a l Co u n t r y s i d eL i v i n gZon e

Re s i d e n t i a l T e r r a c eHo u s i n ga n dAp a r t me n t Bu i l d i n g sZon e

Ru r a l Wa i t a ke r eFoo t hi l l sZon e

Business

Bu s i n e s sCi t yCe n t r eZ on e

Ru r a l Wa i t a ke r eRa n g e sZ on e

Future Urban

Bu s i n e s sMe t r op ol i t a nCe n t r eZon e

F u t u r eUr ba nZon e

Bu s i n e s sT o wnCe n t r eZon e

Gr e e nI n f r a s t r u c t u r eCo r r i d o r( Op e r a t i v ei ns o meSp e c i a l Ho u s i n gAr e a s )

Bu s i n e s sL oc a l Ce n t r eZon e

Infrastructure

Sp e c i a l Pu r p os eZ on e-Ai r p or t s&Ai r f i e l d s Ce me t e r y Qu a r r y He a l t hc a r eFa c i l i t y&Ho s p i t a l T e r t i a r yEd u c a t i on Mā or i Pu r p os e Ma jo rRe c r e a t i o nFa c i l i t y Sc ho o l St r a t e g i cT r a n s p or t Co r r i d o rZon e

Bu s i n e s sNe i g hb o u r ho o dCe n t r eZon e Bu s i n e s sMi x e dUs eZon e Bu s i n e s sGe n e r a l Bu s i n e s sZon e Bu s i n e s sBu s i n e s sPa r k Zon e Bu s i n e s sHe a v yI n d u s t r yZ on e Bu s i n e s sL i g ht I n d u s t r yZon e

Coastal

Co a s t a l -Ge n e r a l Co a s t a l Ma r i n eZon e[ r c p ]

Open space

Op e nSp a c e-Co n s e r v a t i o nZon e

Co a s t a l -Ma r i n aZon e[ r c p / d p ]

Op e nSp a c e-I n f or ma l Re c r e a t i o nZon e

Co a s t a l -Mo o r i n gZon e[ r c p ]

Op e nSp a c e-Sp or t a n dAc t i v eRe c r e a t i o nZon e

Co a s t a l -Mi n or Por t Z on e[ r c p / d p ]

Op e nSp a c e-Ci v i cSp a c e sZon e

Co a s t a l -F e r r yT e r mi n a l Zon e[ r c p / d p ]

Op e nSp a c e-Co mmu n i t yZon e

Co a s t a l -De f e n c eZon e[ r c p ]

Water [i]

Co a s t a l -Co a s t a l T r a n s i t i o nZon e

Pr e c i n c t s

Ru r a l Ur ba nBou n d a r y

I n d i c a t i v eCo a s t l i n e[ i ]

Overlays

Natural Resources

Ì Ì Ì ÌÌ Ì Ì Ì Ì ÌÌ Ì Ì Ì Ì ÌÌ Ì Ì Ì Ì ÌÌ Ì

T er r es t r i a l [r p/ d p] Ma r i n e 1[r c p] Ma r i n e 2[r c p]

Natural Heritage

Si gni f i c a nt Ec o lo gi c a l Ar ea sOv er la y@@

Wa t erSu pplyMa na g emen t Ar ea sOv er la y[r p]

WWWW WWWW

Na t u r a l St r ea mMa na g emen t Ar ea sOv er la y[r p] Na t u r a l Ur b a n

! ! ! ! !

V V V V▼ V▼V▼ ▼ V▼ V▼V▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼

L a k e Ma na g emen t Ar ea sOv er la y ( Na t u r a lL a k ea n dUr b a n L a k e)

( ( ( ( ( Quali t y Sen s i t i v e Aqu i f er Ma na g emen t Ar ea sOv er la y[r p] ((((( ( ( ( ( ( Wet la n dMa na g emen t Ar ea sOv er la y[r p]

▬ ▬▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬▬

Ai r po r t Appr o a c h Su r f a c e Ov er la y AAAAA AAAAA AÒ ( Ò AÒ ( AÒ ( AÒ ( A ( (Ò Ò (Ò (Ò (Ò ( (Ò Ò (Ò (Ò (Ò (

Na t i o na l Gr i d Co r r i d o rOv er la y

Na t i o na l Gr i dYa r dCo mpr o mi s ed

# # # #

St o c k a d e Hi ll Vi ew s ha f t Ov er la y–8 mh ei ght a r ea

Mo t o r wa yI nt er c ha n g e Co nt r o l

V eh i c le Ac c es s Res t i c t i o n Co nt r o l

Cen t r e Fr i n g e Of f i c e Co nt r o l Hei ght V a r i a t i o n Co nt r o l

@ @ @ @ Par k i ng V a r i a t i o n Co nt r o l @@@@ U U U U U ev el Cr o s s i n g sWi t h Si ght li n esCo nt r o l U@U@U @ U @ U L U U U U U

V U 123

Ar t er i a l Ro a d s

Designations

Ha z a r d o u sFa c i li t i es I nf r a s t r u c t u r e

Emer g en c yMa na g emen t Ar eaCo nt r o l

Ma c r o i nv er t eb r a t e Co mmu ni t yI nd ex G G G G

Business Park Zone Office Control

Bu i ld i n g Fr o nt a ge Co nt r o l

G G G G

Gen er a l

Controls

G G G G

) ) )

Hi s t o r i cHer i t a g e Ov er la yPla c e [r c p/ d p]

F lo w 1[r p]

EEEE p] E E E E Flow 2[r E Ç ÇE Ç ÇE Ç ÇE ÇÇ Ç Ç Ç ÇÇ Ç Ç Ç

G G G G

a c en t t oL ev el Cr o s s i ngs X X X Adj

Wa i t a k er e Ra n g esHer t a ge Ar eaOv er la y

Su b d i v i s i o n Sc h ed u le

St o c k a d e Hi ll Vi ew s ha f t [i ]

I d en t i f i edGr o wt h Co r r i d o rOv er la y

Gen er a l Co mmer c i a lF r o nt a ge

Ex t en t o f Ov er la y

Au c k la n dWa rMemo r i a l Mu s eu mVi ew s ha f t Ov er la yCo nt o u r s[i ]

Built Environment

Ri d g eli n e Pr o t ec t i o n Ov er la y

Au c k la n dWa rMemo r i a l Mu s eu mVi ew s ha f t Ov er la y[r c p/ d p]

Si t es&Pla c eso f Si gni f i c a nc et oMa n aWh en u aOv er la y[r c p/ d p]

KeyRet a i l Fr o nt a ge

L o c a llySi gni f i c a nt Vo lc a ni cVi ew s ha f t sOv er la yCo nt o u r s[i ]

Spec i a l Ch a r a c t er Ar ea sOv er la yRes i d en t i a la n dBu s i n es s

Mana Whenua # # # #

L o c a llySi gni f i c a nt Vo lc a ni cVi ew s ha f t sOv er la y[r c p/ d p]

Hi s t o r i cHer i t a g e Ov er la yEx t en t o f Pla c e [r c p/ d p]

Na t i o na l Gr i dYa r dUn c o mpr o mi s ed # # # #

Reg i o na llySi gni f i c a nt Vo lc a ni cVi ew s ha f t sOv er la yCo nt o u r s[i ]

Historic Heritage & Special Character

Na t i o na l Gr i dSu b s t a t i o n Co r r i d o r

# # # #

Reg i o na llySi gni f i c a nt Vo lc a ni c Vi ew s ha f t s&Hei ght Sen s i t i v e Ar ea sOv er la y[r c p/ d p]

L o c a l Pu b li cVi ew sOv er la y[r c p/ d p]

Ai r c r a f t No i s e Ov er la y

ÉÉÉÉ r yBu f f er Ar eaOv er la y É É É É Quar É É É É Nat i o na l Gr i dSu b d i v i s i o n Co r r i d o r

# # # #

Hei ght Sen s i t i v e Ar ea s

Na t u r a l

Ci t yCen t r e Po r t No i s e Ov er la y[r c p/ d p]

# # # #

Vi ew s ha f t s

Mo d i f i ed

Infrastructure # # # #

# # # #

Ou t s t a nd i n g Na t u r a lL a nd s c a pesOv er la y[r c p/ d p] Hi g h Na t u r a l Ch a r a c t erOv er la y[r c p/ d p]

Hi ghUs e Aqu i f erMa na g emen t Ar ea sOv er la y[r p]

# # # # # # # #

Ou t s t a nd i n g Na t u r a l Fea t u r esOv er la y[r c p/ d p] Ou t s t a nd i n g Na t u r a l Ch a r a c t er Ov er la y[r c p/ d p]

Hi ghUs e St r ea mMa na g emen t Ar ea sOv er la y[r p]

! ! ! ! !

No t a b le T r eesOv er la y

Ç Ç Ç ÇÇ Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç ÇÇ Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç ÇÇ Ç Ç Ç ******* ******* ******* *******

St o r mw a t erMa na g emen t Ar eaCo nt r o l

Su b d i v i s i o n Va r i a t i o n Co nt r o l Su r f Br ea k s[r c p] Ca b le Pr o t ec t i o n Ar ea sCo nt r o l [r c p] Co a s t a lI nu nd a t i o n 1per c en t AEPPlu s1 mCo nt r o l

Designations

U 200

Airspace Restriction Designations

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan

Appendix C:

Page 28

Designation Conditions

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

CRL Designation Conditions 10 September 2018

Aotea Alteration: BROWN (confirmed 24 January 2017) Condition 27.1(b) (Swanson St diversion): ORANGE (confirmed 23 June 2017) Strata/Sub-Strata Alteration: GREEN (confirmed 22 September 2017) Mt Eden CRL and NAL Alteration: BLUE (Environment Court Decision 15/12/17) Condition 27.1(b) (second Swanson St diversion): PINK (confirmed 27 March 2018) Operational Vibration Conditions 63 & 66: PURPLE (confirmed 24 July 2018) Karangahape Station Alteration: Amendments not included in this set

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 1

Explanatory Note: The following explanatory note does not form part of the conditions. It is a non-statutory way finding explanation of how the conditions are structured, what they cover in broad terms and where referenced documents can be found. This note does not alter legal obligations and rights created by the conditions. The conditions attach to six different designations. The designations are: 2500-1

A surface designation extending from Britomart Transport Centre to Albert Street/Mayoral Drive (in the vicinity of the Aotea car park entrance on Mayoral Drive) for the construction, operation and maintenance of the CRL – including two rail tunnels and Aotea Station.

2500-2

A sub-strata designation of land below the ground surface (within road resource and private property) for the construction, operation and maintenance of the CRL – including two rail tunnels and ancillary activities. This designation sits underneath the strata (protection) designation 2500-3 and extends from Mayoral Drive to New North Road.

2500-3

A strata (protection) designation that acts as a buffer between activities on the ground surface and the sub-strata designation (2500-2) that provides for the two rail tunnels. This designation sits above designation 2500-2, starting from 5 metres below the ground surface, and extends from Mayoral Drive to New North Road.

2500-4

A surface and sub-strata designation for the construction, operation and maintenance of Karangahape Station, and encompassing land within road reserve and private property in the vicinity of Pitt Street, Beresford Square, Karangahape Road, and Mercury Lane.

2500-5

A surface and sub-strata designation for the construction, operation and maintenance of Newton Station, and encompassing land within road reserve and private property in the vicinity of Symonds Street, Dundonald Street, and New North Road.

2500-6

A surface designation for the construction, operation and maintenance of the CRL – including the rail tunnels and connections required to join the CRL to the North Auckland Railway Line (NAL). This designation is located generally between New North Road, Mt Eden Road and Boston Road in the north and the NAL in the south. It also includes land located on the southern side and adjacent to the NAL between Normanby Road and Mt Eden Road, and to the immediate east and west of Porters Avenue.

Hereafter for the purpose of this condition set the designations are referred to as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. The table of contents for the conditions provides a broad overview of the subject matter. It commences with definitions and abbreviations and progresses to general conditions applicable to all designations followed by the conditions for pre-construction, construction, and operation. Under each of these

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 2

headings may be found sub-headings dealing with specific aspects of the work. There follow advice notes and appendices for: - buildings for consideration as to building condition surveys; and - heritage buildings for consideration as to building condition surveys The conditions for designation 3 conclude the suite of conditions. Set out below are a series of figures illustrating and explaining the location, extent and nature of designations 1 â€“ 6. For precise details, please refer to the relevant designation overlays within the planning maps. Figure 1: Designations Overview Map The map below is not to scale and is intended as a visual tool only to show the location of each designation. The Land Requirement Plans and associated Schedule of Directly Affected Parties (attached to each designation) should be referred to for the actual area of land required.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 3

Figure 2: Visual explanation of the designation types Surface Designations

Sub-strata Designations

Strata Designation with Sub-strata Designation below

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 4

Figure 3: Indicative long-section of the designations across the length of the CRL

The relationship between the various plans required by designation conditions is illustrated in the diagram below:

The documents referred to in the designation conditions can be found at [insert]

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 5

Contents

Requiring Authority Designation Conditions – for Designations 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 DEFINITIONS GENERAL CONDITIONS Condition 1 Condition 2 Condition 3 PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS Condition 4 – Appointment of Communication and Consultation Manager Condition 5 – Pre-Construction Communication and Consultation Plan Condition 6 – Network Utility Operators Condition 7 – Community Liaison Groups Condition 8 – Mana Whenua Consultation Condition 9 – Network Utility Operator Liaison CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS Condition 10 – Outline Plan Requirements Condition 11 – Independent Peer Review of CEMP and DWPs Condition 12 – Availability of Outline Plan(s) Condition 13 – Monitoring of Construction Conditions Communication and Consultation Condition 14 – Contact Person Condition 15 – Communication and Consultation Plan Condition 16 – Communications – Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers Condition 17 – Concerns and Complaints Management Condition 18 – “One Network” Consultation Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and Delivery Work Plans (DWPs) Condition 19 – Preparation, Compliance and Monitoring Condition 20 – CEMP Requirements Condition 21 – CEMP Construction Works Requirements Condition 22 – Review Process for CEMP and DWPs

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 6

Condition 23 – Update of CEMP and DWPs following review Condition 24 – Network Utilities Transport, Access and Parking Condition 25 – General Transport, Access and Parking Condition 26 – Monitoring of Transport Network Congestion Condition 27 – Transport, Access and Parking: Specific Requirements (Britomart to Mayoral Drive) Condition 28 – Transport, Access and Parking: Specific Requirements (Karangahape Station Area) Condition 29 – Transport, Access and Parking: Specific Requirements (Newton Station Area) Condition 30 – Transport, Access and Parking: Specific Requirements (NAL Area) Noise and Vibration Condition 31 – Project Standards – Construction Noise Condition 32 – Project Standards – Blasting Noise Condition 33 – Project Standards – Construction Vibration Condition 34 – Project Standards – Construction Vibration (Amenity) Condition 35 – Project Standards – MediaWorks Condition 36 – Construction Noise and Vibration DWP Condition 37 – Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan (SSCNMP) Condition 38 – Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plan (SSCVMP) Condition 39 – Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers Condition 40 – Construct ion Noise and Vibration Management Plan – MediaWorks Built Heritage/Archaeology Condition 41 – Historic Character – Built Heritage Condition 42– Historic Character – Archaeology Condition 43 – Heritage Advisory Group and Composition Condition 44 – Heritage Advisory Group Function Condition 45 – Bluestone Wall Management Plan Building Condition Surveys Condition 46 – Process for Building Condition Surveys Urban Design Condition 47 – Urban Design Principles

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 7

Condition 48 – Mitigation Planting Requirements Condition 49 – Engagement with Mana Whenua and the Mana Whenua Principles Condition 50 – Specific Area Requirements: Britomart to Aotea Station Condition 51 – Specific Area Requirements: Karangahape Station area Condition 52 – Specific Area Requirements: Newton Station area Condition 53 – Specific Area Requirements: North Auckland Line area Condition 54 – Station Plan Requirements Trees and Vegetation Condition 55 – Trees and Vegetation DWP Public Art Condition 56 – Public Art DWP Contamination Condition 57 – Contamination DWP Condition 58 – Contamination Validation Report at Completion of Construction Air Quality Condition 59 – Air Quality DWP Social Impact and Business Disruption Condition 60 – Property Management Strategy Condition 61 – Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP Specific Design Requirements Condition 62 – Specific Design Requirements relating to 152 Vincent Street OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS Condition 63 – Operational Rail Vibration Condition 64 – Operational Noise – Mechanical Ventilation Plant Condition 65 – Operational Noise and Vibration Management Plan (ONVMP) Condition 66 – Operational Noise and Vibration Management – Mediaworks ADVICE NOTES APPENDIX ONE – Buildings for Consideration as to Building Condition Surveys APPENDIX TWO – Heritage Buildings for Consideration as to Building Condition Surveys

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 8

Requiring Authority Designation Conditions â€“ Designation 3 Condition 1 Condition 2 Condition 3 Condition 4 Condition 5 ADVICE NOTES

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 9

Requiring Authority Designation Conditions – for Designations 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

DEFINITIONS 1 2

Consult

Consulting

Consultation

6 1 4 5

Fully operational traffic lane

May include a traffic lane that is subject to a reduced speed limit, or one which may have a temporary reduction in the lane width, due to construction activity.

Two way access

Access into and out from a site or a road. This access may include restrictions (eg. left in, left out) where these are specified within the relevant conditions.

6 1 4 5 6

Receivers that undertake activities within spaces that rely on a particularly low noise and vibration environment. For these designations these spaces are defined as:

1 2 4 5

The process of providing information about the construction works, and receiving for consideration, information from stakeholders, directly affected and affected in proximity parties, regarding those effects and proposals for the management and mitigation of them.

Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers

•

Public Performance Theatres;

•

Recording Studios, both sound and television (including Mediaworks, except the specific spaces addressed by Condition 35);

•

In relation to sensitive equipment - Medical Facilities and Scientific Laboratories;

•

In relation to the requirement to record witness statements - The Auckland District Court in Albert Street

Receivers that may be disturbed during rest, concentration, communication or prayer. For these designations these include (but are not limited to): 1 2 4 5

Sensitive Noise and Vibration Receivers

Site Specific Construction

•

Dwellings

•

Offices

•

Schools, including Child Care Centres and tertiary facilities

•

Libraries

•

Hospitals

•

Rest Homes

•

Marae and other Cultural Centres

•

Churches

•

Hotels or other accommodation facilities

These include site specific construction noise management plans (SSCNMP), site specific construction vibration plans (SSCVMP), or a

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 10

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

2 4 5 6

Condition

Noise and Vibration Management Plans

1 2 4 5

Best practicable option

Has the meaning under the Resource Management Act 1991 and, for the purpose of these conditions, comprises the best practicable option for minimising the effects of any construction activity (including effects on the transport network or heritage values) on the receiver.

Historic Character

This includes heritage buildings, sites and places identified in the New Zealand Historic Places Trust register or in the Auckland Council District Plan (Isthmus or Central Area Sections) or as specifically identified in conditions.

6 1 2 4

combination of both noise and vibration in one plan (SSCNVMP) to address the effects from the construction activity on notable or sensitive receivers.

5 6

Mana whenua for the purpose of this designation are considered to be the following (in no particular order), who at the time of Notice of Requirement expressed a desire to be involved in the City Rail Link Project: 1 2 4

Mana Whenua

5 6

1 2 4

Material change

5 6

4 5 6

Ngati Maru

•

Ngati Paoa

•

Ngai Tai ki Tamaki

•

Ngati Te Ata

•

Ngati Whatua o Orakei

•

Te Akitai

•

Te Kawerau o maki

•

Ngati Tamaoho

Material change will include amendment to any base information informing the CEMP or other Plan or any process, procedure or method of the CEMP or other Plan which has the potential to materially increase adverse effects on a particular receiver. For clarity, changes to personnel and contact schedules do not constitute a material change. Delivery Work Plans will contain specific objectives and methods for avoiding, remedying or mitigating effects and address the following topics:

1 2

•

Delivery Work Plans

(a)

Transport, Access and Parking;

(b)

Construction noise and vibration;

(c)

Historic Character (including Archaeology);

(d)

Urban Design (including landscape and station plans);

(e)

Trees and vegetation;

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 11

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(f)

Social Impact and Business Disruption;

(g)

Air quality;

(h)

Public Art; and

(i)

Contamination.

1 2 4 5

Peak Particle Velocity

The maximum component peak vibration level (in mm/s) measured in any of three orthogonal axes (vertical, transverse, longitudinal).

MediaWorks

MediaWorks means any television, radio and/or interactive media facilities which broadcast from the MediaWorks site (including any successor which conducts the same activities).

6 6

MediaWorks site means the properties at 2-3 Flower Street and 44-52 New North Road included within the following:

MediaWorks site

MediaWorks buildings

Studio 1

Lot 1 DP 84213

NA40B/1323

Lot 2 DP 49561

NA2063/54

Lot 4 Section 3 Deeds Plan 45(blue)

NA557/190

Part Lot 5 Section 3 Deeds Plan 45 Blue

NA557/144

Lot 1 DP 60771

NA15C/727

MediaWorks buildings means the buildings located at 2 Flower Street (Lot 2 DP 49561, NA2063/54), 3 Flower Street (Lot 1 DP 84213, NA40B/1323), 40 New North Road (Lot 1 DP 80372, NA37A/545), 44 New North Road (Lot 4 Section 3 Deeds Plan 45 (Blue), NA557/190), 4648 New North Road (Pt Lot 5 Section 3 Deeds Plan 45 (Blue), NA557/144), and 52 New North Road (Lot 1 DP 60771, NA15C/727). Studio 1 means the main broadcasting studio at the MediaWorks building at 3 Flower Street as shown on Diagram 1.

ABBREVIATIONS CEMP

Construction Environmental Management Plan

DWP

Delivery Work Plan

NoR

Notice of Requirement

ONVMP

Operational Noise and Vibration Management Plan

PPV

Peak Particle Velocity

SSCNVMP

Site Specific Noise and Vibration Management Plan

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 12

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

GENERAL CONDITIONS 1.1 The City Rail Link Project (City Rail Designations 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6) shall be undertaken in general accordance with the following, subject to final detailed design: (a) the information provided by the Requiring Authority in the Notice of Requirement dated 23 August 2012 and supporting documents (as updated by information provided by the Requiring Authority up until the close of the Hearing and during the course of Environment Court proceedings) being: (i) Assessment of Environmental Effects report (contained in Volume 2 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated 15 August 2012 Rev B); (ii) Supporting environmental assessment reports (contained in Volume 3 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated August 2012); (iii) The Concept Design Report (contained in Volume 2 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated 13 August 2012 Rev 3); (iv) Plan sets:

1 2 1

4 5 6

•

Land requirement plans (contained in Volume 1 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated 15 August 2012 and GIS4214293-100-10 Rev 5 as amended for 32 Normanby Road, dated 14 September 2015);

•

Plans contained in the Concept Design Report Appendices (contained in Volume 3 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated 13 August 2012 Rev 3);

•

Plan CIV-000-DRG-0001 attached at Appendix 1 to these Conditions.

(v) Information provided in response to the Section 92 requests and/or in advance of the Council’s section 42A report, including the following: •

“City Rail Link Notice of Requirement: Social Impact Assessment” prepared by Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Ltd (Beca), dated 19 April 2011 (approved for release 19 April 2013);

•

“City Rail Link – Supplementary Report: Traffic Modelling of Alternative Construction Scenarios” prepared by Flow Transportation Specialists Ltd, dated 22 May 2013.

(vi) Evidence (including supplementary evidence) provided prior to and at the Council hearing, including but not limited to: •

Statement of Evidence by Ian Clark (Transport) dated 2 July 2013;

•

“Drawing 0220, Revision B” dated 20 August 2013, being part of the City Rail Link Project: Mt Eden Worksite set by Aurecon, submitted as part of the Second Supplementary Statement of Evidence of William (Bill) Russell Newns for Auckland Transport;

•

“City Rail Link Notice of Requirement: Outline Plan Process and Environmental Management Plan System (Indicative)” prepared by Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Ltd, dated 27 September 2013;

•

“City Rail Link: Indicative Communication and Consultation Plan” prepared by Auckland Transport, dated September 2013;

•

“Outline Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan” submitted as Attachment A to the Statement of Evidence of Amelia Joan Linzey (Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Ltd), dated 26 September

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 13

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

2013. (vii) All material and evidence (including rebuttal evidence) provided by the Requiring Authority in the Environment Court proceedings (ENV-2014-AKL-000057). (b) Except as modified by the following alterations: (i) Assessment of Environmental Effects (Reference CRL-AOT-RME-000-0057), Design and Construction Report (Reference CRL-AOT-RME-000-0059 and Drawings CRL¬ SYW-RME-000- DWG-0025-0030 (‘Aotea Alteration’ - CRL Designation 1); and (ii) Assessment of Environmental Effects (Reference CRL-SYWRME-000-RPT-0065, Design and Construction Memorandum (Reference CRL-SYW- RME-000-MEM0002) and Drawings CRL-SYW- RME-000-DRG-0120 to 0124 and 0128 to 0132 ‘Strata / Sub-Strata Alteration (CRL Designation 2); and (iii) Assessment of Environmental Effects (Reference CRL-MTE-RME- 000-RPT-0060, Revision 7 dated 9/11/16), Design and Construction Memorandum (Reference CRL-MTE-RME-000-MEM-0001, dated 9/11/16) and Drawings CRL-SYW-RME000-DWGDRG-0101 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16, 0102 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16, 0110 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16 and 0133 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16 and CRL-EFCROA-000-DRG-1027 Revision 4 dated 30/6/16, 1028 Revision 4 dated 30/6/16 and 1127 Revision 2 dated 30/6/16 and CRL-EFC-CON-000-DRG- 0060 Revision 1 dated 20/6/16, 0061 Revision 1 dated 20/6/16, 0062 Revision 1 dated 20/6/16, 0063 Revision 1 dated 20/6/16 and 0064 Revision 1 dated 8/7/16)(‘Mt Eden Station Alteration’ - CRL Designation 6), Section 92 responses dated 20/12/16, 17/2/17 and 27/4/17; (iv) Assessment of Environmental Effects (Reference CRL-PAT-ENV-CON-PLN-003285, Revision 2 dated 19/12/17, Section 92 Responses dated 19/2/18. 1.2 Where there is inconsistency between: (a) The documents listed above and these conditions, these conditions shall prevail; (b) The information and plans set out in conditions 1.1(a) and 1.1(b) lodged with the requirements and presented at the Council Hearing and during the course of Environment Court proceedings, the most recent information and plans shall prevail; (c) The indicative management plans and evidence presented at the Council Hearing and the management plans (DWPs, CEMP, etc) required by the conditions of these designations and submitted through an Outline Plan, the requirements of the management plans shall prevail. 1 2 2

2.1 In accordance with section 184(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the RMA), these designations shall lapse if not given effect to within 15 10 years from the date on which they are confirmed.

5 6 1 2 3

4 5 6

3.1 As soon as reasonably practicable, and no later than the point at which any part or parts of the City Rail Link become operational, the Requiring Authority shall: (a) Review the area and volume of land designated for the City Rail Link; (b) Identify any areas of designated land that are either no longer necessary for construction of the City Rail Link (if the City Rail Link has been constructed in part), or no longer necessary for the on-going operation and/or maintenance of the City Rail Link or for on-going mitigation measures; and

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 14

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(c) Give notice in accordance with Section 182 of the RMA for the removal of those parts of the designation identified in (b) above. (d) Give notice in accordance with s182 of the RMA for the drawback of the CRL designation post construction where the CRL overlaps the North Auckland Line designation (Auckland Unitary Plan reference 6300) as follows: (i) Between 4 Haultain Street and 5 Fenton Street north and south (Identification reference 7 on drawing CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-0104 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16); (ii) Between 49-51 Boston Road and Severn Street (Identification references 1, 2 and 3 on drawing CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-0101 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16; (iii) At 14-22 Boston Road (Identification references 5 on drawing CRL-SYW-RME000-DRG-0101 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16); (iv) At 11 Water Street (Identification reference 6 on drawing CRL-SYW-RME-000DRG-0101 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16); (v) At 26 and 28 Mt Eden Road (Identification references 5 and 6 on drawing CRLSYW-RME-000-DRG-0103 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16); (vi) Over road reserve at Normanby Road between Lauder Road and Boston Road to reflect the Normanby Road overbridge (Identification reference 2 on drawing CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-0103 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16); and (vii) At Porters Ave to reflect the location of signalling infrastructure (Identification reference 8 on drawing CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-0104 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16). PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS Appointment of Communication and Consultation Manager

1 2 4 5 6

4.1 Within three months of the confirmation of the designation the Requiring Authority shall appoint a Communication and Consultation Manager to implement the Pre-construction Communication and Consultation Plan (Condition 5). The Communication and Consultation Manager shall be the main and readily accessible point of contact for persons affected by or interested in the City Rail Link Project until the commencement of the construction phase of the Project, or the contact person under Condition 14 is appointed. 4.2 The Communication and Consultation Managerâ€™s contact details (or, if appointed under Condition 14, that contact persons details) shall be listed in the Pre-construction Communication and Consultation Plan and listed on the Requiring Authority website, the City Rail Link Website, and the Auckland Council website. Pre-Construction Communication and Consultation Plan

1 2 4 5 6

5.1 The objective of the Pre-construction Communication and Consultation Plan is to set out a framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation is undertaken with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties prior to the commencement of construction of the City Rail Link. 5.2 The Requiring Authority shall prepare a Pre-Construction Communication and Consultation Plan. This Plan shall be submitted to Auckland Councils Major Infrastructure Projects Team Manager, within 2 months of the Designation being confirmed, for confirmation that the Plan has been prepared in accordance with this condition. 5.3 The Plan shall be implemented and complied with within 3 months from the confirmation of the designations until the commencement of the construction of the City Rail Link.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 15

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

5.4 This Plan shall set out recommendations and requirements (as applicable) that should be adopted by and/or inform the development of the CEMP and DWPs. 5.5 The Pre-construction Communication and Consultation Plan shall set out how the Requiring Authority will: (a) Inform the community of Project progress and likely commencement of construction works and programme; (b) Engage with the community in order to foster good relationships and to provide opportunities for learning about the Project; (c) Obtain (and specify reasonable timeframes for) feedback and input from Stakeholders, directly affected and affected in proximity parties regarding the development of the CEMP and DWPs; (d) Respond to queries and complaints. Information shall include but not be limited to: (i) Who is responsible for responding; (ii) How responses will be provided; (iii) The timeframes that the responses will be provided within. (e) Where feedback (in accordance with this condition) is provided, the Pre-construction Communication and Consultation Plan shall articulate how that feedback has informed the development of the CEMP and DWPs and where it has not, reasons why it hasnâ€™t; (f) Provide updates on the property acquisition process as well as the management strategy for properties acquired by the Requiring Authority for the construction of the City Rail Link. 5.6 The Pre-Construction Communication and Consultation Plan shall be prepared in consultation with Stakeholders, directly affected parties and affected in proximity parties including, but not limited to: (a) All property owners and occupiers (including, subject to Condition 61.5, sub lessees) identified within the designation footprint; (b) All property owners and occupiers adjacent to construction sites (Britomart and Albert Street (Designation 1), Karangahape Road (Designation 4), Newton Station (Designation 5), and the main construction site including grade separation works at Normanby Road and Porters Ave (Designation 6)); (c) New Zealand Historic Places Trust (NZHPT); (d) Department of Corrections; (e) Ministry of Justice; (f) MediaWorks; (g) Network Utility Operators; (h) Bear Park Early Childhood Centre; (i) Body Corporate 164980 & Tenham Investments Limited (j) Community Liaison Group(s) (refer Condition 7); 5.7 The Pre-construction Communication and Consultation Plan shall, as a minimum, include: (a) A communications framework that details the Requiring Authorityâ€™s communication strategies, the accountabilities, frequency of communications and consultation, the range of communication and consultation tools to be used (including any modern and relevant communication methods, newsletters or similar, advertising etc.), and any other relevant communication matters;

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 16

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(b) Details of the Communication and Consultation Manager for the pre-construction period (Condition 4 of this designation) including their contact details (phone, email and postal address); (c) The methods for identifying, communicating and consulting with stakeholders, directly affected parties and affected in proximity parties and other interested parties. Such methods shall include but not be limited to: (i) Newsletters; (ii) Newspaper advertising; (iii) Notification and targeted consultation with stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties; and (iv) The use of the project website for public information. (d) The methods for identifying, communicating and consulting with the owners of 1 Queen Street (HSBC House) and 21 Queen Street (Zurich House) regarding the development of the City Rail Link design and construction methodology between Britomart Transport Centre and Customs Street (through the Downtown Shopping Centre site). (e) The methods for communicating and consulting with mana whenua for the implementation of mana whenua principles for the project (refer to condition 8 and 48); (f) The methods for communicating and consulting with the Community Liaison Group(s); (g) How communication and consultation activity will be recorded; and (h) Methods for recording reasonably foreseeable future planned network utility works so that these can be considered and incorporated, where appropriate, into the City Rail Link design. 5.8 The Pre-construction Communication and Consultation Plan will be publicly available once finalised and for the duration of construction. Network Utility Operators 6.1 Under s 176(1)(b) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) no person may do anything in relation to the designated land that would prevent or hinder the City Rail Link, without the prior written consent of the Requiring Authority.

1 2 6

4 5 6

6.2 In the period before construction begins on the City Rail Link (or a section thereof), the following activities undertaken by Network Utility Operators will not prevent or hinder the City Rail Link, and can be undertaken without seeking the Requiring Authority’s written approval under section 176(1)(b) of the RMA: (a) Maintenance and urgent repair works of existing Network Utilities; (b) Minor renewal works to existing Network Utilities necessary for the on-going provision or security of supply of Network Utility Operations; (c) Minor works such as new property service connections; (d) Upgrades to existing Network Utilities within the same or similar location with the same or similar effects on the City Rail Link designation. 6.3 For the avoidance of doubt, in this condition an “existing Network Utility” includes infrastructure operated by a Network Utility Operator which was: (a) In place at the time the notice of requirement for the City Rail Link was served on Auckland Council (23 August 2012); or

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 17

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(b) Undertaken in accordance with this condition or the section 176(1)(b) RMA process. Community Liaison Groups 7.1 Within three months of the confirmation of the designations the Requiring Authority shall, in consultation with the Auckland Council, establish at least one Community Liaison Group in each of the following key construction areas: (a) Britomart and Albert Street (Designation 1) (b) Karangahape Road (Designation 4) (c) Newton Station (Designation 5) (d) Main Construction site (Designation 6) 7.2 The number of Groups shall be confirmed with the Auckland Council. 7.3 The membership of the Community Liaison Group(s) shall include representative(s) of the Requiring Authority and be open to all directly affected and affected in proximity parties to the Project including, but not limited to the following: (a) Representative(s) for and/or directly affected and affected in proximity property owners and occupiers; (b) CBD Residents Advisory Group; (c) The Karangahape Road Business Association; (d) Eden Terrace Business Association; (e) Heart of the City; (f) Roman Catholic Diocese of Auckland; 7

1 2 4 5 6

(g) St Patrickâ€™s Cathedral; and (h) St Benedictâ€™s Parish. 7.4 In addition to the requirements in Condition 5, the purpose of the Groups shall be to: (a) Provide a means for receiving regular updates on Project progress; (b) Monitor the effects of constructing the Project on the community by providing a regular forum through which information about the Project can be provided to the community. (c) Enable opportunities for concerns and issues to be reported to and responded by the Requiring Authority. (d) Provide feedback on the development of the CEMP and DWPS. (e) Proposed potential joint initiatives to the Requiring Authority for the Property Management Strategy regarding the interim use of properties including vacant land acquired for the construction of the City Rail Link. 7.5 The Requiring Authority will consult with the Groups in respect of the development of the CEMP and DWPs. 7.6 The Requiring Authority will appoint one or more persons appropriately qualified in community consultation as the Community Consultation Advisor(s) to: (a) Provide administrative assistance to the Groups; (b) Ensure the Groups are working effectively (including the development of a Code of Conduct) and appropriate procedures for each Group; and (c) Act as a community consultation advisor to the Group. 7.7 The Requiring Authority will use its best endeavours to ensure that the Groups meet at least annually until the commencement of construction and then at least once every three months or as otherwise required once construction commences.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 18

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

7.8 Once construction has commenced the Requiring Authority will provide an update at least every three months (or as otherwise agreed) to the Groups on compliance with the designation conditions and the CEMP and DWP and any material changes to these plans. 7.9 The Requiring Authority shall provide reasonable administrative support for the Groups including organising meetings at a local venue, inviting all members of the Groups, as well as the taking and dissemination of meeting minutes. 7.10 The Groups shall continue for the duration of the construction phase of the Project and for six months following completion of the Project. Mana Whenua Consultation 8.1 Within three months of the confirmation of the designations the Requiring Authority shall establish a kaitiaki or mana whenua forum to provide for an on-going role in the design and construction of the CRL Project. 8.2 The frequency at which the forum meets shall be agreed between the Requiring Authority and mana whenua. 8.3 The role of the mana whenua forum may include the following: (a) Developing practical measures to give effect to the principles in the Urban Design DWP (refer to Condition 49);

(b) Input into, where practicable, the design of the stations (refer to Condition 54);

(d) Working collaboratively with the Requiring Authority around built heritage and archaeological matters;

5 6

(e) Undertaking kaitiakitanga responsibilities associated with the City Rail Link Project, including monitoring, assisting with discovery procedures, and providing mÄ tauranga MÄ ori input in the relevant stages of the Project; and (f) Providing a forum for consultation with mana whenua regarding the names for the City Rail Link stations, noting that there may be formal statutory processes outside the project (such as the New Zealand Geographic Board) which may be involved in any decision making on station names. 8.4 The mana whenua forum may provide written advice to the Requiring Authority in relation to any of the above matters. The Requiring Authority must consider this advice and the means by which any suggestions may be incorporated in the City Rail Link project. Network Utility Operator Liaison 9.1 The Requiring Authority and its contractor shall:

1 2 9

4 5 6

(a) Work collaboratively with Network Utility Operators during the development of the further design for the City Rail Link to provide for the ongoing operation and access to network Utility operations; (b) Undertake communication and consultation with Network Utility Operators as soon as reasonably practicable, and at least once prior to construction timing being confirmed and construction methodology, and duration being known; and (c) Work collaboratively with Network Utility Operators during the preparation and implementation of the CEMP (Condition 24) and DWPs in relation to management of adverse effects on Network Utility Operations. 9.2 A summary of the communication and consultation undertaken between the Requiring Authority and Network Utility Operators prior to construction commencing shall be

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 19

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

provided as part of the Outline Plan. 9.3 The Requiring Authority shall undertake on-going communication and consultation with Network Utility operators throughout the duration of construction, including in relation to changes envisaged by Conditions 22 and 23 affecting Network Utility Operations to ascertain whether or not any changes or updates to the CEMP Network Utilities section are required to address unforeseen effects. CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS Outline Plan Requirements 10.1 The Requiring Authority shall submit an Outline Plan to the Auckland Council for the construction of the City Rail Link in accordance with section 176A of the RMA. The Outline Plan shall include: (a) The Communication and Consultation Plan (Condition 15); (b) The Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP); (c) Delivery Work Plans (DWPs); (d) Site Specific Construction Noise/Vibration Management Plans (SSCNVMPs) and Notable Receiver Management Plans; and (e) Any other information required by the conditions of this designation associated with the construction of the City Rail Link.

1 2 10

4 5 6

10.2 The plans listed in Condition 10.1 above must clearly document the comments and inputs received by the Requiring Authority during its consultation with stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties, and any recommendations received as part of the Independent Peer Review Panel process (where applicable), along with a clear explanation of where any affected party comments or peer review recommendations have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. 10.3 The Requiring Authority may choose to give effect to the designation conditions associated with the construction of the City Rail Link: (a) Either at the same time or in parts; (b) By submitting one or more: (i) Communication and Consultation Plans; (ii) CEMP; (iii) DWPs; and (iv) SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs 10.4 These plans should clearly show how the part integrates with adjacent City Rail Link construction works and interrelated activities. This particularly applies where the Urban Design DWP is submitted as a number of plans. 10.5 Early engagement will be undertaken with Auckland Council in relation to preparation and submission of the Outline Plan to establish a programme for the Outline Plan process to ensure achievable timeframes for both parties. 10.6 All works shall be carried out in accordance with the Outline Plan(s) required by this condition.

1 11

2 4

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 20

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

5 6

Condition

agreed to by Auckland Council to form an Independent Peer Review Panel. The purpose of the Independent Peer Review Panel is to undertake a peer review of the CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39), and provide recommendations on whether changes are required to those plans in order to meet the objective and other requirements of these conditions. 11.2 The CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39) must clearly document the comments and inputs received by the Requiring Authority during its consultation with stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties, along with a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. This information must be included in the CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39) provided to both the independent peer reviewer and Auckland Council as part of this condition. 11.3 The CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39) submitted to Auckland Council shall demonstrate how the recommendations from the independent peer reviewers have been incorporated, and, where they have not, the reasons why not. 11.4 In reviewing an Outline Plan submitted in accordance with these designation conditions, Auckland Council shall take into consideration the independent specialist peer review undertaken in accordance with this condition and any additional information provided to Auckland Council by affected parties. Availability of Outline Plan(s)

1 2 12

4 5 6

12.1 For the duration of construction the following plans and any material changes to these plans shall be made available for public viewing on the Project web site: (a) CEMP; (b) DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs); and (c) Communication and Consultation Plan. 12.2 A copy of these Plans will also be held and made available for viewing at each construction site. Monitoring of Construction Conditions

1 2 13

4 5 6

13.1 The Requiring Authority, its contractor team, and the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s) shall establish and implement a collaborative working process for dealing with day to day construction processes, including monitoring compliance with the designation conditions and with the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and any material changes to these plans associated with construction of the City Rail Link. 13.2 This collaborative working process shall: (a) Operate for the duration of the construction works and for 6 months following completion of construction works where monitoring of designation conditions is still required, unless a different timeframe is mutually agreed between the Requiring Authority and the Auckland Council; (b) Have a “key contact” person representing the Requiring Authority and a “key contact” person representing the contractor team to work with the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s); (c) The “key contacts” shall be identified in the CEMP and shall meet at least monthly unless a different timeframe is agreed with the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s). The purpose of the meeting is to report on compliance with the

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 21

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

designation conditions and with the CEMP, DWPs and material changes to these plans and on any matters of non-compliance and how they have been addressed; (d) Once construction has commenced, the Requiring Authority and / or the contractor shall provide an update to the Community Liaison Groups (Condition 7 of this designation) at least once every 3 months, or if in accordance with Condition 7 these groups meet more regularly, at least once every two months. 13.3 The purpose and function of the collaborative working process is to: (a) Assist as necessary the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s) to confirm that: (i) The works authorised under these designations are being carried out in compliance with the designation conditions, the CEMP, DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and any material changes to these plans; (ii) The Requiring Authority and its contractor are undertaking all monitoring and the recording of monitoring results in compliance with the requirements of the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and any material changes to these plans; (b) Subsequent to a confirmed Outline Plan, provide a mechanism through which any changes to the design, CEMP or DWPs, which are not material changes requiring approval under Condition 10 triggering the requirement for a new Outline Plan, can be required, reviewed and confirmed; (c) Advise where changes to construction works following a confirmed Outline Plan require a new CEMP or DWP (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs); (d) Review and identify any concerns or complaints received from, or related to, the construction works monthly (unless a different timeframe is mutually agreed with the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer) and adequacy of the measures adopted to respond to these. Communication and Consultation

1 2 4 5 6

Contact Person 14.1 The Requiring Authority shall make a contact person available 24 hours seven days a week for the duration of construction for public enquiries on the construction works.

Communication and Consultation Plan

1 2 4 5 6

15.1 The objective of the Communication and Consultation Plan is to set out a framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation is undertaken with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties during the construction of the City Rail Link. 15.2 The Requiring Authority shall prepare a Communication and Consultation Plan which shall be implemented and complied with for the duration of the construction of the City Rail Link. 15.3 The Communication and Consultation Plan shall set out how the Requiring Authority will: (a) Inform the community of construction progress and future construction activities and constraints that could affect them; (b) Provide early information on key Project milestones; (c) Obtain and specify a reasonable timeframe (being not less than 10 working days), for feedback and inputs from directly affected and affected in proximity parties

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 22

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

regarding the development (as part of the review process provided by Condition 22) and implementation of the CEMP or DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSNMPs and SSCVMPs); and (d) Respond to queries and complaints including but not limited to: (i) Who is responsible for responding; (ii) How responses will be provided; (iii) The timeframes that responses will be provided within. 15.4 The Communication and Consultation Plan shall as a minimum include: (a) A communications framework that details the Requiring Authority’s communication strategies, the accountabilities, frequency of communications and consultation, the range of communication and consultation tools to be used (including any modern and relevant communication methods, newsletters or similar, advertising etc), and any other relevant communication matters; (b) The Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project including their contact details (phone, email and postal address); (c) The methods for identifying, communicating and consulting with persons affected by the project including but not limited to: (i) All property owners and occupiers within the designation footprint (ii) All property owners and occupiers adjacent to construction sites (Britomart and Albert Street (Designation 1), Karangahape Road (Designation 4), Newton Station (Designation 5), Main Construction site and the works at Normanby Road and Porters Ave (Designation 6)) (iii) New Zealand Historic Places Trust (NZHPT) (iv) Department of Corrections (including the entity contracted by Department of Corrections to administer and run the Mt Eden Corrections facility at 1 Lauder Road) (v) Ministry of Justice (including but not limited to) confirming the details of the contact person required under Condition 14 of this designation, and to provide appropriate details (including but not restricted to timing, duration, scale, noise effects, vibration effects, access restrictions, and disruption to utilities) in respect to any works impacting the operation of the Auckland District Court at 65-71 Albert Street, Auckland. Communication and consultation of such details should be provided to the Ministry of Justice Auckland Property Programme Manager at least 9 months prior to the commencement of such works. (vi) Media Works (vii) Community Liaison Group(s) (refer Condition 7); (viii) Bear Park Early Childhood Centre; (ix) Body Corporate 164980 and Tenham Investments Ltd; (x) Network Utility Operators, including the process: •

To be implemented to capture and trigger where communication and consultation is required in relation to any material changes affecting the Network Utilities;

•

For the Requiring Authority to give approval (where appropriate) to Network Utility Operators as required by section 176(1)(b) of the RMA during the construction period;

•

For obtaining any supplementary authorisations (including but not limited to

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 23

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

resource consents (including those required under a National Environmental Standard) and easements); â€˘

For inspection and final approval of works by Network Utility Operators; and

â€˘

For implementing conditions 9, 22, 23, and 24 of this designation in so far as they affect Network Utility Operations.

(xi) The owner of 4 Kingston Street (xii) The owner of 6-12 Kingston Street (xiii) The owner of 83 Albert Street (xiv) The owner(s) of 5 Porters Avenue (ALLOT 236 SEC 10 Suburbs AUCKLAND) (d) How stakeholders and persons affected by the project will be notified of the commencement of construction activities and works, the expected duration of the activities and works, and who to contact for any queries, concerns and complaints; (e) How stakeholders and persons affected by the project will be consulted in the development and review of the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs), including specifying reasonable timeframes for feedback; (f) Methods for communicating in advance temporary traffic management measures and permanent changes to road networks and layouts to directly affected and in proximity parties, bus (public and private) operators, taxi operators, bus users, and the general public; (g) Methods for communicating in advance to surrounding communities (including sensitive noise and vibration receivers) which must be notified at least 24 hours in advance where construction activities are predicted to: (i) Exceed the noise limits (refer Condition 31); or (ii) Exceed a vibration limit (refer Conditions 33 and 34); or (iii) Be within 200m of a blast site (refer Condition 32). Further provisions for Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers are contained in Condition 16. (h) Methods for communicating in advance proposed hours of construction activities outside of normal working hours and on weekends and public holidays, to surrounding communities, and methods to record and deal with concerns raised about such hours; (i) Methods for communicating and consulting with mana whenua for the duration of construction and implementation of mana whenua principles for the project (refer to Conditions 8 and 49); (j) Methods for communicating and consulting with the Auckland Council Parks Department regarding works to be undertaken to any trees on public land (streets, squares, etc.) located within the City Rail Link surface designation footprint, including how trees not being removed, or in close proximity to the surface designation footprint where works are occurring, will be protected; (k) Methods for communicating and consulting in advance of construction works with emergency services (Police, Fire, Ambulance) on the location, timing and duration of construction works, and particularly in relation to temporary road lane reductions and/or closures and the alternative routes or detours to be used, with specific detail around the management of the Fire and Ambulance from their central stations on Pitt Street; (l) A list of Stakeholders, directly affected and affected in proximity parties to the

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 24

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

construction works who will be communicated with; (m) How communication and consultation activity relating to construction activities and monitoring requirements will be recorded; and (n) Methods for communicating and consulting with the Department of Corrections (including the entity contracted by Department of Corrections to administer and run the Mt Eden Corrections facility at 1 Lauder Road), to confirm the details of the contact person required under Condition 14 of this designation, and in respect of any works impacting on access or works in proximity to the Mt Eden Corrections Facility and the Boston Road Community Corrections site; including temporary traffic management measures and permanent changes to road networks and layouts which may impact on access to and from the Facility and the motorway network. 15.5 The Communication and Consultation Plan shall also include (as relevant) linkages and cross-references to the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs). 15.6 The Communication and Consultation Plan shall include a summary of the communication and consultation undertaken between the Requiring Authority and parties as required by the Pre-construction Communication and Consultation Plan. The summary shall include any outstanding issues or disputes raised by parties. The Communication and Consultation Plan shall be reviewed six monthly for the duration of construction and updated if required. Any updated Communication and Consultation Plan shall be provided to the “key contacts” (see Condition 13) and the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer for review and agreement on any further action to be undertaken. Any further action recommended as a result of this review shall be undertaken by the Communication and Consultation Manager for the City Rail Link and confirmation of completion provided back to the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer. 15.7 If, in the course of amendments undertaken as part of the review process, a material change to the Communication and Consultation Plan is made, those parties affected by the change shall be notified within 1 month of the material change occurring. Communications – Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers

1 16

4 5 6

1 17

2 4

16.1 A SSCNVMP shall be prepared for all Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers (refer Condition 39). As part of the SSCNVMP (and further to Condition 15 of this designation), the Requiring Authority shall undertake communication and consultation, as soon as reasonably practicable (and at least once following confirmation of construction timing and methodology), with any Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers located within 200 metres of blasting, or within 100 metres (either horizontally or vertically) of the designation footprint for other construction activities. Communication and consultation with these parties should focus on a collaborative approach to manage the adverse effects from construction noise and vibration while works are undertaken in the vicinity. 16.2 The Requiring Authority shall undertake on-going communication and consultation with notable noise and vibration receivers throughout the duration of construction occurring in the vicinity. This communication shall be reported back to the “key contacts” (see Condition 13) and the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer for their review and confirmation of any further action to be undertaken. The Auckland Council Consent Monitoring Officer shall advise the Requiring Authority of its recommendation within 10 working days of receiving this information from the Requiring Authority. Concerns and Complaints Management 17.1 Upon receiving a concern or complaint during construction, the Requiring Authority shall instigate a process to address concerns or complaints received about adverse effects. This shall:

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 25

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

5 6

Condition

(a) Identify of the nature of the concern or complaint, and the location, date and time of the alleged event(s); (b) Acknowledge receipt of the concern or complaint within 24 hours of receipt; (c) Respond to the concern or complaint in accordance with the relevant management plan , which may include monitoring of the activity by a suitably qualified expert, implementation of mitigation measures, and, in the case of noise and / or vibration, preparation of a site specific noise and / or vibration management plan (in accordance with Conditions 37 and 38); 17.2 A record of all concerns and / or complaints received shall be kept by the Requiring Authority. This record shall include: (a) The name and address of the person(s) who raised the concern or complaint (unless they elect not to provide this) and details of the concern or complaint; (b) Where practicable, weather conditions at the time of the concern or complaint, including wind direction and cloud cover if the complaint relates to noise or air quality; (c) Known City Rail Link construction activities at the time and in the vicinity of the concern or complaint; (d) Any other activities in the area unrelated to the City Rail Link construction that may have contributed to the concern or complaint such as non-City Rail Link construction, fires, traffic accidents or unusually dusty conditions generally; (e) Remedial actions undertaken (if any) and the outcome of these, including monitoring of the activity. 17.3 This record shall be maintained on site, be available for inspection upon request, and shall be provided every two months (or as otherwise agreed) to the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer, and to the “key contacts” (see Condition 13). 17.4 Where a complaint remains unresolved or a dispute arises, the Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer will be provided with all records of the complaint and how it has been dealt with and addressed and whether the Requiring Authority considers that any other steps to resolve the complaint are required. Upon receiving records of the complaint the Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer must determine whether a review of the CEMP and/or DWPs is required under Condition 22 to address this complaint. The Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer shall advise the Requiring Authority of its recommendation within 10 working days of receiving the records of complaint. “One Network” Consultation

1 18

4 5 6

18.1 The Requiring Authority and its contractor shall work collaboratively with the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) during the preparation of the Traffic, Access and Parking DWP (Conditions 25, 27, 28, 29, and 30) in relation to confirming the management of adverse transport effects on the road network. A record of this consultation and outcomes shall be included in the Traffic, Access and Parking DWP. The Requiring Authority shall consult with the NZTA throughout the duration of construction on any changes or updates to the Traffic, Access and Parking DWP which relate to the management of the road network.

Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and Delivery Work Plans (DWPs) 19

1 2 4

Preparation, Compliance and Monitoring 19.1 The objective of the CEMP and DWPs is to so far as is reasonably practicable, avoid,

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 26

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

5 6

Condition

remedy or mitigate any adverse effects (including cumulative effects) associated with the City Rail Link construction. 19.2 All works must be carried out in accordance with the CEMP, the DWPs required by these conditions and in accordance with any changes to plans made under Condition 23. 19.3 The CEMP and DWPs shall be prepared, complied with and monitored by the Requiring Authority throughout the duration of construction of the City Rail Link. 19.4 The DWPs shall give effect to the specific requirements and objectives set out in these designation conditions. 19.5 The CEMP shall include measures to give effect to any specific requirements and objectives set out in these designation conditions that are not addressed by the DWPs. 19.6 Where mitigation measures are required to be implemented by the Requiring Authority in relation to the construction of City Rail Link, it shall meet reasonable and direct costs of implementing such mitigation measures. CEMP Requirements 20.1 In order to give effect to the objective in Condition 19.1, the CEMP must provide for the following: (a) In relation to Designation 2, the use of one Tunnel Boring Machine (unless the effects of using more than one Tunnel Boring Machine are not materially different from those associated with the use of one Tunnel Boring Machine); (b) Notice boards that clearly identify the Requiring Authority and the Project name, together with the name, telephone number and email address of the Site or Project Manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager; (c) Training requirements for employees, sub-contractors and visitors on construction procedures, environment management and monitoring; (d) A Travel Management Plan for each construction site outlining onsite car parking management and methods for encouraging travel to the site using forms of transport other than private vehicle to assist in mitigating localised traffic effects; and

1 2 4 5 6

(e) Where a complaint is received, the complaint must be recorded and responded to as provided for in Conditions 13, 15 and 17. 20.2 The CEMP shall include details of: (a) The site or Project Manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager (who will implement and monitor the Communication and Consultation Plan), including their contact details (phone, email and physical address); (b) The Document management system for administering the CEMP, including review and Requiring Authority / Constructor / Auckland Council requirements; (c) Environmental incident and emergency management procedures; (d) Environmental complaint's management procedures (see also Condition 17); (e) An outline of the construction programme of the work, including construction hours of operation, indicating linkages to the DWPs which address the management of adverse effects during construction; (f) Specific details on demolition to be undertaken during the construction period; (g) Means of ensuring the safety of the general public; and (h) Methods to assess and monitor potential cumulative adverse effects. 20.3 Subject to any alternative agreement with the landowner(s) of HSBC House and Zurich House, the Requiring Authority shall prepare specific construction methodologies for the

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 27

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

works adjacent to 1 Queen Street and 21 Queen Street detailing how they will be undertaken to avoid compromising the structural integrity of the existing structures on the site including their foundation systems. The specific construction methodologies shall be prepared in consultation with the owner(s) of these properties. A record of this liaison and outcomes shall be included in the CEMP as part of the Outline Plan. This summary must provide a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated into the CEMP, and the reasons why not. This summary must be provided to both the Independent Peer Review Panel and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan process. CEMP Construction Works Requirements 21.1 In order to give effect to the objective in Condition 19.1, the CEMP shall include the following details and requirements in relation to all areas within the surface designation footprint where construction works are to occur, and / or where materials and construction machinery are to be used or stored: (a) Where access points are to be located and procedures for managing construction vehicle ingress and egress to construction support and storage areas; (b) Methods for managing the control of silt and sediment within the construction area; (c) Methods for earthworks management (including depth and extent of earthworks and temporary, permanent stabilisation measures and monitoring of ground movement) for earthworks adjacent to buildings and structures; (d) Measures to adopt to keep the construction area in a tidy condition in terms of disposal / storage of rubbish and storage unloading of construction materials (including equipment). All storage of materials and equipment associated with the construction works shall take place within the boundaries of the designation;

1 4 5 6

(e) Measures to ensure all temporary boundary / security fences associated with the construction of the City Rail Link are maintained in good order with any graffiti removed as soon as possible; (f) For the duration of construction affecting Lower Queen Street or Queen Elizabeth II Square, construction fences and / or hoardings shall be placed no closer than 3 metres from the north frontage (building frontage onto Queen Elizabeth II Square) of 21 Queen Street in the vicinity of the entrance to the ground level retail space and the main pedestrian entrance to the building. (g) The location and specification of any temporary acoustic fences and visual barriers, and where practicable, opportunities for mana whenua (see Condition 8) and community art or other decorative measures along with viewing screens to be incorporated into these without compromising the purpose for which these are erected; (h) How the construction areas are to be fenced and kept secure from the public and, where practicable and without compromising their purpose how opportunities for public viewing, including provision of viewing screens and display of information about the project and opportunities for mana whenua and community art or other decorative measures can be incorporated to enhance public amenity and connection to the project; (i) The location of any temporary buildings (including workers offices and portaloos) and vehicle parking (which should be located within the construction area and not on adjacent streets); (j) Methods to control the intensity, location and direction of artificial construction lighting to avoid light spill and glare onto sites adjacent construction areas;

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 28

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(k) Methods to ensure the prevention and mitigation of adverse effects associated with the storage, use, disposal, or transportation of hazardous substances; (l) That onsite stockpiling of spoil or fill at Downtown and Lower Albert Street construction yards be minimised where practicable; (m) That site offices and less noisy construction activities be located at the edge of the construction yards where practicable; and (n) Methods for management of vacant areas once construction is completed in accordance with the Urban Design DWP. 21.2 Unless expressly agreed in writing with the landowner of the Downtown Shopping Centre (at 7 Queen Street): (a) the Downtown construction yard (including QEII Square, Downtown Shopping Centre and Lower Albert Street), shall be progressively released from occupation for construction purposes where the area or any part of the area is no longer required for construction of the section of CRL between Britomart and Wyndham Street; and (b) following completion of the section of the CRL between the Downtown Shopping Centre and Wyndham Street and reinstatement of Albert Street, Lower Albert Street shall not be occupied for construction purposes for any section of CRL south of Wyndham Street. Review Process for CEMP and DWPs 22.1 The CEMP and DWPs shall be reviewed at least annually or as a result of a material change to the City Rail Link project or to address unforeseen adverse effects arising from construction or unresolved complaints. Such a review may be initiated by either Auckland Council or the Requiring Authority. The review shall take into consideration: (a) Compliance with designation conditions, the CEMP, DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and material changes to these plans;

1 2 4 5 6

(b) Any changes to construction methods; (c) Key changes to roles and responsibilities within the City Rail Link project; (d) Changes in industry best practice standards; (e) Changes in legal or other requirements; (f) Results of monitoring and reporting procedures associated with the management of adverse effects during construction; (g) Any comments or recommendations received from Auckland Council regarding the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs); and (h) Any unresolved complaints and any response to the complaints and remedial action taken to address the complaint as required under Condition 17. 22.2 A summary of the review process shall be kept by the Requiring Authority, provided annually to the Auckland Council, and made available to the Auckland Council upon request. Update of CEMP and DWPs following Review

1 2 4 5 6

23.1 Following the CEMP and DWPs review process described in Condition 22, the CEMP may require updating. 23.2 Any material change to the CEMP and DWP must be consistent with the purpose and objective of the relevant condition. 23.3 Affected parties will be notified of the review and any material change proposed to the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs).

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 29

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

23.4 The CEMP and DWPs must clearly document the comments and inputs received by the Requiring Authority from affected parties about the material change, along with a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. 23.5 Any material change proposed to the CEMP and DWPs shall be subject to an independent peer review as required by Condition 11. 23.6 Following that review any material change proposed to the CEMP and DWPs relating to an adverse effect shall be submitted for approval to Auckland Council Compliance and Monitoring Officer, at least 10 working days prior to the proposed changes taking effect. If any changes are not agreed, the relevant provisions of the RMA relating to approval of outline plans shall apply. Network Utilities 24.1 To manage the adverse effects on Network Utilities Operations during the construction of the City Rail Link, the following shall be included in the CEMP. 24.2 The purpose of this section of the CEMP shall be to ensure that the enabling works and construction of the City Rail Link adequately take account of, and include measures to address the safety, integrity, protection or, where necessary, relocation of existing network utilities that traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation during the construction of the City Rail Link. 24.3 For the avoidance of doubt and for the purposes of this condition an â€œexisting Network Utilityâ€? includes infrastructure operated by a Network Utility Operator which was: (a) In place at the time the notice of requirement for the City Rail Link was served on Auckland Council (23 August 2012); or (b) Undertaken in accordance with condition 6 of this designation or the section 176(1)(b) RMA process. 1 24

4 5 6

24.4 The CEMP shall be prepared in consultation with Network Utility Operators who have existing Network Utilities that traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation and shall be adhered to and implemented during the construction of the City Rail Link. The CEMP shall include as a minimum: (a) Cross references to the Communication and Consultation Plan for the methods that will be used to liaise with all Network Utility Operators who have existing network utilities that traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation; (b) Measures to be used to accurately identify the location of existing Network Utilities, and the measures for the protection, support, relocation and/or reinstatement of existing Network Utilities; (c) Methods to be used to ensure that all construction personnel, including contractors, are aware of the presence and location of the various existing Network Utilities (and their priority designations) which traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation, and the restrictions in place in relation to those existing Network Utilities. This shall include: (i) Measures to provide for the safe operation of plant and equipment, and the safety of workers, in proximity to existing Network Utilities; (ii) Plans identifying the locations of the existing Network Utilities (and their designations) and appropriate physical indicators on the ground showing specific surveyed locations; (d) Measures to be used to ensure the continued operation of Network Utility Operations and the security of supply of the services by Network Utility Operators at

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 30

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

all times; (e) Measures to be used to enable Network Utility Operators to access existing Network Utilities for maintenance at all reasonable times on an ongoing basis during construction, and to access existing Network Utilities for emergency and urgent repair works at all times during the construction of the City Rail Link; (f) Contingency management plans for reasonably foreseeable circumstances in respect of the relocation and rebuild of existing Network Utilities during the construction of the City Rail Link; (g) A risk analysis for the relocation and rebuild of existing Network Utilities during the construction of the City Rail Link; (h) Earthworks management (including depth and extent of earthworks and temporary and permanent stabilisation measures), for earthworks in close proximity to existing Network Utilities; (i) Vibration management and monitoring for works in close proximity to existing Network Utilities; (j) Emergency management procedures in the event of any emergency involving existing Network Utilities; (k) The process for providing as-built drawings showing the relationship of the relocated Network Utilities to the City Rail Link to Network Utility Operators and the timing for providing these drawings; (l) Measures to ensure that network utility services are not interrupted to the Mt Eden Corrections Facility as a result of City Rail Link works. The requiring authority shall advise the Department of Corrections and the entity contracted by Department of Corrections to administer and run the Mt Eden Corrections facility at 1 Lauder Road, of any works on network utilities in the vicinity of the Mt Eden Corrections Facility which may impact on utility service provision to the Mt Eden Corrections Facility at least 14 days prior to those works occurring to allow the Department of Corrections (and the entity contracted to administer and run the facility at 1 Lauder Road) to arrange suitable contingencies. Communication and consultation with the Department of Corrections, and the entity contracted to administer and run the facility at 1 Lauder Road, shall be recorded in accordance with condition 15) of this designation. The Requiring Authority shall be responsible for ensuring that construction works do not interrupt network utility services to the Mt Eden Corrections Facility, unless by prior arrangement with Department of Corrections and the entity contracted by Department of Corrections to administer and run the Mt Eden Corrections facility at 1 Lauder Road. (m) A summary of the consultation (including any methods or measures in dispute and the Requiring Authorities response to them) undertaken between the Requiring Authority and any Network Utility Operators during the preparation of the CEMP. 24.5 If the Requiring Authority and a Network Utility Operator cannot agree on the methods proposed under the CEMP to manage the construction effects on the Operatorâ€™s network utility operation, unless otherwise agreed, each party will appoint a suitably qualified and independent expert, who shall jointly appoint a third such expert to advise the parties and make a recommendation. That recommendation will be provided by the Requiring Authority as part of the CEMP along with reasons if the recommendation is not accepted. Transport, Access and Parking 25

General Transport, Access and Parking

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 31

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

4 5 6

Condition

25.1 A Transport, Access and Parking DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects of construction of the City Rail Link, or any part of it, on the transport network. 25.2 The objective of the Transport, Access and Parking DWP is to so far as is reasonably practicable, avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on transport, parking and property access. This is to be achieved by: (a) Managing the road transport network for the duration of construction by adopting the best practicable option to manage congestion; (b) Maintaining pedestrian access to private property at all times; and (c) Providing on-going vehicle access to private property to the greatest extent possible. 25.3 To achieve the above objective, the following shall be included in the Transport, Access and Parking DWP: (a) The road routes which are to be used by construction related vehicles, particularly trucks to transport construction related materials, equipment, spoil, including how the use of these routes by these vehicles will be managed to mitigate congestion, and to the greatest extent possible, avoid adverse effects on residential zoned land and education facilities; (b) Transport route options for the movement of construction vehicles carrying spoil, bulk construction materials or machinery shall be identified and details provided as to why these routes are considered appropriate routes. In determining appropriate routes, construction vehicles carrying spoil, bulk construction materials or machinery shall as far as practicably possible only use roads that: (i) Form part of the regional arterial network; (ii) Are overweight / over dimensioned routes; (iii) Or other routes (specified below) where no other practical option is available. (c) For the purposes of this condition the following routes (that at the time this designation was confirmed were not part of the regional arterial network and / or overweight / over dimensioned) shall be used where practicable for the movement of construction vehicles carrying spoil, bulk construction materials or machinery: (i) Ngahura Road, for trucks heading to/from Eden Terrace construction site; (ii) Dundonald Street and Basque Road, for trucks heading to/from the Newton Station construction sites; (iii) Pitt Street (between Hobson Street and Hopetoun Street), Beresford Square, Mercury Lane, Canada Street and Upper Queen Street (between Canada Street and Karangahape Road), for trucks heading to/from Karangahape Station construction sites; (iv) Wellesley Street (between Nelson Street and east of Albert Street), Cook Street (between Mayoral Drive and Hobson Street) and Mayoral Drive (between Wellesley Street and Cook Street) for trucks heading to/from Aotea Station construction sites; (v) Nelson Street (north of Wellesley Street), Hobson Street (north of Cook Street) and Lower Albert Street, for trucks heading to/from the Albert Street and Downtown construction sites. (d) Where other routes are necessary (other than those routes identified above), the Transport, Access and Parking DWP shall identify any residential zoned land and education facilities and shall provide details on how adverse effects from these vehicle movements are to be mitigated through such measures as: (i) Communication and consultation (in accordance with Condition 15 of this

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 32

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

designation) with these properties in advance of the vehicle movements occurring; (ii) Restricting vehicle movements on Monday to Friday to between 9.30am and 4pm, and on Saturday to between 9am and 2pm. (e) Proposed temporary road lane reductions and / or closures, alternative routes and temporary detours, including how these have been selected and will be managed to mitigate congestion as far as practicably possible and how advance notice will be provided; (f) How disruption to the use of private property will be mitigated through: (i) Ensuring pedestrian and cycle access to private property is retained at all times; (ii) Providing vehicle access to private property as far as practicably possible at all times, except for temporary closures where landowners and occupiers have been communicated and consulted with in reasonable advance of the closure; and (iii) How the loss of any private car parking will be mitigated through alternative car parking arrangements. (g) Where an affected party unexpectedly finds their vehicle blocked in as a result of a temporary closure, the Requiring Authority shall (within reasonable limits) offer alternative transport such as a taxi, rental car, or other alternative. Note: For the purposes of designation Conditions 25, 27, 28, 29 and 30 â€œtemporary closureâ€? is defined as the following: (i) In place for less than six hours, the Requiring Authority shall communicate and consult on the closure at least 24 hours in advance, but is not required to offer or provide alternative parking arrangements, though it may choose to offer this on a case by case basis in consultation with the affected party; and (ii) In place for between six and 72 hours, the Requiring Authority shall communicate and consult on the closure at least 72 hours in advance, and will offer and provide where agreed with the affected party alternative parking arrangements. The alternative parking arrangement should be as close to the site affected as is reasonably practicable. (h) How disruption to use of the road network will be mitigated for emergency services, public transport, bus users, taxi operators, freight and other related vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists through: (i) Prioritising, as far as practicably possible, pedestrian and public transport at intersections where construction works are occurring; (ii) Relocating bus stops and taxi stands to locations which, as far as practicably possible, minimise disruption; and (iii) Identifying alternate heavy haul routes where these are affected by construction works. (i) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan that detail how emergency services, landowners, occupiers, public transport users, bus and taxi operators, and the general public are to be consulted with in relation to the management of the adverse effects on the transport network. (j) The alternative (to road) transport options that are available (including the option of rail use at the main construction site adjacent the North Auckland Rail Line) and that have been considered and assessed for the transportation of spoil. This will include as applicable:

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 33

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(i) Benefits that could be provided by alternative options; (ii) Potential adverse effects associated with alternative options; (iii) Where an alternative option is proposed, methods for managing potential adverse effects; and (iv) Reasons for either adopting or not adopting alternative transport options. Monitoring of Transport Network Congestion 26.1 To achieve the objective of Condition 25.2(a), the Requiring Authority will undertake monitoring of the transport network and implement additional mitigation measures as required to manage congestion to achieve the best practicable option. 26.2 The purpose of the monitoring is to monitor congestion on the transport network by measuring average delays for traffic travelling along specified routes. The evaluation times will be: (a) The average travel times over the weekday two hour morning peak period; and (b) The average travel times over the weekday two hour evening peak period; and (c) The average weekday inter-peak travel times between 9am to noon, noon to 2pm and 2 to 4pm. 26.3 The Requiring Authority shall carry out continuous monitoring for the duration that construction of the City Rail Link is occurring. The intention is that this monitoring is to be continuous, although it is acknowledged that there may be occasional malfunctions. 26.4 If a congestion incident occurs (such as an accident), the monitoring during the affected period will be considered unrepresentative. 26.5 Monitoring shall commence six months prior to construction of the City Rail Link to establish a baseline of existing transport congestion. 26

26.6 The monitoring will establish whether the City Rail Link construction works have increased traffic delays as follows: (a) Either by more than 10 minutes (from the monitoring previously undertaken in accordance with this condition) (b) Or if the travel times are more than three minutes or 30% greater than the forecast modelled increases along that route (according to the most recent traffic model test of that scenario, undertaken prior to the start of construction. The modelled time is to be based on the Auckland City Centre SATURN traffic model or a different traffic model approved by the Requiring Authority). (c) The 30% above shall only apply for an increase predicted to be over four minutes. 26.7 If the travel times exceed the above criteria on any one of the specified routes, then additional mitigation shall be implemented by the Requiring Authority in its role as the Road Controlling Authority (under its statutory obligation). The additional mitigation could include but is not limited to advertising alternative routes, removing on street car parking or implementing operational measures, such as lane reconfigurations or signal phasing, to increase capacity on the surrounding network where reasonably possible at that time. 26.8 The purpose of additional mitigation measures is to mitigate the increases in traffic delays, reducing these to below the levels identified in Condition 26.6 as far as is reasonably achievable. 26.9 For the purposes of this condition, the following are the specified routes:

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 34

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(a) Wellesley Street (between Victoria Street and Princes Street) (b) Victoria Street (between Wellesley Street and Princes Street) (c) Customs Street/Fanshawe Street (between Nelson Street and Tangihua Street) (d) Quay Street/Lower Hobson Street (between Fanshawe Street/Hobson Street and Tangihua Street) (e) Nelson Street/Hobson Street (between Pitt Street and Fanshawe Street) (f) Queen Street (between Mayoral Drive and Customs Street) (g) New North Road/Symonds Street (between Dominion Road and Newton Road) (h) Mount Eden Road (between Normanby Road and Symonds Street) (i) Khyber Pass Road between the southern motorway ramps and Symonds Street if this route is to be used by construction related trucks (j) Newton Road between the northwestern motorway ramps and Symonds Street 26.10 The specified routes shall exclude whichever east-west route has its intersection with Albert Street closed at the time of the surveys. Transport, Access and Parking: Specific Requirements (Britomart to Mayoral Drive) 27.1 To achieve the objective in Condition 25, the following measures shall be implemented: (a) A vehicle access lane at least 3m wide shall be provided along the eastern side of Albert Street between Customs Street and Victoria Street to provide access to properties (except that while the Albert Street/Victoria Street intersection is closed, this access lane is only to be provided between Customs Street and Durham Street); (b) A vehicle access lane at least 3m wide shall be provided along the western side of Albert Street between Customs Street and Victoria Street to provide access to properties, except that: (i) While the Albert Street/Customs Street intersection is closed, this access lane is only to be provided between Victoria Street and Wolfe Street; and (ii) While the Albert Street/Victoria Street intersection is closed, this access lane is only to be provided between Kingston Street and Customs Street. If Kingston Street is also to be closed to Albert Street during this construction stage, this access lane shall be provided between Wyndham Street and Customs Street; and 27

(iii) For a single period of up to 3 months while the cut and cover trench structure establishment works are carried out along Albert Street between Swanson Street and Customs Street, this access land is only required to be provided between Victoria Street and Swanson Street if northbound traffic is otherwise diverted via Swanson Street West and Federal Street; and (iv) For a single period of up to 10 months while the public realm reinstatement works are carried out along Albert Street between Wyndham Street and Wolfe Street, this access lane is only required to be provided between Victoria Street and Swanson Street if northbound traffic is otherwise diverted via Swanson Street West and Federal Street. (c) The east-west / west-east connection (two fully operational traffic lanes in each direction) is to be maintained in each direction at two of the Customs Street, Victoria Street and Wellesley Street intersections with Albert Street during the period when the third of those intersections is otherwise fully closed; (d) The left turn movement from Customs Street (from the east) into Albert Street, and the left turn from Customs Street (from the west) into Albert Street, shall be retained while the Albert Street / Customs Street intersection is fully closed;

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 35

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(e) The left turn from Durham Street into Queen Street shall be reopened while the Albert Street/Victoria Street intersection is fully closed; (f) Two way access shall be provided on the single service lane along the western side of Albert Street between 87 Albert Street and Kingston Street while the Albert Street/Victoria Street intersection is fully closed. If Kingston Street is also to be closed to Albert Street during this construction stage, this access shall be provided to Wyndham Street; (g) Vehicular access into and egress from: (i)

Mills Lane to and from either Albert Street or Swanson Street; and

(ii) The Stamford Plaza Auckland main entrance and forecourt area is to be provided at all times and for the avoidance of doubt cannot be temporarily closed during construction. (h) Providing pedestrian and cycle access to private property at all times; (i) Providing footpaths of at least 1.5m in width along either side of Albert Street; (j) At a minimum two safe crossing passageways (which are “fully accessible” with a minimum width of 1.5m wide and well lit ), need to be provided in the vicinity of Swanson Street and Wyndham Street, in addition to pedestrian crossings at the intersections of Victoria Street and Customs Street; (k) Ensuring that construction traffic does not use Swanson Street, Wolf Street or Federal Street north of Swanson Street; (l) During the Kingston Street closure, pedestrian access to and from the Auckland District Court’s fire escape on the north side of Kingston Street shall be maintained at all times; and (m) 18 metres of on street parking within Kingston Street shall be reversed for police at the nearest practicable location. 27.2 The Traffic, Access and Parking DWP shall demonstrate how these measures will be implemented and shall also include the following: (a) How construction works will be undertaken to mitigate congestion on Albert Street, Wellesley Street, Victoria Street, Customs Street, and Quay Street including retaining east-west traffic movements across Albert Street on Customs Street, Victoria Street and Wellesley Street; (b) The timing and sequencing of temporary road lane reductions and / or closures, and the alternative routes and temporary detours to be used, including: (i) How these have been selected and will be managed to, where practicable, mitigate congestion on the surrounding road network; (ii) How the Albert Street/Wyndham Street intersection will be reopened as soon as practically possible; (c) How disruption to the use of private property located immediately adjacent the designation with access onto Galway Street, Tyler Street, Queen Elizabeth Square, Customs Street, Albert Street, Kingston Street, will be mitigated through: (i) Providing vehicle access to private property as practicably possible at all times; (ii) Retaining local vehicle access to properties located along Albert Street (which may include only left in, left out access); (iii) Retaining access for loading and unloading of goods located along the service lane on the eastern side of Albert Street, between Victoria Street and Wellesley Street; and;

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 36

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(iv) Providing an on street loading bay on Customs Street, Lower Albert Street or Lower Queen Street to provide servicing to 21 Queen Street if access during construction cannot be provided to the existing loading bay area for 21 Queen Street, accessed from Lower Albert Street; and; (v) Providing access for loading and unloading of goods between Wyndham Street and Victoria Street West. (d) How disruption to the use of the local road network will be mitigated for private bus users, pedestrians and cyclists through: (i) Providing, where practicable, for the continued operation of private bus operators from hotels and other pick up / drop off locations in the city centre area (cross references to the Communication and Consultation Plan for consulting with private bus operators shall be included in the CEMP and Traffic, Access and Parking DWP); and (ii) Retaining pedestrian and cycle access through Lower Queen Street and / or Queen Elizabeth Square to provide access to and from the Ferry terminal and Customs Street; and (e) How disruption to pedestrians and cyclists requiring the ability to cross from east to west (and vice versa) across Albert Street between Victoria Street and Customs Street can be mitigated through providing, where practicable, safe pedestrian and cyclist passageways across the construction works on Albert Street. Transport Access and Parking: Specific Requirements (Karangahape Station Area) 28.1 To achieve the objective in Condition 25, the following measure shall be implemented: (a) Retaining one lane of traffic in each direction on Pitt Street (unless otherwise agreed with the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer); and (b) Spoil trucks shall not use East Street where practicable and on-street parking at the Southern end of East Street will be retained. 28.2 The Traffic, Access and Parking DWP shall demonstrate how these measures will be implemented and shall also include the following: (a) How construction of the shafts providing access to the Station can be undertaken to mitigate congestion on Pitt Street, Karangahape Road, and Mercury Lane;

(b) The timing and sequencing of temporary road lane reductions and / or closures on Pitt Street, Mercury Lane, and the western end of Beresford Street, and the alternative routes and temporary detours to be used, including how these have been selected and will be managed to, where practicable, mitigate congestion on the surrounding road network; (c) How disruption to the use of private property located immediately adjacent the surface designation with access onto Beresford Street, Pitt Street, Mercury Lane, and East Street will be mitigated through: (i) Providing pedestrian and cycle access to private property at all times, particularly those businesses located at the eastern end of Beresford Street and the northern end of Mercury Lane; (ii) Providing vehicle access to private property, which may include only a turn in and a turn out in the same direction), as practicably possible at all times, except for temporary closures where landowners and occupiers have been communicated and consulted with in reasonable advance of the closure; (iii) Providing local vehicle access to properties located along Beresford Street and Samoa House Lane (which may include only a turn in and a turn out in the same

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 37

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

direction); (iv) Alternative parking arrangements or other offers for resolving the temporary loss of car parking during construction for the Hopetoun Alpha Building. Transport, Access and Parking: Specific Requirements (Newton Station Area) 29.1 To achieve the objective in Condition 25, the Traffic, Access and Parking DWP shall include the following: (a) How construction of the shafts providing access to the Newton Station, although constructed wholly on private land, can be undertaken to mitigate construction related congestion on Symonds St, the Symonds Street / Mt Eden Road / New North Road intersection, Dundonald Street, and the western end of Basque Road; (b) The timing and sequencing of temporary road lane reductions and / or closures on Symonds St in the vicinity of the intersection of Symonds Street / Mt Eden Road and New North Road , Dundonald Street, and the western end of Basque Road, and the alternative routes and temporary detours to be used, including how these have been selected and will be managed to, where practicable, mitigate congestion on the surrounding road network; 29

(c) How disruption to the use of private property located immediately adjacent the surface designation with access onto Symonds Street, Dundonald Street, and the western end of Basque Road will be mitigated through: (i) Providing pedestrian and cycle access to private property at all times, particularly for those businesses and residences located along Symonds Street and Dundonald Street; (ii) Providing vehicle access to private property, which may include only a turn in and a turn out in the same direction), as practicably possible at all times, except for temporary closures where landowners and occupiers have been communicated and consulted with in reasonable advance of the closure. How the loss of public pay and display parking located at the Auckland Transport Symonds Street Public Car Park will be mitigated through alternative parking arrangements. The Requiring Authority may be able to arrange such alternative car parking at the Burleigh Street car park. (d) The effects of the temporary use of the Symonds Street car park as a construction site are to be mitigated by the Requiring Authority by active parking management and enforcement, within 400m of the car park, to maximise short term parking within this area Transport and Property Access: Additional Requirements (NAL Area) 30.1 To achieve the objective in Condition 25, the following measures shall be implemented: (a) The retention of at least two traffic lanes (one in either direction) on Mt Eden Road during the construction of the replacement Mt Eden Road Bridge;

(b) During the closure of the Normanby Road level crossing to construct the grade separated crossing, the Mt Eden Road and Normanby Road intersection shall be signalised and a second traffic lane shall be provided on the Boston Road approach to its intersection with Mt Eden Road intersection. Additionally, the no parking restrictions on Boston Road shall be extended along the length of Boston Road and considered for any adjacent local roads to facilitate through traffic; (c) A temporary pedestrian crossing (over the rail line) at Normanby Road is to be provided for the period of the temporary closure of the Normanby Road connection; (d) Access will be maintained to Nikau Street at all times by at least one lane (minimum

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 38

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

3m), and two lanes on Nikau St between Flower and Korari Streets. Access to sites within Flower Street and Korari Street is to be retained, from Nikau Street or New North Road, at all times; (e) Construction works will be undertaken to ensure two-way access is maintained at all times for vehicles to all accessways to the MediaWorks site including staff and visitors cars, trucks and service vehicles; (f) Providing for traffic to turn right out of Ruru Street to reduce any congestion (particularly at peak times) resulting from not being able to travel via Nikau Street to the traffic lights at Flower Street and New North Road; (g) Providing accessibility along Mt Eden and Normanby Roads as a priority for, where practicable: public transport (buses), emergency services, access to properties for pedestrians, and cyclists; (h) Construction works will be undertaken to ensure two-way access is maintained at all times for all vehicles accessing the Mt Eden Corrections Facility at Lauder Road (including staff and visitorsâ€™ cars, service vehicles, prison vans, emergency vehicles and buses), communication and consultation with the Department of Corrections, and the entity contracted by Department of Corrections to administer and run the Mt Eden Corrections facility at 1 Lauder Road, on this matter shall be recorded in accordance with Condition 15) of this designation. The Requiring Authority shall be responsible for ensuring that the construction works do not restrict 24-hour two-way access for all vehicles accessing the Mt Eden Corrections Facility at Lauder Road; (i) Construction works will be undertaken to ensure two-way access is maintained at all times for vehicles accessing the premises at 51-63 Normanby Road, including staff and visitors cars, trucks and service vehicles. The measures shall: (i) Ensure safe and reasonable access to and from the site, to Austroads standards; (ii) Not result in the loss of any on site parking; (iii) Incorporate a crossing width sufficient not to reduce the range of vehicles required to access the site, relative to the existing situation; (iv) It is noted that the site is used occasionally by large trucks of up to 18m. These vehicles are to be provided for in the design of the access (i.e. the vehicle crossing and the access onto the site); (v) Following completion of the grade separation of Normanby Road safe and reasonable access will be provided to and from the property at 51-63 Normanby Road to meet the relevant Austroads and NZS2890.1 standards or the applicable standard required by the road controlling authority. (j) Construction works will be undertaken to ensure pedestrian and two-way vehicle access is maintained at all times to access the premises at 32 Normanby Road, including staff and visitors cars, trucks and service vehicles. The measures shall: (i) Ensure safe and reasonable access to and from the site, to Austroads standards; (ii) Incorporate a crossing width sufficient not to reduce the range of vehicles required to access the site, relative to the existing situation; (iii) Should the Requiring Authority require part of the site at 32 Normanby Road that is currently used for 40 car parking spaces for the construction of the City Rail Link 34 alternative car parking spaces will be provided at 14-22 Boston Road (in accordance with Plans DRG 0052 Rev 2.0 CRL-EFC-CON-000-DRG-0064 Revision 1 dated 8/7/16 and DRW 0058 Rev 5.0 CRL-EFC-ROA-000-DRG-1027 Revision 4 dated 30/6/16, 1028 Revision 4 dated 30/6/16 and 1127 Revision 2

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 39

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

dated 30/6/16). The Requiring Authority shall provide safe pedestrian access across the North Auckland Line and into the site for customers and staff, visiting or employed at the site in accordance with Condition 30.1(c) until the grade separation works are completed and permanent access is reinstated to the site. (k) At completion of the grade separation of Normanby Road safe and reasonable pedestrian and vehicle access to and from the site and 34 on site car parking spaces will be provided for the property at 32 Normanby Road. In the case of pedestrian and vehicle access and parking arrangements, this will be in accordance with Plans DRG 0058 Rev 5.0 CRL-EFC-ROA-000-DRG-1027 Revision 4 dated 30/6/16, 1028 Revision 4 dated 30/6/16 and 1127 Revision 2 dated 30/6/16, and meet the following requirements: (i) The ramp access will meet relevant Austroads, NZS2890.2 and the Auckland Council District Plan: Isthmus Section design standards; (ii) The 34 car parking spaces will be provided across the site and the adjoining KiwiRail property. The spaces will be compliant with the appropriate Auckland Council District Plan: Isthmus Section parking standards for dimension and manoeuvring; (iii) The design, structures and barriers associated with the ramp and pedestrian access to the site will be subject to the urban design process of Condition 47; and (iv) Provision for landscape planting both on the site and on the KiwiRail land in the area shown on DRG 0058 Rev 5.0 CRL-EFC-ROA-000-DRG-1127 Revision 2 dated 30/6/16 and if appropriate beyond the site (in accordance with Condition 47.2). Indicative widths of landscaping on DRG 0058 Rev 5.0 are 1m for the section shown alongside the railway and 0.5m for the section on the southern side of the ramp. (l) The KiwiRail land required by condition (k) above for car parking spaces, landscaping and the ramp access will be provided by the Requiring Authority until such time as the vehicle access ramp is no longer required by the landowner. If the vehicle access ramp is no longer required to provide access to the property it shall be removed by the Requiring Authority at its cost within 3 months unless otherwise agreed with the landowner. (m) Construction of the grade separation works at Normanby Road on the parcels of land identified on the CRL NOR6 Sheet 2 as parcels 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 393, 394, 399, 400 and 401 shall not commence until the KiwiRail land is available and written confirmation of this has been provided by the Requiring Authority to Auckland Council. (n) Access to Water Street to and from Mt Eden Road for CRL construction related heavy commercial vehicles shall be limited to left-in and left-out movements only. (o) Access to 14-22 Boston Road from Normanby Road shall be restricted to left-in and left-out movements only; the exception to this will be when Normanby Road is closed; and (p) During the temporary works along Boston Road, a 1.8m wide footpath on the north side of the street, in addition to two 3.0m wide traffic lances shall be provided on Boston Road between Normanby Road and Khyber Pass. A safe temporary pedestrian crossing facility shall be provided at the western extent of Active Construction Zone M1. 30.2 The Traffic, Access and Parking DWP shall demonstrate how these measures will be

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 40

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

implemented and shall also include the following: (a) How construction works can be undertaken to mitigate congestion on New North Road, Ruru Street, Korari Street, Flower Street, Nikau Street, Ngahura Street, Porters Avenue, Mt Eden Road, Normanby Road, Boston Road, Nugent Street, and the road network in general in this area including: (b) Which routes are to be used by construction trucks to remove spoil from the construction yard including how the use of these routes by these vehicles will be managed to mitigate congestion; (c) Which routes are to be used by construction related traffic (especially trucks) to deliver construction materials and other related goods and services to the construction yard including how the use of these routes by these vehicles will be managed to mitigate congestion; The grade separation of Porters Ave so that it is undertaken at a time when vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists can be managed and accommodated on Dominion Road, Mt Eden Road and Normanby Road to an extent which mitigates where practicable, delays to travel journeys from congestion on these roads resulting from City Rail Link construction works; (d) The grade separation of Normanby Road so that it is undertaken at a time when vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists can be managed and accommodated on Dominion Road, Mt Eden Road and Porters Avenue, to an extent which mitigates where practicable, delays to travel journeys from congestion on these roads resulting from City Rail Link construction works; (e) Any reduction in the number of fully operational traffic lanes associated with the closure of Porters Avenue and Normanby Road, and the reduction in the number of vehicle lanes on the Mount Eden Road bridge, is to be undertaken on only one of these three two routes at a time; (f) The timing and sequencing of temporary road lane reductions and / or closures at the Symonds Street / New North Road / Mt Eden Road intersection , Ruru Street, Korari Street, Flower Street, Nikau Street, Ngahura Street, Porters Avenue, Mt Eden Road in the vicinity of the bridge over the rail line, Normanby Road, Boston Road, Nugent Street in the vicinity of the rail crossing, and the alternative routes and temporary detours to be used, including how these have been selected and will be managed to, where practicable, mitigate congestion on the surrounding road network; (g) How disruption to the use of property located immediately adjacent to the surface designation with access onto New North Road, Ruru Street, Korari Street, Flower Street, Nikau Street, Ngahura Street, Porters Avenue, Mt Eden Road, Normanby Road, Boston Road, Nugent Street will be mitigated through: (i) Providing pedestrian and cycle access to private property at all times; (ii) Providing local vehicle access and pedestrian access at all times to properties located along Flower Street (between Nikau Street and Shaddock Street) and Shaddock Street (between Flower Street and its dead end to the east), which are not located within the designation footprint, except for temporary closures where landowners and occupiers have been communicated and consulted with in reasonable advance of the closure; (iii) Retaining local vehicle and pedestrian access to properties located outside the designation footprint along Haultain Street, Fenton Street, Porters Avenue, Ngahura Street, Ruru Street, Korari Street, Flower Street, Nikau Street, Mt Eden

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 41

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Road, Boston Road, Nugent Street, and Normanby Road at all times except for temporary closures where landowners and occupiers have been communicated and consulted with in reasonable advance of the closure; and (iv) Full accessibility to those parts of Porters Avenue not affected by, but in the vicinity of, the construction works; and (h) How disruption to the use of Mt Eden Rail Station will be mitigated through providing, where practicable, access during construction works associated with the replacement of Mt Eden Road Bridge. Noise and Vibration Project Standards - Construction Noise 31.1 Construction noise shall comply with the following Project Standards (unless otherwise provided for in a SSCNMP which is approved under Condition 37, 39 or 40): Monday to Saturday 0700 – 2200

Sundays and Public Holidays

Occupied commercial and industrial buildings (including offices)

75 dB LAeq

Sensitive Noise and Vibration Receivers (excluding offices)

75 dB LAeq 90 dB LAFmax

65 dB LAeq 1 80 dB LAFmax2

60 dB LAeq 75 dB LAFmax

Receiver Type

1 31

4 5 6

Early Childhood Education Centres (whilst occupied during normal opening hours) Bear Park Early Childhood Education Centre at 32 Akiraho Street (whilst occupied during normal opening hours)

0700 – 2200

At all other times 2200 – 0700

35 dB LAeq in sleeping areas

35 dB LAeq in sleeping areas 65 dB LAeq in outdoor playing areas

Notes: 1. 60dB LAeq for Designation 5 and Designation 6; and 2. 75dB LAFmax for Designation 5 and Designation 6. 31.2 Construction noise shall be measured and assessed in accordance with the provisions of NZS 6803:1999 Project Standards - Blasting Overpressure and Vibration 32

For the avoidance of doubt this condition only applies to NoR 6 where blasting is required. 32.1 Prior to commencement of production blasts (ie. blasting that is undertaken as part of the

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 42

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

construction process), trial blasts (ie. preliminary blasts that occur prior to production blasts for the purpose of data acquisition), shall be undertaken to demonstrate how adverse effects will be managed and how compliance with Conditions 32.2, 32.3 and 32.4 will be achieved in production blasting. Trial blasts will determine site-specific attenuation characteristics, air overpressure levels and maximum instantaneous charge weight (MIC) thresholds. Outcomes shall be documented in a Trial Blasting Report. This Trial Blasting Report shall be used for subsequent design of production blasting. 32.2Air overpressure from the blast events shall not exceed 120 dB LZpeak at the facade of any occupied building measures and assessed in accordance with the provisions of the Australian Standard AS 2187.2-2006 Explosives – Storage and use – Use of explosives. 32.3Air overpressure from blast events shall not exceed 133dB LZpeak at the facade of any unoccupied building measured and assessed in accordance with the provisions of Australian Standard AS 2187.2-2006 Explosives – Storage and use – Use of explosives. 32.4 Unless a SSCNVMP is approved under Conditions 38, 39 or 40 which includes an alternative blasting vibration standard: (a) Vibration from blast events shall not exceed 10mm/s PPV for 95% of blast events and 15mm/s for 100% blast events when measured at the foundation of any building that will be occupied during the blast event when measured and assessed in accordance with the provisions of DIN 4150-3:1999. (b) Vibration from blast events shall not in any case exceed the limits specified in Condition 33 when measured at the foundation of any building when measured and assessed in accordance with the provisions of Condition 33. 32.5 For the purposes of 32.2 and 32.3, a building is deemed to be occupied if there are persons inside only during the blast event (ie. if the occupants of a dwelling are out (eg. at work) during the blast event then the dwelling is deemed to be unoccupied). 32.6 Blasts must be performed at set times during the daytime only, between 9am and 5pm, Monday to Saturday only. 32.7 Comprehensive vibration and air overpressure level predictions must be performed prior to every blast event. 32.8 Blasting shall not be carried out where overpressure levels are predicted to be above the Project Standards in 32.1 and 32.2 at any building. Blasting shall not be carried out where vibration levels are predicted to be above the project standards in Condition 32.4 at any building. 32.9 These criteria may be varied only by a Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan (SSCNMP) that has been approved under Condition 37. Project Standards - Construction Vibration 33.1 Construction vibration (including blasting) shall comply with the following Project Standards for building damage (unless otherwise provided for in a SSCVMP which is approved under Condition 38, 39 or 40)

1 2 4 33

5 6

Type of Structure

Short-term (transient) vibration1

PPV at the foundation at a frequency of 1-10Hz (mm/s)

10-50 Hz (mm/s)

50-100 Hz (mm/s)

Long-term (continuous) vibration

PPV at horizontal plane of highest floor (mm/s)

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 43

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Commercial/ Industrial

20 – 40

40 – 50

Residential/ School

5 – 15

15 – 20

Historic or sensitive structures

3–8

8 – 10

2.5

Note: 1. Standard DIN 4150-3:1999 defines short-term (transient) vibration as “vibration which does not occur often enough to cause structural fatigue and which does not produce resonance in the structure being evaluated”. Long-term (continuous) vibration is defined as all other vibration types not covered by the short-term vibration definition. 33.2 Construction vibration (including blasting) shall be measured in accordance with German Standard DIN 4150-3:1999. Project Standards - Construction Vibration (Amenity) 34.1 Between the hours of 10pm and 7am vibration generated by construction activities (excluding blasting) shall not exceed: (a) a Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) of 0.3mm/s when measured at any part of the floor of any bedroom; 1 2 34

4 5 6

(b) a noise level of 35 dB LAeq(15min) when measured in any bedroom. 34.2 Between the hours of 7am and 10pm vibration generated by construction activities (excluding blasting) shall not exceed: (a) A Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) of 1mm/s as measured on the floor of the receiving room for residentially occupied habitable rooms, bedrooms in temporary accommodation and medical facilities; and (b) A Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) of 2mm/s as measured on the floor of the receiving room for retail and office spaces (including work areas and meeting rooms); 34.3 The limits in 34.1 and 34.2 shall only be investigated and applied upon the receipt of a complaint from any building occupant. They shall not be applied where there is no concern from the occupant of the building. 34.4 Where the limits in 34.1 and 34.2 are found (through measurement) to be exceeded then a SSCVMP shall be prepared for that receiver (Condition 38). Project Standards – MediaWorks 35.1 The noise and vibration limits set out in Conditions 35.2 and 35.3 shall apply only during Sensitive Times. For the purposes of MediaWorks, Sensitive Times are defined as follows: (a) During scheduled live broadcasting (b) During emergency/breaking news live broadcasting (c) During scheduled recording sessions If the limits are complied with in Studio 1, the noise and vibration levels in all other Studios will be acceptable. For the avoidance of doubt, (a)-(c) above include sound checks as well as actual broadcast/recording time. 35.2 Noise Limits – Studios The noise level (whether air borne or reradiated from ground vibration) from all

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 44

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

construction sources as received inside Studio 1 shall not exceed 30dB LAeq (5 min) and 33 dB LAeq (1 sec). These limits apply to the construction component of the total noise. However for up to two periods of tunnelling, each no more than 15 consecutive days, the noise limits may be up to 5 decibels higher (ie. 35dB LAeq (5 min) and 38 dB LAeq (1 sec)) during Sensitive Times, other than during the Live Broadcasting Periods as follows: (a) Weekdays: 0600-0900 hours 1200-1230 hours 1730-1930 hours 2230-2330 hours (b) Christmas holiday season (Saturday prior to Christmas Day to Sunday following New Years Day inclusive) and weekends: 1730-1900 hours The Requiring Authority must give MediaWorks at least 12 days notice of the commencement of each such period. 35.2A Rockbreaking shall not be used for tunnel excavation within 100m of the MediaWorks site during Sensitive Times unless compliance with the noise limits in Condition 35.2 can be demonstrated in accordance with the methodology set out in the SSCNVMP. 35.3 Vibration Limits â€“ Studios For the protection of studio camera image quality, the construction vibration level (including blasting) as received inside Studio 1 shall not exceed 0.1mm/s PPV. This limit may be elevated by agreement of both the Requiring Authority and MediaWorks where image quality is found to be unaffected. 35.4 Noise level measurements inside Studio 1 shall be undertaken at a position that is representative to the level received within 2m from, and at a similar height to, the microphone of the main presenter(s). 35.5 Noise level measurements inside Studio 1 shall be undertaken with all doors to the studio closed. 35.6 For the protection of amenity, the construction vibration level as received in inside office areas, meeting rooms and technical suits shall not exceed 1mm/s PPV (as received on the floor of the receiving room) when those spaces are in use. 35.7 For the prevention of building damage, the construction vibration level shall not exceed the limits in Condition 33 at all times. 35.8 For the protection of sensitive equipment, the construction vibration (including blasting) level shall not exceed 200mg (2m/s2) between 5-500Hz. Levels are to be measured on the floor supporting the Sensitive Equipment. 35.9 All attended noise and vibration measurements shall be undertaken by a suitably qualified and experienced expert. 35.10 For the avoidance of doubt, the MediaWorks conditions (Conditions 35, 40 and 66) only apply for so long as television, radio and/or interactive media facilities broadcast from the MediaWorks site. 35.11 Blasting shall not occur during MediaWorks Sensitive Times (as defined in Condition 35.1). Blasting shall occur at times to be agreed with MediaWorks and as documented in the SSCNVMP. 36

Construction Noise and Vibration DWP

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 45

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

2 4 5 6

Condition

For the avoidance of doubt, this condition is applicable to the management of construction noise and vibration on all receivers, including sensitive and notable receivers. 36.1 A Construction Noise and Vibration DWP shall be prepared and implemented. The objective of the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP is to provide for the development and implementation of identified best practicable option to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects on receivers of noise and vibration resulting from construction. 36.2 The Construction Noise and Vibration DWP shall: (a) Adopt the noise and vibration standards for construction set out in Conditions 31, 32, 33 and 34 of these designations; (b) Be generally consistent with the draft Construction Noise and Vibration management plan submitted as part of the Notice of Requirement documentation (dated 23 August 2013); and (c) Identify methods to achieve best practicable option for mitigating adverse effects. 36.3 To achieve this objective, the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP shall include: (a) The roles and responsibilities of the noise and vibration personnel in the contractor team with regard to managing and monitoring adverse noise and vibration effects; (b) That piling and road cutting will be restricted to between the hours of 7am to 7pm, Monday to Saturday; (c) Construction machinery and equipment to be used and their operating noise and vibration levels; (d) Identification of construction activities that are likely to create adverse noise and vibration effects, the location of these in the construction site areas, and the distance to comply with the Project Criteria in Conditions 31, 32, 33 and 34; (e) The timing of construction activities that are likely to create an adverse noise and vibration effect; (f) The location of sensitive noise and vibration receivers; (g) A record of communication and consultation with sensitive noise and vibration receivers. The record must include a clear explanation of where any comments from sensitive receivers have not been incorporated in the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP, and the reasons why not. This information must be included in the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP provided to both the Independent Peer Review Panel and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan process specified in Condition 11; (h) Specific measures to address the concerns raised by those sensitive receivers; (i) Specific training procedures for construction personnel including: (i) The project noise and vibration performance standards for construction (conditions 31, 32, 33 and 34); (ii) Information about noise and vibration sources within the construction area and the locations of sensitive noise and vibration receivers; and (iii) Construction machinery operation instructions relating to mitigating noise and vibration; (j) Methods and measures to mitigate adverse noise and vibration effects including, but not limited to, structural mitigation such as barriers and enclosures, the scheduling of high noise and vibration construction, use of low noise and vibration machinery, temporary relocation of affected receivers or any other measures or offer agreed to

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 46

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

by the Requiring Authority and the affected receiver; (k) The proposed methods for monitoring construction noise and vibration to be undertaken by a suitably qualified person for the duration of construction works including: (i) Updating the predicted noise and vibration contours based on the final design and construction activities; (ii) Confirm which buildings are to be subject to a pre and post building condition survey in accordance with Condition 46. This includes consideration of those buildings in Appendix One and Two to these conditions; (iii) The timing and location for monitoring of buildings during construction is required (Note that the flow charts contained in Appendices B and C of Appendix J of the technical noise and vibration report provided as part of the Notice of Requirement should be used as a guide); (iv) Identifying appropriate monitoring locations for receivers of construction noise and vibration; (v) Procedures for working with the Communication and Consultation Manager to respond to complaints received on construction noise and vibration, including methods to monitor and identify noise and vibration sources; (vi) Procedures for monitoring construction noise and vibration and reporting to the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer; and (vii) Procedures for how works will be undertaken should they be required as a result of the building condition surveys; (l) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which detail how landowners and occupiers are to be communicated with around noise and vibration effects. Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan (SSCNMP) For the avoidance of doubt, this condition does not apply to MediaWorks. 37.1 The objective of a SSCNMP is to detail the best practicable option to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on a receiver resulting from construction noise that does not comply with the Project Noise Standards.

1 2 37

4 5 6

37.2 Further to the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP in Condition 36, a SSCNMP shall be prepared for any receiver or activity for which air overpressure is either predicted or measured to exceed the limits in Condition 32, or where construction noise is either predicted or measured to exceed the Project Noise Standards in Condition 31, except where the exceedance of the standards in Condition 31 is less than 5 decibels and does not exceed : (a) 0700-2200: 1 period of up to 2 consecutive weeks in any 2 months (b) 2200-0700: 1 period of up to 2 consecutive nights in any 10 days 37.3 For predicted exceedances of less than 5 decibels (refer 37.2) monitoring shall be undertaken to confirm the actual noise levels. If exceedance is shown to be more than 5 decibels, or the period exceeds those detailed, then a SSCNMP will be prepared. 37.4 In addition to the SSCNMPs prepared in accordance with Condition 37.2, and notwithstanding Condition 37.1, the Requiring Authority shall prepare SSCNMPs specifying the best practicable option for management, methods and measures to mitigate all noise effects for the properties located at: (a) 1 Queen Street (Lot 1 DP 165403);

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 47

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(b) 21 Queen Street (Lot 1 DP 67723); (c) 29 Customs Street West (Lot 7 DP 77037) (d) 188 Quay Street (Lot 5 DP 63972 and Lot 1 DP 78340); and (e) 23-29 Albert Street (Lot 1 DP 116724). 37.5 SSCNMPs will identify: (a) The extent to which noise may exceed the Project Noise Standards in Condition 31 or the overpressure limits in Condition 32; (b) The timing and duration of any exceedance; (c) Details of the type of activity causing any exceedance; (d) The summary of the communication and consultation undertaken with the receiver. The summary must include a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. This information must be included in the SSCNMP provided to both the Independent Peer Review Panel and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan process specified in Condition 11; (e) The methods and measures to mitigate noise effects, including but not limited to, potential to offer temporary relocation of affected receivers, alternative ventilation, faรงade sound insulation improvements, building condition surveys in the case of overpressure generated by blast events, or other offers made by the Requiring Authority and whether these have been agreed to by the affected receiver; (f) The reasons why the management and mitigation measures and methods reflect best practicable option. 37.6 The SSCNMP shall be submitted for the review of Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan. The works shall then be undertaken in accordance with the SSCNMP confirmed by the Requiring Authority as part of the Outline Plan. Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plan (SSCVMP) For the avoidance of doubt, this condition does not apply to MediaWorks. 38.1 The objective of a SSCVMP is to detail the best practicable option to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on a receiver resulting from vibration that does not comply with the Project Vibration Standards. 38.2 Further to the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP in Condition 36, a SSCVMP shall be prepared: 1 2 38

4 5 6

(a) For any unoccupied building, structure or infrastructure for which construction vibration is either predicted or measured to exceed the Project Vibration Standards in Condition 33; (b) Where a complaint or concern is raised and the vibration level exceeds the amenity levels of Condition 34.2(a) and 34.2(b); (c) In response to other concerns or complaints where required (refer Condition 17).; (d) For the properties listed in Condition 37.4. 38.3 Where the amenity limits in Conditions 34.2(a) and 34.2(b) are exceeded: (a) Best practicable management of vibration must be applied; and (b) The vibration activity shall be scheduled to avoid disturbance. If this is not practicable then reasonable respite periods shall be provided to reduce vibration exposure. 38.4 The limits in condition 33 may be relaxed by a SSCVMP but only for a building, structure or infrastructure that has been assessed by a suitably qualified and experienced structural

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 48

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

engineer and where it has been deemed to be capable of withstanding higher vibration levels without sustaining building or structural damage, and where appropriate vibration and building condition monitoring regimes are in place. 38.5 SSCVMPs will identify: (a) The timing and duration of any exceedance; (b) Details of the type of activity giving rise to any exceedance; (c) Site Specific vibration criteria that addresses the issue(s) of concern (i.e. building damage, amenity and sensitive equipment). Site Specific criteria shall be determined by a suitably qualified independent vibration expert; (d) The summary of the communication and consultation undertaken with the receiver. The summary must include a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. This information must be included in the SSCVMP provided to both the Independent Peer Review Panel and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan process specified in Condition 11; (e) The methods and measures to mitigate vibration effects, including but not limited to, investigating alternative low-vibration construction methods, undertaking highvibration works outside sensitive times, vibration barriers, building condition surveys, potential to offer temporary relocation of affected receivers, or other offers made by the Requiring Authority and agreed to by the affected receiver; (f) The reasons why the management and mitigation measures and methods reflect best practicable option. 38.6 The SSCVMP shall be submitted for the review of Auckland Council. The works shall then be undertaken in accordance with the SSCVMP confirmed by the Requiring Authority as part of the Outline Plan. Notable Receivers Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers For the avoidance of doubt, Conditions 39.5 and 39.6 do not apply to MediaWorks. 39.1 Further to Condition 36, the Requiring Authority and its contractor, in conjunction with a suitably qualified expert, shall work collaboratively with each notable receiver during the preparation of a SSCNVMP to confirm the extent and management of adverse effects on each Notable Receiver.

1 39

2 4 5 6

39.2 In addition to the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP, a SSCNVMP shall be prepared for each identified Notable Receiver. The objective of the SSCNVMP is to detail the best practicable option to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse noise and vibration effects on each Notable Receiver. 39.3 The Requiring Authority shall consult with the notable receiver throughout the duration of construction and update the SSCNVMP as required to achieve the objective in 39.2. 39.4 The SSCNVMP shall include: (a) The level at which noise and vibration effects on the notable receiver will unreasonably interfere with its operation. This will enable development of the site specific criteria. In the case of MediaWorks this is set out in Condition 40; (b) Construction activities and equipment which are likely to create adverse noise and vibration effects and the location and timing of these in relation to the notable receiver; (c) The methods and measures associated with the worksite including, but not limited to, structural mitigation such as barriers and enclosures, use of low noise and

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 49

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

vibration machinery and the scheduling of high noise and vibration construction; (d) The methods and measures associated with the notable receiver building or operation including, but not limited to, potential for isolation of sensitive areas and equipment, dampening of reradiating surfaces and temporary relocation of affected receivers that are proposed to minimise adverse noise and vibration effects on the notable receiver; (e) Details about the methods to be adopted by the Requiring Authority to minimise construction noise and vibration effects on the notable receiver and the anticipated effectiveness of those methods; (f) A summary of the communication and consultation undertaken with the notable receiver. The summary must include a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not; (g) Offers made by the Requiring Authority to the notable receiver to mitigate effects and the response by the operators, such as relocation, and whether those offers were accepted or not by the notable receiver; 39.5 If the parties cannot agree on any of the matters above they shall each appoint a suitably qualified and independent expert, who shall jointly appoint an independent and suitably qualified third expert who shall certify the following matters to be included in the SSCNVMP: (a) The level at which noise and vibration effects on the notable receiver unreasonably interfere with its operation (the certified noise and vibration limit); (b) The mitigation methods and measures within the worksite (at source) including, but not limited to, structural mitigation such as barriers and enclosures, use of low noise and vibration machinery and the scheduling of high noise and vibration construction; (c) The mitigation methods and measures at the notable receiver including but not limited to: isolation of sensitive areas and equipment; dampening of reradiating surfaces; any response to such offers; and temporary relocation of affected receivers; (d) Whether or not the mitigation methods and measures reflect best practicable management; and (e) Whether or not the residual effects are likely to cause significant disruption to the activities of the notable receiver. 39.6 Following the above process the SSCNVMP shall be submitted for the review of Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan. For the avoidance of doubt, the Requiring Authority shall not be entitled to make any changes to the SSCNVMP through the Outline Plan process following any agreement reached with the notable receiver and/or through the above certification process without the consent of the notable receiver. The works shall then be undertaken in accordance with the SSCNVMP confirmed by the Requiring Authority as part of the Outline Plan process.

Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan â€“ Mediaworks Further to Condition 36, a SSCNVMP shall be prepared for MediaWorks implementing the project standards in Condition 35. 40.1 The MediaWorks SSCNVMP shall identify high noise or vibration plant and machinery, and list the relevant items that require testing in accordance with Condition 40.4 and 40.8. 40.2 Prior to any demolition or construction commencing, the Requiring Authority shall undertake a noise survey to determine the Transmission Loss (TL) performance of the

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 50

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

MediaWorks building envelope. This testing shall only be undertaken outside of Sensitive Times. 40.3 Prior to any demolition or construction commencing, the Requiring Authority shall undertake a vibration survey to determine the transfer function of the MediaWorks building structure from ground vibration outside the building to reradiated noise in Studio 1. This testing shall only be undertaken outside of Sensitive Times. 40.4 All high noise plant and machinery to be used at a location where it is predicted to generate noise levels in excess of 3 dB below the limits specified in Condition 35.2 shall be tested prior to use, to determine its Sound Power Level (Lw) at a sufficient distance from the MediaWorks building to ensure compliance. These measured Lws shall be used to predict the noise level at the MediaWorks building faรงade(s) from proposed construction scenarios. The faรงade TL (refer Condition 40.2) shall then be applied to predict the noise levels in the relevant rooms. 40.5 All high noise plant and machinery may not be used until Condition 40.4 is satisfied, taking into account the cumulative noise levels from active sources on the site. 40.6 The Requiring Authority and its contractor, in conjunction with a suitably qualified expert, shall work collaboratively with MediaWorks during the preparation of a SSCNVMP to confirm the extent and management of adverse effects on MediaWorks. 40.7 The SSCNVMP shall set out the requirements for monitoring, the number of monitors, the instrument location, any adjustments necessary if a proxy position is required and any other procedures or requirements that are necessary. The data shall be available in real time to the Requiring Authority, Auckland Council and MediaWorks. 40.8 Prior to the use of any high vibration equipment to be used at a location where it is predicted to generate vibration levels greater than 75% of the PPV vibration limits in Condition 35.3, 35.6, 35.7 and 35.8, or reradiated noise within 3 decibels of the limits in Condition 35.2, the Requiring Authority shall undertake vibration measurements at a sufficient distance from the MediaWorks building to ensure compliance, applying the transfer function required by Condition 40.3 to assess reradiated noise. These measurements shall be used to determine minimum set-back distances from the building to avoid potential exceedances of the vibration limits in Conditions 35.2, 35.3, 35.6, 35.7 and 35.8. The results of the testing and the outcomes affecting construction operations shall be set out in the SSCNVMP. 40.9 The noise and vibration levels from construction shall be monitored to determine compliance with conditions 35.2, 35.3, 35.6, 35.7 and 35.8 continuously by automated noise and vibration monitors located at positions that will represent the noise and vibration level in the relevant spaces and for the relevant noise and vibration limits. The SSCNVMP shall set out the requirements for monitoring, the instrument location, any adjustments necessary if a proxy position is required and any other procedures or requirements that are necessary including methods to exclude extraneous sources. The data shall be available in real time to the Requiring Authority, Auckland Council and MediaWorks. 40.10 Monitoring to determine compliance or otherwise with Condition 35.67 relating to office amenity shall only be undertaken in response to complaints from MediaWorks. The measurements must be attended by a suitably qualified person. 40.11 The SSCNVMP shall set out corrective action measures that must be adopted in situations where any of the noise and vibration limits in Conditions 35.2, 35.3, 35.6, 35.7, and 35.8 are exceeded and where the noise and/or vibration levels are unacceptable to MediaWorks. The corrective action measures must include the following: (a) Immediate cessation of the work(s) that is giving rise to the exceedance;

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 51

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(b) A procedure to require the implementation of whatever measures are necessary to reduce the noise or vibration levels; (c) A monitoring procedure to determine compliance (once the remediation works are complete); (d) A requirement to ensure that the work(s) responsible for the exceedance are not recommenced during Sensitive Times; (e) A complaints procedure that is capable of effecting the immediate cessation of works including making a point of contact directly available 24 hours, seven days a week. 40.12

40.13

If there is a disagreement between the Requiring Authority and MediaWorks as to the content of the SSCNVMP, they shall each appoint a suitably qualified and independent expert, who shall jointly appoint an independent and suitably qualified third expert who shall certify the matters set out in Condition 40.11 and any other matters in dispute in the SSCNVMP. Following the above process the SSCNVMP shall be submitted for the review of Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan. For the avoidance of doubt, the Requiring Authority shall not be entitled to make any changes to the SSCNVMP through the Outline Plan process following any agreement reached with MediaWorks and/or through the above certification process without the consent of MediaWorks. The works shall then be undertaken in accordance with the SSCNVMP confirmed by the Requiring Authority as part of the Outline Plan process.

Built Heritage/Archaeology Historic Character â€“ Built Heritage 41.1 The Historic Character DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects on built heritage and archaeology that may result from associated works prior to, during, and after the construction of the City Rail Link or any part of it. 41.2 The objective of the Built Heritage section is to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on built heritage as far as reasonably practicable. To achieve the above objective, the following shall, as a minimum, be included in the built heritage section of the Historic Character DWP:

1 2 41

4 5 6

(a) Preparation of a Building Record and Salvage Strategy that outlines a suitable set of procedures for the removal, storage and for later refitting and reuse of elements of heritage buildings and/or structures identified for demolition including the Griffiths Building, Beresford Toilets, Bluestone Toilets, and the rear annex to the building at 223-227 Symonds Street. (b) The proposed methods for monitoring building damage that is to be undertaken by a suitably qualified person for the duration of construction works. This includes confirming which Built Heritage buildings and structures are to be subject to a pre and post building condition survey through: (i) Using the updated predicted vibration contours undertaken in Condition 36; (ii) Reviewing those buildings in Appendix 2 to these conditions in accordance with Condition 46.1; (iii) Reviewing buildings within the designation footprint (including above sub-strata designation) or located in close proximity to identify buildings which have been recognised as having heritage value as a result of scheduling under the Historic Places Act 1993 or in the Auckland Unitary Plan. (c) Identification and methodology for recording of Built Heritage directly affected by the construction, or associated pre- and post-construction works (i.e. within the

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 52

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

surface designation footprint), which cannot be retained and / or adaptively re-used / partially retained. For the avoidance of doubt, the following buildings and structures may be demolished: (i) Bluestone Toilets (SCDP Category B); (ii) Beresford Toilets; (iii) Rear annex to building at 229-231 Symonds Street; and (iv) Griffiths Building. (d) Identification and methodology for recording Built Heritage directly affected by the construction, or associated pre- and post-construction, which are to be: (i) Adaptively reused; (ii) Partially retained in design and construction; or (iii) Built heritage elements have been integrated into other elements of the City Rail. (iv) In particular, the Requiring Authority shall explore the adaptive re-use of the buildings at 51-53 Victoria Street West (known as Marthaâ€™s Corner building) with complete demolition only considered as a last resort. As guidance, an appropriate level of adaptive re-use could include retention of the faĂ§ade on all street frontages or the utilisation and incorporation of elements of the building into the design: (e) How Built Heritage Buildings and Structures will be protected during construction through the use of screening or other protective measures to mitigate adverse construction effects; (f) How mitigation or rectification of damage to Built Heritage Buildings and Structures will be addressed; and (g) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which detail how the Auckland Council Heritage Department, the New Zealand Historic Places Trust, and mana whenua (see condition 15) are consulted, and the communication with the general public on the management of the adverse effects relating to Built Heritage. Historic Character - Archaeology 42.1 A Historic Character DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects on built heritage and archaeology that may result during construction of the City Rail Link or any part of it.

1 42

4 5 6

42.2 The objective of the Archaeology section of the Historic Character DWP is to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on archaeological remains during construction, as far as reasonably practicable. 42.3 To achieve the above objective the following matters shall be included in the Archaeology section of the Historic Character DWP: (a) Constructor roles and responsibilities, stand-down periods and reporting requirements are to be clearly identified; (b) How procedures for archaeological investigations and monitoring of preliminary earthworks are to be implemented in areas where there is potential for archaeological remains to be discovered; (c) Procedures for the discovery of, including accidental discovery of archaeological remains including: (i) The ceasing of all physical construction works in the immediate vicinity of the

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 53

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

discovery; (ii) Practices for dealing with the uncovering of cultural or archaeological remains and the parties to be notified (including, but not limited to, appropriate iwi authorities, the Auckland Council Consents Monitoring officer, the New Zealand Historic Places Trust, and the New Zealand Police (if koiwi (human skeletal remains) are discovered); (iii) Procedures to be undertaken before physical works in the area of discovery can start again, including any iwi protocols, recording of sites and material, recovery of any artefacts, and consultation to be undertaken with iwi, Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer and Heritage Unit, and with the New Zealand Historic Places Trust; and (iv) Procedures for recording any archaeological remains or evidence before it is modified or destroyed, including opportunities for the conservation and preservation of artefacts and ecofacts (biological material) that are discovered. Consideration shall be given to the incorporation of in-situ material or artefacts into the design of stations and / or public places associated with the City Rail Link project. Consideration shall also be given to the provision for ‘post-excavation’ assessment analysis and publication of material within 24 months of completion of construction. (v) Provision for ‘post-excavation’ archiving, assessment and analysis of the archaeological records and materials; publication of results of that work within 24 months of completion of construction assessment analysis and publication of material within 24 months of completion of construction. (d) Training procedures for all contractors are to be undertaken in advance of construction, regarding the possible presence of cultural or archaeological sites or material, what these sites or material may look like, and the relevant provisions of the Historic Places Act 1993 if any sites or material are discovered; (e) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which details how the Auckland Council Heritage Department, the New Zealand Historic Places Trust, mana whenua (see condition 8) are consulted, and the communication with the general public on the management of the adverse effects relating to archaeology. Heritage Advisory Group and Composition

43.1 The Requiring Authority must engage, at its expense, a panel of suitably qualified and experienced heritage experts to discharge the functions required by conditions 44 and 45. The Heritage Advisory Group will consist of three independent experts, whose members will not be directors or employees of the Requiring Authority, the New Zealand Historic Places Trust or the consent authority. The Heritage Advisory Group will comprise one nominee from the Requiring Authority, one nominee from the consent authority, and a third nominee appointed jointly by the Requiring Authority's and consent authority's nominees. 43.2 Before establishing the Heritage Advisory Group the Requiring Authority shall seek the opinion of NZHPT on the appointment of the Heritage Advisory Group. 43.3 The Heritage Advisory Group may determine its own processes and procedures for conducting its meetings and performing its functions as it sees fit, including methods for ensuring any disagreements between panel members are resolved, and must meet as necessary to fulfil its functions. All costs associated with the role and function of the Heritage Advisory Group and appropriate administrative support must be paid by the

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 54

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Requiring Authority. If any member of the Heritage Advisory Group is unable to continue in the role for whatever reason, then a replacement member must be appointed using the process set out in this condition. Heritage Advisory Group Function 44.1 The functions of the Heritage Advisory Group are to review the assessment of the alternatives and option selected by the Requiring Authority to manage the adverse effects on the heritage values of the Bluestone wall and the Martha’s Corner building. 44.2 In relation to Bluestone Wall, the Heritage Advisory Group will: (a) Certify that the method selected by the Requiring Authority under Condition 45 will have the least impact on the heritage value of the Bluestone wall compared to other reasonably practicable methods; or 44

(b) Prepare a report as to why the method selected by the Requiring Authority under Condition 45 will not have the least impact on the heritage value of the Bluestone wall and set out details as to an alternative recommended reasonably practicable method.

44.3 In relation to Martha’s Corner, the Heritage Advisory Group will: (a) Certify that the heritage outcomes for Martha’s Corner adhere to the intent of Condition 41; or (b) Prepare a report as to why the method selected by the Requiring Authority will not adhere to the intent of Condition 41 and set out details as to the recommended reasonably practicable method. 44.4 The Requiring Authority must provide Auckland Council with the Heritage Advisory Group’s certification or report, and if applicable the reasons the Requiring Authority has not selected the method recommended by the Heritage Advisory Group. Bluestone Wall Management Plan 45.1 A Bluestone Wall Management Plan shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects on the heritage values of the Bluestone wall during the construction of the City Rail Link. 45.2 The objective of this Plan is to minimise adverse effects on the heritage values of the Bluestone wall during the construction of the City Rail Link by adopting the best practicable option. 45

45.3 To achieve the above objective, the following shall be included in the Bluestone Wall Management Plan: (a) Identification of the key heritage values of the wall; (b) Assessment of the alternative construction methods to ensure that construction of the City Rail Link has the least impact on the heritage value of the Bluestone wall, within the practical constraints of constructing the project; and (c) The option selected by the Requiring Authority. 45.4 The Bluestone Management Plan shall be prepared in consultation with the NZHPT and the Heritage Advisory Group (set out in Condition 43).

Building Condition Surveys

Process for Building Condition Surveys

46.1 Prior to construction, as a minimum those buildings listed in Appendix One and Appendix Two or identified pursuant to Condition 41.2(b) will be considered for a building condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 55

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

5 6

Condition

survey. A building condition survey will be undertaken where it is assessed that there is potential for damage to buildings or structures arising from construction as determined by an independent suitably qualified person appointed by the Requiring Authority based on the criteria below unless the relevant industry criteria applied at the time or heightened building sensitivity or other inherent building vulnerability requires it. Building damage criteria will initially be assessed in accordance with Burland, J.B. (1997) â€œAssessment of Risk of Damage to Buildings due to Tunnelling and Excavationâ€?. Additional factors which may be considered in determining whether a building condition survey will be undertaken include: (a) Age of the building; (b) Construction types; (c) Foundation types; (d) General building condition; (e) Proximity to any excavation; (f) Whether the building is earthquake prone; and (g) Whether any basements are present in the building. 46.2 Where prior to construction it is determined that a Building Condition Survey is required in accordance with Condition 46.1, or if measurements exceed the criteria in Condition 33: (a) The Requiring Authority shall employ a suitably qualified person to undertake the building condition surveys and that person shall be identified in the CEMP; (b) The Requiring Authority shall provide the building condition survey report to the relevant property owner within 15 working days of the survey being undertaken, and additionally it shall notify and provide the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer a copy of the completed survey report; (c) The Requiring Authority shall contact owners of those buildings and structures where a Building Condition Survey is to be undertaken to confirm the timing and methodology for undertaking a pre-construction condition assessment; (d) The Requiring Authority shall record all contact, correspondence and communication with owners and this shall be available on request for the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring Officer; (e) Should agreement from owners to enter property and undertake a condition assessment not be obtained within 3 months from first contact, then the Requiring Authority shall not be required under these designation conditions to undertake these assessments; (f) The Requiring Authority shall undertake a visual inspection during "active construction" if requested by the building owner where a pre-construction condition assessment has been undertaken. (g) The Requiring Authority shall develop a system of monitoring the condition of existing buildings which is commensurate with the type of the existing building and the proximity of the CRL works. The purpose of monitoring is to assess whether or not active construction is compromising the structural integrity of the building. (h) The Requiring Authority shall, during the Building Condition Survey, determine whether the building is classified as Commercial / Industrial / School or a Historic or sensitive structure in terms of Condition 33. 46.3 During construction: (a) The Requiring Authority shall implement procedures that will appropriately respond

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 56

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

to the information received from the monitoring system. Where necessary this may include the temporary cessation of works in close proximity to the relevant building until such time as measures are implemented to avoid further damage or compromise of the structural integrity of the building. (b) Any damage to buildings or structures shall be recorded and repaired by the Requiring Authority and costs associated with the repair will met by the Requiring Authority. 46.4 Following construction: (a) The Requiring Authority shall, within 12 months of the commencement of operation of the City Rail Link, contact owners of those buildings and structures where a Building Condition Survey was undertaken to confirm the need for undertaking a post-construction condition assessment; (b) Where a post-construction building condition survey confirms that the building has deteriorated as the result of construction or operation works relating to the City Rail Link, the Requiring Authority shall, at its own cost, rectify the damage; and 46.5 Where the Requiring Authority is required to undertake building repairs in accordance with Conditions 46.3(b) or 46.4(b), such repairs shall be undertaken as soon as reasonably practicable and in consultation with the owner of the building. Urban Design Urban Design Principles 47.1 The objective of the Urban Design DWP is to enable the integration of the CRL’s permanent works into the surrounding landscape and urban design context. 47.2 An Urban Design DWP shall be developed to ensure that the areas within the designation footprint used during the construction of the City Rail Link are to be restored and the permanent works associated with the CRL are developed in accordance with urban design principles. The following Principles from the Urban Design Framework submitted as part of the Notice of Requirement documents will be used to inform the Urban Design and Landscape Plan: (a) Mana Whenua Principles – see Condition 49; 1 47

4 5 6

(b) Movement and Connections – (i) Existing Networks - Structures of the CRL should not interrupt or adversely change the function of existing public open space, street networks and infrastructure. (ii) Entrance Location - Station entrances should be clearly identifiable and conveniently located in relation to existing and anticipated main pedestrian routes and destinations. (iii) Intuitive Orientation - The location and nature of structures resulting from the CRL (station entrances in particular) should facilitate intuitive orientation and support a legible street network. (iv) Way Finding - Coherent signage should be utilised to aid intuitive orientation and way finding. (v) Mode Integration - Spatial integration with bus stops as well as kiss and ride should be facilitated where possible without imposing on the quality of public realm. (vi) Bicycle Parking – Appropriate numbers of safe bicycle storage or parking should

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 57

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

be provided in each station environment. (vii) Street Crossings - Safe pedestrian street crossings shall be provided in the immediate vicinity of station entrances to the extent practicable. The provision of level street crossings is preferable over any grade separated solutions. (viii) Footpaths – Footpaths surrounding stations need to be adequate to provide for pedestrians entering and exiting the stations. (ix) Grade separated rail crossings – Structures associated with grade separated rail crossings need to be carefully and sensitively designed and in accordance with crime prevention through environmental design principles to ensure appropriate amenity and safety are retained or achieved. Measures to achieve this may include: a.

Utilising permeable balustrades on overbridges;

Maximising the width of the footpath at grade in street reserves;

Orientating any steps parallel to overbridges;

Providing appropriate levels of lighting (in accordance with the Auckland Transport Street Lighting Policy (Appendix 1) for “Pathways in high risk, high brightness areas”); and

Treatment of the sides of ramps and footpaths to enhance visual amenity.

(x) Grade separated rail crossings – Permeable balustrades on overbridges should be required not only for crime prevention purposes but to enable views into the neighbouring sites. For clarity all balustrades comprised within Normanby Road grade separation works (as defined in condition 30.1(l) shall be permeable including without limitation the ramp to be constructed into the site at 32 Normanby Road. (xi) The Porters Avenue Bridge (lift and bridge structure above finished ground level) shall be located no closer than 3.5m from the property boundary of 5 Porters Avenue (ALLOT 236 SEC 10 Suburbs AUCKLAND). Foundation support (i.e. below finished ground level) for the bridge may extend closer but shall not cross the property boundary. (xii) The design of the Porters Avenue and Fenton Street pedestrian/cycle bridges shall: a.

Minimise loss of privacy on adjacent residential sites, including by locating the pedestrian/cycle bridge in the western half of the Avenue;

Ensure the lifts are through lifts to carry bicycles; and

Incorporate bicycle push ramps into the side of the pedestrian stairways.

(xiii) The extensions to Ruru Street and Nikau Street shall generally be undertaken in accordance with the indicative road layout shown on drawing CRL-SYW-RME000-DRG-0110 Revision 1 dated 26/7/16. (c) Public Realm and Landscape – (i) Existing Streetscape – Structures of the CRL should be designed to respect and contribute positively to the form and function of existing public open space. (ii) Universal Access – Station environments should promote universal access (e.g. footpath ramps and smooth ground surfaces).

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 58

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(iii) Safe Environments â€“ Structures resulting from the CRL should promote safe environments. The station entrances should release patrons into safe public spaces that are well lit at night, overlooked by other users (e.g. residents or workers) and have sufficiently wide and unobstructed footpaths. (iv) Reinstated Surfaces - The design and construction of reinstated streetscapes should be coherent with the wider area and/or recent public realm upgrades in the area. (v) Station Plazas - The design and construction of station plazas should be coherent with the wider area and/or recent public realm upgrades in the area. (vi) Public Art - Integration of art and design should foster local identity and character and reflect and/or interpret local characteristics including natural heritage and Mana Whenua cultural narratives, history, art and particular traits of the local community. (vii) Landscape Planting â€“ Plant species used in station environments and/or as part of landscape plantings should consider the opportunity to acknowledge the areaâ€™s pre-human ecology as and where appropriate. This may include species which connect strongly with Mana Whenua cultural narratives. (viii) Entrances within the Road Reserve - Designs for station entrances within the road reserve should be designed to consider the impacts upon other modes of traffic, including the expected pedestrian patronage. (ix) Utility Structures - Above ground utility structures (e.g. vents, access services) should be designed to minimise any negative effect on public realm. Where possible these structures should be integrated with other buildings. (x) Where landscape planting is affected by construction works on private properties, replanting and/or mitigation of any such landscaping shall be undertaken in consultation with those landowners, and in recognition of wider mitigation works required for those properties (e.g. vehicle parking and access requirements). 47.3 The Urban Design DWP shall show how these principles have been used to guide and influence the design of permanent works associated with the CRL, and how the design has responded or otherwise to these principles and initiatives. 47.4 The work to restore those areas within the designation footprint used during construction of the City Rail Link will occur as part of construction or within six months of the City Rail Link being operational. Auckland Council Urban Design Panel 47.5 The Requiring Authority shall request the Auckland Council to refer the Urban Design DWP to the Auckland Urban Design Panel (or other equivalent entity (if any) at that time) and invite the Auckland Urban Design Panel to comment on: (a) The degree to which the Urban Design DWP has appropriately responded to the principles listed in 47.2 and 49.1; (b) The degree to which station plans have appropriately responded to the principles listed in Condition 54.1. 47.6 As part of the Urban Design DWP submitted, the Requiring Authority shall: (a) Provide a record of feedback received from the Auckland Urban Design Panel (or equivalent entity at that time); (b) Provide detail of how the Urban Design DWP has responded to any feedback

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 59

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

received from the Auckland Urban Design Panel (or equivalent entity at that time) and, where they have not, the reasons why; (c) Provide detail regarding the degree to which the community stakeholder, affected party and affected in proximity party feedback has been considered and where applicable incorporated into design. Where feedback has not been incorporated, the Requiring Authority shall provide comment as to reasons why the feedback has not been incorporated; (d) The information set out in (a), (b) and (c) above must be included in the Urban Design DWP submitted to both the independent peer reviewer and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan. Mitigation Planting Requirements

1 48

4 5 6

48.1 The Urban Design DWP shall include any replacement planting proposed to mitigate the adverse effects of tree and vegetation removal from within the designation footprint. It is acknowledged that the mitigation of effects of tree and vegetation removal will be considered in response to the urban design principles of Condition 47. 48.2 Any landscaping included under the Urban Design DWP shall be implemented in accordance with this plan within the first planting season following the City Rail Link being operational. If the weather in that planting season is unsuitable for planting, as determined by the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer (in consultation with the Auckland Council Parks Department), the landscaping shall instead be implemented at the first practicable opportunity thereafter. The next practicable opportunity shall be agreed by the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer. 48.3 The landscaping will be maintained by the Requiring Authority for a period of 5 years for specimen trees and 3 years for all other landscape planting. Engagement with Mana Whenua and the Mana Whenua Principles 49.1 The Urban Design DWP shall include: (a) How mana whenua (see Condition 8) have been engaged with during its development in relation to the implementation and interpretation of the Principles set out under Condition 47, and particularly in relation to the mana whenua principles set out below:

1 49

4 5 6

(i) Mana / Rangatiratanga – As the original local authorities of Tamaki Makaurau, Iwi require high level Treaty based relationships with all key stakeholders including the Requiring Authority and Auckland Council which recognise their Tangata Whenua status in order to fulfil their roles as kaitiaki. Such partnership relationships can then inform engagement with AT / Council at all levels including direct involvement with design consortia. Relationships are required at governance and senior management levels. Such relationships are a precursor to actualising the other 6 principles. (ii) Whakapapa – Names and genealogical connections– reviving names revives mana through Iwi connections to specific ancestors and events / narratives associated with them. An Iwi inventory of names associated with a given site can be developed so that the most appropriate names are identified to develop design, interpretation and artistic responses. (iii) Tohu – Acknowledging the wider significant Iwi cultural land marks associated with the CRL route and their ability to inform the design of the station precincts, entrances and exits. In particular exploring opportunities to maximise view shafts to such tohu / landmarks as a way of both enhancing cultural landscape

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 60

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

connections and as way finding / location devices. (iv) Taiao – Exploring opportunities to bring natural landscape elements back into urban /modified areas e.g. specific native trees, water / puna wai (springs) – promoting bird, insect and aquatic life to create meaningful urban eco systems which connect with former habitats, mahinga kai (food gathering areas) and living sites. (v) Mauri tu – Ensuring emphasis on maintaining or enhancing environmental health / life essence of the wider site – in particular focusing on the quality of wai / water (puna / springs), whenua / soil and air. In particular any puna or underground waterways encountered should be carefully treated with Mana Whenua assistance to ensure their mauri is respected and enhanced where possible. It is also important to minimise the disturbance to Papatuanuku through carefully planned ground works. (vi) Mahi toi – Harnessing the Creative dimension through drawing on names and local tohu to develop strategies to creatively re-inscribe iwi narratives into architecture, interior design, landscape, urban design and public art. (vii) Ahi kaa – need to explore opportunities to facilitate living presences for iwi / hapu to resume ahi-kaa and kaitiaki roles in and around the CRL route and new station precincts; and (b) A summary of the engagement with mana whenua (see Condition 15) and identification of where design has incorporated the mana whenua principles and other mana whenua aspirations. The summary must include a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated and the reasons why not. The summary must be included in the Urban Design DWP submitted to both the Independent Peer Review Panel and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan. Specific Area Requirements: Britomart to Aotea Station 50.1 For this designation the Urban Design DWP shall include how the following are to be restored following completion of the City Rail Link construction works: (a) Queen Elizabeth Square and lower Queen Street between Quay Street and Customs Street; (b) Albert Street between Quay Street and Victoria Street; and 50

(c) Albert Street between Victoria Street and Mayoral Drive including those part of Victoria and Wellesley Streets, the Council owned land on the southeast corner of Albert and Wellesley Streets which is to be used as a construction area, affected by surface construction works; and (d) Kingston Street. 50.2 The restoration plan for this designation shall demonstrate how street upgrades and public realm improvements have been considered when Albert Street and Mayoral Drive are reinstated. This should include as a minimum how the design and construction utilises material palettes, planting schedules and street furniture that are coherent with the surrounding streetscape character. Specific Area Requirements: Karangahape Station area

51.1 For this designation the Urban Design DWP shall include restoration plans (showing how the following are to be restored following completion of the City Rail Link construction works): (a) Beresford Square and Street including where surface works have occurred within Pitt

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 61

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Street; and (b) Mercury Lane. 51.2 The restoration plan for this designation shall demonstrate how street upgrades and public realm improvements have been considered when Beresford Street, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane are reinstated. This should include as a minimum: (a) How the design and construction utilises material palettes, planting schedules and street furniture that are coherent with the surrounding streetscape character. (b) Methods for street upgrades and public realm improvements. Specific Area Requirements: Newton Station area 52

52.1 For this designation the Urban Design DWP shall include restoration plans (showing how the following are to be restored following completion of the City Rail Link construction works) for those areas used for surface construction works within the designation footprint, including the construction yard located on the northeast corner of Mt Eden Road and Symonds Street. Specific Area Requirements: North Auckland Line area 53.1 For this designation the Urban Design DWP shall include the following: (a) Restoration Plans showing how the worksite area will be maintained during the construction period. (b) Restoration Plans showing how the following are to be restored after construction completion:

(i) The replacement of Mt Eden Road Bridge; (ii) The area used for the grade separation of Porters Avenue; (iii) The area used for the grade separation of Normanby Road; and (iv) The replacement of the pedestrian connection, to be provided over the railway, between Ngahura Street and Fenton Street, including a connection to the Mount Eden Station. (c) How the bulk, scale and massing of structures resulting from the City Rail Link at Mt Eden Station are integrated with the components of the Mt Eden Station located in the adjacent North Auckland Line designation. Station Plan Requirements 54.1 The Urban Design DWP shall include a Station Plan/s (report and design plan/s as required) and include the following: (a) The design details showing both the above ground and below ground elements of the station/s;

1 54

4 5

(b) How the above ground and below ground design of the stations has taken into account the following principles: (i) Overarching - stations should achieve a successful and memorable transport experience. (ii) Function - stations will provide safe, functional and clear transport solutions. (iii) Performance - stations will provide a credible, sustainable design outcome that responds to climate, site and social economics. (iv) Personality - stations will provide an expression that contributes to their context and local identity and will respond to an appropriate network wide identity. (v) Existing and New Building Structures.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 62

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(vi) Built Heritage: •

•

Where built heritage is required for City Rail Link station requirements, adaptive reuse strategies should be considered to preserve the building’s role in establishing the streetscape and urban character. The development of new buildings and structures should minimise impact on, and disturbance of, Built heritage listed by the New Zealand Historic Places Trust or the Auckland Council District Plan that play a significant role in establishing the streetscape and urban character of the local area.

(vii) Bulk, Scale and Massing: •

• •

•

Bulk, scale and massing of structures resulting from the City Rail Link (station buildings in particular) should be sympathetic with the surrounding built urban form. Aotea Station building frontages should correspond with the road reserve boundary unless a specific station plaza area is intended. Karangahape Road station building(s) should be sensitively designed so as to contribute positively and to complement the good public realm and urban form qualities that currently exist in this area of Karangahape Road, Pitt Street and the upper end of Beresford Street. The redevelopment of land acquired for the Newton Mt Eden Station provides the opportunity for a continuous active building frontage to correspond with the road reserve boundary, providing:  This does not conflict with the operation requirements of the station; or  Unless a specific station plaza area is intended.

(viii) Active Frontage – Structures resulting from the City Rail Link should present an active frontage towards public spaces like streets, squares, pedestrian walkways or station plaza areas provided that this doesn’t conflict with the operation requirements of the station. Where no active frontage is proposed, an explanation of the reasons shall be outlined in the Urban Design DWP. (ix) Weather Protection – Where practicable, station entrances should provide some weather protection along their frontage (e.g. verandahs, awnings, canopies etc.) and these should be considered as part of the design. (x) Adaptability – The design of structures resulting from the City Rail Link should be able to adapt to change over time (e.g. change of uses, innovations in technology etc.) where reasonably practicable and anticipate opportunities (e.g. additional entrances) that may become possible in the future. The station design should not inhibit wider development opportunities (e.g. above or around station entrances). (xi) Identity – The design of the station entrances should provide an expression that reflects their respective context and local cultural identity. They could reflect, respond and/or interpret local characteristics like natural or Mana Whenua heritage, history, art, particular traits of the local community and unique architectural and urban forms of the area. (xii) Construction Quality – The design and construction of structures resulting from the City Rail Link (station buildings in particular) should be of a quality that lasts over time. Materials should be selected that are highly durable, elegant and

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 63

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

vandal resistant where they come into contact with patrons. (xiii) Mana Whenua Principles â€“ see Condition 49. (c) How these principles have been used to guide and influence the design, and how the design has responded, or otherwise, to these principles and initiatives; and (d) A summary of the engagement with mana whenua (see Condition 15) and identification of where design has incorporated the mana whenua principles and other mana whenua aspirations into station design. The summary must include a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated and the reasons why not. The summary must be included in the Urban Design DWP submitted to both the Independent Peer Review Panel and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan. Trees and Vegetation Trees and Vegetation DWP 55.1 A Trees and Vegetation DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects from the removal of trees and vegetation during the construction of the City Rail Link or any part of it. 55.2 The objective of the Trees and Vegetation DWP is to avoid the removal of scheduled trees as far as practicable. Where trees are identified for removal in surface works the Requiring Authority will remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on trees and vegetation. 55.3 To achieve the above objective the following shall be included in the Trees and Vegetation DWP and implemented as required:

1 55

4 5 6

(a) Confirmation of the trees to be removed due to surface construction works and whether it is appropriate and feasible to relocate or store these trees for replanting. The removal of schedule trees which form a significant group should only be undertaken as a last resort; (b) A list of trees, which due to being located in proximity to construction works, have root systems and / or foliage within and / or overhanging the surface designation footprint, and the methods to be used, where practicable, to protect these trees from construction works; (c) Cross references to the Urban Design DWP and the proposed mitigation of any tree / vegetation removal through replanting trees at a 1:1 ratio, re-instatement of the area, and other methods. In preparing the Trees and Vegetation DWP, the Requiring Authority shall seek input from the Auckland Council Parks Department with regard to tree species / vegetation selection, tree pit construction where deemed necessary, and the positioning of replacement trees and from directly affected land owners with regards to preferences for any replacement planting for vegetation / trees removed from private property or for any replacement planting on private property; (d) Other methods to be used to monitor and report on the management of the adverse effects from tree / vegetation removal; and (e) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which detail how the Auckland Council Parks Department, mana whenua (see condition 8) are consulted, and communication with the general public on the management of the adverse effects relating to the removal of trees and vegetation.

Public Art 56

Public Art DWP

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 64

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

56.1 A Public Art DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects on public art located within or in close proximity to the designation footprint. 56.2 The objective of the Public Art DWP is to enable: (a) The appropriate removal and / or relocation of one piece of public art directly affected by the construction of the City Rail Link; (b) The protection of two pieces of public art that are located on public land in close proximity to the City Rail Link construction works. 56.3 To achieve the above objective the following shall be included in the Public Art DWP and implemented as required: (a) The process that will be undertaken to remove the public art work known as "Enduring Fires" (at the time of the Notice of Requirement process located within Queen Elizabeth Square), including the consultation undertaken with the Auckland Council and Ngati Whatua ki Tamaki or Ngati Whatua o Orakei as to its removal, storage, re-establishment or relocation and / or replacement (as part of the restoration works associated with the City Rail Link construction); (b) The process that will be undertaken to protect or remove the public art work known as "Maori Warrior" (at the time of the Notice of Requirement process located on the pavement of Quay Street adjacent to 1 Queen Street), including the consultation undertaken with the Auckland Council as to its protection during construction or whether it should be removed, stored, relocated and / or replaced (as part of the restoration works associated with the City Rail Link construction); (c) The process to protect the public art known as "Matahorua Anchor and Tainui Anchor" (at the time of the Notice of Requirement process located at the northern end of the Bledisloe Building on Wellesley Street) from construction works to the west, including the consultation undertaken with the Auckland Council as to its protection. 56.4 If one does not already exist, an asset management plan shall be prepared by the Requiring Authority in collaboration with Auckland Council for any of the above listed public art works as part of any protection or removal process. 56.5 Should the above public art works be removed from these sites prior and separate to the City Rail Link project, this condition will not need to be complied with. Contaminated Land Contamination DWP 57.1 A Contamination DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects relating to contaminated land during the construction of the City Rail Link or any part of it. 1 57

4 5 6

57.2 The objective of the Contamination DWP is to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on human health which may result from the disturbance of contaminated materials during construction. 57.3 To achieve the above objective the following shall be included in the Contamination DWP and implemented as required: (a) A health and safety plan that addresses: (i) Worker safety in relation to hazardous substances; and (ii) Worker training with regard to handling hazardous substances, identifying potentially contaminated soil / material, and notification procedures for discovery of contamination; (b) Procedures for how erosion and sediment control, storm water, dust, and odour

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 65

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

control measures will manage the removal of contaminated soil / material; (c) Procedures for contaminated soil classification, management and disposal of contaminated soil / material; (d) Where any trenches/excavations during civil works are to be sealed as a result of contamination and how this is to be recorded; (e) How and which work areas are to be restricted to authorised personnel only and procedures to limit the presence of ignition sources in these areas (e.g. no smoking within or adjacent to construction area, no welding or open flames near areas with high concentrations of hydrocarbon contamination); (f) Procedures for the monitoring and management of the removal of contaminated soil / material by a suitably qualified environmental specialist; (g) How the placement of re-used contaminated soil / material will be recorded and tracked; (h) Where areas for stockpiling and storing contaminated soil / material will be established on the construction site and the procedures for managing the containment of the contaminated soil / material in these areas; (i) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which detail how the general public are to be communicated with on the management of the adverse effects relating to the removal of contaminated soil / material. Contamination Validation Report at Completion of Construction 1 58

4 5 6

58.1 At the completion of construction works a validation report will be prepared in accordance with any Ministry for the Environment guidelines and submitted to the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer documenting the management of soil and evidence of appropriate disposal. The validation report shall include a record of all analytical results, volumes, tip dockets, and any incidents or complaints and how these were addressed. The validation report shall also identify any areas which need on-going monitoring and management by the Requiring Authority.

Air Quality Air Quality DWP 59.1 An Air Quality DWP shall be prepared to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects on air quality during the construction of the City Rail Link or any part of it. 59.2 The objective of the Air Quality DWP is to detail the best practicable option to avoid dust and odour nuisance being caused by construction works and to remedy any such effects should they occur. 1 59

4 5 6

59.3 To achieve the above objective the following shall be included in the Air Quality DWP and implemented as required: (a) The procedures to be implemented for the continuous monitoring of Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) concentrations and meteorology including, but not limited to, the establishment of two monitoring sites (to the north and south of the site); (b) Identification of the sensitive locations, and the specific methods for monitoring, including trigger limits to determine whether further action (such as implementation of the mitigation measures discussed below or other mitigation measures) is required; (c) Procedures for responding to malfunctions with construction machinery or works

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 66

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

causing accidental dust discharges including, but not limited to, the requirement to remedy any malfunction within 24 hours; (d) Procedures for monitoring weather conditions and the requirement that water spray is used on soil stockpiles, any non-paved construction areas, and the wheels of trucks where dust may disperse beyond the site; (e) Procedures for establishing when the covering of trucks will be required; (f) Procedures for determining when hard surfaced areas in construction yards and active construction areas should be cleaned including, but not limited to, the requirement that such areas be cleaned whenever dust generation occurs due to traffic on these surfaces; (g) Procedures for responding to discharges of odour (including in the event of excavation of contaminated sites) including, but not limited to, the requirement to address discharge of objectionable odour by immediately ceasing the activity causing the discharge; (h) Procedures for equipment inspection (including timeframes for regular inspections), maintenance, monitoring and recording, including baghouses, pressure relief valves and high level alarms to mitigate dust emissions; (i) Procedures for, where practicable, limiting dust and odour nuisance and the methods for monitoring these procedures including Identification of contingency measures to address identified and verified adverse effects on sensitive receptors. Contingency measures may include options such as: (i) Cleaning of air filtration intakes; or (ii) Cleaning of other buildings and infrastructure; and (j) Procedures for responding to any complaints received and the timeframes for response to complaints and reporting; (k) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which detail how the communities in the vicinity of construction works are to be communicated with on the management of the adverse effects relating to air quality. Social Impact and Business Disruptions Property Management Strategy 60.1 The Requiring Authority will prepare a Property Management Strategy and shall submit the Strategy to Auckland Council within 3 months of the Designation being confirmed for confirmation that the Strategy has been prepared in accordance with this condition. 1 60

4 5 6

60.2 The purpose of the Strategy is to set out how the Requiring Authority will ensure the properties acquired for the City Rail Link are appropriately managed so they do not deteriorate and adversely affect adjoining properties and the surrounding area. The Strategy shall identify measures and methods to ensure the properties are managed in a manner that: (a) Does not significantly change the character, intensity and scale of the effects of the existing use of the land; (b) Maintains the condition of the property at that which existed at the time of purchase by the Requiring Authority; (c) Contributes to the functioning of the area within which the property is located; (d) Maintains occupancy as far as reasonably practicable; and (e) Provides confidence to occupants, adjoining property owners, and the community

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 67

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

that the properties are managed responsibly pending construction. Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP 61.1 The Requiring Authority shall prepare a Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP. The objective of the Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP is to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects arising from disruption to businesses, residents and community services/facilities so far as reasonably practicable. 61.2 To achieve this objective the Requiring Authority shall engage a suitably qualified specialist(s) to prepare a Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP to address the following specific issues: (a) How disruption to access (including pedestrian, cycle, passenger transport and service/private vehicles) for residents, community services and businesses as a result of construction activities will, so far as is reasonably practicable, be avoided, remedied or mitigated; (b) How the disruption effects that result or are likely to result in the loss of customers to businesses as a result of construction activities will, so far as is reasonably practicable, be avoided, remedied or mitigated; (c) How the loss and/or relocation of community facilities and the loss or change to catchments associated with these facilities as a result of the property acquisition process particularly to the Chinese Community Centre and Life Centre Church and the temporary loss of car parking at Hopetoun Alpha will be mitigated; and 1 61

4 5 6

(d) How loss of amenity for residents, community services and businesses as a result of construction activities will be or has been mitigated through the CEMP and other DWPs. 61.3 The Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP shall be prepared in consultation with the community, community facility operators, business owners, affected parties and affected in proximity parties to: (a) Understand client and visitor behaviour and requirements and operational requirements of community facilities and businesses; (b) Identify the scale of disruption and adverse effects likely to result to businesses, residents and community services/facilities as a result of construction of the City Rail Link; (c) Assess access and servicing requirements and in particular any special needs of residents, community facilities and businesses; and (d) To develop methods to address matters outlined in (b) and (c) above, including: (i) The measures to maximise opportunities for pedestrian and service access to businesses, residents and social services/facilities that will be maintained during construction, within the practical requirements of the Transport, Access and Parking conditions (Conditions 25 to 30) and the Transport, Access and Parking DWP; (ii) The measures to mitigate potential severance and loss of business visibility issues by way-finding and supporting signage for pedestrian detours required during construction; (iii) The measures to promote a safe environment, taking a crime prevention through environmental design approach; (iv) Other measures to assist businesses and social services/facilities to maintain client/customer accessibility, including but not limited to client/customer

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 68

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

information on temporary parking or parking options for access; (v) Other measures to assist residents, businesses and social services/facilities to provide for service delivery requirements; (vi) The process (if any) for re-establishment and promotion of normal business operation following construction; (vii) If appropriate and reasonable, requirements for temporary relocation during construction and/or assistance for relocation (including information to communities using these services and facilities to advise of relocations); and (viii) The measures to remedy and mitigate the disruption impacts to the community as a result of any closure and/or relocation of community services and facilities required by the Project. 61.4 The Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP shall include: (a) A summary of the findings and recommendations of the Social Impact Assessment report (2013); (b) A record of the consultation undertaken with the community including specific access and operational requirements of individual businesses and residents including, if relevant, consultation on the necessity for, and the feasibility of, options and requirements for temporary relocation during construction and/or assistance for relocation); (c) An implementation plan of the methods to mitigate the disruption effects (as developed in 61.3 above); (d) Reference to any site/business specific mitigation plans that exist (though these may not be included in the DWP); (e) Cross reference to detail on how the CEMP and DWPs have responded to the issues of resident, business and social service/facility accessibility and amenity; (f) Details of on-going consultation with the local community through the Community Liaison Groups to provide updates and information relating to the timing for project works and acquisition; (g) Details of best endeavours steps undertaken with regard to acquisition and/or relocation of the Chinese Community Centre and Life Centre Church under the Public Works Act 1981; and (h) The process for resolution of any disputes or complaints in relation to the management / mitigation of social impacts (including business disruption impacts). 61.5 In relation to the site at 32 Normanby Road, the Requiring Authority shall consult with sub-lessees in the presence of the landowner and head lessee when developing site/business specific mitigation plans, unless the sub-lessee(s) request otherwise. 61.6 The Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP shall be implemented and complied with for the duration of the construction of the City Rail Link and for up to 12 months following the completion of the Project if required. 61.7 Suitably qualified independent specialists for the social impact and business disruption mitigation (whose appointment shall be agreed by the Council) shall peer review the Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP pursuant to Condition 11. 61.8 The Requiring Authority shall prepare an annual report on the identification, monitoring, evaluation and management of the effects outlined in the Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP together with a summary of matters raised by the community, and how these have been responded to. The report shall be presented to the Community Liaison Groups.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 69

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Specific Design Requirements 62

62.1 The operational tunnel will avoid running under the building footprint of the property at 152 Vincent Street.

OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS Operational Rail Vibration 63.1 The Requiring Authority shall confirm that operational rail vibration and reradiated noise levels comply with the following Project Criteria at any noise or vibration sensitive receiver existing at the time of lodgement of the CRL NoR: Vibration Criteria

Building Type

Reradiated Noise Criteria (dB LASmax re: 20 µPa)

PPV (mm/s)

Commercial uses with primarily daytime use1

0.2

Residences and buildings where people normally sleep

0.15

Auditoria/Theatres1

0.1

TV/Recording Studios

0.06

Note: 1. 2.

Such as offices, businesses, churches, schools, universities and libraries. This includes Albert Street District Court.

63.2 For any noise or vibration sensitive building types that are not provided for in the table above, the upper limit for vibration and reradiated noise shall not exceed 0.3 mm/s PPV and 50 dB LASmax respectively. 63.3 For the avoidance of doubt this does not apply to the North Auckland Line and Britomart Designations. 63.4 When assessing operational rail vibration and reradiated noise, compliance with Conditions 63.1 and 63.2 shall be achieved for at least 95% of any 20 consecutive train pass-by ‘events’. Operational Rail Vibration 63A.1 The Requiring Authority shall confirm that operational rail vibration and reradiated noise levels comply with the following Project Criteria at any noise or vibration sensitive receiver existing at the time of lodgement of the CRL NoR: Building Type 63A

Reradiated Noise Criteria (dB LASmax re: 20 µPa)

Velocityᵌ (mm/s)

4 5

Vibration Criteria

Commercial uses with primarily daytime use1

0.14

Residences and buildings where people normally sleep

0.1

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 70

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Auditoria/Theatres1 TV/Recording Studios

0.1

0.045

Note: 1. Such as offices, businesses, churches, schools, universities and libraries. 2. This includes Albert Street District Court. 3. Maximum one-second root-mean-square (RMS) value with an upper frequency limit of 80 Hz. 63A.2 For any noise or vibration sensitive building types that are not provided for in the table above, the upper limit for vibration and reradiated noise shall not exceed a RMS level (1s, maximum) of 0.21 mm/s and 50 dB LASmax respectively. 63A.3 For the avoidance of doubt the Project Criteria in Conditions 63A.1 and 63A.2 do not apply to the North Auckland Line and Britomart Designations. 63A.4 When assessing operational rail vibration and reradiated noise, compliance with Conditions 63A.1 and 63A.2 shall be achieved for at least 95% of any 20 consecutive train pass-by ‘events’. The events shall be representative of the rolling stock fleet operating on the line and shall include maintenance activities, unless such maintenance activities are undertaken after 11.30pm or before 6.00am. 63A.5 Subject to Condition 66.4 in the case of MediaWorks, when assessing operational rail vibration measurement shall be made in accordance with Section 5.2.3 of BS6472-1:2008 Guide to evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings. Operational Noise – Mechanical Ventilation Plant 64.1 Operational noise from mechanical ventilation plant servicing the underground rail sections of the City Rail Link shall be measured and assessed in accordance with the following Project Criteria:

Location

Period

Auckland Central Area

7.00am to 11:00pm

11:00pm to 7:00am

7.00am to 10:00pm

10:00pm to 7:00am

2 64

dB LAeq

dB LAFmax 75

4 5 6

Auckland Isthmus Area

64.2 Measurements shall be undertaken in accordance with New Zealand Standard NZS 6801:2008 “Acoustics – Measurement of environmental sound” and assessed in accordance with New Zealand Standard NZS 6802:2008 “Acoustics - Environmental Noise”. 64.3 For the avoidance of doubt this does not apply to the North Auckland Line and Britomart Designations. 1 65

2 4

Operational Noise and Vibration Management Plan (ONVMP) 65.1 To manage the adverse effects from the maintenance and operation of the City Rail Link, the Requiring Authority shall, prior to the operation of the CRL, prepare an Operational Noise and Vibration Management Plan, (ONVMP) to the satisfaction of Auckland Council’s

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 71

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

5 6

Condition

Compliance Monitoring Manager. The objective of the ONVMP shall be to ensure that the tracks, rolling stock and associated infrastructure (including ventilation and other mechanical plant) are maintained and operated in accordance with maintenance standards as outlined in the Requiring Authority’s maintenance programme for the City Rail Link, so that operational noise and vibration levels received at noise sensitive receiver locations, and vibration levels comply with Conditions 63 and 64. . 65.2 The ONVMP shall set out procedures for: (a) The maintenance of rolling stock to minimise noise and vibration emissions including, but not limited to, the management of wheel roughness and flats, braking systems, cooling systems, suspension systems and any other significant source associated with the operation of locomotives; (b) The maintenance of tracks to minimise noise and vibration emissions, including, but not limited to, the management of curve squeal, rail roughness, joint constructions and any other significant source associated with the use of the tracks; (c) The implementation of mitigation measures associated with the operation and maintenance of the City Rail Link, for the operational life of the City Rail Link; (d) The management of noise from the operation of the line, including, but not limited to, the use of audible warning devices and acceleration / deceleration controls (where relevant); and (e) The management of noise and maintenance of noise-generating equipment from stations and associated ventilation and mechanical plant infrastructure including, but not limited to, PA systems, fans and ventilation noise and audible warning devices. 65.3 The ONVMP shall be adhered to at all times. It may be updated or amended at any time with the approval of Auckland Council’s Compliance Monitoring Manager. 65.4 For the avoidance of doubt this does not apply to the North Auckland Line and Britomart Designations.

Operational Noise and Vibration Management – MediaWorks 66.1 At least six months prior to the opening of the CRL, the Requiring Authority shall provide a report from a suitably qualified noise and vibration expert to Auckland Council’s Compliance Monitoring Manager and to MediaWorks. The report shall confirm the trackform mitigation applied to the project has been designed to ensure that operational noise and vibration will not exceed the levels as set out in Conditions 63A.1, 63A.2 and 66.5. 66.2 The Requiring Authority shall implement continuous vibration monitoring on the tunnel structure on the East Link Down Main line within 20m of the closest point of the CRL tunnel to Studio 1 to determine compliance with Conditions 63A.1 and 63A.2 during the operation of the CRL (but only for so long as MediaWorks remains located at the MediaWorks site). The monitoring regime shall: (a) Be based on measurements with an upper frequency limit of 500 Hz; Note: The upper monitored frequency band of 500Hz reflects the supplier’s permissible criteria specified for equipment operated by MediaWorks. (b) Ensure that measurement equipment and signal chain complies with the manufacturers guidelines for accuracy and calibration; (c) Capture every train pass-by on the line which may be triggered by vibration level radio frequency tag, interrupted beam or any other practicable triggering method; (d) Ensure the retention of the RMS data for every train pass-by on the line; (e) Ensure the transmission of RMS data for every train pass-by to the Requiring

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 72

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Authority at an interval not exceeding 48 hours between data uploads to enable records to be viewed and interrogated as required without requiring access to the monitoring location; (f) Ensure that the Requiring Authority, Auckland Councilâ€™s Compliance Monitoring Manager and MediaWorks are alerted to RMS values exceeding a value at the tunnel monitoring location that corresponds to 90% of the limits specified in Condition 63A.1 for TV/Recording Studios to enable the Requiring Authority to instigate preventative maintenance of tracks and rolling stock with the aim of avoiding exceedences of the noise and vibration limits at the MediaWorks building. The ONVMP required by Condition 65 shall set out the method for determining the transfer function between the tunnel monitoring location and the floor of Studio 1, and what the vibration trigger level is (based on measurements on the tunnel structure) for investigation and corrective action measures relative to Condition 66.2(f) above. The transfer function shall be accurately determined prior to the railway becoming operational using the tunnel monitoring location and the floor of Studio 1. 66.3 Conditions 63A.1, 63A.2 and 66.5 shall be complied with at the MediaWorks building for so long as MediaWorks remains located at the MediaWorks site. 66.4 Noise shall be measured in accordance with the requirements of NZS6801:2008 Acoustics - Measurement of Environmental Sound. Vibration shall be measured in accordance with the requirements of section 5.2.3 of BS6472-1:2008 Guide to evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings, except that all references to people, persons and body in that clause shall apply to equipment as well. 66.5In addition to compliance with the criteria set out in Condition 63A.1 relating to TV/Recording Studios, and for the purpose of monitoring the effects of vibration on camera shake, the vibration arising from train pass-bys shall at all times comply with a vibration limit of 1m/s2 between 5Hz and 500Hz when measured on the floor of the MediaWorks filming studios. 66.6 In the event of any exceedance of any noise or vibration in Conditions 63A.1 and 63A.2 during a Sensitive Times (as defined in Condition 35.1) measures to reduce the noise or vibration below the relevant limit in Condition 63A shall be implemented as soon as reasonably practicable. ADVICE NOTES

1 AN1

4 5 6

1 2 AN2

4 5 6

AN3

The Requiring Authority will require an Authority under the Historic Places Act 1993 to destroy, damage or modify any archaeological site. This Authority is required in advance of earthworks commencing in the area where the archaeological site is located. It is expected that there will be staged Section 12 Authority applied for to cover the earthworks programme. In the event of unanticipated archaeological sites or koiwi being uncovered the Requiring Authority shall cease activity in the vicinity until it has the relevant approvals, and consulted with the Historic Places Trust and relevant iwi interests. The Requiring Authority will need to acquire the relevant property interests in land subject to the designation before it undertakes any works on that land pursuant to the designation. That may include a formal Public Works Act 1981 land acquisition process. It is acknowledged that property rights issues are separate from resource management effects issues and that the resolution of property issues may be subject to confidentiality agreements between the Requiring Authority and the relevant landowners. Prior to construction if Network Utility Operators are carrying out works that do not require prior written consent of the Requiring Authority in accordance with condition 6 of this

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 73

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

2 4 5 6 1 2 AN4

Condition

designation, they must carry out those works in accordance with the Corridor Access Request (CAR) Process (as set out in Part 4 of the National Code of Practice for Utility Operatorsâ€™ Access to Transport Corridors 2011) where that process applies to the works being carried out. Under section 176 of the RMA no person may do anything in relation to the land subject to the designation that would prevent or hinder the Rail Link without the written approval of the Requiring Authority.

5 6 1 AN5

2 4

Some of the land is subject to existing designations. Nothing in these designation conditions negates the need for the Requiring Authority to adhere to the provisions of section 177 of the RMA.

5 Some of the land is subject to existing designations. Nothing in these designation conditions negates the need for the Requiring Authority to adhere to the provisions of section 177 of the RMA.

AN6

AN7

Modifications to Britomart Transport Centre to connect the City Rail Link tracks into the rail network are separate to this designation and are covered under the Britomart Transport designation.

AN8

Works required to connect the City Rail Link to the North Auckland Rail Line occurring within the North Auckland Rail Line designation are separate to this designation and are covered under the North Auckland Line Rail designation.

For the avoidance of doubt, the Requiring Authority shall obtain the written consent of the Minister of Corrections in accordance with section 177 of the RMA for any work authorised by the City Rail Link designation on the Mt Eden Corrections Facility site at 1 Lauder Road.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 74

Appendix One to Designation Conditions (NoR for Designations 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6) Condition 36 of this designation requires as part of the CEMP process the confirmation of where and when building condition surveys will be undertaken in relation to vibration and settlement. Note that those buildings classed in the â€œheritageâ€? category are covered under the Appendix Two below. In accordance with condition 46, at a minimum building condition surveys shall be considered for the following buildings:. No

Address

Property Known As

8-12 Albert Street

Quay West Hotel

17 Albert Street

Cohesive Technology House

22-26 Albert Street

The Stamford

74 Albert Street

Chifley Suites

76-84 Albert Street

City Gardens Apartments

103,105,107 Albert Street

Manhattan Apartments

109-125 Albert Street

Sky City - Grand Hotel & Convention Centre

106-108 Albert Street

Elliot Tower (Proposed)

128 Albert Street

Crown Plaza

103 Vincent Street

YWCA Accommodation

109 Vincent Street

The Rodney Apartments

113 Vincent Street

Winsun Heights Apartments

135 Vincent Street

Dynasty Gardens Hotel

150 Vincent Street

The City Lodge

156 Vincent Street

Eclipse Apartments

71-87 Mayoral Drive

Rendezvous Grand Hotel

29,39,41 Pitt Street

Hopetoun Delta Apartments

22-28 Beresford Square

The Beresford

259-281 Karangahape Road

Retail and Residential building

14 East Street

Residential Building

9 A-C Mercury Lane

Residential Building

18 East Street

Residential Building

153 Newton Road

Beatnik

10 Flower Street

Eden Terrace Apartments

1 Akiraho Street

Eden Oaks

21 Queen Street

Zurich House (Anzo Tower)

7 Albert Street

Retail and Office building

9-11 Albert Street

Food Alley

23-29 Albert Street

ANZ Centre

12-26 Swanson Street

Affco House Carpark

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 75

Address

Property Known As

58 Albert Street

APN NZ Complex

63 Albert Street

AMI House

65-69 Albert Street

Auckland District Court

38 Wyndham Street

Wyndham Towers

92-96 Albert Street

Former Telecom Tower

85 Albert Street

Retail and Office building

87-89 Albert Street

Albert Plaza

99 Albert Street

AA Building

135 Albert Street

ASB Building

120 Albert Street

BDO Tower

44-52 Wellesley Street West

Wellesley Centre

67-101 Vincent Street

Auckland Police Station

22 Dundonald Street

Soundcraft Ltd

3 Flower Street

TV3 Building

32 Normanby Road

Commercial Building

3 Enfield Street

Horse and Trap

101 Mount Eden Road

Hometune

1 Ngahura Street

Auckland Boxing Association

1 Queen Street

HSBC House

125 Queen Street

New World Supermarket tenancy

148 Quay Street

Tenham Investments and Body Corporate 184960

29 Customs Street West

AMP Centre

15-19 East Street

32 Akiraho Street

83 Albert Street

4 Kingston Street

6-12 Kingston Street

Bear Park Early Childhood Centre

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 76

Appendix Two to Designation Conditions (NoR for Designations 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6) Condition 41 of this designation requires as part of the CEMP process the confirmation of where and when building condition surveys will be undertaken in relation to Built Heritage (including those affected as a result of excavation). In accordance with condition 46, at a minimum building condition surveys shall be considered for the following buildings: No

Address

Property Known As

12 – 32 Customs Street

Customs House

2 Queen Street

Endeans Building

12 Queen Street

3 Albert Street

West Plaza

13 Albert Street Auckland Central

Yates Building

15 Albert Street

Link House

35 Albert Street Auckland Central

Price Buchanan Building

37 – 39 Albert Street Auckland Central

41 Albert Street

46 Albert Street

49 Albert Street Auckland Central

53 Albert Street Auckland Central

55 Albert Street

57 Albert Street

61 Albert Street Auckland Central

Shakespeare Hotel and Brewery

76 to 78 Albert Street Auckland Central

Bluestone Wall + toilets under wall

83 to 85 Albert Street Auckland Central

102 Albert Street

26, 34 – 36 Wyndham Street

Former Gas Co Building

9 – 11 Durham Street

Bluestone Store

37-43 Victoria Street West

51-53 Victoria Street West

61-65 Victoria Street West

66 Victoria Street West

London Dairy

68 Victoria Street West

J H Hannan

24 Wellesley Street West

Bledisloe House

15-31 Wellesley Street West

Former CPO - Britomart Transport Centre

New Zealand Herald

Martha’s Corner

Archibald and Sons Warehouse/ T & G Building

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 77

Address

Property Known As

42 Wellesley Street

Griffiths Holdings Building

33 Wyndham Street

Aotea Square Aotea Centre (rear section)

11 Mayoral Drive

Former Public Trust

105 Vincent Street

Auckland Chinese Presbyterian Church

133 Vincent Street

Juliette’s

53 Pitt Street

Former Central Ambulance Station

59 Pitt

65 Pitt Street

70 – 74 Pitt Street

The Chatham

78 Pitt Street Pitt Street

Wesleyan Church

78 Pitt Street

Wesleyan Bicentennial Hall

1 Beresford Square Auckland Central

Former Pitt Street Fire Station

16 – 18 Beresford Square

211-235 Karangahape Road

238 Karangahape Road

George Court Building

1 Cross Street

George Court Factory Building

243 Karangahape Road

Naval and Family Hotel

246-254 Karangahape Road

Hallenstein Brothers Building

251 – 253 Karangahape Road

256 Karangahape Road

257 Karangahape Road

258-266 Karangahape Road

268 Karangahape Road

259-261 Karangahape Road

270 Karangahape Road

283 Karangahape Road

Samoa House

9 Mercury Lane

Mercury Theatre former Kings Theatre

151 Newton Rd

Retail/Recording Studio

206-208 Symonds Street

210 Symonds Street Retail

Pitt Street Buildings (O’Malley’s Corner)

Mercury Theatre entrance - Norman Ng Building

Cheapskates/Penny Farthing Bike Shop French Café

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 78

Address

Property Known As

215 Symonds Street

Edinburgh Castle Building

221 Symonds Street

224 Symonds Street

227 Symonds Street

231 Symonds Street Retail

233 Symonds Street

235 Symonds Street

237 Symonds Street

239-241 Symonds Street

243 Symonds Street

245 Symonds Street

249 Symonds Street

253 Symonds Street

1-13 Mt Eden Road

15-17 Mt Eden Road

21 New North Road

14 New North Road

Villa Dalmacija

St Patrick’s Square 43 Wyndham Street

St Patrick’s Cathedral

59 Alex Evans Street

St Benedict’s Church

1 – 9 St Benedicts Street

St Benedict's Presbytery

6 St Benedicts Street

Residential

43 Wyndham Street & Hobson Street

St Patrick’s Presbytery

Beresford Square

Forrester’s Hall

Former Post Office

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 79

Proposed Draft Notice of Requirement Requiring Authority Designation Conditions – NoR for Designation 3 Condition Number

NoR Design ation Applies to

Condition

1.1 The City Rail Link Project (City Rail Designation 3) shall be undertaken in general accordance with the following: (a) The information provided by the Requiring Authority in the Notice of Requirement dated 23 August 2012 and supporting documents being: (i) Assessment of Environmental Effects report (contained in Volume 2 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated 15 August 2012 Rev B); (ii) Supporting environmental assessment reports (contained in Volume 3 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated August 2012); (iii) The Concept Design Report (contained in Volume 2 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated 13 August 2012 Rev 3); (iv) Plan sets: (i) Land requirement plans (contained in Volume 1 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated 15 August 2012); 1

(ii) Plans contained in the Concept Design Report Appendices (contained in Volume 3 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated 13 August 2012 Rev 3). (b) Except as modified by the following alterations: (i) Assessment of Environmental Effects (Reference CRL-SYW-RME-000-RPT0065, Design and Construction Memorandum (Reference CRL-SYW-RME-000MEM-0002) and Drawings CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-0120 to 0124 and 0128 to 0132 ‘Strata / Sub-Strata Alteration (CRL Designation 2 and 3). (ii) Assessment of Environmental Effects (Reference CRL-MTE-RME- 000-RPT0060 Revision 7 dated 9/11/16), Design and Construction Memorandum (Reference CRL-MTE-RME-000-MEM-0001 dated 9/11/16) and Drawing CRLSYW-RME-000-DRG-0133 Revision 1 dated 26/7/17) (‘Mt Eden Station Alteration’ - CRL Designation 3 and 6). 1.2 Where there is inconsistency between the documents listed above and these conditions, these conditions shall prevail.

2.1 In accordance with section 184(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the RMA), this designation shall lapse if not given effect to within 10 years from the date on which it is confirmed. 3.1 The Requiring Authority shall, as soon as reasonably practicable, but no later than at completion of detailed design:

(a) Review the area and volume of land of NoR Designation 3 required to protect the structural integrity of the two tunnels (including the relevant considerations at Condition 5.5); (b) Identify any areas of designated land that are no longer necessary to protect the structural integrity, safety or operation of the two tunnels; and (c) Then give notice in accordance with Section 182 of the RMA for the removal of those parts of the designation identified in (b) above.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 80

Condition Number

NoR Design ation Applies to

Condition

4.1 Under s 176(1)(b) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) no person may do anything in relation to the designated land that would prevent or hinder the City Rail Link, without the prior written consent of the Requiring Authority. 4.2 In the periods pre, during and post construction of the City Rail Link, the following activities undertaken by Network Utility Operators will not prevent or hinder the City Rail Link, and can be undertaken without seeking the Requiring Authorityâ€™s written approval under section 176(1)(b) of the RMA: (a) Maintenance and urgent repair works of existing Network Utilities; 4

(b) Minor renewal works to existing Network Utilities necessary for the on-going provision or security of supply of Network Utility Operations; (c) Minor works such as new property service connections; (d) Upgrades to existing Network Utilities within the same or similar location with the same or similar effects on the City Rail Link designation. 4.3 For the avoidance of doubt, in this condition an â€œexisting Network Utilityâ€? includes infrastructure operated by a Network Utility Operator which was: (a) In place at the time the notice of requirement for the City Rail Link was served on Auckland Council (23 August 2012); or (b) Undertaken in accordance with this condition or section 176(1)(b) RMA process. 5.1 This designation does not authorise any CRL works but restricts development from proceeding without the approval of the Requiring Authority where that development would result in an adverse effect on the CRL in terms of safety, operation or construction. 5.2 The Requiring Authority will work with developers in a collaborative manner and may require alterations or changes to development proposals for the purpose in 5.1. 5.3 The Requiring Authority may require alterations or changes to any proposal for development including but not limited to construction of basements and foundations where such works disturb the ground in a way that is likely to result in loading changes and result in deformations or produce other risks to the integrity of the CRL structures.

5.4 Reasons shall be given by the Requiring Authority for these changes to demonstrate they are reasonably necessary to provide for safety, construction or operation of the CRL, 5.5 Any proposal for physical works or activities within the designation shall be provided to the Requiring Authority and will be assessed on the following: (a) Building height, size, mass and proximity to the CRL structures; (b) Foundation and basement designs; (c) Geotechnical conditions; (d) Separation between the CRL structures and the proposed development; (e) Nature of the activities including methods and staging of construction; (f) The predicted loading change on the CRL structures resulting from the development; and (g) Any other relevant information necessary to determine the likelihood and extent of any adverse effect that may occur as a result of the proposed development.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 81

Condition Number

NoR Design ation Applies to

Condition

These factors will also be relevant considerations in the drawback of the designation as provided for in Condition 3.1. 5.6 That assessment shall be peer reviewed by an independent certified engineer, paid for by the Requiring Authority, and the findings supplied to the landowner/ developer and the Auckland Council for information. Advice Notes relating to the Designation

AN 1

AN 2

This is a designation for protection purposes only. It protects the City Rail Link infrastructure to be constructed, operated and maintained in a separate designation located beneath this designation. The use of the land within this designation is subject to the agreement of the Requiring Authority to protect the subterranean works below. Any person proposing to undertake physical works within this designation is required to contact the Requiring Authority and obtain its approval in accordance with provisions set out in section 176(1)(b) of the Resource Management Act 1991.

If Network Utility Operators are carrying out works that do not require prior written consent of the Requiring Authority in accordance with condition 6 of this designation, they must carry out those works in accordance with the Corridor Access Request (CAR) Process (as set out in Part 4 of the National Code of Practice for Utility Operatorsâ€™ Access to Transport Corridors 2011) where that process applies to the works being carried out.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 82

Diagram 1

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 83

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan

Appendix D:

Page 29

Staging Plans

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

STAGE 1 - Q1 2020

PITT ST

CSA/SITE FACILITIES SETUP: 1. OFFICE AND WELFARE UNITS. 2. SITE SERVICES AND CONNECTIONS (POTABLE WATER, WASTEWATER, POWER, COMMUNICATIONS). 3. STORAGE CONTAINERS. 4. SET UP ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS. 5. SET UP WASTE MANAGEMENT AND COVERED SPOIL AREAS.

AH A

PE R

TREE REMOVAL

SF OR D

CAFE & TOILET DEMOLITION

TREE REMOVAL SEQUENCE 1. SET-UP FENCING 2. TRIM BRANCHES 3. MOBILISE EXCAVATOR 4. CUT TREE TRUNK 5. EXCAVATE STUMP 6. CLEAN-UP SURROUNDINGS

BE Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-17 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_BERESFORD R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

STORAGE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

KAR ANG

TREE REMOVAL PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (CSA): MEDIUM EXCAVATOR (8-14T) CRANE TRUCK CONCRETE SAWS, JACK-HAMMERS, HAMMER-DRILLS WELDING AND CUTTING EQUIPMENT ELEVATED WORK PLATFORM TELEHANDLER/FORKLIFT CONTAINERS PUMP, GENERATORS, COMPRESSOR LARGE SKIP BINS

LOCALISED TREE REMOVAL

DEMOLITION SEQUENCE 1. SET-UP FENCING WITH NOISE MATS 2. DISMANTLE ROOF FRAME & GLASS 3. DEMOLISH TOILET WITH EXCAVATOR 4. CART AWAY SPOIL 5. CLEAN-UP SURROUNDINGS

PLANT & EQUIPMENT 1. CRANE TRUCK 2. ELEVATED WORK PLATFORM 3. CONCRETE SAW & CHAIN SAW 4. MEDIUM EXCAVATOR 8-25T 5. SAMLL EXCAVATOR 3-8T 6. HYDRO EXCAVATION TRUCK 7. 6 WHEEL TRUCK 8. PLATE COMPACTOR 9. SMALL ROLLER COMPACTOR 3T 10. CONCRETE BREAKER

CSA ACCESS

WATER TREATMENT AND COVERED SPOIL AREAS

CLIENT:

TREE REMOVAL WORK AREA

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS SHEET TITLE

PARKING BAYS REMOVED

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS BERESFORD SQUARE STAGE 1

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES DESIGNATION BOUNDARY COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CREATOR ID :

STATION OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD--CON-LKA-SKE-EW BER

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

STAGE 2 - JAN 2020 - FEB 2020

PITT ST

RELOCATION CONDUCTED WITHIN THIS FOOTPRINT, ALLOWING ONE TRAFFIC LANE FLOW IN EACH DIRECTION

PE R D

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-17 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_BERESFORD R0.DWG

SQ OR D BE RE SF

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

STORAGE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

WATER TREATMENT AND COVERED SPOIL AREAS

CSA ACCESS

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT 1. BERESFORD SQUARE CLOSED TO THROUGH TRAFFIC 2. ON STREET PARKING CLOSED 3. ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTIES MAINTAINED

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

CLIENT:

KAR ANG

AHA

PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (CSA): MEDIUM EXCAVATOR (8-14T) CRANE TRUCK CONCRETE SAWS, JACK-HAMMERS, HAMMER-DRILLS WELDING AND CUTTING EQUIPMENT ELEVATED WORK PLATFORM TELEHANDLER/FORKLIFT CONTAINERS PUMP, GENERATORS, COMPRESSOR LARGE SKIP BINS

WASTEWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL STORMWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH SEQUENCE 2m (W) x 1.5m (D) x 50m (L) 1. MARK OUT TRENCH 2. SAW CUT TRENCH 3. BREAK OFF TOP SURFACE WITH 3-5T EXCAVATOR 4. EXCAVATE TRENCH, COMBINATION OF HYDROVAC & EXCAVATOR 5. LAY BEDDING MATERIAL AT BASE OF TRENCH 6. INSTALL DUCTING/PIPEWORK 7. BACKFILL TRENCH 8. REINSTATE SURFACE

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS SHEET TITLE

WORK AREA

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS BERESFORD SQUARE STAGE 2

PARKING BAYS REMOVED PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CREATOR ID :

DESIGNATION BOUNDARY STATION OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD--CON-LKA-SKE-EW BER

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

STAGE 3 - Q1 - Q2 2020 MANHOLE LOCATION WW LAUNCH DRILL PIT 4x4m - APPROX 5.5m DEEP

PITT ST

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH 2m (W) x 1.5m (D) x 10m (L) MANHOLE LOCATION

STAGED CONNECTIONS ACROSS BERESFORD SQUARE

SF OR D

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-17) Last Plotted: 2019-09-20 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_BERESFORD R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

WW RECEIVE DRILL PIT 3x3m - APPROX 4m DEEP STORAGE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

WATER TREATMENT AND COVERED SPOIL AREAS

CLIENT:

CSA ACCESS

SW RECEIVE DRILL PIT 3x3m - APPROX 3m DEEP TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT 1. BERESFORD SQUARE CLOSED TO THROUGH TRAFFIC 2. ON STREET PARKING CLOSED 3. ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTIES MAINTAINED

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH WASTEWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL STORMWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL

DIRECTIONAL DRILL SEQUENCE - WASTEWATER & STORMWATER 4 PITS AS INDICATED, APPROX 100m DRILL LENGTH. 1. PREPARE DRILL LAUNCH AREA ON PITT ST (4x4m PIT) 2. SET-UP DRILL RIG 3. DRILL FROM PITT ST DOWN BERESFORD SQUARE 4. PULL PIPE BACK UP BERESFORD SQUARE PIT TOWARDS PITT ST PIT 5. EXCAVATE COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH TO MIDDLE OF ROAD TO CONNECT TO EXISTING STORMWATER & WASTEWATER 6. INSTALL MANHOLES AT DRILL PITS & INDICATED LOCATIONS. CONNECT TO NEW PIPES 7. BACKFILL EXCAVATED AREAS 8. REINSTATE SURFACE COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH SEQUENCE 2m (W) x 1.5m (D) x 80m (L) 1. MARK OUT TRENCH 2. PROTECT BUILDING FRONTAGES WHERE REQUIRED 3. SAW CUT TRENCH 4. BREAK OFF TOP SURFACE WITH 3-5T EXCAVATOR 5. EXCAVATE TRENCH, COMBINATION OF HYDROVAC & EXCAVATOR 6. LAY BEDDING MATERIAL AT BASE OF TRENCH 7. INSTALL DUCTING/PIPEWORK 8. BACKFILL TRENCH 9. REINSTATE SURFACE PLANT & EQUIPMENT 1. CRANE TRUCK 2. ELEVATED WORK PLATFORM 3. CONCRETE SAW & CHAIN SAW 4. MEDIUM EXCAVATOR 8-25T 5. SAMLL EXCAVATOR 3-8T 6. HYDRO EXCAVATION TRUCK 7. 6 WHEEL TRUCK 8. PLATE COMPACTOR 9. SMALL ROLLER COMPACTOR 3T 10. CONCRETE BREAKER

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

SHEET TITLE

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS BERESFORD SQUARE STAGE 3

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES DESIGNATION BOUNDARY CREATOR ID :

STATION OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS

WORK AREA

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

KAR ANG AHA PE R D

SW LAUNCH DRILL PIT 4x4m - APPROX 4m DEEP

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD--CON-LKA-SKE-EW BER

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

STAGE 4 - Q1 - Q2 2020 NEW SW AND WW MANHOLES

PITT ST

TRENCH FOR DRY SERVICES

SF OR D

STAGED CONNECTIONS ACROSS BERESFORD SQUARE

KAR ANG AHA PE R

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO PROPERTIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES

STAGED COMBINED TRENCH FOR SW & WW 2m (W) x 4m (D) x 10m (L)

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-17) Last Plotted: 2019-09-20 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_BERESFORD R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

STORAGE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

WATER TREATMENT AND COVERED SPOIL AREAS

CSA ACCESS

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT 1. BERESFORD SQUARE CLOSED TO THROUGH TRAFFIC 2. ON STREET PARKING CLOSED 3. ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTIES MAINTAINED

CLIENT:

NEW SW AND WW MANHOLES

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH SEQUENCE 2m (W) x 1.5m (D) x 100m (L) 1. MARK OUT TRENCH 2. PROTECT BUILDING FRONTAGES WHERE REQUIRED 3. SAW CUT TRENCH 4. BREAK OFF TOP SURFACE WITH 3-5T EXCAVATOR 5. EXCAVATE TRENCH, COMBINATION OF HYDROVAC & EXCAVATOR 6. LAY BEDDING MATERIAL AT BASE OF TRENCH 7. INSTALL DUCTING/PIPEWORK 8. INSTALL MANHOLES AT DRILL PITS & INDICATED LOCATIONS. 9. CONNECT PIPEWORK TO MANHOLES 10. BACKFILL TRENCH 11. REINSTATE SURFACE

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS

ISSUE/REVISION

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH WORK AREA

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS SHEET TITLE

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS BERESFORD SQUARE STAGE 4

DESIGNATION BOUNDARY STATION OUTLINE COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CREATOR ID :

PROJECT NAME

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD--CON-LKA-SKE-EW BER

KEY PLAN

CROS S

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

STAGE 1 - Q4 2019

ANE

L CURY R E M

CESS

CSA AC

A ST

CESS

CANAD

CSA AC

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH SEQUENCE - WASTEWATER, STORMWATER & POTABLE WATER 2M (W) X 3-5M (D) X 20M (L) 1. MARK OUT TRENCH 2. PROTECT BUILDING FRONTAGES WHERE REQUIRED 3. SAW CUT TRENCH 4. BREAK OFF TOP SURFACE WITH 3-5T EXCAVATOR 5. EXCAVATE TRENCH, COMBINATION OF HYDROVAC & EXCAVATOR 6. INSTALL TRENCH PROTECTION/SHORING WHERE REQUIRED 7. LAY BEDDING MATERIAL AT BASE OF TRENCH 8. INSTALL DUCTING/PIPEWORK/MANHOLES 9. BACKFILL TRENCH 10. REINSTATE SURFACE

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-16 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_MERCURY R0.DWG

PLANT & EQUIPMENT 1. CONCRETE SAW 2. MEDIUM/LARGE EXCAVATOR 8-25T 3. SAMLL EXCAVATOR 3-8T 4. HYDRO EXCAVATION TRUCK 5. 6 WHEEL TRUCK 6. PLATE COMPACTOR 7. SMALL ROLLER COMPACTOR 3T 8. CONCRETE BREAKER 9. SHEET PILES/TRENCH BOX

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

DEMOLITION WORKS AREA SUBJECT TO CONFIRMED OUTLINE PLAN 'OPW60339200'

NMENTAL STORAGE, ENVIRO AREAS COVERED SPOIL CONTROLS AND

CESS

CSA AC

CLIENT:

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH PARKING BAYS REMOVED

ST EAST

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS SHEET TITLE

WORK AREA

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS MERCURY LANE STAGE 1

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES DESIGNATION BOUNDARY COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CREATOR ID :

STATION/TEMPORARY SHAFT OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW MERCURY

KEY PLAN

RECEIVE DRILL PIT 3x3m APPROX 5m DEEP

ST DIRECTIONAL DRILL, STORMWATER RELOCATION

CROS S

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

STAGE 1A - Q4 2019

URY MERC

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH LAUNCH DRILL PIT 4x4m APPROX 5m DEEP

LANE

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

CSA AC

CESS

CANAD

A ST

CSA AC LAUNCH DRILL PIT 4x4m APPROX 5m DEEP

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH SEQUENCE - WASTEWATER & POTABLE WATER 2m (W) x 1.5m (D) x 20m (L) 1. MARK OUT TRENCH 2. PROTECT BUILDING FRONTAGES WHERE REQUIRED 3. SAW CUT TRENCH 4. BREAK OFF TOP SURFACE WITH 3-5T EXCAVATOR 5. EXCAVATE TRENCH, COMBINATION OF HYDROVAC & EXCAVATOR 6. INSTALL TRENCH PROTECTION/SHORING WHERE REQUIRED 7. LAY BEDDING MATERIAL AT BASE OF TRENCH 8. INSTALL DUCTING/PIPEWORK/MANHOLES 9. BACKFILL TRENCH 10. REINSTATE SURFACE

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-16 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_MERCURY R0.DWG

DIRECTIONAL DRILL SEQUENCE - STORMWATER 3 PITS AS INDICATED, APPROX 50m DRILL LENGTH 1. PREPARE DRILL LAUNCH AREAS ON MERCURY LANE 2. SET-UP DRILL RIG 3. DRILL FROM MERCURY LANE TOWARDS CROSS ST FROM BOTH LOCATIONS 4. PULL PIPE THROUGH FROM CROSS ST TO MERCURY LANE 5. INSTALL MANHOLES OVER NEW PIPE AT PIT LOCATIONS 6. BACKFILL EXCAVATED AREAS 7. REINSTATE SURFACE PLANT & EQUIPMENT 1. CONCRETE SAW 2. MEDIUM/LARGE EXCAVATOR 8-25T 3. SAMLL EXCAVATOR 3-8T 4. HYDRO EXCAVATION TRUCK 5. 6 WHEEL TRUCK 6. PLATE COMPACTOR 7. SMALL ROLLER COMPACTOR 3T 8. CONCRETE BREAKER 9. SHEET PILES/TRENCH BOX 10. DRILL RIG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

DEMOLITION WORKS AREA SUBJECT TO CONFIRMED OUTLINE PLAN 'OPW60339200'

NMENTAL STORAGE, ENVIRO EAS VERED SPOIL AR CO D AN LS CONTRO

S EAST

CESS CSA AC

CLIENT:

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH STORMWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

SHEET TITLE

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS MERCURY LANE STAGE 1A

WORK AREA PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES CREATOR ID :

DESIGNATION BOUNDARY STATION/TEMPORARY SHAFT OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS

PARKING BAYS REMOVED

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CESS

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW MERCURY

KEY PLAN

CROS S

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

STAGE 2 - Q4 2019 - Q1 2020

STAGED WORKS TO ALLOW SINGLE LANE AT ALL TIMES

Y LA RCUR

CSA AC

A ST

CESS

CANAD

CSA AC

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH SEQUENCE - WASTEWATER, STORMWATER & POTABLE WATER 2M (W) X 3-5M (D) X 80M (L) 1. MARK OUT TRENCH 2. PROTECT BUILDING FRONTAGES WHERE REQUIRED 3. SAW CUT TRENCH 4. BREAK OFF TOP SURFACE WITH 3-5T EXCAVATOR 5. EXCAVATE TRENCH, COMBINATION OF HYDROVAC & EXCAVATOR 6. INSTALL TRENCH PROTECTION/SHORING 7. LAY BEDDING MATERIAL AT BASE OF TRENCH 8. INSTALL DUCTING/PIPEWORK/MANHOLES 9. BACKFILL TRENCH 10. REINSTATE SURFACE

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-16 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_MERCURY R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

DEMOLITION WORKS AREA SUBJECT TO CONFIRMED OUTLINE PLAN 'OPW60339200'

NMENTAL STORAGE, ENVIRO AREAS COVERED SPOIL CONTROLS AND

S EAST

CESS CSA AC

CLIENT:

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH PARKING BAYS REMOVED

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

SHEET TITLE

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS MERCURY LANE STAGE 2

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES DESIGNATION BOUNDARY CREATOR ID :

STATION/TEMPORARY SHAFT OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS

WORK AREA

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CESS

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW MERCURY

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan

Appendix E:

Page 30

Construction Environmental Management Plan

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

City Rail Link Karangahape Station Early Works Construction Environmental Management Plan

CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800001

Revision: Final Date: October 2019

Page 1

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Karangahape Station Early Works Construction Environmental Management Plan CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800001

This document is uncontrolled when printed. This document should be printed in colour

Revision Status Revision

Date

Version details

Prepared By

Approved By

26/9/19

Draft for Auckland Council and Independent Peer Review

Caroline Secretin

Peter Roan

21/10/19

Final for Auckland Council certification

Caroline Secretin

Peter Roan

Approval Status Name/Title

Signature

Date

Prepared by:

Caroline Secretin Principal Environmental Scientist

21/10/2019

Reviewed by:

Fiona Davies Associate Director - Environment

21/10/2019

Approved by:

Peter Roan Planning and Approvals Manager

21/10/2019

Page 2

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Table of contents Glossary ............................................................................................................. 7 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 10 1.1

Karangahape Station ....................................................................................................... 10

1.2

Purpose of the CEMP ....................................................................................................... 11

1.3

CEMP Structure ............................................................................................................... 11

1.4

Environmental Sub-Plans................................................................................................. 12

1.5

Feedback on CEMP and Sub-Plans ................................................................................... 14

1.6

Mana Whenua ................................................................................................................. 14

1.7

Sustainability ................................................................................................................... 15

1.7.1.

Infrastructure Sustainability...................................................................................... 15

1.7.2.

ISCA IS Rating Scheme .............................................................................................. 15

1.8

Relevant Conditions ........................................................................................................ 16

1.8.1.

Designation Conditions ............................................................................................. 16

1.8.2.

Resource Consent Conditions ................................................................................... 24

1.9

CEMP Reviews and updates............................................................................................. 30

2. Karangahape Station Early Works............................................................. 31 2.1

Overview of Works .......................................................................................................... 31

2.2

Construction Methodology .............................................................................................. 31

2.2.1.

Construction Staging ................................................................................................ 31

2.2.2.

Beresford Square and Pitt Street .............................................................................. 33

2.2.3.

Mercury Lane ........................................................................................................... 37

2.3

Programme ...................................................................................................................... 40

2.4

Hours of work .................................................................................................................. 40

2.5

Site layout and management........................................................................................... 40

2.6

Site Security, safety and public viewing ........................................................................... 42

2.6.1. 2.7

Crime Prevention through Environmental Design ..................................................... 42

Site Housekeeping ........................................................................................................... 43

2.7.1.

Graffiti ...................................................................................................................... 43

2.7.2.

Litter ........................................................................................................................ 43

2.8

Returning the site to public use ....................................................................................... 43

3. Social and Environmental Management ................................................... 44 3.1 Page 3

Construction Activities and Associated Environmental Receivers ................................... 44

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan 3.2

Environmental Risk Register ............................................................................................ 46

3.3

Cumulative Effects ........................................................................................................... 46

3.4

Legislative and Other Requirements................................................................................ 46

3.4.1.

National Legal Requirements and Policies ................................................................. 46

3.4.2.

Legislation, Standards and Guidelines relating to Environmental Aspects ................. 47

4. Implementation and Operation ................................................................ 49 4.1

Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................................................... 49

4.1.1.

Overview and Responsibility for this CEMP ............................................................... 49

4.1.2.

Specific Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................................ 49

4.2

Training and Induction..................................................................................................... 52

4.2.1.

Induction Training .................................................................................................... 52

4.2.2.

Tool Box Talks........................................................................................................... 52

4.2.3.

Pre-Start meetings.................................................................................................... 53

5. Environmental Management .................................................................... 54 5.1

Network Utilities ............................................................................................................. 54

5.1.1.

Provision of Drawings to Network Utility Operators .................................................. 55

5.2

Social Impact and Business Disruption ............................................................................ 55

5.3

Communication and Consultation ................................................................................... 56

5.4

Erosion and Sediment Control ......................................................................................... 57

5.5

Air Quality ....................................................................................................................... 58

5.6

Trees and Vegetation ...................................................................................................... 59

5.7

Transport, Access and Parking ......................................................................................... 60

5.8

Construction Noise and Vibration.................................................................................... 62

5.9

Lighting Spill and Glare .................................................................................................... 63

5.10 Historic Character ............................................................................................................ 63 5.10.1.

Built Heritage ........................................................................................................... 63

5.10.2.

Archaeology ............................................................................................................. 64

5.11 Urban Design ................................................................................................................... 66 5.12 Contaminated Soils.......................................................................................................... 66 5.13 Groundwater and Settlement.......................................................................................... 67 5.14 Building Condition Surveys .............................................................................................. 68 5.15 Hazardous Substances ..................................................................................................... 69 5.16 Industrial and Trade Activities ......................................................................................... 70 5.17 Waste Management ........................................................................................................ 70 5.18 Energy Use ....................................................................................................................... 71 Page 4

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan 5.19 Water use ........................................................................................................................ 71 5.20 Material use .................................................................................................................... 72 5.21 Emergency and Incident Response .................................................................................. 72 5.21.1.

Emergency Response Plan ........................................................................................ 72

5.21.2.

Incident Response .................................................................................................... 73

5.21.3.

Spill Response .......................................................................................................... 74

5.21.4.

Recording and Reporting of Incidents ....................................................................... 74

5.21.5.

Complaint Process .................................................................................................... 74

6. Monitoring and Review............................................................................. 76 6.1

Environmental Monitoring .............................................................................................. 76

6.1.1.

Collaborative Working .............................................................................................. 76

6.1.2.

Collaborative Meeting .............................................................................................. 77

6.2

Environmental Inspections .............................................................................................. 77

6.3

Environmental Auditing................................................................................................... 77

6.4

Corrective and Preventive Action .................................................................................... 77

6.5

Environmental Reporting ................................................................................................ 78

6.6

Document Control ........................................................................................................... 78

6.7

CEMP Review ................................................................................................................... 78

6.7.1.

Management Review ................................................................................................ 78

6.7.2.

Review Approval Process .......................................................................................... 79

Appendix A: ISCA Requirements ..................................................................... 81 Appendix B: CEMP Staging Drawings .............................................................. 88 Appendix C: Designation Conditions ............................................................... 89 Appendix D: Resource Consent Conditions ..................................................... 90 Appendix E: Consultation Records .................................................................. 91 Appendix F: Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan...... 102 Appendix G: Communication and Consultation Plan .................................... 103 Appendix H: Erosion and Sediment Control Plan .......................................... 104 Appendix I: Air Quality Delivery Work Plan .................................................. 105 Appendix J: Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan ................................. 106 Appendix K: Transport, Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan .................. 107 Appendix L: Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan ............. 108 Page 5

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Appendix M: Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage) ........... 109 Appendix N: Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology).............. 110 Appendix O: Contamination Delivery Work Plan .......................................... 111 Appendix P: Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan 112 Appendix Q: Building Condition Surveys ...................................................... 113 Appendix R: Emergency Spill Response Plan ................................................ 115

Page 6

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Glossary Term

Definition

Auckland Council

AECOM

AECOM New Zealand Limited

AEE

Assessment of Environmental Effects

AEP

Annual exceedance probability

ANZECC (2000)

Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality (2000)

AQ DWP

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan, also Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP)

AUP(OP)

Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part)

BCS

Building Condition Survey

bgl

below ground level

BPO

Best Practicable Option

CCP

Communication and Consultation Plan

CDWP

Contamination Delivery Work Plan, also refers to Contaminated Soils Management Plan

CEMP

Construction Environmental Management Plan

CEP

Construction Execution Procedure

CLG (or CBLG)

Community (Business) Liaison Groups

CNV DWP

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Communication and Consultation Manager

Responsible for notifying residents of works occurring within the near vicinity and managing mitigation as required; primary contact for project related complaints and enquiries.

Construction Contractor

Also referred to as Link Alliance

CPTED

Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design

CRL

City Rail Link

CRLL

City Rail Link Limited

CSA

Construction Support Area

CWD

Clean Water Diversion Bunds

A unit of measurement on a logarithmic scale which describes the magnitude of sound pressure with respect to a reference value (20ÂľPa)

DBH

Tree Diameter at Breast Height

DRI

Dust Risk Index

DRP

Development Response Plan

DWD

Dirty water diversion

DWP

Delivery Work Plan

Early works

Refer to the works being undertaken prior to the main works. Detail of these works is provided in section 2 of this CEMP.

Page 7

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Term

Definition Sections of the early works refer to both Beresford Square / Pitt Street and Mercury Lane early works. Stages refer to the construction stages at both sections of the early works.

ECBF

East Coast Bays Formation

ERP

Emergency Response Plan

ESCP (or ESCMP)

Erosion and Sediment Control (Management) Plan

ESCM

Erosion and Sediment Control Measures

ESM

Environment and Sustainability Manager

ESRP

Emergency Spill Response Plan

GD05

Auckland Council, Erosion and Sediment Control, Guidelines for Land Disturbing Activities in the Auckland Region, Guideline Document 005, 2016

GHG

Greenhouse Gas

GSMCP

Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan

H&S

Health and Safety

HC DWP

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan

HHA

Historic Heritage Area

HNZPT

Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga

HNZPTA

Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act

IAP2

International Association for Public Participation

IPRP

Independent Peer Review Panel

Infrastructure Sustainability

ISCA

Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia

ITA EMP

Industrial Trade Activity Environmental Management Plan

Link Alliance

Construction Contractor

Main construction works

These works relate to the construction of the station and mined tunnels for the rail tracks

MfE

Ministry for the Environment

Management Plan

Not applicable

NES

National Environmental Standard

NAL

North Auckland Rail Line

NUO

Network Utility Operators

NZTA

New Zealand Transport Agency

PADWP

Public Art Delivery Work Plan

Permit to Notify (PTN)

Permit to Notify will be used to facilitate internal approvals for works that are likely to have an impact on the adjacent community (refer to CCP for further detail).

Page 8

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Term

Definition

RMA

Resource Management Act 1991

SIBD DWP

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Sediment Retention

SSCNMP

Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan

SSCNVMP

Site Specific Construction Noise Vibration Management Plan

SSCVMP

Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plan

SDS (or MSDS)

(Material) Safety Data Sheet

Sub-plans, suite of plans, DWP, MPs

Referring to sub-plans throughout the documents. These plans include all Delivery Work Plans (DWP) and Management Plans (MP) which are supporting documents to this CEMP. All DWP/MPs are listed in Section 1.4 of this CEMP.

TAP DWP

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

Tree Protection Zone

A Tree Protection Zone considers root and crown area of the tree that would need to remain isolated from construction disturbance to maintain tree health. The height of the Tree Protection Zone is dictated by the height of the tree and the width (or radius) around the tree is calculated by multiplying the treeâ€™s diameter at breast height (DBH) by 12.

TSP

Total Suspended Particulate

TV DWP

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

UD DWP

Urban Design Delivery Work Plan

WARRMP

Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Management Plan

Page 9

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

1. Introduction The City Rail Link (CRL) project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line in the vicinity of Mt Eden station. The CRL involves the construction of two new underground stations at Aotea and Karangahape, and a new surface station at Mt Eden including redeveloping the North Auckland Line (NAL) platform (refer to Figure 1-1). The design and construction of the CRL infrastructure between the Aotea and Mt Eden Stations is being delivered by the Link Alliance.

Figure 1-1: CRL Route and Location

This CEMP has been prepared in relation to construction of the new Karangahape Station (the Station).

1.1

Karangahape Station

The Karangahape Station consists of two entrances, one at Beresford Square / Pitt Street and the other at Mercury Lane, linked together by platforms with two mined tunnels approximately 32m below Pitt Street. The Karangahape Station will also comprise equipment rooms, ventilation systems and emergency egress at both Mercury Lane and Beresford Square / Pitt Street. Given the nature and scale of the Karangahape Station construction, works will be undertaken in a staged manner, involving:   

Early works (demolition, network utility relocation and site establishment works) – to be undertaken from October 2019 through to early 2020; Main construction works (construction of the station and mined tunnels for the rail tracks) – to be undertaken from early 2020 through to late 2023; and Public realm reinstatement – likely to be undertaken from late 2022 to late 2024.

Further detail on the construction works is provided in section 2.2 of this CEMP. Page 10

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan Development of this CEMP will be undertaken in stages to reflect the staged construction approach. This CEMP addresses the Karangahape Station early works, described in detail in section 2. CEMPs will be prepared in the future to include the main construction activities and public realm reinstatement.

1.2

Purpose of the CEMP

The purpose and objective of this CEMP is to outline how the Karangahape Station early works will be carried out and managed to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on the environment (including cumulative effects) as far as is reasonably practical, in accordance with the CRL designation and the Aotea to North Auckland Line (A2N) consent conditions. The designation and resource consent conditions also require the preparation of a suite of Delivery Works Plans (DWPs) and Management Plans (MPs) (the ‘sub-plans’), which set out detailed methods for avoiding, remedying or mitigating adverse effects associated with the works. The CEMP and sub-plans (refer to section 1.4) will be implemented throughout the entire works period and will be reviewed and updated as necessary. Overall, implementation of this CEMP will ensure:    

Appropriate management of potential adverse environmental effects associated with the early works; Compliance with the conditions of the CRL designation and resource consent; Compliance with environmental legislation; and Achievement of the project’s environmental and sustainability objectives.

The CEMP and sub-plans will be reviewed at least annually or as a result of a material change to the project, or to address unforeseen adverse effects arising from construction or unresolved complaints.

1.3

CEMP Structure

The CEMP is structured as follows: 



 

Page 11

Section 1 details the project background, outlines the purpose of the CEMP, the scope of the CEMP and sub-plans (namely the DWPs and MPs), and outlines designation and resource consent conditions relevant to this CEMP. Section 2 provides a description of the early works and includes the works programme, hours of operation, site layout, details on security, safety and public viewing, site housekeeping. Section 3 describes the social and environmental management context of the works, discusses the construction activities and environmental receivers. This section also discusses the environmental risks associated with construction activity and outlines applicable legislative requirements. Section 4 details the implementation and operation of the CEMP. This section covers roles and responsibilities and training requirements. Section 5 summarises the environmental management procedures and operating procedures that will be implemented to manage emergency incidents. These procedures refer to the suite of sub-plans attached in Appendices F to P of this CEMP. | Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan ď‚ˇ

Section 6 describes environmental monitoring requirements, environmental inspections, environmental auditing, corrective and preventive action, reporting, document control and CEMP review.

1.4

Environmental Sub-Plans

This CEMP is an overarching document that outlines how the Link Alliance will manage the environmental, social and economic effects of the Karangahape Station early works. The principles and general approach to managing the effects are set out in this CEMP, with detailed management methods described in the sub-plans that inform the CEMP (provided in Appendix F to P of this CEMP). Table 1-1 and Table 1-2 outline the sub-plans relevant to the early works, along with the reference to the relevant CRL designation and A2N resource consent conditions that set out the requirements for the sub-plans. Where the designation and resource consent conditions require the preparation of both a DWP and a MP to address the same subject matter (e.g. air quality), a single Plan has been prepared to address all relevant condition requirements. Table 1-1: Plans attached to the CEMP to address the relevant CRL designation conditions

Plan

Acronym

Designation Purpose Condition #

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

SIBD DWP

To outline the practices and processes to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects arising from disruption to businesses, residents and community services/facilities arising from construction.

5.2 and Appendix F

Communication and Consultation Plan

CCP

To outline the practices and processes to ensure appropriate communication and consultation is undertaken with the community, stakeholders and parties affected by construction activities.

5.3 and Appendix G

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan (also an Air Quality Management Plan)

AQ DWP

To outline the practices and processes to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects on air quality arising from construction.

5.5 and Appendix I

Trees and Vegetation DWP

TV DWP

To provide for the development and implementation of identified best practicable options to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on trees and vegetation resulting from construction effects.

5.6 and Appendix J

Transport, Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

TAP DWP

18, 20.1, 21.1, 25, 26 and 28

To outline the practices and processes to manage the adverse effects of construction on the transport network (including parking and access).

5.7 and Appendix K

Page 12

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Section of CEMP and Appendices

Construction Environmental Management Plan Plan

Acronym

Designation Purpose Condition #

Section of CEMP and Appendices

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

CNV DWP

16.1, 16.2, 31, 33.2, 34, and 36 to 39

To provide for the development and implementation of identified best practicable options to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on receivers of noise and vibration resulting from construction effects

5.8 and Appendix L

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

HC DWP (Built Heritage Section)

41 and 46

To outline the practices and processes to avoid, remedy or mitigate the potential adverse effects on built heritage that may result during construction.

5.10.1 and Appendix M

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

HC DWP (Archaeology Section)

To manage the adverse archaeological effects that may result during construction.

5.10.2 and Appendix N

Urban Design Delivery Work Plan

UD DWP

To enable the integration of the permanent works into the surrounding landscape and urban design context.

5.11 This plan is not relevant to the early works

Public Art Delivery Work Plan

PA DWP

To manage the adverse effects on public art located within or in close proximity to the construction footprint.

This plan is not relevant to the early works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan (also a Contaminated Soils Management Plan)

CDWP

To outline the practices and processes to manage the adverse effects of contaminated land arising from construction.

5.12 and Appendix O

Table 1-2: Plans attached to the CEMP to address the relevant A2N resource consent conditions

Plan and relevant assessment

Acronym

Resource Consent Condition #

Purpose

Section of CEMP

Communication and Consultation Plan

CCP

25 and 27

To outline the practices and processes to ensure appropriate communication and consultation is undertaken with the community, stakeholders and parties affected by construction activities.

5.3 and Appendix G

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan

ESCP

53 - 58, 65 73

To outline the methods for managing and controlling erosion and sediment discharges from the construction area.

5.4 and Appendix H

Air Quality Management Plan

AQ DWP

219 - 228

To outline the practices and processes to avoid, remedy or

5.5 and Appendix I

Page 13

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan Plan and relevant assessment

Acronym

Resource Consent Condition #

Purpose

Section of CEMP

mitigate the adverse effects on air quality arising from construction. Contaminated Soils Management Plan

CDWP

131-141

To outline the practices and processes to manage the adverse effects of contaminated land arising from construction.

5.12 and Appendix O

Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan

GSMCP

96-103

To outline the practices and processes to monitor the effects of groundwater drawdown on buildings in proximity to the proposed works.

5.13 and Appendix P

Industrial and Trade Activities Environmental Management Plan

ITA EMP

159 and 166

To outline the practices and processes to avoid, remedy or mitigate the potential adverse effects on stormwater and receiving environment generated by runoff from construction activities.

5.16 This plan is not relevant to the early works

1.5

Feedback on CEMP and Sub-Plans

This CEMP and the suite of sub-plans have been developed to enable consultation with and feedback from the Karangahape Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG) as per condition 7 of the CRL designation and condition 19 of the A2N resource consent. A record of consultation outcomes in relation to this CEMP is included in Appendix E, which sets out where feedback has been incorporated into the plans; or reasons have been provided to explain why changes haven’t been incorporated. The CEMP and DWPs have been reviewed by Independent Peer Reviewers (IPR) prior to submission to Auckland Council, as per the requirements of CRL designation condition 11. The IPRs are suitably qualified independent specialists agreed to by Auckland Council to form an IPR Panel. A record of feedback from the IPR on this CEMP is provided in Appendix E and where the feedback has been incorporated into the Plan, or not, and the reasons for this.

1.6

Mana Whenua

We are all descended from Ranginui, our Father Sky and Papatuanuku, our Mother Earth. Ngā mana whenua o Tāmaki Makaurau have a special relationship with Ranginui, Papatuanuku, and their resources. Acting as kaitiaki, they endeavour to protect their whānau, hapū and Iwi and encourage all people to act as protectors of the earth. Kaitiakitanga includes:    

protecting, restoring, enhancing the mauri (life supporting capacity) of resources; fulfilling spiritual, emotional and inherited responsibilities to the environment; maintaining mana over resources; and ensuring the welfare of the people those resources support. In Tāmaki Makaurau it is mana whenua who are Kaitiaki.

The aspiration of the project to be exemplary in the practice of sustainability – encompassing the four well-beings (environmental, cultural, social and economic) – aligns and supports kaitiakitanga. Page 14

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan In meeting their sustainability commitments, CRL staff, contractors and others involved in the project are also supporting kaitiakitanga and mana whenua as kaitiaki. Furthermore, they are also improving the state of the environment that we pass on for future generations. The CRL sustainability framework is informed by tikanga tiaki and mātauranga. A CRL Mana Whenua forum has been established for the purposes of undertaking kaitiakitanga responsibilities associated with the project. The forum comprises those mana whenua groups who expressed an interest in being involved in the project and its related activities. Eight mana whenua self-identified their interest in CRL and are currently part of the forum:        

Ngāti Maru; Ngāti Paoa; Ngāi Tai Ki Tāmaki; Ngāti Te AtaWaiohua; Ngāti Whātua o Ōrākei; Te AkitaiWaiohua; Te Kawerau a Maki; and Ngāti Tamaoho.

CRLL and the Link Alliance continue to work collaboratively with the mana whenua forum on all aspects of the project. With the commencement of construction for the early works for Karangahape Station, the forum’s role will include cultural induction for contractors, assistance with discovery procedures, monitoring, and ongoing provision of mātauranga Māori input.

1.7

Sustainability

This section provides detail about the sustainability practices that will be implemented as part of the CRL Project and the Karangahape Station early works. It includes a description of the rating scheme chosen to measure sustainability of the CRL.

1.7.1. Infrastructure Sustainability The Link Alliance shares CRLL’s objective for the CRL project, which is to set the benchmark for designing, building and operating sustainable infrastructure in New Zealand and to optimise environmental, social and economic outcomes over the long term. Optimising outcomes involves more than simply minimising impacts and complying with consent conditions, but reflects the ‘triple bottom line’. The context for environmental and sustainability targets for the CRL has been established through a comprehensive review of local and national targets. The Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia’s (ISCA) Infrastructure Sustainability (IS) rating scheme 1 has been chosen to measure the sustainability performance of the project.

1.7.2. ISCA IS Rating Scheme The project is targeting certified Design and As-built ratings against the IS rating scheme, specifically, an ‘Excellent’ rating.

Refer to www.isca.org.au for background information about the scheme. Page 15 | Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan The project performance will be assessed in the categories outlined in Table 1-3. Details regarding the management of the IS Rating Scheme are included in the project’s Sustainability Management Plan2. In some cases, the IS requirements are additional to the project’s designation and resource consent requirements and effectively enhance the designation and consent requirements. It is essential that the IS requirements are met to achieve the project’s sustainability goals, however they are not designation or resource consent requirements that require certification by Auckland Council. Table 1-3: ISCA Rating Categories

Themes

Categories

Abbreviation

Management and Governance

Management Systems

Man

Procurement and Purchasing

Pro

Climate Change Adaptation

Cli

Energy & Carbon

Ene

Wai (Water)

Wat

Materials

Mat

Discharges to Air, Land & Water

Dis

Whenua (Land)

Lan

Waste

Was

Ecology

Eco

People & Place

Community Health, Wellbeing & Safety

Hea

Heritage

Her

Stakeholder Participation

Sta

Urban & Landscape Design

Urb

Innovation

Inn

Using Resources

Emissions, Pollution & Waste

Innovation

Project sustainability requirements that relate directly to this CEMP are included in Appendix A. Further details regarding the specifics of the evaluation and means of achieving relevant sustainability targets are provided in the relevant management plans and DWPs.

1.8

Relevant Conditions

1.8.1. Designation Conditions The early works are subject to CRL Designation 2500-43, which was confirmed in November 2015. The designation conditions are included in Appendix C of this CEMP. Table 1-4 identifies the designation conditions relevant to this CEMP and where these are addressed in this Plan.

Link Alliance Sustainability Management Plan, Revision A00, 13 September 2019, CRL-SYW-SUS-LKA-PLN-800000 A Notice of Requirement for alterations to the CRL Designation 2500-4 in relation to the Karangahape Station is currently under appeal. Page 16 | Karangahape Station Early Works 3

Construction Environmental Management Plan Table 1-4: Relevant designation conditions and references to relevant sections of the CEMP

Designation Condition

CEMP Section

7.1

Within three months of the confirmation of the designations the Requiring Authority shall, in consultation with the Auckland Council, establish at least one Community Liaison Group in each the following key construction areas: (b) Karangahape Road (Designation 4) In addition to the requirements in Condition 5, the purpose of the Groups shall be to: (d) Provide feedback on the development of the CEMP and DWPS.

1.5 5.3

13.1

The Requiring Authority, its contractor team, and the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s) shall establish and implement a collaborative working process for dealing with day to day construction processes, including monitoring compliance with the designation conditions and with the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and any material changes to these plans associated with construction of the City Rail Link.

13.2

This collaborative working process shall:

7.4

13.3

Page 17

(a) Operate for the duration of the construction works and for 6 months following completion of construction works where monitoring of designation conditions is still required, unless a different timeframe is mutually agreed between the Requiring Authority and the Auckland Council; (b) Have a “key contact” person representing the Requiring Authority and a “key contact” person representing the contractor team to work with the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s); (c) The “key contacts” shall be identified in the CEMP and shall meet at least monthly unless a different timeframe is agreed with the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s). The purpose of the meeting is to report on compliance with the designation conditions and with the CEMP, DWPs and material changes to these plans and on any matters of non-compliance and how they have been addressed; (d) Once construction has commenced, the Requiring Authority and / or the contractor shall provide an update to the Community Liaison Groups (Condition 7 of this designation) at least once every 3 months, or if in accordance with Condition 7 these groups meet more regularly, at least once every two months. The purpose and function of the collaborative working process is to: (a) Assist as necessary the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s) to confirm that: (i) The works authorised under these designations are being carried out in compliance with the designation conditions, the CEMP, DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and any material changes to these plans; (ii) The Requiring Authority and its contractor are undertaking all monitoring and the recording of monitoring results in compliance with the requirements of the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and any material changes to these plans; (b) Subsequent to a confirmed Outline Plan, provide a mechanism through which any changes to the design, CEMP or DWPs, which are not material changes requiring approval under Condition 10 triggering the requirement for a new Outline Plan, can be required, reviewed and confirmed; | Karangahape Station Early Works

1.5 Appendix E

6.1

5.21.5, 6

Construction Environmental Management Plan

17.1

17.2

17.3 17.4

19.1 19.2

Page 18

Designation Condition (c) Advise where changes to construction works following a confirmed Outline Plan require a new CEMP or DWP (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs); (d) Review and identify any concerns or complaints received from, or related to, the construction works monthly (unless a different timeframe is mutually agreed with the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer) and adequacy of the measures adopted to respond to these. Upon receiving a concern or complaint during construction, the Requiring Authority shall instigate a process to address concerns or complaints received about adverse effects. This shall: (a) Identify the nature of the concern or complaint, and the location, date and time of the alleged event(s); (b) Acknowledge receipt of the concern or complaint within 24 hours of receipt; (c) Respond to the concern or complaint in accordance with the relevant management plan, which may include monitoring of the activity by a suitably qualified expert, implementation of mitigation measures, and, in the case of noise and / or vibration, preparation of a site specific noise and / or vibration management plan (in accordance with Conditions 37 and 38); A record of all concerns and / or complaints received shall be kept by the Requiring Authority. This record shall include: (a) The name and address of the person(s) who raised the concern or complaint (unless they elect not to provide this) and details of the concern or complaint; (b) Where practicable, weather conditions at the time of the concern or complaint, including wind direction and cloud cover if the complaint relates to noise or air quality; (c) Known City Rail Link construction activities at the time and in the vicinity of the concern or complaint; (d) Any other activities in the area unrelated to the City Rail Link construction that may have contributed to the concern or complaint such as non-City Rail Link construction, fires, traffic accidents or unusually dusty conditions generally; (e) Remedial actions undertaken (if any) and the outcome of these, including monitoring of the activity. This record shall be maintained on site, be available for inspection upon request, and shall be provided every two months (or as otherwise agreed) to the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer, and to the â€œkey contactsâ€? (see Condition 13). Where a complaint remains unresolved or a dispute arises, Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer will be provided with all records of the complaint and how it has been dealt with and addressed and whether the Requiring Authority considers that any other steps to resolve the complaint are required. Upon receiving records of the complaint the Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer must determine whether a review of the CEMP and/or DWPs is required under Condition 22 to address this complaint. The Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer shall advise the Requiring Authority of its recommendation within 10 working days of receiving the records of complaint. The objective of the CEMP and DWPs is to so far as is reasonably practicable, avoid, remedy or mitigate any adverse effects (including cumulative effects) associated with the City Rail Link construction. All works must be carried out in accordance with the CEMP, the DWPs required by these conditions and in accordance with any changes to plans made under Condition 23. | Karangahape Station Early Works

CEMP Section

5.21.5 and Appendix G

5.21.5, 6 and Appendix G

6 and Appendix G 6 and Appendix G

1.2 6.6 and 6.7

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Designation Condition

CEMP Section

19.3

The CEMP and DWPs shall be prepared, complied with and monitored by the Requiring Authority throughout the duration of construction of the City Rail Link. The DWPs shall give effect to the specific requirements and objectives set out in these designation conditions.

19.4 19.5 20.1

20.2

21.1

Page 19

The CEMP shall include measures to give effect to any specific requirements and objectives set out in these designation conditions that are not addressed by the DWPs. In order to give effect to the objective in Condition 19.1, the CEMP must provide for the following: (b) Notice boards that clearly identify the Requiring Authority and the Project name, together with the name, telephone number and email address of the Site or Project Manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager; (c) Training requirements for employees, sub-contractors and visitors on construction procedures, environment management and monitoring; (d) A Travel Management Plan for each construction site outlining onsite car parking management and methods for encouraging travel to the site using forms of transport other than private vehicle to assist in mitigating localised traffic effects; and (e) Where a complaint is received, the complaint must be recorded and responded to as provided for in Conditions 13, 15 and 17. The CEMP shall include details of: (a) The site or Project Manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager (who will implement and monitor the Communication and Consultation Plan), including their contact details (phone, email and physical address); (b) The Document management system for administering the CEMP, including review and Requiring Authority / Constructor / Auckland Council requirements; (c) Environmental incident and emergency management procedures; (d) Environmental complaint's management procedures (see also Condition 17);

Appendices F to Q 4 and 6

4.1 4.2 Appendix K 5.21.5 and Appendix G 4.1 6.6 and 6.7 5.21 5.21.5 and Appendix G 2

(e) An outline of the construction programme of the work, including construction hours of operation, indicating linkages to the DWPs which address the management of adverse effects during construction; (f) Specific details on demolition to be undertaken during the construction period; 2 (g) Means of ensuring the safety of the general public; and 2 (h) Methods to assess and monitor potential cumulative adverse effects. 3.3 In order to give effect to the objective in Condition 19.1, the CEMP shall include the following details and requirements in relation to all areas within the surface designation footprint where construction works are to occur, and / or where materials and construction machinery are to be used or stored: (a) Where access points are to be located and procedures for managing construction vehicle ingress and egress to construction support 2 and storage areas; | Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Designation Condition

CEMP Section

(b) Methods for managing the control of silt and sediment within the construction area;

5.4 and Appendix H 5.4 and Appendix H 2

22.1

Page 20

(d) Measures to adopt to keep the construction area in a tidy condition in terms of disposal / storage of rubbish and storage unloading of construction materials (including equipment). All storage of materials and equipment associated with the construction works shall take place within the boundaries of the designation; (e) Measures to ensure all temporary boundary / security fences associated with the construction of the City Rail Link are maintained in 2.6 and 2.7 good order with any graffiti removed as soon as possible; (g) The location and specification of any temporary acoustic fences and visual barriers, and where practicable, opportunities for mana 2.6 and 5 whenua (see Condition 8) and community art or other decorative measures along with viewing screens to be incorporated into these without compromising the purpose for which these are erected; (h) How the construction areas are to be fenced and kept secure from the public and, where practicable and without compromising their 2.6 and 2 purpose how opportunities for public viewing, including provision of viewing screens and display of information about the project and opportunities for mana whenua and community art or other decorative measures can be incorporated to enhance public amenity and connection to the project; (i) The location of any temporary buildings (including workers offices and portaloos) and vehicle parking (which should be located within 2.5 the construction area and not on adjacent streets); (j) Methods to control the intensity, location and direction of artificial construction lighting to avoid light spill and glare onto sites 5.9 adjacent construction areas; (k) Methods to ensure the prevention and mitigation of adverse effects associated with the storage, use, disposal, or transportation of 5.15 hazardous substances; (m) That site offices and less noisy construction activities be located at the edge of the construction yards where practicable; and 2 (n) Methods for management of vacant areas once construction is completed in accordance with the Urban Design DWP. 5.11 The CEMP and DWPs shall be reviewed at least annually or as a result of a material change to the City Rail Link project or to address unforeseen adverse effects arising from construction or unresolved complaints. Such a review may be initiated by either Auckland Council or the Requiring Authority. The review shall take into consideration: (a) Compliance with designation conditions, the CEMP, DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and material changes to 1.2, 6.7 these plans; (b) Any changes to construction methods; (c) Key changes to roles and responsibilities within the City Rail Link project; | Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

22.2 23.1 23.2 23.3 23.4 23.5 23.6

24.1 24.2

24.3

24.4

Page 21

Designation Condition (d) Changes in industry best practice standards; (e) Changes in legal or other requirements; (f) Results of monitoring and reporting procedures associated with the management of adverse effects during construction; (g) Any comments or recommendations received from Auckland Council regarding the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs); and (h) Any unresolved complaints and any response to the complaints and remedial action taken to address the complaint as required under Condition 17. A summary of the review process shall be kept by the Requiring Authority, provided annually to the Auckland Council, and made available to the Auckland Council upon request. Following the CEMP and DWPs review process described in Condition 22, the CEMP may require updating. Any material change to the CEMP and DWP must be consistent with the purpose and objective of the relevant condition. Affected parties will be notified of the review and any material change proposed to the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs). The CEMP and DWPs must clearly document the comments and inputs received by the Requiring Authority from affected parties about the material change, along with a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. Any material change proposed to the CEMP and DWPs shall be subject to an independent peer review as required by Condition 11.

CEMP Section

6.7 6.7 6.7 Appendix G 1.5

1.5 Following that review any material change proposed to the CEMP and DWPs relating to an adverse effect shall be submitted for approval 1.5 and 1.9 to Auckland Council Compliance and Monitoring Officer, at least 10 working days prior to the proposed changes taking effect. If any changes are not agreed, the relevant provisions of the RMA relating to approval of outline plans shall apply. To manage the adverse effects on Network Utilities Operations during the construction of the City Rail Link, the following shall be 5.1 included in the CEMP. The purpose of this section of the CEMP shall be to ensure that the enabling works and construction of the City Rail Link adequately take 5.1 account of, and include measures to address the safety, integrity, protection or, where necessary, relocation of existing network utilities that traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation during the construction of the City Rail Link. For the avoidance of doubt and for the purposes of this condition an â€œexisting Network Utilityâ€? includes infrastructure operated by a 5.1 Network Utility Operator which was: (a) In place at the time the notice of requirement for the City Rail Link was served on Auckland Council (23 August 2012); or (b) Undertaken in accordance with condition 6 of this designation or the section 176(1)(b) RMA process. The CEMP shall be prepared in consultation with Network Utility Operators who have existing Network Utilities that traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation and shall be adhered to and implemented during the construction of the City Rail Link. The CEMP shall include as a minimum:

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Designation Condition

CEMP Section

(a) Cross references to the Communication and Consultation Plan for the methods that will be used to liaise with all Network Utility Operators who have existing network utilities that traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation; (b) Measures to be used to accurately identify the location of existing Network Utilities, and the measures for the protection, support, relocation and/or reinstatement of existing Network Utilities; (c) Methods to be used to ensure that all construction personnel, including contractors, are aware of the presence and location of the various existing Network Utilities (and their priority designations) which traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation, and the restrictions in place in relation to those existing Network Utilities. This shall include: (i) Measures to provide for the safe operation of plant and equipment, and the safety of workers, in proximity to existing Network Utilities; (ii) Plans identifying the locations of the existing Network Utilities (and their designations) and appropriate physical indicators on the ground showing specific surveyed locations; (d) Measures to be used to ensure the continued operation of Network Utility Operations and the security of supply of the utilities by Network Utility Operators at all times;

5.1 and Appendix G 5.1 and Appendix G 5.1 and Appendix G

(e) Measures to be used to enable Network Utility Operators to access existing Network Utilities for maintenance at all reasonable times on an ongoing basis during construction, and to access existing Network Utilities for emergency and urgent repair works at all times during the construction of the City Rail Link (f) Contingency management plans for reasonably foreseeable circumstances in respect of the relocation and rebuild of existing Network Utilities during the construction of the City Rail Link; (g) A risk analysis for the relocation and rebuild of existing Network Utilities during the construction of the City Rail Link;

(h) Earthworks management (including depth and extent of earthworks and temporary and permanent stabilisation measures), for earthworks in close proximity to existing Network Utilities;

Page 22

5.1 and Appendix G 5.1 and Appendix G 5.1 and Appendix G 5.1 and Appendix G 2.2, 5.1 and Appendix H

(i) Vibration management and monitoring for works in close proximity to existing Network Utilities;

2.2, 5.1 and Appendix L

(j) Emergency management procedures in the event of any emergency involving existing Network Utilities;

2.2, 5.1, 5.21

(k) The process for providing as-built drawings showing the relationship of the relocated Network Utilities to the City Rail Link to Network Utility Operators and the timing for providing these drawings;

2.2, 5.1

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

24.5

Page 23

Designation Condition

CEMP Section

(m) A summary of the consultation (including any methods or measures in dispute and the Requiring Authorities response to them) undertaken between the Requiring Authority and any Network Utility Operators during the preparation of the CEMP.

5.1, 5.3, Appendix E and Appendix G Appendix G

If the Requiring Authority and a Network Utility Operator cannot agree on the methods proposed under the CEMP to manage the construction otherwise agreed, each party will appoint a suitably qualified and independent expert, who shall jointly appoint a third such expert to advise the parties and make a recommendation. That recommendation will be provided by the Requiring Authority as part of the CEMP along with reasons if the recommendation is not accepted.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

1.8.2. Resource Consent Conditions The Karangahape Station early works are subject to the A2N regional resource consents approved by Auckland Council on 17 November 20164. A full set of the resource consent conditions are included in Appendix D. Table 1-5 identifies the resource consent conditions relevant to this CEMP and where they are addressed in this Plan.

(R/LUC/2016/1890, R/REG/2016/1892, R/REG/2016/1895, R/REG/2016/1896, REG/2016/1897, R/REG/2016/1898, R/REG/2016/1899, R/REG/2016/1900 and R/REG/2016/2038) Page 24 | Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan Table 1-5: Relevant resource consents conditions and references to relevant sections of the CEMP

No.

Resource Consent condition

CEMP Section

Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG) 19

The Consent Holder shall consult with the CLG in respect of the development and review of the CEMP and other Management Plans.

1.5 and Appendix E

Communication and Consultation 25

Page 25

At least 3 months prior to the commencement of construction, the Consent Holder shall prepare a CCP, the purpose of which is to set out a framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected inproximity parties during the construction of the Project. The CCP shall be based on and, where appropriate, incorporate the provisions of the PCCP, and shall set out how the Consent Holder will: a) Inform the community and business of construction progress and future construction activities and constraints that could affect them; b) Provide early information on key Project milestones; c) Obtain and specify a reasonable timeframe (being not less than 10 working days), for feedback and inputs from directly affected and affected in-proximity parties regarding the implementation and review of the CEMP or other Management Plans; d) Respond to queries and complaints including but not limited to: i) Who is responsible for responding; ii) How responses will be provided; and iii) The timeframes within which responses will be provided. The CCP shall (as a minimum) include: a. A communications framework that details the Consent Holderâ€™s communication strategies, accountabilities, frequency of communications and consultation, the range of communication and consultation tools to be used (including relevant communication methods, newsletters or similar, advertising etc.), and any other relevant communication matters; b. The Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project including 24 hour contact details (phone, email and postal address); c. The 0800 CRL TALK phone number; d. The methods for identifying, communicating and consulting with persons affected by the project including but not limited to: i) All property owners and occupiers of the sites that are identified at Appendix 4, and adjacent construction sites; ii) Mana Whenua unless any of those named advise the Consent Holder of a different liaison process; iii) Heritage NZ; iv) NZ Transport Agency/ Auckland Motorway Alliance (AMA); v) Kiwirail; vi) Department of Corrections; vii) Ministry of Justice; | Karangahape Station Early Works

5.3 and Appendix G 5.3 and Appendix G

5.3 and Appendix G

Construction Environmental Management Plan

No.

Resource Consent condition

viii) Network Utility Operators; and ix) The Community and Business Liaison Group (refer Conditions 16-24) e. How stakeholders and persons affected by the Project will be notified of the commencement of construction, the expected duration of the activities and works, and who to contact for any queries, concerns and complaints; f. How stakeholders and persons affected by the Project will be consulted in the development and review of the CEMP and other Management Plans, including specifying reasonable timeframes for feedback; g. A list of stakeholders, directly affected and affected in-proximity parties to the construction works with whom the Consent Holder will communicate; i. A summary of communication and consultation undertaken between the Consent Holder and parties as required by the PCCP. The summary shall include any outstanding issues or disputes raised by parties; j. How communication and consultation relating to construction activities and monitoring requirements will be recorded; and k. How opportunities to interpret and display archaeological finds within the Project area will be identified and implemented, including how Heritage NZ will be involved in this process. Advice note: At the time this resource consent was granted, the Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project was Carol Greensmith, phone 0800 CRL TALK. The CCP shall also include (as relevant) linkages and cross-references to the CEMP and other Management Plans.

The CCP shall be reviewed six monthly for the duration of construction and updated if required. Any updates to the CCP shall be provided to the “key contacts” and the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for review and agreement on any further action to be undertaken. 31 Any further action recommended as a result of the review under Condition 30 shall be undertaken by the Consent Holder’s Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project and confirmation of completion shall be provided to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring). 32 If, in the course of amendments undertaken as part of the review process under Condition 30, a material change to the CCP is made, the Consent Holder shall notify those parties affected by the change within 20 working days of the material change occurring. 33 The CCP shall be implemented and complied with for the duration of the construction of the Project. Construction Management 35 Prior to the commencement of construction of the Project, the Consent Holder shall prepare a Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) including all certified Management Plans which form part of these conditions to ensure compliance with the resource consents. 36 The CEMP shall include details of: a. Final project details and staging of works to illustrate that the works remain within the limits and standards approved under these resource consents and that the construction activities avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on the environment. b. The site or project manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager, including their contact details (phone, email and physical address); Page 26

| Karangahape Station Early Works

CEMP Section

5.3 and Appendix G 5.3 and Appendix G 5.3 and Appendix G 5.3 and Appendix G Noted This Plan and sub-plans 2 and 5 4.1.2

Construction Environmental Management Plan

No.

Resource Consent condition

d. Communication and consultation procedures for ensuring that residents, road users and businesses in the immediate vicinity of construction areas are given prior notice of the commencement of construction and are informed about the expected duration and effects of the work. In particular, the procedures shall provide for the following in relation to residents, road users and businesses potentially affected by the construction works: i) consultation prior to the commencement of construction; ii) notice periods for changes to pedestrian and vehicle access; iii) regular updates on construction progress; iv) key dates for major milestones such as road closure and re-opening; and v) communication on any other matters potentially affecting residents or business operations in the vicinity of the works. e. Notice boards that clearly identify the Consent Holder and the Project name, together with the name, telephone number and email address of the Site or Project Manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager; f. g. h. i. j.

General site layout and management; Hours of operation; Means of ensuring the safety of the general public; Certified Management Plans referred to in these conditions; Water Discharge Quality Monitoring Programme; and

k. Identification of the suitably independent, qualified Chartered Professional Engineer, or member of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, who will be undertaking the condition surveys required by the conditions of consent. 37 38 39

Page 27

The CEMP shall be provided to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification at least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction. CEMP can be certified as per the requirements of these consent conditions within 10 working days of receipt of the CEMP. Construction shall not commence until written certification is obtained from Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring). The CEMP required by Condition 35 shall be implemented and maintained throughout the entire construction period for the Project, or relevant Project stage, to manage potential adverse effects arising from the construction and shall be updated as necessary (or as required by the review process in Condition 42). | Karangahape Station Early Works

CEMP Section source not found. 5 and Appendix G

5.3, Appendix G 2.5 2.4 2.6 5 Appendix H and ITA EMP (to be prepared for the main works) 5.14 and Appendix Q Noted 6.7 6.7

Construction Environmental Management Plan

No.

Resource Consent condition

Any change to the CEMP shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification and no activity reliant upon a change to the CEMP can be undertaken until the change has been certified. The Consent Hold shall request the Councilâ€™s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination as to whether the proposed change can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days of submission of the change. Construction Traffic 41 The Consent Holder shall, so far as is it is reasonably practicable, avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on transport, parking and property access. This is to be achieved through the following objectives: a. managing the road transport network for the duration of the construction by adopting the best practicable option to manage congestion; b. maintaining pedestrian access to private property at all times; and c. providing on-going vehicle access to private property to the greatest extent possible. Advice Note: Condition 41 refers to objectives to be achieved. The requirement to provide mechanisms to achieve these objectives is included in the relevant CRL designation conditions. Review Process for CEMP and other Management Plans 42 The Consent Holder shall review the CEMP and other Management Plans at least annually or a. As a result of a material change to the Project; b. To address unforeseen or materially greater adverse effects arising from construction or c. To address unresolved complaints. 43 A review pursuant to Condition 42 may be initiated by either the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) or the Consent Holder and shall take into consideration: a. Compliance with resource consent conditions, the CEMP, other Management Plans and any material changes to these Plans; b. Any changes to construction methods; c. Key changes to roles and responsibilities relating to the Project; d. Relevant changes in industry best practice standards; e. Relevant changes in legal or other requirements; f. Results of monitoring and reporting procedures associated with the management of adverse effects during construction; g. Any comments or recommendations received from Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) or as a result of the CCP process regarding the CEMP and other Management Plans; and h. Any complaints and any response to complaints and remedial action taken to address the complaint as required under Conditions 45-49. 44 A summary of the review process shall be kept by the Consent Holder, provided annually to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring), and advised to and made available to the CLG. Concerns and Complaints Management 45 Upon receiving a concern or complaint during construction of the Project, the Consent Holder shall instigate a process to address the concern or complaint. This shall: a. Identify of the nature of the concern or complaint, and the location, date and time of the alleged event(s); Page 28

| Karangahape Station Early Works

CEMP Section 6.7

5.7, 5.3 and Appendix K

Noted

6.7

5.3 and Appendix G

Construction Environmental Management Plan

No.

47 48

Page 29

Resource Consent condition b. Acknowledge receipt of the concern or complaint within 24 hours of receipt; c. Respond to the concern or complaint in accordance with the relevant Management Plan, which may include (for example) monitoring of the activity by a suitably qualified expert, and implementation of mitigation measures; and d. Provide the person raising the concern or complaint with details of the response. A record of all concerns and / or complaints received shall be kept by the Consent Holder. This record shall include: a. The name and address of the person(s) who raised the concern or complaint (unless they elect not to provide this or do not want the information recorded) and details of the concern or complaint; b. Where practicable and relevant, weather conditions at the time of the concern or complaint, including wind direction and cloud cover if the complaint relates to air quality; c. The relevant known construction activities being undertaken at the time and in the vicinity of the concern or complaint; d. Any other activities in the area unrelated to the Project that may have contributed to the concern or complaint such as non-related construction, fires, traffic accidents or unusually dusty conditions generally; e. Remedial actions undertaken (if any) and the outcome of these, including monitoring of the activity and any proposed changes to any Management Plan; and f. the response of the person who raised the concern or complaint to the remedial actions undertaken. This record shall be maintained on site, be available for inspection upon request, and shall be provided every two months (or as otherwise agreed) to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring). Where a complaint remains unresolved or a dispute arises, the Consent Holder will provide to Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) a copy of all records of the complaint and advice as to a. how it has been dealt with and addressed; and b. whether the Consent Holder considers that any other steps to resolve the complaint are required. In addition to Condition 48, the Consent Holder shall also request the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) to determine whether a review of the CEMP and/or Management Plan(s) is required under Condition 42 to address the unresolved complaint or dispute. The Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) will be asked to advise the Consent Holder of its recommendation within 10 working days of receiving the records of complaint.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

CEMP Section

5.3 and Appendix G

5.3 and Appendix G 5.3 and Appendix G

5.3 and Appendix G

Construction Environmental Management Plan

1.9

CEMP Reviews and updates

This CEMP is a live document that will be reviewed at least annually or as a result of a material change to the project, to reflect changes to matters such as the construction methodology and the management of environmental effects, or to address unforeseen adverse effects arising from construction or unresolved complaints. Any material changes to this CEMP must be certified by Auckland Council prior to any on-site activity reliant upon the change commencing. A formal review process is described in section 6.7 of this CEMP.

Page 30

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Karangahape Station Early Works

2.1

Overview of Works

Early works will be carried out to prepare the Karangahape Station site for the main construction works (subject to a separate CEMP). The early works are shown on the drawings provided in Appendix B and an overview of the works is provided in Table 2-1. Table 2-1: Overview of Karangahape Early Works

Works location

Overview of construction activities

Beresford Square / Pitt Street

 Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Beresford Square / Pitt Street;  Removal of street trees and the demolition of the café / toilet in Beresford Square;  Establishment of the Beresford Square Construction Support Area (CSA) to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.; and  Closure of Beresford Square to vehicle traffic (other than construction traffic) while retaining pedestrian and cycle access;  Removal of existing street furniture where required (such as seating, street lighting (to be replaced with temporary lighting).

Mercury Lane

 Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Mercury Lane;  Establishment of the Mercury Lane CSA to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc; and  Establishment of the Mercury Lane temporary working platform.

It should be noted that the demolition of buildings and above ground structures within the Mercury Lane CSA are authorised by the CRL Enabling Works OPW – Karangahape Road Demolition Works (Council reference OPW60339200) 5, confirmed by Auckland Council in June 2019 and do not form part of this Plan. A CEMP and set of sub-plans were prepared and provided when lodging the OPW with Auckland Council.

2.2

Construction Methodology

Section 2.2.1 to 2.2.3 describes the construction staging and construction methodology for the early works at Pitt Street/Beresford Square and Mercury Lane.

2.2.1. Construction Staging The early works will be divided into stages as outlined in Table 2-2 (refer to Construction Staging Plans provided in Appendix B).

CRL Enabling Works Outline Plan of Works (OPW) – Karangahape Road Demolition Works (Council reference OPW60339200), CRL-KRD-RME-000-RPT-0129 Page 31 | Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Table 2-2: Construction Staging

Stage

Description

Dates

Approximate Duration

Beresford Square / Pitt Street Stage 1 – Tree Removal and Café / Toilet demolition

 Sequenced tree removal in Beresford Square maintaining access for pedestrians.

Q1 2020

3 months

 Demolition and removal of toilet and café.

Q1 2020

3 months

Stage 2 – Service relocation

 Excavation of combined service trench on Pitt Street one stage.  Relocation of services within trench and reinstatement of pavement.

Q1 2020

1 month

Stage 3 – Service relocation

 Excavation of combined service trench on northern side of Beresford Square and western side of Pitt Street.  Relocation of services within trenches and reinstatement of pavement.  Directional drill to relocate wastewater line on southern side of Beresford Square.

Q1 2020

2 months

Stage 4 – Service relocation

 Excavation of combined service trench on southern side of Beresford Square.  Relocation of services within trench and reinstatement of pavement.  Staged combined trench for wastewater and stormwater line on western end of Beresford Square.

Q1 2020 – Q2 2020

2 months

Q1 2020

3 months

 Beresford Square Construction support area (CSA) establishment CSA to be progressively established from January 2020 with further development through to the start of the main construction works. This CSA will remain for the duration of the Karangahape Station works (approx. five years). Mercury Lane Stage 1 – Western service relocation

 Excavation of combined service trench within western side of Mercury Lane carriageway  Option 1: Relocation of all services within trench and reinstatement of pavement.  Option 1A: Directional drilling for new stormwater service at requirement depth, followed by relocation of remaining services in combined service trench.

Q4 2019

2 months

Stage 2 – Eastern service relocation

 Excavation of combined service trench within eastern side of Mercury Lane carriageway and Cross Street.  Relocation of services within trench and reinstatement of pavement.

Q4 2019 – Q1 2020

3 months

Q1 2020

2 months

 Site establishment

Page 32

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Stage

Description

Dates

Approximate Duration

Q1 2020

2 months

Site to be progressively established from January to March 2020 with further development through to the start of the main construction works. ď‚ˇ Mercury Lane CSA establishment CSA to be progressively established from January to March 2020 with further development through to the start of the main construction works. This CSA will remain for the duration of the Karangahape Station works (approx. five years).

Vehicle and pedestrian access to properties surrounding the works areas will be maintained during the works, though there may be a requirement for temporary closures over short periods during certain works, such as the establishment / change-over of utility diversions. Beresford Square will be permanently closed as part of the early works to enable construction of the new Karangahape Station. Any potential disruption to vehicle/pedestrian access during the works will be mitigated by implementing the relevant operating procedures as described in section 5 of this CEMP, and further detailed in the TAP DWP (refer to section 5.7 and Appendix K of this CEMP). The following sections 2.2.2 and 2.2.3 describe the construction methodology for the early works at Beresford Square/Pitt Street and Mercury Lane, respectively.

2.2.2. Beresford Square and Pitt Street The early works that will be undertaken in Beresford Square and Pitt Street are outlined in Table 2-3, inclusive of the construction sequence, equipment, and approximate earthworks areas and volumes. Details of timeframes, earthworks volumes and areas are indicative only.

Page 33

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan Table 2-3: Overview of Beresford Square and Pitt Street construction sequencing, equipment and earthworks

Stage

Beresford Square / Pitt Street construction works

Indicative construction sequence of works

Indicative construction equipment and material

Approx. earthworks area (m²)

Approx. earthworks volumes (mᶟ)

Stage 1 –

1.i. Tree Removal

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Trimming of small branches Slinging of main branches Trunk cutting Excavation and removal of roots Evacuation and reinstatement.

150 m²

200 mᶟ

1.ii. Café / Toilet demolition

1. 2.

Removal of the roofing Dismantling of frame and removal of glass Demolition of toilet with medium excavator mounted breaker after salvaging recommended items Levelling (backfilling) for the execution of the construction platform.

1. Crane lorry 2. Aerial work platform 3. Concrete saw 4. Chain saws 5. Large excavator 8-25T 6. Small excavator 3 -8T 7. Hydrovac truck 8. 6 wheeler truck 9. Plate compactor 10. Small roller compactor 11. Concrete breaker 12. Mobile crane (only for tree removal) 13. Welding / cutting (only for café demolition)

100 m²

150 mᶟ

100 m²

150 m3

Stage 2

Page 34

2.i. Excavation of combined service trench within Pitt Street carriageway Trench dimensions will be approximately 2m x 1.5m x 30m (WxDxL) 2.ii. Relocation of services within trench and reinstatement of pavement

| Karangahape Station Early Works

1. Mark out trench 2. Saw cut trench 3. Break off top surface with small 3-5T excavator 4. Excavate trench using hydrovac and small excavator 5. Lay bedding material at base of trench 6. Install ducting/pipework 7. Backfill trench with imported fill 8. Reinstate surface with asphalt

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

Concrete saw Small excavator (3-8T for under canopies) Large excavator (8-25T) Hydrovac truck 6 Wheeler truck Small roller compactor 3T Plate compactor Concrete breaker (if required) Concrete breaker Sheet piles/trench shields

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Stage

Beresford Square / Pitt Street construction works

Indicative construction sequence of works

Indicative construction equipment and material

Approx. earthworks area (m²)

Approx. earthworks volumes (mᶟ)

Stage 3 – Service relocation

3.i. Excavation of combined service trench on northern side of Beresford Square and western side of Pitt Street Trench dimensions will be approximately 2m x 1.5m x 80m (WxDxL)

1. 2.

180 m²

300 mᶟ

3.ii. Relocation of services within trenches and reinstatement of pavement Note: item 2 of construction sequence (protect building frontage) not applicable.

1. Concrete saw 2. Small excavator (3-8T for under canopies) 3. Large excavator (8-25T) for installation of manholes and deeper excavations of pits etc. 4. Hydrovac truck 5. 6 Wheeler truck 6. Plate compactor 7. Concrete breaker (if required) 8. Drill rig 9. Sheet piles

180 m²

300 mᶟ

3.iii. Directional drill to relocate wastewater and stormwater line on southern side of Beresford Square, approximately 100m length. Excavation of 4 launch and retrieval pits and manhole installation

1. Prepare drill launch area (4x4m pit) 2. Set up drill rig 3. Drill from the corner of Beresford Square and Pitt Street down Beresford Square 4. Pull pipe through from launch to retrieval pit 5. Install new manholes along the line 6. Backfill excavated areas with imported fill 7. Reinstate disturbed surface with asphalt

50 m²

220 mᶟ

4.i. Excavation of combined service trench on southern side of Beresford Square.

1. Mark out trench 2. Protect building frontages where required

100 m²

150 m3

Stage 4 – Service relocation Page 35

| Karangahape Station Early Works

3. 4.

6. 7. 8. 9.

Mark out trench Protect building frontage with plywood sheet or similar where trenching up to boundary is required (only relevant to stage 3.i.). Saw cut trench Break off top surface with small excavator Excavate trench using hydrovac and small excavator Lay bedding material at base of trench Install ducting/pipework Backfill trench with imported fill Reinstate surface with asphalt.

1. Concrete saw 2. Protect building frontages where required

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Stage

Beresford Square / Pitt Street construction works

Indicative construction sequence of works

Indicative construction equipment and material

Trench dimensions will be approximately 2m x 1.5m x 100 m (WxDxL) 4.ii. Relocation of services within trench and reinstatement of pavement 4. iii. Staged combined trench for wastewater and stormwater line on western end of Beresford Square

3. Saw-cut trench 4. Break off top surfacw with small 3 -5T excavator 5. Excavate trench using hydrovac and small excavator 6. Lay bedding material at base of trench 7. Install ducting/pipework 8. Backfill trench with imported fill 9. Reinstate surface

3. Saw cut trench 4. Break off top surface with 3-5T excavator 5. Excavate trench with hydrovac and excavator 6. Lay bedding material at base of trench 7. Install ducting/pipework 8. Backfill trench 9. Reinstate trench

Establishment of site offices staff facilities, along with material laydown and storage areas. Construction of retaining walls, contouring of site.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15.

Beresford Square Construction support area (CSA) establishment CSA will be progressively established from January 2020 with further development through to the start of the main construction works CSA is located in the carpark next to Hopetoun Alpha (church).

Page 36

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Spoil surge pile Erosion and Sediment Control Measure (ESCM) – water treatment area (established for main works)

Crane lorry Aerial work platform Concrete saw Chain saws Large excavator 8-25T Small excavator 3 -8T Hydro excavation truck 6 wheeler truck Plate compactor Small roller compactor Concrete breaker Mobile crane Welding / cutting Concrete truck Generator

Approx. earthworks area (m²)

Approx. earthworks volumes (mᶟ)

1,880 m²

1800 m3

Construction Environmental Management Plan

2.2.3. Mercury Lane The early works that will be undertaken in Mercury Lane are outlined in Table 2-4, inclusive of the construction sequence, equipment, and approximate earthworks areas and volumes. Details of timeframes, earthworks volumes and areas are indicative only. Table 2-4: Overview of Mercury Lane construction sequencing, equipment and earthworks

Stage

Summary of works at Mercury Lane

Stage 1 / 1A – Western service relocation

1.i. Excavation of combined service trench within western side of Mercury Lane carriageway 2m x 3-5m x 20m (WxDxL) 1.ii. Relocation of services (stormwater, wastewater and potable water) within trench and reinstatement of pavement

1A.i. Directional drill to install new stormwater service. Approx 50m length, 3pits approx. 4x4x5m deep.

Indicative construction sequence of works 1. Mark out trench 2. Saw cut trench 3. Break off top surface with small 3-5T excavator 4. Excavate trench with combination of Hydrovac machine and small excavator 5. Lay bedding material at base of trench 6. Install ducting/pipework 7. Backfill trench with imported fill 8. Install Manholes Reinstate surface with asphalt 1.

2. 3.

Page 37

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Prepare drill launch pits (excavation approximately 4x4m x 5m deep) Set up drill rig Drill from launch pits to receive pit

Indicative construction equipment and material

Approx. earthworks Area (m²)

Approx. earthworks volumes (mᶟ)

1. Concrete saw 2. Small excavator (3-8T for under canopies) 3. Larger excavator (8-25T) for installation of manholes and deeper excavations of pits 4. Hydro excavation truck 5. 6 Wheeler truck 6. Plate compactor 7. Concrete breaker (if required) 8. Drill rig 9. Sheet piles

40 m²

200 m3

40 m²

200 m3

50 m²

300 m3

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Stage

Summary of works at Mercury Lane

Indicative construction sequence of works

Approx. earthworks Area (m²)

Approx. earthworks volumes (mᶟ)

160 m²

800 m3

160 m²

800 m3

90 m²

90 m3

Stage 2 – Eastern service relocation

2.i. Excavation of combined service trench within eastern side of Mercury Lane carriageway and Cross Street 2m x 3-5m x 80m (WxDxL) 2.ii. Relocation of services (stormwater if not completed in Stage 1A, wastewater and potable water) within trench and reinstatement of pavement

Site Establishment Site to be progressively established from January to March 2020 with further development through to Page 38

1. Retaining wall structure

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Pull pipe through from corner back to pit 5. Install new manholes over new pipe at locations marked indicated 6. Backfill excavated areas 7. Reinstate 1. Mark out trench 2. Saw cut trench 3. Break off top surface with small 3-5T excavator 4. Excavate trench with combination of Hydrovac machine and small excavator 5. Lay bedding material at base of trench 6. Install ducting/pipework 7. Backfill trench with imported fill 8. Install Manholes 9. Reinstate surface with asphalt 1. Excavation 2. Installation of steel mesh 3. Shotcrete

Indicative construction equipment and material

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Crane lorry Aerial work platform Concrete saw Chain saws Medium excavator 8-25T

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Stage

Summary of works at Mercury Lane

the start of the main construction works

2. Platform construction

CSA establishment CSA to be progressively established from January 2020 (to March 2020) with further development through to the start of the main construction works

Page 39

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Indicative construction sequence of works

Indicative construction equipment and material

Approx. earthworks Area (m²)

Approx. earthworks volumes (mᶟ)

4. Repeat of operations 1 to 3 as necessary to platform level.

6. Small excavator 3 -8T 7. Hydro excavation truck 8. 6 wheeler truck 9. Plate compactor 10. Small roller compactor 11. Medium roller compactor 12. Concrete breaker 13. Mobile crane 14. Drill rig (site establishment only) 15. Water pump (site establishment only) 16. Air compressor (site establishment only) 17. Welding / cutting 18. Concrete truck 19. Generator

1,500 m²

3,000 m3

4,500 m²

9,000 m3

70 m²

70 m3

200 m²

300 m3

Spoil surge pile no 2 (for the main works)

200 m²

300 m3

ESCM – water treatment area (for the main works)

150 m²

200 m3

1. Excavation and backfilling to platform level (cut and fill) 2. Compaction of platform material Area of offices and laydown Temporary retaining structure Spoil surge pile no 1 (for the main works)

Construction Environmental Management Plan

2.3

Programme

The Karangahape Station early works are anticipated to last approximately six months from Q4 2019 through to Q1 2020. Indicative timeframes for each stage of works in Beresford Square / Pitt Street and Mercury Lane are set out in Table 2-2.

2.4

Hours of work

The early works will typically be carried out from 0700 to 2200hrs Monday to Sunday, in accordance with the CRL construction noise and vibration standards (designation conditions 31 and 35). Specific piling and road cutting works will be restricted to 0700 to 1900 from Monday to Saturday, as per designation condition 36.3b (refer to the CNV DWP attached in Appendix L for further detail). Limited construction works (e.g. the delivery of oversized plant or network utility works that need to be undertaken in off-peak periods) may be undertaken outside the typical working hours to minimise traffic disruption, in accordance with the designation and resource consent conditions. Operating procedures will be implemented, including communication with affected residents and businesses, to minimise any potential disturbance (refer to section 5 of this CEMP).

2.5

Site layout and management

Two CSAs (CSA 2 and CSA 3) will be established as part of the early works in Beresford Square and Mercury Lane as outlined in Table 2-5. In terms of the CSA layout, where practicable an overview of activities is provided below: 

Quieter site activities, such as the site offices / staff facilities and storage areas will be located on the periphery of the CSA which are closest to surrounding buildings and face externally to the rest of the construction site; Noisier activities such as truck movements, will be located internally within the CSA; and Vehicle and truck entrances/exits will be located potentially on Beresford Square and Mercury Lane at the respective CSA (indicative location provided in Figure 2-1 and Figure 2-2).

 

Drawings in Appendix B of this CEMP provide detail of indicative layout and activities at the CSAs (note that these are subject to change). Table 2-5: Overview of CSAs

CSA

Location

Key Activities (to be established as part of the early works)

CSA 2

15 – 27 Beresford Square

 Office and staff facilities (lunchroom, changing rooms, toilets and showers facility etc.);  Limited construction vehicle parking;  A laydown area for materials and equipment;  Concrete pumping equipment and concrete load-in;  Storage areas for general and hazardous goods;  A waste management area (rubbish/recycling bins);  A surge pile area i.e. an earthworks storage area used for storing spoil during excavation and storing backfill material during backfilling (for the main works);

Refer Figure 2-1

Page 40

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan  Spill kit(s);  Retaining walls/embankments; and  Entrance/exit to CSA for trucks (with stabilised entry and exit) and a separate pedestrian entrance. CSA 3 Refer Figure 2-2

Mercury Lane within the Mercury Plaza site that is subject to building demolition5

It should be noted that establishment of CSAs will commence during the early works phase and will continue through to the main works phase. Additional plant and activities will be required in the CSAs to support the main works, such as installation of the bentonite and water treatment plants and establishment of the temporary shaft in the Mercury Lane CSA. These activities will be addressed in the CEMP and sub-plans prepared for the main works.

Figure 2-1: CSA 2 -Beresford Square indicative layout Page 41 | Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Figure 2-2: CSA 3 – Mercury Lane indicative layout

2.6

Site Security, safety and public viewing

Site security and safety will be provided as follows during the early works: 



 

Temporary mesh fences (approximately 1.8m in height) will be erected around active working areas for the network utility relocations and demolition works in Beresford Square / Pitt Street and Mercury Lane (includes Canada Street and East Street frontage). Noise barriers (acoustic screens) will be installed along fencing as appropriate during the works. As such, it is not practical to establish viewing windows or incorporate artworks in the early works site fencing. Hoardings (in the form of plywood fencing) will be established around the perimeter of the CSAs in Beresford Square and Mercury Lane. The hoardings will serve as acoustic barriers around the CSAs. Where practicable, the hoardings may become spaces for project signage or information or provide opportunities for mana whenua and community artwork on public facing sides. Gates will be provided as appropriate at the entry and exit points of active working areas and at the CSA entry / egress points. These will be locked shut when the site is unattended. Site personnel will be located at each site entrance to prevent unauthorised persons from entering the site.

2.6.1. Crime Prevention through Environmental Design Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles (surveillance, access management, territorial reinforcement, quality environments) will be adopted in establishment of the site as practicable during the early works, such as: Page 42

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan      



2.7

Closing site office windows at night to prevent prying eyes being “attracted” to contents in the office. Provision of lighting within construction areas and security lighting in the CSAs as appropriate, such as office entrances. Installation of CCTV within the wider working area. Clear identification of entry/exit points for work areas and CSAs. Ensuring work areas are well managed to discourage antisocial behaviours, defacement or vandalism of construction areas (such as through graffiti) or crime. Providing well-defined and well-lit pedestrian routes with clear sight lines to promote convenient and safe movement within and adjacent to the area of works (refer to the TAP DWP at Appendix K for further detail in this regard). Providing legible and informative wayfinding signage within and around the works area as appropriate to the construction staging.

Site Housekeeping

All work sites will be maintained in a tidy and neat condition, and due care shall be taken to prevent damage to any adjoining public or private property. Equipment and materials will be stored safely, securely and in an orderly manner. No materials or debris shall be placed or allowed to roll, wash, slide or blow across adjacent boundaries. The aim is to create a sense of ownership and responsibility among construction staff for construction areas, to encourage staff to take pride in their work spaces and maintain these to a high standard. On completion of construction work in individual areas, all plant and construction materials will be removed from the site as practicable.

2.7.1. Graffiti Weekly inspections of site fencing will be undertaken, during which time the fencing will be checked for integrity and graffiti. Graffiti on permanent hoardings (such as public facing CSA hoardings) will be discouraged by placing murals and project information on hoardings (where practicable). A small quantity of paint will be kept on site to paint over any graffiti occurring on site within 48 hours of it being identified (which might take longer if working at height is required). The construction site will be inspected daily for litter. The Link Alliance will work with businesses to assist in the regular removal of waste from the works area.

2.7.2. Litter All litter will be removed and disposed of in an appropriate manner. Waste management practices will be implemented through the project Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Management Plan (WARRMP – refer to section 5.17).

2.8

Returning the site to public use

Individual working areas for the network utility relocations will be reinstated with asphalt following the relocation works. These areas will form part of the main works and subsequent public realm reinstatement works to return the site to public use. The public realm reinstatement will be subject to an Urban Design DWP (UD DWP) prepared as part of a future Outline Plan for the main works.

Page 43

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Social and Environmental Management

This CEMP presents a framework of principles, environmental policy and performance standards as well as processes for implementing good environmental management. The methods for achieving this are presented in further detail in the following sections 3.1 to 3.4.

3.1

Construction Activities and Associated Environmental Receivers

The key construction activity associated with the early works include the relocation of network utilities (through excavation and directional drilling), tree removal in Beresford Square and demolition of the Beresford Square café/toilets, along with site and CSA establishment in Beresford Square and Mercury Lane. The early works have the potential to generate adverse environmental effects relating to social and businesses disruption, traffic, noise and vibration, dust, trees and vegetation, erosion and sediment discharges, contamination, groundwater and settlement, and heritage (built heritage and archaeology). The sub-plans attached to the CEMP detail mitigation measures specific to the potential environmental effects generated by the construction activities. Table 3-1 summarises key activities (further detail is provided in section 2.2) required for the early works and potential sensitive receivers. Table 3-1: Construction activities and associated environmental receivers

Main Activity

Description of activity

Environmental Receivers

Tree Removal

 Removal of trees  Use of chainsaw

 Trees and vegetation  Residents/social and businesses (noise and vibration/amenity/cultural)  Traffic network  Network Utilities

Demolition

 Welding  Cutting  Demolition with medium excavator mounted breaker  Demolition removal

 Stormwater (ultimately marine receiving environment)  Air Quality (Dust)  Buildings (settlement/ vibration/ heritage)  Residents/social and businesses (noise/vibration/dust/odour/amenity/cultural)  Traffic network  Discharge to ground (landfill)  Network Utilities

Trench Excavation

 Excavation  Spoil handling and removal  Temporary support / trench box/ sheet piles

 Stormwater (ultimately marine receiving environment)  Air Quality (Dust)  Buildings (settlement/ vibration/ heritage)  Residents/ social and businesses (noise/vibration/dust/odour)  Traffic network  Network Utilities

Page 44

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan Main Activity

Description of activity

Environmental Receivers

Directional Drilling

 Excavation  Spoil handling and removal  Temporary support / trench box/ sheet piles  Drilling  Backfilling

 Stormwater (ultimately marine receiving environment)  Buildings (settlement/ vibration/ heritage)  Residents/ social and businesses (noise/vibration/odour)  Traffic network  Network Utilities

Backfilling of trenches

 Backfilling  Spoil handling  Construction of new road pavement (i.e. breaking up and excavating existing road surface concrete and asphalt)

 Stormwater (ultimately marine receiving environment)  Air Quality (Dust)  Buildings (settlement/ vibration)  Residents/ social and businesses (noise/vibration/dust/odour)  Traffic network  Network Utilities

Platform construction

 Excavation and backfilling to platform level  Compaction of platform material

 Stormwater (ultimately marine receiving environment)  Air Quality (Dust)  Buildings (settlement/ vibration/ heritage)  Residents/ social and businesses (noise/vibration/dust)  Traffic network  Network Utilities

All

 Site establishment  CSA establishment  Movement of vehicles in the work area  Storage of excavated spoil and imported fill (up to 100 mᶟ, if necessary)  Construction and installation of erosion and sediment control devices  Construction of permanent stormwater devices  Relocation of existing utilities  Waste management  Hazardous substances management  Mobile plant and diesel generator  Hand drilling  Impact piling  Compacting

 Stormwater (ultimately marine receiving environment)  Air Quality (Dust)  Buildings (settlement/ vibration/ heritage)  Residents/ social and businesses (noise/vibration/dust/odour)  Traffic network  Discharge to ground (landfill) and groundwater  Network Utilities

Page 45

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

3.2

Environmental Risk Register

The Risk Register includes environmental risks associated with the Karangahape Station early works. It has been set up based on the construction methodology (refer to section 2) and assessment of potential risks on the environment (section 3.1). The information contained in the Risk Register provides a guide for the implementation of environmental management activities, controls and monitoring, thus minimising environmental impacts. The Risk Register is a ‘living document’ and will be updated as appropriate during the works, such as to address site conditions, revised construction methodologies, new or changed construction staging, or changes to legislative requirements. The Risk Register shall be reviewed at least quarterly by the ESM (refer to section 4.1.2 for responsibilities of the ESM). The ESM will update the CEMP and sub-plans (in conjunction with Technical Specialists) to reflect updates/changes to the Risk Register as appropriate.

3.3

Cumulative Effects

Methods to address cumulative effects are outlined for specific activities within the relevant subplans. Most notably these include construction noise and vibration; transport, access and parking; air quality (dust) effects; and social impacts and business disruption. Monitoring for each section of early works at Beresford Square/Pitt Street and Mercury Lane includes methods so that the effects from the construction activities are well understood and delineated from effects of other concurrent construction projects in proximity to the works to the extent practicable.

3.4

Legislative and Other Requirements

This section describes the statutory framework and other requirements for environmental management on the project and outlines relevant legislation, policies, plans and consents.

3.4.1.

National Legal Requirements and Policies

The works shall be undertaken to comply with all relevant legislation, regulation, strategies and policies in order to appropriately manage environmental effects. Key environmental legislation and regulations relevant to the early works is identified in Table 3-2. Table 3-2: Key national legislation, regulations and standards

National legislation, regulations, strategies and policies Resource Management Act, 1991 Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act, 1996 Protected Objects Act (1975) for the relevant archaeological and heritage standards/practices Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act (HNZPTA), 2014 National Environmental Standard – Air Quality, 2004 (NES:AQ) National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health Regulations (NES CS), 2011 Health and Safety at Work (Asbestos) Regulations 2016 Health and Safety at Work (Hazardous Substances) Regulations 2017 Hauraki Gulf Marine Park Act, 2000 WasteMINZ Technical Guidelines for Disposal to Land, Waste Management Institute New Zealand (WasteMINZ), 2018 Page 46

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan National legislation, regulations, strategies and policies National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management (NPSFM), 2014 Protection of trees on development sites (non-NZ): Australian Standard AS4970-2009 Dangerous Goods Act (1974) and Regulations

The Link Alliance will identify, maintain and continually evaluate compliance with legal and other related requirements that are applicable to the delivery of the project (refer section 6 for further detail about the monitoring and reporting requirements).

3.4.2.

Legislation, Standards and Guidelines relating to Environmental Aspects

Table 3-3 identifies the key legislation, standards and guidelines which are relevant to the environmental aspects of the works. These shall be read in conjunction with the relevant sub-plans appended to this CEMP. Table 3-3: Standards, guidelines and specific statutory requirements associated with environmental aspects and detailed in the CEMP and sub-plans

Environmental Aspect/Plan

Acronym

Plans, Statutory Requirements, Guidelines and Standards

Social and Impact Business Disruption DWP Communication and Consultation Plan

SIBD DWP



CCP

 

Land disturbing activities / erosion and sediment control

ESCP

Air Quality DWP

AQ DWP

Trees and Vegetation DWP

TV DWP

Transport, Access and Parking DWP

TAP DWP

Construction Noise and Vibration DWP

CNV DWP

Page 47

| Karangahape Station Early Works



International Association for Impact Assessment Social Impact Assessment: Guidance for Assessing and Managing the Social Impacts of Projects, 2015. International Association for Public Participation engagement spectrum (IAP2). CRL’s Overarching Communication and Consultation Strategy (2018).

GD05, Auckland Council Guideline Document No. 2016/005 for Erosion and Sediment Control Guide for Land Disturbing Activities in the Auckland Region (2016).  Auckland Council Best Management Practice: Catch pit Protection Area (2015).  Ministry for Environment, Good Practice Guide for Assessing and Managing the Environmental Effects of Dust Emissions 2001.  AS/NZ 3580.1.1: 2007 Method for sampling and analysis of ambient air – Guide to siting air monitoring equipment.  National Environmental Standard for Air Quality (AQNES).  Auckland Unitary Plan AUP (OP) Table E26.4.3 Network Utilities and electricity generation – Trees in roads and open space zones and the Notable Trees Overlay.  AS4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites.  Auckland Transport Agency’s Code of Practice for Temporary Traffic Management (CoPTTM)  Auckland Transport’s Code of Practice (ATCoP)  NZS 6803:1999 Acoustics – Construction Noise.  DIN 4150-3:1999 Structural Vibration (German standard).  BS 5228:2009 Code of Practice for Noise and Vibration Control on Structures (British Standard).  NZS 6801:2008 Measurement of Sound.  NZS 6802:2008 Assessment of Environmental Sound.

Construction Environmental Management Plan Environmental Aspect/Plan

Acronym

Plans, Statutory Requirements, Guidelines and Standards

Historic Character DWP

HC DWP

 

Contamination DWP

CDWP



Stormwater Management



HNZPT Guidelines Kōiwi Tangata Human Remains (2010); AUP(OP) Schedule 14.2 (Schedule ID. 02739, Refer Map 14.2.12.1 Historic Heritage Area Karangahape Road). Ministry for Environment A Guide to the Management of Cleanfills, 2002. Health and Safety in Employment (Asbestos) Regulations, 1998. Worksafe New Zealand Code of Practice: Management and Removal of Asbestos, November 2016 amended December 2016 Ministry for Environment, Contaminated Land Management Guidelines No. 1 to 5. New Zealand Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Asbestos in Soil, 2017 AUP(OP) Permitted Activity Criteria. Ministry for the Environment (MfE) Resource Management National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health Regulations, 2011 (NES CS) Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996, HSNO regulations and gazette notices. Hazardous Substances (fireworks, safety ammunition, and other explosives transfer) Regulations 2003 no. 2003/176. Land Transport Rule 45001/1 and 45001/2: Dangerous Goods 2005. AS/NZ 2430.3 Classification of Hazardous Areas. AS 2430.1:1987 Classification of Hazardous Areas – Explosive Gas Atmosphere. NS 6101.1:1998 Classification of Hazardous Areas – Flammable Gas and Vapour Atmospheres. AS/NZS 238 and AS/NZS 61241.1.2 Electrical Installations in Hazardous Zones. ANZECC 2000 Guidelines.

Waste Management

  

Waste Minimisation Act 2008. NZWaste Strategy. Auckland Council Bylaws – Part 22 Solid Waste.

     

Hazardous substances

      

Page 48

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Implementation and Operation

Section 4 details how the CEMP and sub-plans will be implemented. It covers:    

Roles and responsibilities; Training and induction process; Operating procedures; and Emergency and incident response.

4.1

Roles and Responsibilities

Section 4.1 details roles and responsibilities for the project and includes contact details.

4.1.1.

Overview and Responsibility for this CEMP

Three main groups are responsible for the environmental management of the works, namely: 

CRLL as the wider CRL project owner, requiring authority, and holder of the resource consents with overall responsibility for compliance with consent and designation conditions and project approvals; The Link Alliance who are undertaking the construction works with overall responsibility for site environmental management; and Auckland Council who is responsible for auditing the works and monitoring compliance with designation and resource consent conditions, the CEMP and sub-plans.

 

Each person involved in the project has equal responsibility to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse environmental effects during the early works. Section 4.1.2 provides further detail on the roles and responsibilities during the early works.

4.1.2.

Specific Roles and Responsibilities

Table 4-1 describes the key Link Alliance roles and responsibilities in relation to environmental management during the construction period. The sub-plans also outline specific roles and responsibilities in relation to the implementation of the respective plans as appropriate. Table 4-1: Specific Roles and Responsibilities

Role  Project Director – Francois Dudouit  Deputy Project Director – Dale Burtenshaw  Construction Manager – Philippe Begou  Karangahape Station Project Manager – Jonathan Hill

Page 49

Responsibilities  Overseeing project planning, acquisition, design, constructability, procurement, stakeholder engagement, communications, programme and financial control.  Providing strategic direction to all workstreams to provide an integrated approach to project delivery.  Ultimate responsibility for compliance with resource consent and designation conditions.  Ultimate responsibility for achieving the sustainability outcomes.  Overseeing the Karangahape Station construction delivery.  Ensuring site personnel adhere to the CEMP and sub-plans and comply with environmental operating procedures.  Ensuring site personnel adhere to the project communication protocols and procedures.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan Role  Karangahape Station Construction Manager – Dan Trotman

 Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager – Rachel Blundell

 Environmental and Sustainability Manager (ESM) – Sarah Sutherland

Page 50

Responsibilities  Development, management and monitoring of Construction Execution Procedures (CEPs), including the integration of environmental and sustainability requirements.  Providing project progress/milestone information for stakeholder briefings (e.g. CLG, Mana Whenua forum).  Coordinates emergency responses, along with the ESM.  Manages a Communications and Engagement team that is the main and readily accessible point of contact for stakeholders and persons affected by the works.  Implementation of Link Alliance Communications for the Karangahape Station early works and responsible for communicating key aspects of the works to stakeholders, affected parties and the general public including: - Informing the community / key stakeholders of the project, construction milestones, programme and progress. - Notifying project neighbours / key stakeholders of project works that may affect them and regular liaison with the affected community.  Primary contact for project related complaints and enquiries.  Managing stakeholder enquiries and working with relevant team members to resolve complaints.  Immediately reporting any high-risk stakeholder / communication issues to the Karangahape Station Project Manager and the CRLL GM Corporate Relations and Communications.  Assisting the CRLL Communications team with key stakeholder engagement including the Mana Whenua Forum and Local Boards.  Providing advice to the Karangahape Station Project Manager / Construction Manager on critical stakeholder engagement, communications and relationship building.  Co-ordination of Karangahape CLG meetings.  Assisting the Karangahape Station Construction Manager in briefing site personnel on: - The mandatory site inductions regarding the standards and requirements for community relations; - Procedures to follow if staff are approached by a member of the public or the media; and - Behavioural procedures in and around the construction site boundaries.  Providing leadership to the site team to achieve project environmental objectives and outcomes.  Undertaking regular site inspections, auditing and checking of environmental management practices and procedures/compliance with the CEMP, sub-plans and resource consent and designation conditions.  Tracking compliance information.  Coordinating environmental interfaces with consultants, subcontractors and suppliers.  Submitting relevant reporting and records to Auckland Council.  Attending compliance meetings with Auckland Council Compliance and Monitoring Officers.  Reporting any changes to construction techniques or environmental changes which may require changes to existing / new planning approvals.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan Role

 Project and Site Engineers

 All Staff (including subcontractors)

Responsibilities  Reviewing and updating CEMP and relevant sub-plans during works (at least annually).  Updating and maintaining the environmental portion of the project Risk Register.  Coordinating environmental monitoring as per the CEMP and subplans.  Training staff (including subcontractors) on environmental and sustainability aspects.  Reporting on the project environmental and sustainability KPIs.  Coordinating the interfaces and communications with external agencies and stakeholders in relation to environmental management on the project in conjunction with the Communication and Engagement Manager.  Coordinating environmental emergency / incident responses and undertaking incident investigations.  Informing the Project Director/Karangahape Station Project Manager of environmental or sustainability non-compliances.  Resolving environmental non-compliances.  Ensuring staff are handling hazardous substances as per the Safety Data Sheets, are trained appropriately and are handling and storing hazardous substances appropriately.  Is an IS Accredited Professional.  Supervising subcontractors.  Undertaking daily site inspections and environmental monitoring.  Ensuring environmental erosion and sediment control works are installed and maintained.  Ensuring all staff are aware of environmental requirements and management measures are implemented and maintained to ensure ongoing effectiveness.  Adherence to the CEMP and sub-plans.  Attending tool-box talks and environmental training (including becoming familiar with the requirements of the CEMP and sub-plans, as directed by the ESM).  Reporting environmental incidents, complaints, defects and any other problems to senior staff.  Ensuring that environmental management processes and procedures are followed and mitigation/protection measures are maintained and working correctly.  Ensuring that the site and adjacent areas are protected and respected (litter placed in bins, site kept tidy).  Direct all public and media enquiries to the Communications and Engagement Manager.  Use approved haul routes, site access and designated site parking (if available) to minimise disruption to the local community.  Work within approved construction hours.  Work within the conditions specified in the Permits to Notify (refer to CCP for further detail).  Show consideration for stakeholders and community members at all times.

Contact details for the Karangahape Station Project Manager and Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager are provided in Table 4-2. Page 51

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan Table 4-2: Contact details for project staff

Title

Name

Contact no.

Karangahape Station Project Manager Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager

Jonathan Hill

Jonathan.hill@linkalliance.co.nz

022 019 1668

Rachel Blundell

Rachel.Blundell@linkalliance.co.nz

027 306 9156

The general public contact details for the Karangahape Station early works are as follows:  

4.2

CRL Hotline: 0800 CRL TALK (0800 275 8255). Karangahape Station email address: karangahape@linkalliance.co.nz.

Training and Induction

All project staff will receive appropriate training that is relevant for the environmental aspects of their work. As a minimum, all personnel will be required to complete the project induction training. Other trainings include weekly tool box talks and pre-start meetings.

4.2.1.

Induction Training

The project induction will include an overview of the environmental, cultural, social and sustainability aspects of the works, including the key requirements and staff responsibilities in relation to this CEMP and the sub-plans. The purpose of the induction is to ensure that, at a minimum, all project staff:   

  

Understand the importance of following the environmental policy, procedures and requirements of this CEMP; Are aware of the roles and responsibilities relating to environmental management for the works; and Are aware of the significant environmental, cultural and social values and issues within the vicinity of the works, the potential impact of the construction activities on these values and the management of these impacts; Are aware of the emergency response and incident procedures; Understand and implement site sustainability measures and monitoring; and Understand the Project communications and the complaints management procedures.

The Link Alliance Site Access and Inductions memo6 provides details on the early works site induction process and booking procedure.

4.2.2.

Tool Box Talks

Weekly tool box talks will be conducted for site personnel to deliver specific training and to ensure all site staff are aware of the key environmental issues, social, cultural and sustainability matters relevant to the works. This may include (but not limited to) the following:    6

Spill kit training; Hazardous substances handling; Graffiti covering;

Link Alliance Early Works Site Access and Inductions Memo, dated 29 August 2019. Page 52 | Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan ď‚ˇ ď‚ˇ

Stormwater discharge control; Correct installation of erosion and sediment control measures (refer to section 5.4) or acoustic screens; and Tree protection.

ď‚ˇ

Tool box talks will provide site personnel with ongoing environmental training and information throughout the project. All tool box talk participants must sign an attendance sheet.

4.2.3.

Pre-Start meetings

Pre-start meetings will be used by the supervisors and foremen to explain the work to be done in the upcoming shift. All operational aspects of the task will be discussed, including safety and environmental issues and controls, particularly if there are new hazards or if there has been a recent incident. An environmental management representative must attend, as applicable, to explain new environmental controls or reiterate existing controls.

Page 53

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

5. Environmental Management The following sections of the CEMP describe the environmental management measures that will be implemented during construction of the project to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse environmental effects. Sub-plans detailing the controls and measures for each environmental aspect are crossreferenced where relevant and form appendices to this CEMP.

5.1

Network Utilities

The early works will involve the relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station as outlined in section 2 of this CEMP. All works relating to network utilities will be managed in accordance with operational requirements, safety and integrity of network utilities that are within, or are in close proximity to the works area. Co-ordination and consultation with Network Utility Operators (NUO) has been undertaken throughout the development of the works methodology and will continue during the works. Operational procedures will follow the ‘Identifying and communication with key stakeholders’ section 6 of CCP (Appendix G of this CEMP) and ‘Stakeholders and affected people’ section 7.2 of the CCP. The Link Alliance will also utilise the strategies outlined in the ‘Communication Tools’ section 6.2 of the CCP. Consultation has been undertaken with the following key NUOs in relation to the early works:       

Vector Electricity; Vector Gas; Vector Communications; Chorus; Vodafone; Auckland Council’s stormwater unit (Healthy Waters); and Watercare Services.

The Karangahape Station Utilities Management Plan7 has also been developed with the NUOs for the CRL project as a whole. Consultation with NUO has included regular workshops and ongoing liaison through emails, phone calls, and meetings. NUO procedures for utility disruption will be followed in the event of any disruption as a result of the additional utility relocation works. It is considered that current practices by NUO reflect best practice and will therefore be used as standard procedure for the duration of the utility relocation works. Section 9.10 of the SIBD DWP describes specific mitigation measures to be implemented. A key risk in relation to the network utility relocations is encountering unknown utilities. Detailed design and planning of the works in conjunction with the NUOs, including investigation trenches / potholing have been undertaken in order to manage and mitigate this risk. Should unknown utilities be encountered during the works, this will be managed on a case by case basis. Any damage to network utilities will be managed on a case by case basis and in accordance with the works emergency response procedure. The procedure will be made available to all sub-contractors, and posted on notice boards around site to ensure all relevant personnel on site are aware of the emergency response procedures involving exiting network utilities. All NUOs and their contractors 7

City Rail Link Mount Eden Station, Karangahape Station and NAL Connections – Utilities Management Plan, Document ref: CRL-SYW-UTI-000-PLN-0001 3 August 2018. Page 54 | Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan shall adhere to the obligations outlined within this CEMP while undertaking work within the early works site. This includes all personnel undertaking the relevant induction and training processes as outlined within section 4.2 of this CEMP and complying with the environmental procedures outlined within section 5 of this CEMP. Regular consultation and coordination with all NUOs will be undertaken throughout the works to ensure the continued operation of all utilities and to ensure the NUO have access to existing utilities for maintenance/emergency access and repair at all reasonable times. This will be through workshops, regularly scheduled meetings, phone calls and emails.

5.1.1.

Provision of Drawings to Network Utility Operators

All utilities installed or relocated as part of the works will be surveyed by a registered surveyor and transferred into a drawing which satisfies each of the service providers specific ‘as built’ requirements. This information will be provided to the service providers following the completion of the utility works.

5.2

Social Impact and Business Disruption

During the Karangahape Station early works construction, there is potential for disruption to businesses, residents and community services/facilities. A SIBD DWP (Appendix F of this CEMP) has been developed in accordance with CRL designation condition 61 to outline how any adverse effects to businesses, residents and community services/facilities will be avoided, remedied or mitigated as far as reasonably practicable. Feedback obtained from the community and businesses to inform the preparation of this DWP has reinforced the importance of regular communication between the project team and affected parties during the works. Engagement with residents, communities and businesses located adjacent to and in proximity to the early works area was carried out between August and October 2019. Affected parties were contacted via face to face communication (included arranged meetings, door knocking, information sessions and face to face meetings at the CLG meeting). The following key issues and concerns were identified as a result of engagement with residents, communities and businesses:          

Page 55

The need for ongoing and proactive communication. Loss of outdoor seating areas. Dust and noise nuisance associated with construction works in proximity to businesses and residential properties. The need for unimpeded vehicle and pedestrian access to private properties, including private car parks. The impact of the loss of car parking on businesses, i.e. no parking available for customers. Concerns over tenants leaving premises due to disruption. The need to minimise impacts on the appearance and attractiveness of Beresford Square and avoid unsafe spaces. The need to maintain visibility to businesses. Ensuring that the placement of construction hoarding does not exacerbate social issues in the area including homelessness and drug use. Ensuring recognition of vulnerable groups and the diverse community in the Karangahape Road.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan Social impact and business disruption effects will also be mitigated through implementation of the other relevant sub-plans required under the CRL designation and A2N regional resource consent conditions, in particular the TAP DWP, CNV DWP (and SSCNVMPs), HC DWP (Built Heritage), CCP, TV DWP, and the AQ DWP. Mitigation measures include, but are not limited to, the following:   

Regular engagement (courtesy visits, project progress meetings, advertising). Development Response Plan (DRP) – includes actions such as cleaning ground floor windows, regular access audits, business support, etc. Briefing of staff, including contractors, to ensure they are aware of the project obligations to stakeholders, including the diverse community and vulnerable groups. Briefings will also include information on the following:   

      

How to approach rough sleepers; How to deal with illegal activity; and Steps to follow during an emergency situation on site.

Minimising utility disruption through continuous communication with affected communities and NUOs. Minimising dust and odour (refer to AQ DWP). Managing and monitoring of traffic disruptions (refer to TAP DWP). Management of construction noise and vibration (refer to CNV DWP). Preserving the visual amenity, heritage and landscape (refer to HC DWP – Built Heritage and the TV DWP). Implementation of methods to improve community character and maintain safety. Implementation of methods to prevent business visibility disruption (e.g. using Perspex in permanent hoardings and feature lighting, open mesh fencing as practicable).

Section 8 of the SIBD DWP outlines the process for receiving and monitoring complaints and provides a freephone number and an email address to report any complaints. Regular monitoring of social impact and business disruption from the works will be undertaken through the implementation of the SIBD DWP and other relevant sub-plans.

5.3

Communication and Consultation

A Communication and Consultation Plan (CCP) has been prepared in accordance with CRL designation condition 15 and resource consent conditions 25, and 27 to 33 (refer to Appendix G of this CEMP). The CCP provides a framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in-proximity parties during construction of the Karangahape Station early works. Appendix B of the CCP provides an engagement map identifying the affected parties and parties affected in proximity to the early works. Appendix C of the CCP provides a list of affected parties and a summary of the consultation methods and outcome of discussions. Community engagement for the works will range from simply informing people about the project to consulting and involving them in meaningful decisions about key aspects of the project. The priority for communication with affected parties will be via face-to-face conversations. A secondary audience of those in wider proximity or interested in the works will be serviced through a Page 56

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan predominantly online and electronic communication strategy. The key messages for this audience will be advanced communication of changes to road function to enable informed choice and to ensure travel-related information is readily available. The Communication Strategy for the works includes the following: 



The use of various communication channels and tools to notify affected parties of the works (e.g. E-notices, one on one meetings, CLG meetings), and frequency of communication relevant to the works and actual/potential effects on receivers. Identifying and communicating with key stakeholders such as owners of businesses, NUO, Auckland Council Parks Department, HNZPT and Emergency Services.

The CLG is a key mechanism for reflecting community concern and interest and communicating the programme to the community’s most affected parties. A CLG has been established for the Karangahape Station area. Communication and consultation with affected parties and the wider community in the vicinity of the works area will be regular and ongoing. Methods to facilitate communication will be through the CLG, which will meet at least every three months during the construction phase. These methods include engagement tools such as publications, phone calls, use of the CRL website to provide updates, signage, and advertising material. Section 7 of the CCP outlines the requirements and process for managing complaints and includes timeframes for responding to complaints. Overall the CCP aims to provide communities with confidence that they will be kept informed and know how this will happen, have effective ways to connect with the project and input into issues that affect them. Additionally, the CCP will ensure stakeholders and affected parties are consulted with, and where there are direct effects on them, they will have inquiries and complaints responded to in a timely manner and can get in touch easily on a 24/7 basis should the need arise.

5.4

Erosion and Sediment Control

Earthworks activities during the early works have the potential to generate sediment generation at Beresford Square, Pitt Street, Mercury Lane and Cross Street. Detail on the earthworks activities is provided in section 2.2 of this CEMP. An ESCP has been prepared in accordance with resource consent conditions 53 to 58, 65 to 73 and 166, and is provided in Appendix H of this CEMP. The ESCP sets out the measures that will be implemented during the works to mitigate and manage the potential adverse effects from sediment generation on the receiving environment. The ESCP follows the principles of Auckland Council GD05. Erosion and Sediment Control Measures (ESCM) will be installed prior to the start of any vegetation clearance, site set up or earthworks and will remain in place until the reinstatement of the respective has been completed. ESCM that will be implemented throughout the works are summarised below (and further detailed in the ESCP and depicted in drawings attached in Appendix B of the ESCP): 

General ESCM include:      

Page 57

Catchpit/ stormwater inlet protection; Diversion channels/ bunds; Filter socks; Sand logs/ coir logs/ hay bales; Dewatering devices; Settlement tanks;

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan   



Stabilised entrances and surfaces; and Truck wash/ shaker ramps.

Measures to minimise the environmental risk associated with concrete and asphalt works. It is recommended that drainage channels are completely isolated during these works and if not practicable, then careful placement of sandbags or bunds should be implemented. Erosion and sediment source control such as:     

General site management practises, e.g. housekeeping and disturbed ground stabilisation; Soil management practices e.g. stockpiles to be located within construction areas (including CSAs) and away from overland flow paths; Sediment transport control measures such as diversion bund and clean water diversions; Open trench works control measures stabilisation of exposed areas, dewatering and use of settlement devices; and Removal of all ESCM after resinstatement has been established.

Tailored ESCM for construction areas are shown on the ESCP drawing in Appendix B of the ESCP. ESCM monitoring inspection and maintenance procedures will be undertaken on a weekly basis and after rainfall events as detailed in the ESCP.

5.5

Air Quality

During the construction phase there is potential for discharge of contaminants (in particular, dust) to air as outlined in section 3.1 of this CEMP. Dust generating activities include demolition, excavation, spoil removal, storage of excavated spoil and imported fill, movement of vehicles and backfilling of trenches. An AQ DWP has been prepared to identify measures that will be implemented to avoid, remedy, or mitigate the potential adverse effects on air quality during the Karangahape Station early works and is provided in Appendix I of this CEMP. The AQ DWP has been prepared in accordance with designation condition 59 and resource consent condition 222 of discharge permit R/REG/2016/1899. Specifically, the AQ DWP sets out the best practicable options that will be implemented to manage the potential adverse effects of discharges of dust, odour and hazardous air pollutants generated during construction. Due to the proximity of pedestrians, residences and businesses to the works, all locations within 100m of the designation are considered sensitive to the effects of dust. General measures that will be employed during the early works to control potential dust emissions are outlined in the AQ DWP and will include:     

Page 58

Construction Environmental Management Plan  

Maintenance of surface moisture content: watering or wet suppression is used to dampen dry or dusty exposed areas / earthwork areas; and Removing excavated spoil from site on a regular basis.

The AQ DWP provides environmental performance standards for dust monitoring, dust deposition and odour, and includes trigger levels and actions to be implemented, as well as a visual dust monitoring programme. Dust control will be a combination of visual monitoring (primarily) and targeted ambient dust monitoring, good management of the construction areas, and a rapid response to any of the trigger levels and/or to any complaints received. Relevant dust (including dust control during contaminated material handling) and odour mitigation measures, control of vehicle exhaust emissions and dust contingency measures are outlined in sections 5.3 to 5.8 of the AQ DWP.

5.6

Trees and Vegetation

The early works (Beresford/Pitt Street stage 1) will require the removal of 12 street trees (of exotic and native origin) within Beresford Square and have the potential to result in impacts on retained tree(s) within Beresford Square within proximity to the works (if not appropriately protected). It is noted that none of the affected trees are scheduled under the AUP (OP). A Trees and Vegetation DWP (TV DWP) has been prepared to manage these effects in accordance with the requirements of CRL designation condition 55 (refer to Appendix J of this CEMP). As outlined in the TV DWP, tree removal will be undertaken by a suitably qualified and experienced arborist and will be informed by site observations, such as the proximity of surrounding buildings, tree size and overall condition. The methodologies used may include the following:   

Removal should be staged whereby the outer limbs are removed first, followed by the inner limbs and the main trunk. Depending on the location of utility lines, tree stumps should either be dug out or ground in situ. Removed tree debris will either be mulched onsite or removed for mulching offsite, depending on which is more practicable.

Consideration will be given to the relocation and replanting of the native trees that require removal; providing the roots balls of these trees are not compromised by underground utilities, and it is deemed to be a practical option. Replacement planting will be undertaken as part of the public realm reinstatement works, following the completion of construction of the new Karangahape Station. Planting shall be undertaken in accordance with designation condition 55.3(c) and will be addressed in the Urban Design DWP (UD DWP) to be prepared as part of the public realm reinstatement OPW (refer to section 5.11 of this CEMP). Should works (including truck movements) be required within the immediate vicinity of retained tree(s) in Beresford Square and Pitt Street, Tree Protections Zones (including canopy protection) shall be established as outlined in the TV DWP. The following construction activities will not be permitted in designated Tree Protection Zones due to their adverse effect on trees and roots:   Page 59

Mechanical excavation on the road, footpath or any public space. Stockpiling of building materials, debris or soil. | Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan     

Vehicular traffic except on existing paved surfaces. Installation of service pits or hatches. Vehicular crossings. Cutting or damaging of tree roots with a diameter greater than 30mm. Alteration of soil levels and structure.

Consultation regarding trees and vegetation has been undertaken with the CLG and relevant stakeholders and partners including the Mana Whenua Forum and Auckland Council Parks Department (refer to CCP in Appendix G for further details).

5.7

Transport, Access and Parking

The early works in Pitt Street/Beresford Square and Mercury Lane will impact the traffic network in, and surrounding the construction area. A Transport, Access and Parking DWP (TAP DWP) has been prepared to identify the measures that will be implemented to mitigate and manage the potential adverse effects of the early works on the transport network, parking and property access. It covers impacts to pedestrians and cyclists, access to properties/businesses, public transport, vehicle movements, parking, taxi stands and emergency services access. The TAP DWP (Appendix K of this CEMP) has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of designation conditions 25 and 28. The potential effects on the transport network as a result of the early works, and associated operational procedures are summarised in Table 5-1. Table 5-1 Karangahape Station early works transport, access and parking operational procedures

Transport Network

Impacts

Operational Procedures

Pedestrians and Cyclists

 All existing pedestrian routes will remain open along Beresford Square, Pitt Street, Karangahape Road and Mercury Lane, although they will occasionally need to be diverted across the street to allow safe movement around the construction zones.  Most of the construction work will require a reduction in width to the footpaths within the various work stages.  The cycle ramp outside 59 Pitt Street will require relocation.

 A minimum footpath width of 1.5m for pedestrians will be provided.  Auckland Transport has agreed on the relocation of the cycle ramp further north along Pitt Street.

Access to properties /businesses

 All access to private properties will be maintained for pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles for the duration of the early works.

 In the event of short term closures that will impact vehicle access to properties during the early works, affected parties will be consulted in advance of the closure in accordance with CRL designation condition 25.3(g)(i).  Any disturbance to local businesses will be mitigated through procedures described in the SIBD DWP (refer to Appendix F of this CEMP).

Page 60

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan Transport Network

Impacts

Operational Procedures

Public transport (Bus)

 The early works will have a relatively low impact (up to 3 mins delay) to journey times for selected bus routes.  The Auckland Transport Bus Stop outside 78 Pitt Street (City Link Bus Service) will require relocation.

 Auckland Transport is already delivering on the relocation of the bus stop which will be outside the works zone (location to be confirmed).

Vehicle movements (including cars, trucks and overdimension vehicles)

 Truck movements are expected to be low, at approximately 25 to 30 return trips per day (maximum).  Local access to the work site by over-dimension vehicles will require the use of some local streets that are not part of the over dimension network. The routes required are the same as those outlined for construction vehicles in Section 4.3 of the TAP DWP (also refer CRL designation condition 25.3(c)(iii)).

 Where over-dimension or overweight vehicle movements are required, these will take place via the Transport Agency’s over-dimension and overweight routes, where practicable.  Over-dimensional loads will be managed by limiting the movements of these vehicles outside of the commuter peak periods, and by applying mobile traffic management where these vehicles are required to traverse multiple lanes of traffic.

Parking and loading zones

 Closure of 15-27 Beresford Square for use of Beresford Square CSA. This parking was previously leased by Wilson. The lease agreement now lies with CRLL until the end of the construction of the CRL project.  Upon closure of the Beresford Square exit onto Pitt Street in January 2020, on-street parking in the upper half of Beresford Square will be removed for the early works construction zone.  On commencement of the Beresford Square CSA, on-street parks at the lower end of Beresford Square (Day Street to Hopetoun Street) will be gradually removed to accommodate trucks into and out of the CSA.  Mercury Lane will experience a closure of the majority of its car parks (about 21) for the duration of the early works.  The mobility parking space on Beresford Square will be relocated.  Three loading zones (on Mercury Lane, Pitt Street and Beresford Square) will be closed during the early works.

 The mobility parking space on Beresford Square will be relocated to Day Street.  Other loading zones in close proximity to the works will be used as alternatives.  Other on and off-street parking facilities are available as alternative parking locations, within a 300m radius of the early works construction area.

Taxi stands

 No impacts to the Taxi Stand on Karangahape Road anticipated during the early works (subject to the Traffic Management Plan to be prepared for Karangahape Road).

Page 61

| Karangahape Station Early Works

N/A

Construction Environmental Management Plan

5.8

Construction Noise and Vibration

The early works will impact the existing noise environment at Beresford Square and Mercury Lane due to construction activities using equipment (such as excavation, saw cutting, drilling, piling, compacting, welding) that generate noise and vibration (in close proximity to sensitive receptors. A Construction Noise and Vibration DWP (CNV DWP) has been developed to identify and provide for implementation of the best practicable option to avoid, remedy or mitigate potential adverse noise and vibration effects resulting from the Karangahape Station early works. The CNV DWP identifies noise and vibration performance standards that must, where practicable, be complied with and details the management and control methodologies to be implemented during construction. The CNV DWP has been prepared in accordance with designation conditions 16, 31, 33, 34, and 36 to 39 and is provided in Appendix L of this CEMP. The CNV DWP will be implemented throughout the entire construction period and will be the primary tool for the management of noise and vibration effects resulting from the construction activities of the early works. Construction noise will be measured and assessed in accordance with NZS6803:1999, and will be managed to comply with the construction noise limits required by conditions 31.1 and 31.2 of the designation (unless otherwise provided for in an approved Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan – SSCNMP). A number of buildings (mainly commercial) have been identified at Beresford Square/Pitt Street, East Street, Mercury Lane, Karangahape Road and Cross Street, where construction activities are predicted to exceed the noise limits. In addition, a notable receiver is located at 9 Mercury Lane (Theatre). A SSCNMP (for specific construction activities) has been prepared for these properties to mitigate these construction noise effects. Construction vibration will be measured and assessed in accordance with DIN 4150-3:1999, and will be managed to comply with the vibration limits for building damage required by conditions 33.1 and 33.2 of the designation (unless otherwise provided for in an approved Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plan – SSCVMP). Specific day time/night time vibration limits are provided in designation condition 34.3, however those are only required to be investigated/applied for after the receipt of a complaint from any building occupant. A number of buildings have been identified at East Street, Beresford Square/Pitt Street, Mercury Lane, Karangahape Road and Cross Street, which may be at risk of exceeding the building damage vibration limits. A SSCVMP has been prepared to mitigate these construction vibration effects. In some instances, a combined Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (SSCNVMP) will be prepared for properties that have the potential to be affected by noise and vibration generated by the construction activities. General noise and vibration management and mitigation measures are proposed to be implemented throughout construction to avoid exceedances of the noise and vibration criteria. These are listed in section 7 of the CNV DWP and relate to:         Page 62

Training; Construction traffic and deliveries (for noise mitigation); Plant and equipment; Pneumatic breakers; Piling and compaction; Noise barriers and enclosures (for noise mitigation); Traffic tyre noise (for noise mitigation); and Scheduling of activities. | Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan Engagement with residents and business potentially affected by noise and vibration will be a key component for the management of disruption from construction activities as outlined in the CNV DWP and the CCP. Engagement will include (but not be limited to) notifications to affected parties prior to and during the works, regular engagement with notable noise and vibration receivers, and wider updates on progress of the works and activities. It is important that information is provided in a transparent and consistent manner in relation to exposure, duration, mitigation and management measures. Monitoring of noise and vibration is detailed in section 9 of the CNV DWP, including monitoring requirements, timing, frequency, locations and standards. Section 10 of the CNV DWP includes a range of contingency measures that shall be implemented in case of exceedance of noise and/or vibration (building damage/amenity) limits. Operational procedures associated with building condition surveys are described in section 5.14 of this CEMP.

5.9

Lighting Spill and Glare

Temporary lighting will be required in the early works construction areas where work is carried out during the hours of darkness. Light spill may cause a nuisance to surrounding residents and businesses, while glare from temporary lighting has the potential to impact motorists in surrounding areas. The principal objectives for the management of temporary lighting are to:   

Minimise the nuisance level to adjacent residents/building occupiers of the project; Minimise the impact of glare on the surrounding road environment; and Increase employee and subcontractor awareness of their obligations with regard to minimising effects of light spill on adjacent neighbours.

The Link Alliance will minimise light spill by:  



5.10

Selecting light fittings that provide a defined directional beam; Mounting lights in elevated positions so that they may point down towards the works, rather than aiming across the work space and increasing the risk of light shining into adjacent buildings; and Adopting work methods that minimises light spill and glare such as not ‘over’ lighting or using more light than necessary for safety and work activities.

Historic Character

Section 5.10 of this CEMP describes the environmental management procedures related to historic character, including built heritage and archaeology.

5.10.1. Built Heritage The early works area (and area in close proximity to the works) contains a number of built heritage features, including: 

Page 63

Heritage buildings (almost all buildings in Pitt Street, Beresford Square and Mercury Lane in proximity to the early works) with notable buildings being Auckland’s early fire and ambulance station, Mercury Theatre, Pitt Street Wesleyan Church, former St James Church in Beresford Square and buildings in 61-65 Pitt Street; and | Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan 

Historic streetscape elements, including basalt kerbs and blocks within footpaths of Pitt Street.

A number of heritage buildings could potentially be affected by vibration, ground movement and impact damage during the early works. A Historic Character DWP – Built Heritage Section (HC DWP – Built Heritage Section) has been prepared to identify measures that will be implemented to mitigate and manage the potential adverse effects on built heritage during the Karangahape Station early works. The HC DWP (Built Heritage Section) has been prepared in accordance with designation condition 41 (refer to Appendix M). This HC DWP (Built Heritage Section) considered buildings located in proximity to the early works which are recognised as having heritage value by being either scheduled in the AUP (OP), included in the schedule for Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area or listed under the HNZPTA 2014. The HC DWP (Built Heritage Section) outlines the operational procedures that will be implemented during the early works in order to mitigate and manage effects on built heritage. These include (but are not limited to) the following measures: 

    

Building Condition Surveys prior to the commencement of works (with surveys during or post the works as required, refer to section 5.14 and refer to the CNV DWP (Appendix L of this CEMP) and the GSMCP (Appendix P of the CEMP); Implementation of appropriate built heritage protection during the works where construction activities are undertaken adjacent to buildings; Vibration management and monitoring (as per the CNV DWP and SSCVMP); Ground settlement management and monitoring (as per the GSMCP); Contingency measures for management and recording during construction; and Implementation of a recording and salvage strategy in relation to the demolition of the Beresford Street Toilets.

5.10.2. Archaeology A Historic Character DWP (Archaeology Section) DWP (HC DWP – Archaeology Section) has been developed in accordance with designation condition 42, and is included in Appendix N of this CEMP. The HC DWP (Archaeology Secetion) has been prepared to identify measures that will be implemented to mitigate and manage the potential adverse effects on archaeology during construction of the Karangahape Station early works. This HC DWP (Archeaology Section) is consistent with the archaeological provisions of the HNZPTA 2014 and the archaeological Authority issued by the HNZPT authorising modification of archaeological sites within the Karangahape Station early works area8. No archaeological sites have been identified within the wider Karangahape Station early works area. However, the HC DWP (Archaeology Section) notes: 

A house and a Sunday school were located in the Beresford Square CSA in the 19th and 20th centuries, which may have associated subsurface remains.

All modifications and investigation of pre-1900 archaeological remains are subject to the archaeological provisions of the HNZPTA and must be carried out in accordance with the conditions of an Authority issued by NZNPT under that Act. A general Authority for the Aotea Station to Mt Eden Station NAL works, including modification of any subsurface remains exposed by the Karangahape Station early works include the CSA, has been granted by HNZPT (Authority No. 2017/793). The Authority sets management procedures in place for any archaeological discoveries. Page 64 | Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan 



Other potential areas of archaeological interest include the properties at 9A, 9B, 9C, 11-13 and 17-21 Mercury Lane within the Mercury Lane CSA which may have subsurface archaeological remains. There is a limited chance of impacting on subsurface pre-1900 archaeological or significant 20th century historic heritage remains within the road reserves of Mercury Lane, Pitt Street and Beresford Square, such as early drainage infrastructure or street surfaces.

Detailed archaeological procedures and mitigation measures are provided in the HC DWP (Archaeology Section), and these are summarised below (related to the entire project area unless specified otherwise). 



CSA – An archaeologist will be present to monitor any excavations or surface clearance within the Beresford Square and Mercury Lane CSAs in case any subsurface archaeological features are present. If any subsurface archaeological features (pre-1900 or early 20th century date) are exposed within the CSAs, they will be investigated, sampled and recorded by the archaeologist. Archaeology Discovery Protocols – If any archaeological features and deposits are exposed during works the Link Alliance will notify the Project Archaeologist, who will then assess the features, record the exposed remains and recover samples of archaeological material for further analysis. Discovery of archaeological or cultural remains – 



Mana Whenua protocols –  



 

Page 65

If any archaeological or cultural remains (pre-1900 or early 20th century date) are encountered, works will stop in the immediate vicinity of the find until the Project Archaeologist can assess the site. The Project Archaeologist will stop works in the immediate vicinity by notifying the Karangahape Station Project Manager and will investigate and record the remains. If significant archaeological features or deposits are identified during works the Auckland Council, HNZPT and Mana Whenua will be notified by the Project Archaeologist, and the remains will be investigated and recorded in accordance with accepted archaeological practice and as directed by HNZPT, if these are of a pre1900 date.

If archaeological remains relating to Māori occupation are exposed, the Project Archaeologist will inform the appropriate Mana Whenua representatives. Specific protocols will be followed for Kōiwi Tangata (Human Remains) and Taonga (Māori Artefacts).

Recording of features and deposits – Any in situ pre-1900 or significant 20th century archaeological features exposed during the early works will be investigated, recorded and sampled consistent with accepted archaeological practice. Artefact Management Plan – The location of artefact features will be marked on the site plan and retained for analysis. Stand down periods – in the event any archaeological features are revealed during works, stand down periods involving the ceasing of works in the immediate vicinity may be required to allow archaeological investigation and consultation with the appropriate parties. | Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan 



5.11

Post excavation analysis and archiving – During the works, information on any archaeological discoveries will be provided to the Auckland Council Cultural Heritage Implementation Team and Consent Monitoring Officer, HNZPT and Mana Whenua. Reporting – information on any archaeological discoveries will be provided to the Auckland Council Cultural Heritage Implementation Team and Compliance Monitoring Officer, HNZPT and Mana Whenua.

Urban Design

An Urban Design DWP (UD DWP) will be prepared as part of the main works and is not applicable to the Karangahape Station early works.

5.12

Contaminated Soils

A Contamination DWP (CDWP) has been prepared to identify measures that will be implemented to mitigate and manage the potential human health and environmental effects associated with contaminated soil during the early works. The CDWP has been prepared in accordance with designation conditions 57 and 58 and resource consent conditions 131 to 150. The CDWP is provided in Appendix O of this CEMP. The objective of the CDWP is to detail the best practicable options to avoid, remedy, or mitigate the potential adverse effects of contaminated soil discharges generated by construction activities. Investigations of soil contaminant concentrations undertaken to date have identified that significant soil contamination is unlikely to be encountered during land disturbance activities. There is, however, the potential to encounter gravel type fill materials (surface level to approximately 2m below ground level (m bgl) for metals and heavy end hydrocarbons) for which soil contaminant concentrations may be in the order of applicable standards defined by the MfE NES CS and AUP (OP) Permitted Activity Criteria. The primary source of potential contamination within the Karangahape Station early works area relates to the presence of fill of unknown origin. This is largely due to the fact that the works are to be completed within an urban setting comprising road infrastructure. In addition, asbestos is likely to be present in the underground wastewater and stormwater pipes due to the age of the pipes. General site management practices that will be implemented to manage any potential contamination during the works include (but are not limited to) the following:      

Appropriate storage and removal of spoil material, including any contaminated fill; Implementing record keeping measures; Material importation procedures; Procedures to manage the unexpected discovery of contaminated or hazardous materials; Health and safety requirements for the works, including the use of personal protective equipment and personal decontamination; and Specific management measures in relation to surface water, dust and groundwater (as outlined in the respective DWPs and MPs – refer to paragraph below).

Should asbestos be observed or suspected during the land disturbance works, all work shall cease, and an appointed asbestos professional will be recommended by the Project Contaminated Land Professional. Works can recommence once asbestos has been appropriately managed/safely removed as advised by the asbestos professional. Page 66

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan The management of contamination associated with surface water, sediment, dust and groundwater is covered by the following relevant sub-plans: 

 

5.13

Erosion and sediment control procedures are described in section 5.4 of this CEMP and further detailed in the ESCP attached in Appendix H of this CEMP. The ESCP will ensure the relevant procedures are in place to capture and treat any sediment laden water generated by the site works to avoid any discharge to sensitive environments, such as the stormwater system; The dust control and monitoring procedures are described in section 5.5 and further detailed in the AQ DWP, in Appendix I of this CEMP; and The groundwater monitoring and contingency procedures are described in section 5.13 of this CEMP, and detailed in the Groundwater Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan in Appendix P of this CEMP.

Groundwater and Settlement

The Groundwater Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan (GSMCP) has been prepared to prevent any damage that may affect the serviceability of structures and services. The GSMCP is attached in Appendix P of this CEMP and has been prepared in accordance with resource consent conditions 82 to 84, 89 to 117, 119, 120, and 124 to 129. The objective of this GSMCP is to provide appropriate measures to avoid, remedy or mitigate any potential adverse effects (including cumulative effects) as a result of the dewatering and excavation activities involved in the Karangahape Station early works. A review of the hydrogeological studies completed prior to the CRL project stages and historic groundwater monitoring data from piezometers installed in the region of Beresford Square and Mercury Lane indicates the presence of a shallow or perched groundwater level, varying between approximately 2 to 6 m bgl. The perched water level fluctuates between these maximum and minimum levels in response to rainfall events, particularly in the Beresford Square area. The regional groundwater system is located beneath the perched groundwater zone (at depths varying between approximately 8 to 10 m bgl). The early works will require excavation to a maximum depth of 5 m bgl and will therefore not intersect the regional groundwater regime. A groundwater monitoring plan has not been included as part of the early works GSCMP due to the following:   



The excavations are too shallow to intersect the groundwater table; Perched water zones which might occur in the area are likely to be drained/impacted by the existing stormwater and wastewater service trenches in the area; Excavations will be open for only a limited duration of time. Should excavations intersect groundwater, the effect on groundwater is likely to be very limited and only immediately surrounding the excavation. Therefore, a regional groundwater monitoring program will not be effective in monitoring such localised effects; and Building settlement operational procedures would act to monitor and manage the effects of any groundwater drawdown.

A groundwater monitoring plan and associated contingency actions will be provided with a detailed program for the main works GSMCP where long-term drainage and drawdown of the groundwater table is expected. Page 67

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan A settlement monitoring plan is included in the early works GSMCP. It includes building condition survey requirements, monitoring of ground and buildings (details of building survey marks, building movement monitoring markers, etc.), utilities and infrastructure surveys and settlement trigger levels. Further detail on building surveys is provided in section 5.14 of this CEMP. Appendix E of the GSMCP outlines the tolerable amount of lateral deflection the pit or trench excavation support could undergo during construction without the resulting settlement effects exceeding trigger levels set out in the Consent. A response, mitigation and contingency plan is also provided in the GSMCP. It includes: 



5.14

Responses required where exceedances of trigger levels have been identified during groundwater monitoring. No groundwater alerts have been specified in the GSMCP for the early works. This will be updated for the main works once a groundwater monitoring plan has been developed to take into account effects from the main construction works. Responses to settlement alerts and alarm trigger levels, responses for any damage to buildings, structures or services and mitigation options should the settlement exceed identified trigger or alarm levels.

Building Condition Surveys

Building condition surveys (BCS) will be undertaken prior to works commencing, in accordance with designation condition 46 and resource consent condition 109. Based on the CNV DWP, GSCMP and HC DWP (Built Heritage), detailed pre-construction, construction and post-construction BCS will be undertaken for all the identified buildings and services listed in Appendix Q of this CEMP (refer to CNV DWP, GSCMP and HC DWP Built Heritage Section attached in Appendix L, P, and N respectively). The following general requirements apply to all BCS and visual inspections:  

The BCS shall be undertaken by an independent Senior Qualified Person. The survey shall include:      

 

Identification of Building Class: Commercial / Industrial / School or a Historic or sensitive structure in terms of designation condition 33; Any information about the type of foundations; Existing levels of damage (aesthetic, superficial, affecting levels of serviceability); Whether observed damage is associated with structural damage; Susceptibility of building or structure to further movement; and Photographic evidence.

All contact, correspondence and communication with building owners will be recorded, with documents available on request. The BCS or structure condition survey reports shall be provided by the Link Alliance to the relevant property owner within 15 working days of any survey being undertaken. A copy of each report shall also be provided to Auckland Council. Damage to buildings identified during BCS and visual inspections, that result from the early works activities require action as outlined in section 7 of the GSMCP.

For built heritage (as per the HC DWP – Built Heritage Section), the pre-condition surveys will include, as appropriate: Page 68

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan   

The exterior and interior of heritage buildings identified in the AUP(OP) and by HNZPT; A record of condition of buildings using photographs, drawings, etc.; Consideration of the stability of any elements including applied decorative elements or features and any fragile elements; Any recommended remediation to secure or mitigate potential problems prior to the commencement of construction; and The location of cracks greater than 2 mm in aperture width, shall be recorded with a position accuracy of +/- 200 mm.

 

The buildings (and services) may require further surveys during construction if complaints are made or if vibration criteria have been exceeded. Where a post-construction building condition survey confirms that the building has deteriorated as a result of construction, the damage will be rectified. Further detail on the methodology for pre-condition and post-construction condition surveys, and any additional construction survey is provided in the CNV DWP, GSCMP and HC DWP (Built Heritage Section).

5.15

Hazardous Substances

The early works will require the use and storage of hazardous substances, which can result in potential environmental impacts if they are not managed carefully and are discharged to the environment in an uncontrolled manner. This section provides details of the storage, handling, transport and disposal of hazardous substances relevant to the early works at Karangahape Station and addresses some of the requirements of designation condition 21.1 (k) and resource consent condition 168. Hazardous substances will be kept on site within specified hazardous substances storage areas. These areas will be bunded and hazardous substances kept in secure containers. The monitoring and management of hazardous substances will be the responsibility of the ESM. A list of all hazardous substances kept on site during the construction phase will be prepared and maintained in the project Hazardous Substances Register. An indicative list of substances (subject to change) is provided in Table 5-2 and is applicable for both Beresford Square / Pitt Street and Mercury Lane works. Table 5-2: Indicative list of substances to be stored for the Karangahape Station early works

Substances

Volume (L)

Storage

Location

Diesel

Drums in bunded pallets

Hydraulic Oil

Drums in bunded pallets

Adjacent to the works and / or at the CSA

Grease

Tubs / tubes in bunded pallets

Lubricants

Tubs / tubes in bunded pallets

Acetylene

12,000 (4 x cylinders)

G or smaller cylinders (12mᶟ of gas) in bunded pallets

Polymer

Bags or tins in bunded pallets

Grout additives

Bags or tins in bunded pallets

Page 69

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Substances

Volume (L)

Storage

Cement

5,000

5t stored in bags

Oxygen

24,000 (8 x cylinders)

G or smaller cylinders (24mᶟ of gas bottles) secured in a cage

Paint

Sealed tubs / tins of paint stored in small quantity for graffiti removal

Total volume (L)

41,220

Location

The following general procedures will be implemented: 

A list of all hazardous substances kept on site, including class information and Material Safety Data Sheets (SDS’s for each hazardous substance) will be stored and maintained on site at the following locations:  



Requirements for proper storage, handling, transport and disposal of hazardous substances such as (but not limited to):   

 

5.16

A full set at the project office. A sub-set at each storage location relevant to the specific materials being stored.

Adherence to safe handling practices when refilling and dispensing containers; Depending on the review of all hazardous substances and HSNO classes, a secondary containment and signage may be required; and Bunding will be 110% of the largest container (as per condition 168 of the resource consent).

Drums should be located in an area where there is no risk of collision with vehicles, such as fork-lift trucks (e.g. as diesel splashing onto a hot engine may ignite). Spill response procedures (refer to section 5.21.2 of this CEMP), such as confinement of leaks and spills to the vicinity of the drum and mopped up quickly, to lessen the slip risk and contain / minimise any contamination. Spill kit(s) will be available in case of emergency spill.

Industrial and Trade Activities

An Industrial and Trade Activities Environmental Management Plan (ITA EMP) is not required for the early works and will be prepared for the main construction works as required by condition 159 of the resource consent A2N as part of the site management (CSA).

5.17

Waste Management

A WARRMP has been prepared for the project. The purpose of the WARRMP is to outline the strategies and initiatives the Link Alliance will take to target zero waste to landfill for the project during both temporary and main construction works. The types of waste that are likely to be generated during construction include:    Page 70

Demolition wastes from buildings, structures, pavements, and other hardstand areas; Earthworks and excavation spoil including cleanfill, managed fill and contaminated spoil; General construction wastes including metals, pipes, plasterboard, concrete, timber framework, packaging materials, hazardous and special wastes; and | Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan 

Site office wastes including food waste, recyclables, general landfill waste, and other miscellaneous waste.

The WARRMP contains predicted waste streams (type and quantity), and the proposed waste management approach for each taking into account the waste management hierarchy of avoid, reduce, reuse, recycle, recover, treat and dispose. Specifically, in relation to waste avoidance and resource recovery during the construction phase, the Link Alliance will:     

Consider how to avoid the creation of waste by designing out waste and/or optimising the use of the materials available and procured; Consider how materials can be reused or recycled; Consider potential waste generated by the product or related packaging; Consider the environment and social impacts of the waste; and Consider how far items must be transported for recovery.

If the disposal of hazardous waste is required, this waste will be disposed of safely, through an appropriate contractor authorised to handle, transport, process or safely dispose of the waste concerned.

5.18

Energy Use

The Link Alliance is committed to minimising the use of fossil fuels and the corresponding release in greenhouse gas emissions (GHG emissions). Where practical, renewable energy sources will be used and methods to reduce energy use and GHG emissions will be implemented such as:      

Use of power from the national grid rather than on site generators; Use of biofuel; Use of hybrid and/or energy efficient equipment; Use of LED lights; Operator and driver training; and Optimisation of equipment maintenance.

During construction, data from energy use will feed into carbon footprint calculations in order to monitor actual energy use and to help measure the effects of innovations and improvements that have been implemented. Inductions and tool box meetings throughout the project will highlight the energy use goals and the measures that individuals can take to help achieve the goals. Refer to the Sustainability Management Plan for further information regarding the carbon footprint calculations and the Sustainability Opportunities Register for further examples of energy reduction opportunities under investigation.

5.19

Water use

Water is a resource often used without consideration due to its apparent abundance in New Zealand. However, as with other material use, it should be used with consideration and care as there are environmental costs associated with its delivery and treatment. Water use will be monitored during the project to track performance and promote considerate use. Where practical, water saving opportunities will be implemented such as: Page 71

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan  



Reuse of ground water (provided it is not contaminated) for dust suppression; Capture of rain water for use on site for non-potable requirements (where relevant activities for the early/main works are undertaken e.g. saw cutting, wheel washing, jet grouting, concrete mixing); and Water efficient workers amenities.

Water losses can contribute to significant water use, as such, meter readings will be completed weekly to identify significant increases in water use that are unexplainable. The project Environmental and Sustainability Inspections will include checks of hoses and water connections for leaks. Refer to the Sustainability Management Plan for further information regarding the metering and modelling of water use and the Sustainability Opportunities Register for further examples of water use reduction opportunities.

5.20

Material use

Due to the very nature of construction, significant volumes of materials will be used. In order to reduce the environmental, social and economic impacts associated with material usage a number of initiatives will be undertaken, including:    

The use of environmentally certified materials; The use of renewable resources; The use of recycled products (provided they meet specification); and The use of locally sourced products.

Material use will be monitored using the ISCA Materials calculator (refer to section 1.7) and further information is provided in the Sustainability Management Plan.

5.21

Emergency and Incident Response

This section details the emergency and incident response measures to be implemented and includes the following:     

Emergency Response Plan; Incident response; Spill response; Recording and reporting of incidents; and Complaint process.

5.21.1.

Emergency Response Plan

An environmental emergency is an event which has a detrimental effect on the surrounding environment. A detrimental environmental effect is something that causes significant harm to the environment, which is not legally allowed and requires immediate response. An environmental emergency can also be a deviation from the Link Alliance environmental management system. This means there has been a failure to follow the established process or procedures that help the contractor achieve best practice. Examples of environmental emergencies include, but are not restricted to:  Page 72

Significant (large volume) chemical / oil spill; | Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan  

Excessive discharge of sediment to the stormwater system; Hazardous substance release to air.

An Emergency Response Plan (ERP) (or Emergency Management Plan9) has been prepared for the early works. The ERP takes into account three levels of emergencies, which are divided according to the severity of the emergency. For example, level 1 – minor oil spill, level 2 -moderate chemical spill and level 3 – serious chemical spill. The contents of the ERP includes:       

Description of the potential emergency; The person responsible for actioning the ERP (roles and responsibilities as well as training details are provided in the ERP); The equipment required to deal with the emergency including rescue equipment; Emergency contact list and numbers; Directions to site workers and other affected persons on what they are required to do, including clear identification of the evacuation point location; The methods used to deal with the emergency; and Emergency reporting instructions (refer to incident reporting in section 5.21.4 of this CEMP).

The ERP will be displayed in noticeable locations around the site and employees will be trained in its requirements.

5.21.2.

Incident Response

An environmental incident is an occurrence which has (or potentially could have had) a negative or ‘adverse’ effect on the environment. An adverse effect is something that causes (or could have caused) environmental harm. This means there has been a failure to follow the established process or procedures that help the project achieve best practice (e.g. failure to report a spill). Environmental incidents include but are not restricted to:   

Spills; Unforeseen impacts on areas of high environmental value such as archaeology or built heritage; and Consent non-compliances (e.g. noise, sediment).

The spill response procedure is summarised in section 5.21.3 of this CEMP. Response to various environmental incidents is outlined in the relevant sub-plans. For serious incidents, the immediate response may involve stopping works until a solution to managing the incident is developed and implemented. Incident reporting procedures are detailed in section 5.21.4 of this CEMP.

Emergency Management Plan – Link Alliance Management Plan, CRL-SYW-HSE-LKA-PLN-800003, Rev. A00, September 2019, referred to as ERP Page 73 | Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

5.21.3.

Spill Response

During the construction phase, the ESM will be responsible for providing training and orientation to employees or subcontractors that addresses the proper action regarding spills (refer to sections 5.21.1 and 5.21.2 of this CEMP). The Link Alliance will ensure that spill response materials are available, commensurate with the type, quantity and storage arrangements for hazardous substances on site. As deemed necessary, vehicles (e.g. utility vehicles), heavy equipment (e.g. excavators), pumps, and generators will be covered by adjacent spill kits that, at a minimum, will contain: ď‚ˇ ď‚ˇ

sufficient oil absorbent material to contain (e.g. oil absorbent boom) and cleanup any drips, leaks, or spills (e.g. ruptured hydraulic line); and plastic bags to contain any contaminated absorbents, soils, or wastes. Bags containing used cleanup material will be transported to the designated hazardous material/waste storage area for proper drumming, labelling, and classification prior to off-site disposal.

An Emergency Spill Response Plan (ESRP) for the project has been prepared and details the procedure to follow in the event of a spill (Appendix R of this CEMP).

5.21.4.

Recording and Reporting of Incidents

Environmental incidents will be recorded and reported in accordance with the Link Alliance environmental incident reporting and investigation process. The Link Alliance has developed an HSE incident report form 10 and this form will be completed in the event of an environmental incident. The incident report form requires event details (i.e. event type), description of the incident, corrective action and an initial risk assessment. The cause of all incidents will be subject to an investigation, organised by the ESM to determine the root causes of the incident and to monitor the implementation of appropriate corrective /remedial action. The results of investigations and lessons learnt previously on the project will be shared at the tool box sessions. This will ensure that a repeat incident is avoided. In the event of an environmental incident, the ESM will inform the Karangahape Station Project Manager and Auckland Council with a specific notification timeframe (and associated information) depending on the incident severity level. A summary and review of incidents for the duration of the project and for the relevant month will be included in the project Monthly Report (refer to section 6.5).

5.21.5.

Complaint Process

A CCP (refer to section 5.3 and Appendix G of this CEMP) has been developed which details the strategy, tools and process to manage communication between the Link Alliance, its stakeholders and the community throughout the construction and monitoring periods for the project. In accordance with designation condition 5, the CCP sets out how the Link Alliance will inform the community of project progress and construction dates, foster good relationships with the community, obtain feedback from stakeholders, and outline how complaints and queries will be responded to.

Link Alliance HSE Incident Report Form, CRL-SYW-HSE-LKA-FRM-800001 Page 74 | Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan In addition to the procedure listed in the CCP, each sub-plan provides detail on the project complaints process. For example, any complaints related to noise and vibration will be recorded in a Project Complaints Register. These complaints must be promptly investigated to resolve the cause of the complaint (refer to the CNV DWP in Appendix L of this CEMP). The Link Alliance will provide Auckland Council's Noise Complaints Team with contact details for the CRLL Complaints Team to ensure noise related complaints are communicated and addressed as quickly as possible.

Page 75

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Monitoring and Review

Section 6 details the construction environmental monitoring and review requirements of the project and includes the following:       

Environmental monitoring; Environmental inspections; Environmental auditing; Corrective and preventive action; Reporting; Document control; and CEMP review.

6.1

Environmental Monitoring

Scheduled monitoring of environmental performance will be undertaken during the early works. This will enable the overall effectiveness of the environmental controls to be determined and allows areas of non-compliance to be identified so corrective actions can be taken. The individual sub-plans specify the monitoring for each environmental component, the frequency of monitoring required and the responsible person, as required within contract documentation or environmental approvals. Monitoring will take place on a routine basis, with additional monitoring required as appropriate i.e. in the event of a complaint or incident, or after a specific event, such as a rain event (water quality monitoring). The ESM will be responsible for implementation of on-site measurements of environmental aspects. Monitoring results will be reported to the relevant parties in accordance with the designation and resource consent conditions.

6.1.1.

Collaborative Working

The Link Alliance will adopt a collaborative working process during the works with the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring Officers, in accordance with the designation conditions. The key personnel involved in the collaborative working process are listed in Table 6-1, and will meet regularly during the works to discuss:      

Compliance with the designation conditions, CEMP and sub-plans; Significant changes to the CEMP and sub-plans; Any matters of non-compliance and how they have been addressed; The results of, need for, and frequency of site inspections; Environmental monitoring results; and Any other agenda items agreed by the key contacts.

Table 6-1: Collaborative key contacts

Organisation

Title

Name

Auckland Council

Team Leader Central Monitoring

Steven Pearce

Auckland Council

Compliance Monitoring Officer

Tim O’Grady

CRLL Representative

Principal Planner

Richard Jenkins

Page 76

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Organisation

Title

Name

Link Alliance

Environment and Sustainability Manager

Sarah Sutherland

6.1.2.

Collaborative Meeting

At least five working days prior to construction commencing the key contacts will mutually agree on an initial schedule for a collaborative meeting. The meeting will be held at least monthly unless a different timeframe is agreed with Auckland Council. The collaborative working process will operate for the duration of the works (and will continue to operate for the duration of the wider Karangahape Station works in accordance with the conditions). The ESM will be responsible for co-ordinating any changes to the CEMP or sub-plans required as a result of the collaborative working process and communicating these updates or information resulting from the collaborative working process with the Project team.

6.2

Environmental Inspections

Weekly environmental inspections will be conducted by the ESM (or a delegate) during the works. The findings of these inspections, any required remedial actions, the person responsible for implementing the actions and the required timeframe will all be recorded. These shall be monitored to ensure they are closed out in the necessary timeframe. Requirements for specific environmental inspections are provided in the suite of sub-plans with checklists and for some of them, recording inspection sheets are provided in Appendices of the sub-plans.

6.3

Environmental Auditing

Internal (by project Staff) environmental auditing will be undertaken to determine whether the environmental management system conforms to planned arrangements and is being properly implemented and maintained. Internal auditing will take place on a quarterly basis by the ESM (or a delegate). Internal environmental audits focus on environmental and sustainability matters within a single operational procedure/group of related operational procedures (for example, erosion and sediment control procedures). Environmental management procedures are provided in section 5 of this CEMP. External Environmental and Sustainability Audits (by Parent Company Staff not involved in the project or a suitably qualified consultant) will be completed as per the project Audit Schedule, and at least annually, to assess the effectiveness of the Environmental Management System. Audit findings (internal and external) will be provided to the Karangahape Station Construction Manager/Project Manager within two to four weeks of the audit. Recommendations on corrective/preventive actions will be provided to address any environmental/sustainability matters to be improved or as a result of non-compliances (refer to section 6.4 for further detail).

6.4

Corrective and Preventive Action

Corrective or preventive actions identified during environmental audits shall be appropriately based on the magnitude of the problem and the environmental harm encountered.

Page 77

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan The Project Director is responsible for closing out the corrective or preventative actions resulting from environmental inspections, audits and external regulatory compliance monitoring. Assessment and follow-up reviews on the effectiveness of corrective and preventive actions will be undertaken and the outcomes documented, communicated and implemented. Compliance will be included as a regular agenda item at management and project meetings. Minutes will be kept for each meeting and will record and assign actions to individuals where appropriate.

6.5

Environmental Reporting

Reporting requirements will evolve as the project progresses. In the early phase the focus is on establishment of systems, controls and competence of all personnel, while later the emphasis will shift to monitoring performance. Near to project completion the focus will shift to final reports to address approval requirements. The ESM manages environmental reporting and is responsible for submitting the reports required externally. Reporting requirements include:  

Project internal reporting requirements; and Specific reporting to Auckland Council where required (as per specific sub-plans), including the monthly compliance report (refer section 6.1).

6.6

Document Control

The ESM is responsible for ensuring that all relevant documentation is submitted and maintained within the project filing and document control system. This documentation will include (but is not limited to):       

Original CEMP document and subsequent versions (including sub-plans); All records of environmental monitoring; All environmental incident reports and investigation outcomes; Formal and informal audit and environmental inspection reports; Minutes of environmental meetings; Records of environmental training; and Copy of SDS for hazardous substances storage at CSA/work area.

6.7

CEMP Review

This CEMP (including sub-plans) will be updated, with the necessary approval, over the course of the project to reflect material changes associated with changes to construction techniques, the natural environment or due to unresolved complaints. Approval from Auckland Council will be required for any relevant revisions of this CEMP and sub-plans that are of a material nature. In addition, they may be updated in response to any unforeseen adverse effects arising from construction, unresolved complaints or environmental incidents (refer to section 6.7.1 for further detail). A review may also be initiated by Auckland Council as a result of comments or recommendations received from Auckland Council or during communication and consultation.

6.7.1.

Management Review

A management review of the CEMP and other sub-plans will take place at least annually by the project management team (Link Alliance) (as per condition 42 of the resource consent conditions Page 78

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan and designation condition 22.1). The management review will be organised by the ESM and will take into consideration: 

Compliance with the designation and/or consent conditions, the CEMP and sub-plans (including site specific plans) and material changes to these plans; Any significant changes to construction activities or methods; Key changes to roles and responsibilities within the project team; Changes in industry best practice standards; Changes in legal or other requirements; Results of inspections, monitoring and reporting procedures associated with the management of adverse effects during construction; Comments or recommendations from Auckland Council regarding the CEMP and sub-plans; Unresolved complaints and any response to complaints and remedial action taken to address the complaint.

      

The review process will also look at environmental controls and procedures to ensure they are still applicable to the activities being undertaken. Reasons for making any changes to the CEMP or subplan(s) will be documented. A copy of the original CEMP or sub-plan(s) and subsequent revisions will be kept for the project records and marked as obsolete. Each new/updated plan version will be given a revision number and date to prevent obsolete documentation being used.

6.7.2.

Review Approval Process

The CLG and any affected parties will be notified of any material changes to the CEMP or sub-plans and provided an opportunity to provide feedback. Any material changes to the CEMP and DWPs shall be subject to an independent peer review. Changes to the CEMP or MPs required by the resource consent conditions 42 and 43 will be submitted to the Auckland Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification and no activity reliant upon a change to the CEMP can be undertaken until the change has been certified. Changes to the CEMP and DWPs required by the designation conditions 22.1 and 23.6 will be submitted to Auckland Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for approval and no activity reliant upon a change to the CEMP can be undertaken until the change has been approved. Following that change the Link Alliance will request Auckland Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination as to whether the proposed change can be certified, in writing, within 10 days of submission of the change. Significant material changes to the sub-plans (required by the designation conditions and relating to an increase in adverse environmental effects) will be submitted to the Auckland Council for approval, at least ten working days before the proposed changes take effect.

Page 79

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

List of Appendices Appendix A: ISCA Requirements ................................................... 81 Appendix B: CEMP Staging Drawings ............................................ 88 Appendix C: Designation Conditions ............................................. 89 Appendix D: Resource Consent Conditions ................................... 90 Appendix E: Consultation Records ................................................ 91 Appendix F: Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan ........................................................................................... 102 Appendix G: Communication and Consultation Plan ................... 103 Appendix H: Erosion and Sediment Control Plan ......................... 104 Appendix I: Air Quality Delivery Work Plan ................................. 105 Appendix J: Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan ................ 106 Appendix K: Transport, Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan .. 107 Appendix L: Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan .................................................................................................. 108 Appendix M: Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage) .................................................................................................. 109 Appendix N: Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology) .................................................................................................. 110 Appendix O: Contamination Delivery Work Plan......................... 111 Appendix P: Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan ....................................................................... 112 Appendix Q: Building Condition Surveys ..................................... 113 Appendix R: Emergency Spill Response Plan ............................... 115

Page 80

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Appendix A: ISCA Requirements Table A identifies the ISCA Credit Requirements relevant to this CEMP and where they are addressed in the document. Where the CEMP and sub-plans do not address these requirements in full, references to other plans/documents have been provided (e.g. the Sustainability Management Plan). Further details regarding the specifics of the evaluation and means of achieving the relevant targets is provided in the relevant sub-plans and other relevant documents. Table A: ISCA Requirements Credit

Relevant section of the CEMP

Requirement *

Other Relevant Information / Comments

Sustainability and leadership commitment MAN-1 Level 1

Commitments to mitigating negative environmental, cultural, social and economic impacts

Sections 1.2 and 1.7

Also refer to the Sustainability Management Plan

MAN-1 Level 1

Commitments embedded into sustainability objectives/and or targets

Sections 1.2 and 1.7

Also refer to the Sustainability Management Plan

Risk and opportunity management MAN-2 Level 2

Environmental, cultural, social and economic risks and opportunities are assessed

Section 3

MAN-2 Level 1

The risk assessment is updated at least annually

Sections 1.2 and 6.7.1

Also refer to the Sustainability Opportunities Register

Organisational structure, roles and responsibilities MAN-3 Level 1

Members of the senior management team has central responsibility for managing sustainability

Section 4.1

Also refer to the Sustainability Management Plan

MAN-3 Level 2

A principle participant in the project team is an IS Accredited Professional

Sections 1.7 and 4.1.2

Also refer to the IS accreditation records and meeting minutes

MAN-3 Level 3

Independent sustainability professional is engaged to monitor and review sustainability performance

Section 1.7

Also refer to the Sustainability Management Plan and Audit Schedule

Inspection and Auditing MAN-4 Level 2

Internal environmental and sustainability inspections undertaken weekly

Sections 4.1.2, 6.2 and 6.3

Also refer to the Sustainability Management Plan and Audit Schedule

MAN-4 Level 2

Internal environmental and sustainability audits completed at least quarterly

Section 6.3

Also refer to the Sustainability Management Plan and Audit Schedule

MAN-4 Level 2

External environmental and sustainability audits completed at least annually

Section 6.3

Also refer to the Sustainability Management Plan and Audit Schedule

Page 81

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Credit

Relevant section of the CEMP

Requirement *

Other Relevant Information / Comments

Reporting and review MAN-5 Level 2

Plans demonstrate how improvements and/or changes have been made to the management systems as a result of management review

Sections 5.3 and 6.7.1

Also refer to the Communication and Consultation Plan

Knowledge sharing MAN-6 Level 3

There is a knowledge sharing process in place that encourages sharing of sustainability knowledge across the project, to parent organisations, key stakeholders and to the wider industry

Sections 1.5, 5.2, 5.3 and 6.1

Also refer to the Communication and Consultation Plan, the Sustainability Management Plan and the Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

MAN-6 Level 3

Sustainability knowledge sharing initiatives extend beyond project boundaries and key stakeholder boundaries to the wider industry.

Sections 5.2, 5.3 and 6.1

Also refer to the Communication and Consultation Plan and the Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

MAN-6 Level 3

Sustainability knowledge sharing includes ‘mistakes’ as well as ‘good practices’.

Sections 5.3, 6.2 and 6.3

Also refer to the Communication and Consultation Plan

Receiving Water Quality DIS-1 Level 1

Measures to minimise adverse impacts to receiving wai environmental values during construction and operation have been identified and implemented. These measures demonstrate an awareness of the values of wai ora and its Mauri, and opportunity for mana whenua feedback has been provided and where practicable incorporated into these measures. AND Monitoring of wai discharges and receiving wai is undertaken at appropriate intervals and at times of discharge during construction.

Sections 5.4, 5.12, 5.13, 5.21.3 and 6.1

Also refer to the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, Emergency Spill Response Plan, Contamination Delivery Work Plan and the Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan

DIS-2 Level 2

Monitoring and modelling of wai discharges and receiving wai demonstrates no adverse impact on receiving wai environmental values.

Sections 5.4 and 6.1

Also refer to Erosion and Sediment Control Plan

Page 82

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Credit

Requirement *

Relevant section of the CEMP

Other Relevant Information / Comments

Sections 5.4 and 6.1

Also refer to the Sustainability Management Plan

The infrastructure does not increase peak stormwater flows for rainfall events of up to a 1.5 year ARI event discharge DIS-3 Level 3

Opportunities to improve receiving wai environmental values have been identified and implemented. Monitoring and modelling demonstrates improvement of receiving wai environmental values

Noise DIS-2 Level 1

Measures to mitigate noise during construction and operation have been identified and implemented

Section 5.8

Also refer to the Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan and Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plans

DIS-2 Level 1

Monitoring of noise is undertaken at appropriate intervals and in respons to complaints during construction.

Section 5.8

Also refer to the Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan and Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plans

DIS-2 Level 2

For construction, modelling and monitoring demonstrates no recurring or major divergences from the noise management process in ISCA approved noise guidelines.

Section 5.8

Also refer to the Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan and Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plans

For operation, modelling demonstrates no recurring or major exceedances of noise goals. Vibration DIS-3 Level 1

Measures to mitigate vibration during construction and operation have been identified and implemented

Section 5.8

Also refer to the Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan and Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plans

DIS-3 Level 1

Monitoring of vibration is undertaken at appropriate intervals and in response to complaints during construction.

Section 5.8

Also refer to the Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan and Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plans

DIS-3 Level 1

For construction, modelling and monitoring demonstrates no exceedances of vibration goals for structural damage to buildings and structures.

Sections 5.8 and 5.10.1

Also refer to the Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan and the Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

DIS-3 Level 2

For operation, modelling demonstrates no recurring or

Sections 5.8 and 5.10.1

Also refer to the Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work

Page 83

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Credit

Relevant section of the CEMP

Requirement * major exceedances of vibration goals for human comfort criteria. No physical damage has been caused to any buildings or structures by vibration caused by construction.

Other Relevant Information / Comments Plan and Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Air Quality DIS-4 Level 1

Measures to minimise adverse impacts to local air quality during construction have been identified and implemented

Section 5.5

Also refer to the Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

DIS-4 Level 1

Monitoring of air emissions and/or air quality is undertaken at appropriate intervals and in response to complaints during construction

Section 5.5

Also refer to the Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

DIS-4 Level 2

Monitoring and modelling demonstrates no recurring or major exceedances of air emission or air quality goals

Section 5.5

Also refer to the Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Light Pollution DIS-5 Level 1

Measures to prevent light spill during construction and operation have been identified and implemented

Section 5.9

DIS-5 Level 1

The lighting design for operation prevents horizontal light spill through compliance with the numerical limits for obtrusive light in Tables 2.1 and 2.2 of AS4282.

Section 5.9

Energy and carbon monitoring and reduction ENE-1 Level 1

Monitoring and modelling of energy use and GHG emissions and actions taken to reduce them is undertaken

Section 5.18

Also refer to Sustainability Management Plan

ENE 1 Level 2-3

Monitoring demonstrates at least 25% reduction in construction GHG emissions. And a reduction of at least 20% reduction in â€œsignificantâ€? scope 3 emissions.

Section 5.18

Also refer to Sustainability Management Plan

Use of renewable energy ENE-2 Level 1

Opportunities for the use of renewable energy fully investigated.

Section 5.18

Also refer to Sustainability Management Plan

Wai (water) use, monitoring and reduction

Page 84

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Credit

Requirement *

Relevant section of the CEMP

Other Relevant Information / Comments

WAT-1 Level 1-2

Monitoring of water use is undertaken. There is at least 5% reduction compared to the base case footprint.

Section 5.19

Also refer to Sustainability Management Plan

Replace potable wai (water) WAT-2 Level 1

Monitoring demonstrates that some proportion of total wai use is from non-potable sources (substituting for potable).

Sections 5.4, and 5.19

Also refer to Sustainability Management Plan and the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan

Materials lifecycle impact measurement and reduction MAT-1 Level 1

Monitoring and modelling of material lifecycle impacts are undertaken using the Materials Calculator and demonstrates a reduction in materials lifecycle impacts of at least 15% compared to a base case footprint.

Section 5.20

Also refer to Sustainability Management Plan

Environmentally labelled products and supply chains MAT-2 Level 1

A Percentage of Materials/products have an ISCA approved environmental label.

Section 5.20

Also refer to Sustainability Management Plan

Crime Prevention HEA-2 Level 2

The likelihood of crime prevention has been reduced through the implementation of CPTED guidelines, in design, construction and operation, including temporary construction diversions and lighting. All tunnels or underpasses have end to end visibility.

Section 2.6

Heritage assessment and management HER-1 Level 1

Measures to minimise the adverse impacts to heritage during construction have been identified and implemented

Section 5.10

Also refer to the Historic Heritage Delivery Work Plan

HER-1 Level 1

Community heritage values have been identified through consultation and integrated into studies.

Section 5.10, 5.2, 5.3

Also refer to the Historic Heritage Delivery Work Plan

Stakeholder engagement strategy

Page 85

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Credit

Requirement *

Relevant section of the CEMP

Other Relevant Information / Comments

STA-1 Level 1

A comprehensive stakeholder management strategy is developed

Sections 5.2, 5.3 and 5.21.5

Also refer to the Communication and Consultation Plan and Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP

STA-1 Level 2

The community is informed of the draft strategy and provided an opportunity to give feedback. Community feedback is documented and used to guide completion of the final strategy.

Sections 5.2, 5.3 and 5.21.5

Also refer to the Communication and Consultation Plan

STA -1 Level 2

The strategy is implemented, and formal monitoring, evaluation and corrective action is undertaken.

Sections 5.2, 5.3 and 5.21.5

Also refer to the Communication and Consultation Plan

STA-3 Level 1

The community has been provided with information that: - was provided in a timely manner - supported community participation - was meaningful and relevant - was accessible This has been verified by internal management/reviews/audits or community feedback with 65%80% support

Sections 5.2, 5.3, 5.21.5 and 6

Also refer to the Communication and Consultation Plan

STA-3 Level 2

The community has been provided with information that: -was provided in a timely manner - supported community participation - was meaningful and relevant - was accessible And this has been verified by independent reviews/audits or community feedback with >80% support

Sections 5.2, 5.3, 5.21.5 and 6

Also refer to the Communication and Consultation Plan

Site planning URB-1 Level 1

Page 86

An urban and landscape design plan is developed and implemented that includes the following: 1. Site analysis; 2. Vision and objectives for the infrastructure; 3. Site planning; and 4. Strategies that respond to:

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Section 5.11

Also refer to the Urban Design Delivery Work Plan

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Credit

Requirement *

Relevant section of the CEMP

a. the relevant People and Place principles outlined in the New Zealand Urban Design Protocol (NZUDP) or b. other ISCA approved guidelines

* Refer to ISCA Rating Tool for full details of the requirement

Page 87

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Other Relevant Information / Comments

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Appendix B: CEMP Staging Drawings

Page 88

| Karangahape Station Early Works

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

STAGE 1 - Q1 2020

PITT ST

AH A

PE R

TREE REMOVAL

SF OR D

CAFE & TOILET DEMOLITION

TREE REMOVAL SEQUENCE 1. SET-UP FENCING 2. TRIM BRANCHES 3. MOBILISE EXCAVATOR 4. CUT TREE TRUNK 5. EXCAVATE STUMP 6. CLEAN-UP SURROUNDINGS

BE Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-17 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_BERESFORD R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

STORAGE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

KAR ANG

LOCALISED TREE REMOVAL

DEMOLITION SEQUENCE 1. SET-UP FENCING WITH NOISE MATS 2. DISMANTLE ROOF FRAME & GLASS 3. DEMOLISH TOILET WITH EXCAVATOR 4. CART AWAY SPOIL 5. CLEAN-UP SURROUNDINGS

CSA ACCESS

WATER TREATMENT AND COVERED SPOIL AREAS

CLIENT:

TREE REMOVAL WORK AREA

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS SHEET TITLE

PARKING BAYS REMOVED

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS BERESFORD SQUARE STAGE 1

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES DESIGNATION BOUNDARY COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CREATOR ID :

STATION OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD--CON-LKA-SKE-EW BER

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

STAGE 2 - JAN 2020 - FEB 2020

PITT ST

RELOCATION CONDUCTED WITHIN THIS FOOTPRINT, ALLOWING ONE TRAFFIC LANE FLOW IN EACH DIRECTION

PE R D

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-17 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_BERESFORD R0.DWG

SQ OR D BE RE SF

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

STORAGE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

WATER TREATMENT AND COVERED SPOIL AREAS

CSA ACCESS

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT 1. BERESFORD SQUARE CLOSED TO THROUGH TRAFFIC 2. ON STREET PARKING CLOSED 3. ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTIES MAINTAINED

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

CLIENT:

KAR ANG

AHA

WASTEWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL STORMWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS SHEET TITLE

WORK AREA

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS BERESFORD SQUARE STAGE 2

PARKING BAYS REMOVED PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CREATOR ID :

DESIGNATION BOUNDARY STATION OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD--CON-LKA-SKE-EW BER

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

STAGE 3 - Q1 - Q2 2020 MANHOLE LOCATION WW LAUNCH DRILL PIT 4x4m - APPROX 5.5m DEEP

PITT ST

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH 2m (W) x 1.5m (D) x 10m (L) MANHOLE LOCATION

STAGED CONNECTIONS ACROSS BERESFORD SQUARE

SF OR D

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-17) Last Plotted: 2019-09-20 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_BERESFORD R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

WW RECEIVE DRILL PIT 3x3m - APPROX 4m DEEP STORAGE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

WATER TREATMENT AND COVERED SPOIL AREAS

CLIENT:

CSA ACCESS

SW RECEIVE DRILL PIT 3x3m - APPROX 3m DEEP TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT 1. BERESFORD SQUARE CLOSED TO THROUGH TRAFFIC 2. ON STREET PARKING CLOSED 3. ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTIES MAINTAINED

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH WASTEWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL STORMWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

SHEET TITLE

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS BERESFORD SQUARE STAGE 3

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES DESIGNATION BOUNDARY CREATOR ID :

STATION OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS

WORK AREA

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

KAR ANG AHA PE R D

SW LAUNCH DRILL PIT 4x4m - APPROX 4m DEEP

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD--CON-LKA-SKE-EW BER

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

STAGE 4 - Q1 - Q2 2020 NEW SW AND WW MANHOLES

PITT ST

TRENCH FOR DRY SERVICES

SF OR D

STAGED CONNECTIONS ACROSS BERESFORD SQUARE

KAR ANG AHA PE R

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO PROPERTIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES

STAGED COMBINED TRENCH FOR SW & WW 2m (W) x 4m (D) x 10m (L)

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-17) Last Plotted: 2019-09-20 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_BERESFORD R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

STORAGE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

WATER TREATMENT AND COVERED SPOIL AREAS

CSA ACCESS

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT 1. BERESFORD SQUARE CLOSED TO THROUGH TRAFFIC 2. ON STREET PARKING CLOSED 3. ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTIES MAINTAINED

CLIENT:

NEW SW AND WW MANHOLES

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS

ISSUE/REVISION

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH WORK AREA

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS SHEET TITLE

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS BERESFORD SQUARE STAGE 4

DESIGNATION BOUNDARY STATION OUTLINE COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CREATOR ID :

PROJECT NAME

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD--CON-LKA-SKE-EW BER

KEY PLAN

CROS S

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

STAGE 1 - Q4 2019

ANE

L CURY R E M

CESS

CSA AC

A ST

CESS

CANAD

CSA AC

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-16 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_MERCURY R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

DEMOLITION WORKS AREA SUBJECT TO CONFIRMED OUTLINE PLAN 'OPW60339200'

NMENTAL STORAGE, ENVIRO AREAS COVERED SPOIL CONTROLS AND

CESS

CSA AC

CLIENT:

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH PARKING BAYS REMOVED

ST EAST

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS SHEET TITLE

WORK AREA

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS MERCURY LANE STAGE 1

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES DESIGNATION BOUNDARY COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CREATOR ID :

STATION/TEMPORARY SHAFT OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW MERCURY

KEY PLAN

RECEIVE DRILL PIT 3x3m APPROX 5m DEEP

ST DIRECTIONAL DRILL, STORMWATER RELOCATION

CROS S

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

STAGE 1A - Q4 2019

URY MERC

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH LAUNCH DRILL PIT 4x4m APPROX 5m DEEP

LANE

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

CSA AC

CESS

CANAD

A ST

CSA AC LAUNCH DRILL PIT 4x4m APPROX 5m DEEP

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-16 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_MERCURY R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

DEMOLITION WORKS AREA SUBJECT TO CONFIRMED OUTLINE PLAN 'OPW60339200'

NMENTAL STORAGE, ENVIRO EAS VERED SPOIL AR CO D AN LS CONTRO

S EAST

CESS CSA AC

CLIENT:

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH STORMWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

SHEET TITLE

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS MERCURY LANE STAGE 1A

WORK AREA PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES CREATOR ID :

DESIGNATION BOUNDARY STATION/TEMPORARY SHAFT OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS

PARKING BAYS REMOVED

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CESS

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW MERCURY

KEY PLAN

CROS S

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

STAGE 2 - Q4 2019 - Q1 2020

STAGED WORKS TO ALLOW SINGLE LANE AT ALL TIMES

Y LA RCUR

CSA AC

A ST

CESS

CANAD

CSA AC

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-16 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_MERCURY R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

DEMOLITION WORKS AREA SUBJECT TO CONFIRMED OUTLINE PLAN 'OPW60339200'

NMENTAL STORAGE, ENVIRO AREAS COVERED SPOIL CONTROLS AND

S EAST

CESS CSA AC

CLIENT:

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH PARKING BAYS REMOVED

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

SHEET TITLE

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS MERCURY LANE STAGE 2

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES DESIGNATION BOUNDARY CREATOR ID :

STATION/TEMPORARY SHAFT OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS

WORK AREA

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CESS

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW MERCURY

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Appendix C: Designation Conditions

Page 89

| Karangahape Station Early Works

CRL Designation Conditions 10 September 2018

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 1

2500-2

2500-3

2500-4

2500-5

2500-6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 2

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 3

Figure 2: Visual explanation of the designation types Surface Designations

Sub-strata Designations

Strata Designation with Sub-strata Designation below

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 4

Figure 3: Indicative long-section of the designations across the length of the CRL

The relationship between the various plans required by designation conditions is illustrated in the diagram below:

The documents referred to in the designation conditions can be found at [insert]

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 5

Contents

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 7

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 8

Requiring Authority Designation Conditions â€“ Designation 3 Condition 1 Condition 2 Condition 3 Condition 4 Condition 5 ADVICE NOTES

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 9

Requiring Authority Designation Conditions – for Designations 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

DEFINITIONS 1 2

Consult

Consulting

Consultation

6 1 4 5

Fully operational traffic lane

May include a traffic lane that is subject to a reduced speed limit, or one which may have a temporary reduction in the lane width, due to construction activity.

Two way access

Access into and out from a site or a road. This access may include restrictions (eg. left in, left out) where these are specified within the relevant conditions.

6 1 4 5 6

Receivers that undertake activities within spaces that rely on a particularly low noise and vibration environment. For these designations these spaces are defined as:

1 2 4 5

Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers

•

Public Performance Theatres;

•

Recording Studios, both sound and television (including Mediaworks, except the specific spaces addressed by Condition 35);

•

In relation to sensitive equipment - Medical Facilities and Scientific Laboratories;

•

In relation to the requirement to record witness statements - The Auckland District Court in Albert Street

Receivers that may be disturbed during rest, concentration, communication or prayer. For these designations these include (but are not limited to): 1 2 4 5

Sensitive Noise and Vibration Receivers

Site Specific Construction

•

Dwellings

•

Offices

•

Schools, including Child Care Centres and tertiary facilities

•

Libraries

•

Hospitals

•

Rest Homes

•

Marae and other Cultural Centres

•

Churches

•

Hotels or other accommodation facilities

These include site specific construction noise management plans (SSCNMP), site specific construction vibration plans (SSCVMP), or a

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 10

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

2 4 5 6

Condition

Noise and Vibration Management Plans

1 2 4 5

Best practicable option

Historic Character

6 1 2 4

combination of both noise and vibration in one plan (SSCNVMP) to address the effects from the construction activity on notable or sensitive receivers.

5 6

Mana Whenua

5 6

1 2 4

Material change

5 6

4 5 6

Ngati Maru

•

Ngati Paoa

•

Ngai Tai ki Tamaki

•

Ngati Te Ata

•

Ngati Whatua o Orakei

•

Te Akitai

•

Te Kawerau o maki

•

Ngati Tamaoho

1 2

•

Delivery Work Plans

(a)

Transport, Access and Parking;

(b)

Construction noise and vibration;

(c)

Historic Character (including Archaeology);

(d)

Urban Design (including landscape and station plans);

(e)

Trees and vegetation;

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 11

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(f)

Social Impact and Business Disruption;

(g)

Air quality;

(h)

Public Art; and

(i)

Contamination.

1 2 4 5

Peak Particle Velocity

The maximum component peak vibration level (in mm/s) measured in any of three orthogonal axes (vertical, transverse, longitudinal).

MediaWorks

MediaWorks means any television, radio and/or interactive media facilities which broadcast from the MediaWorks site (including any successor which conducts the same activities).

6 6

MediaWorks site means the properties at 2-3 Flower Street and 44-52 New North Road included within the following:

MediaWorks site

MediaWorks buildings

Studio 1

Lot 1 DP 84213

NA40B/1323

Lot 2 DP 49561

NA2063/54

Lot 4 Section 3 Deeds Plan 45(blue)

NA557/190

Part Lot 5 Section 3 Deeds Plan 45 Blue

NA557/144

Lot 1 DP 60771

NA15C/727

ABBREVIATIONS CEMP

Construction Environmental Management Plan

DWP

Delivery Work Plan

NoR

Notice of Requirement

ONVMP

Operational Noise and Vibration Management Plan

PPV

Peak Particle Velocity

SSCNVMP

Site Specific Noise and Vibration Management Plan

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 12

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

1 2 1

4 5 6

•

Plans contained in the Concept Design Report Appendices (contained in Volume 3 of the Notice of Requirement suite of documents, dated 13 August 2012 Rev 3);

•

Plan CIV-000-DRG-0001 attached at Appendix 1 to these Conditions.

(v) Information provided in response to the Section 92 requests and/or in advance of the Council’s section 42A report, including the following: •

“City Rail Link Notice of Requirement: Social Impact Assessment” prepared by Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Ltd (Beca), dated 19 April 2011 (approved for release 19 April 2013);

•

“City Rail Link – Supplementary Report: Traffic Modelling of Alternative Construction Scenarios” prepared by Flow Transportation Specialists Ltd, dated 22 May 2013.

(vi) Evidence (including supplementary evidence) provided prior to and at the Council hearing, including but not limited to: •

Statement of Evidence by Ian Clark (Transport) dated 2 July 2013;

•

“City Rail Link Notice of Requirement: Outline Plan Process and Environmental Management Plan System (Indicative)” prepared by Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Ltd, dated 27 September 2013;

•

“City Rail Link: Indicative Communication and Consultation Plan” prepared by Auckland Transport, dated September 2013;

•

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 13

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

5 6 1 2 3

4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 14

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

1 2 4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 15

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 16

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

1 2 6

4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 17

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

1 2 4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 18

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(b) Input into, where practicable, the design of the stations (refer to Condition 54);

(d) Working collaboratively with the Requiring Authority around built heritage and archaeological matters;

5 6

1 2 9

4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 19

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

1 2 10

4 5 6

1 11

2 4

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 20

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

5 6

Condition

1 2 12

4 5 6

1 2 13

4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 21

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

1 2 4 5 6

Contact Person 14.1 The Requiring Authority shall make a contact person available 24 hours seven days a week for the duration of construction for public enquiries on the construction works.

Communication and Consultation Plan

1 2 4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 22

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

To be implemented to capture and trigger where communication and consultation is required in relation to any material changes affecting the Network Utilities;

•

For the Requiring Authority to give approval (where appropriate) to Network Utility Operators as required by section 176(1)(b) of the RMA during the construction period;

•

For obtaining any supplementary authorisations (including but not limited to

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 23

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

resource consents (including those required under a National Environmental Standard) and easements); â€˘

For inspection and final approval of works by Network Utility Operators; and

â€˘

For implementing conditions 9, 22, 23, and 24 of this designation in so far as they affect Network Utility Operations.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 24

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

1 16

4 5 6

1 17

2 4

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 25

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

5 6

Condition

1 18

4 5 6

Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and Delivery Work Plans (DWPs) 19

1 2 4

Preparation, Compliance and Monitoring 19.1 The objective of the CEMP and DWPs is to so far as is reasonably practicable, avoid,

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 26

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

5 6

Condition

1 2 4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 27

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

1 4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 28

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

1 2 4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 29

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 30

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

General Transport, Access and Parking

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 31

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

4 5 6

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 32

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 33

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 34

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 35

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Mills Lane to and from either Albert Street or Swanson Street; and

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 36

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 37

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 38

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 39

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 40

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 41

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Sundays and Public Holidays

Occupied commercial and industrial buildings (including offices)

75 dB LAeq

Sensitive Noise and Vibration Receivers (excluding offices)

75 dB LAeq 90 dB LAFmax

65 dB LAeq 1 80 dB LAFmax2

60 dB LAeq 75 dB LAFmax

Receiver Type

1 31

4 5 6

Early Childhood Education Centres (whilst occupied during normal opening hours) Bear Park Early Childhood Education Centre at 32 Akiraho Street (whilst occupied during normal opening hours)

0700 – 2200

At all other times 2200 – 0700

35 dB LAeq in sleeping areas

35 dB LAeq in sleeping areas 65 dB LAeq in outdoor playing areas

For the avoidance of doubt this condition only applies to NoR 6 where blasting is required. 32.1 Prior to commencement of production blasts (ie. blasting that is undertaken as part of the

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 42

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

1 2 4 33

5 6

Type of Structure

Short-term (transient) vibration1

PPV at the foundation at a frequency of 1-10Hz (mm/s)

10-50 Hz (mm/s)

50-100 Hz (mm/s)

Long-term (continuous) vibration

PPV at horizontal plane of highest floor (mm/s)

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 43

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Commercial/ Industrial

20 – 40

40 – 50

Residential/ School

5 – 15

15 – 20

Historic or sensitive structures

3–8

8 – 10

2.5

4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 44

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Construction Noise and Vibration DWP

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 45

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

2 4 5 6

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 46

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

1 2 37

4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 47

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 48

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

1 39

2 4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 49

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 50

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 51

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

40.13

1 2 41

4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 52

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

1 42

4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 53

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 54

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Building Condition Surveys

Process for Building Condition Surveys

46.1 Prior to construction, as a minimum those buildings listed in Appendix One and Appendix Two or identified pursuant to Condition 41.2(b) will be considered for a building condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 55

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

5 6

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 56

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 57

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Utilising permeable balustrades on overbridges;

Maximising the width of the footpath at grade in street reserves;

Orientating any steps parallel to overbridges;

Providing appropriate levels of lighting (in accordance with the Auckland Transport Street Lighting Policy (Appendix 1) for “Pathways in high risk, high brightness areas”); and

Treatment of the sides of ramps and footpaths to enhance visual amenity.

Minimise loss of privacy on adjacent residential sites, including by locating the pedestrian/cycle bridge in the western half of the Avenue;

Ensure the lifts are through lifts to carry bicycles; and

Incorporate bicycle push ramps into the side of the pedestrian stairways.

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 58

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 59

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

1 48

4 5 6

1 49

4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 60

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 61

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

1 54

4 5

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 62

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

(vi) Built Heritage: •

•

(vii) Bulk, Scale and Massing: •

• •

•

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 63

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

1 55

4 5 6

Public Art 56

Public Art DWP

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 64

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 65

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 66

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 67

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

4 5 6

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 68

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 69

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Specific Design Requirements 62

62.1 The operational tunnel will avoid running under the building footprint of the property at 152 Vincent Street.

Building Type

Reradiated Noise Criteria (dB LASmax re: 20 µPa)

PPV (mm/s)

Commercial uses with primarily daytime use1

0.2

Residences and buildings where people normally sleep

0.15

Auditoria/Theatres1

0.1

TV/Recording Studios

0.06

Note: 1. 2.

Such as offices, businesses, churches, schools, universities and libraries. This includes Albert Street District Court.

Reradiated Noise Criteria (dB LASmax re: 20 µPa)

Velocityᵌ (mm/s)

4 5

Vibration Criteria

Commercial uses with primarily daytime use1

0.14

Residences and buildings where people normally sleep

0.1

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 70

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

Auditoria/Theatres1 TV/Recording Studios

0.1

0.045

Location

Period

Auckland Central Area

7.00am to 11:00pm

11:00pm to 7:00am

7.00am to 10:00pm

10:00pm to 7:00am

2 64

dB LAeq

dB LAFmax 75

4 5 6

Auckland Isthmus Area

2 4

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 71

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

5 6

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 72

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

Condition

1 AN1

4 5 6

1 2 AN2

4 5 6

AN3

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 73

Condition Number

NoR Designati on Applies to

2 4 5 6 1 2 AN4

Condition

5 6 1 AN5

2 4

Some of the land is subject to existing designations. Nothing in these designation conditions negates the need for the Requiring Authority to adhere to the provisions of section 177 of the RMA.

5 Some of the land is subject to existing designations. Nothing in these designation conditions negates the need for the Requiring Authority to adhere to the provisions of section 177 of the RMA.

AN6

AN7

Modifications to Britomart Transport Centre to connect the City Rail Link tracks into the rail network are separate to this designation and are covered under the Britomart Transport designation.

AN8

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 74

Address

Property Known As

8-12 Albert Street

Quay West Hotel

17 Albert Street

Cohesive Technology House

22-26 Albert Street

The Stamford

74 Albert Street

Chifley Suites

76-84 Albert Street

City Gardens Apartments

103,105,107 Albert Street

Manhattan Apartments

109-125 Albert Street

Sky City - Grand Hotel & Convention Centre

106-108 Albert Street

Elliot Tower (Proposed)

128 Albert Street

Crown Plaza

103 Vincent Street

YWCA Accommodation

109 Vincent Street

The Rodney Apartments

113 Vincent Street

Winsun Heights Apartments

135 Vincent Street

Dynasty Gardens Hotel

150 Vincent Street

The City Lodge

156 Vincent Street

Eclipse Apartments

71-87 Mayoral Drive

Rendezvous Grand Hotel

29,39,41 Pitt Street

Hopetoun Delta Apartments

22-28 Beresford Square

The Beresford

259-281 Karangahape Road

Retail and Residential building

14 East Street

Residential Building

9 A-C Mercury Lane

Residential Building

18 East Street

Residential Building

153 Newton Road

Beatnik

10 Flower Street

Eden Terrace Apartments

1 Akiraho Street

Eden Oaks

21 Queen Street

Zurich House (Anzo Tower)

7 Albert Street

Retail and Office building

9-11 Albert Street

Food Alley

23-29 Albert Street

ANZ Centre

12-26 Swanson Street

Affco House Carpark

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 75

Address

Property Known As

58 Albert Street

APN NZ Complex

63 Albert Street

AMI House

65-69 Albert Street

Auckland District Court

38 Wyndham Street

Wyndham Towers

92-96 Albert Street

Former Telecom Tower

85 Albert Street

Retail and Office building

87-89 Albert Street

Albert Plaza

99 Albert Street

AA Building

135 Albert Street

ASB Building

120 Albert Street

BDO Tower

44-52 Wellesley Street West

Wellesley Centre

67-101 Vincent Street

Auckland Police Station

22 Dundonald Street

Soundcraft Ltd

3 Flower Street

TV3 Building

32 Normanby Road

Commercial Building

3 Enfield Street

Horse and Trap

101 Mount Eden Road

Hometune

1 Ngahura Street

Auckland Boxing Association

1 Queen Street

HSBC House

125 Queen Street

New World Supermarket tenancy

148 Quay Street

Tenham Investments and Body Corporate 184960

29 Customs Street West

AMP Centre

15-19 East Street

32 Akiraho Street

83 Albert Street

4 Kingston Street

6-12 Kingston Street

Bear Park Early Childhood Centre

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 76

Address

Property Known As

12 – 32 Customs Street

Customs House

2 Queen Street

Endeans Building

12 Queen Street

3 Albert Street

West Plaza

13 Albert Street Auckland Central

Yates Building

15 Albert Street

Link House

35 Albert Street Auckland Central

Price Buchanan Building

37 – 39 Albert Street Auckland Central

41 Albert Street

46 Albert Street

49 Albert Street Auckland Central

53 Albert Street Auckland Central

55 Albert Street

57 Albert Street

61 Albert Street Auckland Central

Shakespeare Hotel and Brewery

76 to 78 Albert Street Auckland Central

Bluestone Wall + toilets under wall

83 to 85 Albert Street Auckland Central

102 Albert Street

26, 34 – 36 Wyndham Street

Former Gas Co Building

9 – 11 Durham Street

Bluestone Store

37-43 Victoria Street West

51-53 Victoria Street West

61-65 Victoria Street West

66 Victoria Street West

London Dairy

68 Victoria Street West

J H Hannan

24 Wellesley Street West

Bledisloe House

15-31 Wellesley Street West

Former CPO - Britomart Transport Centre

New Zealand Herald

Martha’s Corner

Archibald and Sons Warehouse/ T & G Building

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 77

Address

Property Known As

42 Wellesley Street

Griffiths Holdings Building

33 Wyndham Street

Aotea Square Aotea Centre (rear section)

11 Mayoral Drive

Former Public Trust

105 Vincent Street

Auckland Chinese Presbyterian Church

133 Vincent Street

Juliette’s

53 Pitt Street

Former Central Ambulance Station

59 Pitt

65 Pitt Street

70 – 74 Pitt Street

The Chatham

78 Pitt Street Pitt Street

Wesleyan Church

78 Pitt Street

Wesleyan Bicentennial Hall

1 Beresford Square Auckland Central

Former Pitt Street Fire Station

16 – 18 Beresford Square

211-235 Karangahape Road

238 Karangahape Road

George Court Building

1 Cross Street

George Court Factory Building

243 Karangahape Road

Naval and Family Hotel

246-254 Karangahape Road

Hallenstein Brothers Building

251 – 253 Karangahape Road

256 Karangahape Road

257 Karangahape Road

258-266 Karangahape Road

268 Karangahape Road

259-261 Karangahape Road

270 Karangahape Road

283 Karangahape Road

Samoa House

9 Mercury Lane

Mercury Theatre former Kings Theatre

151 Newton Rd

Retail/Recording Studio

206-208 Symonds Street

210 Symonds Street Retail

Pitt Street Buildings (O’Malley’s Corner)

Mercury Theatre entrance - Norman Ng Building

Cheapskates/Penny Farthing Bike Shop French Café

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 78

Address

Property Known As

215 Symonds Street

Edinburgh Castle Building

221 Symonds Street

224 Symonds Street

227 Symonds Street

231 Symonds Street Retail

233 Symonds Street

235 Symonds Street

237 Symonds Street

239-241 Symonds Street

243 Symonds Street

245 Symonds Street

249 Symonds Street

253 Symonds Street

1-13 Mt Eden Road

15-17 Mt Eden Road

21 New North Road

14 New North Road

Villa Dalmacija

St Patrick’s Square 43 Wyndham Street

St Patrick’s Cathedral

59 Alex Evans Street

St Benedict’s Church

1 – 9 St Benedicts Street

St Benedict's Presbytery

6 St Benedicts Street

Residential

43 Wyndham Street & Hobson Street

St Patrick’s Presbytery

Beresford Square

Forrester’s Hall

Former Post Office

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 79

Proposed Draft Notice of Requirement Requiring Authority Designation Conditions – NoR for Designation 3 Condition Number

NoR Design ation Applies to

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 80

Condition Number

NoR Design ation Applies to

Condition

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 81

Condition Number

NoR Design ation Applies to

Condition

AN 1

AN 2

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 82

Diagram 1

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement

Page 83

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Appendix D: Resource Consent Conditions

Page 90

| Karangahape Station Early Works

CONDITIONS Definitions ACZ – Active Construction Zone AEE - Assessment of Environmental Effects prepared by Aurecon New Zealand Limited/ Golder Associates (NZ) Limited, dated 13 May 2016 AQMP - Air Quality Management Plan CCP - Communication and Consultation Plan CEMP - Construction Environmental Management Plan CLG - Community and Business Liaison Group Commencement of construction or construction works – in all conditions which refer to ‘commencement of construction’, construction has the same meaning as the Construction Contracts Act 2002 and includes work such as site clearance, earthmoving and earthworks, excavation, tunnelling, and boring; and the construction, erection, installation, carrying out, alteration, repair, restoration, renewal, maintenance, extension, demolition, removal, or dismantling of any building or structure; and all other matters referred to in section 6 of that Act. CRL – City Rail Link CSA – Construction Support Areas CSMP - Contaminated Soils Management Plan EMP - Industrial and Trade Activities Environmental Management Plan ESC – Erosion and Sediment Control ESCP - Erosion and Sediment Control Plan FTMP – Flocculent Treatment Management Plan GSMCP - Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan IBA - Independent Building Assessor – The person engaged under Condition 91 to make recommendations to Council on building serviceability and damage matters and otherwise carry out the functions ascribed to the IBA under these conditions. Key contacts - are identified in the CEMP and are a “key contact” person representing the Consent Holder and a “key contact” person representing the contractor team to work with the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring). Refer Condition 30 Management Plan/s means one or all of the following: 

Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP)



Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP)



Contaminated Soils Management Plan (CSMP)



Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP)

In Consent: REG/2016/1892

Address: Wyndham Street, Auckland Central to NAL, Mt Eden Station



Flocculent Treatment Management Plan (FTMP)



Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan (GSMCP)



Industrial and Trade Activity Environmental Management Plan (EMP) and Mana Whenua - Ngati Maru, Ngati Paoa, Ngai Tai Ki Tamaki, Ngati Te Ata Waiohua, Te Kawerau a Maki, Ngati Whatua o Orakei, Te Akitai, and Ngati Tamaoho

NAL – North Auckland Line PCCP - Pre-Construction Communication and Consultation Plan Plan – any Management Plan or other plan prepared under these conditions including any plan applicable to a stage of the works Project – the CRL Aotea Station to North Auckland Line Section, or any stage of the Project. Referee – the independent and appropriately qualified senior person to whom a dispute is referred under Condition 8. Senior Qualified Person - means a person with a post-graduate degree in environmental science, chemistry, biology, geology (including a Chartered Professional Engineer (CPEng)) or similar field; or having sufficient technical experience that is at least equivalent; and having at least five years’ professional experience. Services – includes including gas, water, sewerage, telecoms, stormwater, fibre optics and power. SVR - Site Validation Report TP90 - Auckland Council Technical Publication No. 90, Erosion & Sediment Control: Guidelines for Land Disturbing Activities in the Auckland Region, and any amendments to TP90 See also definitions specific to resource consents, namely, Water Permit R/REG/2016/1890 Take and Diversion of Groundwater. General Conditions These conditions apply to all resource consents. Activity in accordance with application 1.

The scope and extent of works envisaged by this project shall be carried out in general accordance with the plans and all information submitted with the application, detailed in Appendix 5, and all referenced by the Council as consent numbers R/LUC/2016/1890, R/REG/2016/1892, R/REG/2016/1895, R/REG/2016/1896, REG/2016/1897, R/REG/2016/1898, R/REG/2016/1899, R/REG/2016/1900 and R/REG/2016/2038. Advice note: Relevant plans may be updated as part of the Management Plan process referred to in these conditions.

If there is any conflict between the application documents and the conditions of these resource consents, the conditions of the resource consents will prevail.

The requirements of these conditions, including requirements for Management Plans and reports, shall relate to the Project or any stage of the Project (as applicable).

Under section 125 of the RMA, this consent lapses 10 years after the date it is granted unless:

The consent is given effect to; or

The Council extends the period after which the consent lapses.

The Consent Holder shall pay the Council an initial consent compliance monitoring charge of $8000 (inclusive of GST), plus any further monitoring charge or charges to recover the actual and reasonable costs incurred to ensure compliance with the conditions of these consents. Advice note: The initial monitoring deposit is to cover the cost of inspecting the site, carrying out tests, reviewing conditions, updating files, etc., all being work to ensure compliance with the resource consents. In order to recover actual and reasonable costs of monitoring conditions in excess of those covered by the deposit, costs shall be charged at the relevant hourly rate applicable at the time. The Consent Holder will be advised of further monitoring charges. Only after all conditions of the resource consents have been met, will the Council issue a letter confirming compliance at the request of the Consent Holder.

Copies of Resource Consents 6.

All personnel working on the Project shall be made aware of, and have access to, at least one copy of these resource consents, associated reference documents and plans, and the certified Management Plans.

Site Access 7.

Subject to compliance with the Consent Holder's health and safety requirements and provision of reasonable notice, servants or agents of the Council shall be permitted to have access to relevant parts of the surface construction sites controlled by the Consent Holder at all reasonable times for the purpose of carrying out inspections, surveys, investigations, tests, measurements and/or to take samples.

Dispute Resolution 8.

In the event of any dispute, disagreement or inaction arising from the implementation of these resource consents, including a.

any Council certification required by these conditions, or

implementation of, or monitoring required by, these conditions, the disputed matter shall be referred in the first instance to the Consent Holder and Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring), to determine a resolution process.

If a resolution process cannot be agreed, then the matter shall be referred to an independent and appropriate Senior Qualified Person (â€˜the refereeâ€™), agreeable to both parties (such agreement not to be unreasonably withheld by either party). The referral shall set out in writing the details of the matter to be referred for determination and the reasons why the parties have not agreed. The referee shall be appointed within 10 working days of the Consent Holder or the Council giving notice to the other of its intention to seek an expert determination. Following the appointment, the referee shall issue a written decision on the matter, including the reasons for his or her decision. In making the decision, the referee shall be entitled to seek further information and to hear from the parties as he or she sees fit in his or her sole discretion. The reasonable fees of the referee shall be paid equally by both disputing parties. Advice Note: The dispute resolution process provided for by this condition does not prejudice any partiesâ€™ right to take enforcement action in relation to implementation of these conditions. However, the dispute resolution process will be applied before any formal enforcement action is taken by the Council, except in urgent situations. The Auckland Transport contact for this resolution process is the Manager Planning and Integration, Property and Planning Team, Capital Development Division Pre-Construction Communication and Consultation Plan (PCCP) 9.

Immediately following the grant of these consents, the Consent Holder shall prepare a PCCP, the purpose of which is to set out a framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation is undertaken with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in-proximity parties.

10.

The PCCP shall be submitted to Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring), within 40 working days of the grant of these consents, with a request for certification that the PCCP has been prepared in accordance with these conditions of consent.

11.

The PCCP shall set out recommendations and requirements (as applicable) that shall be adopted by and/or inform the development of the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and other Plans.

12.

The PCCP shall also set out how the Consent Holder will: a.

Inform the community of Project progress and the likely commencement of construction, and the programme;

Engage with the community in order to foster good relationships and to provide opportunities for learning about the Project;

Obtain (and specify reasonable timeframes for) feedback and input from stakeholders, directly affected and affected in-proximity parties regarding the development of the CEMP and other Plans;

Respond to queries and complaints by providing as a minimum the following information: i) Who is responsible for responding to the query / complaint; ii) How responses will be provided; iii) The timeframes within which responses will be provided.

13.

14.

Where feedback (in accordance with this condition) is provided, the PCCP shall articulate how that feedback has informed the development of the CEMP and other Plans and where it has not, the reasons why it has not.

The PCCP shall be prepared in consultation with stakeholders, directly affected parties and affected in-proximity parties including, but not limited to: a.

All property owners and occupiers of the sites that are identified in Appendix 4, and adjacent to the Projectâ€™s construction sites;

Mana Whenua unless any of those named advise the Consent Holder of a different liaison process;

Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga (Heritage NZ);

NZ Transport Agency / Auckland Motorway Alliance (AMA);

KiwiRail;

Department of Corrections;

Ministry of Justice;

Network Utility Operators; and

The Community and Business Liaison Group (refer Conditions 16-24).

In addition to the requirements of Conditions 11 and 12 above, the PCCP shall, as a minimum, include: a.

A communications framework that details the Consent Holderâ€™s communication strategies, accountabilities, frequency of communications and consultation, the range of communication and consultation tools to be used (including relevant communication methods, newsletters or similar, advertising etc.), and any other relevant communication matters;

Details of the Consent Holderâ€™s Communication and Consultation Manager for the pre- construction period including 24 hour contact details (phone, email and postal address);

The 0800 CRL TALK phone number;

The methods for identifying, communicating and consulting with stakeholders, directly affected parties and affected in-proximity parties and other interested parties. Such methods shall include but not be limited to: i)

Newsletters; 5

ii)

Newspaper advertising;

iii)

Notification and targeted consultation with stakeholders, affected parties and affected in-proximity parties; and

iv)

The use of the Project website for public information.

The methods for communicating and consulting with the Community and Business Liaison Group (refer Conditions 16-24);

How communication and consultation activity will be recorded; and

Methods for recording reasonably foreseeable future planned network utility works so that those works can be considered and incorporated, where appropriate, into the Project design. The PCCP shall be advertised on the Project website as being publicly available once finalised for the duration of the Projectâ€™s pre- construction period. Advice Note: At the time these resource consents were granted, the Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project was Carol Greensmith, phone 0800 CRL TALK.

15.

The certified PCCP shall be implemented and complied with within 60 working days from the resource consent decision until the commencement of construction.

Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG) 16.

Within 60 working days of the resource consent decision, the Consent Holder shall, in consultation with Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring), establish a Community and Business Liaison Group in the construction area (Aotea Station to North Auckland Line Section). Advice Note: It is not the intention to set up a new CLG, but to invite those identified in Condition 17 to join one of the already established CLGs set up under the terms of the CRL Designation (refer to Condition 7 of the CRL Designation conditions). These existing CLGs include (and are known as): Aotea Station; Karangahape Station; and Mt Eden Station.

17.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that membership of the CLG shall include representative(s) of the Consent Holder and be open to all directly affected and affected in-proximity parties to the Project including, but not limited to the following: a.

Representative(s) for and/or directly affected and affected in-proximity property owners and occupiers identified in Appendix 4, and are adjacent to the Projectâ€™s construction sites;

Karangahape Road Business Association Inc;

Regional Facilities Auckland;

CBD Residents Advisory Group;

Heart of the City;

18.

If not already included under (a), Mr C P Browne, 22 Stable Lane, Eden Terrace; and

Mana Whenua unless any of those named advise the Consent Holder of a different liaison process.

In addition to involvement in the PCCP (refer Conditions 9-15), the Consent Holder shall ensure that the CLG shall: a.

Receive regular updates on Project progress;

Enable the effects of constructing the Project on the community and businesses to be monitored by providing a regular forum through which information about the Project can be provided to the community;

Enable opportunities for concerns and issues to be reported to and responded by the Consent Holder; and

Be provided with feedback on the development of, and any material changes to the CEMP and other Management Plans.

Respond to any issues raised in regard to business disruption.

Provide to any landowner or tenant at his/her request, any information specific to that landownerâ€™s or tenantâ€™s property.

19.

The Consent Holder shall consult with the CLG in respect of the development and review of the CEMP and other Management Plans.

20.

Prior to preparation of the PCCP under Condition 9, the Consent Holder shall appoint one or more persons appropriately qualified in community consultation as the Community Consultation Advisor(s) to: a.

Provide administrative assistance to the CLG;

Ensure the CLG is working effectively (including the development of a Code of Conduct and appropriate procedures for the CLG); and

Act as a community consultation advisor to the CLG.

21.

The Consent Holder must use its best endeavours to ensure that the CLG meets at least annually until the commencement of construction and then at least once every three months or as otherwise required once construction commences.

22.

Once construction has commenced, the Consent Holder shall provide an update at least every three months (or as otherwise agreed) to the CLG on compliance with resource consent conditions, including the CEMP and other Management Plans, and any material changes to these Plans.

23.

The Consent Holder shall provide reasonable administrative support for the CLG including organising meetings at a local venue, inviting all members of the CLG, and taking responsibility for keeping and disseminating meeting minutes.

24.

The CLG shall continue for the duration of the Project and for six months following completion of the Project and an additional six months if a majority of the members of the CLG agree.

Communication and Consultation Plan (CCP) 25.

At least 3 months prior to the commencement of construction, the Consent Holder shall prepare a CCP the purpose of which is to set out a framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in-proximity parties during the construction of the Project.

26.

[blank]

27.

The CCP shall be based on and, where appropriate, incorporate the provisions of the PCCP, and shall set out how the Consent Holder will:

28.

Inform the community and business of construction progress and future construction activities and constraints that could affect them;

Provide early information on key Project milestones;

Obtain and specify a reasonable timeframe (being not less than 10 working days), for feedback and inputs from directly affected and affected in-proximity parties regarding the implementation and review of the CEMP or other Management Plans;

Respond to queries and complaints including but not limited to: i)

Who is responsible for responding;

ii)

How responses will be provided; and

iii)

The timeframes within which responses will be provided.

The CCP shall (as a minimum) include: a.

The Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project including 24 hour contact details (phone, email and postal address);

The 0800 CRL TALK phone number;

The methods for identifying, communicating and consulting with persons affected by the project including but not limited to: i)

All property owners and occupiers of the sites that are identified at Appendix 4, and adjacent to the Projectâ€™s construction sites;

ii)

Mana Whenua unless any of those named advise the Consent Holder of a different liaison process;

iii)

Heritage NZ;

iv)

NZ Transport Agency/ Auckland Motorway Alliance (AMA);

Kiwirail;

vi)

Department of Corrections;

vii)

Ministry of Justice;

viii)

Network Utility Operators; and

ix)

The Community and Business Liaison Group (refer Conditions 16-24)

How stakeholders and persons affected by the Project will be notified of the commencement of construction, the expected duration of the activities and works, and who to contact for any queries, concerns and complaints;

How stakeholders and persons affected by the Project will be consulted in the development and review of the CEMP and other Management Plans, including specifying reasonable timeframes for feedback;

A list of stakeholders, directly affected and affected in-proximity parties to the construction works with whom the Consent Holder will communicate;

A requirement that the Consent Holder shall make any information that is relevant to 22 Stable Lane available to the owner of that property (Christopher Patrick Browne) on request, and advise that owner in the event that any alert or alarm trigger levels are exceeded that are relevant to 22 Stable Lane. In addition, the CCP shall state the method by which Christopher Patrick Browne can make such a request and the anticipated timeframe within which it will be provided;

A summary of communication and consultation undertaken between the Consent Holder and parties as required by the PCCP. The summary shall include any outstanding issues or disputes raised by parties;

How communication and consultation relating to construction activities and monitoring requirements will be recorded; and

How opportunities to interpret and display archaeological finds within the Project area will be identified and implemented, including how Heritage NZ will be involved in this process.

Advice Note: At the time this resource consent was granted, the Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project was Carol Greensmith, phone 0800 CRL TALK. 29.

The CCP shall also include (as relevant) linkages and cross-references to the CEMP and other Management Plans.

30.

The CCP shall be reviewed six monthly for the duration of construction and updated if required. Any updates to the CCP shall be provided to the parties referred to in Condition 28(d) and the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for review and agreement on any further action to be undertaken.

31.

Any further action recommended as a result of the review under Condition 30 shall be undertaken by the Consent Holderâ€™s Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project and confirmation of completion shall be provided to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

32.

If, in the course of amendments undertaken as part of the review process under Condition 30, a material change to the CCP is made, the Consent Holder shall notify those parties affected by the change within 20 working days of the material change occurring.

33.

The CCP shall be implemented and complied with for the duration of the construction of the Project.

Pre-Construction Meetings and Notification 34.

Prior to commencement of any stage of construction, the Consent Holder shall arrange a pre-construction meeting with Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring in conjunction with relevant technical specialists, as required) as well as the site contractor and shall invite Mana Whenua to attend. a.

The meeting shall be located on the Project site unless otherwise agreed;

The meeting shall be scheduled no less than five working days before the anticipated commencement of construction;

The meeting shall include representation from the contractor who will undertake the works;

The following information shall be made available by the Consent Holder at the pre- construction meeting: i)

Conditions of consent;

ii)

Approved (signed/stamped) construction plans for that stage;

iii)

Timeframes for key stages of the works authorised under these consents;

iv)

Contact details of the site contractor, site stormwater engineer and other key contractors;

All certified Management Plans; and Advice Note: by this stage, all of the Management Plan s should have been certified, given the plans are required to be lodged 20 working days prior to commencement of construction.

vi)

A copy of the Corridor Access Request from Auckland Transport.

Appropriate provision to the extent sought by Manu Whenua, or their nominated representative(s), shall be made for a cultural induction of the contractor's staff. Advice Note: To arrange the pre-construction meeting required by Condition 34 please contact Steve Pearce, Team Leader Central Monitoring at steve.pearce@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz, or 09 301 01 01. The conditions of consent should be discussed at this meeting. All information required by the Council should be provided no later than two days prior to the meeting.

Construction Management 35.

Prior to the commencement of construction of the Project, the Consent Holder shall prepare a Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) including all certified Management Plans which form part of these conditions to ensure compliance with the resource consents.

36.

The CEMP shall include details of: a.

Final project details and staging of works to illustrate that the works remain within the limits and standards approved under these resource consents and that the construction activities avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on the environment.

The site or project manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager, including their contact details (phone, email and physical address);

The parties listed in Condition 28(d);

Communication and consultation procedures for ensuring that residents, road users and businesses in the immediate vicinity of construction areas are given prior notice of the commencement of construction and are informed about the expected duration and effects of the work. In particular, the procedures shall provide for the following in relation to residents, road users and businesses potentially affected by the construction works: i)

consultation prior to the commencement of construction;

ii)

notice periods for changes to pedestrian and vehicle access;

iii)

regular updates on construction progress;

iv)

key dates for major milestones such as road closure and re-opening; and

communication on any other matters potentially affecting residents or business operations in the vicinity of the works.

Notice boards that clearly identify the Consent Holder and the Project name, together with the name, telephone number and email address of the Site or Project Manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager;

General site layout and management;

An outline of the Project’s construction programme, including construction hours of operation;

Means of ensuring the safety of the general public;

Certified Management Plans referred to in these conditions;

Water Discharge Quality Monitoring Programme; and

Identification of the suitably independent, qualified Chartered Professional Engineer, or member of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, who will be undertaking the condition surveys required by the conditions of consent.

37.

The CEMP shall be provided to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification at least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction.

38.

The Consent Holder shall request the Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination, in writing, as to whether the CEMP can be certified as per the requirements of these consent conditions within 10 working days of receipt of the CEMP. Construction shall not commence until written certification is obtained from Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

39.

The CEMP required by Condition 35 shall be implemented and maintained throughout the entire construction period for the Project, or relevant Project stage, to manage potential adverse effects arising from the construction and shall be updated as necessary (or as required by the review process in Condition 42).

40.

Construction Traffic 41.

The Consent Holder shall, so far as is it is reasonably practicable, avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on transport, parking and property access. This is to be achieved through the following objectives: a.

managing the road transport network for the duration of the construction by adopting the best practicable option to manage congestion;

maintaining pedestrian access to private property at all times; and

providing on-going vehicle access to private property to the greatest extent possible.

Advice Note: Condition 41 refers to objectives to be achieved. The requirement to provide mechanisms to achieve these objectives is included in the relevant CRL designation conditions. Review Process for CEMP and other Management Plans 42.

43.

44.

The Consent Holder shall review the CEMP and other Management Plans at least annually or a.

as a result of a material change to the Project;

to address unforeseen or materially greater adverse effects arising from construction or

to address unresolved complaints.

A review pursuant to Condition 42 may be initiated by either the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) or the Consent Holder and shall take into consideration: a.

Compliance with resource consent conditions, the CEMP, other Management Plans and any material changes to these Plans;

Any changes to construction methods;

Key changes to roles and responsibilities relating to the Project;

Relevant changes in industry best practice standards;

Relevant changes in legal or other requirements;

Results of monitoring and reporting procedures associated with the management of adverse effects during construction;

Any comments or recommendations received from Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) or as a result of the CCP process regarding the CEMP and other Management Plans; and

Any complaints and any response to complaints and remedial action taken to address the complaint as required under Conditions 45-49.

A summary of the review process shall be kept by the Consent Holder, provided annually to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring), and advised to and made available to the CLG.

Concerns and Complaints Management 45.

Upon receiving a concern or complaint during construction of the Project, the Consent Holder shall instigate a process to address the concern or complaint. This shall: a.

Identify of the nature of the concern or complaint, and the location, date and time of the alleged event(s);

Acknowledge receipt of the concern or complaint within 24 hours of receipt;

46.

Respond to the concern or complaint in accordance with the relevant Management Plan, which may include (for example) monitoring of the activity by a suitably qualified expert, and implementation of mitigation measures; and

Provide the person raising the concern or complaint with details of the response.

A record of all concerns and / or complaints received shall be kept by the Consent Holder. This record shall include: a.

The name and address of the person(s) who raised the concern or complaint (unless they elect not to provide this or do not want the information recorded) and details of the concern or complaint;

Where practicable and relevant, weather conditions at the time of the concern or complaint, including wind direction and cloud cover if the complaint relates to air quality;

The relevant known construction activities being undertaken at the time and in the vicinity of the concern or complaint;

Any other activities in the area unrelated to the Project that may have contributed to the concern or complaint such as non-related construction, fires, traffic accidents or unusually dusty conditions generally;

Remedial actions undertaken (if any) and the outcome of these, including monitoring of the activity and any proposed changes to any Management Plan; and

the response of the person who raised the concern or complaint to the remedial actions undertaken.

47.

This record shall be maintained on site, be available for inspection upon request, and shall be provided every two months (or as otherwise agreed) to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

48.

Where a complaint remains unresolved or a dispute arises, the Consent Holder will provide to Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) a copy of all records of the complaint and advice as to

49.

how it has been dealt with and addressed; and

whether the Consent Holder considers that any other steps to resolve the complaint are required.

In addition to Condition 48, the Consent Holder shall also request the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) to determine whether a review of the CEMP and/or Management Plan(s) is required under Condition 42 to address the unresolved complaint or dispute. The Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) will be asked to advise the Consent Holder of its recommendation within 10 working days of receiving the records of complaint.

Specific conditions – land use consent R/LUC/2016/1890 Earthworks Duration 50.

Consent R/LUC/2016/1890 shall expire 15 years from the date it is granted unless it has been surrendered or been cancelled at an earlier date pursuant to the RMA.

Completion or abandonment of works 51.

Upon completion or abandonment of earthworks on the subject site all areas of bare earth shall be permanently stabilised against erosion to the satisfaction of the Team Leader Central Monitoring.

52.

The Consent Holder shall manage the on-going monitoring of the measures taken under Condition 51 and for that purpose, should discuss any potential measures with Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring), with reference to TP90.

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) 53.

At least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction within a CSA or ACZ, the Consent Holder shall submit to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification an ESCP which provides for the management of all bulk earthworks to minimise any discharge of debris, soil, sediment or sediment-laden water beyond the site to either land and/ or stormwater drainage systems.

54.

The Consent Holder shall request the Council's (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination as to whether the ESCP can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days of receipt of the ESCP. No construction activity shall commence until certification from Council is provided.

55.

An ESCP shall include, but is not be limited to, the following matters: 

identification of construction zones and construction support areas;



specific erosion and sediment control works for each Active Construction Zone (location, dimensions, capacity supporting calculations and design drawings), which should be in line with Industry Best Practice that will meet or exceed the performance of measures detailed in TP90;



catchment boundaries;



the timing and duration of construction and operation of control works (in relation to the staging and sequencing of earthworks);



details relating to the management of exposed areas;



reference to the Flocculent Treatment Management Plan and confirmation of erosion and sediment control measures necessary to give effect to that plan;



reference to the Contaminated Soils Management Plan and confirmation of erosion and sediment control measures necessary to give effect to that plan; and



monitoring and maintenance requirements, including information on complaint investigation and response procedures, training, and roles and responsibilities.

56.

Any change to an ESCP shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification.

57.

The Consent Holder shall request the Council's (Team Leader Central Monitoring) written determination as to whether the proposed change can be certified, to be provided within 10 working days of submission of the change. No activity reliant upon a change to the ESCP can be undertaken until the change has been certified.

58.

The Consent Holder shall comply with the ESCP for the duration of the earthworks associated with the Project.

Flocculent Treatment Management Plan (FTMP) 59.

At least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction, the Consent Holder shall submit to Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification an FTMP which confirms the measures that will be taken to ensure that the construction of the Project or Project Stage will be generally consistent with the Water Quality Assessment and the Industrial and Trade Activities Assessment prepared by Golder Associates (NZ) Limited, both dated December 2014.

60.

The Consent Holder shall request the Council's (Team Leader Central Monitoring) written determination as to whether the FTMP can be certified, within 10 working days of receipt of the FTMP. No construction activity shall commence until certification from Council is provided.

61.

The FTMP shall include, but not be limited to, the following matters: 

Specific design details of the flocculent treatment system based on a batch dosing methodology for the site's settlement tanks, including the potential for use of non - flocculants (e.g. chitin based flocculants);



Monitoring, maintenance (including post-storm) and contingency programme (including a record sheet);



Details of optimum dosage (including assumptions);



Results of initial flocculent treatment trial;



A spill contingency plan; and



Details of the person or bodies who will hold responsibility for the long-term operation and maintenance of the flocculent treatment system and the organisational structure which will support this system.

62.

Any change to the FTMP shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification.

63.

The Consent Holder shall request the Council's (Team Leader Central Monitoring) written determination as to whether the proposed change requested under Condition 62 can be certified, to be provided within 10 working days of submission of the change. No activity reliant upon a change to the FTMP can be undertaken until the change has been certified.

64.

The Consent Holder shall comply with the FTMP for the duration of construction of the Project.

As Built certification 65.

Prior to the commencement of bulk earthworks, a certificate signed by a Senior Qualified Person shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) to certify that the erosion and sediment controls (including diversion bunds, silt fences and sumps) have been constructed in accordance with the certified ESCP(s) as required by Condition 53 of this consent.

66.

The certification from the Senior Qualified Person for these measures shall be supplied to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) immediately upon completion of construction of those measures. Information supplied, if applicable, shall include: 

The contributing catchment area;



The shape of structure (dimensions of structure);



The position of inlets/outlets; and



The stabilisation of the structure.

General Performance Standards 67.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that there shall be no deposition of earth, mud, dirt or other debris on any road or footpath resulting from bulk earthworks on the subject site. In the event that such deposition does occur, it shall immediately be removed. In no instance, shall roads or footpaths be washed down with water without appropriate erosion and sediment control measures in place to prevent contamination of the stormwater drainage system, watercourses or receiving waters.

68.

The operational effectiveness and efficiency of all erosion and sediment control measures specifically required as a condition of resource consent, including the certified ESCP referred to in Condition 53, shall be maintained throughout the duration of earthworks, or until the Project site is permanently stabilised against erosion.

69.

The site shall be progressively stabilised against erosion at all stages of earthworks activity, and shall be sequenced to minimise the discharge of contaminants to groundwater or surface water.

70.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that the erosion and sediment control measures are constructed and maintained in accordance with TP90, except where a higher standard is detailed in an ESCP/FTMP, in which case the higher standard shall apply.

71.

Sediment control measures shall be inspected on a weekly basis and after a significant storm event to ensure effective operation.

72.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that all material removed from or delivered to the Project site shall be covered during transportation.

Review Condition for regional land use (earthworks) consent R/LUC/2016/1890 73.

Pursuant to section 128 of the RMA the conditions of this consent may be reviewed by the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) at the Consent Holder's cost, by giving notice pursuant to section 129 of the Act within six months after commencement of bulk earthworks and subsequently at intervals of not less than one year thereafter in order to achieve the following: a.

To deal with any adverse effects on the environment which may arise or potentially arise from the exercise of this consent and which it is appropriate to deal with at a later stage;

To alter erosion and sediment control requirements as a result of previous monitoring outcomes, and/or in response to changes to the environment and/or hydro-geological knowledge, and/or changes to industry best practice;

If, at any time, it is found that the information made available to the Council in the application contained inaccuracies which materially influenced the decision and the effects of the exercise of the consent are such that it is necessary to apply more appropriate conditions; and

If, at any time, CRL-related works being undertaken under a designation providing for aspects of the Project, or a separate resource consent, leads to an inconsistent approach to the management of effects.

Stormwater quality (redevelopment of Albert Street - high use road) 74.

Management of stormwater from the redevelopment of Albert Street that is necessitated by the Project shall achieve the following performance standard, and measures to achieve that standard shall be implemented prior to completion of the Project: Works Via a treatment device(s) that meets the design guideline requirements

Device catchment 17,300 area m2

Design guideline Best Practicable Option, designed in accordance with the principles of TP10/75% TSS removal

75.

At least 30 days prior to the commencement of construction of the stormwater devices on the site, the Consent Holder shall submit a final detailed design of the stormwater management system required to comply with Condition 74 to the Team Leader Central Monitoring for certification. The information shall include, but not be limited to: a.

A site drainage plan;

Catchment area details (and associated water quality volume calculations) for stormwater treatment device(s);

Plans and engineering drawings for the stormwater treatment(s); and

Design calculations for the stormwater treatment device(s) demonstrating the treatment efficiency.

As builts 76.

The Consent Holder shall provide As-Built certification and plans of the stormwater management works, which are certified (signed) by a suitably qualified registered surveyor as a true record of the stormwater management system constructed in accordance with the design approved under Condition 75, to the Team Leader Central Monitoring.

77.

The As-Built plans shall display the entirety of the stormwater management system, and shall include

78.

location, dimensions and levels of any overland flow paths including cross sections and long sections;

plans and cross sections of all stormwater management devices, including confirmation of the Water Quality Volume, storage volumes and levels of any outflow control structure;

documentation of any discrepancies between the design plans and the As-Built plans approved by the Modifications Approval condition.

A post-construction meeting shall be held by the Consent Holder, within 20 working days of completion of the stormwater management works, that: a.

is located on the subject area;

includes representation from the Team Leader Central Monitoring; and

includes representation from the site stormwater engineer or contractors who have undertaken the works and any other relevant parties.

Operation and Maintenance Plan 79.

The Consent Holder shall provide an Operation and Maintenance Plan for the stormwater management system to the Team Leader Central Monitoring 5 days prior to the post-construction meeting required by Condition 78.

80.

81.

The Operation and Maintenance Plan shall set out how the stormwater management system is to be operated and maintained to ensure that adverse environmental effects are minimised. The plan shall include: a.

details of who will hold responsibility for long-term maintenance of the stormwater management system and the organisational structure which will support this process;

a programme for regular maintenance and inspection of the stormwater management system;

a programme for the collection and disposal of debris and sediment collected by the stormwater management devices or practices;

a programme for post storm inspection and maintenance;

a programme for inspection and maintenance of the outfall;

general inspection checklists for all aspects of the stormwater management system, including visual checks and

a programme for inspection and maintenance of vegetation associated with the stormwater management devices.

The stormwater management system shall be managed in accordance with the Operation and Maintenance Plan (see Condition 79).

Specific conditions â€“ water permit (groundwater diversion/discharge) R/REG/2016/1892 DEFINITIONS: Commencement of Dewatering:

Means Commencement of Bulk Excavation and/or the commencement of the taking or diversion of groundwater, other than for initial state monitoring purposes.

Completion of Excavation

Means the stage when all Bulk Excavation has been completed.

Completion of Dewatering:

Means when the tunnel and associated shafts and access-ways within a construction zone have been constructed and no further groundwater is being extracted for the construction of the railway and utility infrastructure.

Completion of Construction

Means when the Consent Holder advises the Council in writing that construction is complete in relation to the consent.

Serviceability Limit/s

As detailed in Table 1 Building Damage Classification, it is the limit beyond which Serviceability Damage may occur. It represents the magnitude of structural deflections (caused by ground settlement) or lateral displacement) beyond which structural, as opposed to nonstructural (aesthetic) damage may occur, including:

i. any reduction of operational functionality ii. any reduction in weathertightness or service life or iii. any reduced durability. In determining Serviceability Limits for a given building, structure or service, the predicted and actual response to deflection must be considered in relation to the existing conditions of the building, structure or services (and parts thereof). Damage

Includes aesthetic and structural (serviceability) damage.

Alert Level

= 80% design prediction.

Alarm Level

= 100% design prediction

Manager:

Means the Team Leader Water Allocation, NRSI, AC, or nominated Auckland Council staff acting on the Team Leaderâ€™s behalf.

RL:

Means Reduced Level.

Consent duration 82.

The Dewatering and Diversion consent and water permit 46500 shall expire 35 years after the consent commences unless it has been surrendered or been cancelled at an earlier date pursuant to the RMA.

Performance standards 83.

Within the 5mm settlement contours on the drawings in Appendix 1, all excavations, dewatering systems, retaining structures and associated works (including backfilling) for the CRL construction must be designed, constructed and maintained so as to avoid any damage that exceeds the Serviceability Limits of buildings, structures and services.

84.

Category of Damage

Normal Degree of Severity

Description of Typical Damage

Negligible

Hairline cracks.

Very Slight

Fine cracks easily treated during normal redecoration. Perhaps isolated slight fracture in building. Cracks in exterior visible upon close inspection. Typical crack widths up to 1mm.

Slight

Cracks easily filled. Redecoration probably required. Several slight fractures inside building. Exterior cracks visible, some repainting may be required for weather-tightness. Doors and windows may stick slightly. Typically crack widths up to 5mm.

Moderate

Cracks may require cutting out and patching. Recurrent cracks can be masked by suitable linings. Brick pointing and possible replacement of a small amount of exterior brickwork may be required. Doors and windows sticking. Utility services may be interrupted. Weather tightness often impaired. Typical crack widths are 5mm to 15mm or several greater than 3mm.

Severe

Extensive repair involving removal and replacement of walls especially over door and windows required. Window and door frames distorted. Floor slopes noticeably. Walls lean or bulge noticeably. Some loss of bearing in beams. Utility services disrupted. Typical crack widths are 15mm to 25mm but also depend on the number of cracks.

Very Severe

Major repair required involving partial or complete reconstruction. Beams lose bearing, walls lean badly and require shoring. Windows broken by distortion. Danger of instability.

(Building Damage Classification after Burland (1995), and Mair et al (1996))

General Category

CRL Consent

(after Burland – 1995) Aesthetic Damage

Negligible effects for <5mm predicted ground settlement Aesthetic Damage Effects – to be mitigated

Serviceability Damage

Serviceability Limit (interface between Damage Category 2 “Slight” and Damage Category 3 “Moderate”)

Serviceability Damage Effects – to be avoided

Stability Damage

Stability Damage Effects – to be avoided

Planner’s report to the Independent Hearing Commissioners R/LUC/2016/1890, R/REG/2016/1892, R/REG/2016/1895, R/REG/2016/1896, R/REG/2016/1897, R/REG/2016/1898, R/REG/2016/1899, R/REG/2016/1900 and R/REG/2016/2038 Page 22

Typical crack widths are greater than 25mm but depend on the number of cracks.

Table 1: Building Damage Classification Note: ‘Description of Typical Damage’ applies to Masonry buildings only. The ‘General Category’ applies to all buildings.

85.

The maximum bulk excavation depths, including shafts shall not exceed the specified depth in Schedule A below in the respective construction zones by more than 2 metres without approval from the Manager: Schedule A: Construction Zone

Design Component

Design Depth

ACZ A

Aotea Station

6.5 mRL

ACZ A

Wellesley Street Entrance

5.5 mRL

ACZ A

Victoria Street Entrance

6.5 mRL

ACZ-K

Karangahape Station

30 mRL

ACZ-K

Pitt Street Shaft

ACZ-K

Mercury Lane Shaft

30 mRL

ACZ-M

Newton Grade Separation Structure

54 mRL

26.5 mRL

86.

The design tunnel alignment shall not be raised by more than 4m without approval from the Manager.

87.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that the following underground structures are sealed from groundwater ingress following construction:

88.

ACZ A – Aotea Station.

ii.

ACZ N – North Tunnels.

iii.

ACZ K – Pitt Street and Mercury Lane shafts between the ground surface and the top of the unweathered rock.

iv.

ACZ S – South Tunnels excluding Newton Y-Junctions.

ACZ M – Mt Eden Station trench, cut and cover tunnels and Newton Grade Separation Structure.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that: a.

the North and South Tunnels (excluding the Vincent Street, Upper Queen Street and Symonds Street tunnel cross passages and Newton Y-Junctions) are sealed within one month of excavation, and

the three tunnel cross passages are sealed within three years of excavation, unless it is demonstrated by monitoring results submitted to and agreed by Council that potentially adverse effects of settlement will not occur, in which case the tunnel cross passages shall be sealed prior to Completion of Construction.

89.

After Completion of Construction, with the exception of permanent groundwater drawdown in the vicinity of Aotea Station (perched groundwater), Karangahape Station and the Newton Y-junctions, groundwater levels shall not be reduced by the CRL project below pre-existing seasonal low levels or rise above seasonal high levels measured during pre-construction monitoring in accordance with Condition 105.

90.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that there is no long-term mounding due to damming of groundwater by the proposed rail infrastructure.

Appointment of Independent Building Assessor (IBA) 91.

Prior to the Consent Holder submitting the GSMCP under Condition 97, the Consent Holder shall request that Council engage, at the cost of the Consent Holder, a suitably qualified independent specialist, agreed to by the Consent Holder, to fill the role of Independent Building Assessor (IBA). The Consent Holder shall acknowledge that the IBA can, at the expense of the Consent Holder, engage other independent specialists, but only in consultation with the Consent Holder.

92.

The IBA required by Condition 91 shall report to the Manager on building damage matters and how these matters may be addressed by the Consent Holder. The IBAâ€™s report shall have regard to the following: a.

that site-specific assessments are undertaken to an appropriate level of detail;

monitoring data is collected, interpreted and assessed in regard to limiting effects to avoid Serviceability Damage (refer Table 1);

Alert and Alarm limits; and

any matters referred to in Conditions 109, 115, 124 and 125.

Pre-Dewatering services survey 93.

Prior to the Commencement of Dewatering, and following the identification of potentially affected Services, the Consent Holder shall, in consultation with the relevant service provider, undertake a condition survey of all such Services. This condition does not apply to any Service where written evidence is provided to the Manager that the owner of that Service has confirmed they do not require a condition survey.

94.

The monitoring of any settlement effects on those potentially affected Services shall be in accordance with Conditions 120 and 121.

95.

In the event that the Servicesâ€™ trigger levels listed in Appendix 2 are breached, the Consent Holder must carry out remedial actions in accordance with Conditions 125 and 128.

Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan (GSMCP) 96.

During construction, the Consent Holder shall implement procedures that will appropriately respond to the information received from the monitoring system, including assessment at each excavation stage of the actual retention and building response against the predictions determined from the detailed design.

97.

The procedures referred to in Condition 96 shall be set out in a GSMCP, prepared and submitted by the Consent Holder at least 20 working days prior to the Commencement of Dewatering, together with a statement from the IBA confirming its adequacy, to the Manager for certification.

98.

The Consent Holder shall request the Manger’s written determination as to whether the GSMCP can be certified, to be provided in writing within 10 working days of receipt of the GSMCP.

99.

No dewatering on the subject site shall commence until certification from the Manager is provided.

100.

The GSMCP required by Condition 97 shall include the requirements of this resource consent including, but not limited to, the following: a.

An “as built” survey plan of all monitoring locations based on approximate positions located on the plans entitled: 

A02502731, Figure 39, Rev B dated May 2016 and ET Table 7.1 (Appendix 3); and



The plans referred to in Appendix 1 and any further building-specific monitoring requirements determined from the detailed pre-construction building condition assessment.

Full details (frequency and scope) of groundwater (including construction logs), ground surface, building, retaining wall, building façade, inclinometer monitoring programme and conditions surveys, and frequency and scope of visual inspections required by this consent;

A bar chart, such as a Gantt chart, showing the timing and frequency of the condition surveys and monitoring required by this consent relative to the Commencement of Dewatering and the Completion of Dewatering;

Groundwater alert triggers, defined as 90% of predicted drawdown below seasonal low groundwater levels;

Details of all alert and alarm triggers (including any necessary horizontal and vertical displacements), the frequency of monitoring and the criteria to cease monitoring for each ground, building and retaining wall deformation marks and inclinometers, extensometers. The alert and alarm triggers shall be an update of the provisional triggers provided on drawings CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG2640 Rev 4. dated 14 October 2016 and CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2642 Rev 3. dated 11 October 2016;

101.

Details of the contingency measures to be implemented if alert or alarm triggers are exceeded, including a Response Plan;

Identification of any adjacent Services susceptible to damage and details of any pre and post construction monitoring or inspection;

Details of monitoring proposed to ensure the effects of any ground settlement adjacent to shafts proposed for the installation of new utilities near Mt Eden Station are adequately monitored;

Details of the monitoring proposed to be undertaken to protect the issued groundwater diversion consents listed below against cumulative settlement effects: i.

Consent No. 45735, 46 Upper Queen Street

ii.

Consent No. 44531, 224 Hobson Street

iii.

Consent 44857, 106 Vincent Street

iv.

Consent No. 45635, 210 Federal Street

Consent No. 44571, 58 Albert Street

vi.

Consent No. 43162, 26 Poynton Terrace

Identification of existing basements which could be subject to potential flooding from post-construction groundwater mounding; details of monitoring of longterm groundwater mounding effects; and details of groundwater drain construction to prevent groundwater mounding; and

The review of the proposed alarm and alert trigger levels in Appendix 2, approved by the IBA, following the pre-construction building condition surveys (required by Condition 109) that confirms they are set to ensure Serviceability Limits will be not be exceeded and whether the monitoring frequency is adequate, possibly requiring further site investigation work where sensitive structures are identified as part of Condition 112.

The GSMCP may be varied, including frequency of monitoring, subject to the certification of the Manager, which is contingent on approval of the IBA. Advice Note: The Manager will endeavour to determine whether the change can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days of submission of the change.

102.

Once certified, the GSMCP shall be implemented for the periods specified in conditions of this consent.

103.

The Consent Holder shall advise the Manager, in writing, of the date of the proposed Commencement of Dewatering.

Monitoring - Groundwater 104.

The Consent Holder shall install, maintain and replace if necessary, groundwater monitoring boreholes listed in Appendix 3 of this consent and shown on drawing A02502731, Figure 39, Rev B dated May 2016 (Appendix 3) and ET Table 7.1 (Appendix 3) of this consent, for the period required by the conditions of this consent.

105.

The Consent Holder shall measure and record groundwater levels at the monitoring boreholes specified in drawings and ET Table 7.1 attached to these conditions (Appendix 3) at the frequency specified in Schedule B.

Schedule B: Bore Name

Location

As per list in As per Appendix 3 Plans in Appendix 3

Groundwater level monitoring frequency and duration (to an accuracy of 10mm, calibrated by the instrument supplier)1 From bore construction for at least three months prior to Commencement of Dewatering

Commencement of Dewatering until either six months after the Completion of Dewatering, or until such time following the completion of dewatering that monitoring of settlement and building monitoring marks has ceased under Condition 120.

Weekly

At least three times Weekly1

Note 1: The monitoring frequency and duration may be changed if approved by the Manager. Any change shall be specified in the GSMCP. 106.

These records, reported in reduced level, shall be compiled and submitted to the Manager at monthly intervals.

107.

The groundwater alert trigger level criteria is listed in Schedule C below for the monitoring boreholes.

Schedule C: Provisional Alert Trigger Level Criteria Alert Trigger Low Level

108.

90% of predicted drawdown response in all units

Where groundwater alert trigger levels are exceeded, as identified from monitoring data obtained pursuant to Condition 105, the Consent Holder shall undertake the actions set out in the certified GSMCP; a.

notify the Manager within 2 working days, advising the trigger exceedance, the risk of settlement causing damage to buildings, and details of the actions taken; and

send a copy of the material notified to Council to the relevant building owner.

Building Inspection 109.

Prior to the submission of the GSMCP, the Consent Holder shall employ an independent Senior Qualified Person to undertake, subject to the approval of the property owner, a detailed pre-construction condition survey of all buildings specified in Appendix 2 in order to confirm their existing condition. The survey and assessment shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a.

any information about the type of foundations;

existing levels of damage considered to be of an aesthetic or superficial nature;

existing levels of damage considered to affect the serviceability of the building where visually apparent and without recourse to intrusive or destructive investigation;

a professional opinion as to whether observed damage may or may not be associated with actual structural damage;

susceptibility of the building or structure to further movement;

specific assessment of building damage with reference to the trigger levels identified in Appendix 2;

review of proposed alarm and alert trigger levels to confirm they are appropriately set; and

photographic evidence of (b) and (c).

110.

Where the Consent Holder is required to access property (including buildings or structures) owned by a third party to undertake monitoring, surveys or inspections and that access is declined or subject to what the Consent Holder considers to be unreasonable terms, the Consent Holder shall notify the Manager of that circumstance, and provide an alternative monitoring plan which includes the matters stated in Condition 100.

111.

Any condition survey undertaken in accordance with Condition109, or any other condition surveys undertaken by the Consent Holder, shall be undertaken as follows: a.

The Senior Qualified Person shall be identified in the CEMP to undertake the condition surveys (see Condition 36);

The Consent Holder shall contact owners of those buildings and structures where a condition survey is to be undertaken to confirm the timing and methodology for undertaking a pre-construction condition survey;

The Consent Holder shall record all contact, correspondence and communication with owners and this shall be available on request for the Manager;

The Consent Holder shall provide the building condition survey or structure condition survey report to the relevant property owner and the Manager within 15 working days of the survey being undertaken;

The Consent Holder shall undertake a visual inspection during construction if requested by the building or structure owner where a pre-construction condition survey has been undertaken and monitoring data and observations note any changes from the pre-construction condition survey report.

The Consent Holder shall develop a system of monitoring the condition of existing buildings or structures which is commensurate with the type of the existing building or structure and the proximity of the Project works in order to assess whether or not construction activities are compromising the structural integrity of the building or structure.

112.

Should the pre-construction building condition survey and assessment highlight greater sensitivity of buildings than envisaged by the application, and should this increased sensitivity mean that the Serviceability Limit for the building may be exceeded, then the Consent Holder shall, at its cost, implement additional measures (that may include modifications to the design of the retention systems or further geotechnical investigation, as discussed with the building owner.

113.

The Consent Holder shall carry out a visual inspection of the surrounding ground and external building facades of the listed buildings in Appendix 2 adjacent to the tunnel/trench and station alignment to monitor for any deterioration or movement of any pre-existing cracks at a frequency to be specified in the GSMCP.

114.

The Consent Holder shall keep a record of the time, date and any observations for each inspection. This record is to be maintained and submitted to the Manager in accordance with Condition 128.

115.

No earlier than six months after Completion of Dewatering and within six months of Completion of Construction, a detailed condition survey all previously surveyed buildings, structures and water, stormwater and wastewater services, shall be prepared by a suitably qualified engineering professional. This condition survey report shall address all matters reviewed in the pre-dewatering condition survey. It shall also identify any new damage (if any) that has occurred since the pre-dewatering condition survey was undertaken and include a determination of the cause of any such damage and steps to repair it as provided for in Condition 125. The requirements of this condition need not be fulfilled for any particular building where the Consent Holder can provide written evidence to the Manager that the current owner of that building has advised they do not require such a condition survey.

116.

At the reasonable request of the Manager, the Consent Holder shall, without delay, undertake an additional condition survey of any building within the area defined by the groundwater monitoring, deformation monitoring and modelling undertaken pursuant to the conditions of this consent potentially affected by excavation, for the purpose of checking for damage and follow up with a report of damage to that building.

117.

Subject to Condition 125, the requirement for any such condition survey will cease six months after the Completion of Construction, unless the requirements of Condition 115 have not been met and subject to a consistent pattern of deformation records having been obtained in this period in which no evidence of adverse effects is apparent.

118.

[condition moved to Condition 96]

Ground Surface and Building Monitoring 119.

120.

The Consent Holder shall establish and maintain a settlement monitoring network of ground settlement monitoring marks and building movement monitoring marks to detect any deformation (vertical and/or horizontal movement) for the period required by the conditions of this consent, as follows: a.

The minimum scope of settlement monitoring is shown on the drawings in Appendix 1;

Subject to the ownersâ€™ approval, at least two sets (minimum of three pins) of building movement monitoring marks shall be located on each building listed in Appendix 2; and

The final location and number of building movement monitoring marks shall take into account the building type and size, accessibility to survey the marks and risk of damage from ground settlement, as determined by requirements of conditions of this consent, and the effects of differential settlement from the predicted settlement contours on the drawings I Appendix 1 as modified by the detailed design and reflected in the GSMCP.

The Consent Holder shall survey and record each ground and building movement mark in accordance with the following Schedule D; and records of the baseline monitoring shall be compiled and submitted to the Manager prior to the Commencement of Dewatering.

Schedule D: Ground settlement and building movement monitoring mark measurement Frequency 1 and Duration Monitoring Station name and type

Frequency All settlement marks, PreCommenceme nt of Dewatering (baseline monitoring)

All settlement marks, Commenceme nt of Dewatering to Completion of Dewatering

All ground and building settlement monitoring marks within 50 metres of the excavations during excavation and dewatering

Post-Completion of Dewatering

Postcompletion of constructio n

All settlement and building monitoring 1 mark

Three times to a horizontal and vertical accuracy of +/2mm (achieved by precise levelling)

Monthly

Daily for two weeks and weekly thereafter

Monthly for six months after the completion of dewatering, or until such time following the completion of dewatering that measurements have stabilized.

See Condition 121

Note 1: The monitoring frequency and duration may be changed if approved by the Manager and subsequently specified in the GSMCP.

121.

Where groundwater drainage is proposed at (a)

Karangahape Station;

(b)

Newton Y Junctions; and

(c)

The perched groundwater system at Aotea Station

and consolidation settlement risks are identified at Completion of Construction that could cause building damage, the Consent Holder shall prepare a post construction monitoring plan to be approved by the IBA and certified by the Manager. The post construction monitoring plan shall specifically address (a)

the potential for delayed consolidation settlement effects resulting from long term groundwater drainage; and

(b)

Monitoring durations and the process for establishing cessation of monitoring.

Retaining Wall Monitoring 122.

For the measurement of vertical and lateral wall movement, the Consent Holder shall install retaining wall deflection pins as near to the top of the wall as practicable, with inclinometers installed either in a retaining pile or immediately behind one and extending to the base of the retaining pile for the monitoring of wall deflection.

123.

Monitoring of the retaining wall pins and inclinometers shall be undertaken and recorded in accordance with Schedule E below unless otherwise specified and agreed in the GSMCP:

Schedule E: Frequency Baseline

Active Excavation

Post Excavation

Pre-Commencement of Dewatering

Commencement of Dewatering to one month after Completion of Excavation

One month after Completion of Excavation to Completion of Dewatering

Retaining wall pins

Inclinometer

Retaining wall pins

Inclinometer

Twice to a horizontal and vertical accuracy of +/2mm

Once for every 2 metres depth (on average) of excavation, and, in any case, at a minimum of once weekly.

Once for every 6 metres depth (on average) of excavation, and, in any case, at a minimum of once weekly.

Minimum of three sets of readings at fortnightly intervals

Minimum of three sets of readings at monthly intervals

Contingency

124.

In the event that monitoring of ground or building settlement, differential settlement, or horizontal movement associated with the construction works identifies movement which exceeds the vertical and horizontal movement triggers detailed in Appendix 2 or any revised trigger levels subject of this consent, then the Consent Holder shall instigate the Response Plan detailed in the GSMCP and undertake the following procedures: a.

Notify the Manager and the IBA within 24 hours;

If measurements exceed any of the alert values, then a Senior Qualified Person engaged by the Consent Holder or the Consent Holder’s contractor shall reassess the works constructed up to that time to confirm – 

that works’ progress against the design predictions are within expectations;

ď‚ˇ

whether additional measures (if any) are required to restrain further increases in movement; and

ď‚ˇ

that possible ensuing effects will exceed Serviceability Limits. Measures (if any) to be implemented, identified in the Response Plan in the GSMCP or as agreed with the IBA, may include an increase in the frequency of monitoring, or additional support measures.

The Senior Qualified Person shall prepare and submit a written report to the Manager, within one week of alert level exceedance, which provides analyses of all monitoring data relating to the exceedance of any of the trigger levels and any actions taken;

If measurements exceed any of the alarm values the Consent Holder shall:

125.

Follow the process identified in Condition 124(b);

ii)

Commission and submit a written report, prepared by the Senior Qualified Person engaged in accordance with Condition 124(b) to the Manager, within one week of alarm level exceedance, which provides analyses of all monitoring data, relating to the exceedance of any of the trigger levels and any recommendations for remedial actions, if required, in order to avoid damage that will affect building Serviceability and which may also allow Completion of Construction; and

iii)

Implement the recommendations of the report. In the instance that the recommendation is to stop work, pursuant to Conditions 124(b) and (d)(ii), the remedial action(s) that have been recommended shall be undertaken before the works recommence.

In relation to alarm level exceedance, the recommendations of the IBA (refer Condition 92), which may include remedial actions up to and including stopping the works, if that is (in the opinion of the IBA) in the best interests of preventing building serviceability damage, shall be implemented by the Consent Holder (unless the building owner(s) request in writing that the construction works are to be completed in accordance with the report prepared under Condition124 (d)(ii).

If any damage to buildings, structures or services is caused wholly or in part by the exercising of this consent, the Consent Holder shall: a.

notify the Manager and the asset owner as soon as practical;

engage a Senior Qualified Person to prepare a report as soon as practical, describing the damage and identifying methods to avoid and mitigate the potential for Serviceability damage and to remedy any damage caused wholly or in part by the exercising of this consent; and provide a copy of the report to the Manager and the asset owner; and

thereafter promptly undertake (at the entire cost of the Consent Holder) all necessary repairs to fully remedy the damage caused by the exercise of this consent, with timing to be agreed with the asset owners. “Entire cost” includes all design and consenting costs as well as all construction costs.

This obligation as a condition of the resource consent shall apply to all Damage that is identified during the latest of the periods listed below: i)

Two years after Completion of Dewatering; or

ii)

One year after groundwater levels have stabilised; and

iii)

The completion of post construction monitoring required to be carried out under Condition 121; and

iv)

Six months after any completion of any other works associated with the project which have the potential to cause settlement.

Reporting 126.

The Consent Holder shall advise the Manager, in writing within ten working days of Completion of Dewatering.

127.

The Consent Holder shall advise the Manager, in writing within ten working days of Completion of Construction.

128.

All data collected as required by conditions of this consent from Commencement of Dewatering to completion of monitoring are to be compiled, compared with the relevant trigger levels and submitted to the Manager at two monthly intervals, unless otherwise specified in this consent, setting out the previous results, providing an explanation for any trends and providing a construction progress timeline.

Review Condition – Water Permit R/ REG/2016/1892 129.

The conditions of this consent may be reviewed by the Manager pursuant to Section 128 of the Resource Management Act 1991, by the giving of notice pursuant to Section 129 of the Act, within six months after Commencement of Dewatering and subsequently at intervals of not less than one year thereafter in order to vary the monitoring and reporting requirements, and performance standards in order to take account of information, including the results of previous monitoring and changed environmental knowledge, on: a.

Ground conditions

Aquifer parameters

Groundwater levels and

Ground surface deformation.

Advice Note: Under section 128 of the RMA the conditions of this consent may be reviewed by the Manager at the Consent Holder’s cost in the following circumstances:

At any time, if it is found that the information made available to the Council in the application contained inaccuracies which materially influenced the decision and the effects of the exercise of the consent are such that it is necessary to apply more appropriate conditions. Specific conditions â€“ discharge permit (contaminated land) R/REG/2016/1895 and land use consent R/LUC/2016/1890 (Contaminated Land and Resource Management (National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health) Regulations 2011) Duration 130.

Consent R/REG/2016/1895 shall expire 15 years from the grant date, unless it has been surrendered or been cancelled at an earlier date pursuant to the Resource Management Act 1991. Advice Note: this condition does not apply to R/LUC/2016/1890

Contaminated Soils Management Plan (CSMP) 131.

At least 20 days prior to the commencement of construction (earthworks), the Consent Holder shall provide a Contaminated Soils Management Plan (CSMP) to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification. The CSMP shall be prepared by a Contaminated Land Professional in accordance with the Contaminated Land Management Guidelines, No.1 - Reporting on Contaminated Sites in New Zealand, Ministry for the Environment (revised 2011).

132.

The Consent Holder shall request that Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) provide a determination to the Consent Holder, in writing, within 10 working days of receipt of the CSMP, whether the CSMP can be certified as per the requirements of the Condition 134.

133.

No earthworks shall commence until a. certification is provided from the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) that the CSMP satisfactorily meets the requirements of Schedule 13 (A4) of the ACRP:ALW, and b. all measures identified in that plan as being required to be established prior to the commencement of earthworks have been established.

134.

The CSMP shall address the following matters: a.

The areas within the project site designated for the excavation works, including depths and extent of the proposed works, and an updated map/s showing the land disturbance activity areas

Excavation, management, and disposal procedures for soil, sediment, dust, surface run-off water, perched groundwater, and groundwater, if encountered

Temporary containment, treatment, and testing procedures for any water getting in contact with the contaminated material if the disposal option is to the stormwater system or the marine environment is considered

Contingency measures for unexpected discovery of contamination

Proposed sampling and analysis, if applicable; and

Any proposed works summary reporting.

Advice Note: The Council acknowledges that the CSMP is intended to provide flexibility of for the management of the works and contaminant discharge. Accordingly, the Plan may need to be further updated. Any updates must be limited to the scope of this consent and consistent with the conditions of this consent. If you would like to confirm that any proposed updates are within scope, or have any other queries, please contact the Council (Team Leader Earth and Stream Works, Trees, and Contaminated Land, Natural Resources and Specialist Input) on (09) 301 0101. 135.

The Consent Holder shall notify the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) at least two working days prior to any earthworks activity on the site and provide the following details: a.

Name and telephone number of the project manager and the site owner

Site address to which the consents relate

Activity to which the consents relate and

Expected duration of the works.

136.

All disturbance of contaminated and potentially contaminated soil shall be carried out in accordance with the certified CSMP required by Condition 131 and any changes to the plan shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification prior to the change being implemented.

137.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that all disturbance of contaminated soil shall be supervised by a suitably qualified and experienced Contaminated Land Professional, whose responsibilities shall include making sure that the soil management and disposal procedures, the contingency measures outlined in the certified CSMP required by Condition 131, and all relevant consent conditions are adhered to.

138.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that regular inspections of the works area shall be carried out by a suitably qualified and experienced Contaminated Land Professional. These inspections shall be documented and the relevant records retained and provided to Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) in the Site Validation Report (SVR) required by Condition 149.

139.

The Consent Holder shall manage all soil disturbance works to minimise any discharge of debris, soil, silt, sediment or sediment-laden water from the subject site to either land, stormwater systems or the receiving marine environment. The implementation of erosion and sediment controls shall be in accordance with the ESCP required by Condition 53. Advice Note: Measures such as covering the excavations overnight and during heavy rainfall, diverting overland flow around the works area, and appropriate treatment of any water collected in an excavation prior to the disposal may be required to comply with this condition. 37

140. The Consent Holder shall manage all soil disturbance works to avoid the potential for cross-contamination of materials to occur, in particular, movement of contaminated soil around the site and/or deposition of contaminated soil on other parts of the site shall be avoided. Where soils are identified for off-site disposal, they shall be loaded directly for removal, where possible, and all material shall be covered during transportation off site. 141. To minimise the spread of contaminated material, any temporary stockpiles of the excavated contaminated material shall be located within the catchment of erosion and sediment controls for the site. All stockpiles shall be covered with either polythene or an equivalent impermeable material when the site is not being worked and during periods of heavy rain. 142. At all times, dust shall be controlled in accordance with the publication titled Good Practice Guide for Assessing and Managing the Environmental Effects of Dust Emissions, Ministry for the Environment (2001). 143. Excess soil or waste materials removed from the subject site shall be deposited at a disposal site which holds a consent to accept the relevant level or type of contamination. Advice note: Where it can be demonstrated that the soil has been fully characterised and meets the definition of ‘clean fill’ material in Section J1 of the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part), the removal of such material to a consented disposal facility is not required. In such circumstances, a record of the location, depth, and volume of the material removed as ‘clean fill’ should be kept for the purpose of being included in the SVR required by Condition 149). 144. The Consent Holder shall implement the procedures for the management, treatment, temporary containment, testing, and disposal of groundwater and surface run-off water via the stormwater system in accordance with the report titled Auckland City Rail Link: Resource Consent Package 2: Aotea Station to North Auckland Line Construction and CRL Operation: Draft Erosion & Sediment Control Management Plan, dated 13 May 2016, prepared by Aurecon New Zealand Limited, and provided with the application. 145. Any perched groundwater, or surface run-off water, encountered within the excavation area requiring removal shall be considered as potentially contaminated, and shall either: a.

be disposed of by a licensed liquid waste contractor; or

pumped to sewer, providing relevant permits are obtained; or

discharged to the stormwater system, provided testing demonstrates compliance with 50 times the Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council (ANZECC) Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality (2000) for the protection of 95 percent of marine water species, and is free from petroleum hydrocarbons.

146.

Where contaminants which have not been anticipated by the application are identified, works in the area containing the unexpected contamination shall cease until the contingency measures outlined in the certified CSMP required by Condition 131 have been implemented, and have been notified to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring). Any unexpected contamination encountered during the works and contingency measures implemented shall be documented in the Site Validation Report required by Condition 149. Advice Note: In accordance with Condition 146, any unexpected contamination may include separate phase hydrocarbons, contaminated soil, perched water or groundwater. The Consent Holder is advised that where unexpected contamination is significantly different in extent and concentration from that anticipated, handling the contamination may be outside the scope of this consent. Advice should be sought from the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) prior to carrying out any further work in the area of the unexpected contamination to check this is within the scope of this consent.

147.

All imported fill shall: a.

comply with the definition of of clean fill material in Section J1 of the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part); and

be solid material of an inert nature; and

not contain hazardous substances or contaminants above recorded natural background levels of the receiving site.

Advice Note: Background contamination levels for the site receiving clean fill can be found in Technical Publication No. 153, Background concentrations of inorganic elements in soils from the Auckland Region, Auckland Regional Council (2001). 148.

All sampling and testing of contamination on the site shall be overseen by a suitably qualified and experienced Contaminated Land Professional. All sampling shall be undertaken in accordance with Contaminated Land Management Guidelines, No.5 â€“ Site Investigation and Analysis of Soils, Ministry for the Environment (revised 2011). Advice Note: All testing and analysis should be undertaken in a laboratory with suitable experience and ability to carry out the analysis. For more details on how to confirm the suitability of the laboratory please refer to Contaminated Land Management Guidelines, No.5 â€“ Part 4: Laboratory Analysis, Ministry for the Environment (revised 2011).

Site Validation Report (SVR) 149.

Within three months of the completion of earthworks on the site, the Consent Holder shall provide a Site Validation Report (SVR) to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring). The SVR shall be prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced Contaminated Land Professional in accordance with the Contaminated Land Management Guidelines, No.1 - Reporting on Contaminated Sites in New Zealand, Ministry for the Environment (revised 2011).

150.

The SVR required by Condition 149 shall address the following matters: a.

a summary of the works undertaken, including a statement confirming whether the excavation of the site has been completed in accordance with the certified CSMP required by Condition 131;

the location and dimensions of the excavations carried out, including the relevant site plan;

a summary of soil, groundwater, and surface run-off water testing undertaken, if applicable, including tabulated analytical results, and interpretation of the results in the context of the Contaminated Land Rules of the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part);

copies of the disposal dockets for the contaminated soil and â€˜clean fillâ€™ material removed from the site;

records of any unexpected contamination encountered during the works and contingency measures undertaken, if applicable;

details regarding any complaints and/or breaches of the procedures set out in the certified CSMP required by Condition 131 and the conditions of this consent;

results of testing, if required, of any spoil disposed offsite; and

results of testing of any imported fill material to ensure compliance with the definition of clean fill material in Section J1 of the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part).

Specific conditions â€“ discharge permit (other) R/REG/2016/1896 and discharge permit (ITA) R/REG/2016/1898 (CONSTRUCTION) 151.

This consent shall expire 15 years after the consent commences unless it has been surrendered or been cancelled at an earlier date pursuant to the Resource Management Act 1991.

Baseline Receiving Environment Monitoring 152.

Prior to the commencement of construction, the Consent Holder shall undertake baseline monitoring of water quality and freshwater ecology in Meola Creek. The monitoring shall be undertaken to identify the pre-construction condition of Meola Creek against which to measure construction effects and possible remedial or mitigation measures if required.

153.

At least 20 working days prior to any baseline monitoring commencing, the Consent Holder shall submit a programme for the baseline monitoring as required by Condition 152 to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification. The programme shall include, but not be limited to: a.

Sampling locations (at Auckland Council flow monitoring site);

Methods and procedures for water quality (minimum bi-monthly samples for a 12 month period) and freshwater ecology sampling; 40

Water quality monitoring parameters for analysis, which shall include: 



Total Suspended Solids

g/m3



Total recoverable copper

g/m3



Dissolved copper

g/m3



Total recoverable zinc

g/m3



Dissolved zinc

g/m3



Ammoniacal nitrogen

g/m3



Nitrate nitrogen

g/m3



Nitrite nitrogen

g/m3



Total nitrogen

g/m3



Dissolved reactive phosphorus

g/m3

Ecological monitoring, which shall include: 

Algal (periphyton) and macrophyte growth



Macroinvertebrate assessment.

Baseline Receiving Environment Reporting 154.

The Consent Holder shall provide to the Council (Team Leader – Central Monitoring) the results of the baseline monitoring undertaken in accordance with Conditions 152 and 153 within 60 working days of the final baseline monitoring being undertaken.

155.

As part of the results required by Condition 153, the Consent Holder shall provide a programme for ongoing monitoring of Meola Creek, following the commencement of construction, including the reporting of results. The same testing regime and approach as set out in baseline monitoring conditions shall be used unless otherwise agreed between the Consent Holder and the Council.

Pre-Commencement of construction support areas and zones 156.

The Consent Holder shall notify the Council (Team Leader – Central Monitoring) in writing at least 10 working days prior to the commencement of construction of each CSA or ACZ.

157.

The CSAs shall be generally confined to the area and boundaries shown on plans CRL-SYE-RME-000-DRG-2001, Rev 1.0 dated 13/05/2016 and 2002, Rev 1 dated 13/05/2016 and 2003, Rev 1 dated 13/05/2016 and 2004, Rev 1 dated 13/05/2016 and 2005, Rev 1 dated 13/05/2016 and 2006, and Rev 1 dated 13/05/2016 and submitted as part of the application.

158.

In the event that material modifications to the CSA boundaries are required, the following information shall be provided: a.

Plans and drawings outlining the details of the modifications; and

Supporting information that confirms how the proposal does not affect the stormwater management system;

This information shall be to the satisfaction of the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) and be made available at the preconstruction meeting required by Condition 34. Site Management (ACZ and CSAs) 159.

At least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction, a final Industrial and Trade Activities Environmental Management Plan (EMP) shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification.

160.

The Consent Holder shall request the Councilâ€™s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination as to whether the EMP can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days following receipt of the EMP.

161.

The EMP shall be prepared by a Senior Qualified Person and shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a.

identification of the specific activities conducted on the site;

the identification of potential contaminants associated with these activities;

methods used to prevent identified contaminants contacting stormwater runoff as far as practicable and methods to manage environmental risks from site activities;

an Emergency Spill Response Plan (which includes the provision that all spills over 20 litres, or any spill of Environmentally Hazardous Substances that has entered the stormwater system, a water-body or has contacted unsealed ground, shall be reported immediately to the Auckland Councilâ€™s 24 Hour Pollution Hotline (09-377-3107));

an up-to-date and accurate site drainage plan showing the location of all site catch pits and the final discharge point(s) of the site stormwater system;

an appropriate auditing programme to ensure all components of the siteâ€™s EMP are implemented;

methods for providing and recording staff training; and

a monitoring programme as outlined in Conditions 173 and 174.

162.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that the CSAs and ACZs are operated and managed in accordance with the certified EMP to ensure the risks from the site are managed appropriately.

163.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that a copy of the Council certified EMP is kept on site and accessible at all times. 42

164.

Following any change to the EMP, the Consent Holder shall submit details of the change to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification and request that the Councilâ€™s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) written determination as to whether the change can be certified to be provided within 10 working days of submission of the change. No activity reliant upon a change to the EMP pursuant to Condition 164 can be undertaken until the change has been certified.

165.

The EMP shall be reviewed and updated annually from the date of granting of this consent, to ensure all components of the EMP remain relevant.

Structural Controls 166.

167.

168.

The Industrial Trade and Activity area for each of the Construction Support Areas shall not exceed the following: CSA

Exposed Area not to exceed (m2)

25,000

9,000

36,000

6,500

In the event that any CSA requires an increase in area, the following information shall be provided to the Team Leader â€“ Central Monitoring whose certification shall be requested prior to implementation: a.

Plans and drawings outlining the details of the modifications; and

Supporting information that confirms how the proposal does not affect the capacity or performance of the existing structural and procedural controls.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that the following structural controls are constructed for the following catchment areas and design standards and they are completed prior to discharges commencing from the site: Works/controls

Device catchment area

Design requirements

2 x Settlement Tanks Activity area of grout Settlement Tanks sizing to be based on located on CSA 4 plant (400m2), and 2% of the contributing catchment segment storage yard (2660m2) on CSA 4

Inlet protection measures

On all catch pits within Design in accordance with Auckland CSA areas Council Best Management Practice: Catch pit Protection Area (AC 2011).

2 x Settlement Tanks All Active Construction Settlement Tank sizing to be based on located in CSA 1, CSA Zone (ACZ) 2% of the contributing catchment 2, CSA 3, CSA 4 and CSA 5

Bunding of Environmentally Hazardous Substances

169.

As required

110% largest container

In the event that any minor modifications to the structural system are required, the following information shall be provided to the Team Leader â€“ Central Monitoring whose certification shall be requested prior to implementation: a.

Plans and drawings outlining the details of the modifications; and

Supporting information that confirms how the proposal does not affect the capacity or performance of stormwater management system.

Certification of structural controls 170.

Within 30 days of implementation, As-Built certification and plans of the stormwater management works, certified (signed) by a suitably qualified registered surveyor or a Chartered Professional Engineer as a true record of the stormwater management system, shall be provided to the Team Leader â€“ Central Monitoring.

171.

The As-Built plans shall include, but not be limited to: a.

The surveyed location (to the nearest 0.1m) of the discharge points, with coordinates expressed in terms of NZTM and LINZ datum;

Location, dimensions and levels of any major overland flow paths including cross sections and long sections;

Plans and cross sections of all stormwater management devices, including confirmation of the Water Quality Volume, storage volumes and levels of any outflow control structure

Documentation of any discrepancies between the design plans and the As-Built plans.

172.

A meeting shall be held on site after the implementation of structural controls and the provision of As-Built documentation, and prior to the commencement of construction activities at each of the CSA/ACZs. The meeting shall include representation from the Team Leader Central Monitoring and the site stormwater engineer/contractors who have undertaken the work and shall confirm compliance with the relevant consent conditions.

Discharge monitoring: 173.

Within 30 days of the installation of the water treatment systems, and prior to operation, the Consent Holder shall develop and submit to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification a discharge monitoring programme.

174.

The water quality monitoring programme shall include, but not be limited to: a.

Sampling locations (to include the final discharge from the treatment system located in CSA 1, CSA 2, CSA 3, CSA 5 and CSA 4);

Methods and procedures for discharge sampling; and

Monitoring parameters for analysis, which shall include: Daily 

Water clarity (black disc)



Turbidity

(NTU)



Weekly (in addition to the above) 

Total Suspended Solids

g/m3



Total recoverable copper

g/m3



Dissolved copper

g/m3



Total recoverable zinc

g/m3



Dissolved zinc

g/m3



Total petroleum hydrocarbons g/m3



Ammoniacal nitrogen*

g/m3



Nitrate nitrogen*

g/m3

*only in discharge from treatment systems in CSA 3 and CSA 4

175.

identified trigger levels for each of the above parameters. These trigger levels shall be developed with reference to the ANZECC Guidelines for water quality where applicable; and

the methods and procedures for investigating and reporting stormwater discharge monitoring results to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

The discharge monitoring programme shall be implemented upon completion of works set out in Condition 168. 45

176.

Within five working days of receipt of sample results showing contaminants exceeding the agreed trigger levels in Condition 174(d): a.

An investigation shall be undertaken to determine why exceedances were detected and to identify any additional source controls or treatment required; and

The results of the investigation shall be reported to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

Discharge Reporting Requirements 177.

Within eight weeks following the start of the monitoring required by Condition 173 a monitoring report shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring). The monitoring report shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a.

a summary of the monitoring results to date;

an interpretation of those results and suggestions for improvement to the site operations;

a programme for ongoing monitoring including the reporting of results; and

a programme for the ongoing maintenance of the discharge water management and treatment system.

178.

For the duration of the construction stages of the Project, the Consent Holder shall forward a report annually from the date of granting of this consent to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) evaluating the siteâ€™s environmental performance for the year to date.

179.

The Annual Report required by Condition 178 shall include but not be limited to: a.

all aspects of the performance of the EMP relating to this consent;

a summary of all revisions and revised sections of the EMP;

details of all inspections and maintenance of the stormwater system for the preceding 12 months;

details of and changes to the person(s) or body responsible for the maintenance of site and the organisational structure supporting this process;

results and analysis of the preceding 12 months of stormwater monitoring, along with an interpretation of those results and suggestions for improvement to the site operations; and

records of any spills or incidents which occurred within the previous 12 months and the response which was undertaken.

Specific conditions â€“ discharge permit (other) R/REG/2016/2038 (OPERATIONAL) Advice note: Should the Consent Holder obtain approval for the discharge of operational wastewater to the trade waste system, this consent can be surrendered or cancelled.

180.

This consent shall expire 35 years after the consent commences unless it has been surrendered or been cancelled at an earlier date pursuant to the Resource Management Act 1991.

Dewatering Treatment devices 181.

The treatment device/s for the removal of contaminants of concern from tunnel water discharge shall be constructed for the operational tunnel ground water seepage catchment area/s, and design requirements shall be completed in accordance with design guidelines to meet baseline monitoring levels in Condition 187(d).

182.

At least 20 working days prior to the installation of treatment devices required by Condition 181, the Consent Holder shall submit detailed designs, including relevant drawings, cross sections, plans and calculations to the Team Leader â€“ Central Monitoring for certification at the same time as the application for Engineering Plan Approval.

As-Built Plans 183.

Within 30 days of practical completion of the treatment device works, As-Built plans, which are certified (signed) by a Chartered Professional Engineer as a true record of the stormwater management system, shall be provided to the Team Leader - Central Monitoring.

184.

The certified As-Built Plans shall also be provided to the Team Leader â€“ Central Monitoring 5 days prior to the post-construction meeting required by Condition 205.

185.

The As-Built plans shall display the entirety of the stormwater management system, and shall include: a.

the surveyed location (to the nearest 0.1m) and level (to the nearest 0.01m) of the discharge points to the stormwater system with co-ordinates expressed in terms of NZTM and LINZ datum;

plans and cross sections of all treatment devices, including confirmation of the Water Quality Volume, storage volumes and levels of any outflow control structure; and

documentation of any discrepancies between the design plans and the As-Built plans approved by the modifications approval referred to in Condition 202.

Discharge Monitoring 186.

Prior to operation of the CRL, the Consent Holder shall develop and submit a discharge monitoring programme to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification. The monitoring programme shall include start up monitoring for the first month of operation of the treatment system, and regular on-going monitoring.

187.

The discharge monitoring programme shall include, but not be limited to:

Sampling locations (to include samples of water from the main station sumps (untreated water), and the final discharge from the treatment system (treated water) at each station);

Methods, frequency and procedures for discharge sampling

Monitoring parameters for analysis, which shall include: 



Turbidity

NTU



Total Suspended Solids

g/m3



Total recoverable copper

g/m3



Dissolved copper

g/m3



Total recoverable zinc

g/m3



Dissolved zinc

g/m3



Total petroleum hydrocarbons

g/m3

Identified trigger levels for each of the above parameters in the final discharge, developed with reference to the ANZECC Guidelines for water quality where applicable; and

The methods and procedures for investigating and reporting discharge monitoring results to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

188.

The discharge monitoring programme shall be implemented for the duration of the discharge of operational tunnel groundwater seepage.

189.

Within five working days of receipt of sample results showing contaminants exceeding the agreed trigger levels: a.

An investigation shall be undertaken to determine why exceedances were detected and to identify any additional source controls or treatment required;

Methods will be implemented to meet trigger levels, and the timing for their implementation shall be noted; and

The results of the investigation shall be reported to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

Start-up Reporting 190.

A monitoring report shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) following the completion of the first month of sampling. The monitoring report shall include, but not be limited to the following: a.

A summary of the first months monitoring results (10 samples);

An interpretation of those results and suggestions for improvement of the treatment system as required; and

Confirmation of the programme for regular on-going monitoring. 48

Operation and Maintenance Plan 191.

The Consent Holder shall submit an Operation and Maintenance Plan to the Team Leader - Central Monitoring for approval certification, 5 days prior to the postconstruction meeting referred to in Condition 205. The Plan shall include: a.

details of who will hold responsibility for long-term maintenance of the stormwater management system and the organisational structure which will support this process;

a programme for regular maintenance and inspection of the stormwater management system;

a programme for the collection and disposal of debris and sediment collected by the stormwater management devices or practices;

a programme for post storm inspection and maintenance; and

general inspection checklists for all aspects of the treatment system, including visual checks.

192.

The stormwater management system shall be managed in accordance with the approved certified Operation and Maintenance Plan.

193.

Any amendments or alterations to the Operation and Maintenance Plan shall be submitted to, and approved certified by the Team Leader â€“ Central Monitoring, in writing prior to implementation.

Routine monitoring 194.

The Consent Holder shall submit an annual monitoring report to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring). The monitoring report shall include, but not be limited to the following: a.

A summary of the monitoring results for the previous year;

An interpretation of those results and suggestions for improvement/s to the treatment system if relevant; and

A programme for the on-going maintenance of the discharge treatment system.

Stormwater diversion and discharge (related to works at the Mount Eden end) Advice note: these conditions relate to stormwater management works at the Mount Eden end of the project. The conditions do not relate to any of the specific consents authorised 195.

[Blank]

Stormwater drainage system design 196.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that the design of stormwater drainage systems does not result in any increase in flooding beyond the pre-development scenario within the immediate adjacent areas of the Project footprint and the downstream receiving environment. Stormwater management works

197.

The following stormwater management works shall be constructed for the following catchment areas and design requirements, and shall be completed prior to construction of any barriers (e.g., earth bunds or retaining structures along the edge of the rail corridor) that would modify existing overland flow paths: Works to be undertaken

Catchment location

Design requirement(s)

Additional pipe capacity, OLFP

Fenton street

Underground drainage

Shaddock Street

Inlet upgrade, scruffy domes

West of Mt Eden Road

Capacity for 10 year ARI, reducing flooding up to 100 year ARI, provision for OLFP for flows in excess of the 100 year, and designed to meet at least 50% blockage

Sump and superpits

Water Street

Megapits, inlet, connections to existing network

Normanby Road

Super pit

Boston Road

New inlets, underground drainage

Rail Corridor

198.

The stormwater management works shall be installed in general accordance with those listed in Condition 197, unless otherwise approved by Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

199.

If changes to the Stormwater management works in Condition 197 are requested, the Consent Holder must provide details of flood modelling, and alternative mitigation measures, including how these have been selected and will be managed, to the Healthy Waters Department (see Condition 202).

Detailed Design Guidelines 200.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that all stormwater management devices, as required to achieve Condition 196, are designed in accordance with Auckland Council Technical Publication 10 (TP10).

201.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that the detailed designs, including drawings, plans and calculations for the stormwater management devices required to achieve Condition 196 are submitted to Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification at the time of application for Engineering Plan Approval and in any event, at least 30 days prior to construction of the proposed stormwater works.

Modifications approval 202.

In the event that any modifications to the stormwater management system design implemented under Conditions 196 and 197 of this consent are required, the following information shall be provided: ď‚ˇ

Plans and drawings outlining the details of the modifications; and

ď‚ˇ

Supporting information that confirms compliance with the performance standards of Conditions 196 and 197.

All information shall be submitted to, and approved by the Team Leader â€“ Central Monitoring, prior to implementation. Advice Note: All proposed changes should be discussed with the Team Leader Central Monitoring, prior to implementation. Any changes to the proposal which will affect the capacity or performance of the stormwater management system may require an application to Council pursuant to Section 127 of the RMA. An example of a minor modification within the scope of this consent could be a change to the location of a pipe or slight changes to the site layout but if there is a change of device type (even proprietary), the consent may have to be varied under section 127. Pre-construction meeting 203.

A pre-construction meeting shall be held by the Consent Holder prior to commencement of the construction of any stormwater devices onsite, and must: a.

be arranged five working days prior to initiation of the construction of any stormwater devices on the site;

be located on the subject area;

include representation from the Team Leader - Central Monitoring; and

include representation from the site stormwater engineer [or] contractors who will undertake the works and any other relevant parties.

Advice Note: To arrange the pre-construction meeting required by this consent, please contact the Team Leader - Central Monitoring [monitoring@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz].

Information required for Pre-construction meeting 204.

The following information shall be made available prior to, or at the pre-construction meeting: a.

timeframes for key stages of the works authorised under this consent;

erosion and sediment control measures during construction activities;

contact details of the site contractor and site stormwater engineer; and

construction plans approved signed or stamped by an Auckland Council Development Engineer.

Post-construction meeting 205.

A post-construction meeting shall be held by the Consent Holder, within 20 working days of completion of the stormwater management works, that: a.

is located on the subject area;

includes representation from the Team Leader - Central Monitoring; and

includes representation from the site stormwater engineer or contractors who have undertaken the works.

Certification of stormwater management works (As-Built Plans) 206.

As-Built certification and plans of the stormwater management works, which are certified (signed) by a Chartered Professional Engineer as a true record of the stormwater management system, shall be provided to the Team Leader - Central Monitoring for approval, 5 days prior to the post-construction meeting required by this consent.

207.

The As-Built plans shall display the entirety of the stormwater management system, and shall include: a.

the surveyed location (to the nearest 0.1m) and level (to the nearest 0.01m) of the discharge structure, with co-ordinates expressed in terms of NZTM and LINZ datum;

location, dimensions and levels of any overland flow paths including cross sections and long sections;

plans and cross sections of all stormwater management devices, including confirmation of the Water Quality Volume, storage volumes and levels of any outflow control structure; and

documentation of any discrepancies between the design plans and the As-Built plans approved by the modifications approval process of Condition 202.

Operation and Maintenance Plan 208.

An Operation and Maintenance Plan shall be provided to the Team Leader - Central Monitoring for certification 5 days prior to the post-construction meeting required by this consent and shall set out how the stormwater management system is to be operated and maintained to ensure that adverse environmental effects are minimised. The plan shall include: a.

details of who will hold responsibility for long-term maintenance of the stormwater management system and the organisational structure which will support this process;

a programme for regular maintenance and inspection of the stormwater management system;

a programme for the collection and disposal of debris and sediment collected by the stormwater management devices or practices;

a programme for post storm inspection and maintenance;

general inspection checklists for all aspects of the stormwater management system, including visual checks; and

a programme for inspection and maintenance of any vegetation associated with the stormwater management devices.

209.

The stormwater management system shall be managed in accordance with the approved Operation and Maintenance Plan.

210.

The Operation and Maintenance Plan shall be updated and submitted to the Team Leader â€“ Central Monitoring upon request.

Capture and diversion of stormwater 211.

Roading, kerbs and channels constructed across overland flow paths shall be set at a level that maximises the capture of water by road cesspits. Other than at designated overland flow paths, driveway crossings shall be constructed in order to minimise the overflow of water from the road into private properties.

212.

For stormwater flows in excess of the capacity of the primary drainage systems, overland flow paths shall be provided and maintained to allow surplus stormwater from critical storms (up to the 100 year ARI event), to discharge with the minimum of nuisance and damage.

213.

Overland flow paths and secondary flow paths shall be kept free of all obstructions, including buildings and solid fences.

Maintenance Report 214.

The Consent Holder shall maintain a record of the details of all inspections and maintenance for the stormwater management system, for the preceding three years.

215.

A copy of the records referred to in Condition 214 shall be provided to the Team Leader - Central Monitoring in a maintenance report on request. 53

Contents of Maintenance Report 216. The maintenance report shall include the following information: a.

details of who is responsible for maintenance of the stormwater management system and the organisational structure supporting this process;

details of any maintenance undertaken; and

details of any inspections completed.

Specific conditions â€“ discharge permit (air â€“ construction) R/REG/2016/1899 217.

This resource consent shall expire 15 years after the consent commences unless it has been surrendered or been cancelled at an earlier date pursuant to the RMA.

218.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that all processes on the Project work site shall be implemented, operated, maintained, supervised, monitored and controlled so that any emissions authorised by this consent are maintained at the minimum practicable level.

219.

Unless provided for by Condition 220, there shall be no dust or odour beyond the boundary of the Project work site caused as a result of on-site processes which, in the opinion of Council, is noxious, offensive or objectionable.

220.

Any noxious, offensive or objectionable dust or odour beyond the boundary of the Project work site caused as a result of construction and earthworks activities associated with the Project shall be mitigated as soon as practicable in accordance with the requirements of the certified Air Quality Management Plan as required by Condition 222.

221.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that beyond the boundary of the Project worksite, there shall be no hazardous air pollutant caused as a result of construction and earthworks activities associated with the Project that causes, or is likely to cause, adverse effects on human health, environment or property.

Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) 222.

The Consent Holder shall review the draft Air Quality Management Plan â€“ Aotea Station to North Auckland Line dated May 2016, and submit to Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) a final AQMP/s which is generally consistent with the draft AQMP provided in support of the application.

223.

a clear identification of the type and location of the controls proposed;

a detailed framework for the management, mitigation and monitoring of construction and earthworks activities associated with the Project;

a focus principally on the sources of dust discharges, and

d. 224.

an assessment of the risk of discharges from each ACZ and the associated CSA.

The final AQMP/s shall also provide detailed methods including, but not limited to, the following matters: a.

methods to ensure exposed surfaces remain dampened to minimise dust emissions (possible examples include a water spray system or other suitable system, water carts and other suppression methods);

ensuring a 20 km/hr vehicle speed limit within the ACZs and CSAs;

operation of wheel washes;

regular sweeping of public roads around the exit points of ACZs and CSAs and sealed vehicle accessways within these areas;

measures for supressing dust from any temporary stock piles (demonstrating how they are to be limited to no more than 24 mÂł of uncovered spoil at any one time in each ACZ);

measures for the handling of cement associated with the forming of cement stabilised columns, including filter systems and high level alarms where a silo is used;

covering of loads of material being delivered and removed from the site;

instrument monitoring of dust concentrations (including identification of a monitoring methodology, monitoring network and appropriate alert thresholds) to ensure that any significant dust effects arising from the ACZs or CSAs are identified and remedied as soon as practicable throughout the Project;

the locations of instrument dust monitoring sites, including at least three re-locatable and/or fixed monitors to be associated with each of ACZs A, K and M, and the duration of this monitoring;

measures for responding to continuous instrument dust monitoring trigger alarms, including contingency measures to reduce measured concentrations below the trigger thresholds and provisions for responding after standard operating hours;

measures for undertaking meteorological observations and visual inspections of dust or other air discharges from the Project, to be completed at least on a daily basis, with all relevant information logged; and

information regarding complaint logging, investigation and response procedures, training and roles and responsibilities.

The Team Leader Central Monitoring shall be requested to respond to the AQMP/s with any suggested changes within 10 working days from receipt of the AQMP; otherwise the AQMP may be considered by the Consent Holder to be certified by the Council.

225.

Any change to the AQMP/ shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification. No activity reliant upon a change to the AQMP can be undertaken until the change has been certified. The Team Leader Central Monitoring shall be requested to respond to the proposed change within 10 working days from receipt of the change; otherwise the AQMP may be considered by the Consent Holder to be certified by the Council.

226.

All works shall be undertaken in accordance with the certified AQMP/s.

Monitoring Requirements 227.

Prior to the commencement of construction, and for the duration of excavation and construction associated with the Project which have the potential for significant dust emissions, the Consent Holder shall install, operate and maintain continuous dust monitoring undertaken using mobile instruments for the purposes of monitoring Total Suspended Particulates (TSP). The locations, durations and methods of TSP monitoring at each of ACZs A, K and M shall be in accordance with the details in the certified AQMP(s) required by Condition 222.

228.

The dust monitoring instruments shall be fitted with an alarm system that sends a warning to the responsible person identified by the AQMP/s when dust concentrations exceed alert levels specified by the certified AQMP/s. The Consent Holder shall ensure that the responsible person, or other nominated person, is available at all times to take immediate action to reduce dust emissions from the site.

Specific conditions â€“ discharge permit (air â€“ operational) R/REG/2016/1900 229.

This consent shall expire 35 years after the consent commences unless it has lapsed, been surrendered or been cancelled at an earlier date pursuant to the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA).

Limit Conditions 230.

All processes within the CRL operations areas shall be operated, maintained, supervised, monitored and controlled to ensure that emissions authorised by this consent are maintained at the minimum practicable level.

231.

Beyond the boundary of the CRL operations, there shall be no dust and/or odour caused by discharges from the tunnels which, in the opinion of an enforcement officer, is noxious, offensive or objectionable.

232.

No discharges from any activity from the CRL operations shall give rise to visible emissions, other than water vapour and clean steam, to an extent which, in the opinion of an enforcement officer, the discharges are noxious, dangerous, offensive or objectionable.

233.

Except as authorised by this consent, beyond the boundary of the CRL operations, there shall be no hazardous air pollutant, caused by discharges from the CRL operations, which is present at a concentration that causes, or is likely to cause adverse effects to human health, the environment or property.

234.

Only electric-powered locomotives shall operate within the CRL rail tunnels, with the exception of any vehicles associated with construction or maintenance activities.

Process Conditions 235.

At least 20 working days prior to the commencement of the operation of the CRL, the Consent Holder shall prepare and submit to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification procedures that address the cleaning of the rail tunnels and tunnel vents to minimise the build-up of particulate matter. These procedures may form part of an operations and maintenance plan, or equivalent. The TCeam Leader Central Monitoring shall be requested to respond to the proposed procedures with any suggested changes within 10 working days from receipt of the procedures; otherwise the procedures shall be considered to be certified by the Council.

236.

Cleaning of the rail tunnels and tunnel vents shall be undertaken in accordance with the plan certified in accordance with Condition 235 so that discharges of particulate from the vents are minimised in accordance with Condition 230.

Reporting Conditions 237.

The Consent Holder shall notify the Team Leader Central Monitoring as soon as practicable in the event of any significant discharge to air, which results, or has the potential to result, in a breach of these conditions.

238.

The Consent Holder shall record all air quality complaints that are received including: a.

The date, time, location and nature of the complaint;

The name, phone number and address of the complainant, unless the complainant elects not to supply these details;

Any remedial actions undertaken; and

The response provided to the person making the complaint.

Details of any complaints received shall be provided to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) within one working day of receipt of the complaint. Review Condition 239.

The conditions of this consent may be reviewed by the Team Leader Central Monitoring pursuant to section 128 of the RMA, by the giving of notice in accordance with section 129 of the RMA, in October 2017 and annually thereafter in order to:

Deal with any significant adverse effect on the environment arising from the exercise of the consent that was not foreseen at the time that the application was considered;

Consider the adequacy of conditions that prevent nuisance beyond the boundary of the site, particularly if complaints have been received on a frequent basis and have been validated by an enforcement officer;

Consider developments in emission control technology and management practices that would enable the Best Practicable Option in reducing discharges to air; or

To take into account any act of parliament, regulation, national policy statement or relevant regional plan that relates to limiting, recording or reducing emissions authorised by this consent.

Advice notes 1.

Any reference to number of days within this decision refers to working days as defined in s2 of the RMA.

For more information on the resource consent process with Auckland Council see the councilâ€™s website www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz. General information on resource consents, including making an application to vary or cancel consent conditions can be found on the Ministry for the Environmentâ€™s website: www.mfe.govt.nz.

If you disagree with any of the above conditions, or disagree with the additional charges relating to the processing of the application, you have a right of objection pursuant to sections 357A or 357B of the Resource Management Act 1991. Any objection must be made in writing to the council within 15 working days of notification of the decision.

The Consent Holder is responsible for obtaining all other necessary consents, permits, and licences, including those under the Building Act 2004, and the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014. This consent does not remove the need to comply with all other applicable Acts (including the Property Law Act 2007 and the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015), regulations, relevant Bylaws, and rules of law. This consent does not constitute building consent approval. Please check whether a building consent is required under the Building Act 2004.

The Consent Holder shall be advised that any works, structures (including groundanchors) or access required to facilitate the excavations/retaining/foundation construction both permanent and temporary on adjacent properties or land may require the written consent of the effected property owner to be submitted with building and/or resource consent application(s). For more advice the Consent Holder shall contact Auckland Council town planning and building control help desks.

The Resource Consent Holder is advised that the date of the commencement of this consent will be as determined by Section 116 of the RMA, unless a later date is stated as a condition of consent. The provisions of Section 116 of the RMA are summarised in the covering letter issued with this consent.

The Resource Consent Holder is advised that, pursuant to Section 126 of the RMA, if this resource consent has been exercised, but is not subsequently exercised for a continuous period of five years, the consent may be cancelled by the AC unless other criteria contained within Section 126 are met.

The Consent Holder is advised that the quality of the pumped groundwater that is to be discharged to the stormwater system or indirectly to stream meets the ANZECC (2000) guidelines for the protection of 95% freshwater species.

APPENDIX 1:

Total Ground Settlement Contours and Monitoring Station Locations

CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2610, Rev 3.0, dated 14/10/2016 CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2611, Rev 3.0, dated 14/10/2016 CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2612, Rev 3.0, dated 30/09/2016 CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2613, Rev 4.0, dated 14/10/2016 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-2614, Rev 1.0, dated 13/5/2016 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-2615, Rev 1.0, dated 13/5/2016

APPENDIX 2: Provisional Building and Structures and Services Trigger Levels and Buildings requiring Detailed Pre-Condition Survey CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2640, Rev 4.0, dated 14/10/16 CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2642, Rev 3.0, dated 11/10/16

APPENDIX 3:

Groundwater Monitoring Bores

PDP A02502731, Figure 39, Rev B, dated May 2016 and Earthtech Consulting Table 7.1, (Appendix 4). Groundwater Monitoring Bores: CRL Stage 2 Construction Location Zone ACZ A

ACZ N

ACZ K

ACZ S

ACZ M

BH 210 Wellesley Street West and Elliot Street Intersection BH 209 Wellesley Street West BH411 BHA BH206B BH423 BH266 BH 268 Vincent Street BH 213 Vincent Street BH 316 Karangahape Road BH 319 Karangahape Road BH274 BH324 BH325 BH218 BH425 BH320 EB312 BH 223 Upper Queen Street BH 225 Symonds Street BH285 BH M1 Upper Shaddock

Eastings mE (NZTM)

Northing mN (NZTM)

Screen Depths

Unit

(A) At 5m depth (new)

(A) Fill (soft clay)

(A) At 8m depth (existing) (B) At 25m depth (existing) At 6.7m depth

(A) EW (B) EU

At 10.9m depth At 5.0m depth (A) At 5m depth (existing) (A) At 10m depth (existing) (A) At 14m depth (existing) (A) At 6m depth (existing) (B) At 17m depth (existing) At 8.0m depth At 6.0m depth At 3.5m depth

At 6.0m depth At 1.7m-7.0m depth (A) At 7m depth (new)

ER TA ER ER ER (A)ER (A) EU (A) EW

(A) EW (B) EW

ER ER ER EW Fill/TA ER Fill/TA (A) TA

(A) At 11m depth (new)

(A) TA

At 7.8m depth (A) At 6mï‚± depth (new)

VA/TA (A) TA/ER

Street BH M2 Ruru Street BH323 BH426 BH427

(A) At 6mï‚± depth (new) At 5.5m depth

(A) TA/ER ER TA/ER ER

APPENDIX 4: Sites”

Plans titled “Location Plan Showing Sites Adjacent to Construction



CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2901, revision 1;



CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2902, revision 1;



CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2903, revision 1;



CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2904, revision 1;



CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2905, revision 1;



CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2906, revision 1.

APPENDIX 5: a.

Information from Application

Application Form, and Assessment of Environmental Effects prepared by Aurecon NZ Ltd, dated 13 May 2016, including:

Report title and reference

Author

Rev

Dated

Assessment of Environmental Effects Resource Consent Package 2 Aotea Station to North Auckland Line Construction and CRL Operation CRLSYW-RME-000-RPT-0047

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

13 May 2016

Design and Construction Report CRLSYW-RME-000-RPT-0006

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13 May 2016

Auckland City Rail Link (CRL) Aotea Station to North Auckland Line Construction and CRL Operation: Groundwater Technical Report

Pattle Delamore Partners Ltd

Assessment of Settlement Effects ReportCRL-SYW-RME-000-RPT-0045

Aurecon NZ Ltd

Auckland City Rail Link Aotea Station to North Auckland Line Construction and CRL Operation Contaminated Land Assessment 1378206325-067

Golder Associates 0

May 2016

Auckland City Rail Link Aotea Station to North Auckland Line Construction and CRL Operation Water Quality Assessment 1378206325-069

Golder Associates 0

May 2016

Auckland City Rail Link Aotea Station to North Auckland Line Construction and CRL operation Air Quality Assessment1378206325

Golder Associates 0

May 2016

Auckland City Rail Link Aotea Station To North Auckland Line Construction and CRL Operation Built Heritage Impact Assessment CRL-SYW-RME-000-RPT0046

Reverb Ltd

13 May 2016

Draft Erosion and Sediment Control Management Plan â€“ CRL-SYW-RME-000RPT-0059

Aurecon NZ Ltd

13 May 2016

Auckland City Rail Link Aotea Station to

Golder Associates 0

12 May 2016

3.0

30 June 2016

May 2016

North Auckland Line Construction and CRL Operation Industrial and Trade Activities Assessment- 1378206325-070 Geotechnical Engineering Report CRLSYW-GEO-000-RPT-0006

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

02.06.2015

City Rail Link Project: Archaeological Assessment

Clough & Associates Ltd

5.0

10.12.2012

Line Construction and CRL Operation Contaminated Land Assessment- South Pacific Timber 1378206325-076

Golder Associates 0

July 2016

Plan title and reference

Author

Rev

Dated

Location Plan Overall- CRL-SYW-RME000-DRG-2000-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Location Plan Aotea Station- CRL-SYWRME-000-DRG-2001-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Location Plan North Tunnels- CRL-SYWRME-000-DRG-2002-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Location Plan Karangahape Station- CRLSYW-RME-000-DRG-2003-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Location Plan South Tunnels- CRL-SYWRME-000-DRG-2004-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Location Plan Mt Eden Station East- CRLSYW-RME-000-DRG-2005-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Location Plan Mt Eden Station WestCRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2006-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Alignment Plan and Long Section CRL Down (MC20) Sheet 1 of 4- CRL-SYWRME-000-DRG-2010-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Alignment Plan and Long Section CRL Down (MC20) Sheet 2 of 4- CRL-SYWRME-000-DRG-2011-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Alignment Plan and Long Section CRL Down (MC20) Sheet 3 of 4- CRL-SYWRME-000-DRG-2012-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Alignment Plan and Long Section CRL Down (MC20) Sheet 4 of 4- CRL-SYWRME-000-DRG-2013-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Aotea Station Roof Slab Overall PlanCRL-AOT-RME-000-DRG-2110-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Aotea Station Elevation- CRL-AOT-RME000-DRG-2111-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Aotea Station Cross Section Grid 2- CRLAOT-RME-000-DRG-2118-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Aotea Station Cross Section Grid 9- CRLAOT-RME-000-DRG-2119-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Aotea Station Cross Section Grid 13 Victoria St Entrance- CRL-AOT-RME-000DRG-2120-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Aotea Station Cross Section Grid 14 Victoria Street Entrance- CRL-AOT-RME000-DRG-2121-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Aotea Station Cross Section Grid 25CRL-AOT-RME-000-DRG-2122-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Aotea Station Cross Section Grid S3CRL-AOT-RME-000-DRG-2123-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Aotea Station Cross Section Grid S3CRL-AOT-RME-000-DRG-4023-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

08.07.16

Karangahape Station Plan General Arrangement Street Level CRL-KRDRME-000-DRG-2142-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Karangahape Station Overall Street Level Plan CRL-KRD-RME-000-DRG-2130-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Karangahape Station Overall Street Level Plan CRL-KRD-RME-000-DRG-2132-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Karangahape Station North Zone Sections Sheet 1 CRL-KRD-RME-000-DRG-21361.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Karangahape Station South Zone Sections Sheet 1 CRL-KRD-RME-000DRG-2138-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Karangahape Station Platform Level Tunnel Sections Sheet 1 CRL-KRD-RME000-DRG-2139-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Karangahape Station Platform Level Tunnel Sections Sheet 2 CRL-KRD-RME-

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

000-DRG-2140-1.0 Karangahape Station Platform Tunnel and Central Passenger Tunnel and Escalator Tunnel-Setout CRL-KRD-RME-000-DRG2143-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Mt Eden Station Plan Newton Grade Separation Structure CRL-MTE-RME-000DRG-2150-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

04.07.16

Mt Eden Station Section 1 Newton Grade Separation Structure CRL-MTE-RME-000DRG-2151-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

04.07.16

Mt Eden Station Cross Sections Newton Shaft CRL-MTE-RME-000-DRG-2152-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

04.07.16

Mt Eden Station Isometric of Permanent Structure Newton Grade Separation Structure CRL-MTE-RME-000-DRG-21531.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Mt Eden NAL Plan And Sections- Ruru Street Bridge Sheet 1 of 1 CRL-MTERME-000-DRG-2158-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Mt Eden NAL Plan And Sections – Western Flyover Sheet 1 of 2 CRL-MTERME-000-DRG-2160-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Mt Eden NAL Plan And Sections- Mt Eden Road Bridge Sheet 1 of 2 CRL-EFC-RME000-DRG-2166-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Mt Eden NAL Elevation- Mt Eden Road Bridge Sheet 2 of 2 CRL-EFC-RME-000DRG-2167-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Mt Eden NAL Plan And SectionsNormanby Road Bridge Sheet 1 of 3 CRLEFC-RME-000-DRG-2170-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Mt Eden NAL Plan And Sections – Normanby Road Bridge Sheet 2 of 3 CRLEFC-RME-000-DRG-2171-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Structural Geological Long Section MC20 West Sheet 1 of 1 CRL-MTE-RME-000DRG-2173-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Structural Geological Long Section MC30

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

West Sheet 1 of 1 CRL-MTE-RME-000DRG-2174-1.0 Mt Eden NAL Cross Sections West Sheet 1 of 2 CRL-MTE-RME-000-DRG-2176-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Mt Eden NAL Cross Sections West Sheet 2 of 2 CRL-MTE-RME-000-DRG-2177-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Mt Eden NAL Structural Geological Long Section MC50 East Sheet 1 of 1 CRLEFC-RME-000-DRG-2178-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Mt Eden NAL Structural Geological Long Section MC60 East Sheet 1 of 1 CRLEFC-RME-000-DRG-2179-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Mt Eden NAL Cross Sections East Sheet 1 of 2 CRL-EFC-RME-000-DRG-2180-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Mt Eden NAL Cross Sections East Sheet 2 of 2 CRL-EFC-RME-000-DRG-2181-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Mt Eden NAL Structural Geological Long Section MC10 and MC40 NAL Sheet 1 of 2 CRL-EFC-RME-000-DRG-2182-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Mt Eden NAL Structural Geological Long Section MC10 and MC40 NAL Sheet 2 of 2 CRL-EFC-RME-000-DRG-2183-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Mt Eden NAL Structural Geological Long Section MC10 and MC40 NAL Sheet 1 of 1 CRL-EFC-RME-000-DRG-2184-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Mt Eden NAL Cross Sections NAL Sheet 1 Aurecon NZ Ltd of 1 CRL-EFC-RME-000-DRG-2185-1.0

1.0

13.05.16

South Tunnels Plan- Southern Junction CRL-NJT-RME-000-DRG-2190-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

South Tunnels Section- Southern Portal CRL-NJT-RME-000-DRG-2191-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

South Tunnels Section- Southern Junction CRL-NJT-RME-000-DRG-2192-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

North And South Tunnels Segmental Lining General Arrangement CRl-SYWRME-000-DRG-2196-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

North and South Tunnels Cross Passage CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2197-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Aotea Station Construction Support Area 1 Aurecon NZ Ltd (Indicative Layout) Aotea Station CRLAOT-RME-000-DRG-2951-1.0

1.0

13.05.16

Karangahape Station Construction Support Area 2 (Indicative Layout) Beresford Square CRL-KRD-RME-000DRG-2961-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Karangahape Station Construction Support Area 3 (Indicative Layout) Mercury Lane CRL-KRD-RME-000-DRG2962-A

Aurecon NZ Ltd

13.05.16

Mt Eden NAL Construction Support Area 4 Aurecon NZ Ltd (Indicative Layout) Tunnelling Phase CRLMTE-RME-000-DRG-2971-1.0

1.0

13.05.16

Mt Eden NAL Construction Support Area 5 Aurecon NZ Ltd (Indicative Layout) Station and Tie Into NAL CRL-MTE-RME-000-DRG-2972-1.0

1.0

13.05.16

Settlement Contours Mechanical Settlement Plan Sheet 1 of 6 CRL-SYWRME-000-DRG-2601-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Settlement Contours Mechanical Settlement Plan Sheet 2 of 6 CRL-SYWRME-000-DRG-2602-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Settlement Contours Mechanical Settlement Plan Sheet 3 of 6 CRL-SYWRME-000-DRG-2603-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Settlement Contours Mechanical Settlement Plan Sheet 4 of 6 CRL-SYWRME-000-DRG-2604-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Settlement Contours Mechanical Settlement Plan Sheet 5 of 6 CRL-SYWRME-000-DRG-2605-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Settlement Contours Mechanical Settlement Plan Sheet 6 of 6 CRL-SYWRME-000-DRG-2606-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Settlement Contours And Building Assessment Mechanical And Consolidation Settlement Sheet 1 of 6 CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2610-3.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

14.10.16

Settlement Contours And Building Assessment Mechanical And Consolidation Settlement Sheet 2 of 6 CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2611-3.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

14.10.16

Settlement Contours And Building Assessment Mechanical And Consolidation Settlement Sheet 3 of 6 CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2612-3.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

30.09.16

Settlement Contours And Building Assessment Mechanical And Consolidation Settlement Sheet 4 of 6 CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2613-4.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

14.10.16

Settlement Contours And Building Assessment Mechanical And Consolidation Settlement Sheet 5 of 6 CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2614-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Settlement Contours And Building Assessment Mechanical And Consolidation Settlement Sheet 6 of 6 CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2615-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

13.05.16

Aotea To NAL Trigger Levels Table And Notes Sheet 1 of 2 CRL-SYW-RME-000DRG-2640-4.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

14.10.16

Aotea To NAL Trigger Levels Table And Notes Sheet 2 of 2 CRL-SYW-RME-000DRG-2642-3.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

11.10.16

Geological Longsection Aotea Station Sheet 1 of 2 CRL-AOT-GEO-000-DRG0011-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

25.05.16

Geological Longsection Aotea Station Sheet 2 of 2 CRL-AOT-GEO-000-DRG0012-1.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

1.0

25.05.16

Ground Investigation Locations CRL And Non-CRL (Detailed) 3 of 15 CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0029-3.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

3.0

24.06.16

Ground Investigation Locations CRL And Non-CRL (Detailed) 4 of 15 CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0030-3.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

3.0

24.06.16

Ground Investigation Locations CRL And Non-CRL (Detailed) 5 of 15 CRL-SYW-

Aurecon NZ Ltd

3.0

24.06.2016

GEO-000-DRG-0031-3.0 Geological and Hydrogeological Cross Section Wellesley Street CRL-SYW-GEO000-SKE-0017-4.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

4.0

05.07.2016

Geological and Hydrogeological Cross Section Victoria Street CRL-SYW-GEO000-SKE-0018-3.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

3.0

23.06.2016

Geological And Hydrogeological Cross Section DR6MC30 Chainage 1750-2100 CRL-SYW-GEO-000-SKE-0028-5.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

5.0

05.07.2016

Geological and Hydrogeological Cross Section Beresford Square CRL-SYWGEO-000-SKE-0029-3.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

3.0

05.07.2016

Geological and Hydrogeological Cross Section Cross Street CRL-SYW-GEO000-SKE-0030-3.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

3.0

05.07.2016

Ground Investigation Locations CRL And Non-CRL (Detailed) 1 of 15 CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0027-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

23.06.2016

Ground Investigation Locations CRL And Non-CRL (Detailed) 2 of 15 CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0028-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

23.06.2016

Ground Investigation Locations CRL And Non-CRL (Detailed) 3 of 15 CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0029-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

23.06.2016

Ground Investigation Locations CRL And Non-CRL (Detailed) 4 of 15 CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0030-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

23.06.2016

Ground Investigation Locations CRL And Non-CRL (Detailed) 5 of 15 CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0031-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

23.06.2016

Ground Investigation Locations CRL And Non-CRL (Detailed) 6 of 15 CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0032-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

23.06.2016

Ground Investigation Locations CRL And Non-CRL (Detailed) 7 of 15 CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0033-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

23.06.2016

Ground Investigation Locations CRL And Non-CRL (Detailed) 8 of 15 CRL-SYW-

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

23.06.2016

GEO-000-DRG-0034-2.0 Ground Investigation Locations CRL And Non-CRL (Detailed) 9 of 15 CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0035-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

23.06.2016

Ground Investigation Locations CRL And Non-CRL (Detailed) 10 of 15 CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0036-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

23.06.2016

Ground Investigation Locations CRL And Non-CRL (Detailed) 11 of 15 CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0037-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

23.06.2016

Ground Investigation Locations CRL And Non-CRL (Detailed) 12 of 15 CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0038-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

23.06.2016

Ground Investigation Locations CRL And Non-CRL (Detailed)13 of 15 CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0039-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

23.06.2016

Ground Investigation Locations CRL And Non-CRL (Detailed)14 of 15 CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0040-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

23.06.2016

Ground Investigation Locations CRL And Non-CRL (Detailed)15 of 15 CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0041-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

23.06.2016

Geological Long Section DR6MC30 Chainage 2750-3100m CRL-SYW-GEO000-SKE-0033-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

07.07.16

Geological and Hydrogeological Long Section DR6MC20 Chainage 3050-3400 CRL-SYW-GEO-000-SKE-0034-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

07.07.16

Geological Cross Section At DR6MC50 Chainage 625 CRL-SYW-GEO-000-SKE0042-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

05.07.16

Geological And Hydrogeological Cross Section At DR6MC20 Chainage 3185 CRL-SYW-GEO-000-SKE-0045-2.0

Aurecon NZ Ltd

2.0

05.07.16

Geological Cross Section At DR6MC20 Aurecon NZ Ltd Chainage 3312 CRL-SYW-GEO-000-SKE0046-2.0

2.0

05.07.16

Queen Street Plumbing And Drainage Services Permanent Works Foul Water-

18.11.2015

Aurecon NZ Ltd

Ground Level CRL-BTM-DRN-000-DRG1310-A Queen Street Plumbing And Drainage Aurecon NZ Ltd Services Permanent Works Surface Water- Ground Level CRL-BTM-DRN-000DRG-1610-A

18.11.2015 q

Aotea Station Station North Drainage Layout CRL-AOT-DRN-000-DRG-1101-3

Aurecon NZ Ltd

22.06.16

Aotea Station Station South Drainage Layout CRL-AOT-DRN-000-DRG-1102-2

Aurecon NZ Ltd

21.03.16

Karangahape Station Station North Drainage Layout CRL-KRD-DRN-000DRG-1101-2

Aurecon NZ Ltd

08.04.16

Karangahape Station Station South Drainage Layout CRL-KRD-DRN-000DRG-1102-2

Aurecon NZ Ltd

05.07.16

CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2901

Aurecon NZ Ltd

CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2902

Aurecon NZ Ltd

CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2903

Aurecon NZ Ltd

CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2904

Aurecon NZ Ltd

CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2905

Aurecon NZ Ltd

CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2906

Aurecon NZ Ltd

Other additional information

Author

Rev

Dated

Stakeholder Meeting Minutes: Nikau Street Aurecon NZ Ltd 1950mm dia. Stormwater Diversion

22 January 2016

Mana Whenua Forum

Auckland Transport

10 December 2015

Section 92 Response Groundwater

Pattle Delamore Partners Ltd

29 June 2016

CRL Monthly Mana Whenua Forum

Auckland Transport

19 May 2016

Section 92 Response Groundwater Figures

Pattle Delamore Partners Ltd

29 June 2016

Section 92 Response Contamination

Golder Associates -

30 June 2016

Cone Penetrometer test Karangahape Station

Aurecon NZ Ltd

14.06.2016

Section 92 Response

Aurecon NZ Ltd

30.06.2016

Aotea Station PLAXIS analysis â€“ Bluestone wall sections

Aurecon NZ Ltd

29.06.2016

Further S92 Response

Aurecon NZ Ltd

08.07.2016

Ground Settlement question 89 answer

Aurecon NZ Ltd

05.07.2016

Further s92 Response Groundwater

Pattle Delamore Partners Ltd

08.07.2016

Further S92 Response Question 88 answer

Aurecon NZ Ltd

01.07.2016

Earthtech Memo Ref m3256-1

Aurecon NZ Ltd

22.08.16

CRL-MTE-UTI-000-MEM-0012 Preliminary Flood Assessment Results and Mitigation Measures

Aurecon NZ Ltd

31.08.16

Hydrological and Hydraulic Review of the CRL Southern Connection Modelling

Richard Smedley â€“ Senior Stormwater Specialist, Healthy Waters Department

01.09.2016

Preliminary Flood Assessment: Consenting Analysis of potential downstream mitigation requirements

Aurecon NZ Ltd

9.09.2016

Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (Decision Version) assessment tables:

Golder Associates

September 2016

Aurecon / Golder Associates

20 September 2016

Earthworks

Groundwater diversion and take

Water Quality

Contaminated land

Air Quality

Stormwater

Industrial and Trade activities

Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan Auckland Council Decisions Version 2016 (CRLMTE-UTI-000-MEM-00XX)

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Appendix E: Consultation Records

CLG Comments A CLG meeting was held on 17 September 2019. The following comment was received on the CEMP. Comment ID

Date

Time

Forum

Contributor

Comment

Resolution

17 September 2019

1700-1900 hrs

CLG

Julie Adamson

Who gets notified when trigger levels (e.g. noise/vibration, etc.) are exceeded?

The procedures for when trigger levels are exceeded are outlined in the various DWPs or MPs (e.g. AQ DWP, CNV DWP, etc.). For example, if the noise and/or vibration limits are exceeded, the Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager will liaise with the affected receiver. Noise and/or vibration monitoring will be carried out to verify the extent of any adverse effects. Mitigation measures as outlined in the CNV DWP will be implemented.

Independent Peer Review Page no.

CEMP section

Paragraph/ sentence

Comment

Resolution

Section 1.5

Second paragraph

It is unclear if all the DWPs have been subject to the IPR. While the CEMP is subject to the IPR the DWPs have not been reviewed by the same IPR process that the CEMP was subject to. For clarity it is important that the CEMP accurately reflects the process that applies.

Section 1.5 of the CEMP has been amended with the following text: â€œPrior to submission to Auckland Council the CEMP and DWPs are reviewed by Independent Peer Reviewers (IPR), as per the requirements of designation condition 11. The IPRs are suitably qualified independent specialists agreed to by Auckland Council to form an IPR Panel. Each of the DWPs that form part of the CEMP undergo separate independent peer review by suitably qualified independent specialistsâ€?. Change to CEMP

Page 91

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan 33

Section 2.1

Last paragraph

This paragraph confirms that the demolition of buildings and above ground structures within the Mercury Lane CSA are authorised by an existing OPW and do not form part of this CEMP. The specific conditions of the OPW are not known and it is suggested that there be a cross check between the CEMP and OPW to ensure and confirm consistency applies.

A sentence has been added at the end of the paragraph to reflect the works: “A CEMP and set of sub-plans were prepared and provided when lodging the OPW to Auckland Council.” Change to CEMP

36 and 39

Sections 2.2.2 and 2.2.3

Tables 2.3 and 2.4

These tables confirm that various stages and construction sequences that apply to the CEMP. The tables specify the works details based on the current knowledge and information available. It is suggested that these tables also allow for a contingency if the unexpected is encountered. This is suggested to be based on a process that will be followed in such a circumstance.

A sentence has been added in the text prior to each of these tables indicating that the information provided in these tables is indicative only. The process to be followed in case of a material change to the CEMP is outlined in section 6.7 of the CEMP. Change to CEMP

Section 3.2

Second paragraph

This paragraph confirms that the risk register will be reviewed quarterly. This detail about how this will occur should be included with a cross reference to the specific roles and responsibilities in Section 4.1.2.

The risk register will be reviewed quarterly by the ESM. Section 3.2 has been reworded in the CEMP and cross references to the ESM responsibilities section (section 4.1.2). Change to CEMP

Section 4.1.1

Second paragraph

This paragraph notes that the Alliance will appoint an ESM and ESP during the construction phase of the project. This is confusing as to if these appointments will apply to the early works (this CEMP) or just the construction works as per Section 1.1. It is assumed that this should also apply to this CEMP (early works).

ESP has been removed from the CEMP (for consistency across all CEMPs for CRLC3). This section has been reworded in the CEMP to read: “The Link Alliance will appoint an ESM as part of the Construction Team during the Karangahape Station early works”. Change to CEMP

Section 3.4.2

Table 3.3

This table confirms the responsibilities of the site personnel. There are a significant number of DWPs all of which have many requirements and procedures to follow. A key role for the project will be ensuring these are all complied with, consistencies achieved and ensuring there is no conflict between them. This role isn’t specifically identified and should be included within Table 3.3 as a key task for the successful CEMP implementation.

Reference to section 3.4.2 appears to be an error and it appears that the IPR means to refer to Table 4-1 in section 4.1.2 of the CEMP. The key role for ensuring compliance with the DWPs is the ESM. The ESM is responsible for reviewing and updating the sub-plans and checking compliance with the sub-plans (as stated under this role in Table 4-1).

Page 92

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan The third paragraph of section 4.1.1 also states that the ESM is responsible for ensuring the CEMP and sub-plans are implemented. No change to CEMP 54

Section 4.2.2

Section 5

Page 93

Bullet points

| Karangahape Station Early Works

These points illustrate what will be discussed at the weekly toolbox talks. Included is silt fence erection. When referring to Section 5.4 of the CEMP it is noted that the erosion and sediment control methods do not include silt fences and include a range of other measures. While Section 4.2.2 is just an example, more specificity or a cross link to Section 5.4 could be provided.

The items listed under section 4.2.2 are merely examples of topics which may be discussed at tool box talks. This section in the CEMP has been amended to refer to erosion and sediment control measures (and cross references to section 5.4 in the CEMP). Change to CEMP

This section refers to various appendices and notes these form part of the CEMP. These are not included in the draft CEMP provided and have not been viewed or assessed within this IPR process.

Section 5 is a summary of environmental management procedures provided in the various DWPs or MPs. As required by the CRL designation conditions, each of the DWPs that form part of the CEMP undergo separate independent peer review by appropriate subject matter experts. While it is not the task of the CEMP independent reviewer to individually peer review each of the component DWPs, the CEMP reviewer can therefore be assured that the full CEMP including all of its component DWPs are adequately reviewed. However, some of the sub sections (in section 5) do not have an associated DWP and would have been included in the scope of the peer review. No change to CEMP

Construction Environmental Management Plan Designation conditions â€“ IPRP comments No

Designation Condition

CEMP Section

IPRP Comments

Response

19.1

The objective of the CEMP and DWPs is to so far as is reasonably practicable, avoid, remedy or mitigate any adverse effects (including cumulative effects) associated with the City Rail Link construction. All works must be carried out in accordance with the CEMP, the DWPs required by these conditions and in accordance with any changes to plans made under Condition 23. The CEMP and DWPs shall be prepared, complied with and monitored by the Requiring Authority throughout the duration of construction of the City Rail Link. The DWPs shall give effect to the specific requirements and objectives set out in these designation conditions. The CEMP shall include measures to give effect to any specific requirements and objectives set out in these designation conditions that are not addressed by the DWPs.

1.2

Fully addressed in CEMP

Noted. No change to CEMP required.

6.6 and 6.7

Fully addressed in CEMP Fully addressed in CEMP Not assessed as part of IPR process The CEMP provides a summary of the DWPs however these DWPs have not been reviewed at this time.

Noted. No change to CEMP required. Noted. No change to CEMP required. Noted. No change to CEMP required. Noted. No change to CEMP required.

4.1

Fully addressed in CEMP

Noted. No change to CEMP required.

4.2

Fully addressed in CEMP Not assessed as part of the IPR process

Noted. No change to CEMP required. Noted. No change to CEMP required.

5.21.5 and Appendix G

Fully addressed in CEMP. Appendices not assessed as part of this IPR process at this time.

Noted. No change to CEMP required.

4.1

Fully addressed in CEMP

Noted. No change to CEMP required.

19.2 19.3 19.4 19.5

20.1

20.2

Page 94

In order to give effect to the objective in Condition 19.1, the CEMP must provide for the following: (b) Notice boards that clearly identify the Requiring Authority and the Project name, together with the name, telephone number and email address of the Site or Project Manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager; (c) Training requirements for employees, sub-contractors and visitors on construction procedures, environment management and monitoring; (d) A Travel Management Plan for each construction site outlining onsite car parking management and methods for encouraging travel to the site using forms of transport other than private vehicle to assist in mitigating localised traffic effects; and (e) Where a complaint is received, the complaint must be recorded and responded to as provided for in Conditions 13, 15 and 17.

The CEMP shall include details of: (a) The site or Project Manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager (who will implement and monitor the Communication and Consultation Plan), including their contact details (phone, email and physical address);

| Karangahape Station Early Works

6 Appendices F to Q 4 and 6

Appendix K

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Designation Condition

CEMP Section

IPRP Comments

Response

(b) The Document management system for administering the CEMP, including review and Requiring Authority / Constructor / Auckland Council requirements;

6.6 and 6.7

This section doesnâ€™t detail any specific requiring authority, constructor or Auckland Council requirements. These should be included.

Section 6.6 of the CEMP describes the CEMP document control procedures. The ESM (Link Alliance contractor) is responsible for maintaining the document control system. Section 6.7 provides a detailed CEMP review process (including the material changes process and review/approval by Auckland Council). A management review of the CEMP will take place annually and is organised by the ESM (the Link Alliance contractor under the CRL is responsible for environmental management of the early works).

Page 95

5.21

(d) Environmental complaint's management procedures (see also Condition 17);

5.21.5 and Appendix G

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Fully addressed in the CEMP Fully addressed in the CEMP. Appendices not addressed as part of this IPR process at this time. Fully addressed in the CEMP. Fully addressed in the CEMP.

No change to CEMP Noted. No change to CEMP required. Noted. No change to CEMP required.

Noted. No change to CEMP required. Noted. No change to CEMP required.

Construction Environmental Management Plan

21.1

Designation Condition

CEMP Section

IPRP Comments

Response

(g) Means of ensuring the safety of the general public; and

(h) Methods to assess and monitor potential cumulative adverse effects.

3.3

Fully addressed in the CEMP. Fully addressed in the CEMP.

Noted. No change to CEMP required. Noted. No change to CEMP required.

Fully addressed in the CEMP. Fully addressed in the CEMP however appendices are not assessed as part of the IPR process at this time. Fully addressed in the CEMP

Noted. No change to CEMP required. Noted. No change to CEMP required.

Fully addressed in the CEMP

Noted. No change to CEMP required.

2.6 and 2.7

Fully addressed in the CEMP Fully addressed in the CEMP

Noted. No change to CEMP required. Noted. No change to CEMP required.

2.6 and 2

Fully addressed in the CEMP

Noted. No change to CEMP required.

2.5

Fully addressed in the CEMP Fully addressed in the CEMP

Noted. No change to CEMP required. Noted. No change to CEMP required.

In order to give effect to the objective in Condition 19.1, the CEMP shall include the following details and requirements in relation to all areas within the surface designation footprint where construction works are to occur, and / or where materials and construction machinery are to be used or stored: (a) Where access points are to be located and procedures for managing construction vehicle 2 ingress and egress to construction support and storage areas; (b) Methods for managing the control of silt and sediment within the construction area; 5.4 and Appendix H

(c) Methods for earthworks management (including depth and extent of earthworks and temporary, permanent stabilisation measures and monitoring of ground movement) for earthworks adjacent to buildings and structures; (d) Measures to adopt to keep the construction area in a tidy condition in terms of disposal / storage of rubbish and storage unloading of construction materials (including equipment). All storage of materials and equipment associated with the construction works shall take place within the boundaries of the designation; (e) Measures to ensure all temporary boundary / security fences associated with the construction of the City Rail Link are maintained in good order with any graffiti removed as soon as possible; (g) The location and specification of any temporary acoustic fences and visual barriers, and where practicable, opportunities for mana whenua (see Condition 8) and community art or other decorative measures along with viewing screens to be incorporated into these without compromising the purpose for which these are erected; (h) How the construction areas are to be fenced and kept secure from the public and, where practicable and without compromising their purpose how opportunities for public viewing, including provision of viewing screens and display of information about the project and opportunities for mana whenua and community art or other decorative measures can be incorporated to enhance public amenity and connection to the project; (i) The location of any temporary buildings (including workers offices and portaloos) and vehicle parking (which should be located within the construction area and not on adjacent streets); (j) Methods to control the intensity, location and direction of artificial construction lighting to avoid light spill and glare onto sites adjacent construction areas;

Page 96

| Karangahape Station Early Works

5.45.4 and Appendix H

2.6 and 5

5.9

Noted. No change to CEMP required.

Construction Environmental Management Plan

IPRP Comments

Response

(k) Methods to ensure the prevention and mitigation of adverse effects associated with the 5.15 storage, use, disposal, or transportation of hazardous substances; (m) That site offices and less noisy construction activities be located at the edge of the construction 2 yards where practicable; and (n) Methods for management of vacant areas once construction is completed in accordance with 5.11 the Urban Design DWP. The CEMP and DWPs shall be reviewed at least annually or as a result of a material change to the City Rail Link project or to address unforeseen adverse effects arising from construction or unresolved complaints. Such a review may be initiated by either Auckland Council or the Requiring Authority. The review shall take into consideration: (a) Compliance with designation conditions, the CEMP, DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and 1.2, 6.7 SSCVMPs) and material changes to these plans; (b) Any changes to construction methods; (c) Key changes to roles and responsibilities within the City Rail Link project; (d) Changes in industry best practice standards; (e) Changes in legal or other requirements; (f) Results of monitoring and reporting procedures associated with the management of adverse effects during construction; (g) Any comments or recommendations received from Auckland Council regarding the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs); and (h) Any unresolved complaints and any response to the complaints and remedial action taken to address the complaint as required under Condition 17. A summary of the review process shall be kept by the Requiring Authority, provided annually to the 6.7 Auckland Council, and made available to the Auckland Council upon request. Following the CEMP and DWPs review process described in Condition 22, the CEMP may require 6.7 updating. Any material change to the CEMP and DWP must be consistent with the purpose and objective of 6.7 the relevant condition.

Fully addressed in the CEMP Fully addressed in the CEMP NA

Noted. No change to CEMP required. Noted. No change to CEMP required. Noted. No change to CEMP required.

Fully addressed in the CEMP

Noted. No change to CEMP required.

Fully addressed in the CEMP Fully addressed in the CEMP Fully addressed in the CEMP

Noted. No change to CEMP required. Noted. No change to CEMP required. Noted. No change to CEMP required.

23.3

Affected parties will be notified of the review and any material change proposed to the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs).

Appendix G

Noted. No change to CEMP required.

23.4

The CEMP and DWPs must clearly document the comments and inputs received by the Requiring Authority from affected parties about the material change, along with a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. Any material change proposed to the CEMP and DWPs shall be subject to an independent peer review as required by Condition 11.

1.5

Appendices not assessed as part of this IPR process at this time. Fully addressed in the CEMP Fully addressed in the CEMP

Noted. No change to CEMP required.

22.1

22.2 23.1 23.2

23.5 Page 97

Designation Condition

| Karangahape Station Early Works

CEMP Section

1.5

Noted. No change to CEMP required.

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Designation Condition

IPRP Comments

Response

23.6

Following that review any material change proposed to the CEMP and DWPs relating to an adverse 1.5 and 1.9 effect shall be submitted for approval to Auckland Council Compliance and Monitoring Officer, at least 10 working days prior to the proposed changes taking effect. If any changes are not agreed, the relevant provisions of the RMA relating to approval of outline plans shall apply. To manage the adverse effects on Network Utilities Operations during the construction of the City 5.1 Rail Link, the following shall be included in the CEMP. The purpose of this section of the CEMP shall be to ensure that the enabling works and 5.1 construction of the City Rail Link adequately take account of, and include measures to address the safety, integrity, protection or, where necessary, relocation of existing network utilities that traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation during the construction of the City Rail Link. For the avoidance of doubt and for the purposes of this condition an â€œexisting Network Utilityâ€? 5.1 includes infrastructure operated by a Network Utility Operator which was: (a) In place at the time the notice of requirement for the City Rail Link was served on Auckland Council (23 August 2012); or (b) Undertaken in accordance with condition 6 of this designation or the section 176(1)(b) RMA process. The CEMP shall be prepared in consultation with Network Utility Operators who have existing Network Utilities that traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation and shall be adhered to and implemented during the construction of the City Rail Link. The CEMP shall include as a minimum:

Fully addressed in the CEMP

Noted. No change to CEMP required.

Noted. No change to CEMP required. Noted. No change to CEMP required.

5.1 and Appendix G

(b) Measures to be used to accurately identify the location of existing Network Utilities, and the measures for the protection, support, relocation and/or reinstatement of existing Network Utilities;

5.1 and Appendix G

(c) Methods to be used to ensure that all construction personnel, including contractors, are aware of the presence and location of the various existing Network Utilities (and their priority designations) which traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation, and the restrictions in place in relation to those existing Network Utilities. This shall include: (i) Measures to provide for the safe operation of plant and equipment, and the safety of workers, in proximity to existing Network Utilities; (ii) Plans identifying the locations of the existing Network Utilities (and their designations) and appropriate physical indicators on the ground showing specific surveyed locations;

5.1 and Appendix G

24.1 24.2

24.3

24.4

Page 98

| Karangahape Station Early Works

CEMP Section

Fully addressed in the CEMP

Noted. No change to CEMP required.

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Designation Condition

CEMP Section

IPRP Comments

Response

(d) Measures to be used to ensure the continued operation of Network Utility Operations and the security of supply of the utilities by Network Utility Operators at all times;

5.1 and Appendix G

Noted. No change to CEMP required.

5.1 and Appendix G

(f) Contingency management plans for reasonably foreseeable circumstances in respect of the relocation and rebuild of existing Network Utilities during the construction of the City Rail Link;

5.1 and Appendix G

(g) A risk analysis for the relocation and rebuild of existing Network Utilities during the construction of the City Rail Link;

5.1 and Appendix G

(h) Earthworks management (including depth and extent of earthworks and temporary and permanent stabilisation measures), for earthworks in close proximity to existing Network Utilities;

2.2, 5.1 and Appendix E

Fully addressed in the CEMP, however appendices not assessed as part of this IPR process at this time. Fully addressed in the CEMP, however appendices not assessed as part of this IPR process at this time. Fully addressed in the CEMP, however appendices not assessed as part of this IPR process at this time. Fully addressed in the CEMP, however appendices not assessed as part of this IPR process at this time. Fully addressed in the CEMP, however appendices not assessed as part of this IPR process at this time. Note it appears this appendix reference is incorrect and should be Appendix H

Page 99

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Noted. No change to CEMP required.

This has been corrected to Appendix H in Table 1-4 in the CEMP.

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Designation Condition

CEMP Section

IPRP Comments

Response

(i) Vibration management and monitoring for works in close proximity to existing Network Utilities;

2.2, 5.1 and Appendix E

Fully addressed in the CEMP, however appendices not assessed as part of this IPR process at this time.

This has been corrected to Appendix L in Table 1-4 in the CEMP.

(j) Emergency management procedures in the event of any emergency involving existing Network Utilities;

2.2, 5.1 and Appendix E

5.1, 5.3 and Appendix G

Note it appears this Appendix reference is incorrect and should be Appendix L Fully addressed in the CEMP, however appendices not assessed as part of this IPR process at this time. Unsure if Appendix E is correct reference Fully addressed in the CEMP, however appendices not assessed as part of this IPR process at this time. Unsure if Appendix E is correct reference. Fully addressed in the CEMP, however appendices not assessed as part of this IPR process at this time. Note it appears this appendix reference is incorrect and should be Appendix E

Page 100

| Karangahape Station Early Works

This has been corrected in Table 1-4 in the CEMP.

Reference to Appendix E (records of consultation) has been included in this section of Table 1-4 in the CEMP. Appendix G (Communication and Consultation Plan) provides detail on consultation with NUOs.

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Designation Condition

CEMP Section

IPRP Comments

Response

24.5

Appendix G

Fully addressed in the CEMP, however appendices not assessed as part of this IPR process at this time.

Noted. No change to the CEMP required.

Page 101

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Appendix F: Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Page 102

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Karangahape Station Early Works Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800004 Revision: Final Date: October 2019

Page 1

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Karangahape Station early works Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800004 This document is uncontrolled when printed. This document should be printed in colour

Revision Status Revision

Date

Version details

Prepared By

Approved By

30/09/2019

Draft for Auckland Council and Independent Peer Review

John Daly

Peter Roan

21/10/2019

Final for Auckland Council approval

John Daly

Peter Roan

Approval Status Name/Title

Signature

Date

Prepared by:

John Daly Principal Planner

21/10/2019

Reviewed by:

Kim Hardy Technical Director SIBD Discipline Lead

21/10/2019

Approved by:

Peter Roan Link Alliance â€“ Consents Lead

21/10/2019

Page 2

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Table of contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 6 1.1

Karangahape Station ......................................................................................................... 6

1.2

SIBD DWP Staging.............................................................................................................. 7

1.3

Purpose of the SIBD DWP .................................................................................................. 7

2. SIBD Methodology and CRL Designation Conditions .................................. 8 2.1

SIBD DWP Authors............................................................................................................. 8

2.2

IAIA Guidance for Assessing and Managing Social impacts of Projects (2015) ................... 8

2.3

International Association for Public Participation ............................................................. 8

2.4

CRL Designation Conditions ............................................................................................... 9

2.5

SIBD DWP Review and updates ....................................................................................... 13

3. Karangahape Station Early Works............................................................. 14 3.1

Overview of Works .......................................................................................................... 14

4. Social Impact & Business Disruption Assessment & Community Profile .. 15 4.1

CRL NOR Social Impact Assessment Summary ................................................................. 15

4.2

The Community Profile .................................................................................................... 16

4.2.1.

Description of the Social Environment ...................................................................... 16

4.3

The Demographic Profile ................................................................................................. 18

4.4

Community Context......................................................................................................... 20

4.4.1.

Local Community Planning........................................................................................ 20

4.4.2.

Karangahape Road Enhancements ............................................................................ 21

4.4.3.

Karangahape Road Business Association................................................................... 21

4.4.4.

CRL News Stories ...................................................................................................... 22

5. Consultation and Engagement .................................................................. 23 5.1

Introduction .................................................................................................................... 23

5.1

Establishing the Affected Community.............................................................................. 24

5.2

Engagement with Affected Parties .................................................................................. 25

5.3

Face to Face Engagement with Affected Parties .............................................................. 26

5.3.1.

Engagement Material ............................................................................................... 27

6. The Affected Communityâ€™s Feedback ....................................................... 28

Page 3

6.1

Karangahape Road Business Association ......................................................................... 29

6.2

Residential, Visitor Accommodation and Noise Sensitive Properties .............................. 29

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan 6.3

Commercial and Businesses Community ......................................................................... 30

6.4

Community Organisations / Facilities .............................................................................. 31

6.5

Pitt Street Methodist Church ........................................................................................... 31

6.6

The HUB Open Meeting Session ...................................................................................... 32

6.7

Community Meetings ...................................................................................................... 32

6.8

Community and Business Liaison Group .......................................................................... 33

6.9

Summary of Key Issues and Mitigation............................................................................ 34

7. Summary of Issues Identified and Response Provided in Technical Assessments .................................................................................................... 35 8. Mitigation Implementation Plan............................................................... 37 8.1

Introduction .................................................................................................................... 37

8.2

Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................................................... 37

8.3

Compliance with Designation Conditions ........................................................................ 37

8.4

Continuous Up to Date Engagement................................................................................ 38

8.4.1.

Continuous Up to Date Engagement on Karangahape Road Enhancement Works ..... 38

8.5

Development Response Plan (DRP) ................................................................................. 38

8.6

Site Team Briefings .......................................................................................................... 39

8.7

Noise and Vibration Disruption ....................................................................................... 40

8.8

Traffic Access and Parking Disruption .............................................................................. 40

8.8.1.

Vehicular Access and On Street Parking .................................................................... 40

8.8.2.

Pedestrians and Cyclists............................................................................................ 41

8.8.3.

Public Transport ....................................................................................................... 41

8.8.4.

Construction Traffic .................................................................................................. 41

8.8.5.

Hopetoun Alpha Parking ........................................................................................... 42

8.9

Utility Disruption ............................................................................................................. 42

8.10 Air Quality ....................................................................................................................... 42 8.11 Visual Amenity, Heritage and Landscape......................................................................... 42 8.12 Community Character...................................................................................................... 43 8.13 Diverse Community and Vulnerable Groups.................................................................... 43 8.14 Community Safety ........................................................................................................... 44 8.15 Business Visibility Disruption........................................................................................... 44 8.16 Health and Wellbeing ...................................................................................................... 44 8.17 Business Disruption ......................................................................................................... 44

9. Issues and Public Enquiries ....................................................................... 47 9.1 Page 4

Introduction .................................................................................................................... 47

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan 9.2

Queries and Complaints Process ..................................................................................... 47

9.3

Disputes Resolution and Public Works Act ...................................................................... 47

10. Reporting .................................................................................................. 49 10.1 Community and Business Liaison Group Reporting ......................................................... 49 10.2 Annual Reporting and Monitoring ................................................................................... 49

11. Review ....................................................................................................... 50 Appendix A: Record of CLG, Independent Peer Review and Auckland Council Feedback ......................................................................................................... 51 A1. CLG Comments .......................................................................................... 51 A2. Independent Peer Review Comments ...................................................... 51 A3. Auckland Council Comments .................................................................... 55 Appendix B: Affected Community Feedback from Door Knocking Exercise ... 57 Appendix C: Community Event Letters ........................................................... 91 Appendix D: Engagement Material - Factsheet and Calling Card.................... 93 Appendix E: Meeting Response Recording Sheet with Questions .................. 96 Appendix F: Potential Development Response Measures .............................. 98

Page 5

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

1. Introduction The City Rail Link (CRL) project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line in the vicinity of Mt Eden Station. The CRL also involves the construction of two new underground stations at Aotea and Karangahape and a redeveloped Mt Eden Station (refer to Figure 1-1). The design and construction of the CRL infrastructure between the Aotea and Mt Eden Stations is being delivered by the Link Alliance.

Figure 1-1: CRL Route and Location

This Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan (SIBD DWP) has been prepared in relation to construction of the new Karangahape Station.

1.1 Karangahape Station The Karangahape Station consists of two entrances, one at Beresford Square / Pitt Street and the other at Mercury Lane, linked together by platforms with two mined tunnels approximately 32m below Pitt Street. The Station will also comprise equipment rooms, ventilation systems and emergency egress at both Mercury Lane and Beresford Square / Pitt Street. Given the nature and scale of the Karangahape Station construction, works will be undertaken in a staged manner, involving: · · ·

Page 6

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

1.2 SIBD DWP Staging To reflect the staged construction approach for the Karangahape Station, SIBD DWPs will be developed in stages. This SIBD DWP addresses the Karangahape Station early works, which are described in detail in the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and summarised in Section 2 of this Plan. SIBD DWPs will also be prepared for the main construction works and the public realm reinstatement. It is acknowledged that the staged construction works have the potential to result in cumulative SIBD impacts due to the nature and timescale of the works. Engagement with the affected community therefore covered both the early and main works, with discussion on the approved enabling works associated with the Mercury Lane building demolition (Auckland Council reference OPW60339200) – refer to Section 3.1 of this DWP.

1.3 Purpose of the SIBD DWP This SIBD DWP has been prepared to mitigate and manage potential adverse effects on businesses, residents and community services/facilities during construction of the Karangahape Station early works. In accordance with CRL designation Condition 61.1, the objective of the DWP is: ·

“to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects arising from disruption to businesses, residents and community services/facilities so far as reasonably practicable.”

It identifies mitigation measures that will be undertaken with regards to the following potential adverse social impact and business disruption effects: · · · ·

Disruption to access for residents, community services and businesses; Disruption effects that result or are likely to result in the loss of customers to businesses as a result of the construction activities; Loss and / or relocation of community facilities and the catchments associated with these facilities; and Loss of amenity for residents, community services and businesses as a result of construction activities.

The SIBD DWP has been prepared in consultation with the community, business owners, affected parties and affected in proximity parties. This SIBD DWP addresses the requirements of CRL designation Condition 61 and will be implemented throughout the construction period. The SIBD DWP forms part of the CEMP for the Project.

Page 7

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

2. SIBD Methodology and CRL Designation Conditions 2.1 SIBD DWP Authors This SIBD DWP has been prepared by John Daly (co-author) and Kim Hardy (co-author and technical reviewer). John holds a MA (Hons) in Sociology and a MSc in Urban and Regional Planning. He is a Chartered Member of the Royal Town Planning Institute and a member of the New Zealand Association for Impact Assessment. John has 12 years of professional experience including the preparation of Town Centre Impact Assessments, Environmental Impact Assessment Screening and Statements of Community Involvement for commercial, industrial and hotel development in London, UK; community consultation and engagement for residential development and to inform planning guidance in Scotland and London, UK. Kim holds a MSocSci (Hons) in Human Geography and Resources and Environmental Planning. She has been a practising planner for 28 years and is experienced in public and stakeholder engagement, assessing social and cultural impacts of land development and infrastructure projects. Kim completed her Masters Thesis on ‘Effective Public Participation and the Resource Management Act 1991’. She has 10 years’ experience as an Independent Hearings Commissioner and Chairperson and is an experienced statutory planning decision maker. She holds full IAP2 Australasia Certification in Engagement. Kim has been a Full Member of the New Zealand Planning Institute for 24 years and is a member of the New Zealand Association for Impact Assessment.

2.2 IAIA Guidance for Assessing and Managing Social impacts of Projects (2015) To ensure effective and robust practices the ‘International Association for Impact Assessment Social Impact Assessment: Guidance for Assessing and Managing the Social Impacts of Projects’ has informed the preparation of this SIBD DWP. This states: ‘Social Impact Assessment (SIA) is now conceived as being the process of identifying and managing the social issues of project development and includes the effective engagement of affected communities in participatory processes of identification, assessment and management of social impacts. Although SIA is still used as an impact prediction mechanism and decision making tool in regulatory processes to consider the social impacts in advance of a permitting or licencing decision, equally more important is the role of SIA in contributing to the ongoing management of social issues throughout the whole project development cycle, from conception to post closure.’ 1

2.3 International Association for Public Participation To ensure effective communication and consultation practices the ‘International Association for Public Participation’ core values and engagement spectrum 2 have also been taken into account for the purposes of engagement with the affected community.

International Association for impact Assessment Social impact Assessment, Guidance for Assessing and Managing the Social Impacts of Projects, April 2015, page iv. 2

https://www.iap2.org.au/About-Us/About-IAP2-Australasia-/Spectrum

Page 8

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Table 2-1 identifies examples of how the CRL engagement approach aligns with the IAP2 spectrum. Those in bold have been employed directly in the preparation of this SIBD DWP. Table 2-1: Alignment with IAP2 Public Participation Spectrum

Inform

Consult

Involve

Collaborate

Empower

Website updates

Social impact assessments

Social media

Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG)3

Business Forum

Mana Whenua Forum

Community information pop-up hub

Local Boards

Opportunities for collaboration making will be identified through the engagement activities with affected parties and stakeholders, particularly in relation to the DRP.

Project newsletters and factsheets

Project enquiry email and phone line

Construction notifications

Stakeholder workshops, presentations and briefings

Advisory Boards / Steering Groups

Opportunities for communitydecision making will be identified in relation to elements of the DRP, such as the selection of community artists for hoardings.

Refer to the Karangahape Station early works Communication and Consultation Plan (CCP) for further details on the Community Consultation Plan.

2.4 CRL Designation Conditions The CRL Notice of Requirement (NoR) process was completed in November 2015 and confirmed the extent of the six CRL designations and associated conditions for the location of the station and tunnel alignment from Britomart to Mt Eden. A Social Impact Assessment (SIA) was prepared in support of that NoR process in 2013 4. CRL designation Condition 61 require the preparation of the SIBD DWP prior to construction work commencing. Table 2-2 identifies the CRL designation condition relevant to this SIBD DWP and where the relevant sections of Condition 61 are addressed in this document.

The designation conditions reference the Community Liaison Group (CLG), while the resource consent conditions reference the Community and Business Liaison Group. CLG has been used through this DWP as a common reference for the same group. 3

City Rail Link Notice of Requirement: Social Impact Assessment Prepared for Auckland Transport by Beca Carter Hollings and Ferner Ltd 18 April 2013 [also dated 19 April 2011]. Page 9 | Karangahape Station Early Works 4

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Table 2-2: CRL Designation Conditions and Location in Plan

Condition

Reference 61.1

61.2

The Requiring Authority shall prepare a Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP. The objective of the Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP is to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects arising from disruption to businesses, residents and community services/facilities so far as reasonably practicable. To achieve this objective the Requiring Authority shall engage a suitably qualified specialist(s) to prepare a Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP to address the following specific issues:

61.3

8.3, 8.4, 8.8

b) How the disruption effects that result or are likely to result in the loss of customers to businesses as a result of construction activities will, so far as is reasonably practicable, be avoided, remedied or mitigated; c) How the loss and/or relocation of community facilities and the loss or change to catchments associated with these facilities as a result of the property acquisition process particularly to the Chinese Community Centre and Life Centre Church and the temporary loss of car parking at Hopetoun Alpha will be mitigated; and d) How loss of amenity for residents, community services and businesses as a result of construction activities will be or has been mitigated through the CEMP and other DWPs. The Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP shall be prepared in consultation with the community, community facility operators, business owners, affected parties and affected in proximity parties to:

8.3, 8.15, 8.17 8.8.5

8.3 - 8.14, 8.16

a) Understand client and visitor behaviour and requirements and operational requirements of community facilities and businesses;

Sections 4, 5 and 6

b) Identify the scale of disruption and adverse effects likely to result to businesses, residents and community services/facilities as a result of construction of the City Rail Link;

Sections 4, 5 and 6

Assess access and servicing requirements and in particular any special needs of residents, community facilities and businesses; and

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Matter Addressed in another Project DWP

2.1

a) How disruption to access (including pedestrian, cycle, passenger transport and service/private vehicles) for residents, community services and businesses as a result of construction activities will, so far as is reasonably practicable, be avoided, remedied or mitigated;

Page 10

Section where addressed in this DWP Whole document

8.8

TAP DWP

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Condition

Condition

Reference d) To develop methods to address matters outlined in (b) and (c) above, including: i. The measures to maximise opportunities for pedestrian and service access to businesses, residents and social services/facilities that will be maintained during construction, within the practical requirements of the Transport, Access and Parking conditions (Conditions 25 to 30) and the Transport, Access and Parking DWP; ii. The measures to mitigate potential severance and loss of business visibility issues by way-finding and supporting signage for pedestrian detours required during construction;

61.4

Section where addressed in this DWP 8.8

8.5, 8.15

TAP DWP

iii. The measures to promote a safe environment, taking a crime prevention through environmental design approach;

8.13, 8.14

iv. Other measures to assist businesses and social services/facilities to maintain client/customer accessibility, including but not limited to client/customer information on temporary parking or parking options for access;

Section 8

TAP DWP

v. Other measures to assist residents, businesses and social services/facilities to provide for service delivery requirements;

8.4, 8.5, 8.8, 8.13, 8.17

TAP DWP

vi. The process (if any) for re-establishment and promotion of normal business operation following construction;

N/A in this case

vii. If appropriate and reasonable, requirements for temporary relocation during construction and/or assistance for relocation (including information to communities using these services and facilities to advise of relocations); and

N/A in this case

viii. The measures to remedy and mitigate the disruption impacts to the community as a result of any closure and/or relocation of community services and facilities required by the Project.

N/A in this case

The Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP shall include:

Section 4

a) A summary of the findings and recommendations of the Social Impact Assessment report (2013); b) A record of the consultation undertaken with the community including specific access and operational requirements of individual businesses and residents including, if relevant, consultation on the necessity for, and the feasibility of, options and requirements for temporary relocation during construction and/or assistance for relocation); Page 11

Matter Addressed in another Project DWP TAP DWP

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Section 6, Appendix B

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Condition

Condition

Reference c)

An implementation plan of the methods to mitigate the disruption effects (as developed in 61.3 above);

d) Reference to any site/business specific mitigation plans that exist (though these may not be included in the DWP);

e) Cross reference to detail on how the CEMP and DWPs have responded to the issues of resident, business and social service/facility accessibility and amenity; f)

Details of on-going consultation with the local community through the Community Liaison Groups to provide updates and information relating to the timing for project works and acquisition;

Details of best endeavours steps undertaken with regard to acquisition and/or relocation of the Chinese Community Centre and Life Centre Church under the Public Works Act 1981; and

Section where addressed in this DWP Section 8 Sections 6, 7

Sections 7 6.8, 8.4, 9.2 N/A

h) The process for resolution of any disputes or complaints in relation to the management / mitigation of social impacts (including business disruption impacts).

9.3

61.5

In relation to the site at 32 Normanby Road, the Requiring Authority shall consult with sub-lessees in the presence of the landowner and head lessee when developing site/business specific mitigation plans, unless the sublessee(s) request otherwise.

N/A

61.6

The Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP shall be implemented and complied with for the duration of the construction of the City Rail Link and for up to 12 months following the completion of the Project if required.

8.3

61.7

Suitably qualified independent specialists for the social impact and business disruption mitigation (whose appointment shall be agreed by the Council) shall peer review the Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP pursuant to Condition 11.

61.8

The Requiring Authority shall prepare an annual report on the identification, monitoring, evaluation and management of the effects outlined in the Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP together with a summary of matters raised by the community, and how these have been responded to. The report shall be presented to the Community Liaison Groups.

Page 12

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Appendix A

Sections 10 and 11

Matter Addressed in another Project DWP Construction Noise and Vibration (CNV) DWP - Site Specific CNV Management Plans

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

2.5

SIBD DWP Review and updates

This SIBD DWP is a live document that will be reviewed at least annually, or as a result of a material change to the project, or to address unforeseen adverse social impact and business disruption effects arising from construction, or unresolved complaints.

Page 13

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Karangahape Station Early Works

3.1 Overview of Works Early works will be undertaken at the new Karangahape Station site to enable and provide for the subsequent main construction works. The early works are detailed in the CEMP. An overview of the works is provided in Table 3-1. Table 3-1: Overview of Karangahape Early Works

Works location

Overview of construction activities

Beresford Square / Pitt Street

· Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Beresford Square / Pitt Street; · Removal of street trees and the demolition of the café / toilet in Beresford Square; · Establishment of the Beresford Square Construction Support Area to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.; · Closure of Beresford Square to vehicle traffic (other than construction traffic) while retaining pedestrian and cycle access; and · Removal of existing street furniture where required (such as seating and street lighting to be replaced with temporary lighting).

Mercury Lane

· Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Mercury Lane; · Establishment of the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.; and · Establishment of the Mercury Lane temporary working platform.

It should be noted that the demolition of buildings and above ground structures within the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area is authorised by the CRL Enabling Work Outline Plan – Karangahape Road Demolition Works (OPW60339200), confirmed in June 2019. A separate SIBD report was prepared for the demolition works.

Page 14

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

4. Social Impact & Business Disruption Assessment & Community Profile 4.1 CRL NOR Social Impact Assessment Summary A Social Impact Assessment5 (SIA) was submitted and approved as part of the NoR for CRL and is listed in Condition 1 of the CRL designation. The purpose of the NoR SIA was to provide an assessment of the likely social consequences (benefits and dis-benefits) that may arise due to the CRL project. The four key potential areas of adverse social impacts arising from the construction of the CRL were identified in that SIA report as including: 1. Loss or disturbance of community facilities and social services as a result of the proposed works could disrupt people’s way of life and community cohesion. 2. Severance between communities, facilities, residents and businesses, particularly during construction, could impact on people’s way of life and community cohesion. 3. Physical impacts of construction works could impact on people’s health and wellbeing (e.g. as a result of nuisance or disturbance from construction noise, vibration or other discharges, or from the uncertainty/frustration arising from changes in accessibility for people living and working in the areas affected by the construction activity). 4. Impacts on individual tenants and landowners, resulting from issues associated with property purchase, relocation and/or displacement. Additionally, the Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) referred to in the SIA identified that the adverse temporary effects all relate to the management of the existing road transport network during construction. The key adverse temporary effects include disruptions or inconvenience to: · · · · · ·

Emergency service vehicles; Bus operators and users (private and public); Private vehicles; Couriers and delivery vehicles; Freight vehicles; and Cyclists and pedestrians.

For the mitigation of potential adverse effects, a number of mitigation methods were identified. For several specifically identified social impacts, the development of a Social Impact Management Plan was recommended, in conjunction with on-going consultation with key stakeholders and communities of interest. In line with those recommendations and the requirements of the designation condition, this SIBD DWP has been prepared and has been informed by engagement with the affected community. Wider communication will also be undertaken and be led by the Link Alliance’s Communication and Engagement team, in accordance with the CCP. Section 6 provides an overview of the DWPs and MPs that have been prepared is support of the Karangahape early works Outline Plan and cross references the relevant sections which set out mitigation measures.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan The SIA also identified a number of positive effects associated with CRL once the line and stations are operational, including: · Increased train capacity improving accessibility and connectivity for people. · Increased commuter access stimulating economic development and enhancing commuter well-being. · Being a catalyst for inner city redevelopment, resulting in land use intensification and regeneration of central city areas. With positive effects including improved quality of environment, economic opportunities and opportunities for increased community development in the city centre area. It is acknowledged that these effects may not be apparent or will not be tangible to the affected community during the construction process of the early works for Karangahape Station.

4.2 The Community Profile 4.2.1. Description of the Social Environment SIA Social Environment A desktop scoping and profiling exercise was undertaken as part of the NoR SIA. The findings are summarised below, and a fresh exercise was undertaken for this SIBD discussed further below. The NoR SIA identified land uses adjoining and within the wider CRL designation corridor are generally characterised as comprising commercial and office buildings; apartments and visitor accommodation; warehouses and storage facilities; entertainment centres and restaurants; civic buildings and community centres; and residential accommodation. A summary of the NoR SIA Land Use Survey results characterised the Karangahape Road area as: · · ·

The dominant land use identified in this area was Retail, including food establishments on Karangahape Road and in the Mercury Plaza food court Other activities included the Green Party headquarters for Auckland Central and Hopetoun Alpha, a ‘commercial’ event facility (e.g. wedding and event venue) and identified heritage building.

The NoR SIA identified Social Infrastructure within the Karangahape Road Area as follows: Health Services · ·

Karangahape Road Health Centre (283 Karangahape Road) Physio Solutions (184 Karangahape Road) *

Places of Worship · ·

Pitt Street Methodist Church (Pitt Street) The Church (Karangahape Road)

Emergency Services · · Page 16

Central Fire Station (Pitt Street) St Johns Ambulance Station (Pitt Street) | Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Community Facilities/Sport and Recreation · · · · · ·

The YMCA complex (corner Vincent Street, Greys Avenue, Pitt Street) Hopetoun Alpha function and event centre 20 (Beresford Square, western side of Pitt Street) Green Party Auckland Office (17 Mercury Lane)*** Mercury Plaza Food Court (23-31 Mercury Lane) Myers Park (in the vicinity of the Karangahape Station area) *

Following the more recent site visits and research, the social infrastructure within the affected community area was refined and those activities denoted by an asterisk ‘*’ have been omitted from SIBD engagement as they are not within close geographical proximity of the works. It is also noted that an Outline Plan for demolition of the Mercury Plaza Food Court ‘**’ has already been confirmed and no further engagement was therefore undertaken with this party. The Green Party Auckland Office ‘***’ has relocated in anticipation and to ‘make way for this vital piece of infrastructure for Aucklanders6’. SIBD Social Environment The NoR SIA description of the social environment is generally consistent with the current characteristics of the community affected by the Karangahape Station early works. However, for the purposes of preparing this SIBD DWP, a fresh assessment was undertaken based on desktop research, site visits and face to face meetings, to ensure that the potentially impacted community profile is accurate and specific to the Karangahape early works. The Karangahape Road area has a long-established history in the Auckland Region and a rich built heritage (refer to the Built Heritage section of the Historic Character DWP). With its combination of business and residential activities, together with the eclectic mix of entertainment, retail and food outlets it is well known as a vibrant, creative community with a strong sense of local identify. This is evident in the recent initiatives run by the Karangahape Road Business Association (KRBA) – art exhibitions and street enhancements. The area has a vibrant night time economy with pubs, night clubs, including LGBT venues and restaurants operating into the evening and early hours of the morning. LGBT venues play an important function for the Auckland LGBT community. Adult entertainment premises also operate on extended hours within the area. Karangahape Road was one of the first central city locations to see regeneration of commercial buildings for residential use and for the construction of bespoke residential apartments. There are a number of residential apartments in the area, including apartments on Karangahape Road and on and around Beresford Square. The strong sense of local identity and the mix of businesses and services present in the area was highly valued by a number of the community when consulted about the CRL project. The community is in the process of experiencing change with the Karangahape Road Enhancement works which are progressing along Karangahape Road jointly by Auckland Council and Auckland Transport (AT).

https://www.greens.org.nz/news/press-release/green-party-pops-champagne-crl-announcement Page 17 | Karangahape Station Early Works 6

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan The area is also known for being occupied by a steady flow of homeless residents and a number of community services are established locally to provide support. For example, the Pitt Street Methodist Church supports the operation of a mobile showering facility from its carpark on a weekly basis and the Merge Café (a social enterprise providing subsidised meals) which is located outside the affected community area but is a member of the CLG. The area also accommodates important social infrastructure for vulnerable groups not identified in the earlier NoR SIA. This includes: ·

NZ Prostitutes Collective (2 Canada Street) - The Collective is run by sex workers and advocates for the rights, health, and well-being of all sex workers. Its services focus on workers’ rights, HIV and STI prevention, and education. It also provides safer sex supplies to sex workers and offers free sexual health clinics at community bases. Auckland Drug Information Outreach (ADIO) Trust (12 East Street) - an independent public health unit funded by the Ministry of Health. The primary purpose is to prevent the spread of Blood-Borne Viruses such as HIV/AIDS, Hep B and Hep C, amongst Injecting Drug Users. ADIO regards confidentiality as the cornerstone of its service. It provides for the safe disposal of injecting equipment which is critical in protecting the wider community from the spread of blood borne viruses through needle stick injury from discarded needles and syringes.

4.3 The Demographic Profile Desktop research was also undertaken, drawing on the Waitematā Local Board Area Demographics Report Card 2016, Statistics New Zealand 2013 Census data and the KRBA website to further inform our understanding of the community profile. Waitematā Local Board Area Demographics Report Card 2016 The key facts contained in the Waitematā Report include: · · ·

It is a significant centre of employment which is mostly concentrated in the City Centre; The area accounts for 24 per cent of all employment and 15 per cent of all businesses; The area is under-represented in older and younger age groups and over-represented in age groups between 20 and 34 years, resulting in a median age of 30.4 years compared to a regional median of 35.1 years; and More than a third (43%) of local residents were born overseas, and of that group, 63 per cent had been in New Zealand for less than ten years. The largest group born overseas was from the People’s Republic of China and the United Kingdom, with smaller groups from India and Korea commerce and the area is home to a large tertiary and private education sector 7.

New Zealand 2013 Census data It is recognised that the Waitematā Report Card data related to a significantly larger area than the Karangahape early works. The 2013 Census data has been reviewed and provides a more localised understanding of the works area. This showed that the area has a resident population of 966 people and 381 households with an average age of 31 (refer to Figure 4-1 and Table 4-1).

An Interpreter was available to attend meetings if requested/required. | Karangahape Station Early Works

Page 18

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Figure 4-1: 2013 Census Mesh blocks for Project Area Table 4-1: Census Mesh block data for Project area

Mesh Block 0412200 – Mercury Lane to Upper Queen St 0412100 – East Street to Mercury Lane 0412000 – South Street to Karangahape Road 0435604 – Beresford Square, Samoa House Lane, K Rd 0435603 – Samoa House Lane, Beresford Square, Day Street 0436002 - Day Street to Hopetoun Street 0435500 – Beresford Square Pitt St 0435700 – K Rd to Poynton Terrace 0435400 – Poynton Terrace to Greys Ave Totals / Average

Population

Median Age

Households #

303

29.6

102

37.5

33.2

28.5

31.2

231

29.3

123

84 51

28.8 31.2

36 15

30.7

966

31.1

381

Karangahape Road Business Association (KRBA) The KRBA website has been reviewed for information on the range of business and community organisations8 which include: · · ·

Art & Fashion; Entertainment - Shows and Music and Adult Entertainment; Hospitality - Food Courts and Restaurants, Cafes, and Bars;

http://kroad.com/businesses/ Page 19 | Karangahape Station Early Works 8

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan · · ·

Necessities – Accommodations, Health and Medicines, and Services e.g. laundries and banks, and Superettes; Professional Services - Personal Care, Non-profits e.g. religious bodies and community groups, professional services e.g. architects and marketing, and trades; and Retail, a wide range of stores.

The website also provides an overview of car parking 9 sites in the Karangahape Road Area (refer Figure 4-2). In the course of preparing the SIBD DWP, the KRBA Manager was consulted with (see Section 6.1).

Figure 4-2: Extract from KRBA website – Table on Car Parking in the Karangahape Road Area

Feedback from engagement with KRBA is discussed at Section 6.1.

4.4 Community Context 4.4.1. Local Community Planning The key local planning document is the ‘Karangahape Road Plan 2014-2044’ which was developed by the Waitematā Local Board after receiving feedback from iwi, the KRBA, community groups, residents and other key stakeholders. The purpose of the Karangahape Road Plan is to provide a clear planning framework to guide how the Karangahape Road area could grow and change over the next 30 years. The document identifies six key moves that are integral to change in the area: 1. Showcase the Karangahape Road area as the creative, edgy fringe of the city centre.

https://kroad.com/manage/resources/list-of-parking-spaces-october-2018-1.pdf Page 20 | Karangahape Station Early Works 9

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan 2. Protect, enhance and celebrate Karangahape Road’s historic and cultural heritage, biodiversity and vibrancy. 3. Provide safe and convenient connections in and through the Karangahape Road area. 4. Improve and develop an integrated network of civic and public open spaces in the Karangahape Road area. 5. Create a safe and enjoyable environment to live, work and play in Karangahape Road. 6. Promote the City Rail Link station at Karangahape Road as the catalyst for new investment and growth in the area. Key move 6 demonstrates that the CRL Karangahape Station is anticipated and forms a key part of the 30 year strategy. The Karangahape Road Plan identifies a number of actions for achieving Key Move 6. While these generally relate to wider development opportunities and the operational stage of the station, the actions include: · explore opportunities to capture the benefits of the City Rail Link both during construction and once completed. Each of the key moves have been considered in the development of the Mitigation Implementation Plan set out in Section 7 of this SIBD DWP, including the benefits resulting from the construction works.

4.4.2. Karangahape Road Enhancements Construction of the Karangahape Road enhancements project has commenced. This is a joint project between AT and Auckland Council that aims to preserve the road's unique character, while creating a street environment that supports the local community and meets the needs of a growing population10. Proposed enhancements include walking and cycling facilities along and around Karangahape Road. Construction commenced on Stage 1 of the enhancement works in July 2019 and the indicative date for construction completion is late 2020. The Link Alliance will continue to co-ordinate and work with Auckland Council and AT to manage and mitigate the impacts of two construction projects works and to ensure good communication with businesses, residents and the wider community.

4.4.3. Karangahape Road Business Association The KRBA was founded in 1924 and aims to foster the economic development of the K' Road precinct. It does this through delivering a comprehensive programme of marketing and events, networking opportunities and advocacy to local bodies. It is a partner with Auckland Council in its city-wide Business Improvement Programme and derives its income from a separate rate collected by council from business and property owners within its precinct boundary and returned to the KRBA. The KRBA’s services include: · · · ·

Promotion through an annual programme of marketing and events; Business workshops and networking opportunities; Advocacy to local bodies over major works planned for the precinct; Advocacy to local bodies over issues relating to service provision;

https://at.govt.nz/projects-roadworks/karangahape-road-enhancements/ Page 21 | Karangahape Station Early Works 10

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan · · · · · ·

Free listing on the KRBA website; Access to real time pedestrian counts and quarterly retail spending reports; Regular updates on news and activities in the precinct; A point of contact for general business enquiries relating to the precinct; A day security foot patrol between 10am – 6pm; and A night security mobile patrol on Friday and Saturday nights from 10pm – 3am augmented by a Barwatch service from 10pm – 4am.

4.4.4. CRL News Stories Recent news articles were also reviewed to understand issues that have been raised in the media by or about the affected community. Articles in relation to works on Albert St were also reviewed to provide additional insights into the impacts of the work. Key articles include: ·

· ·

The closure of a long-time Karangahape Road menswear retailer Leo O’Malley 11. Feedback was obtained from the business and CRL was one factor mentioned, amongst others including the Karangahape Road enhancement works and wider trends in the retail and fashion sectors. A number of news articles that respond positively to the CRL Karangahape Station have been published12. Other articles have addressed requests for compensation and political support for establishing a hardship fund13, in response to business disruption effects perceived to have been caused by the CRL Albert Street works.

Concerns regarding the CRL Albert Street works, located about ½ km to the north of the Karangahape Station, were raised in feedback, particularly in relation to the extent of tunnelling work that would be required. However, the nature of the works, the difference in construction approach and methods between the two areas were explained to affected parties during the engagement.

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=12262661 https://www.nzherald.co.nz/property/news/article.cfm?c_id=8&objectid=12202134, https://www.nzherald.co.nz/property/news/article.cfm?c_id=8&objectid=12201234 13 https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/114603866/auckland-city-rail-link-albert-st-shop-owners-get-backup-in-fight-forpayouts?cid=app-android 11 12

Page 22

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

5. Consultation and Engagement 5.1 Introduction Consultation and engagement was undertaken to inform this SIBD DWP, particularly the mitigation implementation plan (refer to Section 7 of this SIBD DWP). This engagement was structured and informed by understanding of the CRL designation, the proposed works, the affected community and Karangahape Road area. The consultation methodology is set out in the Table 5-1 below: Table 5-1: Consultation Methodology

Task

Activity

1. Develop an understanding of the early works, Karangahape Road, the cumulative effects of the enabling, early and main works and the affected community

· Reviewed the NoR SIA report and AEE; · Reviewed public submissions on the NoR to see who made comment from the Karangahape works area; · Reviewed the SIBD DWP for the Mercury Lane demolition works (OPW60339200), including previous engagement; · Undertook a site walkover; · Karangahape Station Project Manager briefing on works; · Undertook an aerial assessment and property database assessment to understand the ownership and occupancy structure of the impacted area; · Reviewed the Karangahape Road business directory and business websites to understand the scope of services offered and to confirm their proximity to the proposed works; and · Compiled a list of directly affected and affected in proximity properties and map.

Confirm properties that will potentially be affected / affected in proximity by the early works.

2. Liaise with the Karangahape Station Communication and Consultation Manager

· Clarification of existing relationships with property owners and occupiers. · Review of previous engagement and discussion on key issues.

3. Engagement Programme

· Door knocking, arranged meetings, Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG) and Info Hub sessions – refer to Table 5-2 for further details of this engagement.

4.Discussion with other Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) and review of other DWPs and MPs

· Discussion with SMEs on potential impacts and any engagement undertaken and to ensure joined up approach to mitigation and identification of impacts. · Establish a coordinated approach to engagement. · Review of draft DWPs

5. Consultation on draft DWP

· Attendance at the Karangahape CLG meeting on 17 September to discuss the plan with, and receive comments/feedback from the CLG. · Independent Peer Reviewer and Auckland Council reviewers.

Page 23

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

5.1 Establishing the Affected Community The methodology for establishing the Affected Community was based upon determining the ‘affected parties’ and ‘affected in proximity parties’ as these terms are used in CRL designation Condition 61.3). This involved: 1. A desktop assessment of the site with proximity to the location of the physical works and with potential property access impacts associated with the works (these were identified as the Directly Affected Areas). 2. A desktop assessment of the activities within proximity of the works where limitations on the road network may impact accessibility to their site (these were identified as the proximity affected areas. 3. Refinement of the parties affected by the works occurred during the door knocking exercise. The SIBD engagement team made judgements on site as to the parties that would potentially be impacted and refined the parties consulted, mainly discounting parties not within the vicinity of the works. Engagement has focused predominantly on the affected community as shown in the purple (affected parties) and blue (affected in proximity parties) areas in Figure 5-1 below. Additional engagement with members of the public was undertaken via the Information Hub and the YMCA was invited to the Beresford Square community event (refer to Section 5.2). Figure 5-1: Engagement Map Showing Affected Parties

Page 24

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

5.2 Engagement with Affected Parties Affected parties were contacted via face to face communications. The engagement included: ·

An arranged meeting took place with one party with an existing and ongoing CRLL and Link Alliance relationships. An arranged meeting took place on 30/08/2019. Door knocking for those with no existing CRLL relationship 14 and who were being approached for the first time. Follow up meetings were arranged on request. Door knocking took place between 19/08/2019 and 20/09/2019. Attendance at an information session held at Beresford Square on 22/08/2019. The information session was aimed at the community as a whole and were attended by local residents, employees of local businesses and passers-by / members of the public. Attendance at two community ‘Meet the Experts’ events at Beresford Square on 11/09/2019 and Cross Street Market on 16/09/2019. These events were publicised by a letter drop and emails to properties surrounding Beresford Square and Cross Street Market. Discussions with members of the CLG meeting on 17/09/2019. The meeting was attended by a variety of SMEs, including the SIBD SMEs.

For affected parties not successfully contacted during the engagement period for this SIBD DWP, a site visit was made to or adjacent to the property. This provided an opportunity to establish the relationship of the property with the works, and to gain an understanding of the potential impacts of the works on the resident, business or community organisation. Further engagement with these parties for the purpose of keeping them informed of the timing, scope and progress of the early of the works progress will be led by the Karangahape Station Communication Team. Engagement will be attended by the Link Alliance SMEs as appropriate, including the SIBD SMEs. Feedback will inform the ongoing work on the Mitigation Implement Plan and Development Response Plan (DRP) set out in Section 7 of this DWP. The approach adopted with respect to engaging with the affected community is set out in Table 5-2 below. Table 5-2: Consultation and Engagement Process

Relationship

Activity

Existing Relationship

· · · · · · · ·

No Existing Relationship

Compile contact database based on information gathered from Tasks 1 and 2 in Table 5-1. Feedback questions developed. Emails sent to database requesting meetings. Attendance at meetings. Feedback documented. Compile contact database based on information gathered from Tasks 1 and 2 in Table 5-1. Feedback questions developed. Door knocking exercise with Residents, Business / Community Organisation Managers and/or Business Owners. Feedback documented.

It is noted that some parties have experienced the impacts of initial investigation works for Karangahape Station or observed works associated with the Aotea Station and these comments were captured as part of the door knocking exercise. Page 25

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Relationship

Activity ·

Information Hub / Community Event

CLG Members

· · · · · · · · · ·

OR Follow up meetings if requested or if Managers and/or Business Owners not available on first visit; or phone calls / emails if affected party contact not apparent during door knocking to arrange meeting. Attendance at meetings. Feedback documented. Feedback questions developed. Identification of parties to be letter dropped and emailed. Arranged for other SMEs and the Karangahape Station Project Manager to attend following a review of feedback received from the affected community to date. SIBD specialists attended the Info Hub. Feedback documented. Feedback questions developed. SIBD specialists attended the CLG and staffed a ‘SIBD’ desk. Feedback documented.

The engagement meetings with CRLL or Link Alliance ‘No Existing Relationship’ parties were led by John Daly and Kim Hardy (co-authors of this DWP) and/or a member of the wider SIBD Engagement Team. In some instances, a qualified noise expert was also in attendance. Where specific areas of concern were identified during the engagement, such as construction traffic, the SIBD team undertook to facilitate a follow up visit with the relevant SME to address the specific issues of concern. Feedback from the meetings is contained within Appendix B.

5.3 Face to Face Engagement with Affected Parties The purpose of the face to face engagement (information hub sessions, door knocking and arranged meetings) was to: 1. Establish positive working relations between the Project community and the Link Alliance as the consortium delivering the early works and future Karangahape Station main works; 2. Inform potentially affected parties of the early works and the proximity to their premises. This discussion and information sought to ensure affected parties understood the work prior to seeking feedback; 3. Obtain feedback from affected parties on the matters identified in CRL designation Condition 61.3, i.e. the type and scale of disruption, specific access and servicing requirements, and client and visitor behaviour and requirements; and 4. Develop avoidance, remediation and/or mitigation measures to address the issues and concerns identified, as far as reasonably practicable. To ensure a level of consistency and that the matters set out in the designation conditions were addressed during the engagement interviews, a series of questions were asked relating to the operation of the business/residential accommodation and specifically about social impacts / business disruption resulting from the early works. The engagement team was briefed on the utility relocation works, the wider works and the purpose of the SIBD DWP, and provided affected parties with an overview of the Karangahape Station early works. Page 26

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Operational Questions: · · · ·

What are your trading days / hours? What are the access arrangements for residents, customers, staff, deliveries? What are the Servicing / Bin Store Arrangements? Any other Operational / Business Requirements?

Managing disruption and social impacts to your business / residential property in relation to: · · · · · ·

Any special access and servicing requirements or special needs; Effects on Customers / business / residential occupier; Effects on amenity (e.g. dust, noise, visual appearance, traffic issues); Business visibility and wayfinding; Safety; and Any other comments on the potential social impacts or business disruption.

A copy of the meeting response recording sheet with questions is included in Appendix E.

5.3.1. Engagement Material The SIBD engagement team received a detailed brief on the Karangahape Station Mercury Lane demolition works (approved under OPW60339200 – refer Section 3.1), Karangahape Station early works and the next stage of main Karangahape Station construction works prior to commencing engagement. The SIBD Engagement team took plans on-site of the early and main works to brief the affected community. This engagement included details of the main works, which will form part of a separate OPW and SIBD DWP, and the Mercury Lane demolition works. Copies of the Karangahape Station information factsheet and / or the calling cards (refer to Appendix D) were left with each affected party were provided to owners/occupiers not present at the time of door knocking. These included details of the information hub.

Page 27

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

6. The Affected Communityâ€™s Feedback Feedback, via a door knocking exercise, was received from owners or occupiers (affected parties) of 86 properties within the affected community. This feedback exercise was spread across the geographical area of the works and was obtained predominantly from business owners or managers and residential property manager and available residents. Further feedback was obtained from residents, members of the public and local businesses via the Information Hub, CLG and Community Events. In addition to meeting affected parties, an understanding of the impacts has been gained from a review of the other Karangahape Station early works DWPs and discussion with the respective SMEs, including transport and acoustic specialists, and the feedback received as part of the approved SIBD DWP for the Mercury Lane demolition works (OPW60339200). Figure 6-1 provides an overview of the key concerns and the location of the parties consulted. The majority of affected parties are concerned about combinations of issues. Appendix B identifies the affected parties and summaries the individual feedback received.

Figure 6-1: Overview of Key Concerns within the Affected Community

The level of engagement is considered appropriate and enabled the SIBD SMEs to identify Social Impact and Business Disruption concerns and issues. The concerns and issues raised by affected parties are discussed further below. Page 28

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

6.1 Karangahape Road Business Association The SIBD team met with the KRBA prior to commencing meetings with affected businesses and residents to draw on the expertise and insight that the business association has of the Karangahape Road, the wider area and particularly the affected community. Key insights included: · · · · ·

KRBA has worked closely with Auckland Transport, including on the DRP to the Karangahape Road Enhancement Works. KRBA has led on the DRP for the enhancement works and has run events such as ‘Connect Business’ and is keen to be involved with the DRP for the CRL Karangahape Station works. Communication and information are very important, and the Link Alliance needs to be proactive in providing information and a timetable. Face to Face communication is highly valued by the local community. The KRBA runs a range of events, and there are a number of events organised by the wider community. The construction team needs to work around events, such as the Karangahape Road Festival (First Thursday in December) and Pride events (February).

6.2 Residential, Visitor Accommodation and Noise Sensitive Properties Residential and visitor accommodation properties along the area of works include: · · ·

Apartment blocks located on Beresford Square and Karangahape Road. Smaller scale residential units on East Street and an apartment in Cross Street. BK Hostel.

Residential and visitor accommodation properties within the affected community were engaged with via a door knocking exercise targeted at the property manager or residents (selected) available at the time of door knocking. To ensure engagement with a wider sample of residents the SIBD Engagement Team attended an information hub session and also the community events at Beresford Square and Cross Street Market. Residents generally welcomed the early engagement and sought on-going and regular communication so that they can understand and plan ahead for noise and other potential disruption associated with the early works. A number of property owners were also positive about the Karangahape Station, particularly the redevelopment of Beresford Square. Property owners recognised the placemaking potential of CRL, the improvement in connectivity and also speculated on the potential to increase property values 15. Issues of concern for residents included: ·

A key SIBD issue identified was the potential for construction noise impacts. In recognition of this as a likely issue SIBD SMEs were accompanied with an Acoustic SME to respond directly to noise and vibration concerns. Two property owners raised concerns that noise and disruption would lead to tenants vacating the property. Noise issues were discussed with the Acoustic SME.

No advice or information was given on property values as part of the SIBD engagement. Page 29 | Karangahape Station Early Works 15

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan ·

Concerns about the loss of pedestrian and vehicular access to properties, including private car parks, and road diversions that would be required. Residents were informed of the proposed Traffic Management Plans relating to road diversions and the intention to retain pedestrian access to properties. Concerns around the position of hoardings and passage ways/diversions being unwelcoming to walk along.

6.3 Commercial and Businesses Community Commercial businesses, including retail, offices, pubs, clubs and restaurants, within the affected community were engaged with via a door knocking exercise targeted at the business manager or owner available at the time of door knocking. To ensure engagement with a wider sample of businesses and residents the SIBD Engagement Team attended an information hub session and also the community events at Beresford Square and Cross Street Market. Karangahape Road The businesses located on Karangahape Road and not in immediate proximity to the construction works were generally positive about the CRL project and were welcoming of the early engagement and notice of the works. Ongoing and proactive communication was identified as the key mitigation measure. Mercury Lane / East Street Businesses on Mercury Lane identified the benefits of additional workers in the area being a potential source of new customers. However, concerns were raised in terms of the impacts from the loss of on-street car parking for customers and loading areas. Construction traffic was also a concern. The TAP DWP and the approach to mitigation was discussed with businesses and changes to loading bays and the closure of car parks will be further communicated to businesses. Noise disruption was a key concern for offices and the ability to continue working, whilst the impact of dust was raised by one business (a tattoo parlour). Noise issues were discussed with the Acoustic SME and the approach to dust suppression was also discussed. Beresford Square / Pitt Street Businesses on Beresford Square raised a range of issues due to the proximity, scale and nature of the works. Issues included: · · · · ·

The proximity of hoarding and the impact on the appearance of the street. The need to maintain visibility to businesses The loss of outdoor seating areas. The need to retain pedestrian access and private car parking. The impact of noise, vibration and disturbance on the employees from construction work and traffic.

Noise issues were discussed with the Acoustic SME and affected businesses were keen to know about on monitoring of the works and impacts. Businesses were keen to have an input into the DRP.

Page 30

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

6.4 Community Organisations / Facilities Within the affected community two organisations provide services for vulnerable groups (sex workers and drug users) and the need for ease of access and privacy and discretion were raised as potential issues during the construction process. This feedback has been fed back to the Link Alliance and actions have been identified as part of the Mitigation Implementation Plan. Merge Café is keen to ensure that its customers have easy access to the café and are not put off walking. Wayfinding signage used to direct customers would be welcomed. Homelessness was raised by a number of parties within the affected community, from the perspective of keeping sites secure and displacement of rough sleeping locations. Wider engagement with appropriate bodies is a recommended action within the Mitigation Implementation Plan (refer to Section 7). Businesses on Pitt Street, Beresford Square and Karangahape Road raised issues with the existing operational public toilet at the junction of Beresford Square and Pitt Street as a centre for anti-social behaviour. Feedback was mixed on whether the toilet should be retained, as it is an important facility with businesses wanting their toilets to be retained for customers only or removed. The Link Alliance is currently considering the re-location of the toilet within the vicinity of the area in conjunction with Auckland Council. The Neighbourhood Police team were briefed on the early works and made recommendations in terms of: · · · · · ·

Keeping passageways well lit; The use of CCTV Cameras; Keeping sites secure from opportunists and targeted thefts; Awareness training / messaging in relation to crime / anti-social behaviour prevalent at certain locations within the area for staff; An Alcohol Ban is also in place at certain times and locations within the area; and The extent of engagement and communication with the affected community was welcomed.

This feedback will be provided to the Link Alliance team and will also in form the DRP. Feedback has been obtained from the St John’s Ambulance Service and a follow up meeting is being arranged with Fire and Emergency New Zealand. Feedback from the arranged meeting with the owner of the Hopetoun Alpha (and the owner of a number of other properties within the affected community) is set out in Appendix B entry 79.

6.5 Pitt Street Methodist Church The Methodist Church was initially door knocked, and then owing to the matters raised, a follow up meeting was arranged and attended by SMEs. Issues discussed include: ·

Page 31

Construction noise and disruption to church services – especially any weddings or funerals. It was agreed that with advance notice of key services, the Link Alliance shall as far as practicable, manage activities so as not to cause disturbance. Potential impacts of construction vibration on stained glass windows, which was previously removed for works at the Chatham building. The SSNVMP was explained and this will consider vibration effects and vibration monitoring. | Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan ·

· ·

The Church has 3 access points and has offered the option of restricting access if required and practicable. This will require ongoing communication particularly in relation to key services. The Church contacted the South Island Organ Company who subsequently confirmed that the Organ will not be impacted by the scale of vibration anticipated. A request for collateral material for display in the Church to inform parishioners about the early work / CRL and to provide the congregation with regular updates. Material will be provided by the Communications and Engagement Manager.

6.6 The HUB Open Meeting Session The Link Alliance has opened an information hub at the Old Station Bar on Beresford Square as part of its wider engagement strategy for the Karangahape Station works. The SIBD team provided details of the information hub as part of its door knocking exercise and free-standing signage was displayed to attract passers-by. The hub has been open between 5 – 6 pm on a Thursday evening over the SIBD engagement period. Details of the information session on the 22/08/2019 were provided to the affected community as part of the door knocking engagement and SIBD SMEs attended the session. The session was attended by 14 people, including 6 residents, 6 employees of local businesses and 2 passer-bys. Key comments from attendees included: · · · ·

A request for on-going and proactive communication on the project. General support for the station, but requests for details on the final station design, wider redevelopment and completion dates. Information on car parking arrangements and road closures which were provided as part of the discussion. Concerns around noise levels, disruption and the extent of impacts being similar to those experienced on Albert Street (associated with Aotea Station) with SMEs available to discuss with attendees.

6.7 Community Meetings The SIBD team recognised that the Karangahape Station early works have two distinct components, with one focused on Beresford Square and the other on the streets surrounding the works area in Mercury Lane. In order to engage with the affected community on a tailored basis, two community events were organised, targeted for the residents and businesses on Beresford Square (including Pitt Street and Day Street) and those in proximity to the Mercury Lane works at Cross Street Market. A range of SMEs attended to answer questions. The letters issued to affected parties in proximity to Beresford Square and Cross Street Market are contained in Appendix C. The Beresford Square community event raised the following issues: · · Page 32

A request for on-going and proactive communication on the project. General support for the station, but requests for details on the final station, wider redevelopment and completion dates. | Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan · · ·

· ·

Information on car parking arrangements and road closures which were provided as part of the discussion. Confirmation of pedestrian and vehicular access arrangements to private properties. Concerns around noise levels, disruption and the extent of impacts on Albert Street (associated with Aotea Station) with SME available to discuss with attendees. Details of the hoarding and concerns that the Beresford Square will not be appealing during works. The need to minimise impacts on the appearance and attractiveness of Beresford Square and avoid unsafe spaces. The need to maintain visibility to businesses.

The Cross Street Market community event raised the following issues: · · · · · · · ·

Request that the car parking spaces to be lost on Cross Street are reallocated on the street. Concerns about dust impacts on the tattoo parlour where there is a need for a dust free environment. Pedestrian access needs to be maintained and directional signage for customer must be provided. Signage should be provided on alternative routes to the market, including on streets not affected by the work. Keen to provide input into the opportunities for artwork on hoardings. Concern around noise impacts, particularly given the noise of the investigation works which continued until late. Potential business opportunities from the construction works working in the area. Keen to provide ongoing input into the DRP, particularly in relation to signs, hoardings and alternative pedestrian access to Cross Street from Karangahape Road.

6.8 Community and Business Liaison Group The Karangahape CLG has as its focus, the Karangahape Station area from Pitt Street and Beresford Square to Karangahape Road, Mercury Lane and East Street. The CLG is attended by a cross-section of the community, including residents, property owners, businesses and interest groups. The CLG has the following role: · · · ·

An avenue for local community representatives to understand and share what’s happening in their area during construction. Monitor and give feedback on the effects of construction on their community. Provide input into the preparation of a variety of different environmental management plans designed to help manage the impacts of construction (including this SIBD DWP). Review of the DWPs and management plans required by the CRL designation and resource consent conditions.

SIBD SMEs attended the recent Karangahape CLG meeting to listen to the issues raised by members of the CLG in relation to the potential SIBD impacts. These included the following as relevant to this SIBD DWP: · Page 33

A request for notification in relation to conditions being breached. | Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan · · ·

The position of the relocated operational public toilet currently at the junction of Beresford Square and Pitt Street. The cumulative effects of the CRL and Karangahape Road Enhancement works, particularly the impacts on the loss of car parking. Community organisation members are interested in displaying information on CRL at their premises.

6.9 Summary of Key Issues and Mitigation Overall, the SIBD impacts identified from engagement with the affected community and stakeholders can be summarised as follows: · · · · · · · · ·

Page 34

Loss of outdoor seating areas. Dust and noise nuisance associated with construction works in proximity to businesses and residential properties. The need for unimpeded vehicle and pedestrian access to private properties, including private car parks. The impact of the loss of car parking on businesses, i.e. nowhere for customers to park. Ongoing and proactive communication is key. Concerns over tenants leaving premises due to disruption. The need to minimise impacts on the appearance and attractiveness of Beresford Square and avoid unsafe spaces. The need to maintain visibility to businesses. Ensuring placement of construction hoarding doesn’t exacerbate social issues in the area including homelessness and drug use.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

7. Summary of Issues Identified and Response Provided in Technical Assessments In addition to this SIBD DWP, the Karangahape early works Outline Plan is supported by a range of other DWPs and MPs. A number of these documents identify mitigation methods which are relevant to mitigating social impact and business disruption impacts, albeit from a specific subject matter perspective. Table 7-1 summaries the issues raised from the affected community and identifies the relevant DWP/MP. For a complete overview of the DWPs and MPs refer to Section 1.4 â€˜Environmental Sub-Plansâ€™ of the CEMP. Table 7-1: Issues and DWPs Summary

Issue

DWP / MP

Objective

Relevant Section

Air Quality, Dust and Odour Issues.

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

The objective of the Air Quality DWP is to detail the best practicable option to avoid dust and odour nuisance being caused by construction works and to remedy any such effects should they occur.

Sections 4. Monitoring Requirements and 5. Operating Procedures

Built Heritage and character of Karangahape Road and surrounding area.

Built Heritage section of the Historic Character Delivery Work Plan

The objective of the Built Heritage section is to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on built heritage as far as reasonably practicable.

Section 5. Management and Mitigation Measure 6. Building Record and Salvage Strategy

Communication and Engagement

Communication and Consultation Plan

The objective of the Communication and Consultation Plan is to set out a framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation is undertaken with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties during the works.

Sections 6. Communication Strategy and 7. Protocols, Processes and Contract Details. Specific engagement / consultation identified within the relevant DWP

Noise and Vibration

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

The objective of the CNV DWP is to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on human health which may result from the disturbance of contaminated materials during construction.

Sections 6. General Management Procedures and Mitigation Measures, 8. Monitoring and 9. Contingency Measures

Noise and Vibration

Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Appendix F of the CNV DWP

Page 35

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Issue

DWP / MP

Objective

Relevant Section

Area Character and Amenity

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

The objective of the Trees and Vegetation DWP is to avoid the removal of scheduled trees as far as practicable. Where trees are identified for removal, the adverse effects shall be remedied or mitigated.

Section 4. Mitigation Measures

Transport, Access and Parking

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

Sections 4. Proposed Traffic Management and 5. Assessment of Effects

Page 36

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

8. Mitigation Implementation Plan 8.1 Introduction This section of the SIBD DWP sets out the mitigation actions to be implemented in relation to the Karangahape Station early works. These have been developed in part from the feedback from the affected community. Additionally, mitigation of the specific concerns raised by individual affected parties is set out in Appendix B.

8.2 Roles and Responsibilities The key Link Alliance personnel responsible for the delivery of the actions and recommendations in this SIBD DWP are identified in Table 8-1 below. Refer to the CEMP for further detail on roles and responsibilities. To ensure the commitments made through the proposed mitigation measures are implemented, key personnel will be informed of their obligations and responsibilities. In addition, all site personnel, including subcontractors, are responsible for implementing the requirements of this SIBD DWP. Table 8-1: Key Personnel

Role

Name

Karangahape Station Project Manager

Jonathan Hill

Karangahape Station Construction Manager

Dan Trotman

Environmental and Sustainability Manager

Sarah Sutherland

Communications and Engagement Manager

Rachel Blundell

Social Impact and Business Disruption Leads

Kim Hardy / John Daly

Link Alliance Development Response Manager

TBC

Contact details for the Karangahape Station Project Manager and Communications and Engagement Manager are provided in the CEMP. The general public contact details for the Karangahape Station early works are as follows: Âˇ Âˇ

CRL Hotline: 0800 CRL TALK (0800 275 8255) Karangahape Station email address: karangahape@linkalliance.co.nz

8.3 Compliance with Designation Conditions The Link Alliance is required to comply with all relevant CRL designation and resource consent conditions. This will be achieved via the implementation of the CEMP, DWPs and MPs and the ongoing compliance with conditions. An important tool for keeping the affected community informed are the Planning pages of the CRL website. These include an explanation of key planning terms, the designation and resource consent decision notices and documentation for the Karangahape Station area.

Page 37

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan The Communications and Engagement Manager will be responsible for sharing this information and also promoting the CRL website. Responses to queries will be provided by the appropriate SME, via the Communication and Engagement Manager.

8.4 Continuous Up to Date Engagement The need for early, continuous and up to date engagement was raised by a number of the parties consulted with. This will be undertaken by the Karangahape Communication and Engagement team including: a) Courtesy visits and /or email updates to businesses to check in with parties regarding the project. The purpose being to share information so residents and business can plan ahead, and also to obtain feedback on issues of concern and to identify pathways for their resolution in liaison with the appropriate SMEs. b) Project progress meetings undertaken with businesses, to confirm project programme and when scheduled works will take place. c) Provision of advance notice to businesses on the scope of works on a regular basis in line with the CCP. This is necessary to ensure businesses can plan ahead and advise customers in advance of their arrival. Longer term programme of works (and therefore potential for disruption) will also be particularly important for hotels – for example, in terms of managing future conference and event bookings. d) Engagement with the affected community, via: · · · · · ·

Works notification letters Local drop-in sessions Monthly email newsletters On-site signage for key traffic shifts Digital communications including website updates and social media updates to CRLL’s channels on Facebook and Instagram Advertising and campaigns for major traffic shifts.

As part of this engagement the SIBD team in conjunction with the Karangahape Station Communications and Engagement Manager will seek feedback on any emergent social impact and business disruption effects once construction work has commenced.

8.4.1. Continuous Up to Date Engagement on Karangahape Road Enhancement Works The Communications and Engagement Manager and members of the wider project team will liaise with the AT and Auckland Council and adopt a collaborative approach in regard to the Karangahape Road enhancement works and Karangahape Station construction works. The Communications and Engagement Manager, in conjunction with the Communication Team for Karangahape Road enhancement works, will regularly update the affected community on the nature if the work and timeframes.

8.5 Development Response Plan (DRP) A DRP programme for the Karangahape Station early works is being developed in consultation with the KRBA and the affected parties and includes identification of the proposed support actions, the Page 38

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan implementation partners, the timing and frequency of the actions and the DRP Team deliverables and specifications. Some of the actions include physical works such as cleaning ground floor windows, regular access audits, wayfinding signage, business support through trader directories and maps, activations and events. Consumer spending and footfall data will be used to inform the development and on-going implementation of the DRP and other mitigation measures as appropriate. The DRP will also take account of additional construction work in the affected community area, including Karangahape Road enhancement works. Potential DRP measures are set out in Appendix F.

8.6 Site Team Briefings The Karangahape Station Project Manager will brief all site staff, including contractors, prior to their arrival on site and ensure they are fully aware of the project obligations to stakeholders within the area of the construction works (refer to Section 4.2 of the CEMP for further details regarding inductions and training). This will include a requirement to treat adjoining businesses, residents and community groups as ‘project neighbours’ and ensure that, as far as practicable, the contractor’s day to day actions around the periphery of the site and their interface with the public areas is respectful and as considered as possible. This includes, for example, staging work to minimise disturbance that works are co-ordinated on an area basis and that rework and consequential additional disruption is not required. A key issue raised by the community groups and which will be addressed in site team briefings is set out in Table 8-2 below together with the recommended actions. Table 8-2: Community Groups Issues and Actions

Issues

Actions

Respect for diverse and vulnerable community groups

Deliberate briefing of site team, including contractors, prior to commencing works on the unique community characteristics and that Link Alliance will be a considerate and respectful neighbour and members of the community for the duration of the project. Encouraging team participation in significant community events as far as practicable. Briefings will include information on how to handle a range of issues/situations, including: · how to approach rough sleepers; · how to deal with illegal activity; or · dealing with an emergency situation on site. Alternatively, the briefing will include details of available training.

The briefings will be updated to respond to feedback from the continuous engagement with the affected community and following discussions with community organisations which represent and/or support vulnerable groups in the community.

Page 39

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

8.7 Noise and Vibration Disruption Construction noise and vibration will be managed, monitored and mitigated through the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP (CNV DWP) as part of the Karangahape Station early works Outline Plan. Mitigation measures are set out in Section 6 of the CNV DWP. The Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plans (SSCNMP) provided at Appendix F of the CNV DWP will be implemented as required. Refer to the CNV DWP for parties requiring a SSCNMP to be prepared. Construction noise and vibration was raised by a number of parties within the affected community and this is one of the main issues that also contributes to social impact and business disruption. Engagement with affected parties will continue to be undertaken to ensure they have advance notice of construction works commencing and an understanding of noise levels. This engagement will be led by the Karangahape Communications and Engagement Manager in conjunction with the Acoustic SMEs.

8.8 Traffic Access and Parking Disruption Disruption to traffic, access and parking will be managed, monitored and mitigated through the Transport, Access and Parking DWP (TAP DWP). This DWP includes a detailed assessment of the effects and the mitigation measures as summarised below. In addition to the mitigation measures that are set out in the TAP DWP ongoing and proactive communication will be maintained to inform the affected community of access and parking disruption and to allow the community to plan ahead for works. Communication will also be key to avoiding or reducing uncertainty about the nature of the traffic management changes.

8.8.1. Vehicular Access and On Street Parking A key transport mitigation method will be the development of a number of Temporary Traffic Management Plans (TMPs) which will be implemented for the works with evolving traffic management requirements and lane configurations as required. During all stages of the works, all existing traffic movements between public streets will continue to be available except for Beresford Square. Beresford square will still be accessible from Hopetoun Street. Various parking spaces across Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane will be closed during different stages of the early works, including a mobility parking space on Beresford Square. The Mercury Lane utility relocations will occupy sections of the footpath and traffic lanes, however vehicular and pedestrian access will be maintained at all times throughout the works. The affected community will be given advance notice of the closures / diversions and the Link Alliance will engage with Auckland Transport regarding the relocation of the disability parking space to a suitable location. The Link Alliance will also update KRBA so it can update its database of car parking, and provision of signage to identify alternative public car parking will be provided as part of the DRP. Affected businesses and KRBA will also be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area. Notification and communication regarding on-street car parking changes will be undertaken in conjunction with AT, and the Link Alliance will notify the affected community of changes to on-street Page 40

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan car parking, including the relocation of the disability car parking spaces via the communication methods set out at Section 8.4.

8.8.2. Pedestrians and Cyclists All existing pedestrian routes will remain open along Beresford Square, Pitt Street, Karangahape Road and Mercury lane, although occasionally diverted across the street to allow safe movement around the construction zones. Access to local properties and businesses will be maintained at all times. Most of the construction work will require a reduction in width to the footpaths within the various stages. However, a minimum footpath width of 1.5m for pedestrians will be provided. At crossing locations, the width will be large enough to ensure that crossing demand can be accommodated. TMP’s will ensure that all pedestrian routes meet accessibility requirements of Auckland Transport’s Code of Practice, with appropriate ramps and gradients for all users. Wayfinding signage will be provided at each junction along the key pedestrian routes through the works area. Where appropriate, this will provide information on the location and operation of specific buildings or businesses (details will be developed as part of the DRP). Cycle infrastructure in the area includes a cycle ramp located north of the Beresford Square and Pitt Street intersection (outside 59 Pitt Street) and a shared path from this point to the Pitt Street / Hopetoun Street Intersection. During Stage 2 of the Beresford Square / Pitt Street works, the cycle ramp will require closing as it falls within a work zone. This will prevent access from the Pitt Street roadway to the shared path for cyclists. Consultation is being undertaken with AT to agree the relocation of this cycle ramp further north on Pitt Street, thereby avoiding the work zone.

8.8.3. Public Transport During the Beresford Square/ Pitt Street Stage 1 works, AT bus stop #1084 will be relocated to enable smooth operation of the works in Stage 2 (and the main works in 2020). Consultation with AT confirmed that AT is already delivering on the relocation and the bus stop will be moved to outside of the works zone in order to be maintained longer term through future phases of the CRL construction. This will result in less disruption to the bus network and their customers.

8.8.4. Construction Traffic Access for construction traffic and truck loading will occur via the proposed vehicle access points and within the work sites indicated on the temporary traffic management plans. Conflicts between pedestrians, private vehicles and construction activity at each access point will be managed by a Traffic Controller (during active site hours). The truck movements and deliveries will be timed to minimise congestion impacts and disruption to the transport network. Truck movements for the early works are expected to be low, at approximately 10 – 15 deliveries per day. Local access to the work site by over-dimension vehicles will require the use of some local streets that are not designated as over dimension routes. Over-dimensional loads will be managed by limiting the movements of these vehicles outside of the commuter peak periods, and by applying mobile traffic management where these vehicles are required to traverse multiple lanes of traffic.

Page 41

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

8.8.5. Hopetoun Alpha Parking The construction support area on Beresford Square does not encroach on Hopetoun Alphaâ€™s land. The works do not result in the temporary loss of car parking at Hopetoun Alpha and no specific mitigation is required (as required under designation Condition 61.2c when there is a temporary loss of car parking at Hopetoun Alpha).

8.9 Utility Disruption The early works will involve the relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station. All works relating to network utilities will be managed in accordance with operational requirements, safety and integrity of network utilities that are within, or are in close proximity to the works area. To manage social impact and business disruption effects, with respect to utility disruption, the following mitigation will be implemented: a) The Communications and Engagement Manager will liaise with the relevant Network Utility Operators communications teams to ensure consistent messaging regarding outage times is available to the affected community. b) Throughout construction, regular communication between the Link Alliance and the Network Utility Operators will take place to ensure the relocations are progressed effectively and efficiently. c) Where planned service outages are required, the affected community will be notified in line with the CCP and / or the Network Utility Operatorsâ€™ requirements.

8.10 Air Quality An Air Quality DWP (AQ DWP) has been prepared for the early works. This identifies that due to the proximity of pedestrians, residential properties (specifically the residences in the George Court building on Mercury Lane and the houses on East Street) and businesses to the works, all locations within 100 m of the early works construction areas are considered sensitive 16 to the effects of dust that may result from the works. In order to minimise and avoid impacts on the surrounding community, dust and odour mitigation measures are recommended in conjunction with ongoing monitoring and engagement with the community. The measures are set out in detail in the AQ DWP.

8.11 Visual Amenity, Heritage and Landscape The affected community currently benefit from living or working in an area with tree lined streets and a rich built heritage. The early works will impact on 15 trees within and adjacent to Beresford Square and Pitt Street and the historic character of the area with heritage buildings on Pitt Street, Beresford Square and Mercury Lane. The Trees and Vegetation DWP and Built Heritage Section of the Historic Character DWP identify appropriate mitigation to relocate (if feasible) and replace trees and to protect heritage buildings. The MfE has defined the sensitivity of different land uses in its Good Practice Guide for Assessing and Managing Odour in New Zealand. These definitions apply equally to the effects of dust, with both high density residential and commercial/retail areas considered to have high sensitivity. Page 42 | Karangahape Station Early Works 16

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan However, it is recognised that the loss of the trees and impacts on the setting of heritage buildings during the constructions will have a social impact on residents and businesses. The Link Alliance will seek to address impacts on the character of the area through its DRP with regard given to the impacts on heritage and the loss of trees. Through its DRP, the Link Alliance will work with a range of partners, including the KRBA, to leverage key events and festivals and promotional opportunities. The Link Alliance will also identify and implement activation opportunities along the corridor (not necessarily involving replacement trees or alternative soft landscaping), where practicable and safe, during construction. CRLL also undertakes a number of tours along the project corridor each month and this can include discussion on the heritage of the area.

8.12 Community Character Karangahape Road has a distinct character with a strong sense of local identity, with the KRBA referring to is as Aucklandâ€™s most colourful, vibrant and bohemian precinct. It is home to bars and clubs, including LGBT venues, restaurants and a mix of small and independent business. The area is also home to music venues and art galleries and adult entertainment premises. It is recommended that the Link Alliance seek to support the vibrancy of Karangahape Road and particularly initiatives which will help mitigate the impacts of the works, particularly on Beresford Square as part of the DRP, including supporting events and by seeking activation opportunities. There is also the potential to seek synergies with the KRBA DRP for the Karangahape Road Enhancement works and to support its calendar of events.

8.13 Diverse Community and Vulnerable Groups In recognition of the diverse community, which includes LGBT venues, and the potential for vulnerable groups, including drug users and sex workers, to be present within the affected community the construction team will be briefed on the character of the area and the importance of equality and respect prior to commencing work. Opportunities to support or attend existing â€˜Inclusive Community Eventsâ€™, such as those run by the Karangahape Road Business Association17 will be investigated and attended if practicable and relevant. The Link Alliance will discuss the Karangahape Station early works and seek advice from an appropriate body, such as with Auckland Council or Auckland City Mission. The Link Alliance will discuss the measures needed to assist any homeless person displaced as a result of the works and to ensure the construction sites are safe and secure. The Link Alliance will undertake ongoing engagement and proactive communication with the Prostitute Collective and ADIO Trust Needle Exchange, including discussions to ensure on ease of access which was raised in feedback.

https://kroad.com/kba-info/kba-newsletter-december-2018/our-inclusive-community

Page 43

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

8.14 Community Safety The affected community raised existing social issues that are present in the area. The concerns include homeless people sleeping within the area, and drug taking with the toilets on Beresford Square being sited as the focus of the problem by some within the community. The Link Alliance will engage with the KRBA, which provides a security patrol service, the Neighbourhood Police and wider community on the relocation of the public toilets and on the impact of construction works more generally. This includes discussion on the position of the hoardings and features that can be incorporated to maintain visibility and connectivity within the area. Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CEPTED) measures will also be discussed and implemented as part of the DRP.

8.15 Business Visibility Disruption The relationship between patronage levels and line of sight/visibility with businesses or advertising is highly valued by businesses in the project area. Hoardings will be erected on Beresford Square which will reduce the visibility of businesses and the early works will result in the loss of through traffic and customer car parking. The Link Alliance are preparing a DRP, in conjunction with SIBD SMEs, other SMEs, the KRBA and affected businesses, that will address the issue of visibility and actions to be undertaken to enhance visibility for the duration of the works.

8.16 Health and Wellbeing It is recognised that the social impacts and business disruption resulting from the early works could affect the health and wellbeing of the affected community with concerns also raised by some parties during the door knocking. The Link Alliance will support businesses by providing pro-active communication on construction timing and scope of work to minimise risk of anxiety and stress around uncertainty. The Link Alliance will provide information on how to contact practical help agencies - including external helplines, local mental health services, counselling and support agencies. This information will be made available in pamphlet form using multiple channels such as info@cityraillink.govt.nz, the CRL project website, and local project information centres. The Link Alliance will continue to work with the affected community, and through the CLG and the CRL 'Business Forum' it will offer workshops for affected parties to address topics such as coping with stress, resilience, staying positive through difficult times, looking after self, and strategies for managing challenging situations. These workshops would be facilitated by appropriately qualified professionals such as counsellors, psychologists, and business advisors.

8.17 Business Disruption The NoR SIA stated that the CRL project will generate both economic opportunities and impacts. The Assessment of Environmental Effects for the CRL NoR process, prepared in 2012 stated that â€œa key purpose and driver of the CRL is to make the city centre more accessible, resulting in an anticipated Page 44

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan increase in economic performance, and create changes in land use, development opportunities, and intensification (particularly around stations)”. Whilst the CRL project will in the longer term generate positive outcomes both locally and regionally, the businesses consulted to date have identified a number of concerns with the impacts of the construction works on them. The issued raised by affected business parties are summarised in Table 8-3 below together with the recommended actions. Table 8-3: Business Disruption Issues and Actions

Issues

Actions

The loss of tables and chairs for outdoor eating/drinking

· The DRP will identify business support measures, which may include support for businesses to obtain outdoor licenses.

Loss of on street car parking.

· Businesses will be notified of on street car parks being lost. · Wayfinding signage to alternative parking location will be displayed. · The Link Alliance shall only remove spaces on Mercury Land on a staged basis and only as required for the utility works. Refer to the TAP DWP for further details.

Provision of vehicle loading spaces within immediate proximity to businesses.

· The approach to loading bays is set out in the TAP DWP. · Businesses will be notified of changes to the available loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area.

Support community health and wellbeing

· The Link Alliance will support business by providing pro-active communication on construction timing and scope of work to minimise risk of anxiety and stress around uncertainty. · Refer to Sections 8.13 and 8.16.

Visibility of businesses.

DRP: · ‘Open for business’ publicity · Wayfinding strategy · Open mesh fencing · Perspex in permanent hoardings and feature lighting

Regular communications on construction staging and timing and what to expect on weekly, monthly and longer-term basis.

· Implementation of ongoing proactive CCP to assist with forward planning.

Consideration of timing of works to avoid busy periods for restaurants/food outlets.

· Review of construction staging and timeframes for commencement of works in proximity to key businesses as practicable.

Minimise impediments and ease of pedestrian access to premises along Beresford Square / Pitt Street.

· Pedestrian access to be maintained at all times to all properties. Any disruption to be minimised and communicated in advance. · Pro-active pedestrian movement planning – DRPs, including hoarding design, wayfinding signage and feature lighting.

Impacts from construction traffic – noise and congestion.

· Truck movements for the early works are expected to be low, at approximately 10 – 15 deliveries per day.

Page 45

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Issues

Actions Âˇ Local access to the work site by over-dimension vehicles will require the use of some local streets that are not designated as over dimension routes. Over-dimensional loads will be managed by limiting the movements of these vehicles outside of the commuter peak periods, and by applying mobile traffic management where these vehicles are required to traverse multiple lanes of traffic.

Page 46

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

9. Issues and Public Enquiries 9.1 Introduction Public enquires are the responsibility of the Communication and Engagement Team and will be handled in line with the CCP. SMEs, including the SIBD SMEs will be consulted for input to answer public queries as appropriate.

9.2 Queries and Complaints Process Any party is able to make general enquiries via the CRL email info@cityraillink.govt.nz and freephone 0800 CRL TALK (275 8255). Additionally, parties affected by the works will be able to make enquiries via the karangahape@linkalliance.co.nz email which was provided during the consultation exercise undertaken for this SIBD DWP. A record will be kept by the Link Alliance of queries and complaints received. This record will include: · · · · · ·

A description of the complaint; The relevant DWPs the complaint relates to; Mitigation measures undertaken in response to the complaint; Who is responsible for mitigation of the complaint; Timeframes for addressing the complaint, including when the complaint is resolved; and Any affected parties.

Complaints and queries will be reported in the annual report of this SIBD DWP (see Section 10.2 Annual Reporting and Monitoring). In addition, an update meeting will be held with the CLG at least every three months, through which social impact and business disruption concerns can be raised with the SIBD SMEs and other SMEs (refer to Section 7 of the CCP).

9.3 Disputes Resolution and Public Works Act Disputes may arise where a stakeholder affected by an issue considers their complaint has not been resolved. In the context of this project, disputes may arise relating to: · ·

Social impacts and business disruption, including noise and vibration disruption and transport impacts. Claims of financial loss due to construction effects on businesses in proximity to the works.

With respect to SIBD, noise and vibration complaints/disputes, where a resolution through the complaints process cannot be achieved, an Independent Expert specialising in the subject matter will be appointed to review the complaint and arbitrate between the parties. Financial compensation is outside the scope of this SIBD DWP, however any claims received by the Link Alliance will be forwarded to CRLL. A claim for financial compensation under the Public Works Act 1981 is a possibility for affected parties who are significantly affected by the project. The Public Works Act entities affected parties to compensation for ‘substantial injurious affection’, which may include damage to property or losses to a business. Page 47

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

To pursue any claim under the Public Works Act for financial compensation as a result of the project, an affected party will need to lodge their claim with CRLL directly. Further information on the Public Works Act process, including in relation to businesses potentially impacted by the works, is available on the CRL website18 including the following factsheet:

https://www.cityraillink.co.nz/public-works-act

Page 48

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

10. Reporting 10.1 Community and Business Liaison Group Reporting The CLG will meet regularly, at least every three months, over the course of the construction works. Social impact and business disruption concerns raised by affected parties and any complaints received including the mitigation/response package employed will be discussed at the CLG. CLG members will have the opportunity to raise any concerns or requests for additional mitigation.

10.2 Annual Reporting and Monitoring The Link Alliance will be responsible for the implementation of the measures included in the SIBD, including the Mitigation Implementation Plan (Section 7) and the DRP (Section 8.5). The SIBD SMEs will prepare an annual report on the identification, monitoring, evaluation and management of the effects outlined in this DWP, along with a summary of any comments or complaints raised by the community, including how these have been addressed. This information will be available to affected parties through the annual report which will be made available on the CRL website. The Link Alliance must provide monthly reporting to Auckland Council, demonstrating how the works continue to be undertaken in accordance with all the relevant management plans and CRL consent conditions. If issues raised are significant and require a revision to this SIBD DWP, including the mitigation implementation plan, the DWP will updated and submitted to Auckland Council for approval. This will be in addition to the regular liaison and engagement with the affected community via the proposed business forum and the CLG to discuss issues, including the implementation of the Mitigation Implementation Plan and the DRP. The Link Alliance Development Response Manager will also undertake a weekly audit of the construction areas and resolve any key issues identified with the construction team.

Page 49

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

11.

Review

This SIBD DWP will be updated, with the necessary approval, over the course of the Project to reflect material changes associated with changes to construction methods, the natural environment or due to unresolved complaints. Approval from Auckland Council will be required for any relevant revisions of the SIBD that are of a material nature. A review of the SIBD DWP by the SMEs will be undertaken at least annually and will take into consideration: · · · · · · · · · ·

Compliance with the designation or consent conditions, the CEMP, DWPs and EMPs (including site specific plans) and material changes to these plans Any significant changes to construction activities or methods Key changes to roles and responsibilities within the Project team Changes in industry best practice standards Changes in legal or other requirements (social and environmental legal requirements, consent conditions, relevant policies, plans, standards, specifications and guidelines) Results of inspections, monitoring and reporting procedures associated with the management of adverse effects during construction Comments or recommendations from Auckland Council regarding the CEMP, DWPs and MPs Matters raised by affected parties/the affected community and the CLG. The annual report and CLG reports. Unresolved complaints and any response to complaints and remedial action taken to address the complaint.

The review will meet the requirements of the relevant designation conditions. Reasons for making changes to the SIBD DWP will be documented. A copy of the original SIBD DWP and subsequent versions will be kept for the Project records and marked as obsolete. Each new / updated version of the SIBD DWP will be issued with a version number and date to eliminate obsolete SIBD DWP documentation being used. A summary of the review process will be provided annually to Auckland Council and made available to Council on request.

Page 50

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Appendix A: Record of CLG, Independent Peer Review and Auckland Council Feedback A1. CLG Comments A Karangahape CLG meeting was held on 17th September to discuss the Karangahape early works and for the CLG to provide comments / feedback on the CEMP and sub-plans, including this SIBD DWP. Verbal comments were received from the CLG on this SIBD DWP as follows: CLG Member

Comment

Response

Pitt Street Methodist Church

· A request for notification in relation to conditions being breached. · The position of the relocated operational public toilet currently at the junction of Beresford Square and Pitt Street. · The cumulative effects of the CRL and Karangahape Road Enhancement works, particularly the impacts on the loss of car parking.

· No changes as addressed in Sections 8.3 - Compliance with Designation Conditions and 8.4 - Continuous Up to Date Engagements. · No changes as addressed in Section 8.14 Community Safety. · Refer to Section 8.4.1. · Continuous Up to Date Engagement on Karangahape Road Enhancement Works.

Pitt Street Methodist Church / Merge Café

· Both are interested in displaying information on CRL at their premises.

· Noted and this feedback has been passed to the Communication and Engagement Manager to provide information in line with the CCP

Merge Café

· Keen to ensure that its customers have easy access to the café and are not put off walking. · Wayfinding signage used to direct customers would be welcomed.

· Refer to Section 8.5 which includes reference to wayfinding signage and Appendix F: Potential Development Response Measures

A2. Independent Peer Review Comments An Independent Peer Review of the SIBD DWP was undertaken by Dr Gillian Stewart from CoCreationz Ltd. The comments received are as follows:

Page 51

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Independent Peer Review Comments

Response

1) Designation Condition 61.8 states that “the Requiring Authority shall prepare an annual report on the identification, monitoring, evaluation and management of the effects outlined in the Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP together with a summary of matters raised by the community, and how these have been responded to”. This is an important data source providing cumulative identification and management measures of ongoing SIBD effects. The point of the designation condition is to ensure that SIBD DWPs are ‘living documents’ and they should inform implementation and monitoring and reporting, as well as the preparation of each new CEMP and DWPs.

This feedback is noted and aligns with Sections 2.5 - SIBD DWP Review and Updates and 10.2 Annual Reporting and Monitoring. Feedback received on the early works will inform the preparation of the Karangahape Station main works SIBD DWP (that forms part of a separate Outline Plan for those works).

2) I am deeply concerned that the Link Alliance is focused disproportionately upon the prediction and management/ mitigation of identifiable SIBD impacts at the expense of comprehensive monitoring and analysis of whether or not these measures are working as intended. This concern is shared by the SIBD co-authors. There is a heavy reliance upon ongoing consultation and engagement, implementation of the DRP (which is yet to be formalised as a strategy or plan) feedback loops and annual reporting, but there does not appear to be any process or method in place for monitoring the appropriateness or relevance of these management/ mitigation measures. On page 15 of the SIBD it states “… the development of a Social Impact Management Plan was recommended”. I strongly suggest that the Link Alliance resources the development and implementation of a Social Impact and Business Disruption Monitoring Plan (SIBDMP) for all stages of the Karangahape works (and by logical extension for Aotea and Mt Eden project areas). This is to promote affected party and public confidence in the relevance and appropriateness of all mitigation strategies outlined by this SIBD DWP; to promote good practice Environmental Impact Assessment and SIA; to inform future CEMP’s and SIBD DWPs; and to ensure there exists an evidence-base for meeting the CRL NOR Designation Conditions.

The Link Alliance has only commenced initial investigation works at Karangahape Station to date, and this has occurred during SIBD engagement. Ongoing monitoring of the early works will be undertaken as outlined in Section 10.2 of this DWP - Annual Reporting and Monitoring, alongside ongoing engagement by the Link Alliance, which will allow the affected community to raise issues. The monitoring approach is considered appropriate for the scale and timeframes of the early works and will be reviewed as part of the preparation of the Karangahape Station main works SIBD DWP.

3) Whilst I welcome the concept and intent of the Development Response Plan (DRP) as a means of mitigating identified social impact and business disruption effects through supportive relationships and positive initiatives, this DRP remains a list of activities in an appendix to the SIBD DWP, when it should ideally be a well-developed strategy or plan by now, with process, methodology and resources specifically outlined. It still remains unclear as to whom is responsible for the development and implementation of the DRP for Karangahape, and how

The SIBD will be updated with the responsible person for the DRP once this is confirmed. The Development Response Manager’s responsibilities will be: · Manages planning, delivery and evaluation of the overall Karangahape DRP. · Manages street response measures including street cleaning, graffiti removal. · Co-ordinates business promotion events. · Co-ordinates business support programme.

Page 52

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Independent Peer Review Comments

Response

it relates to ongoing identification, monitoring, evaluation and management of the effects outlined in this DWP via the consultation and engagement plan and annual reporting mechanisms. It would also be useful to understand what the feedback and take-up of these measures has and will be over the course of the CRL Project.

· Proactively identifying opportunities to mitigate impact on businesses. · Regular audits of the construction sites, including the DRP, and address issues with the construction manager. Feedback from the affected community will inform the review of this SIBD DWP as detailed in Sections 10.2 - Annual Reporting and Monitoring and 11 - Review, and the SIBD DWP for the main works. Also refer to the response provided in relation to IPR point 7.

4) The relationship between implementation, monitoring and annual reporting, including methodology, process, lines of accountability and responsibility should be clarified in this SIBD DWP. For example, there is no process outlined explaining how those implementing and monitoring the SIBD DWP will report to the SIBD SME’s responsible for preparing the annual report and future SIBD DWP’s.

Feedback received from the affected community to the communication team and issues identified by the Development Response Manager will be recorded to allow the SIBD SMEs to prepare the annual report.

5) The SIBD DWP should state who is responsible for planning/ designing, implementing and monitoring the DRP.

Table 8-1: Key Personnel will be updated with the name of the Development Response Manager once this position is confirmed.

6) It is not clear at all whether pedestrian counts and business transaction data are or will be gathered and monitored as part of the implementation of this SIBD DWP via the DRP or if at all. As stated in previous SIBD DWP peer reviews, it is essential that the Link Alliance now address and resource this issue alongside a commitment to general monitoring issues raised.

As detailed in Section 8.5 consumer spending and footfall data will be used to inform the development and on-going implementation of the DRP and other mitigation measures as appropriate.

7) Overall, the DRP remains a wish list of measures, rather than a well-resourced and comprehensive management and monitoring strategy. This situation has the potential to do more harm than good, if affected parties come to expect and depend on it as a means to address their concerns, challenges and impacts. I strongly suggest this DRP approach is properly planned, resourced and implemented in ways that support the purpose of the SIBD DWP.

The DRP is an identified and confirmed action which will be implemented by the Link Alliance to mitigate SIBD impacts resulting from the early works.

8) It would be useful for this document to have a reference/ control number.

A Link Alliance document number has been added to the cover page.

9) It is useful to understand that there will be a staged construction approach for the Karangahape Station works and that SIBD DWPs will be developed in stages. It is noted that this is the first of three SIBD DWPs covering early works, main construction and public realm reinstatement. However, it would be useful for this document to elaborate on the interrelationship between these SIBD DWPs as regards their process and methodology, in particular how this early works

As noted in Section 5.1 and Section 6 of this DWP, the authors of this SIBD DWP have reviewed and considered the SIBD DWP for the Mercury Lane demolition works (OPW60339200), including the previous SIBD engagement undertaken to inform the preparation of that DWP. Refer also to the response to IPR point 11.

Page 53

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Appendix F is titled ‘Potential’ development response measures to allow engagement and consultation with affected parties.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Independent Peer Review Comments

Response

SIBD DWP will inform or be continued and referenced in the preparation of the latter documents. 10) Whilst I understand that the work and activities of early works, main construction and public realm reinstatement will differ, requiring new assessments, this creates some challenges and questions regarding i) whether this SIBD DWP will provide a baseline assessment that will be expanded on or developed by the following SIBD DWPs; ii) how the implementation of this SIBD DWP will be monitored and ongoing engagement will be managed and reported in ways that could usefully inform the development of the others. Please clarify whether or not monitoring and ongoing engagement processes for the early works will inform the development and preparation of the main construction and public realm reinstatement CEMPs and associated SIBD DWPs.

This feedback is noted and will be addressed in the Karangahape Station main works SIBD DWP.

11) Furthermore, I found it difficult to understand what the relationship, if at all, is between this SIBD DWP (Karangahape Station Early Works) and the KRoad Demolition works SIBD DWP, whether the preparation and method of the previous document has informed the preparation and methodology of this one currently under review. From my site visit, I note that demolition works have not yet commenced. Does this mean that demolition and early works will be both conducted at the same time? A statement clarifying their relationship and recognition of the cumulative impacts on social and business disruption effects, or lack of, is necessary.

The cumulative impacts of the enabling, early and main works are acknowledged and Sections 1.2 and Table 5-1: Consultation Methodology have been updated to acknowledge cumulative impacts.

12) On p.16 the SIBD DWP references “a number of positive effects associated with CRL once the line and stations are operational…” This is a slight expansion on previous commentary that referred to economic benefits. I strongly suggest that more should be done to identify and manage positive impacts that can be achieved through the CEMP and SIBD DWP implementation, rather than only focus on negative effects and risks that require management and mitigation. For example, CRLL and the Link Alliance, as good neighbours, should proactively contribute to impacts and outcomes sought by other projects and issues occurring in the Karangahape community area. The CRL Project will have an impact on the lives, safety and security of the more vulnerable members of this community – the homeless, sex workers, the diverse LGBT community, backpackers/ visitors new to the CBD environment, users of services provided by the City Mission, Methodist Church and ADIO Trust. Whilst I acknowledge that every effort will be made to brief construction workers on appropriate behaviour toward these individuals, CRLL and the Link Alliance should make every effort to utilise its resources and

Table 8-2: Community Groups Issues and Actions states that the Link Alliance team will be encouraged to participate in significant community events as far as practicable. Further reference is made to attending ‘Inclusive Community Events’ in Section 8.13 Diverse Community and Vulnerable Groups. The approach to ongoing engagement is detailed in Section 8.4 Continuous Up to Date Engagement. As part of this engagement and the work on the DRP the Link Alliance will identify additional mitigation measures, including potential benefits, for the affected community.

Page 54

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Independent Peer Review Comments

Response

power to work alongside organisations that support these people.

A3. Auckland Council Comments Dr Jennifer Joynt, Urban Researcher – RIMU, has reviewed and provided comment on the draft SIBD DWP as follows: Auckland Council Comments

Response

There is limited evidence that the information sessions and advisory notices are available in languages other than English. Has there been any provision for nonEnglish speakers? If not, it is recommended that future communication includes options for language translation (including nonverbal language).

The SIBD engagement team were briefed on the availability of a translator to facilitate meetings with members of the affected community. A translator was not required for the SIBD door knock engagement exercise.

Has there been any consultation with representatives of the disabled community? there will be disabled parking removed, and potential impacts from reduced pavement widths, but there is no mention about this specific engagement with disability representatives. The DWP needs to note where the disability parking will be relocated to, and how far this is from the existing location in Beresford Square. Section 8.8.1 states that signage to the new parking will be ‘considered’ this needs to be ‘required’ and notice about the new location needs to be circulated through the communication channels.

The Traffic Management Plans (TMPs) application and approval process, through Auckland Transport, will ensure that foot ways around work zones are suitable for disability users, with step free access provided where required to maintain accessibility for all users. Further engagement will be undertaken with the affected community, via the engagement on the DRP and on future DWPs.

Page 41 section 8.8.4 has an incomplete sentence about the number of vehicle movements.

This section has been updated to respond to the comment.

Page 44. Table 8.3 states that ‘the link alliance shall reopen space on Mercury Lane and East Street when not required for construction works. How often will this be reviewed and who’s responsibility will it be to review and implement the changes?

The text has been amended to refer to Mercury Lane only. Further details are included within the TAP DWP with TMPs also being developed for the works. TMPs will be approved by AT.

Section 8.8.5 needs to refer to Condition 61.2 as that specifically refers to Hopetown Alpha parking.

This section has been updated to respond to the comment.

Will the painted street furniture developed by the Harunga Project be affected by the work? The paintings hold significant meaning for the K Road community, particularly the vulnerable. These should be relocated rather than removed within the K road area in consultation with the Harunga project and Piki Toi.

The painted street furniture is located on the pavement on Karangahape Road. The painted street furniture will not be affected. If for unforeseen reasons works affect the furniture, then Harunga project and Piki Toi will be consulted.

There is no information on where the public toilets will be relocated to, and how the existing antisocial behaviour associated with them won’t be relocated too.

The public toilets will likely only move a short distance from their current location, with the exact location to be confirmed. The re-location will be undertaken in conjunction with Auckland Council, the responsible party for management of the toilets.

Page 55

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Auckland Council Comments

Response The measures to address anti-social behaviour are set out in Section 8.14 Community Safety.

It is recommended that the contractor briefings should include communication directly from representatives for the homeless community (e.g. City mission or James Liston House), the Auckland Drug Information Outreach (ADIO) and the NZ prostitutes collective sex workers to assist sensitive exchanges. For example, information should be given to contactors on how to approach rough sleepers, particularly if they are asleep or what to do if they come across illegal activity or someone in danger, who to contact etc.

Table 8-2: Community Groups Issues and Actions has been updated to respond to the comment.

The pathway for seeking compensation for losses under the Public Works Act needs to be more explicit. Is there potential for this to be aligned with the business mentor role?

Section 9.3 Disputes Resolution and Public Works Act has been updated with details of the CRL factsheet on the Public Works Act, which includes recommendations on who advice should be sought from.

The noise impact at some properties on East Street will be extreme and prolonged. The mitigation offered does not appear to consider ventilation requirements during hot weather. Several of the properties reportedly have single glazing and no mechanical ventilation. If mitigation to allow for ventilation cannot be offered, consideration should be given to preventing work during high summer.

Refer to the CNV DWP and SSNVMP which addresses noise issues.

Page 56

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Appendix B: Affected Community Feedback from Door Knocking Exercise Address

Property/ Occupier

Meeting summary

Feedback

Mitigation

Mercury Lane 3-5 Mercury Lane

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Services and Deliveries Deliveries on Mercury Lane are in a convenient location to the pub.

Affected businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area. No mitigation required.

Mercury Bar and Gaming Lounge

Business Effects Construction workers are an opportunity for the business. Other Comments Communication is key and will help with business planning.

White Elephant Op Shop

BK Hostel

9 Mercury Lane

Mercury Theatre

2 Mercury Lane (also see 238 KRoad)

Residential Property / Commercial

Page 57

| Karangahape Station Early Works

SIBD and acoustic door knocked but manager not available. Contact details left. SIBD and acoustic door knocked but manager not available. Contact details left. SIBD and acoustic door knocked and discussion with event manager / staff. SIBD and acoustic door knocked and discussion with property manager and resident attendee at the Cross Street Market Community Event - Refer to Section 6.7 of the SIBD DWP.

Queried whether there are wider works to re-grade Mercury Lane. /

The CCP will be implemented to ensure affected parties are kept informed, with the Communications & Engagement Manager leading on future engagement. /

Other Comments Welcomed briefing on the works and keen for ongoing communication and updates with the theatre manager/owner. Amenity Concern about noise levels during construction works for businesses and residents.

The CCP will be implemented to ensure affected parties are kept informed, with the Communications & Engagement Manager leading on future engagement with the owner. Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Access Pedestrian and car park access needs to be maintained on Mercury Lane/ Concerns about the level of construction traffic. 24 Mercury Lane

Wilsons Car Park

30 Mercury Lane

Wilsons Car Park

3/2 Canada St

NZ Prostitutes Collective

Communications & Engagement Manager is arranging engagement, supported by appropriate SMEs. Communications & Engagement Manager is arranging engagement, supported by appropriate SMEs. SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with manager.

Refer to TAP DWP mitigation measures. Pedestrian and vehicle access to off street car parking will be maintained

/ / Other Comments Operate an outreach programme and drop in location for wider Auckland Region. Respect for privacy and discretion is required.

Refer to Section 8.13 Diverse Community and Vulnerable Groups and 8.14 Community Safety of the SIBD DWP.

Offer a lot of social support for diverse group of vulnerable people from across the Region. Need a key go-to contact person with responsibility if concerns or issues arise

Page 58

| Karangahape Station Early Works

The Communications & Engagement Manager will be a point of contact for issues, and will co-ordinate responses from SMEs.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Access Parking needed, already shortage of parking in the area. Already issues with parking. Some days are busier with clinic times. Need parking for nurses also. Karangahape Road 195-239 K Road

Buana Satu

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Off street car parking will be maintained. The Link Alliance will provide advance notice of the loss of on street car parking and the provision of signage to identify additional public car parking will be considered as part of the DRP.

Access Loading Bay on K-Road, but also load from rear of property (accessed via Pitt St). Access will need to be arranged to the rear of the property.

Affected businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area.

Customer drive to the shop so loss of car parking will have an impact.

Communication via a number of different methods will be used to make the public aware that businesses in the area are open for business.

Access to the rear of the property will be maintained with any diversion notified to the occupier (refer to the TAP DWP for details of diversions on Pitt St)

The provision of signage to identify additional public car parking will form part of the DRP. Other Comments Combination of CRL and K-Road Enhancement works mean a lot going on. Page 59

| Karangahape Station Early Works

The implementation of the DWPs will be used to mitigate the effects of the early works.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Link Alliance will continue to work with AT to minimise the combined impacts and proactively communicate and update the affected community.

243 K Road

10. Leo Oâ€™Malley

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Other Comments The premises is re-locating in w/c 07/10. Relocation is partly due to the extent of CRL works and K-Road Enhancement Works, and wider retail trends.

11. Calendar Girls

Invite to Beresford Square Community event with contact details provided. SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business manager.

12. Pitt St Pub

Business / Customer Effects The pavement area is used for outdoor seating and concerns about any loss. The area has an active night time economy. Visibility and Wayfaring Signage and visibility important.

No specific occupier mitigation required.

The DRP will identify business support measures, which may include support for businesses to obtain outdoor licenses. The implementation of the DWPs will mitigate the impacts on the affected businesses day and night. Wayfinding measures will be utilised to guide members of the public to the premises. Visibility impacts will be minimised via the use of mesh or low rise fencing if practicable.

Page 60

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Other Comments Public toilets on Beresford Square are focus of anti-social behaviour. 249-253 K Road

13. VAPO 14. The Hemp Store Café

259-261 K Road

Page 61

15. Eagle Bar

| Karangahape Station Early Works

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left – Two visits. SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left – Two visits.

Refer to Section 8.14 Community Safety of the SIBD DWP.

/ Other Comments Concerns over the extent of Albert Street works and similar impacts on K-Road.

The SIBD team explained the difference in approach between Albert St and K-Road.

Ongoing proactive communication and updates required.

The CCP will be implemented to ensure affected parties are kept informed, with the Communications & Engagement Manager leading on future engagement.

The cumulative effects of K-Road enhancement works and the early works.

Link Alliance will continue to work with AT to minimise the combined impacts and proactively communicate and updated the affected community.

The removal of the public toilets and the impact on businesses in the area.

Refer to Section 8.14 Community Safety of the SIBD DWP.

More bike parking as part of final design.

SIBD SMEs explained the nature of the early works and the opportunities for future engagement.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan 16. POKPOK Thai Restaurant 267-281 K Road

17. The Kebab house

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left – Two visits. SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

/ Servicing and Deliveries Access for delivery vehicles directly outside on K-Road only. Waste bin taken from Beresford Square

18. Uncle Man 19. Strange Haven

283 K Road 214 K Road 238 K-Road (Selected) (also see 2 Mercury Lane) 256 & 258A K Rd

Page 62

SIBD and acoustic door knock and contact details left. SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

20. Samoa House 21. Vacant 22. Multiple Occupiers

Meeting not obtained. / SIBD meeting with property manager / representative.

23. Mithaiwala Restaurant / Café

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Customer/ Business Effects 1 staff car park in the Beresford Square Car Park building. / Servicing and Deliveries Waste / Services / Deliveries picked up on K Rd outside store – not too concerned Access Access from Beresford Square only used a little. Car parking for staff, but not too concerned. / / See 2 Mercury Lane.

Servicing and Deliveries All deliveries directly outside, or on Mercury Lane. No special waste delivery/removal.

No changes to access - no mitigation required. Affected businesses will be notified of any changes to waste pick up locations. Access to off street parking is to be retained – no mitigation required.

No mitigation required.

Noted – general mitigation measures identified in Section 7 of the SIBD are sufficient.

No works are proposed outside of the property but affected businesses will be notified of the closure and the location of

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan alternative available loading bays in the area and waste pick up locations.

24. Shosha (Vape & Hookah Store)

25. G.A.Y. Auckland 26. Charlie Baxters 27. Free Bird

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left. SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left. SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Customer/ Business Effects Access for customers and to deliveries to be maintained during works. Servicing and Deliveries Out the front of store. No large deliveries. Deliveries and customer parking are for short durations.

Customer/ Business Effects They have three other stores in Auckland. If they find the site no longer functions during the proposed works, they will close it down to operate from the other locations. / / Servicing and Deliveries Deliveries outside, drivers use access directly in front of the store. Access out front of the store is important.

Access

Page 63

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Access will be maintained to the business â€“ no specific mitigation is required. No works are proposed outside of the property but affected businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area and waste locations. The implementation of the DWPs will help mitigate the impacts on affected businesses and support measure will be identified in the DRP if required.

No works are proposed outside of the property but affected businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area and waste locations.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

268 K Rd

28. Ink bar & Nightclub 29. Bangkok’s Thai Food Café

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left. SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left. SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left.

270 K Rd

30. The Family Bar

270 K Rd

31. Club Saloon Bar

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with staff member.

278 – 282 K Road

32. Apero Restaurant (Ismo Koski)

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

No concerns as long as vehicle access in front of the store is retained and pedestrian access remains available. / / / Other Comments Staff member confirmed that the Manager has received a copy of the Information Sheet with contact details. No comments raised to date. Customer/ Business Effects Generally, not concerned about CRL as project as sufficiently distant from the business and there is an opportunity if more people are walking past the restaurant as they cannot park in the area. But conversely concerned that the area may be less desirable to due to the construction works. Access All access is provided via Karangahape Road; deliveries, staff and customers. Servicing and Deliveries Use the loading bays immediately outside, but more concerned about

Page 64

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Pedestrian and vehicle access will be maintained – no specific mitigation required.

No specific mitigation required.

Communication via a number of different methods will be used to make the public aware that businesses in the area are open for business. Additional support measure for affected businesses will be identified in the DRP if required.

Pedestrian and vehicle access will be maintained – no specific mitigation required. Affected businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan the effects of the Karangahape Road enhancement work

284 - 286 K Rd

33. Cosmic

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Servicing and Deliveries Quick drop-offs directly out front.

Access Customers either park close by, walk in, or park outside and rush in quickly. Loss of short term parking out front of store is biggest concern. 290 K Rd

34. African Hair Braiding & Extension Centre

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Servicing and Deliveries Loading out front K Rd.

Access requirements Customers park nearby or walk in off street. Request options on where customer can park.

Access to property biggest concern.

Page 65

| Karangahape Station Early Works

the location of alternative available loading bays in the area.

Affected businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area. The Link Alliance will provide advance notice of the loss of on street car parking and the provision of signage to identify additional public car parking will be considered as part of the DRP. No works are proposed outside of the property but affected businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area and waste locations. The Link Alliance will provide advance notice of the loss of on street car parking and the provision of signage to identify additional public car parking will be considered as part of the DRP. No impact on pedestrian access.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan 292 - 300 K Rd

35. ArtSpace 36. Tautai Guiding Pacific Arts

SIBD door knocked and contact details left. SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

/ Servicing and Deliveries Off East St which leads to the rear of the property - retain access. Access requirements Customers park nearby or walk in off the street. Request parking alternatives if lost.

Amenity Limit noise during art show hours. Concern over noisy construction vehicles travelling up East St. Inform of construction vehicle routes.

37. K Rd Mart 312 K Rd

38. Ivan Anthony Gallery

SIBD door knocked and contact details left.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

The Link Alliance will provide advance notice of the loss of on street car parking and the provision of signage to identify additional public car parking will be considered as part of the DRP. Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP. Implementation of the CCP to ensure affected parties are kept informed, with the Communications & Engagement Manager leading on engagement with the owner.

/ Access Customers park nearby or walk in off street. Parking is a concern, question where will people be able to park.

Amenity Concern over noisy construction vehicles travelling up East St. Limit noise during art show hours Page 66

Access to private properties will be retained.

The Link Alliance will provide advance notice of the loss of on street car parking. Signage to identify additional public car parking will be considered as part of the DRP. Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan 39. Michael Lett Gallery

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / occupier.

Servicing and Deliveries Deliveries directly outside (East St) retain access. Access requirements Customers park nearby or walk in off street - retain access. Amenity Concern over noisy construction vehicles travelling up East St. Request to be informed of construction vehicle routes.

East Street 8 East Street

40. Vacant

SIBD door knocked and discussion with on site worker.

10 East Street

41. Adio Trust

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with manager.

Asbestos currently being removed from building, but no concerns raised. Access requirements Critical health service dependant on ease of access to clinic. Ease of access on East St is essential Vehicle access up East St at all times of the day is essential (24 hr access). If access to surrounding streets impacted this will affect how easily people can get to the premises. Business / Customer Effects Open 10am-8pm. ‘Vending machine’ dispensing clean needles is open 24 hours. Amenity Vibration sensitive. Lots of sensitive medical equipment. Equipment

Page 67

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Affected businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area and waste locations. Pedestrian access will be retained – no mitigation required. Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP. No specific mitigation required.

Refer to Section 8.13 Diverse Community and Vulnerable Groups and 8.14 Community Safety of the SIBD DWP.

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan might be compromised if vibration occurs too much. Wayfinding Clear signage directing to business would be helpful 12 East Street

14 East Street

42. Residential Mixed use

43. Mixed residential and commercial use

SIBD door knock meeting with residential occupier.

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / occupier.

Access One on-site car parking. Two onstreet car parks but accepting that there is no entitlement to on-street car parks. Maintain access for on-site car parking. Amenity Concerns for noise, vibration, and construction effects and their proximity to them that would mean they will end their tenancy at this location. Access No foot traffic or clients to the site. Access through gate to car parking area for at least 4x car parks. Other comment 2x residential flats upstairs.

16 East Street

Page 68

44. Studio Q

| Karangahape Station Early Works

SIBD door knocked. Communications team to follow up on engagement.

Wayfinding measures will be utilised to guide members of the public to the premises. The Link Alliance will provide advance notice of the loss of on street car parking and the provision of signage to identify additional public car parking will be considered as part of the DRP. Vehicular access will be maintained. The implementation of the DWPs will be used to mitigate the effects of the early works. Additional support measure for affected businesses will be identified in the DRP if required. Noted not specific mitigation required. Implementation of the CCP to ensure affected parties are kept informed.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan 18 East Street

15 â€“ 19 East Street

45. Residential

46. Backpacker Car World

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with owner.

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / occupier.

Amenity The property is currently rented out and the owner is concerned that tenants will leave once the construction works start due to noise and disruption. Other Comments CRL are communicating in regard to the purchase of the rear section of the property, but the owner is not responding as she does not feel CRL are listening to her or appreciate the value/rental income of the property. Access Loss of car parking will affect business as customers wonâ€™t have anywhere to park on-street, or if car parking is provided within the yard (off-street) this will result in a loss of display area. Business / Customer Effects Concerns over construction traffic movements and the potential for vehicles to damage parked cars and stock. Requests CCTV be installed to monitor traffic and to capture any accidents. Concerned it will be difficult to evidence accidents that occur without CCTV. Noise

Page 69

| Karangahape Station Early Works

The implementation of the DWPs will be used to mitigate the effects of the early works, including the CNV DWP and SSCNV MP. Implementation of the CCP to ensure affected parties are kept informed in regard to the early works. Refer to Section 9.3 in relation to Public Works Act. The Link Alliance will provide advance notice of the loss of on street car parking and the provision of signage to identify additional public car parking will be considered as part of the DRP. Over-dimensional loads will be managed by limiting the movements of these vehicles outside of the commuter peak periods, and by applying mobile traffic management where these vehicles are required to traverse multiple lanes of traffic. Refer to the TAP DWP for further details.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan General noise and disruption will impact work and be less attractive for customers. 17 Galatos Street

47. Venue

21 East Street

48. UnoLoco Event Management

Page 70

| Karangahape Station Early Works

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting. No place to leave contact details. SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with Business Owner/Manager

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

/ Visibility and Wayfaring Not a particular concern. Clients make appointments â€“ donâ€™t relying on customers arriving on impulse. Servicing and Deliveries Access for deliveries / pickups via the garage which fronts onto East Street. Items / props for events are stored in the garage and are dropped off / collected at all hours.

No specific mitigation required.

Private access will be maintained to the property. Affected businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Amenity Noise is a concern, due to the sound booth utilised by the business. It is located in the rear of the building (away from the East St frontage) but is very sensitive to noise â€“ e.g. the internal air conditioning must be turned off when in use. It is in use approx. 2 -3 times per week. Construction noise would be very disruptive.

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

The noise may also be disruptive for staff working in the office. The building is also not well insulated. This could prevent staff from concentrating. The meeting rooms are also located on the East St frontage so noise may disrupt client and internal meetings. Dust may also be an issue in the garage. Props for events are stored in the garage and do not want these damaged. Access Staff and customers park on the surrounding streets. Pedestrian and vehicle access is via the front door and garage on East Street. 23 East Street

Page 71

49. European Motors

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Noise Quiet periods required in order to successfully identify mechanical

Dust suppression techniques will be used. Refer to the AQ DWP for details.

Pedestrian and vehicle access to the property will be maintained and wayfinding measures will be utilised to guide members of the public to the premises.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan issues. Concern over noise form the project will impact his ability to do his job well. Servicing and Deliveries Large vehicles on East St. Waste oil / tyres / couriers Access requirements Road tests for vehicles, need access up East St. Generally, do a loop around Cross St / Mercury Lane. Customers dropping off cars to his shop

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP. Over-dimensional loads will be managed by limiting the movements of these vehicles outside of the commuter peak periods, and by applying mobile traffic management where these vehicles are required to traverse multiple lanes of traffic. Refer to the TAP DWP for further details. Ongoing engagement and notification to be led / coordinated by the Communications & Engagement Manager.

29 East Street

Page 72

50. International Earth Sciences (IESE) Ltd

| Karangahape Station Early Works

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meetings (two â€“ follow up with acoustician) with Business Owner/Manager.

Amenity Owner advised that they have their own noise monitoring equipment. They will monitor levels and contact Auckland Council should the limits be exceeded. Customer/ Business Effects Concerned about impact on business from dust, asbestos contamination and rat infestations as a result of the demolition of the Mercury Plaza. Requested written confirmation of how these issues have been dealt with. Are there management plans?

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

Demolition works are carried out under OPW OPW60339200. All DWPs will be available on the CRL website - Communications & Engagement Manager to notify.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Access Disruption to access would incur a cost for the business.

51. Electric Bike Team

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with Business Owner/Manager.

Requested written confirmation regarding any changes to access and parking affecting their office, and details of the process to follow if they find their access is restricted.

Ongoing engagement and notification to be led / coordinated by the Communications & Engagement Manager.

Particularly concerned about the effects on access, parking and queuing on public roads. Effect of construction traffic on vehicle access a major concern with queuing outside the site and volumes of movements. Effect on car parking along East Street on narrow roads. Access Concern about access for Trucks to the Compound if they use East Street. Traffic management â€“ problems with drivers speeding around corner up East St. Concern with narrow foot path. General Provide better connection from station to the bike path once project completed.

Refer to TAP DWP mitigation measures.

Amenity Store very close to compound.

Page 73

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Business support measures will be identified in the DRP if required.

Refer to the TAP DWP for further details of required mitigation.

Noted.

The suite of DWPs will manage and / or mitigate amenity impacts as far as practicable.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan 52. Think Concepts

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with Business Owner/Manager.

Amenity Noise is a particular concern; may cause disruption to work. They are planning to install some internal glass partitions in the next month or so, to create meeting rooms along the East Street frontage (adjacent to the CRL construction services area). Access Car parking for the business is provided in basement. Want to ensure the road remains open so that customers and staff have access to the car parks.

South Street 2 South Street

53. Residential

SIBD and Acoustic site visit and contact details left.

Amenity The occupier lives and works on site. Noise is a concern as the occupier is on site all day. Requested no noise outside of 8am – 6pm. Is also concerned that should adapted shipping containers be used to provide temporary pedestrian access around the construction sites they will generate noise – the sheet metal panels used in these create a lot of noise underfoot. Concerned about tracking of mud and soil from the construction sites onto the surrounding streets and footpaths. This could make its way inside – this is not acceptable.

Page 74

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

Vehicular access to the premises will be maintained. The TAP DWP will be implemented which includes traffic management and mitigation.

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

DWPs, including the CEMP, will be implemented to prevent mud and soil tracking on the road.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

2A South Street

54. Residential

17 South Limited

55. Gorilla Technology

SIBD and Acoustic site visit and contact details left. SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with Business Owner/Manager.

Access Pedestrian and vehicle access to the property is via South Street. There are 5 car parks on site; 2 are used by tenants in the cottages around the corner, one by the interviewee, and also by tenants of the residential unit at 2 South Street. / Customer/ Business Effects The business records podcasts â€“ their recording space is available for customers to rent at any time of the day or night. Have concerns about the effect of noise and vibration on the podcast recordings. Access Pedestrian access is via the front door on South Street. Staff and customers park on the surrounding streets. Have that construction workers and any other locals whose normal carparking spaces have been removed due to CRL will occupy the spaces they rely on. Some of their customers are politicians who are accompanied by security staff (i.e. require multiple cars), therefore availability of on street car parks in important. Want to ensure vehicle access to the property via surrounding streets remains available. Suggested

Page 75

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Vehicular and pedestrian access to the premises will be maintained. The TAP DWP will be implemented which includes traffic management and mitigation.

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP. Other support actions will be developed as part of the DRP. The Link Alliance will provide advance notice of the loss of on street car parking and the provision of signage to identify additional public car parking will be considered as part of the DRP.

Vehicular and pedestrian access to the premises will be maintained. The TAP DWP will be implemented

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Cross Street Unit 5 - 1 Cross Street

56. World Net

SIBD and Acoustic site visit and contact details left.

57. Glamuzina Architects

SIBD and acoustic door knock and left contact details. Representative attended the Cross Street Market Community Event. SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the individual Business Owner/Manager.

58. Epsilon Law; Black & Blue Ltd

imposing time limits for on-street car parks to ensure people donâ€™t occupy the spaces all day. /

which includes traffic management and mitigation.

Refer to Section 6.7 of the SIBD DWP.

Noise / Business Effects Concerns about impacts on noise during working hours. One occupier indicated that they would leave the building if noise was disruptive. Need for sound insulation. Concerns about the effect of noise and vibration on the recording equipment/studio.

59. The Aviary 60. Nisha Madhan 61. Motion Sickness

Page 76

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP. Other support actions will be developed as part of the DRP.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan 62. Voice Brand Agency

63. IMPAC Services 2 Cross Street

64. Cross Street Markets

2A Cross Street

65. The Warren Woodwork

Page 77

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Access Need for pedestrian access and access to car parking areas.

Vehicular and pedestrian access to the premises will be maintained. The TAP DWP will be implemented which includes traffic management and mitigation.

Other Comments Request for ongoing updates on works.

Ongoing engagement and notification to be led / coordinated by the Communications & Engagement Manager.

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the individual Business Owner/Manager. SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting and subsequent Cross Street Market Community Event.

Other Comments The business is relocating to new premises. Refer to Section 6.7 of the SIBD DWP.

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager and subsequent Cross Street Market Community Event.

Visibility and Wayfaring Not a particular concern. They have some impulse shoppers / enquiries. A proportion are via word of mouth from Cross Street Market, the rest are on their database therefore come to the business for a specific purpose. Amenity Their business is reasonably noisy itself therefore construction noise is not a particular concern. Dust however is more concerning as they do keep their door onto Cross Street open. They have a mechanical ventilation system in the workshop â€“

No mitigation is required. Feedback from the meeting has been used to inform Section 8 of the SIBD. No specific mitigation required.

Dust suppression techniques will be used. Refer to the AQ DWP for details.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan this does not bring in air from the outside. Access Not overly concerned about access. Advised that access to the business / workshop is via the door on Cross Street. Courier deliveries use this access. Customers either park nearby or walk to classes if local to the area. The classes are typically in the evening. Pitt Street 40 Pitt Street

66. Central Fire Station

70 Pitt Street

67. Chattham Apartments

72-80 Pitt Street (multiple units)

68. Pitt St Methodist Church

69. Flying out movie and music store

Page 78

| Karangahape Station Early Works

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Services Manager. Two SIBD site visits â€“ no place to leave calling card and no contact details available online. Initial SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting followed by an arranged meeting with SME and Construction Contractor.

Request for a meeting with SMEs, Construction Contractor and Fire Service Personnel. /

The Link Alliance will provide advance notice of the loss of on street car parking and the provision of signage to identify additional public car parking will be considered as part of the DRP.

Communications & Engagement Manager is organising a meeting to be attended by SMEs.

Refer to Section 6.5 of the SIBD DWP.

Access requirements Need customer access to the front door. Need access to a loading space. Carparks at rear of building.

Pedestrian access will be maintained to the property. The businesses will be notified of changes to the car park access, and the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

82 Pitt Street

70. Def Store

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Amenity Visibility, noise and dust main concern. There is a small podcast recording area downstairs in the basement but not expected to be disrupted by the construction activity. Front door is main ventilation. Other Comments Lots of creative people in the community who could contribute to artwork. Servicing and Deliveries Utilise the church parking space for loading, when needed.

Access The priority is to have access to their front door. Noise Concerned about noise. Business / Customer Effects Concerned about overall experience when inside the shop. 90% of visitors are walk-ins, hence need for good visibility and pedestrian access. Visibility into the shop is very important Page 79

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP. Other support actions will be developed as part of the DRP.

Noted and opportunities will be explored as part of the DRP. The businesses will be notified of changes to the car park access, and the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area. Pedestrian access will be maintained to the property. Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP. Wayfinding measures will be utilised to guide members of the public to the premises. Visibility impacts will be minimised via the use of mesh or low rise fencing if practicable.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan 47 Pitt Street

71. Auckland central ambulance station

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Noise Noise and vibration are less of a concern â€“ equipment is built for ambulances. Access Transport issues discussed at meeting regarding TAP DWP. Other Comments Homeless sleeping is prevalent in the area. Welcomed wider communication and information on the wider Emergency Planning Strategy.

55-59 Pitt Street

72. Vada - Hairdresser

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Access Needs easy and convenient customer access. Taxi/uber drop off and pick up point. Convenient drop off and pick up point for customers is essential (e.g. uber drop off/pickup). Business / Customer Effects Would appreciate anything that can be done to avoid deterring clients especially at Christmas time. January is very quiet and a good time to do works.

Page 80

| Karangahape Station Early Works

No specific mitigation required.

Refer to TAP DWP. Refer to Section 7.13 Diverse Community and Vulnerable Groups Ongoing engagement and notification to be led / coordinated by the Communications & Engagement Manager. Pedestrian access will be maintained for customers, with wayfaring signage used to direct customers around the works. This will include customers arriving via uber. Taxi stands are not impacted by the early works. DWPs will be implemented to avoid impacts of the works over the Christmas period, and the business owner will be updated on the works by the Communications & Engagement Manager.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Visibility and Wayfaring Visibility is a priority. Currently benefit from good visibility due to the corner location and large picture windows on both sides of the building.

73. Tattoo Parlour

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Other Comments Planning to invest in interior of shop and is very concerned about the financial impact of the project. But understands the value and importance of the project to Auckland and the area. Positive supporter of the CRL project. Access requirements Access to front door. Access to carparking building in Beresford Square. Wayfinding Would like opportunity for signage on hoardings.

Other Comments Power and internet connections are essential for day to day business â€“ therefore cannot lose access. 74. Neighbourhood Good NZ

Page 81

| Karangahape Station Early Works

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Access / Servicing and Deliveries

Pedestrian access will be maintained to the property and vehicular access to the car park. Wayfinding measures will be utilised to guide customers to the premises, and signage displayed to the car park building on Beresford Sq. if required. Advance notice will be given of any network disruption in line with the CCP and / or by the utility provider.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Customers currently benefit from relatively easy access to the shop and available on street parking. Loading access required. Concerned with the duration and loss of carparking outside the shop in Beresford Square

Pedestrian access will be maintained for customers, with wayfaring signage used to direct customers around the works. The businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area. DRP will identify business support measures and consider signage to other car parks.

Business / Customer Effects Uninterrupted electricity and internet is VIP to continued business activity.

Advance notice will be given of any network disruption in line with the CCP and / or by the utility provider.

Concerned that with all the works going on in the area K Road will become a high avoidance area for retail.

The implementation of the DWPs will help mitigate the impacts on the business and support measure will be identified in the DRP if required.

Amenity Experience with the trenching works is that they were very noisy. Very concerned about outlook to the building site, lighting and access to the shopfront all Page 82

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP. The implementation of the DWPs will help mitigate the impacts on the business and support measure

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan will be identified in the DRP if required. Wayfinding and Visibility Visibility is key to customers. Currently relies on passing trade.

Wayfinding measures will be utilised to guide members of the public to the premises. Visibility impacts will be minimised via the use of mesh or low rise fencing if practicable.

75. Waves Vintage

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Access Pedestrian access for customers is priority. Needs access to carpark. Wayfinding Visibility to the shop window. Business Effects Uninterrupted electricity and internet is important to continued business activity. Other Comments Advance communication is very important. Need to know about the extent of barriers outside her property

76. Red Bar 77. Graphic Design

Page 83

| Karangahape Station Early Works

SIBD and acoustic door knocked but not open. SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Pedestrian and vehicle access will be maintained â€“ no specific mitigation required. Wayfinding measures will be utilised to guide members of the public to the premises. Advance notice will be given of any network disruption in line with the CCP and / or by the utility provider. Implementation of the CCP to ensure affected parties are kept informed, with the Communications & Engagement Manager leading on engagement regarding barriers.

/ Noise Wil not be able to work in the building if vibration and noise is significant.

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Access requirements Owner requires access at all hours 24/7. Loading bay access is required. Losing traffic access from Beresford square is biggest downside but not end of the world. Not a lot of foot traffic in Beresford square unless people live or work there.

Business Effects Uninterrupted electricity and internet is important to continued business activity. Other Comments Relocation of toilets should be in eyesight of where they are now so people can see them and still us

Pedestrian access will be maintained â€“ no specific mitigation required. The DRP will identify business support measures. The businesses will be notified of closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area. Advance notice will be given of any network disruption in line with the CCP and / or by the utility provider. Refer to Section 8.14 Community Safety of the SIBD DWP.

Anti-Social and homelessness are issues in the area. Interested in providing community design input to final outcome for Beresford Square. 61 Pitt Street

Page 84

78. Johnny Feedback Coffee Shop

| Karangahape Station Early Works

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Servicing and Deliveries Along Pitt St. Receive deliveries approx. twice a week.

Noted and opportunities will be explored as part of the DRP.

The businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan location of alternative available loading bays in the area. Access requirements Retain access as customers are foot traffic, or from nearby offices. Wayfinding Wayfinding signage important as customer base is mainly foot traffic. Amenity Noise is a concern. Beresford Square 15 & 19 Beresford Square

79. Hopetoun Alpha

Two SIBD site visits and follow up voicemail to the occupier. Arranged meeting with building owner (also owns a number of properties in the areas including 1 Cross Street)

arranged meeting with the owner: Major concern with Parking, truck access and need for a discussion on Houptoun Alpha.

Albert Street and businesses in the area will all fold Does not feel confident with AT and insist it must be done better than Albert St.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

Summary of key comments from

Concerned this will be a repeat of

Page 85

Pedestrian access will be maintained, but wayfaring signage will be implemented to ensure ease of access for customers.

Refer to the mitigation set out in Section 8. Continued engagement by the Communication & Engagement Manager in line with the CCP, including in relation to the DRP.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Hopeful for better results for Beresford Square. Would like to meet and discuss hoardings and get a better understanding of what is planned for the businesses in the area 1 â€“ 7 Beresford Square

80. Northern Line

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager. Follow up meeting arranged with the construction contractor.

Business Effects Very concerned about continued viability of business but owner met with the contractor and now understands scope of works and impact on his outdoor area.

The DRP will identify business support measures, which may include support for businesses to obtain outdoor licenses.

Access and use of his outdoor area is very important along with visibility. Heavily reliance on outdoor seating area. Christmas is busiest trading week and concerns about impacts on customers during this period. Concerned with the impact on the business over the four year development timeframe. Concerned that hoarding might result in loss Access The only entrance is off Beresford square. Page 86

| Karangahape Station Early Works

The Communication & Engagement Manager will explain the programme to the business to allow them to plan ahead.

Pedestrian access will be maintained.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Wayfaring / Visibility The business enjoys very good visibility from Pitt St and Beresford Square and wants to maintain this as much as possible.

81. Bravo Hospitality

82. Sugar and Partners

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Servicing and Deliveries Usually on Beresford Square - retain access / provide close alternative. Access requirements Staff have 3 â€“ 4 carparks in the Beresford Square car park building. Drop in interviews, but generally office just used by staff. Amenity Noise â€“ ground floor business so important noise is adequately mitigated. Servicing and Deliveries Deliveries are via the car parking building accessed off Beresford Square Normal daily deliveries of milk / groceries etc. Access requirements

Page 87

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Wayfinding measures will be utilised to guide members of the public to the premises. Visibility impacts will be minimised via the use of mesh or low rise fencing if practicable. The businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area. Pedestrian and vehicle access to off street car parking will be maintained. Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP. The businesses will be notified of the closure of loading bays and the location of alternative available loading bays in the area.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Staff vehicle access is via the car parking building accessed off Beresford Square Need notification of any changes or alternatives. General Biggest concern is vehicle access to car park building on Beresford Sq. Inform early if not achievable. Amenity Noise and visibility are concerns.

Pedestrian and vehicle access to off street car parking will be maintained. The Link Alliance will implement the CCP and notify the business of access changes. Pedestrian and vehicle access to off street car parking will be maintained Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP. Visibility impacts will be minimised via the use of mesh or low rise fencing if practicable.

83. Theta System Limited

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Servicing and Deliveries Deliveries are via the car parking building accessed off Beresford Sq. Access requirements Staff vehicle access is via the car parking building accessed off Beresford Square. Staff occupy majority of car parks in this building. Need notification of any changes or alternatives as critical to business. Amenity Noise request to mitigate as much as possible.

Page 88

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Vehicle access to off street car parking will be maintained Pedestrian and vehicle access to off street car parking will be maintained. The Link Alliance will implement the CCP and notify the business of access changes.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP. 16-18 Beresford Square

84. Centurion Sauna

22-28 Beresford Square

85. Residential

SIBD team called to arrange a meeting / attendance at Info Hub / Community event. SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting and follow up meeting with residents. Residents also attended the Beresford Square community event - Refer to Section 6.7 of the SIBD.

/ Amenity Investigation works have started in Beresford Square and is already finding the noise disruptive. One occupier requested double glazing. Concern about noise levels during future stages and outdoor balcony areas will be unusable. To manage the impact the occupier has requested double glazing of all the windows on the Beresford Square frontage and a heat pump to manage the heat in summer. Access Pedestrian and car park access needs to be maintained. Concerns about the level of construction traffic. Other Comments Concern about the impacts on the appearance and character of Beresford Square and local businesses.

Day Street Page 89

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP.

Pedestrian and vehicle access to off street car parking will be maintained Refer to TAP DWP mitigation measures. Refer to Section 8.11 of the SIBD.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan 36 Day Street

86. Residential

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting and follow up meeting with residents. Residents also attended the Beresford Square community event - Refer to Section 6.7 of the SIBD.

Amenity Concern about noise levels during construction works and concerns that tenants will move. Access Pedestrian and car park access needs to be maintained. Concerns about the level of construction traffic.

Page 90

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Noise and Vibration impacts on the property will be mitigated. Refer to CNV DWP. Pedestrian and vehicle access to off street car parking will be maintained Refer to TAP DWP mitigation measures.

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Appendix C: Community Event Letters

Page 91

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Page 92

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Appendix D: Engagement Material - Factsheet and Calling Card

Page 93

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Page 94

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Page 95

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Appendix E: Meeting Response Recording Sheet with Questions CRL C3 – Community Consultation Form – SIBD Person Name

Role: Manager /Owner Date /Time

Address Unit Number

Contact

Building Name

Other

Type of business Operating hours

Monday – Friday:

Saturday:

Sunday:

What are your access arrangements for customers, staff, deliveries?

Do you have any fit out or alterations planned during the works?

Does anyone need out of hours access (e.g. Security/cleaners)?

What is the Servicing / Bin Store Arrangements?

Any other Operational / Business Requirements?

We would like to talk to you about the potential social impacts and business disruption to your residential property / business / community organisation in relation to: Access (including pedestrian, cycle, passenger transport and service/private vehicles) Servicing and Deliveries / Loading Bays

Page 96

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Any special access and servicing requirements or special needs

Effects on residents / customers / businesses

Effects on amenity (e.g. dust, noise, visual appearance, traffic issues) Business visibility and wayfaring

Safety

Any other comments:

Page 97

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Appendix F: Potential Development Response Measures Business Support package Link Alliance offers a business support package free of charge which includes twelve months with a Business Mentor from Business Mentors NZ, a 12-month membership with the Auckland Business Chamber and free social media training. Trader Directory An online directory promoting businesses to the 1600+ CRL workers expected at peak construction, encouraging them to shop local and to use local services and facilities. Also accessible by Auckland’s wider community. The Trader Directory will be printed and available at all construction sites, handed out to cruise ship passengers and will be promoted using established social media channels. It is free to list local businesses and CRL Ltd has received strong interest in the Trader Directory already. Business may register by emailing the City Rail Link at traders@cityraillink.govt.nz. Meet the Neighbours Series Link Alliance / CRL Ltd has started a ‘meet the neighbours’ series which profiles local businesses providing insights into business owners and the challenges and opportunities that exist neighbouring the CRL project. The series is included in our project newsletter ‘CRL Connection’ which is disseminated to more than 4000 people. The profiles are also promoted on our existing social media channels and will be shared with KRBA. Street cleaning and maintenance Link Alliance will work closely with council contractor cleaning services to prioritise construction areas with a daily cleaning and maintenance service. This is often more regular and thorough than the businesses have normally. Business advertising Link Alliance will work with businesses to include their advertising where possible on hoarding structures. Temporary signage will also be created to help further emphasise that these businesses are open. Additional Wayfinding Signage Link Alliance will display wayfinding signage at key points to help pedestrians navigate their way through diversions. On-street Business Directory Map A hardcopy designed business directory map will be developed to be placed in highly visible areas. Activations and events Working with our partners to leverage key events and festivals and promotional opportunities. CRL Ltd also undertakes a number of tours along the project corridor each month. Affected Community Involvement The Link Alliance will identify opportunities for KRBA and the affected community to be consulted on and to make decisions in regards to the DRP, and it will continue to support community information session.

Page 98

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Appendix G: Communication and Consultation Plan

Page 103

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Karangahape Station Early Works Communication and Consultation Plan

CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800012

Revision: Final Date: October 2019

Page 1

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

Karangahape Station early works CCP CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800012 This document is uncontrolled when printed. This document should be printed in colour

Revision Status Revision

Date

Version details

Prepared By

Approved By

Rev A

03/10/2019

Draft for Auckland Council review

John Daly

Peter Roan

Rev 0

21/10/2019

Final for Auckland Council approval

John Daly

Peter Roan

Approval Status Name/Title

Signature

Date

Prepared by:

John Daly Principal Planner

21/10/2019

Reviewed by:

Jarrod Snowsill Associate Director

21/10/2019

Rachel Purdy Link Alliance â€“ Senior Planner Controlled by:

Rachel Blundell Link Alliance - Communication and Engagement Manager

21/10/2019

Approved by:

Peter Roan Link Alliance - Consents Lead

21/10/2019

Page 2

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

Table of contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 5 1.1

Karangahape Station ......................................................................................................... 5

1.2

Staging of this CCP ............................................................................................................. 6

1.3

Purpose of the Communication and Consultation Plan ..................................................... 6

1.4

Methodologies and References ......................................................................................... 6

1.5

Relevant Conditions .......................................................................................................... 7

1.6

CCP Review and updates ................................................................................................. 11

2. Karangahape Early Works ......................................................................... 12 2.1

Overview of Works .......................................................................................................... 12

2.2

Affected Parties ............................................................................................................... 12

3. Overarching Strategies and Methodologies ............................................. 14 3.1

International Association for Public Participation ........................................................... 14

3.2

The CRL Overarching Communication and Consultation Strategy (2018) ........................ 15

3.3

Communication and engagement strategic objectives and principles ............................. 16

4. Consultation and Communication Strategy .............................................. 17 4.1

Plan Overview ................................................................................................................. 17

4.2

Consultation and communication approach .................................................................... 17

4.3

Key Project Messages ...................................................................................................... 18

4.4

Expected Outcomes ......................................................................................................... 18

5. Roles and Responsibilities ......................................................................... 20 5.1

Overview ......................................................................................................................... 20

5.2

Key Personnel .................................................................................................................. 20

5.3

Link Alliance and CRLL Reporting Requirements.............................................................. 21

5.3.1.

Reporting tools ......................................................................................................... 21

6. Communication Approach ........................................................................ 22

Page 3

6.1

Strategy Overview: Conversation Locally; Broadcast to Wider Audience ........................ 22

6.2

Communication Tools ...................................................................................................... 22

6.3

Branding and Collateral ................................................................................................... 23

6.4

Identifying and communication with key stakeholders ................................................... 23

6.4.1.

Parties affected by the project .................................................................................. 23

6.4.2.

Owners, occupiers and businesses ............................................................................ 24

6.4.3.

Network Utility Operators ........................................................................................ 24

6.4.4.

Auckland Council Parks Department ......................................................................... 24

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan 6.4.5.

Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga (HNZPT) ...................................................... 24

6.4.6.

Emergency Services .................................................................................................. 25

6.4.7.

Auckland Transport .................................................................................................. 25

6.4.8.

Identifying additional people affected by the project ................................................ 25

6.5

Stakeholder Communication Channels ............................................................................ 25

7. Protocols, Processes and Contact Details ................................................. 26 7.1

Community and Business Liaison Groups ........................................................................ 26

7.1.1.

CLG purpose ............................................................................................................. 26

7.1.2.

Process ..................................................................................................................... 26

7.2

Stakeholders and affected parties ................................................................................... 27

7.2.1.

Pre-Construction Engagement .................................................................................. 27

7.2.2.

Construction Phase Engagement .............................................................................. 28

7.2.3.

Permit to Notify........................................................................................................ 28

7.2.4.

Kaitiaki or Mana Whenua Forum .............................................................................. 29

7.2.5.

Network Utility Operators ........................................................................................ 29

7.2.6.

Emergency services .................................................................................................. 31

7.2.7.

Heritage ................................................................................................................... 31

7.2.8.

Auckland Transport .................................................................................................. 32

7.2.9.

CEMP and Sub-plan reviews ..................................................................................... 32

7.3

Notable Receivers............................................................................................................ 32

7.4

Public Engagement .......................................................................................................... 32

7.4.1.

Public Enquiries ........................................................................................................ 32

7.4.2.

Other Enquiries ........................................................................................................ 34

7.4.3.

Complaints ............................................................................................................... 34

7.4.4.

Digital Channels........................................................................................................ 36

7.4.5.

Media ....................................................................................................................... 37

7.5

Managing Crisis and Emergency Situations ..................................................................... 37

7.5.1.

Requirements ........................................................................................................... 37

7.5.2.

Emergency contacts ................................................................................................. 37

Appendix A: Staging Drawings ........................................................................ 39 Appendix B: Engagement Map and Feedback Overview ................................ 40 Appendix C: Summary of Communication and Consultation .......................... 42 Appendix D: Engagement with Affected Parties ............................................. 45 Appendix E: Auckland Council Feedback......................................................... 49 Page 4

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

1. Introduction The City Rail Link (CRL) project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line in the vicinity of Mt Eden Station. The CRL also involves the construction of two new underground stations being Aotea and Karangahape and a redeveloped Mt Eden Station (refer to Figure 1-1). The design and construction of the CRL infrastructure between the Aotea and Mt Eden Stations is being delivered by the Link Alliance.

Figure 1-1: CRL Route and Location

This Communication and Consultation Plan (CCP) has been prepared in relation to construction of the new Karangahape Station.

Page 5

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

1.2 Staging of this CCP To reflect the staged construction approach for the Karangahape Station, this CCP will be developed in stages. This CCP addresses the Karangahape Station early works, which are described in detail in the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and summarised in Section 2 of this CCP. CCPs will also be prepared for the main construction works and the subsequent public realm reinstatement.

1.3 Purpose of the Communication and Consultation Plan This CCP has been prepared to provide a framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in-proximity parties during the Karangahape Station early works. The two key elements of the CCP relate to: · ·

Communication: keeping stakeholders and affected parties fully informed on the progress of the works and the relevant processes involved so that they can make informed decisions. Consultation: providing information/options and discussing them with stakeholders and affected parties, giving them the opportunity to influence and inform the management and mitigation of effects from the works and to inform the preparation of Delivery Work Plans (DWPs) and Management Plans required by the CRL designation conditions and the Aotea to North Auckland Line (A2N) resource consent conditions. The purpose and approach of this CCP is set out in more detail in Section 3 and the communication and consultation strategy is set out in Section 4.

This CCP addresses the requirements of CRL designation Condition 15 and Conditions 25 to 31 of the A2N resource consent and will be implemented throughout the construction period. The CCP forms part of the CEMP for the Karangahape Station early works.

1.4

Methodologies and References

To ensure effective communication and consultation practices are implemented during the works, the International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) engagement spectrum 1 has been considered in the preparation of this CCP. In addition, this CCP has been informed by the following strategies prepared by City Rail Link Limited (CRLL): · ·

The CRL Overarching Communication and Consultation Strategy (2018); and The CRL Communication and Consultation Strategy (2012).

The CCP also builds upon the following plans: · ·

The CRL Pre-Construction Communication & Consultation Plan (November 2015); and CRL Communication & Consultation Plans prepared to date for other CRL contracts (in particular the Britomart and Albert Street works).

https://www.iap2.org.au/About-Us/About-IAP2-Australasia-/Spectrum

Page 6

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

1.5

Relevant Conditions

Table 1-1 identifies the designation and resource consent conditions relevant to this CCP and where they are addressed in the document. Table 1-1: Relevant conditions and location in this CCP

Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of CCP

Other Plans

City Rail Link Designation Conditions 15.1

This document

15.2

The Requiring Authority shall prepare a Communication and Consultation Plan which shall be implemented and complied with for the duration of the construction of the City Rail Link.

This document

15.3

The Communication and Consultation Plan shall set out how the Requiring Authority will:

15.4

Page 7

(a) Inform the community of construction progress and future construction activities and constraints that could affect them;

6.2, 6.4, 6.5, 7.2

SIBD DWP

(b) Provide early information on key Project milestones;

6.2, 7.1, 7.2

SIBD DWP

(c) Obtain and specify a reasonable timeframe (being not less than 10 working days), for feedback and inputs from directly affected and affected in proximity parties regarding the development (as part of the review process provided by Condition 22) and implementation of the CEMP or DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSNMPs and SSCVMPs); and

7.1.2, 7.2.9

(d) Respond to queries and complaints including but not limited to: (i) Who is responsible for responding; (ii) How responses will be provided; (iii) The timeframes that responses will be provided within.

7.4.1 - 7.4.3

CEMP, SIBD DWP

The Communication and Consultation Plan shall as a minimum include: (a) A communications framework that details the Requiring Authority’s communication strategies, the accountabilities, frequency of communications and consultation, the range of communication and consultation tools to be used (including any modern and relevant communication methods, newsletters or similar, advertising etc), and any other relevant communication matters;

4, 6.1-6.2

(b) The Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project including their contact details (phone, email and postal address);

5.2

(c) The methods for identifying, communicating and consulting with persons affected by the project including but not limited to: (i) All property owners and occupiers within the designation footprint (ii) All property owners and occupiers adjacent to construction sites (Britomart and Albert Street (Designation 1), Karangahape Road (Designation 4), Newton Station (Designation 5), Main Construction site and the works at Normanby Road and Porters Ave (Designation 6)) (iii) New Zealand Historic Places Trust (NZHPT) …….. (vii) Community Liaison Group(s) (refer Condition 7); …….

6.2, 6.4, 6.5. 7.1 – 7.4

| Karangahape Station Early Works

CEMP

Communication and Consultation Plan Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of CCP

Other Plans

(x) Network Utility Operators, including the process: • To be implemented to capture and trigger where communication and consultation is required in relation to any material changes affecting the Network Utilities; • For the Requiring Authority to give approval (where appropriate) to Network Utility Operators as required by section 176(1)(b) of the RMA during the construction period; • For obtaining any supplementary authorisations (including but not limited to resource consents (including those required under a National Environmental Standard) and easements); • For inspection and final approval of works by Network Utility Operators;

Page 8

(d) How stakeholders and persons affected by the project will be notified of the commencement of construction activities and works, the expected duration of the activities and works, and who to contact for any queries, concerns and complaints;

6.2, 6.4, 7.1 – 7.3

(e) How stakeholders and persons affected by the project will be consulted in the development and review of the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs), including specifying reasonable timeframes for feedback;

6 and 7

CEMP, SIBD DWP and CNV DWP

(f) Methods for communicating in advance temporary traffic management measures and permanent changes to road networks and layouts to directly affected and in proximity parties, bus (public and private) operators, taxi operators, bus users, and the general public;

6.1, 6.2, 6.4, 7

TAP DWP

(g) Methods for communicating in advance to surrounding communities (including sensitive noise and vibration receivers) which must be notified at least 24 hours in advance where construction activities are predicted to: (i) Exceed the noise limits (refer Condition 31); or (ii) Exceed a vibration limit (refer Conditions 33 and 34); or (iii) Be within 200m of a blast site (refer Condition 32). Further provisions for Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers are contained in Condition 16.

6.2, 7.2.1, 7.3

CNV DWP and SSCNVMP

(h) Methods for communicating in advance proposed hours of construction activities outside of normal working hours and on weekends and public holidays, to surrounding communities, and methods to record and deal with concerns raised about such hours;

6.2, 7.1 – 7.3

CNV DWP and SSCNVMP

(i) Methods for communicating and consulting with mana whenua for the duration of construction and implementation of mana whenua principles for the project (refer to Conditions 8 and 49);

7.2.4

(j) Methods for communicating and consulting with the Auckland Council Parks Department regarding works to be undertaken to any trees on public land (streets, squares, etc.) located within the City Rail Link surface designation footprint, including how trees not being removed, or in close proximity to the surface designation footprint where works are occurring, will be protected;

6.4.4

| Karangahape Station Early Works

TV DWP

Communication and Consultation Plan Condition

Relevant section of CCP

Other Plans

(k) Methods for communicating and consulting in advance of construction works with emergency services (Police, Fire, Ambulance) on the location, timing and duration of construction works, and particularly in relation to temporary road lane reductions and/or closures and the alternative routes or detours to be used, with specific detail around the management of the Fire and Ambulance from their central stations on Pitt Street;

6.4.6, 7.2.4

SIBD DWP and TAP DWP

(l) A list of Stakeholders, directly affected and affected in proximity parties to the construction works who will be communicated with;

Appendix B - C

SIBD DWP

(m) How communication and consultation activity relating to construction activities and monitoring requirements will be recorded; and

5.3

CEMP

(n) …….

N/A

15.5

The Communication and Consultation Plan shall also include (as relevant) linkages and cross-references to the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs).

As referenced in this document

15.6

The Communication and Consultation Plan shall include a summary of the communication and consultation undertaken between the CRL and parties as required by the Pre-construction Communication and Consultation Plan. The summary shall include any outstanding issues or disputes raised by parties. The Communication and Consultation Plan shall be reviewed six monthly for the duration of construction and updated if required. Any updated Communication and Consultation Plan shall be provided to the “key contacts” (see Condition 13) and the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer for review and agreement on any further action to be undertaken. Any further action recommended as a result of this review shall be undertaken by the Communication and Consultation Manager for the City Rail Link and confirmation of completion provided back to the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer.

Appendices B – D

If, in the course of amendments undertaken as part of the review process, a material change to the Communication and Consultation Plan is made, those parties affected by the change shall be notified within 1 month of the material change occurring.

1.6

Condition No.

15.7

SIBD DWP

1.6

Resource Consent Conditions 25

The CCP shall be based on and, where appropriate, incorporate the provisions of the PCCP, and shall set out how the Consent Holder will:

Page 9

This document

a) Inform the community and business of construction progress and future construction activities and constraints that could affect them;

6.2, 6.4, 6.5, 7.2

SIBD DWP

b) Provide early information on key Project milestones;

6.2, 7.1, 7.2

SIBD DWP

c) Obtain and specify a reasonable timeframe (being not less than 10 working days), for feedback and inputs from directly affected and affected in-proximity parties regarding the implementation and review of the CEMP or other Management Plans;

7.1.2, 7.2.9

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Condition No.

Page 10

Condition

Relevant section of CCP

d) Respond to queries and complaints including but not limited to: i) Who is responsible for responding; ii) How responses will be provided; and iii) The timeframes within which responses will be provided.

7.4..1 – 7.4.3

Other Plans

The CCP shall (as a minimum) include: a) A communications framework that details the Consent Holder’s communication strategies, accountabilities, frequency of communications and consultation, the range of communication and consultation tools to be used (including relevant communication methods, newsletters or similar, advertising etc.), and any other relevant communication matters;

4, 6.1-6.2

b) The Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project including 24 hour contact details (phone, email and postal address);

5.2

c) The 0800 CRL TALK phone number;

7.4.1

d) The methods for identifying, communicating and consulting with persons affected by the project including but not limited to: i) All property owners and occupiers of the sites that are identified at Appendix A, and adjacent to the Project’s construction sites; ii) Mana Whenua unless any of those named advise the Consent Holder of a different liaison process; iii) Heritage NZ; iv) NZ Transport Agency/ Auckland Motorway Alliance (AMA); v) Kiwirail; …….. viii) Network Utility Operators; and ix) The Community and Business Liaison Group (refer Conditions 16-24)

6.2, 6.4, 6.5. 7.1 – 7.3

e) How stakeholders and persons affected by the Project will be notified of the commencement of construction, the expected duration of the activities and works, and who to contact for any queries, concerns and complaints;

6.2, 6.4, 7.1 – 7.4

f) How stakeholders and persons affected by the Project will be consulted in the development and review of the CEMP and other Management Plans, including specifying reasonable timeframes for feedback;

7.1.2, 7.2.9

g) A list of stakeholders, directly affected and affected in-proximity parties to the construction works with whom the Consent Holder will communicate;

Appendices BD

h) …..

N/A

i) A summary of communication and consultation undertaken between the Consent Holder and parties as required by the PCCP. The summary shall include any outstanding issues or disputes raised by parties;

Appendices B D

SIBD DWP

j) How communication and consultation relating to construction activities and monitoring requirements will be recorded; and

5.3, 7.2

CEMP

k) How opportunities to interpret and display archaeological finds within the Project area will be identified and implemented, including how Heritage NZ will be involved in this process.

6.4.5, 7.2.7

HC DWP

| Karangahape Station Early Works

CEMP

Communication and Consultation Plan Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of CCP

The CCP shall also include (as relevant) linkages and cross-references to the CEMP and other Management Plans.

As referenced in this document

1.6

Any further action recommended as a result of the review under Condition 30 shall be undertaken by the Consent Holder’s Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project and confirmation of completion shall be provided to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

Noted

1.6

The CCP shall be implemented and complied with for the duration of the construction of the Project.

Noted

1.6

Other Plans

CCP Review and updates

This CCP is a live document that will be reviewed six monthly for the duration of construction and updated if required. Any updates to the CCP shall be provided to the parties referred to in CRL designation condition 15.6 and resource consent Condition 28(d) and the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for review and agreement on any further action to be undertaken. In accordance with designation Condition 15.7 and resource consent condition 32, any parties affected by material change to the CCP shall be notified of the change within one 20 working days of the change occurring. A formal review process is described in the CEMP.

Page 11

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

Karangahape Early Works

2.1 Overview of Works Early works will be undertaken at the new Karangahape Station site to enable and provide for the subsequent main construction works. The early works are detailed in the CEMP and shown on the plans provided in Appendix A to this CCP. An overview of the work is provided in Table 2-1. Table 2-1: Overview of Karangahape Early Works

Works location

Overview of construction activities

Beresford Square / Pitt Street

· Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Beresford Square / Pitt Street; · Removal of street trees and the demolition of the café / toilet in Beresford Square; · Establishment of the Beresford Square Construction Support Area to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.; and · Closure of Beresford Square to vehicle traffic (other than construction traffic) while retaining pedestrian and cycle access. · Removal of existing street furniture where required (such as seating, street lighting (to be replaced with temporary lighting).

Mercury Lane

· Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Mercury Lane; and · Establishment of the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc. · Construction of the Mercury Lane temporary working platform.

It should be noted that the demolition of buildings and above ground structures within the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area is authorised by the CRL Enabling Work Outline Plan – Karangahape Road Demolition Works (Auckland Council reference OPW60339200), confirmed in June 2019, does not form part of this CCP.

2.2 Affected Parties Figure 2-1 (also included in Appendix B) identifies the affected parties and affected in proximity parties in relation to the Karangahape Station early works (it should be noted that this is the affected community with whom which engagement has been undertaken to inform the Karnagahape Station early works Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan (SIBD DWP)). Appendix B also contains a map showing the key concerns raised by these parties, based on their location, during the early works SIBD. A list of affected parties, along with a summary of the consultation methods and outcomes of discussions undertaken with these parties is contained in Appendices B – D to this CCP. Reference should also be made to the SIBD DWP (Appendix F of the CEMP) for further detail regarding the SIBD engagement.

Page 12

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Figure 2-1: Karangahape Station Early Works Affected Parties

These parties will form a key part of the primary early works audience with whom engagement will be undertaken during the early works (refer to Section 6 of this CCP). Other key stakeholders with respect to the Karangahape Station early works are identified in Sections 6 and 7 of this CCP, with a summary of engagement undertaken to date provided in Appendix C.

Page 13

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

3. Overarching Strategies and Methodologies This section outlines the existing CRLL communication and engagement strategies that have informed the preparation of this CCP along with key public participation and guidance, in particular the IAP2 engagement spectrum.

3.1 International Association for Public Participation IAP2 is an international association of public participation and engagement practitioners. To ensure that this CCP is effective and all communication and consultation is meaningful, the International Association for Public Participation’s (IAP2) core values2 have been used in the development of this CCP. These are: · · · · · · ·

Public participation is based on the belief that those who are affected by a decision have a right to be involved in the decision-making process. Public participation includes the promise that the public's contribution will influence the decision. Public participation promotes sustainable decisions by recognizing and communicating the needs and interests of all participants, including decision makers. Public participation seeks out and facilitates the involvement of those potentially affected by or interested in a decision. Public participation seeks input from participants in designing how they participate. Public participation provides participants with the information they need to participate in a meaningful way. Public participation communicates to participants how their input affected the decision.

IAP2’s community engagement spectrum of participation is based on the decisions to be made and the associated level of influence (if any) the community has on project decision making, noting that the level of public engagement will depend on the likely impact of a project on communities. Community engagement for CRL will range from informing people about the project, to consulting and involving them in meaningful decisions about key aspects of the project design as well as empowering them with the opportunity for innovative initiatives. Table 3-1 below identifies examples of how the proposed CRL engagement approach aligns with the IAP2 spectrum and how communication and engagement activities will help achieve the objectives for the project. Table 3-1: Alignment with IAP2 Public Participation Spectrum

Inform

Consult

Involve

Collaborate

Empower

· Website updates · Social media · Project newsletters and factsheets

· Community information pop-up hub · Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG)3

· Social impact assessments · Business Forum · Advisory Boards / Steering Groups

· Mana Whenua Forum · Local Boards · Opportunities for collaboration making will be

· Opportunities for communitydecision making will be identified through the engagement activities with

https://www.iap2.org.au/About-Us/About-IAP2-Australasia-/Core-Values The designation conditions reference the Community Liaison Group (CLG), while the resource consent conditions reference the Community and Business Liaison Group. CLG has been used through this DWP as a common reference for the same group. Page 14 | Karangahape Station Early Works 2 3

Communication and Consultation Plan Inform

Consult

· Project enquiry email and phone line · Construction notifications

· Stakeholder workshops, presentations and briefings

Involve

Collaborate identified through the engagement activities with affected parties and stakeholders,

Empower affected parties and stakeholders.

The results of engagement undertaken in relation to the CRL project to date have and will continue to inform the management and mitigation of actual and potential adverse effects from the works and the preparation of the suite of Delivery Work Plans and Management Plans required by the CRL designation and resource consent conditions.

3.2 The CRL Overarching Communication and Consultation Strategy (2018) CRLL is committed to delivering a high level of communications and engagement and the implementation of the overarching Communication and Consultation Strategy is recognised as supporting the delivery of the CRL and of building positive perceptions of the CRL throughout its development and delivery. Table 3-2 provides an overview of CRLL’s communications and engagement objectives for the wider CRL Project. Table 3-2: Communications and Engagement Objectives

These objectives have been adopted by the Link Alliance in the development of this CCP. Page 15

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

3.3 Communication and engagement strategic objectives and principles A Communication and Consultation Strategy was first established for the CRL project in 2012, including a range of objectives and principles. These were adopted in the Pre-Construction Communication and Consultation Plan prepared by Auckland Transport (November 2015) and subsequent CCP’s prepared for the CRL construction works undertaken to date. The engagement objectives and principles set out in the Communication and Consultation Strategy have informed and been adopted in the preparation of this CCP. These include the following A proactive approach - approach stakeholders with information rather than sit back and wait for people to come to it with inquiries; key stakeholders and affected parties have a right to express their views and concerns about a project that has the potential to affect them. Effective communication channels - maintain constructive links with key stakeholders by communicating on a regular basis; continual networking and presence in the business and other relevant communities; and seeking opportunities for dialogue and information-sharing. Openness about issues - be upfront and transparent about what is proposed and provide as much certainty as possible while acknowledging that aspects of project detail is not finalised. Responsiveness - Responses will use best practice by being timely, full, helpful, frank and detailed; key stakeholders and affected parties have a right to expect that their views and concerns will be listened to and considered in project decisions even if agreement cannot be reached. The objectives have four areas of focus: 1. Inform stakeholders about the Project · ·

Engage constructively with key stakeholders/target audiences, providing consistent information across the project Maintain and enhance existing relationships for ongoing constructive engagement

2. Explain the process and timing · ·

Ensure key target audiences and stakeholders have an accurate understanding of the project and its implications Explain how the planning processes work and how people can input into them

3. Educate people about the CRL · ·

Discuss how the project fits into strategic city planning and the regional development of transport infrastructure Minimise uncertainty and dispel misinformation

4. Enhance our reputation · ·

Page 16

Being open and responsive to stakeholder feedback Manage communications risks that may impact the project and our reputation.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

4. Consultation and Communication Strategy Plan Overview

4.1

This CCP has been prepared to provide a communications framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in-proximity parties during the Karangahape Station early works. In accordance with the designation and consent conditions, this CCP set outs the processes and protocols that will be implemented by the Link Alliance during the early works to: · · ·

Inform the community of construction progress and future construction activities and constraints that could affect them. Provide early information on key project milestones. Obtain and specify a reasonable timeframe for feedback and inputs from directly affected and affected in-proximity parties regarding the development and implementation of the CEMP and sub-plans (DWPs and Management Plans). Respond to queries and complaints including but not limited to: · · ·

Who is responsible for responding to feedback and inputs; How responses will be provided; and The timeframes within which responses will be provided.

4.2 Consultation and communication approach The purpose of this CCP is to describe the processes and protocols relating to how the Link Alliance will: ·

· ·

Manage and deliver communication and consultation with the community, stakeholders and affected parties and affected in proximity parties during the Karangahape Station early works. Undertake stakeholder relationship activities (including the Mana Whenua Forum, Local Board engagement and engagement with the media). Comply with the requirements and responsibilities set out in the CRL designation and resource consent conditions and the overarching CRLL Communication and Consultation Plans (as identified in Section 1.4) for the wider CRL project.

This CCP will ensure: · · · · · · · Page 17

The public, including affected in proximity and directly affected parties, are well informed of the Project – works progress and any potential impacts that could affect them. Disruptions are minimised. There is ‘one face’ for the project. Both the Link Alliance and CRLL maintain a positive reputation and support amongst the stakeholder groups. Information is provided early on key project milestones. A framework is provided to obtain feedback and input from directly affected and affected in proximity parties. That queries and complaints are responded to quickly and appropriately. | Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan · ·

Stakeholders, including the media, pedestrians, motorists, adjacent residents and businesses, are positively engaged. All parties involved in the project understand their responsibilities and can collaborate and quickly respond to stakeholder concerns.

4.3 Key Project Messages The key messages to be communicated to affected parties, stakeholder and wider audiences in relation to the wider CRL works are: · ·

· · ·

· ·

CRL is integral to meeting Auckland’s growth and subsequent transport demand. Completing the CRL will provide faster, more frequent travel for all Auckland rail users with two new stations at Aotea and Karangahape and major redevelopment of the Britomart and Mt Eden Stations. Better frequency and reliability will encourage people to leave their cars at home, easing pressure on Auckland’s roads for those who need to use them. The CRL is more than just improving public transport. It is a transformative project that will lead the way in integrated transport and urban development. It will enable significant residential and commercial development around the stations to create new urban precincts, support our housing needs, enhance our environment and make Auckland a more attractive place to live. Disruption during construction will be managed to ensure Auckland keeps working. The CEMP and sub-plans developed for the works reflect unwavering commitment to environmental sensitivity and community well-being, cultural matters and safety.

The following key messages are particularly relevant to the early works: · ·

· ·

CRL will involve the construction of a new Karangahape Station with two Station entrances provided at Beresford Square and Mercury Lane. Early works are required prior to the main Karangahape Station construction works in order to relocate network utilities located within the footprint of the Station box in Beresford Square / Pitt Street and Mercury Lane and establish the construction support areas. Designation and regional resource consents will be complied with and sub-plans implemented to ensure CRL is constructed with as little disruption as possible. Access will be maintained to all properties during the works. In the event that short term and temporary impacts on property access are required, the Link Alliance will engage with the affected parties prior to the works being undertaken. Works will be undertaken in accordance with the CEMP and sub-plans, prepared in accordance with the designation and resource consent conditions.

The hierarchy of the key messages and the communication methods will be defined by the audience (e.g. local / regional / national) and its relationship to the early works.

4.4 Expected Outcomes The following is a summary of the outcomes expected as a result of implementing this CCP: · · · Page 18

Strong relationships with key stakeholders. Positive interaction with affected parties and affected in proximity parties. Robust information received to influence the CEMP and sub-plans. | Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan · · · · · ·

Page 19

Effective CLGs. Informed community. Informed road users. Informative and useful online presence. Positive media coverage. Reduced misinformation.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

5. Roles and Responsibilities 5.1 Overview The Link Alliance and the CRLL Communication and Stakeholder Engagement Team will work together during the Karangahape Station early works in the following ways: · · · ·

During the works, communications with directly affected and affected in proximity parties and stakeholders will be the responsibility of the Link Alliance, in collaboration with CRLL. The Link Alliance will be responsible for communicating with the wider Auckland population in relation to the works, in collaboration with CRLL. The Link Alliance will provide regular information and updates to CRLL on works progress as required. The works will be closely monitored to endeavour to ensure stakeholder satisfaction.

The Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager and the Karangahape Station Project Manager will meet with the CRLL Communications Team regularly as required during the early works.

5.2 Key Personnel The key Link Alliance personal responsible for implementation of this CCP are identified in Table 5- 1. However, all site personnel are responsible for following the requirements of this CCP. Refer to the early works CEMP for further detail on roles and responsibilities. Table 5-1: Key Personnel

Role

Name

Karangahape Station Project Manager

Jonathan Hill

Karangahape Station Construction Manager

Dan Trotman

Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager

Rachel Blundell

Contact details for the Karangahape Station Project Manager and Communications and Stakeholder Manager are provided in Table 5-. Table 5-2: Link Alliance Contact details

Title Karangahape Station Project Manager Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager

Name Jonathan Hill

Email Jonathan.hill@linkalliance.co.nz

Contact no. 022 019 1668

Rachel Blundell

Rachel.Blundell@linkalliance.co.nz

027 306 9156

Contact details for the Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer are outlined in Table 5-3. Table 5-3: Auckland Council Contact details

Name Timothy O’Grady

Page 20

Email Timothy.OGrady@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contact no. 021 834 584

Communication and Consultation Plan

5.3 Link Alliance and CRLL Reporting Requirements A high level of communication will be maintained between the Link Alliance and CRLL during the works. This is particularly important to achieve a proactive response to issues as they arise and seek to avoid escalation of high-risk issues that may negatively affect the reputation of CRLL, the Link Alliance or the Auckland Council. The Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager will immediately report to the CRLL GM Corporate Relations & Communications on any high-risk events or issues will: ·

Be of interest to CRLL or the CRL project sponsors (Auckland Council and Central Government). Have the potential to attract media attention. Present reputational risk to the Link Alliance or CRLL.

· ·

5.3.1. Reporting tools The following reporting tools will be used as part of the communications process between the Link Alliance and CRLL. Table 5-4: Reporting tools

Tools

Responsibility

Description

Urgent notifications

Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager

Immediately report any issues or concerns to CRLL communications team when they may result in media interest or present reputational risk to the project participants.

Weekly meeting

Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager

Weekly meeting with the CRLL GM Corporate Relations and Communications to report on progress, any issues being proactively addressed by Link Alliance, the forward construction programme and media opportunities.

Customer Relationship Management (CRM) database

Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager

Central repository for all stakeholder contact details and interactions with Link Alliance.

Page 21

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

6. Communication Approach 6.1 Strategy Overview: Conversation Locally; Broadcast to Wider Audience The Link Alliance communication and consultation approach will be to engage and inform the primary audience of local residents / businesses and affected / interested stakeholders about the Karangahape Station early works. The engagement approach will prioritise face-to-face interaction and access to information to ensure affected parties are aware of the works and associated actual or potential effects. A wider audience (i.e. the general public) will be engaged with through a predominantly online and electronic communication strategy. The key messages for this audience will be advanced communication of changes to road function to enable informed choice and to ensure travel-related information is readily available.

6.2 Communication Tools The following engagement and communication tools will be utilised during the works, with a preference for electronic media rather than printed material in keeping with the Link Alliance sustainability goals. Table 6-1: Communication tools

Channel

Tool

Usage/content

Distribution frequency

Publications

Construction look aheads

E-notices or printed notifications that provide advance notification of the proposed work activities and potential impacts. Notifications will address (as appropriate):

Monthly

· Key project milestones. · Upcoming works. · Activities and the expected impact. · Major complaints. · Feedback. Distribution: via email to all parties identified in Appendix C and any other parties that have registered an interest in the Project. Also, available on CRL website.

Face to face

Page 22

FAQs and Q&As

Approved responses to frequently asked questions. Distribution: email or CRL website.

As and when required

Flyers

To promote engagement opportunities to business and residential occupiers Distribution: distributed to parties identified in Appendix C.

As and when required

One-on-one discussions

One-on-one meetings with residents, businesses or organisations to inform them of the early works and address specific concerns.

Ongoing as required during the works

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Channel

Tool

Usage/content

Distribution frequency

Directly affected and affected in proximity parties

Meetings with directly-affected and affected in proximity parties to inform them of the early works occurring outside their business or residence and discuss the details of the early works, proposed mitigation and address any specific concerns.

As required during the works

Info Hub Sessions

A public information space (currently at the Old Station Bar on Beresford Square â€“ subject to change in early 2020 as construction works progress in this area) containing information on CRL, in particular the Karangahape Station works and staffed by members of the Link Alliance team to respond to questions or provide information on the CRL and Karangahape Station works. The information hub is open to members of the public and invited parties, via letter drops.

Weekly prior to the commencement of early works (frequency TBC following the commencement of works)

CLG meetings

Karangahape Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG) meetings will be undertaken on a quarterly basis, or as required. Any material changes to the CEMP of sub-plans, shall be provided to the CLG for review and comment.

Every 3 months, or at another frequency agreed by all parties

6.3 Branding and Collateral All communication materials and signage developed for the early works will adhere to the CRLL and Link Alliance Branding Guidelines.

6.4 Identifying and communication with key stakeholders The Link Alliance recognises the diversity of stakeholders and their level of interest and involvement in the early works. While large segments of the community or particular groups have similar interests and issues, there are also specific individuals and groups with unique or individual needs. This includes those from culturally diverse backgrounds. The Link Alliance will endeavour to fully understand stakeholders and the community, their expectations and communication needs. The Link Alliance, in co-ordination with CRLL as required, will be responsible for maintaining clear lines of communication between key stakeholder groups and ensuring they are kept fully informed about the early works. The communication channels which will be utilised to engage with stakeholder groups, including the frequency of engagement, are described in section 6.2 above.

6.4.1. Parties affected by the project A list of the parties affected by the early works and their contact details are provided in Appendix C. The Link Alliance is responsible for keeping this list updated during the early works. An overview of the parties affected by the works is set out below. Page 23

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

6.4.2.

Owners, occupiers and businesses

The current key contacts for the property owners, occupiers and businesses directly affected and affected in proximity to the works have been identified during the pre-construction consultation phase (refer to Section 2 and Appendix B of this CCP) and their contact details are provided in Appendix C. These persons will be provided with the contact details for the Link Alliance, including phone, email, post and website details where they will be able to sign up for information and updates.

6.4.3. Network Utility Operators The network utilities that will be impacted by the early works are owned by the following Network Utility Operators (NUOs): · · · · · · ·

Vector Electricity; Vector Gas; Vector Communications; Chorus; Vodafone; Auckland Council’s stormwater unit (Healthy Waters); and Watercare Services Ltd.

Engagement with the NUOs has been undertaken to inform the design of the early works and will be ongoing during construction, with the objective of ensuring appropriate management of utility assets and the ability to meet operational requirements at all times. Refer to Section 7.2.3 of this CCP for further detail. The Karangahape Road Station Utilities Management Plan has also been developed through engagement with the NUOs.

6.4.4. Auckland Council Parks Department The Link Alliance has engaged with the Auckland Council Parks Department regarding works to trees on public land located within the works area. Specifically, the early works will require the removal of 13 street trees in Beresford Square as outlined in the Trees and Vegetation DWP. Two trees on Pitt Street will be located in proximity to the works so may require protection through the implementation of tree protection measures outlined in the Trees and Vegetation DWP.

6.4.5. Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga (HNZPT) Extensive engagement has been undertaken with the HNZPT Regional Archaeologist in obtaining the CRL Archaeological Authority (Authority No. 2017/793). On-going consultation with HNZPT will continue to occur in accordance with the conditions of this Authority, including notifying HNZPT prior to the commencement of works. Refer to Section 7.2.5 of this CCP for further detail regarding engagement with HNZPT, along with Auckland Council in relation to heritage aspects of the early works.

Page 24

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

6.4.6. Emergency Services The Link Alliance have and will continue to engage with emergency services regarding the early works and potential changes in traffic movements around the works area to inform the preparation of the Transport, Access and Parking DWP. Emergency services engaged with include: · · ·

New Zealand Police. New Zealand Fire Service. St Johns Ambulance.

It should be noted that the Central Fire Station and St John’s Central Ambulance Station are both located on Pitt Street. Keep Clear zone markings are present on the road outside 40 - 50 and 47 Pitt Street, as well as an emergency services traffic signal to provide entry/ exit to these facilities. Engagement will be ongoing as required during the works as per Section 7.2.4 of this CCP.

6.4.7. Auckland Transport The Link Alliance will work closely with Auckland Transport to provide advance notice of key traffic alterations, changes to public transport routes, and in relation to Karangahape Road enhancement works.

6.4.8. Identifying additional people affected by the project Additional parties or stakeholders affected by the early works will be identified through site visits, the preparation of the CEMP and sub-plans, complaints and enquiries recorded in the CRM system, email communication and one-on-one discussions with the community.

6.5 Stakeholder Communication Channels The Karangahape CLG will remain the key touchstone for general communications with key stakeholders and their representatives (refer to Section 7.1 for further detail). Day-to-day communications and stakeholder liaison protocols will be delivered using a variety of channels, with differing frequencies as outlined in section 6.2 above.

Page 25

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

7. Protocols, Processes and Contact Details 7.1 Community and Business Liaison Groups The establishment of a Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG) is one of the key consultation tools required by the CRL designation and resource consent conditions. The CLG is a key mechanism for reflecting community concern and interest and communicating the programme to the community’s most affected parties. A CLG has been established for the Karangahape Station area. Membership of the Karangahape CLG includes representatives from affected property owners and occupiers, businesses and the K’ Road Business Association (KBA).

7.1.1. CLG purpose The purpose of the Karangahape CLG is to: ·

Provide the CLG with regular updates on works progress, construction activities, including any significant changes or milestones and the management of potential adverse construction effects. Ensure that community interests are identified and recognised through the construction process so that construction impacts/disruption can be minimised as practicable and community safety can be appropriately managed. Provide feedback on the development of the CEMP and sub-plans. Monitor the effects of construction works on the community by providing a regular forum through which feedback can be provided to the Link Alliance. Provide opportunities for concerns and issues to be raised and responded by the Link Alliance. Propose initiatives regarding the interim use of properties including vacant land acquired for the construction of CRL.

· · · ·

7.1.2. Process The Link Alliance will organise CLG meetings, including the meeting venue and provide administrative assistance to the CLG. The process for coordinating the Karangahape CLG meetings is set out below. Table 7-1: CLG meeting coordination

Stage

Description

The Link Alliance Communications staff will liaise with the Karangahape CLG members regarding meeting dates and venues. The venue will always be a local venue.

The Link Alliance will organise the CLG meetings and arrange for the appropriate Link Alliance personnel to be present.

The Link Alliance Communications staff will take notes and carry out actions required.

The Link Alliance Communications staff will keep a record of the meetings (including attendance). CRLL will subsequently publish the meeting minutes on the CRL project website.

Page 26

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan In accordance with the designation and resource consent conditions, the CLG shall be provided with a reasonable timeframe (not less than 10 working days) to provide feedback on the development, implementation and review of any material changes in relation to the CEMP and sub-plans.

7.2 Stakeholders and affected parties The CRL designation and resource consent conditions identify a range of stakeholders in relation to the CRL project and require the identification of directly affected and affected in proximity parties to the works. It is noted that a number of the stakeholders identified in the designation and resource consent conditions are not relevant to the Karangahape Station early works, given their extent and location (refer to Table 1-1). A full list of the parties affected by the Karangahape Station early works is contained in Appendix D of this CCP and shown on the Engagement Maps in Appendix B.

7.2.1. Pre-Construction Engagement The Link Alliance has undertaken pre-construction communication and consultation with directly and affected in proximity parties identified in Appendix D, along with key stakeholders, during the preparation of the early works CEMP, DWPs and Management Plans (MPs). The following DWPs are required under the CRL designation conditions: · · · · · · · · ·

Construction Environmental Management Plan*. Communication and Consultation Plan*. Transport, Access and Parking DWP. Construction Noise and Vibration DWP (including Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plans). Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP. Historic Character DWP (comprising Built Heritage and Archaeology sections). Trees and Vegetation DWP. Contamination DWP*. Air Quality DWP*.

The following MPs are required under the A2N resource consent conditions: · · · · · ·

Construction Environmental Management Plan*. Communication and Consultation Plan*. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan Contaminated Soils Management Plan*. Air Quality Management Plan*.

* Note: For these plans, which are required under both the CRL designation and A2N resource consent conditions, one combined plan has been prepared to satisfy both the resource consents and designation conditions. Feedback from directly affected and affected in proximity parties, along with the CLG and key stakeholders, regarding the development of the CEMP and sub-plans was sought in accordance with the CRL designation and A2N resource consent conditions. Feedback is captured in the respective plans, along with the Link Alliance’s response to the feedback. Page 27

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

7.2.2. Construction Phase Engagement The Link Alliance is required to monitor the construction works progress and identify activities that may impact the community and stakeholders. This includes ensuring workers understand the construction activities that may cause particular concern to the community, such as noisy activities or works that may result in disruption to property access or the transport network. The ‘Communication Tools’ detailed in Section 6.2 of this CCP provide a framework to proactively communicate with stakeholders and the adjacent community during the early works. In addition to the general communication and consultation protocols which will be implemented during the works, the following sections outline the stakeholder specific protocols which will be implemented.

7.2.3. Permit to Notify When the Link Alliance is planning on undertaking works that will impact on particular persons or businesses (including but not limited to exceedance of the project noise or vibration limits or impact property access), the Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager shall notify those persons or businesses that will be impacted by the works at least 24 hours in advance of the works being undertaken. A Permit to Notify (PTN) will be used to facilitate internal approvals for works that are likely to have an impact on the adjacent community. This will provide a way to activate communication about potential impacts on affected parties and ensures that notification timeframes will be met, and advanced warning provided. The Permit to Notify process is set out in Table 7-2. Table 7-2: Permit to Notify process

Stage

Responsibility

Description

Link Alliance construction team members

· Submit a Permit to Notify (PTN) to the Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager in advance of the works. · The PTN will include: o identification of scheduled works; and o details of works including: - Description of the works. - Anticipated impacts as a result of the works. -

Description of any mitigation measures employed. Times and duration of the works. Contact details for enquiries.

Karangahape Station Construction Manager

· Signs off the PTN. · Where notifications contain technical content, the relevant Alliance team member/specialist shall approve the content prior to sign off.

Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager

· Approves construction notifications prior to distribution to stakeholders affected by the particular work

Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager

· Communicates by appropriate mechanism (email, phone, or face to face communication) to building owners, tenants/businesses and Body Corporate representatives of the date, time in advance of the works.

Page 28

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

7.2.4. Kaitiaki or Mana Whenua Forum A CRL Mana Whenua forum was established in 2012 for the purposes of undertaking kaitiakitanga responsibilities associated with the project. The forum comprises those Mana Whenua groups who expressed an interest in being involved in the CRL project and its related activities. Eight Mana Whenua self-identified their interest in the CRL project and are currently part of the forum: · · · · · · · ·

Ngāti Maru; Ngāti Paoa; Ngāi Tai Ki Tāmaki; Ngāti Te Ata Waiohua; Ngāti Whātua o Ōrākei; Te Ākitai Waiohua; Te Kawerau a Maki; and Ngāti Tamaoho.

The Mana Whenua forum will be managed by CRLL and will continue to address matters such as: · · · · ·

CEMP and sub-plans. Archaeology, including assistance with discovery protocols. Koiwi and artefact discovery. Cultural induction and monitoring. Ongoing provision of mātauranga Māori input.

During construction works the Link Alliance shall: · ·

Attend the hui arranged by CRLL as required. Follow the protocols for recovery and preservation of artefacts, koiwi, and other items of interest to Maori in the event that these are discovered during the early works. These protocols are identified in the early works Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section) (Appendix G of the CEMP) and in the Archaeological Authority 4 granted for the CRL Aotea to Maungawhau (Mt Eden) construction works. Ensure that all project staff are given a cultural induction, in accordance with iwi guidelines.

7.2.5. Network Utility Operators Ongoing communication and consultation will be undertaken with NUOs during the early works as outlined below.

Material changes affecting Network Utilities Where a material change is identified that has not already been agreed with the NUO and which affects network utilities, then the following process will be adopted: · ·

The Link Alliance will contact the relevant NUO to organise an on-site meeting in conjunction with the contractor. If the change is subsequently agreed on site, then the relevant construction and/or as-built drawings will be revised.

Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga reference 2017-793 Page 29 | Karangahape Station Early Works 4

Communication and Consultation Plan ·

If the change cannot be agreed on-site, then a meeting will be held between Link Alliance and the relevant NUO Project Manager to identify a mutually agreeable outcome.

Section 176(1)(b) RMA Approvals In relation to the Requiring Authority (CRLL) giving approval to NUOs under section 176(1)(b) of the RMA for NUO works in the CLR designation: · ·

The relevant NUO will identify the scope of work required to be undertaken, including location and timing. The Link Alliance Utilities Manager and the CRLL Utilities Manager will meet with the relevant NUO Project Manager to discuss the scope of work, programming, and physical interface with the CRL construction works. Based on this discussion, CRLL will determine whether or not the proposed utility works would ‘prevent or hinder’ the early works (and whether CRLL is able to give written consent to the utility works). Wherever possible, a mutually agreed ‘work plan’ will be developed that allows necessary utility works to proceed in a way that does not hinder the early works (particularly in the case of maintenance and urgent repair works).

Supplementary Authorisations Depending on the circumstances, the relevant NUO or the Link Alliance Utilities Manager, along with the CRLL Utilities Manager will identify what authorisations are required and consider: ·

If the proposed utility works are not related to the CRL project, then the NUO will be responsible for obtaining any necessary authorisations (including resource consents where required). If the utility works are required to facilitate the CRL project, then the Link Alliance will meet with the relevant NUO Project Manager to identify an appropriate design and construction methodology for the works and confirm authorisations required. The Link Alliance will be responsible for obtaining any necessary authorisations (including resource consents where required).

Inspection and final approval of works by network utility operators The process for the inspection and final approval of works by NUOs is as follows: · · · ·

Upcoming inspection, testing, and commissioning works will be identified at weekly meetings between the Link Alliance and the NUOs. The Link Alliance will arrange necessary site inspections directly with the relevant NUO Project Manager. If the inspection passes, then the NUO will sign off the work package. If the inspection fails, then the Link Alliance will work together to identify the appropriate remedial action and a re-inspection will be organised with the NUO.

Ongoing communication and consultation During the Karangahape Station early works there will be regular on-site liaison between the Link Alliance and the NUOs. This will generally be undertaken by way of ‘tool box’ meetings at the start of each day, complemented by weekly meetings during utility construction works between the Link Alliance and the NUOs. The purpose of the weekly meetings when utility works are progressing is to Page 30

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan plan in greater detail for upcoming utility works in conjunction with other aspects of the Project works – e.g. temporary traffic management.

Review of Management Plans The CEMP and sub-plans for the works will be reviewed at least annually, or as a result of a material change to the project, or to address unforeseen adverse effects arising from construction, or unresolved complaints. The Link Alliance will inform the NUOs of any such reviews and will actively engage with the NUOs where a material change to the project has implications for network utilities or the review is required in order to address unforeseen effects or unresolved complaints relating to the utilities aspect of the project.

7.2.6. Emergency services As outlined in Section 6 of this CCP, the Link Alliance will consult with emergency services regarding their specific operational requirements in relation to the early works. This will include information on the location, timing and duration of the works (particularly in relation to traffic lane reductions and/or closures, alternative routes and detours) and consultation in advance of the commencement of construction. The Transport, Access and Parking DWP (Appendix D of the CEMP) states that the early works will be undertaken so as not to impede emergency service access to properties adjacent to the works area or the Central Fire Station and St Johns Ambulance Station located on Pitt Street.

7.2.7. Heritage In addition to engagement undertaken with HNZPT outlined in Section 6.4.7 of this CCP, the Link Alliance has engaged with the Auckland Council Cultural Heritage Implementation Team Leader regarding the preparation of the Archaeology section of the Historic Character DWP and the Auckland Council Heritage Unit (Built Heritage and Implementation) during the preparation of the Built Heritage section of the Historic Character DWP. Engagement with these parties will remain ongoing during the early works in relation to matters such as construction progress and any unexpected archaeology or built heritage finds during the early works. In relation to engagement on heritage related matters during the early works, the Link Alliance shall: · · ·

Page 31

Communicate information on any archaeological or built heritage discoveries during the course of works to Auckland Council Heritage Unit, HNZPT and Mana Whenua. Contact HNZPT, iwi and the police in the occurrence that koiwi (human remains) are discovered during the course of works. Provide a written summary report by the Project archaeologist to HNZPT, Auckland Council (Heritage Unit and Consent Monitoring officer) and Mana Whenua within 20 days of the completion of monitoring. Provide archival photography records of the Beresford Toilets (to be demolished as part of the early works) to the Manager Auckland Council Heritage Unit (Built Heritage and Implementation) as per the building record and salvage strategy for the toilets set out in the Built Heritage section of the Historic Character DWP.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan ·

Maintain regular updates (via the appropriate communication tools detailed in section 6.2) with regard to archaeological or built heritage discoveries and monitoring during the early works.

7.2.8. Auckland Transport As outlined in Section 6 of this CCP, the Link Alliance will consult with Auckland Transport. This will include information on the location, timing and duration of the works (particularly in relation to traffic lane reductions and/or closures, alternative routes and detours) and consultation in advance of the commencement of construction. Discussions will also relate to the Auckland Transport Karangahape Road Enhancement Works. Refer to the Transport, Access and Parking DWP (Appendix D of the CEMP) for further details on engagement with Auckland Transport.

7.2.9. CEMP and Sub-plan reviews In accordance with the designation and resource consent conditions, the CEMP, DWPs and MPs shall be reviewed at least annually or as a result of a material change to the works, to address unforeseen adverse effects arising from construction or unresolved complaints. The Link Alliance shall notify any parties affected by the review and any material change proposed to the plans and document any inputs received from the affected parties. All affected parties shall be provided with a reasonable timeframe (not less than 10 working days) to provide feedback on the changes.

7.3 Notable Receivers CRL designation Condition 16.1 requires that communication and consultation is undertaken (via the appropriate communication tools detailed in section 6.2), as soon as reasonably practicable (and at least once following confirmation of the early works timing and construction methodology), with any Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers located within 100 metres of the designation footprint. Notable receivers with respect to noise and vibration include: · · ·

1. Mercury Theatre due to its theatre usage and basement level recording facilities. 21 East St has recording functionality. 80 Pitt St has recording functionality.

Further detail regarding notable receivers, including consultation that will be undertaken, is provided in the early works CNV DWP (including Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan at Appendix F to the CNV DWP).

7.4 Public Engagement 7.4.1. Public Enquiries Email addresses for public enquiries in relation to the Karangahape Station early works are as follows: ·

Page 32

karangahape@linkalliance.co.nz - in relation to Karangahape Station construction works; and

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

info@cityraillink.govt.nz - in relation to the wider CRL Project (any queries in relation to the Karangahape Station construction works will be forwarded through to the Link Alliance email).

Access to a member of the Link Alliance will also be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week at the CRL Freephone number: 0800 CRL TALK (275 8255) This number will be promoted to directly affected and affected in proximity parties and stakeholders before the early works commence. This number will feature on all project signage, communication material, CRL website and other collateral.

Requirements The Link Alliance will: · ·

Identify the Freephone number on all project advertising and collateral. Allocate a team member responsible for answering the Freephone at all times. They will actively respond to issues, enquiries and emergencies. Record all enquiries, requests for information and complaints.

Process The process for managing enquiries or complaints via the 24/7 Freephone number is set out in Table 7-3. Table 7-3: Public enquiries

Stage

Description

The Link Alliance team member receives an enquiry or complaint.

The communication team member contacts: · The Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager, if the issue is about the construction activity; or · CRLL GM Corporate Relations & Communications, if it is a media enquiry, political enquiry, or related to CRL works outside the Link Alliance scope.

The Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager responds in writing to the communication team member as quickly as possible.

The Link Alliance team member contacts the enquirer with the response, unless it relates to a media or political enquiry, in which case the CRLL GM Corporate Relations & Communications will respond.

The Link Alliance team member determines whether the enquirer is satisfied with the response, including any mitigation action taken if it is a complaint.

The Link Alliance team member responds with further information or action as required.

For construction related complaints, the Link Alliance team member in consultation with the Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager and the Karangahape Station Project Manager determines if a specific mitigation response is required. If so, they refer to the specific DWP / Management Plan (e.g. Traffic, Noise and Vibration, Contamination, etc.), and contact the relevant responsible person or site supervisor.

The Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager will conduct surveys every three months to determine levels of satisfaction with the process of communication responses.

Page 33

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan In accordance with the designation and resource consent conditions, a record of public enquires shall be maintained on-site and be available to the Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Office on Request (refer Section 5.2 for contact details).

7.4.2. Other Enquiries In addition to the email contact and Freephone number above, enquiries from the public may be received in writing or from face to face contact. All such contacts will be recorded in the Link Alliance communication CRM system.

Requirements The Link Alliance site team shall be well briefed to respond to any enquiries, and site supervision is present on site during working hours and is able to actively respond to all issues, enquiries and emergencies.

Process The process for managing public enquiries generally is set out in Table 7-3 above.

Response Timeframes Timeframes for responding to other enquiries is set out in Table 7-4. Table 7-4: Public enquiries response timeframe

Enquiry channel

Response timeframe

Written correspondence (letters)

· Within 5 working days of receipt.

Written correspondence (emails and social media)

· Acknowledged on day of receipt. · Resolved within 2 working days, unless there are significant claims for damages or escalations due to scale or complexity (e.g. Health and Safety investigation).

0800 project information line calls

· Within 2 hours of the same working day during business hours of 8am to 6pm. · Within 24 hours for calls received outside of business hours (unless the call relates to an ‘emergency’ situation requiring immediate action).

Meetings

· Response / resolution to be completed within the timeframes agreed in the meeting.

7.4.3. Complaints Complaints will be dealt with in a responsive manner so that the complainant feels their concerns are being heard and addressed. This approach is designed to develop a relationship of trust and reliability between the community and the Link Alliance. The project will be contactable 24/7 through the Freephone number.

Requirements Link Alliance shall ensure that: Page 34

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan · ·

The Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager handles all complaints that arise on the project, and they are tracked through the CRM system. The community is notified of the project contact details through which complaints can be made. This will include the website, works notifications, onsite signage and project publications and newsletters. Link Alliance staff shall be briefed on the complaints process and are prepared to receive complaints through the Freephone number, by email, in writing or through face to face contact.

Complaints process The process for managing complaints is set out in Table 7-5. Table 7-5: Complaints management process

Stage

Description

All complaints are forwarded to the Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager.

The Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager acknowledges the complaint on day of receipt by phone or in writing. If the Communications and Engagement Manager is not available, the Link Alliance Karangahape Station Project Manager or another member of the project team shall acknowledge the complaint.

The contact details and details of the complaint are entered into the CRM database.

Acknowledgement of a complaint is provided within on day of receipt. However, should the complaint demand a more detailed response, this will be provided within 2 working days or as soon as is practicable. Note: See the ‘Response timeframes’ in Table 7-6 below.

The Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager shall work closely with the Link Alliance Karangahape Station Project Manager or Construction Manager to resolve complaints. They are proactive in keeping complainants informed of what action is being taken to address their concerns.

If a complaint cannot be resolved within the complaints process timeframe, the complainant is invited to a meeting with the Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager and the Karangahape Station Project Manager.

All meetings shall be recorded in the CRM database to ensure that a complete record of times dates and location of meetings is maintained.

When a complaint is resolved it shall be ‘closed out’ as an action in the CRM. Each month a record of complaints activity will be reviewed by the Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager to check that all actions have been closed out.

Complaints data is reviewed regularly by the Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager.

Response timeframes Table 7-6: Response timeframes

Complaint channel

Response timeframe

Written correspondence (letters)

· Within 5 working days of receipt.

Page 35

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Complaint channel

Response timeframe

Written correspondence (e-mails and social media)

· Acknowledge on day of receipt · Resolved within 2 working days, unless there are significant claims for damages or escalations due to scale or complexity (e.g. Health and Safety investigation).

0800 project information line calls

· Within 2 hours of the same working day during business hours of 7am to 7pm. · Within 24 hours for calls received outside of business hours (unless the call relates to an ‘emergency’ situation requiring immediate action).

Meetings

· Response / resolution to be completed within the timeframes agreed in the meeting.

Auckland Council Reporting In accordance with the designation and resource consent conditions, a record of complaints shall be maintained on-site and be available to the Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Office on Request (refer Section 5.2 for contact details). The record shall be provided to Auckland Council every two months (or as otherwise agreed) and to the “key contacts” listed in Section 6.1 of the CEMP. Where a complaint remains unresolved or a dispute arises, the Link Alliance shall provide the Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer with all records of the complaint and how it has been dealt with and addressed and whether the Requiring Authority considers that any other steps to resolve the complaint are required.

7.4.4. Digital Channels The CRL Project website is the heart of the project’s communications strategy. It is a ‘one-stop-shop’ for vital and interesting information for both the local community and a wider audience. It will also have links to other Project information including newsletters, FAQs and social media posts. The Link Alliance shall provide information to the CRLL Communications Team that can be used for the CRL website and social as outlined in the table below. Table 7-7: Media channels

Channel

Details

Information requirements

Website

As the hub of communications for project information, CRLL’s website provides:

The Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager will provide the CRLL Communications Team with regular updates about construction progress, works notifications, photography and videography for upload to the CRL website.

Social Media

Page 36

· Facility for people to sign up for email updates · Contact email address for public enquiries. · The Freephone number: 0800 CRL TALK (275 8255). · DWPs, CEMP and CCP relating to the project. CRLL manages Facebook and Instagram accounts for the Project.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

CRLL Communications Team responsibility – information for regular social media updates.

Communication and Consultation Plan

7.4.5. Media All media enquiries will be channelled through the CRLL Media Manager. The Link Alliance shall support the CRLL Media Manager in responding to media enquiries as follows: · · ·

Reporting to CRLL immediately on any matters which may be contentious or affect the good reputation of CRLL or the project. Providing a very quick turnaround on facts. The Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager shall work closely with the CRLL Media Manager to provide technical responses, personnel or material to assist with media enquiries.

As part of the project induction, all Link Alliance staff and subcontractors will be briefed on the process to follow if approached by the media during the early works.

7.5 Managing Crisis and Emergency Situations The Link Alliance Emergency Response and Incident Management Plan describes how the Link Alliance will manage any emergencies and potential crisis situation. A crisis or emergency is a potential or actual incident that: ·

Poses significant harm to people, property, the environment or the local community, and requires assistance from external emergency services agencies.

It is not a small-scale incident that can be managed without the mobilisation of the Incident/ Crisis Management team and without the assistance of external emergency agencies. For example, a first aid injury or small spill.

7.5.1. Requirements In the event of a crisis or emergency, the Link Alliance shall: · · ·

Activate the Emergency Response and Incident Management Plan which details all Health and Safety processes. Guide strategic stakeholder management and communication processes, in line with the Incident Management Frameworks of Link Alliance and CRLL. Alliance shall support CRLL in responding to the community, the media or the public.

7.5.2. Emergency contacts Table 7-8: Emergency responsibilities contact

Responsibility

Contact

Emergency Response Co-ordinator – Karangahape Station

Link Alliance Karangahape Station Project Manager – Jonathan Hill

Crisis/emergency management oversight

Link Alliance Project Director – Francois Dudouit

Construction management

Link Alliance Construction Manager – Phillipe Begou Link Alliance Karangahape Station Construction Manager – Dan Trotman

Health and Safety

Link Alliance Health and Safety Manager – Joseph McArdle

Page 37

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Responsibility

Contact

Link Alliance Communications

Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager â€“ Rachel Blundell

CRLL Communications

CRLL GM Corporate Relations & Communications - Victoria Jessop

Page 38

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

Appendix A: Staging Drawings

Page 39

| Karangahape Station Early Works

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

STAGE 1 - Q1 2020

PITT ST

AH A

PE R

TREE REMOVAL

SF OR D

CAFE & TOILET DEMOLITION

TREE REMOVAL SEQUENCE 1. SET-UP FENCING 2. TRIM BRANCHES 3. MOBILISE EXCAVATOR 4. CUT TREE TRUNK 5. EXCAVATE STUMP 6. CLEAN-UP SURROUNDINGS

BE Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-17 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_BERESFORD R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

STORAGE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

KAR ANG

LOCALISED TREE REMOVAL

DEMOLITION SEQUENCE 1. SET-UP FENCING WITH NOISE MATS 2. DISMANTLE ROOF FRAME & GLASS 3. DEMOLISH TOILET WITH EXCAVATOR 4. CART AWAY SPOIL 5. CLEAN-UP SURROUNDINGS

CSA ACCESS

WATER TREATMENT AND COVERED SPOIL AREAS

CLIENT:

TREE REMOVAL WORK AREA

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS SHEET TITLE

PARKING BAYS REMOVED

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS BERESFORD SQUARE STAGE 1

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES DESIGNATION BOUNDARY COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CREATOR ID :

STATION OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD--CON-LKA-SKE-EW BER

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

STAGE 2 - JAN 2020 - FEB 2020

PITT ST

RELOCATION CONDUCTED WITHIN THIS FOOTPRINT, ALLOWING ONE TRAFFIC LANE FLOW IN EACH DIRECTION

PE R D

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-17 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_BERESFORD R0.DWG

SQ OR D BE RE SF

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

STORAGE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

WATER TREATMENT AND COVERED SPOIL AREAS

CSA ACCESS

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT 1. BERESFORD SQUARE CLOSED TO THROUGH TRAFFIC 2. ON STREET PARKING CLOSED 3. ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTIES MAINTAINED

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

CLIENT:

KAR ANG

AHA

WASTEWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL STORMWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS SHEET TITLE

WORK AREA

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS BERESFORD SQUARE STAGE 2

PARKING BAYS REMOVED PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CREATOR ID :

DESIGNATION BOUNDARY STATION OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD--CON-LKA-SKE-EW BER

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

STAGE 3 - Q1 - Q2 2020 MANHOLE LOCATION WW LAUNCH DRILL PIT 4x4m - APPROX 5.5m DEEP

PITT ST

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH 2m (W) x 1.5m (D) x 10m (L) MANHOLE LOCATION

STAGED CONNECTIONS ACROSS BERESFORD SQUARE

SF OR D

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-17) Last Plotted: 2019-09-20 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_BERESFORD R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

WW RECEIVE DRILL PIT 3x3m - APPROX 4m DEEP STORAGE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

WATER TREATMENT AND COVERED SPOIL AREAS

CLIENT:

CSA ACCESS

SW RECEIVE DRILL PIT 3x3m - APPROX 3m DEEP TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT 1. BERESFORD SQUARE CLOSED TO THROUGH TRAFFIC 2. ON STREET PARKING CLOSED 3. ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTIES MAINTAINED

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH WASTEWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL STORMWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

SHEET TITLE

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS BERESFORD SQUARE STAGE 3

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES DESIGNATION BOUNDARY CREATOR ID :

STATION OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS

WORK AREA

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

KAR ANG AHA PE R D

SW LAUNCH DRILL PIT 4x4m - APPROX 4m DEEP

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD--CON-LKA-SKE-EW BER

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

STAGE 4 - Q1 - Q2 2020 NEW SW AND WW MANHOLES

PITT ST

TRENCH FOR DRY SERVICES

SF OR D

STAGED CONNECTIONS ACROSS BERESFORD SQUARE

KAR ANG AHA PE R

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO PROPERTIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES

STAGED COMBINED TRENCH FOR SW & WW 2m (W) x 4m (D) x 10m (L)

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-17) Last Plotted: 2019-09-20 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_BERESFORD R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

STORAGE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

WATER TREATMENT AND COVERED SPOIL AREAS

CSA ACCESS

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT 1. BERESFORD SQUARE CLOSED TO THROUGH TRAFFIC 2. ON STREET PARKING CLOSED 3. ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTIES MAINTAINED

CLIENT:

NEW SW AND WW MANHOLES

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS

ISSUE/REVISION

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH WORK AREA

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS SHEET TITLE

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS BERESFORD SQUARE STAGE 4

DESIGNATION BOUNDARY STATION OUTLINE COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CREATOR ID :

PROJECT NAME

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD--CON-LKA-SKE-EW BER

KEY PLAN

CROS S

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

STAGE 1 - Q4 2019

ANE

L CURY R E M

CESS

CSA AC

A ST

CESS

CANAD

CSA AC

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-16 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_MERCURY R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

DEMOLITION WORKS AREA SUBJECT TO CONFIRMED OUTLINE PLAN 'OPW60339200'

NMENTAL STORAGE, ENVIRO AREAS COVERED SPOIL CONTROLS AND

CESS

CSA AC

CLIENT:

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH PARKING BAYS REMOVED

ST EAST

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS SHEET TITLE

WORK AREA

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS MERCURY LANE STAGE 1

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES DESIGNATION BOUNDARY COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CREATOR ID :

STATION/TEMPORARY SHAFT OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW MERCURY

KEY PLAN

RECEIVE DRILL PIT 3x3m APPROX 5m DEEP

ST DIRECTIONAL DRILL, STORMWATER RELOCATION

CROS S

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

STAGE 1A - Q4 2019

URY MERC

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH LAUNCH DRILL PIT 4x4m APPROX 5m DEEP

LANE

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

CSA AC

CESS

CANAD

A ST

CSA AC LAUNCH DRILL PIT 4x4m APPROX 5m DEEP

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-16 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_MERCURY R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

DEMOLITION WORKS AREA SUBJECT TO CONFIRMED OUTLINE PLAN 'OPW60339200'

NMENTAL STORAGE, ENVIRO EAS VERED SPOIL AR CO D AN LS CONTRO

S EAST

CESS CSA AC

CLIENT:

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH STORMWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

SHEET TITLE

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS MERCURY LANE STAGE 1A

WORK AREA PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES CREATOR ID :

DESIGNATION BOUNDARY STATION/TEMPORARY SHAFT OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS

PARKING BAYS REMOVED

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CESS

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW MERCURY

KEY PLAN

CROS S

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

STAGE 2 - Q4 2019 - Q1 2020

STAGED WORKS TO ALLOW SINGLE LANE AT ALL TIMES

Y LA RCUR

CSA AC

A ST

CESS

CANAD

CSA AC

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-16 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_MERCURY R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

DEMOLITION WORKS AREA SUBJECT TO CONFIRMED OUTLINE PLAN 'OPW60339200'

NMENTAL STORAGE, ENVIRO AREAS COVERED SPOIL CONTROLS AND

S EAST

CESS CSA AC

CLIENT:

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH PARKING BAYS REMOVED

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

SHEET TITLE

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS MERCURY LANE STAGE 2

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES DESIGNATION BOUNDARY CREATOR ID :

STATION/TEMPORARY SHAFT OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS

WORK AREA

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CESS

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW MERCURY

Communication and Consultation Plan

Appendix B: Engagement Map and Feedback Overview Engagement has focused predominantly on the affected community as shown in the purple (affected parties) and blue (affected in proximity parties) areas in Figure B-1 below. Additional engagement with members of the public was undertaken via the Information Hub and the YMCA was invited to the Beresford Square community event. Figure B-1: Engagement Map Showing Affected Parties

Figure B-2 overleaf provides an overview of the key concerns and the location of the parties consulted. Appendix D identifies the affected parties. A summary of the individual feedback and mitigation is contained within the early works SIBD DWP.

Page 40

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Figure B-2: Overview of Key Concerns within the Affected Community

Page 41

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

Appendix C: Summary of Communication and Consultation Table C-1: Summary of Communication and Consultation

Stakeholder/Contact Details

Summary of Communication and Consultation Government/Statutory

Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga

· Engagement has been undertaken with HNZPT regarding the wider CRL Project, and an associated Archaeological Authority has been obtained. Engagement will continue in relation to the Karangahape Station early works as required as outlined in this CCP.

Auckland Council

· Pre-application meetings with Auckland Council Regulatory staff, technical advisors and compliance staff have been undertaken in relation to the Karangahape Station early works and the preparation of the CEMP and sub-plans.

Auckland Transport

· Engagement has been undertaken with Auckland Transport regarding the Karangahape early works, in particular impacts on the traffic network, public transport services and the interface between the Auckland Transport Karangahape Road streetscape enhancement works and the Link Alliance early works (which has been integrated into traffic modelling undertaken in relation to the early works). Refer to the Transport, Access and Parking DWP for further detail

New Zealand Transport Agency

· Engagement has been undertaken with the Transport Agency in relation to the use of over-dimensional routes and the management of works to minimise impacts on the surrounding network. Network Utility Operators

Vector Power James Thatcher - Vector PM 0212214798 james@james.thatcher.co.nz Vector Comms Graeme Norton 0212249979 graeme.norton@vector.co.nz Vector Gas Darryl Wharerau - Project Manager 0212461611 darryl.wharerau@vector.co.nz Northpower Jason Butler - Project Manager 0299782972 jason.butler@northpower.co.nz Vodafone Lindsay Fitness - Vodafone Principal 0299125520 Page 42

| Karangahape Station Early Works

· Engagement with NUOs has included a series of workshops, attended by Link Alliance technical staff, NUO project managers and specialist engineers from the CRLL Principal Technical Advisor Team. The workshops have addressed the particular scope, time and cost constraints of relocating live services in the project area. · Key outputs from the workshops include detailed design drawings of the combined services proposals, agreed programme and timing details for the work implementation, and commercial agreements for the procurement of the work. · The requirement to provide continuous service supply to the building owners and occupiers and to minimise any service outages during the course of the works, have been key considerations during design development and construction planning of the early works.

Communication and Consultation Plan lindsay.fitness@vodafone.com City Council – Stormwater Yasenko Krpo - Healthy Waters 021 506 276 yasenko.krpo@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Chorus Daniel Samuel - Field Based Manager 0212970982 Daniel.Samuel@chorus.co.nz Watercare Frank Lin - Project Manager 021977879 Frank.Lin@water.co.nz

Mana Whenua · · · · · · · ·

Ngati Whatua o Orakei Ngāti Te Ata Ngati Paoa Te Akitai Waiohua Ngati Maru Ngati Tamaoho Te Kawerau a Maki Ngai Tai ki Tamaki

Engagement with the CRL Mana Whenua Forum has included the following: · Hui on 15 August 2019 which outlined the Link Alliance and the Link Alliance scope of work, overview of construction aspects and a design update (including station design process and Cultural Advisor role) provided by CRLL and the Link Alliance team. · Hui on 3 September 2019, which included an overview of the Aotea and Karangahape Station early works (including construction staging, methodology and an overview of the CEMP and sub-plans prepared for the works) by the Link Alliance and discussion on the Station design, specifically the incorporation of Mana Whenua design principles. · The Link Alliance will continue to work collaboratively with the Mana Whenua forum during the Karangahape Station early works. Surrounding Community

Karangahape Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG)

· Provision of CEMP and sub-plan summary documents to the CLG followed by a CLG meeting on 17 September 2019 at which the CLG members had the opportunity to provide feedback and comment on the plans to the Link Alliance (feedback has been captured in the respective plans in accordance with the designation and consent conditions). The meeting was attended by a range of Link Alliance staff and the respective plan authors... A Summary is included at Section 6.8 of the SIBD DWP.

Karangahape Business Association

· SIBD and Karangahape Station Stakeholder and Communications Manager meeting and attendance at the Beresford Square Information Session between 19/08/2019 and 20/09/2019. A Summary is included at Section 6.1 of the SIBD DWP.

Affected Parties – Residential and business owners / occupiers

· Refer to Appendix B and a summary of engagement undertaken with affected parties in Appendix D. Engagement from the Link Alliance will remain ongoing during the Karangahape Station early works as outlined in this CCP and the SIBD DWP.

Property Owners

· Refer to a summary of engagement undertaken with affected parties in Appendix D. Engagement from the Link Alliance and CRLL

Page 43

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Communication team (as appropriate) will remain ongoing during the Karangahape Station early works as outlined in this CCP and the SIBD DWP.

Page 44

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

Appendix D: Engagement with Affected Parties Consultation and engagement, via a door knocking exercise, was undertaken with affected parties including residential and business owners or occupiers or property / business managers from 86 properties within the affected community area. Meetings were attended by the Link Alliance Social Impact and Business Disruption (SIBD) and Acoustic engagement teams with the Karangahape Station Stakeholder and Communications Manager attending as required. Refer to Sections 4 – 6 of the SIBD DWP for further details of the engagement and Appendix B of the SIBD DWP for details of how feedback was responded to. Table D-1: Summary of Engagement with Affected Parties

Address

Property Owner / Occupier

Engagement summary Mercury Lane

3-5 Mercury Lane

Mercury Bar and Gaming Lounge

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

White Elephant Op Shop

SIBD and acoustic door knocked but manager not available. Contact details left.

BK Hostel

SIBD and acoustic door knocked but manager not available. Contact details left.

9 Mercury Lane

Mercury Theatre

SIBD and acoustic door knocked and discussion with event manager / staff.

2 Mercury Lane (also 238 KRoad)

Residential Property / Commercial

SIBD and acoustic door knocked and discussion with property manager and resident attendee at the Cross Street Market Community Event - Refer to Section 6.7 of the SIBD DWP.

24 Mercury Lane

Wilsons Car Park

Communications & Engagement Manager is arranging engagement, supported by appropriate SMEs.

30 Mercury Lane

Wilsons Car Park

Communications & Engagement Manager is arranging engagement, supported by appropriate SMEs.

3/2 Canada St

NZ Prostitutes Collective

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with manager. Karangahape Road

195-239 K Road

243 K Road

249-253 K Road

Page 45

Buana Satu

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Leo O’Malley

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Calendar Girls

Invite to Beresford Square Community event with contact details provided.

Pitt St Pub

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business manager.

VAPO

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left – Two visits.

The Hemp Store Café

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property Owner / Occupier

Engagement summary

259-261 K Road

Eagle Bar

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left – Two visits.

POKPOK Thai Restaurant

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left – Two visits.

The Kebab house

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Uncle Man

SIBD and acoustic door knock and contact details left.

Strange Haven

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

283 K Road

Samoa House

Meeting not obtained.

214 K Road

Vacant

n/a

238 K-Road (also 2 Mercury Lane)

Multiple Occupiers

SIBD meeting with property manager / representative.

256 & 258A K Rd

Mithaiwala Restaurant / Café

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Shosha (Vape & Hookah Store)

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

G.A.Y. Auckland

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left.

Charlie Baxters

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left.

Free Bird

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Ink bar & Nightclub

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left.

Bangkok’s Thai Food Café

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left.

270 K Rd

The Family Bar

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left.

270 K Rd

Club Saloon Bar

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with staff member.

278 – 282 K Road

Apero Restaurant (Ismo Koski)

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

284 - 286 K Rd

Cosmic

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

290 K Rd

African Hair Braiding & Extension Centre

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

292 - 300 K Rd

ArtSpace

SIBD door knocked and contact details left.

Tautai Guiding Pacific Arts

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

K Rd Mart

SIBD door knocked and contact details left.

Ivan Anthony Gallery Michael Lett Gallery

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / occupier.

Vacant

SIBD door knocked and discussion with on site worker.

267-281 K Road

268 K Rd

312 K Rd 8 East Street Page 46

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property Owner / Occupier

Engagement summary

10 East Street

Adio Trust

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with manager.

12 East Street

Residential Mixed use

SIBD door knock meeting with residential occupier.

14 East Street

Mixed residential and commercial use

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / occupier.

16 East Street

Studio Q

SIBD door knocked. Communications team to follow up on engagement.

18 East Street

Residential

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with owner.

15 â€“ 19 East Street

Backpacker Car World

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / occupier.

17 Galatos Street

Venue

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting. No place to leave contact details.

21 East Street

UnoLoco Event Management

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with Business Owner/Manager

23 East Street

European Motors

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting.

29 East Street

International Earth Sciences (IESE) Ltd

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meetings (two â€“ follow up with acoustician) with Business Owner/Manager.

Electric Bike Team

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with Business Owner/Manager.

Think Concepts

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with Business Owner/Manager.

2 South Street

Residential

SIBD and Acoustic site visit and contact details left.

2A South Street

Residential

SIBD and Acoustic site visit and contact details left.

17 South Limited

Gorilla Technology

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with Business Owner/Manager.

World Net

SIBD and Acoustic site visit and contact details left.

Glamuzina Architects

SIBD and acoustic door knock and left contact details. Representative attended the Cross Street Market Community Event.

Epsilon Law; Black & Blue Ltd

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the individual Business Owner/Manager.

Unit 5 - 1 Cross Street

The Aviary Nisha Madhan Motion Sickness Voice Brand Agency IMPAC Services

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the individual Business Owner/Manager.

2 Cross Street

Cross Street Markets

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting and subsequent Cross Street Market Community Event.

2A Cross Street

The Warren Woodwork

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager and subsequent Cross Street Market Community Event.

40 Pitt Street

Central Fire Station

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Services Manager.

Page 47

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property Owner / Occupier

Engagement summary

70 Pitt Street

Chattham Apartments

Two SIBD site visits â€“ no place to leave calling card and no contact details available online.

72-80 Pitt Street (multiple units)

Pitt St Methodist Church

Initial SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting followed by an arranged meeting with SME and Construction Contractor.

Flying out movie and music store

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

82 Pitt Street

Def Store

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

47 Pitt Street

Auckland central ambulance station

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

55-59 Pitt Street

Vada - Hairdresser

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Tattoo Parlour

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Neighbourhood Good NZ

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Waves Vintage

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Red Bar

SIBD and acoustic door knocked but not open.

Graphic Design

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

61 Pitt Street

Johnny Feedback Coffee Shop

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

15 & 19 Beresford Square

Hopetoun Alpha

Two SIBD site visits and follow up voicemail to the occupier. Arranged meeting with building owner (also owns a number of properties in the areas including 1 Cross Street)

1 â€“ 7 Beresford Square

Northern Line

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager. Follow up meeting arranged with the construction contractor.

Bravo Hospitality

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Sugar and Partners

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Theta System Limited

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

16-18 Beresford Square

Centurion Sauna

SIBD team called to arrange a meeting / attendance at Info Hub / Community event.

22-28 Beresford Square

Residential

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting and follow up meeting with residents. Residents also attended the Beresford Square community event - Refer to Section 6.7 of the SIBD DWP. Day Street

36 Day Street

Page 48

Residential

| Karangahape Station Early Works

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting and follow up meeting with residents. Residents also attended the Beresford Square community event - Refer to Section 6.7 of the SIBD DWP.

Communication and Consultation Plan

Appendix E: Auckland Council Feedback Mr Blair Masefield, Technical Director – Planning from Land and Survey Ltd, has reviewed and provided comment on the draft CCP as follows: Comment

Response

(1) There is no reference to the AC Compliance Monitoring Officer Mr Tim O’Grady in sections 5.2, and Tables 7-3 and 7-5. Keeping AC informed of public complaints and queries at an appropriate time is important to enable AC to how to respond, if required, and as necessary;

Sections 5.2 the CCP has been updated to include contact details for the Compliance Monitoring Officer and new text has been added to Section 7.4 in relation to Council reporting as per the requirements of the designation and consent conditions.

(2) The Communication Tools in Table 6-1 remain generic and minimal. This has been appropriate for the Enabling works OPW and perhaps for these works given the limited extent. Far more comprehensive, targeted and thought out communication tools are expected for the Karangahape Road community to introduce the Project, identify its effects, how they will be managed, and how these people and their community can interact with the Alliance. The start of this communication strategy is expected to be reflected in this document and built upon in the K Rd Main Works CCP.

The communication tools are considered appropriate for the Karangahape Station early works. However, to assist with providing further detail: · the affected parties map (informing the preparation of the SIBD DWP from Appendix B is now included in Section 2.1 to provide context for the CCP as to the identified affected community; and · additional information has been included in Table 6-1 related to the operation of the information hub in Beresford Square. The future Karangahape Station main works CCP will be prepared cognisant of this comment.

Page 49

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Appendix H: Erosion and Sediment Control Plan

Page 104

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Karangahape Station Early Works Erosion and Sediment Control Plan

CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800010 Revision: Final Date: October 2019

Page 1

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan â€“ Karangahape Station

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800010

This document is uncontrolled when printed. This document should be printed in colour

Revision Status Revision

Date

Version details

Prepared By

Approved By

25/09/2019

Draft for Auckland Council Review

Joanna Miller, Ellen Chang

Peter Roan

21/10/19

Final for submission to Auckland Council

Joanna Miller, Ellen Chang

Peter Roan

Approval Status Name/Title Prepared by:

Joanna Miller, Ellen Chang Professional Civil Engineer

Reviewed by:

Caroline Secretin Principal Environmental Scientist

Verified by:

Duane Rollo Associate Director

Approved by:

Peter Roan Consents Lead â€“ Link Alliance

Page 2

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Signature

Date

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan â€“ Karangahape Station

Table of contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 5 1.1

Karangahape Station ......................................................................................................... 5

1.2

ESCP Staging ...................................................................................................................... 6

1.3

Purpose of the ESCP .......................................................................................................... 6

1.4

Relevant Conditions .......................................................................................................... 6

1.5

Sustainability ..................................................................................................................... 9

1.6

ESCP Review and updates.................................................................................................. 9

2. Karangahape Early Works ......................................................................... 10 2.1

Overview of Works .......................................................................................................... 10

2.2

Earthworks ...................................................................................................................... 10

2.3

Topography and Drainage ............................................................................................... 11

3. Erosion and Sediment Control and Management ..................................... 14 3.1

Key Principles .................................................................................................................. 14

3.2

Erosion and Sediment Control Measures......................................................................... 14

3.2.1.

General ESC Measures .............................................................................................. 14

3.2.2.

Asphalt Works and Concrete Pumping / Pouring....................................................... 15

3.2.3.

Erosion and Sediment Source Control ....................................................................... 16

3.2.4.

Beresford Square / Pitt Street ................................................................................... 17

3.2.5.

Mercury Lane ........................................................................................................... 19

3.3

Monitoring During Construction ...................................................................................... 21

3.4

Heavy Rainfall Response & Contingency Measures ......................................................... 21

3.5

Other Environmental Management Considerations ........................................................ 21

3.5.1.

Contamination.......................................................................................................... 21

3.5.2.

Dust Control ............................................................................................................. 22

3.6

Site Reinstatement .......................................................................................................... 22

4. Roles and Responsibilities, Training and Complaints Response ............... 23 4.1

Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................................................... 23

4.2

Training ........................................................................................................................... 23

4.3

Complaints ...................................................................................................................... 23

Appendix A: ISCA Requirements ..................................................................... 24 Appendix B: ESCP Drawings ............................................................................ 25 Page 3

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan â€“ Karangahape Station

Appendix C: Record of CLG and Auckland Council Comments ........................ 26 C1. CLG Comments .......................................................................................... 26 C2. Auckland Council Comments ..................................................................... 26

Page 4

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan – Karangahape Station

Introduction

The City Rail Link (CRL) project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line in the vicinity of Mt Eden Station. The CRL also involves the construction of two new underground stations at Aotea and Karangahape and a redeveloped Mt Eden Station (refer to Figure 1-1). The design and construction of the CRL infrastructure between the Aotea and Mt Eden Stations is being delivered by the Link Alliance. This Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) has been prepared in relation to construction of the new Karangahape Station (the Station).

Figure 1-1: CRL Route and Location

1.1

Karangahape Station

The Karangahape Station consists of two entrances, one at Beresford Square / Pitt Street and the other at Mercury Lane, linked together by platforms with two mined tunnels approximately 32m below Pitt Street. The Station will also comprise equipment rooms, ventilation systems and emergency egress at both Mercury Lane and Beresford Square / Pitt Street. Given the nature and scale of the Karangahape Station construction, works will be undertaken in a staged manner, involving:   

Page 5

Early works (demolition, network utility relocation and site establishment works)– to be undertaken from October 2019 through to early 2020; Main construction works (construction of the station and mined tunnels for the rail tracks) – to be undertaken from early 2020 through to late 2023; and Public realm reinstatement – likely to be undertaken from late 2022 to late 2024.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan – Karangahape Station

1.2

ESCP Staging

To reflect the staged construction approach for the Karangahape Station, ESCPs will be developed in stages. This ESCP addresses the Karangahape Station early works, which are described in detail in the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and summarised in section 2 of this ESCP. ESCPs will also be prepared for the main construction works and the public realm reinstatement.

1.3

Purpose of the ESCP

This ESCP has been prepared to identify measures that will be implemented to mitigate and manage the potential adverse effects on the receiving environment from any erosion and sediment generation during the early works. This ESCP has been prepared in accordance with Conditions 53-58, 65-73 and 166 of the CRL regional resource consent (land use consent R/LUC/2016/1890). This ESCP forms part of the CEMP for the Karangahape Station early works. The ESCP shall be read in conjunction with other relevant early works Delivery Work Plans (DWP) and Management Plans (MP) required by the designation and land use consent conditions. The ESCP has been developed to enable consultation with and feedback from the Karangahape Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG) (as per resource consent Condition 19). A record of the consultation outcomes is provided in Appendix C of this ESCP.

1.4

Relevant Conditions

Table 1-1 identifies the resource consent conditions relevant to this ESCP and where they are addressed in the document. Table 1-1 Relevant ESCP conditions and location in the Plan

Condition No.

Condition

Relevant ESCP section Land use consent R/LUC/2016/1890 conditions

At least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction within a Construction Support Area (CSA) or ACZ, the Consent Holder shall submit to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification an ESCP which provides for the management of all bulk earthworks to minimise any discharge of debris, soil, sediment or sediment-laden water beyond the site to either land and/ or stormwater drainage systems.

This ESCP

Noted

An ESCP shall include, but is not be limited to, the following matters:

Page 6

 identification of construction zones and construction support areas;

2.1 and 2.2

 specific erosion and sediment control works for each Active Construction Zone (location, dimensions, capacity supporting

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan – Karangahape Station

Condition No.

Condition

Relevant ESCP section

calculations and design drawings), which should be in line with Industry Best Practice that will meet or exceed the performance of measures detailed in TP90;  catchment boundaries;

2.3

 the timing and duration of construction and operation of control works (in relation to the staging and sequencing of earthworks);

3 (and CEMP)

 details relating to the management of exposed areas;

3.2.3

 reference to the Flocculent Treatment Management Plan and confirmation of erosion and sediment control measures necessary to give effect to that plan;

Not required for early works

 reference to the Contaminated Soils Management Plan and confirmation of erosion and sediment control measures necessary to give effect to that plan; and

1.3 and 3.2.3

 monitoring and maintenance requirements, including information on complaint investigation and response procedures, training, and roles and responsibilities.

3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 4 (and CEMP)

Any change to an ESCP shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification.

1.6

Noted

The Consent Holder shall comply with the ESCP for the duration of the earthworks associated with the Project.

Noted

 The contributing catchment area;  The shape of structure (dimensions of structure);  The position of inlets/outlets; and  The stabilisation of the structure. 67

Page 7

3.2

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan â€“ Karangahape Station

Condition No.

Condition

Relevant ESCP section

sediment control measures in place to prevent contamination of the stormwater drainage system, watercourses or receiving waters. 68

3.3, 3.4, 3.5 and 3.6

The site shall be progressively stabilised against erosion at all stages of earthworks activity and shall be sequenced to minimise the discharge of contaminants to groundwater or surface water.

3.1 and 3.2

Sediment control measures shall be inspected on a weekly basis and after a significant storm event to ensure effective operation.

3.3

The Consent Holder shall ensure that all material removed from or delivered to the Project site shall be covered during transportation.

3.2.3

167

Noted

a. Plans and drawings outlining the details of the modifications; and b. Supporting information that confirms how the proposal does not affect the capacity or performance of the existing structural and procedural controls. 168

Page 8

Activity area of grout plant (400m2), and segment storage yard (2660m2) on CSA 4

Settlement Tanks sizing to be based on 2% of the contributing catchment

Inlet protection measures

On all catch pits within CSA areas

2 x Settlement Tanks located in CSA 1, CSA 2, CSA 3, CSA 4 and CSA 5 Bunding of Environmentally

All Active Construction Zone (ACZ)

Design in accordance with Auckland Council Best Management Practice: Catch pit Protection Area (AC 2015). Settlement Tank sizing to be based on 2% of the contributing catchment

As required

110% largest container

| Karangahape Station Early Works

3.2.1, 3.2.4 and 3.2.5

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan – Karangahape Station

Condition No.

Condition

Relevant ESCP section

Hazardous Substances 169

In the event that any minor modifications to the structural system are required, the following information shall be provided to the Team Leader – Central Monitoring whose certification shall be requested prior to implementation: a. Plans and drawings outlining the details of the modifications; and

Noted

b. Supporting information that confirms how the proposal does not affect the capacity or performance of stormwater management system.

1.5

Sustainability

The Link Alliance is seeking an Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia (ISCA) Infrastructure Sustainability (IS) Rating. Further details can be found in the CEMP and Sustainability Rating Management Plan. Project sustainability requirements that relate directly to this ESCP are included in Appendix A. These requirements are imbedded within this ESCP to ensure that sustainability is a key focus and ‘the way we do things’. In some cases, the IS requirements and sustainability goals enhance the designation and consent requirements. Further detail on sustainability is provided in section 1.7 of the CEMP.

1.6

ESCP Review and updates

This ESCP is a live document that will be reviewed at least annually, or as a result of a material change to the project, or to address unforeseen erosion and sediment runoff effects arising from construction, or unresolved complaints. Any material changes to this ESCP must be certified by Auckland Council prior to any on-site activity reliant upon the change commencing (as per conditions 42 and 43 of resource consent). Refer to the CEMP for further detail on the review and updating process.

Page 9

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan – Karangahape Station

Karangahape Early Works

2.1

Overview of Works

Early works will be undertaken at the new Karangahape Station site to enable and provide for the subsequent main construction works. The early works are detailed in the CEMP. An overview of the works is provided in Table 2-1. Table 2-1: Overview of Karangahape Early Works

Works location

Overview of construction activities

Beresford Square / Pitt Street

 Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Beresford Square / Pitt Street;  Removal of street trees and the demolition of the café / toilet in Beresford Square;  Establishment of the Beresford Square Construction Support Area to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.;  Closure of Beresford Square to vehicle traffic (other than construction traffic) while retaining pedestrian and cycle access; and  Removal of existing street furniture where required, such as seating and street lighting (to be replaced with temporary lighting).

Mercury Lane

 Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Mercury Lane; and  Establishment of the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.

It should be noted that the demolition of buildings and above ground structures within the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area is authorised by the CRL Enabling Work Outline Plan – Karangahape Road Demolition Works (Auckland Council reference OPW60339200), confirmed in June 2019, and does not form part of this ESCP.

2.2

Earthworks

Earthworks associated with the Karangahape Station early works will largely comprise:   

Excavation associated with network utility relocations (involving open trenching using excavators and hydro vac trucks) and directional drilling; Contouring to establish the two Construction Support Areas (CSAs); and Construction of the temporary working platform in the Mercury Lane CSA.

The approximate earthwork areas and volumes required for the early works are outlined in Table 2-2.

Page 10

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan â€“ Karangahape Station Table 2-2 Approximate Earthwork Areas and Volumes

Construction Works Area

Approx. Area m2

Approx. Volume m3 350 m3

Pitt Street Stage 1

250 m2

Pitt Street Stage 2

100 m2

150 m3

Pitt Street Stage 3

410 m2

820 m3

Pitt Street Stage 4

100 m2

150 m3

Beresford Square CSA establishment

1,880 m2

1,800 m3

Total Beresford Square / Pitt Street

2,740 m2

3,270 m3

Mercury Lane Stage 1 Mercury Lane Stage 1A Mercury Lane Stage 2 Site Establishment (including retaining wall and temporary working platform construction) within CSA Mercury Lane CSA (including offices, laydown areas, temporary retaining structure, spoil surge piles and settlement pond) Total Mercury Lane Total for Karangahape Station early works

80 m2 50 m2 320 m2 1,590 m2

400 m3 300 m3 1,600 m3 3,090 m3

5,120 m2

9,870 m3

7,160 m2 9,900 m2

15,260 m3 18,530 m3

Beresford square / Pitt Street

Mercury Lane

Refer to section 2.2.1 of the CEMP for a detailed breakdown of the earthwork areas and volumes.

2.3

Topography and Drainage

Karangahape Station contributes to two separate catchments, with Karangahape Road forming the boundary between the two catchments. Pitt Street and Beresford Square drain to north of Karangahape Road into an existing stormwater system, eventually discharging to the Waitemata Harbour by the Central Business District area. There are no flood sensitive areas or major overland flow paths identified in the early works area (refer Figure 2-1). The slopes in this area range from 1.5% to 2.7%. Mercury Lane drains to a different catchment south of Karangahape Road and into an existing stormwater system, eventually discharging to the Waitemata Harbour by Meola Reef Reserve. There are no flood sensitive areas identified in the early works area, but overland flow paths are located along Mercury Lane (refer Figure 2-2). The slope in this area is approximately 9.5%.

Page 11

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan â€“ Karangahape Station

Karangahape Rd

Figure 2-1 Overland Flow Paths and Flood Sensitive Areas in Beresford Square and Pitt Street (Source: Auckland Council Geomaps)

Page 12

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan â€“ Karangahape Station

Figure 2-2 Overland Flow Paths and Flood Sensitive Areas in Mercury Lane (Source: Auckland Council Geomaps)

Page 13

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan – Karangahape Station

Erosion and Sediment Control and Management

Erosion and sediment control measures will be designed, installed and maintained in accordance with Auckland Council “Erosion and Sediment Control Guide for Land Disturbing Activities in the Auckland Region”, Guideline Document 005 (GD05). It is noted that GD05 has superseded Auckland Council Technical Publication 90 (TP90) “Erosion and sediment control guidelines for land disturbing activities in the Auckland Region”, which is referred to in the consent conditions.

3.1

Key Principles

Key erosion and sediment control principles applicable to the early works are as follows: 

Selection of construction methodologies and staging of construction to limit the duration and area of earthworks exposed to erosion at any given time. Minimise the total area of disturbance by keeping the area of earthworks to a minimum and progressive stabilisation of exposed areas. Avoidance of overland flow paths where practicable. Protection and stabilisation of steep slopes using clean water diversion bunds (CWD), and vegetative covers. Stabilisation of exposed surface areas as soon as practicable. This may include one or more of the following measures:

   

 

  

Application of granular material, straw mulch, hydro-seeding or grassing (either temporarily or permanently). Installation of downslope perimeter controls or diversions around and within the construction area, to detain and treat sediment laden runoff and prevent contamination of the existing stormwater system and receiving environment. Use of silt fences around the construction area as required to trap sediment laden runoff. Adoption of specific construction practices within the construction area to minimise sedimentation generation during trenching.

Regular inspection and maintenance of sediment control devices.

3.2

Erosion and Sediment Control Measures

3.2.1.

General ESC Measures

Erosion and sediment control measures (ESCM) will be installed by the Contractor prior to the start of any vegetation clearance, site set up or earthworks. The mitigation measures will remain in place until reinstatement of active working areas is complete. ESCM identified in Table 3-1 can be implemented throughout the construction area. All ESCMs shall be designed and maintained in accordance with GD05. Table 3-1 General Erosion and Sediment Control Measures

ESCM

Application

Catchpit/ Stormwater inlet protection



Page 14



Cover catchpit grates and inlets with geotextile to filter sediment laden runoff before discharge into the stormwater network; or Other proprietary catchpit protection systems, such as silt/filter sock, sand logs, coir logs and hay bales.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan – Karangahape Station ESCM

Application

Diversion channel/bund

  

Filter socks

  

Sand logs/coir logs/hay bales



Dewatering (if required)



Settlement Tanks

 

  

Truck Wash and/or Shaker Ramp

   

3.2.2.

Filter socks can be used to intercept and impound runoff before it enters a catchpit or other stormwater inlet. Can be used to reduce the velocity of runoff flows within a channel, as a check dam. Contain and impound discharges from pumped stormwater or concrete washwater (as a turkey nest to promote settlement). Use in carriageway to divert clean water from construction site where there is steep terrain uphill or unfavourable carriageway crossfall.

Dewatering devices will be used to pump out any water that collects within open trenches or excavation areas or for sediment control devices for maintenance.  A minimum of 100mm water clarity is required to pump out of the works area. The water shall be pumped to settlement tanks or to a tanker and removed offsite. Refer to the Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan (GSMCP) for further detail on groundwater levels within the early works area.

 Stabilised entrance and surface

Install to divert runoff from external catchments entering construction areas or for conveyance of sediment laden runoff within construction areas. Hotmix diversion bunds can be used where kerb and channels have been removed or on impervious surfaces. Diversion bunds must have sufficient capacity to carry the flow safely from a 5% annual exceedance probability (AEP) storm, with 300mm freeboard, in accordance with GD05.

Settlement tank sizing is based upon 2% of the exposed area. Water quality standards must be met before discharging to an existing stormwater inlet, where by pH ranges is between 5.5 to 8.5 and clarity is greater than 100mm. Use available machinery to hydrovac the settlement tanks when full, then the sediment-laden runoff is to be disposed offsite. Install at egress points for construction outside of the carriageway. Any cut or exposed surfaces within the construction area can be stabilised with aggregates. All aggregates should comply with minimum thickness of 150mm with 50-150mm washed aggregate sizing. Any shaker ramps installed should be 5m in length (minimum) to allow for at least one full revolution of a truck tyre. Shaker ramps will need to be placed at the exit and any runoff from the shaker ramp area (including or excluding wheel-wash system) must pass through an appropriate sediment retention device. Localised wheel wash shall be provided where impracticable to install entry and exit stabilised entrances. Truck wash shall connect to a settlement tank or similar retention device to be disposed offsite.

Asphalt Works and Concrete Pumping / Pouring

The environmental risk of concrete or asphalt works is high, and it is recommended that drainage channels are completely isolated during these works. If this is not practicable, careful placement of sandbags or bunds should be implemented.

Page 15

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan – Karangahape Station Other recommended controls are:  Delay concreting works when bad weather is forecast, if practicable.  Minimise the volume of water used on site (e.g. in dust suppression, concrete cutting) so there is less to control.  Use concrete saws that can have a vacuum attached to minimise the amount of dust produced during cutting, OR use a wet/dry vacuum, to collect all concrete or asphalt contaminated material or runoff on site.  If the above is not practical, divert all runoff to the construction pit/ trench or unsealed ground, away from overland flow paths. Runoff or wash water contaminated with concrete fines / dust is highly alkaline and cannot be diluted, therefore, all captured runoff from concrete cutting and/or cement mixing must be treated or disposed off-site.  Wash all equipment and tools in a designated site wash out area.  Do not allow concrete trucks or concrete pumpers to wash out on site unless there is a designated wash area.  Use tarpaulin sheets under concrete pumps and delivery chutes to capture any spills.

3.2.3.

Erosion and Sediment Source Control

The erosion and sediment source controls listed in Table 3-2 have been identified as applicable to all of the early works area. This includes CSAs and work zones identified in stages for utilities relocation and site clearance. Table 3-2 General source control measures applicable to the works area for elimination and/or minimisation of erosion and sediment generation

Source/Activity

Source Control Measure

General site management

    

Soil Management & Stockpiles

     

Sediment transport due to runoff from external catchments entering the construction site Page 16

 

Ensure overland flow paths are unobstructed and stabilised (if required), if practicable. Check the weather forecast and plan accordingly if there is to be heavy rainfall/wind; Stabilise work areas with high sediment generation potential as soon as practicable by placing geotextile and covering with clean hardfill or other approved method; Regularly sweep or remove any accumulated sediment associated with the works; Dampen dusty exposed working areas to minimise wind distribution of sediments. Soil removal using hydrovac will be disposed of at an approved off-site facility. All soil removed should be placed in covered trucks for off-site transport. Stockpiles are to be in construction areas serviced by ESCMs only. Stockpiles of fine material shall be dampened or covered to reduce the potential for windblown sediments or the generation of sediment laden runoff (refer to the AQ DWP for detail on stockpile management). Stockpiles shall be located away from overland flow paths. Any hazardous construction materials shall be stored in an isolated and bunded area in accordance with the CEMP. Construct diversion bunds/channel to divert runoff from external catchments entering land disturbance sites; and Use clean water diversions (e.g. sandbags, compacted earth, bund) where there is steep terrain uphill of the works area to reduce the volume of water requiring management.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan – Karangahape Station Source/Activity

Source Control Measure

Open trench work

 



Erosion due to runoff travelling over reinstated ground

3.2.4.



Cut and Cover methodology shall be adopted. Backfill and compact trenches as soon as possible in an immediate and progressive manner; Exposed areas shall be stabilised as soon as possible and at the end of each day’s operations. This can include aggregate for carriageway and footpath areas and topsoil, seed and mulch/geotextile for landscaping and berm areas. Dewatering of trenches and/or excavations must be pumped to a retention device (settlement device) and using a hydrovac to be disposed of at an appropriate off-site location. Do not remove ESCMs until the reinstatement of active working areas is established.

Beresford Square / Pitt Street

The section details erosion and control measures that will be implemented for construction work within Beresford Square and Pitt Street (tree removal, café/toilet demolition, excavation of service trenches, network utility relocation and CSA establishment).

3.2.4.1

Beresford Square Construction Support Area

The Beresford Square CSA footprint and ESCM are shown on the ESCP Drawings provided in Appendix B. The following erosion and sediment controls will be implemented during the works: 



Page 17

Diversion bund to divert clean water away from the construction zone to a stormwater inlet and dirty water to a settlement tank. Clean water and dirty water diversion (CWD and DWD) must have sufficient capacity to carry the flow safely from a 5% annual exceedance probability (AEP) storm. Stabilised entrance will be provided at the entrance/exit level to Beresford Square where practicable. The truck exit area shall have a shaker ramp installed so that sediment is not transported out of the construction area. The shaker ramp shall have adequate teeth depth so that material dropped from one vehicle is not picked up by the next. Sediment laden water from the shaker ramp/wash area will be diverted to a sediment retention facility at the northern corner of the CSA. Where it is not practicable to implement these control measures, the minimum requirement will be the provision of a localised wheel wash or shaker ramps for trucks, with a temporary holding tank positioned within the CSA to capture runoff. A settlement tank will be placed in the northern corner of Beresford Square CSA to service the wheel wash for the trucks as well as runoff within CSA. The settlement tanks will be emptied using hydro-excavation when full and the sediment-laden runoff will be disposed of at an appropriate off-site location. Two in-line settlement tanks are proposed, designed to service at minimum 2% of the contributing catchment area with tank sizing outlined in Table 3-3.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan – Karangahape Station Table 3-3 Settlement Tank Sizing for Beresford Square CSA

Stage Number

Settlement Tank / Sediment Retention

Contributing Catchment Area (m2)

Minimum Settlement Tank Volume (m3)*

Beresford Square CSA

(Sediment Retention) SR containing 2 in-line tanks (included in the water treatment area)

1,880 m2

37.6m3

* Minimum volume for settlement retention device is calculated as 2% of the contributing catchment area.

3.2.4.2

Beresford Square / Pitt Street Stages 1 and 2

Beresford Square / Pitt Street Stage 1 and 2 works footprint and ESCM are shown on ESCP Drawings in Appendix B. The proposed erosion and sediment controls that will be implemented during these works are as follows: 

Inlet protection will be required at each stormwater catchpit within the works area which discharges into the existing stormwater network at one existing catchpit (CP1) by Beresford Square Bar Restaurant. Diversion bund to divert clean water away from the construction zone to a stormwater inlet and dirty water to a settlement tank. Clean water and dirty water diversion (CWD and DWD) must have sufficient capacity to carry the flow safely from a 5% annual exceedance probability (AEP) storm. The settlement tanks will be emptied using hydro-excavation when full and the sedimentladen runoff will be disposed off-site at an appropriate location. The settlement tanks have been sized to service at minimum 2% of the contributing catchment area. Tank sizing for each stage can be found in Table 3-4.



Table 3-4 Settlement Tank Sizing for Beresford Square / Pitt Street Stages 1 and 2

Stage Number

Settlement Tank / Sediment Retention

Contributing Catchment Area (m2)

Minimum Settlement Tank Volume (m3)*

Stage 1

SR1

250 m2

5 m3

Stage 2 (Silt sock)

SR2

100 m2

2 m3

* The recommended tank volume applies to the total area of each stage. ** Open Excavation Area is based on a trench width provided by the contractors, and the length of trench provided by the contractors. ***Volume for Stormwater Management applies to each stage and is not the cumulative value of all the stages listed in the row. **** Minimum settlement tank volume has been calculated using a conservative approach of 2% of the open excavation area

3.2.4.3

Beresford Square / Pitt Street Stages 3 and 4

Beresford Square / Pitt Street Stage 3 and 4 works footprint and ESCM are shown on the ESCP Drawings in Appendix B. The proposed erosion and sediment controls that will be implemented during these works are as follows: 

Inlet protection will be required at each stormwater catchpit within the works area which discharges into the existing stormwater network:  

Page 18

One existing catchpit (CP1) by Beresford Square Bar Restaurant; One existing catchpit (CP2) in front of 61 Pitt Street;

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan – Karangahape Station    

One existing catchpit (CP3) in front of 259-281 Karangahape Road; One existing catchpit (CP4) in front of 22-28 Beresford Square; and One existing catchpit (CP5) in front of 15 Beresford Square.

Diversion bund to divert clean water away from the construction zone to a stormwater inlet and dirty water to a settlement tank. CWD and DWD must have sufficient capacity to carry the flow safely from a 5% AEP storm. Settlement tanks will be emptied using hydro-excavation when full and the sediment-laden runoff will be disposed off-site at an appropriate location. The settlement tanks have been sized to service at minimum 2% of the contributing catchment area. Tank sizing for each stage can be found in Table 3-5. SR4A, SR4 and SR5 refer to silt socks depicted in the drawings in Appendix B of this ESCP.



Table 3-5 Settlement Tank Sizing for Beresford Square / Pitt Street Stage 3 and 4

Stage Number

Settlement Tank / Sediment Retention

Contributing Catchment Area (m2)

Minimum Settlement Tank Volume (m3)*

Stage 3

SR3

410 m2

8.2 m3

Stage 4

SR4

100 m2

2 m3

* Minimum volume for settlement retention device is calculated as 2% of the contributing catchment area.

** Open Excavation Area is based on a trench width provided by the contractors, and the length of trench provided by the contractors. ***Volume for Stormwater Management applies to each stage and is not the cumulative value of all the stages listed in the row. **** Minimum settlement tank volume has been calculated using a conservative approach of 2% of the open excavation area

3.2.5.

Mercury Lane

This section details the erosion and control measures that will be implemented for the Mercury Lane construction works, being the excavation of service trenches, network utility relocation, reinstatement of pavement and establishment of the Mercury Lane CSA.

3.2.5.1 Mercury Lane Construction Support Area and Site Establishment The Mercury Lane CSA footprint and ESCM are shown on the ESCP Drawings in Appendix B of this ESCP. The following erosion and sediment controls will be implemented during the works: 



Page 19

Diversion bund to divert clean water away from the construction zone to a stormwater inlet and dirty water to a settlement tank. CWD and DWD must have sufficient capacity to carry the flow safely from a 5% AEP storm. Stabilised entrance will be provided at the entrance/exit level to the CSA where practicable. The truck exit area shall have a shaker ramp installed so that sediment is not transported out of the construction area. The shaker ramp shall have adequate teeth depth so that material dropped from one vehicle is not picked up by the next. Sediment laden water from the shaker ramp/wash area will be diverted to a sediment retention facility in the north-western corner of the CSA. Where it is not practicable to implement these control measures, the minimum requirement will be the provision of a localised wheel wash or shaker ramps for trucks, with a temporary holding tank positioned within the CSA to capture runoff. Two in-line settlement tanks will be placed in the south-western corner of the Mercury Lane CSA to service the wheel wash for the trucks as well as runoff within the CSA. The settlement tanks will be emptied using hydro-excavation when full and the sediment-laden runoff will | Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan – Karangahape Station be disposed off-site at an appropriate location. The settlement tanks will be designed to service at minimum 2% of the contributing catchment area with tank sizing outlined in Table 3-6. Table 3-6 Settlement Tank Sizing for Mercury Lane CSA

Stage Number

Settlement Tank / Sediment Retention

Contributing Catchment Area (m2)

Minimum Settlement Tank Volume (m3)*

Mercury Lane CSA

SR containing 2 in-line tanks (included in the water treatment area)

6,710 m2

134.2 m3

+ Site Establishment

* Minimum volume for settlement retention device is calculated as 2% of the contributing catchment area.

3.2.5.2

Mercury Lane Stages 1, 1A and 2

Mercury Lane Stages 1, 1A and 2 works footprint and ESCM are depicted in ESCP Drawings attached in Appendix B of this ESCP. The proposed erosion and sediment controls that will be implemented during these works are as follows: 

Inlet protection required at each stormwater catchpit which discharges into the existing stormwater network.  



One existing catchpit (CP1) in front of 9A Mercury Ave; and Three existing catchpits (CP2, CP3 & CP4) by Mercury Lane and Cross Street intersection.

Diversion bund to divert clean water away from the construction zone to a stormwater inlet and dirty water to a settlement tank. CWD and DWD must have sufficient capacity to carry the flow safely from a 5% AEP storm. The settlement tank will be emptied using hydro-excavation when full and the sedimentladen runoff will be disposed at an appropriate off-site location. The settlement tanks have been sized to service at minimum 2% of the contributing catchment area. Tank sizing for each stage can be found in Table 3-7. Note: SR2 refers to silt socks depicted in the drawings in Appendix B of this ESCP.

Table 3-7 Settlement Tank Sizing for Mercury Lane Stage 1,1A and 2

Stage Number

Settlement Tank

Contributing Catchment Area (m2)

Minimum Settlement Tank Volume (m3)*

Stage 1

SR1

80 m2

1.6 m3

Stage 1A

SR1A and silt sock

50 m2

1 m3

Stage 2

SR2 (silt socks)

320 m2

6.4 m3

* Minimum volume for settlement retention device is calculated as 2% of the contributing catchment area.

Page 20

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan – Karangahape Station

3.3

Monitoring During Construction

All site-specific erosion and sediment control measures will be inspected on a weekly basis and after rainfall events by the Link Alliance. Inspection will include, but will not be limited to, the requirements outlined in Table 3-8. Table 3-8 Monitoring Requirements for ESCM

Erosion and Sediment Control Catchpit / Stormwater Inlet Protection

Inspection/Maintenance Requirements

Frequency



Check for damage, blockages and leaks – repair immediately. Remove accumulated sediment immediately.

Daily, before & after rainfall

Check for scour and areas where a breach may or has occurred – repair immediately. Remove sediment build up deposited in the DWD channel. Check for low spots, formation of gullies or debris – repair immediately.

Weekly & after rainfall

 Clean & Dirty Water Diversion Bunds and Channels

  

Settlement Tanks



Check if the tank is full, then empty using hydrovac and the sediment-laden runoff to be disposed offsite.

Weekly & after rainfall

Stabilised Entranceway and Surface



Check quantity of aggregate and geotextile for sediment build up and deterioration – apply more aggregate as required. Check aggregate thickness and if not GD05 to specification then apply more aggregates or change as required.

Weekly & after rainfall

Check for any structure used to trap runoff and clean it out. Add further aggregate as necessary if aggregate thickness is not to specification or mud blockage is evident.

Weekly & after rainfall



Truck Wash and/or Shaker Ramp

 

3.4

Heavy Rainfall Response & Contingency Measures

The Karangahape early works are planned to extend over five months, between October 2019 and March 2020. High intensity rainfall events can occur during the summer months as well as prolonged rain events during winter months. The Link Alliance shall monitor weather forecasts, inspect all erosion and sediment control measures for adequacy, and undertake any remedial works required prior to forecasted rain events.

3.5

Other Environmental Management Considerations

3.5.1.

Contamination

The majority of spoil from the early works will likely meet clean fill classification (refer to the Contamination Delivery Work Plan (CDWP) in Appendix O of the CEMP).

Page 21

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan â€“ Karangahape Station During all land disturbance activities site staff will actively monitor active works areas for the conditions/materials specified in the CDWP. The CDWP outlines the measures to be implemented if suspected contaminated material is discovered.

3.5.2.

Dust Control

Land disturbance activities shall be undertaken in accordance with the AQ DWP (Appendix I to the CEMP) in order to minimise the potential for dust generation.

3.6

Site Reinstatement

Decommissioning of ESCM shall only occur once the active works areas are permanently stabilised. Due care will be taken during the removal process so as not to mobilise any sediment.

Page 22

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan â€“ Karangahape Station

4. Roles and Responsibilities, Training and Complaints Response 4.1 Roles and Responsibilities The key management roles in relation to environmental management during construction are outlined in the Project CEMP. However, all site personnel will be responsible for following the requirements of this ESCP during the early works.

4.2 Training All site staff will undergo general environmental awareness training and training about their responsibilities relating to this ESCP. Training requirements are described in detail in the CEMP. Specific training requirements relating to this ESCP are outlined in Table 4.1. Table 4.1: ESCP training requirements

Training requirements

Frequency

Attendance

Training on ESCP requirements and resource consent conditions.

As required and during new staff induction

All new site staff

Tool box meetings on site to include erosion and sediment control as a standard agenda item.

Weekly tool box meetings, or as required (e.g. start of new substantial activity)

All site staff

Construction, maintenance and inspections of erosion and sediment control devices

As required

Site supervisors and staff site with erosion and sediment control management responsibilities

4.3 Complaints Any complaints received during the early works shall be recorded and promptly investigated to identify and resolve the cause of the complaint in accordance with the complaints response protocol detailed in the early works Communication and Consultation Plan.

Page 23

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan â€“ Karangahape Station

Appendix A: ISCA Requirements Table A identifies the ISCA Credit Requirements relevant to this ESCP and where they are addressed in the CEMP. Further details regarding the specifics of the evaluation and means of achieving the relevant targets is provided in the relevant sub-plans and other relevant documents. Table A: ISCA Requirements Credit

Relevant section of the ESCP

Requirement *

Other Relevant Information / Comments

Receiving Water Quality DIS-1 Level 1

DIS-2 Level 2

Monitoring and modelling of wai discharges and receiving wai demonstrates no adverse impact on receiving wai environmental values. The infrastructure does not increase peak stormwater flows for rainfall events of up to a 1.5 year ARI event discharge

DIS-3 Level 3

Opportunities to improve receiving wai environmental values have been identified and implemented. Monitoring and modelling demonstrates improvement of receiving wai environmental values

Section 3.2, 3.3, 3.5

Section 3.3, 3.4

Section 3

* Refer to ISCA Rating Tool for full details of the requirement

Page 24

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Also refer to the Emergency Spill Response Plan, Contamination Delivery Work Plan and the Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan

Also refer to the Sustainability Ratings Management Plan

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan â€“ Karangahape Station

Appendix B: ESCP Drawings

Page 25

| Karangahape Station Early Works

.0 63

PITT ST SW

LEGEND:

N SW

S SW

C FO

SW W VG

S S S

SW W VG

S S FOC

S SW FOC VG

S SW FO C VG

WASTEWATER

STORMWATER

POTABLE WATER

VECTOR GAS

VECTOR COMMS FO

VECTOR ELEC

VODAFONE

CHORUS

CITYLINK

STORMWATER

258

PE R

268

AHA

ANG KAR

270

EXISTING

S S W SW VG C

C FO

S S S W SW VG

C FO

S S S W SW VG

S S S S W FOC V W G

256

S S S SW VG C

SW FO VG C

S S

PROPOSED

S S S S S S

4-6

FOC

S S S SW W VG

S S S SW S W FO C V W G

S FO V W CG

S S S W

S S

SW VG C

S S

S FO V W G C

SW SW

S S

S W

FO VSW G C

S S

S S S

278

16-18

DIRTY WATER DIVERSION

SETTLEMENT TANK

S S

S S S

CLEAN WATER DIVERSION BUND

> SILT SOCK UTILITIES LEGEND:

W SW VG C

STABILISED ENTRANCE

> >

SW INLET PROTECTION

267-281

FCO

S SW VGW

S S

S FOC SWW VG

S S TS

SW W

W T

284

246-254

FO C SW W VG

W SW

VG C SW

VE SW

ESCP LEGEND:

243

W C FO VSW G

VG C

W T

S S

VGC

EXISTING CRL DESIGNATION BOUNDARIES

W C FO VSW G

C VG

W FO VSW G C

S S S W SW VG

SW SW

SW SW SW SW

VG C C VG

SW SW

VG SW

VE W

VG C

W VE

VE C VG

W VE

VE C VG

W VE VE

C VG

W VE

VE VGC SW

W VE VG C

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES

8-10

63.0

TREE REMOVAL

61-65

CP1 WILL HAVE FILTER SOCK OR SIMILAR MECHANISM TO PROVIDE FILTRATION AND STORMWATER INLET PROTECTION

S SW

259-261

S SW

12-14

S S

SW SW

SW SW SW

VE C

VE W VE

VE W

VG VE

VE W

S SW

249

64.0

W VE

C FO

W VE VE

VG C

VW E VE

VEW

SW SW W VG

C VG

VEW

VE C

VE W

VE W SW

VE W VE C VG

VE W VE SW

W VE

VE W

Last saved by: JOSEPH.DELATORRE(2019-09-12) Last Plotted: 2019-09-12 Filename: AECOM_DS10_AU\Documents\60604837-CRL C3-Alliance Detail Design\DesignJV\900 CAD-GIS\01_WIP\25-SKETCHES\CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-SKE-000001

S SW T

1-7

VG SW T

W VG

S W

SETTLEMENT TANK TO BE EMPTIED WHEN FULL AND DISCHARGED OFFSITE

SW T

SW VG

SW T

SW SW

WORK ZONE

15-25

62.

SW FO 290

NOTES: SW SW

61.

1. FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURE STANDARD DETAILS REFER TO GUIDELINE DOCUMENT 005.

2. STABILISED ENTRANCEWAYS ARE REQUIRED AT ANY ENTRY OR EXIT POINT OF A CONSTRUCTION SITE.

3. ALL DRAWINGS SHALL BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH KARANGAHAPE STATION EARLY WORKS ESCP AND CEMP.

SCALE 1:200 4. ALL AREAS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY.

CLIENT:

CREATOR ID : CRL_KRD_390_00_LKA_SKE_000001 70

100mm

SIZE A1

FOR INFORMATION APPROVED

PROJECT:

DRAWN

D. ROLLO

TITLE:

J. DELA TORRE A

FOR INFORMATION DESCRIPTION

19.08.19

CHECKED

DATE

APPROVED

DATE

C. SECRETIN

19.08.19

This drawing is confidential and shall only be used for the purpose of this project. The signing of this title block confirms the design and drafting of this project have been prepared and checked in accordance with the Link Alliance quality assurance system to ISO 9001-2000.

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE STATION

ZONE:

E. CHANG

REV

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

SCALE AS SHOWN

DESIGNED REVISIONS

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

64 .0

62 .0

PITT ST

KEY PLAN

EROSION AND SEDIMENT PITT STREET - STAGE 1 SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

TYPE

SHEET

CRL - KRD - RME - LKA - SKE - 000001

REVISION

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

LEGEND: WORK ZONE

65 SW

64 .0

62 .0

TREE REMOVAL

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES VG

EXISTING CRL DESIGNATION BOUNDARIES

ESCP LEGEND:

T SW

S S

SW VG C FO

SW W VG C FO

FOC

W SW FOC VG

S S SW FO C VG

SW FO VG C

SS S

SS W

SW VG C

W SW VG C

268

AHA ANG KAR

SW SW

FCO

S FOC SWW VG

256

NOTES:

1. FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURE STANDARD DETAILS REFER TO GUIDELINE DOCUMENT 005. 2. STABILISED ENTRANCEWAYS ARE REQUIRED AT ANY ENTRY OR EXIT POINT OF A CONSTRUCTION SITE. 3. ALL DRAWINGS SHALL BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH KARANGAHAPE STATION EARLY WORKS ESCP AND CEMP.

SW FO

CITYLINK

C FO

S SS W SW VG

S SS S W FOC V W G

FOC

S SS SW W VG

S FO V W CG

S SS W

S FO V W CG

SS S

S FO V W G C

SS S

FO VSW G C

S S

W FO VSW G C

SS SS SW

4. ALL AREAS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY. 290

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

DESIGNED REVISIONS

100mm

284

CHORUS

W S VGW

S SW VGW S

SW VGW

SS S S

C FO

W SW

VODAFONE

267-281

VECTOR ELEC

278

FO C SW W VG

VECTOR COMMS FO

16-18

VECTOR GAS

270

C FO

S S SW

W 40

259-261

12-14

S S S SW S W FO C V W G

SW SW

SW SW SW SW SW SW

CREATOR ID : CRL_KRD_390_00_LKA_SKE_000002

POTABLE WATER

C FO

S S S W SW VG

SW SW

S SS W SW VG

SW VG

VE W

VE W VE C VG

W VE VE

C VG

W VE

VE C VG

W VE

VGC SW

W VE VE

T S

VE VE

VG C VG

VG C

W T

S SS

VGC

VG C

S S

VE W

VG C

C VG

W VE

C VG

S SW

WASTEWATER

S W

8-10

246-254

STORMWATER

258

EXISTING STORMWATER

4-6

PROPOSED

> UTILITIES LEGEND: SILT SOCK

243

SETTLEMENT TANK

FOR INFORMATION APPROVED

PROJECT:

DRAWN

D. ROLLO

TITLE:

J. DELA TORRE A

FOR INFORMATION DESCRIPTION

19.08.19

CHECKED

DATE

APPROVED

DATE

C. SECRETIN

19.08.19

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE STATION

ZONE:

E. CHANG

REV

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

61-65

CLIENT:

SW SW

SW SW SW SW

VE C

VEW

VG VE

VE W VE

VE W

SW SW

62.

SCALE 1:200

249

SQ OR D

RE SF BE

W VE

VG C

VW E

VE C

VEW

15-25

SW SW

SW W VG

VE VEW

VE C

VE W

VE W SW

VE W VE

C VG

VE W VE

W VE

64.0

63.0

SW SW

S S

1-7

SW W

DIVERTED DIRTY WATER WILL BE FILTERED THROUGH SILT SOCKS, OR EQUIVALENT METHOD, BEFORE BEING RELEASED TO KERB AND CHANNEL

SW VG

C W

S W

S SW

SW T

SW INLET PROTECTION

VG SW T

DIRTY WATER DIVERSION

VG SW T

C SW

SW T

CLEAN WATER DIVERSION BUND

SW SW

PITT ST

STABILISED ENTRANCE

> >

PE R

SW SW

61 .0

PITT ST

EROSION AND SEDIMENT PITT STREET - STAGE 2 SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

TYPE

SHEET

CRL - KRD - RME - LKA - SKE - 000002

REVISION

SW S

FO C

S W VG SW

C FO

S S

W VG SW

S S

C FO 4-6

FCO

FOC

PE R

S C VG W

8-10

AHA

S C VG W

S W S S S FO C VG SW W

S S

VG SW W

243

SW SW

KAR

ANG

249

S S S V W S CG W

S S S

268

259-261

12-14

W VGSW

S S S

270

C FO

VGSWW

61-65

FOC

VGSW W

LEGEND:

16-18

FO C

C V SW G W

S S W

CVGSW

ESCP LEGEND:

VGSW C

EXISTING CRL DESIGNATION BOUNDARIES

284

STABILISED ENTRANCE

> >

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES

267-281

SW SW

278

WORK ZONE

SW TS

S S C VGSW S W

SW SW

VEVE

T VEVE

W SW

VEVE

S VG

T VEVE

VG C

T VEVE

SW S

VG C

VG VGC

S S

W VVEE

FCO

VGSWW

VG C

SW SW

SW WSWS SW S S S VG W C W S FO S S S VG W S C W FO S S S VG W S C W

C SW VG

VVEE W

C SW VG

VVEE W

SW VGC

VVEE W

SW VG C

VVEE

SW VG C

W C

VVEE W

SW VG

W SW VG

VVEE

S SW

VVEE

62.

CLEAN WATER DIVERSION BUND DIRTY WATER DIVERSION SW INLET PROTECTION

0 SW

290

SETTLEMENT TANK SW

PROPOSED

S SW

0 61.

> UTILITIES LEGEND: SILT SOCK

S SW

T W VG SW

64.0

63.0

15-25

SW VG C

W C

W VVEE C

SW V G

VVEEW C

SW V BE G RE SF OR D SQ

VVEEW

SW V G

VVEE W C SW V G

VVEE W

SW SW

1-7

Last saved by: JOSEPH.DELATORRE(2019-09-13) Last Plotted: 2019-09-23 Filename: AECOM_DS10_AU\Documents\60604837-CRL C3-Alliance Detail Design\DesignJV\900 CAD-GIS\01_WIP\25-SKETCHES\CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-SKE-000003

SW V G

W VVEE

SW VG

W VVEE

S VG SW

W VG SW C

S VG SW T

SW T

W C

PITT ST

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

.0 65

64 .0

62 .0

61 .0

PITT ST

FILTER SOCK OR LOGS CAN BE USED TO FILTER SEDIMENT AND TO THEN DISCHARGE TO AN EXISTING CP DOWNSTREAM

KEY PLAN

EXISTING

STORMWATER

WASTEWATER

STORMWATER

SW 283-287

SW SW

SETTLEMENT TANK TO BE EMPTIED WHEN FULL AND DISCHARGED OFFSITE

VECTOR COMMS FO

VECTOR ELEC

VODAFONE

CHORUS

CITYLINK

292-300

1. FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURE STANDARD DETAILS REFER TO GUIDELINE DOCUMENT 005.

VECTOR GAS

NOTES:

UN 0

POTABLE WATER

SW 295

TO PE HO 2.5

W VG

22-28

2. STABILISED ENTRANCEWAYS ARE REQUIRED AT ANY ENTRY OR EXIT POINT OF A CONSTRUCTION SITE. 3. ALL DRAWINGS SHALL BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH KARANGAHAPE STATION EARLY WORKS ESCP AND CEMP.

10m

SCALE 1:250 4. ALL AREAS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY.

CREATOR ID : CRL_KRD_390_00_LKA_SKE_000003

100mm

SIZE A1

FOR INFORMATION APPROVED

PROJECT:

DRAWN

D. ROLLO

TITLE:

J. DELA TORRE A

FOR INFORMATION DESCRIPTION

19.08.19

CHECKED

DATE

APPROVED

DATE

C. SECRETIN

19.08.19

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE STATION

ZONE:

E. CHANG

REV

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

SCALE AS SHOWN

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

EROSION AND SEDIMENT PITT STREET - STAGE 3 SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

TYPE

SHEET

CRL - KRD - RME - LKA - SKE - 000003

REVISION

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

. 63

.0 T

.0 65

61 .0

PITT ST

WORK ZONE

S S

W VG SW C

C FO

VG SW W

> SILT SOCK UTILITIES LEGEND: 256

PROPOSED SW

FCO

FOC

VG SW W

S S S W S S S FO C VG SW W

FO S C VG W

246-254

DIRTY WATER DIVERSION

EXISTING

STORMWATER

WASTEWATER

POTABLE WATER

VECTOR GAS

VECTOR COMMS FO

VECTOR ELEC

VODAFONE

CHORUS

CITYLINK

STORMWATER

249

S C VG W

CLEAN WATER DIVERSION BUND

C FO

W VG SW

S S S

S S

D PE R ANG

AHA

259-261

268

KAR

W VGSW

S S S V W S CG W

4-6

8-10

270

C FO

VGSWW

S S

FCO

VGSWW

FOC

VGSW W

278

16-18

FO C

C V SW G W

C VGSW

S S S W

S CVG W

S S VGSW C

S S

TS SW

284

VEVE C

T VEVE

267-281

VEVE

W S

VEVE

W SW

T VEVE

SW SW

VG C

T VEVE

SW S

VGC

SETTLEMENT TANK

12-14

W VVEE

SW INLET PROTECTION

243

S S S

WSWS SW S S S VG W C W S FO S S S VG W S C W FO S S VG W C

S S

SW SW

> >

61-65

C SW V G

VVEE W SW VGC

VVEE SW VG C

VVEE W

SW VG C

VVEE

SW VG C

SW VG

STABILISED ENTRANCE

VVEE

ESCP LEGEND:

258

VVEE

S SW

VVEE

62.

0 SW

290

S SW

VVEE W

C SW VG

SF RE

15-25

S SW

SW SW

W VG SW

SQ OR D

S SW

SW VG C

W VVEE

SW V G

W VVEE C

SW V G

VVEEW C

SW V G

VVEEW C

SW V G

VVEE W C SW V G

VVEE W

64.0

63.0

61.

SW 283-287

SW SW

22-28

SETTLEMENT TANK TO BE EMPTIED WHEN FULL AND DISCHARGED OFFSITE

292-300

2. STABILISED ENTRANCEWAYS ARE REQUIRED AT ANY ENTRY OR EXIT POINT OF A CONSTRUCTION SITE.

3. ALL DRAWINGS SHALL BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH SW KARANGAHAPE STATION EARLY WORKS ESCP SWAND CEMP. SW SW

SCALE 1:250

10m

1. FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURE STANDARD DETAILS REFER TO GUIDELINE DOCUMENT 005.

295

2.5

NOTES:

4. ALL AREAS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY. SW

Last saved by: JOSEPH.DELATORRE(2019-09-13) Last Plotted: 2019-09-13 Filename: AECOM_DS10_AU\Documents\60604837-CRL C3-Alliance Detail Design\DesignJV\900 CAD-GIS\01_WIP\25-SKETCHES\CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-SKE-000004

1-7

CREATOR ID : CRL_KRD_390_00_LKA_SKE_000004

100mm

SIZE A1

FOR INFORMATION APPROVED

PROJECT:

DRAWN

D. ROLLO

TITLE:

J. DELA TORRE A

FOR INFORMATION DESCRIPTION

19.08.19

CHECKED

DATE

APPROVED

DATE

C. SECRETIN

19.08.19

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE STATION

ZONE:

E. CHANG

REV

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

SCALE AS SHOWN

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

SW VG

W VVEE

S VG SW

VG SW C

S VG SW T

SW T

W C

SW S

EXISTING CRL DESIGNATION BOUNDARIES

RY LAN E

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES

MERCU

64.0

LEGEND:

PITT ST

65.0

FILTER SOCK OR LOGS CAN BE USED TO FILTER SEDIMENT AND TO THEN DISCHARGE TO AN EXISTING CP DOWNSTREAM

EROSION AND SEDIMENT PITT STREET - STAGE 4 SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

TYPE

SHEET

CRL - KRD - RME - LKA - SKE - 000004

REVISION

CRO

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

SW SW

S VE

LEGEND:

SW VE

S S

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES SW

S S VE

STABILISED ENTRANCE CLEAN WATER DIVERSION BUND DIRTY WATER DIVERSION SW

> >

SW INLET PROTECTION

EXISTING CRL DESIGNATION BOUNDARIES

ESCP LEGEND: SW

WORK ZONE

SW SW

SETTLEMENT TANK

Last saved by: JOSEPH.DELATORRE(2019-08-21) Last Plotted: 2019-09-12 Filename: AECOM_DS10_AU\Documents\60604837-CRL C3-Alliance Detail Design\DesignJV\900 CAD-GIS\01_WIP\25-SKETCHES\CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-SKE-000011

SW W

SW W S

S W

SW S

SWS W

STORMWATER INLET PROTECTION TO BE ESTABLISHED AROUND CP1

S VG

C C

SW SW

C VE

C C

C C C

CANA DA ST

C C

VG T

S VG

57.0

59.0

C C

58.0

C SW

S SW W

C C

VE VE

VG W

S SW

C C C

C C

T VE

T S

60.0 S

63.0

C VE

VE VE

C C

61.0

T C

C C

62.0

23-31

SW SW

VE VE

SW W

SW SW

SW 11-13

SW W

VG S

SW W

CL T CL T C C VE VEVG S VG S SW W SW W W

T T

URY MERC

CL VE

LANE

VE VG

VG VG

CL T VG VE S

CL T

RY LAN

CL T VG VE S

SW L C T

VE T

MERCU

SETTLEMENT TANK TO BE EMPTIED WHEN FULL AND SW SW DISCHARGED OFFSITE SW

VE VE

S 2

SW VE

PROPOSED

EXISTING SW

> SILT SOCK UTILITIES LEGEND:

STORMWATER

WASTEWATER

STORMWATER

SW VE

SW SW

POTABLE WATER VECTOR GAS

FO SW VE

VECTOR COMMS FO SW

W VG

VECTOR ELEC SW

VODAFONE

CHORUS

CITYLINK

SW SW

ST EAST

SW SW

NOTES:

SW SW

1. FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURE STANDARD DETAILS REFER TO GUIDELINE DOCUMENT 005.

SW SW

2. STABILISED ENTRANCEWAYS ARE REQUIRED AT ANY ENTRY OR EXIT POINT OF A CONSTRUCTION SITE.

SW SW

3. ALL DRAWINGS SHALL BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH KARANGAHAPE STATION EARLY WORKS ESCP AND CEMP. SW

SCALE 1:200

4. ALL AREAS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY.

CREATOR ID : CRL_KRD_390_00_LKA_SKE_000011

100mm

SIZE A1

FOR INFORMATION APPROVED

PROJECT:

DRAWN

D. ROLLO

TITLE:

J. DELA TORRE A

FOR INFORMATION DESCRIPTION

19.08.19

CHECKED

DATE

APPROVED

DATE

C. SECRETIN

19.08.19

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE STATION

ZONE:

E. CHANG

REV

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

SCALE AS SHOWN

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

EROSION AND SEDIMENT MERCURY LANE - STAGE 1 SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

TYPE

SHEET

CRL - KRD - RME - LKA - SKE - 000011

REVISION

SW SW

C VE

S VE

VE VE

WORK ZONE SW

S SW

DIRTY WATER DIVERSION

SETTLEMENT TANK

> SILT SOCK UTILITIES LEGEND:

VE VE

PROPOSED

STORMWATER

WASTEWATER

SW VE

POTABLE WATER

VECTOR GAS

VECTOR COMMS FO

VECTOR ELEC

STORMWATER

EXISTING SW

SW INLET PROTECTION

SW SW

CLEAN WATER DIVERSION BUND SW

STABILISED ENTRANCE

> >

ESCP LEGEND:

EXISTING CRL DESIGNATION BOUNDARIES SW

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES

LEGEND:

SW W

SW W S

CANA

DA ST

SWS W SW S

S W

S VG S S

C C

C C C

C C

STORMWATER INLET PROTECTION TO BE ESTABLISHED AROUND CP1

VG T S

S VG

57.0 C C

C C

C C C

C C

59.0

C C

SW SW

SW VE

58.0

S SW

VG S

60.0 S

VE VE

T VE

61.0

S SW W

C C

T C

C C

63.0

SW SW SW

C C

62.0

C C

SW SW SW

23-31

VE VE

SW W

T 11-13

SW SW

SW W

VG S

CL S

CL T C VE VG S

VG S

S W

SW W

CL VE

VE S

ANE

CL T VG

CL T VG VE S

CL T C VEVG S

URY L MERC

VE VG

CROSS ST

RY LAN E

CL T

MERCU

T SW L C T VG

SETTLEMENT TANK TO BE EMPTIED WHEN FULL AND DISCHARGED OFFSITE

VE VE

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

DIVERTED DIRTY WATER WILL BE FILTERED THROUGH SILT SOCK, OR EQUIVALENT METHOD, BEFORE BEING RELEASED TO KERB AND CHANNEL TO AN EXISTING SW CP

VODAFONE

CSW

CHORUS

CITYLINK

SW SW

VE VE

NOTES:

1. FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURE STANDARD DETAILS REFER TO GUIDELINE DOCUMENT 005.

SW SW

3. ALL DRAWINGS SHALL BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH KARANGAHAPE STATION EARLY WORKS ESCP AND CEMP.

SW SW

SCALE 1:200

4. ALL AREAS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY.

REVISIONS

CREATOR ID : CRL_KRD__00_LKA_SKE_000012

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870 10

100mm

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

DESIGNED

FOR INFORMATION APPROVED

PROJECT:

DRAWN

D. ROLLO

TITLE:

J. DELA TORRE A

FOR INFORMATION DESCRIPTION

19.08.19

CHECKED

DATE

APPROVED

DATE

C. SECRETIN

19.08.19

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE STATION

ZONE:

E. CHANG

REV

CLIENT:

SW SW

2. STABILISED ENTRANCEWAYS ARE REQUIRED AT ANY ENTRY OR EXIT POINT OF A CONSTRUCTION SITE.

S EAST

SW SW

EROSION AND SEDOMENT MERCURY LANE - STAGE 1A SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

TYPE

SHEET

CRL - KRD - RME - LKA - SKE - 000012

REVISION

CRO

SW SW

VE VE

SW SW

S VG

SW SW SW

S VE

LEGEND:

SW VE

S S

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES SW

S S VE

STABILISED ENTRANCE CLEAN WATER DIVERSION BUND DIRTY WATER DIVERSION SW

> >

SW INLET PROTECTION

EXISTING CRL DESIGNATION BOUNDARIES

ESCP LEGEND: SW

WORK ZONE

SW SW

SETTLEMENT TANK

Last saved by: JOSEPH.DELATORRE(2019-08-19) Last Plotted: 2019-08-19 Filename: AECOM_DS10_AU\Documents\60604837-CRL C3-Alliance Detail Design\DesignJV\900 CAD-GIS\01_WIP\25-SKETCHES\CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-SKE-000013

SW W

SW W S

CANA DA ST

DIVERTED DIRTY WATER WILL BE FILTERED THROUGH SILT SOCKS, OR EQUIVALENT METHOD, BEFORE BEING RELEASED TO KERB AND CHANNEL TO AN EXISTING SW CP S

SW S

SWS W

S W

S VG

C C

C C C

C C

57.0 C C

C C

VG T

T S

C C

59.0

C C

58.0

C SW

S SW W

VG W

S SW

C C C

C C

T VE

T S

60.0 S

63.0

C VE

VE VE

C C

61.0

T C

C C

62.0

23-31

VE VE

SW SW

SW SW 11-13

SW W

SW SW

SW 9

SW W

SW SW

C VE VG S

VG S

SW W

T T C

VE S

CL VE

CL T VG

CL T VG VE S

CL T VEVG S

A URY L MERC

VG S

CL T

VE VG

CL T

SW L C T

RY LAN

CP2

MERCU

VE SW

VE VE

SW SW

KEY PLAN SW

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

CP3

CP4

SW VE

PROPOSED

EXISTING SW

> SILT SOCK UTILITIES LEGEND:

STORMWATER

WASTEWATER

STORMWATER

SW VE

SW SW

POTABLE WATER VECTOR GAS

FO SW VE

VECTOR COMMS FO SW

W VG

VECTOR ELEC SW

VODAFONE

CHORUS

CITYLINK

SW SW

ST EAST

SW SW

NOTES:

SW SW

1. FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURE STANDARD DETAILS REFER TO GUIDELINE DOCUMENT 005.

SW SW

2. STABILISED ENTRANCEWAYS ARE REQUIRED AT ANY ENTRY OR EXIT POINT OF A CONSTRUCTION SITE.

SW SW

3. ALL DRAWINGS SHALL BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH KARANGAHAPE STATION EARLY WORKS ESCP AND CEMP.

SCALE 1:200

SW 8

4. ALL AREAS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY.

CREATOR ID : CRL_KRD__00_LKA_SKE_000013

100mm

SIZE A1

FOR INFORMATION APPROVED

PROJECT:

DRAWN

D. ROLLO

TITLE:

J. DELA TORRE A

FOR INFORMATION DESCRIPTION

19.08.19

CHECKED

DATE

APPROVED

DATE

C. SECRETIN

19.08.19

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE STATION

ZONE:

E. CHANG

REV

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

SCALE AS SHOWN

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

EROSION AND SEDIMENT MERCURY LANE - STAGE 2 SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

TYPE

SHEET

CRL - KRD - RME - LKA - SKE - 000013

REVISION

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

LEGEND: WORK ZONE

SAFETY ZONE / CONES PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES

SAFETY BARRIER LINES

UTILITIES LEGEND:

PROPOSED

DIRTY WATER TO BE DIVERTED TO THE SETTLEMENT TANK. WHICH IS TO BE EMPTIED WHEN FULL AND DISCHARGED OFFSITE

WASTEWATER

STORMWATER

POTABLE WATER VECTOR GAS VECTOR COMMS FO

OUN ST

STORAGE

VECTOR ELEC T

VODAFONE

CHORUS

CITYLINK

STORAGE

ESCP LEGEND: STABILISED ENTRANCE

OFFICES

HOPE T

STORMWATER

CANTEEN

SILT FENCE

CHANGING ROOMS\ TOILETS\ SHOWERS

> >

HOPETOUN ALPHA

WATER TREATMENT AREA

CLEAN WATER DIVERSION BUND DIRTY WATER DIVERSION INDICATIVE FLOW PATH INDICATIVE CONSTRUCTION YARD INDICATIVE LAYDOWN AREA SW INLET PROTECTION SETTLEMENT TANK

NOTES:

STORAGE

EXISTING

CAR PARK

FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURE STANDARD DETAILS REFER TO GUIDELINE DOCUMENT 005.

STABILISED ENTRANCEWAYS ARE REQUIRED AT ANY ENTRY OR EXIT POINT OF A CONSTRUCTION SITE.

ALL DRAWINGS SHALL BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH KARANGAHAPE STATION EARLY WORKS ESCMP.

SURGE PILE

WHEEL WASHING

OFFICES

OFFICE

W VE

VE VE

W VE

C VG VE

C VG

S VE

S T

C VG

S VE

60m

SCALE 1:1500

CREATOR ID : CRL_KRD_390_00_LKA_SKE_000021

100mm

SIZE A1

FOR INFORMATION APPROVED

PROJECT:

DRAWN

D. ROLLO

TITLE:

J. DELA TORRE A

FOR INFORMATION DESCRIPTION

19.08.19

CHECKED

DATE

APPROVED

DATE

C. SECRETIN

19.08.19

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE STATION

ZONE:

E. CHANG

REV

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

SCALE AS SHOWN

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

VE C

VE SW

SC VG

W VE

C VG

T W

W VE

W SW

SW SW

BERESFORD SQUARE

T W

PUBLIC CAR PARK CLOSED DURING WORKS

PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE

SHAKER RAMP AND/OR WHEEL WASH SHOULD BE PLACED AT THE EXIT TO REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM TRUCK TYRES. OTHERWISE LOCALISED WHEEL WASH WILL BE USED AS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT

W VE

STABILISED ENTRY AND EXIT FOR TRUCKS. IT SHOULD BE MINIMUM 5m IN LENGTH

W VE

EXIT

ENTRANCE

CONSTRUCTION LAYDOWN AREA PITT STREET SHEET 1 OF 3 PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

TYPE

SHEET

CRL - KRD - RME - LKA - SKE - 000021

REVISION

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

C CC

C C C

ENTRANCE

C C

C C C

SW SW

STABILISED ENTRY AND EXIT FOR TRUCKS. IT SHOULD BE MINIMUM 5m IN LENGTH

CAR CA EXIT ENT R RANCE

CHANGING ROOMS TOILETS / SHOWERS

SURGE PILE

LEGEND: WORK ZONE SW

SAFETY ZONE / CONES SW

BANK

CRANE AREA

BANK

VE VE

C SW

CAR PARK

C C

SW SW

OFFICES

SW SW

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES

SAFETY BARRIER LINES

PROPOSED

CANTEEN

VECTOR COMMS FO

STORMWATER

VECTOR ELEC VODAFONE

CHORUS

CITYLINK

ESCP LEGEND: SW

STORAGE

OFFICES

VECTOR GAS

FO VE

SW SW

TUNNEL STORAGE

WATER TREATMENT AREA

POTABLE WATER

SW VE VE

VE VE

STORAGE

FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURE STANDARD DETAILS REFER TO GUIDELINE DOCUMENT 005.

WASTEWATER

SITE TRACK

NOTES:

STORMWATER

SURGE PILE

EXISTING

UTILITIES LEGEND:

STABILISED ENTRANCE

SCALE 1:200 SW SW

SW SW

100mm

SCALE

SIZE

AS SHOWN

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CREATOR ID : CRL_KRD_390_00_LKA_SKE_000022

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870 20

FOR INFORMATION APPROVED

DRAWN

FOR INFORMATION DESCRIPTION

TITLE:

19.08.19

CHECKED

DATE

APPROVED

DATE

C. SECRETIN

19.08.19

CLEAN WATER DIVERSION BUND DIRTY WATER DIVERSION INDICATIVE FLOW PATH INDICATIVE CONSTRUCTION YARD

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE STATION CONSTRUCTION LAYDOWN AREA MERCURY LANE SHEET 2 OF 3 PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

SW INLET PROTECTION SETTLEMENT TANK

ZONE:

D. ROLLO

J. DELA TORRE

PROJECT:

E. CHANG

REV

> >

INDICATIVE LAYDOWN AREA

EAST ST

DIRTY WATER TO BE DIVERTED TO THE SETTLEMENT TANK. WHICH IS TO BE EMPTIED WHEN FULL AND DISCHARGED OFFSITE

ALL DRAWINGS SHALL BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH KARANGAHAPE STATION EARLY WORKS ESCMP.

STABILISED ENTRANCEWAYS ARE REQUIRED AT ANY ENTRY OR EXIT POINT OF A CONSTRUCTION SITE.

SILT FENCE 2.

CLIENT:

TEMPORARY SHAFT

MERCURY LANE STATION

S C

SITE TRACK

SW S

SW SW

STABILISED ENTRY AND EXIT FOR TRUCKS. IT SHOULD BE MINIMUM 5m IN LENGTH

SW SW

C C

EXIT VG

CC C

SW S W

C C

57.0

58.0

59.0

SHAKER RAMP AND/OR WHEEL WASH SHOULD BE PLACED AT THE EXIT TO REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM TRUCK TYRES. OTHERWISE LOCALISED WHEEL WASH WILL BE USED AS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT

VG SW

CC CC

MERCURY LANE

SHAKER RAMP AND/OR WHEEL WASH SHOULD BE PLACED AT THE EXIT TO REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM TRUCK TYRES. OTHERWISE LOCALISED WHEEL WASH WILL BE USED AS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT

VG W

SWS W

S SW

60.0

CC CC

VE VG

SW W

VG S

SW W

T VG

VG SW

SW CL T VG S VE

T VG

T C

VE S

SW W

N IA TR CE ES N D RA PE NT E

CL VE S

CRO SS ST VE

VE T

CL T C VG VE S

63 .0

VE C

CL T C VG VE S

CL C VE VG S

61. 0

C CL VE

62 .0

CLEAN WATER DIVERSIONS TO DIVERT AWAY FROM THE CSA

LAN

RCU SW

SW SW

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

TYPE

SHEET

CRL - KRD - RME - LKA - SKE - 000022

REVISION

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan â€“ Karangahape Station

Appendix C: Record of CLG and Auckland Council Comments C1. CLG Comments A Karangahape CLG meeting was held on 17 September 2019 to discuss the Karangahape early works and for the CLG to provide comments / feedback on the CEMP and sub-plans, including this ESCP. No comments were received in relation to this ESCP.

C2. Auckland Council Comments This ESCP was provided to Auckland Council as a draft for comment. No comments were received.

Page 26

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Appendix I: Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Page 105

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Karangahape Station Early Works Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800009

Revision: Final Date: October 2019

Page 1

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Table of contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................... 5 1.1

Karangahape Station ......................................................................................................... 5

1.2

Air Quality DWP Staging .................................................................................................... 6

1.3

Purpose of the Air Quality DWP ........................................................................................ 6

1.4

Relevant Conditions .......................................................................................................... 6

1.5

Sustainability..................................................................................................................... 9

1.6

DWP Review and updates ............................................................................................... 10

1.7

AQ DWP Author .............................................................................................................. 10

2. Karangahape Early Works .........................................................................11 2.1

Overview of Works .......................................................................................................... 11

2.2

Discharges to Air ............................................................................................................. 11

2.3

Sensitive Locations .......................................................................................................... 12

2.4

Key Personnel.................................................................................................................. 12

3. Environmental Standards ..........................................................................13 3.1

Environmental Performance Standards........................................................................... 13

4. Monitoring Requirements .........................................................................14 4.1

Dust Monitoring .............................................................................................................. 14

4.2

Visual Inspection and Monitoring Methods .................................................................... 14

4.3

Instrumental Monitoring ................................................................................................. 14

4.3.1.

Dust ............................................................................................................................ 14

4.3.2.

Meteorological Monitoring.......................................................................................... 15

4.3.3.

Dust Trigger Alerts....................................................................................................... 15

4.4

Monitor Locations ........................................................................................................... 15

4.5

Monitoring Data .............................................................................................................. 16

4.6

Monitoring Equipment Maintenance .............................................................................. 16

4.7

Monitoring for Hazardous Air Pollutants......................................................................... 16

4.8

Odour Monitoring ........................................................................................................... 16

5. Operating Procedures ...............................................................................18 5.1

General Methods of Dust Control.................................................................................... 18

5.2

Dusk Risk Index ............................................................................................................... 18

5.3

Dust Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................... 19

5.3.1. Page 3

Methods of Dust Control â€“ All Areas (Low Risk) ........................................................... 19

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan 5.3.2.

Further Methods of Dust Control â€“ Moderate Risk ...................................................... 20

5.3.3.

Further Methods of Dust Control â€“ High and Extreme Risk Conditions ......................... 20

5.3.4.

Equipment Malfunction ............................................................................................... 21

5.4

Review of Dust Mitigation ............................................................................................... 21

5.4.1.

Sources of Information ................................................................................................ 21

5.5

Dust Control during Contaminated Material Handling .................................................... 22

5.6

Odour Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................ 22

5.7

Control of Vehicle Exhaust Emissions .............................................................................. 22

5.8

Dust contingency measures............................................................................................. 23

6. Communication with Affected Parties ......................................................24 6.1

Complaints ...................................................................................................................... 24

7. Environmental Training .............................................................................25 7.1

Project Staff..................................................................................................................... 25

8. Record Keeping .........................................................................................26 8.1

Air Quality Diary .............................................................................................................. 26

Appendix A: Record of CLG, IPR and Auckland Council Comments .................27 A1. CLG Comments ..........................................................................................27 A2. IPR Comments ...........................................................................................27 A3. Auckland Council Comments.....................................................................27 Appendix B: ISCA Requirements......................................................................29 Appendix C: Beaufort Scale .............................................................................30 Appendix D: Dust Risk Index ...........................................................................31

Page 4

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

1. Introduction The City Rail Link (CRL) project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line in the vicinity of Mt Eden Station. The CRL also involves the construction of two new underground stations at Aotea and Karangahape and the redeveloped Mt Eden Station (refer to Figure 1-1). The design and construction of the CRL infrastructure between the Aotea and Mt Eden Stations is being delivered by the Link Alliance.

Figure 1-1: CRL Route and Location

This Air Quality Delivery Work Plan (AQ DWP) has been prepared in relation to construction of the new Karangahape Station.

1.1 Karangahape Station The Karangahape Station will consist of two entrances, one at Beresford Square / Pitt Street and the other at Mercury Lane, linked together by platforms with two mined tunnels approximately 32m below Pitt Street. The Station will also comprise equipment rooms, ventilation systems and emergency egress at both Mercury Lane and Beresford Square / Pitt Street. Given the nature and scale of the Karangahape Station construction, works will be undertaken in a staged manner, involving: · · ·

Page 5

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

1.2 Air Quality DWP Staging To reflect the staged construction approach for the Karangahape Station, this AQ DWP will be developed in stages. This AQ DWP addresses the Karangahape Station early works, which are described in detail in the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and summarised in Section 2 of this AQ DWP. AQ DWPs will also be prepared for the main construction works and the public realm reinstatement.

1.3 Purpose of the Air Quality DWP This AQ DWP has been prepared to identify the measures that will be implemented to mitigate and manage the potential adverse effects on air quality during the Karangahape Station early works. The objective of the AQ DWP is to detail the best practicable options to avoid, remedy, or mitigate the adverse effects of discharges of dust, odour and hazardous air pollutants generated by construction activities for the works. Amongst other things, this AQ DWP includes procedures for ensuring that construction and earthworks activities do not result in the following effects beyond the boundary of the work site: Âˇ Âˇ

Offensive or objectionable dust or odours; or Hazardous air pollutants that cause, or are likely to cause, adverse effects on human health, environment or property.

The CRL designation 2500-4 (Condition 59) requires the preparation of an AQ DWP, while condition 222 of discharge permit R/REG/2016/1899 require the preparation of an Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). These two separate requirements have been combined and are addressed in this single AQ DWP. This AQ DWP has been developed to enable consultation with and feedback from the Karangahape Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG); and review by the Independent Peer Reviewer (IPR) prior to submission to Auckland Council (as per designation Conditions 7 and 11, and resource consent Condition 19). A record of consultation outcomes is included in Appendix A. This AQ DWP forms part of the CEMP for the Karangahape Station early works.

1.4

Relevant Conditions

Table 1-1 identifies the designation and resource consent conditions relevant to this AQ DWP and where they are addressed in the document. Table 1-1: Air Quality conditions and location in AQ DWP

Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

CRL Designation Conditions 59.1

An Air Quality DWP shall be prepared to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects on air quality during the construction of the City Rail Link or any part of it.

Whole Document

The objective of the Air Quality DWP is to detail the best practicable option to avoid dust and odour nuisance being caused by construction works and to remedy any such effects should they occur.

1.3

59.2 Page 6

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

To achieve the above objective the following shall be included in the Air Quality DWP and implemented as required:

59.3

(a) The procedures to be implemented for the continuous monitoring of Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) concentrations and meteorology including, but not limited to, the establishment of two monitoring sites (to the north and south of the site);

4.3

(b) Identification of the sensitive locations, and the specific methods for monitoring, including trigger limits to determine whether further action (such as implementation of the mitigation measures discussed below or other mitigation measures) is required;

2.3, 5

(c) Procedures for responding to malfunctions with construction machinery or works causing accidental dust discharges including, but not limited to, the requirement to remedy any malfunction within 24 hours;

5.3.4

(d) Procedures for monitoring weather conditions and the requirement that water spray is used on soil stockpiles, any non-paved construction areas, and the wheels of trucks where dust may disperse beyond the site;

4.3

(e) Procedures for establishing when the covering of trucks will be required;

(f) Procedures for determining when hard surfaced areas in construction yards and active construction areas should be cleaned including, but not limited to, the requirement that such areas be cleaned whenever dust generation occurs due to traffic on these surfaces;

(g) Procedures for responding to discharges of odour (including in the event of excavation of contaminated sites) including, but not limited to, the requirement to address discharge of objectionable odour by immediately ceasing the activity causing the discharge;

4.7 ,5.6

(h) Procedures for equipment inspection (including timeframes for regular inspections), maintenance, monitoring and recording, including baghouses, pressure relief valves and high level alarms to mitigate dust emissions;

(i) Procedures for, where practicable, limiting dust and odour nuisance and the methods for monitoring these procedures including Identification of contingency measures to address identified and verified adverse effects on sensitive receptors.

Contingency measures may include options such as: (i) Cleaning of air filtration intakes; or

5.8

(ii) Cleaning of other buildings and infrastructure; and

5.8

(j) Procedures for responding to any complaints received and the timeframes for response to complaints and reporting;

5.8

(k) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which detail how the communities in the vicinity of construction works are to be communicated with on the management of the adverse effects relating to air quality.

Discharge Permit R/REG/2016/1899 Conditions 217

Page 7

This resource consent shall expire 15 years after the consent commences unless it has been surrendered or been cancelled at an earlier date pursuant to the RMA.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Noted

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

218

This Document

219

This Document

220

This Document

221

This Document

222

This Document

223

The final AQMP/s shall be prepared by a Senior Qualified Person, provided to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification at least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction and shall include: a. a clear identification of the type and location of the controls proposed; b. a detailed framework for the management, mitigation and monitoring of construction and earthworks activities associated with the Project; c. a focus principally on the sources of dust discharges, and d. an assessment of the risk of discharges from each ACZ and the associated CSA.

224

Page 8

The final AQMP/s shall also provide detailed methods including, but not limited to, the following matters: a. methods to ensure exposed surfaces remain dampened to minimise dust emissions (possible examples include a water spray system or other suitable system, water carts and other suppression methods); b. ensuring a 20 km/hr vehicle speed limit within the ACZs and CSAs; c. operation of wheel washes; d. regular sweeping of public roads around the exit points of ACZs and CSAs and sealed vehicle accessways within these areas; e. measures for supressing dust from any temporary stock piles (demonstrating how they are to be limited to no more than 24 mÂł of uncovered spoil at any one time in each ACZ); f. measures for the handling of cement associated with the forming of cement stabilised columns, including filter systems and high level alarms where a silo is used;

| Karangahape Station Early Works

This Document

5.3.1 5.3.1 5.3.1 5.3.1 Not applicable

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Condition No.

225

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

g. covering of loads of material being delivered and removed from the site; h. instrument monitoring of dust concentrations (including identification of a monitoring methodology, monitoring network and appropriate alert thresholds) to ensure that any significant dust effects arising from the ACZs or CSAs are identified and remedied as soon as practicable throughout the Project; i. the locations of instrument dust monitoring sites, including at least three relocatable and/or fixed monitors to be associated with each of ACZs A, K and M, and the duration of this monitoring; j. measures for responding to continuous instrument dust monitoring trigger alarms, including contingency measures to reduce measured concentrations below the trigger thresholds and provisions for responding after standard operating hours; k. measures for undertaking meteorological observations and visual inspections of dust or other air discharges from the Project, to be completed at least on a daily basis, with all relevant information logged; and l. information regarding complaint logging, investigation and response procedures, training and roles and responsibilities.

5.3.1

4.3

4.4

4.3.3

4.2 2.4, 6, 7

226

All works shall be undertaken in accordance with the certified AQMP/s.

Noted

227

4.3

228

1.5

Sustainability

Page 9

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan in Appendix B. These requirements are imbedded within this AQ DWP to ensure that sustainability is a key focus and â€˜the way we do thingsâ€™. In some cases the IS requirements and sustainability goals enhance the designation and consent requirements.

1.6

DWP Review and updates

This AQ DWP is a live document that will be reviewed at least annually, or as a result of a material change to the Project, or to address unforeseen adverse air quality effects arising from construction, or unresolved complaints. Any material changes to this AQ DWP must be certified by Auckland Council prior to any on-site activity reliant upon the change commencing. Refer to the CEMP for further detail on the review and updating process.

1.7

AQ DWP Author

This AQ DWP has been prepared by Andrew Curtis who is a Technical Director at AECOM specialising in air quality.

Page 10

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Karangahape Early Works 2.1 Overview of Works

Early works will be undertaken at the new Karangahape Station site to enable and provide for the subsequent main construction works. The early works are detailed in the CEMP. An overview of the work is provided in Table 2-1. Table 2-1: Overview of Karangahape Early Works

Works location

Overview of construction activities

Beresford Square / Pitt Street

· Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Beresford Square / Pitt Street; · Removal of street trees and the demolition of the café / toilet in Beresford Square; · Establishment of the Beresford Square Construction Support Area to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.; · Closure of Beresford Square to vehicle traffic (other than construction traffic) while retaining pedestrian and cycle access; and · Removal of existing street furniture where required, such as seating and street lighting (to be replaced with temporary lighting).

Mercury Lane

It should be noted that the demolition of buildings and above ground structures within the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area is authorised by the CRL Enabling Work Outline Plan – Karangahape Road Demolition Works (Council reference OPW60339200), confirmed by Auckland Council in June 2019. Those works do not form part of this AQ DWP.

2.2

Discharges to Air

The main potential discharges to air arising from the construction activities discussed above is particulate matter (dust). The following dust generating activities from the Karangahape Station early works have been identified: · · · · · · · · Page 11

Dust associated with demolition of the Beresford Square café and toilets; Breaking up and excavating existing road surface concrete and asphalt; Excavation of trenches, and spoil removal; Excavation of launch and receiving pits for directional drilling; Storage of excavated spoil and imported fill (up to 24 m³, if necessary); Movement of vehicles in the work areas; Backfilling of the utility relocation trenches; Excavation contouring of Mercury Lane CSA and construction of Mercury Lane Station temporary work platform (including the importation / use of fill material); and | Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan Âˇ

Contouring of Beresford Square CSA.

In addition, there will also be discharges of combustion related air pollutants from mobile plant and diesel generators. These include oxides of nitrogen (nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2)), carbon monoxide (CO) and volatile organic compounds (VOC).

2.3

Sensitive Locations

Due to the proximity of pedestrians, and businesses to the works, all locations within 100 m of the areas of the designation in which the early works will be undertaken are considered sensitive1 to the effects of dust that have the potential to result from the works. In addition, any location within 100 m of the areas of the designation in which the early works will be undertaken where people live is considered a sensitive location, specifically the residences in 1 Beresford Square, the George Court building on Mercury Lane and the houses on East Street.

2.4

Key Personnel

The key personnel responsible for implementation of this AQ DWP are identified in Table 2-2. However, all site personnel are responsible for following the requirements of the AQ DWP. Refer to the CEMP for further detail on roles and responsibilities. Table 2-2: Key Personnel and Contact details

Role

Name

Karangahape Station Project Manager

Jonathan Hill

Karangahape Station Construction Manager

Dan Trotman

Environmental and Sustainability Manager

Sarah Sutherland

Link Alliance Karangahape Early Works Air Quality Specialist

Andrew Curtis

Link Alliance Communication and Engagement Manager

Rachel Blundell

The MfE has defined the sensitivity of different land uses in its Good Practice Guide for Assessing and Managing Odour in New Zealand. These definitions apply equally to the effects of dust, with both high density residential and commercial/retail areas considered to have high sensitivity. Page 12 | Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Environmental Standards 3.1 Environmental Performance Standards

As required by the CRL designation and resource consent conditions, the intention of this AQ DWP is to ensure that construction air quality effects are kept to a practical minimum, recognising the sensitivity of the environment within which the works are being undertaken. Generally, the compliance measure used in construction processes is that dust and other air discharges do not result in “off-site” nuisance, where off-site in this case is defined as being outside of the CRL designation. Because a “dust nuisance” cannot necessarily be identified until it has occurred, there are numerical guidelines that can be used in conjunction with Total Suspended Particulate monitoring to identify levels of dust that are likely to be considered a nuisance. These values, developed by the Ministry for the Environment (MfE), are set out in Table 3-1, together with additional values to deal with short term emissions that are most likely to result in effects. Table 3-1 also contains Trigger levels for odour, wind and dust deposition. Table 3-1: Environmental Trigger Levels for Air Discharges

Discharge

Trigger Level

Action

Dust Monitoring

Trigger values for Action 160 μg/m³ (1 hour average) 60 μg/m³ (24 hour average)

Implement requirements of Section 5.3.3 and any additional mitigation measures identified in Section 6.

Dust Deposition

Evidence of dust on windows (a finger run down the glass leaves a clear line) Dirt on clean washing

Implement any required mitigation set out in Section 5.

Odour

Presence of odour that is out of character with environment (e.g. smell of refuse in a residential area)

Implement any monitoring in Section 4.7 and mitigation set out in Section 5.

Page 13

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Monitoring Requirements 4.1 Dust Monitoring

The overall approach to dust control is primarily based on visual monitoring in combination with targeted ambient dust monitoring; good management of the construction areas; and a rapid response to any of the triggers outlined in Table 4-1 and/or to any complaints received. Good practice focusing on pre-emptive measures will aid in the avoidance of significant dust emissions, or if dust emissions occur, the subsequent mitigation or remediation of any adverse effects.

4.2 Visual Inspection and Monitoring Methods General visual monitoring of all early works construction areas will be undertaken on a daily basis or potentially more frequently, if conditions change. This type of monitoring relates to the control measures described in Section 5 of this AQ DWP and will include pre-emptive measures to avoid dust emissions. Table 4-1 below describes the monitoring programme. Table 4-1: Visual Dust Monitoring Programme

Monitoring Activity

Frequency

Check weather forecasts for strong winds and rainfall to plan appropriate work schedule and dust management response.

Daily

Inspect construction exits and adjoining roads for the presence of dust deposition.

Twice daily

Observe weather conditions including wind and rain via observations and data outputs from weather stations.

Daily and as conditions change

Inspect all exposed surfaces for dampness.

Daily and as conditions change

Inspect stockpiles to ensure enclosure, covering, stabilisation or dampness. Ensure stockpile height is less than 3 m where possible or appropriate.

Daily and as conditions change

Inspect dust generating activities to ensure dust emissions are effectively controlled.

Daily and as new activities are commenced

Inspect watering systems (sprays and water carts) if used, to ensure equipment is maintained and functioning to effectively dampen exposed areas

Weekly

Monitor dust generating activities and water application rate (as required).

In winds over 5.5 m/s (11 knots or Beaufort Scale 3) at 1.5 m above the ground

Check for dust on local roads being used to access the site.

Daily

Inspect any wheel wash equipment to ensure effective operation.

Weekly

4.3 Instrumental Monitoring 4.3.1.

Dust

While the Karangahape early works are relatively minor in nature and scale, and in general instrumental dust monitoring is not required, the proximity of residential properties to the Mercury Lane CSA, particularly those on East Street, means that continuous dust monitoring at this location is Page 14

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan required. It is proposed to monitor Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) concentrations at only one location (specific monitor location to be confirmed prior to the commencement of these works). The TSP monitor will be easily re-locatable, able to run without mains power supply and will employ optical nephelometry that works by directing a laser beam through a sample of air containing particulate and measuring the light scattered by the particles in the sample.

4.3.2.

Meteorological Monitoring

Meteorological monitoring for the early works will be based on visual observations, with site engineers considering the weather conditions on a daily basis or as conditions change, and not undertaking activities when wind speeds are greater than 11 m/s or 6 on the Beaufort force scale that might carry dust beyond the site boundary. The Beaufort Scale (Appendix C) will be used to determine wind speed.

4.3.3.

Dust Trigger Alerts

The section below identifies how dust trigger alerts will be managed when that type of monitoring does occur. The monitoring equipment will be set up with text alerts to key personnel in the relevant work zone, when dust concentrations exceed the Trigger values set out in Table 3-1, namely 160 µg/m³ as a 1hour average and 60 µg/m³ as a 24-hour average. At a minimum this will include: · · · ·

The Karangahape Station Project Manager; The Karangahape Station Construction Manager; The Environmental and Sustainability Manager; and The Karangahape Station Site Supervisor.

If personnel change then the Instrument Technician will be contacted to update the alerts. If a dust trigger alert is sent, one of the above staff members will immediately (within 30 minutes) respond and investigate the cause of the alert. This investigation will: · · ·

determine if the alert is real and not caused by equipment malfunction; identify the source of dust; and check to see that all of the required mitigation measures are being implemented.

If it is determined that construction activities are the cause of dust and that mitigation measures are not effective at controlling dust, the Dust Contingency Measure outlined in Section 5.8 of this DWP shall be implemented. If these measures fail to effectively manage dust to acceptable levels, works will be halted until it can be determined why dust emissions are occurring and what additional mitigation measures are required to control ambient dust to acceptable levels. The findings of the investigation shall be recorded in the Air Quality Diary (refer Section 8.1 of this AQ DWP).

4.4 Monitor Locations The TSP monitor will be located on the eastern boundary of the Mercury Lane CSA, potentially in the same location as that proposed during the demolition works (which are subject to a separate AQ DWP). However, the final location will be determined once the demolition works are complete.

Page 15

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

4.5 Monitoring Data All monitoring data from the TSP monitor will be available to project staff on-line, once that equipment is installed.

4.6 Monitoring Equipment Maintenance When installed, the TSP monitoring equipment will require periodic maintenance. The monthly maintenance of the equipment will be carried out by either site personnel, who have received appropriate training, or an Instrument Technician. Maintenance and calibration will be carried out on the schedule specified by the equipment supplier by an Instrument Technician familiar with the equipment installed. In the event that there is an equipment malfunction, or the equipment needs to be relocated for some reason, then the Instrument Technician will attend to this.

4.7 Monitoring for Hazardous Air Pollutants While no specific areas of contaminated material have been identified near to the early works area, should this material be encountered (refer to the Contamination DWP), the procedures provided in the Contamination DWP will be followed, which may necessitate the requirement for air monitoring.

4.8 Odour Monitoring Odour monitoring will be undertaken when it is considered likely that odorous material will be encountered (such as the excavation of contaminated materials). The decision to undertake monitoring will be made by the Environmental and Sustainability Manager. The frequency of monitoring will be dependent on the nature / scale of the source, location in relation to sensitive receptors, and meteorological conditions during exposure. Odour scouting will occur: · ·

If potentially contaminated material is excavated and loaded into trucks for off-site disposal; and/or If odour complaints have been received.

The Environmental and Sustainability Manager will ensure that at least one person in each work area is trained as an odour scout. This monitoring will involve the odour scout being downwind of the works and assessing odours on the intensity scale set out in Table 4-2. Where odours are identified as being “Distinct” and above, and the odour characteristic unpleasant, mitigation measures will be implemented (refer Section 5.6 of this AQ DWP). All observations shall be recorded in the daily Air Quality Diary (refer Section 8.1 of this AQ DWP). Table 4-2: Odour Intensity Scale

Intensity Scale

Criteria

No Odour

Very Weak

Weak

Distinct

Page 16

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Intensity Scale

Criteria

Strong

Very Strong

Extremely Strong

The odour scout will reassess the level of odour once the mitigation measures have been implemented. If the odours are still â€˜Distinctâ€™, further mitigation will be implemented, and / or the works halted until more conducive meteorological conditions are present, i.e. not blowing towards the sensitive receptor. If it is suspected that sources upwind of the works are responsible for any odour then the odour scout will make appropriate observations and document this also.

Page 17

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Operating Procedures

There are a range of routine measures that will be used on the site to manage and mitigate the effects of discharges of dust, odour or construction vehicle exhaust emissions. Additional mitigation may also be required in the event that: · · ·

Monitoring indicates that abnormal discharges of dust are occurring; Weather conditions are changing such that dust or odour discharges are more likely as determined using the Dust Risk Index; and / or Complaints are received regarding discharges of dust, odour or construction vehicle exhaust emissions.

All processes on the worksite will be implemented, operated, maintained, supervised, monitored and controlled so that any emissions authorised by the resource consent are maintained at the minimum practicable level. If the available mitigation methods are unsuccessful in controlling discharges (i.e. dust and odour) that cause significant adverse effects on receptors beyond the works boundary, then activities causing the discharge will be suspended until adequate mitigation can be put in place.

5.1 General Methods of Dust Control Dust control methods are generally associated with either reducing the potential for dust generation and transport associated with the activities described in Section 2 of this AQ DWP. General measures that will be employed during the early works to control dust from construction activities include: · · · · · · · ·

Controlling dust from any excavation by placing material directly into trucks where possible; If material being excavated is very dry, using water sprays to increase surface moisture; If materials are placed in temporary stockpiles, use water in dry windy conditions to control the dust potential prior to removal off-site; Controlling dust from exposed surfaces: Placing limits on vehicle speeds; Limiting disturbance of soil or dusty materials: Reduction in vehicle movements and speeds and the use of lighter vehicles will also reduce disturbance and dust generation; Limiting area of exposed materials: Staging of works and minimisation of material exposure in works areas will reduce the potential for wind erosion; Maintenance of surface moisture content: Watering or wet suppression is used to dampen dry or dusty exposed areas; and Removing excavated spoil from site on a regular basis.

5.2 Dusk Risk Index One of the main potential air quality impacts comes from dust associated with the construction process. To provide better guidance to the Environmental and Sustainability Manager, Karangahape Station Construction Manager and Site Supervisor on the implementation of dust mitigation, the works will use a Dust Risk Index (DRI). The DRI process is described in Appendix D. A simple “traffic light” indication of dust risk will be posted in each work area, so that site staff are aware of the dust risk. Note for the early works the DRI is considered Low Risk. Page 18

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

5.3 Dust Mitigation Measures The dust prevention methods recommended in Table 5-1 are methods that have been found to be effective for many sites across New Zealand. These methods can be used alone or in combination depending on the circumstances. Alternate methods may be employed after the effectiveness of those methods is demonstrated and this AQ DWP updated accordingly. The scale of dust prevention methods required in a particular area will be dependent on the degree of risk that the dust would cause adverse effects on the surrounding area. The dust control methods for the various degrees of risk are described below.

5.3.1.

Methods of Dust Control – All Areas (Low Risk)

The dust prevention methods outlined in Table 5-1 will be used, as applicable, in all areas of the Project. The list is not exhaustive and additional methods may be found to be effective. Table 5-1: Dust management measures for all areas (Low Risk)

Source of Dust

Control

Stockpiles

Limit the height of uncovered stockpiles to reduce wind entrainment. Stockpiles exceeding 3 m in height have a higher risk of discharging dust;

· ·

Ensure that stockpiles do not exceed 24 m3 in size; Orientate stockpiles where possible in order to maximise wind sheltering as much as possible; Maximise shelter from winds as far as practicable; Keep active stockpiles damp at all times or bunker or cover stockpiles of fine materials; Dampen or bunker or cover inactive stockpiles if they are producing visible dust emissions.

· · · Unpaved Surfaces such as Roads and Yards

· · · ·

Sealed surfaces

· ·

Vehicles

· · · · · ·

Limit the amount of exposed surfaces as much as possible; Keep exposed surfaces damp. Typical water requirements for most parts of New Zealand are up to 1 litre per square metre per hour; Cover surfaces with coarse materials where practicable (e.g. ballast); Stabilise cleared areas not required for construction, access or for parking if liable to cause excessive dust during windy conditions. Methods may include placing metal on surfaces. Regular removal of dust through washing or vacuum sweeping – the frequency determined by visual inspection; Clear all spillages on sealed surfaces as soon as practicable. Limit vehicle speeds to 20 km/h through the works areas; Limit load sizes to avoid spillages; Cover loads of fine materials; Minimise travel distances through appropriate site layout and design; Minimise mud and dust track out from unsealed areas to sealed areas by using wheel cleaning facilities at site exits to sealed roads; Where necessary sweep public roads to remove any tracked dust.

Importation and Placement of Fill

Use water sprays as required during the placement and compaction of fill material to prevent dust generation;

Miscellaneous

Ensure sufficient water is available on site;

Page 19

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Source of Dust

Control · · ·

Earthmoving and Construction

· · ·

5.3.2.

Take account of daily weather forecast wind speed, wind direction and spoil conditions before commencing an operation that has a high wind potential; Install hoardings around CSAs sooner rather than later to assist by acting as wind breaks; Minimise the area of surfaces covered with fine materials. During periods of extreme dust risk, dampen areas that are to be earth-worked prior to any earthwork commencing. Allow time for penetration of the soil; Employ additional measures as practicable where dropping material from height, such as the use of water sprays; Stabilise exposed areas not required for construction, access or parking, along with completed fill and spoil areas as soon as practicable.

Further Methods of Dust Control – Moderate Risk

Moderate risk conditions require a greater level of dust control and attention to dust suppression. The methods outlined in Table 5-2 will be implemented in addition to the methods outlined in Table 5-1 during conditions presenting a medium risk. As above, this list is not exhaustive and other methods may also be employed to control dust. Table 5-2: Potential dust sources and control methods for moderate risk areas

Source of Dust

Controls (in addition to Low Risk Controls)

Vehicle Movements on unsealed surfaces

· ·

Loading, unloading and transport of dusty materials

Stockpiling

5.3.3.

Further limit vehicle speeds on unsealed surfaces; If wind speeds at the level of the unsealed surface are predicted in excess of 8 m/s (16 knots or Beaufort Scale factor 5), maintain unsealed surfaces in regular use in damp condition through surface watering (e.g. with water carts or fixed irrigation); Where a suitable water supply is not available for surface watering, synthetic dust suppressants may be used as an alternative. The use of recycled oil-based suppressants is expressly prohibited.

Limit loading or unloading during windy conditions that cause dust to be emitted beyond the site boundary; Use water sprays to dampen material prior to and during unloading to minimise dust generation if unloading needs to occur; Limit vehicle speeds on unsealed surfaces.

Bunker or cover stockpiles of fine, dry materials.

Further Methods of Dust Control – High and Extreme Risk Conditions

The greatest attention to dust control will be paid in extreme risk conditions and this is reflected in the further control measures outlined in Table 5-3. These methods should be employed in addition to the measures outlined in Table 5-1 and Table 5-2 during high and extreme risk conditions. As above this list is not exhaustive and other methods may also be employed to control dust.

Page 20

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan Table 5-3: Potential dust sources and control methods for high and extreme risk areas

Source of Dust

Controls (in addition to Low and Moderate Risk Controls)

Vehicle Movements on unsealed surfaces

Maintain regularly used unsealed road surfaces in damp condition through surface watering in all wind conditions.

Earthmoving, excavation and construction

Maintain surfaces of active earthworks areas in damp condition. This should include pre-watering of earthworks surfaces, prior to excavation allowing enough time for moisture to penetrate the soil;

Stockpiling

· ·

Maintain active stockpiles in damp condition with regular watering; Dampen or bunker or cover inactive stockpiles if they are producing visible dust emissions; Utilise windbreak fences or temporary bunkers if they are producing visible dust.

5.3.4.

Equipment Malfunction

If construction equipment fails and causes accidental dust discharges, it will be shut-down immediately and the fault repaired and tested prior to being allowed to continue operation. If equipment associated with dust control fails the activities reliant on the equipment will be suspended until the fault can be repaired. The location, duration and time of any dust discharge caused by equipment failure will be recorded in the environmental dairy.

5.4 Review of Dust Mitigation When site staff are alerted to a potential off-site dust nuisance through any of the monitoring techniques described in Section 5 of this AQ DWP, or as a result of a complaint from a third party, the Construction Manager / Site Supervisor will immediately undertake a review of site activities to determine the source of the dust and implement such further mitigation as may be required in order to reduce the dust generation to acceptable levels. The Construction Manager / Site Supervisor will notify the Environmental and Sustainability Manager as appropriate. In general, the additional mitigation will be those measures set out in Tables 5-1 to 5-3. Once the additional mitigation has been implemented the Construction Manager / Site Supervisor will review the monitoring data to ensure that it has been effective.

5.4.1.

Sources of Information

The following are locations where information necessary for determining the DRI and general dust control can be obtained: · ·

Page 21

Site specific monitoring web site where TSP and meteorological data can be accessed (to be established); and, Met Service: http://www.metservice.com/towns-cities/auckland/auckland-central

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

5.5 Dust Control during Contaminated Material Handling While no areas have been identified that are expected to contain contaminated material, the Contamination DWP (Appendix O of the Karangahape early works CEMP) sets out in detail how contaminated material will be dealt with should it be discovered. Set out below is further clarification on the specific mitigation measures that can be used to minimise the potential for any effects associated with discharges to air from contaminated material. In general it is considered that the dust generation, monitoring and control procedures described above are also suitable for use during the excavation, handling and transportation of any contaminated soils encountered during the works. Because of the increased potential for effects associated with dust from contaminated material, it is assumed that there is an extreme dust risk associated with these works, and all appropriate mitigation measures will be implemented to minimise effects. Dependent on the location and the size of the excavation and nature of the contaminant this may include: · · · ·

Pre-wetting the area to eliminate the potential for dust generation, while taking care not to overwater and cause contaminated run-off; Where practical, directly loading contaminated soils into trucks for transport to off-site disposal locations, and ensuring that all trucks are covered; If stockpiling is necessary, ensuring they are damped or otherwise covered, particularly in dry windy weather conditions; and Carrying out ambient dust monitoring to assess the effectiveness of the control measures.

5.6 Odour Mitigation Measures Discharges of odour are most likely to occur from any contaminated material encountered during the works (refer to the Contamination DWP for further detail in this regard). Odour emissions will be monitored by the odour scout during the excavation of such material and the following techniques utilised if necessary: · · ·

Limiting the time that the odorous material in the excavation is exposed; Removing excavated odorous material from site as quickly as possible in covered trucks; and The use of odour masking agents, chemical counteractants or digestive deodorant sprays.

If significant odour is detected and the odorous material cannot be removed quickly, and odour masking agents, chemical counteractants or digestive deodorant sprays are not immediately available, the odorous material will be covered, and work in that area suspended until suitable mitigation measures can be put in place. Section 4.7 sets out the odour monitoring procedure.

5.7 Control of Vehicle Exhaust Emissions Further to operational controls mentioned in Section 5.2 , the following key actions will be carried out to minimise emissions from vehicle exhausts: ·

Page 22

All construction machinery used on the site will be maintained in accordance with manufacturers’ requirements;

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan Âˇ

Âˇ

Where excessive exhaust smoke is identified from any construction vehicle that vehicle will be serviced as soon as is practicable and taken out of use until such maintenance has been completed; and Unless warm-up or turbo maintenance procedures require it, construction vehicles will not be left idling while parked or unattended.

5.8 Dust contingency measures In the event that there is a significant dust emission that results in either complaints or concentrations of dust that are significantly greater than the trigger values set out in Table 3-1, the Link Alliance will implement contingency measures, dependent on the nature of the complaint. These measures would be undertaken as a last resort if the source of the dust cannot be eliminated, in order to prevent build up. Measures may include the following options as appropriate (dependent on the level of dust emissions and adverse effects on a sensitive receiver): 1. Dust inside buildings or at a level which prevents windows being opened Following discussions with the building owner and/or occupiers, arrange to fit or retrofit dust filters to any building/apartment air supply systems. Where a building or specific apartment does not have an existing air supply system, then such a system will be installed, and all reasonable costs associated with the installation, operational and maintenance costs while the project is occurring. 2. Dust on the outside of buildings Arrange for the exterior of the building to be cleaned.

Page 23

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Communication with Affected Parties

Communication and consultation with affected parties and the wider community in vicinity of the early works will be regular and ongoing. Methods to facilitate communication will be through the Karangahape Community and Business Liaison Group, which will meet at least every three months during construction works, and through the methods discussed in Sections 6 and 7 of the Karangahape early works Communication and Consultation Plan (CCP) (Appendix G of the CEMP). These measures include engagement tools such as publications, phone calls, use of the CRL website to provide updates, signage, and advertising material. One on one engagement may also be used to engage with affected parties.

6.1 Complaints Although the measures described in this AQ DWP are aimed at avoiding complaints regarding discharges to air, complaints may still be received from members of the public during the works. Complaints shall be recorded and promptly investigated to identify and resolve the cause of the complaint in accordance with the complaints response protocol detailed in Section 7 of the CCP.

Page 24

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Environmental Training 7.1 Project Staff

To achieve effective implementation of this AQ DWP and ensure works are undertaken in accordance with this AQ DWP and the designation and resource consent requirements, all site staff (contractors and subcontractors) will undergo general environmental awareness training and training about their responsibilities relating to the activities under this AQ DWP. Training requirements are described in detail within the CEMP. Specific training requirements relating to this AQ DWP are outlined in Table 7-1. Table 7-1: Specific Training requirements in relation to AQ DWP

Training requirements

Frequency

Attendance

Introduction to the on-site monitoring equipment

As required & during new staff induction

All new staff members

Responding to complaints regarding dust and air quality concerns

As required & during new staff induction

Karangahape Station Construction Manager, delegated staff member and duty managers

Page 25

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Record Keeping 8.1 Air Quality Diary

Construction activities can be affected by a number of different external and internal factors, such as weather conditions or equipment malfunction, which can contribute to an increase of dust emissions. Various control and mitigation measures are to be carried out on the site in order to prevent such effects, and monitoring and inspection procedures will be used to assess the level of dust emissions both within the works site and beyond its boundary. Recording relevant monitoring and inspection results, as well as the conditions of external and internal factors, can help to assess if control measures are being effective and to define appropriate corrective or preventive actions in case any undesirable effects are detected. The procedures for recording a daily Air Quality Diary are detailed below: · ·

The Site Engineer will fill out the daily diary each day and maintain the record on site. The following information will be recorded in the daily diary: · · · · ·

Any dust control equipment malfunctions and any remedial action(s) taken; Results of the visual observations / inspections of dust emissions; General weather conditions during the day (i.e., windy, calm, warm, rain, etc.); The frequency of watercart and/or water sprinkling system use; and The date and signature of the person entering the information.

A copy of the daily Air Quality Diary will be kept on-site for the duration of works.

Page 26

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Appendix A: Record of CLG, IPR and Auckland Council Comments A1. CLG Comments A Karangahape CLG meeting was held on 17th September to discuss the Karangahape early works and for the CLG to provide comments / feedback on the CEMP and sub-plans, including this AQ DWP. No comments were received in relation to this AQ DWP.

A2. IPR Comments The IPR comments were as follows: DWP section

Paragraph/ sentence

Comment

Resolution

4.3.2

The IPR suggested a change the following change to the wind speed trigger “greater than 11 m/s or 6 on the BS”.

Change accepted

4.3.3

The IPR requested confirmation of trigger levels and inclusion of the trigger level in the text.

Change accepted

4.2

IPR comment “If it is contaminated material there needs to be some assessment to establish if there are likely to be health effects for sensitive receptors. (What is the source of the contamination? Is it only a “ nuisance odour effect” or a public health effect. The odour intensity scale is not appropriate in this instance”

No specific areas of contamination have been identified. However, a new section has been added to deal with the potential for hazardous air pollutants associated with contaminated materials.

5.6

IPR question “What has the contaminated land report said about the possibility of finding material here?”

No specific sources of contamination have been identified.

A3. Auckland Council Comments The Auckland Council review comments were as follows: DWP section Table 3-1 and Section 4.3.3

Page 27

Paragrap h/ sentence

Comment

Resolution

There is a discrepancy in Table 3-1 and section 4.3.3 relating to the instrumental dust monitoring 24-hour average trigger value. This would be most appropriate at 60 µg/m³ as proposed in section 4.3.3, being in accordance with the recommendation of the Good Practice Guide for Assessing and Managing Dust (GPG:Dust, Ministry for the Environment,

Table 3-1 has been modified to remove any confusion over the trigger values.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

DWP section

Paragrap h/ sentence

Comment

Resolution

2016). The proposed 1-hour average trigger value (160 µg/m³) is lower than the recommendation of the GPG:Dust, but is appropriate. I consider this discrepancy could be remedied by a minor edit to the AQDWP following certification if appropriate. Section 4.2

Page 28

Only a single instrumental dust monitor is currently proposed for the Mercury Lane CSA to comply with Conditions [designation] 59.3(a) and [air discharge consent] 227. I consider this acceptable for this early works package, but note that further instrumental dust monitors will be required for more significant dust generating activities at the Active Construction Zone in future (to be addressed in future by the ‘Main Construction Works’ package). During this early works package, visual dust monitoring will need to be carefully undertaken at the Beresford Sq area; section 4.2 of the AQDWP is adequate for this requirement.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Noted.

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Appendix B: ISCA Requirements Table B identifies the ISCA Credit Requirements relevant to this Air Quality DWP and where they are addressed in the document. Credit

Requirement*

Relevant Section of AQ DWP

DIS-4 Level 1

Measures to minimise adverse impacts to local air quality during construction have been identified and implemented

3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

DIS-4 Level 1

Monitoring of air emissions and/or air quality is undertaken at appropriate intervals and in response to complaints during construction

DIS-4 Level 2

Monitoring and modelling demonstrates no recurring or major exceedances of air emission or air quality goals

4, 5

Refer to the ISCA Rating Tool for full details of the requirement

Page 29

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Other relevant Information / Comments

Also refer to Monitoring Results and Reports

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Appendix C: Beaufort Scale Beaufort Force

Specification on Land

Speed Knots

km/h

m/s

Less than 1

Calm

Smoke rises vertically.

Very Light

Direction of wind shown by smoke drift but not by wind vanes

1–3

1–5

0.3 – 1.4

Light Breeze

Wind felt on face, leaves rustle, ordinary wind vane moved by wind.

4–6

6 – 11

1.67 – 3

Gentle Breeze

Leaves and small twigs in constant motion, wind extends light flag.

7 – 10

12 – 19

3.3 – 5.3

Moderate Breeze

Wind raises dust and loose paper, small branches move.

11 – 16

20 – 29

5.6 – 8

Fresh Breeze

Small trees in leaf start to sway, crested wavelets on inland waters.

17 – 21

30 – 39

8.3 – 10.8

Strong Breeze

Large branches in motion, whistling in telegraph wires, umbrellas used with difficulty.

22 – 27

40 – 50

11.1 – 13.9

Near Gale

Whole tress in motion, inconvenient to walk against wind

28 – 33

51 – 61

14.2 – 16.9

Gale

Twigs break from trees, difficult to walk.

34 – 40

62 – 74

17.2 – 20.6

41 – 47

75 – 87

20.8 – 24.2

48 – 55

88 – 101

24.4 – 28

0 1

Page 30

Description

Slight structural damage occurs, chimney pots and slates removed. Trees uprooted, considerable structural damage occurs.

Strong Gale

Storm

Violent Storm

Widespread damage.

56 – 63

102 – 117

28.3 – 32.5

Hurricane

Widespread damage.

> 64

> 119

> 33

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Appendix D: Dust Risk Index One of the main potential air quality impacts comes from dust associated with the construction process The AQ DWP sets out some of the mitigation measures that can be used to control this. However there are work activities and locations where the need for dust mitigation is minimal and others where it is extremely important. To provide better guidance to the Karangahape Station Construction Manager, and site staff on the implementation of dust mitigation, a Dust Risk Index (DRI) may be used during the Karangahape Station early works, when deemed necessary by the Link Alliance Environmental and Sustainability Manager. This is a technique recently developed for the construction phase of the NZ Transport Agency Cambridge Expressway and Transmission Gully projects. The full Transport Agency version of the DRI is detailed below; however the Link Alliance may develop a simplified, works specific version going forward. The objectives of using the DRI are to highlight those areas and activities that are of higher risk of generating dust issues by: Âˇ Âˇ

A systematic and consistent approach to risk identification in relation to dust generation; A simplification of decision making in relation to the application of dust mitigation techniques and procedures; and Improved Stakeholder satisfaction and a reduction of dust related complaints from them.

Âˇ

Factors and Weighting Assumptions The DRI uses a simple approach to generate a number that identifies the risk of dust generation and potential issues. The greater the number, the higher the likelihood of dust related issues. The formula involves combining a number of factors together in the following ways: DRI = Sum(E+S+M+WS+D+A)*R*WD Where: E = Surface exposure. S = Stabilisation. R = Rainfall. M = Month of the Year. WS = Wind Speed. WD = Wind Direction D = Distance to nearest receiver. A = Construction Activity.

Surface Exposure This factor recognises that where material has been removed from the surface of the ground that dust is more likely to be generated than if the original surface is still in place. As such a value of 0 is used where the surface remains untouched and a value of 10 is used where the surface has been exposed and the vegetation removed, and a value of 50 is used when the exposed surface has been significantly disturbed. Page 31

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Stabilisation This factor recognises that surfaces that have been exposed, in the manner referred to above and then subsequently stabilised are less likely to generate dust. Stabilisation measures associated with this project include: · · ·

Water; Chemical dust suppressant; and Aggregate covers such as Gap TNZ40, Gap 65, Drainage 200.

As such a value of 0 is used where the surface is fully stabilised in a manner described above, 5 when there is some degree of stabilisation and a value of 10 when no form of stabilisation has been used.

Rainfall This factor recognises that dust issues are neutralised by the presence of sufficient rainfall, or the receipt of sufficient rainfall within the previous 24-48 hours. As such a value of 0 has been assigned where it is currently raining and 1 where 5 mm or more of rainfall has been received in the previous 24 hours. A value of 1.5 has been assigned where 5 mm or more of rainfall has been received in the previous 48 hours. A value of 2 is assigned when it has not rained for more than 2 days.

Month of the Year This factor recognises that certain periods of the year are more likely to be periods of higher risk due to low soil moisture levels or higher wind speeds. As such the winter and spring months of June to September are assigned a value of 0; a value of 5 is used for April, May, October and November; and a value of 10 for the months of December to March.

Wind Speed Wind speed is recognised as a significant factor. Increases in dust issues coincide with an increase in wind speed. The following weightings have been applied to the wind speed groupings: · · · · ·

0-9 km/h 0 10-18 km/h 10 19-27 km/h 50 28-36 km/h 200 Greater than 36 km/h 500

Wind Direction This factor recognises that the degree to which a stakeholder or sensitive receiver adjacent the Project is effected by dust is strongly influenced by the direction of the wind in relation to their position. Where the wind direction is such that the receiver is downwind of the works then a value of 1 has been assigned to the factor. However where the wind is blowing away from the sensitive receiver then the value assigned is 0. Given the narrow nature of the Project alignment it is accepted that a value of 0 is highly unlikely for most areas due to the close proximity of sensitive receptors.

Page 32

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Distance to the nearest Sensitive Receptor Closely related to the direction and speed of wind, as determining factors for dust issues, it is recognised that the distance to the nearest sensitive receiver also contributes to the risk involved. As such a value of 100 has been assigned to this factor.

Construction Activity The final factor recognises that certain construction activities are more or less likely to contribute to dust related issues. As such the following groups of construction activities have been assigned differing values. Where there are other activities occurring, choose the most similar activity or contact the Environment Manager for guidance. · · · · · ·

No Activity Piling Operations Excavator cutting and shaping of natural ground Handling of Spoil Pavement Construction Fill Placement

0 1 5 5 5 20

Overall DRI Value Once the DRI has been calculated for a particular location it needs to be assigned to a risk value using Table E-1 Table E-1 Conversion Values for DRI to Dust Risk

DRI Value

Risk

0 to 250

Low

250 to 350

Moderate

350 to 500

High

Greater than 500

Extreme

Forecasting At the beginning of each week on a Monday morning a DRI forecast will be carried out in order to assist with planning of dust management mitigation measures for that week. The forecast will identify the likely DRI for each day Monday through Saturday. The forecast will then be disseminated to the construction teams and staff responsible for dust mitigation such as supervisors and water cart drivers. The information will allow a more focussed and proactive approach to dust control and mitigation.

DRI Review Process At the conclusion of each month, as part of the monthly environmental reporting the Environmental and Sustainability Manager will review the performance the works in terms of dust management. As part of this review, the effectiveness of the DRI will be assessed and any amendments to the DRI advised and commented on.

Page 33

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Communication of the DRI One means of communicating the DRI to construction staff is via a warning board similar to that used to convey fire danger in rural areas. Therefore each work area will have a board in a prominent location such as beside the site office or canteen where the current DRI value is displayed.

Page 34

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Appendix J: Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

Page 106

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Karangahape Station Early Works Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800007 Revision: Final Date: October 2019

Page 1

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

Karangahape Station early works Trees CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800007

This document is uncontrolled when printed. This document should be printed in colour

Revision Status Revision

Date

Version details

Prepared By

Approved By

30/09/2019

Draft for Auckland Council and Independent Peer Review

Lyndsey Smith

Peter Roan

21/10/2019

Issued to Council for approval

Lyndsey Smith

Peter Roan

Name/Title

Signature

Date

Approval Status

Prepared by:

Angela Chaffe and Lyndsey Smith Environmental Scientist (Ecologist)

21/10/2019

Reviewed by:

Fiona Davies Associate Director - Environment

21/10/2019

Approved by:

Peter Roan Link Alliance â€“ Consents Lead

21/10/2019

Page 2

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

Table of contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 4 1.1

Karangahape Station ......................................................................................................... 4

1.2

Purpose of the Trees and Vegetation DWP........................................................................ 5

1.3

Relevant Conditions .......................................................................................................... 5

1.4

DWP Review and Updates ................................................................................................. 6

2. Karangahape Early Works ........................................................................... 7 2.1

Overview of Works ............................................................................................................ 7

2.2

Construction Methodology ................................................................................................ 7

2.3

Roles and Responsibilities ................................................................................................. 7

3. Affected Trees and Vegetation ................................................................... 9 3.1

Karangahape Early Works .................................................................................................. 9

4. Mitigation Measures ................................................................................. 13 4.1

Trees Requiring Removal ................................................................................................. 13

4.1.1.

Permanent Removal and Replacement ..................................................................... 13

4.1.2.

Transplanting Trees .................................................................................................. 14

4.2

Trees not Requiring Removal........................................................................................... 14

4.2.1.

Tree Protection Zones and Crown Protection............................................................ 15

5. Consultation .............................................................................................. 17 Appendix A: Record of CLG, Independent Peer Review and Auckland Council Comments ....................................................................................................... 18 Appendix B: Location of Impacted Trees........................................................ 21

Page 3

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

1. Introduction The City Rail Link (CRL) project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line (NAL) in the vicinity of Mt Eden Station. The CRL also involves the construction of two new underground stations at Aotea and Karangahape, and a redeveloped Mt Eden Station (refer to Figure 1-1). The design and construction of the CRL infrastructure between the Aotea and Mt Eden Stations is being delivered by the Link Alliance. This Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan (TV DWP) relates to the Karangahape Station Early Works.

Figure 1-1: CRL Route and Location

Page 4

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

1.2 Purpose of the Trees and Vegetation DWP In accordance with CRL designation condition 55, this TV DWP has been prepared to identify measures that will be implemented to mitigate and manage the potential adverse effects on trees and vegetation during the Karangahape Station early works. The objective of the DWP (designation condition 55.2) is: ď‚ˇ ď‚ˇ

To avoid the removal of scheduled trees as far as practicable; and Where trees are identified for removal during surface works the Requiring Authority will remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on trees and vegetation.

This TV DWP addresses the requirements of CRL designation condition 55 and will be implemented throughout the construction period. This TV DWP has been prepared in consultation with and feedback from the Karangahape Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG); and has undergone an Independent Peer Reviewer (IPR) prior to submission to Auckland Council (as per designation conditions 7 and 11). A record of consultation outcomes (CLG and IPR) is provided in Appendix A.

1.3

Relevant Conditions

Table 1-1 identifies the designation conditions relevant to this TV DWP and where they are addressed in the document. Table 1-1: Trees and Vegetation conditions and location in the TV DWP

Condition No.

Condition

55.1

A Trees and Vegetation DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects from the removal of trees and vegetation during the construction of the City Rail Link or any part of it.

55.2

The objective of the Trees and Vegetation DWP is to avoid the removal of scheduled trees as far as practicable. Where trees are identified for removal in surface works the Requiring Authority will remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on trees and vegetation.

55.3

To achieve the above objective the following shall be included in the Trees and Vegetation DWP and implemented as required:

Page 5

Relevant section of DWP

1.2

Sections 3 and 4.1

(b) A list of trees, which due to being in proximity to construction works, have root systems and / or foliage within and / or overhanging the surface designation footprint, and the methods to be used, where practicable, to protect these trees from construction works;

Section 3

(c) Cross references to the Urban Design DWP and the proposed mitigation of any tree / vegetation removal through replanting trees at a 1:1 ratio, reinstatement of the area, and other methods. In preparing the Trees and Vegetation DWP, the Requiring Authority shall seek input from the Auckland Council Parks Department with regard to tree species / vegetation selection, tree pit construction where deemed necessary, and the positioning of

Section 4.1.1

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

replacement trees and from directly affected land owners with regards to preferences for any replacement planting for vegetation / trees removed from private property or for any replacement planting on private property;

1.4

(d) Other methods to be used to monitor and report on the management of the adverse effects from tree / vegetation removal;

Section 4.1.2 and 4.2

(e) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which detail how the Auckland Council Parks Department, mana whenua (see condition 8) are consulted, and communication with the general public on the management of the adverse effects relating to the removal of trees and vegetation.

Section 5

DWP Review and Updates

This TV DWP is a live document that will be reviewed at least annually, or as a result of a material change to the project, or to address unforeseen adverse effects on trees and vegetation arising from construction, or unresolved complaints. Any material changes to this TV DWP must be approved by Auckland Council prior to any on-site activity reliant upon the change commencing. Refer to the CEMP for further detail on the review and updating process.

Page 6

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

Karangahape Early Works 2.1 Overview of Works

Early works will be undertaken to establish the site of the new Karangahape Station in advance of the main construction works. The early works are detailed in the CEMP with an overview provided in Table 2-1. Table 2-1: Overview of Karangahape Early Works

Works location

Overview of construction activities

Beresford Square / Pitt Street

 Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Beresford Square / Pitt Street;  Removal of street trees that are compromised by the proposed combined service trench;  The demolition of the café / toilet in Beresford Square;  Establishment of the Beresford Square Construction Support Area to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.; and  Closure of Beresford Square to vehicle traffic (other than construction traffic) while retaining pedestrian and cycle access. Removal of existing street furniture where required (such as seating, street lighting (to be replaced with temporary lighting).

Mercury Lane

 Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Mercury Lane; and  Establishment of the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area within to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.; and  Construction of the Mercury Lane temporary working platform.

It should be noted that the demolition of buildings and above ground structures within the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area, along with the removal of trees within the demolition area, is authorised by the CRL Enabling Work Outline Plan – Karangahape Road Demolition Works (Auckland Council reference OPW60339200), confirmed by Auckland Council in June 2019, and does not form part of this TV DWP.

2.2 Construction Methodology The Karangahape Station Early Works will be divided into stages as described in the CEMP.

2.3 Roles and Responsibilities The key personnel responsible for this TV DWP are identified in Table 2-1. All site personnel are also responsible for following the requirements of the TV DWP. Refer to the CEMP for further detail on roles and responsibilities.

Page 7

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan Table 2-2: Key Personnel

Role

Name

Karangahape Station Project Manager

Jonathan Hill

Karangahape Station Construction Manager

Dan Trotman

Environmental and Sustainability Manager

Sarah Sutherland

Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager

Rachel Blundell

Project Arborist

TBC

Page 8

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

3. Affected Trees and Vegetation A Tree Assessment1 was prepared in August 2012 and formed part of the original Notice of Requirement (NoR) for establishing the CRL designations. The assessment found that there are no scheduled trees within or near the construction footprint of Karangahape Station.

3.1 Karangahape Early Works In total, 20 trees were identified as potentially being impacted by the Karangahape Station early works: 



Three of these trees (T146, T147 and T149) were identified during the initial Tree Assessment1 and are located at the corner of Beresford Square and Pitt Street. Tree T149 will require removal to enable the utility relocation works. T146 and T147 will be retained. During the Early Works, traffic will be diverted to run immediately adjacent to these trees (T146 and T147), through an area which is currently in use as a bus stop and for on street parking. As these trees are currently maintained by Auckland Transport to allow bus access, it is not considered that the proposed works will have additional impacts on these trees (canopy or roots) (refer to Figure 3-1). It should be noted that T148 has been removed prior to the commencement of CRL works at the site of the new Karangahape Station (refer Table 3-1). Eleven trees (X6-X16) in Beresford Square2, between the Hopetoun Alpha building and Pitt Street, will need to be removed to enable the utility relocation works in this area, which requires the formation of a combined open trench within the footprint of the trees. It is also noted that these trees are within the footprint of the Karangahape Station main construction works. Five trees (X17-X21) in Beresford Square will be retained. However, due to their location adjacent to the Beresford Square Construction Support Area (CSA), which will be accessed by large construction related vehicles, there is a risk that their canopy could be impacted.

The location of the impacted trees is shown in Figure 3-1 and further context is shown in Appendix B. Table 3-1 provides a summary of the trees that could be impacted by the works and proposed mitigation measures. It should be note that: where relevant, the tree numbering presented in this TV DWP is consistent with the Tree Assessment1. Where it has been determined that there is the potential for additional trees (to those highlighted within the Tree Assessment) to be impacted by the works, these have been numbered using a different reference system (X1 etc). The numbering system is continuous through each of the CRL TV DWPs prepared to date. Therefore, the numbering of additional trees potentially impacted by the works starts at X6 for the purpose of this Karangahape Station early works TV DWP.

Boffa Miskell. (2012). City Rail Link Tree Assessment. Report prepared for Auckland Transport, dated August 2012. ‘Additional Tree Assessment to Support C3 Utility Relocation Works - Beresford Square, letter from Angela Chaffe of AECOM New Zealand Limited to Rachel Purdy (Link Alliance), dated 23 July 2019. Page 9 | Karangahape Station Early Works 2

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

Figure 3-1: Illustrating tree trimming undertaken on T146 and T147 for the bus stop.

Figure 3-2: Trees on Beresford Square and Pitt Street that could be Impacted by Karangahape Station Early Works

Page 10

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan Table 3-1: Identified Trees Impacted by Karangahape Station Early Works

Tree ID

Common name

Botanical name

Scheduled

Overall condition

T146

Pohutukawa

Fair

T147

Pohutukawa

Good

T148

London Plane

Metrosideros excelsa Metrosideros excelsa Platanus x acerifolia

Estimate height (m) 4

Project effect

Mitigation measures

To be retained To be retained Removal

Good

Removal

Good

Removal

Platanus x acerifolia

Fair

Removal

Brush box

Lophostemon confertus

Good

Removal

Pohutukawa

Metrosideros excelsa

Good

Removal

X10

Rewarewa

Knightia excelsa

Fair

Removal

X11

Oriental plane

Platanus orientalis

Good

Removal

X12

Oriental plane

Platanus orientalis

Good

Removal

X13

Rewarewa

Knightia excelsa

Fair

Removal

X14

Pohutukawa

Metrosideros excelsa

Good

Removal

X15

Pohutukawa

Metrosideros excelsa

Good

Removal

X16

Pohutukawa

Metrosideros excelsa

Poor

Removal

None required. Refer to Section 4.2 None required. Refer to Section 4.2 Tree removed prior to CRL works by the Link Alliance / CRLL. Transplant not possible. Tree to be replaced as part of public realm reinstatement Transplant not possible. Tree to be replaced as part of public realm reinstatement Transplant not possible. Tree to be replaced as part of public realm reinstatement Transplant not possible. Tree to be replaced as part of public realm reinstatement Replant (if practicable); refer to Section 4.1.2. Otherwise tree to be replaced as part of public realm reinstatement Replant (if practicable); refer to Section 4.1.2. Otherwise tree to be replaced as part of public realm reinstatement Transplant not possible. Tree to be replaced as part of public realm reinstatement Transplant not possible. Tree to be replaced as part of public realm reinstatement Replant (if practicable); refer to Section 4.1.2. Otherwise tree to be replaced as part of public realm reinstatement Replant (if practicable); refer to Section 4.1.2. Otherwise tree to be replaced as part of public realm reinstatement Replant (if practicable); refer to Section 4.1.2. Otherwise tree to be replaced as part of public realm reinstatement Replant (if practicable); refer to Section 4.1.2. Otherwise tree to be replaced as part of public realm reinstatement

Fair

T149

London Plane

Platanus x acerifolia

London Plane

Platanus x acerifolia

London Plane

Page 11

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan Tree ID

Common name

Botanical name

Scheduled

Overall condition

X17

Pohutukawa

Good

X18

Pohutukawa

Good

X19

Pohutukawa

Poor

X20

Pohutukawa

Fair

X21

Pohutukawa

Metrosideros excelsa Metrosideros excelsa Metrosideros excelsa Metrosideros excelsa Metrosideros excelsa

Estimate height (m) 7

Good

Project effect

Mitigation measures

To be retained To be retained To be retained To be retained To be retained

Tree Protection. Refer to Section 4.2 Tree Protection. Refer to Section 4.2 Tree Protection. Refer to Section 4.2 Tree Protection. Refer to Section 4.2 Tree Protection. Refer to Section 4.2

As previously noted, none of the trees within the early works area are scheduled under the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part). Despite this, consideration has been given to the feasibility of replanting all trees planned for removal. Due to the location of existing utilities, it is considered unsafe and impractical to extract intact root balls to enable transplantation of T149, X6, X7 and X8. Trees X9, X10, X13, X14, X15 and X16 are native specimens and opportunities to replant these trees are under investigation. However, this will depend on whether relocation is appropriate and feasible (considering matters such as, tree condition and structure, ground conditions, the location of utilities in relation to tree roots, time of the year and potential relocation costs). Where relocation is determined to be appropriate and feasible, the trees will be relocated to elsewhere within the designation footprint, if practicable. It is noted that the early works in Mercury Lane will not impact any vegetation - vegetation within the Mercury Lane CSA will be removed as part of the Mercury Lane demolition works Outline Plan (refer to Section 2.1 of this DWP) and no street trees will be impacted by the utility works.

Page 12

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

4. Mitigation Measures As outlined in Section 3, the Karangahape Station early works could impact on 21 trees within and adjacent to Beresford Square and Pitt Street. In order to mitigate the effects of tree removal on the local streetscape and prevent further loss or damage to impacted trees, the following mitigation measures will be implemented during the works.

4.1 Trees Requiring Removal Trees T149, X6, X7, X8, X9, X10, X11, X12, X13, X14, X15 and X16 will likely need to be removed during the early works. Removal of these trees will be undertaken by a suitably qualified and experienced arborist.

4.1.1. Permanent Removal and Replacement Due to the location of existing underground utilities it will not be practical to relocate trees T149, X6, X7, X8, X11 and X12. As such, these trees will require removal prior to the commencement of the utility relocation works. The method for removal of these trees will be informed by a qualified arborist in accordance with site observations, such as the proximity of surrounding buildings, tree size and overall condition, and expert knowledge. The methodologies used may include the following:   

Staged removal whereby the outer limbs are removed first, followed by inner limbs and the main trunk. Depending on the location of utility lines, tree stumps shall either be dug out or ground in situ. Removed tree debris will either be mulched onsite or removed for mulching off-site, depending on which is more practicable.

All trees permanently removed as part of the early works will need to be replaced to address adverse effects on amenity and the local streetscape. If the future public realm reinstatement design allows, replacement trees for those removed in Beresford Square will be planted in the square as part of the site’s reinstatement. If this is not possible, replacement trees will be planted in an appropriate location elsewhere within the CRL designation. The locations of replacement trees will be included in a replanting plan prepared as part the Urban Design DWP3 for the Karangahape Station public realm reinstatement. The Urban Design DWP and replanting plans will consider the following in accordance with designation Condition 55.3(c):    

Replanting of removed trees at a ratio of at least 1:1. The species and characteristics of replacement trees will be determined following input from Auckland Council Parks Department. Design for re-instatement of Beresford Square, including opportunities to replace removed trees with appropriate native species. Document input from the Auckland Council Parks Department with regard to tree species / vegetation selection, tree pit construction and positioning of replacement trees.

The Urban Design DWP will be prepared at some time in the future, when public realm designs have been finalised Page 13 | Karangahape Station Early Works

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan 



An outline of the maintenance periods and responsibilities for care of the trees (i.e. maintenance is to be undertaken by the Requiring Authority for a period of five years for specimen trees and 3 years for all other landscape planting). Any consultation undertaken in relation to the replacement planting (refer to Section 5 of this TV DWP).

4.1.2. Transplanting Trees As outlined in Section 3.1, if it is appropriate and feasible to relocate trees X9, X10, X13, X14, X15 and X16, the transplanting of these trees will be undertaken in a manner that allows them to be replanted within the designation area following the completion of main construction works or at another suitable location to be determined in consultation with the Auckland Council Parks Department. Tree relocation methodologies generally follow a set process and shall be informed by a qualified arborist. However, if replanting is considered a feasible option, the relocation of these six trees should consider the following:  



Timing of works – Removal should ideally occur outside of active growth stages, after flowering or before flower budding, if practicable. Temporary storage site – this will need to be identified prior to removing the trees. The site must have a hardstand area large enough to house the trees, with a water connection; and be in or near the CBD to allow easy transport. Preparation – prior to being dug out, the trees will need to be pruned and any remaining branches tied back to protect them during the relocation process. A trench will need to be dug around the root balls and outer roots trimmed as required. The trench will need to be deep and wide enough to allow the root balls to be undercut at a 45-degree to allow its extraction. Transport – The root balls will need to be covered in damp hessian/burlap to keep as much of the root balls and soil in tact during transport. The trees will need to be removed using a digger or small crane and transported, in an upright position, using a flatbed truck. Storage – the trees will need to be transferred to temporary planter boxes large enough to contain the root ball and support the tree during storage. The planter should be kept in a cool, shaded place and the roots kept moist until it can be replanted. Replanting – once the relocation site has been identified, replanting will need to be undertaken within a similar window in which the tree is ‘dormant’. The replanting locations should be included in the replanting plans prepared as part the Urban Design DWP.

If these trees cannot be relocated, they will need to be replaced in accordance with the criteria described in Section 4.1.1.

4.2 Trees not Requiring Removal Trees T146 and T147, located on the footpath on the eastern side of Pitt Street will not be removed as part of the Karangahape Station early works. However, to provide sufficient working area for the relocation of utilities within Pitt Street, southbound vehicle traffic (heading along Pitt Street towards Karangahape Road) will temporarily use the outermost traffic lane (closest to the footpath) that currently provides for on-street parking and a bus stop. The use of this lane adjacent to the Trees T146 and T147 as a bus stop means that Auckland Transport regularly undertake maintenance and Page 14

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan trimming of these trees. Therefore, it is not considered that the temporary alteration in the Pitt Street traffic layout during the early works will impact further on these trees. Trees X17 – X21, located within Beresford Square adjacent to the Beresford Square CSA, will be retained. However, there is the potential for these trees to be impacted as a result of truck and other large vehicle movements accessing the CSA. The trees at greatest risk of impact are X17, X18 and X19, closest to the vehicle entrance, staff facilities and indicative location of storage areas (including the surge pile and water treatment area that will be operational during the main works construction phase). X17 and X18 were assessed to be in good condition while X19 was in poor condition.

4.2.1. Tree Protection Zones and Crown Protection Tree Protections Zones around trees X17 – 21 shall be established to ensure the trunks, roots, canopy and branches are protected during the early works. The Tree Protection Zone encompasses the root and crown area of the tree that would need to remain isolated from construction disturbance to maintain tree health. The height of the Protection Zone is dictated by the height of the tree and the width (or radius) around the tree is typically calculated by multiplying the tree’s diameter at breast height (DBH) by 12 (AS 4970-2009): Tree Protection Zone = DBH x 12 The Tree Protection Zone will not be less than 2m nor greater than 15m, except where crown protection is required. If a tree is multi-stemmed at 1.4m above the ground (refer to Figure 4-1) the Australian Standard (AS4970-2009) indicates that in this situation the following equation should be used to determine the DBH, which would then feed into the equation above to calculate the Tree Protection Zone:

Figure 4-1: Tree forks below 1.4m where the arborist would measure DBH (AS4970-2009).

The information needed for this calculation has not been collected within the original arboricultural assessment of trees (Boffa Miskell, 2012), therefore, a site visit will be completed to obtain the measures needed to determine the Tree Protection Zone. Crown protection will also be required to ensure that the trees do not receive injury from machinery such as excavators, drilling rigs, cranes, trucks and hoarding installation. Crown protection will be located 1m outside of the perimeter of the crown, which may be within the Tree Protection Zone. Page 15

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

Figure 4-2: Indicative Tree Protection Zone (AS4970-2009).

The following activities will not be permitted in the Tree Protection Zones:       

Page 16

Mechanical excavation on the road, footpath or any public space. Stockpiling of building materials, debris or soil. Vehicular traffic except on existing paved surfaces. Installation of service pits or hatches. Vehicular crossings. Severing of tree roots with a diameter greater than 30mm. Alteration of soil levels and structure.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

5. Consultation The early works Communication and Consultation Plan (CCP) (Appendix L of the CEMP) outlines the engagement to be undertaken with the Auckland Council Parks Department and mana whenua. It also details the general communication that will be undertaken with the general public (through the CLG) on the management of the adverse effects relating to the removal of trees within the Enabling Works area. Refer in particular to Sections 6 and 7 of the CCP.

Page 17

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

Appendix A: Record of CLG, Independent Peer Review and Auckland Council Comments

A1. CLG Comments A Karangahape CLG meeting was held on 17th September to discuss the Karangahape early works and for the CLG to provide comments / feedback on the CEMP and sub-plans, including this TV DWP. No comments were received in relation to this TV DWP.

A2. Independent Peer Review Comments An Independent Peer Review of the draft TV DWP was undertaken by Jon Redfern, from Arborlab. The comments received are as follows: Page no.

DWP section

Paragraph/ sentence

Comment

Resolution

7 8

2.1 3.1

N/A

Peer reviewer added additional text.

Text provides further clarity relating to why trees need to be removed e.g. conflict with new services.

3.1

Trees T148 and T149 will require removal to enable the utility relocation works

Most of the trees are proposed to be removed due to the relocation of the services, however, there’s no information on how the relocation works directly compromise the trees.

The TV DWP cross references the CEMP, which includes staging plans that illustrate how the services are to be relocated.

3.1

Trees T148 and T149 will require removal to enable the utility relocation works

I think there needs to be more information on exactly how these works will have any impact and if are there any alternatives that could be used to retain them. In particular the two mature London Plane trees (T149 and X6) should be retained if at all possible.

T149 and X6 will be directly impacted by trenching works required to install dry services.

3.1

T148 condition assessment presented in Table 3-1.

Tree No.148 has been removed and I have a slightly different assessment on the trees’ overall health (though I’m generally ok with their original assessment).

Table 3-1 updated to reflect that the tree has previously been removed and will not be impacted by the early works. Reference to T148 has then been subsequently removed from the text.

8 8 / 10 12

3 3.1 4.1.1

Exotic trees.

Exotic trees are afforded the same protection standards as native trees. I don’t think that it’s appropriate that one of

The reason for tree removal is the need to relocation utility services. Therefore, any reference to trees being exotic has been removed.

Page 18

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

Page no.

DWP section

Paragraph/ sentence

Comment

Resolution

the reasons for tree removal is due to origin. 10

3.1

Large trees.

The relocation of large trees is possible, though in an urban setting such as this it can be problematic. Maybe this is better – ‘Due to … ,it is impractical to extract and store the trees onsite or relocate through the city, and there are no practical, longterm storage facilities’.

The reason that the trees can not be relocated is due to the presence of existing services and because of the trees size it is more likely that their root ball will have become entwined with the service. However, the main reason for not translocating trees is the services - the text has been updated in this regard.

3.1

Reasons why trees may not be relocated.

A couple of these trees are not worth relocating due to their structure.

Section 3.1 updated to include the peer reviewer comments on the structure and quality of trees that are not proposed to be relocated.

4.2.1

Calculation for multi-stem trees.

The correct calculation for multiple stems as detailed in the Australian Standards. This should be used for consistency and reliability.

Section 4.2.1 has been updated to follow the guidelines within AS49702009 for multi stemmed trees.

A3. Auckland Council Comments Comments on the draft TV DWP were received from Howell Davis, Senior Specialist – Urban Forest, Auckland Council as follows: Page no.

DWP section

Paragraph/ sentence

Comment

Resolution

3.1

The tree numbering system used in this plan is consistent with that used in the Tree Assessment and previous TV DWPs prepared for earlier CRL works.

The plans and numbering for the trees needs to be tidied up, there are two numbering systems now being used in the documents and one that refers to the original Boffa Report that had a tree survey of the route and now we have localised numbering for this part of the route where additional trees are now noted as being necessary to remove for site establishment and for utility relocation work.

Further clarification has been provided in Section 3.1 on the numbering system used in this TV DWP.

3.1 and Appendix C (now Appendix B)

Figures

I would recommend that a more detailed plan is developed for the trees in the area around the Beresford/Pitt Street and K road/Canada Street Stations, as there are trees in the vicinity of works on both these streets which are not noted on the current plans as needing protection. It would be a lot easier to deal with what is being removed and what is going to be fenced and protection provided if all trees were numbered.

Figures have been updated as requested and include the additional street trees in Beresford Square that will be subject to Tree Protection

Page 19

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

Page no.

Page 20

DWP section

4.1.1

Paragraph/ sentence

Tree replacement will be presented in the Urban Design Delivery Work Plan.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Comment

Resolution

The trees on Beresford at entrance to the new site yard should be protected if this access is going to be used by larger vehicles as it is currently only being used by passenger vehicles.

during the early works.

The removal of trees outside of the original proposal can be dealt with via condition 55, however it is also recommended that further references are made to the more immediate need to look at the Streetscape (Urban Design DWP) and public realm reinstatement works in both of these areas to ensure that sufficient space is allowed for to enable the replanting of the tree 14 trees that are likely to be removed during this part of the project. It is recommended that the proposed utility relocation work is vetted by the wider team who are involved in the streetscape and Urban Design DWP to ensure that sufficient space is provided to enable the planting of at least 14 new large replacement trees. Utilities should be combined into one service trench wherever possible and outside of the alignment of where any possible tree planting may take place.

Noted. Development of the network utility relocations and the future public realm reinstatement design by the Link Alliance will be undertaken cognisant of providing sufficient space for vegetation to be planted as part of the reinstatement works.

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

Appendix B: Location of Impacted Tree

Page 21

| Karangahape Station Early Works

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

LEGEND: DESIGNATION BOUNDARY

TREES IDENTIFIED IN THE INITIAL ASSESSMENT ADDITIONAL IMPACTED TREES

TUNNEL COVER AREA TUNNEL MINE AREA

TBM TUNNEL

UN ST

CANTEEN

STORAGE

Last saved by: JOSEPH.DELATORRE(2019-10-17) Last Plotted: 2019-10-17 Filename: AECOM_DS10_AU\Documents\60604837-CRL C3-Alliance Detail Design\DesignJV\900 CAD-GIS\01_WIP\25-SKETCHES\CRL-KRD-URB-LKA-SKE-000002

HOPET O

STORAGE OFFICES

CHANGING ROOMS\ TOILETS\ SHOWERS

HOPETOUN ALPHA

WATER TREATMENT AREA

STORAGE

CAR PARK SURGE PILE OFFICES

OFFICE

PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE

X20

2.5

X18

X19

X17

X13

X15

X16

X12

BERESFORD SQUARE

10m

SCALE 1:250

CREATOR ID : 70

100mm

SIZE A1

FOR INFORMATION APPROVED

PROJECT:

CHECKED DESCRIPTION

APPROVED

DATE

TITLE: DATE

A. CHAFFE

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE STATION

ZONE:

DRAWN J DELA TORRE

REV

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

SCALE AS SHOWN

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

KARANGAHAPE STATION PITT STREET TREE AND VEGETATION DWP PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

TYPE

SHEET

CRL - KRD - URB - LKA - SKE - 00002

REVISION

POYNTON TERRACE

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

40-50 50

LEGEND:

239

DESIGNATION BOUNDARY

TREES IDENTIFIED IN THE INITIAL ASSESSMENT 238

76 80-86

ADDITIONAL IMPACTED TREES TUNNEL COVER AREA TUNNEL MINE AREA

T146

TBM TUNNEL

PE R

T147

KAR A NG

A HA

PITT ST

MERCU RY LAN

T148

246-254

T149

61-65

243

4-6

OR D

256

BE RE SF

X6 258 8-10

249

1-7 Last saved by: JOSEPH.DELATORRE(2019-09-10) Last Plotted: 2019-10-17 Filename: AECOM_DS10_AU\Documents\60604837-CRL C3-Alliance Detail Design\SHARED\Sketches\CRL-KRD-URB-LKA-SKE-000001

268 259-261

12-14

X11

ANG A

KAR

X10

X13

270

HAP E

X12

16-18

278

267-281

X15 284

15-25

X16

290

X14

283-287

X21 2.5

22-28

10m

SCALE 1:250

292-300

CREATOR ID : CRL_KRD_630_00_LKA_SKE_000001

100mm

SIZE A1

FOR INFORMATION APPROVED

PROJECT:

CHECKED DESCRIPTION

APPROVED

DATE

CITY RAIL LINK KARANGAHAPE STATION

ZONE:

DRAWN

TITLE:

J. DELA TORRE

REV

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

SCALE AS SHOWN

DESIGNED REVISIONS

CLIENT:

KARANGAHAPE STATION TREE AND VEGETATION DWP

DATE

A. CHAFFE

PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

TYPE

SHEET

CRL - KRD - URB - LKA - SKE - 000001

REVISION

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Appendix K: Transport, Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

Page 107

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Karangahape Station Early Works Transport, Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800002 Revision: Final Date: 15th October 2019

Page 1

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

Karangahape Station early works Transport Access and Parking DWP CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800002 This document is uncontrolled when printed. This document should be printed in colour

Revision Status Revision

Date

Version details

Prepared By

Approved By

30/09/2019

Draft for Auckland Council and Independent Peer Review

Dan Marsh and Josie Ackroyd

Peter Roan

21/10/2019

Issued to Auckland Council for approval

Dan Marsh and Josie Ackroyd

Peter Roan

Name/Title

Signature

Approval Status Date

Prepared by:

Dan Marsh and Josie Ackroyd Transport Specialist

21/10/19

Reviewed by:

Duncan Tindall Transport Specialist

21/10/19

Approved by:

Peter Roan Link Alliance â€“ Consents Lead

21/10/19

Page 2

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

Table of contents 1. Introduction ...............................................................................................6 Karangahape Station ........................................................................................................ 6 TAP DWP Staging .............................................................................................................. 7 Purpose of the TAP DWP .................................................................................................. 7 Relevant Conditions ......................................................................................................... 8 Sustainability .................................................................................................................. 12 DWP Review and updates .............................................................................................. 12

2. Karangahape Early Works ........................................................................13 Overview of Works ......................................................................................................... 13 2.1.1.

Hours of Operation .................................................................................................. 13

2.1.2.

Construction Workforce .......................................................................................... 13

2.1.3.

Work Travel Demand Management ......................................................................... 14

2.1.4.

Construction Support Areas (CSAs) .......................................................................... 14

3. Existing Conditions ...................................................................................16 General ........................................................................................................................... 16 3.1.1.

Traffic Movements .................................................................................................. 16

3.1.2.

Clearways and Taxi Stands ....................................................................................... 17

3.1.3.

Parking and Loading ................................................................................................ 18

Bus Routes and Stops ..................................................................................................... 19 Walking and Cycling Facilities ......................................................................................... 21 3.3.1.

Walking Facilities ..................................................................................................... 21

3.3.2.

Cycling Facilities ...................................................................................................... 21

Emergency Services ........................................................................................................ 22 Over Dimensional Routes ............................................................................................... 22

4. Proposed Traffic Management ................................................................ 23 Philosophy ...................................................................................................................... 23 General Traffic Management .......................................................................................... 23

Page 3

4.2.1.

Beresford Square / Pitt Street - Stage 1.................................................................... 24

4.2.2.

Beresford Square / Pitt Street â€“ Stage 2 ................................................................... 24

4.2.3.

Beresford Square / Pitt Street - Stage 3.................................................................... 25

4.2.4.

Beresford Square / Pitt Street - Stage 4.................................................................... 25

4.2.5.

Mercury Lane - Stage 1 ............................................................................................ 25

4.2.6.

Mercury Lane - Stage 1A .......................................................................................... 26

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan 4.2.7.

Mercury Lane - Stage 2 ............................................................................................ 26

Construction Traffic ........................................................................................................ 26 Contractor Parking ......................................................................................................... 28

5. Assessment of Effects ..............................................................................29 SATURN Traffic Model .................................................................................................... 29 5.1.1.

Traffic Model Assumptions and Modelling Scenarios ............................................... 29

General Traffic Effects (Modelling Results) ..................................................................... 29 5.2.1.

Flow Difference Plots............................................................................................... 30

5.2.2.

Distribution Analysis ................................................................................................ 31

5.2.3.

Journey Times (General Traffic) ............................................................................... 34

5.2.4.

Public Transport Effects ........................................................................................... 35

SIDRA Modelling ............................................................................................................. 36 5.3.1.

Assumptions............................................................................................................ 36

5.3.2.

Effects ..................................................................................................................... 37

Effect of Closing Beresford Square.................................................................................. 38 Effects to Bus Stops ........................................................................................................ 38 Effects to Pedestrians and Cyclists .................................................................................. 38 Construction Traffic Effects ............................................................................................ 39 Effects to Property Access .............................................................................................. 40 Effects to Parking and Loading........................................................................................ 40 5.9.1.

Off Street Parking, 15 â€“ 27 Beresford Square ........................................................... 40

5.9.2.

On Street Parking .................................................................................................... 40

5.9.3.

Mobility Parking ...................................................................................................... 41

5.9.4.

Parking for Hopetoun Alpha .................................................................................... 41

5.9.5.

Loading Zones ......................................................................................................... 41

5.9.6.

Taxi Stands .............................................................................................................. 42

Effects to Emergency Services ........................................................................................ 42 Effects to Over Dimensional Vehicles ............................................................................. 42

6. Travel Time / Congestion Monitoring ......................................................43 7. Consultation and Communication ........................................................... 44 Appendix A: Record of CLG, IPR and Auckland Council Comments ...............46 A1. CLG Comments .........................................................................................46 A2. IPR Comments ..........................................................................................48 A3. Auckland Council Comments ...................................................................49 Page 4

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

Appendix B: Independent Peer Review (Full) ................................................50

Page 5

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

Introduction

The City Rail Link (CRL) project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line in the vicinity of Mt Eden station. The CRL also involves the construction of two new underground stations at Aotea and Karangahape and a redeveloped Mt Eden Station (refer to Figure 1-1). The design and construction of the CRL infrastructure between the Aotea and Mt Eden Stations is being delivered by the Link Alliance.

Figure 1-1: CRL Route and Location

This Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan (TAP DWP) has been prepared in relation to construction of the new Karangahape Station.

Karangahape Station The Karangahape Station consists of two entrances, one at Beresford Square / Pitt Street and the other at Mercury Lane, linked together by platforms with two mined tunnels approximately 32m below Pitt Street. The Station will also comprise equipment rooms, ventilation systems and emergency egress at both Mercury Lane and Beresford Square / Pitt Street. Given the nature and scale of the Karangahape Station construction, works will be undertaken in a staged manner, involving:   

Page 6

Early works (demolition, network utility relocation and site establishment work) – to be undertaken from October 2019 through to early 2020; Main construction works (construction of the station and mined tunnels for the rail tracks) – to be undertaken from early 2020 through to late 2023; and Public realm reinstatement – likely to be undertaken from late 2022 to late 2024.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

TAP DWP Staging To reflect the staged construction approach for the Karangahape Station, TAP DWPs will be developed in stages. This TAP DWP addresses the Karangahape Station early works, which are detailed in the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP), and summarised in Section 2 of this DWP. TAP DWPs will also be prepared for the Karangahape Station main construction works and the subsequent public realm reinstatement.

Purpose of the TAP DWP This TAP DWP has been prepared to mitigate and manage the potential adverse effects of constructing the Karangahape Station early works on the transport network. In accordance with CRL designation Condition 25.2, the objective of this TAP DWP is: To so far as reasonably practicable, avoid, remedy, or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on transport, parking and property access. This will be achieved by:   

Managing the road transport network for the duration of construction by adopting the best practicable option to manage congestion; Maintaining pedestrian access to private property at all times; and Providing on-going vehicle access to private property to the greatest extent possible.

Specifically, this TAP DWP sets out how transport, parking and property access will be managed during the works in accordance with CRL designation Conditions 25.3 (general TAP DWP matters), 28.1 and 28.2 (matters specific to the Karangahape Station area). This TAP DWP will be implemented throughout the construction period. The DWP has been developed in consultation with key stakeholders for the early works, including the Karangahape Community and Business Liaison Group. It has been reviewed by the Independent Peer Reviewer (IPR) prior to submission to Auckland Council (refer to Appendix A). This TAP DWP forms part of the CEMP for the early works.

Page 7

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

Relevant Conditions Table 1-1 identifies the CRL designation conditions relevant to this TAP DWP and where they are addressed in the document. Table 1-1: General TAP designation conditions and location in Plan

Condition No.

Condition

â€œOne Networkâ€? Consultation

18.1

The Requiring Authority and its contractor shall work collaboratively with the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) during the preparation of the Traffic, Access and Parking DWP (Conditions 25, 27, 28, 29, and 30) in relation to confirming the management of adverse transport effects on the road network. A record of this consultation and outcomes shall be included in the Traffic, Access and Parking DWP. The Requiring Authority shall consult with the NZTA throughout the duration of construction on any

Relevant section of DWP

Section 7 & Appendix A

changes or updates to the Traffic, Access and Parking DWP which relate to the management of the road network. 20

CEMP Requirements

20.1

In order to give effect to the objective in Condition 19.1, the CEMP must provide for the following: (d) A Travel Management Plan for each construction site outlining onsite car parking management and methods for encouraging travel to the site using forms of transport other than private vehicle to assist in mitigating localised traffic effects

Section 3.1.3

CEMP Construction Works Requirements

21.1

In order to give effect to the objective in Condition 19.1, the CEMP shall include the following details and requirements in relation to all areas within the surface designation footprint where construction works are to occur, and / or where materials and construction machinery are to be used or stored: (a) Where access points are to be located and procedures for managing construction vehicle ingress and egress to construction support and storage areas;

Section 2.1.4 & 4.3

General Transport, Access and Parking

25.1

A Transport, Access and Parking DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects of construction of the City Rail Link, or any part of it, on the transport network.

25.2

25.3

Page 8

(a) Managing the road transport network for the duration of construction by adopting the best practicable option to manage congestion;

All Sections

(b) Maintaining pedestrian access to private property at all times; and

Section 5.6

Section 5.8

To achieve the above objective, the following shall be included in the Transport, Access and Parking DWP:

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

(a) The road routes which are to be used by construction related vehicles, particularly trucks to transport construction related materials, equipment, spoil, including how the use of these routes by these vehicles will be managed to mitigate congestion, and to the greatest extent possible, avoid adverse effects on residential zoned land and education facilities; (b) Transport route options for the movement of construction vehicles carrying spoil, bulk construction materials or machinery shall be identified and details provided as to why these routes are considered appropriate routes. In determining appropriate routes, construction vehicles carrying spoil, bulk construction materials or machinery shall as far as practicably possible only use roads that:

Section 4.3 & 5.7

(i) Form part of the regional arterial network; (ii) Are overweight / over dimensioned routes; (iii) Or other routes (specified below) where no other practical option is available. (c) For the purposes of this condition the following routes (that at the time this designation was confirmed were not part of the regional arterial network and / or overweight / over dimensioned) shall be used where practicable for the movement of construction vehicles carrying spoil, bulk construction materials or machinery: (iii) Pitt Street (between Hobson Street and Hopetoun Street), Beresford Square, Mercury Lane, Canada Street and Upper Queen Street (between Canada Street and Karangahape Road), for trucks heading to/from Karangahape Station construction sites;

Section 4.3 & 5.7

(e) Proposed temporary road lane reductions and / or closures, alternative routes and temporary detours, including how these have been selected and will be managed to mitigate congestion as far as practicably possible and how advance notice will be provided;

Section 4.2

(f) How disruption to the use of private property will be mitigated through: (i) Ensuring pedestrian and cycle access to private property is retained at all times; (ii) Providing vehicle access to private property as far as practicably possible at all times, except for temporary closures where landowners and occupiers have been communicated and consulted with in reasonable advance of the closure; and

Section 5.6, 5.8 & 5.9

(iii) How the loss of any private car parking will be mitigated through alternative car parking arrangements. (g) Where an affected party unexpectedly finds their vehicle blocked in as a result of a temporary closure, the Requiring Authority shall (within reasonable limits) offer alternative transport such as a taxi, rental car, or other alternative.

Section 5.8

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Section 5.8

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

(ii) In place for between six and 72 hours, the Requiring Authority shall communicate and consult on the closure at least 72 hours in advance and will offer and provide where agreed with the affected party alternative parking arrangements. The alternative parking arrangement should be as close to the site affected as is reasonably practicable. (h) How disruption to use of the road network will be mitigated for emergency services, public transport, bus users, taxi operators, freight and other related vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists through: (i) Prioritising, as far as practicably possible, pedestrian and public transport at intersections where construction works are occurring;

Section 4.1

(ii) Relocating bus stops and taxi stands to locations which, as far as practicably possible, minimise disruption; and

Section 5.5 & 5.9.6

(iii) Identifying alternate heavy haul routes where these are affected by construction works.

Sections 4.3, 5.7 & 5.11

(i) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan that detail how emergency services, landowners, occupiers, public transport users, bus and taxi operators, and the general public are to be consulted with in relation to the management of the adverse effects on the transport network.

Section 7 and Appendix A

Monitoring of Transport network Congestion

26.1

To achieve the objective of Condition 25.2(a), the Requiring Authority will undertake monitoring of the transport network and implement additional mitigation measures as required to manage congestion to achieve the best practicable option.

26.2

Section 6

The purpose of the monitoring is to monitor congestion on the transport network by measuring average delays for traffic travelling along specified routes. The evaluation times will be: (a) The average travel times over the weekday two-hour morning peak period; and

Section 6

(b) The average travel times over the weekday two-hour evening peak period; and

Section 6

The Requiring Authority shall carry out continuous monitoring for the duration that construction of the City Rail Link is occurring. The intention is that this monitoring is to be continuous, although it is acknowledged that there may be occasional malfunctions.

Section 6

26.4

If a congestion incident occurs (such as an accident), the monitoring during the affected period will be considered unrepresentative.

Section 6

26.5

Monitoring shall commence six months prior to construction of the City Rail Link to establish a baseline of existing transport congestion.

Section 6

26.6

The monitoring will establish whether the City Rail Link construction works have increased traffic delays as follows:

26.3

(a) Either by more than 10 minutes (from the monitoring previously undertaken in accordance with this condition)

Page 10

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Section 6

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan Condition No.

26.7

26.8

26.9

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

(b) Or if the travel times are more than three minutes or 30% greater than the forecast modelled increases along that route (according to the most recent traffic model test of that scenario, undertaken prior to the start of construction. The modelled time is to be based on the Auckland City Centre SATURN traffic model or a different traffic model approved by the Requiring Authority).

Section 6

If the travel times exceed the above criteria on any one of the specified routes, then additional mitigation shall be implemented by the Requiring Authority in its role as the Road Controlling Authority (under its statutory obligation). The additional mitigation could include but is not limited to advertising alternative routes, removing on street car parking or implementing operational measures, such as lane reconfigurations or signal phasing, to increase capacity on the surrounding network where reasonably possible at that time.

Section 6

The purpose of additional mitigation measures is to mitigate the increases in traffic delays, reducing these to below the levels identified in Condition 26.6 as far as is reasonably achievable.

Section 6

For the purposes of this condition, the following are the specified routes: (e) Nelson Street/Hobson Street (between Pitt Street and Fanshawe Street)

Section 6

Transport Access and parking: Specific Requirements (Karangahape Station Area)

28.1

To achieve the objective in Conditions 25, the following measure shall be implemented:

28.2

(a) Retaining one lane in each direction on Pitt Street (unless otherwise agreed with the Auckland Council Monitoring Officer); and

Section 4.2

(b) Spoil trucks shall not use East Street where practicable and on street parking at the Southern end of East Street will be retained.

Section 4.3& 5.7

The Traffic, Access and Parking DWP shall demonstrate how these measures will be implemented and will also include the following: (b) The timing and sequencing of temporary road lane reductions and / or closures on Pitt Street, Mercury Lane and the western end of Beresford Street, and the alternative routes and temporary detours to be used, including how these have been selected and will be managed to, where practicable, mitigate congestion on the surrounding road network.

Section 4.2

(c) How disruption to the use of private property located immediately adjacent the surface designation with access onto Beresford Street, Pitt Street, Mercury Lane and East Street will be mitigated through:

Page 11

(i) Providing pedestrian and cycle access to private property at all times, particularly those businesses located at the eastern end of Beresford Street and northern end of Mercury Lane.

Section 5.6

(ii) Providing vehicle access to private property, (which may include only a turn in and a turn out in the same direction), as practicably possible at all times except for temporary closures where landowners and occupiers have been communicated and consulted with in reasonable advance of the closure.

Section 4.2

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

(iii) Providing local vehicle access to properties located along Beresford Street and Samoa House Lane (which may include only a turn in and a turn out in the same direction);

Section 4.2

(iv) Alternative parking arrangements or other offers for resolving the temporary loss of car parking during construction for the Hopetoun Alpha Building.

Section 5.9.4

Sustainability Then Link Alliance is seeking an Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia (ISCA) Infrastructure Sustainability (IS) Rating. Further details can be found in the CEMP and Sustainability Rating. Project sustainability requirements that relate directly to this TAP DWP are included in CEMP. These requirements are imbedded within this TAP DWP to ensure that sustainability is a key focus and â€˜the way we do thingsâ€™. In some cases, the IS requirements and sustainability goals enhance the designation and consent requirements.

DWP Review and updates This TAP DWP is a live document that will be reviewed at least annually, or as a result of a material change to the project, or to address unforeseen adverse transport, access and parking effects arising from construction, or unresolved complaints. Any material changes to this TAP DWP must be approved by Auckland Council prior to any on-site activity reliant upon the change commencing. Refer to the CEMP for further detail on the review and updating process.

Page 12

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

Karangahape Early Works Overview of Works

Early works will be undertaken to establish the site of the new Karangahape Station in advance of the main construction works. The early works are detailed in the Project CEMP with an overview provided in Table 2-1. Table 2-1: Overview of Karangahape Early Works

Works location

Overview of construction activities

Beresford Square / Pitt Street

 Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Beresford Square / Pitt Street;  Removal of street trees and the demolition of the café / toilet in Beresford Square;  Establishment of the Beresford Square Construction Support Area to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.; and  Closure of Beresford Square to vehicle traffic (other than construction traffic) while retaining pedestrian and cycle access. Removal of existing street furniture where required (such as seating, street lighting (to be replaced with temporary lighting).

Mercury Lane

 Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Mercury Lane;  Establishment of the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area (CSA) to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.; and  Establishment of the Mercury Lane temporary working platform.

It should be noted that the demolition of buildings and above ground structures within the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area is authorised by the CRL Enabling Work Outline Plan – Karangahape Road Demolition Works (Auckland Council reference OPW60339200), confirmed in June 2019, and does not form part of this TAP DWP.

2.1.1. Hours of Operation Works will generally be undertaken between 7000hrs and 2200hrs Monday to Sunday, taking into account any specific construction noise or traffic, access and parking restrictions outlined in the CRL designation conditions. Limited construction related activities may be undertaken outside these hours, such as the delivery of oversized plant as detailed in the CEMP, providing they comply with the relevant designation conditions.

2.1.2. Construction Workforce The construction workforce required for the Karangahape early works will vary over the duration of the works, however it is expected to peak at approximately 50 staff. This number includes subcontractor workforces, such as traffic management, and staff from the various network utility operators, who will be on-site intermittently during the works.

Page 13

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan Limited workforce parking will be provided on-site within the Beresford Square and the Mercury the Lane Construction Support Areas (refer to Figure 2-1 and Figure 2-2). The majority of workers will need to either park within nearby public parking buildings or travel via other modes. Vehicle access to construction zones will be restricted to plant and material delivery, spoil removal and utility service vehicles.

2.1.3. Work Travel Demand Management Given the small size of the workforce for the Karangahape early works, the traffic effects of workforce travel on the network will be negligible. However, potential impacts from workforce travel will be further minimised through the use of public transport and carpooling as practicable. The workforce will be provided with public transport travel information and encouraged to carpool if they drive.

2.1.4. Construction Support Areas (CSAs) The early works will involve the establishment of CSAs in Beresford Square and Mercury Lane as detailed in the CEMP. The Beresford Square CSA will be located in the existing carpark at 15 â€“ 27 Beresford Square as shown in Figure 2-1. The Mercury Lane CSA will be located in the lower half of Mercury Lane, backing on to East Street following the demolition of existing buildings within the CSA footprint as shown in Figure 2-2. Initial establishment of the CSAs will focus on setting up offices, parking, and laydown areas. Additional CSA elements, such as the stormwater treatment pond and bentonite plant will not be required until the commencement of the Karangahape main works in 2020 (which will be subject to a separate TAP DWP).

Figure 2-1: Beresford Square Construction Support Area Indicative Layout Page 14

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

Figure 2-2: Mercury Lane Construction Support Area Indicative Layout

Page 15

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

3. Existing Conditions General For the purpose of this TAP DWP, the existing conditions are in reference to the current on-street layout (as at the beginning of July 2019). Although it is noted that the Auckland Transport (AT) Karangahape Road Streetscape Improvements (Cycleway and Busway upgrade/ improvement project) commenced in late July 2019 at Symonds Street and will, in time, eventually change the existing situation on Karangahape Road. There is no conflict of work zones anticipated, as early works for the Karangahape Station will not have a physical presence on Karangahape road.

3.1.1. Traffic Movements Table 3-1 outlines the road classification and the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) of the roads, which will support the utility relocation work in the area of the new Karangahape Station. Road classifications are based on the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) One Network Road Classification system1. Table 3-1: Road Classification and AADT

Road Name

Classification

AADT

Karangahape Road

Arterial

22,450 vehicles

Pitt Street

Arterial

20,000 vehicles

Hopetoun Street

Arterial

8,800 vehicles

Beresford Square

Secondary Collector

1,000 vehicles

Mercury Lane

Primary Collector

2,900 vehicles

There is one signalised intersection located within the vicinity of the works - the Karangahape Road / Pitt Street / Mercury Lane intersection, shown in Figure 3-1. Both directions of Karangahape Road and Pitt Street support a three-lane approach. This intersection provides for vehicular movements and pedestrian movements across all legs. It also supports cyclists with advanced cycling stop boxes on Pitt Street and both legs of Karangahape Road.

https://nzta.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=95fad5204ad243c39d84c37701f614b0 Page 16 | Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

Figure 3-1 Karangahape Road / Pitt Street / Mercury Lane intersection

Mercury Lane and the eastern end of Beresford Square both support one-way traffic movements. Mercury Lane provides for a one-way traffic flow entering from Karangahape Road or Pitt Street and exiting with a left or right turn movement onto Canada Street. Beresford Square allows left and right turn entry and exit from Hopetoun Street but exit only (left and right turn) on to Pitt Street.

3.1.2. Clearways and Taxi Stands Pitt Street has a clearway zone in place on the southbound approach to the Karangahape Road intersection. The hours of the clearway are 7am – 9am and 4pm – 6pm, Monday – Friday. Part of the west leg of the Karangahape Road / Pitt Street intersection (outside 259 – 281 Karangahape Road) also has a clearway zone at all times except for between midnight to 7am Monday to Sunday, when it acts as a taxi stand. On the opposite side of Karangahape Road westbound between the hours of 8am – 6pm, Monday – Sunday there is a 5-minute Loading Zone (LZ5). Outside these hours (i.e. between 6pm - 8am) the road space is allocated to Small Public Service Vehicles (PSV). This allows for use by taxis during this time.

Page 17

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

3.1.3. Parking and Loading Parking and loading provisions within the early works area are as follows:  

The early works area falls within the City Centre Parking Zone (CCPZ - paid on street parking). There are 6 loading zones with a maximum 5-minute stay duration (LZ5) located on Pitt Street, Karangahape Road, Mercury Lane and Beresford Square as follows in Figure 3-2):

Figure 3-2: Loading Zones Karangahape Road / Pitt Street / Beresford Square and Mercury Lane

   

Beresford Square (1): 5m loading zone; Pitt Street (2 & 3): two 11m loading zones; Karangahape Road (4& 5): 43m and 20m loading zones; Mercury Lane (6): 16m loading zone

(Note: measurements of these loading zones are approximate)



Page 18

Beresford Square supports a mobility car parking space located outside number 1.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan 

The majority of the on-street parking provision comprises parallel parking spaces, with the exception of Beresford Square, where parking consists of parallel, perpendicular and angled spaces.

Bus Routes and Stops Currently, AT’s outbound Western bus routes travel from Auckland’s city centre (Wellesley or Victoria Street) and along Pitt Street (refer to Figure 3-3). Once reaching the Karangahape Road intersection, buses on this route make a right turn on to Karangahape Road and continue westbound as shown in Figure 3-3. The inbound services follow a different route and travel along Karangahape Road, turning left into Queen Street to access the city.

Stop #1084 – CityLink Bus only

Figure 3-3: Western Bus Service Route

The Services using this route exiting Pitt Street are outlined in Table 3-2. Services 209, 110 and 129 are peak only services (inbound only on AM and outbound only on PM. Hence, AM peak services are not captured in the table as AM service do not use Pitt Street). Current AM peak services ending in the city will return to the origin of their service or change into a difference service, it is expected that the buses will be dispersed across the city centre road network.

Page 19

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan Table 3-2: Western Bus Service Numbers and Frequencies on Karangahape Road

Number of Buses Exiting Pitt Street onto K Road 7am – 9am 12pm – 2pm 4pm -6pm

Bus Route Number 18

195

209

110

129

132

133

134

CityLink

Approx.1 bus every 3 mins

Approx. 1 bus every 3 mins

Approx. 1 bus every 2 mins

Total (2 Hours)

The CityLink buses, like the Western Services, travel southbound up Pitt Street and on reaching the Karangahape Street / Pitt Street intersection, CityLink make a left turn onto Karangahape Road (refer to Figure 3-4). The CityLink bus is serviced by bus stop #1084 located within the work zone on Pitt Street.

Karangahape Station Site Area

Figure 3-4: CityLink Bus Service Route

AT’s bus stop number 1084 is located at 78 Pitt Street, approximately 35m from the Pitt Street Karangahape Road intersection. This stop is used only by the City Link Bus. Page 20

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan The eastern leg of the Karangahape Road / Pitt Street intersection has bus stops on both sides of the road. Services using these stops include the 525, 866, 966 and the Inner Link buses. These services all travel along Ponsonby Road with both the 866 and 966 travelling to and from the North Shore.

Walking and Cycling Facilities 3.3.1. Walking Facilities Karangahape Road, Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane all have footpaths on both sides of the street. This allows pedestrians to easily access adjacent properties, including those that have businesses or shop fronts on these streets. The width of footpaths at bus stops locations on Pitt Street and Karangahape Road are large enough to provide waiting space for bus users while maintaining pedestrian movement. Mercury Lane does not have many active frontages at street level, with less pedestrian traffic making it feel more isolated for pedestrian perceptions of personal safety. Mercury Lane has a steep gradient (refer to Figure 3-5), which likely creates challenges for wheelchair users or those with other mobility impairments.

Figure 3-5: Mercury Lane pedestrian environment (08/07/2019)

The Barnes Dance pedestrian phase at the Karangahape Road / Pitt Street / Mercury Lane intersection means that pedestrians have good connectivity and efficient crossing opportunities, being able to cross in all directions during the pedestrian green man phase. Pedestrians use the footpaths provided as a through route to get to main destinations such as bus stops, shops and businesses on Karangahape Road.

3.3.2. Cycling Facilities None of the streets within the early works area have dedicated on-road cycle facilities although a cycle ramp is located on the northern side of the Beresford Square / Pitt Street intersection corner (approximately outside the property at 59 Pitt Street). This cycle ramp connects into a shared path, which extends north along Pitt Street through the Hopetoun intersection and on to Union Street.

Page 21

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan It should be noted that additional cycle facilities will be implemented on Karangahape Road as part of the AT Karangahape Road Streetscape Improvements, currently under construction.

Emergency Services The Central Fire Station and St Johnâ€™s Central Ambulance Station are both located on Pitt Street. Keep Clear zone markings are present on the road outside 40 - 50 and 47 Pitt Street, as well as an emergency services traffic signal to provide entry/ exit to these facilities.

Over Dimensional Routes Pitt Street and Karangahape Road both form part of the NZTA Over-Dimensional road network as shown in Figure 3-62.

Figure 3-6: NZTA Over-Dimensional Network

https://www.nzta.govt.nz/assets/resources/overdimen-veh-route-maps/4-auckland/docs/OD_427%20Auckland.pdf Page 22 | Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

4. Proposed Traffic Management Philosophy This TAP DWP has been developed in general accordance with the traffic management approach outlined in the CRL designation conditions, as well as with Auckland Transport’s Code of Practice (ATCoP) and the Transport Agency’s Code of Practice for Temporary Traffic Management (CoPTTM). In practical terms, this means providing for the connectivity and access described in the designation conditions wherever and whenever possible, and in particular for main road movements. Additional turn bans or changes to connectivity or access have been restricted to those imposed by safe operational practice, and geometric or spatial constraints for traffic management. The modal priorities adopted by this TAP DWP are: 1. 2. 3. 4.

Active transport Public transport Freight, service vehicles, couriers and taxis Private vehicles (including construction traffic).

Karangahape Road and Pitt Street are classified as a Level 2LS (low speed) roads in the CoPTTM. The traffic management measures proposed in this TAP DWP have been developed accordingly for this classification. In addition, the traffic management methods outlined below have been developed to be commensurate with the nature and scale of the early works construction activities and the expected effects on the transport network.

General Traffic Management The utility relocations forming part of the early works will be undertaken in several construction stages over a period of approximately 6 months (refer to the CEMP for further detail). The majority of the early utility works for Beresford Square / Pitt Street will be in Beresford Square with part of the works in Pitt Street. Mercury Lane works will be ongoing and consistent across the 6 month period. During this time, a number of Temporary Traffic Management Plans (TMP’s) will be implemented for the works with evolving requirements and lane configurations. Traffic management will range from footpath occupation and closures to more extensive lane closures on Pitt Street. However, one lane of traffic in each direction on Pitt Street will be maintained throughout the duration of works 3 and vehicular access to properties will be maintained as practicably possible for the duration of the works 4. Across all stages of the utility relocations, the works will occupy the footpath of individual work areas to varying extents. However, pedestrian access (with a minimum width of 1.5m) will be maintained adjacent to the individual work areas in Pitt Street, Beresford Square and Mercury Lane. TMP’s will ensure that all pedestrian routes meet accessibility requirements of ATCoP, with appropriate ramps and gradients for all users. Full pedestrian access across the Karangahape Road / 3

In accordance with designation condition 28.1a In accordance with designation condition 28.2(c)(ii) and (iii) Page 23 | Karangahape Station Early Works 4

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan Pitt Street / Mercury Lane intersection will be maintained at all times during the works5. Traffic management areas interfacing with pedestrian crossing points will widen to cater for the crossing demand as required during the works. Wayfinding signage will be provided at junctions along the key pedestrian routes through the works area. Where appropriate, additional information will be provided on the location and operation of specific buildings or businesses (refer to the Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan (SIBD DWP) for further detail in this regard). The staging of the Mercury Lane works will be coordinated with the Mercury Lane Demolition works (subject to confirmed Outline Plan OPW60339200 and supporting TAP DWP) to ensure there is no TTM overlap or conflicts. To enable the required early works, access from Beresford Square onto Pitt Street will be closed from January 2020 and continuing through the main contract works phase. Beresford square will still be accessible from Hopetoun Street. All other existing traffic movements between public streets will continue to be available. During the Beresford Square/ Pitt Street Stage 1 works, bus stop #1084 will be relocated to enable smooth operation of the works in Stage 2 (and the main works in 2020). Due to the nature of the works encroaching into the road carriageway, various on-street parking spaces across Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane will be closed during stages of the early works, including a disabled park in Beresford Square and a loading zone.

4.2.1. Beresford Square / Pitt Street - Stage 1 This stage is comprised of two different events, tree removal and demolition of the café and toilets (Q1 2020). It will include:   

  

Minor localised traffic management to traffic lanes for individual tree removal along Beresford Square. Sequenced tree removal works so to maintain access at all times. Occupying a large area of the footpath on the corner of Beresford Square and Pitt Street (while maintaining a pedestrian route of 1.5m around the work zones) for the café and toilet demolition and for the trees located on the corner. Intermittent impact to car parks by the individual tree removal. Relocation of Bus Stop #1084 in preparation for future stages. Relocation of the cycle ramp on Pitt Street for Stage 3.

4.2.2. Beresford Square / Pitt Street – Stage 2 This stage has been agreed with AT to take place in early January/February 2020 when there will be reduced traffic volumes on the roads. Implementing Stage 2 will include: 

Extensive road lane closures, reducing Pitt Street to one lane in the northbound direction and one lane in the southbound direction.

In accordance with designation condition 28.2(c)(i) Page 24 | Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan  

Closure of Beresford Square exit to Pitt Street (January 2020) from the beginning of this stage and continuing into the main station construction works. Parking closures (approximately 25 parking spaces will be permanently closed in Beresford Square):    

North side of Beresford Square from Pitt Street up to the Hopetoun Alpha Building (Access will be maintained). The south side of Beresford Square from the café and toilets to just east of Samoa House Lane. Parking spaces and the loading zone outside 61 – 65 Pitt Street. Parking on the East side of Pitt Street will be temporarily removed for this stage between Poynton Terrace and the Karangahape Road intersection.

4.2.3. Beresford Square / Pitt Street - Stage 3 This stage will reduce the northbound traffic lanes to one, between the Karangahape intersection and 59 Pitt Street. It will include:   

Several long sections of the footpath will be occupied for the works on the North side of Beresford Square and on Pitt Street. A 1.5m wide pedestrian route will be maintained. Beresford Square exit on to Pitt Street will remain closed. Approximately 25 on-street parks on Beresford Square will be impacted by the works

4.2.4. Beresford Square / Pitt Street - Stage 4 Stage 4 will reduce the number of northbound traffic lanes on Pitt Street to one lane on between the Karangahape intersection and the Beresford Square. It will include:   

A large portion of the footpath will be occupied on the southern side from 14 to 22 Beresford Square. During this time, a 1.5m wide pedestrian route around these works will be provided as well as full access to properties. Beresford Square exit on to Pitt Street will remain closed. Approximately 25 on-street parks on Beresford Square will be impacted by the works.

4.2.5. Mercury Lane - Stage 1 This stage requires the closure of the western side of Mercury Lane. Main points for this stage will include:    

Page 25

Removal of approximately 21 on-street parking spaces. Additionally, some parking spaces will also be removed on the eastern side to maintain the movement of the traffic down the street. Partial footpath closures will reroute pedestrians to the opposite side of Mercury Lane around the works, with temporary pram ramps provided at the crossing points. Access to the service lane adjacent to the Mercury Theatre will be maintained at all times.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

4.2.6. Mercury Lane - Stage 1A Stage 1A directional drilling within the road reserve to relocate utilities will require:  

A localised closure at the entrance to Cross Street to receive the directional drill. Traffic management on Cross Street to assist with maintaining access.

4.2.7. Mercury Lane - Stage 2 Stage 2 works are an alternative option to Stage 1A, involving network utility relocation via open trenching. These works will occupy the eastern side of Mercury Lane. Main points for this stage will include:   

Removal of approximately 21 on-street parking spaces. Additionally, some parking spaces will also be removed on the eastern side to maintain the movement of the traffic down the street. Pedestrian access will be maintained along parts of the footpath but redirected to the other side of the street around the works close to Cross Street. Temporary pram ramps will be provided at the crossing points.

Construction Traffic Access for construction traffic and truck loading will occur via the proposed vehicle access points and within the worksites indicated on the temporary traffic management plans (refer to CEMP). Conflicts between pedestrians, private vehicles and construction activity at each access point will be managed by a Traffic Controller (during active site hours). Overall, the volume of construction traffic generated by these early works is predicted to be very low, with a maximum of 25 – 30 truck return trips per day (i.e. 50 - 60 one-way movements) in total for the early works phase. Construction traffic will include deliveries for the establishments of the CSA’s. The number of movements per day and truck volumes will fluctuate throughout the early works depending upon the tasks being undertaken. It is also noted that this construction traffic will be adding to what is already predicted to be on the city centre network as a result of the wider CRL Project. Most of these movements will generally occur between 0700 hrs and 1900 hrs, Monday to Saturday, but can also occur between 0700 hrs and 2200 hrs (especially for the movement of plant to minimise disruption to traffic). The cumulative effect of other construction traffic generated by CRL activity occurring in the same time frames is covered in Section 5.7. Truck movements into Beresford Square and Mercury Lane will be via the arterial road network as defined by the Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in Part (AUP), over dimensional (OD) routes, over weight (OW) routes and other authorised routes where no other practical option is available (as per CRL designation Condition 25.3(c)(iii)). Both work sites are well located in relation to accessing the arterial and OD/OW networks and construction vehicles will not be required to use local roads or to pass through sensitive areas such as residential streets or past schools (refer to CRL designation Condition 25.3(a)). The options available to access and leave the sites are shown in Figure 4-1.

Page 26

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

Figure 4-1: Arterial Road network and authorised routes for trucks and construction vehicles

Truck movements to and from the work areas will be as follows:  

 



Page 27

Due to the closure of Beresford Square at the east end, entry into and exit from Beresford Square will be limited to Hopetoun Street. When leaving Beresford Square, trucks will be able to make a right-turn movement into Hopetoun Street and then left onto Pitt Street to access the regional arterial, over dimensional or state highway network (SH1 or SH16). Because Mercury Lane is one-way, entry will only be obtained via Karangahape Road or Pitt Street. When leaving Mercury Lane, trucks and other construction vehicles will be limited to leftturn movements in to Canada Street, then left in to Upper Queen Street and then Karangahape Road to access the regional arterial, over dimensional routes or the state highway network. Reverse manoeuvring of construction vehicles shall not take place on any arterial route. The only exception to this is if a truck or other construction vehicle is inside the work zone and the manoeuvre is assisted by a Traffic Controller. If reverse manoeuvring is required on any other street (i.e. Beresford Square or Mercury Lane) this shall be carried out with the assistance of a Traffic Controller and manual Stop/ Go control as required. | Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan Truck movements to and from sites will generally be via 11m large rigid trucks, or smaller units. These truck types can be accommodated within the streets used to access the sites shown in Figure 4-1. When required, delivery of large plant by over-dimension vehicles will take place via the Transport Agencyâ€™s over-dimension routes where practicable. These routes include the State Highway network, Newton Road, Great North Road, Karangahape Road, Symonds Street and Pitt Street (Between Karangahape Road and Vincent Street).

Contractor Parking On-site parking will be provided for the loading/unloading of equipment and materials, and for essential contractor vehicles. This will be provided within the work site and / or within the Beresford Square and Mercury Lane CSAâ€™s as outlined in Section 2.1.3 and 2.1.4. Contractor parking does not include general construction staff parking.

Page 28

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

5. Assessment of Effects SATURN Traffic Model The purpose of this modelling section is to present the steps undertaken to assess the potential transport impacts, particularly the proposed temporary traffic management as a result of CRL early works for Pitt Street and Beresford Square. This includes detailing the impacts associated with the utility works planned on Pitt Street and Beresford Square and the surrounding areas.

5.1.1. Traffic Model Assumptions and Modelling Scenarios To isolate the potential impact of the proposed temporary traffic management, two scenarios (with and without the proposed temporary traffic management) were created. Each is discussed below in greater detail, outlining each scenario the assumptions underpinning each.

2019 Reference Model (without CRL temporary traffic management) The Auckland City Centre SATURN 20186 model was used as a base for this assessment. The 2019 Reference Case includes existing infrastructure provision (including committed schemes) and latest bus routing. The Model explicitly reflects the network changes listed below which are expected to take place at least in part during the same time as the utility work planned on Pitt Street and Beresford Square:   

Karangahape Road construction works between Ponsonby Road and Symonds Street were included to reflect streetscape construction work on Karangahape Road7. Symonds Street /Karangahape Rd intersection to reflect K Road Cycleway construction complete8 were included. Corrected inconsistent distances 9 from ‘2018 Base model’ and “AT Karangahape Road Streetscape TMP A & F” model on Karangahape Road.

2019 CRL Model Karangahape Road (with CRL temporary traffic management) For the 2019 CRL Model (with CRL temporary traffic management), the 2019 Reference Model above was used as a base for this assessment. The only network change introduced was the worst-case scenario listed below:  

Closing one traffic lanes northbound and one traffic lane southbound on Pitt Street while adding a right turn flare at the Pitt Road / Karangahape Road intersection. Banning the one-way approach from Beresford Square towards Pitt Street.

General Traffic Effects (Modelling Results) To isolate the potential impact of the proposed temporary traffic management, the proposed temporary traffic management included in the 2019 CRL Model Karangahape Road scenario has been compared to the 2019 Reference Case scenario to ascertain the likely traffic effects.

Received the Auckland City Centre SATURN 2019 from Flow Transportation Specialists on 13/08/2019 Received the AFC_K_Road_Modelling_Update_TMP_PhasesAandF_v2 model from AFC on 20/08/2019. 8 Received an updated layout for Karangahape Road/Symonds St junction from AFC on 23/08/2019 9 Agreed corrections with Flow Transportation Specialists and AFC on 27/08/2019 Page 29 | Karangahape Station Early Works 7

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

5.2.1. Flow Difference Plots In the following plots shown in Figure 5-1 and Figure 5-2, the green bands indicate the increases in traffic flows between the 2019 Reference Case scenario and the utility work planned on Pitt Street and Beresford Square for each stage, while the blue lines indicate decreases in traffic flows (width propositional to the volume of change). The flows displayed are what SATURN terms “actual” flows, which are the flows that are predicted to be able to get through to the particular links within the single peak hour. In congested networks, these “actual” flows are lower than the demand flows.

Figure 5-1: Actual Flow Difference (2019 Reference Case vs Proposed Closure); Morning Peak

Page 30

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

Figure 5-2: Actual Flow Difference (2019 Reference Case vs Proposed Closure); Evening Peak

The demand flows follow a similar pattern of traffic rerouting as compared to actual flows but with a minor increase of less than 10 flows on an average. The proposed temporary traffic management is predicted to result in traffic flow changes primarily on Pitt Street, Beresford Square and the immediate surrounding area. The reduction of the traffic capacity on Pitt Street and closure of Beresford Square corresponds to where a reduction in flow is most significant as a result of the temporary traffic management. As a result of the reduced capacity on Pitt Street, additional delay on Pitt Street then reroutes traffic flow (increases in flow â€“ green) away from Pitt Street to Queen Street and Howe Street which are the immediate north-south corridors. Howe Street provides a direct connection from Karangahape Street to Wellington Street and Union Street avoiding the usage of Pitt Street. Thereâ€™s also a slight increase in traffic flows along the Motorways showing traffic rerouting over a wider area.

5.2.2. Distribution Analysis To understand the changes in flow distributions as a result of the temporary construction work, flow distributions of vehicles using Pitt Street were extracted from both the 2019 Reference Case and the Proposed Closure and is shown in Figure 5-3 to Figure 5-6 for both morning and evening peak. The reduction of capacity on Pitt Street will likely change mobility patterns, rerouting traffic away from Pitt Street to alternative routes parallel to Pitt Street, largely due to the additional delay caused by construction. The CRL model shows a considerable overall reduction in traffic flows along the Pitt Street, Karangahape Road section between Queen and Symonds Street and Upper Queen Street. The traffic flows on Hopetoun Street are reduced significantly due to the Beresford Closure.

Page 31

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

Figure 5-3: 2019 Reference Model Distribution Analysis (Area of Interest); Morning Peak

Page 32

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Figure 5-4: 2019 CRL Model Karangahape Road Distribution Analysis (Area of Interest); Morning Peak

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

Figure 5-5: 2019 Reference Model Distribution Analysis (Area of Interest); Evening Peak

Page 33

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Figure 5-6: 2019 CRL Model Karangahape Road Distribution Analysis (Area of Interest); Evening Peak

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

5.2.3. Journey Times (General Traffic) The proposed temporary traffic management is predicted to result in journey time changes due to rerouting caused by capacity reduction on Pitt Street. The results suggest that traffic on Pitt Street experience more delays due to the capacity reductions implemented. There is also a slight increase in journey times on the surrounding routes because of traffic rerouting. Specified routes have been assessed and are listed below:      

Wellesley Street (between Victoria Street and Princes Street). Victoria Street (between Wellesley Street and Princes Street). Nelson Street / Hobson Street (between Pitt Street and Fanshawe Street). Queen Street (between Mayoral Drive and Customs Street). Customs Street / Fanshawe Street (between Nelson Street and Tangihua Street). Quay Street / Lower Hobson Street (between Fanshawe Street / Hobson Street and Tangihua Street).

These routes are illustrated in Figure 5-7 below. The journey time routes are consistent with those specified routes that are used to monitor the CRL construction effects.

Figure 5-7: Journey Time Routes

Table 5-1 and Table 5-2 present the modelled journey times for the routes assessed for both the Reference Case and temporary construction works. The comparative analysis suggests that the temporary construction work will have a relatively low impact (less than a minute change) to all the journey times assessed. Both the rerouting and delay caused by the temporary construction works do not seem to extend far enough to have any noteworthy change on the journey times routes specified in the consent conditions. Page 34

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan Table 5-1: Journey Times (Morning Peak)

Routes

Direction

Reference

CRL

Westbound

6 min 54 sec

6 min 36 sec

Eastbound

11min 30 sec

11 min 48 sec

Westbound

6min 24 sec

6 min 24 sec

Eastbound

7min 42 sec

8 min 6 sec

Nelson Street

Northbound

3 min 12 sec

3 min 36 sec

Hobson Street

Southbound

3 min 24 sec

Southbound

6 min 6 sec

Northbound

6 min 54 sec

6 min 42 sec

Westbound

8 min 24 sec

Eastbound

9 min -30 sec

10 min 6 sec

Westbound

2 min 48 sec

Eastbound

2 min 30 sec

Victoria Street Wellesley Street

Queen Street Customs Street / Fanshawe Street Quay Street / Lower Hobson Street

Table 5-2: Journey Times (Evening Peak)

Routes

Direction

Reference

CRL

Westbound

10 min 0 sec

10 min 18 sec

Eastbound

9 min 30 sec

9 min 24 sec

Westbound

7 min 54 sec

Eastbound

10 min

9min 54 sec

Nelson Street

Northbound

3 min 3 sec

3 min 36 sec

Hobson Street

Southbound

5 min 12 sec.2

5min 12 sec

Southbound

9 min 24 sec

Northbound

8 min 24 sec

8 min 18 sec

Westbound

5 min 6 sec

Eastbound

15 min 30 sec

15 min 54 sec

Westbound

2 min 18 sec

Eastbound

2 min 30 sec

Victoria Street Wellesley Street

Queen Street Customs Street / Fanshawe Street Quay Street / Lower Hobson Street

5.2.4. Public Transport Effects To understand the impact of the proposed closure on the bus routes, travel times for crucial bus routes that pass through or immediately surrounding Pitt Street and Beresford Square has been extracted for the traffic management option and compared to the reference case. Table 5-3 and Table 5-4 summarise the comparative analysis between the proposed closure and the Reference Case, as shown below for various routes. The comparative analysis suggests that the proposed closure will likely increase bus journey times (ranging between 0-3 minutes) for the majority of the assessed bus routes.

Page 35

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan Table 5-3: Bus Journey Times (Morning Peak)

Routes

Reference

CRL

Difference

Great North Rd, Queen St Great North Rd, Queen St, Mayoral Dr, Nelson St, Hobson St

25min 24 sec

25 min 28 sec

+18 sec

21min 6 sec

22 min 12 sec

18, 195, 209 (Pitt Rd) - (West)

8 min 42 sec

9 min 54 sec

+1min 12 sec

Hobson St, SH16, SH1

4min 12 sec

4 min 12 sec

0min 0 sec

City Link Inbound

19 min 18 sec

22 min 12 sec

+2 min54sec

City Link Outbound

25 min 0 sec

24min 54 sec

-6 sec

Routes

Reference

CRL

Difference

Great North Rd, Queen St Great North Rd, Queen St, Mayoral Dr, Nelson St, Hobson St

17min 36 sec

18min 18 sec

+36 sec

19min 24 sec

20min 12 sec.2

18, 195, 209 (Pitt Rd) - (aka West)

10 min6 sec

11min 12 sec

+1min 6 sec

Hobson St, SH16, SH1

6min

6 min

0 min 0 sec

City Link Inbound

28 min 24 sec

30 min 54 sec

+2min 30 sec

City Link Outbound

18 min 36 sec

18min 42 sec

+6 sec

+1 min 6 sec

Table 5-4: Bus Journey Times (Evening Peak)

+54 sec

SIDRA Modelling To support the SATRUN modelling undertaken and provide a greater level of detail regarding the impacts on the intersection of Karangahape Road/ Pitt Street / Mercury Lane, a SIDRA model was developed. This model tested the same scenarios and layout as with the SATURN model.

5.3.1. Assumptions To be consistent between the modelling packages the SIDRA model was developed with the same assumptions as were used within the SATURN (Section 5.1.1) for both the existing situation:  

Karangahape Road having construction works between Ponsonby Road and Symonds Street to reflect the Streetscape Upgrade project on Karangahape Road. Symonds Street / Karangahape Road Intersection reflecting the Karangahape Cycleway construction as complete.

And the proposed worst-case layout being tested:  

Closing one traffic lane northbound and one traffic lane southbound on Pitt Street while adding a right turn flare at the Pitt Road / Karangahape Road intersection. Banning the one-way approach from Beresford Square towards Pitt Street.

Traffic signal phasing, phase timings and volumes were obtained from the Auckland Transport Operation Centre (ATOC) and were used within the base model. For the proposed scenario test for the impacts of the works, the update to the existing volumes was informed by the SATURN model, with the following exceptions:

Page 36

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan ď‚ˇ

ď‚ˇ

In the morning Peak, SATURN predicts too much traffic in the base model for the RT movement from Karangahape Road to Pitt St and the movements on Pitt Street north. As such, the demand flows for these movements has been kept the same as the SCATS counts in SIDRA, to make sure the queues and delays are not overestimated. Similarly, in the evening peak, SATURN predicted too much volume for the movements on Pitt Street however if we kept the SCATS volumes the delays predicted by SIDRA would be too high compared to those predicted by SATURN. Instead we have used SATURN predicted demands for these movements so that the delays predicted by both models are similar to each other.

5.3.2. Effects The result from the SIDRA are broadly in alignment with the SATURN results and show the delay and queue lengths likely from the lane closures on Pitt Street. Table 5-5 and Table 5-6 below indicate the delay and queue length results on each approach to the intersection for the morning and evening peaks. Table 5-5: Average Delay (seconds)

AM Peak

Pitt Street Left 30.2 133.3 +103.1

Through 50.5 128.7 +78.2

Existing Proposed Difference PM Peak

Pitt Street

Existing Proposed Difference

Left 33.4 229.2 +195.8

Through 143.6 224.6 +81

Karangahape Road Westbound Right 55.3 133.3 +78

Left 44.4 41.4 -3

Through 39.8 36.8 -3

Karangahape Road Eastbound Right 46.9 190.3 +143.4

Karangahape Road Westbound Right 148.6 229.2 +80.6

Left 56.6 48.5 -8.1

Through 52 43.9 -8.1

Left 20.2 21.2 +1

Through 40.5 194 +153.5

Right 45.1 198.3 +153.2

Karangahape Road Eastbound Right 174.8 195 +20.2

Left 18.7 17.5 -1.2

Through 143.4 190.4 +47

Right 146.6 194 +47.4

Table 5-6: Queue Length (distance in metres)

AM Peak

Pitt Street Left 36.6 269.6 +233

Through 42.9 269.6 +266.7

Existing Proposed Difference PM Peak

Pitt Street

Existing Proposed Difference

Left 89.7 316.6 +226.9

Through 209.5 316.6 +107.1

Karangahape Road Westbound Right 42.9 269.6 +226.7

Left 47.5 31.3 -16.2

Through 47.5 31.6 -15.9

Right 78.8 278.2 +199.4

Karangahape Road Westbound Right 209.5 316.6 +107.1

Left 105.6 53.4 -52.2

Through 105.6 53.9 -51.7

Right 274.9 299.2 +24.3

Karangahape Road Eastbound Left 38.4 42.8 +4.4

Through 87.2 270.7 +183.5

Right 84.8 270.7 +185.9

Karangahape Road Eastbound Left 39.5 16.6 -22.9

Through 331.3 392.3 +61

Right 331.3 392.3 +61

Similar to the SATURN outputs, the SIDRA modelling indicates that Pitt Street experiences the most impact from the works as is to be expected due to the lane closures. The overall delay for Pit Street Page 37

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan increases to approximately 3.7 minutes in the evening peak; up from around 2.5 minutes in the existing situation. The morning peak is less impacted as this is not the dominant direction, with delays increasing to 1.5 minutes from around 1 minute. Delays on the Karangahape Road right turns also increase to around 3 minutes; up from 1 minute in the existing situation. This is due to reduction in capacity on Pitt Street to a single lane and as such the right turn from Karangahape Road is also reduced to a single lane for safety reasons. Queue length follows a similar pattern to delay with Pitt Street expected to experience longer queues in both the morning and evening peak, increasing to approximately 225 metres in the morning peak and 315 metres in the evening peak. Karangahape Road will also experience an increase in queue lengths, most notable on the right turn movements which again is flow on effect from the reduce lane capacity on Pitt Street. Overall the results from SIDRA broadly align with the delay indications from SATURN and provide more detail regarding the impact on the intersection of Pitt Street and Karangahape Road. To further lessen the impact and disruption from the utility relocations on Pitt Street, the timing of these works has been programmed for a period between early January and February 2020. This has been done to take advantage of the both the school holiday and New Year holiday period, during which time traffic volumes are generally lower across the network. Through engagement with Auckland Transport, this is their preferred time for the works to occur for the reasons stated above.

Effect of Closing Beresford Square As part of the overall assessment the effect of closing Beresford Square to vehicles exiting on to Pitt Street is negligible. Vehicle movements on Beresford Square are approximately 900 per day with an estimate of 50% of these vehicles (450) passing through or exiting on to Pitt Street. The closure of this was included within the SATURN modelling outlined in Section 5.2 to provide an understanding of the effects on the local network. The rerouting and redistribution of traffic indicated there will be little impact to the surrounding network due to low vehicle volumes and that rerouted vehicles can easily be absorbed by the network. Additionally, diversion routes will be outlined as part of the TMP design (refer to CEMP).

Effects to Bus Stops The works will impact AT Bus Stop #1084 outside 78 Pitt Street which provides for the City Link Bus Service. Consultation with AT confirmed that AT is already delivering on the relocation and the bus stop will be moved to outside of the works zone in order to be maintained longer term through future phases of the CRL construction. This will result in less disruption to the bus network and their customers.

Effects to Pedestrians and Cyclists All existing pedestrian routes will remain open along Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane, although occasionally diverted across the street to allow safe movement around the construction zones. Access to local properties and businesses will be maintained at all times. Most of the construction work will require a reduction in width to the footpaths within the various stages. However, a minimum footpath width of 1.5m for pedestrians will be provided. At crossing locations, the width will be large enough that crossing demand can be accommodated. Reduced footpath width may have effects on local businesses. Wayfinding signage and various Page 38

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan communication methods will be used so that pedestrians are aware that businesses are open, and access is maintained - refer to the SIBD DWP for further details. Cycle infrastructure in the area includes a cycle ramp located north of the Beresford Square and Pitt Street intersection (outside 59 Pitt Street) and a shared path from this point to the Pitt Street / Hopetoun Street Intersection. During the early works, the cycle ramp will require closing as it falls within a work zone. This will prevent access from on road to the shared path for cyclists. AT has agreed to the location where a cycle ramp facility can be relocated to. This will be further north on Pitt Street, outside property number 41, thereby avoiding the work zone. Across all stages of the utility relocation works, effects on pedestrians and cyclists are expected to be limited to only minor inconvenience.

Construction Traffic Effects Where practicable, truck movements will be restricted to the Arterial network as defined in the AUP. Given the dimensions of the proposed utility trenches, spoil volumes from the utility works, along with the establishment of the CSAâ€™s will be relatively small (approximately 3,000m3 over 6 months). The removal of these spoil volumes via the road network will not adversely affect congestion. Truck movements are expected to be low, at approximately 25 - 30 return truck trips per day as outlined in Section 4.3). It is noted that early works at the Aotea Station will occur during a similar time period and will use the same arterial routes with a similar numbers of deliveries. The congestion impacts of construction traffic from the cumulative number of construction vehicles travelling on the defined routes are not considered unmanageable and will be able to be absorbed by the network. Although, emphasis should be placed on these movements occurring outside peak traffic hours to minimise disruption to the traffic network. An additional 60 vehicle movements to Hopetoun Street, Beresford Square and Mercury Lane are outlined as a percentage of the existing vehicle movements in Table 5-7 below. This is also shown for Karangahape Road and Pitt Street for 60 vehicle movements10 as these roads are connected to both sites. Table 5-7: Amount of construction traffic as a percentage of AADT

Road Name

Current AADT

% Construction traffic trips will contribute

Karangahape Road

22,450 vehicles

0.6% of daily traffic

Pitt Street

20,000 vehicles

0.6% of daily traffic

Hopetoun Street

8,800 vehicles

0.6% of daily traffic

Beresford Square

1,000 vehicles

4.4% of daily traffic

Mercury Lane

2,900 vehicles

2.0% of daily traffic

Truck movements will not be required to take place on streets that pass education facilities, nor on streets with residential zoned land (refer CRL Condition 25.3(a)).

This is worst case - It is not expected that 30 movements day will be occurring at Mercury Lane and Beresford Square at the same time Page 39 | Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan Where over-dimension or overweight vehicle movements are required, these will take place via the Transport Agency’s over-dimension and overweight routes, where practicable. These streets are multi-lane arterials, and there are not expected to be any issues manoeuvring over dimension vehicles. Local access to the work site by over- dimension vehicles will require the use of some local streets that are not part of the over dimension network. The routes required are the same as outlined for construction vehicles in Section 4.3 (also refer CRL designation Condition 25.3(c)(iii)). Over-dimensional loads will be managed by limiting the movements of these vehicles outside of the commuter peak periods, and by applying mobile traffic management where these vehicles are required to traverse multiple lanes of traffic.

Effects to Property Access Throughout the duration of the early works, all access to private properties will be maintained for pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles. Signage will be used to direct traffic and pedestrians wishing to gain access to businesses. If short term closures impacting vehicle access to properties are necessary during the early works, affected parties will be consulted with in advance of the closure in accordance with CRL designation Condition 25.3(g)(i). Where an affected party unexpectedly finds their vehicle blocked in as a result of a temporary closure, the Requiring Authority will (within reasonable limits) offer alternative transport such as a taxi, rental car, or other alternative, in accordance with CRL designation Condition 25.3(g).

Effects to Parking and Loading The works on Mercury Lane will require most of the on-street parking for the full duration of the works. Parking space availability in Beresford Square will be removed upon the closure of Beresford Square and the commencement of the setup of the CSA. There is a mixture of on-street and offstreet paid parking facilities available as alternative parking locations within a 300m radius of the early works in the Karangahape Station area. The following sections outline the impacts to parking in more detail.

5.9.1. Off Street Parking, 15 – 27 Beresford Square 15 – 27 Beresford Square previously has been leased by Wilson as a paid parking lot in Beresford Square and provided upwards of 40 car park spaces. The lease agreement now lies with City Rail Link Limited (CRLL) until the end of construction of the CRL project. The land is being used for the Beresford Square CSA.

5.9.2. On Street Parking Upon the closure of Beresford Square exit to Pitt Street in January 2020 (Beresford Square Stage 2 works), all of the Beresford Square on-street parking, from Pitt Street to Day Street, will be removed to enable the early works to be undertaken. On commencement of the Beresford Square CSA establishment in late 2019, the on-street parks on the lower end of Beresford Square will gradually be removed to accommodate the swept paths of large trucks into and out of the CSA. Eventually there will be no remaining on-street parks available in Beresford Square. Page 40

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan Mercury Lane will experience the closure of majority of its on-street parks (approximately 21) for the duration of the early works in this area. This will include approximately 2 parks on Cross Street (subject to the final construction methodology for the utility relocation works). In addition to the loss of general on-street car parking, a disabled car park space and loading zones in the works area will also be affected. These are covered in Sections 5.9.3 and 5.9.5 respectively. Parking space removal will be staged, and removed only as required for the utility works.

5.9.3. Mobility Parking The early works will impact the mobility parking space located in Beresford Square. Mobility parking requirements include “a firm plane surface, with a fall not exceeding 1:40 in either direction of parking or at 90 degrees to it, or 1:33 if the surface has a bitumen seal (AS 2890.5: 1993). Although a gradient 1:50 is preferred” (NZTA)11. The mobility park will be moved from Beresford Square to Day Street, approximately 70m from the existing space. This location has been identified as the closest appropriate location, which can support the specific mobility park requirements.

5.9.4. Parking for Hopetoun Alpha The Beresford Square CSA will not encroach on Hopetoun Alpha’s land. As such, the works do not impact designation Condition 28.2(c)(iv).

5.9.5. Loading Zones Where loading zone will be closed as a result of the construction works, it is not proposed to provide an additional space as an alternative. Instead, it is suggested that other loading zones in close proximity to the works are used as alternatives for deliveries to businesses for the duration of the closure. Due to the demolition occurring at Mercury Lane 12 it is expected that the demand for the loading zone in this area will be reduced. In reference to Figure 3-2 (Section 3.1.3), Table 5-8 outlines which of the six loading zones will be available during the different early works stages. There will be 3 alternative Loading Zones available for use during the early works.

Traffic Control Devices Manual, Part 13, Parking Control Auckland Council reference OPW60339200 Page 41 | Karangahape Station Early Works 12

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan Table 5-8: Loading Zones available Pitt Street / Beresford Square - Stages 1 -5

Stage

Loading Zone 1

Loading Zone 2

Loading Zone 3

Loading Zone 4

Loading Zone 5

Loading Zone 6

Beresford Square / Pitt Street – Stage 1,

Closed

Open

Beresford Square / Pitt Street – Stage 2

Closed

Open

Closed

Open

Beresford Square / Pitt Street – Stage 3

Closed

Open

Closed

Open

Beresford Square / Pitt Street – Stage 4

Closed

Open

Closed

Open

Mercury Lane – Stage 1

Open

Closed

Mercury Lane – Stage 1a

Open

Closed

Mercury Lane – Stage 2

Open

Closed

5.9.6. Taxi Stands The early works are not expected to impact the existing taxi stands on Karangahape Road.

Effects to Emergency Services The Karangahape early works will not impact on the access and egress for Emergency Services from their facilities on Pitt Street.

Effects to Over Dimensional Vehicles Pitt Street is a key part of the over- dimensional road network providing a link into the middle of Auckland City Centre. The required width for vehicles on an over dimensional route is 11.5m wide x 6.5m high. Stage 4 of the Beresford Square / Pitt Street works will have an approximate minimum width of 9.6m across 3 lanes (2 northbound, 1 south bound) and Stage 5 will have only single 3.2m wide lanes in each direction. Stage 4A of the Beresford Square / Pitt Street early works is unavoidable and will limit the ability for Pitt Street to accommodate over-dimensional vehicles for approximately 3 – 4 weeks from early January over the holiday period. Should the early works require any OD vehicles to be brought to the site, this will be coordinated around the 3 – 4 week closure as practicable, within the contractor’s programme. NZTA will issue a temporary suspension to over dimensional load requests during this time.

Page 42

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

6. Travel Time / Congestion Monitoring CRL designation Condition 26 requires that monitoring of travel times and transport network congestion be carried out on specified routes during the CRL construction works. The specified route subject to monitoring (designation Condition 26.9) that is closest to the Karangahape early works is Nelson Street (between Pitt Street and Fanshawe Street). In accordance with CRL designation Condition 26.6, the monitoring will establish whether the CRL construction works have increased average traffic delays as follows: (a) “Either by more than 10 minutes (from the monitoring previously undertaken in accordance with this condition) (b) Or if the travel times are more than three minutes or 30% greater than the forecast modelled increases along that route (according to the most recent traffic model test of that scenario, undertaken prior to the start of construction. The modelled time is to be based on the Auckland City Centre SATURN traffic model or a different traffic model approved by the Requiring Authority). (c) “The 30% above shall only apply for an increase predicted to be over four minutes.” AT will be monitoring the routes specified in designation Condition 26.9 throughout the CRL works and will identify if the works are resulting in travel time increasing in excess of the conditions. Should travel times on the route be exceeded, additional mitigation will be implemented in accordance with designation Condition 26.7 to minimise impacts to below the travel time levels specified in designation Condition 26.6 as far as reasonably achievable.

Page 43

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

7. Consultation and Communication The Karangahape Early Works Communications and Consultation Plan (CCP) (in particular Sections 6 and 7) sets out the communications and consultation procedures that will be implemented to advise affected parties, key stakeholders (including emergency services) and the general public of the early works, potential impacts on transport, access and parking and proposed temporary traffic management works. Table 7-1 identifies the key stakeholders with respect to this TAP DWP with whom engagement will be undertaken in relation to the Karangahape early works. Table 7-1: Stakeholder Engagement in relation to this TAP DWP

Stakeholder

TAP DWP Interests

Engagement

 Cycle ramp closure  Bus Stop closure / relocation  Bus Journey Times along Pitt Street as a result of the works  Relocation of the mobility park in Beresford Square  Loading zone temporary closures in the works area  Monitoring of transport network congestion during works  Co-ordination with the Karangahape Streetscape Improvement Project

 Agreed relocation of cycle ramp.  Minimal impact to bus journey time due to works being undertaken over ‘holiday period’  AT are already delivering on the Bus stop relocation.  Loading Zones- no concerns raised  AT understand that they have responsibility for monitoring  Karangahape Road Streetscape project has been accounted for within this assessment. Ongoing liaison between Link Alliance and AT for coordination during construction

New Zealand Transport Agency (One Network” consultation as per condition 18)

 Over Dimensional Route on Pitt Street – reduction in road capacity during Pitt Street early works  Management of the works to minimise adverse transport effects on the road network through a One Network approach as per condition 18

 Over dimensional route will be restricted to OD loads over the 34-week holiday period.  No impacts envisaged from the early works on to the state highway.

Karangahape Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG)

 Management of transport, access and parking impacts in Beresford Square / Pitt Street / Karangahape Road / Mercury Lane during the early works

Regular meetings as outlined in the CCP

Emergency Services

 Temporary Traffic Management during the early works must not impede to the emergency services clearway zones on Pitt Street.  Emergency Services must be made aware of any road closures or traffic management that could impact their route choices.

 Fire and Emergency and St Johns consulted with about the works that will be happening.  No foreseen issues.  Feedback incorporated where appropriate, else relayed to the suitable people within the alliance.

Page 44

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan Stakeholder

TAP DWP Interests

Engagement

Private property owners/occupiers, where their access is impacted by the works

Management of transport, access and parking impacts in Beresford Square / Pitt Street / Karangahape Road / Mercury Lane during the early works and any property specific matters

Engagement prior to and during the works as required. Access will be maintained to properties at all times.

Page 45

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

Appendix A: Record of CLG, IPR and Auckland Council Comments A1. CLG Comments A Karangahape CLG meeting was held on 17th September to discuss the Karangahape early works and for the CLG to provide comments / feedback on the CEMP and sub-plans, including this TAP DWP. Comments received from the CLG on this TAP DWP are as follows: CLG Member

Feedback / comments

Response

Dave Perkin - Beggs Big & Tall Menswear

 Concerned with the removal of on-street parking on Beresford Square and Pitt Street (the latter particularly before Christmas).  Interested in the timeframes to determine the best time to end their lease.

 Pitt Street not fully affected before Christmas. During works on Pitt Street (over the Christmas holiday period), there will be traffic lane restrictions, however one lane southbound and one lane northbound will remain. Parking and loading will also stay.  In the 1st phase of works in Beresford Square (tree removal and demolition), parking will be intermittently available. Parks at the lower (Hopetoun) end of Beresford Square will still be available.  From January onwards, works will be undertaken within Beresford Square, predominantly between Samoa House Lane and Pitt Street.  Parking at lower end of Beresford Square will be removed late January/early February. Layout at end January will be extent of the works.  Mobility space on Beresford Square will be relocated to Day Street.  Parking is available on St James St, Greys Ave, and Cross St. No changes are required to this TAP DWP.

Doug and Paul - Residents in apartment on the corner of Cross Street/Mercury Lane

 Concerned with access restrictions to their property.  Interested in the impacts to the parking on Cross Street and Mercury Lane.

 Access to apartment garages (in and out) will be retained. No restriction to traffic movement on Mercury Lane.  Some on-street parking at the top of Mercury Lane will be removed during the works in order to allow enough space for Fire trucks/emergency services to manoeuvre.  Parking on Cross Street will be impacted during the works but can be moved to the other side of the road.  Work will be within the CRL designation. No changes are required to this TAP DWP.

Page 46

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan CLG Member

Feedback / comments

Response

Felix - Resident from Hopetoun St apartments.

Concerned about safely crossing roads in the area (particular Hopetoun Street) if having to park elsewhere due to the closure of parks in Beresford Square.

 CRL related truck movements will be left turn only into Beresford Square.  It is advised for pedestrians to use the signalised crossing at the top of the road for pedestrians.  AT will not permit a Right Turn bay into Beresford Square. The Link Alliance/CRLL do not have influence over this decision.  For efficiency during construction, truck movements will operate via a one-way flow through Beresford, trucks won’t be turning right out of Beresford Square onto Pitt Street.  Beresford Square works start in December. This is when car parks will begin to be closed on Beresford Square. It will be a rolling closure, so they won’t all be closed at once.  Most of Beresford Square will be closed off in later phases of work.  There will be dedicated local vehicle access for Samoa House Lane.  The early works will only extend onto Pitt Street and not onto Karangahape Road. There may be construction works associated with the AT K Road works occurring at the same time as the CRL Karangahape Station early works but no overlap of work zones. Truck movements for the AT K road project will be different from the CRL works.  The mining of the CRL rail tunnels will be underground. Excavation will occur underneath Beresford Square, to reduce noise.  It is not envisaged to close Mercury Lane during the early works. It will only be closed if absolutely necessary for 1- 2 hours under a TMP. The designation conditions do not allow for closures. No changes are required to this TAP DWP.

Enquired into:  Feasibility of right turn bay into Beresford Square.  Timing of the closure of Beresford Square.  If the K Road AT works will be in the same areas.  The location of mining of the tunnel.  If Mercury Lane will be closed.

Page 47

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

A2. IPR Comments An Independent Peer Review of the draft TAP DWP was undertaken by Tony Innes, from Commute Transportation Consultants. The full IPR document can be found in Appendix B. A summary of the comments received which required a response from the Link Alliance are as follows: Section of DWP / condition

Comment

Response

2.1.4 & 4.3 / 21.1 (a)

The DWP outlines the proposed access points. We are yet to see the supporting Traffic Management plans as they are still with AT. Two Construction Support Areas (CSAs) have been identified and these have appropriate access and storage.

Noted that TMP’s are still under development and consultation with AT.

The DWP addresses these matters including reductions in width to 1.5m in some areas. Importantly pedestrian access is maintained to all buildings during construction. There will also be wayfinding and a new ramp providing access to the shared path, for which the location has been agreed with AT. The approach is considered appropriate for the works proposed. We also note that heavy vehicle swept paths may be ‘tight’ in some areas (Mercury Lane all stages). Typically, road design standards such as RTS-18 and Council Engineering standards require a 500mm clearance around design vehicles used in vehicle tracking assessments. This may result in changes to pedestrian footpaths which should be investigated further. It is recommended that this is picked up in the TTMP process which is at the next level of detail.

Concerns with vehicle swept paths noted. This has been passed on the appropriate TTMP designer.

Only the Nelson/Hobson Street route is identified there may be others that are impacted. It is understood that all of the routes are being monitored so this should pick up any issues.

The early works area does not extend far enough to influence the other monitored routes, therefore not explicitly mentioned in the monitoring section. Impacts to all monitored routes are covered in the Modelling section of the TAP (Section 5). Nelson / Hobson Street is the closest monitored route to the site and may experience minor impacts.

5.6 /25.2 (b)

6 / 26.9

No amendments to the TAP DWP.

No amendments to the TAP DWP have been made.

Page 48

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

A3. Auckland Council Comments Comments on the draft TAP DWP were received from Mr Pravin Dayaran, Auckland Council’s Transport, Access and Parking Specialist. The following statement was made: “Overall, there are no key issues where we would require further information…All the conditions (with regard to the corresponding references within the draft DWP) have been addressed as per section 1.4 of the DWP.” On review of the comments detailed provided, the following was noted: 

In section 4.2.7 reference is made (as an alternative to Option 1) to works occupying the western side. Not sure if this is a typo and should be ‘eastern’.

This has been checked against the staging plans and this TAP DWP. Section 4.2.7 states that: Stage 2 works are an alternative option to Stage 1A, involving network utility relocation via open trenching. These works will occupy the eastern side of Mercury Lane. No amendments have been made to the TAP DWP based on Auckland Council comments.

Page 49

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

Appendix B: Independent Peer Review (Full)

Page 50

| Karangahape Station Early Works

CRL Independent Peer Review Karangahapre Road Station Utility Relocation Works Transport, Access and Parking Review 9 October 2019

Project:

CRL Independent Peer Review

Report title:

Transport, Access and Parking Review

Document reference:

CRL Karangahape Station Utility Peer Review Report Draft to Client v1

Date:

9 October 2019

Report Status

Prepared By

Reviewed By

Approved By

Final Report

Tony Innes

Mike Nixon

Tony Innes

CRL Independent Peer Review Transportation Assessment Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 1 Background .................................................................................................................. 1 Peer Review Assessment ............................................................................................. 1 1

Introduction ................................................................................................................... 2 1.1

Scope of peer review ........................................................................................... 2

1.2

Background information ....................................................................................... 3

1.3

Structure of this Report ........................................................................................ 3

Transport, Access and Parking DWP ............................................................................ 4 2.1

CRL Designation Condition 25.1 ........................................................................ 15

2.2

CRL Designation Condition 25.2 ........................................................................ 15

Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 16

CRL Independent Peer Review Transport, Access and Parking Review

Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND The City Rail Link (CRL) is the key project in an integrated transport programme to keep Auckland moving as the city grows by more than 700,000 people during the next 30 years. The 3.4km double track underground rail line linking Britomart and the existing western line near Mt Eden via the city centre will allow a train every five to 10 minutes from most Auckland rail stations. Britomart would become a through station and provide for two intermediate stations in the Aotea and Karangahape Road areas. The project recently obtained a designation. This designation had several conditions attached to it. Particularly related to this review is condition 11 which requires an independent review of the Delivery Works Plan (DWP) and other management plans that outline how the project is to be delivered and the effects addressed. This report relates to the independent peer review of the DWP for works associated with the Karangahape Road Station Utility Relocation Works. An assessment of the DWP compliance with the relevant designation conditions has been undertaken as part of this peer review. PEER REVIEW ASSESSMENT Based on the review undertaken, it is clear that a comprehensive DWP has been developed for these enabling works. The DWP documents are clearly written and show how compliance with the appropriate designation conditions will be met during construction. Based on the above assessment this independent peer review has found that the DWP has appropriately addressed the transportation impacts as defined by the designation conditions. There will need to be careful and detailed management of the impacts through the more detailed traffic management plans, particularly maintaining access to existing buildings on Beresford Square and Samoa House Lane. It is also considered more detailed analysis will be required to demonstrate appropriate consideration for the swept paths of large vehicles and the needs of other road users e.g. pedestrians travelling past the proposed Mercury Lane works. Given a project of this scale, there will be inevitably be disruption associated with construction. However, the DWP has identified that there is a sufficient process, and mitigation proposed, to manage the transportation effects to ensure that the project will â€œso far as is reasonably practicable, avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on transport, parking and property accessâ€? subsequent to the above areas being addressed. Importantly the DWP seeks to ensure that pedestrian safety and amenity is maintained, property access is maintained and the impact of construction on the surrounding road network is kept to a minimum.

CRL Independent Peer Review Transport, Access and Parking Review

1 1.1

Page 2

INTRODUCTION SCOPE OF PEER REVIEW

The City Rail Link (CRL) is the key project in an integrated transport programme to keep Auckland moving as the city grows by more than 700,000 people during the next 30 years. The 3.4km double track underground rail line linking Britomart and the existing western line near Mt Eden via the city centre will allow a train every five to 10 minutes from most Auckland rail stations. Britomart would become a through station and provide for two intermediate stations in the Aotea and Karangahape Road areas. Prior to the main CRL construction contract, enabling works are proposed to be undertaken in some areas of the route, with the objective to proceed far enough to avoid the points of conflict and to create a construction support area for the remaining CRL works. These enabling works are split into a number of different areas and packages along the route. One of these sections is the early relocation of utility works around the Karangahape Road Station works, for which this DWP relates. The CRL project recently obtained a designation. This designation had a number of conditions attached to it. The purpose of this report is to address condition 11 which requires an independent peer review of the Delivery Works Plan (DWP) and other management plans that outline how the project is to be delivered and the effects addressed. Condition 11 is outlined overleaf.

CRL Independent Peer Review Transport, Access and Parking Review

Page 3

Independent Peer Review of CEMP and DWPs 11.1 Prior to submitting the CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39) to Auckland Council for the construction of the City Rail Link, the Requiring Authority shall engage suitably qualified independent specialists agreed to by Auckland Council to form an Independent Peer Review Panel. The purpose of the Independent Peer Review Panel is to undertake a peer review of the CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39), and provide recommendations on whether changes are required to those plans in order to meet the objective and other requirements of these conditions. 11.2 The CEMP, DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39) must clearly document the comments and inputs received by the Requiring Authority during its consultation with stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties, along with a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. This information must be included in the CEMP, and DWPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39) provided to both the independent peer reviewer and Auckland Council as part of this condition. 11.3 The CEMP, DWP’s, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs (other than those prepared in accordance with Condition 39) submitted to Auckland Council shall demonstrate how the recommendations from the independent peer reviewers have been incorporated, and, where they have not, the reasons why not. 11.4In reviewing an Outline Plan submitted in accordance with these designation conditions, Auckland Council shall take into consideration the independent specialist peer review undertaken in accordance with this condition and any additional information provided to Auckland Council by affected parties. This report documents the independent peer review of the DWP enabling works near the proposed Karangahape Road Station. The extent of works as set out in the DWP includes: • • • •

Part of Pitt Street Part of Karangahape Road Beresford Square Part of Mercury Lane.

This independent peer review has been undertaken by Tony Innes from Commute Transportation Consultants. 1.2

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

In undertaking this review the following documents have been reviewed: • • •

1.3

The TAP DWP entitled Karangahape Station Early Works,: Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan, Revision A, 30th September 2019; Beresford Square Drawings, Karangahape Station Indicative Early Works, Beresford Square, Stage 1 to Stage 4, and Mercury Lane Drawings, Karangahape Station Indicative Early Works, Beresford Square, Stage 1 to Stage 4.

STRUCTURE OF THIS REPORT

There are a large number of designation conditions and sub-conditions that need to be addressed in the Transport, Access and Parking DWP. To provide an efficient assessment and peer review, this report follows the same format as the DWP report. The DWP report included a table (Table 1) which cross-referenced the section of the report that addressed the designation conditions considered applicable to the Transport, Access and Parking. This report adds a column to this table and provides a summary of the peer reviewers assessment of

CRL Independent Peer Review Transport, Access and Parking Review

the DWP against each criterion. The DWP table from the original review has been retained and an additional column added to address this addendum. A summary against the key designation conditions has then be undertaken to summarise the peer review.

TRANSPORT, ACCESS AND PARKING DWP

An assessment of the DWPâ€™s compliance with the relevant designation conditions has been undertaken as part of this peer review. Table 1 provides this assessment by individual condition. .

Page 4

CRL Independent Peer Review Transport, Access and Parking Review

Page 5

Table 1 : Designation Condition Assessment

Condition Number

Designation Condition

Relevant Section:

Original Peer Review Comments

Section 7 & Appendix A

The DWP outlines where and how the NZTA have been engaged. It is understood that the NZTA have confirmed no issues of significance on the State Highway network.

Communication and Consultation 18.1

The works will impact on the existing Over Dimension Route, however the NZTA have indicated this can be managed through their approval process for OD traffic and ensuring that not approvals are given for this route during the Stage 2 works (holiday period) when the route will not be suitable. This condition is appropriately dealt with.

Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and Delivery Work Plans (DWPs) 20.1

In order to give effect to the objective in Condition 19.1, the CEMP must provide for the following:

3.1.3

For the scale of works proposed and the lack of parking provided to the workforce will encourage ride sharing or alternative modes. The provision of travel options for the workforce given the scale of the works is considered an appropriate response to this condition.

2.1.4 & 4.3

(d) A Travel Management Plan for each construction site outlining onsite car parking management and methods for encouraging travel to the site using forms of transport other than private vehicle to assist in mitigating localised traffic effects 21.1

In order to give effect to the objective in Condition 19.1, the CEMP shall include the following details and requirements in relation to all areas within the surface designation footprint where construction works are to occur, and / or where materials and construction machinery are to be used or stored: (a) Where access points are to be located and procedures for managing construction vehicle ingress and egress to construction support and storage areas;

CRL Independent Peer Review Transport, Access and Parking Review

Page 6

General Transport, Access and Parking 25.1

A Transport, Access and Parking DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects of construction of the City Rail Link, or any part of it, on the transport network.

25.2

The objective of the Transport, Access and Parking DWP is to so far as is reasonably practicable, avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on transport, parking and property access. This is to be achieved by: (a) Managing the road transport network for the duration of construction by adopting the best practicable option to manage congestion;

All

This is covered in the summary section in this report. This is covered in the summary section in this report.

All sections

This is an important intersection for the transport network and therefore a staged approach to the works has been undertaken to limit as much as possible the impact on the transport system. The transport modelling shows relatively small increases in delay for private vehicles as a result of the works as would be anticipated with works of this scale. There will be increased delay and queuing as a result of these works, this is to be expected. The analysis has also looked at potential rerouting of traffic and the impact on parallel routes. Parking and loading considerations have also been considered. These early works result in the relocation of one bus stop only (which affects one route â€“ Citylink). The bus travel times are the most impacted, but still only have an increase of generally no more than 10%, which is considered manageable. It should be noted that the proposed plans show no reduction in southbound capacity on Pitt Street during Stages 1, 3 and 4, with a reduction to one lane occurring during Stage 2 only. While this would be expected to have a noticeable effect, it is noted these works are planned for 22 December 2019 to 20 January 2020 i.e. the holiday period, when traffic volumes are traditionally lower. It is also noted that while the northbound capacity on

CRL Independent Peer Review Transport, Access and Parking Review

Page 7

Pitt Street is reduced to one lane, there is only one lane of traffic feeding into this section at any one time (one left turn lane from Karangahape Road and one right turn lane from Karangahape Road â€“ these movements do not occur simultaneiously). As such, the modelling may have exaggerated the effects of the proposed Pitt Street capacity reductions. Overall the response is considered appropriate for the works proposed. (b) Maintaining pedestrian access to private property at all times; and

5.6

25.3

To achieve the above objective, the following shall be included in the Transport, Access and Parking DWP:

5.6

We also note that heavy vehicle swept paths may be â€˜tightâ€™ in some areas (Mercury Lane all stages). Typically, road design standards such as RTS-18 and Council Engineering standards require a 500mm clearance around design vehicles used in vehicle tracking assessments. This may result in changes to pedestrian footpaths which should be investigated further. It is recommended that this is picked up in the TTMP process which is at the next level of detail. There is limited vehicle access in this area of the network. However, where there is vehicle access this is being maintained to the best extent possible.

CRL Independent Peer Review Transport, Access and Parking Review

Page 8

4.3 & 5.7

Routes have been identified and are considered appropriate. The focus on arterial roads is considered an appropriate approach.

(b) Transport route options for the movement of construction vehicles carrying spoil, bulk construction materials or machinery shall be identified and details provided as to why these routes are considered appropriate routes. In determining appropriate routes, construction vehicles carrying spoil, bulk construction materials or machinery shall as far as practicably possible only use roads that:

4.3 & 5.7

General routes have been identified and are considered appropriate. The focus on arterial roads is considered an appropriate approach.

(i) Form part of the regional arterial network;

4.3 & 5.7

(ii) Are overweight / over dimensioned routes;

4.3 & 5.7

(iii) Or other routes (specified below) where no other practical option is available.

4.3 & 5.7

Routes have been identified and are considered appropriate. The focus on arterial roads is considered an appropriate approach. The most appropriate routes for heavy vehicles are being proposed. As above

(c) For the purposes of this condition the following routes (that at the time this designation was confirmed were not part of the regional arterial network and / or overweight / over dimensioned) shall be used where practicable for the movement of construction vehicles carrying spoil, bulk construction materials or machinery: (i) Ngahura Road, for trucks heading to/from Eden Terrace construction site;

n/a

(ii) Dundonald Street and Basque Road, for trucks heading to/from the Newton Station construction sites;

n/a

(iii) Pitt Street (between Hobson Street and Hopetoun Street), Beresford Square, Mercury Lane, Canada Street and Upper Queen Street (between Canada Street and Karangahape Road), for trucks heading to/from Karangahape Station construction sites; (iv) Wellesley Street (between Nelson Street and east of Albert Street), Cook Street (between Mayoral Drive and Hobson Street) and Mayoral Drive (between Wellesley Street and Cook Street) for trucks heading to/from Aotea Station construction sites;

4.3 & 5.7

n/a

The routes identified are considered appropriate for the works proposed.

CRL Independent Peer Review Transport, Access and Parking Review

Page 9

(v) Nelson Street (north of Wellesley Street), Hobson Street (north of Cook Street) and Lower Albert Street, for trucks heading to/from the Albert Street and Downtown construction sites.

n/a

(d) Where other routes are necessary (other than those routes identified above), the Transport, Access and Parking DWP shall identify any residential zoned land and education facilities and shall provide details on how adverse effects from these vehicle movements are to be mitigated through such measures as:

n/a

(i) Communication and consultation (in accordance with Condition 15 of this designation) with these properties in advance of the vehicle movements occurring;

n/a

(ii) Restricting vehicle movements on Monday to Friday to between 9.30am and 4pm, and on Saturday to between 9am and 2pm.

n/a

4.2

Detailed traffic management plans in accordance with COPTTM will be developed and approved at each stage. This is an appropriate standard and gives confidence of the implementation of temporary traffic management measures. The DWP has appropriately identified alternative routes and implications of their works. The impacts are localised and not anticipated to have a significant impact on the operation of the surrounding transport networks.

(f) How disruption to the use of private property will be mitigated through: (i) Ensuring pedestrian and cycle access to private property is retained at all times;

5.6, 5.8 & 5.9

(ii) Providing vehicle access to private property as far as practicably possible at all times, except for temporary closures where landowners and occupiers have been communicated and consulted with in reasonable advance of the closure; and

5.6, 5.8 & 5.9

(iii) How the loss of any private car parking will be mitigated through alternative car parking arrangements.

5.6, 5.8 & 5.9

(g) Where an affected party unexpectedly finds their vehicle blocked in as a result of a temporary closure, the Requiring Authority shall (within reasonable limits) offer alternative transport such as a taxi, rental car, or other alternative.

5.8

This has been addressed above. This has been addressed above.

There is no proposed loss of private parking. This has been identified as a requirement of the DWP.

CRL Independent Peer Review Transport, Access and Parking Review

Page 10

Note: For the purposes of designation Conditions 25, 27, 28, 29 and 30 â€œtemporary closureâ€? is defined as the following: (i) In place for less than six hours, the Requiring Authority shall communicate and consult on the closure at least 24 hours in advance, but is not required to offer or provide alternative parking arrangements, though it may choose to offer this on a case by case basis in consultation with the affected party; and (ii) In place for between six and 72 hours, the Requiring Authority shall communicate and consult on the closure at least 72 hours in advance, and will offer and provide where agreed with the affected party alternative parking arrangements. The alternative parking arrangement should be as close to the site affected as is reasonably practicable. (h) How disruption to use of the road network will be mitigated for emergency services, public transport, bus users, taxi operators, freight and other related vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists through:

(i) Prioritising, as far as practicably possible, pedestrian and public transport at intersections where construction works are occurring; (ii) Relocating bus stops and taxi stands to locations which, as far as practicably possible, minimise disruption; and

(iii) Identifying alternate heavy haul routes where these are affected by construction works.

4.1 5.5 & 5.9.6

4.3,5.7 & 5.11

(j) The alternative (to road) transport options that are available (including the option of rail use at the main construction site adjacent the North Auckland Rail Line) and that have been considered and assessed for the transportation of spoil. This will include as applicable:

n/a

(i) Benefits that could be provided by alternative options;

n/a

The DWP confirms that emergency services have been advised of the plans. This is important with Fire and Ambulance on Pitt Street. The DWP outlines that they are comfortable with the approach. PT and pedestrian needs have been prioritized as required. There is relocation of bus stops, this has been undertaken in consultation with AT. The DWP is considered to appropriately address this condition. The DWP is considered to appropriately address this condition. The DWP is considered to appropriately address this condition.

CRL Independent Peer Review Transport, Access and Parking Review

Page 11

(ii) Potential adverse effects associated with alternative options;

n/a

(iii) Where an alternative option is proposed, methods for managing potential adverse effects; and

n/a

(iv) Reasons for either adopting or not adopting alternative transport options.

n/a

Monitoring of Transport Network Congestion 26.1

26.2

The purpose of the monitoring is to monitor congestion on the transport network by measuring average delays for traffic travelling along specified routes. The evaluation times will be:

The DWP outlines that monitoring will be undertaken and appropriate measures undertaken if required. That said the DWP analysis indicates that the identified monitoring triggers are unlikely to be triggered. As above

(a) The average travel times over the weekday two hour morning or evening peak period; and

(b) The average travel times over the weekday two hour evening peak period; and

26.3

26.4

If a congestion incident occurs (such as an accident), the monitoring during the affected period will be considered unrepresentative.

26.5

Monitoring shall commence six months prior to construction of the City Rail Link to establish a baseline of existing transport congestion.

As above

26.6

The monitoring will establish whether the City Rail Link construction works have increased traffic delays as follows:

As above

(a) Either by more than 10 minutes (from the monitoring previously undertaken in accordance with this condition)

As above

CRL Independent Peer Review Transport, Access and Parking Review

Page 12

26.7

As outlined above the impact on the surrounding transport network is not anticipated to require any further mitigation.

26.8

The purpose of additional mitigation measures is to mitigate the increases in traffic delays, reducing these to below the levels identified in Condition 26.6 as far as is reasonably achievable.

As above

26.9

For the purposes of this condition, the following are the specified routes: (a) Wellesley Street (between Victoria Street and Princes Street)

n/a

(b) Victoria Street (between Wellesley Street and Princes Street)

n/a

(d) Quay Street/Lower Hobson Street (between Fanshawe Street/Hobson Street and Tangihua Street)

n/a

(e) Nelson Street/Hobson Street (between Pitt Street and Fanshawe Street)

(f) Queen Street (between Mayoral Drive and Customs Street)

n/a

(g) New North Road/Symonds Street (between Dominion Road and Newton Road)

n/a

(h) Mount Eden Road (between Normanby Road and Symonds Street)

n/a

(i) Khyber Pass road between the southern motorway ramps and Symonds Street if this route is to be used by construction related trucks

n/a

Only the Nelson/Hobson Street route is identified, there may be others that are impacted. It is understood that all of the routes are being monitored so this should pick up any issues.

CRL Independent Peer Review Transport, Access and Parking Review

(j) Newton Road between the north western motorway ramps and Symonds Street 26.10

The specified routes shall exclude whichever east-west route has its intersection with Albert Street closed at the time of the surveys.

Page 13

n/a n/a

Transport, Access and Parking: Specific Requirements (Karangahape Station Area) 28.1

To achieve the objective in Conditions 25, the following measure shall be implemented: (a) Retaining one lane in each direction on Pitt Street (unless otherwise agreed with the Auckland Council Monitoring Officer); and (b) Spoil trucks shall not use East Street where practicable and on street parking at the Southern end of East Street will be retained.

28.2

4.2

This has been confirmed in the DWP.

4.3 & 5.7

This has been confirmed in the DWP.

4.2

Staging diagrams have been provided which outlines the requirements of the DWP and seeks to minimize the impacts of the construction on the surrounding transport system.

(i) Providing pedestrian and cycle access to private property at all times, particularly those businesses located at the eastern end of Beresford Street and northern end of Mercury Lane.

5.6

This has been confirmed in the DWP.

4.2

This has been confirmed in the DWP.

(iii) Providing local vehicle access to properties located along Beresford Street and Samoa House Lane (which may include only a turn in and a turn out in the same direction);

4.2

The DWP confirms that there will be dedicated access to the Samoa House Lane

CRL Independent Peer Review Transport, Access and Parking Review

(iv) Alternative parking arrangements or other offers for resolving the temporary loss of car parking during construction for the Hopetoun Alpha Building.

Page 14

5.9.4

There is no impact on this car parking

CRL Independent Peer Review Transport, Access and Parking Review

2.1

Page 15

CRL DESIGNATION CONDITION 25.1

Condition 25.1 of the overall CRL designation requires that the DWP mitigates the adverse transport effects of the project. The wording of CRL25.1 is as follows: A Transport, Access and Parking DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects of construction of the City Rail Link, or any part of it, on the transport network. The conclusion of the review of the original DWP was that it was clearly written and showed how compliance with the appropriate designation conditions will be met during construction. The Addendum builds upon this approach. The CRL project is a significant and complex infrastructure project within the busy CBD environment of Auckland. This area of the network is already being impacted upon by the Contract 2 and other enabling works further to the north on Albert Street that are currently underway. These works will have an additional impact; however, this impact is not considered to be significant as confirmed by the transport modelling. The Utility works are forecast to have a small increase in impact on the transport network compared. However, the works to be undertaken were always envisaged as part of the project and the mitigation proposed is considered appropriate to manage the impacts. The staging of the works has been developed to reduce the impact on the transport system with the more impactful closures occurring over the Xmas holiday period. There will be a local interface with existing property access and construction vehicles, however the management proposed to address this potential impact will ensure effects are mitigated. Given a project of this scale there will be inevitable disruption associated with the project’s construction. However, the DWP has identified that there is sufficient process and mitigation proposed to manage the transportation effects to ensure that the effects “so far as is reasonably practicable, avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on transport, parking and property access”. Importantly the DWP seeks to ensure that pedestrian safety and amenity is maintained, property access is maintained and the impact of construction on the surrounding road network is kept to a minimum. With the measures proposed in this DWP and the resolution of the issues identified in this review it is considered by the reviewer that Condition 25.1 of the CRL conditions are satisfied. 2.2

CRL DESIGNATION CONDITION 25.2

Condition 25.2 of the overall CRL designation require that the DWP mitigates the adverse transport effects of the project. The objective of the Transport, Access and Parking DWP is to so far as is reasonably practicable, avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on transport, parking and property access. This is to be achieved by: (a) Managing the road transport network for the duration of construction by adopting the best practicable option to manage congestion; (b) Maintaining pedestrian access to private property at all times; and (c) Providing on-going vehicle access to private property to the greatest extent possible As outlined in the preceding section of this report, based on this review it is considered that the DWP can achieve the objectives set out in this overarching condition. Specifically, this is achieved through:

CRL Independent Peer Review Transport, Access and Parking Review

Page 16

1. Managing the road transport network for the duration of construction by adopting the best practicable option to manage congestion – Active traffic management is proposed that identifies appropriate routes for heavy vehicles to and from the construction area and also identifies route through the wider transport network. 2. Maintaining pedestrian access to private property at all times – Pedestrian safety and efficient is a key focus of the DWP, ensuring pedestrian have safe access to all areas around the construction area. 3. Providing on-going vehicle access to private property to the greatest extent possible – Existing property access has been identified and plans prepared to maintain this access wherever possible. When this is not possible the engagement proposed should allow for adequate planning and based on this review strengthened final measures will ensure existing access users are inconvenienced as little as practical. It is therefore considered that the DWP adequately outlines how the proposed construction project will meet these objectives.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the above assessment this independent peer review has found that the DWP has appropriately addressed the transportation impacts as defined by the designation conditions. There will need to be careful and detailed management of the impacts through the more detailed traffic management plans. Based on the above assessment this independent peer review has found that the DWP has appropriately addressed the transportation impacts as defined by the designation conditions. There will need to be careful and detailed management of the impacts through the more detailed traffic management plans, particularly maintaining access to existing buildings on Beresford Square and Samoa House Lane. It is also considered more detailed analysis will be required to demonstrate appropriate consideration for the swept paths of large vehicles and the needs of other road users e.g. pedestrians travelling past the proposed Mercury Lane works. This review has not seen the proposed TMP drawings (which we would typically see with the DWP) as they are still being reviewed by AT. Until these are provided final confirmation of the DWP’s compliance with the designation conditions cannot be made. However based on the information provided no substantive issues have been identified and none are expected from the review of the drawings. It is therefore considered that the DWP adequately address the intent and requirements of the appropriate designation conditions.

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Appendix L: Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Page 108

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Karangahape Station Early Works Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800003 Revision: Final Date: October 2019

Page 1

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800003 This document is uncontrolled when printed. This document should be printed in colour

Revision Status Revision

Date

Version details

Prepared By

Approved By

30/09/2019

Draft for Auckland Council and Independent Peer Review

Sharon Yung

Peter Roan

21/10/2019

Final for submission to Auckland Council â€“ incorporating council review & independent review comments

Sharon Yung

Peter Roan

Approval Status Name/Title Prepared by:

Sharon Yung

Signature

Date 21/10/2019

Acoustic Engineer

Reviewed by:

Claire Drewery

21/10/2019

Technical Director - Acoustics Approved by:

Peter Roan Link Alliance â€“ Consents Lead

Page 2

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

21/10/2019

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Table of contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 5 1.1

Karangahape Station ......................................................................................................... 5

1.2

CNV DWP Staging .............................................................................................................. 6

1.3

Purpose of the CNV DWP................................................................................................... 6

1.4

Relevant Conditions .......................................................................................................... 7

1.5

Sustainability ................................................................................................................... 13

1.6

DWP Review and updates ............................................................................................... 13

1.7

CNV DWP Author ............................................................................................................. 13

2. Karangahape Early Works ......................................................................... 14 2.1

Overview of Works .......................................................................................................... 14

2.2

Hours of Operation .......................................................................................................... 14

2.3

Key personnel .................................................................................................................. 15

3. Construction Noise and Vibration Criteria ................................................ 16 3.1

Construction Noise Criteria.............................................................................................. 16

3.2

Vibration Criteria – Building Damage .............................................................................. 16

3.3

Vibration Criteria – Amenity ............................................................................................ 17

3.3.1.

Day time criteria ....................................................................................................... 17

3.3.2.

Night time criteria .................................................................................................... 17

4. Equipment Noise and Vibration Source Data ........................................... 18 4.1

Noise Sources .................................................................................................................. 18

4.2

Vibration Sources ............................................................................................................ 19

5. Affected Parties / Notable Receivers ........................................................ 20 5.1

Noise ............................................................................................................................... 20

5.2

Vibration – Building Damage ........................................................................................... 21

5.3

Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (SSCNVMP) ............... 21

6. General Management Procedures and Mitigation Measures ................... 22

Page 3

6.1

Training ........................................................................................................................... 22

6.2

Construction Vehicles, Traffic and Deliveries ................................................................... 22

6.3

Plant and Equipment ....................................................................................................... 22

6.4

Pneumatic Breakers......................................................................................................... 23

6.5

Piling and Compaction ..................................................................................................... 24

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan 6.6

Noise Barriers and Enclosures ......................................................................................... 24

6.7

Traffic tyre noise.............................................................................................................. 24

6.8

Scheduling of Activities ................................................................................................... 25

7. Communication ......................................................................................... 26 7.1

Communication ............................................................................................................... 26

7.1.1.

Notable and Sensitive Receivers ............................................................................... 26

7.1.2.

Engagement Methods .............................................................................................. 26

7.2

Complaints Procedure ..................................................................................................... 27

8. Monitoring ................................................................................................ 28 8.1

Noise ............................................................................................................................... 28

8.2

Vibration ......................................................................................................................... 30

8.3

Reporting......................................................................................................................... 32

8.4

Building Condition Surveys .............................................................................................. 32

9. Contingency Measures .............................................................................. 33 9.1

Management Process ...................................................................................................... 33

9.2

Noise ............................................................................................................................... 33

9.3

Vibration â€“ Building Damage ........................................................................................... 33

9.4

Vibration â€“ Amenity ........................................................................................................ 34

9.5

Additional measures........................................................................................................ 34

Appendix A: ISCA Requirements ..................................................................... 35 Appendix B: Construction Noise Contours ...................................................... 36 Appendix C: Construction Vibration Contours ................................................ 37 Appendix D: Record of Communication .......................................................... 38 Appendix E: SSCNVMP .................................................................................... 48 Appendix F: Noise Monitoring Template ........................................................ 49 Appendix G: Vibration Monitoring Template ................................................. 51 Appendix H: Record of CLG, IPR and Auckland Council Comments ................ 53 H1. CLG Comments .......................................................................................... 53 H2. Auckland Council Comments .................................................................... 54 H3. IPR Comments ........................................................................................... 56 Appendix I: Noise and Vibration Measurements of Equipment ..................... 72 Page 4

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

1. Introduction The City Rail Link (CRL) project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line in the vicinity of Mt Eden Station. The CRL also involves the construction of two new underground stations at Aotea and Karangahape and a redeveloped Mt Eden Station (refer to Figure 1-1). The design and construction of the CRL infrastructure between the Aotea and Mt Eden Stations is being delivered by the Link Alliance.

Figure 1-1: CRL Route and Location

This Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan (CNV DWP) has been prepared in relation to construction of the new Karangahape Station.

Early works (demolition, network utility relocation and site establishment works) – to be undertaken from October 2019 through to early 2020; Main construction works (construction of the station and mined tunnels for the rail tracks) – to be undertaken from early 2020 through to later 2023; and Public realm reinstatement – likely to be undertaken from late 2022 to late 2024.

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

1.2 CNV DWP Staging To reflect the staged construction approach for the Karangahape Station, development of this CNV DWP will be undertaken in stages. This first revision of this CNV DWP addresses the Karangahape Station early works. The early works are detailed in the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP), and summarised in Section 2 of this CNV DWP. This CNV DWP will be revised in the future to include the main construction activities and public realm reinstatement.

1.3 Purpose of the CNV DWP In accordance with CRL designation Condition 36, the purpose of this CNV DWP is to identify and provide for implementation of the Best Practicable Option (BPO) to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse noise and vibration effects resulting from construction during the Karangahape Station early works. It identifies the noise and vibration performance standards that must, where practicable, be complied with and details the management and control methodologies to be implemented in order to achieve compliance. Where compliance cannot be achieved, the CNV DWP identifies BPO mitigation measures to be implemented on a site specific basis. This CNV DWP will be implemented throughout the entire construction period and will be the primary tool for the management of construction noise and vibration effects resulting from the Karangahape Station early works. It is a â€˜living documentâ€™ which may be updated as the works progresses and working conditions become clearer. Providing that the noise and vibration effects at the affected properties are either reduced or maintained at the same level as a result of implementing the mitigation measures identified in this CNV DWP, it is not intended to re-submit the CNV DWP to Auckland Council for re-approval. This CNV DWP has been developed to enable consultation with and feedback from the Karangahape Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG); and review by the Independent Peer Reviewer (IPR) prior to submission to Auckland Council (as per designation Conditions 7 and 11, and resource consent Condition 19). A record of consultation outcomes is included in Appendix H. This CNV DWP forms part of the CEMP for the Karangahape early works.

Page 6

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

1.4 Relevant Conditions Table 1-1 identifies the designation conditions relevant to this CNV DWP and where they are addressed in the document. Table 1-1: Construction noise and vibration conditions and location in the CNV DWP

Conditio n Number

Relevant Section of DWP

Condition Communications – Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers

16.1

16.2

A SSCNVMP shall be prepared for all Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers (refer Condition 39). As part of the SSCNVMP (and further to Condition 15 of this designation), the Requiring Authority shall undertake communication and consultation, as soon as reasonably practicable (and at least once following confirmation of construction timing and methodology), with any Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers located within 200 metres of blasting, or within 100 metres (either horizontally or vertically) of the designation footprint for other construction activities. Communication and consultation with these parties should focus on a collaborative approach to manage the adverse effects from construction noise and vibration while works are undertaken in the vicinity.

7.1

The Requiring Authority shall undertake on-going communication and consultation with notable noise and vibration receivers throughout the duration of construction occurring in the vicinity. This communication shall be reported back to the “key contacts” (see Condition 13) and the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer for their review and confirmation of any further action to be undertaken. The Auckland Council Consent Monitoring Officer shall advise the Requiring Authority of its recommendation within 10 working days of receiving this information from the Requiring Authority. Project Standards - Construction Noise

7.1

Construction noise shall comply with the following Project Standards (unless otherwise provided for in a SSCNMP which is approved under Condition 37, 39 or 40):

3.1 (Bear Park not impacted by Karangahap e works)

Receiver Type Occupied commercial and industrial buildings (including offices)

31.1

Sensitive Noise and Vibration Receivers (excluding offices)

Early Childhood Education Centres (whilst occupied during normal opening hours) Bear Park Early Childhood Education Centre at 32 Akiraho Street (whilst occupied during normal opening hours)

31.2

Page 7

Monday to Saturday

Sundays and Public Holidays

At all other times

0700 – 2200

2200 – 0700

75 dB LAeq

65 dB LAeq 1

60 dB LAeq

90 dB LAFmax

80 dB LAFmax2

75 dB LAFmax

35 dB LAeq in sleeping areas

65 dB LAeq in outdoor playing areas Construction noise shall be measured and assessed in accordance with the provisions of NZS 6803:1999 Project Standards - Construction Vibration

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

8.1

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan Conditio n Number

Condition

Relevant Section of DWP

Construction vibration (including blasting) shall comply with the following Project Standards for building damage (unless otherwise provided for in a SSCVMP which is approved under Condition 38, 39 or 40) Long-term Short-term (transient) vibration1 (continuous) vibration PPV at PPV at the foundation at a Type of PPV at horizontal frequency of Structure horizontal plane of plane of highest floor 1-10Hz 10-50 Hz 50-100 Hz highest floor (mm/s) (mm/s) (mm/s) (mm/s) (mm/s) 33.1

33.2

Commercial/ 20 20 – 40 40 – 50 40 10 Industrial Residential/ 5 5 – 15 15 – 20 15 5 School Historic or sensitive 3 3–8 8 – 10 8 2.5 structures Note: 1. Standard DIN 4150-3:1999 defines short-term (transient) vibration as “vibration which does not occur often enough to cause structural fatigue and which does not produce resonance in the structure being evaluated”. Long-term (continuous) vibration is defined as all other vibration types not covered by the short-term vibration definition. Construction vibration (including blasting) shall be measured in accordance with German Standard DIN 4150-3:1999.

3.2 8.2

Project Standards - Construction Vibration (Amenity) Between the hours of 10pm and 7am vibration generated by construction activities (excluding blasting) shall not exceed: 34.1

3.3

(a) a Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) of 0.3mm/s when measured at any part of the floor of any bedroom; (b) a noise level of 35 dB LAeq(15min) when measured in any bedroom. Between the hours of 7am and 10pm vibration generated by construction activities (excluding blasting) shall not exceed:

34.2

(a) A Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) of 1mm/s as measured on the floor of the receiving room for residentially occupied habitable rooms, bedrooms in temporary accommodation and medical facilities; and

3.3

(b) A Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) of 2mm/s as measured on the floor of the receiving room for retail and office spaces (including work areas and meeting rooms); 34.3

The limits in 34.1 and 34.2 shall only be investigated and applied upon the receipt of a complaint from any building occupant. They shall not be applied where there is no concern from the occupant of the building.

34.4

Where the limits in 34.1 and 34.2 are found (through measurement) to be exceeded then a SSCVMP shall be prepared for that receiver (Condition 38).

3.3

Appendix E

Construction Noise and Vibration DWP For the avoidance of doubt, this condition is applicable to the management of construction noise and vibration on all receivers, including sensitive and notable receivers.

36.1

Page 8

A Construction Noise and Vibration DWP shall be prepared and implemented. The objective of the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP is to provide for the development and implementation of identified best practicable option to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects on receivers of noise and vibration resulting from construction.

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

This DWP

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan Conditio n Number

Condition

Relevant Section of DWP

The Construction Noise and Vibration DWP shall: (a) Adopt the noise and vibration standards for construction set out in Conditions 31, 32, 33 and 34 of these designations; 36.2

(b) Be generally consistent with the draft Construction Noise and Vibration management plan submitted as part of the Notice of Requirement documentation (dated 23 August 2013); and (c) Identify methods to achieve best practicable option for mitigating adverse effects.

To achieve this objective, the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP shall include: (a) The roles and responsibilities of the noise and vibration personnel in the contractor team with regard to managing and monitoring adverse noise and vibration effects;

2.3

(b) That piling and road cutting will be restricted to between the hours of 7am to 7pm, Monday to Saturday;

2.2

(d) Identification of construction activities that are likely to create adverse noise and vibration effects, the location of these in the construction site areas, and the distance to comply with the Project Criteria in Conditions 31, 32, 33 and 34;

(e) The timing of construction activities that are likely to create an adverse noise and vibration effect; (f) The location of sensitive noise and vibration receivers; (g) A record of communication and consultation with sensitive noise and vibration receivers. The record must include a clear explanation of where any comments from sensitive receivers have not been incorporated in the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP, and the reasons why not. This information must be included in the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP provided to both the Independent Peer Review Panel and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan process specified in Condition 11; 36.3

(h) Specific measures to address the concerns raised by those sensitive receivers;

2.2 5 Appendix D

Appendix D &E

(i) Specific training procedures for construction personnel including: (i) The project noise and vibration performance standards for construction (conditions 31, 32, 33 and 34);

6.1

(ii) Information about noise and vibration sources within the construction area and the locations of sensitive noise and vibration receivers; and (iii) Construction machinery operation instructions relating to mitigating noise and vibration; (j) Methods and measures to mitigate adverse noise and vibration effects including, but not limited to, structural mitigation such as barriers and enclosures, the scheduling of high noise and vibration construction, use of low noise and vibration machinery, temporary relocation of affected receivers or any other measures or offer agreed to by the Requiring Authority and the affected receiver;

(k) The proposed methods for monitoring construction noise and vibration to be undertaken by a suitably qualified person for the duration of construction works including:

(i) Updating the predicted noise and vibration contours based on the final design and construction activities;

(ii) Confirm which buildings are to be subject to a pre and post building condition survey in accordance with Condition 46. This includes consideration of those buildings in Appendix One and Two to these conditions; Page 9

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

8.4

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan Conditio n Number

Condition

Relevant Section of DWP

(iii) The timing and location for monitoring of buildings during construction is required (Note that the flow charts contained in Appendices B and C of Appendix J of the technical noise and vibration report provided as part of the Notice of Requirement should be used as a guide);

(iv) Identifying appropriate monitoring locations for receivers of construction noise and vibration;

(v) Procedures for working with the Communication and Consultation Manager to respond to complaints received on construction noise and vibration, including methods to monitor and identify noise and vibration sources;

7.2

(vi) Procedures for monitoring construction noise and vibration and reporting to the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer; and

(vii) Procedures for how works will be undertaken should they be required as a result of the building condition surveys;

(l) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which detail how landowners and occupiers are to be communicated with around noise and vibration effects.

Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan (SSCNMP) For the avoidance of doubt, this condition does not apply to MediaWorks 37.1

37.2

The objective of a SSCNMP is to detail the best practicable option to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on a receiver resulting from construction noise that does not comply with the Project Noise Standards. Further to the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP in Condition 36, a SSCNMP shall be prepared for any receiver or activity for which air overpressure is either predicted or measured to exceed the limits in Condition 32, or where construction noise is either predicted or measured to exceed the Project Noise Standards in Condition 31, except where the exceedance of the standards in Condition 31 is less than 5 decibels and does not exceed: (a) 0700-2200: 1 period of up to 2 consecutive weeks in any 2 months (b) 2200-0700: 1 period of up to 2 consecutive nights in any 10 days

37.3

For predicted exceedances of less than 5 decibels (refer 37.2) monitoring shall be undertaken to confirm the actual noise levels. If exceedance is shown to be more than 5 decibels, or the period exceeds those detailed, then a SSCNMP will be prepared.

37.4

Condition not relevant to Karangahape early works SSCNMPs will identify: (a) The extent to which noise may exceed the Project Noise Standards in Condition 31 or the overpressure limits in Condition 32; (b) The timing and duration of any exceedance; (c) Details of the type of activity causing any exceedance;

37.5

(d) The summary of the communication and consultation undertaken with the receiver. The summary must include a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. This information must be included in the SSCNMP provided to both the Independent Peer Review Panel and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan process specified in Condition 11; (e) The methods and measures to mitigate noise effects, including but not limited to, potential to offer temporary relocation of affected receivers, alternative ventilation, faรงade sound insulation improvements, building condition surveys in the case of overpressure generated by blast events, or other offers made by the Requiring Authority and whether these have been agreed to by the affected receiver; (f) The reasons why the management and mitigation measures and methods reflect best practicable option.

Page 10

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Appendix E .

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan Conditio n Number 37.6

Condition

Relevant Section of DWP

The SSCNMP shall be submitted for the review of Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan. The works shall then be undertaken in accordance with the SSCNMP confirmed by the Requiring Authority as part of the Outline Plan. Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plan (SSCVMP)

38.1

The objective of a SSCVMP is to detail the best practicable option to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on a receiver resulting from vibration that does not comply with the Project Vibration Standards.

38.2

Further to the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP in Condition 36, a SSCVMP shall be prepared: (a) For any unoccupied building, structure or infrastructure for which construction vibration is either predicted or measured to exceed the Project Vibration Standards in Condition 33; (b) Where a complaint or concern is raised and the vibration level exceeds the amenity levels of Condition 34.2(a) and 34.2(b); (c) In response to other concerns or complaints where required (refer Condition 17). (d) For the properties listed in Condition 37.4. Where the amenity limits in Conditions 34.2(a) and 34.2(b) are exceeded:

38.3

(a) Best practicable management of vibration must be applied; and (b) The vibration activity shall be scheduled to avoid disturbance. If this is not practicable then reasonable respite periods shall be provided to reduce vibration exposure.

38.4

The limits in condition 33 may be relaxed by a SSCVMP but only for a building, structure or infrastructure that has been assessed by a suitably qualified and experienced structural engineer and where it has been deemed to be capable of withstanding higher vibration levels without sustaining building or structural damage, and where appropriate vibration and building condition monitoring regimes are in place. SSCVMPs will identify: (a) The timing and duration of any exceedance; (b) Details of the type of activity giving rise to any exceedance; (c) Site Specific vibration criteria that addresses the issue(s) of concern (i.e. building damage, amenity and sensitive equipment). Site Specific criteria shall be determined by a suitably qualified independent vibration expert;

38.5

(d) The summary of the communication and consultation undertaken with the receiver. The summary must include a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. This information must be included in the SSCVMP provided to both the Independent Peer Review Panel and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan process specified in Condition 11; (e) The methods and measures to mitigate vibration effects, including but not limited to, investigating alternative low-vibration construction methods, undertaking high-vibration works outside sensitive times, vibration barriers, building condition surveys, potential to offer temporary relocation of affected receivers, or other offers made by the Requiring Authority and agreed to by the affected receiver. (f) The reasons why the management and mitigation measures and methods reflect best practicable option.

38.6

The SSCVMP shall be submitted for the review of Auckland Council. The works shall then be undertaken in accordance with the SSCVMP confirmed by the Requiring Authority as part of the Outline Plan.

Appendix E

Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers 39.1

Page 11

Further to Condition 36, the Requiring Authority and its contractor, in conjunction with a suitably qualified expert, shall work collaboratively with each notable receiver during the | Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Appendix E

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan Conditio n Number

Condition preparation of a SSCNVMP to confirm the extent and management of adverse effects on each Notable Receiver.

39.2

In addition to the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP, a SSCNVMP shall be prepared for each identified Notable Receiver. The objective of the SSCNVMP is to detail the best practicable option to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse noise and vibration effects on each Notable Receiver.

39.3

The Requiring Authority shall consult with the notable receiver throughout the duration of construction and update the SSCNVMP as required to achieve the objective in 39.2.

39.4

The SSCNVMP shall include: (a) The level at which noise and vibration effects on the notable receiver will unreasonably interfere with its operation. This will enable development of the site specific criteria. (b) Construction activities and equipment which are likely to create adverse noise and vibration effects and the location and timing of these in relation to the notable receiver; (c) The methods and measures associated with the worksite including, but not limited to, structural mitigation such as barriers and enclosures, use of low noise and vibration machinery and the scheduling of high noise and vibration construction; (d) The methods and measures associated with the notable receiver building or operation including, but not limited to, potential for isolation of sensitive areas and equipment, dampening of reradiating surfaces and temporary relocation of affected receivers that are proposed to minimise adverse noise and vibration effects on the notable receiver; (e) Details about the methods to be adopted by the Requiring Authority to minimise construction noise and vibration effects on the notable receiver and the anticipated effectiveness of those methods; (f) A summary of the communication and consultation undertaken with the notable receiver. The summary must include a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated and the reasons why not. (g) Offers made by the Requiring Authority to the notable receiver to mitigate effects and the response by the operators, such as relocation, and whether those offers were accepted or not by the notable receiver;

39.5

If the parties cannot agree on any of the matters above they shall each appoint a suitably qualified and independent expert, who shall jointly appoint an independent and suitably qualified third expert who shall certify the following matters to be included in the SSCNVMP: (a) The level at which noise and vibration effects on the notable receiver unreasonably interfere with its operation (the certified noise and vibration limit); (b) The mitigation methods and measures within the worksite (at source) including, but not limited to, structural mitigation such as barriers and enclosures, use of low noise and vibration machinery and the scheduling of high noise and vibration construction; (c) The mitigation methods and measures at the notable receiver including but not limited to: isolation of sensitive areas and equipment; dampening of reradiating surfaces; any response to such offers; and temporary relocation of affected receivers; (d) Whether or not the mitigation methods and measures reflect best practicable management; and (e) Whether or not the residual effects are likely to cause significant disruption to the activities of the notable receiver.

39.6

Following the above process the SSCNVMP shall be submitted for the review of Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan. For the avoidance of doubt, the Requiring Authority shall not be entitled to make any changes to the SSCNVMP through the Outline Plan process following any agreement reached with the notable receiver and/or through the above certification process without the consent of the notable receiver. The works shall then be undertaken in accordance with the SSCNVMP confirmed by the Requiring Authority as part of the Outline Plan process.

Page 12

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Relevant Section of DWP

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

1.5 Sustainability The Link Alliance is seeking an Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia (ISCA) Infrastructure Sustainability (IS) Rating. Further details can be found in the CEMP and Sustainability Rating Management Plan. Project sustainability requirements that relate directly to this CNV DWP are included in Appendix A. These requirements are imbedded within this CNV DWP to ensure that sustainability is a key focus and ‘the way we do things’. In some cases the IS requirements and sustainability goals enhance the designation and consent requirements.

1.6 DWP Review and updates This CNV DWP is a live document that will be reviewed at least annually, or as a result of a material change to the project, or to address unforeseen adverse noise and vibration effects arising from construction, or unresolved complaints. Any material changes to this CNV DWP must be approved by Auckland Council prior to any on-site activity reliant upon the change commencing. Refer to the CEMP for further detail on the review and updating process.

1.7 CNV DWP Author This CNV DWP has been prepared by Sharon Yung, Acoustic Consultant at AECOM and reviewed by Claire Drewery the nominated Acoustics Specialist for the Project. Claire has 17 years’ professional experience as an acoustic consultant and she holds a Diploma in Acoustics and Noise Control. Sharon and Claire are Members of the Institute of Acoustics (IOA).

Page 13

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Karangahape Early Works 2.1 Overview of Works

Works location

Overview of construction activities

Beresford Square / Pitt Street

 Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Beresford Square / Pitt Street;  Removal of street trees and the demolition of the café / toilet in Beresford Square;  Establishment of the Beresford Square Construction Support Area to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.; and  Closure of Beresford Square to vehicle traffic (other than construction traffic) while retaining pedestrian and cycle access.  Removal of existing street furniture where required, such as seating, street lighting (to be replaced with temporary lighting).

Mercury Lane

 Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Mercury Lane; and  Establishment of the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area within to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.  Establishment of the Mercury Lane Station temporary working platform.

It should be noted that the demolition of buildings and above ground structures within the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area are authorised by the CRL Enabling Work Outline Plan – Karangahape Road Demolition Works (Auckland Council reference OPW60339200), confirmed in June 2019, and does not form part of this CNV DWP.

2.2 Hours of Operation Works will generally be undertaken between 7am and 10pm Monday to Saturday. Designation Condition 36.3(b) requires that piling and road cutting will be restricted to between the hours of 7am to 7pm, Monday to Saturday.

Page 14

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

2.3 Key personnel The key personnel responsible for this CNV DWP are identified in Table 2-2. Refer to the CEMP for further detail on roles and responsibilities. Table 2-2: Key Personnel

Role

Name

Karangahape Station Project Manager

Jonathan Hill

Karangahape Station Construction Manager

Dan Trotman

Environmental and Sustainability Manager

Sarah Sutherland

Karangahape Station Stakeholder and Communication Manager

Johanna McIntosh

Acoustics Specialist

Claire Drewery

Noise and Vibration Monitoring

Joe Grimes

Vibration Monitoring â€“ Trained Site Personnel

TBC

Noise Monitoring - Trained Site Personnel

TBC

All personnel working on the Project, including subcontractors, are responsible for following the requirements of this CNV DWP. They must be briefed on this CNV DWP and sign an induction form and any noise and vibration schedules that relate to the work they will be carrying out.

Page 15

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

3. Construction Noise and Vibration Criteria 3.1 Construction Noise Criteria Construction noise will be measured and assessed in accordance with New Zealand Standard NZS6803:1999 “Acoustics – Construction Noise”. Construction noise will be managed to comply with the Project Standards (unless otherwise provided for in an approved Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan (SSCNMP)). The Project Standards for construction noise are specified in CRL designation Condition 31 and provided in Table 3-1. These noise levels are applicable 1m from any building façade. Table 3-1: Construction Noise Limits Monday to Saturday 0700 – 2200

Sundays and Public Holidays 0700 – 2200

All other times 2200 – 0700

Occupied commercial and industrial buildings (including offices)

75 dB LAeq

Sensitive Noise and Vibration Receivers (excluding offices)

75 dB LAeq

65 dB LAeq

60 dB LAeq

90 dB LAFmax

80 dB LAFmax

75 dB LAFmax

Receiver type

Note: Sensitive receivers (usually building occupants) whose amenity needs to be considered with regards to noise and/or vibration effects; includes but is not limited to dwellings, hotels, educational facilities (including day care facilities), hospitals, places of worship, laboratories, studios, theatres and auditoria.

Section 4.1 of the CNV DWP details equipment and associated noise levels for construction activities. Section 9 of the CNV DWP details how construction activities will be measured/ assessed against the noise criteria. If any construction activity cannot practicably comply with the limits in Table 3-1, a SSCNMP will be prepared in accordance with designation condition 37 (refer to Table 1-1 in Section 1.4 of this CNV DWP).

3.2 Vibration Criteria – Building Damage Construction vibration will be measured and assessed in accordance with German Standard DIN 4150-3:1999 “Structural Vibration – Part 3 Effects of Vibration on Structures”. Construction vibration will be managed to comply with the Project Standards for building damage (unless otherwise provided for in an approved Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plan (SSCVMP)). The construction vibration limits are specified in CRL designation Condition 33 and provided in Table 3-2. Table 3-2: Construction Vibration Limits – Building Damage Long-term (continuous) vibration

Short-term (transient) vibration* Type of structure

PPV at the foundation at a frequency of:

PPV at horizontal plane of highest floor (mm/s)

PPV at horizontal plane of the highest floor (mm/s)

1 – 10 Hz (mm/s)

10 – 50 Hz (mm/s)

50 – 100 Hz (mm/s)

Commercial / Industrial

20-40

40-50

Residential / School

5 – 15

15 – 20

Historic or sensitive structures

3–8

8 – 10

2.5

Page 16

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan * DIN 4150-3:1999 defines short-term (transient) vibration as “vibration which does not occur enough to cause structural fatigue and which does not produce resonance in the structure being evaluated” Long-term (continuous) vibration is defined as all other vibration types not covered by the short-term vibration definition.

Section 4.2 of this CNV DWP details equipment and vibration emission radii for construction activities. Section 9 of this CNV DWP details how construction activities will be measured/ assessed against the vibration criteria. If any construction activity cannot practicably comply with the limits outlined in Table 3-2, a SSCVMP will be produced in accordance with designation Condition 38 (refer to Table 1-1 in Section 1.4 of this CNV DWP).

3.3 Vibration Criteria – Amenity 3.3.1. Day time criteria Between the hours of 7am and 10pm vibration generated by construction activities (excluding blasting) shall not exceed: a

b c

A Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) of 1mm/s as measured on the floor of the receiving room for residentially occupied habitable rooms, bedrooms in temporary accommodation and medical facilities; A Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) of 2mm/s as measured on the floor of the receiving room for retail and office spaces (including work areas and meeting rooms); and Designation Condition 34.3 states that the limits identified in Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.1 of this CNV DWP need only be investigated and applied upon the receipt of a complaint from any building occupant. They shall not be applied where there is no concern from the occupant of the building.

When a complaint occurs, and the limits are found (through measurement) to be exceeded then a SSCVMP shall be prepared for that receiver.

3.3.2. Night time criteria Night time works are not expected to take place for the Early works. If any works occurs between the hours of 10pm and 7am, noise and vibration generated by construction activities (excluding blasting) shall not exceed: a

a Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) of 0.3mm/s when measured at any part of the floor of any bedroom; and

a noise level of 35 dB LAeq(15min) when measured in any bedroom.

Page 17

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

4. Equipment Noise and Vibration Source Data 4.1 Noise Sources Various construction activities and pieces of equipment will act as noise sources on site during the early works. Table 4-1 details predicted noise levels from the likely significant noise sources at various receiver setback distances. The noise data has been taken from British Standard 5228-1:2009 â€œCode of practice for noise and vibration control on construction and open sitesâ€?, manufacturers data or the AECOM database of noise measurements. The noise levels do not account for mitigation. The noise levels detailed in Table 4-1 are placeholders, and actual equipment noise levels and model numbers will be recorded and updated within the table when work commences. Updates will be provided as an appendix to this CNV DWP. The noise levels detailed in Table 4-1 allow identification of the need for mitigation or management to achieve compliance with the Project noise criteria. Section 6 of this CNV DWP provides details of management procedures and mitigation measures. Table 4-1: Equipment noise levels

SPL (dB LAeq) Equipment

Sound power level (dB LwA)

10m

20m

50m

Excavator (3-5T)

Excavator (5-8T)

Excavator (8-25T)

111

Excavator w/ Pick

116

Crane Lorry

105

Crane

105

Cherry Picker

106

Truck

109

Saw Cut

116

Hydrovac

104

Drilling (handheld)

113

Drilling (large)

114

Piling - (Sheet)

116

Chainsaw

114

Plate Compactor

110

Roller Compactor

107

Scaffolding

108

Welding

101

Noise contour maps showing predicted construction noise levels at receivers adjacent to the work sites are presented in Appendix B. Page 18

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

4.2 Vibration Sources Some construction activities are predicted to generate high levels of vibration including excavation, compaction, sheet piling and breaking. Table 4-2 summarises the setback distance from each of these activities inside of which exceedance of the building damage criteria detailed in Section 3.2 of this CNV DWP may occur at the foundation of receiving buildings. The table will be kept up to date and be representative of the actual equipment on-site and include the results of on-site vibration monitoring. The vibration monitoring procedure is detailed in Section 8.2 of this CNV DWP. Table 4-2: Vibration emission radii for building damage criteria

Vibration Criteria Radii (m) Commercial (20 mm/s)

Equipment

Residential (5 mm/s)

Historic/ Vibration Sensitive (3 mm/s)

Excavator (3-8T)

1.1

4.5

7.5

Excavator (8-25T)

1.2

4.7

7.8

Excavator w/ Pick

1.1

4.5

7.5

Truck

0.2

0.9

1.5

Drilling (large)

1.8

7.2

Piling - Sheet

Plate Compactor

0.3

1.2

2.0

Roller Compactor

2.1

8.4

Vibration contours showing the distance at which the building damage criteria is predicted to be exceeded based on the highest vibration generating equipment are presented in Appendix C.

Page 19

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

5. Affected Parties / Notable Receivers 5.1 Noise Table 5-1 identifies buildings where construction activities are predicted to exceed the Project noise limits. A SSCNMP is required for these properties and has been prepared in accordance with designation Condition 37 (refer to Table 1-1 in Section 1.4 of this CNV DWP) dependent on activities and building type. Table 5-1: Buildings predicted to receive noise levels exceeding the Project noise limits

Address

Building type/ comments

1 Beresford Square

Commercial

1 Cross Street

Commercial

4-6 Beresford Square

Mixed Use

8-14 Beresford Square

Mixed Use

19 Beresford Square

Mixed Use

16-18 Beresford Square

Commercial

22 Beresford Square

Mixed Use

12 East Street

Mixed Use

14 East Street

Mixed Use

16 East Street

Residential

18 East Street

Residential

21 East Street 1

Commercial

23 East Street

Commercial

27 East Street

Mixed Use

29 East Street

Commercial

80-82 Pitt Street

Commercial

238 Karangahape Road

Mixed Use

243 Karangahape Road

Commercial

3 Mercury Lane

Commercial

283 Karangahape Road

Cultural

59 Pitt Street

Commercial

61-65 Pitt Street

Commercial

68 Pitt Street

Commercial

70-74 Pitt Street

Commercial

78 Pitt Street

Church

9 Mercury Lane

10/39 Pitt Street Note 1: Notable receiver

Page 20

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Theatre Residential

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

5.2 Vibration â€“ Building Damage Table 5-2 identifies the buildings that may be at risk of exceeding the building damage vibration limits. Historic buildings have been determined from discussions with the Built Heritage specialist. A Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plan (SSCVMP) will be prepared in accordance with designation condition 38 (refer to Table 1-1 in Section 1.4 of this CNV DWP) for receivers where vibration is predicted to exceed the building damage vibration limits. Table 5-2: Buildings predicted exceed Project vibration limits

Address

Building Classification

1 Beresford Square

Historical / vibration sensitive

1 Cross Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

4-6 Beresford Square

Historical / vibration sensitive

8-14 Beresford Square

Historical / vibration sensitive

19 Beresford Square

Historical / vibration sensitive

16-18 Beresford Square

Historical / vibration sensitive

22 Beresford Square

Residential

14 East Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

16 East Street

Residential

18 East Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

21 East Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

23 East Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

27 East Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

238 Karangahape Road

Historical / vibration sensitive

243 Karangahape Road

Historical / vibration sensitive

283 Karangahape Road

Historical / vibration sensitive

47 Pitt Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

59 Pitt Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

61-65 Pitt Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

9 Mercury Lane

Historical / vibration sensitive

5.3 Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (SSCNVMP) The designation conditions allow for SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs to be combined to form SSCNVMPs. The Karangahape early works SSCNVMP in Appendix E of this CNV DWP therefore considers both construction noise and vibration.

Page 21

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

6. General Management Procedures and Mitigation Measures The early works have the potential to exceed the relevant construction noise and vibration limits at the closest receivers. To avoid or minimise exceedances it is vital that appropriate mitigation methods and measures are utilised. This DWP identifies the methods to achieve best practicable option for mitigating adverse effects during the construction works. These methods and measures will include, but not be limited to, those detailed in this section of the CNV DWP.

6.1 Training Procedures relating to environmental training, including noise and vibration site management procedures, are detailed in the Karangahape early works CEMP. As a minimum, before commencing work on site all personnel will receive training based on this CNV DWP and relevant to their scope of works. If required, specific training will be provided for site personnel. Training will cover:        

Roles and responsibilities for managing noise and vibration. Familiarisation with noise and vibration limits. Details of noise and vibration sources on-site. Noise and vibration mitigation and management procedures. Location of sensitive and notable receivers. Construction noise and vibration effects on receivers. Details of any operational requirements and constraints identified through communication and consultation. Complaints management procedures.

6.2 Construction Vehicles, Traffic and Deliveries Noise mitigation methods and measures for construction vehicles, traffic and deliveries shall include, where practicable:           

Fitting engine exhausts with silencers. Using broadband reversing alarms. Minimising slamming doors. Minimising speed and engine revs. Controlling / limiting noise from vehicle stereos being operated on site. Minimising the use of horns. Turning engines off when stationary for extended periods of time. Placing bedding layer or resilient liner in truck trays. Using rubber seals around tailgates. Use of rubber tracks to eliminate squeal wherever possible. Minimising track squeal from tracked equipment such as excavators, by maintaining tracks regularly.

6.3 Plant and Equipment Designation Condition 21.1 (m) requires that site offices and less noisy construction activities be located at the edge of the construction yards where practicable (refer to the CEMP for further detail on the layout of the Beresford and Mercury Lane Construction Support Areas). Page 22

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan Plant and equipment noise and vibration mitigation methods and measures shall include, where practicable:     



Selecting plant and equipment with low noise and vibration emission levels. Turning off plant and equipment or throttle them down to a minimum when not in use. Selecting appropriately sized equipment for the task. Using mufflers and engine covers/screens where appropriate. Ensuring equipment is operated in the correct manner and correctly maintained, including replacement of engine covers, repair of defective silencing equipment, tightening of rattling components, repair of leakages in compressed air lines and shutting down of equipment not in use. Avoiding, where practicable, the night-time use of equipment which generates impulsive noise, including:   

           

impact piling dropping materials from a height metal-to-metal contact on equipment.

Minimising drop height of materials when transferring (e.g. loading and unloading vehicles and storage areas). Enclosing generators with an effective muffler. Using power from Vector Electricity Network rather than from generators. Reducing noise and vibration emissions from plant that has the potential to exceed the criteria by installing silencers, vibration isolation or other appropriate mitigation. Maximising the distance between the engine exhausts of fixed plant and the nearest sensitive building façade. Placing tools and equipment on the ground, rather than dropping. Covering surfaces with resilient material where tools / equipment are placed. Not dragging equipment on the ground. Minimising the need for striking bare metal with tools. Where spoil is being loaded into a dump truck, or fill materials are being unloaded from a dump truck, position the truck to minimise tracking movements. Managing noise generated from the use of concrete, including by limiting noise generated by aggregate loading or by hammering the mixing. Using broadband reversing alarms on all mobile equipment.

6.4 Pneumatic Breakers Noise and vibration mitigation methods and measures for breaking activities shall include, where practicable:    

Page 23

Selecting equipment for the job that takes into account the need to minimise the length of time taken to complete the operation and minimise noise generation. Not “blank” firing the hammer. The activating valve should only be operated with the hammer in contact with the surface to be broken. Keeping breaker bushes and shafts greased as necessary. Using the correct chisel / tip shape for the type of material being broken.

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan 

Using acoustic screens which block line of sight between breaker and sensitive receivers where work is contained within a compact area.

6.5 Piling and Compaction Noise and vibration mitigation methods and measures for piling and compaction activities shall include, where practicable:   

Minimising cable slap and chain clink. Providing mufflers and engine covers/screens on plant where appropriate. Removing obstructions which may exacerbate vibration transmission where appropriate, prior to piling operations.

6.6 Noise Barriers and Enclosures Noise barriers or enclosures will be used in areas where the noise limits are predicted to be exceeded, and where they provide effective mitigation. Noise barriers will generally only be effective for ground floor receivers where noise levels would be reduced by approximately 10 dB. For a noise barrier to be effective it must physically obstruct line of sight between the noise source and receiver. Receivers on the first floor and above will be able to see over the noise barrier and it will provide little attenuation. An effective noise barrier is constructed as follows:    

Positioned to physically obstruct line of sight between the construction work and receiver, where this is practicable. Positioned as close as practicable to the noisy construction activity. Abutted or overlapped to provide a continuous screen with no gaps at the base or between panels. Be a minimum of 1.8m high.

Noise barriers may be constructed from plywood with a minimum surface mass of 10kg/m 2. Proprietary products such as Flex Shield are available that have a lower surface mass but provide the same or better levels of noise attenuation. Flex Shield barriers shall be utilised during utilities relocation and piling due to the temporary/ mobile nature of these works. Relocatable noise barriers shall be erected around all utilities relocation work sites and around all piling sites. Noise enclosures should be utilised where practicable as they provide better attenuation to receivers above ground floor level. Where enclosures are proposed their design will be agreed with the Project Acoustics Specialist.

6.7 Traffic tyre noise Vehicle movements may cause temporary decks, steel plates and manholes to rock or move, giving rise to nuisance noises. Sharp changes in the level of the road surface may result in tyre noise. Link Alliance will use the following methods to reduce noise from these sources so far as reasonably practicable, especially where the noise source will exist for long periods:  Page 24

Firmly fix traffic decks to the road or other structural elements to prevent motion. | Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan   

Placing rubber beneath traffic decks and steel road plates where movement occurs. Providing smooth transitions between changes in road surface level. Ensuring manhole covers are fitted correctly.

6.8 Scheduling of Activities Scheduling of construction activities can be a key tool for managing construction noise and vibration effects. The time of day and the duration of the construction activities will be adjusted after consultation, where possible, to avoid particularly sensitive times for affected receivers. Consideration will also be given to respite periods and avoidance of activity on certain days (if requested by affected neighbours), where practicable. Night time disturbance to nearby residential receivers will be reduced by carrying out noisy activities during the day.

Page 25

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

7. Communication 7.1 Communication Good stakeholder communication practices are a key component for the management of noise and vibration disruption from construction activities. Prior to construction commencing, clear communication channels will be established between the Link Alliance and those in the community identified in the CNV DWP as being potentially affected by the early works construction activities. It is important that the Link Alliance provide information to these parties in a transparent and consistent manner in relation to potential adverse construction noise and vibration effects, duration, along with mitigation and management measures that will be implemented during the works.

7.1.1. Notable and Sensitive Receivers Designation Condition 16.1 requires that communication and consultation is undertaken, as soon as reasonably practicable (and at least once following confirmation of construction timing and methodology), with any Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers located within 100 metres of the designation footprint. On-going communication and consultation will be undertaken with notable noise and vibration receivers throughout the duration of construction occurring in the vicinity as outlined in Section 7.1.2 below. This communication will be reported back to the “key contacts” (see designation Condition 13) and the Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring officer for their review and confirmation of any further action to be undertaken. Designation Condition 36.3(g) requires a record to be kept of communication and consultation with sensitive receivers with regard to construction noise and vibration impacts. A record of communication and consultation with sensitive receivers is provided in Appendix D of this CNV DWP. The record includes details of when the communication/ consultation occurred, comments were received from the sensitive receivers and where the comments have been incorporated into the CNV DWP or where they have not, the reasons for this.

7.1.2. Engagement Methods The Karangahape Station Stakeholder and Communication Manager has a key responsibility to keep the community and stakeholders informed of construction activities as outlined in the early works Communication and Consultation Plan (CCP). The following methodology sets out expectations for stakeholder engagement with regards to noise and vibration generated by the construction works, with detail also provided in Sections 6 and 7 of the CCP: 



Page 26

A contact person will always be available during works, and the project contact details will be prominently displayed at the entrance to the site(s) so that they are clearly visible to the public. Individual notification shall be provided and meetings offered to all neighbours that are predicted to experience noise or vibration levels that exceed the limits detailed in Section 3 of the CNV DWP after the BPO mitigation as detailed in Section 6 has been applied. Where it is impractical to avoid an exceedance, communication and consultation shall be undertaken with the receiver to identify methods and measures to mitigate the adverse effects of construction, including identifying why the selected management and mitigation measures and methods reflect the best practicable option. | Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan 



The Karangahape Station Stakeholder and Communication Manager will make contact with the affected and notable receivers identified in Table 5-1 and Table 5-2 to engage in a consultative process prior to construction. This may involve a face to face meeting or be carried out over the phone as suits the needs of the receiver. The Link Alliance will provide the affected and notable receivers identified in Table 5-1 and Table 5-2 with the following information:    

An overview of the works proposed, including duration, activities to be undertaken, potential impacts etc.; The site and facilities layout; Dates for key milestones (road closures, site establishments and disestablishment etc.); and Project contact details for general queries or complaints.

Where changes are made to any of the above items, in particular to hours of operation or to likely duration of the operation, the affected and notable receivers identified in Table 5-1 and Table 5-2 will be notified.  

 

As required, ongoing engagement throughout the works with Notable Noise and Vibration receivers and any other neighbours raising concerns. Regular notifications (at least monthly) will be provided to affected receivers with an update on the progress of the works, and the specific activities (including locations) due to be undertaken next. A record will be kept of all communications in Appendix D of this CNV DWP. All concerns and complaints regarding construction noise and vibration will be managed in accordance with Section 7.2 of this CNV DWP.

7.2 Complaints Procedure Procedures relating to the management of environmental complaints (including construction noise and vibration) are detailed within Section 7 of the CCP. All complaints will be addressed in accordance with these procedures and a record of the complaint and the Link Alliance response maintained in a Project Complaints Register. The Link Alliance will provide Auckland Council's Team Leader Central Monitoring with contact details for the Karangahape Station Stakeholder and Communications Manager to ensure the Council can pass on any Karangahape early works related noise complaints to the Link Alliance quickly.

Page 27

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

8. Monitoring 8.1 Noise Construction noise will be measured and assessed in accordance with the requirements of New Zealand Standard NZS 6803: 1999 “Acoustics - Construction Noise” Noise monitoring will be conducted by the Acoustic Specialist or trained noise monitoring staff as identified in Section 2.3 of this CNV DWP. The equipment noise levels detailed in Table 4-1 are placeholders. All equipment that is predicted to exceed 75 dB LAeq at 5m will be measured, where practicable, when first operating on site. Actual equipment noise levels at 5m and equipment model numbers will be recorded. Due to the temporary nature of the works, construction monitoring shall be undertaken during first occurrence on site of excavation, saw cutting and other phases of construction when noise has potential to exceed the limits or and in response to reasonable noise complaints. Noise monitoring shall also be undertaken if the construction methodology changes, such that noise criteria may be exceeded at other locations. The SSCNVMPs identify monitoring locations and the timing of monitoring at the most affected receivers. In addition to the monitoring identified in the SSCNVMPs, noise monitoring will be carried out at positions representative of noise sensitive locations at appropriate periods to check ongoing compliance with the construction noise limits. The monitoring position will be at ground floor level. Noise will be measured 1m from the most affected façade of the building, or in the area which relates to a noise complaint. If it is not practicable to measure at this position, measurements will be taken at a representative location and adjusted for distance and façade reflections if necessary. Measurements will also be taken at a known distance, such as 5m, from the noise generating equipment to establish source noise levels. Additional measurement positions may be necessary if the initial measurement results indicate that noise may exceed criteria at other areas of the building façade. These measurements will be undertaken 1m from the façade if windows are normally open or inside the building if windows are normally closed. Where internal measurements are required it will be necessary to control noise from local sources, such as people using the telephone, to ensure only construction noise is measured. Noise monitoring will be conducted for 10-15 minutes at each measurement position, during representative construction activity. The noise level will be reported with the measurement duration (e.g. 65 dB LAeq (15min)) Figure 8-1 outlines the process to be followed when monitoring noise.

Page 28

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Figure 8-1: Noise Monitoring Flowchart

Page 29

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

8.2 Vibration Construction vibration levels will be measured and assessed in accordance with the requirements of German Standard DIN 4150-3:1999 “Structural vibration – Part 3: Effects of vibration on structures”. Due to the temporary nature of the works, vibration monitoring shall be undertaken during first occurrence on site of excavation, saw cutting and other phases of construction when vibration has potential to exceed the limits or and in response to reasonable noise complaints. Noise monitoring shall also be undertaken at identified SSCNVMP locations and if the construction methodology changes, such that vibration criteria may be exceeded at other locations. Vibration monitoring shall only be undertaken by the Acoustic Specialist or trained vibration monitoring staff as identified in Table 2-2 of this CNV DWP. Vibration shall initially be measured at the closest building foundations (usually at basement or ground floor level) and this requires consent to access the building of interest. Additional measurement positions may be necessary if the initial measurement results indicate that vibration may exceed criteria within other areas of the building. It may also be necessary to measure vibration levels in the habitable areas of buildings in response to a complaint. Vibration monitoring will be conducted during representative construction activities and comprise measurements of peak particle velocity (PPV) at one second intervals. The duration of the vibration measurements will be sufficient to capture the highest vibration level from the source. The vibration monitoring equipment (geophones) will be fixed to building structural members (e.g. with clamps, or weighed down with sandbags). The geophones will ideally be located at or near the façade of the building facing the vibration source and will be located away from areas where extraneous vibration (e.g. from footfall or building services) could affect the results. Vibration monitoring shall also be undertaken in response to reasonable vibration complaints, or if the construction methodology changes such that vibration criteria may be exceeded at other locations. Figure 8-2 outlines the process to be followed when monitoring vibration. Note that matters relating to building condition survey and response to damage are set out in Sections 8.4 and 9.3.

Page 30

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Figure 8-2 Vibration monitoring flowchart

Page 31

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

8.3 Reporting All noise and vibration monitoring shall be summarised in a report and submitted to the Karangahape Station Stakeholder and Communication Manager and the Environmental and Sustainability Manager within one week of the assessment. The reports shall be kept at the site office and made available to Auckland Council upon request. A noise monitoring template is presented in Appendix F. A vibration monitoring template is presented in Appendix G.

8.4 Building Condition Surveys A pre-construction building condition survey will be undertaken at all of the identified buildings detailed in the Table 5-2 before the early works construction begins. Designation Condition 46 describes the process for building condition surveys. The building condition surveys will generally be undertaken as follows:  

The building surveys will be undertaken by an independent senior qualified person. The survey shall include:     

  

Any information about the type of foundations; Existing levels of damage (aesthetic, superficial, affecting levels of serviceability); Whether observed damage is associated with structural damage; Susceptibility of building or structure to further movement; and Photographic evidence.

The Link Alliance will provide the building condition survey structure survey report to the property owner and the Council within 15 working days of the survey being undertaken. If requested by a building or structure owner where a pre-construction survey was undertaken, the Link Alliance will undertake a visual inspection. The Link Alliance shall carry out visual inspections of the surrounding ground and external building facades of the listed buildings adjacent to any trench works to monitor any deterioration or movement of any pre-existing cracks.

The buildings may require further surveys during construction if complaints are made or if the vibration criteria have been exceeded. A post-construction condition survey of the same buildings will be conducted a week after the conclusion of works in the area that have the potential to generate vibration at levels approaching or exceeding the limits in Condition 33. A report will then be prepared. Where a post-construction building condition survey confirms that the building has deteriorated as the result of construction the damage will be rectified.

Page 32

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

9. Contingency Measures This section describes contingency measures to be implemented in the event that the noise and/or vibration limits specified within this CNV DWP and/or in an approved SSCNVMP are exceeded. The Karangahape Station Stakeholder and Communication Manager will liaise with affected receiver (refer Section 7 of this CNV DWP) throughout the following processes.

9.1 Management Process Where any construction activity is predicted and/or measured to exceed the construction noise or vibration limits the following process will be applied:  

 

Check that the BPO and all relevant management measures have been implemented. The Karangahape Station Stakeholder and Communication Manager will engage with all affected parties, to understand their particular sensitivities, including times, activities and locations. The Karangahape Station Stakeholder and Communication Manager or nominated representative shall be available 24/7 during the proposed works. Carry out noise and/or vibration monitoring of the construction activity to verify the extent of any adverse effects. Implement further mitigation and/or contingency measures to avoid significant adverse effects as practicable and agreed with the affected party (refer Sections 9.2 to 9.5 of this CNV DWP).

9.2 Noise If noise monitoring demonstrates non-compliance with the noise limits identified in the approved SSCNVMP, the following procedures shall be implemented:  



Undertake additional noise measurements, as necessary, to determine the extent of the exceedance. Discuss additional mitigation options with the Karangahape Station Project Manager as soon as the extent of the exceedance has been determined. This may include immediately stopping works. Undertake noise measurements once recommended mitigation measures have been implemented to confirm that the mitigation has been effective and the noise limits are now being met for the periods agreed. Preparation of a report recording the findings of the survey and detailing additional mitigation or management options. Copies of the report will be provided to CRLL, the Station Project Manager, Karangahape Station Communication and Consultation Manager and the Environmental and Sustainability Manager.

9.3 Vibration – Building Damage If vibration monitoring demonstrates non-compliance with the vibration building damage limits identified in the approved SSCNVMP, the construction activity responsible for the exceedance shall cease as soon as safe and practicable to do so. A detailed building condition survey shall then be undertaken by a suitably qualified engineer to determine if any damage has occurred. The survey shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Page 33

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan   

Comparison of existing condition of building including existing levels of any aesthetic damage or structural damage against pre-construction building survey. Recording (including photographs) the major features of the buildings including location, type, construction, age and present condition, including defects (cracks). Preparation of a report recording the findings of the survey. A copy of the report will be given to the building owner and another copy will be kept at the site office.

If damage has not occurred then that activity can continue provided the measured vibration level is not exceeded further. If minor damage has occurred, such as cosmetic cracks, further mitigation will be applied if practicable. However, the activity can continue provided the measured vibration level is not exceeded further. If moderate or severe damage has occurred and the best practicable option has been implemented, it will be necessary to stop work, if safe to do so, and investigate alternative construction methods. All damage due to construction activities will be repaired within a reasonable timeframe after the construction phase ceases.

9.4 Vibration – Amenity If a complaint is made by a building occupant with regard to vibration levels, vibration monitoring will be conducted in the relevant rooms of the building. If the limits are found to be exceeded then a SSCVMP will be prepared for that receiver.

9.5 Additional measures Where noise and vibration impacts are unavoidable and significant after all reasonable and practicable measures are implemented, alternative mitigation measures, such as temporary relocation or the provision of architectural treatments, will be considered. Temporary relocation involves the relocation of affected occupants for short periods of time where all reasonable and practicable measures and respite periods are implemented and further mitigation is impractical. Architectural treatments may also be sought and involve the provision of alternative ventilation where windows are to remain closed in order to further mitigate noise effects.

Page 34

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Appendix A: ISCA Requirements The table below identifies the ISCA Credit Requirements relevant to this CNV DWP and where they are addressed in the document. Credit

Requirement*

Relevant Section of CNV DWP

Other relevant Information / Comments

Noise DIS-2 Level 1

Measures to mitigate noise during construction [and operation] have been identified and implemented

3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9, Appendix B, D, E, F

Refer also to the Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plans and the Historic Character DWP

DIS-2

Monitoring of noise is undertaken at appropriate intervals and in response to complaints during construction.

8, 9, Appendix E, F, I

Refer also to the Communication and Consultation Plan

For construction, modelling and monitoring demonstrates no recurring or major divergences from the noise management process in ISCA approved noise guidelines.

8, 9, Appendix E, F, I

Level 1 DIS-2 Level 2

Vibration Measures to mitigate vibration during construction [and operation] have been identified and implemented

3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9, Appendix C, D, E, G

Refer also to the Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plans and the Historic Character DWP

DIS-3 Level 1

Monitoring of vibration is undertaken at appropriate intervals and in response to complaints during construction.

8, 9, Appendix E, G, I

Refer also to the Communication and Consultation Plan

DIS-3

For construction, modelling and monitoring demonstrates no exceedances of vibration goals for structural damage to buildings and structures.

8, 9, Appendix E, G, I

DIS-3 Level 1

Level 1

Refer to the ISCA Rating Tool for full details of the requirements

Page 35

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Appendix B: Construction Noise Contours

Page 36

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

174-178 19 1-19 7 7

184 2 0 3-2 07 2 0 2

40 78

70-74

211

6 0

2 08-212

215 6 8

214

2 2 5 80

2 29 35 8 2 842

P ittS treet

29 -41

12A

2 0

C ross S tree t

e nu ve sA rey G

P o yn to nT errace

IS O A 32 9 7 m m x4 2 0 m m

Â°

2 38

1-5/1 59 24 243

1 19

2 51-2 53 8-14

M erc ury Lan e

246 -2 54 3-5

M ercu ryL an e

2 56 9

2 58-26 4

11-13

9 A -9 C

284 284-286 29 0

283

16 29 5

29 2-300

18 8

treet astS E

30 3-307

309

3 312

315-32 5 32 2-324

St at e H ig hw ay 1

32 7 2 5

C L IE N T :

L in kA llia n c eh a sp re p a re dth isd o c u m e n tfo rth es o leu s eo fth ec lie n ta n dfo ras p e c ific p u rp o s e ,e a c ha se x p re s s lys ta te dinth ed o c u m e n t.N oo th e rth irdp a rtys h o u ldre lyo nth is d o c u m e n tw ith o u tth ew ritte nc o n s e n to fL in kA llia n c e .L in kA llia n c eu n d e rta k e sn od u ty ,n o r a c c e p tsa n yre s p o n s ib ility ,toa n yth irdp a rtyw h om a yre lyu p o no ru s eth isd o c u m e n t. T h iss k e tc hisc o n fid e n tia la n ds h a ll o n lyb eu s e dfo rth ep u rp o s eo fth isp ro je c t

C O M P A N YN U M B E R:6 2 6 7 8 7 0

2 0

4 0

326 -334

B u ild in gU se C o m m e rcia l C a rP a rk

8 0

1 0 0M e te rs

C o n stru ctio nA re a s

15-19

C IT YR A ILL IN K

P R O J E C T :

N o iseC o n to u rs

K a ra n g a h a p e

Z O N E :

6 0d B 6 5d B

C u ltu ra l

7 0d B

F ireS ta tio n

7 5d B

R e sid e n tia l

6 0

B u ild in g stob ed e m o lish e d

2 7

C h ru ch

M ix e dU se

C R E A T O RID:

2 3

treet thS u o S

treet sS alato G

treet ayS D

2 70 2 78-280

ne La se ou H oa m Sa

2 2

2 59 -281 16 -18

Sta te H igh w ay 1

e ar u Sq rd o sf re e B

C an ad aS tree t

26 8 10/39

t ee Str un eto op H

P a th :\\N za k l1 fp 0 0 1 \p ro je cts\6 0 5 X \6 0 5 6 0 7 7 8 \4 0 0 _ T E C H \4 1 1 _ A co u stics\G IS \0 2 _ M a p s\C R L C 3 _ A co u stics\1 8 1 2 1 2 _ C R L C 3 _ A co u stics.a p rx

4-6

K ara ng ah ap eR oa d

6 1-6 5

8 0d B

S tu d io

8 5d B

T h e a tre

â‰¤ 9 0d B

P re d ic te dc o n s tru c tio nn o is ele v e ls M e rc u ryL a n e-S ta g e1

T IT L E :

D O C U M E N T :

P R O J E C T

Z O N E

C R L

K R D

R G A N IS A T IO N D IS C IP L IN E O

A C V

C 3

T Y P E

S H E E T

S K E

0 0 2 4

R E V IS IO N

174-178 19 1-19 7 7

184 2 0 3-2 07 2 0 2

40 78

70-74

211

6 0

2 08-212

215 6 8

214

2 2 5 80

2 29 35 8 2 842

P ittS treet

29 -41

12A

2 0

C ross S tree t

e nu ve sA rey G

P o yn to nT errace

IS O A 32 9 7 m m x4 2 0 m m

Â°

2 38

1-5/1 59 24 243

1 19

2 51-2 53 8-14

M erc ury Lan e

246 -2 54 3-5

M ercu ryL an e

2 56 9

2 58-26 4

11-13

9 A -9 C

284 284-286 29 0

283

16 29 5

29 2-300

18 8

treet astS E

30 3-307

309

3 312

315-32 5 32 2-324

St at e H ig hw ay 1

32 7 2 5

C L IE N T :

C O M P A N YN U M B E R:6 2 6 7 8 7 0

2 0

4 0

326 -334

B u ild in gU se C o m m e rcia l C a rP a rk

8 0

1 0 0M e te rs

C o n stru ctio nA re a s

15-19

C IT YR A ILL IN K

P R O J E C T :

N o iseC o n to u rs

K a ra n g a h a p e

Z O N E :

6 0d B 6 5d B

C u ltu ra l

7 0d B

F ireS ta tio n

7 5d B

R e sid e n tia l

6 0

B u ild in g stob ed e m o lish e d

2 7

C h ru ch

M ix e dU se

C R E A T O RID:

2 3

treet thS u o S

treet sS alato G

treet ayS D

2 70 2 78-280

ne La se ou H oa m Sa

2 2

2 59 -281 16 -18

Sta te H igh w ay 1

e ar u Sq rd o sf re e B

C an ad aS tree t

26 8 10/39

t ee Str un eto op H

P a th :\\N za k l1 fp 0 0 1 \p ro je cts\6 0 5 X \6 0 5 6 0 7 7 8 \4 0 0 _ T E C H \4 1 1 _ A co u stics\G IS \0 2 _ M a p s\C R L C 3 _ A co u stics\1 8 1 2 1 2 _ C R L C 3 _ A co u stics.a p rx

4-6

K ara ng ah ap eR oa d

6 1-6 5

8 0d B

S tu d io

8 5d B

T h e a tre

â‰¤ 9 0d B

P re d ic te dc o n s tru c tio nn o is ele v e ls M e rc u ryL a n e-S ta g e2

T IT L E :

D O C U M E N T :

P R O J E C T

Z O N E

C R L

K R D

R G A N IS A T IO N D IS C IP L IN E O

A C V

C 3

T Y P E

S H E E T

S K E

0 0 2 5

R E V IS IO N

174-178 19 1-19 7 7

184 2 0 3-2 07 2 0 2

40 78

70-74

211

6 0

2 08-212

215 6 8

214

2 2 5 80

2 29 35 8 2 842

P ittS treet

29 -41

12A

2 0

C ross S tree t

e nu ve sA rey G

P o yn to nT errace

IS O A 32 9 7 m m x4 2 0 m m

Â°

2 38

1-5/1 59 24 243

1 19

2 51-2 53 8-14

M erc ury Lan e

246 -2 54 3-5

M ercu ryL an e

2 56 9

2 58-26 4

11-13

9 A -9 C

284 284-286 29 0

283

16 29 5

29 2-300

18 8

treet astS E

30 3-307

309

3 312

315-32 5 32 2-324

St at e H ig hw ay 1

32 7 2 5

C L IE N T :

C O M P A N YN U M B E R:6 2 6 7 8 7 0

2 0

4 0

326 -334

B u ild in gU se C o m m e rcia l C a rP a rk

8 0

1 0 0M e te rs

C o n stru ctio nA re a s

15-19

C IT YR A ILL IN K

P R O J E C T :

N o iseC o n to u rs

K a ra n g a h a p e

Z O N E :

6 0d B 6 5d B

C u ltu ra l

7 0d B

F ireS ta tio n

7 5d B

R e sid e n tia l

6 0

B u ild in g stob ed e m o lish e d

2 7

C h ru ch

M ix e dU se

C R E A T O RID:

2 3

treet thS u o S

treet sS alato G

treet ayS D

2 70 2 78-280

ne La se ou H oa m Sa

2 2

2 59 -281 16 -18

Sta te H igh w ay 1

e ar u Sq rd o sf re e B

C an ad aS tree t

26 8 10/39

t ee Str un eto op H

P a th :\\N za k l1 fp 0 0 1 \p ro je cts\6 0 5 X \6 0 5 6 0 7 7 8 \4 0 0 _ T E C H \4 1 1 _ A co u stics\G IS \0 2 _ M a p s\C R L C 3 _ A co u stics\1 8 1 2 1 2 _ C R L C 3 _ A co u stics.a p rx

4-6

K ara ng ah ap eR oa d

6 1-6 5

8 0d B

S tu d io

8 5d B

T h e a tre

â‰¤ 9 0d B

P re d ic te dc o n s tru c tio nn o is ele v e ls P ittS tre e t-S ta g e1

T IT L E :

D O C U M E N T :

P R O J E C T

Z O N E

C R L

K R D

R G A N IS A T IO N D IS C IP L IN E O

A C V

C 3

T Y P E

S H E E T

S K E

0 0 3 1

R E V IS IO N

174-178 19 1-19 7 7

184 2 0 3-2 07 2 0 2

40 78

70-74

211

6 0

2 08-212

215 6 8

214

2 2 5 80

2 29 35 8 2 842

P ittS treet

29 -41

12A

2 0

C ross S tree t

e nu ve sA rey G

P o yn to nT errace

IS O A 32 9 7 m m x4 2 0 m m

Â°

2 38

1-5/1 59 24 243

1 19

2 51-2 53 8-14

M erc ury Lan e

246 -2 54 3-5

M ercu ryL an e

2 56 9

2 58-26 4

11-13

9 A -9 C

284 284-286 29 0

283

16 29 5

29 2-300

18 8

treet astS E

30 3-307

309

3 312

315-32 5 32 2-324

St at e H ig hw ay 1

32 7 2 5

C L IE N T :

C O M P A N YN U M B E R:6 2 6 7 8 7 0

2 0

4 0

326 -334

B u ild in gU se C o m m e rcia l C a rP a rk

8 0

1 0 0M e te rs

C o n stru ctio nA re a s

15-19

C IT YR A ILL IN K

P R O J E C T :

N o iseC o n to u rs

K a ra n g a h a p e

Z O N E :

6 0d B 6 5d B

C u ltu ra l

7 0d B

F ireS ta tio n

7 5d B

R e sid e n tia l

6 0

B u ild in g stob ed e m o lish e d

2 7

C h ru ch

M ix e dU se

C R E A T O RID:

2 3

treet thS u o S

treet sS alato G

treet ayS D

2 70 2 78-280

ne La se ou H oa m Sa

2 2

2 59 -281 16 -18

Sta te H igh w ay 1

e ar u Sq rd o sf re e B

C an ad aS tree t

26 8 10/39

t ee Str un eto op H

P a th :\\N za k l1 fp 0 0 1 \p ro je cts\6 0 5 X \6 0 5 6 0 7 7 8 \4 0 0 _ T E C H \4 1 1 _ A co u stics\G IS \0 2 _ M a p s\C R L C 3 _ A co u stics\1 8 1 2 1 2 _ C R L C 3 _ A co u stics.a p rx

4-6

K ara ng ah ap eR oa d

6 1-6 5

8 0d B

S tu d io

8 5d B

T h e a tre

â‰¤ 9 0d B

P re d ic te dc o n s tru c tio nn o is ele v e ls P ittS tre e t-S ta g e2

T IT L E :

D O C U M E N T :

P R O J E C T

Z O N E

C R L

K R D

R G A N IS A T IO N D IS C IP L IN E O

A C V

C 3

T Y P E

S H E E T

S K E

0 0 3 0

R E V IS IO N

174-178 19 1-19 7 7

184 2 0 3-2 07 2 0 2

40 78

70-74

211

6 0

2 08-212

215 6 8

214

2 2 5 80

2 29 35 8 2 842

P ittS treet

29 -41

12A

2 0

C ross S tree t

e nu ve sA rey G

P o yn to nT errace

IS O A 32 9 7 m m x4 2 0 m m

Â°

2 38

1-5/1 59 24 243

1 19

2 51-2 53 8-14

M erc ury Lan e

246 -2 54 3-5

M ercu ryL an e

2 56 9

2 58-26 4

11-13

9 A -9 C

284 284-286 29 0

283

16 29 5

29 2-300

18 8

treet astS E

30 3-307

309

3 312

315-32 5 32 2-324

St at e H ig hw ay 1

32 7 2 5

C L IE N T :

C O M P A N YN U M B E R:6 2 6 7 8 7 0

2 0

4 0

326 -334

B u ild in gU se C o m m e rcia l C a rP a rk

8 0

1 0 0M e te rs

C o n stru ctio nA re a s

15-19

C IT YR A ILL IN K

P R O J E C T :

N o iseC o n to u rs

K a ra n g a h a p e

Z O N E :

6 0d B 6 5d B

C u ltu ra l

7 0d B

F ireS ta tio n

7 5d B

R e sid e n tia l

6 0

B u ild in g stob ed e m o lish e d

2 7

C h ru ch

M ix e dU se

C R E A T O RID:

2 3

treet thS u o S

treet sS alato G

treet ayS D

2 70 2 78-280

ne La se ou H oa m Sa

2 2

2 59 -281 16 -18

Sta te H igh w ay 1

e ar u Sq rd o sf re e B

C an ad aS tree t

26 8 10/39

t ee Str un eto op H

P a th :\\N za k l1 fp 0 0 1 \p ro je cts\6 0 5 X \6 0 5 6 0 7 7 8 \4 0 0 _ T E C H \4 1 1 _ A co u stics\G IS \0 2 _ M a p s\C R L C 3 _ A co u stics\1 8 1 2 1 2 _ C R L C 3 _ A co u stics.a p rx

4-6

K ara ng ah ap eR oa d

6 1-6 5

8 0d B

S tu d io

8 5d B

T h e a tre

â‰¤ 9 0d B

P re d ic te dc o n s tru c tio nn o is ele v e ls P ittS tre e t-S ta g e3&4

T IT L E :

D O C U M E N T :

P R O J E C T

Z O N E

C R L

K R D

R G A N IS A T IO N D IS C IP L IN E O

A C V

C 3

T Y P E

S H E E T

S K E

0 0 3 1

R E V IS IO N

174-178 19 1-19 7 7

184 2 0 3-2 07 2 0 2

40 78

70-74

211

6 0

2 08-212

215 6 8

214

2 2 5 80

2 29 35 8 2 842

P ittS treet

29 -41

12A

2 0

C ross S tree t

e nu ve sA rey G

P o yn to nT errace

IS O A 32 9 7 m m x4 2 0 m m

Â°

2 38

1-5/1 59 24 243

1 19

2 51-2 53 8-14

M erc ury Lan e

246 -2 54 3-5

M ercu ryL an e

2 56 9

2 58-26 4

11-13

9 A -9 C

284 284-286 29 0

283

16 29 5

29 2-300

18 8

treet astS E

30 3-307

309

3 312

315-32 5 32 2-324

St at e H ig hw ay 1

32 7 2 5

C L IE N T :

C O M P A N YN U M B E R:6 2 6 7 8 7 0

2 0

4 0

326 -334

B u ild in gU se C o m m e rcia l C a rP a rk

8 0

1 0 0M e te rs

C o n stru ctio nA re a s

15-19

C IT YR A ILL IN K

P R O J E C T :

N o iseC o n to u rs

K a ra n g a h a p e

Z O N E :

6 0d B 6 5d B

C u ltu ra l

7 0d B

F ireS ta tio n

7 5d B

R e sid e n tia l

6 0

B u ild in g stob ed e m o lish e d

2 7

C h ru ch

M ix e dU se

C R E A T O RID:

2 3

treet thS u o S

treet sS alato G

treet ayS D

2 70 2 78-280

ne La se ou H oa m Sa

2 2

2 59 -281 16 -18

Sta te H igh w ay 1

e ar u Sq rd o sf re e B

C an ad aS tree t

26 8 10/39

t ee Str un eto op H

P a th :\\N za k l1 fp 0 0 1 \p ro je cts\6 0 5 X \6 0 5 6 0 7 7 8 \4 0 0 _ T E C H \4 1 1 _ A co u stics\G IS \0 2 _ M a p s\C R L C 3 _ A co u stics\1 8 1 2 1 2 _ C R L C 3 _ A co u stics.a p rx

4-6

K ara ng ah ap eR oa d

6 1-6 5

8 0d B

S tu d io

8 5d B

T h e a tre

â‰¤ 9 0d B

P re d ic te dc o n s tru c tio nn o is ele v e ls C S A

T IT L E :

D O C U M E N T :

P R O J E C T

Z O N E

C R L

K R D

R G A N IS A T IO N D IS C IP L IN E O

A C V

C 3

T Y P E

S H E E T

S K E

0 0 3 2

R E V IS IO N

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Appendix C: Construction Vibration Contours

Page 37

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Â°

174-178 12A

2 0

184 2 0 3-2 07 2 0 2 78

70-74

211

6 0

2 08-212

215 6 8

214

2 2 5 80

2 29 35 8 2 842

P ittS treet

C ross S tree t

P o yn to nT errace

19 1-19 7

e nu ve sA rey G

IS O A 32 9 7 m m x4 2 0 m m

P o yn to nT errace

2 38

1-5/1 59 24

6 1-6 5

4-6 1 2 51-2 53 8-14

M erc ury Lan e

246 -2 54 3-5

M ercu ryL an e

2 56 9

2 58-26 4

11-13

re ua q S d or f s re Be

2 70

9 A -9 C

2 78-280 284 284-286 29 0

283

16 29 5

29 2-300

18 8

treet astS E

30 3-307

315-32 5 32 2-324

St at e H ig hw ay 1

32 7

2 5

326 -334

B U IL D IN G S O U T S ID EO FW O R K SA R E A H IS T O R IC /V IB R A T IO NS E N S IT IV E

2 0

C O M M E R C IA L

C R E A T O RID:

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0M e te rs

15-19

6 A

R E S ID E N T IA L C O M P A N YN U M B E R:6 2 6 7 8 7 0

2 7

339 335

C L IE N T :

2 3

treet thS u o S

312

treet sS alato G

treet ayS D

309

A uck lan d-H am ilto nM oto rw ay

ne La se ou H oa m Sa

2 2

2 59 -281 16 -18

C an ad aS tree t

26 8 10/39

t ee Str un eto op H

P a th :\\N za k l1 fp 0 0 1 \p ro je cts\6 0 5 X \6 0 5 6 0 7 7 8 \4 0 0 _ T E C H \4 1 1 _ A co u stics\G IS \0 2 _ M a p s\C R L C 3 _ A co u stics\1 8 1 2 1 2 _ C R L C 3 _ A co u stics.a p rx

K ara ng ah ap eR oa d

243

V IB R A T IO NC O N T O U R S C O M M E R C IA L- 2 0 M M /S

C IT YR A ILL IN K

P R O J E C T :

K a ra n g a h a p e

Z O N E :

R E S ID E N T IA L- 5 M M /S H IS T O R IC /V IB R A T IO NS E N S IT IV E- 3 M M /S

C O N S T R U C T IO NA R E A S

T IT L E :

D O C U M E N T :

P re d ic te dc o n s tru c tio nv ib ra tio nc o n to u rs M e rc u ryL a n e-S ta g e1 P R O J E C T

Z O N E

C R L

K R D

R G A N IS A T IO N D IS C IP L IN E O

A C V

C 3

T Y P E

S H E E T

S K E

0 0 1 5

R E V IS IO N

Â°

174-178 12A

2 0

184 2 0 3-2 07 2 0 2 78

70-74

211

6 0

2 08-212

215 6 8

214

2 2 5 80

2 29 35 8 2 842

P ittS treet

C ross S tree t

P o yn to nT errace

19 1-19 7

e nu ve sA rey G

IS O A 32 9 7 m m x4 2 0 m m

P o yn to nT errace

2 38

1-5/1 59 24

6 1-6 5

4-6 1 2 51-2 53 8-14

M erc ury Lan e

246 -2 54 3-5

M ercu ryL an e

2 56 9

2 58-26 4

11-13

re ua q S d or f s re Be

2 70

9 A -9 C

2 78-280 284 284-286 29 0

283

16 29 5

29 2-300

18 8

treet astS E

30 3-307

315-32 5 32 2-324

St at e H ig hw ay 1

32 7

2 5

326 -334

B U IL D IN G S O U T S ID EO FW O R K SA R E A H IS T O R IC /V IB R A T IO NS E N S IT IV E

2 0

C O M M E R C IA L

C R E A T O RID:

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0M e te rs

15-19

6 A

R E S ID E N T IA L C O M P A N YN U M B E R:6 2 6 7 8 7 0

2 7

339 335

C L IE N T :

2 3

treet thS u o S

312

treet sS alato G

treet ayS D

309

A uck lan d-H am ilto nM oto rw ay

ne La se ou H oa m Sa

2 2

2 59 -281 16 -18

C an ad aS tree t

26 8 10/39

t ee Str un eto op H

P a th :\\N za k l1 fp 0 0 1 \p ro je cts\6 0 5 X \6 0 5 6 0 7 7 8 \4 0 0 _ T E C H \4 1 1 _ A co u stics\G IS \0 2 _ M a p s\C R L C 3 _ A co u stics\1 8 1 2 1 2 _ C R L C 3 _ A co u stics.a p rx

K ara ng ah ap eR oa d

243

V IB R A T IO NC O N T O U R S C O M M E R C IA L- 2 0 M M /S

C IT YR A ILL IN K

P R O J E C T :

K a ra n g a h a p e

Z O N E :

R E S ID E N T IA L- 5 M M /S H IS T O R IC /V IB R A T IO NS E N S IT IV E- 3 M M /S

C O N S T R U C T IO NA R E A S

T IT L E :

D O C U M E N T :

P re d ic te dc o n s tru c tio nv ib ra tio nc o n to u rs M e rc u ryL a n e-S ta g e2 P R O J E C T

Z O N E

C R L

K R D

R G A N IS A T IO N D IS C IP L IN E O

A C V

C 3

T Y P E

S H E E T

S K E

0 0 1 6

R E V IS IO N

Â°

174-178 12A

2 0 19 1-19 7

184 2 0 3-2 07

2 0 2

211

6 0

2 08-212

215 6 8

214

2 2 5

2 29 35 8 2 842

P ittS treet

C ross S tree t

e nu ve sA rey G

70-74

2 38

6 1-6 5 243

4-6 1 19

2 51-2 53

K ara ng ah ap eR oa d

1-5/1 59

P a th :\\N za k l1 fp 0 0 1 \p ro je cts\6 0 5 X \6 0 5 6 0 7 7 8 \4 0 0 _ T E C H \4 1 1 _ A co u stics\G IS \0 2 _ M a p s\C R L C 3 _ A co u stics\1 8 1 2 1 2 _ C R L C 3 _ A co u stics.a p rx

170

183

P o yn to nT errace

M erc ury Lan e

246 -2 54

3-5

M ercu ryL an e

2 56

8-14

2 58-26 4

11-13

re ua q S rd o sf re e B

2 70

9 A -9 C

2 78-280

284

ne La se ou H oa m Sa

2 2

2 59 -281 16 -18

284-286

29 0

283

29 2-300

18 8

treet astS E

30 3-307

3 312

315-32 5

32 2-324 32 7 L in kA llia n c eh a sp re p a re dth isd o c u m e n tfo rth es o leu s eo fth ec lie n ta n dfo ras p e c ific p u rp o s e ,e a c ha se x p re s s lys ta te dinth ed o c u m e n t.N oo th e rth irdp a rtys h o u ldre lyo nth is d o c u m e n tw ith o u tth ew ritte nc o n s e n to fL in kA llia n c e .L in kA llia n c eu n d e rta k e sn od u ty ,n o r a c c e p tsa n yre s p o n s ib ility ,toa n yth irdp a rtyw h om a yre lyu p o no ru s eth isd o c u m e n t.

21 15-19

2 0

4 0

D O C U M E N T :

6 0

8 0

1 0 0M e te rs

K a ra n g a h a p e

Z O N E :

T IT L E :

C R E A T O RID:

C IT YR A ILL IN K

P R O J E C T :

T h iss k e tc hisc o n fid e n tia la n ds h a ll o n lyb eu s e dfo rth ep u rp o s eo fth isp ro je c t

C O M P A N YN U M B E R:6 2 6 7 8 7 0

7 2 3 2 52

treet thS u o S

309

treet sS alato G

treet ayS D

t ee Str un eto op H

29 5

C L IE N T :

C an ad aS tree t

26 8 10/39

Sta te H igh w ay 1

IS O A 32 9 7 m m x4 2 0 m m

16 6

P re d ic te dc o n s tru c tio nv ib ra tio nc o n to u rs P ittS tre e t-S ta g e1 P R O J E C T

Z O N E

C R L

K R D

R G A N IS A T IO N D IS C IP L IN E O

A C V

C 3

T Y P E

S H E E T

S K E

0 0 3 3

R E V IS IO N

Â°

174-178 12A

2 0

184 2 0 3-2 07 2 0 2 78

70-74

211

6 0

2 08-212

215 6 8

214

2 2 5 80

2 29 35 8 2 842

P ittS treet

C ross S tree t

P o yn to nT errace

19 1-19 7

e nu ve sA rey G

IS O A 32 9 7 m m x4 2 0 m m

P o yn to nT errace

2 38

1-5/1 59 24

6 1-6 5

4-6 1 2 51-2 53 8-14

M erc ury Lan e

246 -2 54 3-5

M ercu ryL an e

2 56 9

2 58-26 4

11-13

re ua q S d or f s re Be

2 70

9 A -9 C

2 78-280 284 284-286 29 0

283

16 29 5

29 2-300

18 8

treet astS E

30 3-307

315-32 5 32 2-324

St at e H ig hw ay 1

32 7

2 5

326 -334

B U IL D IN G S O U T S ID EO FW O R K SA R E A H IS T O R IC /V IB R A T IO NS E N S IT IV E

2 0

C O M M E R C IA L

C R E A T O RID:

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0M e te rs

15-19

6 A

R E S ID E N T IA L C O M P A N YN U M B E R:6 2 6 7 8 7 0

2 7

339 335

C L IE N T :

2 3

treet thS u o S

312

treet sS alato G

treet ayS D

309

A uck lan d-H am ilto nM oto rw ay

ne La se ou H oa m Sa

2 2

2 59 -281 16 -18

C an ad aS tree t

26 8 10/39

t ee Str un eto op H

P a th :\\N za k l1 fp 0 0 1 \p ro je cts\6 0 5 X \6 0 5 6 0 7 7 8 \4 0 0 _ T E C H \4 1 1 _ A co u stics\G IS \0 2 _ M a p s\C R L C 3 _ A co u stics\1 8 1 2 1 2 _ C R L C 3 _ A co u stics.a p rx

K ara ng ah ap eR oa d

243

V IB R A T IO NC O N T O U R S C O M M E R C IA L- 2 0 M M /S

C IT YR A ILL IN K

P R O J E C T :

K a ra n g a h a p e

Z O N E :

R E S ID E N T IA L- 5 M M /S H IS T O R IC /V IB R A T IO NS E N S IT IV E- 3 M M /S

C O N S T R U C T IO NA R E A S

T IT L E :

D O C U M E N T :

P re d ic te dc o n s tru c tio nv ib ra tio nc o n to u rs P ittS tre e t-S ta g e2 P R O J E C T

Z O N E

C R L

K R D

R G A N IS A T IO N D IS C IP L IN E O

A C V

C 3

T Y P E

S H E E T

S K E

0 0 2 1

R E V IS IO N

Â°

174-178 12A

2 0 19 1-19 7 184 2 0 3-2 07 2 0 2

40 78

211

6 0

2 08-212

215 6 8

214

2 2 5 80

2 29 35 8 2 842

P ittS treet

C ross S tree t

e nu ve sA rey G

70-74

2 38

6 1-6 5 243 4-6 1 19

2 51-2 53

K ara ng ah ap eR oa d

1-5/1 59

P a th :\\N za k l1 fp 0 0 1 \p ro je cts\6 0 5 X \6 0 5 6 0 7 7 8 \4 0 0 _ T E C H \4 1 1 _ A co u stics\G IS \0 2 _ M a p s\C R L C 3 _ A co u stics\1 8 1 2 1 2 _ C R L C 3 _ A co u stics.a p rx

170

183

P o yn to nT errace

M erc ury Lan e

246 -2 54 3-5

M ercu ryL an e

2 56

8-14

2 58-26 4

11-13

re ua q S rd o sf re e B

2 70

9 A -9 C

2 78-280 284

ne La se ou H oa m Sa

2 2

2 59 -281 16 -18

284-286 29 0

283

29 2-300

18 8

treet astS E

30 3-307

29 3 312

36 31

315-32 5 32 2-324 32 7

B U IL D IN G S O U T S ID EO FW O R K SA R E A H IS T O R IC /V IB R A T IO NS E N S IT IV E R E S ID E N T IA L

C O M P A N YN U M B E R:6 2 6 7 8 7 0

2 0

C O M M E R C IA L

C R E A T O RID:

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0M e te rs

7 2 3 2 52

15-19

treet thS u o S

309

treet sS alato G

treet ayS D

t ee Str un eto op H

29 5

C L IE N T :

C an ad aS tree t

26 8 10/39

Sta te H igh w ay 1

IS O A 32 9 7 m m x4 2 0 m m

16 6

V IB R A T IO NC O N T O U R S C O M M E R C IA L- 2 0 M M /S

C IT YR A ILL IN K

P R O J E C T :

K a ra n g a h a p e

Z O N E :

R E S ID E N T IA L- 5 M M /S H IS T O R IC /V IB R A T IO NS E N S IT IV E- 3 M M /S

C O N S T R U C T IO NA R E A S

T IT L E :

D O C U M E N T :

P re d ic te dc o n s tru c tio nv ib ra tio nc o n to u rs P ittS tre e t-S ta g e3 P R O J E C T

Z O N E

C R L

K R D

R G A N IS A T IO N D IS C IP L IN E O

A C V

C 3

T Y P E

S H E E T

S K E

0 0 3 3

R E V IS IO N

Â°

174-178 12A

2 0

184 2 0 3-2 07 2 0 2 78

70-74

211

6 0

2 08-212

215 6 8

214

2 2 5 80

2 29 35 8 2 842

P ittS treet

C ross S tree t

P o yn to nT errace

19 1-19 7

e nu ve sA rey G

IS O A 32 9 7 m m x4 2 0 m m

P o yn to nT errace

2 38

1-5/1 59 24

6 1-6 5

4-6 1 2 51-2 53 8-14

M erc ury Lan e

246 -2 54 3-5

M ercu ryL an e

2 56 9

2 58-26 4

11-13

re ua q S d or f s re Be

2 70

9 A -9 C

2 78-280 284 284-286 29 0

283

16 29 5

29 2-300

18 8

treet astS E

30 3-307

315-32 5 32 2-324

St at e H ig hw ay 1

32 7

2 5

326 -334

B U IL D IN G S O U T S ID EO FW O R K SA R E A H IS T O R IC /V IB R A T IO NS E N S IT IV E

2 0

C O M M E R C IA L

C R E A T O RID:

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0M e te rs

15-19

6 A

R E S ID E N T IA L C O M P A N YN U M B E R:6 2 6 7 8 7 0

2 7

339 335

C L IE N T :

2 3

treet thS u o S

312

treet sS alato G

treet ayS D

309

A uck lan d-H am ilto nM oto rw ay

ne La se ou H oa m Sa

2 2

2 59 -281 16 -18

C an ad aS tree t

26 8 10/39

t ee Str un eto op H

P a th :\\N za k l1 fp 0 0 1 \p ro je cts\6 0 5 X \6 0 5 6 0 7 7 8 \4 0 0 _ T E C H \4 1 1 _ A co u stics\G IS \0 2 _ M a p s\C R L C 3 _ A co u stics\1 8 1 2 1 2 _ C R L C 3 _ A co u stics.a p rx

K ara ng ah ap eR oa d

243

V IB R A T IO NC O N T O U R S C O M M E R C IA L- 2 0 M M /S

C IT YR A ILL IN K

P R O J E C T :

K a ra n g a h a p e

Z O N E :

R E S ID E N T IA L- 5 M M /S H IS T O R IC /V IB R A T IO NS E N S IT IV E- 3 M M /S

C O N S T R U C T IO NA R E A S

T IT L E :

D O C U M E N T :

P re d ic te dc o n s tru c tio nv ib ra tio nc o n to u rs P ittS tre e t-S ta g e4 P R O J E C T

Z O N E

C R L

K R D

R G A N IS A T IO N D IS C IP L IN E O

A C V

C 3

T Y P E

S H E E T

S K E

0 0 1 9

R E V IS IO N

Â°

174-178 12A

2 0

184 2 0 3-2 07 2 0 2 78

70-74

211

6 0

2 08-212

215 6 8

214

2 2 5 80

2 29 35 8 2 842

P ittS treet

C ross S tree t

P o yn to nT errace

19 1-19 7

e nu ve sA rey G

IS O A 32 9 7 m m x4 2 0 m m

P o yn to nT errace

2 38

1-5/1 59 24

6 1-6 5

4-6 1 2 51-2 53 8-14

M erc ury Lan e

246 -2 54 3-5

M ercu ryL an e

2 56 9

2 58-26 4

11-13

re ua q S d or f s re Be

2 70

9 A -9 C

2 78-280 284 284-286 29 0

283

16 29 5

29 2-300

18 8

treet astS E

30 3-307

315-32 5 32 2-324

St at e H ig hw ay 1

32 7

2 5

326 -334

B U IL D IN G S O U T S ID EO FW O R K SA R E A H IS T O R IC /V IB R A T IO NS E N S IT IV E

2 0

C O M M E R C IA L

C R E A T O RID:

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0M e te rs

15-19

6 A

R E S ID E N T IA L C O M P A N YN U M B E R:6 2 6 7 8 7 0

2 7

339 335

C L IE N T :

2 3

treet thS u o S

312

treet sS alato G

treet ayS D

309

A uck lan d-H am ilto nM oto rw ay

ne La se ou H oa m Sa

2 2

2 59 -281 16 -18

C an ad aS tree t

26 8 10/39

t ee Str un eto op H

P a th :\\N za k l1 fp 0 0 1 \p ro je cts\6 0 5 X \6 0 5 6 0 7 7 8 \4 0 0 _ T E C H \4 1 1 _ A co u stics\G IS \0 2 _ M a p s\C R L C 3 _ A co u stics\1 8 1 2 1 2 _ C R L C 3 _ A co u stics.a p rx

K ara ng ah ap eR oa d

243

V IB R A T IO NC O N T O U R S C O M M E R C IA L- 2 0 M M /S

C IT YR A ILL IN K

P R O J E C T :

K a ra n g a h a p e

Z O N E :

R E S ID E N T IA L- 5 M M /S H IS T O R IC /V IB R A T IO NS E N S IT IV E- 3 M M /S

C O N S T R U C T IO NA R E A S

T IT L E :

D O C U M E N T :

P re d ic te dc o n s tru c tio nv ib ra tio nc o n to u rs C S A P R O J E C T

Z O N E

C R L

K R D

R G A N IS A T IO N D IS C IP L IN E O

A C V

C 3

T Y P E

S H E E T

S K E

0 0 2 3

R E V IS IO N

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Appendix D: Record of Communication

Page 38

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan Address of Sensitive Receiver

Representatives

Date

1 Beresford Square – Residential

1 Cross Street

Meeting with occupants – a range of commercial and a single residential

21/08/19

Interview with the business owner

21/08/19

4-6 Beresford Square – Northern Bar



  

   

8-10 Beresford Square – Theta Inc

Interview with building manager

20/08/19

 

12 Beresford Square – Bravo Hospitality

Page 39

Interview with the business owner

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

20/08/19

 

Comments

Resolution

Offices operate standard business hours, 8:30am to 5:30pm. Poor insultation from noise due to building construction Occupants would like to be kept informed about timing of noise intensive works to schedule meetings around them

Mobile noise barriers will be installed around noisy works and notification to be given 24 hours in advance of activities involving concrete cutting, breaking, piling, compacting and use of the hydro vac. With the mitigation and management measures detailed in Section 6 of the CNV DWP and Table 4-1 of the SSCNVMP, noise may be audible inside the building during concrete cutting, breaking, piling, compacting and use of the hydro vac. However, noise will be intermittent and over a limited duration of only 5 days per stage.

Operates Monday to Saturdays 3pm till late Bar tables are outside on the street Open doors are required for ventilation, in the summer 80% of their patrons sit outside Concern about noise and lack of visibility affecting their business

With the mitigation and management measures detailed in Section 6 of the CNV DWP and Table 4-1 of the SSCNVMP, noise may be audible inside the building during concrete cutting, breaking, piling, compacting and use of the hydro vac. However, noise will be intermittent and over a limited duration of only 5 days per stage. Noisy activities outside this property to be scheduled before 3pm, where practicable.

Office building on Level 1 & 2, operates Monday to Fridays during normal office hours 8:30am – 5:30pm Would like works to take place after business hours as noise is a concern

Operates Monday to Friday 8:30am to 5:00pm Concerned about noise as noise can currently be heard through the trickle vents

Mobile noise barriers to be installed around noisy works. With the mitigation and management measures detailed in Section 6 of the CNV DWP and Table 4-1 of the SSCNVMP, noise

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan may be audible inside the building during concrete cutting, breaking, piling, compacting and use of the hydro vac. However, noise will be intermittent and over a limited duration of only 5 days per stage. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if the works can be scheduled for a time that least impacts them. 15 Beresford Square – Hopetoun Alpha

16-18 Beresford Square – Centurion Sauna

22 Beresford Square – Residential Flats

Interview with Building manager / resident

15/10/19

   

12 East Street Residential

14 East Street – Residential

Interview with one resident

23/08/19



 

16 East Street

Page 40

To be partly demolished 1

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Main concern from building manager is noise disruption for the residents and access to the carpark. The building is naturally ventilated. Noise concern from residents overlooking Beresford Square during daytime due to working from home. Keeping windows and doors closed during the summer is not an option.

With the mitigation and management measures detailed in Section 6 of the CNV DWP and Table 4-1 of the SSCNVMP, noise may be audible inside the building during concrete cutting, breaking, compacting and use of the hydro vac. However, noise will be intermittent and over a limited duration of only 5 days per stage. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if the works can be scheduled for a time that least impacts them. -

Owner states there are two flats over a ground floor commercial office in this building and his is the one facing away from the Mercury Lane CSA. Not concerned about noise as not in during the day. His neighbor overlooks the Mercury Lane construction site, and concerns about noise and dust from demolition work.

With the mitigation and management measures detailed in Section 6 of the CNV DWP and Table 4-1 of the SSCNVMP, noise may be audible inside the building during concrete cutting, breaking, compacting and use of the hydro vac. However, noise will be intermittent and over a limited duration of only 5 days per stage. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if the works can be scheduled for a time that least impacts them. Vibration may be perceptible but will not be at a level that causes building damage.

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan 18 East Street Residential

Interview with owner

21/08/19

 

Owner concerned about noise impacts on the occupants. Access to the building not provided to inspect potential noise intrusion

With the mitigation and management measures detailed in Section 6 of the CNV DWP and Table 4-1 of the SSCNVMP, noise may be audible inside the building during concrete cutting, breaking, compacting and use of the hydro vac. However, noise will be intermittent and over a limited duration of only 5 days per stage. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if the works can be scheduled for a time that least impacts them. Vibration may be perceptible but will not be at a level that causes building damage.

21 East Street – UnoLoco Event Management

Interview with the business owner

05/09/19



Operates normal business hours with regular client meetings held in the office. Ground floor is parking only and first floor is open plan office with two meeting room. There is a sound booth round back for recordings which is used when required. Meeting room and reception is at the front. Air condition unit needs to be turned off when sound booth is in use. CRL is carrying out a building survey next week. Concerns about noise and vibration for their clients and staff that are based in the office and during recordings.

With the mitigation and management measures detailed in Section 6 of the CNV DWP and Table 4-1 of the SSCNVMP, noise may be audible inside the building during concrete cutting, breaking, compacting and use of the hydro vac. Noise will be intermittent throughout the early works period. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if the works can be scheduled for a time when recordings are not taking place. Vibration may be perceptible but will not be at a level that causes building damage. It is recommended windows to be kept closed during works and notice of noisy works to be given 24 hours in advance.

Operates normal business hours. Garage front is set back about 15m from the road side. Front is an empty container used for storage and parking. Major concern about noise as services and business relies on listening to the car noise to identify problems. Also concerned about the closure of road around the site to do the test runs. Only has a shutter gate and the garage is natural ventilated via the shop front. Would like some barriers or acoustic attenuation.

With the mitigation and management measures detailed in Section 6 of the CNV DWP and Table 4-1 of the SSCNVMP, noise may be audible inside the building during concrete cutting, breaking, compacting and use of the hydro vac. However, noise will be intermittent and over a limited duration of only 5 days per stage. Mobile noise barriers to be installed around noisy works to provide some mitigation. It is recommended shutters are kept closed during the high noise generating activities detailed above where practical.

Usually out to work during the day but one resident in 2A South Street works from home

With the mitigation and management measures detailed in Section 6 of the CNV DWP and Table 4-1 of the SSCNVMP, noise may be audible inside the building during concrete cutting,



  

23 East Street – European motor services

Interview with the business owner

22/08/19



    25/27 East Street (2/2A South Street) Residentials Page 41

Interview with resident block representative

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

05/09/19



Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan  

29 East Street – International Earth Sciences Ltd

Interview with the business owner

05/09/19

 

Ideally would like works to be kept within the hours between 8am – 6pm. Appreciate there will be noise and vibration

breaking, compacting and use of the hydro vac. However, noise will be intermittent and over a limited duration of only 5 days per stage. Noisy works to be scheduled between 8am and 6pm, where practicable. Vibration may be perceptible but will not be at a level that causes building damage.

A monitoring / geotech company and has already spoken to someone regarding the social impacts. Stated they will be carrying out their own noise and vibration monitoring in house and will be contacting the council as soon as the limits are breached. They have their own monitoring equipment in the office and they are sensitive to vibrations. Concerned about the demolition in regards to hazardous materials and rat control.

Mobile noise barriers to be installed around noisy works With the mitigation and management measures detailed in Section 6 of the CNV DWP and Table 4-1 of the SSCNVMP, noise may be audible inside the building during concrete cutting, breaking, compacting and use of the hydro vac. However, noise will be intermittent and over a limited duration of only 5 days per stage. Vibration may be perceptible, and monitoring is to be carried out at this property. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if the works can be scheduled for a time that least impacts them.

29 East Street – Electric Bike Team

Interview with the business owner

05/09/19



Not concerned about noise and vibration as long as access was maintained.

No comments to incorporate as owner has no noise or vibration concerns.

29 East Street – Think concept (Level 1)

Interview with business staff

05/09/19



An IT consultant company with mainly remote customer which ring into the office. Concern about noise and vibration as they already can hear and feel the traffic along East St and the adjacent State Highway. Currently looking to install glass partition meeting rooms next to the façade. Notification regarding high impact works would be appreciated.

With the mitigation and management measures detailed in Section 6 of the CNV DWP and Table 4-1 of the SSCNVMP, noise may be audible inside the building during concrete cutting, breaking, compacting and use of the hydro vac. However, noise will be intermittent and over a limited duration of only 5 days per stage. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if the works can be scheduled for a time that least impacts them. Vibration may be perceptible but will not be at a level that causes building damage. Advance notice to be given for noisy works.



 

Page 42

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan 238 Karangahape Road – Commercial GF, Level 1-4 Residential flats

Interview with building manager

22/08/19

  

 

Commercial properties apart from Zambero on corner of building does not have façade access on Mercury Lane. No concerns about noise for commercial properties within the building as shielded by the façade. Concerns about vibration as heritage building which has been requiring repairs to the back south-east façade for a while and there are concerns about safety and stability of the façade with the construction work coming. A building survey is required There is a mixture of residents in the building from professional works to retirees whom are in during the daytime.

Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if the works can be scheduled for a time that least impacts them. Vibration may be perceptible but will not be at a level that causes building damage. Vibration monitoring to take place as detailed in Table 4-3 of the SSCNVMP. A pre-construction building survey to be carried out.

Concerns about construction noise impacts during peak periods (afternoons and evenings, Thursday to Sunday)

With the mitigation and management measures detailed in Section 6 of the CNV DWP and Table 4-1 of the SSCNVMP, noise may be audible inside the building during concrete cutting, breaking, piling, compacting and use of the hydro vac. However, noise will be intermittent and over a limited duration of only 5 days per stage. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if the works can be scheduled for a time that least impacts them. Noisy works to be scheduled outside of peak hours where practicable.

243 Karangahape Road – Pitt St Pub

Interview with Pitt St Pub manager

20/08/19



243 Karangahape Road – Calendar Girls

283 Karangahape Road – Samoa House

49 Pitt Street - Beggs

Interview with business operator

16/10/19

 

Operates Monday to Friday 9am to 5pm and Saturdays 9am to 3pm. Main concern is regarding the lack of carparking for their customers which is an important factor for their business

 Have downsized their business to 1/3 of the building footprint in preparation of the disruption.

 Doors are generally kept open to Pitt street and for ventilation. Noise and vibration are not a big concern. Page 43

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

With the mitigation and management measures detailed in Section 6 of the CNV DWP and Table 4-1 of the SSCNVMP, noise may be audible inside the building during concrete cutting, breaking, piling, compacting and use of the hydro vac. However, noise will be intermittent and over a limited duration of only 5 days per stage. Noisy works to be scheduled outside of peak hours where practicable.

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan Want more consistent and accurate communications about schedules of work 59 Pitt Street – Graphic Design (Level 1)

Interview with the business owner

20/08/19

  

Noise concern when meeting with clients within the office. Sometimes can operate on weekends depending on workload and projects Commented roof chips often fall down when building shakes.

With the mitigation and management measures detailed in Section 6 of the CNV DWP and Table 4-1 of the SSCNVMP, noise may be audible inside the building during concrete cutting, breaking, compacting and use of the hydro vac. However, noise will be intermittent and over a limited duration of only 5 days per stage. Further consultation/notification will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if the works can be scheduled for a time that least impacts them.

59 Pitt Street – Waves Vintage

Interview with the business owner

21/08/19



Not concerned about noise and vibration

No comments to incorporate as owner has no noise or vibration concerns.

59 Pitt Street – Tattoo Parlour

Interview with the business owner

20/08/19

 

Operates Tuesday to Saturdays 11:00 to 18:00 Reception is at the front of the façade with background music and needle sounds dominating inside. Mostly concerned about access.

With the mitigation and management measures detailed in Section 6 of the CNV DWP and Table 4-1 of the SSCNVMP, noise may be audible inside the building during concrete cutting, breaking, compacting and use of the hydro vac. However, noise will be intermittent and over a limited duration of only 5 days per stage. Noisy works to be scheduled before 11am, where practicable.

Operates Tuesdays to Saturdays with extended hours on Wednesday and Thursday from 10:00 to 20:30. Construction work is during the busiest time of the year. Commented noise is unbearable during the current trail trench investigations but glad there will be hoarding for actual works. Have loud background music in shop to mask construction, can operate as hairdressers in noise but not preferred.

Open every day of the week. Shop has a record player which is sensitive to vibrations Does have mechanical ventilation but unsure if it is still operational. Generally, experience noisy conditions already and concerned about the increased noise affecting business.



59 Pitt Street – Vada

Interview with the business owner

21/08/19

  



59 Pitt Street – Fabriks

Interview with the business owner

20/08/19

   

Page 44

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan Vibration may be perceptible and during periods of concrete cutting, breaking, piling and compacting the record player may be affected. 61 Pitt Street – Johnny feedback coffee shop

Interview with the business owner

20/08/19

 

Operates Monday to Saturday 07:00-16:00 Major concerns about noise and visibility as no façade and shop opens with roller doors

Mobile noise barriers will be installed around noisy works whilst equipment is operational. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if the works can be scheduled for a time that least impacts them. Vibration may be perceptible but will not be at a level that causes building damage.

65 Pitt Street - Tokyo Loco Bowl

Interview with the business owner

23/08/19



Main concern about access for customers.



Background music is present and façade is mainly glazing.

68 Pitt Street

70-74 Pitt Street – Chatham Apartments

Interview with the building owner

11/10/19



The owner was concerned about noise impacts, particularly in the CEO office which directly overlooks the works on the first floor. The meeting rooms overlooking the construction works have very high reverberation times. Residential flats are from Level 2 upwards and set back slightly. The building is naturally ventilated

With the mitigation and management measures detailed in Section 6 of the CNV DWP and Table 4-1 of the SSCNVMP, noise may be audible inside the building during concrete cutting, breaking, compacting and use of the hydro vac. However, noise will be intermittent and over a limited duration of only 5 days per stage. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if the works can be scheduled for a time that least impacts them.



Generally open throughout day during standard business hours and occasional evenings for community groups, weddings, performing arts and offices. Main concern about access



Concern about vibration effect on stain glass windows.

   78 Pitt Street – Methodist Church

Page 45

Interview with building manager

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

20/08/19



Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if the works can be scheduled for a time that least impacts them. Vibration may be perceptible but will not be at a level that causes building damage. Further investigation is required. 80 Pitt Street – Flying Out Records

Interview with store manager

21/08/19

   



82 Pitt Street – Def

Interview with the business owner

20/08/19

  

3-5 Mercury Lane –BK Hostel

Page 46

Interview with the Business manager

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

20/08/19

 

Operates everyday 10:00-18:00 Shop spans over ground floor and level 1 with some additional offices Have live music events once a month on Saturday afternoons between 2:30pm -5:00pm Concerns about noise and vibration levels affecting recordings taken in the basement between 8:30am and 10am on Wednesday and Thursday They can currently hear sirens go past when in the basement.

Mobile noise barriers to be installed around noisy works. With the mitigation and management measures detailed in Section 6 of the CNV DWP and Table 4-1 of the SSCNVMP, noise may be audible inside the building during concrete cutting, breaking, compacting and use of the hydro vac. However, noise will be intermittent and over a limited duration of only 5 days per stage. Vibration may be perceptible but will not be at a level that causes building damage. Noisy works outside this building to be scheduled outside of 8:30am – 10am on Wednesday and Thursday whilst recordings are taking place. No noisy works to be scheduled during live music events. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if the works can be scheduled for a time that least impacts them.

Operates Monday to Friday 9:30am – 6:00pm and weekends between 10:00am to 5:00pm Has background music and generally keeps front door opens and road traffic noise can be heard Not too concerned about noise, would like notice and require access maintained

Further consultation to take place to inform schedule of works.

Operates all hours Main concern about noise disturbing customers during sleeping hours and access maintained

With the mitigation and management measures detailed in Section 6 of the CNV DWP and Table 4-1 of the SSCNVMP, noise may be audible inside the building during concrete cutting, breaking, compacting and use of the hydro vac. However, noise will be intermittent and over a limited duration of only 5 days per stage. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if the works can be scheduled for a time that least impacts them.

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan 9 Mercury Lane – Mercury Lane Theatre

Interview with building manager

16/10/19

   



10/39 Pitt Street

Mercury theatre is a heritage building and is currently in use as a venue hire. The venue is in regular use from different parties from dance classes, studio filming, to small concerts etc Noise and sensitive activities will be dependent on the use of the theatre. Not majorly concerned about noise as they generate their own but due to heritage status vibration monitoring is requested. Theatre is naturally ventilated through the roof system only. Windows are not well sealed and fire escape doors are poorly sealed. Works outside the theatre on Mercury lane could be clearly heard in the main auditorium. Some refurbishment and renovation is required on the building and this might happen within the time of the CRL construction works.

Mobile noise barriers to be installed around noisy works. With the mitigation and management measures detailed in Section 6 of the CNV DWP and Table 4-1 of the SSCNVMP, noise may be audible inside the building during concrete cutting, breaking, compacting and use of the hydro vac. However, noise will be intermittent and over a limited duration of only 5 days per stage. Vibration will be perceptible and at worst case may be at levels which could cause building damage during CSA establishment. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if the works can be scheduled for a time that least impacts them. Long Term Noise and vibration monitoring is recommended for this property.

Note: 1. 2. 3.

Page 47

Relationship needs to be managed, meeting time to be arranged Not consulted as owner/manager was unavailable. Not consulted as property is currently vacant.

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Appendix E: SSCNVMP

Page 48

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Karangahape Station Early Works Appendix E Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Revision: Final October 2019

Page 1

| Karangahape Station Early Works â€“ Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan This document is uncontrolled when printed. This document should be printed in colour

Revision Status Revision

Issue Date

Major Changes

Changed By

Approved By

30/09/2019

Initial draft

S Yung

Peter Roan

21/10/2019

Final –incorporating IPR and AC review comments

S Yung

Peter Roan

Approval Status Name/Title

Signature

Date

Prepared by:

Sharon Yung Acoustic Engineer

21/10/2019

Reviewed by:

Claire Drewery Technical Director – Acoustics

21/10/2019

Controlled by:

Claire Drewery Technical Director – Acoustics

21/10/2019

Approved by:

Peter Roan Link Alliance – Consents Lead

21/10/2019

Page 2

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Table of contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 4 1.1

Objective ........................................................................................................................... 4

1.2

Site Plan............................................................................................................................. 4

2. Affected Noise and/or Vibration Receivers ................................................ 5 2.1.1.

Affected receivers ...................................................................................................... 5

3. Karangahape Early Works Activities ........................................................... 6 4. FaĂ§ade performance and internal noise levels ........................................... 7 4.1

Noise ................................................................................................................................. 7

4.2

Vibration ......................................................................................................................... 28

5. Communication and Consultation ............................................................ 34 5.1

Consultation to inform this SSCNVMP ............................................................................. 34

6. Monitoring ................................................................................................ 35

Page 3

6.1

Noise Monitoring............................................................................................................. 35

6.2

Vibration Monitoring....................................................................................................... 35

| Karangahape Station Early Works â€“ Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

1. Introduction This Site-Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (SSCNVMP) forms part of the Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan (CNV DWP) for the Karangahape Station early works. The early works involve tree removal and demolition, network utility relocations, and the establishment of Construction Support Areas in Beresford Square and Mercury Lane. This SSCNVMP provides a specific assessment of construction noise and vibration effects from the early works that are predicted to exceed the Project Standards for construction noise and vibration specified in the CRL designation conditions. This SSCNVMP should be read in conjunction with the Karangahape early works CNV DWP Document ref CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800003 dated 18/10/19, which contains further details of the proposed works, Project Standards, monitoring, general mitigation measures and other information relevant to this SSCNVMP.

1.1 Objective The objective of this SSCNVMP is to detail the best practicable option to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on receivers resulting from construction noise and/or vibration that does not comply with the Project Standards set out in Section 3 of the CNV DWP. This SSCNVMP has been prepared in accordance with designation Conditions 37, 38, and 39.

1.2 Site Plan The location of the Karangahape early works is shown in Figure 1-1. Active work areas are shown in red shading while on-street parking closures are shown in yellow shading.

Key: CRL Designation Boundary

Figure 1-1: Site location â€“ Karangahape Station Early Works

Page 4

| Karangahape Station Early Works â€“ Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

2. Affected Noise and/or Vibration Receivers 2.1.1. Affected receivers Receivers where noise and/or vibration levels from the early works are predicted to exceed project noise or vibration standards, along with the relevant building uses, are listed in Table 2-1. Table 2-1: Affected receivers

Address

Use

Historic/ Vibration Sensitive Classification

Minimum Distance to Works (m)

1 Beresford Square

Commercial

1 Cross Street

Commercial

4-6 Beresford Square

Mixed Use

75*

90*

8-14 Beresford Square

Mixed Use

75*

90*

19 Beresford Square

Mixed Use

75*

90*

16-18 Beresford Square

Commercial

22Beresford Square

Mixed Use

75*

90*

12 East Street

Mixed Use

75*

90*

14 East Street

Mixed Use

75*

90*

16 East Street

Residential

75*

90*

18 East Street

Residential

75*

90*

21 East Street

Commercial1

23 East Street

Commercial

27 East Street

Mixed Use

75*

90*

29 East Street

Commercial

75*

90*

Noise Criteria, dB LAeq

Noise Criteria, dB LAFmax

Vibration Criteria, mm/s

80-82 Pitt Street

Commercial

238 Karangahape Road

Mixed Use

75*

90*

243 Karangahape Road

Commercial

3 Mercury Lane

Commercial

283 Karangahape Road

Cultural

75*

90*

49 Pitt Street

Mixed Use

75*

90*

59 Pitt Street

Commercial

61-65 Pitt Street

Commercial

68 Pitt Street

Commercial

70-74 Pitt Street

Commercial

78 Pitt Street

Church

75*

90*

75*

90*

75*

90*

9 Mercury Lane

Theatre

10/39 Pitt Street

Residential

Page 5

| Karangahape Station Early Works â€“ Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

*This is the Monday to Saturday 07:00 to 22:00 noise criteria. The majority of works will be carried out during this period. For residential receivers the noise limit is reduced to 65 dB L Aeq & 80 dB LAFmax on Sundays and Public Holidays between 07:00 to 22:00 and to 60 dB LAeq & 75 dB LAFmax at all other times. Note 1: Notable Receiver

3. Karangahape Early Works Activities A general overview of construction activities for early works along with proposed start and end dates, are shown in Table 3-1. Table 3-1: Overview of Karangahape Early Works

Works location

Overview of construction activities

Approximate Duration

Beresford Square / Pitt Street

 Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape station in Beresford Square / Pitt Street.

Jan – Feb 2020 – approximately 5 months

 Removal of street trees and the demolition of the café / Q1 2020 – approximately 3 toilet in Beresford Square. months  Establishment of the Beresford Square Construction  Q1 2020 – approximately 3 Support Area (CSA) to provide site offices, construction months vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc. Mercury Lane

 Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape station in Mercury Lane; and

Q4 2019 – Q1 2020 – approximately 5 months

 Establishment of the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.  Construction of the temporary Station working platform

Q1 2020 – approximately 4 months

Details of the construction equipment that is likely to be used for the above activities and the associated noise levels can be found in Section 4.1 of the CNV DWP. Details of the equipment that is expected to generate high levels of vibration can be found in Section 4.2 of the CNV DWP. Note that the equipment levels detailed in the CNV DWP are placeholders. All equipment will be measured operating independently when work commences on site and the actual equipment noise/vibration levels and model numbers recorded and updated within the respective tables in the CNV DWP.

Page 6

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

4. Façade performance and internal noise levels 4.1 Noise The early works, including Construction Support Area establishment, are located in close proximity to a number of receivers, meaning that predicted internal noise levels at these receivers will be high. Use of a concrete saw, concrete breaker, plate compactor, roller compactor, drilling equipment, hydro excavation and piling equipment has the potential to exceed the Project Standards for construction noise. An enclosure over high noise generating equipment, such as the concrete saw, is unlikely to be practical in a number of locations due to space restrictions on site. However, this will be reviewed on a case by case basis and, where practicable, enclosures will be utilised. The works will be of a relatively short duration and concrete cutting, breaking, compacting and piling activities will only take place for a short time period. It will be necessary to consult further with each affected receiver identified in this SSCNVMP before works begin so that noisy activities can be scheduled, where possible, for a time that least impacts them. However, even with the above mitigation and management measures implemented and noise barriers installed as outlined in the CNV DWP, the noise levels predicted at the most exposed façade of a number of properties will still exceed the Project Standards by more than 5 dB during some construction activities. These properties are detailed in Table 4-1 along with an estimate of the current façade performance and the worst-case internal noise levels anticipated to be received during early works.

Page 7

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Table 4-1: Estimated internal noise levels

Address

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

1 Beresford Square

Ground Floor and above: Commercial use 2

90 - 95 dB

Based on external observations façade is around 40% single glazed openable windows and 60% masonry. Mechanical ventilation unknown. Estimated attenuation provided by the façade when windows closed is predicted to be around 30 dB Rw with windows closed.

60 – 65 dB Disturbance to users and potential annoyance to staff and customers.

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works. The benefit of screening provided by noise barriers will be reduced at first floor level and above. Worst-case noise levels will be intermittent in nature and will occur when works are directly outside over a period of 1-3 days per stage whilst piling works takes place. Noise levels may still exceed the criteria whilst works are occurring outside neighbouring properties over an additional 2 day period per stage. Consultation required with affected party before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact.

Page 8

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Address

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

1 Cross Street

Ground Floor and above: Multiple businesses and single residential

100 – 105 dB Worst case due to piling

50% masonry and 50% single glazed windows. Openable windows with no mechanical ventilation. Estimated attenuation provided by the façade when windows closed is predicted to be around 25- 30 dB Rw.

70 – 75 dB Annoyance and disturbance to staff, customers and residents. Sleep disruption if carried out during night-time/early morning hours. There may be difficulty in hearing fire alarms etc

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works. The benefit of screening provided by noise barriers will be reduced at first floor level and above.

(including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier)

Internal noise levels during utility works are likely to exceed the 35 – 40 dB LAeq criteria of AS2107:2016 for sleeping areas in the inner city. Noisy works will occur outside the flats for a period of days. 4-6 Beresford Square

Page 9

Ground Floor: Northern Bar

90 – 95 dB (including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

Façade is masonry wall with around 95% single glazing and openable French doors. There is no mechanical ventilation to the property,

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

60 - 65 dB (With doors closed) Annoyance to staff and customers

Worst-case noise levels will be intermittent in nature and will occur when works are directly outside over a period of 1-3 days per stage whilst piling works takes place. Noise levels may still exceed the criteria whilst works are occurring outside neighbouring properties over an additional 2 day period per stage. 1. Noisy activities must be scheduled for a time outside sleeping hours, with notice given 24 hours in advance. 2.Manage unnecessary impact sounds. 3. Minimise periods of concrete cutting, breaking, piling and compacting during noise sensitive periods. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact.

Noise barriers will be installed around the works which will provide screening to the ground floor. Noisy activities outside this property to be scheduled before 3pm, where practicable.

Address

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

60 – 65 dB Reduction in work efficiency and concentration, disturbance to meetings

only natural ventilation via French doors. The attenuation provided by the façade when doors closes is estimated around 30 dB Rw. The estimated façade performance with the door open is 15 dB Rw. 8-10 Beresford Square

12 Beresford Square

Page 10

First Floor and above: Theta Inc

Ground Floor: Bravo Hospitality

90 – 95 dB

90 - 95 dB (including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

All levels are mechanically ventilated with 100% single glazed façade. Estimated attenuation provided by the façade is predicted to be around 30 dB Rw.

The façade is 100% glazed with 10mm laminated glass façade. The store is mechanically ventilated with trickle vents through the façade. The estimated attenuation provided by the façade is predicted to be around 30 dB Rw.

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

60 – 65 dB Annoyance to staff and customers, speech clarity may be affected

Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact. Noise barriers will be installed around the works which will provide screening to the ground floor. Worst-case noise levels will be intermittent in nature and will occur when works are directly outside over a period of 1-3 days per stage. Noise levels may still exceed the criteria whilst works are occurring outside neighbouring properties over an additional 2 day period per stage.

Address

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

19 Beresford Square

Ground floor: Hopetoun Alpha 2

80 – 85 dB

Based on external observations façade is set back from the street and seems 90% masonry with a single access door, and 10% double height windows. Presence of mechanical ventilation unknown. Estimated façade attenuation is predicted to be around 35 dB Rw with windows closed.

45 – 50dB Impulsive noises may cause annoyance during events.

Noise barriers will be installed around the works which will provide screening to the ground floor.

Based on external observations facade is 90% single glazing and 10% masonry. Small areas of glazing are openable with trickle vents visible. Estimated façade attenuation is around 20-25 dB Rw with windows closed.

70-75 dB (with windows closed) Annoyance and disturbance to staff and customers throughout the day and night time.

Façade consists of 40% masonry and 60% single glazed openable windows and a single glazed sliding

60 - 65dB

Works will be intermittent in nature and will occur outside residential block for the duration of the early works.

(including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

16-18 Beresford Square

Ground Floor and above: Centurion Sauna1

90 - 95 dB

22 Beresford Square

First Floor and above: Residential flats

90 - 95 dB (First floor)

Page 11

(including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Annoying and disturbing for residents. Sleep

Address

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

door facing the works location.

disruption if carried out during nighttime/early morning hours or for residents that sleep during the day.

Estimated attenuation provided by the façade is around 30dB Rw.

Ground floor and above: Residential 2

Page 12

80 – 85 dB (including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)B

Observation from the exterior indicates façade facing work sites is 100% masonry. Back of building not accessible. Estimated attenuation based on observation of façade is around 35 dB Rw with windows closed.

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

45-50 dB . Sleep disruption if carried out during night-time/early morning hours or for residents that sleep during the day. Internal noise levels during utility works are likely to exceed

Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact. Mechanical ventilation may be considered for main works.

Works will be intermittent in nature and will occur outside residential block for the duration of the early works at CSA establishment site. 1.Noisy activities must be scheduled for a time outside sleeping hours, with notice given 24 hours in advance. 2.Manage unnecessary impact sounds. 3. Minimise periods of concrete cutting, breaking and compacting during noise sensitive periods.

Address

14 East Street

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Ground Floor: Studio Q

90 - 95 dB

First Floor: Residential Flats

90 - 95 dB

(including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

the 35 – 40 dB LAeq criteria of AS2107:2016 for sleeping areas in the inner city. Noisy works will occur outside the flats for a period of days

Façade consists of masonry and single glazing (50%) Estimated attenuation provided by the façade is around 30dB Rw.

60– 65 dB Annoyance and reduction in work efficiency

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works. Impacted mainly by CSA establishment. Works will be intermittent in nature throughout the duration of the Early Works.

Façade consists of masonry and single glazing. Estimated attenuation provided by the façade is around 30dB Rw.

60 - 65dB

Impacted mainly by CSA establishment and works will be intermittent in nature. Works will occur at the back of the residential flats during daytime hours only.

Annoying and disturbing for residents. Sleep disruption if carried out during nighttime/early morning hours. Internal noise levels during utility works are likely to exceed the 35 – 40 dB LAeq criteria of

Page 13

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

1.Noisy activities must be scheduled for a time outside sleeping hours, with notice given 24 hours in advance. 2.Manage unnecessary impact sounds. 3. Minimise periods of concrete cutting, breaking and compacting during noise sensitive periods. Locate stationary equipment such as generators away from flats. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact..

Address

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

AS2107:2016 for sleeping areas in the inner city. Noisy works will occur outside the flats for a period of days. 18 East Street Residential

Ground Floor: Residential

90 - 95 dB (including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

Façade is a light weight partition weatherboard with single glazed windows. Access to back façade where most impacted was not given. Estimated façade attenuation is around 25 dB Rw.

65 – 70 dB Annoying and disturbing to residents. Sleep disruption if carried out during nighttime/early morning hours. There may be difficulty in hearing fire alarms etc Internal noise levels during utility works are likely to exceed the 35 – 40 dB LAeq criteria of AS2107:2016 for sleeping areas in the inner city. Noisy works will occur outside the flats for a period of days.

Page 14

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works. Impacted mainly by CSA establishment and works will be intermittent in nature. Works will occur at the back of the residential flats during daytime hours. 1.Noisy activities must be scheduled for a time outside sleeping hours, with notice given 24 hours in advance. 2.Manage unnecessary impact sounds. 3. Minimise periods of concrete cutting, breaking and compacting during noise sensitive periods. 4.Locate stationary equipment such as generators away from flats. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact.

Address

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

21 East Street

Ground Floor and above: UnoLoco Event Management

75 – 80 dB

Office on first floor has exposed steel roof with no insulation and exposed mechanical ventilation system. Façade facing the works consists mainly of single glazing with openable windows making up 80% of the façade and 20% masonry. Windows are usually left open during summer for ventilation. Estimated façade attenuation with windows closed is around 25 dB Rw.

50 – 55 dB (At first floor) Annoyance and reduction in work efficiency. Recordings may be affected.

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works. The benefit of screening provided by noise barriers will be reduced at first floor level and above. Impacted mainly by CSA establishment and works will be intermittent in nature throughout the duration of early works. 1.Manage unnecessary impact sounds. 2. Minimise periods of concrete cutting, breaking and compacting during noise sensitive periods. 3. 24 hours advance notification for noisy activities to co-ordinate sound recording events within office. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact.

23 East Street

Ground Floor: European motor services

75 – 80 dB (including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

Façade is set back approx. 13m from the roadside. 50% façade consists of one small single glazed window in a concrete blocks wall shield by a storage container overhead, and 50% façade is shutter roller door which is kept open. No mechanical ventilation available. Estimated attenuation provide 20-25dB Rw with shutters closed and

65 - 70 dB (with shutters open)

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works. Impacted mainly by CSA establishment and works will be intermittent in nature throughout the duration of early works.

Page 15

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

55 – 60 dB ( with shutters closed) Annoyance to staff and disruption of carrying out mechanical services

24 hours advance notification for noisy activities. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact.

Address

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

50 – 55 dB Annoyance and disturbing to residents. Sleep disruption if carried out during nighttime/early morning hours.

10-15 dB Rw with shutters open. 25/27 East Street / (2/2A South Street) Residential

Ground Floor and above: Residential Flats

75 – 80 dB (including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

Two storey terrace house with openable single glazed windows Attenuation provided by the façade is around 25 dB Rw with windows closed.

Internal noise levels during utility works are likely to exceed the 35 – 40 dB LAeq criteria of AS2107:2016 for sleeping areas in inner city. Noisy works will occur outside the flats for a period of days. 29 East Street

Page 16

Ground floor: Carpark, Electric Bike Team, International Earth Sciences IESE Ltd

75 – 80 dB (including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

Façade is 100% single glazing. Bike Shop’s façade consists of 60% of the overall ground floor façade. Windows are not openable. Due to the terrain, the two commercial businesses on

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

45 – 50 dB Annoyance and disturbance to staff and customers

1.Noisy activities must be scheduled for a time outside sleeping hours, with notice given 24 hours in advance. 2.Manage unnecessary impact sounds. 3. Minimise periods of concrete cutting, breaking and compacting during noise sensitive periods before 8am and after 6pm. 4.Locate stationary equipment such as generators away from flats.

Address

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

the ground floor have a street level carpark situated directed underneath. There is no mechanical ventilation for the bike shop, but there is one for IESE. Estimated façade attenuation is around 30 dB Rw.

238 Karangahape Road

Page 17

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

1.Noisy activities must be scheduled with notice given 24 hours in advance. 2.Manage unnecessary impact sounds. 3. Minimise periods of concrete cutting, breaking and compacting during noise sensitive periods.

First floor: Think concepts

85 – 90 dB

Façade is 100% single glazing with mechanical ventilation within. Estimated façade attenuation is around 30 dB Rw.

55 - 60 dB Concentration disturbance to staff and speech clarity on headphones may be affected.

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works. The benefit of screening provided by noise barriers will be reduced at first floor level and above. 1.Noisy activities must be scheduled with notice given 24 hours in advance. 2.Manage unnecessary impact sounds. 3. Minimise periods of concrete cutting, breaking and compacting during noise sensitive periods. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact.

Ground Floor: Various commercial retails

90 – 95 dB

Main façade of retail spaces faces into the building atrium. Back of retail space is masonry with renovation works required Estimated attenuation provided by the façade is around 35dB Rw.

55 – 60 dB Annoyance to staff and customers

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works.

(including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Building manager is concerned about vibration on building façade and monitoring will be undertaken.

Address

Page 18

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

First floor and above: Residential Flats

90 – 95 dB

Flats façades consists of concrete walls with 2m high openable single glazed windows. Openable area is approx. 20% of overall glazing. Flat sizes varies over floors. Attenuation provided by the façade on corner flat with two large glazing areas is estimated to be around 30dB Rw.

60 – 65 dB Annoying and disturbing to residence. Sleep disruption if carried out during nighttime/early morning hours.

Works will be intermittent in nature and will occur outside residential block for the duration of the early works.

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

1.Noisy activities must be scheduled for a time outside sleeping hours, with notice given 24 hours in advance. 2.Manage unnecessary impact sounds. 3. Minimise periods of concrete cutting, breaking and compacting during noise sensitive periods. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact.

Address

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

243 Karangahape Road

Ground floor: Pitt St Pub

90 - 95 dB

Façade is 50% masonry and 50% single glazing windows. Air lock entrance with wooden door kept open onto the glazing door within. Mechanical ventilation is available. Attenuation provided by the façade is estimated to be around 35dB Rw with door closed.

55 – 60 dB Annoyance to staff and customers but not to a level that interferes with businesses with background music

Noise barriers will be installed around the works which will provide screening to the ground floor. Worst-case noise levels will be intermittent in nature and will occur when works are directly outside over a period of 1-3 days per stage. Noise levels may still exceed the criteria whilst works are occurring outside neighbouring properties over an additional 2 day period per stage.

283 Karangahape Road Page 19

(including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

First Floor and above: Calendar Girls 1

90 - 95 dB

Observation from the exterior show façade consists of 70% masonry with 30% glazing. Unknown if mechanical ventilation is present inside or if windows are openable. Estimated attenuation provided by façade is predicted to be around 3035dB Rw with windows and doors closed.

60 – 65 dB Annoyance to staff and customers but not to a level that interferes with businesses with loud background music

Ground Floor: Samoa House 1

90 - 95 dB

Observation from the exterior show façade is 60% light weight cladding with 25% glazing and 15% open

65 – 70dB Potential annoyance depending on usage

(including attenuation provided to ground floor

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Noisy works to be scheduled before peak operating period (afternoons and evenings Thursdays to Sunday) Noise barriers will be installed around the works which will provide screening to the ground floor. Worst-case noise levels will be intermittent in nature and will occur when works are directly outside over a period of 1-3 days per stage. Noise levels may still exceed the criteria whilst works are occurring outside neighbouring properties over an additional 2 day period per stage. Consultation required with the affected party before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact.

Address

49 Pitt Street

59 Pitt Street

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

by noise barrier around construction area

with shutters. Use around façade is unknown but mechanical vents are visible. Estimated attenuation based on observation is predicted to be around 25 dB Rw with windows and doors closed.

Ground Floor: Beggs

90 – 95 dB

Façade is 50% masonry and 50% single glazed windows. Access to is via a single glazed double doors which are kept open for ventilation. No mechanical ventilation is available. Attenuation provided by the façade is estimated to be around 30dB Rw.

60 – 65 dB Annoyance to staff and customers but not to a level that interferes with businesses

Ground floor: Vada, Waves, Fabriks, Tattoo Parlour

90 – 95 dB

Each shop’s façade consists around 80-100% single glazing windows with glazed doors. No mechanical ventilation available. Attenuation provided by the façade is estimated to be around 30dB Rw.

60 – 65 dB Annoyance to staff and customers but not to a level that interferes with businesses

(including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

period of 1-3 days per stage. Noise levels may still exceed the criteria whilst works are occurring outside neighbouring properties over an additional 2 day period per stage. Consultation required with the affected party before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact. Noise barriers will be installed around the works which will provide screening to the ground floor. Worst-case noise levels will be intermittent in nature and will occur when works are directly outside over a period of 1-3 days per stage. Noise levels may still exceed the criteria whilst works are occurring outside neighbouring properties over an additional 2 day period per stage. 24 hours advance notification to be given before noisy works takes place. Noise barriers will be installed around the works which will provide screening to the ground floor. Worst-case noise levels will be intermittent in nature and will occur when works are directly outside over a period of 1-3 days per stage. Noise levels may still exceed the criteria whilst works are occurring outside neighbouring properties over an additional 2 day period per stage. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if noisy works

Page 20

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Address

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact. Noisy works to be scheduled between 8am and 10am before business open.

First floor: Graphics Design

90 – 95 dB

Façade is double height with 50% single glazing and 50% masonry. Mechanical ventilation is available with openable windows. Estimated attenuation provided by the façade is around 30dB Rw with windows closed.

60 – 65 dB Annoyance and reduction in work efficiency, meetings and concentration may be disrupted.

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works. The benefit of screening provided by noise barriers will be reduced at first floor level and above. Worst-case noise levels will be intermittent in nature and will occur when works are directly outside over a period of 1-3 days per stage on both Beresford Square and Pitt Street. Noise levels may still exceed the criteria whilst works are occurring outside neighbouring properties over an additional 2 day period per stage. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact.

61 Pitt Street

Page 21

Ground Floor: Johnny Feedback coffee shop

90 - 95 dB (including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

Coffee shop has no façade, shop opens with roller doors onto the street. No attenuation provided by the façade.

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

90 - 95 dB Disruption to business, staff and customers

Address

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

exceed the criteria whilst works are occurring outside neighbouring properties over an additional 2 day period per stage. Localised enclosure around noisy equipment to be considered if practicable. 24 hours advance notification to be given before noisy works takes place. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact. 65 Pitt Street

68 Pitt Street

Page 22

Ground Floor: Tokyo Loco

Ground Floor and above 3

90 -95 dB (including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

80-85 dB (including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

Full single glazing façade with no mechanical ventilation. Open plan kitchen dining with extractor fan. Door is kept open during summer for ventilation. Estimated attenuation with door closes is around 30dB Rw and with door open is around 20dB Rw.

60 – 65 dB (Door Closed) Annoyance to staff and customers

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works.

Observation from exterior shows façade consists of around 20% glazing and 80% masonry. Unknown if mechanical ventilation is present.

45 – 50 dB (windows and doors closed) Mild annoyance to users

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works.

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Address

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

Attenuation provided by the façade is estimated to be around 35 dB Rw with windows and doors closed. 70-74 Pitt Street

78 Pitt Street

First Floor and above: Chatham Apartments-

Methodist Church

80 – 85 dB (including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

90 – 95 dB (including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

Page 23

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

neighbouring properties over an additional 2 day period per stage. Consultation required with the affected party before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact.

The building is a masonry construction with large sash windows. The windows are approx. 40% of the facade have lightweight glass and no seals. Estimated attenuation with windows closed is around 30 dB Rw on Level 1.

50-55 dB Disturbance to staff and users of meetings rooms. Reduced concentration and productivity.

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works.

Masonry façade with around 40% high arched single glazing windows. Attenuation provided by the façade is around 30-35dB Rw.

60 – 65 dB Annoyance to staff and customers

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works. Worst-case noise levels will be intermittent in nature and will occur when works are directly outside over a period of 1-3 days per stage. Noise levels may still exceed the criteria whilst works are occurring outside neighbouring properties over an additional 2 day period per stage. On going communication regarding timings of works and advance notice to be given.

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Worst-case noise levels will be intermittent in nature and will occur when works are directly outside over a period of 1-3 days per stage. Noise levels may still exceed the criteria whilst works are occurring outside neighbouring properties over an additional 2 day period per stage. Consultation required with the affected party before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact.

Address

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

80-82 Pitt Street

Ground Floor: Flying Out Records, Def

90 - 95 dB

Façade consists of 50-70% single glazing windows with natural ventilation reliant on keeping doors open. Estimated attenuation with door closes is around 30dB Rw and with door open is around 20dB Rw.

60 – 65 dB (door closed) Recording and music events may be affected. General annoyance to staff and customers

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works.

(including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

Worst-case noise levels will be intermittent in nature and will occur when works are directly outside over a period of 1-3 days per stage. Noise levels may still exceed the criteria whilst works are occurring outside neighbouring properties over an additional 2 day period per stage. Noisy works should be avoided outside this building between 8:30am – 10am on Wednesday and Thursday whilst recordings are taking place.

3-5 Mercury Lane

Page 24

Ground Floor: Mercury Bar and Gaming

80 – 85 dB (including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

Façade has 50% masonry and 50% single glazing windows. Double single glazed door Attenuation provided by the façade is around 30-35dB Rw.

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

50 - 55 dB Light annoyance to staff and customers

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works.

Address

9 Mercury Lane

Page 25

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

First Floor and above: BK Hostel

85 – 90 dB

Façade consists 40% masonry and 60% single glazing operable windows. No mechanical ventilation Attenuation provided by the façade is around 30-35dB Rw.

50 – 55 dB Sleep disturbance to guests. Sleep disruption if carried out during nighttime/early morning hours.

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works. The benefit of screening provided by noise barriers will be reduced at first floor level and above.

Internal noise levels during utility works are likely to exceed the 35 – 40 dB LAeq criteria of AS2107:2016 for hotels bedrooms in inner city areas. Noisy works will occur outside the flats for a period of days.

55 – 60 dB Annoyance to users but potentially masked with background music during venue use.

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works.

Ground Floor and above: Mercury Theatre

90 – 95 dB (including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

Facade consists of 70% masonry and 30% glazing. Attenuation provided by the façade is estimated around 35 dB Rw.

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Works will be intermittent in nature and will not occur directly outside hostel.

Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact.

Address

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

Further consultation with affected party to determine if works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact on users. 10/35 Pitt Street

Ground Floor and above: residential2

80 – 85 dB (including attenuation provided to ground floor by noise barrier around construction area)

Observation from the exterior indicates façade directly facing site is 100% masonry. However, adjacent façade is 90% glazing. Attenuation provided depending on directivity ranges between 35 dB to 25 dB Rw.

55 – 60 dB as worst case through glazing Sleep disturbance to residents. Sleep disruption if carried out during nighttime/early morning hours. Internal noise levels during utility works are likely to exceed the 35 – 40 dB LAeq criteria of AS2107:2016 for bedrooms in inner city areas. Noisy works will occur outside the flats for a period of days during site establishment

Page 26

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Screening provided to ground floor by masonry wall separating receptor from site. The benefit of screening provided by noise barriers will be reduced at first floor level and above. Works will be intermittent in nature but will be present throughout the CSA establishment. 1.Noisy activities must be scheduled for a time outside sleeping hours, with notice given 24 hours in advance. 2.Manage unnecessary impact sounds. 3. Minimise periods of concrete cutting, breaking and compacting during noise sensitive periods. 4.local screening for noisy equipment Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact.

Address

Floor

External Noise Level dB LAeq

Façade Build-up / Expected performance (dB Rw)

Expected Worst-Case Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) with Mitigation/ Potential Effects

Specific Mitigation Measures - Best Practicable Option (BPO)

Note:

Page 27

1. 2.

Relationship needs to be managed, meeting time to be arranged – façade observations from the exterior only Not consulted as owner/manager was unavailable – façade observations from exterior only

Not consulted as property is currently vacant – façade observations from exterior only.

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

4.2 Vibration In addition to the general vibration mitigation measures outlined in Section 6 of the CNV DWP, the specific vibration mitigation measures outlined in Table 4-2 shall be implemented if the initial on-site vibration monitoring at the closest building foundations demonstrates that the building damage vibration limits will be exceeded. Table 4-2: Vibration Mitigation Measures

Equipment/process

Vibration control measures

Excavators, bobcats, loaders

Grease tracks regularly. Avoid unnecessary revving of engines and banging of buckets on the ground. Use smaller equipment where possible.

Excavator mounted rock breaker

Use lower vibration generating equipment such as a handheld jack hammer

Roller compactor (17t)

Use a smaller compactor, less than 10t

Site specific vibration mitigation measures are included in Table 4-3.

Page 28

| Karangahape Station Early Works â€“ Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Table 4-3: Site Specific Vibration Mitigation Measures

Address

Minimum Distance to works (m)

Building Type

1 Beresford Square

Historical / vibration sensitive

1 Cross Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

4-6 Beresford Square

Historical / vibration sensitive

8-14 Beresford Square

Historical / vibration sensitive

19 Beresford Square

Historical / vibration sensitive

Page 29

Specific Mitigation Measures Vibration may be felt within 1 Beresford Square during the use of excavators, drilling, compactors and piling within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. Further liaison will take place and high-vibration emitting activities scheduled outside of sensitive hours, when building occupants may be affected. Vibration may be felt within 1 Cross Street during the use of excavators, drilling, compactors and piling within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. Monitoring will be carried out once construction works begin within 10 metres of the building to determine the actual levels of vibration from the equipment used. The Project team will review the construction methodology and select low vibration-emitting equipment where practicable. Vibration may be felt within 4-6 Beresford Square during the use of excavators, drilling and compactors within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. Further liaison will take place and high-vibration emitting activities scheduled before 3pm, when building occupants may be affected after opening hours. Vibration may be felt within 8-14 Beresford Square during the use of excavators, drilling and compactors within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. Monitoring will be carried out once construction works begin within 10 metres of the building to determine the actual levels of vibration from the equipment used. The Project team will review the construction methodology and select low vibration-emitting equipment where practicable. Vibration may be felt within 19 Beresford Square during the use of excavators, drilling and compactors within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. Further liaison will take place and high-vibration emitting activities scheduled outside of sensitive hours, when building occupants may be affected when venue is operating.

| Karangahape Station Early Works â€“ Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Address

Minimum Distance to works (m)

Building Type

16-18 Beresford Square

Historical / vibration sensitive

22 Beresford Square

Residential

14 East Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

16 East Street

Residential

18 East Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

21 East Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

Page 30

Specific Mitigation Measures Vibration may be felt within 16-18 Beresford Square during the use of excavators, drilling and compactors within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. Further liaison will take place and high-vibration emitting activities scheduled outside of sensitive hours, when building occupants may be affected when venue is operating. Vibration may be felt within 22 Beresford Square during the use of excavators, drilling, compactors and piling within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. Monitoring will be carried out once construction works begin within 10 metres of the building to determine the actual levels of vibration from the equipment used. The Project team will review the construction methodology and select low vibration-emitting equipment where practicable. Further liaison will take place and high-vibration emitting activities scheduled outside of early morning and evening hours, when building occupants may be sleeping. Vibrations may be felt during the use of excavators, drilling, and compactors for the CSA establishment. Further liaison will take place and high-vibration emitting activities scheduled outside of early morning and evening hours, when building occupants may be sleeping. Vibrations will be felt during the use of excavators, drilling and compactors for the CSA establishment. Further liaison will take place and high-vibration emitting activities scheduled outside of early morning and evening hours, when building occupants may be sleeping. Vibrations may be felt during the use of excavators, drilling and compactors for the CSA establishment. Further liaison will take place and high-vibration emitting activities scheduled outside of early morning and evening hours, when building occupants may be sleeping. Vibration may be felt within 21 East Street during the use of excavators, drilling and compactors within 15m of the building throughout the period of CSA establishment. Vibrations will be intermittent in nature and should not be more than 5 days for each stage. Advance notice to be given for high-vibration emitting activities. Monitoring will be carried out once construction works begin within 10 metres of the building to determine the actual levels of vibration from the equipment used.

| Karangahape Station Early Works â€“ Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Address

Minimum Distance to works (m)

Building Type

23 East Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

27 East Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

238 Karangahape Road

Historical / vibration sensitive

243 Karangahape Road

Historical / vibration sensitive

283 Karangahape Road

Historical / vibration sensitive

Page 31

Specific Mitigation Measures The Project team will review the construction methodology and select low vibration-emitting equipment where practicable. Vibrations may be felt within 23 East Street during the use of excavators, drilling and compactors within 15m of the building throughout the period of CSA establishment. Vibrations will be intermittent in nature and should not be more than 5 days for each stage. Further liaison will take place and high-vibration emitting activities scheduled outside of sensitive activities, when building occupants may be affected. Vibrations may be felt during the use of excavators, drilling and compactors for the CSA establishment. Further liaison will take place and high-vibration emitting activities scheduled outside of early morning and evening hours, when building occupants may be sleeping. Vibration may be felt within 238 Karangahape Road during the use of excavators, drilling, compactors and piling within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. High vibration emitting activities to be scheduled outside of early morning and evening hours, when building occupants may be sleeping. Monitoring will be carried out once construction works begin within 10 metres of the building to determine the actual levels of vibration from the equipment used. The Project team will review the construction methodology and select low vibration-emitting equipment where practicable. Vibration may be felt during the use of excavators, drilling and piling within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. Further liaison will take place and high-vibration emitting activities scheduled outside of sensitive activities and events when building occupants may be affected. Vibration may be felt during the use of excavators, drilling and piling within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. Further liaison will take place and high-vibration emitting activities scheduled outside of sensitive activities and events when building occupants may be affected.

| Karangahape Station Early Works â€“ Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Address

49 Pitt Street

Minimum Distance to works (m)

Building Type

Specific Mitigation Measures

Historical / vibration sensitive

Vibration may be felt within 49 Pitt Street during the use of excavators, drilling and compactors within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage along Beresford Square and Pitt Street. Monitoring will be carried out once construction works begin within 10 metres of the building to determine the actual levels of vibration from the equipment used. The Project team will review the construction methodology and select low vibrationemitting equipment where practicable.

59 Pitt Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

61-65 Pitt Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

9 Mercury Lane

Historical / vibration sensitive

Page 32

Vibration may be felt within 59 Pitt Street during the use of excavators, drilling and compactors within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage along Beresford Square and Pitt Street. Monitoring will be carried out once construction works begin within 10 metres of the building to determine the actual levels of vibration from the equipment used. The Project team will review the construction methodology and select low vibration-emitting equipment where practicable. Vibration may be felt within 61-65 Pitt Street during the use of excavators, drilling, piling and compactors within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage along Beresford Square and Pitt Street. Monitoring will be carried out once construction works begin within 10 metres of the building to determine the actual levels of vibration from the equipment used. The Project team will review the construction methodology and select low vibration-emitting equipment where practicable. Vibration may be felt within 9 Mercury Lane during the use of excavators, drilling, compactors and piling within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. Vibrations will be intermittent in nature, and may also be felt throughout the period of CSA establishment. Monitoring will be carried out once construction works begin within 10 metres of the building to determine the actual levels of vibration from the equipment used. The Project team will review the construction methodology and select low vibration-emitting equipment where practicable.

| Karangahape Station Early Works â€“ Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Address

Minimum Distance to works (m)

Building Type

Specific Mitigation Measures Advance notice to be given during high-vibration emitting activities.

Page 33

| Karangahape Station Early Works â€“ Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

5. Communication and Consultation Section 7 of the CNV DWP details the communication and engagement procedures to be implemented during the early works in relation to construction noise and vibration effects. The complaints process is detailed in Section 7.2 of the CNV DWP.

5.1 Consultation to inform this SSCNVMP Consultation with the affected parties identified in this SSCNVMP took place in mid-August 2019. Topics that were covered included:      

Sequencing of construction activities; Likely construction equipment and associated noise and vibration levels; Proposed mitigation and management measures; Building construction typologies/characteristics; Operational hours of businesses; and The operating environment that is required for respective businesses likely impacted by the works.

Further details of the meetings and comments made by the affected parties are provided in Appendix E of the CNV DWP.

Page 34

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

6. Monitoring Section 8 of the CNV DWP provides details of the methodology for noise and vibration monitoring to be undertaken during the early works.

6.1 Noise Monitoring Noise monitoring will be carried out when use of the concrete saw, hydro excavations and concrete breaker begins within 20 metres of the buildings identified in Table 6-1. The monitoring will be carried out at first floor level unless it is not possible to gain access. Table 6-1: Noise Monitoring Locations

Receiver 22 Beresford Square

Monitoring Location 1m from façade of building

1 Cross Street

1m from façade of building

9 Mercury Lane

1m from façade of building

21 East Street

1m from façade of building

14 East Street

1m from façade of building

29 East Street

1m from façade of building

80 Pitt Street

1m from façade of building

70 Pitt Street

1m from façade of building

61 Pitt Street

1m from façade of building

59 Pitt Street

1m from façade of building

6.2 Vibration Monitoring Vibration monitoring will be carried out when works begin on site to determine actual equipment vibration levels and the attenuation provided by local ground conditions. If the initial vibration monitoring demonstrates that the emission radius for the excavator is similar to that identified in the CNV DWP, then the monitoring as detailed below will be carried out. If this monitoring demonstrates that vibration levels are significantly lower, then fewer properties may require monitoring. If they are higher, more properties may require monitoring. Vibration monitoring will be carried out at the following receivers when use of the piling rig, excavator, hand-held concrete breaker or plate compactor occur within 10 metres of the building:         Page 35

1 Cross Street 9 Mercury Lane 21 East Street 238 Karangahape Road 8-14 Beresford Square 22 Beresford Square 59 Pitt Street 61 Pitt Street. | Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Vibration monitoring will be carried out at the following receivers when use of the excavator or piling occurs within 5 metres of the building:    

Page 36

9 Mercury Lane 1 Cross Street 22 Beresford Square 61 Pitt Street.

| Karangahape Station Early Works – Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Appendix F: Noise Monitoring Template Date: _ _ / _ _ / 20 _ _ Equipment set used

Operator: Model:

Serial No. :

Date of last calibration: _ _ / _ _ / 20 _ _ MEASUREMENT DESCRIPTION  Machinery / operational noise (Not at a receiver)

 Noise at a receiver location

Construction location:

Receiver address:

Distance to machinery / operation:

(m)

Distance to receiver:

(m)

Describe noise sources (e.g. roller, piling, generator) and the location relative to the receiver:

Describe any other unrelated noises (e.g. traffic noise) and the location relative to the receiver:

Describe any reflecting surfaces (e.g. walls, buildings) and the location relative to the receiver:

Describe any other factors such as barriers/terrain, or relative elevations of sources and receivers:

It is useful to attach an aerial photograph where possible. If this is done include the following details:  Location of site activity

 Measurement Locations

 Location of reflecting surfaces

 Relative heights

 Locations of unrelated sources

 Intervening barriers/terrain

It is also useful to include photographs or diagrams of the measurement location, the major sound sources, and any other details you believe may be useful.  Additional documents attached

Page 49

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan MEASUREMENT DETAILS

Location reference

Time

Measurement duration, t

LAeq(t)

LAFmax

Adjustment for façade reflection

Equipment operating on site

Sounds heard at measurement location (note dominant and LAFmax sounds) Construction equipment

____h  Constant noise  Cyclic noise

__:__ _ _ . _ dB

_ _ . _ dB

min:sec

____h  Constant noise  Cyclic noise

__:__ min:sec

____h  Constant noise  Cyclic noise

__:__ min:sec

____h  Constant noise  Cyclic noise

__:__ min:sec

NOTES Please include any issues that were encountered during the measurements or other factors that may influence the validity of this measurement.

Page 50

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Other sources

Compliance achieved (y/n)

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Appendix G: Vibration Monitoring Template Date: _ _ / _ _ / 20 _ _ Equipment set used

Operator: Model:

Serial No. :

Date of last calibration: _ _ / _ _ / 20 _ _ MEASUREMENT DESCRIPTION  Machinery / operational vibration (Not at a receiver)

 Vibration at a receiver location

Construction location:

Receiver address:

Distance to machinery / operation:

(m)

Horizontal Distance to receiver:

(m)

Floor Number: Describe vibration sources (e.g. roller, piling, concrete breaking) and the location relative to the receiver:

Describe any other unrelated vibration (e.g. traffic, other construction, footfall, lifts) and the location relative to the receiver:

Describe geometry of foundation (e.g. walls, buildings) and the location relative to the receiver:

Describe the coupling method (geophone to structure)

Describe approximate composition of ground between source and receiver (e.g. basalt, sandstone)

Describe structural resonance observed, if any. For example swaying at higher floors – note the approximate frequency and magnitude.

It is useful to attach an aerial photograph where possible. If this is done include the following details:  Location of site activity

 Measurement Locations

 Location of intervening geometry

 Relative heights

 Locations of unrelated sources

 Changes in composition of terrain

It is also useful to include photographs or diagrams of the measurement location including building plans where available, the major vibration sources, and any other details you believe may be useful. It is important to note whether the measurement was at the foundation, or in the plane of the highest floor.  Additional documents attached

Page 51

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan MEASUREMENT DETAILS

Location reference

Time

Measurement PPV duration, t

Dominant axis of movement

Dominant frequency, Hz

Equipment operating on site

Vibrations observed at measurement location

(y/n) Construction equipment

____h  Continuous  Transient

__:__ min:sec

__._ mms-1

____h  Continuous  Transient

__:__ min:sec

__._ mms-1

____h  Continuous  Transient

__:__ min:sec

__._ mms-1

____h  Continuous  Transient

__:__ min:sec

__._ mms-1

NOTES Please include any issues that were encountered during the measurements or other factors that may influence the validity of this measurement.

Page 52

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Compliance achieved

Other sources

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Appendix H: Record of CLG, IPR and Auckland Council Comments H1. CLG Comments A Karangahape CLG meeting was held on 17th September to discuss the Karangahape early works and for the CLG to provide comments / feedback on the CEMP and sub-plans, including this CNV DWP. Comments were received from the CLG on this CNV DWP as follows: CLG Member

Comment

Response

Resident of apartment in 283 Karangahape Road

Construction was noticed on Sunday evening at 22:00, and vibration was felt within the building during construction works. Equipment used was described as possibly being a plate compactor.

Concerns discussed at the meeting about mitigation measures and control. No change to the CNV DWP made.

Building Owner of 29 East Street

Expressed concerns about noise and vibration from demolition and construction woks, and concerns regarding noise from trucks arriving and departing the site on Mercury Lane / East Street. Owner plans to discuss the situation with the tenants and requested ongoing monitoring of levels during project construction.

Update SSCNVMP to include noise monitoring at 29 East Street.

Representatives of Methodist Church

Queried about whether the properties at 235 Karangahape Road should be included within vibration mitigation table. Would like ongoing communication with contractor regarding timing of construction works going forward.

Explained property is outside of vibration contour limits and hence not included within the table. Update SSCNVMP to include communications request.

Page 53

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

H2. Auckland Council Comments Auckland Council Peer Reviewer

Comment

Response

Mr Daniel Winter

Construction Noise Conditions, rules and assessment criteria are generally all set out correctly. Section 3.3.2 on page 17 of the CNVDWP only refers to vibration but includes a noise rule, so should refer to noise and vibration. The flow chart on page 29 first box states to carry out the noise monitoring in accordance with CNVDWP section10. I cannot find section 10.

Noted and changes made to CNV DWP.

Construction Vibration On page 30 of the CNVDWP the vibration monitoring methodology options includes the use of cable ties. The vibration monitoring equipment (geophones) will be fixed to building structural members (e.g. with clamps, cable ties, or weighed down with sandbags). We do not recommend the use of cable ties as they can cause issues with compliance with the DIN standard monitoring procedures.

Noted and changes made to CNV DWP.

Also on page 30 it states vibration shall initially be measured at the closest building foundations (usually at basement or ground floor level) and this requires consent to access the building of interest.

Communication has happened with some of the building owners/occupiers to discuss vibration logging in their building. It is an ongoing process.

The following have been listed as sites where vibration monitoring is required to be undertaken. 1 Cross Street 9 Mercury Lane 21 East Street 238 Karangahape Road 8-14 Beresford Square 22 Beresford Square 59 Pitt Street 61 Pitt Street. Has any communication been made with building owners/occupiers regarding access to undertake vibration assessments or to assess the possible location of geophones?

Page 54

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Auckland Council Peer Reviewer

Comment

Response

Table 4-3 includes that vibration will be undertaken as follows: Monitoring will be carried out once construction works begin within 10 metres of the building to determine the actual levels of vibration from the equipment used. We suggest the details in the SSCNVMP match up with the CNVDWP, which requires vibration is assessed at the closest building foundations (usually at basement or ground floor level) and any other details known at this stage.

Noted and changes made in the CNV DWP and SSCNVMP

The flow chart on page 29 first box states to carry out the vibration monitoring in accordance with CNVDWP section10. We cannot find section 10. The flow chart recommends a choice of actions for if building damage occurs depending on whether it is minor or moderate damage. We recommend that damage of any kind results in stop work.

Page 55

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

H3. IPR Comments DWP

Response No.

Section

Condition

Comments

Response

7.1.1

16 & 39

 The referenced section, 7.1.1 repeats the condition 16 requirements but needs to actually define the Notable Receivers.  4 Notable Receivers are within the project vicinity and should be identified and assessed as required by Condition 16.1 and 16.2 as they are within 100m of work sites. 1. Mercury Theatre due to its theatre usage and basement level recording facilities. 2. Radio recording Studio, kFM 106.9 at 208 Karangahape Road 3. 21 East St has recording functionality 4. 80 Pitt St has recording functionality

Notable receivers defined in Table 5-1. 21 East St and 80 Pitt St updated as notable receivers in Table 5-1. 208 Karangahape Road not an affected receiver thus not added.

2.2

36.3e

 Section 2.2 responds to 36.3(e) by noting overall work hours, not the times when the adverse effects (eg worst case) will occur. This should be expanded.

Noise and vibration generating activities can occur anytime during the hours of operation. We cannot provide any further detail at this stage.

36.6d

 Noise distance contours are provided and are understood to be based on a SWL of 116 Which may either be a vibropiling rig or concrete saw cutter. Vibration contours are understood to reflect either a breaker/excavator or vibrodriven piler. However, the Vibration contours are plotted against the short term (e.g. transient impulses) criteria rather than the Long term (continuous) criteria. Roller Compactors and Vibro-pilers should be plotted with long term criteria

Vibration generated by roller compactors and vibro-piling works occurs over discrete short periods of time, with the entire works generally only occurring for a few hours dependent on the extent of the worksite. This duration is short term and not enough to cause structural fatigue in a building. Short-term vibration is considered to be vibration which does not occur often enough to cause structural fatigue, and which does not produce resonance in the structure. Buildings typically have resonant frequencies around 4 Hz, while the energy of sheet piling is typically between 31.5 and 63Hz. Considering the vibration would not occur long enough to cause structural fatigue and would not cause building resonance, it would be considered short-term in accordance with the definition

Page 56

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan provided by DIN4150. Therefore, Long term criteria will not been plotted. 4.1

36.3c

 Para 2 notes a new appendix will be provided to capture confirmed noise levels. A place holder for this new appendix should be included with a list of what it needs to be populated (model #, SWL, type of activity)  Table 4-1 Noise values presume free field conditions which are not going to exist at the K road works with so many surrounding buildings. Would suggest a more realistic distance propagation is presented and noted as such.

Appendix J Heading added for measurements of equipment.

Noise values in Table 4-1 are free field but are placeholders. A 3D noise model has been generated for the project which considers other factors such as ground absorption and façade reflections. The 3D model has been used to assess noise levels against the criteria. Contour Maps in Appendix C and D shows the more realistic distance propagations.

4.1

36.3c

 Hydrovac levels are noted to be highly variable and quite noticeable due to their extended periods of operation. Selection of quiet equipment for this item is critical. (We note previous Aotea DWP used 107 vs 104 dBA but expect the actual range is much greater)

Noted

4.1

36.3c

 Sheet piling driving is understood to be vibration driven but this should be clearly stated as the vibration contours do not align with this (refer other comments on stand-off distances)

Sheet piling vibration contours are based on short term criteria as responded in previous comment above. Refer to Response 3.

4.2

36.3c

 A similar appendix to that referred to in 4.1 should be provided to capture confirmed vibration levels. A place holder for this new appendix should be included with a list of what it needs to be populated - (model #, mm/s, type of activity). For example, Roller compactors have a wide range of vibration energy depending on the % chance of exceedance, roller width, amplitude. Similarly, important parameters should be defined or vibro-piling, and drilling that have potential for significant vibration generation.

Appendix J Heading added for measurements of equipment.

4.2

36.3c

 Vibro-Piling (refer comment in 4.1) plate compactor, roller compactor is "long term' vibration sources under DIN 4150 and the radii should reflect the lower criteria.

Separate contours will not be provided. Please refer to response 3.

Page 57

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan Vibration contours should be presented as 'short term' and 'long term' to reflect the varied criteria. This may be most usefully done with a separate set of Contours in Appendix D. 6

36.3j

 No mention is made of localized enclosures for concrete cutting, nor do the predictions of noise reflect that. Mobile concrete cutting barriers have been observed being used outside 99 Albert St on 9 Oct 2019 and were effective for reducing later noise spread. "Refer attached photos. This should be pursued and documented as BPO given the extent of exceedances expected.  Use of lower vibration piling equipment seems necessary to avoid significant breaches of project criteria

Updated in SSCNVMP Section 4.1 to include localized enclosure where practicable.

Low vibration selection is already part of mitigation measures.

6.1

36.2c

 6.1 could usefully reference 6.2-6.8 so all those being trained fully understand implementation of all requirements. E.g. Training should specifically cover the effective use of mitigation measures, not just the need for the mitigation measure. It is common to see temporary noise barriers poorly installed and thus ineffective presumably due to workers not understanding that the poor installation makes them ineffective.

Noted

6.1

36.3h

 Section 6.1 relates to Training, not management of sensitive receiver concerns as mentioned on Page 9.

Updated.

6.2

36.2c

 Use of rubber tracks to eliminate squeal wherever possible

Added to section 6.2

36.3k(i)

 Council's SME to review any changes to contours expected from alterations to DWP

No changes to contours are being made.

8.4

36.3k(vii)

 The portion on how works (presumably rectification works) will be undertaken is relatively brief and could be usefully expanded.

We consider this section to be sufficient and no further details to be added.

App C

36.3f

 Noise contour plots have labelled some residential buildings as commercial. E.g.

Labelling of buildings have been updated for -10/39 and 8/39 Pitt St

Page 58

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan - 238 K Road -3-5 Mercury Lane -27 East st -10/39 and 8/39 Pitt St -49 Pitt St

-49 Pitt St -27 East St 238 K Road and 3-5 Mercury Lane are listed as mixed use and considered correct.

App C & E

36.3g

 Missing a number of sensitive receivers a. Studio at 208-212 K road / 4 cross St b. 246-254 K road c. 36 Day St apartments d. 238 K Road is referenced as commercial but has several levels of apartments e. 49 Pitt St f. 47 Pitt St g. 60 Pitt St h. 84 Pitt St (understood to be represented by “80-82 Pitt Street” but this should be clarified) i. 8/39 Pitt St (understood to be represented by “10/39 Pitt Street” but this should be clarified)

d. 238 K road is referenced a Mixed Use acknowledging the residentials on Level1 and above. Building manager was consulted with for commercial and residential properties f. 47 Pitt St is not predicted to exceed site specific criteria with screening in place h. Represented by “80-82 Pitt Street” i. Represented by “10/39 Pitt Street” All other properties do not exceed the levels required to be included in the SSCNVMP.

Fig 8-1

36.3, k(iii)

 Requirement to monitor noisy equipment (+75dBA@5m) for the first time only leads to a change in Schedules but doesn't lead to any changes to mitigation or planning for noise control. This flow chart and monitoring aspect needs updating to actually result in management of effects.

We consider flow chart is fit for purpose.

See response 16

SSCNVMP Comments (Condition 37) Table 4-1

Page 59

37.2

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan e. 49 Pitt St f. 47 Pitt St g. 60 Pitt St h. 84 Pitt St (understood to be represented by “80-82 Pitt Street” but this should be clarified) i. 8/39 Pitt St (understood to be represented by “10/39 Pitt Street” but this should be clarified) Table 4-1

37.5a

 External noise level is given which can be used to compare to 75 dBA limit but simpler for some readers to be able to clearly see the extent of exceedance

We consider the level of detail provided is appropriate for purpose.

37.5c

 Note "CSA" is not defined. Presume this refers to Construction Support Area. Actual activities in CSA not defined (reference is made on page 6 of SSCNVMP to 4.2 of DWP but the DWP list (table 4-1) does not delineate what equipment goes where.

Defined CSA in Table 3-1. Activities of CSA are defined in staging drawings.

App E

37.5d

 A large number of recipients have concerns that are listed as needing to be followed up on. It would likely assist the completeness of this work to have a column or similar that can be ticked when all aspects of concern for the receiver are understood and quantified.

We do not consider this to be required.

App E

37.5e

 Competing and complex preferences for timing of works is common. E.g. 4-6 Beresford Street prefers Before 3pm, 8-10 Beresford St adjacent prefers after 5:30pm. Across the road, 59 Pitt St wants 8-10am and 1 Beresford square is yet to be consulted. A clear plan needs to be pulled together to ensure timing preferences are understood and are able to be tracked for contractors to best follow.

Noted

Some buildings are within vibration emission radii where ‘minor damage’ has the potential to occur due vibration generating equipment. This is based on worst-case assumptions for ground type and vibration source characteristics.

SSCVMP comments (Condition 38) 4.2

Page 60

38.4

 There is no structural or other evidence presented that the many proposed exceedances of the project criteria are appropriate. There are currently 19 buildings shown as exceeding the Condition 33 criteria with no justification

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan as required by Condition 38.4. This approach should be urgently reviewed.

4.2

Page 61

38.5e

The purpose of vibration emission radii is to identify areas where management and monitoring of vibration levels may be required, as opposed to an accurate assessment of predicted vibration levels at receiver locations. This is the general approach taken on most construction projects involving equipment which generates significant vibration.

 Mitigation measures are listed in Table 4-2 of SSCNVMP, but this does not cover the worst case of piling.  Does the mitigation method of using a 10T roller compactor necessarily provide the reduction in vibration required? More details and acceptable standoff distance should be given so contractor knows when to use smaller equipment at what proximity to heritage buildings.

This table lists additional mitigation measures to the CNV DWP Section 6. Piling mitigation is in Section 6.5. Selection of smaller compacter is a mitigation measure to further reduce vibrations in addition to general measures as listed in the CNV DWP.

 The following properties have not yet been assessed: 12 East St- Commercial – Above amenity limit of 2mm/s for office. No mitigation or SSCVMP offered 29 East St – Commercial - Above amenity limit of 2mm/s for office. No mitigation or SSCVMP offered 80 Pitt St – Historical / vibration sensitive – More than 2.5mm/s expected given proximity of 3mm/s contour at façade. SSCVMP required 3-5 Mercury Lane – Historical / vibration sensitive – More than 2.5mm/s expected given proximity of 3mm/s contour at façade. SSCVMP required 47 Pitt St – Commercial - – Above amenity limit of 2mm/s for office. No mitigation or SSCVMP offered 49 Pitt St – Historical/ vibration sensitive – more than 5mm/s expected. No assessment done. SSCVMP required.

Amenity limits are only applicable in the event of a complaint as per Designation condition 34.3, therefore no SSCVMP is required at this stage. 49 Pitt Street has been added.

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Specific Property SSCVNMP Comments - Noise Address

Specific Mitigation Measures Offered

Comments

Response

1 Cross Street

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works. The benefit of screening provided by noise barriers will be reduced at first floor level and above. Worst-case noise levels will be intermittent in nature and will occur when works are directly outside over a period of 1-3 days per stage whilst piling works takes place. Noise levels may still exceed the criteria whilst works are occurring outside neighboring properties over an additional 2 day period per stage. 1. Noisy activities must be scheduled for a time outside sleeping hours, with notice given 24 hours in advance. 2.Manage unnecessary impact sounds. 3. Minimise periods of concrete cutting, breaking, piling and compacting during noise sensitive periods. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact.

Consider offering temporary relocation if people are going to be exposed to 70-75 dBA. Above 65 dBA, there may be difficulty hearing fire alarms etc.

The work proposed are to be relatively limited in duration (around 5 days) which would imply intensive treatments such temporary relocation are not reasonable at this stage of works.

Consider offering temporary relocation if people are going to be exposed to 70dBA. Above 65 dBA, there may be difficulty hearing fire alarms etc.

18 East Street – Residential

Page 62

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Response No. 26

Comment about fire alarms have been added to potential effects column.

See Response 26

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan 3. Minimise periods of concrete cutting, breaking and compacting during noise sensitive periods. 4.Locate stationary equipment such as generators away from flats. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact. 23 East Street

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works. Impacted mainly by CSA establishment and works will be intermittent in nature throughout the duration of early works. 24 hours advance notification for noisy activities. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact.

55-60 and 65-70 dBA would result in difficulty hearing on phone when talking to customers. What assistance be provided for this?

This property has an office space with enclosed doors and windows which disruption to conversations can be reduced.

61 Pitt Street

Screening provided to ground floor by noise barriers around construction works. Worst-case noise levels will be intermittent in nature and will occur when works are directly outside over a period of 1-3 days per stage. Noise levels may still exceed the criteria whilst works are occurring outside neighboring properties over an additional 2 day period per stage. 24 hours advance notification to be given before noisy works takes place. Further consultation will take place with the affected parties before works begin to determine if noisy works can be scheduled for a time that causes least impact.

Additional mitigation is surely required here with expected levels of 90-95 dBA. Can more effective and enclosing barriers be used here given extremely high levels expected? Levels above 85 dBA are an OH&S concern and I cannot be reasonable to expect businesses and customers to wear hearing protection as the BPO.

The work proposed are to be relatively limited in duration (around 5 days). Localised enclosure around equipment to be consider if practicable. This has been added.

Page 63

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Specific property SSCVMP Comments - Vibration

Response ID

Address

Building Type

Specific Mitigation Measures

IPR Comment

Response

1 Beresford Square

Historical / vibration sensitive

Vibration may be felt within 1 Beresford Square during the use of excavators, drilling, compactors and piling within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. Further liaison will take place and high vibration emitting activities scheduled outside of sensitive hours, when building occupants may be affected.

2-5mm/s expected. No mitigation offered to meet Building damage limits

Vibration levels generated by construction works are highly variable and dependent on the model of equipment used on site, the local geology and the operator. Consistent with the DWP vibration monitoring has been recommended to clarify levels at the commencement of the activities. The mitigation is clearly identified as investigating alternative vibration emitting equipment to reduce impacts and comply with the applicable criteria (3mm/s for historical and 5mm/s for residential).

1 Cross Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

Vibration may be felt within 1 Cross Street during the use of excavators, drilling, compactors and piling within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. Monitoring will be carried out once construction works begin within 10 metres of the building to determine the actual levels of vibration from the equipment used. The Project team will review the construction methodology and

Description of 'may be felt' seems inadequate in light of 2-20mm/s expected. No mitigation offered to meet Building damage limits of 2.5mm/s

Vibration levels generated by construction works are highly variable and dependent on the model of equipment used on site, the local geology and the operator. The occupants may be located in a range of locations throughout the building which would contribute to their individual impact. Given the variability in both the source vibration, the building response and the individuals location, the vibration may be felt, or it may not be. Due to coupling losses across the building vibration levels of 20mm/s would not be achieved and even 10 mm/s is very unlikely for individuals to be exposed to.

Page 64

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan select low vibration-emitting equipment where practicable.

Consistent with the DWP vibration monitoring has been recommended to clarify levels at the commencement of the activities. The mitigation is clearly identified as investigating alternative vibration emitting equipment to reduce impacts and comply with the applicable criteria (3mm/s for historical, 5mm/s for residential and 20mm/s for commercial).

4-6 Beresford Square

Historical /Vibration sensitive

Vibration may be felt within 4-6 Beresford Square during the use of excavators, drilling and compactors within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. Further liaison will take place and high vibration emitting activities scheduled before 3pm, when building occupants may be affected after opening hours.

2-5mm/s expected. No mitigation offered to meet Building damage limits of 2.5mm/s

See response 30

8-14 Beresford Square

Historical / vibration sensitive

Vibration may be felt within 8-14 Beresford Square during the use of excavators, drilling and compactors within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. Monitoring will be carried out once construction works begin within 10

2-5mm/s expected. No mitigation offered to meet Building damage limits of 2.5mm/s

See response 30

Page 65

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan metres of the building to determine the actual levels of vibration from the equipment used. The Project team will review the construction methodology and select low vibration-emitting equipment where practicable. 19 Beresford Square

Historical / vibration sensitive

Vibration may be felt within 19 Beresford Square during the use of excavators, drilling and compactors within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. Further liaison will take place and high vibration emitting activities scheduled outside of sensitive hours, when building occupants may be affected when venue is operating.

Description of 'may be felt' seems inadequate in light of 2-10mm/s expected. No mitigation offered to meet Building damage limits of 2.5mm/s

See response 31

16-18 Beresford Square

Historical / vibration sensitive

Vibration may be felt within 16-18 Beresford Square during the use of excavators, drilling and compactors within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. Further liaison will take place and high vibration emitting activities scheduled outside of sensitive hours, when building occupants

2-5mm/s expected. No mitigation offered to meet Building damage limits of 2.5mm/s

See response 30

Page 66

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan may be affected when venue is operating. 22 Beresford Square

Residential

Vibration may be felt within 22 Beresford Square during the use of excavators, drilling, compactors and piling within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. Monitoring will be carried out once construction works begin within 10 metres of the building to determine the actual levels of vibration from the equipment used. The Project team will review the construction methodology and select low vibration-emitting equipment where practicable. Further liaison will take place and high-vibration emitting activities scheduled outside of early morning and evening hours, when building occupants may be sleeping.

Description of 'may be felt' seems inadequate in light of 1-20mm/s expected. No mitigation offered to meet Building damage limits of 5mm/s or amenity criteria

See response 31

14 East Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

Vibrations may be felt during the use of excavators, drilling, and compactors for the CSA establishment. Further liaison will take place and high vibration emitting activities scheduled outside of early morning and evening hours, when building occupants may be sleeping.

Description of 'may be felt' seems inadequate in light of 1-20mm/s expected. No mitigation offered to meet Building damage limits of 2.5mm/s or amenity criteria

See response 31

Page 67

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

16 East Street

Residential

Vibrations will be felt during the use of excavators, drilling and compactors for the CSA establishment. Further liaison will take place and high vibration emitting activities scheduled outside of early morning and evening hours, when building occupants may be sleeping.

Description of 'may be felt' seems inadequate in light of 5-20mm/s expected. No mitigation offered to meet Building damage limits of 2.5mm/s

See response 31

18 East Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

Vibrations may be felt during the use of excavators, drilling and compactors for the CSA establishment. Further liaison will take place and high vibration emitting activities scheduled outside of early morning and evening hours, when building occupants may be sleeping.

Description of 'may be felt' seems inadequate in light of 5-20mm/s expected. No mitigation offered to meet Building damage limits of 2.5mm/s

See response 31

238 Karangahape Road

Historical / vibration sensitive

Vibration may be felt within 238 Karangahape Road during the use of excavators, drilling, compactors and piling within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. High vibration emitting activities to be scheduled outside of early morning and evening hours, when building occupants may be sleeping. Monitoring will be carried out once construction works begin within 10 metres of the building to determine

Description of 'may be felt' seems inadequate in light of 1-20mm/s expected. No mitigation offered to meet Building damage limits of 2.5mm/s.

See response 31

Page 68

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan the actual levels of vibration from the equipment used. The Project team will review the construction methodology and select low vibration-emitting equipment where practicable. 243 Karangahape Road

Historical / vibration sensitive

Vibration may be felt during the use of excavators, drilling and piling within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. Further liaison will take place and high vibration emitting activities scheduled outside of sensitive activities and events when building occupants may be affected.

Description of 'may be felt' seems inadequate in light of 1-5mm/s expected. No mitigation offered to meet Building damage limits of 2.5mm/s. Note amenity limits also likely to be important for pub's due to rattling glasses

See response 31 Noted for amenity

283 Karangahape Road

Historical / vibration sensitive

Description of 'may be felt' seems inadequate in light of 1-20mm/s expected. No mitigation offered to meet Building damage limits of 2.5mm/s.

See response 31

Page 69

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

59 Pitt Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

Description of 'may be felt' seems inadequate in light of 1-20mm/s expected. No mitigation offered to meet Building damage limits of 2.5mm/s.

See response 31

61-65 Pitt Street

Historical / vibration sensitive

Vibration may be felt within 61-65 Pitt Street during the use of excavators, drilling, piling and compactors within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage along Beresford Square and Pitt Street. Monitoring will be carried out once construction works begin within 10 metres of the building to determine the actual levels of vibration from the equipment used. The Project team will review the construction methodology and

Description of 'may be felt' seems inadequate in light of 1-20mm/s expected. No mitigation offered to meet Building damage limits of 2.5mm/s.

See response 31

Page 70

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan select low vibration-emitting equipment where practicable. 9 Mercury Lane

Page 71

Historical / vibration sensitive

Vibration may be felt within 9 Mercury Lane during the use of excavators, drilling, compactors and piling within 10m of the building. However, vibration will be intermittent in nature and over a limited duration of 5 days per stage. Vibrations will be intermittent in nature, and may also be felt throughout the period of CSA establishment. Monitoring will be carried out once construction works begin within 10 metres of the building to determine the actual levels of vibration from the equipment used. The Project team will review the construction methodology and select low vibration-emitting equipment where practicable. Advance notice to be given during high-vibration emitting activities.

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Description of 'may be felt' seems inadequate in light of 1-20mm/s expected. No mitigation offered to meet Building damage limits of 2.5mm/s.

See response 31

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Appendix I: Noise and Vibration Measurements of Equipment To be updated following equipment measurements.

Page 72

| Karangahape Road Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Appendix M: Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Page 109

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Karangahape Station Early Works Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800006 Revision: Final Date: October 2019

Page 1

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

Karangahape Station early works Historic Character DWP (Built Heritage Section) CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800006 This document is uncontrolled when printed. This document should be printed in colour

Revision Status Revision

Date

Version details

Prepared By

Approved By

Rev A

30/09/2019

Draft for Auckland Council and Independent Peer Review

Jane Matthews

Peter Roan

Rev 0

21/10/2019

Final for Auckland Council approval

Jane Matthews

Peter Roan

Approval Status Name/Title

Signature

Date

Prepared by:

Jane Matthews Heritage Architect

21/10/2019

Reviewed by:

Rachel Purdy Link Alliance â€“ Senior Planner

21/10/2019

Approved by:

Peter Roan Link Alliance â€“ Consents Manager

21/10/2019

Page 2

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

Table of contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 5 1.1

Karangahape Station ....................................................................................................... 5

1.2

Historic Character DWP (Built Heritage Section) Staging ................................................. 6

1.3

Purpose of the Historic Character DWP (Built Heritage Section) ..................................... 6

1.4

Relevant Conditions ........................................................................................................ 6

1.5

Sustainability ................................................................................................................... 9

1.6

DWP Review and updates ............................................................................................. 10

2. Karangahape Early Works ....................................................................... 11 2.1

Overview of Works ........................................................................................................ 11

3. Built Heritage Overview .......................................................................... 12 3.1

Built Heritage in proximity to the Early Works .............................................................. 12

3.1.1.

Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area .............................................................. 12

3.1.2.

Heritage Buildings .................................................................................................. 13

3.1.1.

Historic Streetscape Elements ................................................................................ 20

3.2

Overview of potential Built Heritage impacts during Early Works ................................. 20

3.3

Vibration ....................................................................................................................... 20

3.4

Ground Movement ........................................................................................................ 21

3.5

Stormwater Drainage .................................................................................................... 21

3.6

Impact Damage ............................................................................................................. 21

3.7

Heritage Buildings Potentially Impacted by the Early Works ......................................... 21

4. Management and Mitigation Measures ................................................. 25 4.1

4.1.1.

Pre-Construction Surveys ....................................................................................... 25

4.1.2.

Surveys during Construction ................................................................................... 26

4.1.3.

Post Construction Surveys ...................................................................................... 26

4.1.4.

Photographic Technical Requirements .................................................................... 27

4.2

Page 3

Building Condition Surveys ............................................................................................ 25

Monitoring and Management Measures ....................................................................... 27

4.2.1.

Monitoring Instrumentation ................................................................................... 27

4.2.2.

Vibration ................................................................................................................ 27

4.2.3.

Groundwater and Settlement ................................................................................. 28

4.3

Protection Methodology during construction activities ................................................ 28

4.4

Rectification Methodology ............................................................................................ 28

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

5. Building Record and Salvage Strategy..................................................... 29 5.1

Photographic Recording ................................................................................................ 29

5.2

Salvage Strategy ............................................................................................................ 30

6. General Matters ...................................................................................... 31 6.1

Communication and Consultation ................................................................................. 31

6.2

Key Personnel ................................................................................................................ 31

6.3

Built Heritage role and responsibilities .......................................................................... 31

6.3.1.

Contractor Briefing ................................................................................................. 31

6.3.2.

Recording and monitoring ...................................................................................... 31

Appendix A: Record of CLG, IPR and Auckland Council Comments .............. 32 A1. CLG Comments ........................................................................................ 32 A2. IPR Comments ......................................................................................... 32 A3. Auckland Council Comments .................................................................. 32 Appendix B: ISCA Requirements ................................................................... 34 Appendix C: Historic Heritage and Character Buildings in Proximity to the Karangahape Station Early Works ................................................................. 35

Page 4

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

1. Introduction The City Rail Link (CRL) project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line in the vicinity of Mt Eden Station. The CRL also involves the construction of two new underground stations at Aotea and Karangahape and a redeveloped Mt Eden Station (refer to Figure 1-1). The design and construction of the CRL infrastructure between the Aotea and Mt Eden Stations is being delivered by the Link Alliance.

Figure 1-0-1: CRL Route and Location

This Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (HC DWP) (Built Heritage Section) has been prepared in relation to construction of the new Karangahape Station.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Refer to Section 2 of this HC DWP (Built Heritage Section) for further detail on the construction works.

1.2 Historic Character DWP (Built Heritage Section) Staging To reflect the staged construction approach for the Karangahape Station, HC DWPs will be developed in stages. This HC DWP addresses built heritage for the Karangahape Station early works, which are described in detail in the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and summarised in Section 2 of this DWP. Built Heritage Sections of the HC DWP will also be prepared for the main construction works and the public realm reinstatement.

1.3 Purpose of the Historic Character DWP (Built Heritage Section) This HC DWP (Built Heritage Section) has been prepared to identify measures that will be implemented to mitigate and manage potential adverse effects on built heritage during construction of the Karangahape Station early works. The objective of this HC DWP is to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on built heritage as far as reasonably practicable. The Built Heritage Section addresses the requirements of CRL designation Condition 41 and will be implemented throughout the construction period. This HC DWP has considered buildings located in proximity to the Karangahape early works, which are recognised as having heritage value as a result of scheduling in the Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in Part (AUP), inclusion in the scheduled Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area or listing under the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014. This HC DWP has been developed to enable consultation with and feedback from the Karangahape Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG); and reviewed by the Independent Peer Reviewer (IPR) prior to submission to Auckland Council (as per designation Conditions 7 and 11). A record of consultation outcomes (CLG and IPRP) is included in Appendix A. The Historic Character DWP (Archaeology Section) has been prepared to address the requirements of Condition 41 of the CRL designation. The HC DWP (Built Heritage Section) has been prepared by Matthews & Matthews Architects Ltd and forms part of the CEMP for the early works.

1.4 Relevant Conditions Table 1-1 identifies the designation conditions relevant to this HC DWP (Built Heritage Section) and where they are addressed in the document. Table 1-1: Built Heritage and Archaeology conditions and location in Plan

Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

41.1

The Historic Character DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects on built heritage and archaeology that may result from associated works prior to, during, and after the construction of the City Rail Link or any part of it.

This document

Page 6

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

41.2

The objective of the Built Heritage section is to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on built heritage as far as reasonably practicable. To achieve the above objective, the following shall, as a minimum, be included in the built heritage section of the Historic Character DWP:

This document

6.0

(b) The proposed methods for monitoring building damage that is to be undertaken by a suitably qualified person for the duration of construction works. This includes confirming which Built Heritage buildings and structures are to be subject to a pre and post building condition survey through:

5.0

(i) Using the updated predicted vibration contours undertaken in Condition 36; (ii) Reviewing those buildings in Appendix 2 to these conditions in accordance with Condition 46.1;

4.5, Appendix C

(iii) Reviewing buildings within the designation footprint (including above sub-strata designation) or located in close proximity to identify buildings which have been recognised as having heritage value as a result of scheduling under the Historic Places Act 1993 [now the HNZPTA] or in the Auckland Unitary Plan.

4.5, Appendix C

(c) Identification and methodology for recording of Built Heritage directly affected by the construction or associated pre- and post-construction works (i.e. within the surface designation footprint), which cannot be retained and / or adaptively re-used / partially retained. For the avoidance of doubt, the following buildings and structures may be demolished: (i) Bluestone Toilets (SCDP Category B) (ii) Beresford Toilets (iii) Rear annex to building at 229-231 Symonds Street and (iv) Griffith’s Building

5.1, 6.0, noting only the Beresford Toilets are relevant to this DWP

(d) Identification and methodology for recording Built Heritage directly affected by the construction, or associated pre- and post-construction, which are to be:

Page 7

(i) Adaptively reused;

N/A

(ii) Partially retained in design and construction; or

N/A

(iii) Built heritage elements have been integrated into other elements of the City Rail.

N/A

(iv) …….

N/A

(e) How Built Heritage Buildings and Structures will be protected during construction through the use of screening or other protective measures to mitigate adverse construction effects;

5.3.

(f) How mitigation or rectification of damage to Built Heritage Buildings and Structures will be addressed; and

5.4

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

(g) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which detail how the Auckland Council Heritage Department, the New Zealand Historic Places Trust [now HNZPT], and mana whenua (see condition 15) are consulted, and the communication with the general public on the management of the adverse effects relating to Built Heritage.

7.0

Building Condition Surveys 46.1

Process for Building Condition Surveys Prior to construction, as a minimum those buildings listed in Appendix One and Appendix Two or identified pursuant to Condition 41.2(b) will be considered for a building condition survey. A building condition survey will be undertaken where it is assessed that there is potential for damage to buildings or structures arising from construction as determined by an independent suitably qualified person appointed by the Requiring Authority based on the criteria below unless the relevant industry criteria applied at the time or heightened building sensitivity or other inherent building vulnerability requires it. Building damage criteria will initially be assessed in accordance with Burland, J.B. (1997) â€œAssessment of Risk of Damage to Buildings due to Tunnelling and Excavationâ€?. Additional factors which may be considered in determining whether a building condition survey will be undertaken include: (a) Age of the building; (b) Construction types; (c) Foundation types; (d) General building condition; (e) Proximity to any excavation; (f) Whether the building is earthquake prone; and (g) Whether any basements are present in the building.

46.2

Where prior to construction it is determined that a Building Condition Survey is required in accordance with Condition 46.1, or if measurements exceed the criteria in Condition 33: (a) The Requiring Authority shall employ a suitably qualified person to undertake the building condition surveys and that person shall be identified in the CEMP; (b) The Requiring Authority shall provide the building condition survey report to the relevant property owner within 15 working days of the survey being undertaken, and additionally it shall notify and provide the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer a copy of the completed survey report; (c) The Requiring Authority shall contact owners of those buildings and structures where a Building Condition Survey is to be undertaken to confirm the timing and methodology for undertaking a pre-construction condition assessment; (d) The Requiring Authority shall record all contact, correspondence and communication with owners and this shall be available on request for the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring Officer; (e) Should agreement from owners to enter property and undertake a condition assessment not be obtained within 3 months from first contact, then the Requiring Authority shall not be required under these designation conditions to undertake these assessments;

Page 8

| Karangahape Station Early Works

5.1

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

(f) The Requiring Authority shall undertake a visual inspection during "active construction" if requested by the building owner where a preconstruction condition assessment has been undertaken. (g) The Requiring Authority shall develop a system of monitoring the condition of existing buildings which is commensurate with the type of the existing building and the proximity of the CRL works. The purpose of monitoring is to assess whether or not active construction is compromising the structural integrity of the building. (h) The Requiring Authority shall, during the Building Condition Survey, determine whether the building is classified as Commercial / Industrial / School or a Historic or sensitive structure in terms of Condition 33. 46.3

During construction: (a) The Requiring Authority shall implement procedures that will appropriately respond to the information received from the monitoring system. Where necessary this may include the temporary cessation of works in close proximity to the relevant building until such time as measures are implemented to avoid further damage or compromise of the structural integrity of the building. (b) Any damage to buildings or structures shall be recorded and repaired by the Requiring Authority and costs associated with the repair will met by the Requiring Authority.

46.4

Following construction: (a) The Requiring Authority shall, within 12 months of the commencement of operation of the City Rail Link, contact owners of those buildings and structures where a Building Condition Survey was undertaken to confirm the need for undertaking a post-construction condition assessment; (b) Where a post-construction building condition survey confirms that the building has deteriorated as the result of construction or operation works relating to the City Rail Link, the Requiring Authority shall, at its own cost, rectify the damage; and

46.5

Where the Requiring Authority is required to undertake building repairs in accordance with Conditions 46.3(b) or 46.4(b), such repairs shall be undertaken as soon as reasonably practicable and in consultation with the owner of the building.

4.4

1.5 Sustainability The Link Alliance is seeking an Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia (ISCA) Infrastructure Sustainability (IS) Rating. Further details can be found in the CEMP and Sustainability Rating Management Plan. Project sustainability requirements that relate directly to this HC DWP (Built Heritage Section) are included in Appendix B. These requirements are imbedded within this HC DWP to ensure that sustainability is a key focus and â€˜the way we do thingsâ€™. In some cases, the IS requirements and sustainability goals enhance the designation and consent requirements.

Page 9

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

1.6 DWP Review and updates This HC DWP (Built Heritage Section) is a live document that will be reviewed at least annually, or as a result of a material change to the project, or to address unforeseen adverse built heritage effects arising from construction, or unresolved complaints. Any material changes to the HC DWP must be approved by Auckland Council prior to any on-site activity reliant upon the change commencing. Refer to the CEMP for further detail on the review and updating process.

Page 10

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

Karangahape Early Works 2.1 Overview of Works

Early works will be undertaken at the new Karangahape Station site to enable and provide for the subsequent main construction works. The early works are detailed in the CEMP. An overview of the work is provided in Table 2-1. Table 2-1: Overview of Karangahape Early Works

Works location

Overview of construction activities

Beresford Square / Pitt Street

 Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Beresford Square / Pitt Street;  Removal of street trees and the demolition of the café / toilet in Beresford Square;  Establishment of the Beresford Square Construction Support Area to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.; and  Closure of Beresford Square to vehicle traffic (other than construction traffic) while retaining pedestrian and cycle access.  Removal of existing street furniture where required (such as seating, street lighting (to be replaced with temporary lighting).

Mercury Lane

It should be noted that the demolition of buildings and above ground structures within the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area is authorised by the CRL Enabling Work Outline Plan – Karangahape Road Demolition Works (Council reference OPW60339200), confirmed by Auckland Council in June 2019. Those works do not form part of this HC DWP. It is noted that no building canopies will be removed as part of the early works.

Page 11

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

Built Heritage Overview 3.1 Built Heritage in proximity to the Early Works

Built Heritage potentially affected by the Karangahape Station early works is set out in Table 3-1 below and Appendix C and includes heritage buildings, sites and places identified in the HNZPT List or in the AUP, or specifically identified in the CRL designation conditions.

3.1.1. Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area The Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area (HHA) is identified in the AUP Schedule 14.2 (Refer Figure 3-1 below). Heritage buildings that are identified as contributing to the historic heritage values of the area include almost all buildings in Pitt Street, Beresford Square and Mercury Lane in proximity to the early works. The general heritage characteristics of these buildings are as follows: 

  

Buildings in proximity to the early works include a range of late 19th to early 20th century commercial buildings, churches, Auckland’s early fire and ambulance station buildings as well as the Mercury Theatre. Buildings are generally two or more stories high, typically unreinforced masonry and likely to be identified as earthquake prone. This area includes some of central Auckland’s earliest buildings, including the Pitt Street Wesleyan Church (1865-1866) and the former St James Church in Beresford Square (1876). There are a number of buildings in this area which include fragile elements such as parapets, chimneys, the tower of the former Fire Station building in Beresford Square, as well as stained glass windows in the Wesleyan Church and leadlight features inside the Mercury Theatre and inside 61-65 Pitt Street.

The Statement of Significance for the Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area from the AUP includes the following: “The Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area has significance for its historical association with the commercial and residential development of Auckland, from the time of the city’s colonial establishment through to the mid-20th century. The area retains considerable significance due to the predominance of Victorian and Edwardian-era buildings that have survived modern redevelopment. The decorative physical appearance of these buildings combined with the unity of scale and form reflects the historical pattern of development and creates an urban landscape that is distinctive within Auckland. Despite the many changes that have occurred in the rest of the city throughout the years, Karangahape Road has retained its original purpose, which reinforces its significance as one of Auckland’s earliest and most important commercial and entertainment areas. The character of the area is dominated by the presence of Victorian, Edwardian, and Interwar-period commercial buildings. The buildings are generally two- to three-storeys and have a verandah that covers all or part of the footpath. These features have maintained the historical pattern of commercial development which define a retail landscape of the earlymid 20th century and reflect the core pattern of development for Karangahape Road. Along the associated side-streets there are more modest early and mid-20th century shops and Page 12

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) warehouses that are part of the historical pattern of development and support the areaâ€™s commercial importance.â€?

Figure 3-1: AUP Historic Heritage Area: Karangahape Road (Map 14.2.12.1)

3.1.2. Heritage Buildings Appendix C of this HC DWP details the heritage buildings in proximity to the early works area (those that may be impacted by the works are listed in Section 3.2), including heritage status, and key heritage values, where identified. Property addresses for these buildings are shown on Figure 3-2. Page 13

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

Figure 3-2: Site plan showing property addresses in proximity to the Early Works

Table 3-1 lists the heritage buildings in proximity to the early works which are identified in the HNZPT List and/or scheduled in the AUP, including buildings specifically identified in Appendix 2 of the CRL designation conditions. Table 3-1: Heritage Buildings in proximity to the Karangahape Early Works

Ref no. CRL designation Conditions (App. 2)

Building and Address

59 Pitt Street

Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

61 â€“ 65 Pitt Street

Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

Page 14

Heritage Recognition Scheduled in AUP

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Listed by HNZPT

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Ref no. CRL designation Conditions (App. 2)

Building and Address

70-74 Pitt Street The Chatham

Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

78 Pitt Street Pitt Street Wesleyan Church

Schedule 14.1, Category A, ID 01998

Heritage Recognition Scheduled in AUP

Listed by HNZPT

HNZPT List Category 2 List No. 626

Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

78 Pitt Street Wesleyan Bicentennial Hall

Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

1 Beresford Square Former Central Fire Station

Schedule 14.1, Category B Id 01996 Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape

Page 15

| Karangahape Station Early Works

HNZPT List, Category 1, List No. 117.

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Ref no. CRL designation Conditions (App. 2)

Building and Address

Heritage Recognition Scheduled in AUP

Listed by HNZPT

Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

16-18 Beresford Square

Non-Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

211-235 Karangahape Road Pitt Street Buildings (Oâ€™Malleyâ€™s Corner)

Schedule 14.1, Category B ID 01978

HNZPT List, Category 2, List No. 625.

Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

238 Karangahape Road George Courts Building

Schedule 14.1, Category A ID 01979 Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

Page 16

1 Cross Street George Courts Factory Building

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

HNZPT List, Category 2, List No. 580

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Ref no. CRL designation Conditions (App. 2)

Building and Address

243 Karangahape Road Naval and Family Hotel

Heritage Recognition Scheduled in AUP

Listed by HNZPT

Schedule 14.1, Category B ID 01980

HNZPT List, Category 2, List No. 4498.

Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

3 Mercury Lane (246-254 Karangahape Road) Hallenstein Bros Building

Schedule 14.1, Category B ID 01981

HNZPT List, Category 2, List No. 586

Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

6 Beresford Square

Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

256 Karangahape Road

Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

Mercury Theatre Entrance â€“ Norman Ng Building

Page 17

| Karangahape Station Early Works

HNZPT List, Category 2, List No. 5296 (Mercury Theatre)

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Ref no. CRL designation Conditions (App. 2)

Building and Address

257 Karangahape Road (This building is identified as 259-261 Karangahape Road in the HHA Evaluation)

Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

258-266 Karangahape Road

Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

268 Karangahape Road

Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

259-261 Karangahape Road

Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape

Page 18

Heritage Recognition Scheduled in AUP

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Listed by HNZPT

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Ref no. CRL designation Conditions (App. 2)

Building and Address

Heritage Recognition Scheduled in AUP

Listed by HNZPT

Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

267-271 Karangahape Road Abbotts Building (Note Auckland Council Geomaps gives street address 259 Karangahape Road to group of sites).

283 Karangahape Road (20 Beresford Square) Samoa House

9 Mercury Lane Mercury Theatre; Former Kings Theatre

Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

Non-Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739 NZIA National Award in 1980

Schedule 14.1, Category A ID 01986 Contributing Building in scheduled Karangahape Road HHA; Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739

Page 19

| Karangahape Station Early Works

HNZPT List, Category 2, List No. 5296 (Mercury Theatre)

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

3.1.1. Historic Streetscape Elements The Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area features historic streetscape elements, including basalt kerbs and basalt blocks and cellar lightwells set into the footpaths in some locations (refer to Figure 3-3).

Figure 3-3: Basalt kerb blocks in Pitt Street, which are a feature of the Karangahape Historic Heritage area.

3.2

Overview of potential Built Heritage impacts during Early Works

Unreinforced masonry buildings in proximity to the early works are likely to be at higher risk from the potential effects of vibration or ground movement associated with the works. These buildings may have soft mortar joints, simple foundations and connections of structural members or limited bracing. It is important to understand the specific building structure, including foundations, fabric and detailing, in order to inform the likely built heritage effects and the methods that will be implemented during the works to avoid, remedy or mitigate these effects (outlined in Section 5 of this HC DWP).

3.3 Vibration Ground movement and vibration have the potential to affect nearby buildings and their foundations, with consequential damage to building fabric and services. Potential damage from vibration can range from cosmetic to minor or major damage. Potential effects on historic structures as a result of ground movement due to vibration can include cosmetic or aesthetic effects, such as hairline cracks to surfaces or to mortar joints that might affect appearance, through to changes to building fabric that might affect weather tightness, alignment of windows and doors, or damage to services. Major damage could place buildings at risk in terms of structural stability. For built heritage structures, even aesthetic damage may impact on heritage values, for example if original details or finishes are cracked or damaged, and potentially if inappropriate repairs to such defects are undertaken. A Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan (CNV DWP) has been prepared to address the potential vibration effects of the early works. Section 6 of the CNV DWP notes that: â€˜The early works have the potential to exceed the relevant construction noise and vibration limits at the closest receivers. To avoid or minimise exceedances it is vital that appropriate Page 20

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) mitigation and management measures are utilised. This DWP identifies the methods to achieve best practicable option for mitigating adverse effects during the construction works.’

3.4 Ground Movement Excavation and foundation work can also cause ground displacement and movement of an adjacent historic structure. Excavation deeper than the foundations of neighbouring historic buildings has the potential for risk. A historic structure, with a shallow masonry footing, may experience corresponding displacement that can result in major structural damage. With regards to the proposed network utility relocation works (involving trenching and directional drilling), the Link Alliance has advised that: 

 



Early works to be carried at Beresford Square for the Karangahape Station are within the road reserve and footpath along the front of the buildings. These buildings are likely to be unreinforced masonry / brick buildings on shallow foundations, which are relatively susceptible to damage. The majority of these early works are shallow excavations; i.e. up to 1.5m deep. Prior to carrying out work, [trial trenches] or investigative potholing at discrete locations will be carried out to confirm foundation type and size. These works will not cause any damage to foundations of the building being inspected. The outcome of the investigations will determine the mitigation measures to be implemented to control settlement to the building foundations.

Each individual building will be assessed according to its foundation type, construction and sensitivity to ground movement. A Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan (GSMCP) has been prepared in relation to any potential groundwater or settlement effects from the early works.

3.5 Stormwater Drainage Maintaining a well-functioning stormwater drainage system is essential to the protection of any historic structure. This system can easily be rendered ineffective by construction or demolition work if debris originating at the construction site finds its way to the rainwater disposal system or drains of an adjacent building.

3.6 Impact Damage Construction activities have potential to cause accidental damage to building fabric through direct impact from machinery. Appropriate protection and management will be required to avoid this (refer to Section 5 of this DWP for further detail).

3.7 Heritage Buildings Potentially Impacted by the Early Works Section 5.2 of the CNV DWP identifies the buildings in proximity to the early works, including historic heritage buildings that may be at risk of receiving vibration which exceeds the building damage vibration limits. (Historic heritage buildings in proximity are listed in Table 4-1 below). Section 6.2 of the GSMCP identifies the buildings adjacent to the area of works which may be impacted by settlement as a result of the early works (these buildings are shown in bold in Table 41). Page 21

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Table 3-2: Heritage Buildings that may be impacted by the early works

Ref no. CRL designation Conditions (App. 2)

Address

Building Classification

238 Karangahape Road George Courts Building

Scheduled in AUP, Contributes to scheduled Historic Heritage Area, Listed by HNZPT

1 Cross Street George Courts Factory Building

Contributes to scheduled Historic Heritage Area

1 Beresford Square Former Central Fire Station

Scheduled in AUP, Contributes to scheduled Historic Heritage Area, Listed by HNZPT

59 Pitt Street

Contributes to scheduled Historic Heritage Area

Page 22

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Ref no. CRL designation Conditions (App. 2)

Address

Building Classification

61 â€“ 65 Pitt Street

Contributes to scheduled Historic Heritage Area

4-6 and 8-10 Beresford Square Koia Building (address given on building)

Contributes to scheduled Historic Heritage Area

243 Karangahape Road Naval and Family Hotel

Scheduled in AUP, Contributes to scheduled Historic Heritage Area, Listed by HNZPT

15 â€“ 25 Beresford Square Former St James Church Hopetoun Alpha

Scheduled in AUP, Contributes to scheduled Historic Heritage Area, Listed by HNZPT

Page 23

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Ref no. CRL designation Conditions (App. 2)

Address

283 Karangahape Road Samoa House

259 â€“ 281 Karangahape Road (also referred to as 8-10 Beresford Square and 12-14 Beresford Square)

Contributes to scheduled Historic Heritage Area

3 Mercury Lane (246-254 Karangahape Road) Hallenstein Bros Building

Scheduled in AUP, Contributes to scheduled Historic Heritage Area, Listed by HNZPT

9 Mercury Lane Mercury Theatre

Scheduled in AUP, Contributes to scheduled Historic Heritage Area, Listed by HNZPT

Page 24

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Building Classification

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

Management and Mitigation Measures

Methods to be implemented during construction to mitigate and manage potential built heritage effects will include the following (which are outlined further in this section):     

Building Condition Surveys prior to the commencement of works; Investigations of building foundations prior to the commencement of works; Monitoring of works (including vibration, building movement, groundwater and settlement) as set out in the CNV DWP and GSMCP; Built heritage protection; and Building record and salvage strategy (with respect to the removal of any built heritage items) (refer to Section 6 of this HC DWP).

4.1 Building Condition Surveys 4.1.1. Pre-Construction Surveys Prior to construction condition surveys of heritage buildings identified in the CNV DWP and the GMSCP as being potentially impacted by the works (inclusive of the buildings listed in Appendix 2 of the CRL designation conditions that are in proximity to the early works) (refer to Table 4-1 in this DWP) will be undertaken as part of the early works. These condition surveys will ascertain any preexisting damage to a building, existing structural distress, and any potential weakness of the structure’s foundations or structural elements, as well as non-structural damage. The condition surveys will form the basis for recording buildings and recording baseline information prior to works commencing. The building condition surveys will generally be undertaken as follows (in accordance with CRL designation Condition 46):  

The building surveys will be undertaken by an independent senior qualified person. The survey shall include:     

The building condition survey, will confirm the building classification for the subject buildings i.e. if the building is classified as Commercial / Industrial / School or a Historic or sensitive structure in terms of CRL designation Condition 33 (project construction vibration standards). The foundation type of the building will also be determined. With respect to built heritage, the pre-construction condition surveys will include, as appropriate:  

 Page 25

A survey of the exterior and interior of heritage buildings. A record of the condition of buildings using photographs, annotated drawings and written records, noting any existing signs of structural distress and damage or deterioration of a non-structural nature. Consideration of the stability of any elements, including applied decorative elements or features, and any fragile elements. | Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)  

Any recommended remediation to secure or mitigate potential problems prior to the commencement of construction. The location of all cracks greater than 2 mm in aperture width, which shall be recorded with a positional accuracy of +/- 200mm. Installation of grid crack monitors may be required on selected readily accessible cracks with an aperture width greater than 2 mm discussed above and as determined in consultation with the Built Heritage Specialist.

The condition surveys shall generally include: 

       

An introduction with overview of the premises, record of when the inspection was made, orientation notes for viewing photos and captions, summary of the scope of inspection, purpose of report and any limitations, any areas not accessed; A description of the property construction, based on a visual inspection and review of available architectural drawings and property information obtained from Council; A summary of existing damage and susceptibility to future damage; Site plan; Annotated plans, elevations and sections that relate to the photographic record; Floor plans if available; Burland building damage classification matrix; Pre-Construction Condition Schedule, with description, visible damage evident, damage category recorded and photograph reference; and Annotated photographs recording building condition. This should include general exterior and interior views as well as photographs of specific defects.

The pre-construction condition surveys will be reviewed by the Project Built Heritage Specialist, prior to works commencing.

4.1.2. Surveys during Construction As set out in the CNV DWP, building condition surveys may be undertaken during the construction works in the event that complaints in relation to building damage are received or if the vibration criteria set out in the CRL designation conditions are exceeded. In addition, the Link Alliance shall carry out visual inspections of the surrounding ground and external building facades of buildings for which pre-constriction condition surveys are required adjacent to the early works to monitor any deterioration or movement of any pre-existing cracks.

4.1.3. Post Construction Surveys In accordance with CRL designation Condition 46.4, building condition surveys of those buildings or structures that were subject to a pre-construction building condition survey may be undertaken post-construction of the early works. Where a post-construction building condition survey confirms a building has deteriorated as a result of the works, the damage shall be rectified by the Link Alliance. In addition, as noted in Section 9 of the CNV DWP a post-construction condition survey of the same buildings and services will be conducted a week after the conclusion of works in the area that have the potential to generate vibration at levels approaching or exceeding the limits in CRL designation Condition 33.

Page 26

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

4.1.4. Photographic Technical Requirements General Images - conventional (digital) photography will be used with appropriate professional lenses capable of producing high resolution 1- 2Mb JPEG images. Archival Images - conventional (non-digital) photography will be used, using a medium format camera with appropriate professional lenses capable of producing 2.25 x 2.25 inch black and white negatives. Interior details and subsurface photographs may be taken using a conventional (non-digital) professional grade camera with appropriate professional lenses capable of producing 35 mm colour or black and white negatives. Video equipment shall be high-resolution (broadcast quality), with low light capabilities although additional lighting may also be required.

4.2 Monitoring and Management Measures 4.2.1. Monitoring Instrumentation Based on the results of the pre-construction building condition surveys, and in accordance with the GSMCP, geotechnical and structural instrumentation will be installed on surfaces of, or nearby to, existing structures. In some instances, this will include instrumentation installed within the property as well as on the external surfaces of the property with the property ownerâ€™s consent. The purpose of this instrumentation will be to measure/monitor any movement, settlement or induced vibrations as a result of the works which may have the potential to adversely affect the structure. The instrumentation will be installed prior to starting the construction works.

4.2.2. Vibration Vibration mitigation and management, based on a Best Practicable Option (BPO) approach will be implemented during the works as outlined in the CNV DWP, including undertaking building condition surveys (refer to Section 4.1 of this DWP) and monitoring prior to and during construction. In addition, Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plans (SSCVMP) will be prepared for buildings where vibration levels are predicted or measured to exceed the vibration limits set out in CRL designation Condition 33 (refer to Section 5.2 of the CNV DWP). Regular monitoring and assessment of the vibration measurements will determine the process to be followed and any required action to mitigate and manage any potential effects. As set out in Section 9.3 of the CNV DWP, if vibration monitoring demonstrates non-compliance with the vibration building damage limits identified in any approved SSCVMP, the construction activity responsible for the exceedance shall cease as soon as safe and practicable to do so. A detailed building condition survey shall then be undertaken by a suitably qualified engineer. Any damage to buildings or structures shall be recorded as set out in Section 9.3 of the CNV DWP. Recording shall include photographs and relevant annotated plans, sections and elevations to show the major features of the buildings including location, type, construction, age and present condition, including defects (cracks). A report shall be prepared summarising the findings of the survey and recording.

Page 27

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

4.2.3. Groundwater and Settlement As set out in Sections 4 to 6 of the GSMCP groundwater monitoring and ground surface and building monitoring will be undertaken prior to, during and post construction. Pre-construction building condition surveys will be prepared to provide baseline information for recommended buildings prior to the works commencing. Visual inspections will be undertaken at intervals during the construction and post construction. A response, mitigation and contingency plan is set out in Section 8 of the GSMCP summarising the responses required if any exceedances of movement trigger levels are identified during monitoring.

4.3 Protection Methodology during construction activities Table 4-1 outlines the methodology that will be implemented to protect key features of historic (and other) buildings against construction activities undertaken adjacent to, or in close proximity to these buildings. Table 4-1: Overview of Protection Methodology

Built Heritage Feature

Protection Methodology

Exterior building fabric and surfaces

Where works will be undertaken immediately adjacent to these features, appropriate protection such as plywood sheets or temporary fencing to a minimum of 2 metres high will be required.

Canopies and overhangs

Avoiding impact from machinery movement through use of appropriate equipment and observation while works undertaken under or adjacent to canopies.

Fragile exterior or interior building elements

Appropriate bracing or protection for features such as stained glass and leadlight windows, chimneys, parapets, if vibration or ground settlement will be likely to put these at risk.

Historic streetscape elements

Elements, such as basalt kerbs, or basalt blocks inset into the footpaths shall be carefully removed if required, prior to or during the works and stored for reinstatement at an appropriate time following the completion of works. Cellar lightwells should be retained and protected with plywood as required during the works.

Protection measures shall be reviewed by the Project Built Heritage Specialist prior to works commencing and periodically during the works.

4.4 Rectification Methodology The building condition surveys and assessments and monitoring/management methods outlined in Section 4 of this HC DWP will be the vehicle for any discussion around the need for rectification works. In addition, it is likely that rectification discussions will be undertaken on a case by case basis when the post-condition assessments are undertaken.

Page 28

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

Building Record and Salvage Strategy

The Beresford Toilets and café will be demolished as part of the Karangahape Station early works. In accordance with CRL designation Condition 41.2(a), the strategy for recording and salvage of any elements from the Beresford Toilets shall be undertaken as follows: a) Prior to any works an archival photographic record should be made of the Beresford Toilets and adjoining structure (refer to Section 6.1). b) Original drawings should be located from Auckland Council Archives if available. c) As-built drawings should also be prepared for the toilets. This should include a CAD model from which to generate plans and elevations. d) Written records, summarising information about the history of the toilets and changes over time, systematic description of the exterior and each interior room/ space. The purpose is to record information about the existing structure and its history for potential use in the preparation of interpretive information. e) Research and collate existing archival photography where this exists. Salvage of component parts of the historic toilets is recommended as outlined in Section 6.2, for potential reuse or public realm reinstatement.

5.1 Photographic Recording To provide a high-resolution archival record, photography should be carried out to archival standards using 35mm cameras and good quality lenses at a minimum.  

General Images - conventional (digital) photography will use appropriate professional lenses capable of producing high resolution 1- 2Mb JPEG images. Archival images - For archival images, the camera shall be set to record using a raw file format. This raw file shall not be modified - it shall be considered to be the ‘digital negative’. It is recommended that these images be converted to uncompressed baseline v.6 TIFF for archiving. All images shall have accompanying metadata specifying: photo ID, capture device, converting software, colour space, bit depth, resolution, date of capture, photographer, caption and any alterations made to the image.

Video equipment, if used, shall be high-resolution (broadcast quality), with low light capabilities although additional lighting may also be required. Views of the Beresford Square Toilets shall include: Perspectives:

 Views showing relationship of the Toilets to the surrounding setting, other buildings and streetscape, including Views from Pitt Street to both sides

Exterior:

 Elevations  Features and details (including pilasters and dentils, curved cornice, doors, lamp pole, wrought iron railings

Interior

 Each space inside

The archival photographic record will be reviewed by the Project Built Heritage Specialist and provided to the Auckland Council Heritage Unit (Built Heritage and Implementation) and HNZPT. Page 29

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) General photographic images shall be taken of buildings that are to be demolished as a record, prior to works commencing.

5.2 Salvage Strategy Elements recommended to be salvaged from the Beresford Street Toilets include:   

Wrought iron railings located to both sides of the building; The light standard mounted to the top of the structure; and Small eastern portion of the poured concrete structure including vaulted concrete roof, and metal doors with cast iron hinges. Reuse of as much of the toilet structure where possible, should be considered.

Figure 5-1: Views of the Beresford Toilets and Café. Matthews & Matthews Architects Ltd 2019.

Page 30

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

6. General Matters 6.1 Communication and Consultation Communication with HNZPT and Auckland Council Heritage Unit (Built Heritage and Implementation) will be undertaken to ensure that any issues can, and will, be addressed in a timely and transparent manner. This will cover regular updates on progress, periodic site visits, and in the event of unexpected finds or changes to agreed methodologies. Details of the communication are provided in the Project Communication and Consultation Plan.

6.2 Key Personnel Table 7-1 outlines the key personnel involved in the implementation of this HC DWP (Built Heritage Section), including the Project Built Heritage Specialist, Auckland Council Heritage Unit and HNZPT and key Link Alliance personnel. Table 6-1: Contact Details

Role

Name

Project Built Heritage Specialist

Jane Matthews

Auckland Council Built Heritage Specialist

Dan Windwood

Auckland Council Compliance and Monitoring Officer

Tim Oâ€™Grady

HNZPT Built Heritage Advisor

Robin Byron

Karangahape Station Project Manager

Jonathan Hill

Karangahape Station Construction Manager

Dan Trotman

Environmental and Sustainability Manager

Sarah Sutherland

6.3 Built Heritage role and responsibilities 6.3.1. Contractor Briefing Prior to the start of the works, the Project Built Heritage Specialist will brief the Link Alliance site staff on built heritage requirements for the early works.

6.3.2. Recording and monitoring The Link Alliance shall advise the Project Built Heritage Specialist of the programme for works and any changes that may arise, to ensure that any recording work is completed, and to allow for periodic site visits

Page 31

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

Appendix A: Record of CLG, IPR and Auckland Council Comments

A1. CLG Comments A Karangahape CLG meeting was held on 17th September to discuss the Karangahape early works and for the CLG to provide comments / feedback on the CEMP and sub-plans, including this HC DWP (Built Heritage Section). No comments were received from the CLG on this DWP.

A2. IPR Comments An Independent Peer Review of the draft Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) was undertaken by Jeremy Salmond from Salmond Reed Architects. The comments received are as follows: Section of DWP

Comment

Response

General comments

A sustainability and environmental policy outlining the objectives and goals of the project should be included.

Table B-1 has been included in Appendix B to outline the relevant ISCA requirements

Clarity would be provided by including a timeline for the monitoring events required through the life of the project

Not required by the designation or resource consent conditions

1.4 Relevant Conditions

In Table 1-1, include the full list of buildings and structures which may be demolished under Condition 41.2 (c).

List included, along with a note that only the Beresford Toilets are relevant to this DWP

3.1 Built Heritage

Minor correction (‘will’ instead of ‘shall’)

Text edited

3.2 Vibration

Note that inappropriate repair to aesthetic damage may also have impacts on heritage values

Text updated in this regard

4.1 Building Condition Surveys

Clarify if any difference between ‘building condition survey’ and ‘preconstruction building condition survey’

Clarified with consistent use of ‘building condition survey’, noting these are to be undertaken prior to construction.

5.0 Building record and salvage strategy

Include ‘research and collate existing archival photography where this exists’ into the strategy for recording and salvage for the Beresford Toilets

Text updated in this regard, note changes made to the ‘archival images’ requirements to reflect the Heritage New Zealand Guide to Investigation and Recording of buildings and standing structures.

A3. Auckland Council Comments Mr Dan Windwood, Senior Specialist in Historic Character – Built Heritage, has reviewed and provided comment on the draft Historic Character – Built Heritage DWP as follows:

Page 32

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Section of DWP

Comment

Response

1.5 Sustainability

A sustainability and environmental policy outlining the objectives and goals of the project should be included.

Table B-1 has been included in Appendix B to outline the relevant ISCA requirements

3.1.1. Historic Streetscape Elements

As well as the basalt kerbs and blocks, it should also be noted that cellar lightwells inset into the footpaths are also found in the area. Consideration should also be given to identifying other elements such as historic railings and other street furniture.

Cellar lightwells set into footpaths have been noted. Historic railings to the Beresford Toilets are identified as items for salvage in Section 5.2. No other historic streetscape elements or street furniture are identified as being affected by the early works.

5.1.4. and 6.1 Photographic Technical Requirements

Confirm the final location of archival images.

Included that archival digital images are to be provided to Auckland Council Heritage Unit and HNZPT.

5.3 Protection

Include cellar lightwells as part of historic streetscape elements to be protected

Text updated in this regard

6.2 Salvage Strategy

Retention and reuse of as much of the toilet structure where possible should be considered in order to align with ISCA objectives

Noted in Section 6.2.

Page 33

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

Appendix B: ISCA Requirements Table B.1 identifies the ISCA Credit Requirements relevant to this HC DWP (Built Heritage Section) and where they are addressed in the document. Credit

Requirement*

Relevant Section of HC DWP (Built Heritage Section)

Other relevant Information / Comments

Heritage Assessment and Management HER-1 Level 1

Measures to minimise the adverse impacts to heritage during construction have been identified and implemented

3, 4, 5, 6 and 7

HER-1 Level 1

Community heritage values have been identified through consultation and integrated into studies.

3, 4, 7, Appendix A

HER-2

Monitoring of heritage is undertaken at appropriate intervals during construction and operation.

5, 6 and 7

Level 1

Refer to the ISCA Rating Tool for full details of the requirements

Page 34

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

Appendix C: Historic Heritage and Character Buildings in Proximity to the Karangahape Station Early Works Ref no. App. 2 CRL Conditions 35

Building Details, including Address/ Building Name, Photo, Heritage status and features 59 Pitt Street Wembley Buildings Note dome at corner

Legal Description (as given in Auckland Council Geomaps)

Lot 1Allot 11 SEC 45 City Auckland, Lot 2 Allot 11 SEC 45 City Auckland. NA 38/181, NA572/109

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule 14.1 AUP Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area

Identified as a Contributing Building in the Karangahape Road HHA. (Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739)

HNZPT

Summary

ď‚ˇ The Wembley Building dates from 1924. ď‚ˇ The architect is not known. The Auckland Gas Company was formerly located in the building. (Refer Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area Evaluation, Auckland Council) (61-65) 65 Pitt Street Note parapet, inside- leadlight window to stair, and laylight

Legal Description (as given in Auckland Council Geomaps)

Lot 1 DP 9643, Lot 2 DP 9643 NA 119D/990, NA119D/991

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule 14.1 AUP Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area

Page 35

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Identified as a Contributing Building in the Karangahape Road HHA. (Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739)

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Ref no. App. 2 CRL Conditions

Building Details, including Address/ Building Name, Photo, Heritage status and features HNZPT

Summary  The building was built c.1900, originally with retail at ground floor and accommodation at the upper level.  The two-storey building retains its original unpainted plastered facade and original verandah, which was originally supported on posts.  The verandah has had some modification and is now suspended from the facade.  The interior of this building has a curved leadlight window at the stair landing and a leadlight laylight in an upper level room. 68 Pitt Street

Legal Description (as given in Auckland Council Geomaps)

PT DP 14692, PTDP 18068 NA695/187

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule 14.1 AUP Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area

Identified as a Contributing Building in the Karangahape Road HHA. (Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739)

HNZPT

Summary

 The building is thought to have been built c.1908. 70-74 Pitt Street The Chatham

Legal Description (as given in Auckland Council Geomaps) Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule 14.1 Page 36

| Karangahape Station Early Works

DP 413692 CT 545935

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Ref no. App. 2 CRL Conditions

Building Details, including Address/ Building Name, Photo, Heritage status and features AUP Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area

Identified as a Contributing Building in the Karangahape Road HHA. (Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739)

HNZPT Summary

 The Chatham Building was built c. 1910. The façade of the building has been integrated with the development of the apartment building. 78 Pitt Street Weslyan Church Note capping to apex, and tops of buttresses extending above roofline, stained glass windows, slate roof, basement hall

Legal Description (As given in AUP Schedule 14.1)

Lot 33 Deeds Red U; Lot 34 Deeds Red U

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule Scheduled in Category B with extent of place, 14.1 which extends in part over footpath. Values F Physical Attributes, G Aesthetic, H Context, ID 01998 AUP Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area

Identified as a Contributing Building in the Karangahape Road HHA. (Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739)

HNZPT

Category 2 List No. 626

Summary  The Pitt Street Methodist Church was erected in 1865-1866.  Built to accommodate the expanding Methodist ministry in Auckland, the Gothic church has been referred to as the Cathedral of Auckland Methodism. The site in Pitt Street was purchased in 1864. The foundation stone for the church was laid in November 1865. The Pitt Street Church's brick and stone exterior incorporates a number of stone heads, believed to have been made by the renowned carver and engraver Anton Teutenberg (1840-1933). The church was designed by Philip Herapath (1822-1892).  The church contains stained glass windows and has a slate roof.

Page 37

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Ref no. App. 2 CRL Conditions 39

Building Details, including Address/ Building Name, Photo, Heritage status and features 78 Pitt Street Weslyan Bicentennial Hall

Legal Description (as given in Auckland Council Geomaps)

NA597/52

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule 14.1 AUP Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area

Identified as a Contributing Building in the Karangahape Road HHA. (Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739)

HNZPT

Summary

ď‚ˇ The Wesleyan Bicentenary Hall was designed by Daniel B Patterson and opened in 1940. (NZ Herald 2 February 1940, p.5) 1 Beresford Square Former Central Fire Station Note tower and chimney, parapets

Legal Description

Lot 1 DP 178433

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule Scheduled in Category B with extent of place, 14.1 which extends in part over footpath. Values: A Historic, B Social, F Physical Attributes, H Context, ID 01996 AUP Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area

Identified as a Contributing Building in the Karangahape Road HHA. (Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739)

HNZPT

Refer St John Ambulance National Offices 47-49 Pitt Street on the same property. Category 1, List No. 117.

Summary Page 38

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Ref no. App. 2 CRL Conditions

Building Details, including Address/ Building Name, Photo, Heritage status and features  The building with tower facing Beresford Square was built in 1912 as an extension to the 1902 fire station onto Pitt Street, to cater for an increased number of staff. Designed by architect G W Allsop in Edwardian Baroque style, the building features polychromatic brickwork. (NZ Herald, 7 May 1912, p.9). The building was constructed using brick and ferro-concrete.  The adjacent former fire station facing Pitt Street was later used as the St John Ambulance National Office. 16 – 18 Beresford Square

Legal Description

Lot 3 DP 2588

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule 14.1 AUP Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area

Identified as a Non-Contributing Building in the Karangahape Road HHA. (Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739)

HNZPT

Summary

 Built c.1950s. The gabled roofed building is evident on the aerial photo dating from 1959 on Auckland Council Geomaps. 211 -235 Karangahape Road Pitt Street Buildings (O’Malley’s Corner) Note parapets and chimneys

Legal Description (as given in AUP Schedule 14.1)

Lot 31 Deeds Red U; Lot 32 Deeds Red U Lot 33 Deeds Red U; Road reserve

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule Scheduled in Category B with extent of place, 14.1 which extends in part over footpath. Values: A Historic, B Social, F Physical Attributes, H Context, ID 01981

Page 39

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Ref no. App. 2 CRL Conditions

Building Details, including Address/ Building Name, Photo, Heritage status and features AUP Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area

Identified as a Contributing Building in the Karangahape Road HHA. (Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739)

HNZPT

Category 2 List number 625

Summary

 The Pitt Street Buildings was designed by architect Arthur Herbert White and was completed in 1904 for the adjacent Pitt Street Methodist Church. It was built at the corner, on the site which had been occupied by the timber church hall and the minister’s parsonage.  In 1925 a new suspension verandah, designed by Herbert Clinton Savage, replaced the existing one with its cast iron support posts.  The prominent corner shop was first occupied by James Tattersfield & Co., drapers and clothiers. Leo O’Malley’s men’s clothing store has been here since 1935. 238 Karangahape Road Identified as a Contributing Building in the HHA George Court Building Note wide overhanging cornices

Legal Description (as given in AUP Schedule 14.1)

Lot 1 DP 174920

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule Scheduled in Category A with extent of place over 14.1 whole property. Values: A Historic, F Physical Attributes, G Aesthetic, H Context, ID 01979 AUP Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area

Identified as a Contributing Building in the Karangahape Road HHA. (Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739)

HNZPT

Category 2 List No. 580

Summary  George Courts Department Store was designed by architect Herbert Clinton Savage and opened in 1924.  In 1926, Auckland’s first radio transmitting towers were built on its roof. George Court’s tearoom was opened in November 1934.  The building was converted to apartments in 1994.

Page 40

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Ref no. App. 2 CRL Conditions 44

Building Details, including Address/ Building Name, Photo, Heritage status and features 1 Cross Street George Court Factory Building

Legal Description

NA 77D/871, NZ77D/872

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule 14.1 AUP Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area

Identified as a Contributing Building in the Karangahape Road HHA. (Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739)

HNZPT

Summary

ď‚ˇ The former George Courts and Sons Warehouse at 1 Cross Street was built post 1935 and prior to 1940. It was possibly designed by architect Sinclair Oâ€™Connor. (Refer Karangahape Road HHA Evaluation) 243 Karangahape Road Naval and Family Hotel

Legal Description (as given in AUP Schedule 14.1)

DP 1395

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule Scheduled in Category B with extent of place over 14.1 whole property. Values: A Historic, F Physical Attributes, G Aesthetic, H Context, ID 01980

Page 41

AUP Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area

Identified as a Contributing Building in the Karangahape Road HHA. (Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739)

HNZPT

Category 2 List No. 4498

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Ref no. App. 2 CRL Conditions

Building Details, including Address/ Building Name, Photo, Heritage status and features Summary

 The late -Victorian Naval and Family Hotel was built at the corner of Karangahape Road and Pitt Street in 1895-1896. The ornate three-storey building was built by contractor Thomas Julian and is significant for its decorative Italianate design by architect Arthur P Wilson and as a good example of a Victorian corner pub.  The building is significant for its historic values remaining in continuous use as licenced premises for over a century and for its long associations with hotel keeper Patrick Brodie and family and brewing company Ehrenfried and Campbell and the company’s successors. 246-254 Karangahape Road Hallenstein Bros Building

Legal Description (as given in AUP Schedule 14.1)

Lot 3 A 941

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule Scheduled in Category B with extent of place 14.1 Values: A Historic, B Social, F Physical Attributes, H Context, ID 01981 AUP Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area

Identified as a Contributing Building in the Karangahape Road HHA. (Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739)

HNZPT

Category 2 List No. 586

Summary

 The former Hallenstein Bros Building dates from 1910 and extended in 1926. Image Auckland Libraries Heritage Collections 1-W378 shows the building prior to bays being added to the west. (Refer Auckland Council Karangahape Road HHA Evaluation). 251 – 253 Karangahape Road (Also referred to as 4-8 Beresford Square- Koia Building)

Legal Description (as given in Auckland Council Geomaps) Page 42

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Pt Lot 3DP 19899, Pt Lot 4 DP 168, Pt Lot 16 DP 168, Lot 17 DP 19899

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Ref no. App. 2 CRL Conditions

Building Details, including Address/ Building Name, Photo, Heritage status and features Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule 14.1 AUP Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area

Identified as a Contributing Building in the Karangahape Road HHA. (Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739)

HNZPT

Summary

 The building at 251 Karangahape Road extends through to 4-8 Beresford Square and is thought to have been built c. 1908. (Refer Auckland Council Karangahape Road HHA) 283 Karangahape Road (Also described as 20 Beresford Square.) Samoa House

Legal Description (as in Auckland Council Geomaps)

Lot 1 DP 84190

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule 14.1 AUP Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area

Identified as a Non-Contributing Building in the Karangahape Road HHA. (Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739)

HNZPT

Summary  Samoa House, including the Fale, was designed by JASMAD, now JASMAX architects and completed in 1978. Based on a traditional Samoan Fale, the Fale in Beresford Square is believed to be the first built outside Samoa. The use of striped green glass panels, reminiscent of woven panels, is a distinctive feature of the building frontage to Karangahape Road. The building won an NZIA National Award in 1980. (NZ Architecture 1980/5, p.7)  Samoa House is considered to be significant for its late 20th century historic and architectural values and is featured in the Karangahape Road Heritage Walk.

Page 43

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Ref no. App. 2 CRL Conditions 55

Building Details, including Address/ Building Name, Photo, Heritage status and features 9 Mercury Lane Mercury Theatre, former Kings Theatre

Note inside-leadlight domes

Legal Description (as in AUP Schedule 14.1)

Part DP 7095

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule Scheduled in Category A 14.1 Values A historical, F Physical Attributes, G Aesthetic ID 01986 AUP Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area

Identified as a Contributing Building in the Karangahape Road HHA. (Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739)

HNZPT

Category 2 List No. 5296

Summary  Opened in 1910, the Mercury Theatre was the first purpose-built cinema in Auckland and one of the first in New Zealand. Originally known as Kings Theatre, the building was commissioned by John Fuller and used as a cinema and performing venue.  It is significant as an example of an Edwardian theatre and was one of Auckland’s leading theatres through the much of the twentieth century. 15 - 25 Beresford Square Former St James Church (Presbyterian) (Hopetoun Alpha Building) Note portico, columns and slate roof, piers, railings and wall to street.

Legal Description (as in AUP Schedule 14.1)

Lot 1 DP 178434

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule Scheduled in Category A with extent of place, 14.1 which extends in part over footpath. Values B Social, D Knowledge, E Technological, F Physical Attributes, G Aesthetic, ID 01933 AUP Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area Page 44

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Identified as a Contributing Building in the Karangahape Road HHA. (Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739)

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) Ref no. App. 2 CRL Conditions

Building Details, including Address/ Building Name, Photo, Heritage status and features HNZPT

Category 1 List No. 642

Summary

 The Former St James Church in Beresford Square was opened in March 1876.  The building is significant for its technological values as the first major example of poured concrete construction in Auckland. It has significant for its aesthetic values and physical attributes for its Neo-Classical design by architect Philip Herapath.  The building has significant historic and social values for its association with the early development of the Presbyterian Church in Auckland and association with people who played an important role in the establishment of the church including Rev Hamer, Captain WC Daldy and JC Firth. 267-271 Karangahape Road Abbotts Chambers (Address on building verandah) Note Auckland Council Geomaps gives street address 259 Karangahape Road to all the sites shown on map. Described as 267-281 in Auckland Council’s HHA evaluation.

Legal Description (as given in Auckland Council Geomaps)

Pt Lot 16, DP 20234, Lot 1 DP 2588, Lot 2 DP 2588, Lot 4 DP 2588, PR Lot 4 DP 20234

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule 14.1 AUP Karangahape Road Historic Heritage Area

Identified as a Contributing Building in the Karangahape Road HHA. (Schedule 14.2.12. ID 02739)

HNZPT

Summary  Abbott’s Chambers was constructed c.1910. (Refer Auckland Council Karangahape Road HHA evaluation) Page 45

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section)

Page 46

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Appendix N: Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology)

Page 110

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Karangahape Station Early Works Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800005

Revision: Final Date: October 2019

Page 1

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

Karangahape Station early works Historic Character DWP (Archaeology Section) CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800005 This document is uncontrolled when printed. This document should be printed in colour

Revision Status Revision

Date

Version details

Prepared By

Approved By

30/09/2019

Draft for Auckland Council and Independent Peer Review

Sarah Macready

Peter Roan

21/10/2019

Final for Auckland Council approval

Sarah Macready

Peter Roan

Approval Status Name/Title

Signature

Date

Prepared by:

Sarah Macready Project Archaeologist

21/10/2019

Reviewed by:

Rachel Purdy Link Alliance â€“ Senior Planner

21/10/2019

Approved by:

Peter Roan Link Alliance â€“ Consents Manager

21/10/2019

Page 2

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

Table of contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 5 1.1

Karangahape Station ......................................................................................................... 5

1.2

DWP Staging ...................................................................................................................... 6

1.3

Purpose of the Historic Character DWP (Archaeology Section) ......................................... 6

1.4

Relevant Conditions .......................................................................................................... 6

1.5

Sustainability ..................................................................................................................... 8

1.6

DWP Review and updates ................................................................................................. 8

2. Karangahape Early Works ........................................................................... 9 2.1

Overview of Works ............................................................................................................ 9

3. Historic Heritage Values – Archaeology .................................................... 10 3.1

Archaeological Sites in the Project Area .......................................................................... 10

4. Roles and Responsibilities ......................................................................... 11 4.1

Project Archaeologist Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................ 11

4.2

Contractor Briefing .......................................................................................................... 11

4.3

Key Personnel .................................................................................................................. 11

5. Training ..................................................................................................... 13 5.1

Pre-Construction Briefing ................................................................................................ 13

5.2

Toolbox Talks................................................................................................................... 13

5.3

Training Records .............................................................................................................. 13

6. Archaeological Procedures and Mitigation Measures .............................. 14

Page 3

6.1

Beresford Square CSA ...................................................................................................... 14

6.2

Mercury Lane CSA............................................................................................................ 14

6.3

Archaeology Discovery Protocols .................................................................................... 14

6.4

Discovery of Archaeological or Cultural Remains ............................................................ 14

6.5

Mana Whenua Protocols ................................................................................................. 15

6.5.1.

Archaeological Remains ............................................................................................ 15

6.5.2.

Kōiwi Tangata (Human Remains) .............................................................................. 15

6.5.3.

Taonga (Māori Artefacts) .......................................................................................... 15

6.6

Recording of Features and Deposits ................................................................................ 16

6.7

Artefact Management Plan ............................................................................................. 16

6.8

Stand Down Periods ........................................................................................................ 17

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section) 6.9

Post Excavation Analysis and Archiving ........................................................................... 18

6.10 Reporting Requirements ................................................................................................. 18

7. Communication and Consultation ............................................................ 20 Appendix A: HNZPTA Requirements ............................................................... 21 Appendix B: ISCA Requirements ..................................................................... 22 Appendix C: Record of CLG, IPR and Auckland Council Comments ................ 23 D1. CLG Comments .......................................................................................... 23 D2. IPR Comments ........................................................................................... 23 D3. Auckland Council Comments .................................................................... 24

Page 4

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

1. Introduction The City Rail Link (CRL) project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line in the vicinity of Mt Eden Station. The CRL also involves the construction of two new underground stations at Aotea and Karangahape and the redeveloped Mt Eden Station (refer to Figure 1-1). The design and construction of the CRL infrastructure between the Aotea and Mt Eden Stations is being delivered by the Link Alliance.

Figure 1-1: CRL Route and Location

This Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (HC DWP) (Archaeology Section) has been prepared in relation to construction of the new Karangahape Station.

Page 5

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

1.2 DWP Staging To reflect the staged construction approach for the Karangahape Station, development of this HC DWP (Archaeology Section) will be undertaken in stages. This HC DWP addresses the archaeological aspects of the Karangahape Station early works. The early works are detailed in the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP), and summarised in Section 2 of this DWP. HC DWPs will also be prepared for the main construction works and the public realm reinstatement.

1.3 Purpose of the Historic Character DWP (Archaeology Section) This HC DWP (Archaeology Section) has been prepared to identify measures that will be implemented to mitigate and manage potential adverse effects on archaeology during construction of the Karangahape Station early works. The objective of the HC DWP in accordance with CRL designation Condition 42.2 is: 

“To avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on archaeological remains during construction, as far as is reasonably practicable.”

This Archaeology Section addresses the requirements of CRL designation Condition 42 and will be implemented throughout the construction period. The Archaeology Section is consistent with the archaeological provisions of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 and the archaeological Authority granted by Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga authorising modification of archaeological sites within the Karangahape Station early works project area (2017/793 – refer Appendix A). This HC DWP (Archaeology Section) has been developed to enable consultation with and feedback from the Karangahape Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG); and review by the Independent Peer Reviewer (IPR) prior to submission to Auckland Council (as per designation Conditions 7 and 11, and resource consent Condition 19). A record of consultation outcomes is included in Appendix C. The HC DWP (Archaeology Section) has been prepared by Clough & Associates Ltd and forms part of the CEMP for the early works. The Built Heritage DWP (Archaeology Section) has been prepared to address the requirements of Condition 41 of the CRL designation.

1.4

Relevant Conditions

Table 1-1 identifies the designation conditions relevant to this HC DWP (Archaeology Section) and where they are addressed in the document. Table 1-1: Historic Character – Archaeology conditions and DWP Section where addressed

Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

42.1

A Historic Character DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects on built heritage and archaeology that may result during construction of the City Rail Link or any part of it.

This document

Page 6

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

42.2

The objective of the Archaeology section of the Historic Character DWP is to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on archaeological remains during construction, as far as reasonably practicable.

This document

42.3

To achieve the above objective the following matters shall be included in the Archaeology section of the Historic Character DWP: (a) Constructor roles and responsibilities, stand-down periods and reporting requirements are to be clearly identified;

Sections 4.1, 6.8, 6.10

(b) How procedures for archaeological investigations and monitoring of preliminary earthworks are to be implemented in areas where there is potential for archaeological remains to be discovered;

Sections 6.1, 6.2, 6.4

Page 7

(i) The ceasing of all physical construction works in the immediate vicinity of the discovery;

Sections 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.8

(ii) Practices for dealing with the uncovering of cultural or archaeological remains and the parties to be notified (including, but not limited to, appropriate iwi authorities, the Auckland Council Consents Monitoring officer, the New Zealand Historic Places Trust [now Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga - HNZPT], and the New Zealand Police (if koiwi (human skeletal remains) are discovered);

Sections 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6

(iii) Procedures to be undertaken before physical works in the area of discovery can start again, including any iwi protocols, recording of sites and material, recovery of any artefacts, and consultation to be undertaken with iwi, Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer and Heritage Unit, and with the New Zealand Historic Places Trust [now HNZPT]; and

Sections 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8

(iv) Procedures for recording any archaeological remains or evidence before it is modified or destroyed, including opportunities for the conservation and preservation of artefacts and ecofacts (biological material) that are discovered. Consideration shall be given to the incorporation of in-situ material or artefacts into the design of stations and / or public places associated with the City Rail Link project. Consideration shall also be given to the provision for ‘post-excavation’ assessment analysis and publication of material within 24 months of completion of construction.

Sections 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 6.10

(v) Provision for ‘post-excavation’ archiving, assessment and analysis of the archaeological records and materials; publication of results of that work within 24 months of completion of construction assessment analysis and publication of material within 24 months of completion of construction.

Sections 6.9 6.10

(d) Training procedures for all contractors are to be undertaken in advance of construction, regarding the possible presence of cultural or archaeological sites or material, what these sites or material may look like, and the relevant provisions of the Historic Places Act 1993 [now the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014] if any sites or material are discovered;

Sections 4.2, 5

(e) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which details how the Auckland Council Heritage Department, the New Zealand Historic Places Trust [now HNZPT], mana whenua (see condition 8) are consulted, and the communication with the general public on the management of the adverse effects relating to archaeology.

Section 7

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

1.5

Sustainability

The Link Alliance is seeking an Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia (ISCA) Infrastructure Sustainability (IS) Rating. Further details can be found in the CEMP and Sustainability Rating Management Plan. Project sustainability requirements that relate directly to this HC DWP (Archaeology Section) are included in Appendix B. These requirements are imbedded within this HC DWP to ensure that sustainability is a key focus and â€˜the way we do thingsâ€™. In some cases the IS requirements and sustainability goals enhance the designation and consent requirements.

1.6

DWP Review and updates

This HC DWP (Archaeology Section) is a live document that will be reviewed at least annually, or as a result of a material change to the project, or to address unforeseen adverse archaeological effects arising from construction, or unresolved complaints. Any material changes to the HC DWP must be approved by Auckland Council prior to any on-site activity reliant upon the change commencing. Refer to the CEMP for further detail on the review and updating process.

Page 8

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

Karangahape Early Works 2.1 Overview of Works

Works location

Overview of construction activities

Beresford Square / Pitt Street

 Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Beresford Square / Pitt Street;  Removal of street trees and the demolition of the café / toilet in Beresford Square;  Establishment of the Beresford Square Construction Support Area to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.; and  Closure of Beresford Square to vehicle traffic (other than construction traffic) while retaining pedestrian and cycle access. Removal of existing street furniture where required (such as seating, street lighting (to be replaced with temporary lighting).

Mercury Lane

 Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Mercury Lane; and  Establishment of the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area within to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.  Establishment of the Mercury Lane working platform.

It should be noted that the demolition of buildings and above ground structures within the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area is authorised by the CRL Enabling Work Outline Plan – Karangahape Road Demolition Works (Council reference OPW60339200), confirmed by Auckland Council in June 2019 and do not form part of this HC DWP.

Page 9

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

Historic Heritage Values â€“ Archaeology 3.1 Archaeological Sites in the Project Area

No archaeological sites have been identified within the wider Karangahape Station project area. However, a house and a Sunday school were located in the Beresford Square Construction Support Area (CSA) in the 19th and early 20th centuries, which may have associated subsurface remains. The only other area of potential archaeological interest is the properties at 9A, 9B, 9C, 11-13 and 17-21 Mercury Lane, which are known to have contained buildings during the 19th to mid-20th century. It is possible that 19th and early 20th century archaeological remains may be present subsurface on these properties. The site of the former house and Sunday school in Beresford Square will be affected by the early works (through establishment of the Beresford Square CSA). In addition, the properties at 9-23 Mercury Lane and 20 East Street will be affected by the creation of working platforms within the Mercury Lane CSA which may expose or uncover archaeological remains. The remaining works will be located within the road reserve of Mercury Lane, Pitt Street and Beresford Square. Within the road reserves, there is only limited potential for impacting on subsurface pre-1900 archaeological remains or significant 20th century historic heritage remains, although the possibility of encountering early drainage infrastructure or earlier street surfaces cannot be excluded. The possibility that subsurface pre-1900 or early 20th century archaeological remains may be exposed during the early works will be managed through the implementation of this HC DWP (Archaeology Section) and an Archaeological Authority (no. 2017/793) granted by Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga (HNZPT) for the wider CRL Project (see Appendix A).

Page 10

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

4. Roles and Responsibilities 4.1 Project Archaeologist Roles and Responsibilities The Project Archaeologist will be responsible for ensuring that the archaeological requirements set out in this HC DWP and in the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 (HNZPTA) authority are fulfilled. This includes ensuring that an archaeologist is available to monitor earthworks where required and respond to call-in by the Link Alliance construction team if any suspected archaeological remains are exposed. It also includes preparation of a Site Specific Safety Plan and ensuring that the archaeological team adheres to the construction team’s site safety requirements. The Project Archaeologist will also be responsible for reporting to the relevant parties as outlined in this section regarding the archaeological work.

4.2 Contractor Briefing Prior to the start of early works (including works within the Beresford Square CSA), the Project Archaeologist and Mana Whenua representatives will meet with the Link Alliance (and contractor(s)) on site to brief them on the archaeological and cultural requirements for the works. The Project Archaeologist must be given at least two weeks’ notice by the Link Alliance that works are about to begin. The Alliance shall keep the Project Archaeologist informed as to the work schedule and any changes that may arise. As set out in sections 6.3, 6.4 and 6.6 of this HC DWP, the Link Alliance will temporarily cease works and call-in the Project Archaeologist if suspected archaeological remains are exposed during works when an archaeologist is not present, so that the remains can be assessed and recorded. As set out in sections 6.4 and 6.8 of this HC DWP, the Link Alliance will give the Project Archaeologist sufficient time and opportunity for the recording and sampling of any archaeological features or deposits encountered, and will not resume clearance works in the immediate vicinity until the archaeological work is completed.

4.3 Key Personnel Table 4-1 outlines the key personal involved in the implementation of this HC DWP (Archaeology Section), including the Project Archaeologist, Mana Whenua, Auckland Council Heritage Team and HNZPT and key Alliance personnel. Table 4-1: Key Personnel

Title Project Archaeologist (and Approved Archaeologist under the HNZPT Authority for the Project)

Name Rod Clough - Clough & Associates Ltd

Auckland Council Cultural Heritage Implementation Team Leader

Chris Mallows

Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer

Timothy O’Grady

HNZPT Mid-Northern Regional Archaeologist

Greg Walter

Mana Whenua representatives (if remains relating to Maori occupation are found)

Victoria Jessop (first contact)

Karangahape Station Project Manager

Jonathan Hill

Karangahape Station Construction Manager

Dan Trotman

Page 11

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section) Title Environmental and Sustainability Manager

Page 12

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Name Sarah Sutherland

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

5. Training 5.1 Pre-Construction Briefing Prior to the start of works, the Project Archaeologist will provide a briefing on the archaeological requirements contained within this Archaeology Section of the HC DWP to the Link Alliance and all staff working on the project. These requirements include but are not limited to:    

Statutory requirements under the HNZPTA; How to recognise archaeological material (of pre-1900 or early 20th century date) if exposed during excavation works; What actions need to be taken should any archaeological material or remains be exposed or encountered; and Who to contact in the event of archaeological material being exposed, if the Project Archaeologist is not present on site at the time.

Mana Whenua representatives will also be invited to provide a briefing on cultural requirements in case archaeological remains relating to Māori occupation are exposed during the works.

5.2 Toolbox Talks The Project Archaeologist will attend toolbox meetings as required during the course of the works, the purpose of which will be to remind staff of the project archaeological requirements and to ensure that any new staff joining the project team are fully briefed prior to the commencement of works.

5.3 Training Records A record of attendance at briefing and training sessions will be held by the Environmental and Sustainability Manager as part of the project training record (refer to the CEMP for further detail in this regard).

Page 13

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

6. Archaeological Procedures and Mitigation Measures 6.1 Beresford Square CSA An archaeologist will be present to monitor any excavations within the Beresford Square CSA (such as excavation to establish the settlement pond or other purposes), in case any subsurface archaeological features relating to the former house and Sunday school are present. If any subsurface archaeological features (of pre-1900 or early 20th century date) are exposed, they will be investigated, sampled and recorded by the archaeologist.

6.2 Mercury Lane CSA An archaeologist will be present to monitor any excavations or surface clearance within the properties at 9-21 Mercury Lane. If any subsurface archaeological features (of pre-1900 or early 20th century date) are exposed, they will be investigated, sampled and recorded by the archaeologist.

6.3 Archaeology Discovery Protocols As noted in Section 3.1, there is only limited potential for subsurface archaeological remains to be exposed elsewhere during the early works, which apart from the Beresford Square and Mercury Lane CSAs, will be limited the road reserves. However, the possibility that archaeological features and deposits may be exposed during works will be managed and mitigated by call-in by the construction team; the recording of any remains exposed; and the recovery of samples of archaeological material for further analysis. If suspected archaeological remains (of pre-1900 or early 20th century date) are encountered, works will stop in the immediate vicinity of the find until the Project Archaeologist can assess the site.

6.4 Discovery of Archaeological or Cultural Remains If in situ archaeological features or deposits (of pre-1900 or early 20th century date) are identified during the early works, the Project Archaeologist will stop works in the immediate vicinity by notifying the Karangahape Station Project Manager or the Karangahape Station Construction Manager and will investigate and record the remains, in accordance with accepted archaeological practice as set out in this HC DWP and the requirements of the HNZPT Authority. If remains indicating MÄ ori occupation are exposed the protocols outlined in Section 6.5 of this HC DWP will be followed. If significant archaeological features or deposits are identified during clearance works the Auckland Council (Cultural Heritage Implementation Team Leader and Compliance Monitoring Officer), HNZPT, and Mana Whenua will first be notified by the Project Archaeologist, and the remains will then be investigated and recorded in accordance with accepted archaeological practice and as directed by HNZPT, if of pre-1900 date. Any significant remains of 20th century date will also be investigated and recorded as directed by the Auckland Council Cultural Heritage Implementation Team Leader.

Page 14

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

6.5 Mana Whenua Protocols 6.5.1. Archaeological Remains If archaeological remains relating to Māori occupation are exposed, the Project Archaeologist will inform the appropriate Mana Whenua representatives.

6.5.2. Kōiwi Tangata (Human Remains) If bone material is identified that could potentially be human, the following protocol will be adopted:  



 



Earthworks/investigation will cease in the immediate vicinity while an archaeologist establishes whether the bone is human; If it is not clear whether the bone is human, work shall cease in the immediate vicinity until the Auckland University reference collection and/or a specialist can be consulted and a definite identification made; If bone is confirmed as human (kōiwi tangata), the archaeologist will immediately contact the Mana Whenua representatives, HNZPT, the NZ Police Auckland Central crime squad and Auckland Council Cultural Heritage Implementation Team Leader and Compliance and Monitoring officer; The site will be secured in a way that protects the kōiwi as far as possible from further damage; Once the NZ Police and HNZPT are satisfied that the remains are archaeological, consultation will be undertaken between the Mana Whenua representatives, the HNZPT Regional Archaeologist, the Auckland Council Cultural Heritage Implementation Team and CRLL to determine and advise the most appropriate course of action. No further action will be taken until responses have been received from all parties, and the kōiwi will not be removed until advised by HNZPT; The Mana Whenua representatives will advise on appropriate tikanga and be given the opportunity to conduct any cultural ceremonies that are appropriate; If the Mana Whenua representatives are in agreement and so request, the bones may be further analysed by a skilled bio-anthropological specialist prior to reburial, in line with the HNZPT Guidelines Kōiwi Tangata Human Remains (2010); and Activity in that place can recommence as soon the bones have been reinterred or removed and authorisation has been obtained from HNZPT.

6.5.3. Taonga (Māori Artefacts) Māori artefacts such as carvings, stone adzes, and greenstone objects are considered to be taonga (treasures). These are taonga tūturu within the meaning of the Protected Objects Act 1975. Taonga may be discovered in isolated contexts but are generally found within archaeological sites. If taonga are discovered the following protocols will be adopted: 



Page 15

The area containing the taonga will be secured in a way that protects the taonga as far as possible from further damage, consistent with conditions of the Archaeological Authority (no. 2017/793); The Project Archaeologist will then inform HNZPT, Auckland Council and the nominated Mana Whenua representatives so that the appropriate actions (from cultural and archaeological perspectives) can be determined; | Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section) 



These actions will be carried out within the stand down period specified below, and work may resume at the end of this period or earlier if advised by HNZPT or the Project Archaeologist; The Project Archaeologist will notify the Ministry for Culture and Heritage of the find within 28 days as required under the Protected Objects Act 1975. This can be done through the Auckland War Memorial Museum; and The Ministry for Culture and Heritage, in consultation with Mana Whenua, will decide on custodianship of the taonga. If the taonga requires conservation treatment (stabilisation), this can be carried out by the Department of Anthropology, University of Auckland (09-3737999) and would be paid for by the Ministry. It would then be returned to the custodian or museum.

6.6 Recording of Features and Deposits Any in situ pre-1900 or significant 20th century archaeological deposits or features exposed during the early works will be investigated, recorded and sampled consistent with accepted archaeological practice as set out in this DWP and in accordance with the requirements of the HNZPT Authority (No. 2017/793). Detailed notes of each feature and deposit will be made, photographs will be taken, and all subsurface features located will be detailed on the site plan. Stratigraphic drawings and photographs of features and deposits will be undertaken. Sufficient time and opportunity will be allowed for the recording and sampling of any archaeological features or deposits encountered. The archaeologist(s) will record the archaeological feature(s) or deposit(s) as quickly as possible so that works may resume without undue delay.

6.7 Artefact Management Plan The locations of artefact deposits will be marked on the site plan and retained for analysis. If large numbers of artefacts relating to European occupation are exposed, a representative sample will be retained. The process for storage, analysis and display shall be as follows:   

 

Artefacts will be bagged, labelled by date and context, and may initially be stored in a secure on-site lock-up facility provided by the contractor; As soon as is feasible, artefacts will be transferred to the Project Archaeologist’s offices for cleaning, recording and analysis; Any significant artefacts and/or artefacts meriting public display, will be identified by the Project Archaeologist and, in consultation with the relevant stakeholders, will be considered either for display within the new Karangahape Station or for donation to the Auckland War Memorial Museum, as appropriate; Less significant finds will be disposed of following recording and analysis, subject to CRLL agreement, unless a museum is willing to accept the collection; and Any wooden or fibre artefacts of significance will be wrapped/contained as required for short term preservation and analysis.

Artefacts will be conserved by appropriate specialists if this is recommended by the Project Archaeologist based on the level of significance and suitability for display or addition to museum collections. Page 16

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section) Any Māori artefacts that meet the criteria of taonga tūturu under the Protected Objects Act 1975 will in addition be managed as set out under the Mana Whenua Protocols (Section 6.5.3 of this DWP).

6.8 Stand Down Periods Depending on what is revealed by the clearance works, stand down periods involving the ceasing of works in the immediate vicinity may be required at various stages to allow for archaeological work to be carried out or for consultation with the appropriate parties. Stand down will require clearance works to cease only in the immediate vicinity of the feature or find, and work may proceed in other areas. The maximum stand down periods in Table 6-1 will apply but works may be resumed earlier if the required work has been completed. Timeframes need to be flexible enough to ensure that archaeological works are completed as necessary to ensure that the procedures in this HC DWP and the conditions of the Archaeological Authority (no. 2017/793) are met. Table 6-1: Maximum stand down periods

Trigger

Stand Down Period

Requirements

Release

Archaeological feature, deposit or artefacts

Maximum 2 days in each location, but work may continue in areas where no remains are identified.

Sufficient time must be allowed for the archaeologist to investigate and record the remains.

Work resumes when the Project Archaeologist advises the site foreman that work is completed.

Significant archaeological feature, deposit or artefacts, or significant 20th century historic heritage remains, that were not anticipated

Up to three days for a response from HNZPT for pre-1900 remains, and in most circumstances up to three days for any detailed investigation required. Up to three days for a response from Council if significant post-1900 historic heritage remains are found, and up to three days for any detailed investigation required.

The likely requirement is a mitigation investigation and/or recording by standard archaeological techniques, but this will be advised by HNZPT, or by Auckland Council if the find is of 20th century date. Note that there may be special circumstances in which a longer period of stand down for investigation is deemed necessary by either HNZPT or Auckland Council.

Work resumes when the Project Archaeologist (and the Council’s Compliance Monitoring Officer in the case of post-1900 remains) advises the site foreman that work is completed.

Human bone found

As agreed between the project manager, HNZPT, Auckland Council and Mana Whenua.

HNZPT and NZ Police to be satisfied that kōiwi identification is correct. Mana Whenua representative(s) to organise reinternment or removal of bones from site and appropriate cultural ceremonies.

Work resumes following reinternment or removal of bones from site and when authorisation from HNZPT and the Council’s Compliance Monitoring Officer has been received.

Page 17

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

Trigger

Stand Down Period

Requirements

Release

Taonga or archaeological remains of Māori origin found

Up to three days

HNZPT and Mana Whenua representative(s) to be consulted on appropriate action. Archaeological recording as required.

Work resumes when the Project Archaeologist or HNZPT advises the site foreman that work is completed

6.9 Post Excavation Analysis and Archiving Artefacts and faunal material retained from the site will be analysed and recorded by the appropriate specialists with the results presented in the final archaeological report, which will be provided to the parties specified in Section 6.10 of this HC DWP for information and archiving. Depending on what is exposed, consideration will be given to displaying archaeological material such as artefacts within the new Karangahape Station. Any artefacts of significance relating to European occupation of the area that are recovered from the site that are not required for display may be offered to the Auckland Museum in consultation with the Link Alliance. Any Māori artefacts (taonga tūturu) will be dealt with in accordance with the Mana Whenua protocols outlined in Section 6.5 of this HC DWP and the requirements of the Protected Objects Act 1975. Archaeological material identified by the Project Archaeologist as being appropriate for Carbon 14 dating will be sent to the University of Waikato’s Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory for age determination.

6.10 Reporting Requirements During the course of the project, information on any archaeological discoveries will be provided to the Auckland Council Cultural Heritage Implementation Team and Compliance Monitoring Officer, HNZPT and Mana Whenua. Opportunities for provision of information to the public via on site and media releases will be taken in consultation with those parties, depending on whether any significant archaeology is exposed during earthworks. In compliance with the requirements of HNZPT Authority 2017/793, a written summary report will be provided by the Project Archaeologist to the Link Alliance, HNZPT, Auckland Council (Cultural Heritage Implementation Team and Compliance Monitoring officer) and Mana Whenua within 20 days of the completion of the project works. A full and final monitoring report will be completed within 12 months of the end of the project works, and will be provided to the Link Alliance, HNZPT, the Auckland Council (for inclusion in the Cultural Heritage Inventory), the NZ Archaeological Association Central File, Mana Whenua and any other parties specified in the designation conditions and archaeological Authority. On completion of the final report, the Project Archaeologist will update the archaeological site records on the NZAA Site Recording Scheme (ArchSite database) and

Page 18

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section) Auckland Council Cultural Heritage Inventory with a summary of the results and reference to the final report. Depending on the significance of the archaeological information recovered, articles may be submitted to academic journals for publication.

Page 19

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

7. Communication and Consultation Refer to the early works Communication and Consultation Plan (CCP) (Appendix G of the CEMP) with respect to consultation with the Auckland Council Cultural Heritage Implementation Team, HNZPT, Mana Whenua and the public in relation to archaeological aspects of the early works. In particular, refer to Sections 6 and 7 of the CCP. Matters to be discussed with project stakeholders will include:   

Page 20

Opportunities for public observation of excavations during the construction works; Opportunities and avenues for providing information to project stakeholders and the public regarding archaeological discoveries during the works; and The display of archaeological material and artefacts within the new Karangahape Station, if material meriting public display is recovered during the works.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

Appendix A: HNZPTA Requirements In addition to the requirements of CRL designation 2500-4, and this HC DWP (Archaeology Section) prepared in accordance with CRL designation condition 42, all modification and investigation of pre1900 archaeological remains are subject to the archaeological provisions of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 (HNZPTA) and must be carried out in accordance with the conditions of an Authority issued by HNZPT under that Act. A general Authority for the Aotea Station to Mt Eden Station/NAL works, including modification of any subsurface remains exposed by the Karangahape Station early works including the CSA, has been granted by HNZPT (Authority No. 2017/793). The Authority sets management procedures in place for archaeological discoveries. Care has been taken to ensure that the archaeological procedures set out in this DWP are consistent with the conditions and requirements of the Authority issued by HNZPT.

Page 21

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

Appendix B: ISCA Requirements Table B.1 identifies the ISCA Credit Requirements relevant to this HC DWP (Archaeology Section) and where they are addressed in the document. Credit

Requirement*

Relevant Section of HC DWP (Archaeology Section)

Other relevant Information / Comments

Heritage Assessment and Management HER-1 Level 1

Measures to minimise the adverse impacts to heritage during construction have been identified and implemented.

3, 4, 5, 6 and 7

HER-1 Level 1

Community heritage values have been identified through consultation and integrated into studies.

3, 4.1, 7, Appendix A and Appendix C

HER-2 Level 1

Monitoring of heritage is undertaken at appropriate intervals during construction and operation.

4.1, 4.2 and 6

Refer to the ISCA Rating Tool for full details of the requirements

Page 22

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

Appendix C: Record of CLG, IPR and Auckland Council Comments

C1. CLG Comments A Karangahape CLG meeting was held on 17th September to discuss the Karangahape early works and for the CLG to provide comments / feedback on the CEMP and sub-plans, including this HC DWP (Archaeology Section). No comments were received from the CLG on this DWP.

C2. IPR Comments An Independent Peer Review of the draft HC DWP (Archaeology Section) was undertaken by Matthew Campbell, from CFG Heritage. The comments received are as follows: DWP Section

Comment

Resolution

A table of acronyms should be provided at the start of the document (e.g. CSA)

No changes made. Acronyms have been checked and all are spelled out in full when first used

1.3

Reference to the Built Heritage DWP seems to be redundant.

No change. The two documents together make up the Historic Character DWP and crossreference to each other

3.1 [4.1]

Project Archaeologist roles and responsibilities should outline the legal Health and Safety responsibilities of the project archaeologist and how they fit into the contractor’s and CRLL’s H&S responsibilities and requirements. Under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 it is no longer sufficient for a subcontractor to rely on the contractor’s protocols.

Reference to preparation of a Site Specific Safety Plan has been included in section 4.1 of this DWP

6.4 and 6.6

6.4 and 6.6 refer to “accepted archaeological practice as set out in this HC DWP.” Accepted practice is not set out in the DWP, and reference to the DWP in these paragraphs should be deleted. Reference could usefully be made to HNZPT guidelines.

Section 6.6 of the DWP provides a summary of accepted archaeological recording practice and Section 6.7 details accepted archaeological practice in relation to artefacts. No changes have therefore been made to this DWP

6.5.2

Kōiwi tangata should, for clarity, specify “the NZ Police Auckland Central crime squad.”

Section 6.5.2 has been amended to include this more specific reference

6.8

Stand Down Periods. This section states that “timeframes need to be flexible” and section 5.6 states that “sufficient time and opportunity will be allowed for the recording and sampling of any archaeological features or deposits encountered.”

No changes have been made, as the contents of Table 6.1 are consistent with the Archaeological Management Plan approved under the Heritage NZ Authority (2017/793) and have been standard for previous Authorities and Heritage Management Plans approved by Council for other projects of this

Page 23

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section) DWP Section

Comment

Resolution

However, Table 5.1 provides for Maximum Stand Down Periods, which is incompatible with flexible timeframes and sufficient time and opportunity, as well as Condition 3 of HNZPT authority 2017/793, which states that “All archaeological evidence encountered during the exercise of this authority must be investigated, recorded and analysed in accordance with current archaeological practice.” Current archaeological practice is potentially time consuming and, while it is understood that the archaeologist will make very reasonable effort to clear the area as quickly as possible, this may not always be possible within the time frames outlined on Table 6.1. This table also states “Note that there may be special circumstances in which a longer period of stand down for investigation is deemed necessary by either HNZPT or Auckland Council.” This is potentially confusing. I suggest that Table 6.1 be changed to Stand Down Triggers, the second column deleted and the table re-formatted to include relevant HNZPT, Council and mana whenua response times. The Archaeological Management Plan should be also be updated under Condition 1 of authority 2017/793.

type, where extensive archaeological remains are not expected. It is not considered that there is incompatibility between the fact that the contractor’s timeframes need to be flexible, and the minimum stand down periods given, as the necessary flexibility sits within those timeframes. Only limited remains are likely to be encountered during the early works, but a slightly longer stand down period is given for any significant archaeological remains encountered, with appropriate recognition that HNZPT or Council may require a longer period for investigating any significant discoveries.

C3. Auckland Council Comments This draft HC DWP (Archaeology Section) was received from Myfanwy Eaves, Senior Specialist in Historic Character – Archaeology, Auckland Council. Her review contained no specific comments on this Historic Character DWP (Archaeology Section), except to note that in Table 6.1 Maximum Stand Down Periods, if koiwi tangata are discovered works should only resume when authorised by the Council’s Compliance Monitoring officer in addition to HNZPT and the Project Archaeologist. Table 6.1 has been amended to reflect this.

Page 24

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Appendix O: Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Page 111

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Karangahape Station Early Works Contamination Delivery Work Plan

CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800008

Revision: Final Date: October 2019

Page 1

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Karangahape Station Early Works Contamination DWP CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800008

This document is uncontrolled when printed. This document should be printed in colour

Revision Status Revision

Date

Version details

Prepared By

Approved By

26/09/2019

Draft for Auckland Council and Independent Peer Review

Matthew Brown

Peter Roan

21/10/2019

Final for Auckland Council certification

Matthew Brown

Peter Roan

Approval Status Name/Title Prepared by:

Matthew Brown Environmental Scientist

Signature

Date 21/10/2019

Reviewed by:

Emma Trembath Technical Director

21/10/2019

Approved by:

Peter Roan Consents Lead â€“ Link Alliance

21/10/2019

Page 2

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Table of contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................... 5 1.1

Karangahape Station ......................................................................................................... 5

1.2

Contamination DWP Staging ............................................................................................. 6

1.3

Purpose of the Contamination DWP.................................................................................. 6

1.4

Relevant Conditions .......................................................................................................... 6

1.5

Sustainability ................................................................................................................... 10

1.6

DWP Review and updates ............................................................................................... 10

1.7

CDWP Reviewer .............................................................................................................. 10

2. Karangahape Early Works .........................................................................11 2.1

Overview of Works .......................................................................................................... 11

2.2

Key personnel.................................................................................................................. 11

3. Summary of Anticipated Soil and Groundwater Quality...........................12 4. Site Management Goals ............................................................................13 5. Environmental Site Management Practices ..............................................14 5.1

Overview ......................................................................................................................... 14

5.2

Surface Water and Sediment Control .............................................................................. 14

5.3

Soil Excavation and Disposal ........................................................................................... 14

5.3.1. Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia (ISCA) Land Category Lan-3 Contamination and Remediation ................................................................................................ 14 5.3.2.

Oversight/Supervision ................................................................................................. 14

5.3.3.

General Disposal Requirements ................................................................................... 14

Cleanfill ...................................................................................................................................... 15 Managed Fill/Soil Material .......................................................................................................... 15 Contaminated Fill ....................................................................................................................... 16 5.3.4.

Validation.................................................................................................................... 16

5.3.5.

Record Keeping ........................................................................................................... 16

5.4

Groundwater and Perched Water ................................................................................... 17

5.5

Dust and Odour Control and Monitoring ......................................................................... 17

5.6

Materials Importation ..................................................................................................... 17

5.6.1.

General ....................................................................................................................... 17

5.6.2.

Crushed Concrete ........................................................................................................ 17

6. Health and Safety Plan ..............................................................................18 Page 3

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan 6.1

Site Inductions................................................................................................................. 18

6.2

Daily Toolbox Hazard Identification ................................................................................ 18

6.3

Personal Protective Equipment ....................................................................................... 19

6.4

Personal Decontamination .............................................................................................. 19

6.5

Communication Plan ....................................................................................................... 19

7. Unexpected Discovery of Contamination .................................................20 7.1

General............................................................................................................................ 20

7.2

Asbestos .......................................................................................................................... 21

8. Works Summary Reporting .......................................................................22 9. References .................................................................................................23 Appendix A: Record of CLG, IPR and Auckland Council Comments .................25 A1. CLG Comments ..........................................................................................25 A2. IPR Comments ...........................................................................................25 A3. Auckland Council Comments.....................................................................25 Appendix B: Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia (ISCA) Land Category Lan-3 Contamination and Remediation ...........................................27 Overview .................................................................................................................................... 27 ISCA Lan-3 Sustainability Hierarchy ............................................................................................. 28 Soil Remediation Options Assessment Tool ................................................................................. 28

Page 4

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

1. Introduction The City Rail Link (CRL) project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line in the vicinity of Mt Eden station. The CRL also involves the construction of two new underground stations at Aotea and Karangahape and a redeveloped Mt Eden Station (refer to Figure 1-1). The design and construction of the CRL infrastructure between the Aotea and Mt Eden Stations is being delivered by the Link Alliance.

Figure 1-1: CRL Route and Location

This Contamination Delivery Work Plan (CDWP) has been prepared in relation to construction of the new Karangahape Station.

Page 5

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

1.2 Contamination DWP Staging To reflect the staged construction approach for the Karangahape Station, this CDWP will be developed in stages. This CDWP addresses the Karangahape Station early works, which are described in detail in the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and summarised in Section 2 of this CDWP. CDWPs will also be prepared for the main construction works and the public realm reinstatement.

1.3 Purpose of the Contamination DWP This CDWP has been prepared to identify measures that will be implemented to mitigate and manage the potential human health and environmental effects associated with contaminated soil during the early works (refer to Section 3 for a summary of potential soil and groundwater contaminant conditions). The objective of the CDWP is to detail the best practicable options to avoid, remedy, or mitigate the adverse effects of contaminated soil discharges generated by construction activities for the early works. This CDWP incorporates the requirements of the CRL designation (Conditions 57 and 58) and discharge permit R/REG/2016/1890 (Conditions 131 to 150). The CRL designation requires the preparation of a DWP while the discharge permit requires a Contaminated Soils Management Plan (CSMP). These two separate requirements have been combined and are addressed in this single CDWP. No construction shall commence until this CDWP is certified by Auckland Council. All measures identified in this CDWP must be established prior to the commencement of bulk earthworks. Any changes to the CDWP will be submitted to Auckland Council for certification and no activity reliant on the proposed change(s) can be undertaken until the change has been certified. This CDWP has been developed to enable consultation with and feedback from the Karangahape Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG); and review by the Independent Peer Reviewer (IPR) prior to submission to Auckland Council (as per designation Conditions 7 and 11, and resource consent Condition 19). A record of consultation outcomes is included in Appendix A. This CDWP forms part of the CEMP for the Karangahape Station early works.

1.4

Relevant Conditions

Table 1-1 identifies the designation and resource consent conditions relevant to this CDWP and where they are addressed in the document. Table 1-1: Contaminated Land Conditions and Location in this CDWP

Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

CRL Designation Conditions 57.1

Page 6

A Contamination DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects relating to contaminated land during the construction of the City Rail Link or any part of it.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

This document

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Condition No. 57.2

Condition The objective of the Contamination DWP is to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on human health which may result from the disturbance of contaminated materials during construction.

Relevant section of DWP Section 1.3

To achieve the above objective the following shall be included in the Contamination DWP and implemented as required: (a) A health and safety plan that addresses: (i) Worker safety in relation to hazardous substances; and

Section 6

(ii) Worker training with regard to handling hazardous substances, identifying potentially contaminated soil / material, and notification procedures for discovery of contamination;

57.3

58.1

(b) Procedures for how erosion and sediment control, stormwater, dust, and odour control measures will manage the removal of contaminated soil / material;

Section 5.2 Section 5.5

Section 5.3

(d) Where any trenches/excavations during civil works are to be sealed as a result of contamination and how this is to be recorded;

Not applicable

(e) How and which work areas are to be restricted to authorised personnel only and procedures to limit the presence of ignition sources in these areas (e.g. no smoking within or adjacent to construction area, no welding or open flames near areas with high concentrations of hydrocarbon contamination);

Section 6

(f) Procedures for the monitoring and management of the removal of contaminated soil / material by a suitably qualified environmental specialist;

Section 5.3

(g) How the placement of re-used contaminated soil / material will be recorded and tracked;

Section 5.6

(h) Where areas for stockpiling and storing contaminated soil / material will be established on the construction site and the procedures for managing the containment of the contaminated soil / material in these areas;

Section 5.3

(i) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communications and Consultation Plan which detail how the general public will be communicated with on the management of the adverse effects relating to the removal of contaminated soil / material.

Section 6.5

At the completion of construction works a validation report will be prepared in accordance with any Ministry for the Environment guidelines and submitted to the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer documenting the management of soil and evidence of appropriate disposal. The validation report shall include a record of all analytical results, volumes, tip dockets, and any incidents or complaints and how these were addressed. The validation report shall also identify any areas which need on-going monitoring and management by the Requiring Authority.

Section 8

Resource Consent Conditions 131 Page 7

At least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction (earthworks), the Consent Holder shall provide a Contaminated Soils Management Plan (CSMP) to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring)

| Karangahape Station Early Works

This document

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

for certification. The CSMP shall be prepared by a Contaminated Land Professional in accordance with the Contaminated Land Management Guidelines, No. 1 â€“ Reporting on Contaminated Sites in New Zealand, Ministry for the Environment (revised 2011). 132

Noted

133

No earthworks shall commence until a. certification is provided Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) that the CSMP satisfactorily meets the requirements of Schedule 13(A4) of the ACRP:ALW and b. all measures identified in the plan as being required to be established prior to commencement of earthworks have been established.

Noted

134

The CSMP shall address the following matters: a. the areas within the project site designated for excavation works, and an updated map/s showing the land disturbance activity areas, b. excavation management, and disposal procedures for soil, sediment, dust, surface run-off water, perched groundwater, and groundwater if encountered. c. temporary containment, treatment, and testing procedures for any water getting in contact with contaminated material if the disposal option is to the stormwater system or the marine environment is considered. d. contingency measures for unexpected discovery of contamination. e. proposed sampling and analysis, if applicable. f. any proposed works summary reporting.

135

The Consent Holder shall notify the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) at least two working days prior to any earthworks activity on the site and provide the following details: a. name and telephone number of the project manager and site owner, b. site address to which the consents relate, c. activity to which the consents relate, and d. expected duration of works.

Noted

136

Noted Section 1.6

137

The Consent Holder shall ensure that all disturbance of contaminated soil shall be supervised by a suitably qualified and experienced Contaminated Land Professional whose responsibilities shall include making sure that the soil management and disposal practices, the contingency measures outlined in the certified CSMP required by Condition 131, and all relevant consent conditions are adhered to.

Section 5.3 Section 7

138

The Consent holder shall ensure that regular inspections of the works area shall be carried out by a suitably qualified and experienced Contaminated Land Professional. These inspections shall be documented and the relevant records retained and provided to Council Team Leader Central Monitoring) in the Site Validation Report (SVR) required by Condition 149.

Section 5.3 Section 8

Page 8

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

139

The Consent Holder shall manage soil disturbance works to minimise any discharge of debris, soil, silt, sediment, or sediment-laden water from the site to either land, stormwater systems or the receiving marine environment. The implementation of erosion and sediment controls shall be in accordance with the ESCP required by Condition 53.

Section 4 Section 5

140

The Consent Holder shall manage all soil disturbance works to avoid the potential for cross-contamination of materials to occur, in particular, movement of contaminated soil around the site or deposition of contaminated soil on other parts of the site shall be avoided. Where soils are identified for off-site disposal, they shall be loaded directed for removal, where possible, and all material shall be covered during transportation off site.

Section 4 Section 5

141

To minimise the spread of contaminated material, any temporary stockpiles of excavated contaminated materials shall be located within the catchment of erosion and sediment controls for the site. All stockpiles shall be covered with either polythene or an equivalent impermeable material when the site is not being worked and during periods of heavy rain.

Section 5

142

At all times, dust shall be controlled in accordance with the publication titled Good Practice Guide for Assessing and Managing the Environmental Effects of Dust Emissions, Ministry for the Environment (2001).

Section 5.5

143

Excess soil or waste materials removed from the subject site shall be deposited at the disposal site which holds a consent to accept the relevant type of contamination.

Section 5.3

144

The Consent Holder shall implement the procedures for the management, treatment, temporary containment, testing, and disposal of groundwater and surface run-off water via the stormwater system in accordance with the report titled Auckland City Rail Link: Resource Consent Package 2: Aotea Station to North Auckland Line Construction and CRL Operation: Draft Erosion and Sediment Control Management Plan, dated 13 May 2016, prepared by Aurecon New Zealand Limited, and provided with the application.

Section 5.4

145

Any perched groundwater or surface run-off water encountered within the excavation area requiring removal shall be considered potentially contaminated, and shall either: a. be disposed of by a licensed liquid waste contractor; or b. pumped to sewer, providing relevant permits are obtained; or c. discharged to the stormwater system, provided testing demonstrates compliance with 50 times the Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council (ANZECC) Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality (2000) for the protection of 95 percent of marine water species, and is free from petroleum hydrocarbons.

Section 5.4

146

Condition 7

147

All imported fill shall:

Section 5.6

Page 9

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

a. comply with the definition of clean fill material Section J1 of the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part); and b. be solid material of an inert nature; and c. not contain hazardous substances or contaminants above recorded natural background levels of the receiving site.

148

Section 5.3

149

Within three months of the completion of earthworks on the site, the Consent Holder shall provide a Site Validation Report to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring). The SVR shall be prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced Contaminated Land Professional in accordance with the Contaminated Land Management Guidelines, No. 1 – Reporting on Contaminated Sites in New Zealand, Ministry for the Environment (revised 2011).

Section 8

1.5

Sustainability

The Link Alliance is seeking an Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia (ISCA) Infrastructure Sustainability (IS) Rating. Further details can be found in the Project CEMP and Sustainability Rating Management Plan. Project sustainability requirements that relate directly to this CDWP are included in Section 5.3.1 and Appendix B. These requirements are imbedded within this CDWP to ensure that sustainability is a key focus and ‘the way we do things’. In some cases the IS requirements and sustainability goals enhance the designation and consent requirements.

1.6

DWP Review and updates

This CDWP is a live document that will be reviewed at least annually, or as a result of a material change to the Project, or to address unforeseen adverse air quality effects arising from construction, or unresolved complaints. Any material changes to this CDWP must be certified by Auckland Council prior to any on-site activity reliant upon the change commencing. Refer to the CEMP for further detail on the review and updating process.

1.7

CDWP Reviewer

This CDWP has been reviewed by senior qualified person (Project Contaminated Land Professional), Emma Trembath. Emma is a Technical Director and leader of the AECOM geoscience and remediation services in New Zealand. Emma has a postgraduate degree in Environmental and Marine Sciences, an undergraduate degree in Biological Sciences. She has over 17 years’ experience in contaminated land and landfill industries, including considerable experience in undertaking, managing, and reporting on contaminated land and landfill investigations, works programmes, and remediation projects for public and private sector clients.

Page 10

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

2. Karangahape Early Works 2.1

Overview of Works

Works location

Overview of construction activities

Beresford Square / Pitt Street

 Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Beresford Square / Pitt Street;  Removal of street trees and the demolition of the café / toilet in Beresford Square;  Establishment of the Beresford Square Construction Support Area to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.; and  Closure of Beresford Square to vehicle traffic (other than construction traffic) while retaining pedestrian and cycle access. Removal of existing street furniture where required, such as seating, street lighting (to be replaced with temporary lighting).

Mercury Lane

It should be noted that the demolition of buildings of buildings and above ground structures within the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area are authorised by the CRL Enabling Work Outline Plan – Karangahape Road Demolition Works (Council reference OPW60339200), confirmed in June 2019. These works do not form part of this Plan.

2.2

Key personnel

The key personnel responsible for the CDWP are identified in Table 2-2. However, all site personnel are responsible for following the requirements of the CDWP. Refer to the CEMP for further detail on roles and responsibilities. Table 2-2: Key Personnel

Role

Name

Karangahape Station Project Manager

Jonathan Hill

Karangahape Station Construction Manager

Dan Trotman

Environmental and Sustainability Manager

Sarah Sutherland

Karangahape Early/Project Works Contaminated Land Professional

Emma Trembath

Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager

Rachel Blundell

Page 11

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Summary of Anticipated Soil and Groundwater Quality

Investigations of soil contaminant concentrations were completed in support of the wider CRL project. In relation to the Karangahape Station area, the investigations (refer references in Section 9) identified that significant soil contamination was unlikely to be encountered during land disturbance activities. There is however, the potential to encounter gravel type fill materials (surface to approximately 2 m below ground level for metals and heavy end hydrocarbons) for which soil contaminant concentrations may be in the order of applicable standards defined by the Ministry for the Environment (MfE) Resource Management National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health Regulations 2011 (NES CS) and Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in Part (AUP) Permitted Activity Criteria. The primary source of potential contamination within the enabling works area relates to the presence of fill of unknown origin. This is largely due to the fact the works are to be completed within an urban setting comprising road infrastructure. In addition, asbestos is likely to be present in the underground wastewater and stormwater pipes due to the age that the utility network was originally established. Existing documentation indicates that there is a low probability of encountering large scale contamination within the works area. This includes groundwater contamination.

Page 12

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Site Management Goals

Site management goals for the Karangahape early works are as follows:    

Page 13

To ensure that the land disturbance activities associated with the works are completed in accordance with designation and resource consent requirements. To manage and mitigate potential risk to the health of the workers and neighbouring parties during proposed land disturbance activities. To manage and mitigate potential environmental effects that may be generated as a consequence of the proposed land disturbance activities. To ensure that any spoil generated for off-site disposal is managed appropriately, and is disposed to a licensed facility authorised to accept such materials.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Environmental Site Management Practices

5.1 Overview This section details the procedures for the management of potentially contaminated soil and groundwater during land disturbance activities. It includes control measures for management and mitigation of potentially adverse human health effects associated with exposure to contaminated media, and the control of discharges to air, land and water.

5.2 Surface Water and Sediment Control Erosion and sediment control shall be implemented in accordance with the Karangahape early works Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP). All surface water and sediment control and monitoring will be managed through the ESCP.

5.3 Soil Excavation and Disposal 5.3.1.

Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia (ISCA) Land Category Lan3 Contamination and Remediation

As noted in Section 1.5 the early works will be undertaken in accordance with the ISCA land category Lan-3 â€“ Contamination and Remediation requirements with an aim to reward projects that assess contamination and perform sustainable remediation. Although limited soil contamination was identified in the Karangahape works area, it was noted that as the assessment was limited in scope, contaminated soils above applicable standards defined by the NES CS and AUP Permitted Activity Criteria may be present within fill materials. At that stage, there was no requirement for a Remedial Action Plan (RAP) to be produced for works to be completed within the works area. It is however possible that unexpected soil contamination or hazardous materials could be discovered during the land disturbance works (refer Section 7). If unexpected soil contamination is identified, soil remediation and management options will be assessed and implemented in accordance with the ISCA Lan-3 sustainability hierarchy. A rating tool (multiple category assessment table) will be utilised as part of this decision making process (refer Appendix B for ISCA information and assessment table).

5.3.2.

Oversight/Supervision

The Project Contaminated Land Professional will undertake regular inspection and/or supervise soil disturbance activities associated with the early works.

5.3.3.

General Disposal Requirements

The majority of spoil material generated as part of the early works will likely be removed from the works area and disposed off-site. Any natural soil materials, including Tauranga Group sediments and East Coast Bays Formation materials have been assessed as suitable for disposal as cleanfill. Any fill material required to be removed from the works area will be removed from the site (to off-site disposal) immediately, or temporarily stockpiled in covered and/or bunded areas onsite (depending on the requirement for additional testing, if requested by the disposal facility). A summary of preliminary soil classifications for the project is provided in the following sub-sections. Page 14

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Cleanfill Cleanfill is defined in the AUP as follows: “Means natural material such as clay, gravel, sand, soil and rock which has been excavated or quarried from areas that are not contaminated with manufactured chemicals or chemical residues as a result of industrial, commercial, mining or agricultural activities. Excludes:        

Hazardous substances and material (such as municipal solid waste) likely to create leachate by means of biological breakdown; Product and materials derived from hazardous waste treatment, stabilisation and disposal practices; Materials such as medical and veterinary waste, asbestos, and radioactive substances; Soil and fill material which contain any trace element specified in Table E30.6.1.4.2 at a concentration greater than the background concentration in Auckland soils specified; Sulfidic ores and soils; Combustible components; More than 5% by volume of inert manufactured materials (e.g. concrete, brick, tiles); and More than 2% by volume of attached biodegradable material (e.g. vegetation)”.

A facility where cleanfill material is accepted for deposit, excludes:   

Storage and use of cleanfill material within an earthworks site for the purpose of engineering contours for specific activities, Placement of cleanfill material associated with road construction and maintenance activities, and Onsite storage and use of overburden or aggregate by-product that is cleanfill material associated with mineral extraction activities.

Natural soil materials including Tauranga Group sediments and East Coast Bays Formation materials would be suitable for disposal as cleanfill, and may be disposed a consented disposal facility, such as the Ridge Road Cleanfill (Pukekohe, Auckland); or to other project sites in the region (depending on their resource consent requirements). NB: It should be noted that the classification of cleanfill may vary in regions outside of Auckland.

Managed Fill/Soil Material Managed fill is defined in the AUP as follows: “Cleanfill type material but where the material may include soils which exceed permitted activity contaminant concentrations that will not result in any significant adverse effect on human health, surface water, or groundwater quality, including potable water sources.” Disposal of managed fill must be to a facility authorised (by regulatory bodies such as Auckland Council or Waikato Regional Council) to receive the material. Fill materials within the works area are likely to be suitable for disposal as managed fill pending pre-approval before disposal at a particular facility.

Page 15

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Contaminated Fill For the purposes of this CDWP, contaminated fill1 comprises:  

Hazardous materials in the form of household and industrial waste, organic waste or asbestos containing material. Soil with contamination present above managed fill criteria.

It is proposed that all contaminated fill disturbed as part of the earthworks will be removed from site to a licenced facility. Disposal of contaminated fill must be to a landfill authorised to receive the material. Landfill acceptance criteria vary between waste facilities and these should be confirmed prior to the removal of soil from site. Any spoil materials generated within the works area which cannot be accepted at a managed fill (due to site specific restriction) must be removed to a contaminated fill facility. Examples include Hampton Downs (Waikato) and Redvale landfill (Auckland) facilities. Pre-approval will be required for these disposal locations.

5.3.4.

Validation

The Project Contaminated Land Professional will validate the fill material by collecting soil samples and submitting them for laboratory analysis. The laboratory results will be used to determine the soil disposal locations. The disposal facility will nominate the validation sampling required (each disposal facility holds individual requirements i.e. 1 sample per 1,000 m3).

5.3.5.

Record Keeping

The following off-site soil disposal management and record keeping measures will be implemented by the Link Alliance: 

   

A record of the soil location, depth, and volume of the material removed shall be kept for the purpose of being included in the Works Summary Report (WSR) to be prepared by the Project Contaminated Land Professional, refer Section 8. Records will also indicate whether the material was removed as cleanfill, managed fill or contaminated fill. Irrespective of the disposal facility nominated, all vehicle movements including registration, estimated weight, and disposal location will be recorded. Tracking documentation is to be signed prior to leaving the works area and checked at the waste disposal facility. Transportation subcontractors are required to cover loads and take appropriate measures to control dust. Trucks will be inspected prior to departing the site to ensure the load is adequately covered and any spillage is contained.

Receipts summarising soil disposal will be collated and provided to the Project Contaminated Land Professional at the completion of the land disturbance activities for the works. A record of any contaminated soil left in-situ including the soil location, depth and estimated volume shall also be recorded for the purpose of being included in the WSR.

For the purpose of this Contamination Delivery Works Plan the term ‘Contaminated Fill’ is interchangeable with the terms ‘Contaminated Soil’ and ‘Contaminated Material’. Page 16 | Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

5.4 Groundwater and Perched Water Contaminated groundwater is unlikely to be encountered as part of the works. Groundwater and perched water will therefore be managed in accordance with the early works Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan (GSMCP).

5.5 Dust and Odour Control and Monitoring Dust and odour control shall be implemented in accordance with the early works Air Quality Delivery Work Plan (AQ DWP).

5.6 Materials Importation 5.6.1.

General

Materials will be required to be imported to the works area to complete the subgrade. Two sources of material are proposed, clean quarry materials and recycled crushed concrete aggregate. Material sourced from a certified quarry or supplier does not require testing. This material is considered to meet the definition of a cleanfill (refer Section 5.3.3).

5.6.2.

Crushed Concrete

Prior to materials acceptance the contractor will request the following information from the supplier:   

Address of source site. Copies of pre-demolition asbestos surveys. Copies of asbestos clearance certificates prepared prior to demolition.

This information will be reviewed by the Project Contaminated Land Professional, who will advise the Link Alliance regarding suitability. Additional testing of crushed concrete materials may be required to be undertaken to approve suitability. This will be agreed between the CLS and Construction Contractor on a case by case basis. The following verification and testing regime will be completed by the Project Contaminated Land Professional in support of the acceptance of recycled crushed concrete aggregate.      

The Project Contaminated Land Professional will complete daily site walkovers. Visual observations will be made for the presence of plastic, metal, or other waste fragments such as potential asbestos sheeting. Testing will be completed from stockpiled materials at the site at rate of one sample per 500 m3. Bulk samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials will be analysed via an appropriatelyaccredited laboratory. Soil samples will be analysed via New Zealand Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Asbestos in Soil (BRANZ 2017) methodology. Samples may be analysed for asbestos presence/absence as a screening measure, at the discretion of the Project Contaminated Land Professional.

The Link Alliance and the Project Contaminated Land Professional will retain records pertaining to materials importation completed. These will be provided to the Project Contaminated Land Professional for inclusion in the WSR (refer Section 8). Page 17

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Health and Safety Plan

A specific health and safety plan will be prepared for the works or provided by the sub-contractor. The plan will be developed relevant New Zealand regulatory agency requirements.

6.1

Site Inductions

The provisions of this CDWP shall be outlined to all parties during the site health and safety induction and acknowledged formally as part of the works (i.e. signed project induction register) prior to personnel being allowed on site. There will be limited access to the works area and only inducted personnel will have access. All personnel shall be inducted with full details of the following:      



6.2

Health and safety plan. Daily toolbox meeting requirements. Identification of all hazards, including roles relating to the hazard board and procedures. Restricted areas and their associated requirements. Measures to control exposure to identified hazards including required personal protective equipment. Health and safety controls relating to potentially contaminated soil materials in the works area. This should include procedures to limit the presence of ignition sources in these areas (e.g. no smoking within or adjacent to construction area, no welding or open flames near areas with high concentrations of hydrocarbon contamination). Procedures relating to contingency measures for unexpected discovery of contamination and incident reporting, including asbestos awareness.

Daily Toolbox Hazard Identification

Daily toolbox meetings shall include hazard identification for the proposed daily activities. A risk-based approach should be applied to the management of all hazards. Once a hazard is identified, it should be assessed to determine the level of risk and consideration should be made to the potential consequence of the harm and its likelihood for occurrence. Once the hazard has been assessed, reasonably practicable steps should be taken to control the hazard applying the following hierarchy of controls:

Page 18

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan The hazard board and review of controls should be completed daily in toolbox talks.

6.3

Personal Protective Equipment

The minimum PPE required for all persons engaged in any land disturbance activities (potential exposure to contaminated soil or water materials) includes:     

Nitrile gloves/leather gloves/PVC Palm or otherwise as appropriate to the task. Safety boots (ankle high, steel capped with non-slip durable soles). Hard hat. Safety glasses. Long sleeved shirts and long pants or coveralls.

The following additional PPE will be made available if required.  

6.4

Dust masks. Half face respirators fitted with organic and particulate vapour cartridges.

Personal Decontamination

The Link Alliance must provide a personnel decontamination station during land disturbance works. This will include a space to remove and store potentially contaminated clothing and hand washing facilities. A ‘clean zone’ shall be provided for site workers to eat, drink, and smoke. Workers will be advised not eat, drink, or smoke outside the clean zone during the completion of land disturbance activities. Staff must wash their face and hands at the completion of land disturbance activities and prior to eating, drinking, or smoking.

6.5

Communication Plan

Communication and consultation with affected parties and the wider community in vicinity of the early works will be regular and ongoing. Communication regarding the management of any adverse effects relating to the removal of contaminated soil will be undertaken as required during the works. Methods to facilitate communication will be through the Karangahape Community and Business Liaison Group, which will meet at least every three months during construction works, and through the methods discussed in Sections 6 and 7 of the Karangahape early works Communication and Consultation Plan (CCP) (Appendix G of the CEMP). These measures include engagement tools such as publications, phone calls, use of the CRL website to provide updates, signage, and advertising material. One on one engagement may also be used to engage with affected parties.

Page 19

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Unexpected Discovery of Contamination

7.1 General It is possible that unexpected contamination or hazardous materials could be discovered during the excavation works – including but not limited to the following:      

Intact or broken drums and containers. Soil materials with unusual odours. Indicators of coal tar, e.g. strong naphthalene odour and texture ranging from viscous tar to low density clinker rock. Discoloured or stained water seeps and soils. Hydrocarbon contaminated soil and/or free product. Liquid waste and any material that normally would be sent to a licensed landfill.

During land disturbance works site workers will actively monitor works areas for the conditions /materials specified above. In the event that one of these is identified, the following actions shall be taken:   

 



  



Page 20

Work will cease. The Link Alliance will contact the Project Contaminated Land Professional. Health and safety restrictions will be implemented including limiting access to the area, shut down equipment to reduce potential ignition sources and move workers to an upwind location. The Project Contaminated Land Professional will advise on the appropriate course of action. The Link Alliance will notify (in writing) the Team Leader of Central Monitoring of the identification and the proposed course of action recommended by the Project Contaminated Land Professional. This may include the completion of additional soil testing. All sampling and testing shall be completed in general accordance with Contaminated Land Management Guidelines, No.5 – Site Investigation and Analysis of Soils, Ministry for the Environment (revised 2011). When the material characteristics have been established, soil remediation and management options will be assessed and implemented in accordance with the ISCA Lan-3 sustainability hierarchy. A rating tool (multiple category assessment table) will be utilised as part of this decision making process (refer Appendix B). Work shall not resume unless authorised by the Link Alliance under advice of the Project Contaminated Land Professional. Record all details on an incident form, including GPS of location. If the Project Contaminated Land Professional considers it appropriate, the suspected contaminated material may be excavated into a covered bin to allow works to continue with minimum delay. If excavation into a covered bin is inappropriate, construction work should proceed to an area clear of contamination indicators until material testing as necessary defines the material characteristics. If unsuitable material is to be directly loaded into trucks for disposal at a licensed landfill, all appropriate information such as location, quantity and off-site weighbridge dockets must be recorded. | Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

7.2 Asbestos Should asbestos be observed or suspected during the land disturbance works, all work shall cease, and an appointed asbestos professional will be provided by the Project Contaminated Land Professional to review site conditions and provide guidance as to how to proceed. The following regulations and guidelines should be followed with respect to asbestos management: ď‚ˇ ď‚ˇ

Health and Safety at Work (Asbestos) Regulations 2016. New Zealand Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Asbestos in Soil (BRANZ 2017).

Works can recommence once asbestos has been appropriately managed/safely removed as advised by the asbestos professional provided by the Project Contaminated Land Professional.

Page 21

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Works Summary Reporting

The Project Contaminated Land Professional will prepare a Validation Report / Works Summary Report, to be provided to Auckland Council within three months of the completion of the works programme. The report will include the following:      

     

A summary of the works undertaken, including a statement confirming whether the excavation of the site has been completed in accordance with the certified CDWP. A summary of inspections and oversight completed by the Project Contaminated Land Professional. The location and dimensions of the excavations carried out, including a site plan. A summary of testing undertaken (if applicable) including tabulated analytical results. Records of any unexpected contamination encountered during the works and contingency measures undertaken (if applicable). Details of any validation soil sampling completed in areas of unexpected soil contamination and vicinity of fill material previously identified as exceeding the adopted soil acceptance criteria (if applicable). Copies of the disposal dockets for the contaminated fill and ‘cleanfill’ material removed from the site. Copies of the Project Contaminated Land Professionals site inspection documentation. Details regarding any complaints and/or breaches of the procedures set out in the certified CDWP, and how any incidents or complaints were addressed. Results of testing, if required, of any spoil disposed offsite. Results of testing of any imported fill material. Identification of any areas which need on-going monitoring and management.

The Validation Report / Works Summary Report will be submitted to Auckland Council for their records. Once within the Auckland Council records system, the public will be able to access this report as part of a property file request.

Page 22

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

References

AECOM New Zealand Limited, 2012. Contaminated Land Assessment – City Rail Link. Reference: 60275817 Revision 4. AECOM New Zealand Limited, 2013. Preliminary Remedial Framework – City Rail Link (Draft). Reference: 60275817. Auckland Council, 2019. Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in Part, updated 10 May 2019. Auckland Regional Council, 2002. Background Concentrations of Inorganic Elements in Soils from the Auckland Region. Technical Publication No. 153, October 2001 (reprinted April 2002). Aurecon New Zealand Limited, 2014. Design and Construction Report Resource Consent Package 1 Britomart Station to Wyndham Street Reference: CRL-SYW-RME-000-RPT-0004, Revision 1.0. Aurecon New Zealand Limited, 2017. Auckland City Rail Link Enabling Works – Contract 2.1 and 2.2 Outline Plan. Albert Street Canopy Removals and Utilities Relocation Delivery Work Plan: CRL-PAT-RME000-RPT-0098, Revision 1.0. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, 2000 (Revised 2018). Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. Building Research Association of New Zealand (BRANZ), 2017. New Zealand Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Asbestos in Soil. BRANZ Limited, 2017. New Zealand Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Asbestos in Soil. Health and Safety at Work (Asbestos) Regulations 2016. Golder Associates, 2014. Auckland City Rail Link, Britomart to Wyndham – Contaminated Land Assessment. Reference: 1378206325-014 Rev0. Golder Associates, 2014. Albert Street Stormwater Main Realignment – Contaminated Land Assessment. Reference: 1378206325-010-R-Rev0. Leersnyder, H., Bunting, K., Parsonson, M., and Stewart, C., 2018. Erosion and sediment control guide for land disturbing activities in the Auckland region. Auckland Council Guideline Document GD2016/005. Incorporating amendment 1. Prepared by Beca Ltd and SouthernSkies Environmental for Auckland Council. Ministry for the Environment, 2001. Contaminated Land Management Guidelines No. 1. Reporting on Contaminated Sites in New Zealand. Revised 2011. Ministry for the Environment, 2003. Contaminated Land Management Guidelines No. 2. Hierarchy and Application in New Zealand of Environmental Guideline Values. Revised 2011. Ministry for the Environment, 2004. Contaminated Land Management Guidelines No. 5. Site Investigation and Analysis of Soils. Revised 2011. Ministry for the Environment, 2011. Resource Management Act (National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health) Regulations, 2011. Ministry for the Environment, 2012. User’s Guide, National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health. Pattle Delamore Partners, 2017. Auckland City Rail Link Global Utilities Consent: Groundwater Effects Assessment. WorkSafe New Zealand, 2016. Approved Code of Practice (ACOP) Management and Removal of Asbestos. Page 23

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan Waste Management Institute New Zealand, 2018. Technical Guidelines for Disposal to Land.

Page 24

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Appendix A: Record of CLG, IPR and Auckland Council Comments A1. CLG Comments A Karangahape CLG meeting was held on 17 September 2019 to discuss the Karangahape early works and for the CLG to provide comments / feedback on the CEMP and sub-plans, including this CDWP. No comments were received in relation to this CDWP.

A2. IPR Comments An Independent Peer Review of the draft CDWP was undertaken by Terre Nicholson, from HD Geo. No comments were received from the Independent Peer Reviewer in relation to this CDWP.

A3. Auckland Council Comments Comments on the draft CDWP were received from Marija Jukic, Senior Specialist in Contaminated Land, Auckland Council as follows: DWP section

Paragraph/ sentence

Comment

Resolution

Summary of Anticipated Soil and Groundwater Quality

We consider that the discussion of contaminants in this section is lacking in detail, and that it is not particularly practical to require contractors to look up a list of reference documents should they want further information on the type of contamination to be expected. Could the applicant please provide a more detailed discussion on the results of investigations undertaken, the nature of the fill material encountered and the anticipated contaminants of concern etc.

Further minor detail has been included in Section 3, but in the interest of not duplicating documentation, the CDWP will continue to refer to the overarching CDWP which contains a full summary of contaminant conditions. This is the same for many other sections of the CDWP.

5.3.3

General Disposal Requirements

We note that the following statement is made in this section: “Any fill material required to be removed from the works area will be temporarily stockpiled, either in covered and/or bunded areas onsite or at a storage location provided by subcontractors (e.g. off-site storage yard).” Could the consent holder please provide further information regarding the proposed storage locations provide by subcontractors. Please note it is Council’s position that any contaminated material taken off-site may only be stored at or

Reference removed from the document.

Page 25

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

DWP section

Paragraph/ sentence

Comment

Resolution

disposed of to a site that holds the appropriate consents under Chapter E13 of the AUP (OP). 5.3.3

General Disposal Requirements

Auckland Council has not adopted the document Waste Management Institute New Zealand (WasteMinz) Technical Guidelines for Disposal to Land (2018) in part because it is still being revised and has not been endorsed by Ministry for the Environment. Accordingly, the description provided under the subsection Managed Fill/ Soil Material is not considered to entirely relevant for materials being disposed of within the Auckland region. Accordingly, could the consent holder please revise this section to reference the definition of managed fill as provided under the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part) for any materials to be disposed of within the Auckland region.

It is important that this project, although completed in multiple stages, is managed consistently. This item was not highlighted by Auckland Council during the review of the Aotea Station CDWP. However, this section has been updated as requested.

5.6.2

Crushed Concrete

We do not support the sampling rate for crushed concrete of one sample per 1,500m3, as we consider this too coarse for appropriate screening of the crushed concrete for asbestos. As previously requested in the review comments for the Stages to 1 to 3 Utility Relocation Works, we consider that a sampling rate of 1 sample per 100m3 is appropriate. However, taking on board the comments provided in the email from Jarrod Snowsill (AECOM) to Warwick Pascoe, dated 17 September 2019, and titled document RE: OPW - Stages to 1 to 3 Utility Relocation Works â€“ Lodgement we would accept a minimum of 1 sample per 500m3 for any imported crushed concrete. Could this section please be revised to reflect this.

Updated accordingly.

Unexpected Discovery of Contamination

Whilst weâ€™re generally satisfied with this section of the CDWP, it is noted that no reference is made to the requirement under Condition 146 that the Team Leader of Central Monitoring is notified upon the unexpected discovery of contamination, and that the works in the area containing the unexpected contamination should not recommence until this is done. Could the applicant please revise this

Accepted and updated.

Page 26

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Appendix B: Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia (ISCA) Land Category Lan-3 Contamination and Remediation Overview

The Link Alliance is using the Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia (ISCA) Infrastructure Sustainability (IS) Rating tool. This appendix details IS requirements that are different, or additional to the CRL designation and resource consent requirements. It is essential that these requirements are met to achieve the project’s sustainability goals; however they are not consent requirements to be certified by Auckland Council. These IS rating requirements are included as an appendix because they are not yet fixed. They remain subject to change as the Project’s sustainability program evolves. Applicable ISCA categories that relate to this CDWP are listed below along with their associated target Levels. For each category, a description is provided of how this target level has been achieved. Table B.1 identifies the ISCA Credit Requirements relevant to this HC DWP (Built Heritage Section) and where they are addressed in the document. Credit

Requirement*

Relevant Section of DWP

Other relevant Information / Comments

Contamination and remediation Lan-3 Level 1

Site assessment follows the recommended approach in ‘CLMG No.5 Site Investigation and Analysis of Soils’.

Section 3, 5, 7

A site assessment has been completed for the CRL Project2, which includes samples collected from within the Karangahape Station portion. Although very limited soil contamination was identified, it was noted that as the assessment was limited in scope, contaminated soils above applicable standards defined by the NES CS and AUP Permitted Activity Criteria may be present within fill. At that stage, there was no requirement for a remedial action plan to be produced for the Project. It is however possible that unexpected soil contamination or hazardous materials could be discovered during the excavation works. If unexpected soil contamination is identified, due to spatial restrictions within the construction zones, it is likely that this will be directly loaded into trucks for disposal at a licensed landfill. Soil disposal locations will be based on the soil classification hierarchy and approval process that is outlined in Section 5 of this document.

City Rail Link Contaminated Land Assessment July 2012, prepared by AECOM, Auckland City Rail Link Aotea Station to North Auckland Line Construction and CRL Operation Contaminated Land Assessment May 2016, prepared by Golder Associates, Auckland City Rail Link Aotea Station to North Auckland Line Construction and CRL Operation Water Quality Assessment May 2016, prepared by Golder Associates Page 27 | Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Credit

Requirement*

Relevant Section of DWP

Lan-3 Level 1

Remediation options are identified and selected using a sustainability hierarchy.

Section 5.3.1, Appendix B

Lan-3 Level 2

Sustainability appraisal of remediation options is undertaken against the sustainability indicators in Table 1 of 'A Framework for Assessing the Sustainability of Soil and Groundwater Remediation'.

Not applicable.

Other relevant Information / Comments

Refer above for soil management discussion relating to unexpected soil contamination or hazardous materials discovery.

Refer to the ISCA Rating Tool for full details of the requirements ISCA Lan-3 Sustainability Hierarchy

The ISCA Lan-3 sustainability appraisal process includes the following sustainability hierarchy for remediation: 1. If practicable, on-site treatment of the contamination so that it is destroyed or the associated risk is reduced to an acceptable level. 2. Off-site treatment of excavated soil, so that the contamination is destroyed or the associated risk is reduced to an acceptable level, after which soil is returned to the site. 3. Consolidation and isolation of the soil on site by containment with a properly designed barrier 4. Removal of contaminated material to an approved site or facility, followed, where necessary, by replacement with appropriate material. 5. Where the assessment indicates remediation would have no net environmental benefit or would have a net adverse environmental effect, implementation of an appropriate management strategy. If an option less favourable than the first option is selected, then justification for not selecting options higher on the hierarchy must be provided. In cases where no readily available or economically feasible method is available for remediation, it may be possible to adopt appropriate regulatory controls or develop other forms of remediation. Soil Remediation Options Assessment Tool

If any unexpected discovery of contaminated soil is encountered during the Project, it will be managed using the ISCA sustainability hierarchy approach. Soil remediation and management options will be assessed in accordance with a rating tool and the following multiple category assessment table will be used to complete this:

Page 28

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Contamination (pipe jack) MCA

Revision: 0.1

Date:

Improvement efficiency rating 3

Major improvement

Major reduction

Moderate improvement

Moderate reduction

Minor improvement

Minor reduction

N/A

Criteria

Item #

Comments

Stage 1 If practicable, on-site treatment of the contamination so that it is destroyed or the associeated risk is recuded to an acceptable level

Management Cost Impact

Construction Cost

Construction Programme

Health and Safety

Consents/legal Issues

Coordination with other CRL EW construction activities

Environmental Impacts

Infrastructure Rating impacts

Waste minimisation

Community/stakeholder impacts

Cultural impacts

Risk

Comments

Stage 2

Comments

Stage 3

Comments

Stage 4

Offsite treatment of excabated soil so that the contaminatio is destroyed or the associated risk is reduced to an acceptable level, after which soil is retunred to the site

Consolidation and isolation of the soil is on site by containment with a properly designed barrier

Removal of contaminated material to an approved site or facility, followed, where necessary, by replacment with appropriate material.

Comments

Stage 5 Where the assesssment indicates remediation would have no net environmental benefit or would have a net adverse environmental effect, implementation of an apprpriate management strategy

Recommendation & Justification

Total Average

Outcome

Page 29

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Notes/Comments

Construction Environmental Management Plan

Appendix P: Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan

Page 112

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Karangahape Station Early Works Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan

CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800011

Revision: Final Date: 5 November 2019

Page 1

| Early works - Rev 1

GSMCP â€“ Karangahape Station

Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800011

This document is uncontrolled when printed. This document should be printed in colour

Revision Status Revision

Issue Date

Major Changes

Changed By

Approved By

Rev 0

21/10/2019

Issued for Council review

George Brink

Peter Roan

Rev 1

4/11/2019

Issued for Council certification

George Brink

Peter Roan

Approval Status Name/Title Prepared by:

George Brink CRL Lead â€“ Groundwater and Settlement

Reviewed by:

Graeme Twose Senior Geotechnical Engineer

Approved by:

Peter Roan Link Alliance Consent Lead

Page 2

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Signature

Date 21/10/2019

21/10/2019

GSMCP â€“ Karangahape Station

Table of contents Glossary of Terms .......................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction ............................................................................................. 6 1.1

CRL Project Description ................................................................................................. 6

1.2

Scope of CRL Project Covered by this GMSCP ................................................................. 6

1.3

GSMCP Staging .............................................................................................................. 7

1.4

Purpose of the GSMCP .................................................................................................. 7

1.4.1.

General ............................................................................................................................ 7

1.4.2.

Performance Standards during Construction ................................................................. 7

1.5

GSMCP Authors ............................................................................................................. 8

1.6

Consent Requirements .................................................................................................. 8

1.7

Sustainability .............................................................................................................. 12

1.8

GSMCP Review and updates ........................................................................................ 12

2. Project Description ................................................................................ 13 2.1

Karangahape Station Early Works ................................................................................ 13

3. Existing Environment ............................................................................. 14 3.1

Land Use and Topography ........................................................................................... 14

3.2

Geology ...................................................................................................................... 14

3.3

Hydrogeology.............................................................................................................. 15

3.4

Existing Buildings and Structures ................................................................................. 15

3.5

Existing Basements...................................................................................................... 15

3.6

Existing Utilities .......................................................................................................... 16

3.7

Issued Groundwater Diversion Consents ...................................................................... 16

4. Overview of Monitoring and Reporting Requirements ........................... 17 4.1

Monitoring and Reporting Requirements ..................................................................... 17

4.2

Notification and GSMCP Certification........................................................................... 21

4.3

Data Collection and Reporting Requirements ............................................................... 21

4.4

Independent Building Assessor Reporting Requirements .............................................. 21

4.5

Roles and Responsibilities ........................................................................................... 21

5. Groundwater Monitoring Plan ............................................................... 23 5.1

Early Works................................................................................................................. 23

6. Settlement Monitoring Plan ................................................................... 24 Page 3

| Karangahape Station Early Works

GSMCP â€“ Karangahape Station 6.1

Introduction ................................................................................................................ 24

6.2

Building Condition Surveys .......................................................................................... 24

6.2.1.

Pre-Construction Building Condition Surveys ............................................................... 25

6.2.2.

During-Construction Building Condition Surveys.......................................................... 25

6.2.3.

Post-Construction Building Condition Surveys ............................................................. 25

6.3

Monitoring.................................................................................................................. 26

6.3.1.

Ground and Buildings .................................................................................................... 26

6.3.2.

Utilities and Infrastructure............................................................................................ 27

7. Settlement Trigger Levels ....................................................................... 29 8. Response, Mitigation and Contingency Plan........................................... 30 8.1

Introduction ................................................................................................................ 30

8.2

Response to Alerts ...................................................................................................... 30

8.2.1.

Groundwater Alerts ...................................................................................................... 30

8.2.2.

Settlement Alerts .......................................................................................................... 30

8.3

Response to Alarms..................................................................................................... 30

8.4

Response to Building or Utility Damage ....................................................................... 31

8.5

Mitigation of Effects .................................................................................................... 31

9. Monitoring and Contingency Plan Review .............................................. 33 9.1

General Review of the GSMCP ..................................................................................... 33

9.2

Review of Monitoring and Contingency Requirements ................................................. 33

APPENDIX A: Drawings ................................................................................ 34 APPENDIX B: Geological Cross Sections ........................................................ 35 APPENDIX C: Settlement Trigger Levels ........................................................ 36 APPENDIX D: Settlement Monitoring Instrumentation ................................. 37 APPENDIX E: Wall Deflection Limits to Control Settlement Effects ............... 38 APPENDIX F: Record of CLG Consultation Outcomes .................................... 39

Page 4

| Karangahape Station Early Works

GSMCP â€“ Karangahape Station

Glossary of Terms Term AT BCS CBD CEMP CEP CMJ CPEng CRL CSA ECBF EMS GNS GSMCP IBA m RL NAL

Page 5

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Definition Auckland Transport Building Condition Survey Central Business District Construction Environmental Management Plan Construction Execution Plan Central Motorway Junction Chartered Professional Engineer City Rail Link Construction Support Area East Coast Bays Formation Environment & Sustainability Manager Geological and Nuclear Sciences Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan Independent Building Assessor Metres reduced level North Auckland Line

GSMCP – Karangahape Station

Introduction

1.1 CRL Project Description The City Rail Link (CRL) project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line in the vicinity of Mt Eden Station. The CRL also involves the construction of two new underground stations at Aotea and Karangahape Road, and a redeveloped Mt Eden Station (Figure 1-1). The design and construction of the CRL infrastructure between the Aotea and Mt Eden Stations is being delivered by the Link Alliance.

Figure 1-1 CRL Route and Location

This Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan (GSMCP) has been prepared in relation to construction of the Karangahape Station early works.

1.2 Scope of CRL Project Covered by this GMSCP The Karangahape Station consists of two entrances, one at Beresford Square / Pitt Street and the other at Mercury Lane, linked together by platforms with two mined tunnels approximately 32m below Pitt Street. The Station will also comprise equipment rooms, ventilation systems and emergency egress at both Mercury Lane and Beresford Square / Pitt Street. Given the nature and scale of the Karangahape Station construction, works will be undertaken in a staged manner, involving:

Page 6



Early works (demolition, network utility relocation and site establishment works) – to be undertaken from September 2019 through to early 2020;



Main construction works (construction of the station and mined tunnels for the rail tracks) – to be undertaken from early 2020 through to late 2023; and

| Karangahape Station Early Works

GSMCP – Karangahape Station 

Public realm reinstatement – from late 2022 to late 2024.

1.3 GSMCP Staging To reflect the staged construction approach for the Karangahape Station, the GSMCPs for this area will be developed in stages. This GSMCP has been prepared in relation to the early works only, which are described in detail in the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and summarised in Section 1.7 of this GSMCP. A separate GSMCP will be prepared for the Karangahape Station main construction works.

1.4 Purpose of the GSMCP 1.4.1. General The purpose of this GSMCP is to, so far as reasonably practical: 

Prevent damage that may affect the serviceability of structures and services, and



Provide appropriate measures to remediate or mitigate any adverse effects (including cumulative effects) as a result of the dewatering and excavation activities involved in the early works.

This GSMCP addresses the relevant matters specified in the conditions of Water Permit R/REG/2016/1892 (groundwater diversion and discharge) (‘the Consent’). This GSMCP forms part of the CEMP for the Karangahape Station early works. The majority of the relocation works will be carried out in shallow trenches which do not need excavation support and are not further considered in this GSMCP. The relocation of the wastewater and stormwater lines will however involve deep excavations for which mechanical settlement effects need to be considered. These include: 

  

The excavation of two launch shafts in Pitt Street (4 m x 3 m, maximum depth of 5 m bGL) and recovery shafts in Beresford Square (3m x 3m, maximum depth 3.5m bGL) at either end of the wastewater or stormwater line to be relocated; Directional drilling (approximately 300 mm diameter bore) of the distance between shafts; Rigging of the new pipe (250 mm diameter) through the drilled route; and Installing cased manholes (1.15 m diameter, maximum depth of 5 m bGL) along the length of the route along Beresford Square and at the positions of the launch shafts once work has been completed.

The GSMCP has been developed in consultation with the Karangahape Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG) (as per Resource Consent Condition 16 and 19). Comments received from the CLG have been (where applicable and appropriate) incorporated in the GSMCP, with an explanation provided where any comments have not been incorporated. A record of the consultation outcomes is provided in Appendix F of this GSMCP.

1.4.2. Performance Standards during Construction Consent Conditions 83 and 84 specify the performance standards with respect to settlement that apply during the works, including:

Page 7

| Karangahape Station Early Works

GSMCP – Karangahape Station 

Within the 5 mm settlement contours on the drawings in Appendix 1 (of the Consent), all excavations, dewatering systems, retaining structures and associated works (including backfilling) for the CRL construction must be designed, constructed and maintained so as to avoid any damage that exceeds the Serviceability Limits of buildings, structures and services.



Beyond the 5 mm settlement contours on the drawings in Appendix 1, the Consent Holder must ensure that the damage to masonry buildings due to the Project works does not exceed the “negligible damage” category extent detailed in Table 1 of the Consent, and has only negligible effects on piled buildings, structures and services.

These performance standards will be achieved through the specific design aspects of the early works, and by the contingency measures associated with the design, described in Sections 5, 6, 8 and Appendix E of this GSMCP. The estimated potential ground surface settlements from the early works are evaluated in the memorandum attached as Appendix E. Provided that the excavation support is designed so that any structural deflection does not exceed the maximum tolerable deflections outlined in Appendix E, ground surface settlements as a result of the early works should not exceed the trigger levels outlined in the Consent for the adjacent structures.

1.5 GSMCP Authors This GSMCP has been prepared by a senior qualified person (Geotechnical Professional), George Brink (PhD Engineering Geology). George is an Engineering Geologist with Tonkin and Taylor in Auckland, New Zealand. He has 10 years’ experience in the geotechnical characterisation and evaluation of soil and rock mass behaviour, as well as undertaking, managing, and reporting on geotechnical investigations for a number of international public and private sector clients. This GSMCP has been reviewed by a senior qualified person (Geotechnical Professional), Graeme Twose, NZCE (Civil), BE (Civil, Hons). Graeme is a Senior Geotechnical Engineer with Tonkin and Taylor in Auckland, New Zealand. He has over 20 years’ experience and has specialised in groundwater and settlement assessments for tunnels and deep excavations - with a particular focus on Auckland geology. His involvement in tunnelling and deep excavation projects spans investigation and feasibility stages, through to construction monitoring and contingency planning.

1.6 Consent Requirements Table 1-1 outlines a summary of the resource consent conditions relevant to this GSMCP and where they are addressed in the document.

Page 8

| Karangahape Station Early Works

GSMCP – Karangahape Station Table 1-1 Relevant GSMCP conditions

Consent Condition 83 Performance Standards

84 90 91

Appointment of IBA

92 93

Pre-dewatering Services Survey

94 95 96 97 98 99

Brief Condition Description

Section Addressed in

Within the 5mm settlement contours in Appendix 1 of the Consent, all excavations, dewatering systems, retaining structures and associated works (including backfilling) for the CRL construction must be designed, constructed and maintained to avoid any damage that exceeds the Serviceability limits of buildings, structures and services.

Section 1.4.2

Beyond the 5mm settlement contours on the drawings in Appendix 1, the Consent Holder must ensure that the damage to masonry buildings due to the Project works, including excavations, dewatering systems, retaining structures and associated works (including backfilling), does not exceed the “negligible damage” category extent detailed in Table 1 of the Consent and has only negligible effects on piled buildings, structures and services. The Consent Holder shall ensure that there is no long-term mounding due to damming of groundwater by the proposed rail infrastructure. Prior to the Consent Holder submitting the GSMCP under Condition 97, the Consent Holder shall request that Council engage, at the cost of the Consent Holder, a suitably qualified independent specialist, agreed to by the Consent Holder, to fill the role of Independent Building Assessor (IBA). The Consent Holder shall acknowledge that the IBA can, at the expense of the Consent Holder, engage other independent specialists, but only in consultation with the Consent Holder. The IBA required by Condition 91 shall report to the Manager on building damage matters and how these matters may be addressed by the Consent Holder. Prior to the Commencement of Dewatering, and following the identification of potentially affected Services, the Consent Holder shall, in consultation with the relevant service provider, undertake a condition survey of all such Services. This condition does not apply to any Service where written evidence is provided to the Manager that the owner of that Service has confirmed they do not require a condition survey. The monitoring of any settlement effects on those potentially affected Services shall be in accordance with Conditions 120 and 121. In the event that the Services’ trigger levels in Appendix 2 are breached, the Consent Holder must carry out remedial actions in accordance with Conditions 125 and 128. GSMCP requirements for certification by Auckland Council (timeframes and peer review) Dewatering is not to commence until certification from the Manager is provided. The GSMCP, required by Condition 97, shall include the requirements of the Consent including, but not limited to, the following: a. an “as built” survey plan of all monitoring locations based on approximate positions located on the plans entitled: • A02502731, Figure 39, Rev B dated May 2016 and ET Table 7.1 (Appendix 3); and • The plans referred to in Appendix 1 and any further building-specific monitoring requirements determined from the detailed pre-construction building condition assessment. b. full details (frequency and scope) of groundwater (including construction logs), ground surface, building, retaining wall, building façade, inclinometer monitoring programme and conditions surveys, and frequency and scope of visual inspections required by this consent

Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan ("GSMCP")

100

c. a bar chart, such as a Gantt chart, showing the timing and frequency of the condition surveys and monitoring required by this consent relative to the Commencement of Dewatering and the Completion of Dewatering; d. groundwater alert triggers e. details of all alert and alarm triggers (including any necessary horizontal and vertical displacements), the frequency of monitoring and the criteria to cease monitoring for each ground, building and retaining wall deformation marks and inclinometers, extensometers. The alert and alarm triggers shall be an update of the provisional triggers provided on drawings CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2640 Rev 4. dated 14 October 2016 and CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2642 Rev 3. dated 11 October 2016. f. details of contingency measures to be implemented if alert or alarm triggers are exceeded including a Response Plan. g. identification of any adjacent services susceptible to damage and details of any pre and post construction monitoring or inspection;

101 102 103 Groundwater Monitoring Page 9

104 105

| Early Works – Rev 1

i. details of monitoring proposed to be undertaken to protect the issued groundwater diversion consents listed in the Consent Conditions against cumulative settlement effects; j. identification of existing basements which could be subject to potential flooding from post-construction groundwater mounding; details of monitoring of long-term groundwater mounding effects; and details of groundwater drain construction to prevent groundwater mounding k. the review of the proposed alarm and alert trigger levels in Appendix 2, approved by the IBA, following the pre-construction building condition surveys (required by Condition 109) that confirms they are set to ensure Serviceability Limits will be not be exceeded and whether the monitoring frequency is adequate, possibly requiring further site investigation work where sensitive structures are identified as part of Condition 112 The GSMCP may be varied, including frequency of monitoring, subject to the certification by Auckland Council, which is contingent on approval by the IBA. Once certified, the GSMCP shall be implemented for the periods specified in the conditions of the Consent. The Consent Holder shall advise the Manager, in writing, of the date of the proposed Commencement of Dewatering. The Consent Holder shall install, maintain and replace if necessary, groundwater monitoring boreholes listed in Appendix 3 of this consent and shown on drawing A02502731, Figure 39, Rev B dated May 2016 (Appendix 3) and ET Table 7.1 (Appendix 3) of this consent, for the period required by the conditions of this consent. The Consent Holder shall measure and record groundwater levels at the monitoring boreholes specified above and at the frequency specified in Schedule B.

Section 1.4.2

Section 5 Section 4.4

Section 4.4 Section 6.3.2

Section 6.3.2 and Table 4-1 Section 8

Section 4.3 Section 4.2 Section4.2 Section 5 Appendix D

Section 3 Section 5 Section 6 Table 4-1 Section 5 Section 7 Table 4-1 Section 8 Section 3.6, Section 6.3.2, Table 4-1 Section 3.7 Section 3.5 and 5 Section 7 Section 9.2 Section 1.4 and 9 Section 4

Section 4.2 Section 5

GSMCP â€“ Karangahape Station

Consent Condition

Brief Condition Description 106 107 108

109

110

Building Inspection

111

112 113 114

115

116 117 119 Page 10

| Early Works â€“ Rev 1

These records, reported in reduced level, shall be compiled and submitted to the Manager at monthly intervals. The groundwater alert trigger level criteria is listed in Schedule C for the monitoring boreholes. Where groundwater alert trigger levels are exceeded, as identified from monitoring data obtained pursuant to Condition 105, the Consent Holder shall undertake the actions set out in the certified GSMCP. a. notify the Manager within 2 working days, advising the trigger exceedance, the risk of settlement causing damage to buildings, and details of the actions taken; and b. send a copy of the material notified to Council to the relevant building owner Prior to the commencement of dewatering/excavation, the Consent Holder shall employ an independent Senior Qualified Person to undertake a detailed pre-construction condition survey, of all relevant buildings to confirm their existing condition, subject to the approval of the property owner. The survey shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. any information about the type of foundations; b. existing levels of damage considered to be of an aesthetic or superficial nature; c. existing levels of damage considered to affect the serviceability of the building where visually apparent and without recourse to intrusive or destructive investigation; d. a professional opinion as to whether observed damage may or may not be associated with actual structural damage; e. susceptibility of the building or structure to further movement; f. specific assessment of building damage with reference to the trigger levels identified in Appendix C of the Consent; g. review of proposed alarm and alert trigger levels to confirm they are appropriately set and movement less than trigger levels set will not exacerbate damage, and whether the monitoring frequency and locations of monitoring points are adequate; and h. photographic evidence of (b) and (c). Where the Consent Holder is required to access property (including buildings or structures) owned by a third party to undertake monitoring, surveys or inspections and that access is declined or subject to what the Consent Holder considers to be unreasonable terms, the Consent Holder shall notify the Manager of that circumstance, and provide an alternative monitoring plan which includes the matters stated in Condition 100. Any condition survey undertaken in accordance with Condition 109, or any other condition surveys undertaken by the Consent Holder, shall be undertaken as follows: a. The Senior Qualified Person shall be identified in the CEMP (required by Condition 36); b. Contact owners of those buildings and structures where a condition survey is to be undertaken to confirm the timing and methodology for undertaking a pre-construction condition survey; c. Record all contact, correspondence and communication with owners and this shall be available on request for the Council; d. Provide the building condition survey or structure condition survey report to the relevant property owner and the Council within 15 working days of the survey being undertaken; e. The Consent Holder shall undertake a visual inspection during construction if requested by the building or structure owner where a pre-construction condition survey has been undertaken and monitoring data and observations note any changes from the pre-construction condition survey report. f. Develop a system of monitoring the condition of existing buildings or structures which is commensurate with the type of the existing building or structure and the proximity of the project works in order to assess whether or not construction activities are compromising the structural integrity of the building or structure. Should the pre-construction building condition survey and assessment highlight greater sensitivity of buildings than envisaged by the application, and should this increased sensitivity mean that the Serviceability Limit for the building may be exceeded, then the Consent Holder shall, at its cost, implement additional measures that may include modifications to the design of the retention systems or further geotechnical investigation). The Consent Holder shall carry out a visual inspection of the surrounding ground and external building facades of the listed buildings in Appendix 2 adjacent to the tunnel/trench and station alignment to monitor for any deterioration or movement of any pre-existing cracks at a frequency to be specified in the GSMCP. Keep a record of the time, date and any observations for each inspection. This record is to be maintained and submitted to Auckland Council in accordance with Condition 128. No earlier than six months after Completion of Dewatering and within six months of Completion of Construction, a detailed condition survey all previously surveyed buildings, structures and water, stormwater and wastewater services, shall be prepared by a suitably qualified engineering professional. This condition survey report shall address all matters reviewed in the pre-dewatering condition survey. It shall also identify any new damage (if any) that has occurred since the predewatering condition survey was undertaken and include a determination of the cause of any such damage and steps to repair it as provided for in Condition 125. The requirements of this condition need not be fulfilled for any particular building where the Consent Holder can provide written evidence to the Manager that the current owner of that building has advised they do not require such a condition survey. At the reasonable request of the Manager, the Consent Holder shall, without delay, undertake an additional condition survey of any building within the area defined by the groundwater monitoring, deformation monitoring and modelling undertaken pursuant to the conditions of this consent potentially affected by excavation, for the purpose of checking for damage and follow up with a report of damage to that building. Subject to Condition 125, the requirement for any such condition survey will cease 6 months after the Completion of Construction, unless the requirements of Condition 115 have not been met and subject to a consistent pattern of deformation records having been obtained in this period in which no evidence of adverse effects is apparent. Establishment and maintenance of a settlement monitoring network (ground settlement and building movement monitoring marks) to detect any deformation: a. The minimum scope of settlement monitoring is shown on Appendix 1 of the Consent

Section Addressed in

Section 8

Section 6.2

Section 6.2 Table 4-1

Section 8 Section 6.3 Table 4-1

GSMCP – Karangahape Station

Consent Condition

Ground Surface and Building Monitoring 120

124

Contingency

125

126 127 Reporting 128

Page 11

| Early Works – Rev 1

Brief Condition Description

Section Addressed in

b. Subject to the owners’ approval, at least two sets (minimum three pins) of building movement monitoring marks shall be located on each building listed in Appendix 2 of the Consent. c. The final location and number of building movement monitoring marks shall take into account the building type and size, accessibility to survey the marks and risk of damage from ground settlement, as determined by requirements of conditions of this consent, and the effects of differential settlement from the predicted settlement contours on the drawings in Appendix 1 as modified by the detailed design and reflected in the GSMCP.

Appendix D

The Consent Holder shall survey and record each ground and building movement mark in accordance with Schedule D in the Consent; and records of the baseline monitoring shall be compiled and submitted to the Manager prior to the Commencement of Dewatering. In the event that monitoring of ground or building settlement, differential settlement, or horizontal movement associated with the construction works identifies movement which exceeds the vertical and horizontal movement triggers detailed in Appendix 2 or any revised trigger levels subject of this consent, then the Consent Holder shall instigate the Response Plan detailed in the GSMCP and undertake the following procedures: a. Notify Auckland Council and the IBA within 24 hours; b & c. If measurements exceed any of the alert values, then a Senior Qualified Person engaged by the Consent Holder or the Consent Holder’s contractor shall reassess the works constructed up to that time to confirm that works’ progress against the design predictions are within expectations, whether additional measures (if any) are required to restrain further increases in movement and that possible ensuing effects will exceed Serviceability Limits. Measures (if any) to be implemented, identified in the Response Plan in the GSMCP or as agreed with the IBA, may include an increase in the frequency of monitoring, or additional support measures. The Senior Qualified Person shall prepare and submit a written report to Auckland Council, within one week of alert level exceedance, which provides analyses of all monitoring data relating to the exceedance of any of the trigger levels and any actions taken. d. If measurements exceed any of the alarm values the Consent Holder shall: i) Follow the process identified in Condition 124(b); ii) Commission and submit a written report, prepared by the Senior Qualified Person engaged in accordance with Condition 124(b) to the Manager, within one week of alarm level exceedance, which provides analyses of all monitoring data, relating to the exceedance of any of the trigger levels and any recommendations for remedial actions, if required, in order to avoid damage that will affect building Serviceability and which may also allow Completion of Construction; and iii) Implement the recommendations of the report. In the instance that the recommendation is to stop work, pursuant to Conditions 124(b) and (d)(ii), the remedial action(s) that have been recommended shall be undertaken before the works recommence. e. In relation to alarm level exceedance, the recommendations of the IBA (refer Condition 92), which may include remedial actions up to and including stopping the works, if that is (in the opinion of the IBA) in the best interests of preventing building serviceability damage, shall be implemented by the Consent Holder (unless the building owner(s) request in writing that the construction works are to be completed in accordance with the report prepared under Condition124 (d)(ii). If any damage to buildings, structures or services is caused wholly or in part by the exercising of this consent, the Consent Holder shall: a. notify the Manager and the asset owner as soon as practical; b. engage a Senior Qualified Person to prepare a report as soon as practical, describing the damage and identifying methods to avoid and mitigate the potential for Serviceability damage and to remedy any damage caused wholly or in part by the exercising of this consent; and provide a copy of the report to the Manager and the asset owner; and c. thereafter promptly undertake (at the entire cost of the Consent Holder) all necessary repairs to fully remedy the damage caused by the exercise of this consent, with timing to be agreed with the asset owners. “Entire cost” includes all design and consenting costs as well as all construction costs. This obligation as a condition of the resource consent shall apply to all Damage that is identified during the latest of the periods listed below: i) Two years after Completion of Dewatering; or ii) One year after groundwater levels have stabilised; and iii) The completion of post construction monitoring required to be carried out under Condition 121; and iv) Six months after any completion of any other works associated with the project which have the potential to cause settlement. Auckland Council shall be advised in writing within ten working days of Completion of Dewatering. Auckland Council shall be advised in writing within ten working days of Completion of Construction. All data collected as required by conditions of this consent from Commencement of Dewatering to completion of monitoring are to be compiled, compared with the relevant trigger levels and submitted to the Manager at two monthly intervals, unless otherwise specified in this consent, setting out the previous results, providing an explanation for any trends and providing a construction progress timeline.

Section 8

Section 4

GSMCP – Karangahape Station

1.7

Sustainability

The Link Alliance is seeking an Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia (ISCA) Infrastructure Sustainability (IS) Rating. Further details can be found in the CEMP and Sustainability Rating Management Plan. Project sustainability requirements that relate directly to this GSMCP are included in Appendix G. These requirements are imbedded within the GSMCP to ensure that sustainability is a key focus and ‘the way we do things’. In some cases, the IS requirements and sustainability goals enhance the consent requirements. Further detail on sustainability is provided in Section 1.7 of the CEMP.

1.8

GSMCP Review and updates

This GSMCP is a live document that will be reviewed at least annually, or as a result of a material change to the project, or to address unforeseen settlement effects arising from construction, or unresolved complaints. Any material changes to this GSMCP must be certified by Auckland Council prior to any on-site activity reliant upon the change commencing. Refer to the CEMP for further detail on the review and updating process

Page 12

| Early Works - Rev 1

GSMCP – Karangahape Station

Project Description

2.1 Karangahape Station Early Works Early works will be undertaken at the new Karangahape Station site to enable and provide for the subsequent main construction works. The early works are detailed in the CEMP. An overview of the work is presented in the drawings included in Appendix A (CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW BER and CRLKRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW MERCURY) and summarised in Table 2-1. Table 2-1 Overview of Karangahape Early Works

Works location

Overview of construction activities

Beresford Square / Pitt Street

 Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Beresford Square / Pitt Street;  Removal of street trees and the demolition of the café / toilet in Beresford Square;  Establishment of the Beresford Square Construction Support Area to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.;  Closure of Beresford Square to vehicle traffic (other than construction traffic) while retaining pedestrian and cycle access; and .  Removal of existing street furniture where required (such as seating, street lighting (to be replaced with temporary lighting).

Mercury Lane

Page 13

| Early Works - Rev 1

GSMCP – Karangahape Station

Existing Environment

3.1 Land Use and Topography The new Karangahape Station will be located beneath the ridge lines of Karangahape Road and Pitt Street. Above the Station, topographic elevation ranges from approximately 60 to 65 m RL. Topography slopes radially away to lower elevations from the intersection of Karangahape Road and Pitt Street; northeast towards the head of Myers Park (43 m RL) and north through southeast towards the Central Motorway Junction (40 – 50 m RL). The land uses surrounding the new Karangahape Station area are ‘mixed-use’, including small-scale light industrial activities, residential buildings, cafes, restaurants and community facilities.

3.2 Geology The majority of the Auckland urban area is underlain by sedimentary rocks of the East Coast Bays Formation (ECBF), terrestrial deposits and shallow marine sediments of the Tauranga Group and volcanic deposits of the Auckland Volcanic Field1. Throughout much of the Auckland CBD, man-made fill has been placed and overlies the natural geology described above. Several stages of geotechnical investigations have been completed along the CRL alignment and during prior CRL project stages. The results from these were used to develop a 3-D Leapfrog® ground model for the CRL project area. Based on the available geological information, the general vertical stratigraphic sequence in the area comprises the following: 



Local alluvium deposits of Pleistocene age Tauranga Group Alluvium infill the heads of paleotributary gullies south of the ridge crest;



The thickness of the weathered and residual ECBF varies in the area, possibly as a result of preferential weathering down steeply inclined joints or faults leading to deeper weathering profiles in areas. The residual ECBF underlies the fill (where no alluvium deposits are present), ranging from 4 - 8 m and 3 - 6 m along Beresford Square and Mercury Lane respectively. The thicknesses of the weathered ECBF vary similarly, before grading into unweathered ECBF at depths between 46 and 54 m RL;



The channelised sandstone unit in the Central Motorway Junction area is mapped throughout the Karangahape Station area. The base of the channelised sandstone unit approximates the vertical rail track alignment through this area. The unit is gently folded and faulted, with occasional swarms of joints which may be related to nearby faulting.

Cross-sections along the Beresford Square and Mercury Lane areas were exported from the 3-D model and are included in Appendix B to this GSCMP. 1

Kermode, L. O., (1992). Geology of the Auckland urban area. Scale 1:50 000. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Geological Map 2. Lower Hutt, New Zealand, Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Ltd. 1 sheet + 63 p. Page 14

| Early Works - Rev 1

GSMCP – Karangahape Station

3.3 Hydrogeology Perched Groundwater A review of the hydrogeological studies completed during prior CRL project stages and historic groundwater monitoring data from piezometers installed in the region of Beresford Square and Mercury Lane indicates the presence of a shallow or perched groundwater level, varying between approximately 2 m b GL (maximum high) to 6 m b GL (maximum low). The perched water level fluctuates between maximum and minimum levels in response to rainfall events, particularly in the Beresford Square area. These zones were assessed to be relatively isolated and laterally discontinuous. The topographical high position of this area and fact that the surrounding areas are largely covered by man-made surfaces means that any perched groundwater levels are likely to be predominantly recharged by leaking services and flowing to local topographic sinks or shallow drainage infrastructure. The groundwater conditions within the upper soils are largely unaffected by underdrainage from within the regional groundwater tables that lie within the ECBF. Any potential long-term effects on the perched groundwater profile arising from de-pressurisation of the regional groundwater system is likely to be largely buffered by rainfall recharge2. Regional Groundwater System Beneath the perched groundwater zone (at depths varying between approximately 8 to 10 m bGL), seasonally permanent saturation of the fill / alluvium / residual ECBF is assumed to occur, representing the top of the regional groundwater system in this area. This regional hydrogeological regime is relatively complex, with up to four regional groundwater levels conceptualised in the hydrogeological model of the area.

3.4 Existing Buildings and Structures A list of buildings in the area adjacent to the Karangahape Station early works is provided in Table 3-1 below. Table 3-1 List of buildings – Karangahape Station early works

Beresford Square

Mercury Lane

22-28 Beresford Square 283 Karangahape Road (Samoa House) 16-18 Beresford Square 259-281 Karangahape Road 251-253 Karangahape Road (Koia Building) 61-65 Pitt Street

9 Mercury Lane (Mercury Theatre) 238 Karangahape Road (George Court Building) 1 Cross Street (George Court Factory Building)

3.5 Existing Basements Buildings with existing basements in the area of the early works are as follows: 

224-244 Karangahape Road (George Court Building), which includes two basement levels with the bottom one only on the Southern end of the building.

PDP, (2015). Auckland City Rail Link Project Karangahape Road Pumping Test Report (Stage 3). Prepared for Auckland Transport, dated May 2015. Page 15

| Early Works - Rev 1

GSMCP – Karangahape Station 

1 Cross Street (George Court Factory Building), which includes 1 basement level.

3.6 Existing Utilities Several network utilities have been identified within the area of the Karangahape Station early works including stormwater, wastewater, electricity, telecommunications and gas. These include: Beresford Square 

22kV oil filled cables running from Day Street, along the north side of Beresford Square, north up Pitt Street.



Low voltage electricity cables, running south-east along the southern side of Beresford Square.



Stormwater and wastewater lines which run south-east near the centre of Beresford Square.



Potable water lines which run along both sides of Beresford Square.



Telecommunication cables, running along both sides of Beresford Square.



Gas running along the southern side of Beresford Square.

Mercury Lane 

Low voltage and high voltage electricity cables, running south along the eastern side of Mercury Lane.



Telecommunication cables, running south along both sides of Mercury Lane.



Gas runs along the western side of Mercury Lane.



Stormwater, wastewater and potable water lines run along the centre of Mercury Lane.

3.7 Issued Groundwater Diversion Consents Only one granted groundwater diversion consent currently lodged with Auckland Council, is near or within the vicinity of the Karanagahape Station early works. This consent relates to 26 Poynton Terrace (Consent No. 43162), located approximately 120 m to the east of the Beresford Square entrance. Condition 100 (i) of the Consent requires the GSMCP to include details of the monitoring proposed to be undertaken to protect the issued groundwater diversion consents listed in the Consent against cumulative settlement effects. This consent will not be affected by the Karangahape Station early works but will be reviewed during the preparation of the GSMCP for the main station works.

Page 16

| Early Works - Rev 1

GSMCP – Karangahape Station

Overview of Monitoring and Reporting Requirements

This section provides an overview of the monitoring and reporting required for the Karangahape Station early works in accordance with the consent conditions.

4.1 Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Monitoring shall be completed and records compiled and submitted to Auckland Council by those responsible during the stages and frequencies outlined in Figure 4-1 and Table 4-1 hereafter.

Pre-construction Monitoring

•This monitoring phase will provide baseline data against which effects resulting from the construction works can be assessed. The outcomes will form part of the input for the construction phase assessments.

During Construction Monitoring

•Monitoring during the bulk excavation phase will be used to verify the design analyses, by comparing the actual measurements with those estimated. The monitoring data will be used to reassess the building damage classifications at critical locations. •If these reassessments indicate that the damage classifications have increased significantly then additional analyses, increased monitoring or other actions may be required. Mitigation options, discussed in Section 8 of this GSMCP, may also be required to be implemented.

Post-Construction Monitoring

•Where specified in the Consent, monitoring will occur until the various stages of works are completed (excavation, dewatering and construction), and shall continue as required until stable measurements are demonstrated, and written approval is provided by AC.

Figure 4-1 Summary of Construction Monitoring Stages

Page 17

| Early Works - Rev 1

GSMCP â€“ Karangahape Station Table 4-1: Summary of Monitoring Requirements

Monitoring Type

Construction Stage

Minimum Measurement Frequency

Baseline

Weekly for at least 3 months before commencing dewatering and those boreholes listed in Appendix 3 of the Consent.

Measureme nt Accuracy

Three times a week for all monitoring boreholes until completion of dewatering. Groundwater Monitoring

Excavation/ dewatering

PostConstruction Dewatering

Monitoring shall continue until either six months after the completion of dewatering, or until such time following the completion of dewatering that monitoring of settlement and building monitoring marks has ceased under Condition 120.

Baseline

A detailed pre-construction condition survey is to be carried out of all buildings identified in Appendix 2 of the Consent and relevant to this GSMCP (subject to approval of the property owner).

Excavation/ dewatering

A visual inspection will be undertaken during construction if requested by the building or structure owner where a pre-construction condition survey has been undertaken and visual observations or monitoring data indicates changes from the pre-construction condition.

Building Condition Surveys (BCS)

Page 18

Daily, should the Groundwater Alert Trigger level be exceeded.

| Early Works - Rev 1

Reporting Requirement to Auckland Council, unless otherwise stated

Related Consent Conditions

Relevant GSMCP Sections

104 â€“ 108

Section 5

109 - 117

Section 6.2

Monthly for routine monitoring. 10mm

Within 2 working days of any alert trigger level exceedances.

Within 15 working days to the relevant property owner and Auckland Council. N/A

A record is to be maintained of the time, date and any observations for each inspection. This record is to be maintained and

GSMCP â€“ Karangahape Station

Monitoring Type

Construction Stage

Minimum Measurement Frequency

Measureme nt Accuracy

Visual inspections of the surrounding ground and external facades of buildings identified in Section 6.2 will be carried out quarterly (3 months) from the commencement of excavation / dewatering, or within one week of the completion of works for shorter duration activities. This is to monitor any deterioration or further cracking from pre-construction conditions. PostConstruction Dewatering/ excavation

A post-construction condition survey shall be carried out no earlier than 6 months after completion of dewatering/excavation and within 6 months of completion of construction for any building that had a pre-construction survey.

Baseline

Each ground settlement and building movement monitoring mark shall be surveyed and recorded at least three times prior to the commencement of excavation / dewatering to establish a baseline elevation.

Ground Surface and Building Monitoring

Depending on the stage of construction:

Excavation/ dewatering

Page 19

| Early Works - Rev 1

Monthly, at each ground settlement and building monitoring mark,

Daily for two weeks and weekly thereafter for all ground and building settlement markers within 50m of excavations during excavation until such time following the completion of

Horizontal and vertical accuracy of at least Âą2 mm, or as otherwise achieved by precise levelling during baseline phase.

Reporting Requirement to Auckland Council, unless otherwise stated submitted to AC at two monthly intervals or upon reasonable request from the AC Representative.

Related Consent Conditions

Relevant GSMCP Sections

To be compiled and submitted to AC prior to the commencement of excavation.

A record is to be maintained of the time, date and any observations for each survey, and submitted to the Council at two monthly intervals.

119 - 120

Section 6.3

GSMCP â€“ Karangahape Station

Monitoring Type

Construction Stage

Minimum Measurement Frequency

excavation that stable measurements are demonstrated. PostConstruction Dewatering/ excavation

Page 20

| Early Works - Rev 1

Monthly for six months, or until stable measurements are demonstrated and written approval is provided by Council for certification.

Measureme nt Accuracy

Reporting Requirement to Auckland Council, unless otherwise stated

Related Consent Conditions

Relevant GSMCP Sections

GSMCP – Karangahape Station

4.2 Notification and GSMCP Certification The Link Alliance will advise Auckland Council in writing of the date of the proposed commencement of dewatering. As defined in the Consent, this shall mean the commencement of bulk excavation and / or the commencement of the taking or diversion of groundwater, other than for initial state monitoring purposes. The GSMCP shall be prepared and submitted by the Consent Holder (CRLL) to the Manager (AC) for certification at least 20 working days prior to the Commencement of Dewatering, together with a statement from the IBA confirming its adequacy. Dewatering / excavation on the site will not commence until certification from AC is provided. CRLL shall request Council’s (The Manager) determination as to whether the GSMCP can be certified, in writing within 10 working days of receipt of the GSMCP. CRLL shall also advise the Manager in writing within ten working days of Completion of Dewatering and Construction.

4.3 Data Collection and Reporting Requirements All data collected will be compiled, compared with the relevant trigger levels (summarised in Section 7) and submitted to Auckland Council at two monthly intervals, unless otherwise specified or requested in the Consent.

4.4 Independent Building Assessor Reporting Requirements The Consent Holder shall request that Council engage, at the cost of the Consent Holder, a suitably qualified independent specialist, agreed to by the Consent Holder, to fill the role of Independent Building Assessor (IBA) The IBA shall report to Auckland Council on building damage matters, and how these matters may be addressed, with regards to the following: 

Site-specific assessments are undertaken to an appropriate level of detail;



Monitoring data is collected, interpreted and assessed in regard to limiting effects to avoid Serviceability Damage;



Alert and Alarm limits; and



Any matters with the required BCS, visual inspections, and trigger level exceedance reports in accordance with the response and repairs.

4.5 Roles and Responsibilities The roles and responsibilities relevant to the implementation of this GSMCP are outlined in Table 4-2 (refer also to the CEMP for additional detail on the wider project team roles and responsibilities).

Page 21

| Karangahape Station Early Works

GSMCP â€“ Karangahape Station Table 4-2 Roles and responsibilities

Role

Role Responsibility

Instrumentation and Monitoring Manager

Reviewing the data and correlating the monitoring observations with construction activities and design assumptions. Communicating trends and observations to the Construction Manager, relevant members of the construction team, and CRLL. Responding to Alert and Alarm triggers. Managing contingency measures and responses in the event that an Alarm level is exceeded.

Design Lead â€“ Groundwater and Settlement Effects

Prepare, review and update of GSMCP

Independent Building Assessor (IBA)

Review the GSMCP and any reports associated with alarm triggers.

Page 22

Additional inputs will be provided on an as-requested basis, with assistance from other Technical Specialists as required.

As an advocate for local stakeholders, the IBA will also receive and review monitoring data and on behalf of AC to track progress and building damage and building effects.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

GSMCP – Karangahape Station

Groundwater Monitoring Plan

This section of the GSMCP presents the methodology for the monitoring of groundwater levels as part of the overall Assessment of Settlement Effects during the Project.

5.1 Early Works The proposed early works will extend to a maximum depth of 5 m bGL and will not intersect the regional groundwater regime. To assess the likely impact of the proposed early works on any zones of shallower perched groundwater in the Karangahape Station area, the following was considered: 

The early works (and any associated dewatering) will be of a temporary nature and the maximum dewatering period will be approximately four weeks;



Drawdown will be slow within the relatively low hydraulic conductivity fill / Tauranga Group / residual ECBF materials, and the excavations shored from the top down. The maximum radius of influence (i.e. extent of drawdown) from the edge of the excavation will be localised;



Deeper excavations will be supported to ensure the stability of the works, reducing any potential inflow;



The proposed early works will involve the relocation of existing stormwater and wastewater utilities in the area. These are installed at depths ranging between 2.5 and 4.5 m bGL, and were installed / replaced at various stages in the past. Although no information is available to confirm, it is likely that these services would have been placed on a granular fill bedding material and have impacted any shallow groundwater levels; and



The perched water tables are not laterally continuous and would have already been extensively modified from its natural condition by the surrounding building development, filling and existing utilities acting as drains and connections between lenses.

Any impact on perched groundwater levels from the early works is likely to be highly localised (i.e. in the area immediately surrounding the early works excavation), and any settlement effects due to dewatering are likely to be negligible. No groundwater monitoring plan is included as part of this GSMCP for the Karangahape Station early works.

Page 23

| Karangahape Station Early Works

GSMCP – Karangahape Station

Settlement Monitoring Plan

6.1 Introduction The settlement monitoring actions, instrumentation and trigger levels described in this section are based on the outcome of the assessment of wall deflection limits for the early works construction stage (attached as Appendix E to this document), and in accordance with the relevant conditions of the Consent. This section outlines the building condition and settlement monitoring program Link Alliance will implement to: 

Verify design assumptions;



Confirm the construction induced surface settlements; and



Provide warning that mitigation is required to minimise or rectify potential adverse effects of settlement on structures.

The schedule of monitoring actions is summarised in Appendix D.

6.2 Building Condition Surveys The buildings for which BCS are required as part of the Karangahape Station early works are summarised in Table 6-1 (inclusive of those structures listed in Appendix 2 of the Consent): Table 6-1 Building Condition Surveys - Karangahape Station Early Works

Building ID No. (Consent)

Address Street No.

Street

16-18

Beresford Square

259-281

Karangahape Road

251-253

Karangahape Road

61-65

238

Mercury Lane

Cross Street

157

22-28

Beresford Square

158

283

Karangahape Road

Pitt Street Karangahape Road

The BCS will be completed prior to the early works to identify and monitor effects to buildings in accordance with consent Conditions 109 - 117.

Page 24

| Karangahape Station Early Works

GSMCP – Karangahape Station The following general requirements apply to all BCS and visual inspections undertaken during the works: 

The BCS shall be undertaken by an independent Senior Qualified Person.



All contact, correspondence and communication with building owners will be recorded, with documents available on request.



The BCS or structure condition survey reports shall be provided by the Link Alliance to the relevant property owner within 15 working days of any survey being undertaken. A copy of each report shall also be provided to CRLL and Auckland Council.



Damage to buildings identified during BCS and visual inspections resulting from the early works activities requires action as outlined in Section 8 of this GSMCP.

6.2.1. Pre-Construction Building Condition Surveys Individual pre-construction BCS of all structures listed in Section 6.2 of this GSMCP will be undertaken to establish a baseline building condition against which any subsequent surveys can be compared. The owners of the buildings and structures will be contacted in advance to confirm the timing and methodology for the pre-construction survey. All contact, correspondence and communication with the owners will be recorded and available on request for Auckland Council. Should the pre-construction building condition survey and assessment highlight greater sensitivity of buildings than envisaged by the application, and should this increased sensitivity mean that the Serviceability Limit for the building may be exceeded, then the Link Alliance shall, implement additional measures as discussed in Section 8. In the event that access is declined or subject to what the Consent Holder considers to be

unreasonable terms, the Consent Holder shall notify the Manager of that circumstance, and provide an alternative monitoring plan which includes the matters stated in Condition 100 of the Consent.

6.2.2. During-Construction Building Condition Surveys Visual inspection of ground and buildings adjacent to the early works shall be carried out according to consent conditions as follows: 

The Link Alliance will undertake a visual inspection during construction if requested by the building or structure owner where a pre-construction condition survey has been undertaken and monitoring data and observations note any changes from the pre-construction condition survey report; and



The Link Alliance will carry out a visual inspection of the surrounding ground and external building facades of the buildings identified in Section 6.2 to monitor any deterioration or further cracking of any pre-existing cracks. This will be carried out at least quarterly from the commencement of any dewatering / excavation until completion of the excavation, or (in the event of shorter duration activities) within 1 week of completion of the works.

A record will be maintained of the time, date and any observations for each inspection. This record will be maintained and submitted to Auckland Council.

6.2.3. Post-Construction Building Condition Surveys

Page 25

| Karangahape Station Early Works

GSMCP – Karangahape Station Post-construction BCS will be completed after the completion of the Karangahape Station main works (which will follow the early works outlined in this GSMCP). No earlier than 6 months after the completion of the Karangahape Station main works dewatering / excavation, and within 6 months of completion of the Karangahape Station main works construction, post-construction BCS will be carried out on all buildings where a building condition survey was undertaken prior and during the construction phase. The survey report will include an assessment of the cause of any damage identified. If a complaint is made around building damage following completion of the early works, a post-early works construction BCS will be carried out for that particular building. Additional BCS and reporting up to 6 months’ post-construction on any building within the area potentially affected by the excavation may be completed at the request of Auckland Council. The requirements for any such survey will cease six months after the completion of construction, and subject to a consistent pattern of deformation records in which no evidence of adverse effects is apparent. The post-construction building surveys may not be required in the event that the building owner agrees that the building survey is not required, and written evidence is provided to Auckland Council.

6.3 Monitoring 6.3.1. Ground and Buildings Ground and building survey monitoring marks will be installed along the areas likely to be affected by the early works, and as shown in the drawings attached as Appendix D. The locations and spacing of these positions have been selected to avoid future (main works) duplication of monitoring points. Where the effects from the utility relocation works are likely to extend beyond the monitoring area proposed for the main works, the proposed monitoring points have been extended to include the area of utility works. 



Building Monitoring Marks: A minimum of two sets of three pins, will be installed at three different levels along the building face and on each building identified and listed in Section 3.4 of this GSMCP addendum. Monitoring marks are proposed to be installed at 10m centreto-centre intervals, with at least one set installed on the side of the structure closest to the excavation. Ground Monitoring Marks: Monitoring marks will be installed at 5m centre-to-centre spacing along the first 10m of the building perimeter walls that lead away from the edge of the excavation, increasing to 5m spacing after that. At least one monitoring point is required at the rear of the building footprint. The spacing of ground monitoring points can be reduced to 10m spacing past the building footprint and up to the 5mm settlement contour line developed for the main works in this area.

The location and number of monitoring marks takes into account the building type/size, accessibility and risk of damage from ground settlement. Building Movement Monitoring Markers shall be located on each building identified subject to owners’ approval. This will allow the actual building movement to be monitored and compared with the estimated potential effects. It is proposed, and subject to owners’ approval, that these monitoring points be left in place after the required monitoring period for the early works has ended and in anticipation of the main works. Page 26

| Karangahape Station Early Works

GSMCP – Karangahape Station Monitoring will be required before construction commences, during construction and following completion to confirm the effects of the early works (as summarised in Table 4-1). Pre-construction The Link Alliance will survey and record each ground settlement and building movement monitoring mark at least three times prior to the commencement of excavation to establish a baseline set of readings. Monitoring data from C2 indicate seasonal shrink-swell movements in the order of up to +5mm to -5mm (measured from an average level over a 12-month monitoring cycle) could be expected. The recorded baseline monitoring readings will take into account this historic data trends, and the effects considered in the adopted trigger levels for the construction/post-construction monitoring periods. All settlement and building monitoring mark surveys will be to a horizontal and vertical accuracy of at least ± 2mm as achieved by precise levelling. These records will be compiled and submitted to Auckland Council prior to the commencement of excavation. During Construction Settlement Monitoring Monitoring during construction will comprise surveys of monitoring marks. The ongoing frequency monitoring of the survey marks will vary depending on the monitoring stations position relative to the early works excavation. 

At each ground settlement and building monitoring mark, within 50 m of an excavation during excavation / dewatering on a daily basis for two weeks and weekly thereafter; and



At all other ground settlement and building monitoring mark locations on a monthly basis.

Post-Construction Settlement Monitoring Monitoring of the survey marks will continue monthly for six months, or until stable measurements are demonstrated and written approval is provided by Council for certification.

6.3.2. Utilities and Infrastructure Pre-construction The Link Alliance has identified the utilities potentially affected by the early works and have consulted with the relevant utility owners to determine the extent of pre-construction surveys required. CCTV surveys will be completed on the existing stormwater and wastewater networks in the areas adjacent to the early works excavations. No need for other pre-construction surveys was identified, as the early works activities are primarily concerned with relocating the utilities in question.. During Construction Settlement Monitoring The monitoring of any settlement effects on adjacent utilities will be carried out utilising the ground settlement markers utilised for ground settlement monitoring as outlined in Section 6.3.1. Post-Construction Settlement Monitoring A post-construction condition survey will be carried out no earlier than 6 months after completion of dewatering/excavation of the Karangahape Station main works, and within 6 months of completion of construction for any building that had a pre-construction survey. This will serve to confirm that the immediately adjacent utilities identified in the pre-construction survey have not been damaged.

Page 27

| Karangahape Station Early Works

GSMCP â€“ Karangahape Station The post-completion survey is to be provided in writing to Auckland Council and will include a determination of the cause of damage identified (if any) since the pre-construction survey, and a description of the steps taken to repair any damage.

Page 28

| Karangahape Station Early Works

GSMCP – Karangahape Station

Settlement Trigger Levels

The trigger levels for the respective monitoring actions outlined above are presented in Table C-1 and C-2, Appendix C. No excavation support design or construction methodology for the early works are currently available at the time of writing. This precludes any meaningful assessment of the ground surface settlement likely to be induced by the early works. The trigger levels set out in the Consent (drawing CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2640 Rev 4. dated 14 October 2016) have therefore been adopted for the respective buildings adjacent to the early works. These, together with the expected effects from the main works, were used to estimate the tolerable amount of lateral deflection the shaft or trench excavation support could undergo without the resulting future cumulative settlement effects exceeding the trigger levels set out in the Consent. Where the early works may influence buildings not included in the list of provisional trigger levels, tolerable deflections will be assessed on the basis that any subsequent settlement effects does not exceed the “negligible” damage category. The proposed monitoring frequencies, alert and alarm trigger levels will be reviewed following the BCS and monitoring results from the early works to confirm they are appropriately set for the main works (refer to Section 9 for conditions of review of this GSMCP).

Page 29

| Karangahape Station Early Works

GSMCP – Karangahape Station

Response, Mitigation and Contingency Plan

8.1 Introduction This section presents the triggered action response plan required where exceedances of trigger levels have been identified during monitoring, as outlined in Sections 5 and 6 of this GSMCP.

8.2 Response to Alerts 8.2.1. Groundwater Alerts No groundwater alerts have been specified in this GSMCP for the Karangahape Station early works, for the reasons set out in Section 5.

8.2.2. Settlement Alerts In the event that settlement exceeds the identified Alert trigger levels during the early works, the following procedures will be undertaken: 

Auckland Council and the IBA will be notified within 24 hours;



A Senior Qualified Person within the Link Alliance shall re-assess the works constructed up to that time to confirm the works progress against design predictions, any additional measures to restrain further increases in movement, the possible ensuing effects will exceed serviceability limits; and



A written report will be prepared by the Senior Qualified Person responsible for overview of the monitoring, and provided to Auckland Council within one week of alert level exceedance. The report will provide analyses of all monitoring data relating to the exceedance of any of the trigger levels and any actions taken.

8.3 Response to Alarms In the event that settlement exceeds the identified Alarm trigger levels during construction works, the following procedures will be undertaken: 

Follow the process set out in Section 8.2;



Commission and submit a written report, prepared by the Senior Qualified Person engaged by the Link Alliance to the Manager, within one week of alarm level exceedance. This will provide analyses of all monitoring data, relating to the exceedance of any of the trigger levels and any recommendations for remedial actions, if required, in order to avoid damage that will affect building Serviceability, and which may also allow Completion of Construction; and



Implement the recommendations.

The IBA may also recommend actions to prevent damage to building serviceability, which may include stopping the works if that is in the best interests of preventing building serviceability damage. These recommended actions will be implemented, unless the building owner(s) request in writing that the construction works are to be completed in accordance with the report prepared by the Senior Qualified Person.

Page 30

| Karangahape Station Early Works

GSMCP – Karangahape Station

8.4 Response to Building or Utility Damage In the event that damage to buildings, structures and / or services is reported during the early works or determined from a building condition survey or inspection the following will occur: 

The Link Alliance will notify the Manager and building / asset owner as soon as practically possible;



Engage a Senior Qualified Person to prepare a report as soon as practical, describing the damage and identifying methods to avoid and mitigate the potential for Serviceability damage and to remedy any damage caused wholly or in part by the exercising of this consent; and provide a copy of the report to the IBA, Manager and the building / asset owner;



The reported damage will be compared with the pre-construction building condition survey to determine if the damage is: 

Pre-existing,



New, or



Pre-existing, but exacerbated.



The construction history in the vicinity of the building will be reviewed, along with the recorded settlement history, to determine if the damage can be reasonably attributed to the construction works; and



If the damage can be reasonably attributed to the early works, repairs will be undertaken as soon as practicable unless written approval for this damage is provided from the owners stating alternative arrangements (in accordance with Consent condition 125). The timing and nature of the repairs will depend on the owner’s requirements, stage of construction and degree of damage.



This obligation as a condition of the Resource Consent shall apply to all Damage that is identified during the latest of the periods listed below:    

Two years after Completion of Dewatering; or One year after groundwater levels have stabilised; and The completion of post construction monitoring required to be carried out under Condition 121; and Six months after any completion of any other works associated with the project which have the potential to cause settlement.

8.5 Mitigation of Effects In the event that differential settlement or total settlement exceeds the identified Alert or Alarm trigger level during construction works, or ground conditions differ significantly from the design assumptions then the mitigation options include:

Page 31



Additional specific structural and geotechnical evaluations;



Strengthen and / or stiffen ground support;



Installation of additional instrumentation; or | Karangahape Station Early Works

GSMCP â€“ Karangahape Station ď‚ˇ

Further structural assessment of an affected building.

The most appropriate contingency measure will be implemented to mitigate the actual or anticipated adverse effects of the triggering event.

Page 32

| Karangahape Station Early Works

GSMCP – Karangahape Station

Monitoring and Contingency Plan Review

This section outlines how the GSMCP will be reviewed including the mitigation and contingency procedures to make sure they are still applicable to the activities carried out.

9.1 General Review of the GSMCP The GSMCP will be updated, with the necessary certification by Auckland Council, throughout the course of the works to reflect material changes associated with changes to construction methods or site conditions. Auckland Council certification will be required for any relevant revisions of a material nature to the GSMCP. This GSMCP only addresses the proposed Karangahape Station early works construction stage activities. A separate GSMCP will be prepared for the Karangahape Station main construction works. A yearly management review will be undertaken of the CEMP, including the GSMCP and other subplans. The management review procedure is described in further detail within the CEMP.

9.2 Review of Monitoring and Contingency Requirements The Consent allows for variation to the monitoring and reporting requirements, and performance standards (subject to certification by Auckland Council) in order to take account of information, including the results of previous monitoring and changed environmental knowledge, on:    

Ground conditions; Aquifer parameters; Groundwater levels; and Ground surface deformation.

Furthermore, the conditions of Consent allow for specific review and updates to the following: 



Review of the settlement alarm / alert / stop trigger levels: The trigger levels as provided in the Consent and adopted by this GSMCP may be revised following the completion of the BCS, and an assessment to confirm these are appropriately set and monitoring frequency is adequate. Instrumentation: The specification of instruments, location and numbers of instruments may be modified as a result of the following:     



Page 33

Additional geotechnical investigation and ground characterisation; Specification of instruments and monitoring tools; Findings of the BCS; Detailed design of the temporary trench support system; Modelling of the anticipated ground movement and associated settlements adjacent to the planned excavation.

Response: The response plan included in the GSMCP (Section 8) will be implemented in the event that trigger levels are exceeded. The response plan may be updated in order to deal with any adverse effect on the environment arising or potentially arising from the exercise of this consent, and in particular effects on buildings, structures and services. | Karangahape Station Early Works

GSMCP â€“ Karangahape Station

APPENDIX A: Drawings

Page 34

| Karangahape Station Early Works

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

61-65

KARANGAHAPE STATION EARLY WORKS LIST OF BUILDINGS IDENTIFIED FOR CONDITION SURVEYS

ADDRESS STREET NO.

STREET

47 48 49 50 157 158

16-18 259-281 251-253 61-65 22-28 283

BERESFORD SQUARE KARANGAHAPE ROAD KARANGAHAPE ROAD PITT STREET BERESFORD SQUARE KARANGAHAPE ROAD

251-253

CONSENT ID NO.

259-281

283

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-17 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_BERESFORD R0.DWG

16-18

15 7

22-28

CLIENT:

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS

BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY

JL DESIGNER

GB CHECKED

ISSUE/REVISION

SHEET TITLE

APPROVED

INCLUDED IN APPENDICES 1 & 2 OF THE CONSENT

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS BERESFORD SQUARE BUILDING CONDITION SURVEYS

LINK ALLIANCE SUPPLEMENTARY BUILDINGS COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CREATOR ID :

PROJECT NAME

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

FIGURE A1

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

238

65 PITT ST

KARANGAHAPE STATION EARLY WORKS LIST OF BUILDINGS IDENTIFIED FOR CONDITION SURVEYS

CONSENT ID NO.

ADDRESS STREET NO.

STREET

54 60

238 9

KARANGAHAPE ROAD MERCURY LANE

CROSS STREET

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-17 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_BERESFORD R0.DWG

CLIENT:

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS

BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY

JL DESIGNER

GB CHECKED

ISSUE/REVISION

SHEET TITLE

APPROVED

INCLUDED IN APPENDICES 1 & 2 OF THE CONSENT

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS MERCURY LANE BUILDING CONDITION SURVEYS

LINK ALLIANCE SUPPLEMENTARY BUILDINGS COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CREATOR ID :

PROJECT NAME

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

FIGURE A2

GSMCP â€“ Karangahape Station

APPENDIX B: Geological Cross Sections

Page 35

| Karangahape Station Early Works

EBS1065-BH3 23m

7 14

4 5 6

60mRL

136

300

55 600

500

1500

429

50mRL

70mRL CRL3B-BH325 CRL2-BH216 6m 6m

60mRL

CRL1B-BH134 12m

70mRL

CRL2-BH218 CRL3B-BH314A 10m 7m CRL3B-BH314 7m

CRL2-BH275 14m CRL3B-BH275R 16m

CRL-KAR-XSec-BeresfordSquare1

9 13 18 41 41 94

300

429

150

40mRL

50mRL

429

40mRL

1000

30mRL

20mRL

10mRL

20m

40m

60m

80m

100m

120m

140m

160m

180m

Legend CRL-SYW-GEO-LKA-MOD-030200-B .: ER

LINK: F

.: EU

.: MBL

.: EW

.: MBU

LOOKING SOUTHWEST

Lines

NOTES: 1. THE GEOTECHNICAL INTERPRETATION OF GROUND CONDITIONS AT THIS SITE IS BASED ON OBSERVATIONS AND THE RESULTS OF TESTING AT DISCRETE LOCATIONS, AND THE CONTINUITY OF GROUND COULD VARY FROM THOSE PRESENTED ON THE DRAWING. 2. THIS INFORMATION CANNOT BE USED FOR THE PURPOSES OF PROCUREMENT OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 3. GEOLOGICAL MODEL DISPLAYED IS CRL-SYW-GEO-LKA-MOD-030200-B

20190628 - Track Alignment

Location A: 399544, 802485

Creator

Legal owner

Document type

Document status

Title

Identification number

KRD

B: 399392, 802582 Scale: 1:500

CRLL

Vertical exaggeration: 1x 0m

Responsible dept. Technical reference

50m

N. Kirkeby SECTION

CRL-KAR-XSecBeresfordSquare1

Approved by

DRAFT

Rev. Date of issue

1.0 17/07/2019

Sheet

12 18

4 13

50mRL

300

6 8

429

471

2 50

257

14 42 91

19 176

333

263

33 333 50 136

350

130

267

50mRL

250

405

1350

40mRL

60mRL

CRL5-BH511 29m CRL2-BH221 15m

CRL3B-EB312 0m

CRL2-BH278 9m

CRL5-BH510 2m

CRL4-CPT468 CRL4-BH451 20m 15m

CRL2-BH277 5m

60mRL

70mRL CRL4-CPT469 4m

CRL3B-BH320 2m

CRL1A-MB3A 4m

70mRL

CRL1A-MB3B 4m

CRL-KAR-XSec-MercuryLane

40mRL

600 429

30mRL

20mRL

10mRL

20m

40m

60m

80m

100m

120m

140m

160m

180m

Legend CRL-SYW-GEO-LKA-MOD-030200-B .: ER

.: TA

.: EU

LINK: F

.: EW

.: MBL

.: MBU LOOKING EAST

Lines

20190628 - Track Alignment

Location A: 399542, 802445

Creator

Legal owner

Document type

Document status

Title

Identification number

KRD

B: 399549, 802266 Scale: 1:500

CRLL

Vertical exaggeration: 1x 0m

Responsible dept. Technical reference

50m

N. Kirkeby

Approved by

SECTION

CRL-KAR-XSec-MercuryLane

DRAFT

Rev. Date of issue

1.0 17/07/2019

Sheet

GSMCP â€“ Karangahape Station

APPENDIX C: Settlement Trigger Levels

Page 36

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Table C-1 Buildings - Alert/Alarm Trigger Levels Outlined in Resource Consent

Resource Consent (Appendix 2 of RC Conditions) ID No.

No.

Street

259-281 Karangahape Road

49 50 54 60

251-253 Karangahape Road 61-65 Pitt Street 238 Karangahape Road 9 Mercury Lane

East Street

64 65

23-31 1

Mercury Lane Cross Street

Alternative address 8-10 Beresford Square 12-14 Beresford Square 14-16 Beresford Square 2 Mercury Lane 17 Mercury Lane 21 Mercury Lane -

Vertical Movement (mm)

Differential Vertical Slope Across Building

Alert

Alarm

Alert

Alarm

1/1000

1/800

9 9 10 22

11 11 12 27

1/1000 1/1000 1/1000 1/795

1/800 1/800 1/800 1/636

To be demolished for project 14

1/1000

1/800

Table C-2 Buildings â€“ No Alert/Alarm Trigger Levels Outlined in Resource Consent

ID No.

No.

16-18

157

22-28

158

283

Street Beresford Square Beresford Square Karangahape Road

Alternative address

Vertical Movement (mm)

Differential Vertical Slope Across Building

Alert

Alarm

Alert

Alarm

1/1000

1/800

1/1000

1/800

1/1000

1/800

GSMCP â€“ Karangahape Station

APPENDIX D: Settlement Monitoring Instrumentation

Page 37

| Karangahape Station Early Works

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

20A-20B

LEGEND

LEGEND NOTES

PROPOSED BUILDING SURVEY MONITORING

PROPOSED SETTLEMENT SURVEY MONITORING

2. 3.

PROPOSED RETAINING WALL DEFLECTION SURVEY MONITORING

174

SOME INFORMATION SHOWNBUILDING ON THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN SOURCED FROM THIRD PROPOSED SURVEY MONITORING PARTIES. CO-ORDINATES ARE IN MT EDEN 2000 AND LEVELS ARE TO AUCKLAND L&S 1946 DATUM. PROPOSED SETTLEMENT SURVEY MONITORING LOCATION OF EXISTING14SERVICES HAVE BEEN EXTRACTED FROM AUCKLAND COUNCIL GIS AND UTILITIES PLANS AND ARE INDICATIVE. PHYSICAL LOCATION OF AFFECTED SERVICES WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL AFFECTED SERVICES SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION.

179-189

8 184

PROPOSED INCLINOMETER PROPOSED INCLINOMETER IN RETAINING WALL

191 2

PROPOSED STRAIN GAUGE

PROPOSED EXTENSOMETER

200 8

PROPOSED TUNNEL CONVERGENCE SURVEY MONITORING 201

EXISTING PIEZOMETER

208

PROPOSED PIEZOMETER CANADA ST

KARANGA HAPE RD

235

MP03.2 B053BMP03.1

214

MP03.2 B065BMP03.1

MP04.2 B065BMP04.1

CROSS ST

R AC ON TER

PROPOSED TILTMETER

MP02.2 B053BMP02.1

POYNT

2 3 B054BMP10.1

CZK06SMP10

MP10.2 MP10.3 B054BMP10.1

2 3

MP05.2 B065BMP05.1

CZK06SMP09 CZK01SMP09 CZK03SMP13

238

CZK03SMP12

MP09.2 MP09.3 B054BMP09.1

MP02.2 CZK03SMP11 B065BMP02.1

239

CZK03SMP10

B054BMP0X.X

CZK03SMP09 MP01.2 B065BMP01.1 CZK01SMP08 CZK03SMP08

CZK01SMP07

URY

LAN

C MER

80-86

CZK02SMP16

B054BMP0X.X CZK03SMP07

MP08.2 MP08.3 B054BMP08.1

2 MP05.2 MP05.3 B054BMP05.1 MP06.2 MP06.3 B054BMP06.1 CZK03SMP04 CZK03SMP05 CZK01SMP06

CZK02SMP18

CZK02SMP17

23-31

CZK02SMP15

CZK02SMP14

2 3 CZK03SMP06 B054BMP07.1

CZK02SMP13

CZK02SMP12

CZK02SMP11

CZK02SMP10

CZK02SMP09

CZK01SMP05

CZK02SMP08

CZK02SMP07 CZK02SMP06

40-50

MP01.2 MP01.3 CZK02SMP04 B060BMP01.1 MP02.2 MP02.3 CZK02SMP05 B060BMP02.1 MP03.2 MP03.3 B060BMP03.1 MP01.2 MP01.3 B055BMP01.1

9 11-13

CZK01SMP04

246-254 CZK02SMP10

MP02.2 MP02.3 B052BMP02.1

MP01.2 MP01.3 B052BMP01.1

MP04.2 MP04.3 B060BMP04.1

MP02.3 MP02.2 B050BMP02.1 B050BMP01.3

PITT ST

B050BMP0X.X

MP03.1 MP03.3 MP03.2 B050B61-65

256 243

CZK01SMP03

MP05.2 MP05.3 B060BMP05.1

MP01.3 MP01.2 B049BMP01.1

CZK01SMP09

CZK01SMP02

258 4-6 55

MP02.3 MP02.2 B050BMP02.1 MP06.2 MP06.3 B060BMP06.1

MP01.3 MP01.2 B048BMP01.1

CZK01SMP08

CZK01SMP01

249

268 38 2 3 B060BMP07.1

8-10 MP02.3 MP02.2 B048BMP02.1

T ST

EAS 270

HAPE RD

259-261

1 2 B048BMP03.3

3 2 B048BMP04.1

1-7

KARANGA

12-14

MP03.3 MP03.2 B047BMP03.1

CZK01SMP07

RE S

20 278

284

MP02.3 MP02.2 B047BMP02.1

25-27

267-281

16-18 CZK01SMP06

3 2 B047BMP01.1

23 12 290 21 8

SH1 S

.1 .2 BST20BMP01.3

Last Plotted: 2019-10-18

19 CZK01SMP05

.1 .2 BST22BMP01.3

CZK01SMP04

BST22BMP0X.X

15-25 BST22BMP0X.X .1 .2 BST22BMP02.3

292-300

283-287

T ST EAS

158

5 4

295 CZK01SMP03

GAL

Last saved by: DIONY(2019-10-18) Filename:

22-28

.1 .2 BST22BMP04.3

307

CZK01SMP02

S ATO

.1 .2 BST22BMP03.3

7 5 1

6B 312

16 309 CZK01SMP01

8A-8J

13 322-324

.1 .2 BST22BMP05.3

315-325 12

HO PE TO UN

SCALE

CLIENT:

DESIGNED

CREATOR ID : @CRL-SYW-GEO-IM-DRG-100000 70

100mm

SYW APPROVED

PROJECT:

DRAWN

----

TITLE:

DESCRIPTION

APPROVED

DATE

CHECKED

DATE

----

CITY RAIL LINK PROJECT WIDE

ZONE:

REV

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

SIZE A1

REVISIONS

INSTRUMENTATION & MONITORING KARANGAHAPE STATION ENABLING WORKS PROJECT

DOCUMENT:

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ORGANISTION

TYPE

SHEET

CRL - SYW - GEO - LKA - SKE - 702400

REVISION

####

GSMCP â€“ Karangahape Station

APPENDIX E: Wall Deflection Limits to Control Settlement Effects

Page 38

| Karangahape Station Early Works

MEMO

DATE

5 November 2019

Project Manager Karangahape Station

FROM

Lead – Groundwater and Settlement Effects

SUBJECT

Pitt Street and Mercury Lane Early Works, Karangahape Road Station – Wall Deflection Limits to Control Settlement Effects

Introduction This memorandum has been prepared as part of the proposed early works at Karangahape Road Station, and forms part of the City Rail Link (CRL) C3 project extending from Aotea Station to the North Auckland Line (NAL). The scope of these early works includes several works stages along Beresford Square and Mercury Lane, involving the demolition of existing structures, removal of trees and canopies, the excavation of combined service trenches, and stormwater / wastewater relocations by means of directional drilling methods. Philosophy This memorandum outlines the wall deflection limits for the early works excavation support to ensure that the cumulative effects from the future main station works do not exceed the Consent trigger levels for the buildings adjacent to the area of works. The magnitude of vertical movements due to excavation stress relief depends on the dimensions of the excavation and ground conditions, construction methodology and level of support stiffness. Both the construction methodology and designs have yet to be confirmed at the time of writing. The absence of excavation support design and construction methodology details prevents any meaningful assessment of the likely movement to be induced by the early works. The GSMCP for the Karangahape Station early works will therefore adopt the trigger levels outlined in the existing Aotea to NAL Regional Resource Consent drawing CRL-SYM-RME-000-DRG-2640 Rev 4. Wall deflection limits have however been specified in this memorandum to prevent cumulative surface settlements from the early works and the future main station works from exceeding the Consent limits. The limits outlined in this memorandum are specified in the design requirements for the early works contractor. Adherence to the specified wall deflection limits will be monitored on site by adopting a second set of “soft” or performance trigger levels for the proposed monitoring layout that consider the selected deflection limits and ground deformations. These limits will not be included in the monitoring or reporting requirements outlined in the GSMCP for the early works.

Link Alliance - Level 3, 12 Morgan Street, Newmarket, Auckland 1023

Description of Early Works The new Karangahape Station will be located at the junction of Pitt Street, Mercury Lane and Karangahape Road. Early works will be carried out to prepare the Karangahape Station site prior to commencement of the main construction works, and will include the relocation of network utilities located within the station footprint at Beresford Square, Pitt Street and Mercury Lane. The majority of the relocation works will be carried out in shallow trenches which do not need excavation support. The relocation of the wastewater and stormwater lines will however involve deep excavations: 



  

The excavation of launch pits in Pitt Street (4 m x 3 m, maximum depth of 5 m bGL) and receive pits in Beresford Square (3m x 3m, maximum depth 3.5m bGL) at either end of the wastewater or stormwater line to be relocated; Combined service trench (up to 5m deep) or directional drilling launch and receive pits (4 m x 4 m, maximum depth 5 m) at the intersection of Mercury Lane and Cross Street to relocate wastewater and stormwater lines; Directional drilling (approximately 300 mm diameter bore) of the distance between pits; Rigging of the new pipe (250 mm diameter) through the drilled route; and Installing cased manholes (1.15 m diameter, maximum depth of 5 m bGL) along the length of the route along Beresford Square and at the positions of the launch pits once work has been completed.

The distances between these works and adjacent buildings vary, with the stormwater line (and associated pits/manhole excavations) generally within closer proximity to the building line than those excavations proposed for the wastewater relocation. The layout of the proposed early works at the time of writing are included in Appendix A of the GSMCP, and summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1 Summary of early works and adjacent buildings b

Building Assessed Consent ID No.

Early Works Activity

Depth [m bGL]

Distance to nearest building [m]

Consent settlement alert level [mm]

Building address in consent

Alternative address

259—281 Karangahape Road

8-10 Beresford Square 12-14 Beresford Square

Manhole pit (SW)

3.2

0.57

251-253 Karangahape Road

14-16 Beresford Square

Manhole pit (WW)

5.0

1.0

61—65 Pitt Street

4.8

0.48

1.3

N/Aa

0.54

N/Aa

1.7

5.8

3.8

6.7

50 157 157 54 60 65 65

Pitt Street - launch pit 5.5 (WW) Pitt Street - launch pit 61—65 Pitt Street 4.0 (SW) 22-28 Beresford Beresford Square 4.0 Square retrieval pit (WW) 22-28 Beresford Beresford Square 3.0 Square retrieval pit (SW) 238 Karangahape Trench excavation 2 Mercury Lane 5.0 Road (WW) Mercury theatre 9 Mercury Lane 5.0 launch pit (SW) 1 Cross Street Cross Street - pit (SW) 5.0 Mercury plaza 1 Cross Street 5.0 retrieval pit (SW) Link Alliance - Level 3, 12 Morgan Street, Newmarket, Auckland 1023 -

a b

No trigger levels included in Consent for this building, tolerable settlement assumed to be < 5mm Measured from the edge of the excavation to building line, drawings attached as Appendix A to GSMCP

Existing Environment Ground Conditions Based on the available geological information, the general vertical stratigraphic sequence in the area comprises the following: 

Fill, generally varying in thickness between 2 - 3 m along the Beresford Square and Mercury Lane construction areas, but increases up to 4 m thick just south of the ridge crest at Karangahape Road and 5 - 6 m thick towards the lower slopes and towards CMJ;  Local alluvium deposits of Pleistocene age Tauranga Group Alluvium infill the heads of paleotributary gullies south of the ridge crest;  The thickness of the weathered and residual ECBF varies in the area, possibly as a result of preferential weathering down steeply inclined joints or faults leading to deeper weathering profiles in areas. The residual ECBF underlies the fill (where no alluvium deposits are present), ranging from 4 - 8 m and 3 - 6 m along Beresford Square and Mercury Lane respectively. The thicknesses of the weathered ECBF vary similarly, before grading into unweathered ECBF at depths between 46 and 54 m RL;  The channelised sandstone unit in the CMJ area is mapped throughout the Karangahape Station area. The base of the channelised sandstone unit approximates the vertical rail track alignment through this area. The unit is gently folded and faulted, with occasional swarms of joints which may be related to nearby faulting. Refer to the C3 Geotechnical Baseline Report1 for further information regarding the Project geological setting. Hydrogeology A review of the hydrogeological studies completed during prior CRL project stages and historic groundwater monitoring data from the Beresford Square and Mercury Lane regions indicates the presence of a shallow or perched groundwater level, varying between approximately 3 m bGL (high) to 6 m bGL (low). Beneath the perched groundwater zone (at depths varying between approximately 8 to 10 m bGL), seasonally permanent saturation of the fill / alluvium / residual ECBF is assumed to occur, representing the top of the regional groundwater system in this area. Refer to the PDP Groundwater Technical Report 2 for further information regarding the Project hydrogeological setting. Sources of Settlement Effects The proposed early works will extend to a maximum depth of 5 m bGL, and will not intersect the regional groundwater regime. The effects of consolidation settlement due to the proposed early works are expected to be negligible, and only mechanical settlement effects (i.e. vertical ground movement due to excavation stress relief) are considered here.

Contract 3: Stations and Tunnels Alliance Geotechnical Baseline Report – C, Revision 1. Document No. CRL-SYW-GEO000-RPT-0017, dated 15 July 2019. 2 PDP, (2016). Auckland City Rail Link Aotea Station to North Auckland Line Construction and CRL Operation: Groundwater Technical Report. Prepared for Aurecon on behalf of Auckland Transport, dated May 2016. Link Alliance - Level 3, 12 Morgan Street, Newmarket, Auckland 1023

Assessment Methodology To assess the amount of vertical surface settlement that could occur adjacent to the early works as a result of deflections of the pit or trench excavation support, the general approach outlined in CIRIA (2003)3 was used. This included the following assumptions: -

Support of all excavations will be of high stiffness, meaning top-down construction and props installed at high level; For the case histories summarized in the available literature, ẟ(vm) is equal to 0.5 to 0.7 ẟ(hm) for medium dense to soft soils, with an upper limit (for very soft clays) of ẟ(vm) = ẟ(hm). For this estimation and considering the ground conditions expected on site, a value of ẟ(vm) = 0.5 ẟ(hm) has been adopted; With a high stiff prop installed early during excavation, the maximum horizontal wall movement is not likely to be measured at the wall top but at a depth of some 0.7–0.9 times the maximum excavation depth (CIRIA, 2003), which in turn determines the point of maximum settlement from the edge of the excavation. For this assessment the distribution of maximum horizontal wall movement was conservatively assumed 0.9 times the maximum excavation depth; Distribution of ground surface settlement from the edge of the excavation and lateral deflection of the excavation support will follow the relationship illustrated in Figure 1-1 below.

Figure 1-1 Relationship between analysed lateral wall deflections and predicted ground surface settlements in stiff soil (CIRIA, 2003)

Results Based on the aforementioned philosophy, the distances between the early works excavations and adjacent buildings (Table 1) and the available settlement contours for the updated 9-car Karangahape Station design, maximum total ground surface displacement adjacent to the early works excavations should be restricted to 5mm or less. Following the methodology and empirical relationship outlined above, the design and construction methodology of the early works support will ensure to restrict wall deflections to 10mm or less. Concluding Remarks

CIRIA C580, (2003). Embedded Retaining Walls – Guidance for Economic Design. London, ISBN 0 86017 580 4, 390 pp. Link Alliance - Level 3, 12 Morgan Street, Newmarket, Auckland 1023

The memorandum aims to provide recommendations to ensure that any ground surface settlements from the early works combined with the effects from the main station works do not result in the exceedance of the trigger levels outlined in the Consent for buildings along this area of works. The maximum tolerable deflections outlined here could be achieved using a high-stiffness support and topdown construction approach (following a conceptual design approach similar to the Aotea SP 2.2. trench along Albert Street for example). At the time of designing the early works excavations it should however be confirmed that: 



The tolerable deflections outlined in this memorandum are achievable. In the event that the support of the respective excavations cannot be designed to the required deflection limits documented here, alternative control measures may be required. The information used and assumptions made in this memo are valid for the final excavation design. Should any of these not be representative of the actual design (e.g. position or dimensions of excavation changed, different construction methodology followed than that assumed here etc.), a reassessment of the relationship between the lateral deflection and resultant ground surface settlement will be required to confirm the suitability of design.

Prepared by: George Brink Lead – Groundwater and Settlement Effects

Reviewed by: Graeme Twose Senior Geotechnical Engineer

Link Alliance - Level 3, 12 Morgan Street, Newmarket, Auckland 1023

GSMCP â€“ Karangahape Station

APPENDIX F: Record of CLG Consultation A Karangahape CLG meeting was held on 17th September to discuss the Karangahape early works and for the CLG to provide comments / feedback on the CEMP and sub-plans, including this GSMCP. No comments were received from the CLG on this GSMCP.

Page 39

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan

Appendix F:

Page 31

Communication and Consultation Plan

| Karangahape Station Early Works Outline Plan, Revision A

Karangahape Station Early Works Communication and Consultation Plan

CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800012

Revision: Final Date: October 2019

Page 1

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

Karangahape Station early works CCP CRL-KRD-RME-LKA-PLN-800012 This document is uncontrolled when printed. This document should be printed in colour

Revision Status Revision

Date

Version details

Prepared By

Approved By

Rev A

03/10/2019

Draft for Auckland Council review

John Daly

Peter Roan

Rev 0

21/10/2019

Final for Auckland Council approval

John Daly

Peter Roan

Approval Status Name/Title

Signature

Date

Prepared by:

John Daly Principal Planner

21/10/2019

Reviewed by:

Jarrod Snowsill Associate Director

21/10/2019

Rachel Purdy Link Alliance â€“ Senior Planner Controlled by:

Rachel Blundell Link Alliance - Communication and Engagement Manager

21/10/2019

Approved by:

Peter Roan Link Alliance - Consents Lead

21/10/2019

Page 2

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

Table of contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 5 1.1

Karangahape Station ......................................................................................................... 5

1.2

Staging of this CCP ............................................................................................................. 6

1.3

Purpose of the Communication and Consultation Plan ..................................................... 6

1.4

Methodologies and References ......................................................................................... 6

1.5

Relevant Conditions .......................................................................................................... 7

1.6

CCP Review and updates ................................................................................................. 11

2. Karangahape Early Works ......................................................................... 12 2.1

Overview of Works .......................................................................................................... 12

2.2

Affected Parties ............................................................................................................... 12

3. Overarching Strategies and Methodologies ............................................. 14 3.1

International Association for Public Participation ........................................................... 14

3.2

The CRL Overarching Communication and Consultation Strategy (2018) ........................ 15

3.3

Communication and engagement strategic objectives and principles ............................. 16

4. Consultation and Communication Strategy .............................................. 17 4.1

Plan Overview ................................................................................................................. 17

4.2

Consultation and communication approach .................................................................... 17

4.3

Key Project Messages ...................................................................................................... 18

4.4

Expected Outcomes ......................................................................................................... 18

5. Roles and Responsibilities ......................................................................... 20 5.1

Overview ......................................................................................................................... 20

5.2

Key Personnel .................................................................................................................. 20

5.3

Link Alliance and CRLL Reporting Requirements.............................................................. 21

5.3.1.

Reporting tools ......................................................................................................... 21

6. Communication Approach ........................................................................ 22

Page 3

6.1

Strategy Overview: Conversation Locally; Broadcast to Wider Audience ........................ 22

6.2

Communication Tools ...................................................................................................... 22

6.3

Branding and Collateral ................................................................................................... 23

6.4

Identifying and communication with key stakeholders ................................................... 23

6.4.1.

Parties affected by the project .................................................................................. 23

6.4.2.

Owners, occupiers and businesses ............................................................................ 24

6.4.3.

Network Utility Operators ........................................................................................ 24

6.4.4.

Auckland Council Parks Department ......................................................................... 24

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan 6.4.5.

Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga (HNZPT) ...................................................... 24

6.4.6.

Emergency Services .................................................................................................. 25

6.4.7.

Auckland Transport .................................................................................................. 25

6.4.8.

Identifying additional people affected by the project ................................................ 25

6.5

Stakeholder Communication Channels ............................................................................ 25

7. Protocols, Processes and Contact Details ................................................. 26 7.1

Community and Business Liaison Groups ........................................................................ 26

7.1.1.

CLG purpose ............................................................................................................. 26

7.1.2.

Process ..................................................................................................................... 26

7.2

Stakeholders and affected parties ................................................................................... 27

7.2.1.

Pre-Construction Engagement .................................................................................. 27

7.2.2.

Construction Phase Engagement .............................................................................. 28

7.2.3.

Permit to Notify........................................................................................................ 28

7.2.4.

Kaitiaki or Mana Whenua Forum .............................................................................. 29

7.2.5.

Network Utility Operators ........................................................................................ 29

7.2.6.

Emergency services .................................................................................................. 31

7.2.7.

Heritage ................................................................................................................... 31

7.2.8.

Auckland Transport .................................................................................................. 32

7.2.9.

CEMP and Sub-plan reviews ..................................................................................... 32

7.3

Notable Receivers............................................................................................................ 32

7.4

Public Engagement .......................................................................................................... 32

7.4.1.

Public Enquiries ........................................................................................................ 32

7.4.2.

Other Enquiries ........................................................................................................ 34

7.4.3.

Complaints ............................................................................................................... 34

7.4.4.

Digital Channels........................................................................................................ 36

7.4.5.

Media ....................................................................................................................... 37

7.5

Managing Crisis and Emergency Situations ..................................................................... 37

7.5.1.

Requirements ........................................................................................................... 37

7.5.2.

Emergency contacts ................................................................................................. 37

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

1. Introduction The City Rail Link (CRL) project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line in the vicinity of Mt Eden Station. The CRL also involves the construction of two new underground stations being Aotea and Karangahape and a redeveloped Mt Eden Station (refer to Figure 1-1). The design and construction of the CRL infrastructure between the Aotea and Mt Eden Stations is being delivered by the Link Alliance.

Figure 1-1: CRL Route and Location

This Communication and Consultation Plan (CCP) has been prepared in relation to construction of the new Karangahape Station.

Page 5

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

1.4

Methodologies and References

The CRL Overarching Communication and Consultation Strategy (2018); and The CRL Communication and Consultation Strategy (2012).

The CCP also builds upon the following plans: · ·

https://www.iap2.org.au/About-Us/About-IAP2-Australasia-/Spectrum

Page 6

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

1.5

Relevant Conditions

Table 1-1 identifies the designation and resource consent conditions relevant to this CCP and where they are addressed in the document. Table 1-1: Relevant conditions and location in this CCP

Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of CCP

Other Plans

City Rail Link Designation Conditions 15.1

This document

15.2

The Requiring Authority shall prepare a Communication and Consultation Plan which shall be implemented and complied with for the duration of the construction of the City Rail Link.

This document

15.3

The Communication and Consultation Plan shall set out how the Requiring Authority will:

15.4

Page 7

(a) Inform the community of construction progress and future construction activities and constraints that could affect them;

6.2, 6.4, 6.5, 7.2

SIBD DWP

(b) Provide early information on key Project milestones;

6.2, 7.1, 7.2

SIBD DWP

7.1.2, 7.2.9

7.4.1 - 7.4.3

CEMP, SIBD DWP

4, 6.1-6.2

(b) The Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project including their contact details (phone, email and postal address);

5.2

6.2, 6.4, 6.5. 7.1 – 7.4

| Karangahape Station Early Works

CEMP

Communication and Consultation Plan Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of CCP

Other Plans

Page 8

6.2, 6.4, 7.1 – 7.3

6 and 7

CEMP, SIBD DWP and CNV DWP

6.1, 6.2, 6.4, 7

TAP DWP

6.2, 7.2.1, 7.3

CNV DWP and SSCNVMP

6.2, 7.1 – 7.3

CNV DWP and SSCNVMP

(i) Methods for communicating and consulting with mana whenua for the duration of construction and implementation of mana whenua principles for the project (refer to Conditions 8 and 49);

7.2.4

6.4.4

| Karangahape Station Early Works

TV DWP

Communication and Consultation Plan Condition

Relevant section of CCP

Other Plans

6.4.6, 7.2.4

SIBD DWP and TAP DWP

(l) A list of Stakeholders, directly affected and affected in proximity parties to the construction works who will be communicated with;

Appendix B - C

SIBD DWP

(m) How communication and consultation activity relating to construction activities and monitoring requirements will be recorded; and

5.3

CEMP

(n) …….

N/A

15.5

The Communication and Consultation Plan shall also include (as relevant) linkages and cross-references to the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs).

As referenced in this document

15.6

Appendices B – D

1.6

Condition No.

15.7

SIBD DWP

1.6

Resource Consent Conditions 25

The CCP shall be based on and, where appropriate, incorporate the provisions of the PCCP, and shall set out how the Consent Holder will:

Page 9

This document

a) Inform the community and business of construction progress and future construction activities and constraints that could affect them;

6.2, 6.4, 6.5, 7.2

SIBD DWP

b) Provide early information on key Project milestones;

6.2, 7.1, 7.2

SIBD DWP

7.1.2, 7.2.9

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Condition No.

Page 10

Condition

Relevant section of CCP

7.4..1 – 7.4.3

Other Plans

4, 6.1-6.2

b) The Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project including 24 hour contact details (phone, email and postal address);

5.2

c) The 0800 CRL TALK phone number;

7.4.1

6.2, 6.4, 6.5. 7.1 – 7.3

6.2, 6.4, 7.1 – 7.4

7.1.2, 7.2.9

g) A list of stakeholders, directly affected and affected in-proximity parties to the construction works with whom the Consent Holder will communicate;

Appendices BD

h) …..

N/A

Appendices B D

SIBD DWP

j) How communication and consultation relating to construction activities and monitoring requirements will be recorded; and

5.3, 7.2

CEMP

k) How opportunities to interpret and display archaeological finds within the Project area will be identified and implemented, including how Heritage NZ will be involved in this process.

6.4.5, 7.2.7

HC DWP

| Karangahape Station Early Works

CEMP

Communication and Consultation Plan Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of CCP

The CCP shall also include (as relevant) linkages and cross-references to the CEMP and other Management Plans.

As referenced in this document

1.6

Noted

1.6

The CCP shall be implemented and complied with for the duration of the construction of the Project.

Noted

1.6

Other Plans

CCP Review and updates

Page 11

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

Karangahape Early Works

Works location

Overview of construction activities

Beresford Square / Pitt Street

· Relocation of network utilities located within the footprint of the new Karangahape Station in Beresford Square / Pitt Street; · Removal of street trees and the demolition of the café / toilet in Beresford Square; · Establishment of the Beresford Square Construction Support Area to provide site offices, construction vehicle parking, laydown areas and storage of plant and equipment etc.; and · Closure of Beresford Square to vehicle traffic (other than construction traffic) while retaining pedestrian and cycle access. · Removal of existing street furniture where required (such as seating, street lighting (to be replaced with temporary lighting).

Mercury Lane

It should be noted that the demolition of buildings and above ground structures within the Mercury Lane Construction Support Area is authorised by the CRL Enabling Work Outline Plan – Karangahape Road Demolition Works (Auckland Council reference OPW60339200), confirmed in June 2019, does not form part of this CCP.

Page 12

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Figure 2-1: Karangahape Station Early Works Affected Parties

Page 13

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

Inform

Consult

Involve

Collaborate

Empower

· Website updates · Social media · Project newsletters and factsheets

· Community information pop-up hub · Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG)3

· Social impact assessments · Business Forum · Advisory Boards / Steering Groups

· Mana Whenua Forum · Local Boards · Opportunities for collaboration making will be

· Opportunities for communitydecision making will be identified through the engagement activities with

Communication and Consultation Plan Inform

Consult

· Project enquiry email and phone line · Construction notifications

· Stakeholder workshops, presentations and briefings

Involve

Collaborate identified through the engagement activities with affected parties and stakeholders,

Empower affected parties and stakeholders.

These objectives have been adopted by the Link Alliance in the development of this CCP. Page 15

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

Engage constructively with key stakeholders/target audiences, providing consistent information across the project Maintain and enhance existing relationships for ongoing constructive engagement

2. Explain the process and timing · ·

Ensure key target audiences and stakeholders have an accurate understanding of the project and its implications Explain how the planning processes work and how people can input into them

3. Educate people about the CRL · ·

Discuss how the project fits into strategic city planning and the regional development of transport infrastructure Minimise uncertainty and dispel misinformation

4. Enhance our reputation · ·

Page 16

Being open and responsive to stakeholder feedback Manage communications risks that may impact the project and our reputation.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

4. Consultation and Communication Strategy Plan Overview

4.1

Who is responsible for responding to feedback and inputs; How responses will be provided; and The timeframes within which responses will be provided.

4.2 Consultation and communication approach The purpose of this CCP is to describe the processes and protocols relating to how the Link Alliance will: ·

· ·

This CCP will ensure: · · · · · · · Page 17

Communication and Consultation Plan · ·

4.3 Key Project Messages The key messages to be communicated to affected parties, stakeholder and wider audiences in relation to the wider CRL works are: · ·

· · ·

· ·

The following key messages are particularly relevant to the early works: · ·

· ·

The hierarchy of the key messages and the communication methods will be defined by the audience (e.g. local / regional / national) and its relationship to the early works.

4.4 Expected Outcomes The following is a summary of the outcomes expected as a result of implementing this CCP: · · · Page 18

Communication and Consultation Plan · · · · · ·

Page 19

Effective CLGs. Informed community. Informed road users. Informative and useful online presence. Positive media coverage. Reduced misinformation.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

The Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager and the Karangahape Station Project Manager will meet with the CRLL Communications Team regularly as required during the early works.

Role

Name

Karangahape Station Project Manager

Jonathan Hill

Karangahape Station Construction Manager

Dan Trotman

Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager

Rachel Blundell

Contact details for the Karangahape Station Project Manager and Communications and Stakeholder Manager are provided in Table 5-. Table 5-2: Link Alliance Contact details

Title Karangahape Station Project Manager Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager

Name Jonathan Hill

Email Jonathan.hill@linkalliance.co.nz

Contact no. 022 019 1668

Rachel Blundell

Rachel.Blundell@linkalliance.co.nz

027 306 9156

Contact details for the Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer are outlined in Table 5-3. Table 5-3: Auckland Council Contact details

Name Timothy O’Grady

Page 20

Email Timothy.OGrady@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Contact no. 021 834 584

Communication and Consultation Plan

Be of interest to CRLL or the CRL project sponsors (Auckland Council and Central Government). Have the potential to attract media attention. Present reputational risk to the Link Alliance or CRLL.

· ·

5.3.1. Reporting tools The following reporting tools will be used as part of the communications process between the Link Alliance and CRLL. Table 5-4: Reporting tools

Tools

Responsibility

Description

Urgent notifications

Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager

Immediately report any issues or concerns to CRLL communications team when they may result in media interest or present reputational risk to the project participants.

Weekly meeting

Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager

Customer Relationship Management (CRM) database

Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager

Central repository for all stakeholder contact details and interactions with Link Alliance.

Page 21

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

Channel

Tool

Usage/content

Distribution frequency

Publications

Construction look aheads

E-notices or printed notifications that provide advance notification of the proposed work activities and potential impacts. Notifications will address (as appropriate):

Monthly

Face to face

Page 22

FAQs and Q&As

Approved responses to frequently asked questions. Distribution: email or CRL website.

As and when required

Flyers

To promote engagement opportunities to business and residential occupiers Distribution: distributed to parties identified in Appendix C.

As and when required

One-on-one discussions

One-on-one meetings with residents, businesses or organisations to inform them of the early works and address specific concerns.

Ongoing as required during the works

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Channel

Tool

Usage/content

Distribution frequency

Directly affected and affected in proximity parties

As required during the works

Info Hub Sessions

Weekly prior to the commencement of early works (frequency TBC following the commencement of works)

CLG meetings

Every 3 months, or at another frequency agreed by all parties

6.3 Branding and Collateral All communication materials and signage developed for the early works will adhere to the CRLL and Link Alliance Branding Guidelines.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

6.4.2.

Owners, occupiers and businesses

6.4.3. Network Utility Operators The network utilities that will be impacted by the early works are owned by the following Network Utility Operators (NUOs): · · · · · · ·

Vector Electricity; Vector Gas; Vector Communications; Chorus; Vodafone; Auckland Council’s stormwater unit (Healthy Waters); and Watercare Services Ltd.

Page 24

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

New Zealand Police. New Zealand Fire Service. St Johns Ambulance.

Page 25

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

7.1.1. CLG purpose The purpose of the Karangahape CLG is to: ·

· · · ·

Stage

Description

The Link Alliance Communications staff will liaise with the Karangahape CLG members regarding meeting dates and venues. The venue will always be a local venue.

The Link Alliance will organise the CLG meetings and arrange for the appropriate Link Alliance personnel to be present.

The Link Alliance Communications staff will take notes and carry out actions required.

The Link Alliance Communications staff will keep a record of the meetings (including attendance). CRLL will subsequently publish the meeting minutes on the CRL project website.

Page 26

| Karangahape Station Early Works

The following MPs are required under the A2N resource consent conditions: · · · · · ·

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

Stage

Responsibility

Description

Link Alliance construction team members

Description of any mitigation measures employed. Times and duration of the works. Contact details for enquiries.

Karangahape Station Construction Manager

· Signs off the PTN. · Where notifications contain technical content, the relevant Alliance team member/specialist shall approve the content prior to sign off.

Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager

· Approves construction notifications prior to distribution to stakeholders affected by the particular work

Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager

Page 28

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

Ngāti Maru; Ngāti Paoa; Ngāi Tai Ki Tāmaki; Ngāti Te Ata Waiohua; Ngāti Whātua o Ōrākei; Te Ākitai Waiohua; Te Kawerau a Maki; and Ngāti Tamaoho.

The Mana Whenua forum will be managed by CRLL and will continue to address matters such as: · · · · ·

CEMP and sub-plans. Archaeology, including assistance with discovery protocols. Koiwi and artefact discovery. Cultural induction and monitoring. Ongoing provision of mātauranga Māori input.

During construction works the Link Alliance shall: · ·

7.2.5. Network Utility Operators Ongoing communication and consultation will be undertaken with NUOs during the early works as outlined below.

Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga reference 2017-793 Page 29 | Karangahape Station Early Works 4

Communication and Consultation Plan ·

If the change cannot be agreed on-site, then a meeting will be held between Link Alliance and the relevant NUO Project Manager to identify a mutually agreeable outcome.

Section 176(1)(b) RMA Approvals In relation to the Requiring Authority (CRLL) giving approval to NUOs under section 176(1)(b) of the RMA for NUO works in the CLR designation: · ·

Inspection and final approval of works by network utility operators The process for the inspection and final approval of works by NUOs is as follows: · · · ·

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan plan in greater detail for upcoming utility works in conjunction with other aspects of the Project works – e.g. temporary traffic management.

Page 31

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan ·

Maintain regular updates (via the appropriate communication tools detailed in section 6.2) with regard to archaeological or built heritage discoveries and monitoring during the early works.

1. Mercury Theatre due to its theatre usage and basement level recording facilities. 21 East St has recording functionality. 80 Pitt St has recording functionality.

7.4 Public Engagement 7.4.1. Public Enquiries Email addresses for public enquiries in relation to the Karangahape Station early works are as follows: ·

Page 32

karangahape@linkalliance.co.nz - in relation to Karangahape Station construction works; and

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

info@cityraillink.govt.nz - in relation to the wider CRL Project (any queries in relation to the Karangahape Station construction works will be forwarded through to the Link Alliance email).

Requirements The Link Alliance will: · ·

Process The process for managing enquiries or complaints via the 24/7 Freephone number is set out in Table 7-3. Table 7-3: Public enquiries

Stage

Description

The Link Alliance team member receives an enquiry or complaint.

The Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager responds in writing to the communication team member as quickly as possible.

The Link Alliance team member contacts the enquirer with the response, unless it relates to a media or political enquiry, in which case the CRLL GM Corporate Relations & Communications will respond.

The Link Alliance team member determines whether the enquirer is satisfied with the response, including any mitigation action taken if it is a complaint.

The Link Alliance team member responds with further information or action as required.

The Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager will conduct surveys every three months to determine levels of satisfaction with the process of communication responses.

Page 33

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Process The process for managing public enquiries generally is set out in Table 7-3 above.

Response Timeframes Timeframes for responding to other enquiries is set out in Table 7-4. Table 7-4: Public enquiries response timeframe

Enquiry channel

Response timeframe

Written correspondence (letters)

· Within 5 working days of receipt.

Written correspondence (emails and social media)

· Acknowledged on day of receipt. · Resolved within 2 working days, unless there are significant claims for damages or escalations due to scale or complexity (e.g. Health and Safety investigation).

0800 project information line calls

Meetings

· Response / resolution to be completed within the timeframes agreed in the meeting.

Requirements Link Alliance shall ensure that: Page 34

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan · ·

Complaints process The process for managing complaints is set out in Table 7-5. Table 7-5: Complaints management process

Stage

Description

All complaints are forwarded to the Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager.

The contact details and details of the complaint are entered into the CRM database.

All meetings shall be recorded in the CRM database to ensure that a complete record of times dates and location of meetings is maintained.

Complaints data is reviewed regularly by the Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager.

Response timeframes Table 7-6: Response timeframes

Complaint channel

Response timeframe

Written correspondence (letters)

· Within 5 working days of receipt.

Page 35

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Complaint channel

Response timeframe

Written correspondence (e-mails and social media)

· Acknowledge on day of receipt · Resolved within 2 working days, unless there are significant claims for damages or escalations due to scale or complexity (e.g. Health and Safety investigation).

0800 project information line calls

Meetings

· Response / resolution to be completed within the timeframes agreed in the meeting.

Channel

Details

Information requirements

Website

As the hub of communications for project information, CRLL’s website provides:

Social Media

Page 36

| Karangahape Station Early Works

CRLL Communications Team responsibility – information for regular social media updates.

Communication and Consultation Plan

7.4.5. Media All media enquiries will be channelled through the CRLL Media Manager. The Link Alliance shall support the CRLL Media Manager in responding to media enquiries as follows: · · ·

As part of the project induction, all Link Alliance staff and subcontractors will be briefed on the process to follow if approached by the media during the early works.

Poses significant harm to people, property, the environment or the local community, and requires assistance from external emergency services agencies.

7.5.1. Requirements In the event of a crisis or emergency, the Link Alliance shall: · · ·

7.5.2. Emergency contacts Table 7-8: Emergency responsibilities contact

Responsibility

Contact

Emergency Response Co-ordinator – Karangahape Station

Link Alliance Karangahape Station Project Manager – Jonathan Hill

Crisis/emergency management oversight

Link Alliance Project Director – Francois Dudouit

Construction management

Link Alliance Construction Manager – Phillipe Begou Link Alliance Karangahape Station Construction Manager – Dan Trotman

Health and Safety

Link Alliance Health and Safety Manager – Joseph McArdle

Page 37

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Responsibility

Contact

Link Alliance Communications

Link Alliance Communications and Engagement Manager â€“ Rachel Blundell

CRLL Communications

CRLL GM Corporate Relations & Communications - Victoria Jessop

Page 38

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

Appendix A: Staging Drawings

Page 39

| Karangahape Station Early Works

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

STAGE 1 - Q1 2020

PITT ST

AH A

PE R

TREE REMOVAL

SF OR D

CAFE & TOILET DEMOLITION

TREE REMOVAL SEQUENCE 1. SET-UP FENCING 2. TRIM BRANCHES 3. MOBILISE EXCAVATOR 4. CUT TREE TRUNK 5. EXCAVATE STUMP 6. CLEAN-UP SURROUNDINGS

BE Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-17 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_BERESFORD R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

STORAGE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

KAR ANG

LOCALISED TREE REMOVAL

DEMOLITION SEQUENCE 1. SET-UP FENCING WITH NOISE MATS 2. DISMANTLE ROOF FRAME & GLASS 3. DEMOLISH TOILET WITH EXCAVATOR 4. CART AWAY SPOIL 5. CLEAN-UP SURROUNDINGS

CSA ACCESS

WATER TREATMENT AND COVERED SPOIL AREAS

CLIENT:

TREE REMOVAL WORK AREA

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS SHEET TITLE

PARKING BAYS REMOVED

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS BERESFORD SQUARE STAGE 1

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES DESIGNATION BOUNDARY COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CREATOR ID :

STATION OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD--CON-LKA-SKE-EW BER

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

STAGE 2 - JAN 2020 - FEB 2020

PITT ST

RELOCATION CONDUCTED WITHIN THIS FOOTPRINT, ALLOWING ONE TRAFFIC LANE FLOW IN EACH DIRECTION

PE R D

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-17 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_BERESFORD R0.DWG

SQ OR D BE RE SF

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

STORAGE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

WATER TREATMENT AND COVERED SPOIL AREAS

CSA ACCESS

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT 1. BERESFORD SQUARE CLOSED TO THROUGH TRAFFIC 2. ON STREET PARKING CLOSED 3. ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTIES MAINTAINED

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

CLIENT:

KAR ANG

AHA

WASTEWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL STORMWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS SHEET TITLE

WORK AREA

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS BERESFORD SQUARE STAGE 2

PARKING BAYS REMOVED PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CREATOR ID :

DESIGNATION BOUNDARY STATION OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD--CON-LKA-SKE-EW BER

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

STAGE 3 - Q1 - Q2 2020 MANHOLE LOCATION WW LAUNCH DRILL PIT 4x4m - APPROX 5.5m DEEP

PITT ST

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH 2m (W) x 1.5m (D) x 10m (L) MANHOLE LOCATION

STAGED CONNECTIONS ACROSS BERESFORD SQUARE

SF OR D

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-17) Last Plotted: 2019-09-20 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_BERESFORD R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

WW RECEIVE DRILL PIT 3x3m - APPROX 4m DEEP STORAGE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

WATER TREATMENT AND COVERED SPOIL AREAS

CLIENT:

CSA ACCESS

SW RECEIVE DRILL PIT 3x3m - APPROX 3m DEEP TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT 1. BERESFORD SQUARE CLOSED TO THROUGH TRAFFIC 2. ON STREET PARKING CLOSED 3. ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTIES MAINTAINED

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH WASTEWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL STORMWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

SHEET TITLE

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS BERESFORD SQUARE STAGE 3

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES DESIGNATION BOUNDARY CREATOR ID :

STATION OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS

WORK AREA

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

KAR ANG AHA PE R D

SW LAUNCH DRILL PIT 4x4m - APPROX 4m DEEP

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD--CON-LKA-SKE-EW BER

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

KEY PLAN

STAGE 4 - Q1 - Q2 2020 NEW SW AND WW MANHOLES

PITT ST

TRENCH FOR DRY SERVICES

SF OR D

STAGED CONNECTIONS ACROSS BERESFORD SQUARE

KAR ANG AHA PE R

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO PROPERTIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES

STAGED COMBINED TRENCH FOR SW & WW 2m (W) x 4m (D) x 10m (L)

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-17) Last Plotted: 2019-09-20 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_BERESFORD R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

STORAGE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

WATER TREATMENT AND COVERED SPOIL AREAS

CSA ACCESS

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT 1. BERESFORD SQUARE CLOSED TO THROUGH TRAFFIC 2. ON STREET PARKING CLOSED 3. ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTIES MAINTAINED

CLIENT:

NEW SW AND WW MANHOLES

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS

ISSUE/REVISION

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH WORK AREA

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS SHEET TITLE

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS BERESFORD SQUARE STAGE 4

DESIGNATION BOUNDARY STATION OUTLINE COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CREATOR ID :

PROJECT NAME

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD--CON-LKA-SKE-EW BER

KEY PLAN

CROS S

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

STAGE 1 - Q4 2019

ANE

L CURY R E M

CESS

CSA AC

A ST

CESS

CANAD

CSA AC

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-16 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_MERCURY R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

DEMOLITION WORKS AREA SUBJECT TO CONFIRMED OUTLINE PLAN 'OPW60339200'

NMENTAL STORAGE, ENVIRO AREAS COVERED SPOIL CONTROLS AND

CESS

CSA AC

CLIENT:

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH PARKING BAYS REMOVED

ST EAST

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS SHEET TITLE

WORK AREA

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS MERCURY LANE STAGE 1

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES DESIGNATION BOUNDARY COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CREATOR ID :

STATION/TEMPORARY SHAFT OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW MERCURY

KEY PLAN

RECEIVE DRILL PIT 3x3m APPROX 5m DEEP

ST DIRECTIONAL DRILL, STORMWATER RELOCATION

CROS S

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

STAGE 1A - Q4 2019

URY MERC

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH LAUNCH DRILL PIT 4x4m APPROX 5m DEEP

LANE

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

CSA AC

CESS

CANAD

A ST

CSA AC LAUNCH DRILL PIT 4x4m APPROX 5m DEEP

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-16 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_MERCURY R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

DEMOLITION WORKS AREA SUBJECT TO CONFIRMED OUTLINE PLAN 'OPW60339200'

NMENTAL STORAGE, ENVIRO EAS VERED SPOIL AR CO D AN LS CONTRO

S EAST

CESS CSA AC

CLIENT:

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH STORMWATER DIRECTIONAL DRILL

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

SHEET TITLE

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS MERCURY LANE STAGE 1A

WORK AREA PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES CREATOR ID :

DESIGNATION BOUNDARY STATION/TEMPORARY SHAFT OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS

PARKING BAYS REMOVED

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CESS

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW MERCURY

KEY PLAN

CROS S

ISO A1 594mm x 841mm

STAGE 2 - Q4 2019 - Q1 2020

STAGED WORKS TO ALLOW SINGLE LANE AT ALL TIMES

Y LA RCUR

CSA AC

A ST

CESS

CANAD

CSA AC

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH

Last saved by: HEINTJE OSHA(2019-09-16) Last Plotted: 2019-09-16 Filename: AECOM_AU_w\60560778\CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW_MERCURY R0.DWG

OFFICES AND WELFARE FACILITIES

DEMOLITION WORKS AREA SUBJECT TO CONFIRMED OUTLINE PLAN 'OPW60339200'

NMENTAL STORAGE, ENVIRO AREAS COVERED SPOIL CONTROLS AND

S EAST

CESS CSA AC

CLIENT:

COMBINED SERVICE TRENCH PARKING BAYS REMOVED

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INITIALS SP

DESIGNER

CHECKED

APPROVED

ISSUE/REVISION

SHEET TITLE

KARANGAHAPE STATION INDICATIVE EARLY WORKS MERCURY LANE STAGE 2

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES DESIGNATION BOUNDARY CREATOR ID :

STATION/TEMPORARY SHAFT OUTLINE

PROJECT NAME

C3 - RRFP - STATIONS & TUNNELS

WORK AREA

COMPANY NUMBER : 6267870

CESS

I/R

DATE

DESCRIPTION

SHEET NUMBER

CRL-KRD-CON-LKA-SKE-EW MERCURY

Communication and Consultation Plan

Page 40

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Figure B-2: Overview of Key Concerns within the Affected Community

Page 41

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

Appendix C: Summary of Communication and Consultation Table C-1: Summary of Communication and Consultation

Stakeholder/Contact Details

Summary of Communication and Consultation Government/Statutory

Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga

Auckland Council

Auckland Transport

New Zealand Transport Agency

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Mana Whenua · · · · · · · ·

Ngati Whatua o Orakei Ngāti Te Ata Ngati Paoa Te Akitai Waiohua Ngati Maru Ngati Tamaoho Te Kawerau a Maki Ngai Tai ki Tamaki

Karangahape Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG)

Karangahape Business Association

Affected Parties – Residential and business owners / occupiers

Property Owners

· Refer to a summary of engagement undertaken with affected parties in Appendix D. Engagement from the Link Alliance and CRLL

Page 43

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Communication team (as appropriate) will remain ongoing during the Karangahape Station early works as outlined in this CCP and the SIBD DWP.

Page 44

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan

Address

Property Owner / Occupier

Engagement summary Mercury Lane

3-5 Mercury Lane

Mercury Bar and Gaming Lounge

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

White Elephant Op Shop

SIBD and acoustic door knocked but manager not available. Contact details left.

BK Hostel

SIBD and acoustic door knocked but manager not available. Contact details left.

9 Mercury Lane

Mercury Theatre

SIBD and acoustic door knocked and discussion with event manager / staff.

2 Mercury Lane (also 238 KRoad)

Residential Property / Commercial

SIBD and acoustic door knocked and discussion with property manager and resident attendee at the Cross Street Market Community Event - Refer to Section 6.7 of the SIBD DWP.

24 Mercury Lane

Wilsons Car Park

Communications & Engagement Manager is arranging engagement, supported by appropriate SMEs.

30 Mercury Lane

Wilsons Car Park

Communications & Engagement Manager is arranging engagement, supported by appropriate SMEs.

3/2 Canada St

NZ Prostitutes Collective

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with manager. Karangahape Road

195-239 K Road

243 K Road

249-253 K Road

Page 45

Buana Satu

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Leo O’Malley

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Calendar Girls

Invite to Beresford Square Community event with contact details provided.

Pitt St Pub

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business manager.

VAPO

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left – Two visits.

The Hemp Store Café

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property Owner / Occupier

Engagement summary

259-261 K Road

Eagle Bar

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left – Two visits.

POKPOK Thai Restaurant

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left – Two visits.

The Kebab house

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Uncle Man

SIBD and acoustic door knock and contact details left.

Strange Haven

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

283 K Road

Samoa House

Meeting not obtained.

214 K Road

Vacant

n/a

238 K-Road (also 2 Mercury Lane)

Multiple Occupiers

SIBD meeting with property manager / representative.

256 & 258A K Rd

Mithaiwala Restaurant / Café

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Shosha (Vape & Hookah Store)

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

G.A.Y. Auckland

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left.

Charlie Baxters

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left.

Free Bird

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

Ink bar & Nightclub

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left.

Bangkok’s Thai Food Café

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left.

270 K Rd

The Family Bar

SIBD and Acoustic door knocked and contact details left.

270 K Rd

Club Saloon Bar

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with staff member.

278 – 282 K Road

Apero Restaurant (Ismo Koski)

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

284 - 286 K Rd

Cosmic

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

290 K Rd

African Hair Braiding & Extension Centre

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

292 - 300 K Rd

ArtSpace

SIBD door knocked and contact details left.

Tautai Guiding Pacific Arts

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / manager.

K Rd Mart

SIBD door knocked and contact details left.

Ivan Anthony Gallery Michael Lett Gallery

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / occupier.

Vacant

SIBD door knocked and discussion with on site worker.

267-281 K Road

268 K Rd

312 K Rd 8 East Street Page 46

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property Owner / Occupier

Engagement summary

10 East Street

Adio Trust

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with manager.

12 East Street

Residential Mixed use

SIBD door knock meeting with residential occupier.

14 East Street

Mixed residential and commercial use

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / occupier.

16 East Street

Studio Q

SIBD door knocked. Communications team to follow up on engagement.

18 East Street

Residential

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with owner.

15 â€“ 19 East Street

Backpacker Car World

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with business owner / occupier.

17 Galatos Street

Venue

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting. No place to leave contact details.

21 East Street

UnoLoco Event Management

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with Business Owner/Manager

23 East Street

European Motors

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting.

29 East Street

International Earth Sciences (IESE) Ltd

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meetings (two â€“ follow up with acoustician) with Business Owner/Manager.

Electric Bike Team

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with Business Owner/Manager.

Think Concepts

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with Business Owner/Manager.

2 South Street

Residential

SIBD and Acoustic site visit and contact details left.

2A South Street

Residential

SIBD and Acoustic site visit and contact details left.

17 South Limited

Gorilla Technology

SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting with Business Owner/Manager.

World Net

SIBD and Acoustic site visit and contact details left.

Glamuzina Architects

SIBD and acoustic door knock and left contact details. Representative attended the Cross Street Market Community Event.

Epsilon Law; Black & Blue Ltd

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the individual Business Owner/Manager.

Unit 5 - 1 Cross Street

The Aviary Nisha Madhan Motion Sickness Voice Brand Agency IMPAC Services

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the individual Business Owner/Manager.

2 Cross Street

Cross Street Markets

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting and subsequent Cross Street Market Community Event.

2A Cross Street

The Warren Woodwork

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager and subsequent Cross Street Market Community Event.

40 Pitt Street

Central Fire Station

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Services Manager.

Page 47

| Karangahape Station Early Works

Communication and Consultation Plan Address

Property Owner / Occupier

Engagement summary

70 Pitt Street

Chattham Apartments

Two SIBD site visits â€“ no place to leave calling card and no contact details available online.

72-80 Pitt Street (multiple units)

Pitt St Methodist Church

Initial SIBD and Acoustic door knock meeting followed by an arranged meeting with SME and Construction Contractor.

Flying out movie and music store

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

82 Pitt Street

Def Store

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

47 Pitt Street

Auckland central ambulance station

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

55-59 Pitt Street

Vada - Hairdresser

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Tattoo Parlour

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Neighbourhood Good NZ

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Waves Vintage

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Red Bar

SIBD and acoustic door knocked but not open.

Graphic Design

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

61 Pitt Street

Johnny Feedback Coffee Shop

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

15 & 19 Beresford Square

Hopetoun Alpha

Two SIBD site visits and follow up voicemail to the occupier. Arranged meeting with building owner (also owns a number of properties in the areas including 1 Cross Street)

1 â€“ 7 Beresford Square

Northern Line

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager. Follow up meeting arranged with the construction contractor.

Bravo Hospitality

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Sugar and Partners

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

Theta System Limited

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting with the Business Owner/Manager.

16-18 Beresford Square

Centurion Sauna

SIBD team called to arrange a meeting / attendance at Info Hub / Community event.

22-28 Beresford Square

Residential

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting and follow up meeting with residents. Residents also attended the Beresford Square community event - Refer to Section 6.7 of the SIBD DWP. Day Street

36 Day Street

Page 48

Residential

| Karangahape Station Early Works

SIBD and acoustic door knock meeting and follow up meeting with residents. Residents also attended the Beresford Square community event - Refer to Section 6.7 of the SIBD DWP.

Communication and Consultation Plan

Appendix E: Auckland Council Feedback Mr Blair Masefield, Technical Director – Planning from Land and Survey Ltd, has reviewed and provided comment on the draft CCP as follows: Comment

Response

Page 49

| Karangahape Station Early Works