Issuu

City Rail Link In association with:

ENABLING WORKS â€“ CONTRACT 2.1 & 2.2 CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Albert Street Canopy Removal and Utility Relocation

Document Ref: CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Revision: 4 27 October 2017

INTERNAL WORKING DOCUMENT COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE

Document control record Document prepared by: Aurecon New Zealand Limited Level 4, 139 Carlton Gore Road Newmarket Auckland 1023 PO Box 9762 Newmarket Auckland 1149 New Zealand

T F E W

+64 9 520 6019 +64 9 524 7815 auckland@aurecongroup.com aurecongroup.com

A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a)

Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version.

Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon.

Document control Report title

CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Albert Street Canopy Removal and Utility Relocation

Document ID

CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT0100

Project number

239933

Client

City Rail Link Limited

Client contact

Richard Jenkins

Rev

Date

Revision details/status

Prepared by

Author

11 August 2017

Draft for AT and Connectus review

K Lepoutre & H. McLean

1 September 2017

Draft for CLG feedback

K Lepoutre & H. McLean

21 September 2017

Draft for CLG peer review

K Lepoutre & H. McLean

27 October 2017

Final for Outline Plan lodgement

K Lepoutre & H. McLean

Current revision

Verifier

Approver

L Strogen

Approval Author signature

Approver signature

Name

H McLean

Name

Damien McGahan

Title

Associate

Title

Technical Director

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Contents 1

Introduction

1.1

Purpose of the CEMP

1.2

CEMP Requirements

1.3

Environmental Sub-Plans

1.4

Development of CEMP, DWPs and MPs

1.5

Mana Whenua

1.6

Designation Conditions

1.7

Resource Consent Conditions

Project Description

2.1

CRL Overview

2.2

Canopy Removal and Utilities Relocation

2.3

Construction Methodology

2.4

Programme

2.5

Hours of Operation

2.6

Site Layout and Management

2.7

Security, Safety and Public Viewing

2.8

Graffiti and Litter

2.9

Returning the Site to Public Use

Social and Environmental Management

3.1

Construction Activities and Associated Environmental Receivers

3.2

Environmental Risk Register

3.3

Cumulative Effects

3.4

Legislative and Other Requirement

Implementation and Operation

4.1

Roles and Responsibilities

4.2

Training and Induction

4.3

Operating Procedures

4.4

Emergency and Incident Response

4.5

Stakeholder Communications

Monitor and Review

5.1

Environmental Monitoring

5.2

Environmental Inspections

5.3

Environmental Auditing

5.4

Corrective and Preventative Action

5.5

Reporting

5.6

Document Control

5.7

CEMP Review

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

i CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Appendices Appendix A Designation Conditions Appendix B Resource Consent Conditions Appendix C Site Layout Plans Appendix D Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Appendix E Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan Appendix F Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan Appendix G Historic Character Delivery Work Plan Appendix H Contaminated Delivery Work Plan Appendix I Air Quality Delivery Work Plan Appendix J Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Appendix K Communication and Consultation Plan Appendix L Groundwater Monitoring and Contingency Plan Appendix M Building Condition Surveys Appendix N Record of CLG and IPRP feedback on the CEMP

Figures Figure 1 Worksite layout, temporary pedestrian pathways and hoardings Figure 2 Project area layout Figure 3 Examples of container approach to pedestrian hoarding and safety management Figure 4 Hoarding outside Auckland Council, 135 Albert Street Figure 5 Hoarding outside AA centre, 99 Albert Street

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

21 25 26 26 27

ii CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Tables Table 1 Plans attached to the CEMP 2 Table 2 Designation conditions from the CRL designation relating to the CEMP 1 Table 3 Resource consent conditions from the Aotea to NAL resource consent relating to the CEMP 9 Table 4 Indicative canopy removal or cut back construction methodology 22 Table 5 Indicative utilities relocation construction methodology 23 Table 6 Key national legislation, regulations and standards 29 Table 7 Standards, guidelines and specific statutory requirements associated with environmental aspects and detailed in the CEMP and plans 29 Table 8 Specific roles and responsibilities 32 Table 9 Environmental incident notification 45 Table 10 Collaborative working contacts 47

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

iii CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Introduction

This Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) is submitted in support of the Outline Plan from City Rail Link Limited (CRLL) to Auckland Council (AC) for the removal of canopies and relocation of utilities on the western side of Albert Street from Wellesley Street to Victoria Street West (the Project). The works are required as part of the construction of the City Rail Link (CRL) under designation 1714. The requirement for this CEMP and accompanying Delivery Works Plans (DWP) and Management Plans (MP) is required by designation conditions 19 to 24. A CEMP is also required by conditions 35 to 40 of the Aotea to North Auckland Line (A2N) resource consents1 The proposed works covered by this CEMP can be summarised as follows:



Canopy Removal - from buildings at 99 Albert Street (AA), 103-107 Albert Street (Manhattan Apartment), 109-125 Albert Street (SkyCity) and 135 Albert Street (Auckland Council) to enable the construction of the Aotea Station piled wall.



Utilities Relocation – relocation of existing services on Albert Street between Victoria Street West and Wellesley Street, into a shared services trench approximately 4.0m in depth by 1.5m in width, located in the space between the new station wall and the existing buildings.

More details of the proposed works will be provided throughout this CEMP. This CEMP has been prepared by Aurecon in conjunction with the Construction Contractor (Connectus) and will be implemented by the Construction Contractor through the course of the works. The CEMP provides the overarching framework for the management of construction effects associated with the proposed works. Further DWPs are included as appendices to the CEMP. These DWPs detail the specific environmental management controls for particular aspects of the Project.

1.1

Purpose of the CEMP

The purpose of the CEMP is to confirm the Project construction details and staging of works and to set out how construction activities will be carried out and managed as far as is reasonably practical to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on the environment. This CEMP demonstrates that the works remain within the limits of the CRL designation and associated A2N resource consents. The CEMP will ensure that appropriate environmental management practices are followed during the Project’s construction phase. The CEMP will be implemented throughout the entire construction period (approximately 15 months) for the Project, and updated as necessary. CRLL acknowledges the success of this enabling works Project will set a benchmark for the forthcoming CRL Aotea Station construction in the area. CRLL will endeavour to ensure that the surrounding community and wider general public are proactively engaged with to ensure successful delivery. Overall, implementation of this CEMP will ensure:



Appropriate management of adverse environmental effects associated with construction of the Project;



Compliance with the relevant designation conditions of the CRL designation and A2N resource consents;



Compliance with environmental legislation; and

R/LUC/2016/1890, R/REG/2016/1892, R/REG/2016/1895, R/REG/2016/1896, REG/2016/1897, R/REG/2016/1898, R/REG/2016/1899, R/REG/2016/1900 and R/REG/2016/2038.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

1 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

ď‚§

Achievement of the Projectâ€™s environmental and sustainability objectives.

The CEMP and DWPs will be reviewed at least annually or as a result of a material change to the Project, or to address unforeseen adverse effects arising from construction or unresolved complaints 2. The CEMP and DWPs are required to be prepared in consultation with the Community Business Liaison Group (CBLG) for the Project. Additionally, the CEMP and DWPs have undergone independent peer review prior to submission to AC. Comments received from the CBLG and from the independent peer review process have been (where applicable and appropriate) incorporated in the CEMP and DWPs, with an explanation being provided where any comments have not been incorporated. A record of consultation outcomes (CBLG and independent peer review) for this CEMP is provided in Appendix M; a record of specific consultation outcomes is included in each relevant DWP.

1.2

CEMP Requirements

The CRL designation requires that a CEMP be submitted to AC with the Outline Plan, along with the Communication and Consultation Plan (CCP), DWPs and Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plans (SSCNVMP) (if required)3. Where specific requirements and objectives are not addressed by the DWPs, the CEMP includes measures to give effect to these. The A2N resource consents require a CEMP be provided to AC for certification prior to works commencing. Condition 36 details what must be included in the CEMP.

1.3

Environmental Sub-Plans

The management of specific environmental effects during construction is addressed through the development and implementation of a suite of DWPs and Management Plans (MP) required by the CRL designation and A2N regional resource consents 4. The DWPs and MPs are identified in Table 1 and from appendices to the CEMP. Table 1 Plans attached to the CEMP

Plan

Acronym

CRL Des. Condition #

Purpose

Section of CEMP

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan

ESCP

21.1(b) and (c)

To outline the methods for managing and controlling silt and sediment within the construction area.

Section 4.3.2 & Appendix D

Transport Access and Parking DWP

TAPDWP

25, 30

To manage the adverse effects of construction on the transport network (including parking and access)

Section 4.3.2 & Appendix E

Construction Noise and Vibration DWP

CNVDWP

To provide for the development and implementation of identified best practicable options to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on receivers of noise and vibration resulting from construction effects.

Section 4.3.4 & Appendix F

Designation condition 22 Designation condition 10 4 R/LUC/2016/1890, R/REG/2016/1892, R/REG/2016/1895, R/REG/2016/1896, REG/2016/1897, R/REG/2016/1898, R/REG/2016/1899, R/REG/2016/1900 and R/REG/2016/2038. 3

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

2 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Historic Character DWP (Archaeology Section)

HCDWP

To manage the adverse archaeological effects that may result during construction.

Section 4.3.6 & Appendix G

Contamination DWP (also a Contaminated Soils Management Plan)

CDWP

To manage the adverse effects relating to contaminated land during construction

Section 4.3.9 & Appendix H

Air Quality DWP (also an Air Quality Management Plan)

AQDWP

To avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects arising from disruption to businesses, residents and community services/facilities during construction.

Section 4.3.9 & Appendix I

Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP

SIBDDWP

To avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects on air quality during construction.

Section 4.3.10 & Appendix J

Communication and Consultation Plan

CCP

To set out set out the framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation is undertaken with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties during construction

Section 4.5 & Appendix K

Plan

Acronym

Aotea to NAL Condition #

Purpose

Section of CEMP

Communication and Consultation Plan

CCP

25 to 33

Section 4.5 & Appendix K

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan

ESCP

53-58

Management of the effects associated with soil mobilisation

Section 4.3.2 & Appendix D

Contaminated Soils Management Plan

CDWP

131-134

To manage the adverse effects relating to contaminated land during construction

Section 4.3.8 & Appendix H

Air Quality Management Plan

AQDWP

223-224

To avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects on air quality during construction

Section 4.3.10 & Appendix I

Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring Contingency Plan

GSMCP

96-103

Monitor the effects of groundwater drawdown on buildings in proximity to the proposed works

Section 4.3.12 & Appendix L

109

To establish a baseline of building conditions prior to construction works commencing

Section 4.3.4 & Appendix M

Precondition building surveys

1.4

Development of CEMP, DWPs and MPs

This CEMP, DWPs and MPs have been developed by specialists and were subjected to range of reviews to ensure that they are commensurate to the scale of the effects associated with the Project. The CEMP, DWPs and MPs have been presented to the relevant CBLG for feedback in accordance with designation condition 7.5. Where appropriate, this feedback has been incorporated into the CEMP, DWPâ€™s and MPs. Where feedback has not been incorporated, reasons why have been provided in each document.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

3 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

The CEMP and DWPs and the feedback from the CBLG on these plans has been reviewed by CRL’s Independent Peers Review Panel (IPRP). The IPRP have provided a number of recommendations to ensure the CEMP and DWPs meet the objectives and other requirements of the designation conditions (as required by Condition 11). These inputs, along with the feedback from the CBLG, are attached in Appendix N. Mana whenua briefings for this Project were held on 17 August 2017, 21 September 2017 and 19 October 2017.

1.5

Mana Whenua

We are all descended from Ranginui, our Father Sky and Papatuanuku, our Mother Earth. Ngā mana whenua o Tāmaki Makaurau have a special relationship with Ranginui, Papatuanuku, and their resources. Acting as kaitiaki, they endeavour to protect their whānau, hapū and Iwi and encourage all people to act as protectors of the earth. Kaitiakitanga includes:

   

Protecting, restoring, enhancing the mauri (life supporting capacity) of resources Fulfilling spiritual, emotional and inherited responsibilities to the environment Maintaining mana over resources Ensuring the welfare of the people those resources support

In Tamaki Makaurau it is Mana Whenua who are Kaitiaki. The aspiration of the CRL project to be exemplary in the practice of sustainability – encompassing the four well-beings (environmental, cultural, social and economic) – aligns and supports kaitiakitanga. In meeting their sustainability commitments CRL staff, contractors and others involved in the project are also supporting kaitiakitanga and Mana Whenua as kaitiaki. Furthermore, they are also improving the state of the environment that we pass on for future generations. The CRL sustainability framework is informed by tikanga tiaki and mātauranga. A CRL mana whenua forum has been established for the purposes of undertaking kaitiakitanga responsibilities associated with the project. The forum comprises those Mana Whenua groups who expressed an interest in being involved in the CRL project and its related activities. Eight Mana Whenua self-identified their interest in CRL and are currently part of the forum:

       

Ngāti Maru Ngāti Paoa Ngāi Tai Ki Tāmaki Ngāti Te Ata Waiohua Ngāti Whātua o Ōrākei Te Akitai Waiohua Te Kawerau a Maki Ngāti Tamaoho

CRLL continues to work collaboratively with the Mana Whenua forum on all aspects of the CRL project. With the commencement of the Project’s construction, the forum’s role will include cultural induction for contractors, assistance with discovery procedures, monitoring, and ongoing provision of mātauranga Māori input.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

4 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

1.6

Designation Conditions

The Project works relate to the CRL Designation 1714 confirmed in November 2015 and an alteration to the CRL Designation 1714 confirmed in February 2017. All works will be carried out in accordance with the CEMP and the plans required by the designation. The designation conditions are included in Appendix A. Designation conditions 19 â€“ 24 outline what is required for the CEMP. Table 2 identifies the relevant sections of the CEMP that address each condition.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Table 2 Designation conditions from the CRL designation relating to the CEMP

Condition Number

Condition

Relevant Section of CEMP

Designation Conditions (Designation 1714 (6)) 13.1

The Requiring Authority, its contractor team, and the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s) shall establish and implement a collaborative working process for dealing with day to day construction processes, including monitoring compliance with the designation conditions and with the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and any material changes to these plans associated with construction of the City Rail Link.

13.2

This collaborative working process shall:

13.3

(a) Operate for the duration of the construction works and for 6 months following completion of construction works where monitoring of designation conditions is still required, unless a different timeframe is mutually agreed between the Requiring Authority and the Auckland Council;

5.1

(b) Have a “key contact” person representing the Requiring Authority and a “key contact” person representing the contractor team to work with the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s);

5.1

(c) The “key contacts” shall be identified in the CEMP and shall meet at least monthly unless a different timeframe is agreed with the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s). The purpose of the meeting is to report on compliance with the designation conditions and with the CEMP, DWPs and material changes to these plans and on any matters of non-compliance and how they have been addressed;

5.1

(d) Once construction has commenced, the Requiring Authority and / or the contractor shall provide an update to the Community Liaison Groups (Condition 7 of this designation) at least once every 3 months, or if in accordance with Condition 7 these groups meet more regularly, at least once every two months.

5.1

The purpose and function of the collaborative working process is to: (a) Assist as necessary the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s) to confirm that:

5.1

(i) The works authorised under these designations are being carried out in compliance with the designation conditions, the CEMP, DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and any material changes to these plans;

5.1

(ii) The Requiring Authority and its contractor are undertaking all monitoring and the recording of monitoring results in compliance with the requirements of the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and any material changes to these plans;

5.1

(b) Subsequent to a confirmed Outline Plan, provide a mechanism through which any changes to the design, CEMP or DWPs, which are not material changes requiring approval under Condition 10 triggering the requirement for a new Outline Plan, can be required, reviewed andconfirmed;

5.1

(c) Advise where changes to construction works following a confirmed Outline Plan require a new CEMP or DWP (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs);

5.1

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

1 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

(d) Review and identify any concerns or complaints received from, or related to, the construction works monthly (unless a different timeframe is mutually agreed with the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer) and adequacy of the measures adopted to respond to these.

5.1

Upon receiving a concern or complaint during construction, the Requiring Authority shall instigate a process to address concerns or complaints received about adverse effects. This shall:

5 & Appendix K

(a) Identify of the nature of the concern or complaint, and the location, date and time of the alleged event(s);

5 & Appendix K

(b) Acknowledge receipt of the concern or complaint within 24 hours of receipt;

5 & Appendix K

(c) Respond to the concern or complaint in accordance with the relevant management plan , which may include monitoring of the activity by a suitably qualified expert, implementation of mitigation measures, and, in the case of noise and / or vibration, preparation of a site specific noise and / or vibration management plan (in accordance with Conditions

5 & Appendix K

A record of all concerns and / or complaints received shall be kept by the Requiring Authority. This record shall include:

5 & Appendix K

(a) The name and address of the person(s) who raised the concern or complaint (unless they elect not to provide this) and details of the concern or complaint;

5 & Appendix K

(b) Where practicable, weather conditions at the time of the concern or complaint, including wind direction and cloud cover if the complaint relates to noise or air quality;

5 & Appendix K

(d) Any other activities in the area unrelated to the City Rail Link construction that may have contributed to the concern or complaint such as non-City Rail Link construction, fires, traffic accidents or unusually dusty conditions generally;

5 & Appendix K

(e) Remedial actions undertaken (if any) and the outcome of these, including monitoring of the activity.

5 & Appendix K

17.3

This record shall be maintained on site, be available for inspection upon request, and shall be provided every two months (or as otherwise agreed) to the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer, and to the â€œkey contactsâ€? (see Condition 13).

5 & Appendix K

17.4

Where a complaint remains unresolved or a dispute arises, Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer will be provided with all records of the complaint and how it has been dealt with and addressed and whether the Requiring Authority considers that any other steps to resolve the complaint are required. Upon receiving records of the complaint the Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer must determine whether a review of the CEMP and/or DWPs is required under Condition 22 to address this complaint. The Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer shall advise the Requiring Authority of its recommendation within 10 working days of receiving the records of complaint.

5 & Appendix K

19.1

The objective of the CEMP and DWPs is to so far as is reasonablypracticable, avoid, remedy or mitigate any adverse effects (including cumulative effects) associated with the City Rail Link construction.

19.2

All works must be carried out in accordance with the CEMP, the DWPs required by these conditions and in accordance with any changes to plans made under Condition 23.

Noted

19.3

The CEMP and DWPs shall be prepared, complied with and monitoredby the Requiring Authority throughout the duration of construction of the City Rail Link.

Noted

17.1

17.2

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

2 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

19.4

The DWPs shall give effect to the specific requirements and objectives set out in these designation conditions.

Noted

19.5

The CEMP shall include measures to give effect to any specificrequirements and objectives set out in these designation conditions that are not addressed by the DWPs.

20.1

In order to give effect to the objective in Condition 19.1, the CEMP must provide for the following:

20.2

21.1

(b) Notice boards that clearly identify the Requiring Authority and the Project name, together with the name, telephone number and email address of the Site or Project Manager and the Communication andConsultation Manager;

4.1

(c) Training requirements for employees, sub-contractors and visitors on construction procedures, environment management and monitoring;

4.2

(d) A Travel Management Plan for each construction site outlining onsite car parking management and methods for encouraging travel to the site using forms of transport other than private vehicle to assist in mitigating localised traffic effects; and

Appendix E

(e) Where a complaint is received, the complaint must be recorded and responded to as provided for in Conditions 13, 15 and 17.

Section 5 & Appendix K

The CEMP shall include details of: (a) The site or Project Manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager (who will implement and monitor the Communication and Consultation Plan), including their contact details (phone, email and physical address);

4.1

(b) The Document management system for administering the CEMP,including review and Requiring Authority / Constructor / Auckland Council requirements;

4.1.2.4

4.4

(d) Environmental complaint's management procedures (see also Condition 17);

4.5 & Appendix K

(e) An outline of the construction programme of the work, includingconstruction hours of operation, indicating linkages to the DWPs which address the management of adverse effects during construction;

(f) Specific details on demolition to be undertaken during the construction period;

(g) Means of ensuring the safety of the general public; and

(h) Methods to assess and monitor potential cumulative adverse effects.

In order to give effect to the objective in Condition 19.1, the CEMP shall include the following details and requirements in relation to all areas within the surface designation footprint where construction works are to occur, and / or where materials and construction machinery are to beused or stored: (a) Where access points are to be located and procedures for managing construction vehicle ingress and egress to construction support and storage areas;

2.6 & Appendix E

(b) Methods for managing the control of silt and sediment within the construction area;

4.3.2 & Appendix D,

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

3 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

(c) Methods for earthworks management (including depth and extent of earthworks and temporary, permanent stabilisation measures and monitoring of ground movement) for earthworks adjacent to buildings and structures;

Appendix D,

(d) Measures to adopt to keep the construction area in a tidy conditionin terms of disposal / storage of rubbish and storage unloading of construction materials (including equipment). All storage of materials and equipment associated with the construction works shall take place within the boundaries of the designation;

2.7 & 2.8

(e) Measures to ensure all temporary boundary / security fences associated with the construction of the City Rail Link are maintained in good order with any graffiti removed as soon as possible;

2.6, 2.7 & 2.8

(g) The location and specification of any temporary acoustic fences and visual barriers, and where practicable, opportunities for mana whenua (see Condition 8) and community art or other decorative measures along with viewing screens to be incorporated into these withoutcompromising the purpose for which these are erected;

2.6 & Appendix F

(h) How the construction areas are to be fenced and kept secure from the public and, where practicable and without compromising theirpurpose how opportunities for public viewing, including provision of viewing screens and display of information about the project and opportunities for mana whenua and community art or other decorative measures can be incorporated to enhance public amenity and connection to the project;

2.7

(i) The location of any temporary buildings (including workers officesand portaloos) and vehicle parking (which should be located within the construction area and not on adjacent streets);

2.6

(j) Methods to control the intensity, location and direction of artificial construction lighting to avoid light spill and glare onto sites adjacent construction areas;

4.3.5

(k) Methods to ensure the prevention and mitigation of adverse effects associated with the storage, use, disposal, or transportation of hazardous substances;

4.4

(l) That onsite stockpiling of spoil or fill at Downtown and Lower Albert Street construction yards be minimised where practicable;

N/A

(m) That site offices and less noisy construction activities be located at the edge of the construction yards where practicable; and

2.6

(n) Methods for management of vacant areas once construction is completed in accordance with the Urban Design DWP.

N/A

21.2

Subject to any alternative arrangement with the landowner of theDowntown Shopping Centre, the Downtown construction yard, including QEII Square, Downtown Shopping Centre and Lower Albert Street, shall be progressively released from occupation for construction purposes where the area or any part of the area is no longer required for construction.

N/A

22.1

The CEMP and DWPs shall be reviewed at least annually or as a result of a material change to the City Rail Link project or to addressunforeseen adverse effects arising from construction or unresolved complaints. Such a review may be initiated by either Auckland Council or the Requiring Authority. The review shall take into consideration:

Noted

(a) Compliance with designation conditions, the CEMP, DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and material changes to these plans;

Noted

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

4 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

(b) Any changes to construction methods;

Noted

(d) Changes in industry best practice standards;

Noted

(e) Changes in legal or other requirements;

Noted

(f) Results of monitoring and reporting procedures associated with the management of adverse effects during construction;

Noted

(g) Any comments or recommendations received from Auckland Council regarding the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs); and

Noted

(h) Any unresolved complaints and any response to the complaints and remedial action taken to address the complaint as required under Condition 17.

Noted

22.2

A summary of the review process shall be kept by the Requiring Authority, provided annually to the Auckland Council, and madeavailable to the Auckland Council upon request.

Noted

23.1

Following the CEMP and DWPs review process described in Condition 22, the CEMP may require updating.

Noted

23.2

Any material change to the CEMP and DWP must be consistent with the purpose and objective of the relevant condition.

Noted

23.3

Affected parties will be notified of the review and any material change proposed to the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPsand SSCVMPs).

Noted

23.4

The CEMP and DWPs must clearly document the comments and inputs received by the Requiring Authority from affected parties about the material change, along with a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not.

Noted

23.5

Any material change proposed to the CEMP and DWPs shall be subject to an independent peer review as required by Condition 11.

Noted

23.6

Following that review any material change proposed to the CEMP and DWPs relating to an adverse effect shall be submitted for approval to Auckland Council Compliance and Monitoring Officer, at least 10 working days prior to the proposed changes taking effect. If anychanges are not agreed, the relevant provisions of the RMA relating to approval of outline plans shall apply.

Noted

24.1

To manage the adverse effects on Network Utilities Operations during the construction of the City Rail Link, the following shall be included in the CEMP.

Noted

24.2

The purpose of this section of the CEMP shall be to ensure that the enabling works and construction of the City Rail Link adequately take account of, and include measures to address the safety, integrity, protection or, where necessary, relocation of existing network utilities that traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation during the construction of the City Rail Link.

Noted

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

24.3

For the avoidance of doubt and for the purposes of this condition an â€œexisting Network Utilityâ€? includes infrastructure operated by a Network Utility Operator which was:

Noted

(a) In place at the time the notice of requirement for the City Rail Link was served on Auckland Council (23 August 2012); or (b) Undertaken in accordance with condition 6 of this designation or the section 176(1)(b) RMA process. 24.4

The CEMP shall be prepared in consultation with Network Utility Operators who have existing Network Utilities that traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation and shall be adhered to and implemented during the construction of the City Rail Link. The CEMP shall include as a minimum:

4.3.1 & Appendix K

(a) Cross references to the Communication and Consultation Plan for the methods that will be used to liaise with all Network Utility Operators who have existing network utilities that traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation; (b) Measures to be used to accurately identify the location of existingNetwork Utilities, and the measures for the protection, support, relocation and/or reinstatement of existing Network Utilities; (c) Methods to be used to ensure that all construction personnel, including contractors, are aware of the presence and location of the various existing Network Utilities (and their priority designations) which traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation, and therestrictions in place in relation to those existing Network Utilities. This shall include: (i) Measures to provide for the safe operation of plant and equipment, and the safety of workers, in proximity to existing Network Utilities; (ii) Plans identifying the locations of the existing Network Utilities (and their designations) and appropriate physical indicators on the ground showing specific surveyed locations; (d) Measures to be used to ensure the continued operation of Network Utility Operations and the security of supply of the utilities by Network Utility Operators at all times; (e) Measures to be used to enable Network Utility Operators to accessexisting Network Utilities for maintenance at all reasonable times on an ongoing basis during construction, and to access existing Network Utilities for emergency and urgent repair works at all times during theconstruction of the City Rail Link (f) Contingency management plans for reasonably foreseeable circumstances in respect of the relocation and rebuild of existing Network Utilities during the construction of the City Rail Link; (g) A risk analysis for the relocation and rebuild of existing Network Utilities during the construction of the City Rail Link; (h) Earthworks management (including depth and extent of earthworks and temporary and permanent stabilisation measures), for earthworks in close proximity to existing Network Utilities;

2.3.2

(i) Vibration management and monitoring for works in close proximity to existing Network Utilities;

2.3.2, 4.3.1 & Appendix F

(j) Emergency management procedures in the event of any emergencyinvolving existing Network Utilities; (k) The process for providing as-built drawings showing the relationship of the relocated Network Utilities to the City Rail Link to Network Utility Operators and the timing for providing these drawings;

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

6 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

(l) Measures to ensure that network utilities are not interrupted to the Mt Eden Corrections Facility as a result of City Rail Link works. The requiring authority shall advise the Department of Corrections and the entity contracted by Department of Corrections to administer and runthe Mt Eden Corrections facility at 1 Lauder Road, of any works on network utilities in the vicinity of the Mt Eden Corrections Facility which may impact on utility service provision to the Mt Eden Corrections Facility at least 14 days prior to those works occurring to allow the Department of Corrections (and the entity contracted to administer and run the facility at 1 Lauder Road) to arrange suitable contingencies. Communication and consultation with the Department of Corrections, and the entity contracted to administer and run the facility at 1 Lauder Road, shall be recorded in accordance with condition 15) of this designation. The Requiring Authority shall be responsible for ensuring that construction works do not interrupt network utilities to the Mt Eden Corrections Facility, unless by prior arrangement with Department of Corrections and the entity contracted by Department of Corrections to administer and run the Mt Eden Corrections facility at 1 Lauder Road.

24.5

N/A

(m) A summary of the consultation (including any methods or measures in dispute and the Requiring Authorities response to them) undertaken between the Requiring Authority and any Network UtilityOperators during the preparation of the CEMP.

4.3.1 & Appendix K

If the Requiring Authority and a Network Utility Operator cannot agree on the methods proposed under the CEMP to manage the construction effects on the Operatorâ€™s network utility operation, unless otherwise agreed, each party will appoint a suitably qualified and independent expert, who shall jointly appoint a third such expert to advise the parties and make a recommendation. That recommendation will beprovided by the Requiring Authority as part of the CEMP along with reasons if the recommendation is not accepted.

N/A

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

7 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

1.7

Resource Consent Conditions

The Project falls within the scope of the A2N regional resource consents approved by Auckland Council on 17 November 20165. All works will be carried out in accordance with the CEMP and the plans required by those consents which have been prepared commensurate to the scale of the works proposed. The resource consent conditions are included in Appendix B. Resource consent conditions 35 â€“ 40 outline what is required for the CEMP under the A2N regional consents. Table 3 identifies the relevant sections of the CEMP that address each condition and where management plans identified by the regional consents are located.

R/LUC/2016/1890, R/REG/2016/1892, R/REG/2016/1895, R/REG/2016/1896, REG/2016/1897, R/REG/2016/1898, R/REG/2016/1899, R/REG/2016/1900 and R/REG/2016/2038

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

8 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Table 3 Resource consent conditions from the Aotea to NAL resource consent relating to the CEMP

Condition Number

Condition

Relevant Section of CEMP

Aotea to NAL Resource Consent Conditions Communication and Consultation 25

At least 3 months prior to the commencement of construction, the Consent Holder shall prepare a CCP the purpose of which is to set out a framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in-proximity parties during the construction of the Project.

Blank

The CCP shall be based on and, where appropriate, incorporate the provisions of the PCCP, and shall set out how the Consent Holder will: a. Inform the community and business of construction progress and future construction activities and constraints that could affect them; b. Provide early information on key Project milestones; c. Obtain and specify a reasonable timeframe (being not less than 10 working days), for feedback and inputs from directly affected and affected in-proximity parties regarding the implementation and review of the CEMP or other Management Plans; d. Respond to queries and complaints including but not limited to: i) Who is responsible for responding; ii) How responses will be provided; and iii) The timeframes within which responses will be provided.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

9 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Appendix K

The CCP shall (as a minimum) include: a. A communications framework that details the Consent Holderâ€™s communication strategies, accountabilities, frequency of communications and consultation, the range of communication and consultation tools to be used (including relevant communication methods, newsletters or similar, advertising etc.), and any other relevant communication matters; b. The Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project including 24 hour contact details (phone, email and postal address); c. The 0800 CRL TALK phone number; d. The methods for identifying, communicating and consulting with persons affected by the project including but not limited to: i) All property owners and occupiers of the sites that are identified at Appendix 4, and adjacent to the Projectâ€™s construction sites; ii) Mana Whenua unless any of those named advise the Consent Holder of a different liaison process; iii) Heritage NZ; iv) NZ Transport Agency/ Auckland Motorway Alliance (AMA); v) Kiwirail; vi) Department of Corrections; vii) Ministry of Justice; viii) Network Utility Operators; and ix) The Community and Business Liaison Group (refer Conditions 16-24) e. How stakeholders and persons affected by the Project will be notified of the commencement of construction, the expected duration of the activities and works, and who to contact for any queries, concerns and complaints; f. How stakeholders and persons affected by the Project will be consulted in the development and review of the CEMP and other Management Plans, including specifying reasonable timeframes for feedback; g. A list of stakeholders, directly affected and affected in-proximity parties to the construction works with whom the Consent Holder will communicate; h. A requirement that the Consent Holder shall make any information that is relevant to 22 Stable Lane available to the owner of that property (Christopher Patrick Browne) on request, and advise that owner in the event that any alert or alarm trigger levels are exceeded that are relevant to 22 Stable Lane. In addition, the CCP shall state the method by which Christopher Patrick Browne can make such a request and the anticipated timeframe within which it will be provided; i. A summary of communication and consultation undertaken between the Consent Holder and parties as required by the PCCP. The summary shall include any outstanding issues or disputes raised by parties;

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

10 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

j. How communication and consultation relating to construction activities and monitoring requirements will be recorded; and k. How opportunities to interpret and display archaeological finds within the Project area will be identified and implemented, including how Heritage NZ will be involved in this process. Advice Note: At the time this resource consent was granted, the Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project was Carol Greensmith, phone 0800 CRL TALK. 29

The CCP shall also include (as relevant) linkages and cross-references to the CEMP and other Management Plans.

Noted

The CCP shall be reviewed six monthly for the duration of construction and updated if required. Any updates to the CCP shall be provided to the “key contacts” and the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for review and agreement on any further action to be undertaken.

Noted

Any further action recommended as a result of the review under Condition 30 shall be undertaken by the Consent Holder’s Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project and confirmation of completion shall be provided to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

Noted

If, in the course of amendments undertaken as part of the review process under Condition 30, a material change to the CCP is made, the Consent Holder shall notify those parties affected by the change within 20 working days of the material change occurring.

Noted

The CCP shall be implemented and complied with for the duration of the construction of the Project.

Noted

Construction Management

Prior to the commencement of construction of the Project, the Consent Holder shall prepare a Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) including all certified Management Plans which form part of these conditions to ensure compliance with the resource consents.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

11 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

This document

The CEMP shall include details of:

All sections

a. Final project details and staging of works to illustrate that the works remain within the limits and standards approved under these resource consents and that the construction activities avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on the environment. b. The site or project manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager, including their contact details (phone, email and physical address); c. The “key contacts”; d. Communication and consultation procedures for ensuring that residents, road users and businesses in the immediate vicinity of construction areas are given prior notice of the commencement of construction and are informed about the expected duration and effects of the work. In particular, the procedures shall provide for the following in relation to residents, road users and businesses potentially affected by the construction works: i) consultation prior to the commencement of construction; ii) notice periods for changes to pedestrian and vehicle access; iii) regular updates on construction progress; iv) key dates for major milestones such as road closure and re-opening; and v) communication on any other matters potentially affecting residents or business operations in the vicinity of the works. e. Notice boards that clearly identify the Consent Holder and the Project name, together with the name, telephone number and email address of the Site or Project Manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager; f. General site layout and management; g. An outline of the Project’s construction programme, including construction hours of operation; h. Means of ensuring the safety of the general public; i. Certified Management Plans referred to in these conditions; j. Water Discharge Quality Monitoring Programme; and k. Identification of the suitably independent, qualified Chartered Professional Engineer, or member of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, who will be undertaking the condition surveys required by the conditions of consent. 37

The CEMP shall be provided to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification at least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction

Noted

The Consent Holder shall request the Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination, in writing, as to whether the CEMP can be certified as per the requirements of these consent conditions within 10 working days of receipt of the CEMP.

Noted

Construction shall not commence until written certification is obtained from Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

12 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

The CEMP required by Condition 35 shall be implemented and maintained throughout the entire construction period for the Project, or relevant Project stage, to manage potential adverse effects arising from the construction and shall be updated as necessary (or as required by the review process in Condition 42).

Noted

Any change to the CEMP shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification and no activity reliant upon a change to the CEMP can be undertaken until the change has been certified.

Noted

The Consent Holder shall request the Councilâ€™s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination as to whether the proposed change can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days of submission of the change. 42

The Consent Holder shall review the CEMP and other Management Plans at least annually or

5.7

as a result of a material change to the Project; b. to address unforeseen or materially greater adverse effects arising from construction or c. to address unresolved complaints. 43

A review pursuant to Condition 42 may be initiated by either the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) or the Consent Holder and shall take into consideration:

Noted

a. Compliance with resource consent conditions, the CEMP, other Management Plans and any material changes to these Plans; b. Any changes to construction methods; c. Key changes to roles and responsibilities relating to the Project; d. Relevant changes in industry best practice standards; e. Relevant changes in legal or other requirements; f. Results of monitoring and reporting procedures associated with the management of adverse effects during construction; g. Any comments or recommendations received from Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) or as a result of the CCP process regarding the CEMP and other Management Plans; and h. Any complaints and any response to complaints and remedial action taken to address the complaint as required under Conditions 45-49. 44

A summary of the review process shall be kept by the Consent Holder, provided annually to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring), and advised to and made available to the CLG.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

13 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Noted

Construction Traffic

The Consent Holder shall, so far as is it is reasonably practicable, avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on transport, parking and property access.

Appendix E, section 6

This is to be achieved through the following objectives: a. managing the road transport network for the duration of the construction by adopting the best practicable option to manage congestion; b. maintaining pedestrian access to private property at all times; and c. providing on-going vehicle access to private property to the greatest extent possible. Advice Note: Condition 41 refers to objectives to be achieved. The requirement to provide mechanisms to achieve these objectives is included in the relevant CRL designation conditions. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan

At least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction within a CSA or ACZ, the Consent Holder shall submit to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification an ESCP which provides for the management of all bulk earthworks to minimise any discharge of debris, soil, sediment or sediment-laden water beyond the site to either land and/ or stormwater drainage systems.

4.3.2 & Appendix D

The Consent Holder shall request the Council's (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination as to whether the ESCP can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days of receipt of the ESCP. No construction activity shall commence until certification from Council is provided.

Noted

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

14 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

4.3.2 & Appendix D

An ESCP shall include, but is not limited to, the following matters: • identification of construction zones and construction support areas; • specific erosion and sediment control works for each Active Construction Zone (location, dimensions, capacity supporting calculations and design drawings), which should be in line with Industry Best Practice that will meet or exceed the performance of measures detailed in TP90; • catchment boundaries; • the timing and duration of construction and operation of control works (in relation to the staging and sequencing of earthworks); • details relating to the management of exposed areas; • reference to the Flocculent Treatment Management Plan and confirmation of erosion and sediment control measures necessary to give effect to that plan; • reference to the Contaminated Soils Management Plan and confirmation of erosion and sediment control measures necessary to give effect to that plan; and • monitoring and maintenance requirements, including information on complaint investigation and response procedures, training, and roles and responsibilities.

Any change to an ESCP shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification.

Noted

The Consent Holder shall request the Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) written determination as to whether the proposed change can be certified, to be provided within 10 working days of submission of the change. No activity reliant upon a change to the ESCP can be undertaken until the change has been certified.

Noted

The Consent Holder shall comply with the ESCP for the duration of the earthworks associated with the Project.

Noted

Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan

During construction, the Consent Holder shall implement procedures that will appropriately respond to the information received from the monitoring system, including assessment at each excavation stage of the actual retention and building response against the predictions determined from the detailed design.

Appendix L

The procedures referred to in Condition 96 shall be set out in a GSMCP, prepared and submitted by the Consent Holder at least 20 working days prior to the Commencement of Dewatering, together with a statement from the IBA confirming its adequacy, to the Manager for certification.

Noted

The Consent Holder shall request Council’s (The Manager) determination as to whether the GSMCP can be certified in writing within 10 working days of receipt of the GSMCP.

Noted

No dewatering on the subject site shall commence until certification from the Manager is provided.

Noted

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

15 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

100

The GSMCP required by Condition 97 shall include the requirements of this resource consent including, but not limited to, the following: a. An “as built” survey plan of all monitoring locations based on approximate positions located on the plans entitled: • A02502731, Figure 39, Rev B dated May 2016 and ET Table 7.1 (Appendix 3); and • The plans referred to in Appendix 1 and any further building-specific monitoring requirements determined from the detailed pre-construction building condition assessment. b. Full details (frequency and scope) of groundwater (including construction logs), ground surface, building, retaining wall, building façade, inclinometer monitoring programme and conditions surveys, and frequency and scope of visual inspections required by this consent; c. A bar chart, such as a Gantt chart, showing the timing and frequency of the condition surveys and monitoring required by this consent relative to the Commencement of Dewatering and the Completion of Dewatering; d. Groundwater alert triggers, defined as 90% of predicted drawdown below seasonal low groundwater levels; e. Details of all alert and alarm triggers (including any necessary horizontal and vertical displacements), the frequency of monitoring and the criteria to cease monitoring for each ground, building and retaining wall deformation marks and inclinometers, extensometers. The alert and alarm triggers shall be an update of the provisional triggers provided on drawings CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2640 Rev 4. dated 14 October 2016 and CRL-SYW-RME-000-DRG-2642 Rev 3. dated 11 October 2016; Details of the contingency measures to be implemented if alert or alarm triggers are exceeded, including a Response Plan; g. Identification of any adjacent Services susceptible to damage and details of any pre and post construction monitoring or inspection; h. Details of monitoring proposed to ensure the effects of any ground settlement adjacent to shafts proposed for the installation of new utilities near Mt Eden Station are adequately monitored; i. Details of the monitoring proposed to be undertaken to protect the issued groundwater diversion consents listed below against cumulative settlement effects: i. Consent No. 45735, 46 Upper Queen Street ii. Consent No. 44531, 224 Hobson Street iii. Consent 44857, 106 Vincent Street iv. Consent No. 45635, 210 Federal Street v. Consent No. 44571, 58 Albert Street vi. Consent No. 43162, 26 Poynton Terrace

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

16 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Appendix L

j. Identification of existing basements which could be subject to potential flooding from post-construction groundwater mounding; details of monitoring of long-term groundwater mounding effects; and details of groundwater drain construction to prevent groundwater mounding; and k. The review of the proposed alarm and alert trigger levels in Appendix 2, approved by the IBA, following the preconstruction building condition surveys (required by Condition 109) that confirms they are set to ensure Serviceability Limits will be not be exceeded and whether the monitoring frequency is adequate, possibly requiring further site investigation work where sensitive structures are identified as part of Condition 112. 101

The GSMCP may be varied, including frequency of monitoring, subject to the certification of the Manager, which is contingent on approval of the IBA.

Noted

Advice Note: The Manager will endeavour to determine whether the change can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days of submission of the change. 102

Once certified, the GSMCP shall be implemented for the periods specified in conditions of this consent.

Noted

103

The Consent Holder shall advise the Manager, in writing, of the date of the proposed Commencement of Dewatering.

Noted

Prior to the submission of the GSMCP, the Consent Holder shall employ an independent Senior Qualified Person to undertake, subject to the approval of the property owner, a detailed pre-construction condition survey of all buildings specified in Appendix 2 in order to confirm their existing condition.

Appendix M

Building Inspection 109

The survey and assessment shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. any information about the type of foundations; b. existing levels of damage considered to be of an aesthetic or superficial nature; c. existing levels of damage considered to affect the serviceability of the building where visually apparent and without recourse to intrusive or destructive investigation; d. a professional opinion as to whether observed damage may or may not be associated with actual structural damage; e. susceptibility of the building or structure to further movement; f. specific assessment of building damage with reference to the trigger levels identified in Appendix 2; g. review of proposed alarm and alert trigger levels to confirm they are appropriately set; and h. photographic evidence of (b) and (c).

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

17 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Contaminated Soils Management Plan

131

At least 20 days prior to the commencement of construction (earthworks), the Consent Holder shall provide a Contaminated Soils Management Plan (CSMP) to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification. The CSMP shall be prepared by a Contaminated Land Professional in accordance with the Contaminated Land Management Guidelines, No.1 Reporting on Contaminated Sites in New Zealand, Ministry for the Environment (revised 2011).

Appendix H

132

The Consent Holder shall request that Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) provide a determination to the Consent Holder, in writing, within 10 working days of receipt of the CSMP, whether the CSMP can be certified as per the requirements of the Condition 134.

Noted

133

No earthworks shall commence until

Noted

a.certification is provided from the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) that the CSMP satisfactorily meets the requirements of Schedule 13 (A4) of the ACRP:ALW, and b.all measures identified in that plan as being required to be established prior to the commencement of earthworks have been established. 134

The CSMP shall address the following matters: a. The areas within the project site designated for the excavation works, including depths and extent of the proposed works, and an updated map/s showing the land disturbance activity areas b. Excavation, management, and disposal procedures for soil, sediment, dust, surface run-off water, perched groundwater, and groundwater, if encountered c. Temporary containment, treatment, and testing procedures for any water getting in contact with the contaminated material if the disposal option is to the stormwater system or the marine environment is considered d. Contingency measures for unexpected discovery of contamination e. Proposed sampling and analysis, if applicable; and f. Any proposed works summary reporting. Advice Note: The Council acknowledges that the CSMP is intended to provide flexibility of for the management of the works and contaminant discharge. Accordingly, the Plan may need to be further updated. Any updates must be limited to the scope of this consent and consistent with the conditions of this consent. If you would like to confirm that any proposed updates are within scope, or have any other queries, please contact the Council (Team Leader Earth and Stream Works, Trees, and Contaminated Land, Natural Resources and Specialist Input) on (09) 301 0101.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

18 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Appendix H, sections 2.0 & 5.0

Air Quality Management Plan

223

The final AQMP/s shall be prepared by a Senior Qualified Person, provided to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification at least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction and shall include: a. a clear identification of the type and location of the controls proposed; b. a detailed framework for the management, mitigation and monitoring of construction and earthworks activities associated with the Project; c. a focus principally on the sources of dust discharges, and d. an assessment of the risk of discharges from each ACZ and the associated CSA.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

19 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Appendix I, sections 2.0, 3.3, 4.0 & 5.0

224

The final AQMP/s shall also provide detailed methods including, but not limited to, the following matters: a. methods to ensure exposed surfaces remain dampened to minimise dust emissions (possible examples include a water spray system or other suitable system, water carts and other suppression methods); b. ensuring a 20 km/hr vehicle speed limit within the ACZs and CSAs; c. operation of wheel washes; d. regular sweeping of public roads around the exit points of ACZs and CSAs and sealed vehicle accessways within these areas; e. measures for supressing dust from any temporary stock piles (demonstrating how they are to be limited to no more than 24 mÂł of uncovered spoil at any one time in each ACZ); f. measures for the handling of cement associated with the forming of cement stabilised columns, including filter systems and high level alarms where a silo is used; g. covering of loads of material being delivered and removed from the site; h. instrument monitoring of dust concentrations (including identification of a monitoring methodology, monitoring network and appropriate alert thresholds) to ensure that any significant dust effects arising from the ACZs or CSAs are identified and remedied as soon as practicable throughout the Project; i. the locations of instrument dust monitoring sites, including at least three re-locatable and/or fixed monitors to be associated with each of ACZs A, K and M, and the duration of this monitoring; j. measures for responding to continuous instrument dust monitoring trigger alarms, including contingency measures to reduce measured concentrations below the trigger thresholds and provisions for responding after standard operating hours; k. measures for undertaking meteorological observations and visual inspections of dust or other air discharges from the Project, to be completed at least on a daily basis, with all relevant information logged; and l. information regarding complaint logging, investigation and response procedures, training and roles and responsibilities. The Team Leader Central Monitoring shall be requested to respond to the AQMP/s with any suggested changes within 10 working days from receipt of the AQMP; otherwise the AQMP may be considered by the Consent Holder to be certified by the Council.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

20 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Appendix I, sections 3.0 & 4.0

Project Description

2.1

CRL Overview

The CRL project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line (NAL) in the vicinity of Mt Eden station. The proposed works include the construction of twin underground rail tunnels and two underground stations using cut and cover methods, and tunnel boring methods, up to 42 m below ground. The complex nature and substantial size of the project has meant that the project has been broken up into multiple different packages. This CEMP specifically relates to the removal or cut back of canopies and the relocation of utilities along Albert Street, from Wellesley Street to Victoria Street West. The proposed works are described in more detail in sections 2.2 and 2.3 below.

2.2

Canopy Removal and Utilities Relocation

To enable suitable site access, there is a requirement to remove or cut back the canopies of the buildings located along the western side of Albert Street, between Wellesley Street and Victoria Street West. The following properties are subject to the canopy removal works:

   

99 Albert Street (AA Building) 105 Albert Street (Manhattan Apartments) 109-125 Albert Street (Sky City Building) 135 Albert Street (Auckland Council Building)

The network of buried pipes and cables under Albert Street will need to be permanently diverted to enable construction of the station. The existing services will be relocated into a shared services trench approximately 4.0m in depth by 1.5m in width, located in the space between the new station wall and the existing buildings. Based on the approximate distance from the corners of Albert Street with Wellesley Street and Victoria Street West, it is estimated the trench will be about 220m long and the excavated volume about 1,320m 3. Figure 1 to follow shows the worksite layout, pedestrian pathways and hoarding locations.

Figure 1 Worksite layout, temporary pedestrian pathways and hoardings

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

21 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

2.3

Construction Methodology

2.3.1

Canopy Removal / Dismantling / Cut-backs

The canopy removal or cut back works, specifically the extent of dismantling / removal, is different for each building, however there are common methodologies that will apply to each stage, and similar tools and techniques will be used throughout, as detailed in the schedule below. The equipment listed in Table 4 below will be supplemented by normal hand tools, ladders and handheld power tools. Table 4 Indicative canopy removal or cut back construction methodology

Activity

Equipment & Materials

Set up and prepare site, install temporary traffic management (TTM), and erosion and sediment control (ESC) provisions and install pedestrian pathways;



For AA and Manhattan – via existing undercroft



For Sky City and Auckland Council – Container walkways

Approx. Duration

Trucks, signage, cones, mobile crane, excavator, containers, barriers, hoardings

2 weeks

Scaffold, gas welder / cutting torch, cherry picker, mobile crane, trucks.

Up to 8 weeks, for each building.

Provide pedestrian access to affected building entrances. Provide vehicle access to Manhattan and Sky City car parks. Terminate all power supplies to and relocate any and all plant, equipment and signage currently located on those parts of the canopy to be removed. Erect scaffold, dismantle and remove building canopy or cut-back to agreed position.



Remove glazing/panel/roof sections



Remove roof/secondary supports between main support beams



Remove primary support beams

Install weatherproof flashing to building façade and make good.

Total

2.3.2

No hammer drills or percussion tools to be used, to minimize noise and vibration.

Scaffold, trucks, cherry picker, mobile crane, hand tools. Approximately

2 weeks, for each building.

20 weeks

Utility Services Relocation

Following canopy removals or cut-backs, below ground works will commence on the shared utility services trench. The trench will be excavated in two stages; first stage to 1.5m depth, around existing ducts and cables; second stage to approximately 4.0m depth, for installation of new stormwater and wastewater mains. Hydro-vac excavation will be used where ever possible, to minimise noise and vibration, and

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

22 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

to protect existing buried services. Temporary pedestrian and vehicle bridges will be provided where the trench runs across building entrances. The trench will also be backfilled in two discrete stages; first stage to backfill over the new pipes to approximately 1.5m below ground level; second stage to backfill around the new ducts and cables to the surface. After the first stage of backfilling, the new stormwater and wastewater mains will be tested, then individual property connections (branches) installed, allowing installation of the water supply main. The water main will be tested and then connected to the individual properties. Cable ducts for power and telecommunications cables are then laid in the trench, and the trench is then backfilled to the surface. Cable joint pits are then excavated, cables pulled through the ducts, and cables cutover and connected to individual properties. This section of the work includes power and communications outages, which will be planned and coordinated with building occupants, to minimise disruption. Abandoned or redundant services will then be removed from the station wall piling line, all excavations backfilled and the footpath pavement reinstated. The equipment listed in Table 5 below will be supplemented by hand tools, ladders and hand-held power tools. Table 5 Indicative utilities relocation construction methodology

Activity

Equipment & Materials

Approx. Duration

Mark out proposed footprint of trench section (up to 50m length). Identify and locate existing services on surface.

Trucks, Hand held service locator

2 weeks

Saw cut and remove existing pavement (pavement is primarily asphalt surfacing, with isolated granite tile inserts). This would be done in brief periods progressively along the trench.

Concrete saw, handheld concrete breaker – only where necessary, excavator, trucks

2 - 3 weeks for the overall length of the trench; 2 – 3 days in front of each building

Expose and support existing services to 1.5m depth– maintain all vehicle and pedestrian access with temporary crossings.

HydroVac and normal excavator, trucks

6 weeks

Excavate trench to maximum 4m depth, using mini excavator, carefully working around struts and services. Provide temporary strutting & shoring to trench sides, with timbers or trench shield, as appropriate.

Generally using mini excavator. Truck mounted crane, excavator, trench shields

3 weeks

Lay pipe bedding and install new wastewater and stormwater pipes, connect to downstream discharge points.

Excavator, plate compactor, truck mounted or mobile crane

4 – 6 weeks

This would be done in brief periods progressively along the trench.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

23 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Backfill approximately half trench depth,

Trucks, excavator, plate compactor (no vibrating rollers)

4 -6 weeks

Draw cables through new ducts (where required) and cut-over live mains. Place and compact remaining sections of trench backfill

Truck mounted crane, excavator

10 weeks

Total

Approximately

Lay new power and communication ducts, place and compact trench backfill where possible. Excavation for draw pits and joint bays and connection points to be left open.

2.4

40 weeks

Programme

The Project is anticipated to take approximately 15 months to construct based on Connectus and CRLLâ€™s best knowledge of underground services and therefore, the scope of work considered at the time of preparing this CEMP. Should additional complexity or additional underground services be encountered during the course of the Project, then the Project duration will extend beyond 15 months. To ensure the Project works are undertaken as quickly and efficiently as possible, construction sequence activities may be performed in parallel, i.e. canopies removed/cut-back from more than one building simultaneously. The approximate timing of these main activities is shown in Table 4 and Table 5 above.

2.5

Hours of Operation

The designation conditions require that a number of noise and vibration limits are adhered to which restrict noise and vibration generating activity to between 0700 and 2200 (designation conditions 31 to 35). However, works will generally be undertaken between 0700 and 1900 Monday to Saturday.

2.6

Site Layout and Management

Figure 2 to follow shows an indicative site layout for the Project works area from a traffic management perspective.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

24 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Figure 2 Project area layout

2.7

Security, Safety and Public Viewing

Pedestrians on Albert Street will be separated from the Project area via a variety of hoardings such as containers and solid barriers, which will ensure their safety is maintained and provide a view of the work site where possible. These hoardings also secure the work site area and assist in providing a safe working environment for the construction contractors. Pedestrian access along the western side of Albert Street will be maintained through the construction period. Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 to follow provide examples of how pedestrian access will be managed adjacent to the work site.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

25 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Figure 3 Examples of container approach to pedestrian hoarding and safety management

Figure 4 Hoarding outside Auckland Council, 135 Albert Street

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

26 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Figure 5 Hoarding outside AA centre, 99 Albert Street

2.8

Graffiti and Litter

Security fences and hoardings will be inspected for integrity and graffiti as part of a weekly environmental inspection. A small quantity of paint will be kept on site to paint over graffiti rapidly. The Construction Contractor will target painting over graffiti within 48 hours of identifying the problem (although this may take longer if it requires working at height). The site will be inspected for litter via the daily work site maintenance programme. The Construction Contractor and CRLL will discourage graffiti by putting murals and project information on hoardings (where practicable) to avoid providing a blank canvas for graffiti. CRLL will continue to work with businesses to assist in the regular removal of waste from the Project area.

2.9

Returning the Site to Public Use

This will be detailed in the Urban Design DWP which will be prepared as part of a subsequent Outline Plan process for the CRL Main works.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

27 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Social and Environmental Management

This CEMP presents a framework of principles, environmental policy and performance standards as well as processes for implementing appropriate environmental management. The methods for achieving this are presented in detail in the sections below.

3.1

Construction Activities and Associated Environmental Receivers

Key construction activities associated with the Project include the removal/dismantling of building canopies and excavation of the utilities trench. These activities have the potential to affect different aspects of the environment (e.g. traffic, noise). The DWPs and MPs attached to this CEMP detail mitigation measures specific to the environmental aspect and detail further the construction activity which causes the potential effect.

3.2

Environmental Risk Register

The Project Risk Register includes environmental risks for the construction activities related to the Project. A risk register for the Project will be developed by the Construction Contractor and stored in their document management system. The information contained in the risk register provides a guide for the implementation of environmental management activities, controls and monitoring, thus minimising environmental impacts.

3.2.1

Review of the Register

The risk register is a â€˜living documentâ€™ and will be constantly updated to address changing conditions, revised methodologies and each new work area. The Environment and Sustainability Manager (ESM) is required to maintain and review environmental risks within the register. The risk register will be reviewed prior to the commencement of construction activities (taking into account finalised construction methodologies), at regular intervals and when there is a new or changed activity, equipment or location. Changes to legislative requirements may also drive risk register reviews. The register will be reviewed on a quarterly basis as a minimum. The ESM, with the assistance of environmental and technical experts, will determine whether the CEMP and plans require revision to reflect the revised risk assessment. CRLL, as the consent holder, will be responsible for obtaining AC approvals, if any are required, prior to commencing any new or changed activities. The ESM will inform the relevant staff, Project Director and management team of any changes to the environmental risks within the Project risk register.

3.3

Cumulative Effects

Methods to address cumulative effects are outlined for specific activities within the suite of plans attached to this CEMP. Monitoring for each area includes methods to ensure the effects from the Project are well understood and delineated from effects of concurrent construction projects in proximity.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

28 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

3.4

Legislative and Other Requirement

This section details the statutory framework and other requirements for environmental management on the Project and outlines the relevant legislation, policies, plans and consents.

3.4.1

National Legal Requirements and Policies

The Construction Contractor will comply with all relevant legislation and will employ best practice environmental management procedures. Key environmental legislation for management of the Project is identified in Table 6 below. Table 6 Key national legislation, regulations and standards

National legislation, regulations, strategies and policies Resource Management Act 1991 Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 Protected Objects Act 1975 for the relevant archaeological and heritage standards/practices Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 National Environmental Standard – Air Quality 2004 (NEW:AQ) National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health Regulations 2011

The Construction Contractor will identify, maintain and continually evaluate compliance with legal and other related requirements that are applicable to delivery of the Project.

3.4.2

Legislation, Standards and Guidelines relating to Environmental Aspects

Table 7 identifies legislation, standards and guidelines which are relevant to specific environmental aspects of the Project and will be read in conjunction with the relevant DWPs and MPs of this CEMP. Table 7 Standards, guidelines and specific statutory requirements associated with environmental aspects and detailed in the CEMP and plans

Environmental Aspect/Plan Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Plan Statutory Requirements, Guidelines and Standards 

NZS 6803:1999 Acoustics – Construction Noise



DIN 4150-3:1999 Structural Vibration (German standard)



BS 5228:2009 Code of Practice for Noise and Vibration Control on Structures (British Standard)



NZS 6801:2008 Measurement of Sound



NZS 6802:2008 Assessment of Environmental Sound

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

29 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4



Ministry for Environment, Good Practice Guide for Assessing and Managing the Environmental Effects of Dust Emissions 2001



AS/NZ 3580.1.1: 2007 Method for sampling and analysis of ambient air – Guide to siting air monitoring equipment



National Environmental Standard for Air Quality (AQNES)



Auckland Regional Council – TP90 - Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Land Disturbing Activities



Auckland Regional Council – TP10 – Design Guideline Manual Stormwater Treatment Devices



Ministry for Environment A Guide to the Management of Cleanfills 2002



Health and Safety in Employment (Asbestos) Regulations 1998



Department of Labour Guidelines for the Management and removal of Asbestos (revised) 1999



Ministry for Environment, Contaminated Land Management Guidelines No 1 to 5



National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health Regulations 2011

Traffic Access and Parking DWP



Auckland City Council Manual of Temporary Traffic Management

Historic Character DWP



Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014

Air Quality DWP

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan

Contaminated DWP

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

30 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Implementation and Operation

This section addresses how the CEMP, DWPs and MPs will be implemented. Details around the following are provided:

     

Roles and responsibilities; Training and induction; Operating Procedures; Emergency and Incident Responses; Communication and Interfaces; and Complaints Management.

4.1

Roles and Responsibilities

4.1.1

Overview and Responsibility for this Plan

Each person involved in the Project has equal responsibility to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse environmental effects. There are three key groups with responsibility for environmental management of the Project:

  

CRLL as the Project owner; Connectus, the construction contractor undertaking the works; and AC which audits the works and monitors compliance with resource consent conditions, the CEMP, DWPs and MPs.

Connectus will appoint an ESM as part of the Construction Team during the construction phase of the Project. The ESM will be involved throughout this period to give advice and to ensure that the CEMP and plans are implemented and maintained. Further details of responsibilities during the construction phase are included below.

4.1.2

Specific Roles and Responsibilities

The key management roles for each organisation in relation to environmental management during the construction of the Project are outlined in Table 8. Key roles of personnel as they relate to environmental management during the construction of the Project are detailed below. Roles and responsibilities of personnel which implement specific environmental controls and monitoring programs (such as the contaminated land specialist and archaeologist) are detailed in the relevant Plans.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

31 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Table 8 Specific roles and responsibilities

Organisation

Role

Responsibilities

City Rail Link Ltd

Requiring Authority, Consent Holder and Project Manager

CRLL Project Director

CRLL C2 Construction Manager

Identifying and managing project risks and issues.

Regular reporting to the CRLL Board, CRL Steering Group and Project Control and Integration Group. AC and other key stakeholders.

Managing performance of the Contractor. Responsible for the Contractor’s adherence to DWPs.

o o

CRLL Consents Manager

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Providing strategic direction to all workstreams to provide an integrated approach to the delivery of the CRL. Overseeing project planning, acquisition, design, constructability, procurement, stakeholder engagement, communications, programme and financial control.

CRLL Communications Manager

Overall responsibility for project compliance and performance in relation to environment, quality assurance and incident management. Obtaining new or altered resource consents required during construction (if any). Key contact for monitoring compliance. Attendance at monthly meetings with Connectus ‘Key contact’ and AC Consent Monitoring Officers.

Manager of CRL Communications for CRLL and responsible for communicating key aspects of Project to stakeholders, affected parties and general public. Manages CRL Communications Strategy and is point of contact for CRLL. Manages CBLGs for Project. Manages CRLL’s online presence, specifically the CRLL website. Main point of contact for implementation of, and compliance with CRL designation and resource consent conditions.

32 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

CRLL Construction Safety Manager

o o

CRLL C2.1/2.2 Project Manager

o o

CRLL Street Response Manager

o o

Construction Contractor Connectus

Project Director/Construction Manager

o o o

Stakeholder and Communications Manager

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Health and Safety regime for the CRL enabling works. Being informed of all incidents, according to severity and time scales as outlined in the Health and Safety Plan for Connectus Reporting to the AT Rail Systems and Safety Assurance Manager. Performance oversight of Construction, Coordinate different CRLL (client) work streams to provide quality and timely client inputs and decisions. Liaise fortnightly with the Project affected community regarding project progress and scheduled works in conjunction with the Stakeholder and Communications Manager. Manages CRL street response measures including street cleaning, graffiti removal. Co-ordinates Albert Street Business Promotion events. Co-ordinates CRL Business Support Programme (Business Pack). Proactively identifying opportunities to mitigate impact on businesses. Construction delivery. Ensuring site personnel adhere to the CEMP and delivery work plans. Leading the process and providing expertise in specialist areas. Alerting the Stakeholder and Communications Manager to stakeholder groups, individuals or issues that need attention. Providing technical information and project progress/milestone information to CRLL for briefings and CLG meetings. Leading the response to issues management and crisis management. Ensuring that subcontractors adhere to the Project communication protocols and procedures. The main and readily accessible point of contact for persons affected by the Project in addition to the 24-hour inquiries service.

33 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

o o

Inform the community of project progress and likely commencement of construction works and programme. Liaise fortnightly with the Project affected community. Manage stakeholder enquiries and working with relevant persons in the team to resolve complaints. Immediately report high risk issues to the CRLL Project Manager and the CRLL Communications Manager. Report weekly to CRLL Project Manager and the Communications Manager on all key community relations and stakeholder management issues. Work with the CRLL Communications Manager to manage and track stakeholder relations and risks. Assist the CRLL Communications team with: - stakeholders communications; - delivering communications activity; and - media enquiries

Provide communications collateral and strategic advice to Connectus Project Director/Construction Manager on critical stakeholder engagement, communications and relationship building. Assist the Construction Manager in the briefing of site personnel with respect to - the mandatory site inductions regarding the standards and requirements for community relations; - the protocols to follow if they are approached by a member of the public or the media; and - behaviour protocols in and around the construction site boundaries.

Environmental and Sustainability Manager (ESM)

o o

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Key contact for compliance monitoring. Inspections, auditing and checking of environmental management practices and procedures. On-site compliance with consent conditions and other requirements

34 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

o o

o o o Project and Site Engineers

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

and tracking compliance information. Attendance at compliance meetings with Auckland Council Compliance and Monitoring Officers. Report to CRLL changes to construction techniques or natural environmental changes which require alterations to existing consents or new resource consents. Prepare (with assistance from Technical Specialists), review and update CEMP and relevant subplans. Facilitate and oversee environmental monitoring. Update and maintain the environmental portion of the Project Risk Register. Training of all staff including subcontractors. Reporting on environmental and sustainability KPIs. Undertaking incident investigations. Development, management and monitoring of Construction Execution Procedures (CEPs). Including incorporating environmental and sustainability requirements into the detailed CEPs developed on site. Overseeing subcontractors.

35 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Subcontractors

4.1.2.1

Directing all public and media enquiries to the Stakeholder and Communications Manager.

Identifying themselves as a member of the project team and the company they work for. Using approved haul routes so that access to and egress from the sites is undertaken with minimum disruption to the local community.

Parking only in designated project parking areas, if available

Working within approved construction hours.

Working within the conditions specified in the Permits to Notify.

Showing consideration for stakeholders and community members at all times while working on the project and when travelling to and from the project site.

All Staff

 

Attending project induction tool-box talks;

 

Ensuring that required processes and procedures for environmental management are followed;



Within day to day work responsibilities, ensure the environment both on site and adjacent to the site is protected and respected;

 

Ensure the site is tidy and all litter is placed in bins; and

Responsible for reporting environmental incidents, complaints, defects and other problem areas to senior staff as they arise on site;

Ensuring that environmental mitigation and protection measures are maintained and working correctly;

Ensure all graffiti is removed from the site boundary and security fences as soon as possible.

4.1.2.2

Project Director

 

Takes ultimate responsibility for compliance with resource consent conditions;

 

Approves environmental plans prior to issue; and

Notifies CRLL of any environmental non-compliances (e.g. AC, Heritage New Zealand) or other environmental incidents;

Ensures adequate resources are provided to ensure environmental issues and obligations are appropriately managed.

4.1.2.3



Stakeholder and Communications Manager

Responsible for notifying residents of Project works in accordance with the CCP and SIBDDWP;

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

36 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

 

Disseminates information to the public as approved by CRLL; and Primary contact for Project related complaints and enquiries.

4.1.2.4

Environmental and Sustainability Manager



Provides leadership to ensure staff are motivated to achieve environmental standards, and comply with all resource consent and designation conditions;



Develops, implements and reviews environmental management systems including the CEMP and plans for the Project;



Co-ordinates the interfaces and communications with external agencies and stakeholders in relation to environmental management on the Project in conjunction with Communication and Consultation Manager;



Manages and co-ordinates all consents required (current), and construction monitoring and maintains and submits relevant reporting and records to the AC and CRLL, as required;



Undertakes regular site inspections and audits to ensure compliance with the CEMP and plans and consent conditions;

  

Input records of all environmental monitoring results to Fulcrum;



Coordinates all site monitoring including but not limited to groundwater, settlement, water quality, dust, noise, and vibration monitoring and provides necessary related training and advice to staff in relation to this monitoring;

    

Trains staff in site specific environmental procedures;



Ensures spill kits are available and stocked and provides training on equipment use.

Coordinates environmental interfaces with consultants, subcontractors and suppliers; Coordinates site archaeological monitoring and protection requirements and provides necessary training and advice to site staff;

Coordinates environmental emergency responses; Notifies Project Director of any significant environmental non-compliances; Responsible for resolving issues of environmental non-compliances; Manages maintenance and monitoring of the effectiveness of erosion and sediment controls, stormwater devices and other control devices; and

4.1.2.5

   

Project Technical Specialists

Prepares the DWPs and MPs for the CEMP; Undertakes monitoring as required by the individual DWPs and MPs; Liaise with the ESM to confirm compliance with the DWPs and MPs; Provide assistance to the ESM on technical matters.

4.1.2.6

Project Engineer



Provides leadership to the site team to achieve Project environmental objectives and targets to ensure a high level of performance is achieved;



Responsible for ensuring environmental controls and erosion and sediment control works are installed, modified and maintained as appropriate for each stage of construction;



Assists in the development, implementation and review of Project environmental objectives; and

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

37 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4



Ensures all staff on-site are aware of environmental requirements at all times and sees that routine maintenance to erosion sediment control facilities and management measures continue with ongoing effectiveness.

4.1.3

   

Contact Details

Project Director – Chris Powell - Chris.Powell@connectus.net.nz Environmental Manager – John Surphlis - John.Surphlis@mcdgroup.com H&S Advisor – Glenn Taylor - glenn.taylor@connectus.net.nz Stakeholder Manager – Alan Howard-Smith - alan.howard-smith@hawkins.co.nz

4.2

Training and Induction

All personnel will receive training of a type and level of detail that is appropriate for the environmental aspects of their routine and emergency work assignments. As a minimum, all personnel are required to satisfactorily complete the Project Induction Training. Other mechanisms of communicating environmental controls are through the induction training, weekly tool box talks and prestart meetings, all of which are described below.

4.2.1

Induction Training

The Project Induction includes a presentation of the requirements of this CEMP and in particular the requirements of the issue specific plans, incident response, emergency procedures and spill management. The purpose of the induction is to ensure that, at a minimum, the employee or subcontractor is aware of the main environmental requirements for their scope of work, including:



Understands the importance of conforming with the environmental policy and procedures and to the requirements of this CEMP; and



Is aware of the emergency response and incident procedures.

4.2.2

Tool Box Talks

Weekly tool box talks are conducted for site personnel to deliver specific training in an aspect of work or controls. This may include spill kit training or correct erection of a silt fence. This training provides site personnel with ongoing environmental training and information throughout the Project. Participants in tool box talks shall sign the attendance sheet.

4.2.3

Pre-Start Meetings

Pre-start meetings are used by the supervisors and foremen to explain the work to be done in the upcoming shift. All operational aspects of the task are discussed including safety and environmental issues and controls, particularly if there are new hazards or if there has been a recent incident. An environmental management representative will attend as applicable to explain new environmental controls or reiterate existing controls. Pre-start meetings will be undertaken in accordance with the A2N regional consent requirements.

4.3

Operating Procedures

The following sections of the CEMP describe the environmental aspects associated with the construction phase of the Project along with the operational controls and mitigation measures. The DWPs and MPs of this CEMP detail the controls and measures for each environmental aspect are cross-referenced.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

38 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

4.3.1

Network Utilities

Consultation and co-ordination with Network Utility Operators (NUO) will be ongoing throughout the duration of the construction of the Project and will continue to be undertaken in accordance with the ‘Principles and Objectives’ and ‘How we will communicate and consult’ sections of the CCP (Appendix K). The Construction Contractor will also utilise the strategies outlined in the Engagement Tools section of the Communication and Consultation Plan. The following NUO’s have been consulted with in order to ensure the continued operation of Network Utilities throughout construction of the Project (unless otherwise agreed with the NUO) and to ensure that relocation and protection of applicable utilities occurs prior to and during Project Construction:

       

Vector Electricity Vector Gas Vector Communications Chorus Vodafone AC Stormwater Watercare Services City Link

Consultation has included weekly workshops and ongoing liaison through emails, phone calls, and meetings. No methods or measures of construction were disputed during consultation. Prior to excavation works for utility relocations, all utilities in the excavation area will be physically identified by GPR (Ground Penetrating Radar) (or similar techniques) and marked out on the ground. In order to ensure the continued operation of the utilities and to ensure the NUO have access to existing utilities for maintenance/emergency access and repair at all reasonable times, regular consultation and coordination with all NUOs will be undertaken throughout construction of the Project. This will be through workshops, regularly scheduled meetings, phone calls and emails. 4.3.1.1

Provision of Drawings to Network Utility Operators

All new utilities being installed on the Project will be surveyed by a registered surveyor and transferred into a drawing which satisfies each of the NUOs specific ‘as built’ requirements. This information will be provided to the NUOs via CRLL.

4.3.2

Erosion and Sediment Control

An ESCP has been prepared to satisfy the relevant A2N resource consent conditions 53 – 58 and is included in Appendix D. The ESCP provides for the management of all earthworks operations to minimise any discharge of debris, soil, sediment or sediment laden water beyond the site to either land and/or stormwater drainage systems. The ESCP follows the principles of Erosion and Sediment Control which are well understood by the contracting industry and are based on Auckland Council’s Technical Publication 90 ‘Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Land Disturbing Activities in the Auckland Region’ (referred to as ‘TP90’). Earthworks activities will involve trenching on the western side of Albert Street between Victoria and Wellesley Streets (approx. 200m). Excavations will generally occur in the footpath area between existing buildings and the existing kerb line, up to approximately 4m deep. Excavations are to install new services and remove existing redundant services. Additional trenching to make connections to existing utility networks will be required at both Victoria and Wellesley Street intersections with Albert Street.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

39 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Material from the trenching activities will be removed from site to an approved disposal location. Backfill to trenches will be approved imported fill material in accordance with NUO specifications and A2N resource consent conditions. Sediment loading is anticipated to be low as construction works will be undertaken using the following controls to minimise erosion potential and reduce sediment loads to the receiving stormwater network prior to discharge from the Construction Support Area (CSA) and works area, unless otherwise proposed in the ESCP:



The work site shall include perimeter hoardings to ensure separation of the work site from the public. Ensure the hoarding lines are installed with solid barriers at the base with waterproof seal to existing pavements to divert stormwater away from the construction support areas to existing catchpits;

During an unforeseen rainfall event that limits on carrying out the work, the work shall be stopped and the erosion and sediment control measures shall be checked and upgraded or modified where necessary prior to commencing work again;

 

All catch pits within and in the vicinity of the works site to be protected by inlet protection;



Excavated material shall be loaded straight onto trucks where possible (and covered prior to removal). If spoil/ fill or demolition debris is to be stored on site, material shall be placed within a bunded area using super silt fences or a similar alternative such as covering the stockpile with geotextile. Stockpiles will not be located in an area where runoff cannot be controlled;



Any suspected contaminated materials encountered will be notified to the Engineer and removed from site to appropriate landfill as contaminated soils until soil testing confirms otherwise and are suitable for managed fill disposal;

  

Covered truck loads for material/ spoil transport to and from the construction site;



Access points are expected to be impervious stabilised areas (asphalt) however if bare earth is exposed, stabilised entry/exit points shall be provided;



As vehicles are not expected to be accessing exposed areas, wash down areas and facilities are not proposed to be provided. If vehicles access exposed areas, a washdown area and facility will need to be provided to ensure vehicles leaving the site are ‘clean’.



Road sweeping will be carried out along the adjacent streets where trucks leave the site to ensure that no residual material is left behind which may be hazardous to traffic and pedestrians; and



No discharge of surface or groundwater to wastewater systems is proposed.

All surface and ground water flows to be collected by localised sumps within the excavation area and pumped to a settlement tank within the CSA prior to discharge or be removed by sucker truck where no space for a settlement tank is available;

Water will be available on call to wet down pavement areas to prevent dust movement; Surface site runoff within the CSA shall generally be collected against hoarding lines and directed to existing catch pits. Where flows cannot be collected prior to discharge from the site filter socks (or similar), measures shall be put in place to ensure flows are collected and treated prior to discharge from site;

The footpath will be reinstated to its pre-existing impervious condition on completion of the works.

4.3.3

Traffic, Access and Parking

A Transport, Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan (TAPDWP) has been developed to satisfy the relevant CRL designation conditions (10, 25 and 27) is included in Appendix E. The objective of the TAPDWP is to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on transport, parking and property access by managing the road transport network for the duration of construction, maintaining

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

40 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

pedestrian access to private property as all times, and provided on-going vehicle access so far as is reasonably practicable. The TAPDWP outlines onsite car parking management and methods for encouraging travel to the site using forms of transport other than private vehicles to assist in mitigating localised traffic effects. Critical contractor parking will be provided for on site.

4.3.4

Construction Noise and Vibration

Construction Noise and Vibration is addressed by the Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (CNVMP) Appendix F and has been developed to satisfy the relevant CRL designation conditions (10, 36, 37 and 38). Construction noise and vibration will be generated by construction equipment and activities at the site. Throughout the construction phase, noise and vibration effects will be carefully managed through the implementation of the CNVMP and, where required, the preparation and implementation of Site Specific Noise and Vibration Management Plans (SSNVMP).

4.3.5

Lighting Spill and Glare

During construction, temporary lighting may be required in the main construction areas where sufficient natural light is not available to undertake the works. Spill lighting may cause a nuisance to surrounding residents and businesses. Glare from temporary light has the potential to cause a disabling effect to drivers of vehicles. The principal objectives for the management of temporary lighting are to:

ď‚§ ď‚§

Minimise the nuisance level to adjacent residents/building occupiers of the works; and Minimise the impact of glare on the surrounding road environment; and increase employee and subcontractor awareness of their obligations with regard to minimising effects of light spill on adjacent neighbours.

The Construction Contractor will minimise light spill by selecting / procuring light fittings that provide a defined directional beam. Lights will be mounted in elevated positions so that they may point down towards the works, rather than aiming across the work space and increasing the risk of light shining into adjacent buildings. Additional detail for lighting of pedestrian areas is contained in the SIBD DWP in Appendix J of the CEMP.

4.3.6

Historic Character: Archaeology

A Historic Character DWP (HCDWP) is included in Appendix G has been developed to satisfy the relevant CRL designation conditions (10 and 42) and addresses the management of any adverse archaeological effects that may result during the Project. A built heritage section is not required as the buildings in proximity to the works area are late 20th century buildings with no built heritage values. This DWP will therefore only cover archaeology and will not include built heritage as it is not applicable to the works. The HCDWP establishes procedures to be followed in the event of archaeological remains being discovered. An Archaeological Authority under Section 44(a) of the Heritage NZ Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 (HNZPTA) has been obtained6. The management of any pre-1900 archaeological sites exposed within the Project area must be carried out in accordance with the designation conditions and the Archaeological Authority.

Ref 2017/793 dated 31 May 2017

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

41 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

4.3.7

Urban Design

As this CEMP is specific to enabling works for the CRL it does not include provisions for Urban Design. These will be addressed on a project wide basis in a subsequent Outline Plan which will address such matters through an Urban Design DWP (UDDWP). This approach will ensure consistency of urban design outcomes across all aspects of the CRL project.

4.3.8

Contaminated Soils

A Contamination DWP (CDWP) is included in Appendix H and has been developed to satisfy both the relevant A2N resource consents (conditions 131 – 134) and the CRL designation conditions (10 and 57). The CDWP provides the framework for managing contamination hazards and mitigation measures relevant to the expected conditions that will be encountered while earthworks are being undertaken. The CDWP outlines proposed soil management and contingency measures, and also addresses Health and Safety issues associated with construction works on contaminated land.

4.3.9

Air Quality

During the construction phase there is potential for the discharge of contaminants to air, such as dust. An Air Quality DWP (AQDWP) is included in Appendix I and has been developed to satisfy both the relevant A2N resource consents (conditions 223 – 224) and the CRL designation conditions (10 and 59). The purpose of this AQDWP is to avoid, remedy or mitigate the actual or potential adverse air quality effects during construction.

4.3.10

Social Impact and Business Disruption

During the construction of the Project there is potential for disruption to businesses, residents and community services/facilities to occur. A Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP (SIBDDWP) in included in Appendix J and has been developed to satisfy the relevant CRL designation conditions (10 and 61). Feedback obtained in the preparation of this DWP has reinforced the importance of regular communication between the Project team and affected parties during the period of construction.

4.3.11

Communications and Consultation Plan

A Communication and Consultation Plan (CCP) has been prepared for the Project to satisfy both the relevant A2N resource consents (conditions 25 – 33) and the CRL designation conditions (10 and 15) and is included in Appendix K. The CCP sets out a framework for communication and consultation with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and in proximity parties during construction and should be read in conjunction with the SIBDDWP.

4.3.12

Groundwater Settlement Monitoring and Contingency

A Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan (GSMCP) has been prepared to satisfy the relevant A2N resource consent conditions 96 - 103 and is included in Appendix L. The objective of the GSMCP is to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of groundwater drawdown and settlement on structures in proximity to the Project area. The GSMCP is prepared in conjunction with building condition surveys of those structures.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

42 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

4.3.13

Building Condition Surveys

Building condition surveys will be undertaken in accordance with conditions 46.1 - 46.4 of the designation conditions and condition 109 of the A2N resource consents 7, where it is assessed that there is potential for damage to buildings or structures arising from construction. Given the scale of the works, building condition surveys will be undertaken for the four buildings in which works are proposed to be undertaken directly in front of. The subject buildings are 99 Albert St (AA building), 105-107 Albert St (Manhattan Apartments), 109-125 Albert Street (SkyCity) and 135 Albert Street (Auckland Council). . The building condition surveys will generally be undertaken as follows:

 

The building surveys will be undertaken by an independent senior qualified person; The survey shall include: -

Any information about the type of foundations

Existing levels of damage (aesthetic, superficial, affecting levels of serviceability)

Whether observed damage is associated with structural damage

Susceptibility of building or structure to further movement

Photographic evidence

Specific assessment of damage with reference to trigger levels 8

Review of alarm and alert trigger levels 9



The Construction Contractor will provide the building condition survey report to the property owner and AC within 15 working days of the survey being undertaken;



If requested by a building or structure owner where a pre-construction survey was undertaken, the Construction Contractor will undertake a visual inspection. This is in addition to monthly visual inspections until the completion of dewatering of the Project; and



The Construction Contractor will carry out visual inspections of the surrounding ground and external building facades of the surrounding buildings adjacent to the Project to monitor any deterioration or movement of any pre-existing cracks.

4.3.14

Hazardous Substances

Given the space restrictions of the Project area it is unlikely hazardous substances will be kept on site and instead will be located in a hazardous goods store off site. Small quantities of spray paint will be available on site.

4.4

Emergency and Incident Response

An environmental emergency is an event which has a detrimental effect on the surrounding environment. A detrimental environmental effect is something that causes significant harm to the environment, which is not legally allowed and requires immediate response. An environmental emergency can also be a deviation from the environmental management system defined in the CEMP, DWPs and MPs. This means there has been a failure to follow the established process or procedures that help the contractor achieve best practice.

R/LUC/2016/1890, R/REG/2016/1892, R/REG/2016/1895, R/REG/2016/1896, REG/2016/1897, R/REG/2016/1898, R/REG/2016/1899, R/REG/2016/1900 and R/REG/2016/2038 8 Condition 109, R/LUC/2016/1890, R/REG/2016/1892, R/REG/2016/1895, R/REG/2016/1896, REG/2016/1897, R/REG/2016/1898, R/REG/2016/1899, R/REG/2016/1900 and R/REG/2016/2038 9 Ib id

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

43 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Examples of environmental emergencies include, but are not restricted to:

  

Significant (large volume) chemical / oil spill; Excessive discharge of sediment to the stormwater system; and Hazardous substance release to air.

4.4.1

Emergency Response Plan

An Emergency Response Plan (ERP) will be prepared for the Project by the Construction Contractor. This ERP will take into account the following factors:

    

The parts of the site or adjoining properties likely to be affected; The degree of predictability of the emergency; The likely speed of onset; The likely effect of the emergency; The contents of the ERP will include: -

description of the potential emergency;

the person responsible for actioning the ERP;

the equipment required to deal with the emergency including rescue equipment;

emergency contact numbers;

direction to site workers and other affected persons on what they are required to do;

the methods used to deal with the emergency (e.g. how to use specific equipment

As necessary, emergency services such as Police, Fire Brigade, and Ambulance are to be contacted and invited to visit the site in order to become aware of site access and other emergency considerations. The ERP will incorporate the following components:

    

Emergency contact list (for the above); Emergency Reporting Instructions; Emergency Muster Point Location; Emergency Response Co-ordinator Action Plan; Emergency Personnel and Equipment.

The ERP will be displayed in prominent locations around the site and employees will be trained in its requirements. All relevant Project personnel, subcontractors and relevant emergency agencies will be instructed and rehearsed, as appropriate, in the requirements of the ERP. The ERP is additional to the management plans required by the resource consents and Designation conditions for the Project, but is not required to be certified by AC.

4.4.2

Incident Response

An environmental incident is an occurrence which has (or potentially could have had) a negative or ‘adverse’ effect on the environment. An adverse effect is something that causes (or could have caused) environmental harm. This means there has been a failure to follow the established process or procedures that help the Project achieve best practice (e.g. failure to report a spill). Environmental incidents include but are not restricted to:

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

44 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

  

Spills; Unforeseen impacts on areas of high environmental value such as archaeology; and Consent non-compliances (e.g. noise, sediment).

A Spill Response Plan for the Project (appended to the ERP) will be developed by the Construction Contractor and will detail the actions to be followed in the event of a spill (including training). During the construction phase, the ESM will be responsible for providing training and/or orientation to employees or subcontractors that addresses the proper action regarding spills. The Construction Contractor will ensure that spill response materials are available, commensurate with the type, quantity and storage arrangements for Hazardous Substances on site. Given storage of hazardous substances will likely be provided off site due to the constrained nature of the site, this will consist of wheelie bin spill kits on site to cover all plant and vehicles involved in the works and deal with oil and chemical spills. The response to various environmental incidents is outlined in the relevant plans. For serious incidents, the immediate response may involve stopping works until a solution to manage the incident is developed.

4.4.3

Notification Procedure

Environmental incidents shall be recorded. The cause of all incidents will be subject to an investigation, convened by the ESM to determine the root causes of the incident and to ensure that remedial / corrective action is able to be implemented to ensure a repeat of the incident is avoided. In the event of an environmental incident, the Construction Contractor will provide AT and AC with notification as shown in Table 9. Table 9 Environmental incident notification

Severity Level

Incident Classification

Notification requirement to CRLL Construction Management

Incident Report Form to CRLL Construction Management

Investigation Team

Investigation report to be Supplied to CRLL

Insignificant

Event that occurs within established controls, e.g. a leak or small spill within a spill containment bund.

Via a monthly report

n/a

Minor

Event that breaches established controls but with no effect beyond the site boundary

Within 12 hours

Within 48 hours

Construction contractor

Within 10 working days

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

45 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Serious

Consent breach Environmental harm beyond the site boundary

Immediately upon identification

AS soon as practicable but within 12 hours

AT/CRLL and Construction Contractor Management to allocate resources as appropriate

Within 10 working days

A summary and review of incidents for the duration of the Project and for the relevant month will be included in the Project Monthly Report. CRLL shall be notified of incidents that trigger notification as defined in the incident reporting and investigation procedure. These triggers include off site discharges, unauthorised disturbance or destruction of heritage sites, and breaches and non-conformances of licences and permits issued for the Project. The Construction Contractor Project Director is responsible for notifying CRLL and parent companies of reportable incidents. CRLL is responsible for notifying relevant Regulators.

4.5

Stakeholder Communications

A CCP (Appendix K) has been developed which details the strategy, tools and process to manage communication and engagement between the Construction Contractor, its stakeholders and the community throughout the construction and monitoring periods for the Project. The CCP sets out how the Construction Contractor will inform the community of Project progress and construction dates, foster good relationships with the community, obtain feedback from stakeholders, and outline how complaints and queries will be responded to. The CCP has been prepared following consultation with stakeholders, directly affected parties and affected in proximity parties.

4.5.1

Public Safety

All sites will be contained within fencing, signage displayed and access into site limited and controlled through site sign-in procedures. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles will be applied during site set up. Generally, site security will be maintained by establishing temporary fences at the perimeter of the works and or as described in section 2.7. These may be anchored to or fixed into the ground where their location is critical (e.g. to eliminate fall risks). Gates will be provided at construction entry and exit points and these will be locked shut when the site is unattended. Noise barriers will be integrated with the fences where possible. All security fences, boundary fences around the construction sites will be maintained in good order to ensure their ongoing functionality.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

46 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Monitor and Review

5.1

Environmental Monitoring

Scheduled monitoring of environmental performance is required throughout the construction phase of the Project to ensure that no adverse impact on the environment occurs. This enables the overall effectiveness of the environmental controls to be determined and allows areas of non-compliance to be identified so corrective actions can be taken. The specifics of monitoring for each environmental element are detailed in the individual plans, including any monitoring requirements, the frequency of the monitoring to be undertaken and the appropriate responsible person, as required within contract documentation or environmental approvals issued for the Project. In general, monitoring will be conducted on a routine basis. However, additional monitoring may be required in the event of a complaint or incident, or after a rain event in the case of water quality monitoring. The ESM is responsible for the implementation of on-site measurements of environmental aspects, including water quality. External specialists may be used, where required, to conduct specialist monitoring, including noise, vibration, air quality, and non in-situ water monitoring. The initiation of such monitoring is on an as-needed basis and may be in response to contract requirements, complaints or internal requirements. Environmental monitoring results will be reported will be reported in the monthly compliance report to AC and CRLL.

5.1.1

Collaborative Working

The key contacts listed in Table 10 below will meet regularly to discuss:

     

Compliance with the designation conditions and the CEMP and DWPs; Material changes to the CEMP and DWPs; Any matters of non-compliance and how they have been addressed; The results of, need for, and frequency of site inspections; Environmental monitoring results; and Any other agenda items mutually agreed by the Key Contacts.

Table 10 Collaborative working contacts

Organisation

Title

Name

Auckland Council

Team Leader Central Monitoring

Richard Preece

Construction Contractor

Environment and Sustainability Manager

John Surphlis

CRLL

Principal Planner

Richard Jenkins

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

47 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

5.1.2

Collaborative Meeting

At least five working days prior to construction commencing the key contacts listed above shall mutually agree an initial schedule for a collaboration meeting. The meeting shall be held at least monthly unless a different timeframe is agreed with AC. Collaboration meetings shall continue throughout construction and one month following completion of construction. Additional meetings between Council and Construction Contractor/CRLL specialists may be established on a one off or ongoing basis by mutual agreement of the Key Contacts listed above. These â€˜specialist meetingsâ€™ will allow for the discussion and resolution of technical issues and will provide feedback to the Key Contacts to facilitate decision making in the Collaboration Meeting.

5.2

Environmental Inspections

Weekly environmental compliance Inspections are conducted by the ESM (or a delegate). The findings of these inspections will be recorded, along with any required remedial actions, who is responsible for implementing these actions and in what timeframe. These shall be monitored to ensure that they are closed out in the required timeframe. An appropriate framework will be confirmed by the Construction Contractor prior to works commencing.

5.3

Environmental Auditing

Internal (by Project Staff) environmental auditing is required to determine whether the environmental management system conforms to planned arrangements and is properly implemented and maintained. Internal audits will be completed on a quarterly basis by the ESM (or delegate). Findings from the audits will be presented to the Construction Manager within two weeks of conducting the audit. Internal environmental audits focus on environmental and sustainability matters within a single operational procedure or a group of related operational procedures (e.g. erosion and sediment control procedures, waste management reporting).

5.4

Corrective and Preventative Action

Corrective or preventative actions identified during environmental audits shall be commensurate to the magnitude of the problem and appropriate to the environmental harm encountered. Ultimately the Project Director has responsibility for closing out any corrective or preventative actions resulting from the environmental inspections, audits and external regulatory compliance monitoring. Additionally, assessment and follow-up reviews on the effectiveness of corrective and preventive actions will be undertaken and the outcomes documented, communicated and implemented. Compliance shall be included as a regular agenda item at management meetings and project meetings. Minutes from each meeting shall record and assign actions to individuals where appropriate.

5.5

Reporting

Reporting requirements will evolve as the Project progresses. In the early phase emphasis is on the establishment of systems, controls and competence of all personnel, while later the emphasis will shift to monitoring performance. When nearing completion (as applicable) the focus will be on final reports to address approval requirements. The ESM is responsible for managing the Environmental Reporting Program. The Project Director is responsible for submitting the reports required externally. Reporting requirements include:

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

48 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

  

Project internal reporting requirements; Reporting to CRLL and key stakeholders as specified within contract documents; and Specific reporting to AC where required – refer specific DWPs and MPs.

5.6

Document Control

The ESM is responsible for ensuring all relevant documentation is submitted and maintained within the Project filing and document control system. Applicable documentation will include but not be limited to:

  

All environmental incidents reports and investigation outcomes; Formal and informal audit and environmental inspection reports; and Records of environmental training.

5.7

CEMP Review

This CEMP (including plans) will be updated, with the necessary certification by AC, throughout the course of the Project to reflect any changes to consent conditions, relevant legislation and material changes associated with changes to construction techniques or the natural environment. Additionally, they may be updated in response to any unforeseen adverse effects arising from construction, unresolved complaints or environmental incidents. A review may also be initiated by AC in response to comments or recommendations received from AC (Team Leader Central Monitoring) or as a result of the CCP process.

5.7.1

Management Review

A management review of the CEMP and plans will be undertaken at least annually by the Project Management team. The management review will be organised by the ESM. The review will take into consideration:

         

Site personnel comments; Audit findings and recommendations; Environmental monitoring records; Environmental complaints, incidents and emergencies; Details of corrective and preventative actions; Environmental non-compliances; Changes to organisational structure and roles and responsibilities; On-going compliance with objectives, conditions and targets; Changes to industry best practice standards, legislation and other statutory requirements; and Material changes to DWPs.

The review process will include looking at the environmental controls and procedures to make sure they are still applicable to the activities being carried out. Reasons for making changes to the CEMP will be documented. A copy of the original CEMP document and subsequent revisions will be kept for the Project records, and marked as obsolete. Each new/updated revision of the CEMP documentation will be issued with a revision number and date to eliminate obsolete CEMP documentation being used.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

49 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

5.7.2

Review Certification

Any change to the CEMP or MPs required by the resource consents shall be submitted to AC (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification and no activity reliant upon a change to the CEMP can be undertaken until the change has been certified. CRLL will request ACâ€™s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination as to whether the proposed change can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days of submission of the change. Any material change proposed to the DWPs required by the designation conditions relating to an increase in adverse effect on a particular receiver shall be submitted for approval to AC, at least 10 working days prior to the proposed changes taking effect.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

50 CRL-PAT-RME-000-RPT-0100 Project 239933 | 27 October 2017 | Revision 4

Appendices

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix A Designation Conditions

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix B Resource Consent Conditions

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix C Site Layout Plans

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix D Erosion and Sediment Control Plan

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix E Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix F Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix G Historic Character Delivery Work Plan

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix H Contaminated Delivery Work Plan

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix I Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix J Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix K Communication and Consultation Plan

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix L Groundwater Monitoring and Contingency Plan

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix M Building Condition Surveys

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix N Record of CLG and IPRP feedback on the CEMP

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

CLG Comments The following comments were received from the Community Business Liaison Group (CLG) regarding the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP): Comment Id

Date

Time

Forum

Respondent

Comment

Resolution

12 September

5.30pm

CBLG

Heart of the City

The CRL project could incorporate the real approaches and methodology that have been applied to earlier parts of the project to demonstrate best practice as it develops within the programme of works rather than limit the DWP process to a compliance, box ticking exercises required by consent conditions.

Mitigation specific to identified effects has been addressed in the appendices to the CEMP.

12 September

5.30pm

CBLG

Heart of the City

Local businesses are very interested in how the project will manage actual adverse environmental effects as they arise.

Mitigation specific to identified effects has been addressed in the appendices to the CEMP.

12 September

5.30pm

CBLG

Heart of the City

The plan should include a specific statement which confirms that the project team will take a proactive approach in its engagement with and support of businesses in relation to environmental management.

Statement added at section 1.1.

12 September

5.30pm

CBLG

Heart of the City

Section 2.8 Graffiti and Litter should contain a statement which outlines a practical approach to assisting business with their waste management during the project.

Amendment to section 2.8 to include a reference to waste management.

12 September

5.30pm

CBLG

Heart of the City

The Stakeholder and Communications Managerâ€™s responsibilities as described are much more limited than actual practice. There is no mention of business operators or customers. The DWP should include business operators and customers as key stakeholders for the project.

Table 8 to the Stakeholder and Communications Managers role which includes management of stakeholder enquiries. The table has been amended to include reference to emphasise resolution of stakeholder enquiries by relevant persons in the Project team.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

It is noted a CRL Street Response Manager has been appointed to assist businesses during the construction period (refer table 8).

Comment Id

Date

Time

Forum

Respondent

Comment

Resolution

12 September

5.30pm

CBLG

Vicky Dick – Manhattan Apartments

The Project needs to discuss with the Body Corporate about the use Manhattan land (common are in front of the building).

CRLL has begun discussions with property owners regarding access to private sites for the purpose of undertaking works associated with the Project.

12 September

5.30pm

CBLG

Aaron Money – SkyCity

Advanced bookings need to be addressed as they are noise sensitive.

Advanced warning will be provided through ‘Construction Look a Heads’, face to face interactions and fortnightly meetings or site visits with directly affected and affected in proximity parties during construction – refer section 6.2 and Table 6 of the Project Communication and Consultation Plan (Appendix K to this CEMP).

Independent Peer Reviewer Comments The following comments were received from the Independent Peer Reviewer, Chris Millar, Opus International Consultants Ltd, regarding the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP):

Comment Id

Date

12 October 2017

Time

Forum

Respondent

Comment

Resolution

IPR

Chris Millar

The authors of the document have pulled together a good document and should be congratulated on their work and the fact I have made 5410 suggestions and comments on the document should not be interpreted to mean the document is not suitable but rather the comments reflect my views on environmental management tools and the information I had access to review.

Noted – no update required

Where the same comment has been made more than once, only a single response has been provided as such this table shows a total of 51 responses to the independent reviewer’s comments.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Comment Id

Date

Time

Forum

Respondent

Comment

Resolution

Note DWPs and appendices have not been reviewed by the independent Peer Reviewer. Questions raised by the reviewer may be covered by those sub-plans. If this is the case the reviewer suggests that one of the following changes is made (in order of preference):

An executive summary of the DWPs within the CEMP text removes the impetus for the reader to review the full documents contained in the CEMP appendices and makes the document unnecessarily long. The location of all DWPs is referenced in tables 2 and 3 in respect of the designation and resource consent condition requirements which specify the matters these documents are to address.

Include an executive summary of each DWP in the CEMP covering key features, what is managed, how and who is responsible for implementation. 2. A direct reference to which DWP and where in that document the issue raised is covered, 3. Bring the connection up into the front of the CEMP to provide guidance to those using the CEMP on key issues. Staging of activities needs to be clarified, it is assumed from the order of their being addressed that the canopies are to be removed first and then the utilities addressed. This should be clarified in an indicative program to show whether it will involve a staged removal of canopies as we dig or if the plan is to remove all canopies prior to trenching? Section 2.3 construction methodology table 4 â€“ states 40 weeks (however the durations appear to add up to 16 weeks? Table 5 â€“ states 40 weeks (however the durations appear to add up to 36 weeks? Please clarify what the expected length of each phase is (include expected weather/contingency days if necessary), also neither adds up to 15 months quoted in section 1.1 here.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

No change to the CEMP is required.

Sections 2.2 Project Description, 2.3 Methodology and 2.4 Programme address sequencing of works. Where possible some overlap of activities may occur. No change to the CEMP is required.

Table 4 approximate timeframes amended to read 20 weeks. It is noted the individual durations relate to each building and some overlap will occur as works on adjacent buildings are carried out simultaneously. The durations provided are approximate. No change to the CEMP is required.

Comment Id

Date

Time

Forum

Respondent

Comment

Resolution

Can we please define what a material change will be to ensure that expectations are understood by all parties?

The definition of material change is provided at the beginning of the CRL Designation condition set, Appendix A of the CEMP. No change to the CEMP is required.

How many lanes will be closed, diverted or remain open. Will there be periods when there are full road closures?

Traffic management is addressed in the traffic Access and Parking DWP, Appendix E of the CEMP. No change to the CEMP is required.

The following comment relates to section 1.5 Mana Whenua and the cultural induction for contractors. How is this practically being delivered in the CEMP, the statement here about monitoring, induction etc is not carried through into any of the operation, Accidental discovery procedures or relevant features in the document.

Section 1.5 confirms consultation with Mana Whenua it will continue through the Mana Whenua Forum. The Heritage DWP (Appendix G of the CEMP) identifies the protocols for accidental discovery of archaeological or cultural remains and training requirements preconstruction and during the construction period. No change to the CEMP is required.

Particularly this should be in the induction ADPs Urban design framework Training Stakeholder coms and Screening art design

The following comment relates to section 2.2 Canopy Removal and Utilities Relocation. Check the side of the road being worked on â€“ the buildings being described appear to be on the western side of the road.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Section 2.2 updated to reflect correct location reference.

Comment Id

Date

Time

Forum

Respondent

Comment

Resolution

The following comment relates to section 2.2 Canopy Removal and Utilities Relocation.

Abandoned services and ducts will be either capped or removed.

Will remaining services ducts etc be removed or left in situ?

No change to the CEMP is required.

Have the business and community engagement plans addressed the lighting and access to shops, do any require higher light levels than others?

Lighting and access to adjacent businesses has been addressed in section 5 of the Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP, Appendix J.

Will the container floors (if metal floored) be supplied with flooring that will reduce loud noise from echoing footsteps. This could be a particular issue for those areas with office or accommodation space such as the hotel. Such a flooring could include non-slip rubber

A non-slip surface will be used on the floor of the containers.

The following comment relates to section 2.3 Construction Methodology, specifically the works durations.

The durations identified are approximate. CRLL have been working with SkyCity and Crowne Plaza to understand their requirements.

What is the contingency for large events or conferences being held in either sky city or the Crowne Plaza

A construction look ahead will be circulated on a monthly basis which provides advance notification of the upcoming proposed activities and impacts. The look ahead is also an opportunity to seek clarification or provide feedback on potential impacts based on the business/residents individual situation.

No change to the CEMP is required.

No change to the CEMP is required. 13

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

As this is an old area of our city how is the archaeology and heritage being addressed, will excavations be supervised? Is there any actual or potential effect on the bluestone retaining walls east of the works?

The bluestone retaining wall to the east of the project work site is not affected by these works. No change to the CEMP is required.

Comment Id

Date

Time

Forum

Respondent

Comment

Resolution

The following comment relates to Table 5 Indicative utilities relocation construction methodology, specifically in respect of saw cutting activities.

Mitigation of dust generated by the project works is addressed in the sections 3-5 of the Air Quality DWP, Appendix I of the CEMP. No change to the CEMP is required.

Need to check dealing with dust â€“ will this be water cooled equipment? 15

The following comments relate to section 2.5. Is this intended to read 0700-1900 Monday to Sunday?

Section 2.5 has been amended to reflect the hours of 0700 and 2200.

If not the next sentence needs some further explanation. What will be the process for extending these hours of operation. 16

The following comments relate to section 2.5, specifically in reference to inclusion of conditions 31 to 35 in table 2 of the CEMP. These parameters havenâ€™t been included in the list of relevant conditions above, the noise references are associated with collaborative working process conditions 13.

The designation construction noise and vibration conditions are addressed in the section 3 of the Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan. No change to the CEMP is required.

Please include. 17

The following comments relate to section 2.6, Figure 2 Project area layout. The TC control in this picture for vehicle access, will this be 24/7 or just during works times

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Traffic management during the project works is addressed in the Traffic Access and Parking DWP, Appendix E of the CEMP.

Comment Id

Date

Time

Forum

Respondent

Comment

Resolution

Will the containers and other hoardings include temporary lighting where the normal spill of street lighting will be affected?

Temporary lighting is to be provided on hoardings/containers. Refer section 5 of the Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP and section 4 lighting of the CEMP. Additional references have been made in section 4.

The following comment relates to section 2.7, specifically in reference to maintenance of pedestrian access adjacent to the project works, along the western side of Albert Street. Is this to be maintained in its current state or as a controlled pedestrian environment

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Containers will provide easier access to areas at height where graffiti/vandalism would have been out of access, will there be measures to make it harder to get on top of the containers and prevent access to higher areas of adjacent buildings.

Pedestrian access will be maintained by the use of containers, hoardings and undercrofts on western side of street. Section 2.7 has been amended to more clearly reflect maintenance of pedestrian areas.

The containers will be located in the middle of Albert Street. Pedestrian access close to buildings will be via existing undercrofts and hoarded pathways. No change to the CEMP is required.

Comment Id

Date

Time

Forum

Respondent

Comment

Resolution

The following comments relate to section 2.8, specifically in reference to the inclusion of feedback item 4 from the CBLG.

Waste collection is not currently kerbside in Albert Street in this location. The Manhattan Building is serviced via a laneway on site and will continue to be serviced in this manner during the project works. SkyCity, the AA building and the Auckland Council building are all served via Federal Street.

It seems that the 4 from the CLG has been missed here. I believe the matter to be addressed was the collection and removal of rubbish and recycling for the businesses along this section of the works. With access and footpaths adjusted there will need to be changes to waste collection â€“ especially if currently kerbside.

It is noted the CRLL Street Response Manager will monitor and address any refuse issues that arise, on a daily basis.

Suggest this is covered by describing how recycling and rubbish collections for these businesses will be facilitated, will there be a collection point organized by the project, will the retailers be able to use the projects waste skips, how and where will waste trucks gain access to the side of the street behind hoardings and containers?

The following comment relates to section 2.8, specifically in reference to the weekly environmental inspection.

The Contractor will attend to graffiti as described within 48 hours as described in section 2.8. No change to the CEMP is required.

This potentially leave graffiti around for 9 days. If offensive graffiti it is suggested graffiti is monitored at the same rate as the litter. 23

The following comment relates to section 2.9 and use of the work site post construction. Will this include the reinstatement of canopies? Or will the footpaths remain uncovered on completion of the works?

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Building canopies removed as part of this project will be reinstated by the building owner at the completion of the Contract 3 main CRL works. In the meantime footpaths will remain uncovered.

Comment Id

Date

Time

Forum

Respondent

Comment

Resolution

Please include the risk matrix used and the guidance on assessing the risk. Especially useful would be the change in risk level that would trigger a review â€“ eg from medium to high risk.

Inclusion of the risk matrix is not a requirement of the CRL Designation conditions.

The following comments relate to section 3.4.1, table 6 Key national legislation, regulations and standards.

These standards are addressed in DWPs attached as appendices to the CEMP, as relevant to the respective discipline. All DWPs have been prepared by a suitably qualified person.

Please clarify whether these are the guidelines that through being implemented and adhered to will lead to compliance with the conditions of consent/designation and environmental standards? Not having access to the DWPs and associated appendices it is not possible to comment on whether these are adequate to meet the environmental objectives of the CEMP and wider project.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

No change to the CEMP is required.

Comment Id

Date

Time

Forum

Respondent

Comment

Resolution

The following comments relate to section 3.4.2, table 7 Standards, guidelines and specific statutory requirements associated with environmental aspects and detailed in the CEMP and plans.

These standards are addressed in DWPs attached as appendices to the CEMP, as relevant to the respective discipline. All DWPs have been prepared by a suitably qualified person.

I would question why we have so many standards that relate to the same environmental aspect. It is unlikely that all these standards (particularly in noise and vibration) are going to entirely align on all issues.

No change to the CEMP is required.

I can only assume that parts of each standard are to be used! If this is the case there needs to be clarity about which standard will apply to which component and what the process will be if any of these standards contradict each other. For example if the German and British vibration standards are different on the amount of movement is acceptable which will be relied on?

The following comment relates to section 3.4.2, table 7 Standards, guidelines and specific statutory requirements associated with environmental aspects and detailed in the CEMP and plans Please expand to include the complete title of these plans

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Table 7 has been amended to show the names of the DWPs in full.

Comment Id

Date

Time

Forum

Respondent

Comment

Resolution

While it may still require being adopted by plan change, best practice would be to follow the more up to date GD 05 http://www.aucklanddesignmanual.co.nz/projecttype/infrastructure/technical-guidance For sediment control. If the authors wish to only use the operative documents it is advised that the equivalent/similar practices in GD05 are assessed and either adopted or reasons for not adopting noted

An erosion and sediment control plan is being developed by a suitably qualified person and will represent best practice for these works. This plan requires certification by Auckland Council prior to works commencing.

The following comment relates to section 4.1.1.

Sub-contractors are unknown at this stage. The main contractor for this project is Connectus, the construction contractor (including their subcontractors) undertaking the works.

What about sub-contractors or will the entirety of the work be undertaken by Connectus.

No change to the CEMP is required.

No change to the CEMP is required. 30

The following comment relates to section 4.1.2, table 8 Specific roles and responsibilities, specifically in relation to compliance with health and safety and incident management.

Connectus confirm this is the role of the Health and Safety Manager. No change to the CEMP is required.

Will this be in conjunction with Environmental manager or will all investigations be undertaken by the H&S manager. 31

The following comment relates to section 4.1.2, table 8 Specific roles and responsibilities. Communication with utilities.

Network Utility Operators are identified as a stakeholder in the Communication and Consultation Plan in Appendix K. No change to the CEMP is required.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Comment Id

Date

Time

Forum

Respondent

Comment

Resolution

The following comment relates to section 4.1.2, table 8 Specific roles and responsibilities.

Table 8 has been amended to include the IPR listed additional responsibilities under the Environmental and Sustainability Manager role.

Incident response â€“ spills Reporting on environmental and sustainable KPIs Incident investigations? Implementation of sustainability measures

The following comment relates to section 4.1.2.4. Reviewing changes to DWPs?

Reviewing changes to the DWPs is not the responsibility of the Connectus Environmental and Sustainability Manager. According to the process identified under CRL designation conditions 22 and 23. No change to the CEMP is required.

The following comment relates to section 4.1.2.5, bullet three. Assists ESM on technical matters

It would be useful to have the key contacts for all the utilities to be moved. The council monitoring officer, HNZ, other regulatory officers associated with the project and the major stakeholders â€“ business group etc who may need notification in the event of a spill, or other environmental factor.

All key contacts are listed in Appendix B of the Communication and Consultation Plan attached as Appendix K to the CEMP.

The following comment relates to section 4.2.1.

Induction training will be undertaken for all people working on site as required.

How often will these be held, will it be regular or will there be a threshold of people required. How much work is required before an induction will be undertaken, will a labour hire doing one shift be required to do an entire induction session

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Section 4.1.2.5, bullet three has been amended to include providing assistance to the Environmental and Sustainability Manger on technical matters.

No change to the CEMP is required.

Comment Id

Date

Time

Forum

Respondent

Comment

Resolution

The DWPs provide the details on this but it would help the CEMP be useful to summarise the key risks and mitigation and allow the reader to understand what is expected without having to read through screeds of documents. An executive summary from each document in this section would help this be a good quality stand alone document and allow for ease of understanding in relation to how mitigation measures fit together and what effect changing one system may have on other controls.

The following comment relates to section 4.3.2, bullet two, in regard to unforeseen rainfall events.

The statement made by the reviewer is correct.

No change to the CEMP is required.

Is this aimed at the rainfall being longer than anticipated. 39

The following comment relates to section 4.3.2, bullet five. Discharge to where? Will this be to the stormwater network?

The following comment relates to section 4.3.2, bullet six. Where in site are we going to be able to install silt fences? From the plans provided isnâ€™t the site paved? If so it will not be possible to properly dig in and return the silt fencing? I would suggest that a container, such as a removable skip is used to retain any soil on site and this is covered to prevent rainfall soaking through.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Discharge to the existing stormwater network will occur if testing allows as per section 5.3 of the Contaminated DWP. No change to the CEMP is required. The constrained site limits placement of container within the Project area. A detailed Erosion and Sediment Control Plan is to be lodged with and certified by AC prior to works commencing. No change to the CEMP is required.

Comment Id

Date

Time

Forum

Respondent

Comment

Resolution

The following comment relates to section 4.3.2, bullet ten in relation to catchpits.

A detailed Erosion and Sediment Control Plan is to be lodged with and certified by AC prior to works commencing. No additional impervious surfaces will be created as a result of this project. As such there is no additional stormwater resulting from the Project which needs to be addressed.

Are these able to take the additional stormwater quantities, what risk is there of the remaining catchpits being overwhelmed and the down hill buildings

No change to the CEMP is required. 42

The following comment relates to section 4.3.2, bullet twelve in relation to provision of a washdown area. Would suggest the shallow skip based system in this situation.

The constrained site limits placement of devices within the Project area. A detailed Erosion and Sediment Control Plan is to be lodged with and certified by AC prior to works commencing, however, it is noted vehicles are not expected to be access exposed areas within the Project worksite. No change to the CEMP is required.

The following comment relates to section 4.3.4 in regard to mitigation options. Can we please include what this is likely to be, will it be noise screens, mufflers, enclosed work spaces? Should be able to pull this information from the DWP.

This information is contained in section 5 of the Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan. Repeating that information in this section of the CEMP represents unnecessary duplication and removes the impetus for the reader to review the full document contained in the CEMP as Appendix F. No change to the CEMP is required.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Comment Id

Date

Time

Forum

Respondent

Comment

Resolution

The following comment relates to section 4.3.8.

The project area has been identified as potentially containing contaminated fill associated with road infrastructure and on this basis the Contaminated DWP (Appendix H of the CEMP) has been prepared. At section 6.2 of this DWP the general safety and training requirements for management of contaminated soil is explained. The Health and Safety Officer will be responsible for the implementation of and adherence to contamination related health and safety procedures.

Is it anticipated that there is contaminated soils and materials or is this a DWP essentially a accidental discovery procedure? If so the training provided at induction and tool box sessions will need to cover what to look for and the procedure to deal with any discovery.

No change to the CEMP is required. 45

The following comment relates to section 4.3.9, specifically in regard to cause and mitigation of potential adverse effects. Please provide information on how this will be done – an executive summary of the main causes and mitigation – such as how will the concrete cutting dust be deal with when the pavements are opened?

The following comment relates to section 4.3.10, specifically in regard to feedback from potentially affected parties. What are the key concerns of the group – were their bottom lines or assumptions mentioned that that a manager on the project should be aware of. What promises have been made to get to this point and what has been asked for and rejected by the project? This information is very useful in ensuring that project teams don’t duplicate work and that stakeholders are provided certainty that the team knows about their concerns.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This information is contained in section 3 of the Air Quality Delivery Work Plan. Repeating that information in this section of the CEMP represents unnecessary duplication and removes the impetus for the reader to review the full document contained in the CEMP as Appendix I. No change to the CEMP is required. This information is contained in section 4 and Appendix B of the Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan. Repeating that information in this section of the CEMP represents unnecessary duplication and removes the impetus for the reader to review the full document contained in the CEMP as Appendix J. No change to the CEMP is required.

Comment Id

Date

Time

Forum

Respondent

Comment

Resolution

The following comment relates to section 4.3.12, specifically in regard to groundwater.

A Groundwater Settlement and Monitoring Contingency Plan is being developed for the Project works in accordance with the conditions of the A2N regional resource consents. This plan will be lodged with and certified by AC prior to works commencing.

When is the greatest risk during these works, how does the project intend managing this?

No change to the CEMP is required. 48

The following comment relates to section 5.1 and the monitoring required by each of the DWPs. I believe that these should be summarised in this document so that the reader is able to see all necessary monitoring in one location.

This information is contained in is contained in each individual DWP, attached as appendices to the CEMP. Repeating that information in this section of the CEMP represents unnecessary duplication and removes the impetus for the reader to review the full document contained in the CEMP appendices. No change to the CEMP is required.

The following comment relates to section 5.1.2. Deputies should be identified to represent the each group should the key members listed be unable to attend or should they leave their respective organisation.

The following comment relates to section 5.3, specifically in regard to the frequency of internal audits. This should be done more regularly than quarterly. It is recommended that fortnightly at least is undertaken

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Connectus and CRLL will ensure the appropriate individuals will attend the collaboration meetings should those people identified in table 8 of the CEMP are unavailable. No change to the CEMP is required. Quarterly monitoring is considered appropriate given the scale of the works proposed. No change to the CEMP is required.

Comment Id

Date

Time

Forum

Respondent

Comment

Resolution

The following comment relates to section 5.3, specifically in regard to the 10 working days allowed for certification of a change to the CEMP.

The 10 working day period is specified in condition 23.6 of the CRL designation conditions.

I would suggest this period is too long for a construction project, it is good to see the collaborative meetings earlier in this section and I would recommend that a method of using that group to provide input into any changes would be beneficial and allow for a shortened turnaround period. It could be as simple as emailing the group about the problem, suggesting a solution and incorporating any comments or recommendations from the group have them endorse the proposed change and then submit to council with a 5 day or less turn around expectation.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

No change to the CEMP is required.

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Auckland Office Level 4, Aurecon House 139 Carlton Gore Road Auckland 1023 New Zealand T +64 9 520 6019 F +64 524 7815

Leading. Vibrant. Global. www.aurecongroup.com