Issuu

CRL CONTRACTS 2.1 AND 2.2 ALBERT STREET CANOPY REMOVAL AND UTILITIES DIVERSION CONSTRUCTION NOISE AND VIBRATION DELIVERY WORK PLAN (CNV DWP) Rp 001 r06 20170511 | 23 November 2017

84 Symonds Street PO Box 5811 Wellesley Street Auckland 1141 New Zealand T: +64 9 379 7822 F: +64 9 309 3540 www.marshallday.com

Project:

CRL Contracts 2.1 and 2.2 Albert Street Canopy Removal and Utilities Diversion

Prepared for:

Aurecon PO Box 9762 Newmarket Auckland 1149

Attention:

Helen Mclean

Report No.:

Rp 001 r06 20170511

Disclaimer Reports produced by Marshall Day Acoustics Limited are based on a specific scope, conditions and limitations, as agreed between Marshall Day Acoustics and the Client. Information and/or report(s) prepared by Marshall Day Acoustics may not be suitable for uses other than the specific project. No parties other than the Client should use any information and/or report(s) without first conferring with Marshall Day Acoustics. The advice given herein is for acoustic purposes only. Relevant authorities and experts should be consulted with regard to compliance with regulations or requirements governing areas other than acoustics. Copyright The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Marshall Day Acoustics constitutes an infringement of copyright. Information shall not be assigned to a third party without prior consent.

Document Control Status:

Rev:

Comments

Date:

Author:

Reviewer:

Draft

Draft for PTA Review

14 Jul 2017

Craig Fitzgerald

James Whitlock

Issued

Draft for PTA Review

26 Jul 2017

Craig Fitzgerald

Issued

For CLG review

28 Jul 2017

Craig Fitzgerald

Issued

Revised Appendix C

4 Sep 2017

Craig Fitzgerald

James Whitlock

Issued

Revised Appendix D

3 Oct 2017

Craig Fitzgerald

James Whitlock

Issued

Post IPR review

17 Oct 2017

Craig Fitzgerald

James Whitlock

Issued

Post Council review

23 Nov 2017

Craig Fitzgerald

James Whitlock

Cover Photo: Creative Agency 514-806-1644

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0

INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 5

2.0

PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................... 6

2.1

Overview ..................................................................................................................................................... 6

2.2

Construction Methodology........................................................................................................................ 6

2.3

Construction Hours..................................................................................................................................... 6

2.4

Key Personnel ............................................................................................................................................. 7

3.0

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ..................................................................................................................... 7

3.1

Noise ............................................................................................................................................................ 7

3.2

Vibration ...................................................................................................................................................... 8

4.0

PREDICTED CONSTRUCTION NOISE AND VIBRATION LEVELS ............................................................... 10

4.1

Noise .......................................................................................................................................................... 10

4.2

Vibration .................................................................................................................................................... 11

5.0

MITIGATION AND MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................................... 11

5.1

Training...................................................................................................................................................... 11

5.2

Equipment Selection ................................................................................................................................ 11

5.3

General Measures .................................................................................................................................... 12

5.4

Noise Barriers and Enclosures ................................................................................................................. 12

6.0

COMMUNICATION ................................................................................................................................... 13

6.1

Communication Overview ....................................................................................................................... 13

6.2

Complaints Response ............................................................................................................................... 14

7.0

MONITORING ............................................................................................................................................ 14

7.1

Noise .......................................................................................................................................................... 14

7.2

Vibration .................................................................................................................................................... 16

8.0

EFFECTS ..................................................................................................................................................... 18

8.1

Noise Effects.............................................................................................................................................. 18

8.2

Vibration Effects ....................................................................................................................................... 18

8.3

Management of Adverse Effects ............................................................................................................. 19

9.0

CNV DWP REVIEW AND UPDATING (INCLUDING SSCNMPS AND SSCNMPS) ..................................... 19

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

3 of 55

APPENDIX A GLOSSARY OF TERMINOLOGY APPENDIX B NOISE LEVEL PREDICTIONS APPENDIX C SITE SPECIFIC MANAGEMENT PLANS APPENDIX D COMMUNCATIONS RECORDS APPENDIX E RELEVANT CONDITIONS

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

4 of 55

1.0

INTRODUCTION The Aotea Early Works (CRL Contracts 2.1 and 2.2) involve canopy removal and utility relocation works along the western side of Albert Street from Wellesley Street to Victoria Street West (the Project). This Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan (CNV DWP) has been prepared to manage any adverse effects relating to construction noise and vibration during the construction of the Project. The CNV DWP is required under Condition 36 of the CRL designation 1714 (the CRL designation). The objective of this CNV DWP is to provide for the development and implementation of the identified best practicable options to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects on receivers of noise and vibration resulting from construction of the Project. It builds on the Marshall Day Acoustics Assessment of Construction Noise and Vibration Report1. Some construction activities are predicted to exceed the Project performance standards. Where compliance cannot be achieved within the CRL designation, site specific management plans will be implemented. Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plans (SSCNMP) and Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plans (SSCVMP) are required under Conditions 37 â€“ 40 of the CRL designation. They detail the best practicable options to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on a receiver resulting from noise or vibration that does not comply with the Project Noise and Vibration Standards. This CNV DWP is a live document that will be reviewed and updated during the course of the Project to reflect material changes. Any such changes to this CNV DWP must be submitted to Auckland Council (AC) for review at least 10 working days prior to any on-site activity reliant upon the change commencing. A formal review process is described in Section 9.0 of this DWP. Potentially affected parties have been identified in Section 4.1 and 4.2 of this DWP and SSCNMPs are contained in Appendix C. The potentially affected parties are summarised in Figure 1 below. Figure 1: Potentially Affected Parties

AA Centre Manhattan Apartments

Sky City Grand Hotel and Convention Centre

Auckland Council

Huawei Centre

Crowne Plaza

Econolodge A glossary of terminology is included in Appendix A.

CRL NoR application, Volume 3, Part 1, Appendix 2 â€“ Marshall Day Acoustics report (Rp001 R07 2012068A, 10 Dec 12)

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

5 of 55

2.0

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1

Overview The Project is programmed for 15 months, commencing in January 2018. Canopy dismantling is proposed over a 20 week period. The utilities works will be undertaken once the canopies have been removed and span a 40 week period.

2.2

Construction Methodology The indicative sequence for the canopy removal phase is summarised as follows: •

Site setup using trucks, a mobile crane and cherry picker (2 weeks)

•

Dismantle building canopy using mobile cranes and hand tools (8 weeks per building)

•

Make good building façade using hand tools (2 weeks per building)

The indicative sequence for utility works following the canopy removal is summarised as follows: •

Site setup using trucks and hand tools (2 weeks)

•

Concrete saw the perimeter of the trench and curbing, supported by a hand-held concrete breaker if required (2 – 3 days in front of each building over a period of 2 – 3 weeks)

•

Expose existing services to 1.5m depth using a hydrovac excavator (6 weeks)

•

Excavate trench to 4m depth using a hydrovac and mini excavator, and install trench supports using an auger and mobile crane (3 weeks)

•

Install new utilities and backfill and reinstate pavement using a mobile crane, hand tools, excavator and plate compactor (8 – 12 weeks)

•

Draw cables, reinstate pavement, curbing and disestablish site (10 weeks)

The particularly noisy activities include use of a concrete saw, concrete breaker, hydrovac and plate compactor: •

The use of a concrete saw and concrete breaker are predicted to be the noisiest activities, operating intermittently while the pavement is removed.

•

A hydro-vac will operated intermittently during trench excavation.

•

Use of the plate compactor is also particularly noisy when straddling the seam of new (soft) and existing (hard) sections of asphalt surfacing, at the perimeter of the trench. It is much quieter when compacting loose fill within the trench.

The other phases are comparatively quiet, however, may result in some disturbance locally due to the close proximity of adjacent buildings.

2.3

Construction Hours •

Normal construction hours are Monday to Saturday, 0700 – 1900 hrs

•

Road cutting must be restricted to Monday to Saturday, 0700 – 1900 hrs, in accordance with condition 36.3 (b)

•

Works outside normal construction hours must be necessary, the best practicable option and proceeded by advanced communication (Section 6.1) with potentially affected parties. In some cases, scheduling works during the evening or night-time periods can be advantageous to avoid occupied periods (e.g. commercial buildings).

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

6 of 55

2.4

Key Personnel This CNV DWP has been prepared by Craig Fitzgerald from Marshall Day Acoustics, a Member of the Acoustical Society of New Zealand (MASNZ). The key personnel responsible for this CNV DWP are detailed in Table 1. The Noise and Vibration Monitoring Manager will be responsible for implementing this CNV DWP. The Monitoring Manager will receive suitable training from the Specialist Noise and Vibration Advisor. Table 1: Key Personnel Contact Information Role

Name

Organisation

Phone

Project Director

Chris Powell

Contractor

TBC

Chris.Powell@connectus.net.nz

Stakeholder and Engagement Manager

Alan HowardSmith

Contractor

021361158

alan.howard-smith@hawkins.co.nz

Environment and Sustainability Manager

John Surphlis

Contractor

TBC

John.Surphlis@mcdgroup.com

Noise & Vibration Monitoring Manager

TBC

Contractor

TBC

Specialist Noise & Vibration Advisor

TBC

Expert

TBC

Compliance and Monitoring Officer

Richard Preece

Auckland Council

027 482 0409

Richard.Preece@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz

3.0

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

3.1

Noise

3.1.1 CRL Designation Conditions The relevant Project Construction Noise Standards in CRL designation Condition 31 are summarised in Table 2 below. Rock blasting is not required, so condition 32 is not relevant. Construction noise shall be measured and assessed in accordance with the provisions of New Zealand Standard NZS 6803:1999 “Acoustics - Construction Noise”. These noise limits apply at 1m from the most exposed façade of a receiver. If any construction activity cannot practicably comply with these limits, it must be mitigated as far as practicable using the measures outlined in this CNV DWP. Table 2: CRL Designation Condition 31.1 - Construction Noise Limits relating to NoR 1 Receiver Type

Occupied commercial and industrial buildings (including offices) Sensitive Noise and Vibration Receivers (excluding offices)

Monday to Saturday

Sundays and Public Holidays

At all other times

0700 – 2200

2200 – 0700

75 dB LAeq

65 dB LAeq

60 dB LAeq

90 dB LAFmax

80 dB LAFmax

75 dB LAFmax

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

7 of 55

3.1.2 Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plans Any predicted or measured exceedance from activities occurring in the CRL designation must have a SSCNMP in accordance with CRL designation Condition 37, except where they adhere to condition 37.2, i.e. where the exceedance is less than 5 decibels and does not exceed: •

0700-2200: 1 period of up to 2 consecutive weeks in any 2 months; or

•

2200-0700: 1 period of up to 2 consecutive nights in any 10 days.

For predicted exceedances of less than 5 decibels, monitoring shall be undertaken to confirm the actual noise levels (refer Section 7.1 of this DWP). The objective of a SSCNMP is to detail the best practicable option(s) to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on a receiver resulting from construction noise that does not comply with CRL designation Condition 31. SSCNMPs shall identify the matters outlined in CRL designation Condition 37, summarised as follows: •

The relevant activity, its timing, duration and predicted magnitude of exceedance

•

A summary of the communication and consultation undertaken with the receiver, and

•

The specific methods or measures employed to mitigate the noise effects

The SSCNMPs are included in Appendix C. Notable Receivers have further specific requirements contained in Conditions 16, 39 and 40. However, no Notable Receivers have been identified for these works. Therefore, the requirements for Notable Receivers are not considered further in this DWP.

3.2

Vibration

3.2.1 Building Damage The relevant Project Construction Vibration (building damage) Standards in CRL designation Condition 33 are summarised in Figure 2 and Table 3. Construction vibration shall be measured and assessed in accordance with German Standard DIN 4150-3:1999. If any construction activity cannot practicably comply with these limits, it must be mitigated as far as practicable using the measures outlined in this CNV DWP.

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

8 of 55

Figure 2: Short-term (transient)2 vibration at building foundations (DIN 4150-3 1999: Figure 1)

Table 3: Vibration at horizontal plane of highest floor (DIN 4150-3 1999: Tables 1 and 3) Structure Type

Peak Particle Velocity Vibration Level (mm/s) Short-term (transient)2

Long-term (continuous)3, 4

Line 1. Commercial or Industrial buildings

Line 2. Residential buildings

Line 3. Historic or Sensitive Structures

2.5

3.2.2 Amenity The relevant Project construction vibration amenity standards are contained in CRL designation Condition 34. Construction vibration shall not exceed: •

1mm/s in dwellings 2mm/s in retail and office spaces, 0700 – 2200 hrs

•

Regenerated noise level of 35 dB LAeq(15min) and 0.3 mm/s PPV in bedrooms, 2200 – 0700hrs

This requirement is to be applied only when a complaint from a building occupant has been received.

3.2.3 Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plans The objective of a SSCVMP is to detail the best practicable option to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on a receiver resulting from construction vibration that does not comply with CRL designation Conditions 33 or 34, or in response to other concerns or complaints in accordance with CRL designation Condition 17. SSCVMPs shall identify the matters outlined in CRL designation Condition 38, summarised as follows:

Short-term (transient) vibration is “vibration which does not occur often enough to cause structural fatigue and which does not produce resonance in the structure being evaluated” 3

Long-term (continuous) vibration is types not covered by the short-term vibration definition

The long-term (continuous) criteria can apply at all floor levels, but levels are normally highest at the top floor

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

9 of 55

•

The relevant activity, its timing, duration and predicted magnitude of exceedance

•

A summary of the communication and consultation undertaken with the receiver, and

•

Site specific vibration criteria, methods or measures that addresses the issue(s) of concern (i.e. building damage, amenity or sensitive equipment)

A site specific plan may address both noise and vibration, in which case it would be a SSCNVMP. However, no SSCVMPs are required for the Project as the CRL Project construction vibration standards are not predicted to be breached (refer Section 4.2). Notable Receivers have further specific requirements contained in Conditions 16, 39 and 40. However, no Notable Receivers are identified in close proximity of the works. Therefore, the requirements for Notable Receivers are not considered further in this DWP.

4.0

PREDICTED CONSTRUCTION NOISE AND VIBRATION LEVELS

4.1

Noise Indicative sound levels for the proposed equipment are presented in Table 4 at various receiver set back distances. This table shall be used by the Environment and Sustainability Manager prior to construction to inform when and what equipment will require mitigation or management. It shall be kept up to date by the Specialist Noise & Vibration Advisor when new information becomes apparent through noise monitoring (Section 7.0) or other means. Table 4: Indicative noise levels from proposed equipment at 1m from a façade Equipment

Façade noise level (dB LAeq) at receiver

Sound power level (dB LwA)

No mitigation5

Barrier mitigation6

10m 20m 40m 80m 10m

20m

40m 80m

Concrete saw

115

Hand-held concrete breaker

111

Plate compactor (backfilling)

108

Hydro-vac (utilities excavation)

107

Mobile crane or cherry picker

Excavator (8-12T)

Truck, crane or cherry picker (idling)

Noise modelling of particularly noisy activities is included in Appendix B. The activities are indicative snapshots in time, focused on typical ‘worst case’ periods. Based on the modelling results, SSCNMPs are predicted to be required for the following buildings, included in Appendix C: •

AA Centre building

•

Manhattan Apartments

•

Sky City Grand Hotel and Convention Centre

•

Auckland Council

No effective mitigation from noise barriers located between the noise source and sensitive receiver façade of interest

Assuming 10 decibels mitigation provided by an effective noise barrier (refer Section 5.4)

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

10 of 55

4.2

•

Huawei Centre

•

Crowne Plaza

•

EconoLodge

Vibration Construction activities have the potential to generate high vibration levels. Vibration may be perceptible for brief periods, but the levels and effects will be heavily influenced by the contractor’s proposed construction methodology. Where possible, low vibration methodologies should be prioritised. This includes the avoidance of vibratory piling and vibratory rolling methods, the use of perimeter saw cuts to mitigate the transfer of vibration into nearby structures and minimising the duration of concrete breaking activities. Excavators have the potential to generate high transient vibration levels, but for most activities this can be avoided with careful and considerate use. The construction methodology has been developed to avoid activities that generate high vibration levels. The use of hand-held concrete breakers and plate compactors are predicted to generate the highest vibration levels, but can comply with the limits in Section 3.2.1. Therefore, no SSCVMPs are predicted to be required. Nonetheless, further advice should be sought from a vibration specialist and/or monitoring undertaken when these activities are proposed within 5m of a building. Despite predicted compliance, Appendix 1 of the CRL designation conditions requires a preconstruction building condition survey for the following buildings in accordance with condition 46: •

AA Centre building (commercial building)

•

Manhattan Apartments (residential building)

•

Sky City (commercial building)

•

Auckland Council (commercial building)

Whilst the canopies are removed, hand tools, such as hammer drills, have the potential to excite the structure at high frequencies. This is heard as noise rather than felt as vibration within the building, but is the result of a structural transmission path. Vibration radiates efficiently through concrete structures and is expected to be the dominant effect while the canopies are being removed. Hammer drills should be avoided where practicable (e.g. use of acetylene torch to cut steel). Consultation with building occupants and timing of this activity will be critical in managing effects.

5.0

MITIGATION AND MANAGEMENT

5.1

Training All staff will participate in an induction training session when they commence work on the Project. The induction will include a briefing on this CNV DWP, with attention given to the following matters: •

Construction noise and vibration limits (Section 3.0)

•

Activities with the potential to generate high levels of noise and/or vibration (Section 4.0)

•

Noise and vibration mitigation and management procedures (Section 5.0).

•

The sensitivity of receivers to noise and vibration, and any operational requirements and constraints identified through communication and consultation (Section 6.0).

Awareness of current noise and vibration matters on, or near active worksites, will be addressed during site meetings and/or ‘toolbox’ training sessions.

5.2

Equipment Selection Some activities have the potential to exceed the Project construction noise limits at close receiver distances (e.g. concrete cutting). It is essential that appropriate mitigation and management

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

11 of 55

measures are identified and employed in advance of the works to avoid exceedances. When selecting construction equipment, where practicable:

5.3

•

Prioritise quieter construction methodologies (e.g. bored piling in place of drop hammer piling)

•

Prioritise electric motors over diesel engines

•

Prioritise rubber tracked equipment over steel tracked equipment

•

Equipment should be suitably sized for the proposed task

•

Equipment should be maintained and fitted with exhaust silencers and engine covers

•

Avoid tonal reversing or warning alarms (suitable alternatives may include flashing lights, broadband audible alarms or reversing cameras inside vehicles)

General Measures Best Practical Option (BPO) mitigation will be implemented throughout the construction programme to avoid exceedances. This will include, but not be limited to the following:

5.4

•

Keep the construction time near noise sensitive areas to a minimum

•

Avoid unnecessary noise, such as shouting, the use of horns, loud site radios, rough handling of material and equipment, and banging or shaking excavator buckets

•

Avoid metal on metal contact where practicable by minimising drop height of materials, such as during the erection and dismantling of scaffold and the loading and unloading of trucks

•

Tonal reversing alarms shall be prohibited on site. Suitable alternatives may include flashing lights, broadband audible alarms or reversing cameras inside vehicles

•

Mitigate track squeal from tracked equipment, such as excavators and piling rigs. This may include tensioning and watering or lubricating the tracks regularly

•

Avoid high engine revs where practicable through appropriate equipment selection and turn engines off when idle / parked

•

Maximise the distance between the noise source and the nearest sensitive receiver by positioning fixed plant away from sensitive receivers, or orienting machinery to maximise the distance between the engine exhaust and the nearest sensitive building façade (e.g. excavators)

•

Crane and secure loads using straps in preference to chains where safe and practicable

•

Utilise power from the national grid in preference to generators where practicable

•

For concrete breaking, an initial perimeter saw cut should be used to reduce vibration transfer to neighbouring buildings, match the chisel/tip to the material to be broken and avoid ‘blank’ firing by engaging the material before commencing and stopping before it fires through the material

•

Utilise noise barriers and enclosures where effective (Section 5.4)

•

Implement further measures identified through communication and consultation with sensitive receivers (Section 6.1)

•

Undertake noise and vibration monitoring to confirm compliance, or identify high noise and/or vibration machinery (Section 7.0)

Noise Barriers and Enclosures

5.4.1 Barriers Temporary noise barriers should be used where a noise limit is predicted to be exceeded (Section 4.1) and they would noticeably reduce the received level. They should be installed prior to This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

12 of 55

works commencing and be maintained throughout the works. Effective noise barriers typically reduce the received noise level by 10 decibels where they block line-of-sight from source to receiver. The design and utilisation of temporary noise barriers shall be as follows7: •

The panels should be constructed from materials with a minimum surface mass of 10 kg/m2 such as 18 mm thick plywood

•

The panels should be a minimum height of 2.4 m and include a 1m canopy

•

The panels should be abutted or overlapped to provide a continuous screen without gaps at the bottom or sides of the panels

•

The panels should be positioned as close as practicable to the noisy construction activity to block line-of-sight between the activity and noise sensitive receivers. Where positioned on the site boundary, additional local barriers should be considered near the activity to ensure effective mitigation for sensitive receivers on upper floor levels.

5.4.2 Enclosures Enclosures differ from barriers in that they surround the sound source on more than one side, and usually include a ‘roof’. The effectiveness of noise enclosures depends on the extent that the noise source can be enclosed without constraining the operation of the equipment and resulting in an unacceptable occupational health and safety environment (e.g. noise exposure, heat, dust, poor lighting etc). Enclosures can also result in traffic management issues because they increase the footprint of the effective works area. The following guidelines must be incorporated in the design and utilisation of noise enclosures where practicable and effective: •

Enclosures shall be used where a noise barrier is not sufficient to achieve compliance with the noise limits and it is practicable to do so (e.g. stationary plant such as compressors, pumps, generators, air tools and concrete cutting activities)

•

A suitably qualified and experienced acoustic specialist should be involved in the enclosure design (note that one example is included as Figure B.3 in NZS 6803: 1999).

6.0

COMMUNICATION

6.1

Communication Communication with Project stakeholders in relation to construction noise and vibration impacts is described in the Project Communication and Consultation Plan. A summary of communication with sensitive receivers will be maintained in Appendix D of this CNV DWP, including a clear explanation of where any comments from sensitive receivers have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not, as well as any outstanding issues or disputes. As a minimum, the following communication shall be undertaken:

•

Written notification of the Project description shall be provided to all property occupiers within 50m of a worksite to raise awareness of the Project, the required construction works and their duration in their vicinity. This should be undertaken at least 20 working days prior to the commencement of works on site.

•

The Stakeholder and Communications Manager shall advise any affected parties of construction activities that are predicted to exceed the limits in Section 4.0 following the application of BPO

Specification agreed in response to CLG feedback (Appendix D, Table 14).

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

13 of 55

mitigation identified in Section 5.0. Where avoidance of exceedances is impractical, consultation shall be undertaken to avoid significant adverse effects.

6.2

•

The Stakeholder and Communications Manager shall provide monthly updates of monitoring and project progress to affected parties, including an planned evening works between 1900 – 2200 hours, Monday to Saturday.

•

The Stakeholder and Communications Manager shall address any concerns and complaints regarding construction noise and vibration in accordance with Section 6.2. When discussing vibration concerns, it is important to convey that vibration can be felt at levels far below those that pose even the smallest risk of cosmetic building damage.

Complaints Response The contact name and phone number of the Stakeholder and Communications Manager, to which complaints can be directed, shall be clearly included in any written notification and on-site signage. Any construction noise and/or vibration complaint shall be recorded in a complaints file, and an investigation shall be undertaken involving the following: •

Identification of sources of concern, and measuring or estimating noise and/or vibration levels at the time of the complaint

•

A hotline phone/text number shall be established to receive complaints. Acknowledge receipt of the concern or complaint. An initial response shall be undertaken within 24 hours of receiving a complaint, and resolved as soon practicable. If a reasonable complaint relates to building damage or sleep disturbance, inform the on-duty site manager as soon as practicable to cease works pending the investigation

•

Reporting the findings and recommendations to the Construction Manager

•

Actions and time taken to close-out complaint

•

Communication with the complainant

•

Reporting of the investigation in the complaints file

A record of all concerns and/or complaints received shall include: •

The name of the person(s) who raised the concern or complaint (unless they elect not to provide this) and details of the concern or complaint

•

Where practicable, weather conditions at the time of the concern or complaint, including wind direction and cloud cover if the complaint relates to noise

•

Known construction activities at the time and in the vicinity of the complainant during the concern or complaint period

•

Remedial actions undertaken (if any) and the outcome of these, including monitoring of the activity

7.0

MONITORING

7.1

Noise Construction noise shall be measured and assessed: •

During first occurrence on-site of concrete cutting, concrete breaking, plate compaction, other phases of construction when noise has potential to exceed the limits, or and in response to reasonable noise complaint being received

•

By a suitably qualified acoustics expert (e.g. Member of the Acoustical Society of New Zealand) and in accordance with New Zealand Standard NZS 6803: 1999 “Acoustics - Construction Noise”

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

14 of 55

•

At one metre from the most affected building façade, or, if this position is not accessible, at an equivalent position where practicable. If this is not possible, measured noise levels shall be undertaken at a proxy position and adjusted for distance and façade reflections as appropriate

•

For a representative duration for steady sources and not less than 15 minutes for fluctuating sources (but not greater than 60 minutes). The noise level shall be reported with the measurement duration, e.g. 65 dB LAeq (15min)

•

The monitoring results shall be used to update Section 4.1 if appropriate

A flow chart showing the process for attended noise monitoring is included Figure 3 overleaf. In response to CLG feedback (Appendix D, Table 14), a noise monitor shall be positioned in the East Day Spa reception during works directly outside the façade. An external monitor at 1m from the façade is unlikely to be practical due to the proximity of the works. Therefore, it should be positioned at a location inside the reception that is representative of the space, but away from the reception desk to avoid influence of conversations. The monitor shall be setup with triggers issuing SMS/email alerts above set thresholds to the Noise & Vibration Monitoring Manager and Specialist Noise & Vibration Advisor or their nominated representatives where appropriate. Figure 3: Noise Monitoring Flow Chart Undertake attended noise monitoring (Section 7.1): • • • •

During the first use of high noise equipment (Section 4.1) In response to a reasonable complaint (Section 6.2) To verify an exceedance (Section 7.1) As required by an SSCNMP (Appendix D)

Comply with the project standards? (Section 3.1)

Notify Noise & Vibration Monitoring Manager and review mitigation and management strategies to ensure BPO (Section 5)

Yes Can project standards be practically achieved?

Yes

Identified mitigation and management opportunities

In response to a previous noncompliant measurement?

Yes

Revise construction methodology

Does the receiver qualify for a SSCNMP? (CRL 37)

Yes Prepare SSCNMP in consultation with the affected parties (Appendix D)

Submit report(s) to Noise & Vibration Monitoring Manager within one week of action taken

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

15 of 55

7.2

Vibration Construction vibration levels shall be measured and assessed: •

During the first use on site of concrete breaking, use of a plate compactor, other phases of construction when vibration has potential to exceed the building damage limits, or in response to reasonable complaint being receiver.

•

At the closest building foundations and/or the top floor level as appropriate

•

For a representative construction duration, measured at two second intervals

•

By a suitably qualified acoustics expert (e.g. Member of the Acoustical Society of New Zealand) and in accordance with German Standard DIN 4150-3:1999 “Structural vibration – Part 3: Effects of vibration on structures”

•

Where consent to access the building of interest has been sought and granted

•

The monitoring results shall be used to update Section 4.2 if appropriate

Re-radiated noise from construction vibration shall be measured and assessed by the Specialist Noise & Vibration Advisor (or approved representative) as follows: •

In response to a reasonable complaint being received.

•

Inside the inhabited room(s) of interest, or, if this position is not accessible, in an equivalent room where practicable. If this is not possible, measured vibration levels shall be undertaken at a proxy position and adjusted for distance and building response as appropriate.

•

For a representative duration for steady sources and not less than 15 minutes for fluctuating sources (but not greater than 60 minutes). A representative duration of less than 10 minutes may be suitable for steady noise sources (as determined by the monitoring engineer). The noise level shall be reported with the measurement duration, e.g. 35 dB LAeq (15min). The monitoring reports shall be used to update Section 4.2 of this DWP.

•

The monitoring results shall be used to update Section 4.0 of this DWP and made available to Council.

In response to CLG feedback (Appendix D, Table 14), a continuous vibration monitor be positioned in the East Day Spa reception during works directly outside the façade. It should be placed on the foundations, just inside the external wall and away from foot traffic (e.g. under/behind the existing curtains). The monitor shall be setup with triggers issuing SMS/email alerts above set thresholds to the Noise & Vibration Monitoring Manager and Specialist Noise & Vibration Advisor or their nominated representatives where appropriate. A flow chart showing the process for attended vibration monitoring is included as Figure 4 overleaf.

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

16 of 55

Figure 4: Vibration Monitoring Flow Chart Undertake attended vibration monitoring (Section 7.2): • • • •

During the first use of high vibration equipment (Section 4.2) In response to a reasonable complaint (Section 6.2) To verify an exceedance (Section 7.2) As required by an SSCVMP (Appendix D)

Cosmetic Building Damage Comply with the cosmetic building damage project standards? (Section 3.2)

Yes

Notify Noise & Vibration Monitoring Manager, cease the activity, engage a structural engineer and undertake a building condition survey

Yes

Heritage building?

Engage heritage expert

Building damage?

No Amenity

Yes

Type of damage?

Structural

Cosmetic

Seek advice from structural engineer before continuing

Comply with amenity project standards? (Section 3.2)

Notify Noise & Vibration Monitoring Manager and review mitigation and management strategies to ensure BPO (Section 5) Yes

Yes Yes

Identified mitigation and management opportunities?

Response to a previous noncompliant measurement? Yes

Yes

Revise construction methodology

Can the project standards be practically achieved?

Does the receiver qualify for a SSCVMP? (CRL 38)

Yes Prepare SSCVMP in consultation with the affected parties (Appendix D)

Submit report(s) to Noise & Vibration Monitoring Manager within one week of action taken

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

17 of 55

8.0

EFFECTS

8.1

Noise Effects The noise level and associated effects received inside a noise sensitive space (e.g. office or living room), will depend on the external noise level, sound insulation performance of the façade (particularly the glazing) and room constants (such as the room dimensions and surface finishes). These factors can vary widely. The Construction Noise Standard (NZS 6803) recommends noise limits assessed at 1m from the external façade of a building, assuming a façade sound level difference of 20 decibels. However, 20 decibels is particularly conservative for modern inner city buildings. With knowledge of the façade glazing type, the sound insulation performance can generally be estimated as follows: •

Sealed glazing

30 decibels façade sound level difference

•

Openable windows (closed)

25 decibels façade sound level difference

•

Open windows

15 decibels façade sound level difference.

Table 5 estimates the construction noise level received inside based on the external noise level and façade glazing types above. The potential noise effects are colour coded and summarised as follows: •

Typically acceptable

•

Annoyance for some occupants and reduction in work efficiency

•

Annoyance and degradation of communication quality

Table 5: Daytime noise levels in commercial & industrial buildings and habitable rooms in dwellings External Noise Level (dB LAeq)

8.2

Estimated Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) Sealed glazing (30 dBA)

Openable windows (25 dBA)

Open windows (15 dBA)

90 – 95

60 – 65

65 – 70

75 – 80

85 – 90

55 – 60

60 – 65

70 – 75

80 – 85

50 – 55

55 – 60

65 – 70

75 – 80

45 – 50

50 – 55

60 – 65

70 – 75

40 – 45

45 – 50

55 – 60

Vibration Effects While the primary vibration concern is cosmetic building damage, people may be disturbed at levels significantly below the limits in Section 3.2.1. The relevant Project construction vibration amenity standards are summarised in Section 3.2.2, however, British Standard BS 5228-1:2009 Code of practice for noise and vibration control on construction and open sites – Part 1: Noise” provides the following guidance on the daytime vibration amenity effects: •

0.3 mm/s PPV

Just perceptible

•

1 mm/s PPV

Typically acceptable with prior notification

•

10 mm/s PPV

Likely to be intolerable for any more than a very brief period

Potentially affected parties should be informed about the vibration levels they may experience and assured vibration damage can only occur at magnitudes well above the threshold of perception.

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

18 of 55

In some cases, construction vibration can excite the structure at high frequencies. This is heard as noise rather than felt as vibration within the building, but is the result of a structural transmission path. Reradiated noise effects from vibration can be estimated using Table 5 in Section 8.1.

8.3

Management of Adverse Effects The following process will be implemented by the Environment and Sustainability Manager. It is for any construction activity measured to exceed the relevant construction noise and vibration performance standards that is not already addressed by a SSCNMP or SSCVMP in Appendix C:

9.0

•

For exceedances of the construction vibration standards, activities should cease as soon as safe and practicable to do so

•

Review the construction methodology, mitigation and management strategies to ensure they represent the BPO

•

Determine if the receiver qualifies for a SSCNMP or SSCVMP, or the existing SSCNMP or SSCVMP requires review

•

The Stakeholder and Communications Manager will consult with affected parties to understand their particular sensitivities, including times, activities and locations. Consultation should focus on a collaborative approach to managing the adverse effects from construction noise and vibration while works are undertaken in the vicinity. The Stakeholder and Communications Manager (or representative) shall be available 24/7 during works periods. A record of consultation will be included in the relevant SSCNMP in Appendix C (or Appendix D as appropriate).

•

Implement measures to avoid significant adverse effects as agreed with the affected party and monitor the activity to verify the extent of any adverse effects

•

For exceedances of the construction vibration cosmetic building damage standards, a detailed building condition survey will be undertaken. If damage has not occurred, then that activity can continue provided the measured vibration level is not exceeded further and the construction methodology is the BPO. If damage has occurred, alternative construction methods should be investigated and the Requiring Authority shall commit to repairing the damage within a reasonable timeframe.

•

The installation of mechanical ventilation will be considered for noise sensitive receivers where external windows must be closed in order to avoid significant adverse noise effects and no alternative ventilation system is present. This will be implemented only after all other general noise management and mitigation have been deemed impracticable.

•

Temporary relocation will be considered for sensitive receivers where all practicable noise and vibration management and mitigation measures have been implemented and significant adverse noise effects are predicted. This will be in exceptional cases only, and advice from the Specialist Noise and Vibration Advisor will be sought prior.

CNV DWP REVIEW AND UPDATING (INCLUDING SSCNMPs AND SSCNMPs) In accordance with CRL designation conditions 7.5 and 11, this CNV DWP will undergo a review process with the relevant CRL Community Liaison Group (CLG) and a suitably qualified independent peer reviewer before being issued. The CNV DWP (including SSCNMPs) will be updated throughout the course of the Project to reflect changes associated with construction techniques, equipment or due to unresolved complaints. The review period will be no less than annually in accordance with condition 22. The review(s) will take into consideration: •

Compliance with the CRL designation conditions

•

Any significant changes to construction activities or methods

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

19 of 55

•

Key changes to roles and responsibilities within the Project team

•

Changes in industry best practice standards

•

Results of inspections, monitoring and reporting procedures associated with the management of adverse effects during construction

•

Comments or recommendations from Auckland Council

•

Unresolved complaints and any response to complaints and remedial action taken to address the complaint

The process for updating this CNV DWP (including SSCNMPs) as a result of a material change to the Project or the annual review, is as follows (refer to CRL designation Condition 23): •

Affected parties and the CLG must be notified of the review and any material change proposed to this DWP

•

This DWP must clearly document the comments and inputs received from affected parties in relation to any material changes, along with a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not

•

Any material change proposed to this DWP shall be subject to an independent peer review as required by CRL designation Condition 11

•

Any material change proposed to this DWP relating to an adverse effect shall be submitted for approval to Auckland Council Compliance and Monitoring Officer, at least 10 working days prior to the proposed changes taking effect. If any changes are not agreed, the relevant provisions of the RMA relating to approval of outline plans shall apply

A copy of the original CNV DWP document and subsequent versions will be kept for the Project records, and marked as obsolete. Each new / updated version of the CNV DWP documentation will be issued with a version number and date to eliminate obsolete CNV DWP documentation being used. A summary of the review process will be provided annually to Auckland Council and otherwise be made available on request.

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

20 of 55

APPENDIX A GLOSSARY OF TERMINOLOGY Noise Ambient Noise

Ambient Noise is the all-encompassing noise associated with any given environment and is usually a composite of sounds from many sources near and far.

A-weighting

A frequency filter which is applied to a measurement of sound so as to more closely approximate the frequency bias of the human ear.

Decibel – the basic measurement unit of sound. It is a logarithmic ratio of measured sound pressure level with respect to a reference level of 20 micropascals.

LAeq(T)

The A-weighted, time averaged sound level (on a logarithmic/energy basis) over the measurement period T (e.g. between 10 and 60 minutes).

LAFmax

The maximum A-weighted sound level recorded during the measurement period. Measured with fast time weighting i.e. a 125 millisecond time constant

Noise

A sound that is unwanted by, or distracting to, the receiver.

NZS 6801:2008

New Zealand Standard NZS 6801:2008 "Acoustics - Measurement of Sound"

NZS 6802:2008

New Zealand Standard NZS 6802:2008 "Acoustics - Environmental Noise”.

NZS 6803:1999

New Zealand Standard NZS 6803:1999 “Acoustics – Construction Noise”. Vibration

PPV

Peak Particle Velocity, measured in mm/s. This is the standard metric for assessing construction vibration levels.

DIN 4150-3:1999

German Standard DIN 4150-3:1999 “Structural Vibration – Part 3: Effects of vibration on structures”. This standard is generally adopted in NZ to assess building damage. General

Suitably qualified and experienced acoustic specialist

A person who has sufficient qualifications and experience in the relevant field(s) of acoustics (noise and/or vibration) to undertake robust measurements and assessments i.e. a Member of the Acoustical Society of New Zealand. Other Abbreviations

CRL

City Rail Link

CLG

Community Liaison Group

BPO

Best Practicable Option

CNV

Construction Noise and Vibration

DWP

Delivery Work Plan

SSCNMP

Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan

SSCNVMP

Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

SSCVMP

Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plan

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

21 of 55

APPENDIX B NOISE LEVEL PREDICTIONS Figure 1: AA Centre footpath concrete cutting Figure 2: Sky City canopy dismantling Figure 3: Sky City footpath concrete cutting Figure 4: Sky City hydrovac excavation Figure 5: Auckland Council footpath concrete cutting

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

22 of 55

3D Perspective looking north up Albert Street

3D Perspective looking south down Albert Street

Noise Level (dB LAeq) Key:

55 60 65 70 75

Noise source Buildings Property boundary 2m acoustic hoardings

City Rail Link - Aotea Early Works Figure 1: AA Centre footpath concrete cutting

Client: Auckland Transport Path: J:\JOBS\2017\20170511\07 SoundPLAN\CRL Aotea Early Works Filename: 1. AA Centre concrete cutting.SGS, Prepared: cmf, Date: 1 September 2017 The noise contours in this Figure were obtained by computer interpolation between calculated grid points. There is an interpolation accuracy of +/- 1.5dB. For precise noise levels at specific location, refer to point receiver calculations.

Scale @ A3 1:1000 0

5 10

50 m

60 65 70 75 80 80

3D Perspective looking north up Albert Street

3D Perspective looking south down Albert Street

Noise Level (dB LAeq) Key:

55 60 65 70 75

Noise source Buildings Property boundary 2m acoustic hoardings

City Rail Link - Aotea Early Works Figure 2: Sky City canopy dismantling

Client: Auckland Transport Path: J:\JOBS\2017\20170511\07 SoundPLAN\CRL Aotea Early Works Filename: 2. Sky City canopy dismantling.SGS, Prepared: cmf, Date: 1 September 2017 The noise contours in this Figure were obtained by computer interpolation between calculated grid points. There is an interpolation accuracy of +/- 1.5dB. For precise noise levels at specific location, refer to point receiver calculations.

Scale @ A3 1:1000 0

5 10

50 m

60 65 70 75 80 80

3D Perspective looking north up Albert Street

3D Perspective looking south down Albert Street

Noise Level (dB LAeq) Key:

55 60 65 70 75

Noise source Buildings Property boundary 2m acoustic hoardings

City Rail Link - Aotea Early Works Figure 3: Sky City footpath concrete cutting

Client: Auckland Transport Path: J:\JOBS\2017\20170511\07 SoundPLAN\CRL Aotea Early Works Filename: 3. Sky City footpath concrete cuttingSGS, Prepared: cmf, Date: 1 September 2017 The noise contours in this Figure were obtained by computer interpolation between calculated grid points. There is an interpolation accuracy of +/- 1.5dB. For precise noise levels at specific location, refer to point receiver calculations.

Scale @ A3 1:1000 0

5 10

50 m

60 65 70 75 80 80

3D Perspective looking north up Albert Street

3D Perspective looking south down Albert Street

Noise Level (dB LAeq) Key:

55 60 65 70 75

Noise source Buildings Property boundary 2m acoustic hoardings

City Rail Link - Aotea Early Works Figure 4: Sky City Hydrovac excavation

Client: Auckland Transport Path: J:\JOBS\2017\20170511\07 SoundPLAN\CRL Aotea Early Works Filename: 4. Sky City Hydrovac excavation.SGS, Prepared: cmf, Date: 1 September 2017 The noise contours in this Figure were obtained by computer interpolation between calculated grid points. There is an interpolation accuracy of +/- 1.5dB. For precise noise levels at specific location, refer to point receiver calculations.

Scale @ A3 1:1000 0

5 10

50 m

60 65 70 75 80 80

3D Perspective looking north up Albert Street

3D Perspective looking south down Albert Street

Noise Level (dB LAeq) Key:

55 60 65 70 75

Noise source Buildings Property boundary 2m acoustic hoardings

City Rail Link - Aotea Early Works Figure 5: Auckland Council concrete cutting

Client: Auckland Transport Path: J:\JOBS\2017\20170511\07 SoundPLAN\CRL Aotea Early Works Filename: 5. Auckland Council footpath concrete cutting.SGS, Prepared: cmf, Date: 1 September 2017 The noise contours in this Figure were obtained by computer interpolation between calculated grid points. There is an interpolation accuracy of +/- 1.5dB. For precise noise levels at specific location, refer to point receiver calculations.

Scale @ A3 1:1000 0

5 10

50 m

60 65 70 75 80 80

APPENDIX C SITE SPECIFIC MANAGEMENT PLANS The following site specific plans are included in this appendix: •

C1 AA Centre SSCNMP

•

C2 Manhattan Apartments SSCNMP

•

C3 Sky City Grand Hotel and Convention Centre SSCNMP

•

C4 Auckland Council SSCNMP

•

C5 Huawei Centre SSCNMP

•

C6 Crowne Plaza SSCNMP

•

C7 EconoLodge SSCNMP

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

23 of 55

AA Centre SSCNMP

C1.1

Introduction This Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan (SSCNMP) is for the AA Centre, a commercial building located at 99 Albert Street. A SSCNMP is required because construction is predicted to exceed the Project Noise Standards in CRL Condition 31. This SSCNMP has been prepared in accordance with CRL Condition 37 and is Appendix C1 of the CRL Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan (CNV DWP). It is a supplementary document that builds on the Project CNV DWP, and therefore, directly references relevant sections of the DWP to avoid repetition. The objective of this SSCNMP is to detail the best practicable option(s) to avoid, remedy or mitigate the identified adverse effects from noise exceedances at the AA Centre. Section C1.2 identifies the noise sensitive spaces, the predicted or measured façade sound insulation performance, predicted noise effects and recommended consultation thresholds. As required under CRL Condition 37.5, Section C1.3 presents: •

The extent to which noise may exceed the Project Noise Standards (refer Table C1.3.1)

•

The timing and duration of any exceedance (refer Table C1.3.1)

•

The type of activity causing any exceedance (refer Table C1.3.1)

•

A summary of the communication and consultation with the receiver (refer Table C1.3.2)

•

The methods and measures to mitigate noise effects (refer Table C1.3.3)

•

A statement of why they reflect best practicable option (refer Table C1.3.3)

This SSCNMP has been prepared by Marshall Day Acoustics and forms part of the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) for the Project.

C1.2

Building Details Pre-Construction Consultation Dave Brierley (CRLL) and Craig Fitzgerald (Marshall Day Acoustics) met with AA Centre building representatives Tony Osborne (NPT), Chris Robinson (AA) and Barney Irvine (AA) on 29 August 2017. The matters discussed included the tenant profile, the general building layout, general noise sensitive spaces such as office and meeting rooms, and the identification of specific tenant sensitivities that require further investigation. In summary, the ground floor level fronting Albert Street includes Peppers coffee shop, an AA retail shop and a common lobby for building access. Levels 1 – 3 are car parking, above which levels 4 – 17 are occupied as commercial office space. A typical office has open plan areas and meeting rooms as part of a bespoke tenant fit-out. Identified noise sensitive spaces included the AA retail shop on the ground floor and their call centre on level 14, as well as the Department of Internal Affairs Ceremony room on level 6 and their call centre on level 7. The normal occupied period for all tenancies is expected to be 9am – 5pm, Monday to Friday. Craig Fitzgerald and Barney Irvine visited the AA retail shop on the ground floor. The shop features counter staff interacting with clients, testing booths (computer interaction without sound or aural cues) and customer sales desks. The two external hinged glass door sets were closed, and manually opened when customers arrived or left. Barney noted that it was quiet and was normally busier, and presumably louder. The measured ambient noise level was 60 dB LAeq and the background noise level 55 dB LA90. The ambient noise level was controlled by music, however, Albert Street road traffic and customer conversation babble was also prevalent.

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

24 of 55

Craig Fitzgerald met with Eilish Logan (Department of Internal Affairs) on 29 August 2017. Eilish provided a tour of their tenancy, including the level 6 Ceremony room (where registry weddings are held) and the level 7 call centre. The ventilation noise level in the unoccupied ceremony room was 41 dB LAeq. It was noted that noise from the Victoria Street stormwater relocation works have not disrupted their activities to date, however, they would appreciate prior warning of particularly noisy activities so they can set expectations, reschedule or relocate sensitive activities. The call centre staff were observed to be wearing noise cancelling headsets with microphones. Façade Sound Insulation Performance The AA Centre is an 18-level masonry commercial building with sealed façade glazing, estimated to be 8-10mm thick single pane glass. The estimated sound level difference across the façade is 30 decibels. The ground floor retail façades incorporate multiple sets of frameless hinged glass doors, which are predicted to reduce the sound level difference to approximately 25 decibels while the doors are closed. Table 6 estimates the construction noise level received in various noise sensitive spaces. The potential noise effects are colour coded and summarised as follows: •

Typically acceptable

•

Annoyance for some occupants and reduction in work efficiency

•

Annoyance and degradation of communication quality

Table 6: AA Centre External Noise Level (dB LAeq)

Estimated Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) G Retail

L6 Ceremony8

L4-L17 Office and meeting rooms

90 – 95

65 – 70

60 – 65

85 – 90

60 – 65

55 – 60

80 – 85

55 – 60

50 – 55

75 – 80

50 – 55

45 – 50

Consultation Trigger Level In addition to regular communication, specific consultation should be undertaken prior to construction works that are predicted to exceed 80 dB LAeq at the level 4 façade. The consultation process is set out in Section 8.3 of the CNV DWP.

C1.3

Activity Detail and Consultation Table C1.3.1 shows activities that are predicted to exceed the noise limits in CRL Condition 31 and the associated effects. Table C1.3.2 provides a summary of consultation with the property owners and/or tenants representatives. Table C1.3.3 identifies methods and measures to mitigate noise effects and a statement of why they reflect the best practicable option.

Overlapping colours for the ceremony room reflect the range of potential activities and user configurations, including amplified and unamplified use. Noise sensitivity in this space is expected to vary with configuration. This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

25 of 55

Table C1.3.1: Activity Detail (Noise) ** indicative examples only – To be completed during construction ** #

Activity Details

Predicted Noise Effects

Activity Period Duration Days Hours

Concrete cutting Jan 2018 – Apr 2018 3 days Monday to Saturday 24hr/7days

Location: External noise level: Façade performance: Internal noise level: Potential noise effects:

East façade 80 – 90 dB LAeq 30 decibels sound level difference 50 – 60 dB LAeq Annoyance and reduction in work efficiency

Activity Period Duration Days Hours

X X X X X

Receiver: Location: External noise level: Façade performance: Internal noise level: Potential noise effects:

X X X X X X

Table C1.3.2: Consultation ** indicative examples only – To be completed during construction ** #

Details

Receiver Date Name Phone Email CRL rep

Owner DD/MM/YY X X X X

A. Predicted noise levels

Receiver Date Name Phone Email CRL rep

Tenant DD/MM/YY X X X X

Matters discussed

B. CNV DWP C. Communication protocol D. Scheduling opportunities

B. C. D.

Table C1.3.3: Mitigation Measures ** indicative examples only – To be completed during construction ** #

Actions / specific mitigation measures

A. Notification 24 hours in advance of concrete cutting, with details of timing and contact details. B. Minimise period of concrete cutting C. Manage unnecessary impact sounds, e.g. careful handling and by using strops in place of chains D. Schedule concrete cutting during unoccupied or less noise sensitive periods, e.g. 5pm to 7pm BPO Conclusion: X

A. B. C. D. BPO Conclusion: X

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

26 of 55

Manhattan Apartments SSCNMP

C2.1

Introduction This Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan (SSCNMP) is for Manhattan Apartments, a residential building located at 103 – 107 Albert Street. A SSCNMP is required because construction is predicted to exceed the Project Noise Standards in CRL Condition 31. This SSCNMP has been prepared in accordance with CRL Condition 37 and is Appendix C2 of the CRL Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan (CNV DWP). It is a supplementary document that builds on the Project CNV DWP, and therefore, directly references relevant sections of the DWP to avoid repetition. The objective of this SSCNMP is to detail the best practicable option(s) to avoid, remedy or mitigate the identified adverse effects from noise exceedances at Manhattan Apartments. Section C2.2 identifies the noise sensitive spaces, the predicted or measured façade sound insulation performance, predicted noise effects and recommended consultation thresholds. As required under CRL Condition 37.5, Section C2.3 presents: •

The extent to which noise may exceed the Project Noise Standards (refer Table C2.3.1)

•

The timing and duration of any exceedance (refer Table C2.3.1)

•

The type of activity causing any exceedance (refer Table C2.3.1)

•

A summary of the communication and consultation with the receiver (refer Table C2.3.2)

•

The methods and measures to mitigate noise effects (refer Table C2.3.3)

•

A statement of why they reflect best practicable option (refer Table C2.3.3)

This SSCNMP has been prepared by Marshall Day Acoustics and forms part of the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) for the Project.

C2.2

Building Details Pre-Construction Consultation Fritha Witton (CRLL) and Craig Fitzgerald (Marshall Day Acoustics) met with Manhattan Apartments building management representative Bruce Castle on 24 August 2017. The matters discussed included the general building layout, profile of occupants, and the identification of specific occupant sensitivities that require further investigation. In summary, the ground floor includes the building lobby, LJ Hooker realty office and the City Convenience Store, above which 80 apartments extend from levels 1 – 11, with a rooftop terrace on level 12. Each level has a central corridor with a row of apartments facing Albert Street, and another row facing towards Federal Street. Bathroom extract fans ventilate the apartments using negative pressure and occupants regulate temperature by opening a window or using heat pumps or free standing fans. The majority of the building occupants are adults who are not in the building during the day. There is estimated to be 6 – 7 shift workers who sleep during the day, however, it is understood they are all in apartments facing Federal Street. There is estimated to be 4 – 5 families with pre-school children who may have day sleeps, notably those in apartments 1D, 7C and 7F facing Albert Street. The ambient noise level measured in a selection of representative apartments ranged from 36 dB LAeq with the windows closed to 48 dB LAeq with a window open. Albert Street road traffic dominated the received noise level.

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

27 of 55

Façade Sound Insulation Performance The Manhattan Apartments building is a multi-story masonry residential building with extensive operable façade glazing. The estimated sound level difference across the façade with the windows and doors closed is 25 decibels. The façade is predominantly sealed façade glazing, with some openable windows set in aluminium framing with effective rubber seals. The glass is large single panes, estimated to be 7 – 8mm thick. The estimated sound level difference across the façade with the windows closed is 30 decibels. The ground floor retail will benefit from perimeter site hoardings that will mitigation the external noise level received at the façade by typically 10 decibels. However, noise leakage around the frame of the external doors is predicted to reduce the sound level difference to approximately 20 decibels while the doors are closed. Table 7 estimates the construction noise level received in various noise sensitive spaces. The potential noise effects are colour coded and summarised as follows: •

Typically acceptable

•

Annoyance for some occupants and reduction in work efficiency

•

Annoyance and degradation of communication quality

Table 7: Manhattan Apartments External Noise Level (dB LAeq)

Estimated Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) Retail

Apartments9

90 – 95

70 – 75

60 – 65

85 – 90

65 – 70

55 – 60

80 – 85

60 – 65

50 – 55

75 – 80

55 – 60

45 – 50

•

Consultation Trigger Level In addition to regular communication, specific consultation should be undertaken prior to construction works that are predicted to exceed 75 dB LAeq at the level 1 apartments. The consultation process is set out in Section 8.3 of the CNV DWP.

C2.3

Activity Detail and Consultation Table C2.3.1 shows activities that are predicted to exceed the noise limits in CRL Condition 31 and the associated effects. Table C2.3.2 provides a summary of consultation with the property owners and/or tenants representatives. Table C2.3.3 identifies methods and measures to mitigate noise effects and a statement of why they reflect the best practicable option.

Overlapping colours for apartments accommodate more sensitive day time sleep needs for some occupants

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

28 of 55

Table C2.3.1: Activity Detail (Noise) ** indicative examples only – To be completed during construction ** #

Activity Details

Predicted Noise Effects

Activity Period Duration Days Hours

Concrete cutting Jan 2018 – Apr 2018 3 days Monday to Saturday 24hr/7days

Location: External noise level: Façade performance: Internal noise level: Potential noise effects:

East façade 75 – 85 dB LAeq 25 decibels sound level difference 50 – 60 dB LAeq Annoyance and reduction in work efficiency

Activity Period Duration Days Hours

X X X X X

Receiver: Location: External noise level: Façade performance: Internal noise level: Potential noise effects:

X X X X X X

Table C2.3.2: Consultation ** indicative examples only – To be completed during construction ** #

Details

Receiver Date Name Phone Email CRL rep

Owner DD/MM/YY X X X X

A. Predicted noise levels

Receiver Date Name Phone Email CRL rep

Tenant DD/MM/YY X X X X

Matters discussed

B. CNV DWP C. Communication protocol D. Scheduling opportunities

B. C. D.

Table C2.3.3: Mitigation Measures ** indicative examples only – To be completed during construction ** #

Actions / specific mitigation measures

A. B. C. D. BPO Conclusion: X

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

29 of 55

Sky City Grand Hotel and Convention Centre SSCNMP

C3.1

Introduction This Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan (SSCNMP) is for Sky City Grand Hotel and Convention Centre, a commercial building located at 109 – 125 Albert Street. A SSCNMP is required because construction is predicted to exceed the Project Noise Standards in CRL Condition 31. This SSCNMP has been prepared in accordance with CRL Condition 37 and is Appendix C3 of the CRL Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan (CNV DWP). It is a supplementary document that builds on the Project CNV DWP, and therefore, directly references relevant sections of the DWP to avoid repetition. The objective of this SSCNMP is to detail the best practicable option(s) to avoid, remedy or mitigate the identified adverse effects from noise exceedances at Sky City Grand Hotel and Convention Centre. Section C3.2 identifies the noise sensitive spaces, the predicted or measured façade sound insulation performance, predicted noise effects and recommended consultation thresholds. As required under CRL Condition 37.5, Section C3.3 presents: •

The extent to which noise may exceed the Project Noise Standards (refer Table C3.3.1)

•

The timing and duration of any exceedance (refer Table C3.3.1)

•

The type of activity causing any exceedance (refer Table C3.3.1)

•

A summary of the communication and consultation with the receiver (refer Table C3.3.2)

•

The methods and measures to mitigate noise effects (refer Table C3.3.3)

•

A statement of why they reflect best practicable option (refer Table C3.3.3)

This SSCNMP has been prepared by Marshall Day Acoustics and forms part of the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) for the Project.

C3.2

Building Details Pre-Construction Consultation On 26 May 2017, Richard Jenkins (CRLL), Robert Clark (CRLL), Dave Brierley (CRLL) and Craig Fitzgerald (Marshall Day Acoustics) met with Ina Bajaj and Lara Erceg from East Day Spa, and Arron Money, Collette Leonard and Warren Bias from Sky City. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss CRL construction noise and vibration, particularly in relation to the Aotea Station Early Works. An overview of the proposed works and indicative timeframes were provided, the relevant CRL NoR conditions were summarised, and experiences of their implementation were provided in relation to the C1 and C2 early works contracts. A tour of East Day Spa, the convention centre and hotel was followed by a general discussion about the sensitivity of activities and operational constraints. On 13 June 2017, Craig Fitzgerald undertook measurements to benchmark the existing noise environment at East Day. The findings were detailed in a MDA letter10 that was circulated to East Day Spa and Sky City representatives. On 18 July 2017, Carol Greensmith (CRLL), Robert Clark, Dave Brierley and Craig Fitzgerald met with Arron Money and Matt Ballesty again. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the MDA findings in the East Day Spa letter and discuss wider implications on Sky City operations. On 22 August 2017, Fritha Wilton (CRLL), Dave Brierley and Craig Fitzgerald, met with Arron Money, Collette Leonard and Warren Bias to inform the remaining contents of this SSCNMP. A general discussion about the sensitivity of activities and operational constraints was followed by a tour of

MDA letter Lt001 r01 20170511 CF – East Day Spa Site Visit, dated 19 June 2017

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

30 of 55

representative hotel and convention centre spaces. Craig Fitzgerald measured the existing noise environment in a range of identified noise sensitive spaces for benchmarking purposes and to inform the consultation protocol. Due to restricted access to the Convention Centre that day, measurements were completed at a later date, on 1 September 2017. The identified noise sensitive spaces on the Albert Street façade are summarised as follows: •

•

Level 1 East Day Spa o

Normal hours of operation are 9am – 9pm weekdays and 9am – 8pm on weekends. Generally, Friday – Sunday is consistently busy with all treatment rooms utilised for long periods. Whereas, Monday – Thursday is generally less busy and often slowest around 2 – 4pm.

Quality of service relies on a quiet environment, although some activities are less noise sensitive than others (e.g. massage is very sensitive, whereas threading is less so). A key concern is structure-borne noise from hammer drilling, which they had experienced during recent building renovations.

Reception: The ambient noise level inside the reception area was 52 dB LAeq. Albert Street road traffic was clearly audible, but reduced by the glazed façade and masked by music playing in the space and some activity at the reception desk. The front door was opened three times during the measurement, with the noise level increasing briefly to 62 dB LAeq while open.

Chill room: The unoccupied ambient noise level was 48 dB LAeq. Road traffic was audible at times, but masked effectively by music and air conditioning noise. The chill room is a flexible space and the least sensitive of the treatment rooms.

Treatment rooms: They are set back from Albert Street and are accessed from a central corridor, which provides excellent acoustic separation. Road traffic noise was not perceptible. Sound levels in unoccupied rooms were typically 41 dB LAeq with air conditioning and background music set at normal levels.

Level 3 Gusto at the Grand Restaurant o

Gusto is lively open plan restaurant and bar with connection to the hotel lobby and circulation spaces. The Private Dining Room (PDR) is an enclosed dining room accessed from Gusto restaurant. Both spaces are open all day, but busiest during the evenings.

The ambient noise level in Gusto restaurant during a quiet period was 67 dB LAeq, primarily from music and patron noise from other spaces. The measured level in the unoccupied PDR room was 46 dB LAeq. During busy periods, the noise levels in both spaces would be expected to be in the order of 70 – 75 dB LAeq. In these conditions, the occupants naturally adjust their voice level to ensure communication is effective.

Levels 4 – 5 Convention Centre o

The convention centre typically operates from 9am – 6pm, however, offers extended hours for early meetings or late evening functions. Monday – Wednesday are the busiest days, whilst Friday – Sunday are the quietest. Winter is the busiest season and January the quietest month.

There are 10 breakout rooms on the Albert Street façade. They are flexible spaces that often accommodate a range of activities on a day to day basis. Activities may include didactic presentations (e.g. keynote speaker addressing a room of delegates), group meetings, trade shows or hospitality events (e.g. awards evening). The acoustic sensitivity varies markedly depending on the activity type, use of amplification systems and background noise level. For example, a low background noise environment (i.e. less construction noise ingress) would be

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

31 of 55

preferred for unamplified formal presentation, while a lively background noise environment (allowing more construction noise) would be acceptable for a social event or trade show. It is understood that presenters typically wear lapel mics and are amplified. o •

•

The ambient noise level in a selection of unoccupied conference rooms ranged from 40 to 46 dB LAeq and was controlled by mechanical services noise.

Level 7 Grand Horizon o

There are approximately 14 VIP gaming rooms at Sky City, four of which are on this level. However, only room 68 is located on the Albert Street facade. It is understood that occupancy rates are low, but booking lead times are short and clientele are exclusive and particular about the room that they use.

Room 68 has a lobbied external door with access to a balcony.

The unoccupied ambient noise level was 40 dB LAeq, due primarily to ventilation noise. The space would be expected to be considerably more noisy when occupied. It is understood that background ambient music would typically be playing, but the level would be customised to the clients’ preference

Levels 8 – 21 Hotel rooms o

Hotel rooms are busiest during early mornings and early evenings, with standard check-out by 11am and check-in after 3pm. Hotel occupancy rates are high throughout the year, with February – April the busiest months and January the quietest. Within the proposed construction periods, Saturday mornings are identified as particularly noise sensitive for hotel guests

Sky City will identify flight crews and other guests intending to sleep during the day and book them in hotel rooms facing Federal Street to avoid disturbance.

The ambient noise levels measured in a selection of representative rooms ranged from 32 dB LAeq (with ventilation off) to 41 dB LAeq (more typical with the ventilation on). Albert Street road traffic was audible at times, but more apparent were intermittent hotel activities such as a closing door down the corridor.

In response to CLG feedback (Appendix D, Table 14): •

A noise monitor shall be positioned in the East Day Spa reception during works directly outside the façade. An external monitor at 1m from the façade is unlikely to be practical due to the proximity of the works. Therefore, it should be positioned at a location inside the reception that is representative of the space, but away from the reception desk to avoid influence of conversations.

•

A continuous vibration monitor be positioned in the East Day Spa reception during works directly outside the façade. It should be placed on the foundations, just inside the external wall and away from foot traffic (e.g. under/behind the existing curtains).

•

The monitors shall be setup with triggers issuing SMS/email alerts above set thresholds to the Noise & Vibration Monitoring Manager and Specialist Noise & Vibration Advisor or their nominated representatives where appropriate.

Façade Sound Insulation Performance The existing external noise level at 1m from the East Day Spa Albert Street façade was 73 dB LAeq. Overall the existing outdoor noise environment (dominated by traffic) is very high and already at levels comparable with the daytime construction noise limit of 75 dB LAeq in CRL condition 31. The façade is predominantly sealed 12.38mm thick laminated glazing. The estimated sound level difference across the façade is 35 decibels. The East Day Spa façade is the exception, as it features This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

32 of 55

thick toughened glass and multiple sets of frameless glass doors. The existing sound level difference across the East Day Spa façade with the doors closed was measured to be 26 – 27 decibels, but would improve to approximately 30 decibels when the frameless glass doors are replaced with framed doors and meeting jams with effective acoustic seals. The sound level difference would improve to approximately 40 decibels for the chill room and 50 decibels for the treatment rooms further inside spa. Table 8 and Table 9 overleaf estimate the construction noise levels received in various noise sensitive spaces. The potential noise effects are colour coded and summarised as follows: •

Typically acceptable

•

Annoyance for some occupants

•

Annoyance and degradation of communication quality

Table 8: East Day Spa noise sensitive spaces External Noise Level (dB LAeq)

Estimated Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) Reception

Chill Room

Treatment Rooms

90 – 95

60 – 65

50 – 55

40 – 45

85 – 90

55 – 60

45 – 50

35 – 40

80 – 85

50 – 55

40 – 45

30 – 35

75 – 80

45 – 50

35 – 40

25 – 30

Table 9: Other Sky City noise sensitive spaces External Noise Level (dB LAeq)

Estimated Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) Gusto

Convention Centre11

Grand Horizon

Hotel

90 – 95

55 – 60

85 – 90

50 – 55

80 – 85

45 – 50

75 – 80

40 – 45

Consultation Trigger Level In addition to regular communication, specific consultation should be undertaken prior to construction works that are predicted to exceed 80 dB LAeq at the façade during the day. The consultation process is set out in Section 8.3 of the CNV DWP.

C3.3

Activity Detail and Consultation Table C3.3.1 shows activities that are predicted to exceed the noise limits in CRL Condition 31 and the associated effects. Table C3.3.2 provides a summary of consultation with the property owners and/or tenants representatives. Table C3.3.3 identifies methods and measures to mitigate noise effects and a statement of why they reflect the best practicable option.

Overlapping colours for the convention centre reflect the range of potential activities and user configurations, including amplified and unamplified use. This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

33 of 55

Table C3.3.1: Activity Detail (Noise) ** indicative examples only – To be completed during construction ** #

Activity Details

Predicted Noise Effects

Activity Period Duration Days Hours

Concrete cutting Jan 2018 – Apr 2018 3 days Monday to Saturday 24hr/7days

Location: External noise level: Façade performance: Internal noise level: Potential noise effects:

East façade 80 – 90 dB LAeq 35 decibels sound level difference 45 – 55 dB LAeq Annoyance and reduction in work efficiency

Activity Period Duration Days Hours

X X X X X

Receiver: Location: External noise level: Façade performance: Internal noise level: Potential noise effects:

X X X X X X

Table C3.3.2: Consultation ** indicative examples only – To be completed during construction ** #

Details

Receiver Date Name Phone Email CRL rep

Owner DD/MM/YY X X X X

A. Predicted noise levels

Receiver Date Name Phone Email CRL rep

Tenant DD/MM/YY X X X X

Matters discussed

B. CNV DWP C. Communication protocol D. Scheduling opportunities

B. C. D.

Table C3.3.3: Mitigation Measures ** indicative examples only – To be completed during construction ** #

Actions / specific mitigation measures

A. B. C. D. BPO Conclusion: X

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

34 of 55

Auckland Council SSCNMP

C4.1

Introduction This Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan (SSCNMP) is for the Auckland Council building located at 135 Albert Street. A SSCNMP is required because construction is predicted to exceed the Project Noise Standards in CRL Condition 31. This SSCNMP has been prepared in accordance with CRL Condition 37 and is Appendix C4 of the CRL Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan (CNV DWP). It is a supplementary document that builds on the Project CNV DWP, and therefore, directly references relevant sections of the DWP to avoid repetition. The objective of this SSCNMP is to detail the best practicable option(s) to avoid, remedy or mitigate the identified adverse effects from noise exceedances at Auckland Council. Section C4.2 identifies the noise sensitive spaces, the predicted or measured façade sound insulation performance, predicted noise effects and recommended consultation thresholds. As required under CRL Condition 37.5, Section C4.3 presents: •

The extent to which noise may exceed the Project Noise Standards (refer Table C4.3.1)

•

The timing and duration of any exceedance (refer Table C4.3.1)

•

The type of activity causing any exceedance (refer Table C4.3.1)

•

A summary of the communication and consultation with the receiver (refer Table C4.3.2)

•

The methods and measures to mitigate noise effects (refer Table C4.3.3)

•

A statement of why they reflect best practicable option (refer Table C4.3.3)

This SSCNMP has been prepared by Marshall Day Acoustics and forms part of the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) for the Project.

C4.2

Building Details Pre-Construction Consultation Fritha Witton (CRLL) and Craig Fitzgerald (Marshall Day Acoustics) met with Auckland Council building management representative Ben Thompson on 24 August 2017. The matters discussed included the general building layout, general noise sensitive spaces such as office and meeting rooms, and the identification of specific occupant sensitivities that require further investigation. In summary, the ground floor is the lobby, with office space on every level above. Each level is fairly uniform with a central services core, open plan areas broken up by small meeting rooms, offices and break-out spaces. The main external meeting rooms and conference rooms are on levels 3, 14, 28 and 29 (the top level). It was noted that Auckland Council generally has a flexible or ‘hot-desk’ culture (i.e. no fixed workstation location). Therefore, there is the ability for particularly noise sensitive staff to position themselves away from the Albert Street façade if they are affected by construction noise. Likewise, the large number of meeting rooms in the building enables selection or booking of rooms that are away from the Albert Street façade if necessary. The normal occupied periods are understood to be 9am – 5pm, Monday to Friday. A key concern expressed by Ben Thompson was noise exposure of building occupants when walking to and from the building, in close proximity to the works. Craig Fitzgerald advised that use of site perimeter acoustic hoardings is an effective way of mitigating the noise levels received by passing pedestrians. Pedestrians will pass the site quickly, resulting in low exposure levels, well below the

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

35 of 55

OSH12 noise limits. Therefore, the temporary noise effects on pedestrians will be safe and reasonable. Further information on OSH noise limits will be supplied to Ben Thompson separately for information purposes. Façade Sound Insulation Performance The Auckland Council building is a multi-story masonry commercial building with extensive sealed façade double glazing, estimated to be 6/12/8 (6mm glass pane – 12mm gap – 8mm glass pane). The estimated sound level difference across the façade with the windows and doors closed is 35 decibels. Table 10 below shows estimated construction noise levels received in various noise sensitive spaces. The potential noise effects are colour coded and summarised as follows: •

Typically acceptable

•

Annoyance for some occupants and reduction in work efficiency

•

Annoyance and degradation of communication quality

Table 10: Auckland Council office and meeting rooms External Noise Level (dB LAeq)

Estimated Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq)

90 – 95

55 – 60

85 – 90

50 – 55

80 – 85

45 – 50

75 – 80

40 – 45

Consultation Trigger Level In addition to regular communication, specific consultation should be undertaken prior to construction works that are predicted to exceed 85 dB LAeq at the level 3 façade during the day. The consultation process is set out in Section 8.3 of the CNV DWP.

C4.3

Activity Detail and Consultation Table C4.3.1 shows activities that are predicted to exceed the noise limits in CRL Condition 31 and the associated effects. Table C4.3.2 provides a summary of consultation with the property owners and/or tenants representatives. Table C4.3.3 identifies methods and measures to mitigate noise effects and a statement of why they reflect the best practicable option. Table C4.3.1: Activity Detail (Noise) ** indicative examples only – To be completed during construction ** #

Activity Details

Predicted Noise Effects

Activity Period Duration Days Hours

Location: External noise level: Façade performance: Internal noise level: Potential noise effects:

Concrete cutting Jan 2018 – Apr 2018 3 days Monday to Saturday 24hr/7days

East façade 80 – 90 dB LAeq 30 decibels sound level difference 50 – 60 dB LAeq Annoyance and reduction in work efficiency

12 The OSH noise criteria are contained in the “Approved Code of Practice for the Management of Noise in the Workplace, 2002”

document (ISBN 0-477-03666-X), which is underpinned by the AS/NZS 1269:2005 series of standards. This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

36 of 55

Activity Details

Predicted Noise Effects

Activity Period Duration Days Hours

Receiver: Location: External noise level: Façade performance: Internal noise level: Potential noise effects:

X X X X X

X X X X X X

Table C4.3.2: Consultation ** indicative examples only – To be completed during construction ** #

Details

Receiver Date Name Phone Email CRL rep

Owner DD/MM/YY X X X X

A. Predicted noise levels

Receiver Date Name Phone Email CRL rep

Tenant DD/MM/YY X X X X

Matters discussed

B. CNV DWP C. Communication protocol D. Scheduling opportunities

B. C. D.

Table C4.3.3: Mitigation Measures ** indicative examples only – To be completed during construction ** #

Actions / specific mitigation measures

A. B. C. D. BPO Conclusion: X

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

37 of 55

Huawei Centre SSCNMP

C5.1

Introduction This Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan (SSCNMP) is for Huawei Centre, a commercial building located at 120 Albert Street. A SSCNMP is required because construction is predicted to exceed the Project Noise Standards in CRL Condition 31. This SSCNMP has been prepared in accordance with CRL Condition 37 and is Appendix C5 of the CRL Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan (CNV DWP). It is a supplementary document that builds on the Project CNV DWP, and therefore, directly references relevant sections of the DWP to avoid repetition. The objective of this SSCNMP is to detail the best practicable option(s) to avoid, remedy or mitigate the identified adverse effects from noise exceedances at Huawei Centre. Section C3.2 identifies the noise sensitive spaces, the predicted or measured façade sound insulation performance, predicted noise effects and recommended consultation thresholds. As required under CRL Condition 37.5, Section C5.3 presents: •

The extent to which noise may exceed the Project Noise Standards (refer Table C5.3.1)

•

The timing and duration of any exceedance (refer Table C5.3.1)

•

The type of activity causing any exceedance (refer Table C5.3.1)

•

A summary of the communication and consultation with the receiver (refer Table C5.3.2)

•

The methods and measures to mitigate noise effects (refer Table C5.3.3)

•

A statement of why they reflect best practicable option (refer Table C5.3.3)

This SSCNMP has been prepared by Marshall Day Acoustics and forms part of the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) for the Project.

C5.2

Building Details Pre-Construction Consultation Fritha Witton (CRLL), Dave Brierley (CRLL) and Craig Fitzgerald (Marshall Day Acoustics) met with Huawei Centre building representatives Alex McKenzie (Colwall Property Investments) and Matt Topham (Atrium Investments) on 28 August 2017. The matters discussed included the tenant profile, the general building layout, general noise sensitive spaces such as office and meeting rooms, and the identification of specific tenant sensitivities that require further investigation. In summary, the Albert Street entrance is a common lobby area, above which there are approximately 20 levels of commercial office space, accommodating approximately 60 tenants13. Each level has a central services core and generally one or two tenancies. A typical office has open plan areas and meeting rooms as part of a bespoke tenant fit-out. There are no specific tenant sensitivities that require further investigation, however, it was noted that there is a call centre on level 5. The normal occupied periods are expected to be 9am – 5pm, Monday to Friday. Façade Sound Insulation Performance The Huawei Centre is a multi-story masonry commercial building with sealed façade glazing, estimated to be 8mm thick single pane glass. The estimated sound level difference across the façade with the windows and doors closed is 30 decibels. Table 11 estimates the construction noise level received in various noise sensitive spaces. The potential noise effects are colour coded and summarised as follows:

http://www.120albertstreet.co.nz/tower.html

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

38 of 55

•

Typically acceptable

•

Annoyance for some occupants and reduction in work efficiency

•

Annoyance and degradation of communication quality

Table 11: Huawei Centre office and meeting rooms External Noise Level (dB LAeq)

Estimated Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq)

90 – 95

60 – 65

85 – 90

55 – 60

80 – 85

50 – 55

75 – 80

45 – 50

Consultation Trigger Level In addition to regular communication, specific consultation should be undertaken prior to construction works that are predicted to exceed 80 dB LAeq at the façade during the day with the windows and doors closed. The consultation process is set out in Section 8.3 of the CNV DWP.

C5.3

Activity Detail and Consultation Table C5.3.1 shows activities that are predicted to exceed the noise limits in CRL Condition 31 and the associated effects. Table C5.3.2 provides a summary of consultation with the property owners and/or tenants representatives. Table C5.3.3 identifies methods and measures to mitigate noise effects and a statement of why they reflect the best practicable option. Table C5.3.1: Activity Detail (Noise) ** indicative examples only – To be completed during construction ** #

Activity Details

Predicted Noise Effects

Activity Period Duration Days Hours

Concrete cutting Jan 2018 – Apr 2018 3 days Monday to Saturday 24hr/7days

Location: External noise level: Façade performance: Internal noise level: Potential noise effects:

East façade 80 – 90 dB LAeq 30 decibels sound level difference 50 – 60 dB LAeq Annoyance and reduction in work efficiency

Activity Period Duration Days Hours

X X X X X

Receiver: Location: External noise level: Façade performance: Internal noise level: Potential noise effects:

X X X X X X

Table C5.3.2: Consultation ** indicative examples only – To be completed during construction ** #

Details

Receiver Date Name Phone Email CRL rep

Matters discussed Owner DD/MM/YY X X X X

A. Predicted noise levels B. CNV DWP C. Communication protocol D. Scheduling opportunities

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

39 of 55

Details

Receiver Date Name Phone Email CRL rep

Matters discussed Tenant DD/MM/YY X X X X

A. B. C. D.

Table C5.3.3: Mitigation Measures ** indicative examples only â€“ To be completed during construction ** #

Actions / specific mitigation measures

A. B. C. D. BPO Conclusion: X

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

40 of 55

Crowne Plaza SSCNMP

C6.1

Introduction This Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan (SSCVMP) is for Crowne Plaza, a commercial building located at 128 Albert Street. A SSCNMP is required because construction is predicted to exceed the Project Noise Standards in CRL Condition 31. This SSCNMP has been prepared in accordance with CRL Condition 37 and is Appendix C6 of the CRL Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan (CNV DWP). It is a supplementary document that builds on the Project CNV DWP, and therefore, directly references relevant sections of the DWP to avoid repetition. The objective of this SSCNMP is to detail the best practicable option(s) to avoid, remedy or mitigate the identified adverse effects from noise exceedances at Crowne Plaza. Section C6.2 identifies the noise sensitive spaces, site specific criteria, predicted effects and recommended consultation thresholds. As required under CRL Condition 38.5, Section C6.3 presents: •

The extent to which noise may exceed the Project Noise Standards (refer Table C6.3.1)

•

The timing and duration of any exceedance (refer Table C6.3.1)

•

The type of activity causing any exceedance (refer Table C6.3.1)

•

A summary of the communication and consultation with the receiver (refer Table C6.3.2)

•

The methods and measures to mitigate noise effects (refer Table C6.3.3)

•

A statement of why they reflect best practicable option (refer Table C6.3.3)

This SSCNMP has been prepared by Marshall Day Acoustics and forms part of the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) for the Project.

C6.2

Building Details Pre-Construction Consultation Fritha Witton (CRLL), Dave Brierley (CRLL) and Craig Fitzgerald (Marshall Day Acoustics) met with Crowne Plaza representative Faizal Ali and building owners representatives Alex McKenzie (Colwall Property Investments) and Matt Topham (Atrium Investments) on 28 August 2017. The matters discussed included the general building layout, room types, guests profile and seasonal business variations. The Albert Street access to the Crowne Plaza hotel lobby and Atrium on Elliott shopping centre is on level 4. The Crowne conference facilities are levels 5 and 6, however, only the Albert Room on level 6 fronts Albert Street. Car parking occupies levels 5 – 15, with hotel rooms rom levels 16 – 28. Noise sensitive during early mornings and early evenings. Guests intending to sleep during the day may be identified and booked in hotel rooms facing Elliott Street to avoid disturbance. The ambient noise levels in a selection of unoccupied hotel rooms with the windows closed ranged from 34 dB LAeq to 36 dB LAeq. The measured level was controlled by ventilation noise, but Albert Street road traffic was audible at times. The ambient noise level in the unoccupied Club Lounge on level 28 was 48 dB LAeq, primarily due to fridge noise, ventilation and background music. The ambient noise level in the Albert Room was not measured because it was occupied, but is expected to be approximately 40 – 45 dB LAeq when unoccupied. Façade Sound Insulation Performance The Crowne Plaza is a multi-story masonry commercial building with glazing estimated to be 8mm thick single pane glass. The estimated sound level difference across the façade with the windows and doors closed is 30 decibels.

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

41 of 55

Table 12 estimates the construction noise level received in various noise sensitive spaces. The potential noise effects are colour coded and summarised as follows: •

Typically acceptable

•

Annoyance for some occupants and reduction in work efficiency

•

Annoyance and degradation of communication quality

Table 12: Crowne Plaza External Noise Level (dB LAeq)

Estimated Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) Albert Room14

Hotel Rooms

90 – 95

55 – 60

85 – 90

50 – 55

80 – 85

45 – 50

75 – 80

40 – 45

Consultation Trigger Level In addition to regular communication, specific consultation should be undertaken prior to construction works that are predicted to exceed 80 dB LAeq at the façade during the day with the windows and doors closed. The consultation process is set out in Section 8.3 of the CNV DWP.

C6.3

Activity Detail and Consultation Table C6.3.1 shows activities that are predicted to exceed the noise limits in CRL Condition 31 and the associated effects. Table C6.3.2 provides a summary of consultation with the property owners and/or tenants representatives. Table C6.3.3 identifies methods and measures to mitigate noise effects and a statement of why they reflect the best practicable option. Table C6.3.1: Activity Detail (Noise) ** indicative examples only – To be completed during construction ** #

Activity Details

Predicted Noise Effects

Activity Period Duration Days Hours

Concrete cutting Jan 2018 – Apr 2018 3 days Monday to Saturday 24hr/7days

Location: External noise level: Façade performance: Internal noise level: Potential noise effects:

East façade 80 – 90 dB LAeq 30 decibels sound level difference 50 – 60 dB LAeq Annoyance and reduction in work efficiency

Activity Period Duration Days Hours

X X X X X

Receiver: Location: External noise level: Façade performance: Internal noise level: Potential noise effects:

X X X X X X

42 of 55

Table C6.3.2: Consultation ** indicative examples only â€“ To be completed during construction ** #

Details

Receiver Date Name Phone Email CRL rep

Owner DD/MM/YY X X X X

A. Predicted noise levels

Receiver Date Name Phone Email CRL rep

Tenant DD/MM/YY X X X X

Matters discussed

B. CNV DWP C. Communication protocol D. Scheduling opportunities

B. C. D.

Table C6.3.3: Mitigation Measures ** indicative examples only â€“ To be completed during construction ** #

Actions / specific mitigation measures

A. B. C. D. BPO Conclusion: X

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

43 of 55

EconoLodge SSCNMP

C7.1

Introduction This Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan (SSCNMP) is for a EconoLodge, a commercial building located at 37 Wellesley Street West. A SSCNMP is required because construction is predicted to exceed the Project Noise Standards in CRL Condition 31. This SSCNMP has been prepared in accordance with CRL Condition 37 and is Appendix C7 of the CRL Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan (CNV DWP). It is a supplementary document that builds on the Project CNV DWP, and therefore, directly references relevant sections of the DWP to avoid repetition. The objective of this SSCNMP is to detail the best practicable option(s) to avoid, remedy or mitigate the identified adverse effects from noise exceedances at EconoLodge. Section C7.2 identifies the noise sensitive spaces, the predicted or measured façade sound insulation performance, predicted noise effects and recommended consultation thresholds. As required under CRL Condition 37.5, Section C7.3 presents: •

The extent to which noise may exceed the Project Noise Standards (refer Table C7.3.1)

•

The timing and duration of any exceedance (refer Table C7.3.1)

•

The type of activity causing any exceedance (refer Table C7.3.1)

•

A summary of the communication and consultation with the receiver (refer Table C7.3.2)

•

The methods and measures to mitigate noise effects (refer Table C7.3.3)

•

A statement of why they reflect best practicable option (refer Table C7.3.3)

This SSCNMP has been prepared by Marshall Day Acoustics and forms part of the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) for the Project.

C7.2

Building Details Pre-Construction Consultation Dave Brierley (CRLL), Louise Strogen (Aurecon) and Craig Fitzgerald (Marshall Day Acoustics) met with EconoLodge representatives Ken and Gloria Linstead on 29 August 2017. The matters discussed included the general building layout, room types, guests profile and seasonal business variations. In summary, level 1 (Albert Street road level) includes the reception (accessed from Wellesley St West), lobby and breakfast bar, above which hotel rooms extend from levels 2 – 7. Each level has a central corridor with a row of rooms facing Albert Street, and another row facing towards Elliott Street. Bathroom extract fans ventilate the rooms using negative pressure and occupants regulate temperature by opening a window or using heat pumps (where available). January – April are the busiest months. Noise sensitive during early mornings and early evenings. Saturday mornings are identified as particularly noise sensitive for hotel guests (acknowledging that the normal construction hours do not include Sundays or the night-time on all days). Guests intending to sleep during the day may be identified and booked in hotel rooms facing Elliott Street to avoid disturbance. The ambient noise level measured in a selection of representative unoccupied rooms ranged from 36 in room 211 (level 2) to 46 dB LAeq in room 611 (level 6). The variation reflected the range of window types and condition of the window jam and sealing arrangement. Albert Street road traffic noise dominated the measured levels in all cases. Façade Sound Insulation Performance The EconoLodge façade glazing type and condition of the window sealing arrangement varies from room to room. The range included 5-6mm single pane glass with poor seals on the upper floor levels,

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

44 of 55

approximately 9mm single pane glass with good seals on level 2, and double glazing on level 3 estimated to be 6/50/5 (6mm glass pane – 50mm gap – 6mm glass pane). The estimated sound level difference across the façade to the bar / lobby area is typically 30 decibels. The estimated sound level difference across the façade to the hotel rooms varies from 20 – 30 decibels with the windows are closed, depending on the glazing type and condition of its sealing arrangement. Table 13 estimates the construction noise level received in various noise sensitive spaces based on the external noise level and sound level difference across the façade. The potential noise effects are colour coded and summarised as follows: •

Typically acceptable

•

Annoyance for some occupants and reduction in work efficiency

•

Annoyance and degradation of communication quality

Table 13: EconoLodge External Noise Level (dB LAeq)

Estimated Internal Noise Level (dB LAeq) Bar / Lobby

Hotel Rooms15

90 – 95

60 – 65

60 – 75

85 – 90

55 – 60

55 – 70

80 – 85

50 – 55

50 – 65

75 – 80

45 – 50

45 – 60

Consultation Trigger Level In addition to regular communication, specific consultation should be undertaken prior to construction works that are predicted to exceed 75 dB LAeq at the façade during the day. The consultation process is set out in Section 8.3 of the CNV DWP.

C7.3

Activity Detail and Consultation Table C7.3.1 shows activities that are predicted to exceed the noise limits in CRL Condition 31 and the associated effects. Table C7.3.2 provides a summary of consultation with the property owners and/or tenants representatives. Table C7.3.3 identifies methods and measures to mitigate noise effects and a statement of why they reflect the best practicable option. Table C7.3.1: Activity Detail (Noise) ** indicative examples only – To be completed during construction **

Activity Details

Predicted Noise Effects

Activity Period Duration Days Hours

Location: External noise level: Façade performance: Internal noise level: Potential noise effects:

Concrete cutting Jan 2018 – Apr 2018 3 days Monday to Saturday 24hr/7days

East façade 80 – 90 dB LAeq 30 decibels sound level difference 50 – 60 dB LAeq Annoyance and reduction in work efficiency

Overlapping colours for hotel rooms reflect range of glazing type and condition of its sealing arrangement

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

45 of 55

Activity Details

Predicted Noise Effects

Activity Period Duration Days Hours

Receiver: Location: External noise level: Façade performance: Internal noise level: Potential noise effects:

X X X X X

X X X X X X

Table C7.3.2: Consultation ** indicative examples only – To be completed during construction ** #

Details

Receiver Date Name Phone Email CRL rep

Owner DD/MM/YY X X X X

A. Predicted noise levels

Receiver Date Name Phone Email CRL rep

Tenant DD/MM/YY X X X X

Matters discussed

B. CNV DWP C. Communication protocol D. Scheduling opportunities

B. C. D.

Table C7.3.3: Mitigation Measures ** indicative examples only – To be completed during construction ** #

Actions / specific mitigation measures

A. B. C. D. BPO Conclusion: X

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

46 of 55

APPENDIX D COMMUNCATIONS RECORDS Table 14: CLG review comments Date

CLG Member

Comment

Response

11/08/2017

SKYCITY

Letter received from Matt Ballesty.

Extension provided. Consultation continued to enable completion of the SKYCITY SSCNMP (Appendix C3). Updated CNV DWP (rev 03, dated 04/09/2017) was issued to SKYCITY. The consultation is included in Appendix C3.2.

No initial comments on the main body of the draft CNV DWP (rev 02, dated 28/07/2017), but sought clarification on the purpose of the DWP and requested an extension to the feedback period to include the ongoing consultation and development of the SKYCITY SSCNMP (Appendix C3). 12/09/17 & 13/09/17

SKYCITY

Letter received from Matt Ballesty and subsequent discussion with Arron Money

The following summarises the key points.

(Para. 10)

Requests a higher, heavier site noise barrier with a cantilever component.

There is predicted to be a marginal noise mitigation benefit and CRLL advised that it will be done by the contractor. This is included in Section 5.4.1 of the CNV DWP.

(Para. 11 – 13)

The East Day Spa Albert Street façade is to be partly repositioned to enable the CRL works. SKYCITY requests that as part of the remedial works, the façade be upgraded to a minimum STC 60 sound insulation performance standard. Suitable construction options are provided.

The effects do not justify the STC 60 minimum performance specification. The effects thresholds in Tables 8 and 9 were not challenged by SKYCITY except for comments in para. 15-16 (discussed below). Therefore, the requested specification is considered disproportionate to the residual noise effects. However, the façade must be changed to enable the works to occur. Therefore, SKYCITY were advised that their preferred façade design would be accommodated where practicable.

(Para. 14)

Requests upgrades to the access to East Day Spa from the hotel lobby, involving secondary glazing, solid core door and/or entrance lobby.

The effects do not justify secondary glazing or another entrance lobby. Therefore, the specification is considered disproportionate to the residual noise effects. However, the proposed changes to the façade necessitate a change in the way the tenancy is accessed. As part of the façade upgrades, SKYCITY were advised that their preferred design would be accommodated where practicable.

(Para. 15 – 16)

Questions the East Day Spa façade performance in Table 8 and suggests that a noise reduction of 50 decibels is necessary.

This is a moot point given the commitment to upgrade the façade in response to para. 11 – 13.

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

47 of 55

Date

13/09/17

CLG Member

Comment

Response

(Para. 17)

Notes that noise will travel through the lobby to other parts of the building.

The lobby is not a noise sensitive space. The noise levels received in relevant noise sensitive spaces (e.g. conference rooms on levels 4 and 5), via the escalator route, are predicted to be much lower than those via the external façade.

(Para 18 – 21)

Requests ongoing communication, consultation, consideration of alternative construction methods, and minimum setbacks for fixed plant.

The communication, consultation and consideration of alternative construction methods are addressed/committed to in the CNV DWP Sections 5, 6, 8 and SSCNMP Section C3.2. The basis for the specified setbacks are unknown, but they will be considered and accommodated where practicable.

SKYCITY

Meeting to present and discuss the matters in the letter dated 12/09/17. Robert Clarke and Dave Brierley (CRLL), and Craig Fitzgerald (Marshall Day Acoustics), Arron Money (SKYCITY), Alex Jacob and Fadia Sami (Earcon).

In addition to the matters raised in the letter, continuous noise and vibration monitoring was requested while works are undertaken outside SKYCITY. The monitoring protocol outlined in the CNV DWP was explained. It is considered that continuous monitoring is not justified however, the comfort it would provide to SKYCITY occupants is beneficial, so CRLL agreed to provide this wherever practicable. CRLL propose one continuous vibration monitor be placed on the foundations inside East Day Spa, just inside the external wall and away from foot traffic (e.g. under/behind the existing curtains). Vibration will dissipate as it travels up the building, so additional sensors on other floor levels are not required, as the foundations will be a suitable proxy. CRLL propose one noise monitor in the East Day Spa reception, at a location that is representative of the space but away from the reception desk to avoid influence of conversations. An external monitor at 1m from the façade is not practical due to the proximity of the works. Both the noise and vibration monitors will be setup with triggers issuing SMS/email alerts above set thresholds. This is included in Sections 7.1 and 7.2 of the CNV DWP.

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

48 of 55

Table 15: Independent peer review comments16 DWP17 Section

Comment

Response

1.0

All potentially affected parties should be listed in a table and shown on a plan. The CNVMP/SSCNMPs for enabling works contract 2 provide a good example.

Updated. Figure 1 included to identifying potentially affected parties as suggested. Links also added to reference Sections 4.1 and 4.2.

2.3

Circumstances under which ‘normal’ hours might be exceeded should be stated, along with any corresponding management procedures.

Updated. No works outside normal hours anticipated. However, added that works outside normal construction hours must be proven to be necessary, the BPO and preceeded by advanced communication with potentially affected parties. Section 6.1 updated accordingly as well.

2.4

Missing highlighted and ‘TBC’ details need to be added to Table 1.

No change. Highlighted sections of DWP are ‘living’ parts of the document – To Be Confirmed prior to, and/or during, construction.

3.1.1

The Sunday noise limits for sensitive receivers listed in Table 2 relate to NoRs 5 & 6 and not NoR 1, which has slightly more lenient limits.

Corrected.

4.1

It should be made clear how, when and by whom Table 4 will be used to trigger mitigation/management.

Updated. Shall be used by the Environment and Sustainability Manager prior to construction to inform when and what equipment will require mitigation or management.

It should be made clear who will update Table 4 and what ‘other means’ will be used to obtain information.

Updated. Shall be kept up to date by the Specialist Noise & Vibration Advisor when new information becomes apparent through noise monitoring (Section 7.0) or other means.

5.2

Specific details of ‘quieter construction methodologies’ should be included.

Updated. This section details a good practice equipment selection process, rather than a list of preferred construction methods. However, an example is now included (e.g. bored piling in place of sheet piling).

5.4.1

Specific details of barriers should be stated rather than options. The change to 2.4m high barriers with a 1m canopy should be included in the main text, rather than maintaining a contradictory statement referencing 2m high barriers.

Updated. Barrier specification only reflects the compromise agreed in response to CLG feedback.

Independent Peer Review undertaken by Dr Stephen Chiles, from Chiles Limited, received 10 October 2017

CNV DWP rev 4, dated 3 October 2017

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

49 of 55

DWP17 Section

Comment

Response

5.4.2

Given the extensive predicted non-compliances, enclosures should be used for all concrete cutting where practicable.

Updated. The second bullet point currently states “enclosures shall be used where a noise barrier is not sufficient to achieve compliance with the noise limits and it is practicable to do so”. One of the activity examples is “road cutting activities”. This example has been replaced with “concrete cutting activities” for clarity.

7.1

The proposed noise and vibration monitors in the East Day Spa should be used throughout the works, being moved to whichever building is closest to works at the time.

No change. It is considered that continuous noise and vibration monitoring is not justified by the predicted effects, and this project would be better served by a series of attended measurements at targeted times. Noise and vibration monitoring at East Day Spa was agreed to in response to specific CLG feedback from Sky City (Appendix D, Table 14).

There should be periodic (e.g. monthly) monitoring regardless of complaints.

No change. Targeted monitoring offers better value and correlates with predicted effects. The high noise activities have been identified and they trigger the need for monitoring as appropriate. In addition, there is residual safe guards to monitor in response to complaints.

Measurements less than 15 minutes duration should be acceptable for steady sources.

Updated as suggested.

7.2

There should be routine monitoring for structureborne noise rather than solely in response to complaints. There should be systematic assessment of works on canopies that may cause structureborne noise. The assumption that all canopy removal will be conducted with hand tools unlikely to generate significant noise appears optimistic, and should be revisited in each of the SSCNMPs.

Updated. It is considered that routine structure-borne noise surveys are not justified. Advanced communication and avoiding the use of hammer-drills is considered the most effective way of addressing isolated effects. Section 4.2 has been updated to states ”hammerdrills should be avoided where practicable (e.g. use of acetylene torch to cut steel). Consultation with building occupants and timing of this activity will be critical in managing effects”.

8.3

The process needs to set out how and who determines where exceedances are likely, otherwise the process has no start point.

Updated to identify responsibility of the Environment and Sustainability Manager. Process for any construction activity measured to exceed the relevant construction noise and vibration performance standards that is not already addressed by a SSCNMP or SSCVMP in Appendix C.

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

50 of 55

DWP17 Section

Comment

Response

Appendix C

Missing highlighted details need to be added to tables.

Updated. Further examples highlighted to ensure they are identified as ‘living’ parts of the document – To Be Confirmed prior to, and/or during, construction.

Draft/indicative content is on concrete cutting. Placeholders should be clear that other activities will also be included.

No change. Table titles include the following highlighted qualification: ** indicative examples only – To be completed during construction **.

Table 16: Communications record #

Details

Receiver Date Name Phone Email CRL rep Receiver Date Name Phone Email CRL rep

Matters discussed

Actions / specific measures

X DD/MM/YY X X X X

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

51 of 55

APPENDIX E RELEVANT CONDITIONS Table 17:

CRL Conditions and CNV DWP section where addressed

Condition Description 16

Communications â€“ Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers Not applicable to the Project

CNV DWP ref. Section 3.1.2, Section 3.2.3

Construction Noise and Vibration DWP For the avoidance of doubt, this condition is applicable to the management of construction noise and vibration on all receivers, including sensitive and notable receivers.

36.1

A Construction Noise and Vibration DWP shall be prepared and implemented. The objective of the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP is to provide for the development and implementation of identified best practicable option to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects on receivers of noise and vibration resulting from construction.

36.2

The Construction Noise and Vibration DWP shall: a)

36.3

Adopt the noise and vibration standards for construction set out in Conditions 31, 32, 33 and 34 of these designations;

This document

Section 3.0

b) Be generally consistent with the draft Construction Noise and Vibration management plan submitted as part of the Notice of Requirement documentation (dated 23 August 2013); and

Section 9.0

Section 5.0

Identify methods to achieve best practicable option for mitigating adverse effects.

To achieve this objective, the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP shall include: a) The roles and responsibilities of the noise and vibration personnel in the contractor team with regard to managing and monitoring adverse noise and vibration effects;

Section 2.4

b) That piling and road cutting will be restricted to between the hours of 7am to 7pm, Monday to Saturday;

Section 2.3

c) Construction machinery and equipment to be used and their operating noise and vibration levels;

Section 4.0, Appendix B

d) Identification of construction activities that are likely to create adverse noise and vibration effects, the location of these in the construction site areas, and the distance to comply with the Project Criteria in Conditions 31, 32, 33 and 34;

Section 2.2, Section 4.0, Appendix C

e) The timing of construction activities that are likely to create an adverse noise and vibration effect;

Appendix C

f) The location of sensitive noise and vibration receivers;

Appendix C

g) A record of communication and consultation with sensitive noise and vibration receivers. The record must include a clear explanation of where any comments from sensitive receivers have not been incorporated in the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP, and the reasons why not. This information must be included in the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP provided to both the Independent Peer Review Panel and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan process specified in Condition 11;

Appendix C, Appendix D

h) Specific measures to address the concerns raised by those sensitive receivers;

Appendix C

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

52 of 55

Condition Description 36.3

i) Specific training procedures for construction personnel including;

CNV DWP ref. Section 5.1

I. The project noise and vibration performance standards for construction (conditions 31, 32, 33 and 34); II. Information about noise and vibration sources within the construction area and the locations of sensitive noise and vibration receivers; and III. Construction machinery operation instructions relating to mitigating noise and vibration; j) Methods and measures to mitigate adverse noise and vibration effects including, but not limited to, structural mitigation such as barriers and enclosures, the scheduling of high noise and vibration construction, use of low noise and vibration machinery, temporary relocation of affected receivers or any other measures or offer agreed to by the Requiring Authority and the affected receiver;

Section 5.3, Section 5.4, Section 8.3

k) The proposed methods for monitoring construction noise and vibration to be undertaken by a suitably qualified person for the duration of construction works including:

Section 7.0

I. Updating the predicted noise and vibration contours based on the final design and construction activities; II. Confirm which buildings are to be subject to a pre and post building condition survey in accordance with Condition 46. This includes consideration of those buildings in Appendix One and Two to these conditions; III. The timing and location for monitoring of buildings during construction is required (Note that the flow charts contained in Appendices B and C of Appendix J of the technical noise and vibration report provided as part of the Notice of Requirement should be used as a guide); IV. Identifying appropriate monitoring locations for receivers of construction noise and vibration; V. Procedures for working with the Communication and Consultation Manager to respond to complaints received on construction noise and vibration, including methods to monitor and identify noise and vibration sources; VI. Procedures for monitoring construction noise and vibration and reporting to the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer; and VII. Procedures for how works will be undertaken should they be required as a result of the building condition surveys; l) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which detail how landowners and occupiers are to be communicated with around noise and vibration effects. 37

Section 6.1

Site Specific Construction Noise Management Plan (SSCNMP) For the avoidance of doubt, this condition does not apply to MediaWorks.

37.1

The objective of a SSCNMP is to detail the best practicable option to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on a receiver resulting from construction noise that does not comply with the Project Noise Standards.

Appendix C

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

53 of 55

Condition Description 37.2

Further to the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP in Condition 36, a SSCNMP shall be prepared for any receiver or activity for which air overpressure is either predicted or measured to exceed the limits in Condition 32, or where construction noise is either predicted or measured to exceed the Project Noise Standards in Condition 31, except where the exceedance of the standards in Condition 31 is less than 5 decibels and does not exceed: a)

CNV DWP ref. Section 3.1, Section 4.1, Appendix C

0700-2200: 1 period of up to 2 consecutive weeks in any 2 months

b) 2200-0700: 1 period of up to 2 consecutive nights in any 10 days. 37.3

For predicted exceedances of less than 5 decibels (refer 37.2) monitoring shall be undertaken to confirm the actual noise levels. If exceedance is shown to be more than 5 decibels, or the period exceeds those detailed, then a SSCNMP will be prepared.

Section 7.0

37.4

In addition to the SSCNMPs prepared in accordance with Condition 37.2, and notwithstanding Condition 37.1, the Requiring Authority shall prepare SSCNMPs specifying the best practicable option for management, methods and measures to mitigate all noise effects for the properties located at:

N/A

1 Queen Street (Lot 1 DP 165403);

b) 21 Queen Street (Lot 1 DP 67723); c)

29 Customs Street West (Lot 7 DP 77037)

d) 188 Quay Street (Lot 5 DP 63972 and Lot 1 DP 78340); and e) 37.5

23-29 Albert Street (Lot 1 DP 116724).

SSCNMPs will identify: a)

The extent to which noise may exceed the Project Noise Standards in Condition 31 or the overpressure limits in Condition 32;

Section 4.1, Appendix C

b) The timing and duration of any exceedance; c)

Details of the type of activity causing any exceedance;

d) The summary of the communication and consultation undertaken with the receiver. The summary must include a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. This information must be included in the SSCNMP provided to both the Independent Peer Review Panel and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan process specified in Condition 11; e)

The methods and measures to mitigate noise effects, including but not limited to, potential to offer temporary relocation of affected receivers, alternative ventilation, faรงade sound insulation improvements, building condition surveys in the case of overpressure generated by blast events, or other offers made by the Requiring Authority and whether these have been agreed to by the affected receiver;

The reasons why the management and mitigation measures and methods reflect best practicable option.

37.6

The SSCNMP shall be submitted for the review of Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan. The works shall then be undertaken in accordance with the SSCNMP confirmed by the Requiring Authority as part of the Outline Plan.

Site Specific Construction Vibration Management Plan (SSCVMP)

Section 9.0

For the avoidance of doubt, this condition does not apply to MediaWorks. 38.1

The objective of a SSCVMP is to detail the best practicable option to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on a receiver resulting from vibration that does not comply with the Project Vibration Standards.

Appendix C

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

54 of 55

Condition Description 38.2

Further to the Construction Noise and Vibration DWP in Condition 36, a SSCVMP shall be prepared: a)

For any unoccupied buildings, structure or infrastructure for which construction vibration is either predicted or measured to exceed the Project Vibration Standards in Condition 33;

CNV DWP ref. Section 3.2, Section 4.2, Appendix C

b) Where a complaint or concern is raised and the vibration level exceeds the amenity levels of Condition 34.2(a) and 34.2(b); c)

In response to other concerns or complaints where required (refer to Condition 17); and

d) For the properties listed in Condition 37.4. 38.3

Where the amenity limits in Conditions 34.2(a) and 34.2(b) are exceeded:

Section 7.0

Best practicable management of vibration must be applied; and The vibration activity shall be scheduled to avoid disturbance. If this is not practicable then reasonable respite periods shall be provided to reduce vibration exposure. 38.4

The limits in condition 33 may be relaxed by a SSCVMP but only for a building, structure or infrastructure that has been assessed by a suitably qualified and experienced structural engineer and where it has been deemed to be capable of withstanding higher vibration levels without sustaining building or structural damage, and where appropriate vibration and building condition monitoring regimes are in place.

N/A

38.5

SSCVMPs will identify:

Section 4.2, Appendix C

The timing and duration of any exceedance;

b) Details of the type of activity giving rise to any exceedance; c)

Site Specific vibration criteria that addresses the issue(s) of concern (i.e. building damage, amenity and sensitive equipment). Site Specific criteria shall be determined by a suitably qualified independent vibration expert;

d) The summary of the communication and consultation undertaken with the receiver. The summary must include a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not. This information must be included in the SSCVMP provided to both the Independent Peer Review Panel and Auckland Council as part of the Outline Plan process specified in Condition 11; e)

The methods and measures to mitigate vibration effects, including but not limited to, investigating alternative low-vibration construction methods, undertaking highvibration works outside sensitive times, vibration barriers, building condition surveys, potential to offer temporary relocation of affected receivers, or other offers made by the Requiring Authority and agreed to by the affected receiver.

The reasons why the management and mitigation measures and methods reflect best practicable option.

38.6

The SSCVMP shall be submitted for the review of Auckland Council. The works shall then be undertaken in accordance with the SSCVMP confirmed by the Requiring Authority as part of the Outline Plan.

Section 9.0

Notable Noise and Vibration Receivers

Section 3.1.2, Section 3.2.3

Not applicable to the Project 40

Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan â€“ Medial Works Not applicable to the Project

Section 3.1.2, Section 3.2.3

This document may not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Marshall Day Acoustics Limited Rp 001 r06 20170511 CRL Aotea Early Works CNV DWP.docx

55 of 55