The
Canadian Bar Association British Columbia
Lawyer-Client Privilege Protected sec strikes down provision to search lawyers' offices
Inside President's Column
2
Executive Director's Column
3
Civil Liability Review
4
Law Society AGM
4
Section Talk
5
Practice Talk
7
Legislative Update
9
Executive Committee
2002/2003
IS
Your Online Resource
20
Administrative Justice Project
21
The Locum Lawyer
22
Studying Law in Vienna
23
Letter to the Editor
26
Law Foundation of BC
27
Classified Ads
28
Member Services
28
and Freedoms.
BC President David Paul was pleased with the result. "Solicitor-client privilege is an important cornerstone of our justice system. It ensures that when clients speak to their lawyers, the communication remains private," said Mr. Paul. "Without that protection, police or government could seize confidential documents and use them in any investigation against the client."
The Canadian Bar Association welcomed the Supreme Court's decisions in Lavallee, White Ottenheimer & Baker, and Fink, which upheld the fundamental principle that clients' privileged communications with their lawyers must be protected.
The Court has emphasized that this privilege belongs to the client and can only be waived by the client. "The CBA strives to uphold this principle and believes that everyone who consults with a lawyer must be able to do so in confidence," said Mr. Paul.
Section 488.1 of the Criminal Code sets the parameters for law office searches by police. The court's decision strikes down that provision. The Supreme Court said that section 488.1 allowed unreasonable search and seizure, which is prohibited under section 8 of the Charter.
The Canadian Bar Association, the Federation of Law Societies and the Law Society of Alberta intervened at the Supreme Court, arguing that the Court must be vigilant in protecting this fundamental right. Any exceptions to lawyerclient confidentiality must be clearly defined so lawyers understand the scope of lawyer-client privilege and their ethical obligations. The CBA recommended that section 488.1 be struck down, to uphold the principle of solicitor-client privilege.
n September 12, 2002, the Supreme Court of Canada struck down the provision of the Criminal Code of Canada that authorized searches of law offices, on the basis that such searches are prohibited under section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights
The cases came from three different provinces and were heard together by the Supreme Court. They considered government or police searches of law office files and the principle of solicitor-client privilege. CBA member Jim Lebo of Alberta argued the intervention on behalf of the CBA, with assistance from BC members. All CBA member participation was provided pro bono in this case. Madam Justice Louise Arbour stated that: "Confidential communications to a lawyer represent an important exercise of the right to privacy, and they are central to the administration of justice in an adversarial system. Unjustified, or even accidental infringements of the privilege erode the public's confidence in the fairness of the criminal justice system."
Reform of law in this area is now required. In its decision, the Supreme Court outlined 10 principles to guide Parliament in drafting a new law. The CBA has committed to working with the government in that process, as part of its law reform mandate. Full text of the SCC decision can be found at www .lexum.umontreal.ca/ esc-sec/ en/ rec/ html/lavalle2.en.html. •
www.bccba.org