Issuu

ABEDIAN SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

REVIEW 2022-23

In the spirit of reconciliation, Bond University acknowledges the Traditional Owners and Custodians of the land on which the university now stands. The Kombumerri people have walked and cared for this land and wildlife for thousands of years, and their descendants maintain spiritual connection and traditions. We thank them for sharing their cultures, spiritualities and ways of living with the land and wildlife in this place we all now call home. We pay respect to Elders past, present and emerging.

This book contains a variety of images and student work that are subject to copyright protection. The inclusion of these materials is intended for educational and illustrative purposes. The copyright for the images featured in this book belongs to their respective creators and owners. Every effort has been made to properly attribute and secure the necessary permissions for the use of these images and student work. Readers are advised that the reproduction, distribution, or any unauthorized use of the copyrighted materials in this book may infringe upon the rights of the original copyright holders. It is the responsibility of the reader to respect and adhere to all relevant copyright laws and regulations when using or sharing the content found within this book. For any inquiries or concerns regarding the use of copyrighted material or to request further information about the sources and permissions, please contact the Abedian School of Architecture. The publisher and author disclaim any liability for any unauthorized use or misuse of copyrighted materials within this book.

Edited by Professor Paul Loh Designed by Studio Paradise Abedian School of Architecture Bond University 14 University Drive, Robina Queensland 4226 Australia ISBN: : 978-0-9871509-8-1 © All rights reserved. Bond University. 2023

04 06

08 34

36 60 82 84

FOREWORD, DR SOHEIL ABEDIAN EXECUTIVE DEAN’S WELCOME, PROFESSOR DEREK CARSON BACHELOR OF DESIGN IN ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN PEDAGOGY AT ASA, PROFESSOR PAUL LOH MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE COMPLEMENTARY STUDIES INDUSTRY SUPPORTS STAFF & CREDITS

CONTENTS

PATRON’S FOREWORD

Since the inception of the Architecture School in 2012, and the welcoming of the first cohort comprising 21 students, the school has produced over 329 graduates across the Undergraduate, Graduate and PhD programmes. In this special 10-year anniversary edition, we are delighted to acknowledge each student – etching their name in the historical beginnings of the Abedian School of Architecture.

spearheading international companies: ‘I never imagined when we opened the doors of the school, that only a few years later I would be employing and working with some of the talented graduates of the School and experiencing first-hand the skills and knowledge developed and the role that these emerging architects are playing in the future landscape of our City. Indeed, a serendipitous experience!’

The 10-year anniversary marks a significant milestone, and the opportunity for us to acknowledge the contribution and success of our students, staff, alumni, and collaborators. It is also a reflection of the many stepping stones that have contributed to growth in the fledgling years as we continue to build on the strengths, skills and learning experiences to pave the way for continued prosperity centred on the pursuit of creative excellence, inclusion, and empowerment.

Increasingly vital is the connection and engagement with local industry through meaningful partnerships including the Gold Coast City Council as well as other local Councils, to work alongside each other and to nurture an understanding and appreciation for the role of architecture in the City’s landscape.

We are delighted to acknowledge the significant achievements since the early beginnings, with the first alumni to achieve professional registration as an Architect in 2018, and several alumni now well established in their own practices and 4

It is through collaborations with local practices, design studios and businesses, including internships and mentoring programs, that enables students to interact with industry to gain first-hand experience and develop meaningful integration as they enter the business world. The School strives to create a unique learning environment through the design

studio and to foster innovation in emerging technologies and explore design thinking that responds to evolving challenges. To make a positive impact in an adaptable and ethical manner - ever open to change and possibility, and to contribute to building better communities. The collations in this year’s book showcase a cross-section of student work undertaken in the formative phase of the Abedian School of Architecture – poignant reflections, memories and a glimpse of our emerging architects and potential pioneers of modern architecture. The first ten years is just the beginning! A symbolic moment in time that punctuates the character shaping period of the School as we look forward to the many decades ahead under the leadership of Professor Paul Loh and the dedicated academic team as they guide and prepare future generations of aspiring architects to create spaces that promote happiness, well-being and a strong sense of community.

Dr Soheil Abedian AM Patron

" SPACE HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE SPIRITUAL DIMENSION OF ARCHITECTURE. IT IS NOT THE PHYSICAL STATEMENT OF THE STRUCTURE SO MUCH AS WHAT IT CONTAINS THAT MOVES US." — ARTHUR ERIKSON 5

EXECUTIVE DEAN’S WELCOME

Welcome to the Abedian School of Architecture Review 2022-23. Reviews acknowledge and celebrate the ideas, the creativity, and the collective work of students and staff. This Review is especially important as its publication coincides with the 10th anniversary of the formal opening of the Abedian building itself. Buildings are significant; we live and work in them, we spend time in them, they protect and hold us, and, if designed correctly, they can inspire us. Buildings that house schools of architecture need to be inspiring; they form part of the educational experience and contribute to the school’s identity. This is undoubtedly the case for the Abedian School of Architecture. For the past ten years, it has fulfilled all these roles and more. As a non-architect, each time I step into the Abedian School, I am struck by its cathedral-like height, the eye-catching shape of its walls, the way light permeates it, and its balance of defined space and openness. I often find myself thinking it must be wonderful to learn about 6

architecture in such a place. I suspect those who opened the building in early 2014 must have experienced similar thoughts. I believe in a further 10 years when prospective students visit Bond’s campus for the first time, they will continue to be struck by its qualities. The 2022-23 Abedian Review captures many ideas, creativity, and projects of students, staff, and visiting academics and practitioners. These outputs depicted in it have been borne through hard work, knowledge, collaborations, and creative processes. They have been nurtured within the building from initial ideas to design and implementation. This interplay between the building, the people that inhabit it, the ideas they share, and the mentoring that takes place, creates a School of Architecture. I invite you to enjoy this review and hope you enjoy discovering more about our School and our approach to developing future architects. Professor Derek Carson Executive Dean Faculty of Society & Design

" BUILDINGS ARE SIGNIFICANT; WE LIVE AND WORK IN THEM, WE SPEND TIME IN THEM, THEY PROTECT AND HOLD US, AND, IF DESIGNED CORRECTLY, THEY CAN INSPIRE US."

BACHELOR OF DESIGN IN ARCHITECTURE PROGRAM CODE: SD-90009 CRICOS CODE: 0101291 The Bachelor of Design in Architecture programme is a pathway to our accredited Master of Architecture. Students are taught essential complementary studies in drawings, modelling, architecture history and design thinking in the first three semesters of their studies. Design Studios (Atmosphere, Landscape and Materials) teaches creative design processes through observations, making and experimentation. The final three semesters prepare students to engage in issues relevant to the design of buildings and cities using industryrelevant software, structure, ethics, digital fabrication, and climatic and urbanism study. Design Studios (Australasian Cities, Global Cities and City Lab) explore cities as context for intervention addressing urban visions and increased complexity of design 8

brief. The Graduate Diploma in Architecture programme is a pathway to our Master of Architecture for students who have already completed an undergraduate degree in a field other than architecture. The 2-semester study program provides students with necessary skills in design thinking, drawings, modelling, history of architecture, structure and sustainability.

Image credit: Mat City by Cole Tucker-Evans, Joshua Clark, & Luca Aresani Pando

Creative Design Studio Atmosphere explores experiential and spatial exploitations of form, light and material. Students work in groups to realise full scale installations that utilise existing elements of the architecture building. Focus is made on the making and reuse of material.

ARCH11-140 & ARCH71-140 CREATIVE DESIGN STUDIO: ATMOSPHERE (221)

01 Stack Parasite Interior by Hanna-Rae Cianci, Cole Tucker-Evans, Liam Foxe & Zeping Zheng

Hay Parasite by Nicayden Greenwood, Madelyne Orrock, Oliver Roberts & Zhiqi Zhang 10

Staff Matthew Eagle Peter Kuhnell Megan King

Stack Parasite Exterior by Hanna-Rae Cianci, Cole Tucker-Evans, Liam Foxe & Zeping Zheng

Stack Parasite drawing by Hanna-Rae Cianci

Students Selena Baker Frankie Chan Hanna-Rae Cianci Joshua Clark Liam Foxe Kiera Gazzard Nicayden Greenwood Annalise Grice Isaac Keighran Sophia Livanidis Victoria Nguyen Madelyne Orrock Oliver Roberts Cole Tucker-Evans Christina Wicker Cosette Winter Zhiqi Zhang Zeping Zheng Acknowledgement Melody Chen Lachlan Nielsen Morgan Jenkins

ARCH11-140 & ARCH71-140: CREATIVE DESIGN STUDIO: ATMOSPHERE (231)

Corner Parasite, drawing by Elisabeth Foresto

Corner Parasite by Emily Barnard, Emily Gilchrist, Elisabeth Foresto & Henrietta He 12

Corner Parasite Joinery Detail by Emily Barnard, Emily Gilchrist, Elisabeth Foresto & Henrietta He

Acknowledgement Clare Kennedy Zuzana Kovar Nicholas Skepper Lyn Wang Michael Lineburg Morgan Jenkins Lachlan Nielson Jack Ryan Steps Parasite by Avishek Singh, Sheryn Takudambu, Reem Abdelmoula & Ziyue Shi Soft Room, drawing by Luca Aresani Pando

Staff Matthew Eagle Peter Kuhnell Kelly Njorte Students Reem Abdelmoula Luca Aresani Pando Emily Barnard Jessica Bounds Guy Burdon Frankie Chan Laura Cooper William Featherston Elisabeth Foresto Emily Gilchrist Anna Haggerty Yuhan (Henrietta) He Sana Javid Grace Jordan Simon Lin Finn McLachlan Sreehari Navarathinam Chitra Shiva Dharshini Harvey Rogers Byron Runde Elizabeth Sammut Yanxin Shao Ziyue Shi Avishek Singh Sheryn Takudambu Aiden Thurechht Callum Hemsley Tokody Mia Walton Harry Williams Zhiqi Zhang

Parasite Development by Grace Jordan, Elizabeth Sammut, William Featherston & Finn McLachlan

222 Landscape Studio acts as an introduction to understandings of landscape and Country. The Studio envisioned walks along Australia’s east coast as a potential means to reconnect with Country. To support the coastal walks, structures were proposed to provide shelter and allow for overnight stays. Students explored a coastal dune stretch on Coodjingburra Country to develop an understanding of the terrain, climate, place, environment and cultural landscapes. The Studio tested ways in which architecture can relate to and contribute to our experiences of these environments.

Christina Wicker, Accommodation Plan

ARCH11-133 & ARCH71-133: CREATIVE DESIGN STUDIO: LANDSCAPE (222)

Christina Wicker, Section through accommodation

Christina Wicker, Shared Living

Elisabeth Foresto, Dwelling in Landscape 14

Elisabeth Foresto, Approach to Dwelling

Elisabeth Foresto, Sectional Model

Staff Justin Twohill Megan King

Cole Tucker Evans, Section for Inhabitation Cole Tucker Evans, Sleeping Quarter

Students Luca Aresani Pando Selena Baker Frankie Chan Joshua Clark Elisabeth Foresto Kiera Gazzard Annalise Grice Isaac Keighran Chor Cheung Mok Victoria Nguyen Madelyn Orrock Cole Tucker-Evans Christina Wicker Cosette Winter Zhiqi Zhang Zeping Zheng Acknowledgement Paul Loh Clare Kennedy

Cole Tucker Evans, Courtyard

Cole Tucker Evans, Site Section

232 Landscape Studio challenged students to reconceptualise how we see, sense and measure landscape. Working in groups, students started off drawing and surveying the landscape from 10 paintings by Australian artists. Their worldviews are translated into spatial devices or measuring instruments that allowed the students to observe, draw and measure the landscape. Measuring devices included a Robinson’s scanner (named after the artist William Robinson), mechanical tracer, and wind powered drawing machine - we learn to draw the landscape with intimacy. Observing devices included a periscope that allowed users to experience light and darkness simultaneously, a headset that flattens a landscape, multilens glasses, a distorted view port to trace time, a panaromic viewing machine that produces absence, and a device that views landscape through water – we learn to see the landscape through design narrative and storytelling.

ARCH11-133 & ARCH71-133: CREATIVE DESIGN STUDIO: LANDSCAPE (232)

GRSDI drawing by Harvey Rogers

Reflection, drawing by Emily Gilchrist 16

Staff Paul Loh Jack Ryan Megan King Students Reem Abdelmoula Walaah Al Majiblay Emily Barnard Demi Baxter Jessica Bounds Guy Burdon Laura Cooper William Featherston Emily Gilchrist Callum Hemsley Tokody Anna Haggerty Yuhan (Henrietta) He Cooper Hersee Robert Istodorescu Sana Javid Grace Jordan Simon Lin Finn McLachlan Harvey Rogers Byron Runde Elizabeth Sammut Yanxin Shao Ziyue Shi Avishek Singh Sheryn Takudambu Aiden Thurecht Mia Walton Harry Williams Acknowledgement Peter Kuhnell Nic Allen (Architectus Conrad Gargett) Prof Michael Keniger Kelly Nortje

Survey My Landscape, Spring Exhibition of Group Prototypes

The Material Studio encouraged students to question how materials can play a role in establishing an urban language understood through observing the varying degrees of built permanence in an existing coastal urban village. Students researched materials and tested ideas through a series of permanent, semi-permanent and temporary installations and structural combinations, the outcomes expressing their proposal’s tectonic and the amenity provided to the precinct. Further, students considered the flexibility of their ‘super structure’ for future adaptations. Students developed ideas via workshops, studio sessions and site visits. Through these processes, students developed material logic related to the local context, reinterpretation and adaptation as strategies – as a means to give back to the existing site’s rich material language.

ARCH11-132: CREATIVE DESIGN STUDIO: MATERIAL (223) 01

Luca Aresani Pando 18

Avishek Singh

Joshua Clark

223 Material Studio Group models

Staff Peter Kuhnell Jack Ryan Kelly Nortje

06 04

Students Reem Abdelmoula Luca Aresani Pando Frankie Chan Joshua Clark Kiera Gazzard Annalise Grice Isaac Keighran Chor Cheung Mok Ziyue Shi Avishek Singh Callum Tokody Hemsley Cosette Winter Zhiqi Zhang Acknowledgement Zuzanna Kovar Dominic Finlay-Jones Clare Kennedy

Kiera Gazzard

Annalise Grice

ARCH11-132: CREATIVE DESIGN STUDIO: MATERIAL (233) 01

Flow Yoga Studio by Laura Cooper and Cooper Hersee 20

Material Studies by Grace Jordan and Angelina Stacey

Burrow Library by Grace Jordan and Elizabeth Sammut

Palm Beach Brewery by Harry Williams and Finn McLachlan

Burrow Library Plan by Grace Jordan and Elizabeth Sammut

Staff Peter Kuhnell Jack Ryan Kelly Nortje

05 03

Students Jessica Bounds Guy Burdon Laura Cooper William Featherston Anna Haggerty Cooper Hersee Sana Javid Grace Jordan Simon Lin Finn McLachlan Vebjoern Herland Monstad Lara Oltramare Harvey Rogers Byron Runde Elizabeth Sammut Yanxin Shao Angelina Stacey Mia Walton Harry Williams Acknowledgement Nic Allen (Architectus Conrad Gargett) Melody Chen (Atelier Chen Hung) Paul Loh Elizabeth Musgrave Alex Ward (Populous)

Palm Beach Pavilion Theatre by Simon Lin and William Featherston

This Studio investigated an urban site in Broadbeach to explore its potential to accommodate the housing needs of a growing city. Broadbeach and its surrounding environments form an essential part of the Gold Coast’s cultural landscape and are considered one of the ‘centres’ of the City. Students observed the physical and social context of the site, and its current uses and explored how they might continue while at the same time responding to cultural and social changes, patterns of urban form, densification, and desire for open space.

ARCH13-128: DESIGN FUTURES STUDIO: AUSTRALASIAN CITIES (221)

Luke Shields, Housing Section

Brianna Mudie, Housing massing models 22

Brianna Mudie, Housing model

Staff Justin Twohill Megan King Daniela Ottmann Lindsay Clare

Charlotte Thistlethwaite, Massing Strategies

Charlotte Thistlethwaite, View Strategy

Students Walaah Al Majiblay Emily Barnard Lara Damelian Alfonso Juan De Castro Azuara Larni Filip Robert Jones Emilie Kamp Sarah Kim Katie Lander Naomi Mears Jodie Mitchell Brianna Mudie Ruby-Rose Nalywajko Ella Ramsey Alicia Rice John San Diego Jahsira Schoon Luke Shields Charlotte Thistlethwaite Acknowledgement Chris Knapp Rayne Fouche Kerry Clare

Katie Lander, Broadbeach Housing

Katie Lander, Approach to Broadbeach Housing

Madelyne Orrock, Community Centre

ARCH13-128: DESIGN FUTURES STUDIO: AUSTRALASIAN CITIES (231)

Each student was required to design a new small-to-medium-sized public building in Brisbane’s Boggo Road precinct. There were five building types: a Public Library, a Local Community Centre, a Health and Wellness precinct, a Metro Arts satellite hub, and the Australian Institute of Architects QLD Chapter. Peripherally located around the site were Dutton Park State Primary School, a new Crossriver Rail station, the Old Boggo Road gaol, and the Ecosciences Precinct. In addition to designing their individual buildings, students were jointly responsible for designing the areas of public space between them.

Cosette Winter, Health and Wellness Centre Model

Cosette Winter, Health and Wellness Centre

Madelyne Orrock, Boggo Road Historic Context 24

Madelyne Orrock, Boggo Road Landscape Design

Staff Jasper Brown Megan King

Penelope Young, Public Library Urban Ground

Penelope Young, Public Library Section

Hannah-Rae Cianci, Boggo Road Library Perspective 3 Hannah-Rae Cianci, Boggo Road Library Perspective 2 Hannah-Rae Cianci, Boggo Road Library Perspective 1

Students Walaah Al Majiblay Hannah-Rae Cianci Joshua Clark Liam Foxe Kiera Gazzard Nicayden Greenwood Annalise Grice Marc Haack Isaac Keighran Madelyne Orrock Alicia Rice Cole Tucker-Evans Cosette Winter Penelope Young Acknowledgement Rob Keen Paul Trotter The Boggo Road Cross River Rail team

Hannah-Rae Cianci, Boggo Road Library Section

Following in the footsteps of previous Global Cities Studio ‘virtual visits’ to Qujing, China, in 2020 and Singapore in 2021, the Studio continued its urbaneering travels to Seoul in 2022. The Studio explored and speculated how Seoul could be resilient to inevitable future change and expansion without losing identity and cultural vibrancy.

Collaborating with Seoul National University (SNU) and with practicing architecture firm, Populous, the Studio speculated on the potential of transformative architecture as a form of urban acupuncture to create a new typography - a ‘(Vertical) Sub-City’, a series of super high-density mixeduse clusters supercharging the City and challenging the existing urban highrise archetypes. The lecture program was supported by the New Colombus Plan, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australian Government.

ARCH13-129: DESIGN FUTURES STUDIO: GLOBAL CITIES (222) Global Cities Lecture Program support by New Colombo Plan and Populous

The ‘Living Room’ by Jahsira Schoon, Hannah-Rae Cianci, Lara Damelian & Larni Filip 26

The ‘Living Room’, by Jahsira Schoon, Hannah-Rae Cianci, Lara Damelian & Larni Filip

Staff Mark Bagguley Brian Toyota

ECOmmunity by Ella Ramsey, Emily Barnard, Ruby-Rose Nalywaijko & Charlotte Thistlethwaite

Hibiscus by Alfonso Juan De Castro Azuara, Brianna Mudie, Liam Foxe & Robert Jones

Amethyst Model, by Katie Lander, Naomi Mears, Nicayden Greenwood & Walaah Al Majiblay Amethyst View, by Katie Lander, Naomi Mears, Nicayden Greenwood & Walaah Al Majiblay

Students Walaah Al Majiblay Emily Barnard Hannah-Rae Cianci Lara Damelian Alfonso Juan De Castro Azuara Larni Filip Liam Foxe Nicayden Greenwood Marc Haack Robert Jones Sarah Kim Katie Lander Naomi Mears Brianna Mudie Ella Ramsey Alicia Rice Oliver Roberts Jahsira Schoon Charlotte Thistlethwaite Acknowledgement John Hong (SNU) James Pearce (Populous) Prof. Bonghee Jeon Doojin Hwang Hangman Zo Minsuk Cho Yerin Kang Choon Choi Soo-in Yang Dongwoo Lim New Colombo Plan

Amethyst Verical City, by Katie Lander, Naomi Mears, Nicayden Greenwood & Walaah Al Majiblay

The Studio continued its urbaneering travels by revisiting Seoul in person. The Studio explored and speculated how Seoul could be resilient to inevitable and unavoidable future change and expansion without the loss of identity and cultural vibrancy.

Collaborating with Seoul Technical University and with practicing architecture firm, Populous, the Studio speculated on the potential of transformative architecture as a form of urban acupuncture to create a new typography - a ‘(Vertical) Sub-City’, a series of super high-density mixeduse clusters supercharging the City and challenging the existing urban highrise archetypes. Student’s travel to Seoul was funded by the New Colombus Plan, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australian Government.

ARCH13-129: DESIGN FUTURES STUDIO: GLOBAL CITIES (232) 01

Seoulscapes City by Isaac Keighran, Kiera Gazzard, Madelyne Orrock & Emilie Kamp 28

Seoulscapes by Isaac Keighran, Kiera Gazzard, Madelyne Orrock & Emilie Kamp

Staff Mark Bagguley Brian Toyota

Students Luca Aresani Pando Frankie Chan Joshua Clark Kiera Gazzard Annalise Grice Emilie Kamp Isaac Keighran Cole Tucker-Evans Cosette Winter Zhiqi Zhang

Acknowledgement Sungghi Park James Pearce New Colombo Plan Seoul Technical University

Mat City Model by Cole Tucker-Evans, Joshua Clark, & Luca Aresani Pando

Culture Centre by Cole Tucker-Evans, Joshua Clark, & Luca Aresani Pando

Mat City by Cole Tucker-Evans, Joshua Clark, & Luca Aresani Pando

The Living Hill by Annalise Grice, Cosette Winter, Frankie Chan & Zhiqi Zhang 29

The Studio explored a phenomenological approach to architectural design, informed by an understanding of environmental psychology. Critically considering significant architectural qualities, such as the bodily experience of architecture, atmosphere, architectural narrative, light, tactility, tectonic expression, materiality, detail, transcultural inspiration, relation to context and sense of place. These themes were explored and embodied in the design of a site-specific Summer Architecture Pavilion for HOTA, the Gold Coast Home of the Arts. In keeping with HOTA’s mission to merge art, entertainment and lifestyle, the pavilion is intended as a permanent landmark in the Lake Evandale Art Park.

Pavilion 1 to 5 model by Hannah-Rae Cianci

ARCH13-130: DESIGN FUTURES STUDIO: CITY LAB (223)

Mat City by Cole Tucker-Evans, Joshua Clark, & Luca Aresani Pando 30

Pavilion Vignette by Hannah-Rae Cianci

Staff Adrian Carter Kerry Clare Clare Design Victor Schinazi

Weave Pavilion by Emilie Kamp

Smoke Pavilion Detail by Cole Tucker-Evans

Students Walaah Al Majiblay Emily Barnard Hannah-Rae Cianci Taylor Day Larni Filip Liam Foxe Nicayden Greenwood Marc Haack Robert Jones Emilie Kamp Sarah Kim Brianna Mudie Madelyne Orrock Ella Ramsey Alicia Rice John San Diego Oliver Roberts Charlotte Thistlethwaite Cole Tucker-Evans Acknowledgement Ruth Della Susan Lambert Nikolas Strugar Juhani Pallasmaa Tracey Woods

Smoke Pavilion Sketch Design by Cole Tucker-Evans

Early Pavilion Concept Artworks by Cole Tucker Evans

Voronoid Pavilion Section by Charlotte Thistlethwaite

Smoke Pavilion by Cole Tucker-Evans

ARCH13-130: DESIGN FUTURES STUDIO: CITY LAB (233)

On Country by Cosette Winter

On Country Section by Cosette Winter

Dreamtime Pavilion by Luca Aresani Pando 32

Staff Brian Toyota Victor Schinazi Kerry Clare Students Reem Abdelmoula Walaah Al Majiblay Luca Aresani Pando Frankie Chan Joshua Clark Alfonso Juan De Castro Azuara Liam Foxe Annalise Grice Robert Istodorescu Isaac Keighran Oliver Roberts Ziyue Shi Avishek Singh Callum Tokody Hemsley Cosette Winter Acknowledgement Adrian Carter Sam Caldwell Lawson Royes Justin Twohill

Refraction Pavilion by Avishek Singh

Refraction Pavilion Interior by Avishek Singh

HOTA Pavilion by Alfonso Juan De Castro Azuara

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN PEDAGOGY 01

Design Review with Kerstin Thompson, Christopher Kelly, Lindsay Clare, Clare Kennedy, Tristan Schultz, Dan Plummer and Justin Twohill.

ASA Spring Exhibition 34

Design Charrette 2023 with Professor Donald Bates

First Nation Knowledge in Design Symposium hosted by Uncle John Graham and Professor Paul Loh

Minsuk Cho’s studio with architecture students from SeoulTech and Professor Sunggi Park, funded by New Columbo Plan

SONA Portfolio Evening at ASA

Architectural education seems slightly odd for those outside of the discipline, especially compared to other STEM or Humanities subjects. We teach our students to draw precisely like a technician, think conceptually like an artist, make models like a craft person, analyse climate and structure like an engineer and discuss (if not critique) broader social and cultural issues like a journalist. And as if this is not enough, architecture students need to synthesise these diverse skills and knowledge into a single piece of design work – it is no mean feat. An ideal architectural pedagogy is a mirror reflection of its practice – a complex and messy process. Depending on the scale of a project, most involve multiple stakeholders (clients, planners, building surveyors, numerous consultants, sub-contractors and trades) with competing interests and layers of legislation from planning schemes to the building codes. Beyond this, architects must also consider climate, materials, resources, embodied energy, aesthetics, ethics and define their social and cultural responsibilities. Yet, it is through Design that these complexities are resolved and synthesised - a good design would provide an elegant, seemingly effortless solution to a complex problem.

ASA Spring Exhibition Opening with DJ Lara Damelian

The training to become an architect is an iterative process of observation, analysis, and synthesis of Design thinking through material articulation. The Abedian School of Architecture programmes aim to motivate, develop and scaffold knowledge so students, through their study, incrementally formulate their critical thinking and design sensibility - a safe space to test, fail and experiment. The studio culture is the centre of this pedagogical model, a quasi-practice environment in which each student has their own desk space - a recognition that they are critical members of the School’s community and their voices matter. Conversations between peers and educators in the Studio are catalysts for ideas and reflections. It is also an environment for design production next to a fully equipped workshop with traditional wood-working machinery and advanced technologies, including 3D printers, laser cutters and robotic arms to facilitate students to realise Design through material investigation and experimentation. At the end of the design process, the work is presented in a public forum, often with invited practitioners as guest reviewers, to debate and interrogate its relevance, legitimacy and potential.

ASA Public Lecture by Peter Stutchbury

Throughout the year, public lectures and symposiums energise the School with prominent and emerging architects from gold-medallist recipients to practitioners at the cutting edge of today’s practice. They engage with our students through design reviews and workshops, contributing to the diverse design voices of the School. The bi-annual Spring Exhibition was the moment of celebration of our students’ achievements. To design is to critically synthesise the many factors into an articulated process with specific outcomes. The Abedian School of Architecture provides our next generation of architects with a conducive and inspiring space to test and experiment with emerging ideas. Professor Paul Loh Head of School

MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE

PROGRAM CODE: SD-93017 CRICOS CODE: 078184J The Master of Architecture and Master of Architecture (Professional) are accredited programs as pathways to registration as an Architect. The four-semester (full-time) study covers the necessary competency required under the National Standard of Competency for Architects. Complementary studies include professional studies, management, advanced construction, environmental practices, and architecture theory, leading to the preparation for the Design Thesis studio. The first three studios (Designing City Region, Country, and HighPerformance Building) expose students to different design methods and techniques to address complex architectural issues and building programmes.

The Design Thesis is the ‘capstone’ subject where students develop their independent design research and synthesis learning from their studies addressing contemporary and emerging issues relevant to the built environment.

Image credit: Another Pantry Model, Annabel Tape

The Studio was co-delivered with Bond’s Master of City Planning programme to explore the relationship between architecture and urban/regional planning, issues that affect the contemporary City: urban sprawl, sustainability, and cultural and geographical relevance versus globalisation. Students worked individually and in groups to develop ideas for a future Australian City on a 100 ha site at Pimpama on the northern Gold Coast. The design process involved a one-day planning workshop using Lego blocks and a 1:2000 scale base plan to help the planning and architecture students familiarise themselves with three-dimensional thinking at a regional scale, before producing a more developed urban design vision.

Pimpama 2100, Justin Stokes

ARCH71-119: ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM STUDIO: DESIGNING THE CITY-REGION (221) 01

Pimpama 2100, Annabel Tape 38

Pimpama University, Georgia Mactaggart Pimpama 2100, Group Master Plan Model

Staff Adrian Carter Daniel O’Hare Brian Toyota Kerry Clare Students Elizabeth Barker Kuan Chan Tao Chen Alexandre Cuer Benjamin Cutajar Philip Darnton Maxwell Dowd Koosha Hooshmand Niveditha Jagannathan Lexie Kavanagh Aaron Kidwell Erin Lean Georgia Mactaggart Josh Saling Praveena Bharathi Sarvesan Homesh Seetah Anis Serikbayev Justin Stokes Annabel Tape

Plaza by Homesh Seetah

The Studio was co-delivered with Bond’s Master of City Planning programme to explore the relationship between architecture and urban/regional planning, issues that affect the contemporary City: urban sprawl, sustainability and cultural and geographical relevance verses globalisation. Students worked individually and in groups to prepare submissions for an international student design competition associated with the 4th Seoul Biennale for Architecture and Urbanism 2023, developing concepts for a design to bridge the 900m wide Han River, connecting two banks of the river with the partially developed Nodeul Island, choosing to replace or adaptively reuse an existing highway bridge.

Nodeul Bridge Section by Monalisa Mthethwa & Parnian Agahi Najafabadi

ARCH71-119: ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM STUDIO: DESIGNING THE CITY-REGION (231) 01

Water Village by Gemma Borra, Lara Damelian & Imogen Barry-Murphy 40

Staff Adrian Carter Daniel O’Hare Brian Toyota Students Parnian Agahi Najafabadi Imogen Barry-Murphy Gemma Borra Lara Damelian Kieren Dolores Chor Cheung Mok Monalisa Mthethwa Dizhe Sun Grace Tetley Shawn Thompson Christina Wicker Guang Yin Acknowledgement Kerry Clare Paul Loh Marja Sarvamaki Nima Talebian (structural input)

Nodeul Bridge Collage by Kieren Dolores

Water Village Section by Gemma Borra, Lara Damelian & Imogen Barry-Murphy

Mountain Village Section by Gemma Borra, Lara Damelian & Imogen Barry-Murphy

Acknowledgements Dyfed Aubrey (UN-HABITAT) Johannes Widodo (NUS) Florian Schaetz (FACE) Danny Juric (+Architecture) Susan and Mark Rallings (MGA) Paul Jones (OMA)

In Plug-In Scenario 2, students will have the opportunity to select another relevant city where the UN Pavilion will actively engage with the local community in combatting climate change through discussions about the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The “SDG pavilion” in Singapore will serve as a Science Centre, functioning as a demonstrative structure and living laboratory. Its purpose is to engage with the broader public, promoting science, research, technology, innovation, and community-based learning, while showcasing the advancements made towards achieving the UN’s 2030 target initiatives tied to the SDGs.

CoAction Pavillion, Joshua Saling

One Pavilion, Koosha Hooshmand

01 Eutopia, Marcel Moeller

SDG Pavilion, Elizabeth Barker 42

Students Elizabeth Barker Koosha Hooshmand Lexie Kavanagh Marcel Moller Josh Saling Praveena Bharathi Sarvesan Homesh Seetah Anis Serikbayev Dizhe Sun (MGA) Paul Jones (OMA)

UN Pavilion Studio The studio project aims to establish a global platform that embodies the principles of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, consolidating them within a single building designed to facilitate exchange, empowerment, and radical action. Functioning as a travelling pavilion, the project will encompass various PlugIn Scenarios. The first location will be in Marina Bay, Singapore’s Global City.

Staff Daniela Ottmann Ioana Giurgiu

ARCH71-120: ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM STUDIO: GLOBAL CITIES (222)

Eutopia Section, Marcel Moller

Staff Jasper Brown Doug Neale

Students Gemma Borra Kuan Chan Tao Chen Philip Darnton Maxwell Dowd Benjamin Ferguson Brodan Fernance Niveditha Jagannathan Erin Lean Po-Hao Shen Tiffany Samonte Justin Stokes Annabel Tape

Acknowledgement Jayson Blight Rob Keen Safia Shakarchi

Gastronomy Studio Students were set the challenge of designing a building in central London for their client, Safia Shakarchi, who is the founder of an online food community called “Another Pantry”. Safia describes her venture as: “...a recipe platform that celebrates contemporary food culture. We’re building a collection of recipes from the UK food community in a way that champions seasonal, slow and conscious cooking”. At the time of the design studio, her company only had an online presence, but it was imagined that her business expanded significantly in the near aftermath of the pandemic, and consequently, a new building in Central London is required for her culinary operations.

Another Pantry Model, Annabel Tape

Another Pantry, Annabel Tape

MODA, Gemma Borra

MODA street view, Gemma Borra

Gastronomy, London by Tiffany Samonte

Urban Pantry, Brodan Fernance 43

This Studio acts as an introduction to understandings of Country, and the principles and protocols of designing with and on Country. Guided by the NSW Government Architects draft Connecting with Country framework the Studio engaged with Murwillumbah, the traditional lands of the Moorung Moorbah people of the Bundjalung Nation. By starting with Jagun (Bundjalung for Country) and through sensing, imagining and form giving, students developed understandings that ground a series of strategies for connecting and caring for Jagun.

Understanding Country by Lara Damelian

ARCH71-120: ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM STUDIO: COUNTRY (232)

Learning on Country by Lara Damelian

Housing by Parnian Agahi Najafabadi 44

Connecting with Country by Lara Damelian

Staff Justin Twohill Clare Kennedy Tristan Schultz Students Parnian Agahi Najafabadi Imogen Barry-Murphy Tao Chen Lara Damelian Kieren Dolores Nicole Mesquita-Mendes Chor Cheung Mok Monalisa Mthethwa Anis Serikbayev Grace Tetley Christina Wicker Guang Yin

Acknowledgement Dan Plummer Carmen Stewart Kerstin Thompson Lindsay Clare Christopher Kelly Paul Loh We wish to also acknowledge the Ngandowal and Minyungbal-speaking people of the Bundjalung Nation, in particular the Goodjinburra, Tul-gi-gin and Moorung–Moobah clans, as being the traditional owners and custodians of the land and waters within which the Studio worked

Uncovering Lavender Creek by Christina Wicker

Map with Earth by Christina Wicker

Murwillumbah Section by Christina Wicker

Learning Pavilion Plan by Nicole Mesquita-Mendes

1-5 detail by Lara Damelian

Inclusive Inhabitation by Kuan Chan

Insertion by Lara Damelian

ARCH71-123: ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM STUDIO: HIGH-PERFORMANCE BUILDING (223) Insertion Section by Lara Damelian 46

Engineers Josh Neale Ben Knust Kaan Whittall

Acknowledgement Zuzana Kovar Amber Garde Clare Kennedy Aaron Peters Anna O’Gorman John Ellway Harley Graham Fraser Williams-Martin Nat Lidgerwood Jess Maxted

Staff Matthew Eagle Paul Loh Lindsay Clare Megan King

Students Parnian Agahi Najafabadi Gemma Borra Kuan Chan Tao Chen Benjamin Cutaja Lara Damelian Philip Darnton Maxwell Dowd Lexie Kavanagh Erin Lean Georgia Mactaggart Josh Saling Homesh Seetah Anis Serikbayev Justin Stokes Dizhe Sun Annabel Tape Grace Tetley Guang Yin

The Studio explored adaptive reuse as a design strategy to address our resourcechallenged world. The project focused on an existing industrial area of Miami on the Gold Coast. It encouraged the adaptive reuse of existing materials and structures through careful architectural intervention of modification, re-appropriation and addition. The brief is for a hybrid building program co-locating dwelling, public and commercial uses. Students were invited to examine the significance of Place, focusing on the environment, materials and, most importantly, investigate the role of buildings as community makers and good neighbours.

Dust Temple Study by Grace Tetley Urban Village by Gemma Borra

Green Streets by Benjamin Cutajar

Corners by Erin Lean 47

ARCH71-123: ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM STUDIO: HIGH-PERFORMANCE BUILDING (233)

Occupied Edges Model by Christina Wicker

Occupied Edges Section by Christina Wicker 48

Staff Matthew Eagle Lindsay Clare

Life Lived Outdoors Section by Monalisa Mthethwa

Coastal Tectonics Sectional Detail by Imogen Barry-Murphy

Students Selena Baker Imogen Barry-Murphy Tao Chen Hannah-Rae Cianci Kieren Delores Henrietta He Chor Cheung Mok Monalisa Mthethwa Anis Serikbayev Christina Wicker Guang Yin Acknowledgement Aaron Peters Stuart Vokes Alex Ward Elizabeth Musgrave Dominic Finlay-Jones Fraser Williams-Martin Jared Webb Douglas Neale Kaan Whittall Joshua Neale

Coastal Tectonics by Imogen Barry-Murphy

Coastal Tectonics Plan by Imogen Barry-Murphy

The Design Thesis Studio is the culmination of the Master of Architecture program, representing a comprehensive synthesis of architectural knowledge. The Studio focused on developing a single project throughout the semester, exploring contemporary cultural, environmental, technical, or social contexts. It builds upon the skills and concepts acquired in previous studios and complementary subjects in the Master’s program. The project topic was determined during the Design Thesis Research and Development subject, where students conduct research, site analysis, brief development, and concept design work. The selected projects here demonstrated a high level of resolution in terms of tectonic, spatial, and/or experiential quality, with contextual, cultural, social, and environmental considerations.

ARCH72-502: ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM: DESIGN THESIS STUDIO (221) 01

Palm Beach Civic by Mackenzie Barclay, Matthew Eagle (Mentor), 221 50

Palm Beach Civic by Mackenzie Barclay, Matthew Eagle (Mentor), 221

Staff Daniela Ottmann (231) Jasper Brown (223 & 233) Mark Bagguley (221) Mentors Adrian Carter Paul Loh Marja Sarvimaki Matthew Eagle Peter Kuhnell Brian Toyota Justin Twohill Mark Bagguley

Resilient Strategies by Maria Parnenzini, Brian Toyota (Mentor), 221

Students Steven Baleva Mackenzie Barclay Elizabeth Barker Gemma Borra Nicklaus Browne Kuan Chan Benjamin Cutajar Philip Darnton Maxwell Dowd Benjamin Ferguson Niveditha Jagannathan Lexie Kavanagh Erin Lean Georgia Mactaggart Natasha Maher Nicole Mesquita-Mendes Susannah Moore Marcel Moller Maria Parnenzini Josh Saling Tiffany Samonte Praveena Bharathi Sarvesan Homesh Seetah Po-Hao Shen Dizhe Sun Grace Tetley Acknowledgement Brit Andresen Nicholas Allen Maja Belic Despina Linarki Kerry Clare Katherine Rickard Rob Keen Michael Keniger Hannah Tribe Teresa Wuersching

ARCH72-502: ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM: DESIGN THESIS STUDIO (223)

Learning Environment by Susannah Moore, Adrian Carter (Mentor), 223

Regenerative Plug-In by Po-Hao Shen, Paul Loh (Mentor), 223 52

Flexible Ownership by Benjamin Ferguson, Paul Loh (Mentor), 223

Healing by Marcel Moller, Adrian Carter (Mentor), 223

Pre-Fab Housing by Nicklaus Browne, Peter Kuhnell (Mentor), 223 53

ARCH72-502: ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM: DESIGN THESIS STUDIO (231)

Community Nest by Natasha Maher, Daniela Ottmann (Mentor), 231 54

CoHousing by Joshua Saling, Daniela Ottmann (Mentor), 231

Parasite by Georgia Mactaggart, Paul Loh (Mentor), 231

Dignity in Death by Tiffany Samonte, Adrian Carter (Mentor), 231 55

ARCH72-502: ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM: DESIGN THESIS STUDIO (233)

Chronos Locus by Grace Tetley, Jasper Brown (Mentor), 233 56

Chronos Locus Isometric layout by Grace Tetley, Jasper Brown (Mentor), 233

Reclaiming our Suburbs by Elizabeth Barker, Matthew Eagle (Mentor), 233

Relocating Tumbulgu by Gemma Borra, Brian Toyota (Mentor), 233 57

ARCH99-500: PHD (ARCHITECTURE)

COURTING DAYLIGHT: USING THE COURTYARD PARADIGM TO BRING DAYLIGHT INTO RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURE ON EAST COAST AUSTRALIA

Courting Daylight, image by Susan Lambert

Susan Lambert (completed 2023) Supervisor: Dr Adrian Carter (primary) & Dr Daniela Ottmann This study investigates the available daylight qualities of the courtyard model of house design in the context of the East Coast of Australia. A geographic region that has had only limited consideration in terms of its unique daylight qualities in relation to architecture. The research thesis focuses on the way available daylight is an integral consideration in architectural design that minimises the need for artificial illumination, improves air quality and conserves energy.

The Case Study research method reviews and assesses the daylight contribution in six design solutions and the awareness of site and orientation by experienced architects with well-developed design processes. The case study method is used to illuminate a set of decisions: Why they were taken, how they were implemented, and with what result. This was the basis for the set of questions that were developed to investigate the design principles used by a group of experienced and highly

regarded architects in order to find a level that would establish this understanding of how beneficial natural lighting is and gain new knowledge behind the success of the courtyard paradigm as a means to provide access to ‘daylight’ during the day. The amounts of daylight received in the case study houses have been quantified and assessed to benchmark the design principles used to achieve positive results.

THE SELF-IMAGE OF THE CITY Victoria Jones (ongoing) Supervisor: Dr Marja Sarvimaki (primary) & Dr Adrian Carter This research interrogates the image of the Gold Coast - an unconventional city within Australian urbanism and eludes orthodox classification. The Gold Coast has been born out of fantasy and speculation, designed for fun and profit. It is not fettered by historical precedents or even its own history, and for this characteristic, it is also popularly maligned for lacking what people sense and perceive as culture. Applying anthropologist Clifford Geertz’s definition of culture as “the ensemble of stories we tell ourselves about ourselves” to the living phenomenon of the city; this research is premised on the understanding that urban culture is defined by the ways that citizens narrate their city and their connections to it. And over time, that city’s identity 58

becomes the stories they keep repeating. Through the distillation of texts drawn from the Gold Coast Bulletin, this research will derive an ensemble of accounts about how Gold Coasters narrate their city. These will reveal prevailing narratives that influence built environment outcomes and the image and identity of the city. The practical aim is to bring awareness of the role, power and interplay of urban narratives pushed by different cohorts of Gold Coasters. The goal is to highlight how inclusive urban management can strengthen the image of any city through encouraging citizens to actively participate in storytelling about its past and decision-making for its future.

The Self-Image of Gold Coast, image by Victoria Jones

FROM UNCOMFORTABLE TO COMFORTABLE Waled Shehata (Completed 2021) Supervisor: Craig Langston (Primary) & Marja Sarvimaki

Folasaga, Dion Enari

Bendigo Prison, Photo by Waled Shehata

FOLASAGA Dion Enari (completed 2022) Supervisor: Dr Marja Sarvimaki (primary) & Dr Daniel O’Hare Despite Samoan being the second most frequently spoken language in the Logan City Council, Moreton Bay Regional Council and Ipswich City Council, there are grave concerns for its practice among those born outside of Samoa who now reside in Brisbane, Australia. This research explored the lived experiences of 22 New Zealandborn Samoans who reside in Brisbane and their journeys within mainstream society and Samoan spaces. For some, their navigation was done with ease, while others were met with challenges in both contexts. In this thesis, I argue for the importance of Fa’a Samoa (Samoan way) among this cohort as necessary in navigating both Samoan spaces and mainstream society. This thesis shows that despite being “twice removed” from their ancestral homeland, with birth in New Zealand and residence in Australia, this cohort still valued the importance of Fa’a Samoa in their life journeys. Through exploring our lived experiences with Fa’a Samoa concepts

such as aiga potopoto, fa’alavelave and fa’a matai, respect, support, identity and learning were identified as carrier aspects of Fa’a Samoa, whilst disconnect and burden were recognised as challenges and barriers to Fa’a Samoa continuation. Although Fa’a Samoa was valued among this cohort, Fa’a Samoa challenges must be addressed in order to ensure its survival and sustainability. This study is underpinned by a need for Samoan cultural continuity as it relates to Brisbane. As an insider in this research, I used talanoa, participant observation and relevant literature to bring theirs, mine, our voices to the forefront and centre. It is envisioned that our stories will provide valuable insight to ensure Fa’a Samoa initiatives are done with us and by us, now and for future generations. This study was completed in 2022.

Penal establishments, which took the form of colonies and institutions, are a cornerstone in the history of Australia and constitute a valuable part of Australia’s commonly debated uncomfortable heritage. Australia is the only advanced country in history that began as a purpose-designed penal colony. It didn’t begin as a place where there were settlers who used convicts but as a jail. Penal settlements were intensively built in the 18th Century in Australia; their designs mostly reflected the penitentiaries’ Gothic fashion. Over time, many incarceration establishments around Australia have become functionally obsolete and were decommissioned, and in the last few decades, many have undergone adaptive reuse. While most of these gaols were preserved and converted in their present-day state to museums that celebrate the site’s dark history, others have been transformed differently. The remaining few surviving stocks of uncomfortable and shameful places were adaptively reused to publicly used buildings such as theatres, hotels, event venues or art schools. This thesis aims to discuss the adaptive reuse of heritage gaols as representatives of ‘uncomfortableness’ to accommodate contemporary uses for the free public. This thesis will elaborate on the related attributes and critically discuss a few of the underlying factors and impacts of transforming heritage-listed Australian gaols. These investigations are presented as consecutive publications and together formed a PhD dissertation in the form of Compiled Publications.

COMPLEMENTARY STUDIES Image credit: Farmsworth house by Mies van der Rohe Rendering by Luca Aresani Pando

This section contains work from subjects across our Bachelor’s and Master’s programmes. These complementary studies provide students with essential knowledge of architectural design and act as scaffolds for students to gain knowledge and critical understanding of issues facing the built environment. These complementary studies enable students to develop skills and techniques in drawings, graphic layout, presentation, digital fabrication, digital modelling, computational analysis and simulation, physical making, and design documentation.

The course explores creative thinking for architects through a series of drawing exercises designed to promote observation, visualisation and creative thinking, emphasising perspective theory, scale, and spatial awareness. Students practised broader communication skills through storyboarding, diagramming, and verbal and graphic presentation skills. The notion of “drawing ideas from the mind” culminates in a three-week project involving students’ personal interpretation of a story from Italo Calvino’s “Invisible Cities”, involving an original poster design and a synopsis of the thinking behind their creation. A folio/ journal documenting the students’ journey through the course summarises weekly lecture material and activities.

Drawings by Natasha Maher

Story Telling by Zhiqi Zhang 62

Perinthia by Cole Tucker-Evans

Staff Brian Toyota Nicole Mesquita-Mendes

Students Luca Aresani Pando Emily Barnard Ava Birdwell Jessica Bounds Guy Burdon Laura Cooper William Featherston Elisabeth Foresto Emily Gilchrist Anna Haggerty Henrietta He Sana Javid Grace Jordan Mahli Leighton Simon Lin Natasha Maher Finn McLachlan Sreehari Navarathinam Chitra Shiva Dharshini Oliver Roberts Harvey Rogers Byron Runde Elizabeth Sammut Yanxin Shao Ziyue Shi Avishek Singh Aiden Thurecht Callum Tokody Hemsley Cole Tucker-Evans Mia Walton Harry Williams Zhiqi Zhang

ARCH10-123: DESIGN THINKING THROUGH DRAWING (231)

Serpentine Gallery Pavilion by Peter Zumthor. Study by Natasha Mayer

Staff Brice Pannetier Chris Grieve

Students Reem Abdelmoula Luca Aresani Pando Emily Barnard Jessica Bounds Guy Burdon Laura Cooper William Featherston Emily Gilchrist Anna Haggerty Henrietta He Sana Javid Grace Jordan Simon Lin Natasha Maher Finn McLachlan Sreehari Navarathinam Chitra Shiva Dharshini Harvey Rogers Byron Runde Elizabeth Sammut Yanxin Shao Ziyue Shi Avishek Singh Sheryn Takudambu Aiden Thurecht Callum Tokody Hemsley Mia Walton

This subject introduced students to digital design and prototyping in architecture and design. It centred on the contemporary context of digital technology and its profound implications for design. Through engaging case studies, students explored the principles of digital design thinking and fabrication techniques. Modelling precedent studies and developing effective diagramming strategies allows students to practice workflow using industryrelevant software, enabling students to explore fundamental texture mapping and rendering techniques. An introduction to Virtual Reality expanded the horizons of design possibilities in our digital era.

Farmsworth house by Mies van der Rohe Rendering by Luca Aresani Pando

Bruder Klaus Field Chapel by Peter Zumthor Rendering study by Ziyue Shi

ARCH10-138: DIGITAL DESIGN AND PROTOTYPING (231)

Queens Park Pavilion by Claridge Architects. Study by Grace Jordan 63

Scale Test and Design Speculation by Annalise Grice

ARCH10-140: SUBTRACTIVE FABRICATION LAB (231) Waffle Structure by Luca Aresani Pando

Interior structure by Callum Tokody Hemsley 64

Subtractive to Waffle Structure by Cosette Winter

Staff Brice Pannetier Chris Grieve

Students developed graphics and photography skills to communicate spatial concepts and design qualities through physical artefacts. The course established a solid foundation in digital fabrication and visual communication, empowering students to embrace innovation and creativity in their future pursuits in design.

Students Reem Abdelmoula Luca Aresani Pando Frankie Chan Joshua Clark Kiera Gazzard Annalise Grice Isaac Keighran Alicia Rice Ziyue Shi Avishek Singh Callum Tokody Hemsley Cosette Winter

Acknowledgement Ryan Wirth Paul Loh

The subject explores subtractive digital fabrication methods, employing NURBS modelling software and physical-making techniques. Students were introduced to essential aspects of digital design thinking, geometric modelling, and computer numeric controlled (CNC) fabrication techniques, all integrated within a “file to fabrication” workflow.

Staff Brice Pannetier Chris Grieve

Students Walaah Al Majiblay Emily Barnard Hannah-Rae Cianci Taylor Day Alfonso Juan De Castro Azuara Larni Filip Liam Foxe Nicayden Greenwood Marc Haack Emilie Kamp Sarah Kim Brianna Mudie Madelyne Orrock Ella Ramsey Alicia Rice Charlotte Thistlethwaite Cole Tucker-Evans

Acknowledgement Ryan Wirth Paul Loh Alexander Tohidi

Geodesic Dome Structure by entire class

ARCH11-136: ADDITIVE FABRICATION LAB (223)

This subject explored additive manufacturing techniques and introduced students to parametric design software. Each student designed and fabricated a node for the triangulated catenary dome structure. Through the design process, students explored optimisation strategies working with material and fabrication constraints embedded in additive manufacturing.

Node Joint by Charlotte Thistlethwaite

ARCH11-136 Additive Lab Geodesic Dome Structure

Node Design by Marc Haack 65

Room Render - Texture Study by Brianna Mudie 66

Room Render by Brianna Mudie

Staff James Birt (Film, Screen and Creative Media)

Students Walaah Al Majiblay Emily Barnard Hannah-Rae Cianci Taylor Day Larni Filip Liam Foxe Nicayden Greenwood Marc Haack Emilie Kamp Deborah Keioskie Sarah Kim Brianna Mudie Madelyne Orrock Ella Ramsey Alicia Rice Oliver Roberts John San Diego Willem Scheepers Jahsira Schoon Charlotte Thistlethwaite Cole Tucker-Evans Zhiqi Zhang

DIGM12-201: MODELLING FOR ANIMATION (223)

Acknowledgement: FSD Support for assistance with drone photogrammetry and LiDAR capture

Modelling for Animation empowers students to create lifelike 3D digital twins. This begins with an exploration of 3D design thinking and prototyping, enabling mastery of techniques like context capture, mesh, and extrusion modelling. Students delve into the intricacies of lighting, rendering, and the art of manipulating colour, physics, texture, and functionality. This culminates in the creation of flythrough animations. Here, students employ their acquired skills to meticulously craft digital twins that faithfully depict diverse settings, from scenic campus landscapes to the intimate corners of home interiors and the professional workplace environments.

DIGM70-202: CREATING AR AND VR FOR DESIGN (232)

Staff Nikolche Vasilevski

Interactive Tour by Imogen Barry-Murphy

Students Elizabeth Barker Imogen Barry-Murphy Gemma Borra Lara Damelian Kieren Dolores Chor Cheung Mok Grace Tetley Guang Yin

Acknowledgement: FSD Support for assistance with drone photogrammetry and LiDAR capture

Creating AR and VR for Design investigated emerging technologies, including 360 video, VR, AR, and mixed reality. Students learned fundamental human-centred design principles, including affordance theory and user interface design as it applies to HCI (human-computer interaction). Through designing a VR experience, students synthesise technical skills with storytelling techniques.

Virtual Ontology by Kieren Dolores 67

Incremental metal forming with robot by Reem Abdelmoula, Chor Cheung Mok & Christina Wicker

Soe Ker Tie House, study by Kiera Gazzard 68

Staff Mark Bagguley

Sealight Pavilion, study by Ziyue Shi

Incremental formed metal panels by Reem Abdelmoula, Chor Cheung Mok & Christina Wicker

Callum Tokody Hemsley Christina Wicker Cosette Winter Zhiqi Zhang

Acknowledgement Ryan Wirth

This subject introduced a range of concepts and intuitive levels of understanding of fundamental construction materials, the methodologies involved in their making and application in basic construction systems. Principles concerning material employment, such as embodied energy, wastage, environmental impact, ethical manufacturing practices, structural integrity, economy, efficiency, thermal mass, durability and maintenance, were explored. In addition, the experiential qualities of weight, colour, surface, reflectivity, luminosity, transparency, opacity, translucency, resonance and solidity were also investigated. Output was focused on collaborative methods of craftsmanship in both 2D and 3D outcomes, including the physical construction and assembly of materials and systems utilising the Architecture Fabrication and Research Workshop.

Students Reem Abdelmoula Hind Albalawi Luca Aresani Pando Joshua Clark Kiera Gazzard Annalise Grice Isaac Keighran Chor Cheung Mok Ziyue Shi Avishek Singh

ARCH71-125: MATERIAL AND METHOD (223)

Dobrava Floating Roof, study by Cosette Winter

Staff Mark Bagguley Brice Pannetier

Students Lucas Brooks Maxwell Dowd Grady Hart Robert Jones Jack Just Tom McMahon Maria Parnenzini Praveena Bharathi Sarvesan Justin Stokes Dizhe Sun Grace Tetley Sura Yoo Xiaochen Zhou

Acknowledgement: James Pearce (Populous) Paul Gurney (UAP)

ARCH71-139: DIGITAL DESIGN & INTELLIGENT CONSTRUCTION (223)

This subject introduced the evolving trends and technologies that challenge traditional architectural and construction practices. Through a combination of forums, workshops, guest speakers, field visits, and case studies, this subject aims to facilitate critical thinking about how emerging technologies can be meaningfully deployed in the built environment industries. The subject examined case studies that exemplify new approaches, processes, methods, concepts and best practices, providing an understanding of topics such as Building Information Modelling, lean production, life cycle carbon, technical nutrients, embodied energy, off-site manufacturing, industry 5.0, design for manufacture, blockchains, digital twins, mass customisation, and other emerging processes. 01

3D Robotic Drawing Workshop by Maria Parnenzini, Justin Stokes & Praveena Bharathi Sarvesan 69

Staff Daniela Ottmann

Students Walaah Al Majiblay Emily Barnard Lara Damelian Alfonso Juan De Castro Azuara Larni Filip Emilie Kamp Sarah Kim Katie Lander Naomi Mears Jodie Mitchell Brianna Mudie Ruby-Rose Nalywajko Ella Ramsey Alicia Rice John San Diego Jahsira Schoon Charlotte Thistlethwaite

Acknowledgement Lindsay Clare Brice Pannetier

ARCH10-137: DESIGNING FOR CLIMATE (221)

Facade Study by Naomi Mears

The undergraduate subject examines architecture and its interplay with the natural environment, aiming to develop sustainable design principles and values. Students developed an understanding of primary environmental design principles, incorporating observations of urban areas and their surrounding regions, encompassing cultural, societal, climatic, and economic systems and challenges through building science and climatic analysis on resilience, advanced passive systems, building skins, materials, and microclimates. Solar Studies by Lara Damelian

Daylight Study by Brianna Mudie 70

Site Section by Cole Tucker-Evans

Staff Daniela Ottmann

Students Steven Baleva Gemma Borra Kuan Chan Tao Chen Benjamin Cutajar Philip Darnton Maxwell Dowd Koosha Hooshmand Niveditha Jagannathan Lexie Kavanagh Erin Lean Georgia Mactaggart Natasha Maher Wren Salazar Josh Saling Tiffany Samonte Praveena Bharathi Sarvesan Homesh Seetah Anis Serikbayev Justin Stokes Dizhe Sun Annabel Tape

Acknowledgement Lindsay Clare Brice Pannetier Fernanda Parnenzini

ARCH71-126: DESIGN SYSTEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY (222)

This Master level subject provided students with an overview of the principles of architectural science (energy, climate and comfort), materials science (embodied energy and energy transfer), building envelopes and (passive) design for a sustainable built environment. Beyond a building physics and energy-efficient building design approach, students considered the physiological and socio-cultural responsibility of the built environment to include critical analysis of environmental design theory and sustainability concepts; strategies and propositions for the design of low-carbon and resilient environments were developed towards the UN SDGs. Daylight and U-Value Study by Natasha Maher 71

Staff Brian Toyota Brice Pannetier

Students Reem Abdelmoula Walaah Al Majiblay Luca Aresani Pando Frankie Chan Joshua Clark Alfonso Juan De Castro Azuara Elisabeth Foresto Kiera Gazzard Emily Gilchrist Annalise Grice Henrietta He Emilie Kamp Isaac Keighran Madelyne Orrock Cole Tucker-Evans Cosette Winter Zhiqi Zhang

Acknowledgement: Chris Grieve

Students investigated master planning strategies for urban built forms utilising digital platforms as an analytical and generative design tool. After a comparative analysis of contemporary urban typologies in various global cities in relation to historic urban design movements and regional influences, the students produced a hypothetical concept for the “redevelopment” of a city block in Broadbeach. They then used algorithmic and generative tools to understand the impact of various parameters on their design. Students worked in groups for their initial urban analyses and individually on their parametric application studies.

ARCH13-134 & ARCH71-134: URBAN FUTURES AND PARAMETRIC CITIES (232)

Broadbeach Urban Proposal by Coles Tucker-Evans

Solar Analysis by Alfonso Juan De Castro Azuara

Urban Study by Annalise Grice 72

Broadbeach Proposed Massing by Elisabeth Foresto

Staff Peter Kuhnell

Students Parnian Agahi Najafabadi Imogen Barry-Murphy Gemma Borra Kuan Chan Tao Chen Brodan Fernance Lexie Kavanagh Georgia Mactaggart Josh Saling Homesh Seetah Anis Serikbayev Justin Stokes Annabel Tape Grace Tetley Shawn Thompson Guang Yin

Acknowledgement Maria Parnenzini

ARCH71-118: ARCHITECTURAL PRACTICE: MANAGEMENT AND PROCUREMENT

Masters level students were introduced to essential skills, strategies, and relevant information for professional architectural practice. We delved into project management skills and procedures, including attention to contracts, legislation, codes, standards, and other frameworks for procuring and delivering projects. Students synthesise their learning through a speculative project, responding to planning schemes, developing the scope of work, documentation drawings, specifications, tendering process, and contractual selection.

Site Section by Cole Tucker-Evans

Development Analysis by Brodan Fernance

Site Section by Cole Tucker-Evans

Development Section by Brodan Fernance 73

Staff Peter Kuhnell

Students Walaah Al Majiblay Selena Baker Emily Barnard Kenneth Bo’o Hannah-Rae Cianci Lara Damelian Alfonso Juan De Castro Azuara Larni Filip Liam Foxe Nicayden Greenwood Jason Hillier Robert Jones Sarah Kim Katie Lander Naomi Mears Chor Cheung Mok Brianna Mudie Ella Ramsey Anna-Lena Mueller Alicia Rice Oliver Roberts Willem Scheepers Charlotte Thistlethwaite Christina Wicker Zhiqi Zhang

Acknowledgement Chris Grieve Marguerite Pollard

ARCH10-127: BIM AND DOCUMENTATION This undergraduate subject teaches students to use Building Information Modelling (BIM) for design, development, documentation, and information management within architectural and construction practices. Students developed the fundamental skills required to communicate their projects to a high degree of resolution for documentation, coordination, analysis and construction purposes. An understanding of the various scales and types of drawn representation is synthesised with accompanying documentation methods and techniques in contemporary construction.

Section by Anna-Lena Mueller

Saiko House Section by Christina Wicker 74

Axonometric by Anna-Lena Mueller

Staff Peter Kuhnell

Students Walaah Al Majiblay Emily Barnard Hannah-Rae Cianci Lara Damelian Alfonso Juan De Castro Azuara Larni Filip Liam Foxe Nicayden Greenwood Robert Jones Sarah Kim Katie Lander Naomi Mears Brianna Mudie Ella Ramsey Alicia Rice Willem Scheepers Jahsira Schoon Charlotte Thistlethwaite

Acknowledgement Maria Parnenzini

ARCH13-131: DESIGN ETHICS AND DESIGN DETAILING (222)

Crane House by Atelier Bow Wow, study by Lara Damelian

What is design ethics? Through this subject, students developed an understanding of the ethical concerns of architecture and its role in society in meeting the needs and supporting the well-being of the individual and community through defining meaningful and lasting cultural identity. These understandings were acquired through the critical study of noted architects and design practices to investigate their underlying ethical values, design approaches and practice methods. The research provided the foundation for developing a personal architectural position and value set to define a future practice model. In addition, students developed critical thinking and decisionmaking about construction, material choice and detailing. Students documented and prototyped the building envelope through a deep understanding of the precedent project, examining skin and structure and considering constructability, weathering and ageing, life cycle, embodied energy, material availability, services, and waste. 01

Gando Primary School extension by Kere Architecture, study by Naomi Mears 75

Future Practices, websites of speculative practice by students

Staff Matt Eagle 321 Students Imogen Barry-Murphy Tao Chen Lara Damelian Philip Darnton Kieren Dolores Lexie Kavanagh Erin Lean Monalisa Mthethwa Praveena Bharathi Sarvesan Anis Serikbayev Justin Stokes Dizhe Sun Annabel Tape Grace Tetley

221 Students Steven Baleva Gemma Borra Kuan Chan Benjamin Cutajar Maxwell Dowd Koosha Hooshmand Niveditha Jagannathan Aaron Kidwell Renee Lingard Georgia Mactaggart Natasha Maher Nicole Mesquita-Mendes Nelson Michaels Marcel Moller Susannah Moore Mikaela Nugent Josh Saling Homesh Seetah Sunil Kumar Chengyi Yang

ARCH71-124 : DESIGN PRACTICE FUTURES AND FRAMEWORKS

Future Practices, websites of speculative practice by students

Students examined the business of architecture through the application of creative and speculative design methods in developing an emerging model of architecture practice. The model was informed by the synthesis of an architect’s role as public advocate, development of a set of ethical values and critical analysis of precedent research in the context of contemporary challenges: opportunities of technological disruption, climate change, risk, population displacement, resourcing, management, finance, health and safety and quality assurance. 77

Notan - superposition of layers with different colour intensities, diagram by Cole Tucker-Evans. Architecture and Urbanism of Asia Pacific

Villa Savoye by Le Corbusier. Model by Avishek Singh, Amanda Fierro & Simon Lin. World Architecture and Urbanism.

Amager Bakke by BIG. Model by Emily Gilchrist, Harvey Rogers & Byron Runde. World Architecture and Urbanism.

HISTORY AND THEORY SUBJECTS 78

The teaching of history and theory within the Abedian School of Architecture curriculum includes two undergraduate subjects: ARCH11-114/71-117 World Architecture and Urbanism and ARCH11135/71-135 Architecture and Urbanism of Asia Pacific. As the subject titles imply, the first subject covers architecture and urban planning in Europe, Africa, and the Americas, while the focus of the latter subject is Asia and the Pacific, comprising Australasia. Both subjects cover architectural and urban history and theory from the Stone Ages till today. The goal in examining aesthetic and cosmological concepts; philosophical, social, and environmental issues; vernacular typologies and indigenous cultures; materials; construction methods; as well as evolution of science and technology, is to provide a framework for critical evaluations and analyses of architectural and urban design. There is a strong emphasis on linking the discussed interrelated examples and theories with the cultural, social, and environmental imperatives of the 21st century. Significant concepts, works, architects, planners, and contexts are highlighted for precedent studies and future referrals to develop the students’ design thinking skills and to inspire design excellence. The goal of the discussion is to familiarise the students with the wide range of examples and theories interrelated to the global architectural heritage, including vernacular traditions. Therefore, the teaching is linked to concurrent design studios, architectural technology, environmental studies, and design

communication subjects. In these undergraduate history subjects, each student produces critical analyses of a given building by means of individual research, which leads to a presentation, a physical model, and an essay on its primary features. Engagement with architectural precedents and their informing ideas is intended to encourage critical thinking and the ability to participate in the global architectural discourse. Through the analytical study of selected architects and canonical works of architecture, with a particular focus on their experiential qualities, tectonic attributes, morphological conditions, and underlying theories, the students form their own critical strategies as architectural and urban designers. In the postgraduate theory subjects, the focus is on deepening the student’s understanding of architecture and urbanism within their interdisciplinary realm. ARCH71-112 Contemporary Theory of Architecture and Urbanism, therefore, includes discussions on the various schools of thought during the late 20th and early 21st centuries as they relate to the disciplines of architecture and urban planning, which builds upon the knowledge that students have acquired during undergraduate studies on the history and theory of architecture and urbanism. Most importantly, the aim is to develop each student’s own design methodology through individual readings, reflected by analyses, presentations, and diagramming. This supports their quest to contextualise a proposal for a possible inquiry by providing a theoretical foundation for a Master of Architecture Thesis.

Finally, ARCH71-127 Design Thesis Research and Development entails the many paradigms of design research, also called evidence-based design or practicebased research, by introducing the primary methods of architectural inquiries with both quantitative and qualitative data generation. The goal is to introduce methodological, representational, and intellectual means of innovative and critical thinking in order to inspire design excellence in the forthcoming MArch Design Thesis. Students are assessed based on investigatory assignments, which involve developing a theoretical framework and design concepts relevant to one’s MArch Design Thesis through reading, reflecting, writing, and visual representation. This includes explorations of such issues as conceptual ideas, design hypotheses and methodology, initial design research and design methodology, site selection and analysis, programming, brief development, and other pertinent tasks in the evolving thesis proposal. The outcome is presented to a review panel at the end of the Design Thesis Research and Development semester for evaluation and approval as a foundation for the design solutions in the subsequent stages of the Design Thesis Studio. Marja Sarvimaki Subject Coordinator

FSDO73-601: ARCHITECTURAL FUTURES LAB: DESIGNING AND MAKING AS RESEARCH Students design and fabricate an installation titled the Stair Monster inside one of the staircases in the Abedian School building. The installation spatially modulates the threshold of ascending to the upper floor studios before transforming into an envelope of minimal surfaces tattooed with an AI-generated pattern. The students fabricated the installation and drew the patterns over three days using HoloLens, an Augmented Reality headset with the aid of Fologram. We investigate how tacit knowledge can be generative as a form of design research. Students examine their design experimentation through understanding research workflow and critical reflection of design research practice.

Collective AR drawing. Photography by Lara Damelian

AR drawing. Photography by Lara Damelian

GAI Dreamstudio hallucinating. Image by Kuan Chan 80

AR Assembly of structure. Photography by Parnian Agahi Najafabadi

Staff Gwyllim Jahn Paul Loh Chris Grieve 221 Students Parnian Agahi Najafabadi Gemma Borra Kuan Chan Lara Damelian Chor Cheung Mok Homesh Seetah Justin Stokes Grace Tetley

Acknowledgement Cameron Newnham Nick van den Berg Ryan Wirth Mark Bagguley

Stair Monster. Photography by Chor Cheung Mok

INDUSTRY SUPPORTS

Acknowledgement The Abedian School of Architecture would like to thank Dr Soheil Abedian and Anne Abedian for their generous support to the School. The Abedian Foundation generously provides the Abedian Foundation Master of Architecture Scholarships to eligible students in recognition of Dr Soheil Abedian’s longstanding association with Bond University. These unique scholarships are awarded based on academic merit, to selected students wishing to commence the Master of Architecture program at Bond University. The Architectus Conrad Gargett Design Award was awarded every semester to one design project selected across the School.

The School sincerely thanks Architectus Conrad Gargett for their generous support to the School’s design culture. The School acknowledges the leadership of the former Head of School, Professor Chris Knapp. We also thank Angela Clark and Chloe Parfitt from FSD External Engagement and Marketing Team for their support throughout the preparation of the book. We thank our Industry Advisory Committee (IAC) members who have, over the past 10 years, contributed to the School’s progress.

Current IAC Members:

Previous IAC Members:

Virginia Rigney (Gold Coast City Gallery)

2023 Public Lecture Series

2022 Public Lecture Series

Anne Abedian (Chair, Sunland Group & Abedian Foundation)

Sahba Abedian (previous IAC Chair and Director, Sunland Group)

Leigh Shutter (Associate Professor, Griffith University & AIA)

Donald Bates (Lab & Melbourne School of Design)

Rafael Contreras (Contreras Earl Architecture)

Raith Anderson (Managing Director & Architect, DBI Design)

Michael Banney (Director, m3architecture)

Peter Skinner (Architect & Queensland State President, AIA)

Hannah Tribe (Tribe Studio)

Danny Juric (Plus Architecture)

Gwyllim Jahn (Fologram)

Paul Jones (OMA)

Kerstin Thompson (KTA)

PechaKucha,

Professor Brit Andresen (Andresen O’Gorman Architects and Emeritus Professor UQ)

David Brown (Executive Development Manager, Sunland Group) Peter Cotton (Mirvac Design)

David Gray (Alumni & Founder, Talent Acquisitions)

Amy Degenhart (Design Forum Architects)

Lindy Johnson (Creative Agent)

Brian Toyota (Design Director, ML Design) Kristen Whittle (Director, Bates Smart Architects)

Peter Stutchbury (PSA)

Hosted by Katherine Rickard & David Hanson

Greg Ewart (McVeigh Consulting)

First Nation Knowledge in Design Symposium:

Brian Ringley (Boston Dynamics)

Dominic Finlay Jones (DFJ Architects)

Philip Follent (Philip Follent Architects)

Uncle John Graham (Bond University)

Design Charrette

Honorary Professor Michael Keniger (former Chair of IAC)

Chris Gee (Director, Coast Arc)

Erin McDonald (Blaklash)

Tom Hanrahan (Professor & Dean, Pratt Institute, NY, USA)

Lindsay Clare (Clare Design)

Leah Lang (Qld Government Architect + Leah Lang Architects) Jemima Rosevear (City Architect/Executive Coordinator, Economy, Planning and Environment Directorate, City of Gold Coast) Malcolm Middleton (former Qld Government Architect) Mark Roehrs (Principal Education & Science Sector Leader, HASSELL) Stuart Vokes (Director, Vokes and Peters) Aaron Peters (Director, Vokes and Peters) Nicholas Allen (Associate, Architectus Conrad Gargett)

Steve Harfield (UTS) Ed Haysom (City Architect, City of Gold Coast) Tom Heneghan (Professor, Dept of Architecture, Tokyo University of Arts)

Brit Anderson, Michael Keniger and Elizabeth Musgrave

Tristan Schultz (Relative Creative) Edward Armstrong (Architectus Conrad Gargett) Design Charrette: Donald Bates

Richard Johnson (AO MBE, Johnson Pilton Walker (JPW) & Hon.Prof. UNSW Built Environment) Finn Jones (Architect) Johan Kriegbaum (Cake Equity) Barry Lee (Managing Director, DBI Design) Bruce Medek (Bureau^Proberts) Paul Pholeros (AM, Paul Pholeros Architects Healthabitat & Adjunct University of Sydney) Gavan Ranger (Strategic Director, Arkhefield (Ranger Design) Katherine Rickard (City of Gold Coast)

STAFF & CREDITS The School thanks all the professional staff who have supported the overall programmes listed in this book over the years. Special thanks to all the subject coordinators and students for gathering the work for this publication. To commemorate the 10th Anniversary of the Abedian School building, we listed all the graduates from the Architecture programs at Bond University between 2013 and 2023.

Faculty of Society & Design Professional Staff 2022-23 Executive Dean, Derek Carson Faculty Business Director, Linda Kirwood Learning & Teaching Manager, Belinda Stenton-Dozey Student Affairs and Service Quality Manager, Babu Howlader Marketing & External Engagement Manager, Angela Clark Marketing Assistant, Chloe Parfitt Building Resources Officer, Steven Watts Program Administrator for Built Environment, Lyn Hathaway Fabrication Laboratory (FabLab) Manager, Ryan Wirth FabLab Technical Officer, Nathan Freeman FabLab Technical Officer, Alec Gentile

Academic Staff 2022-23 Professor Paul Loh Professor Adrian Carter Associate Professor Marja Sarvimaki Associate Professor Daniela Ottmann Visiting Professor Kerry Clare Visiting Professor Lindsay Clare Assistant Professor (Practice) Matthew Eagle Assistant Professor Mark Bagguley Jasper Brown (Senior Teaching Fellow) Justin Twohill (Senior Teaching Fellow) Brian Toyota (Senior Teaching Fellow) Peter Kuhnell (Senior Teaching) Brice Pannetier (Senior Teaching) Dr Lei Yu (Research Fellow) Megan King (Tutor) Jack Ryan (Tutor) Chris Grieves (Tutor) Kelly Nortje (Tutor) Publication Credits Edited by Professor Paul Loh Designed by Studio Paradise Abedian School of Architecture Bond University 14 University Drive, Robina Queensland 4226 Australia ISBN: : 978-0-9871509-8-1 © All rights reserved. Bond University. 2023