FREE
OC sheriff’s sergeant accused of illegally eavesdropping on inmate calls
AG’s office moves to force improvements at LA County juvenile halls Now incorporating
PG 02
M O N D AY, A P R I L 17- A P R I L 23, 2023
PG 27
V I S I T PA S A D E N A I N D E P E N D E N T. C O M
V O L U M E 27,
N O. 116
LA council looks to review the effectiveness of anti-camping law By Jose Herrera, City News Service
T
he Los Angeles City Council directed various city departments Wednesday to conduct a review of the effectiveness and financial cost of the city’s anti-camping law aimed at restricting the location of homeless encampments. A motion presented by council members Katy Yaroslavsky and Curren Price and approved unanimously calls for a report on the application, enforcement and effectiveness of the law, known as section 41.18, which bans sitting, sleeping and storing property near an estimated 2,000 designated sites in the city. “I understand that this is a sensitive issue, and I respect that each one of us has different opinions on the use of 41.18 as a tool in our efforts to end homelessness,” Yaroslavsky said. “I’ve stated before that I agree there are certain locations such as school and daycare centers that should be covered by the law. “There are some who believe we should go further and some who believe that those sites shouldn’t exist at all. But while our opinions on 41.18 may differ, the means by which we enforce them should not.” Shortly after the city passed 41.18, the council approved the Street Engage-
| Photo courtesy of Brandi Alexandra/Unsplash
ment Strategy, a component of the outreach engagement framework, which outlined the required steps prior to the enforcement of the law. The Street Engagement Strategy offered an opportunity for the city and its partners to provide housing resources to individuals impacted by the law, though its effectiveness has not yet been fully analyzed. Yaroslavsky said the motion would “shine a light” on how the enforcement of 41.18 has been carried out by requesting a report on
several key metrics of the law including, but not limited to, a breakdown of the total cost of enforcement with details on the staff cost, and the price of anti-camping signage, which she noted has cost the city several million dollars. “The reality is that we don’t have a clearer picture as to how 41.18, specifically as it relates to individual sites determined through council motion, has been applied and whether or not it’s reducing homelessness. That is a problem,” Yaro-
slavsky said. Following the council’s vote, Councilman Hugo Soto-Martínez, who opposed 41.18, posted on Twitter that he would be looking forward to the report examining the law’s efficacy. “LA’s Municipal Code 41.18 criminalizes unhoused people, preventing them from existing in large portions of the city, even as we don’t have nearly enough housing or shelter beds to accommodate everyone forced to live on our streets,” Hugo-Martínez wrote in a Twitter post.
The law prohibits sitting, sleeping, lying and storing personal property within two feet of any fire hydrant or fire plug; within five feet of any operational or utilizable entrance or exit; within 10 feet of a loading dock or driveway; in a manner that interferes with any activity for which the city has issued a permit or restricts accessible passage as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act; or anywhere within a street, including bike paths. The law also prohibits
encampments within 500 feet of a “sensitive” facility including schools, daycare facilities, parks and libraries. Other affected areas include: within 500 feet of a designated overpass, underpass, freeway ramp, tunnel, bridge, pedestrian bridge, subway, wash or spreading ground, railroad track, or where lodging unsheltered or in tents is unhealthy, unsafe and incompatible with safe passage; and within 1,000 feet of a facility opened after Jan. 1, 2018, that provides shelter, safe sleeping, safe parking, or navigation centers for people experiencing homelessness. The ordinance allows the city to prevent encampments for a period of no longer than one year in areas that are deemed an ongoing threat to public health or safety, including due to: death or serious bodily injury of any person at the location due to a hazardous condition; repeated serious or violent crimes or threats of serious or violent crimes, including human trafficking; and fires at the location. The street engagement strategy also includes frameworks to conduct engagement during emergencies, including national disasters and public health matters.
Port operations further disrupted amid labor negotiations
T
he Pacific Maritime Association, the industry group representing shippers, issued a statement Thursday accusing the union that represents West Coast dockworkers of continued disruptive actions at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach amid protracted labor negotiations. Both parties are negotiat-
By City News Service ing new contracts with priorities in wages and the role of automation. The old contract with the association and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union expired July 1. “Last week, ILWU Local 13 withheld labor that shut down terminals throughout the port of Los Angeles and Long Beach,” said the Pacific
Maritime Association in a statement. “This week, the union has unilaterally delayed the standard dispatch process, which is jointly administered by PMA and ILWU, and refused to allow PMA’s participation in the labor dispatch process.” PMA said ILWU’s actions slowed the start of operations throughout the Southern California port complex and
forced crucial cargo handling equipment to be taken out of operation at several key terminals. “This latest work action comes about a month after ILWU Local 13 in Southern California stopped complying with a contract provision providing employers the right to assign staggered shifts during meal periods so cargo
can continue to be received and delivered without interruption,” said the PMA in a statement. The PMA further accused the union’s actions of threatening to accelerate the diversion of discretionary cargo to ports on the East and Gulf coasts. “Cargo diversion places quality jobs at risk far beyond
the docks, including truck drivers, warehouse workers and thousands of others whose livelihoods depend on ongoing operations at the port,” the PMA said in a statement. ILWU did not respond to immediate requests for See Labor negotiations Page 27