Solution Manual For Criminal Law And The Canadian Criminal Code 7CE Sherrie Barnhorst, Richard Barnhorst, Adriel Weaver, Dean Embry Chapter 1-13
Chapter 1 Criminal Law in Canadian Context LEARNING OBJECTIVES Describe how Canada is legally pluralist Explain the constitutional limits on Parliament's power to legislate Identify two circumstances in which a Charter-infringing statute or provision will nevertheless be valid Explain how the principle of stare decisis operates Distinguish between public and private law and public and private wrongs Locate statutes and case law
CHAPTER SUMMARY/COMMENTARY This chapter situates Canadian criminal law within a particular legal and constitutional framework. Canada is a legally pluralist or multijuridical country, in which Indigenous law, civil law, and common law co-exist. It is also a country in which different orders of government— federal, provincial, and Indigenous—operate in areas relevant to criminal law and the administration of criminal justice. Their respective powers are set out in ss 91 and 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867, which divides legislative authority between Parliament and the provincial legislatures, and s 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, which recognizes and affirms existing Aboriginal rights, including the inherent right of self-government. These provisions are subject to judicial interpretation, and, in the case of s 35, ongoing negotiation. Reconsidering and restructuring the relationship between different legal traditions and orders of government is essential to achieving justice for everyone in Canada. This book focuses on the Criminal Code and related judicial decisions. The Criminal Code is enacted by Parliament pursuant to its legislative authority over substantive criminal law and criminal procedure. Parliament‘s power to legislate is constrained by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, part of the Constitution Act, 1982. Section 52 of the Constitution Act, 1982 empowers judges to strike down legislative provisions that are inconsistent with the Charter. Judges also make law by interpreting statutes and establishing legal principles in areas not governed by legislation. Judges are in turn constrained in the exercise of their powers by the principle of stare decisis, which requires that they adhere to and apply precedent. Criminal offences are public wrongs, prosecuted by the state. They may overlap with but are distinct from private wrongs, such as torts, for which individuals can bring civil lawsuits. The Charter has particular significance for criminal law and procedure. Legal rights are set out in ss Instructor’s Manual to accompany Criminal Law and the Canadian Criminal Code 7e, by Barnhorst/Weaver/Embry Chapter 1 © 2023 McGraw Hill Ltd.
1