Shocking Search & Rescue
By Senior Chief Naval Aircrewman (Helicopter) Erica Gibson, USN
I
n the summer of 2020, I was a student going through Helicopter Sea Combat (HSC-2), the East Coast MH60S Fleet Replacement Squadron (FRS). It was time to complete our search and rescue (SAR) jumps syllabus event. It was an annual requalification for myself, but for the other seven rescue swimmers on the flight, it was their initial qualification as Category I students. During the jumps, we train and qualify in direct deployment (DD) procedures. During DD, the rescue swimmer deploys from a 70-foot hover via the helicopter’s rescue hoist into the water. I was the first to go in starting our DD procedures. As I was lowered from the helicopter to the water, I felt an initial shock travel through my hands. Then as my fins touched the surface of the water, I felt a huge shock start at my right hand and travel throughout my body exiting out my left foot. When I was hoisted back into the aircraft, I notified the crew chief. As the DDs continued, another swimmer experienced the same type of shock. Following the two incidents of electrical shock within a 15-minute timeframe, I instructed the crew to “knock it off,” and we returned to base. After we landed, I discovered that receiving a shock during hoisting evolutions was common in the HSC Community and was unfortunately accepted as a risk. I was baffled by the experience because I had never been shocked by the other H-60 platforms (SH-60F/HH-60H/MH-60R). I discussed the occurrence with the aircrew leading chief petty officer of the schoolhouse at the time, and we submitted an Aviation Safety Action Program (ASAP) and Hazard Report (HAZREP) to ensure proper reporting requirements were met. In 2022, the Search and Rescue Model Manager (SARMM) released SARGRAM Consolidation March 2022, requiring HAZREPs from commands for shock-related incidents. Community leadership knew that incidents were happening, but commands weren't reporting them. Additionally, Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) sent out an Interim Flight Clearance (IFC / P 290616Z APR21 COMNAVAIRLANT NORFOLK, VA). The IFC authorized using the Life Saving Systems Hoist Static Discharge (HSD) Cable. The cable cost $89 and was used by the U.S. Coast Guard. Did I bother to convince the command to order it knowing this information? No. We were busy with a high OPTEMPO and I went back and forth with the Paraloft, or parachute maintenance facilities, on who would take ownership and maintenance of the cable if ordered. It was only when we once again had two separate shock incidents in the command during an overland hoisting evolution that I finally convinced all the stakeholders it was time to eliminate the risk. In the first incident, the rescue swimmer felt a painful shock while direct-deploying to the deck, having to drop to his knees to fully dissipate
the shock. In the second incident, the safety observer was struck by the rescue basket (due to rotor down wash) before it landed on the deck and grounded out. The safety observer felt increasing muscle convulsions 40-60 minutes post-shock. Both Sailors were sent to medical for evaluation. Medical evaluation, with an electrocardiogram postshocking incident, is critical. Many sources state up to 2,000 volts of continuous charge are enough to fry internal organs. I recommend watching the video on YouTube of a U.S. Coast Guard rescue swimmer getting shocked on the hoist during DD to understand its severity. When performing a hoisting evolution, swimmers are at risk of shock due to the inability to ground out the hoist. The H-60 helicopters are known to continuously generate 15,000 to 20,000 volts of static electricity. No sources currently identify the exact voltage that dissipates from the rescue hoist when grounding out. To prevent our rescue swimmers at HSC-28 from becoming shocked or hurt, we ordered 14 of the HSD Cables (one per aircraft) and provided training to the shop by following the IFC guidance on HSD Cable use overwater and overland. Although the cable is a bit of an inconvenience being 10 feet in length and in the way while working with rescue equipment, it is worth every bit of risk mitigation. Across the naval enterprise, we are put into situations daily that require risk management (RM). We are all familiar with the RM process; still, we, the most powerful global naval force, are failing to “implement controls” and accepting unnecessary risks at the cost of our ships, our aircraft and more importantly, our warfighters. We are normalizing deviation by cutting corners, finding workarounds, accepting the hazardous “norms,” and not correctly self-assessing and self-correcting. With deviation comes not meeting our warfighting readiness and not supporting our Chief of Naval Operations’ “Get Real, Get Better” Initiative. Who is accepting responsibility for this? Following due diligence, I have written a SAR Action Item Chit for SARMM to mandate HSD Cable incorporation into MH-60R/MH-60S SAR Curtains. In addition to the cable being available to mitigate risks during hoisting evolutions, the chit also mandates educating our community on HSD cable usage and static electricity discharge phenomenon through learning resources such as SAR lectures, wing and squadron SOPs, and applicable type/model/series NATOPS. To get to the main culprit and identify the amount of risk taken, a separate action item to test rescue hoist static discharge during hoisting evolutions was also submitted to NAVAIR’s Airworthiness Website.
47
www.navalhelicopterassn.org
