OmniTrans Bus Stop Safety Improvement Plan

Page 149

Implementation

05

5.2.2 Prioritized Bus Stop Safety Programs

Cost

1. Transit Ambassador Program

Feasibility relates to whether the estimated cost to construct an infrastructure project or develop and install a program. Costs vary from city to city in terms of construction and the extent of the project itself. Projects that require minimal infrastructure changes such as bike lane striping or installing high-visibility crosswalks may only require thermoplastic road markings and can be installed in a short period of time. Other physical countermeasures such as mid-block crossings may require a traffic study, warrant analysis, materials, and the construction costs, which would be the responsibility of the local jurisdiction. Programs vary depending on the purpose of the program, the geographic reach of the program, materials and staff time to design, produce materials, and implement. Some programs may also only run for a short period of time.

This is an implemented program by transit agencies such as Bay Area Rapid Transit and Long Beach Transit and other parts of the country. Omnitrans is currently working to implement an Ambassador program however it’s travel training oriented.

2. Homelessness Programs Homelessness was an important issue from the focus groups, stakeholders and surveys. Riders did not feel safe if shelters were littered or occupied by the unhoused. Programs such the Hub of Hope in Philadelphia and the Alpha Project in San Diego are good examples of agencies and programs that can relieve homelessness around bus stops and in general.

3. CAHOOTS Program This is another successful program that can be explored along with various homelessness programs to help respond to mental illness and substance abuse. Instead of engaging law enforcement for non-violent offenders, which can be perceived in a negative light in certain neighborhoods, a crisis team is employed to intervene. Crisis teams are specifically trained in de-escalation techniques for individuals with mental illness and with addiction issues. Omnitrans does have a relationship with San Bernardino County Department of Public Health that can be tapped into to pursue additional partnering opportunities.

5.3 Prioritization Analysis The team developed a proposed project list based on need, expected effectiveness/benefits, and implementability (cost and feasibility of implementation). Need for proposed projects was based on results of data analysis and input from the TAC such as locations with high incidences of crashes or safety incidents, or locations where passengers reported feeling the most unsafe. To achieve effective prioritization, it is important to include stakeholders in the process and tailor the process to address stakeholder needs. The BSSIP TAC played an important role in the project and program identification and prioritization processes.

Currently, Omnitrans’ typical annual budget is $300,000-$400,000/year of State and Federal capital funding to spend on safety and security. This allocation can only be used for projects over $5,000 that are for design, construction, or purchase of physical amenities that would improve safety. This budget, however, may already be allocated to Omnitrans’ projects and not all be available to spend immediately on the recommendations within this Plan. Through a prioritization process, Omnitrans will need to supplement these funds with outside sources for bus stop safety improvement or program design and implementation.

Feasibility of Implementation These criteria should confirm if the specific project can be built or a program be designed and implemented? Are there funding sources available to pursue and implement these projects and programs? Is there sufficient right-of-way to build the project? Is there enough political will and support from the local jurisdictions, Omnitrans and/or other interested parties to pursue these projects and programs? For infrastructure projects, are the projects part of a past or current planning effort to incorporate the recommendations. For example, if a travel lane is to be converted into a bus-bike lane, is there enough political support to implement the project?

137


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Implementation

1min
pages 215-217

Table 5-32: Implementation Chart - Program Implementation Table 5-33: Implementation Chart - Infrastructure

3min
pages 213-214

Table 5-29: Census Tract 9 Bus Stop Improvements

2min
page 208

Table 5-30: Implementation Chart - Identify the Needs Table 5-31: Implementation Chart - Planning and

1min
page 211

5.6 Implementation Framework

2min
page 210

Assessment

1min
page 212

Table 5-28: Census Tract 9 Bicycle Improvements

1min
page 206

Figure 5-26: Census Tract 9 Pedestrian Recommendations

1min
page 205

Table 5-27: Census Tract 9 Pedestrian Improvements

1min
page 204

Figure 5-25: Census Tract 8 Bus Stop Recommendations

1min
page 203

Table 5-24: Census Tract 8 Pedestrian Improvements

1min
page 198

Table 5-26: Census Tract 8 Bus Stop Improvements

2min
page 202

Table 5-23: Census Tract 7 Bus Stop Improvements

2min
page 196

Table 5-25: Census Tract 8 Bicycle Improvements

1min
page 200

Figure 5-20: Census Tract 7 Pedestrian Recommendations

1min
page 193

Table 5-22: Census Tract 7 Bicycle Improvements

1min
page 194

Table 5-21: Census Tract 7 Pedestrian Improvements

1min
page 192

Table 5-20: Census Tract 6 Bus Stop Improvements

2min
page 190

Table 5-19: Census Tract 6 Bicycle Improvements

1min
page 188

Figure 5-17: Census Tract 6 Pedestrian Recommendations

1min
page 187

Table 5-18: Census Tract 6 Pedestrian Improvements

1min
page 186

Figure 5-16: Census Tract 5 Bus Stop Recommendations

1min
page 185

Figure 5-15: Census Tract 5 Bicycle Recommendations

1min
page 183

Table 5-17: Census Tract 5 Bus Stop Improvements

1min
page 184

Table 5-16: Census Tract 5 Bicycle Improvements

1min
page 182

Figure 5-14: Census Tract 5 Pedestrian Recommendations

1min
page 181

Table 5-15: Census Tract 5 Pedestrian Improvements

2min
page 180

Table 5-13: Census Tract 4 Bicycle Improvements

1min
page 176

Table 5-14: Census Tract 4 Bus Stop Improvements

2min
page 178

Figure 5-11: Census Tract 4 Pedestrian Recommendations

1min
page 175

Table 5-11: Census Tract 3 Bus Stop Improvements

1min
page 172

Table 5-12: Census Tract 4 Pedestrian Improvements

1min
page 174

Figure 5-8: Census Tract 3 Pedestrian Recommendations

1min
page 169

Table 5-9: Census Tract 3 Pedestrian Improvements

1min
page 168

Figure 5-7: Census Tract 2 Bus Stop Recommendations

1min
page 167

Table 5-8: Census Tract 2 Bus Stop Improvements

1min
page 166

Figure 5-4: Census Tract 1 Bus Stop Recommendations

1min
page 161

Figure 5-5: Census Tract 2 Pedestrian Recommendations

1min
page 163

Table 5-7: Census Tract 2 Bicycle Improvements

1min
page 164

Table 5-6: Census Tract 2 Pedestrian Improvements

1min
page 162

Table 5-5: Census Tract 1 Bus Stop Improvements

1min
page 160

4.6 Personal Safety Best Practices

33min
pages 127-143

Table 5-4: Census Tract 1 Bicycle Improvements

1min
page 158

5.3 Prioritization Analysis

8min
pages 149-151

Table 5-3: Census Tract 1 Pedestrian Improvements

1min
page 156

Guidelines

2min
page 144

5.4 Prioritized Bus Stop Access Project Types

2min
page 152

Figure 5-2: Census Tract 1 Pedestrian Recommendations

1min
page 157

Figure 4-6: Fatalities per Billion Passenger Miles Traveled 21

3min
pages 125-126

Figure 4-5: Median Treatment to Discourage Unsafe Pedestrian Midblock Crossing21

4min
pages 123-124

4.5 Best Practices Research

4min
pages 118-119

Figure 4-4: Strategy to Reduce Crime and Reduce Fear that Reduces Transit Ridership15

6min
pages 120-122

4.4 Traffic Calming

2min
pages 116-117

Crime 6

15min
pages 106-113

4.2 Bicycle and Pedestrian Solutions

5min
pages 104-105

4.1 Barriers and Solutions Overview

3min
pages 102-103

Figure 3-3: Virtual Audit Interactive Map

1min
page 92

3.9 Results from Outreach Events

7min
pages 96-101

2.7 Policy and Planning Context

19min
pages 76-87

3.4 Stakeholder Interviews and Outreach Events

4min
page 90

Figure 3-2: Omnitrans Virtual Audit Bus Stops Tour

1min
page 91

Figure 2-29: Census Tracts 6-9 Existing Bicycle Facilities

2min
pages 73-74

Figure 2-26: Census Tract 5 Existing Bicycle Facilities

2min
pages 67-68

Figure 2-27: Census Tract 5 Existing Pedestrian Facilities

1min
pages 69-70

Figure 2-23: Census Tract 4 Existing Bicycle Facilities

2min
pages 61-62

Figure 2-20: Census Tract 3 Existing Bicycle Facilities

2min
pages 55-56

Figure 2-24: Census Tract 4 Existing Pedestrian Facilities

1min
pages 63-64

Figure 2-21: Census Tract 3 Existing Pedestrian Facilities

1min
pages 57-58

Figure 2-18: Census Tract 2 Existing Pedestrian Facilities

1min
pages 51-52

Figure 2-17: Census Tract 2 Existing Bicycle Facilities

1min
pages 49-50

Figure 2-15: Census Tract 1 Existing Pedestrian Facilities

1min
pages 45-46

1.3 Omnitrans’ Ridership Characteristics

1min
pages 15-16

2.4 Bicycle Facilities

1min
page 36

Figure 2-16: Census Tract 2 Land Uses

1min
pages 47-48

Figure 2-1: Omnitrans’ Service Area

2min
pages 19-20

Figure 2-14: Census Tract 1 Existing Bicycle Facilities

2min
pages 43-44

Table 2-4: Collision Analysis per Census Tract16 Table 4-1: How Transit Improvements Can Reduce Urban

1min
page 25

2.3 Land Use

1min
page 32
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
OmniTrans Bus Stop Safety Improvement Plan by KTUA - Issuu