Comment
BY DR MARTIN JAFFA
Meal deals The āvalue addedā packaged salmon meal was an idea that came and went
I
āM in the process of moving oļ¬ce and the move oļ¬ers the opportunity for a clear-out of ļ¬les, books and other miscellanea accumulated over 30 years. One of the collecļæ½ons includes several hundred examples of packaging that appeared in retail from the early 1990s onwards. As well as simple labels, there are hundreds of card outers from the packaging of added-value salmon products. They represent a memory of the past advances of the salmon farming industry in the UK. One of the reasons salmon was selected as a potenļæ½al candidate for farming was its then premium market image. Iniļæ½ally, its scarcity meant salmon could command a premium price, but by the end of the 1980s increased farmed producļæ½on meant salmon became much more widely available. The downside was that this availability undermined its market image as well as the price. Salmon farming had evolved from an industry of high margins and low volumes to one of low margins and (relaļæ½vely) high volumes. The price of farmed salmon fell. The quesļæ½on was what to do. The salmon farming industry blamed Norway for cheap imports and embarked on a dumping case against
26
Comment_Martin Jaffa_v2.indd 26
Norway at the European Commission. Meanwhile, salmon processors began to realise that low-cost salmon oļ¬ered the chance to diversify the market and reach a greater range of consumers. Their approach was to emulate the market development of the broiler chickens. At the ļæ½me, salmon farmers focused on selling whole salmon, but broiler producers recognised that chicken breasts, legs, wings etc were more aļæ½racļæ½ve to consumers than whole chicken for most meal choices. The same approach was taken with salmon as consumers were more likely to buy a couple of ļ¬llets for one meal than using a whole ļ¬sh, even a small one. However, as the 1990s progressed and while the industry was sļæ½ll pursuing its case against Norway at the EU, the low cost of salmon meant that it was the ideal base for producļæ½on of a whole range of added-value products, including meal choices. I have provided images of some of the products I found of most interest but at the ļæ½me these were just the ļæ½p of the iceberg. For example, the Italian range found in most supermarkets expanded from spagheļæ½ bolognaise to cannelloni to lasagne to vegetable lasagne to eventually include salmon lasagne. This acted as an introducļæ½on to salmon in a dish that was already familiar to consumers. More complex dishes included those giving a variety of ethnic opļæ½ons. However, the fate of many of these dishes was sealed when salmon farming companies began to be listed on the stock exchange. Financial analysts were not interested in consumers and what they wanted to eat. Their interest was focused on the share price and
Left: Iniļæ½ally the focus was on selling whole salmon when it was seen as a premium product Above: Various salmon products
www.fishfarmermagazine.com
12/10/2021 15:00:08












