Industrial and Trade Activity Environmental Management Plan
Appendix E: Record of CLG and Auckland Council Comments E1. CLG Comments An Mt Eden Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG) meeting was held on 11 May to discuss the Mt Eden Main Works and for the CLG to provide comments / feedback on the CEMP and subplans, including this ITA EMP. No comments were received from the CLG on this ITA EMP.
E2. Auckland Council Comments The ITA EMP was reviewed by Leon Blackburn, Senior ITA/ Stormwater Specialist. Leon provided the following comments on the ITA EMP: Section of this ITA EMP
Comment
Response
General
Appears written as planning document in terms of tone. The EMP is THE document of structural and procedural controls. i.e ‘documents the procedures to be implemented’ should read as ‘…are implemented’. Understood that EMP live document as per conditions of consent and implement version will address this as per condition 159.
The tone and approach is consistent with the overall management plans.
Cross references to various other plans. Refer 'documents reviewed’ section of this memo regarding cross references and applicability of specific conditions of consent. Example section 1.3 of ITAEMP refers conditions 159 – 179. These also overlap with ‘other’ and details of WTP are in the FTMP, an appendix of ESCP.
The ITA EMP has included clarification around the relationships between the other plans.
1.3
Understand avoidance of duplication, FTMP has the water quality management required under ITA/Other discharge conditions, not LUC conditions because this is for more than just ‘sediment controls’. Comment more for future reference and clarity as to location.
No amendments required.
1.4 conditions
161(f) requires drainage plans. Q: Is it correct that in terms of the ITAMP these will be for the ‘technical area’ of CSA 4 and CSA5, with the wider CSA4 plans being in the referenced ESCP?
Drainage plans are included in the ESCP and have not be included to avoid duplication.
166: MT Eden is CSA 4 and 5 {note for leon) comment in relation to section 2.2 of ESCP
Clarification made in plan that this ITA EMP on relates to CSA 4 and 5. Amended to clarify approvals on if modification made.
169: seek clarity – is this saying that there are already minor modifications? Was this the move to the sediment pond for the majority CSA4 and ACZs? Noting CSA5 is tanks according to figure XX in section X.X of this EMP. Page 50
| Mt Eden Main Works
