Barnabas Aid March/April 2022 17
resemble Himself. Where there are similarities between God and humans; it is because humans are made in the image of God. Human reason is a reflection of Godâs wisdom. Human desire for justice is a reflection of Godâs overwhelming concern for justice. When the prophets were moved with feeling, they were reflecting the emotions of God; they were identifying with the Divine pathos. But we should recognize that the Divine pathos is ultimately beyond our understanding. Godâs feelings are a mystery to us in the same way that Godâs thoughts are a mystery to us. Heschel says that the famous words of Isaiah 55:8-9 about Godâs thoughts can equally be applied to His pathos: For My pathos is not your pathos, neither are your ways My ways, says the Lord. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are My ways higher than your ways, and My pathos than your pathos.5
The Pain of God
Kazoh Kitamori (1916-1998), likewise, saw great significance in the Old Testament prophets and what they revealed of Divine suffering. Having lived through the suffering of war, including the devastation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, followed by the crushing shame of defeat (an unbearable humiliation in Japanese culture), Kitamori published his famous book Theology of the Pain of God in 1946.
Kitamori derives the phrase âthe pain of Godâ from Jeremiah 31:20. The Hebrew word hamah, used many times elsewhere in the Old Testament about human anguish, is in this verse applied to God. Many English translations are along the lines of âMy heart yearns for himâ but a more literal translation is the AV/KJVâs âMy bowels are troubled for himâ or in modern metaphorical language âMy heart is troubled for himâ (KJ21). But Kitamori points out that when hamah is used of humans, its meaning is often much more extreme than âtroubledâ, so Jeremiah 31:20 is better expressed in the Japanese Literary Version which gives âmy bowels are in pain.â He also commends Lutherâs German translation in which God says His heart is breaking.6 Calvin writes of God in this verse attributing to Himself human feelings of âextraordinary painâ and âgreat sorrow.â Kitamori concludes that Jeremiah is speaking in this verse of âthe pain of God.â 7 This pain of God, says Kitamori, âreflects his love toward those turning against it.â Godâs love and His pain come together at the cross.8 Kitamori says that âlove rooted in the pain of Godâ forms âthe entire message of the Bible.â9
The Cross, the Trinity and Ultimate Joy
Also writing from a war-ravaged and defeated country, German theologian JĂźrgen Moltmann (born 1926) published The Crucified God in 1972.10 In this he argues that:
a God who cannot suffer is poorer than any man ⌠the one who cannot suffer cannot love either. So he is a loveless being.11 Moltmann, like Kitamori, sees the cross as the decisive event of Divine suffering. He also sees it as essentially related to Godâs Trinitarian nature. On the cross, the dying Son suffered the agony of abandonment by His Father, and the Father suffered grief for the death of His Son. But they were still united in their love for each other, that is to say, their painful separation was bridged by the Holy Spiritâs love, a love which reaches out from the crucifixion to godforsaken humankind. It appears that, for Moltmann, the cross is an act of Divine âsolidarity with âthe godless and the godforsakenâ, in which the Son of God actually enters into their situation of godforsakenness.â12 This Divine solidarity with sufferers transforms the character of suffering, for it heals the godforsakenness which is the deepest pain of human suffering. Also, says Moltmann, the crucifixion cannot be separated from the resurrection and ultimate eschatological joy. The message of Divine suffering is also the message of Divine victory over suffering. God took suffering and death on Himself in order to heal, liberate and give new life. In the words of Campbell Morgan: The lonely mystery of the pain of God is apart from us, but out of it flows the river, and of that river we drink and live.13
DR PATRICK SOOKHDEO
International Director Barnabas Aid
1 Abraham Heschel, The Prophets, vol. 1, New York, Harper Row, 1962, 1st paperback edition, 1969, p.112. 2 Heschel, The Prophets, vol. 2, p.21. 3 Charles Allen Dinsmore, Atonement in Literature and Life, Boston and New York: Houghton, Mifflin & Company, 1906, pp.232-233. 4 G. Campbell Morgan, The Bible and the Cross, New York: Fleming H Revell, c.1909. Reissued London and Edinburgh: Oliphants, 1941, pp.34-35. 5 Heschel, vol. 2, pp.55-56. 6 Darum bricht mir mein Herz gegen ihn 7 Kazoh Kitamori, Theology of the Pain of God, Richmond, VI, John Knox Press, 1965. (English translation of Kami No itami No Shingaku, 5th edition, Tokyo: Shinkyo Shuppansha, 1958) pp.8, 151-156. 8 Kitamori, pp.156-157. 9 Kitamori, p.162. 10 JĂźrgen Moltmann, Der gekreuzigte Gott: Das Kreuz Christi als Grund und Kritik christlicher Theologie, Munich: Christian Kaiser Verlag, 1972. 11 JĂźrgen Moltmann. The Crucified God: The Cross of Christ as the Foundation and Criticism of Christian Theology, trans. RA Wilson and John Bowden, SCM Press, 1974, p.222. 12 Richard Bauckham ââOnly the Suffering God Can Helpâ. Divine Passibility in Modern Theologyâ, Themelios, vol. 9, issue 3 (April 1984), p.11, summarising Moltmann. 13 Campbell Morgan, p.57.